EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE

614 NORTH SUMMIT, COLLINSVILLE, IL 62234 (618) 344-8476
For profit - Corporation 94 Beds EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#516 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Evercare of Collinsville has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranked #516 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, this places them in the bottom half of all nursing homes in the state, and #13 out of 17 in Madison County means there are only a few local options that perform better. The facility's situation is worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 6 in 2024 to 10 in 2025. Staffing is notably poor, with a rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 54%, which is higher than the state average, suggesting instability among caregivers. Additionally, they have incurred $207,971 in fines, indicating serious compliance issues, and they offer less RN coverage than 96% of Illinois facilities, which can jeopardize resident care. Specific incidents include a failure to conduct background checks on staff that led to verbal abuse of a resident and a serious lapse in care where a resident with epilepsy went without necessary medications for four days, resulting in an emergency seizure. Overall, while there are some areas for improvement, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#516/665
Bottom 23%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
6 → 10 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$207,971 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 11 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
51 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 6 issues
2025: 10 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 54%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $207,971

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 51 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 9 actual harm
Sept 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe environment, free from actual and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe environment, free from actual and potential abuse by failing to perform background check screenings on current employees, having direct contact with residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. This failure resulted in R4 who has a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Depression and Anxiety, experience verbal abuse from a staff member and feeling fear, anger, ashamed and not wanting to come out of room until 8/21/2025. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/30/2024. The survey team validated the abatement on 9/15/2025 at 10:46 AM. The facility remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of policies and procedures and the in-service training.Findings include: R4's Care Plan, not dated, does not address abuse in R4's active care plan. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] and 7/29/2025, documents that R4 is cognitively intact.R4's Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report, dated 6/20/2025, documents that R4 reported that a few weeks ago, kitchen staff member used inappropriate language towards him. R4's Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report, dated 6/24/2025, documents that on 6/20/25 V1, Administrator, R4 stated that a few weeks ago, kitchen staff member used inappropriate language towards R4. V10, Cook, immediately suspended per protocol. It continues to document that (R4) was initially interviewed and stated that he was in the dining room rear the kitchen doors when (V10), who was in the kitchen, used inappropriate language towards him. (R4) could not recall the date but stated it was a few weeks ago. (R4) could not recall if anyone was else heard the language. On 6/24/25(R4) was interviewed again. (R4) still could not recall if anyone else heard the language or when the incident happened. When asked if anything else was said during the conversation with (V10), (R4) could not recall anything. When asked if he could have misunderstood what (V10) said because of the noise that is in the kitchen, he agreed that it was possible. In conclusion, the facility was unable to substantiate the allegation of verbal abuse. Due to the noisy environment of the kitchen, this was a misunderstanding of words spoken. On 9/9/2025 at 1:10 PM R4 stated that this occurred sometime ago around April, May or June. R4 stated that R4 was in the dining room. R4 stated that that he complained about his food being cold and (V10) said that (V10) was going to whoop R4's ass. R4 stated that he had so many feelings from anger to fear. R4 stated that he was startled, embarrassed and ashamed being talk to that way. R4 stated that he feared he would have to fight V10. R4 stated that he would if he had to but why should he have to. R4 stated that it's hard to be on pins and needles every day. R4 stated that he didn't want to come out of his room while V10 worked at the facility. R4 stated that when he learned that V10 had gotten fired he felt relieved and safe. R4 stated that the facility did ask question about the incident, but they don't believe him. R4 stated that he knows what he heard and how he felt. On 9/9/2025 at 11:25 AM asked V1 for V10's background checks. On 9/10/2025 at 11:42 AM V1 stated that she could not find V10's background checks and could not verify if or when they were completed or if there were any offenses.On 9/10/2025 at 11:43 AM asked V1 for V12, Dietary Aide, V17, Housekeeper, V18, Maintenance, V19, Cook, and V20, Cook, healthcare worker registry and background checks. As of 9/11/2025 at 4:00 PM the facility had not provided V10's registry and background checks.On 9/11/2025 at approximately 1:30 PM V1 stated that under the previous ownership the background check facility stopped servicing the facility due to nonpayment and no one followed up. V1 stated that V17's, and V19's Healthcare worker registry checks and background checks were not completed timely. V1 stated that V12's, V18's, and V19's Healthcare Worker Registry and Background checks had not been completed at all. V1 stated that she is responsible for the background checks. V1 stated that she does not have a business office person at this time, and she is ultimately responsible. V1 stated that after finding that V10's background checks were not completed V1 then checked other hires. V1 stated that on 9/9/2025 and 9/10/2025 she ran background checks for employees hired in June and July as they were not done. V1 stated that V6's, CNA, and V16's, CNA, Healthcare worker registry checks and background checks were not completed. V1 stated that V6, V12, V16, V17, V18, V19 and V20 all have direct access to the resident and checks should have been done. V1 stated that prior to performing the Healthcare Worker Registry and Background checks herself on 9/9/2025 and 9/10/2025 she was not aware of any offenses that each employee had or if they were eligible to work in the facility. V1 stated that the background checks are to be completed upon hire and should have been completed.On 9/11/2025 at 2:44 PM V21, Medical Director, stated that he would expect the staff to follow the policy and guidelines set forth by the state regarding Healthcare Worker Registry and Background checks. V21 stated that the residents in the facility are vulnerable and need protection. V21 stated that it is imperative that the background checks are done and timely because you never know who is or will harm someone. V21 stated that the background checks should have been done. The facility's Prevention and Prohibition Program, dated 6/1/2025, documents that to ensure that the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements. Policy I. Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero­ tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to engage in verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, neglect, mistreatment. Or misappropriation of resident property. Procedure II. Screening A. The Facility does not knowingly employ anyone who has had disciplinary action against his/her professional license, or a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry related to abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation or has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating other people.On 9/9/2025 the facility provided a facility matrix and room roster identifying 79 people residing in the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 9/30/2024 was removed 9/15/2025, when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy:A) Administrator was in-serviced by the VP (Vice President) of clinical services on background checks & the need to run prior to staff member working on 9/15/2025.B) Administrator will in-service department heads on ensuring that staff will not work without background check being completed on 9/15/2025.2. A) All staff members that are currently on the working schedule have had a background check completed & are eligible to work in a skilled facility. Completed 9/15/2025.B) Initial audit completed for all current employees, that a background check has been completed. Completed 9/15/2025.C) Review of current policy and procedure to reflect current practices. Completed 9/15/2025.1. No staff will work before having a background check. On-going2. A quality assurance tool was implemented: Audit will be completed for new hires to ensure that background check was completed prior to 1st working day. Administrator and department manager. On going. 3. Root Cause Analysis Completed for background checks. Deficiency: Failed to run background checks on new employees prior to them working their 1st shift.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe environment, free from actual and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe environment, free from actual and potential abuse by failing to perform background check screenings on current employees, having direct contact with residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. This failure resulted in R4 who has a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Depression and Anxiety, experience verbal abuse from a staff member and feeling fear, anger, ashamed and not wanting to come out of room until 8/21/2025. Findings include: R4's Care Plan, not dated, does not address abuse in R4's active care plan.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] and 7/29/2025, documents that R4 is cognitively intact.R4's Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report, dated 6/20/2025, documents that R4 reported that a few weeks ago, kitchen staff member used inappropriate language towards him.R4's Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report, dated 6/20/2025, documents that on 6/20/25 V1, Administrator, R4 stated that a few weeks ago, kitchen staff member used inappropriate language towards R4. V10, Cook, immediately suspended per protocol. It continues to document that (R4) was initially interviewed and stated that he was in the dining room rear the kitchen doors when (V10), who was in the kitchen, used inappropriate language towards him. (R4) could not recall the date but stated it was a few weeks ago. (R4) could not recall if anyone else heard the language. On 6/24/25 (R4) was interviewed again. (R4) still could not recall if anyone else heard the language or when the incident happened. When asked if anything else was said during the conversation with (V10), (R4) could not recall anything. When asked if he could have misunderstood what (V10) said because of the noise that is in the kitchen, he agreed that it was possible. In conclusion, the facility was unable to substantiate the allegation of verbal abuse. Due to the noisy environment of the kitchen, this was a misunderstanding of words spoken.On 9/9/2025 at 1:10 PM R4 stated that this occurred sometime ago around April, May or June. R4 stated that R4 was in the dining room. R4 stated that he complained about his food being cold and (V10) said that (V10) was going to whoop R4's ass. R4 stated that he had so many feelings from anger to fear. R4 stated that he was startled, embarrassed and ashamed being talked to that way. R4 stated that he feared he would have to fight V10. R4 stated that he would if he had to but why should he have to. R4 stated that it's hard to be on pins and needles every day. R4 stated that he didn't want to come out of his room while V10 worked at the facility. R4 stated that when he learned that V10 had gotten fired he felt relieved and safe. R4 stated that the facility did ask questions about the incident, but they don't believe him. R4 stated that he knows what he heard and how he felt.On 9/9/2025 at 11:22AM V1 stated that she was made aware of the allegation. V1 stated that V10 was suspended immediately. V1 stated that an investigation was started. V1 stated that the conclusion of the investigation was that the allegation could not be substantiated due to no witnesses and R4 could not verify for sure that this was said. V1 stated that the allegation was unsubstantiated. V1 stated that V10 was let go from the facility on 8/21/2025 for safety reasons.On 9/9/2025 at 11:25 AM V10's background checks were requestedOn 9/10/2025 at 11:42 AM V1 stated that she could not find V10's background checks and could not verify if or when they were completed.On 9/11/2025 at approximately 1:30 PM V1 stated that she is responsible for the background checks. V1 stated that she does not have a business office person at this time, and she is ultimately responsible. V1 stated that the background checks are to be completed upon hire and should have been completed.The facility's Prevention and Prohibition Program, dated 6/1/2025, documents that to ensure that the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements. Policy I. Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero­ tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to engage in verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, neglect, mistreatment. Or misappropriation of resident property. Procedure II. Screening A. The Facility does not knowingly employ anyone who has had disciplinary action against his/her professional license, or a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry related to abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation or has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating other people.
Aug 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a residents family of a fall in 1 of 4 residents (R8) review...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a residents family of a fall in 1 of 4 residents (R8) reviewed for falls in the sample of 8.Findings Include:R8's Face Sheet, undated, documents R8 has the following diagnoses: Catatonic Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, Repeated Falls, Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, and Type II Diabetes. R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R8 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 6, which indicates R8 has severe cognitive impairment. R8's Progress Notes document R8 had a fall on the following dates: 6/15/25; 7/4/25; 7/26/25; 7/27/25; 8/5/25; 8/7/25; 8/12/15; and two falls on 8/16/25. R8's progress notes fail to document that V18, R8's Family, was notified of these falls and any injuries sustained due to the fall.On 8/18/25 at 10:17 AM, V18, R8's Family, stated the facility used to notify him when R8 had fallen but they have not been doing that recently. V18 stated when he came in to see R8 the last time, R8 had a cut above his eye, and he asked the nurse what happened and that was how he found out R8 had fallen. V18 stated they haven't been notifying him of any changes with R8.On 10/18/25 at 10:35 AM, V3, Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nurses, stated they notify the family and physician when a resident falls.On 10/18/25 at 11:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated they notify the physician family when a resident falls.The Fall Policy, undated, documents to complete the Accident/Incident report and notify the physician and responsible party.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to provide enough CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) and Nurses when reviewed for staffing in the sample of 8. This failure has the pote...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to provide enough CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) and Nurses when reviewed for staffing in the sample of 8. This failure has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include:On 8/15/25 at 8:50 AM, an initial tour of the facility was conducted with 2 CNAs and 2 Nurses working.On 8/15/25 at 10:00 AM, a follow up tour of the facility was conducted with 5 CNAs and 3 Nurses working.On 8/15/25 at 8:40 AM, R1 stated they don't have enough staff because they've had to use more agency staff the past two weeks so they must need more staff. On 8/15/25 at 8:40 AM, R3 stated he has fallen 3 times; he fell when he was getting up to go to the bathroom. R3 stated this last time, he slid off the bed and his a** hit the floor. R3 stated when he fell the first 2 times, staff helped him up right away, this last time, he couldn't reach his call light, so he crawled to the hallway, and there were crickets no one came, so he crawled back to his bed, reached for his cell phone and called 911. R3 stated he had to call 911 to get him off the floor, he didn't need to go to the hospital, he wasn't hurt. R3 stated the facility doesn't have enough of their own staff employed.On 8/18/25 at 8:20 AM, V14, Local Fireman, stated the department had received a call from a gentleman (R3) that had fallen and needed assistance. V14 stated upon their arrival, they searched for staff to find out what room R3 was in and what was going on. V14 stated they were unable to locate any staff in the building, eventually they found a nurse, unsure of name, outside smoking, that told them that she didn't tell anyone she was going out on break because she couldn't find anyone and that she was unaware of any resident calling 911 or being on the floor. V14 stated when they got to R3's room, he was located behind the door on the floor, with dried blood to his hands, face and head. V14 stated eventually they were able to locate a total of 4 employees including the nurse mentioned above. ON 8/18/25 at 8:24 M, V15, Local Police Department Officer/Supervisor, stated his officers were dispatched to the facility and upon arrival they were unable to locate staff and eventually a nurse, unsure of name, and another male staff member, unsure of name, were located outside smoking. V15 stated when they talked with the nurse, she couldn't give tell them where R3's room was. V15 stated the nurse told him R3 falls a lot and has a right to fall. V15 stated they began going down the hallway and heard R3 yelling. Upon entering R3's room, he was on the floor behind the door with dried blood on his hands and face. V15 stated R3 had a broken coat hanger next to him that he had been using to try and get staff's attention. V15 stated the nurse told them R3 was last checked on by her approximately 45 minutes before the first responders entered the building but she never opened the door. V15 stated this is not the first time they have been in the facility and couldn't locate staff. R3's Progress Note, dated 8/3/25 at 7:43 AM, documents the following: This nurse was notified by Officer that entered the facility that pt (patient) was on the floor in his room. Upon entering the pt room the pt had blood on both of his hands. This nurse then asked the pt what happened. Pt assessed by this nurse active ROM (Range of Motion) to all extremities, no head injuries, No bruises to back, arms, or legs. Pt has skin abrasion to right hand. Pt refused to go to the hospital and pt also refused to let this nurse dress the skin abrasion to his hand. Pt smells of liquor and pt has liquor in his silver bottle. The liquid appears to be mixed with (soda). The bottle smells like (alcohol). MD (Medical Doctor) aware. DON (Director of Nurses) aware. Family aware.The Daily Staffing Summary, dated 8/2/25, documents there were 2 nurses and 3 CNAs scheduled for night shift.The Daily Staffing Summary, dated 8/3/25, documents there were 3 nurses and 5 CNAs scheduled for day shift. The Timecard Reports, document there were 2 nurses and 4 CNAs working 8/3/25 the hours of 6:00 AM and 7:30AM.On 8/18/25 at 10:35 AM, V3, Registered Nurse/Assistant Director of Nurses, stated she was not here when R3 fell, she has heard different things but that is hearsay. V3 stated R3 is with it but he does have issues. V3 denied concerns with staffing and stated they run with a 6/3 ratio, 6 CNAs and 3 nurses. The Staffing policy, undated, documents it is the policy of the facility to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.The Resident Roster, dated 8/15/25, documents there are 81 residents residing in the facility.
Jun 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0573 (Tag F0573)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide medical records for 1 out of 1 residents (R3) reviewed fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide medical records for 1 out of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: R3's face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 3/17/25 with diagnosis of, in part, metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy, vascular dementia, and major depressive disorder. R3's MDS dated [DATE], documented she was moderately cognitively impaired. R3's State of Illinois: HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) Complaint Authorization for the Release of Patient Information Pursuant to 45 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 164.508 form documented V6 (R3's Daughter/Power of Attorney) completed it on 3/18/25. On page two of the State of Illinois: HIPAA Complaint Authorization for the Release of Patient Information Pursuant to 45 CFR 164.508 form, it documented the covered entity must act on a request for access no later than 30 days after receipt of the request and once processing is completed, records to be mailed. On 5/28/25 at 2:12 PM, V6 (R3's daughter) stated she requested medical records for R3 on 3/18/25 and still hasn't received them. V6 stated she handed the medical records request form to V7 (social services) and was told she would give it to the administrator since she was not at the facility at that time. On 5/29/25 at 12:35 PM, V7 (social services) stated V6 did sign paperwork when she came back for R3's belongings sometime in March. This surveyor showed the release of medical records form to V7, and she stated that was the form V6 handed to her. V7 stated the administrator was not in the building at that time, so she put it on V1's desk and notified her but didn't hear anything else about that afterwards. On 5/28/25 at 4:15 PM, V1 stated V6 never filled out a release of medical records form that she knows of and V5 (Vice President of Clinical Services) agreed. On 5/29/25 at 12:24 PM, V1 and V5 stated they had never seen the medical request form V6 filled out. V1 stated V7 never reported to her that V6 had turned in medical request forms.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to implement and/or revise an individualized plan of c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to implement and/or revise an individualized plan of care following falls as well as complete a fall risk evaluation for 3 out of 5 residents, (R1, R2, R3); reviewed for accident hazards and supervision in a sample of 5. Findings include: 1.R1's face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, in part, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder and chronic kidney disease. R1's Care Plan with an initiation date of 4/7/25, documented R1 had an actual fall with no injury; on 4/6/25 an unwitnessed fall, on 4/8/25 an unwitnessed fall with no injury; on 4/8/25 three unwitnessed falls with no injury, 4/10/25 unwitnessed fall with no injury, on 4/17/25 an unwitnessed fall with no injury, on 4/19/25 an unwitnessed fall with no injury, on 4/20/25 an unwitnessed fall, golf ball hematoma on head, and on 5/15/25 a fall with no injury. Intervention placed on 4/16/25 documented R1 is encouraged to wear non-skid socks and footwear. R1's Care Plan continued to document she was at risk for falls on 4/19/25. R1's Care Plan documented no new fall interventions in place were appropriate after falls on 4/8/25, 4/13/25, and on 4/26/25. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented she was cognitively intact, has lower extremity impairment on both sides, uses a wheelchair, is dependent on the assistance of staff with toileting hygiene, and requires substantial/maximal assistance for getting from a sitting to a standing position, lying to sitting on side of bed, transferring from a chair to bed/bed to chair, toilet, and tub/shower transfers. The Facility Incident Report dated 2/28/25-5/28/25 documented R1 fell on 4/6/25, 4/8/25, 4/10/25, 4/12/25, 4/15/25, 4/17/25, 4/19/25, 4/20/25, 4/26/25, and 5/14/25. 2.R2's face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, in part, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. R2's MDS dated [DATE], documented she is cognitively intact and requires supervision or touching assistance with going from a sitting to standing position, and transferring from a chair to bed/bed to chair. R2's current Care Plan does not document R2 being at risk for falls. R2's Fall Risk Evaluations dated 3/16/25 and 4/6/25 documented she was at risk for falls. R2's Progress note dated 5/15/2025 at 7:50 PM, documented, Send to ER (emergency room) for evaluation and treatment due to fall, altered mental status, unsteady gait, and possible alcohol consumption which could cause a medication interaction. R2's Fall Investigation dated 5/15/25 at 7:51 PM, documented that R2 had a witnessed fall and noted R2 to have an unsteady gait. The investigation further documented, The provider and administrator were notified of fall. Neuro checks initiated. Will continue to monitor. R2's last Fall Risk Evaluation was dated 4/9/25. There were no Fall Risk Evaluations completed post fall on 5/15/25 for R2. On 5/29/25 at approximately 10:30 AM, R2 stated she likes to go outside on daily walks to keep her body up and moving. R2 stated on 5/15/25 she left the facility and tripped but didn't fall to the ground completely, she has a bad leg and stumbles a lot. R2 stated a lady saw her trip and was concerned and told me she couldn't drive me back but called to get someone to help. R2 stated she made it back to the facility safely. 3.R3's face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 3/17/25 with diagnosis of, in part, metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy, vascular dementia, and major depressive disorder. R3's Care Plan while at the facility, did not document her to be a high fall risk. R3's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 11/12/24, documented her to be a high fall risk. R3's MDS dated [DATE], documented she was moderately cognitively impaired, had inattention and disorganized thinking behavior present at fluctuating times, uses a walker, and required partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet and to go from a sitting to standing position. On 5/28/25 at 2:12 PM, V6 (R3's daughter) stated on 5/15/25, she was driving around 7:56 PM, and saw a lady crossing the intersection and fell, the lady stumbled a little bit and limped off towards the gas station. V6 stated she pulled over to ask if the lady was okay and she told her yes and that she was a resident at the facility. V6 stated she called 911 to check up on her and then the facility to let them know one of their residents fell and was out. V6 stated the police told her that the lady made it back to the facility safely. V6 stated she's very concerned the facility did not report the lady falling out in the intersection and wants to make sure the residents are safe. V6 stated she had seen R3 fall at the facility, but nothing was reported or done about them. On 6/2/25 at 2:10 PM, in a joint interview with V9, licensed practical nurse (LPN) and V10 (LPN), both stated that residents at risk for falls should have a fall risk care plan, a Fall Risk Evaluation is completed after a fall occurs, and new interventions are added to the care plan after a fall happens. V9 stated when R2 leaves the facility and comes back, she's not sure what she gets into, but she will be unbalanced and definitely a fall concern. V9 stated that R3 was a fall risk while at the facility and she made sure to implement precautions on her. On 6/2/25 at 2:58 PM, in a joint interview with V1, Administrator, and V5, [NAME] President of Clinical Services, stated R1 did not fall three times as it stated in her care plan on 4/8/25, she technically slid herself off her chair and was having behaviors. V5 stated she would not expect a fall risk care plan to be in place if a resident were considered to be a high fall risk, only if they have had falls prior. V5 stated it is in the fall policy that a fall risk assessment should be completed after a fall occurs. V5 stated she thinks the facility's care plans need work and plans to improve them. The facility's Fall Evaluation and Prevention Policy, undated, documented the policy will evaluate residents for their fall risk and develop interventions for prevention. Upon admission, the nursing/interdisciplinary care team should determine if a resident is at risk for falls and develop appropriate interventions based on the evaluation. The goal is to prevent falls if possible and avoid injury related to falls. The policy further documented the residents should be evaluated for their fall risk following a fall and if there was a loss of consciousness or the fall was unwitnessed, neuro signs should be initiated and checked for at least 72 hours. The policy also documented tat the analysis of falls included completing the Accident/Incident report and notify the physician and responsible party. Document the physician orders and/or response from the physician and responsible party. The IDT (interdisciplinary) team will review the plan of care and update the interventions as appropriate.
May 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was maintained in a safe working manner for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for equip...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was maintained in a safe working manner for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for equipment. Findings Include: On 05/01/25 at 8:50 AM, V3, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was walking down the 300 hallway pushing a mechanical lift and having a difficult time keeping it straight. While V3 was pushing the lift the right leg would swing out on its own without the use of the controls to move it. V3 would then use her foot to kick the leg back into position. On 05/01/25 at 9:07 AM, V4, CNA and V6, CNA Brought the mechanical lift down to R2's room. While wheeling the lift to R2's room the right leg would move/swing out without V4 using the controls. V4 would put the leg back in place with her foot as she was pushing the lift to the room. V4 and V6 placed R2 in the medical lift and used the controls to lift R2 to put her to bed. While R2 was up in the lift V4 was pushing the lift over the bed the leg swung open and V4 had to kick it back in place. V4 was struggling to get the mechanical lift to the correct position over R2's bed so she could lower R2 into the bed. V4 said the mechanical lift is hard to steer sometimes. On 05/01/25 at 1:35 PM, R5 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented she was cognitively intact said they must use a mechanical lift to get her up out of bed. She said they need new ones because the old ones are hard to push at times. R5 said it scares her when they are getting her up and they have to push it (the lift) real hard to move it. She said it seems like it tilts. R5 said sometimes the CNAs must push it with their feet to get the wheels to turn and she said she is scared they will get her up in the air and the lift will quit on them. On 05/05/25 at 9:00 AM, R6 MDS documented she was cognitively intact said there are times she doesn't get up out of bed due to the mechanical lift battery is dead, they are having trouble with the lift's legs, there isn't enough slings for everyone, or there isn't enough staff in the building to get her up. She said she didn't get up for at least seven days because of all of that. R6 was asked about the word BAD being written on one of the lift legs and R6 said, kind of gives it away don't it. She said she did get up yesterday and when they put her back to bed, she asked them to leave the sling in her room so she would have it for today, but they came in and got it to use on someone else. R6 said when they are getting her up in the mechanical lift it feels like she isn't in it right and she has to grab the lift to keep her balance. On 05/01/25 at 8:53 AM, this surveyor questioned V3, CNA about the mechanical lift's leg swinging out the way it did. V3 said no, it shouldn't. V3 said it has been like that for a few weeks probably. She was also asked about the word BAD written on the right leg and she said it was probably wrote to let people know it was bad. V3 also stated she thinks the control has a short circuit in it because sometimes the lift doesn't want to move up or down. She said maintenance has been notified but she doesn't remember when. V3 said the other lift they have the leg does the same thing. On 05/01/25 at 9:00 AM, V4, CNA said the leg on the mechanical lift is not supposed to open on its own like it does and the word BAD written on the leg is because it (the leg) is not staying closed and she isn't sure how long the lift has been that way. V4 said the mechanical lift can be hard to steer sometimes also. On 05/01/25 at 9:04 AM, V6, CNA stated the leg on the mechanical lift has been like that for a while, but she isn't sure how long. She said it isn't supposed to open up on its own and the reason they have the word BAD written on the leg is to let them know it's not staying closed. On 05/01/25 at 9:12 AM, V7, CNA said the mechanical lift is not working correctly and maintenance is just waiting on a piece to come in. On 05/05/25 at 9:24 AM, V14, CNA stated they only have two mechanical lifts in the building. She said one lift they have to keep it on the charger because the battery doesn't hold a charge and the other lift, they had the legs were not staying in. V14 stated the mechanical lifts have been that way since she started working at the facility a few weeks ago. V14 said when they have an issue with anything they will put in a work order with maintenance, and they will take care of it. On 05/05/25 at 10:45, AM V1, Administrator said when someone has an issue with the mechanical lifts, they do a work order and put it on the maintenance office door and describe what is going on. She said maintenance will write what they did to correct the issue and then he will give the slip to her when he is finished fixing the issue. V1 said she wasn't made aware there were any issues with the mechanical lifts, and they don't have a work order for any of the lifts. The facility's policy Transfer- Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts, undated, documented Purpose In order to protect the safety and well being of the staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility will use mechanical lifting devices for the lifting and movement of residents. It further documented 4. Mechanical lift equipment shall undergo routine maintenance checks by the nursing and maintenance staff to ensure that equipment remains in good working order.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a sanitary and comfortable environment for 4 of 4 (R2, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for sanitary environme...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a sanitary and comfortable environment for 4 of 4 (R2, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for sanitary environment. Findings Include: On 05/01/25 at 9:35 AM, The men's bathroom on the 300 hall was inspected at this time. In the shower area between some of the tiles was black fuzzy, rough in texture spots. In the entrance to the shower there was an area where the tile was missing, and the wall was crumbling. On 05/01/25 at 9:40 AM, The women's bathroom on the 100 hallway was inspected at this time. Upon entering the bathroom there was a strong smell of bleach. Behind the entrance door there was a green substance on most of the wall. V8, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was questioned about the substance behind the bathroom door. V8 stated I'm not gonna lie, it looks like mold. In the shower area of the bathroom on the wall opposite from the shower head, in both corners there was black fuzzy spots on some of the tiles/baseboards. In the corner at the entrance on the side with the shower head there was black spots on the tile. Under the sinks in the bathroom there was a light brown and green area on the wall. After being in the bathroom for a few minutes this surveyor's eyes were burning due to the strong bleach smell. On 05/01/25 at 9:47 AM, The men's bathroom on the 100 hall was inspected at this time. When entering the bathroom there was a strong bleach smell. Both toilets in this bathroom had been used (both had urine left in them) and had not been flushed. On 05/01/25 at 10:00 AM, The men's bathroom on the 200 hall was inspected. In the shower on the back wall there was green/black fuzzy areas noted to the baseboard. On 05/01/25 at 9:15 AM, R3 who is cognitively intact said she only takes a shower once a week because all the walls in the shower are covered with mold. She said they will spray something on the walls and wipe it off but housekeeping doesn't clean the bathroom so she will wear shower shoes when she takes a shower. On 05/01/25 at 10:10 AM, R4 who is cognitively intact said he has seen mold in the showers and on the floors in the showers. He said he has told someone about the mold. On 05/01/25 at 1:35 PM, R5 who is cognitively intact said it stinks when you go in the shower room. She said it smells like mold in there and she has seen mold in the shower room. On 05/05/25 at 10:05 AM, V11, Housekeeping Supervisor said he hasn't seen any mold in the building, and he tries to keep it down. He said when someone tells him about any mold, he will jump right on it and clean it with a little bleach and water because that is the only thing that will get rid of it. On 05/05/25 at 10:45 AM, V1, Administrator said she would expect housekeeping to clean really good with whatever cleaning material they use if they were to see mold. On 05/05/25 at 1:19 PM, V14, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said they have been dealing with mold in the facility for a long time. She said she has worked there for 15 years, and they have always had an issue with mold. She said some of the staff have quit because the mold makes them sick and some of them will go home sick with a headache because of the mold. V14 said one of the bathrooms/shower rooms was shut down for almost a year for them to remodel it but it still smells like mold when you go in there. The facility's policy Mold and Mildew, undated, documented Policy Statement: Mold and mildew growth can occur in areas of humid or often damp areas like shower stalls, kitchens and restrooms. Surface mildew and mold can be mitigated by ensuring these areas are routinely deep cleaned. If areas of mildew or mold are found, these areas must be immediately cleaned with proper mold and mildew cleaners, ensuring all areas are free of mildew or mold.
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure timely assesment for continuity of care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for continuity of care in the sample of 3. Th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure timely assesment for continuity of care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for continuity of care in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 with known epilepsy with seiziures, not receiving anti seizure medications for 4 days and being sent out for emergency treatment and had a seizure. Findings include: R1's Facesheet undated documents an admission date of 11/12/2024 and pertinent medical diagnoses of Epilepsy, unspecified., not intractable without status Epilepticus, Localization-related (Focal) (Partial) Symptomatic Epilepsy and Epileptic Syndromes with Complex Partial Seizures, Not Intractable Without Status Epilepticus, Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Unspecified and Unspecified. Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. R1's Physician Order Summary (POS) dated March 2025 documents R1's pertinent medications as Lacosamide 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (Epilepsy), Fluoxetine 10 milligrams (mg) daily (Major Depressive Disorder), Metoprolol 1 tablet every 12 hours (Primary Hypertension) Amlodipine 10 milligrams (mg) (Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation), Levetiracetam 1000 milligrams (mg) twice a day all with a Start Date of 1/22/25 and Hold date from 3/14/25 to 3/17/25, Tradjenta 5 milligrams (mg) (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) 1 tablet daily Start Date of 2/5/25 and Hold date from 3/14/25 to 3/17/25. R1's Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) dated March 2025 documents R1's 8:00 PM medications were held on 3/14/25, 3/15/25 and 3/16/25 for both 8:00 AM & 8:00 PM doses. The 8:00 AM dose on 3/17/25 was held. On 3/12/25 at 9:51 PM Nurse's Progress notes documents R1 was requesting her new pill. V17 Licensed Practical Nurse documents that R1 was overheard talking to her daughter (V5) about the new pill that she takes 3 times /day and then question as to if the daughter will bring it to her. V17 Licensed Practical Nurse documents that without an order for medication the medication could not be administered. On 3/14/25 at 1:51 PM Nurse's Progress notes documents (V4) Social Service Director addressed the daughter in regards to her giving resident medication while she is on a Leave of Absence (LOA) with her. (V5) daughter was stated that she hasn't given resident any medications , but she did display a bottle of Antibiotics that was suppose to be given from a local pharmacy. The directions for administration were 1 tablet twice a day and there was a total of 10 pills given, but she (R1) only had 4 pills left. (V5) repeatedly stated that she had not given resident (R1) any medications. On 3/14/2025 an email from V7 Nurse Practitioner to V2, Diretor of Nursing, documented an order to hold the medication of R1 due to a report from facility nursing staff that it was a possibility that R1 was being double or tripled dose by V5, her daughter. On 3/20/25 at 9:37 AM V16 Licensed Practical Nurse ( LPN) stated she was the one that was passing medications to R1 when she requested her new pill. As she (V16) was explaining to her that she did not have a new pill. R1 kept repeating that she had a new pill. R1 called her daughter (V5) and the conversation between the two of them was (R1) telling (V5) her daughter that she was not being given the new pill. (V5) R1's daughter came to the facility with a bottle of medicine and wanted it to be given to her mother. (V5) was advised that we could not give the medicine and we would need to obtain an order for the medication. On 3/20/25 at 11:31 AM V17 Nurse Practitioner stated she was on vacation for 2 weeks and V7 Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) was covering for her. V17 stated she was aware that (R1) was being followed by specialists but do not have any interactions with the specialists. V17 stated she was unaware of the labs ordered by the nephrologist. When she returned from vacation she did have an email from V7 advising that there was a possibility that R1 was receiving double dosages of a medicine thought to be an antibiotic. The move to hold the medication was based on not having any information as to why R1 was on any medication besides what was prescribed. V17 stated the expectation was for the specialist to contact us if they have any concerns. If she had any concerns she would contact them. On 3/20/25 at 11:43 AM V7 Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner stated she was not the regular provider for (R1). The nurse practitioner (V17) was on vacation and she (V7) was just covering for (V17). V7 stated she went with the information that was provided from the staff. The staff assumed (R1) was receiving double or triple doses of some type of medication. She (V7) did not know what the medication was and the staff did not specify the medication because they did not know. What was reported was (V5) the daughter was providing the medication to her mother (R1). On 3/20/25 at 12:25 V4 Social Service Director stated when (V5) daughter of R1 returned her mother (R1) to the facility she (V5) did not bring the medication or share that her mother was on a prescribed medication. We became aware of some medication only after the mother (R1) began asking about her new pill. On 3/20/25 at 4:20 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated we did what we were supposed to do. The staff continued to give prescribed medication until able to contact a provider. The order was via email dated 3/14/25 to Hold medications and to monitor (R1). Staff continued to monitor R1 until she was sent to the emergency room 3/17/25. R1's medical records from a local hospital dated 3/17/25 documents residents seizure medications were stopped few days ago per the order of nursing home staff after they had negative interactions with (V5) patient's daughter . While in Triage patient had a tonic seizure lasting less than 1 minute. Patient was postictal and had a nasal trumpet inserted. On 3/21/25 at 10:26 AM V22 Medical Director stated the Nurse Practitioner's should be having contact with the specialist. On 3/21/25 at 2:30 PM V26 pharmacist stated the nurse practitioner dropped the ball, the nurse practitioner should have reviewed the medication before 3 days. It is definitely concerning because Lacosamide has a half-life of 13 hrs and Keppra has a half life of 6-8 hrs. Those meds are significant, while overdosing might be a concern, review of the medication and further assessment was warranted. Do not feel the facility was at fault, the problem lies with the nurse practitioner as a provider not reviewing or assessing the resident sooner. The facility did not have a policy on Continuity of Care.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of epilepsy/seizures received th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of epilepsy/seizures received their anti-convulsant medications as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 (R14) residents reviewed for medications in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R14 missing 10 doses of his anti-convulsant medication and requiring evaluation and treatment in the emergency room (ER) following seizure activity. Findings include: R14's facesheet dated 4/29/25 documents his diagnosis to include epilepsy, unspecified, intractable, without status epilepticus and localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy, epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures, intractable, without status epilepticus, and other seizures. R14's care plan dated 4/29/25 documents The resident has a seizure disorder. Interventions for this care plan include give seizure medications as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. R14's medication administration record (MAR) dated 3/1/25-3/31/25 documents R14 did not receive his oxcarbazepine (anti-seizure medication) oral tablet 600 mg (milligrams) two tablets at 6:00 PM on 3/29/25 and at 8:00 AM on 3/30/25. R14's progress note dated 3/29/25 at 5:05 PM documents: orders-administration note oxcarbazepine oral table 600 mg give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for epilepsy-awaiting med. R14's progress note dated 3/30/25 at 8:47 AM documents his oxcarbazepine was not available and reorder awaiting pharmacy. R14's [DATE]/30/35 at 8:39 AM documents R14's lacosamide oral tablet (anti-seizure medication) 100 mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day for epilepsy was not available, reordered awaiting pharmacy. R14's MAR dated 4/1/25-4/30/25 documents he did not receive his lacosamide on 4/3/25 (PM dose) 4/6/25 (PM dose) 4/7/25 (PM dose) and 4/8/25 (AM and PM dose). R14's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 3/22/25 documents he ran out of his lacosamide 100 mg tablets on 4/5/25 after PM dose. R14's Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 4/9/25 documents he did not receive his next dose of lacosamide until 4/9/25 at 8:30 AM. There is no documentation on these count sheets of R14 receiving AM doses of lacosamide on 4/6/25 or 4/7/25 AM doses. R14's progress note date 4/1/25 at 4:45 PM documents Seizure activity noted in bed. Clonic episode lasting 2.5 minutes. Emesis noted. Resident placed in recovery position until seizure completion. EMS called. Post ictal phase noted with pupils dilated to 6. Walking around room without purpose and combative with staff. Unable to answer questions or respond appropriately. VS: 98.2, 88, 22, 131/74, and 95% on room air. No signs of pain or injury. Sent to (local hospital) for evaluation and treatment. On 4/29/25 at 12:50 PM V6 Nurse Practitioner stated she was first notified by staff to refill R14's lacosamide on 4/8/25. V6 stated she was reviewing R14's information from 4/6/25 and 4/7/25 and was not notified, but she would not know if staff reached out to another provider. V6 stated yes, it would be significant for R14 to receive anti-seizure medication since R14 has had seizures since the age of 9 and R14 is a difficult case and he needs to take his anti-seizure medications as ordered. On 4/29/25 at 1:50 PM V7 Pharmacy [NAME] Lead stated pharmacy was notified by fax on 4/8/25 at 7:21 PM requesting refill on R14's lacosamide. On 4/29/25 at 1:55 PM V8 Pharmacist stated lacosmide has a half-life of 13 hours, and R14 would have been sub therapeutic after 24-30 hours. V8 stated lacosamide was filled by pharmacy on 4/8/25 and started on 4/9/25. V8 stated R14 was sub therapeutic on 4/8/25 and 4/9/25 and was therapeutic by 4/10/25. V8 stated R14 was not therapeutic for 1 day and would not recommend doing this again. V8 stated R14 dodged a bullet that R14 did not have a seizure during that time. V8 stated he would consider this a significant medication error. V8 stated it is never recommended that a resident with a history of seizures misses any of their medication. On 4/29/25 at 1:22 PM V9 Registered Nurse (RN) stated she does not recall R14 ever being out of lacosamide, and if she pulled from pharmacies emergency stock of medication it would have been documented on a sheet. V9 stated she does not remember ever pulling a lacosamide for R14. V9 stated she is unsure of where she got R14's lacosamide doses on 4/625 and 4/27/25. On 4/29/25 at 2:20 PM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated as part of the plan of corrections she was auditing residents who took seizure medications. V2 stated if she saw a missed medication she would educate the nurse, and then should have documented everything in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR). V2 stated she went back and had to put late entries in some of the resident's progress notes related to missed medications. V2 acknowledged R14's controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form that stated R14 ran out of lacosamide after 4/5/25 PM and did not resume until 4/9/25 AM. V2 stated she has no idea how V9 RN would have gotten and documented lacosamide since the medication was not in the facility. V2 stated V11 Medical Doctor (MD) was called on 4/8/25 letting him know R14 needed a signed script for lacosamide. V2 unable to provide documentation of why R14's lacosamide was not refilled and available on 4/6/25. On 4/30/25 at 10:48 AM V2 stated lacosamide is not included in the emergency kit. The facilities policy revised 7/18/18 Emergency Pharmacy and Emergency Kits documents, Emergency pharmacy service is available on a 24-hour basis. Emergency needs for medication are met by using the facility's approved Emergency Medication kit/box or by special order from MAC Rx. MAC Rx supplies emergency medications including emergency drugs, antibiotics, controlled substances, and products for infusion in limited quantities in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations to serve the immediate clinical needs of the resident. The facilities policy undated policy Receiving Controlled Substances documents Procedures: H. Controlled substances are reordered when a four (4) day supply remains to allow for transmitted of the required written prescription to the pharmacist.
Nov 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 resident (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R26) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 43. Findings include: The Facility's Incident Investigation Form, dated 8/11/2024 at 1:30 PM documents, spoke to (R26) R/T (related to) alleged abuse on 8/9/2024 @ (at) 2:45 AM. Stated that he was hit and scratched by NOC (night) CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Asked (R26) about minimal swelling to RT (right) upper lip and left cheek. At first, he stated that he was in his room and was attacked by NOC (night) CNA. Informed (R26) that camera was reviewed and CNA with alleged allegations did not enter his room. (R26) then stated that NOC CNA hit him outside on the patio with (R26) during his shift. According to nurses' documentation @ times of allegation and head to toe assessment, there were no abnormal skin findings. Provider was notified, orders were received for labs, X-Ray to face. X-Ray results negative for fx (fracture.) Nursing staff to monitor his behavior and use two staff members when entering (R26's) room or providing care. V1, Administrator's typed statement dated 8/15/2024 documents, This letter will serve as a follow up to the initial report 8/9/2024 regarding an alleged incident involving resident (R26) and (V8, Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA.) (R26) is a [AGE] year-old long term resident of the facility with diagnosis of schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, diabetes, sleep apnea, COPD, and morbid obesity. He is not a registered offender. On 8/9/2024, nurse reported an alleged altercation between (R26) and (V8). The nurse assessed (R26) with no signs of injury, no swelling, no redness noted to (R26). Employee was suspended pending investigation. Investigation was initiated per protocol. (R26) was interviewed. He reported that at around 2:00 AM, as he was going out the patio door, V8 pushed him against a wall and began hitting R26. He stated that he was punched in the face, shoulder, and chest. He also stated that he did not defend himself, but stood still until (V8) was finished, and then he walked away. (V8) was interviewed. He stated that he was not assigned to (R26's) hallway for the shift nor had any interaction with (R26). Facility cameras were reviewed by Administrator. No interaction was seen between (R26 and V8). Local Police Officer came to the facility to gather information. During the police interview, at times (R26) spoke so softly that the police officer could not hear him. At other times, (R26) would not answer any questions or gave answer that did not relate to the question. The police officer stated to Administrator that he would not start an investigation. (R26) was interviewed again during a care plan meeting on 8/15/2024. He refused to speak about the alleged allegation and stated to administrator, I don't know what you are talking about. Multiple residents and staff were interviewed with no one witnessing or reporting an altercation between (R26 and V8). In conclusion, the facility was unable to substantiate the allegation of abuse. (R26) received a telehealth visit from the facility NP (nurse practitioner) who gave orders for a medical work up. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) has met, and resident's care plan has been updated to reflect current status. The Facility's Newly Acquired Skin Conditions dated 8/9/2024, documents size and location: 0.25 cm (centimeters) left upper check and 1.0 cm left lower cheek. Review of resident interviews included: R6 written statement dated 8/9/2024 documents, (R26) goes out to smoke. Did you see any altercation? No. R20 undated written statement documents I didn't see anyone fighting. R209 written statement dated 8/9/2024 documents, I was sleeping. R209 stated that he didn't know what I was talking about. R30's written statement dated 8/9/2024 documents, (R30) stated that he didn't see (R26) and staff altercation. These statements didn't address if any staff were abusive toward the resident or address the abuse allegation. On 11/13/2024 at 1:08 PM V1, Administrator stated she interviewed other residents after the allegation of staff to resident abuse, but she realized she didn't ask the correct abuse questions. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Policy & Procedure Policy revised 11/28/2016, documents investigation procedures to conduct interviews with resident's roommate and other residents to which the accused individual has regular contact with.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to address pain on one of three resident's care plan (R3)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to address pain on one of three resident's care plan (R3) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 43. Findings include: R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents resident is alert with occasional pain. Over last five days and pain effect on sleep: rarely or not at all. Over the last five days, how often have you limited your day-to-day activities because of pain? Occasionally. Numeric rating scale: 6/10. Verbal descriptor scale: not answered. R3's Physician's Order Sheet, POS, dated 11/2024 documents the following pain medications: Tramadol HCL 50 mg (milligrams) PRN (whenever necessary) every 6 hours as needed for pain, Carbamazepine 200 mg BID (twice a day) for pain, Acetaminophen 500 mg 2 tablets TID (three times a day) for pain, Gabapentin 400 mg TID for pain, Diclofenac sodium 1% gel apply topically 2 grams to ankles and knees twice a day for pain. R3's Pain assessment dated [DATE], 7/23/2024 and 10/23/2024 documents resident no complaint of pain or discomfort. R3's Care Plan, dated 6/4/2024 does not address resident's pain. On 11/13/2024 at 1:25 PM R3 stated she has chronic pain in her legs, knees, and ankles. R3's pain at that time was 6/10. R3 sat in a wheelchair and lifted her left leg at the time of the interview and facial grimaced. On 11/13/2024 at 2:30 PM V9, MDS/Care Plan Coordinator stated R3 has ankle and knee pain, and it should be care planned with pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions should be addressed and documented on her care plan. V9 stated she didn't know why pain wasn't addressed on R3's care plan other than that she had been discharged to the hospital multiple times over the last 6 months. The Facility's Comprehensive Care Planning Policy, revised 7/20/2022, documents the care plan describes a need/problem, and indicating approaches/interventions to be instituted to assist the resident in maintaining/receiving care in relation to the need/problem. A care plan may or may not specify a goal for the resident. The comprehensive care plan shall strive to describe the resident's preferences, choices, and goals to the extent possible to assist in attaining or maintaining the resident's highest practicable quality of life. The resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, and preferences. Person centered measurable objectives and timeframes for ease of evaluating resident progress toward achieving goals. A structured program designed to change need/problem: statement of the targeted problem/need, goal stating the expected outcome of the reduction of the targeted problem, intervention/approaches aimed at reducing the causative factors of the targeted problem. Communication of the care plan is paramount to the success of consistent care delivery. Problems, goals, and interventions should include the date initiated for ease of reference. All intervention entries should include the date of the care intervention was initiated by the staff as well as the date the intervention was added to the care plan if added after the original care plan date.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure dishes were properly cleaned and food was stored in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This has the potential to af...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure dishes were properly cleaned and food was stored in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 11/12/24 at 8:10 AM, V6, Cook, washed food residue from a dish in the far-right compartment of the three-compartment sink, dipped the dish directly into the far-left compartment of the sink containing sanitizing solution, then placed the dish on a rack to dry. V6 did not rinse the dish in between the two sinks, and the middle sink compartment was empty. On 11/13/24 at 8:15 AM, V6 stated the process is usually to wash, rinse and sanitize dishes, but they do not have a stopper for the middle sink, so she just washed and sanitized. On 11/12/24 at 8:15 AM, in the walk-in refrigerator, there was a container labeled Super Cereal that was dated 11/3/24 with no Use By date. There was a container labeled Meat Salad that was dated 11/5/24 with no Use By date. On 11/12/24 at 8:17 AM, in the walk-in freezer, there was a plastic bag with biscuit dough and a plastic bag with breadsticks. Both bags were previously opened and resealed but were not labeled or dated upon opening. On 11/12/24 at 2:00 PM, V4, Dietary Manager, stated food should always be discarded after seven days. The Facility's Refrigerator and Freezer Storage Policy revised 10/2014 documents, It is the policy of (Facility Company) that any item to be placed in the refrigerators and freezers must be covered, labeled and dated with a date-marking system that tracks when to discard perishable foods. Mark container with name of item. [NAME] the date that the original container is opened or date of preparation. Label refrigerated, potentially hazardous food prepared and held for more than 24 hours with the day/date by which the food shall be consumed or discarded (maximum of 7 days from time of preparation). The Facility's Undated Dishwashing: Manual Policy documents, All pots and pans shall be cleaned by washing, rinsing, and sanitizing, according to the following guidelines. The pots and pans will be washed in a hot detergent solution in the first compartment, rinsed in clean warm water in the second compartment, and sanitized by either heat or chemicals in the third compartment. The Facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/12/24 documents there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 26 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 26 of 55 residents (R4, R8, R10, R11, R12, R16, R17, R22, R29, R28, R31, R34, R38, R40, R41, R42, R45, R46, R48, R49, R51, R53, R54, R55, R56, R57) reviewed for room size in the sample of 55. Findings include: The Facility has 30 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 75 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches. All these rooms are certified for Medicare and Medicaid. These rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER], 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 116, 120, 201, 202, 203, 204, 303, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, 313, 314, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322 and 323. room [ROOM NUMBER] is now a family visiting room and a telephone room for residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] is now a storage room. The facility has 8 two bed resident rooms which provide only 77.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms, measure 12 feet one inch by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 72-inch offset. These rooms are as follows: Rooms 207, room [ROOM NUMBER], 209, 214, 216 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Facility has 3 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 76.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 48-inch offset, These Rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] which is now the Break Room, 119 which is now the Activity Room. The Facility has 2 two bedrooms which provide only 78.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 15 feet by 10 feet six inches. There rooms are as follows: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. During observation from 11/12/2024 through 11/15/2024, the following residents were in the above rooms which do not have 80 square feet per resident bed: R4, R8, R10, R11, R12, R16, R17, R22, R29, R28, R31, R34, R38, R40, R41, R42, R45, R46, R48, R49, R51, R53, R54, R55, R56, R57. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, CMS 671, dated 11/12/2024 documents the facility's census is 55.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of roaches. This has the potential to affect all 56 r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of roaches. This has the potential to affect all 56 residents living in the facility. Finding include: On 6/12/2024 at 6:05 PM, V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated We do have roaches here. The maintenance man was supposed to be spraying but he got fired because he was never working. The roaches are really bad on the 300-hall. When I turn the light on, the roaches just scatter. On 6/12/2024 at 6:38 PM, R6 stated, I have roaches in my room. When you turn the light on they run away. I don't like bugs and or roaches. On 6/12/2024 at 7:19 PM, V1, Administrator stated, I just had to terminate (V10) our maintenance man. He was basically not working when he was supposed to be working. My company (Facility) had to file bankruptcy and (V10) was supposed to be keeping up on spraying the facility, landscaping, mowing. He was not doing it. I was finally able to get a contract for a pest control company to come in. On 6/18/2024 at 4:14 PM, V11, Pest Control Technician stated, pest/roaches were found back in February, and we recommended to the facility that they have monthly services, but we were not asked to come back into the facility until yesterday 6/17/2024. We treated the exterior and kitchen and pulled out the equipment and there was roach activity present. We treated the facility and recommended that they do not miss next month's visit. On 6/18/2024 at 4:44 PM, V12, Pest Control [NAME] stated, We were coming monthly to the facility, but it looks like the account was put on hold for 'financial issues back in February and we did service the area back up again starting yesterday. On 06/25/24 at 8:26 AM, R1 stated that he had some roaches in his room last night. On 06/25/24 at 10:30 AM, R2 stated that she has seen roaches in her room, but it has not been lately. She stated that she had just seen some roaches in the bathroom two doors down the hall. On 6/12/2024 at 5:40 PM, dead large roach in dining room and when moved chair live roach scattered across the floor. On 6/12/2024 at 5:59 PM, on the 100-hall was in the telephone room when the light was turned on there were at least four roaches that ran across the room. On 06/25/24 at 10:35 AM, one live roach was noted running along the wall in the 300-hall bathroom. All Pest Control Records provided by the facility were reviewed. The last Pest Control Service provided was dated 2/22/2024 and documents During our last visit, we treated and inspected all areas. Today I serviced all interior and exterior equipment and treated all cracks and crevices. There was a German roach in one of the rooms at the time of the service. Pest Control Company Invoice dated 06/17/24 documents During our visit in February, we treated and inspected all areas. Today, I treated the whole exterior, including all courtyards. I treated the kitchen. The kitchen manager and I pulled out all heavy equipment and treated all cracks and crevices and areas of concern. I informed him and the regional manager what to expect over the next few days. Treatment can cause roaches to flee their normal breeding areas, resulting in what may look like an uptake. I informed them that this is normal and that they should see a decrease in activity around after four days of treatment. I baited individual rooms as needed and placed glue boards accordingly. I spot treated individual utility rooms and made recommendations accordingly. During our next visit, we will continue to treat and inspect all areas as directed. Thank you for your continued business. Facility's policy Insect and Pest Control Policy undated documents It is the policy of this Health Care Center to contract with a duly licensed exterminating service and/or control against infestations of insects and rodents. A preventative treatment, both interior and exterior, shall be applied at least monthly. Treatments will be applied more often if required. Chemicals, materials and equipment used to control insects and rodents will be provided by the Vendor, and will be in accordance with current Federal and State specifications for use in nursing homes. Methods of applications shall be in accordance with current Federal and State regulations and manufacturer's recommendations. CMS form 671 dated 06/25/24 documents a census of 56.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure that there is sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure that there is sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The failure has the potential to harm all 53 resident in the facility. Findings include: Facility's Staffing Schedule dated December 16-31, 2023 documents that on 12/30/23, two nurses and one CNA (Certified Nursing Aid) were working the floor on the midnight shift. On 12/31/23, one nurse and zero CNAs worked the floor on the midnight shift. On 01/10/24 at 2:21 PM, R1 who was alert to person, place and time stated that the facility is short nurses and CNAs on Mondays and Fridays. On 01/10/24 at 3:21 PM, R2 who was alert to person, place and time stated that the facility has been short staffed since COVID. He stated that the facility is mostly short CNAs and sometimes nurses, especially on weekends and holidays. On 01/23/24 at 10:13 AM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing) stated that on 12/31/23, (V11), CNA was supposed to come in at 6:00 PM. She overslept and came in at 11:00 PM. She stayed for an hour and left. (V11) never notified me that she was leaving and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) never notified me that he was the only staff working. On 01/23/24 at 10:33 AM, V1, Administrator stated that on 12/31/23, one CNA failed to show up for work and one CNA walked out. The ADON was the only staff working that night. ADON was the one doing the schedule and failed to prepare for the holiday. No other incidents of the nurse working themselves. Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare and Medicaid form dated 01/24/24 documents a census of 53 residents.
Nov 2023 12 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and progressive devices t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and progressive devices to prevent falls for one of thirteen residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 50. This failure resulted in R2 falling from the toilet when left unsupervised and sustained multiple rib fractures and laceration to his head. Findings include: R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log undated documents diagnoses Paranoid Schizophrenia, anemia, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety, repeated falls, and major depressive disorder. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents, a score of 20. 10 or more points = High Risk Score. R2's MDS, (Minimum Data Set), dated 09/13/23 documents, a BIMS, (Brief Interview of Mental Status), score of 15 out of 15. The MDS documents, that R2 requires limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, and personal hygiene. The MDS documents, that R2 requires extensive assistance of one person for toilet use. The MDS documents, that R2 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. R2's Care Plan dated 03/07/19 documents, Has risk factors for falls: balance, assistive devices, needs assist for transfer, vision problems, medical conditions, meds, poor safety awareness, and behaviors put resident at risk. R2's Interventions: 02/26/23 r/t, (related to), fall, staff to check on frequently when in bed. 03/06/23 r/t fall, staff to utilize pressure alarm for bed and wheelchair. 08/17/23 r/t fall, educated resident and staff to ensure that w/c, (wheelchair) is locked during all transfers. 09/06/23 r/t fall, instructed to use call light and wait for assistance. R2's Nurses Note dated 11/06/22 at 6:27 AM documents Resident has a fall this morning he stated that his pain was 5 he was found lying on his left side. Stated that his left hip hurts. Vitals were B/P, (blood pressure), 120/58, P (pulse) 88, R, (respiration), 21, T, (temperature), 97.1. He stated that he was trying to put his tablet in his drawer. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 11/07/22 at 9:00 AM documents, QA, (quality assurance), committee met to review fall on 11/07/22, resident attempting to put item in drawer, encourage to ask for assistance. No note written for fall on 11/22/22. On 11/16/23 at 3:00 PM, V2, DON, (Director of Nursing), stated that she could find a nurses note about any fall on 11/22/22. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 11/22/22 at 9:15 AM documents, QA committee met to review fall with no injury noted. Resident was attempting to sit in w/c and missed, resulting in him sitting on floor in front of wheelchair. Encouraged resident to use call light and wait on staff assistance. Medical workup obtained. R2's Nurses Note dated 02/26/23 at 8:40 AM documents, This nurse passing HS meds when resident reported to nurse having severe pain 8/10 to left rib area. This nurse asked what happen to area, he reports he had a fall at 3a (SIC) while attempting to go to restroom in bedroom. Resident was able to recall event and states prior to falling he felt dizzy. Resident states he fell on the toilet landing on his left side and hitting head on the wall. Resident states he did not report incident sooner because he was scared and thought Jesus would heal him sooner. This nurse does not see any visible injuries. VS, (vital signs), WNL, (within normal limits). ROM, (range of motion), WNL. Lying in bed currently. Schedule PP, (pain pill), given. Call light in reach. Will follow up with NP, (Nurse Practitioner), for orders to send to ER, (Emergency Room). R2's Nurses Note dated 02/27/23 at 2:00 AM documents, Nurse from (local hospital) called states resident is being d/c, (discharge), with multiple rib fracture and sternum mass on liver, no transportation to get resident back to facility, phone call to (V1) administrator to make her aware of situation, states (psychosocial program) can pick him up from hospital @ 7a (SIC) when they arrive. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 02/27/23 at 10:30 AM documents, QA committee met r/t fall reported on 02/26/23. Resident reported to staff nurse that he fell overnight trying to go to bathroom w/o, (without), assistance, stated he felt dizzy and fell over toilet, he was sent to ER for eval, resident sustained multiple rib fractures from unwitnessed fall, he returned back to facility, staff to check more frequently when in bed. R2's Nurses Note dated 03/06/23 at 8:45 AM documents Resident was ambulating to bathroom on his way back out of bathroom he lost his balance, fell to floor landing on his left side. States he hit his head. Assessment by nurse. Moves all extremities WNL for this resident neuro checks started. V/S 120/77 - 66 - 18 - 97.8 96% RA, (room air), O2 sats, (oxygen saturation). C/o, (complaint of), pain to left ribs area. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 03/07/23 at 10:15 AM documents QA committee met r/t fall on 03/06/23, resident attempted to go to bathroom without assistance. Resident lost balance and fell, staff to utilize pressure alarm for bed. R2's Nurses Note dated 05/19/23 at 11:35 AM documents, resident chair alarm going off. CNA went to room and resident noted to be on knees on the floor. this nurse came to room and resident was getting up from floor by himself. Resident states he has no pain to knees. Resident states he also hit his left shoulder on his roommate's bed. denies pain to shoulder and ROM WNL. Redness/abrasions noted post-fall. Attempted to call emergency contact (POA) but the number is incorrect. Attempted to call NP x 2 but went voicemail and voicemail is full. Will try again. neuro checks WNL - ROM WNL. VS 126/74, 72, 18, 97.5, 96% RA. Resident denies hitting head. Will monitor. Spoke with NP - 0 new orders. monitor for bruising/pain. No Quality Improvement Review Noted for fall on 05/19/23. No intervention noted for fall on 05/19/23. R2's Nurses Note dated 08/17/23 2:10 AM documents, Resident had a fall in bedroom. Staff was in room with resident. No injury noted. NP was notified. Administrator was notified. Resident emergency contact notified. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 08/12/23 9:30 AM documents QA committee met r/t fall with zero injury noted on 08/17/23. Resident attempted to sit back in w/c after incontinent care with CNA, (Certified Nurse Aide), and w/c moved causing him to land on buttocks. Educated resident and staff to ensure that w/c is locked during all transfers. R2's Nurses Note dated 09/06/23 at 6:25 AM documents, Resident had a fall in his room. Writer went to resident room. Found him on the floor sitting on his buttocks. Resident stated, that he was trying to go to his closet to shut the door and went in the opposite direction and slipped and felled (SIC). No injury noted. Vitals are B/P 130/80, P - 113, R 22, T 97.4. Notified emergency contact, notified NP, notified Administrator, notified DON. Will follow facility protocol related to falls. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 09/07/23 at 9:15 AM documents QA committee met r/t fall on 09/06/23 with no injury noted. Resident stated he was closing his closet door and walking backwards and fell, instructed to utilize call light and wait for assistance. R2's Nurses Note dated 11/06/23 at 6:27 AM documents Resident has a fall this morning he stated that his pain was 5 he was found lying on his left side. Stated that his left hip hurts. Vitals were B/P 120/58, P 88, R 21, T 97.1. He stated that he was trying to put his tablet in his drawer. No Quality Improvement Review Noted for fall on 11/06/23. No intervention noted for fall on 11/06/23. On 11/17/23 at 10:59 AM, R2 observed sitting in dining area in wheelchair unsupervised. Chair alarm noted attached to resident. On 11/17/23 at 10:55 AM, V16, CNA stated that they use bed and alarms to prevent (R2) from falling. She stated that he started ambulating with a walker under supervision with a wheelchair following. On 11/17/23 at 11:30 AM, V12, LPN, (Licensed Practical Nurse), stated that to prevent (R2) from falling they use bed alarm and chair alarm. (R2) is a one assist from staff. She stated that they re-educate him on using the call light. On 11/17/23 at 12:45 PM, V2, DON stated that she would expect there to progressive interventions added to a resident's care plan following a fall. Facility's Fall Prevention policy dated 11/10/18 documents To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. 5. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 3 of 5 residents (R20, R34, R40) reviewed for environment in the sample of 50. Findings include: On 11/15/23 at 10:02 AM during the Resident Council Group Meeting, R24 stated, There is mold in the bathroom, and it's gross. R34 stated the bathroom toilet needs to be replaced, and she mentions it to the Facility staff all the time. She stated the bathroom is like an old sanatorium, and the baseboards are not good. R34 also added the light in the 200 Hallway Ice Room needs to be replaced. R40 stated, The first bathroom by the offices is not good. The bottom of the floor has rot. I would rather go around (to the other side of the Facility) than have to take a shower there. On 11/16/23 at 8:10 AM, the Women's Visitor Restroom next to room [ROOM NUMBER] had an area of missing tile on the wall measuring approximately 15 inches across and 24 inches long. There was a rust-colored material on the door frame and hinges. There was plastic sheet covering one of the two toilets. There were two areas on the floor, both measuring approximately 5 inches by 7 inches, where the light-colored flooring was worn down and exposed black material underneath. There were six other areas of scraped flooring. Two of the walls had panels covering missing tiles inserted into the baseboards that were peeling away from the wall. The ceiling had a square, recessed area that was covered in dust with a plug hanging down. The overhead light did not have a cover. Areas on the ceiling and toilet seat were flaking off. There was a crack in the paper towel dispenser. On the right side of the door on the inside there was a hole where tile was missing. On 11/16/23 at 8:18 AM, the Men's Restroom across from room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black material all around the floorboard, and the shower caulking was hanging down between some of the lower tiles. The ceiling had areas that were peeling off, and the ceiling light did not have a cover. The room smelled of urine, and the shower head extended approximately one inch from the wall exposing a small amount of the pipe. On 11/16/23 at 8:19 AM the Women's Restroom across from room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black material along the edges of the shower floor. There was no cover on the lights above the mirror. On 11/16/23 at 8:45 AM the Men's Visitor Restroom next to room [ROOM NUMBER] had no shower head or knob, and there was an area of broken floor tiles measuring approximately 3 inches by 8 inches. On 11/16/23 at 12:27 PM the Utility Room on the 200 Hallway that houses the ice chest was missing a covering on the light. V17, Housekeeper, stated it has been that way for some time. On 11/17/23 at 9:02 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, (DON), stated she expects the Facility to follow its Resident Rights Policy and keep the environment clean, comfortable and safe. She stated she discusses this with staff every two weeks. The Facility's Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities from the Illinois Department on Aging, undated, documents, Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable and homelike.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin on 2/16/23 for 1 resident (R44) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin on 2/16/23 for 1 resident (R44) in a sample of 50; Additionally the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse on 11/28/22 and 11/7/23 for one resident (R41) in a sample of 50. Findings include: 1. R44 Nurse's Progress Notes dated 2/16/23 documents that V14 granddaughter of R44 was combing R44's hair and observed a scar about 16 centimeters at the back of R44's head. No further documentation. R44's Face Sheet undated documents R44 was admitted to the facility 2/19/22 with a pertinent diagnosis of Dementia. R44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R44 has severe cognitive impairment and is Totally dependent for personal grooming and dressing. On 11/15/23 at 4:00 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated I was not here then I can't tell you what happened but I will try to find out for you. On 11/16/23 at 8:10 AM, V2 DON stated the nurse on duty at the time was interviewed and stated it was a scar, she did not know how it occurred. R44 was assessed again today and there is nothing there. On 11/16/23 at 8:40 AM, V9 RN stated the granddaughter (V14) alerted me to the scar on her grandmother's head. There was no blood, it was above the nape of her neck and white. I had the nurse practitioner look at it and she said it look like a surgical scar. There was no treatment. R44 was not admitted with the scar. We did not determine the cause of the scar. We looked this morning and there is nothing. On 11/16/23 at 9:34 AM, V14 Granddaughter to R44 stated she was initially concerned about the scar on the back of of her grandmother's (R44's) head. It was scabbed over and was from ear to ear right about her hair line in the back of her head. V14 did inquire about the scar and no one could explain what happened. We were never given a definitive answer as to how the injury occurred. No staff person came to me/family and said what happened and my grandmother could not say what happened either. I have never had any concerns and that was the first time that I am aware of anything happening to her. Initially, we were the only ones combing R44's hair but the CNAs did start combing her hair also. The Facility Policy & Procedure for Injuries of Unknown Origins undated documents all injuries will be investigated to determine the potential cause of the injury. Upon identification of the cause, interventions will be established to prevent any further injury by the IDT or Administration. All Injuries of Unknown Origin will be discussed at the daily QA meeting. The following is not necessarily all inconclusive, but give guidance on the most common causes of Unknown Injuries. 2. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/28/22 at 11:30 PM documents, R41 hit his roommate with his leg brace. Resident stated, he did it because his roommate would not shut up. Administrator made aware of situation. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/29/22 at 5:00 AM documents, (R41) and his roommate had no more complications throughout the night. Both parties refused to leave the room during the initial situation. Resident noted to be lying in bed with eyes closed. A resident -resident altercation report/investigation was requested but not received. The Care Plan did not address the behavior of R41. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/5/23 documents R41 was pushed out of his wheelchair by another resident. Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/6/23 documents, QA notes documents the QA committee met related to fall on 11/5/23. Staff to supervise R41 while outside on the patio. The Care Plan dated 1/4/23 documents Resident has potential for altered activity pursuit pattern/social isolation as related to -11/6/23 Resident fell from wheelchair on 11/5/23 while outside on the patio. On 11/17/23 at 9:00 AM, V9 RN stated there was bickering between R41 and the other resident, but she could not remember what the bickering was about. The other resident just dumped R41 out of the wheelchair. R41 was sent to the hospital and there have been no further problems between the two. On 11/17/23 at 9:21 AM, R41 stated, he could not remember the guys' name that hit him in the head. R41 states he does not smoke but goes outside to get some air. Someone told him to pass a cigarette to someone and the other guy got mad and gave him a head butt. R41 did not remember the altercation of 11/28/22. R41 did state he is paralyzed and cannot defend himself. R41 could not name any witnesses either. On 11/17/23 at 12:48 PM, V1 Administrator stated her expectations are that the residents be separated immediately and then she be notified. R41's Face Sheet undated documents he was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Altered Mental Status, Chronic Pain and Insomnia. R41's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documents R41 behavior of inattention and disorganized thinking is present. The Facility Policy & Procedure for Abuse Prevention Program undated documents the first step is choosing an Investigation Path to follow: Regardless of the specific nature of the allegation (physical, sexual, verbal/exploitation/mental, theft or neglect), the investigation should consist of -An interview with staff members having contact with the resident and accused individual during the regular contact. -Interview with other residents to which the accused individual has regular contact -Interview with other employees to determine if they have ever witnessed other incidents of mistreatments involving the accused individual -An interview with the accused individual or individuals (with a witness present) After a conclusion based on the investigation is determined, internal reports, interviews, witness statements, and identities of individuals involved shall be released only with the permission of the administrator or the facility attorney. Even if the facility investigation is not complete, the administrator will cooperate with any Department of Public Health investigation in the matter. After reviewing the final report, the administrator or designee is responsible for forwarding an approved copy of the final report to the Department of Public Health within five working days of the occurrence.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete investigation of an injury of unknown origin on ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete investigation of an injury of unknown origin on 2/16/23 for 1 resident (R44) in a sample of 50; Additionally, the facility failed to provide a complete investigation on 11/28/22 and 11/7/23 for one resident (R41) in a sample of 50. Findings include: 1. R44 Nurse's Progress Notes dated 2/16/23 documents, that V14 granddaughter of R44 was combing R44's hair and observed a scar about 16 centimeters at the back of R44's head. No further documentation. R44's Face Sheet undated documents, R44 was admitted to the facility 2/19/22 with a pertinent diagnosis of Dementia. R44's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documents, R44 has severe cognitive impairment and is Totally dependent for personal grooming and dressing. On 11/15/23 at 4:00 PM, V2 Director of Nursing, (DON), stated, I was not here then I can't tell you what happened but I will try to find out for you. On 11/16/23 at 8:10 AM, V2 DON stated, the Nurse on duty at the time was interviewed and stated it was a scar, she did not know how it occurred. R44 was assessed again today and there is nothing there. On 11/16/23 at 8:40 AM, V9 RN stated, the granddaughter (V14) alerted me to the scar on her grandmother's head. There was no blood, it was above the nape of her neck and white. I had the Nurse Practitioner look at it and she said it look like a surgical scar. There was no treatment. R44 was not admitted with the scar. We did not determine the cause of the scar. We looked this morning and there is nothing. On 11/16/23 at 9:34 AM, V14 Granddaughter to R44 stated, she was initially concerned about the scar on the back of her grandmother's (R44's) head. It was scabbed over and was from ear to ear right about her hair line in the back of her head. V14 did inquire about the scar, and no one could explain what happened. We were never given a definitive answer as to how the injury occurred. No staff person came to me/family and said what happened and my grandmother could not say what happened either. I have never had any concerns and that was the first time that I am aware of anything happening to her. Initially, we were the only ones combing R44's hair but the CNAs did start combing her hair also. The Facility Policy & Procedure for Injuries of Unknown Origins undated documents all injuries will be investigated to determine the potential cause of the injury. Upon identification of the cause, interventions will be established to prevent any further injury by the IDT or Administration. All Injuries of Unknown Origin will be discussed at the daily QA meeting. The following is not necessarily all inconclusive but give guidance on the most common causes of Unknown Injuries. 2. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/28/22 at 11:30 PM documents, R41 hit his roommate with his leg brace. Resident stated, he did it because, his roommate would not shut up. Administrator made aware of situation. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/29/22 at 5:00 AM documents, R41 and his roommate had no more complications throughout the night. Both parties refused to leave the room during the initial situation. Resident noted to be lying in bed with eyes closed. A resident-to-resident altercation report/investigation was requested but not received. The Care Plan did not address the behavior of R41. R41's Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/5/23 documents, R41 was pushed out of his wheelchair by another resident. Nurse's Progress Notes dated 11/6/23 documents, QA notes documents, the QA committee met related to fall on 11/5 23. Staff to supervise R41 while outside on the patio. The Care Plan dated 1/4/23 documents, R41 has potential for altered activity pursuit pattern/social isolation as related to -11/6/23 R41 fell from wheelchair on 11/5/23 while outside on the patio. On 11/17/23 at 9:00 AM, V9 RN stated, there was bickering between R41 and the other resident, but she could not remember what the bickering was about. The other resident just dumped R41 out of the wheelchair. R41 was sent to the Hospital and there have been no further problems between the two. On 11/17/23 at 9:21 AM, R41 stated, he could not remember the guys' name that hit him in the head. R41 states he does not smoke but goes outside to get some air. Someone told him to pass a cigarette to someone and the other guy got mad and gave him a head butt. R41 did not remember the altercation of 11/28/22. R41 did state he is paralyzed and cannot defend himself. R41 could not name any witnesses either. On 11/17/23 at 12:48 PM, V1 Administrator stated her expectations are that the residents be separated immediately and then she be notified. R41's Face Sheet undated documents, he was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Altered Mental Status, Chronic Pain and Insomnia. R41's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documents R41 behavior of inattention and disorganized thinking is present. The Facility Policy & Procedure for Abuse Prevention Program undated documents the first step is choosing an Investigation Path to follow: Regardless of the specific nature of the allegation (physical, sexual, verbal/exploitation/mental, theft or neglect), the investigation should consist of -An interview with staff members having contact with the resident and accused individual during the regular contact. -Interview with other residents to which the accused individual has regular contact -Interview with other employees to determine if they have ever witnessed other incidents of mistreatments involving the accused individual -An interview with the accused individual or individuals (with a witness present) After a conclusion based on the investigation is determined, internal reports, interviews, witness statements, and identities of individuals involved shall be released only with the permission of the administrator or the facility attorney. Even if the facility investigation is not complete, the administrator will cooperate with any Department of Public Health investigation in the matter. After reviewing the final report, the administrator or designee is responsible for forwarding an approved copy of the final report to the Department of Public Health within five working days of the occurrence.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly sanitize and store a residents BiPAP device f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly sanitize and store a residents BiPAP device for 1 of 12 residents (R14) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 50. Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 3:13 PM R14 stated nobody has cleaned the tubing for his BiPAP machine since he got it a few months ago. His mask for his BiPAP mask was laying on a fly swatter on his bedside table, not in a bag. R14 stated he had not used the fly swatter for a while, but he has used it to kill flies when it was hot. On 11/15/23 at 10:00 AM R14's BiPAP mask continued to lay on top of the fly swatter on his bedside table, not in a plastic bag. On 11/16/23 at 10:10 AM R14's BiPAP mask was still laying on top of a fly swatter on his bedside table, not contained in a bag. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating he is alert and oriented. R14's Care Plan, Physician Order Sheet dated 11/1/23 to 11/30/23, Treatment Administration Record, and Medication Administration Record were reviewed and did not include documentation of R14's BiPAP use or directions on when to clean or change tubing. On 11/16/23 at 10:00 AM V9, Registered Nurse (RN) stated the midnight shift are responsible for changing the tubing on R14's BiPAP machine. On 11/17/23 at 10:00 AM V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated they do not clean the tubing on R14's BiPAP machine because it would be impossible to dry it on the inside. She stated the tubing is changed once a month. On 11/17/23 at 12:25 PM V9, stated she just went down today and changed R14's BiPAP tubing and put his mask in a bag. She stated she does not know where the other nurses document when they change his tubing but she is going to put it in his nurses notes. On 11/17/23 at 12:27 PM V2 stated any oxygen, BiPAP or CPAP masks or tubing should be stored in a bag when not in use. She stated R14's BiPAP mask should not have been laying on a fly swatter on his bedside table. The facility's policy, Policy for CPAP BiPAP revised 3/8/13 documents, E. Circuits are to be cleaned every week and prn. The facility's policy, Cleaning of Respiratory Suction, Oxygen, and Humidification Equipment revised 01/02 documents, The purpose of disinfecting of respiratory equipment is to prevent equipment-associated pulmonary infections.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement protocol to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring that residents who require antibiotics are prescribed the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement protocol to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring that residents who require antibiotics are prescribed the appropriate antibiotics for 1 of 3 (R36) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in a sample of 50. Findings include: R36's Physician Order undated documents diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, depression episodic with catatonic features, hypertension, asthma, hyperlipidemia, history of cerebrovascular accident, and Gastroesophageal reflux disease. R36's Physician Order dated 11/07/23 documents Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 mg twice daily for 7 days. DX, (diagnosis): UTI, (Urinary tract Infection). UA, (urinalysis), today nitrite positive. Sending urine for CX, (culture). Start Macrobid BID for 7 days. Follow-up in 2 weeks to ensure resolution of UTI & reassess urinary symptoms. R36's Nurses Note dated 11/07/23 at 12:00 PM documents Resident came back to facility from urologist appt. Resident starting Macrobid 100 mg PO, (by mouth), twice a day r/t, (related to), UTI. UA today nitrite positive. Sending urine for culture. F/U, (follow up), in 2 weeks to ensure resolution of UTI & reassess urinary symptoms. No urine culture noted in the chart. R36's MDS, (Minimum Data Set), dated 08/18/23 documents a BIMS, (Brief Interview for Mental Status), score of 15 out of 15. The MDS documents that R36 requires limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfer, walk in room, walk in corridor, locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS documents that R36 is not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. The MDS documents that R36 is always continent of bladder and bowel. R36's Care Plan 08/18/23 documents Self-care deficit - needs supervision and/or assist to complete quality care and/or poorly motivated to complete ADLs (activities of daily living). On 11/17/23 at 12:45 PM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing) stated that she expect the facility to urine culture before starting antibiotics for a UTI. Facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy dated 12/10/21 documents To improve the use of Antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This will be accomplished utilizing the Core Elements.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications are controlled for 4 of 4 residents (R23, R27, R43, and R52) reviewed for medication storage in the sample ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications are controlled for 4 of 4 residents (R23, R27, R43, and R52) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 50. Findings include: On 8/15/23 at 8:10 AM, V9 Registered Nurse (RN) opened the top drawer of the 300-hall medication cart to administer medications for R40. While drawer was opened, 4 clear medication cups were observed in the top drawer, with each cup containing multiple pills and capsules. There were last names on these cups, but no date or time of when they were set up or when they were to be administered. There was also an insulin syringe lying next to the cups in the drawer containing 7 units of cloudy liquid. The insulin syringe was not labeled with a name or date. V9 identified the medications she had pre-set up in the four cups as R43's, R23's, R27's, and R52's morning medications. She also identified the syringe as R43's morning dose of 7 units of Humalog insulin. V9 stated she had them ready for when the residents come up to the dining room. She stated she does not always pre-set up medications. She stated if any of the medication cups got spilled, she would re-pour the medications. She stated if she got called away in the case of an emergency whatever nurse replaced her could get the residents' medications off their cards if they did not want to administer what she had in the cups. On 11/16/23 at 11:45 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON), stated no nurse should be pre-setting up medications before starting medication pass. She stated the nurse should set up one resident's medication at a time and administer those medications before starting the next resident. The facility's policy, Medication Administration, revised 10/07 documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activities program to support residents in all their wellness domains. This has the pote...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activities program to support residents in all their wellness domains. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: During the Resident Council Group Meeting on 11/15/23 at 10:02 AM, R24 stated the Facility used to have an Activities Director, but she left last December and has not been replaced. R24 stated, They have nothing for us to do around here. It's very boring. R34 stated V3, Social Services Director, is the social worker and has other things to do besides Activities. On 11/15/23 at 11:50 AM, R32 stated, We used to have activities, but we don't anymore. We want to play Bingo and go outside and go to the store. It would just give us something to look forward to. We're just bored. It just isn't right. They need to treat us like this is our home. It's important. On 11/16/23 at 1:15 PM, R1 stated the Facility used to tell them when they were going to have Activities, but they have not done that in a while. On 11/14/23 at 11:10 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, (DON), stated V11, Facility Van Driver, does both Transportation and Activities. She stated V11 was not in the Facility, and there was nobody doing Activities today. On 11/15/23 at 10:36 AM, V3, Social Services Director, stated V11 has been doing Activities in between Transportation for the past several months and was unsure whether V11 had any specialized training for Activities. On 11/15/23 at 10:55 AM V1, Administrator, stated the Facility has not had a full time Activities Director for about 6 months, but V11, Facility Van Driver, has been doing both Transportation and Activities. V1 stated V11 is a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and has no specialized training for Activities. On 11/15/23 at 1:40 PM, V11, Facility Van Driver, stated she is doing both Transportation and Activities. She usually does Activities three or four times per week, depending on the Transportation schedule, and verbally informs each resident of Activities instead of using an Activities Calendar. She said there is no staff available to do Activities on the weekends. She stated she is a CNA and has not had any formal training for Activities. On 11/17/23 at 9:02 AM, V2, DON, stated the Facility is actively looking for an Activities Director, but they have not had any applicants. She would expect the Facility to follow its Activity related policies. During the course of the survey, there were no Activities Calendars posted on bulletin boards, in the Activity Director's Office, or in the (Psychosocial Programming) Dining Room. On 11/14/23 at 10:17 AM, R23 was in her wheelchair, (w/c), in the dining room, yelling out, Come in here and help me! Take me out of here! No staff approached R23 to give reassurance or to assess needs. At 10:27 AM, R23 was still yelling out and sitting in her w/c in the dining room by herself with no staff in the room or in sight of resident. R23 stated, They took me out to smoke and then left me in here and never came back. V1, Administrator, was walking up the hall and was asked about R23 sitting in the dining room yelling out. V1 stated R23 is kept in the dining room so staff can interact with her when she is yelling out and offer her snacks. R23 did not have any snacks at the time of the observation. At 10:40 AM, R23 was sitting in the dining room again and yelling out loudly, Mom!. V2 DON was in dining room talking to R23 and assuring her she is not in the way. R23's Face Sheet documents, her diagnoses to include Psychosis, Blindness Both Eyes, Schizophrenia, Anxiety and Bipolar Disorder. R23's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), documents she is moderately cognitively impaired. R23's Care Plan dated 9/24/23 documents, the problem: Blindness (Sensory Perceptual Deficit) with the goal, dated 12/23/21, Will function at optimal level through adaptation skills within limitation imposed by blindness x 90 days. Intervention for this problem includes Adapt activity involvement with talking books, radio reading, braille bingo cards, etc. R23's Care Plan dated 3/8/23 documents, the problem: Sad, Depressed Mood Indicators with the goal, dated 6/6/23, Resident will verbalize reason for negative feelings and verbalize one positive aspect of current situation once weekly through next 90 days. Intervention for this care plan includes, Seat in an area of activity for added stimulation and opportunity for socialization. R23's Care Plan dated 3/8/23 documents the problem: Altered Mood State (anger/easily upset) potential for altered social reaction. The goal for this care plan, dated 6/6/23 is, Resident will accept redirection/support during episodes of anger as evidenced by reduction of <> to <> over next 90 days. Intervention for this care plan includes, Encourage, invite, and praise involvement in activities, assist as necessary. The Facility's Activity Policy reviewed 9/17 documents, It is the policy of (Facility) to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Activities shall be planned on a monthly basis for the following month. An activity calendar shall be posted at the beginning of each month for formal activities. The calendar will be printed in large print and displayed in the following area(s). Bulletin board in the main entry area by Nurse's station, Activity Director Office, Adapt Dining Room. The Facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS 671) dated 11/14/23 documents, there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0680 (Tag F0680)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to employ a qualified therapeutic recreational specialist or activities professional to provide a resident centered activities p...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to employ a qualified therapeutic recreational specialist or activities professional to provide a resident centered activities program. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: During the Resident Council Group Meeting on 11/15/23 at 10:02 AM, R24 stated the Facility used to have an Activities Director, but she left last December and has not been replaced. R24 stated, They have nothing for us to do around here. It's very boring. On 11/15/23 at 11:50 AM, R32 stated, We used to have activities, but we don't anymore. We want to play Bingo and go outside and go to the store. It would just give us something to look forward to. We're just bored. It just isn't right. They need to treat us like this is our home. It's important. On 11/15/23 at 10:55 AM, V1, Administrator, stated they have been without a full time Activities Director for about 6 months, but V11, Facility Van Driver, has been doing Activities along with Transportation. V1 stated V11 is a Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA), and has no training specific to activities. On 11/14/23 at 11:10 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, (DON), stated, (V11) is the Activities person, but she is not here and may be running residents to appointments. She also does transportation. There is nobody doing activities today. On 11/15/23 at 10:36 AM, V3, Social Services Director, stated V11 has been doing Activities in between resident transportation since June or July of this year. V3 was unsure whether V11 had any certifications in order to provide the activities. On 11/15/23 at 1:40 PM, V11, Facility Van Driver, stated she does both Transportation and Activities. She stated activities are usually three to four times per week, depending on transportation schedule, and there are no activities on the weekends. She stated she has worked here as a CNA for years but, has no specialized training for activities. On 11/17/23 at 9:02 AM, V2, DON, stated the Facility is actively looking for an Activity Director, but have not had any applications. She stated, she would expect the Facility to follow its Activity related policies. The Facility's Policy For Activity Director reviewed 9/17 documents, It is the policy of (Facility) to provide an activities program that is directed by a qualified professional who is responsible for directing the development, implementation, supervision and ongoing evaluation of the activities program. An activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who: 1. Is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who: A. Is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing. B. Is eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990. 2. Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, 1 of which was full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting. 3. Is a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant. 4. Has a training course approved by the State. The Facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS 671) dated 11/14/23 documents there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to properly store, prepare and distribute food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to properly store, prepare and distribute food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 8:15 AM, in the dry storage room there were two 12-quart containers of dry cereal that were not labeled or dated. There was a package of fried onion straws that had been opened, but was not resealed, leaving the contents open to air. There was a cabinet containing chemicals that also had a case of soda inside. V4, Dietary Manager, stated that was not intended for resident consumption and would get rid of it. On 11/14/23 at 8:19 AM, in the kitchen next to the ice machine there was a bottle of unopened soap next to the meat slicer. The meat slicer was not covered. On 11/14/23 at 8:20 AM, the walk-in refrigerator had a cart with two trays of chicken strips and two trays of chicken patties. The trays were labeled with stickers, but were not covered, leaving the chicken open to air. There was a bag of white shredded cheese on a shelf that had been opened, but was not resealed, leaving the cheese open to air. There were two stainless steel containers of food that were not labeled or dated. The containers were covered with wax paper which did not form a tight seal on the items inside. V4, Dietary Manager, stated they were lasagna roll ups. There was a quart of skim milk with a Use By date of 11/11/23. There were four gallons of whole milk with Use By dates of 11/12/23. There were two vacuum sealed packages with unknown contents stored above the milk cartons that were not labeled or dated. V4 stated they were pork, and he did not know they were still in there. V4 placed the packages of pork and outdated milk on a cart and stated he would discard it. There was a large bowl of fruit on the bottom shelf that was not covered, labeled or dated. V4 stated they were pears. There were nine individual Styrofoam containers that were not labeled or dated. V4 stated those are puddings the nurses use for medication pass. There was a bowl covered with aluminum foil that was dated 11/14/23, but was not labeled. V4 lifted the lid and stated that was salad mix. On 11/14/23 at 8:25 AM, the walk in freezer had ice crystals on the ceiling pipes and an icicle measuring approximately two inches hanging from the pipe. V4 stated the temperatures have been fine, but that always just happens after they remove the ice. There was a box of donuts stored directly on the floor. There were two boxes of uncooked beef patties stored on a shelf above a box of corn dogs. The box of beef patties on top had been opened and was not resealed, leaving the beef open to air. There were an additional two boxes of uncooked beef patties that were stored on top of potatoes on a shelf above cheese soup. On 11/15/23 at 3:50 PM, V1, Administrator, stated she expects staff to follow their Facility food storage policies. The Facility's Refrigerator and Freezer Storage Policy revised 10/14 documents, It is the policy of (Corporation) that any item to be placed in the refrigerators and freezers must be covered, labeled and dated with a date-marking system that tracks when to discard perishable foods. Cover all containers. Mark container with name of item. [NAME] the date that the original container is opened or date of preparation. Store cooked meats above raw meats in the refrigerator or freezer. Use or discard food according to the manufacturer's use-by-date. The Facility's Storage Policy revised 10/20 documents, It is the policy of (Corporation) that food shall be stored on shelves in areas that provide the best preservation. Food shall be stored at the proper temperature and for the appropriate length of time to protect quality of food and food cost. All items will be dated upon receipt. Individual cans or bags shall each be dated to ensure that stock is rotated properly. Store chemical and poisonous materials in a separate area that can be locked. Store leftovers in covered, labeled and dated containers under refrigeration or frozen. When using only part of a product, the remaining product should be in the original package or airtight container and labeled and dated. The Facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS 671) dated 11/14/23 documents there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to utilize the services of an Infection Preventionist (IP) at a minimum part time basis to track Facility infections and staff and resident va...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to utilize the services of an Infection Preventionist (IP) at a minimum part time basis to track Facility infections and staff and resident vaccinations in order to prevent the spread of infectious disease. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 11/17/23 at 9:50 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated she is acting as the IP, but has not completed the training. She just started working here about two months ago and has not yet had the time. She thinks V20, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) has the certification, but she is in charge of the Facility's Infection Control. On 11/17/23 at 10:25 AM, V9, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, (V2) does Infection Control for the Facility. I notify (V2) of any resident infections, diagnoses, medications, dose, and organism, if available, but (V2) does the tracking and trending. On 11/17/23 at 12:46 PM, V1, Administrator, stated they do not have a policy specific to the Infection Preventionist, but would expect the IP to have the required training. The Facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS 671) dated 11/14/23 documents there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 25 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 25 of 55 residents (R2, R5, R6, R9, R11, R12, R13, R17, R18, R24, R29, R30, R32, R37, R38, R39, R40, R43, R44, R46, R49, R50, R103, R104 and R105) reviewed for room size in the sample of 55. Findings include: The Facility has 30 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 75 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches. All these rooms are certified for Medicare and Medicaid. These rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER], 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 116, 120, 201, 202, 203, 204, 303, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, 313, 314, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322 and 323. room [ROOM NUMBER] is now a family visiting room and a telephone room for residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] is now a storage room. The facility has 8 two bed resident rooms which provide only 77.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms, measure 12 feet one inch by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 72-inch offset. These rooms are as follows: Rooms 207, room [ROOM NUMBER], 209, 214, 216 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Facility has 3 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 76.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 48-inch offset, These Rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] which is now the Break Room, 119 which is now the Activity Room. The facility has 2 two bedrooms which provide only 78.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 15 feet by 10 feet six inches. There rooms are as follows: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. During observation from 11/14/2023 through 11/17/2023, the following residents were in the above rooms which do not have 80 square feet per resident bed: (R2, R5, R6, R9, R11, R12, R13, R17, R18, R24, R29, R30, R32, R37, R38, R39, R40, R43, R44, R46, R49, R50, R103, R104 and R105) Form CMS 671 dated 11/14/23 documents the facility's census is 55.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to complete treatments and interventions as prescribed by a physician, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to complete treatments and interventions as prescribed by a physician, properly document treatments per their Facility Policy, as well as continue implementing interventions listed in the resident Care Plan to prevent a resident from self-harm biting for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care the sample of 7. Findings include: R1's Comprehensive Nursing assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 has a diagnosis of anxiety and a mood disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 was cognitively impaired, had a behavior that occurred daily and put R1 at significant risk for physical illness or injury. R1's Care Plan dated 1/12/2023 documents, Resident has (an) anxiety problem which causes him to bite on hands and fingers. It further documents, Make sure he has his teddy bear to hold. R1's Care Plan has not been updated to reflect the use of geri-sleeves. R1's Psychiatric Consult dated 5/2/2023 documents R1 has a history of anxiety that was ongoing daily and R1 would bite arms/nails and pick at scabs until they bled. R1's Psychiatric Consult dated 6/26/2023 documents R1 continue with chronic behavior of chewing on hands and arms. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 7/11/2023 at 8 AM documents R1 was picking at his right arm, causing it to bleed. It further documents the area was cleansed and a dressing was applied with a wrap to keep R1 from pulling it off easily. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 7/17/2023 at 9:30 AM documents R1 continued to pick at his right arm and causing it to bleed. It further documents the area was cleansed and a dressing was applied. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 7/17/2023 at 11 AM documents R1 continued to remove the dressing and pick at the scabs, causing them to bleed. It further documents, the area was cleansed, and a dressing and wrap was applied. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 8/7/2023 at 8 AM documents the Nurse Practitioner examined R1 and ordered geri-sleeves (protective sleeves worn on the arms) to bilateral arms. R1's Treatment Record dated 8/1/2023-8/31/2023 documents several days and shifts with no entries to indicate a dressing with antibiotic ointment nor geri-sleeves were applied as ordered by the physician. R1's Behavior Tracking Record dated August 2023 documents, Target behavior: Nervousness-biting fingernails, fingers and wrist. Goal: To eliminate/reduce occurrence of biting. Interventions: 1. Approach calmly 2. Offer resident a snack 3. Make sure resident has his teddy bear to hold 4. Offer resident tasks to do with hands. It further documents R1 had several occurrences of this behavior and the interventions 1-4 were utilized. On 9/12/2023 at 12:04 PM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, (R1) would bite his fingers and arms. I would bandage it and he would rip it off and bite it again. He bit them bad. He had sleeves but would still pull them down and pick and bite. I've seen him with a teddy bear before, it has to be somewhere around here. On 9/12/2023 at 3:03 PM, V9, LPN stated R1's biggest problem was biting chunks out of his hands and arms. V9 continued to state R1's teddy bear was given to him to deter him from the biting. V9 stated the teddy bear was missing and staff were looking for it. On 9/13/2023 at 9:14 AM, V8, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, (R1)'s teddy bear disappeared a couple weeks before. He had several appointments, so I wonder if he left it somewhere. We checked with laundry. They showed us a bunch of different stuffed animals, but they weren't his. Staff were talking about getting him another teddy bear but that one had sentimental value. His cup and teddy bear were good interventions to prevent him from biting. I gave him a throw blanket with the ties on the end that tie together so he could play with those. On 9/13/2023 at 9:45 AM, V3, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated, I would say the biting did get a little worse while the bear was missing. We just put the sleeves on him and reminded him not to do it. The Facility's Grievance Form dated 8/31/2023 documents, Nature of Complaint/Grievance: Missing a [NAME] teddy bear. It continues to document as of 9/12/2023 Facility staff were continuing to look for the bear. On 9/13/2023 at 10:25 AM V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I see that (upon review of R1's August Treatment Record). If they (Nursing staff) didn't document it, there's not much I can say about that. My expectation would be if you did treatments, you would fill in the blanks to sign off that you did it. I would think they would have gotten him another one (teddy bear) or another item as an intervention to prevent him from biting. I didn't personally know him. This is my third day here. The Facility's Policy General Rules of Charting/Documentation dated 1/05 (January 2005) documents, Policy- To ensure proper documentation is completed based on individual resident needs. It continues, Procedure: 4. Do not leave blank spaces. Draw a straight line through any empty spaces. It continues, 13. Document Daily treatments on the treatment sheet.
Aug 2023 3 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate appropriate interventions to prevent the dislodgement of 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate appropriate interventions to prevent the dislodgement of 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for gastrostomy tube, (g-tube), placement. This failure resulted in R3 gastrostomy tube being dislodged, causing R3 pain, and being sent to local emergency room and he had to be hospitalized for the replacement of the g-tube. R3's admission sheet documents, that R3 was admitted [DATE]. R3's Care Plan, dated 7/7/23, documents, that R3 receives enteral nutrition support. Related diagnosis: Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury, G-Tube 18 FR R3's Nurses Notes, dated 9/17/22, documents, that the nurse entered the room for feeding and flush and noticed R3's gown wet. G-tube displaced and deflated. R3's Nurses Notes, dated 10/14/22 at 10 AM, documents, Resident was getting out of bed with assist with CNA. G tube sliding in and out balloon was deflated. Order was received to send R3 to ER. R3's Nurses Notes, dated 2/20/23 at 9:45 AM, documents, resident was sent to the (local) hospital r/t, (related to), G-tube kept popping out. R3's (Local Hospital) Patient Visit Information, dated 2/20/23, documents, that R3 was seen today for gastrostomy tube dysfunction. R3's G-tube was replaced. R3's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documents, that R3 is [AGE] year-old patient with a history of stroke, hypertension, sleep apnea, paraplegia, who present to the ED, (Emergency Department), complaints dislodged G-Tube. It documents, that R3 was taken to the GI lab, (Gastrointestinal Laboratory), and G-tube was successfully replaced. R3's Progress Note, dated May 11, 2023, documents, that the reason for visit: presents after hospital stay for GT (Gastrostomy Tube) replacement. On 8/9/2023 at 8:14 AM V10, R3's mother, stated, that R3 came to the facility because he needed 24-hour care. V10 stated, that R3's g-tube has come out multiple times since being at the facility. V10 stated, that it was a total of six times while at the facility. V10 stated, that shortly after being at the facility R3 had to go to the emergency room because, his g-tube came out. V10 stated, that it had to hurt each time when that g-tube with the ball on it was pulled out of the small hole in his stomach. V10 stated, it would hurt me. V10 stated, that R3 cannot express himself, due to his stroke, but that doesn't mean that the pain isn't there. V10 stated, that each time his g-tube comes out he must go to the emergency room to get it put back in. V10 stated, that it's ridiculous. V10 stated, that the being pulled and jerked from bed to stretcher to bed to stretcher has too uncomfortable and painful as well. V10 stated, that her son would not be ok with this. V10 stated, that her son would not be ok with being in pain and taken back and for to the hospital. V10 stated, that she feels bad for him. V10 stated, that she was informed that the g-tube came out during care. V10 stated, that they are supposed to be trained to care for R3. V10 stated, that she was told that in May his feeding came out during a transfer. V10 stated, that she knew R3 was in pain and that she felt helpless. On 8/9/2023 at 3:44 PM V11, LPN, stated, that she provided care for R3. V11 stated, that R3's g-tube was pulled out a couple time when the staff turned him and cleaned him. R3 stated, that the tubing was under the cover and got pulled in the process. V11 stated, that R3 could not move his arms and could not have pulled them out himself. On 8/10/2023 at 2:00 PM V4, LPN, stated, that R3 was a quadriplegic and could not move without staff assistance. V4 stated, that R3 could not move his hands. V4 stated, that R3's g- tube came out multiple times. V4 stated, that she was not sure how many times. V4 stated, R3 was not capable of pulling the tubing out. V4 stated, that she was the nurse when R3's g-tube was pulled out during a transfer. V4 stated, she was able to get R3 out to the emergency room for g-tube replacement. V4 stated, that it was a while ago and she was unable to say what exactly happened. V4 stated, that it was pulled out during a transfer. V4 stated, that R3 did not have an abdominal binder. V4 stated, that they asked for a longer tubing, but did not get one. V4 stated, that the binder would have probably worked and kept his tubing from being pulled out, but they did not get one. On 8/14/2023 3:56 PM V14, Doctor, stated, that with the number of times that the g-tube was dislodged, he would have expected some interventions have been put into place. V14 stated, that an abdominal binder may or may not be appropriate depending on the patient, because it compresses breathing. V14 stated, that other interventions could have been put in place to prevent dislodgement like if the resident is pulling out then positioning the tubing so that the patient could not reach. V14 stated, that if the g-tube is being dislodged during care then getting a longer tube. V14 stated, that if the tubing was leaking then getting the appropriate tubing. V14 stated, that a dressing could have been applied to help maintain placement. V14 stated, that he would expect interventions to be put in place. On 8/14/2023 at 4:05 PM V11, LPN, stated, that the initial pull through the opening would cause R3 pain.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 4 of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 4 of 4 (R1, R2, R6, R7) rooms reviewed for insect presence. Findings included: 1. R7's MDS, dated [DATE], documents, that R7 is cognitively intact and requires assistance from staff for assistance with activities of daily living, (ADL). R7's Care Plan, dated 1/16/23, documents, that R7 has a self-care deficit-needs supervision and/or assist to complete quality care and/or poorly motivated to complete ADLs. It continues Assist with ADL's as necessary with staff assist of 2. On 8/8/2023 at 1:31 PM, R7 stated, that the facility has a lot of flies. R7 stated, that they are horrible at times. R7 stated, that she swats at them and try to kill them. R7 stated, that she spends a lot of time in her room and that's where the flies and fruit flies are. On 8/8/2023 at 3:39 PM observed R7 sitting in room on the bed. Observed multiple flies in room. Observed a fly on the headboard, 1 on R7's leg, 1 on the bedside table. R7 observed swatting at the flies in room. 2. R6's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R6 is moderately impaired cognitively, and requires assistance from staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). On 8/8/2023 at 3:33 PM R6 sitting in wheelchair in room. Observed a fly flying around R6's room. R6 stated that there is a lot of flies. R6 stated that he did not want to get anyone in trouble. R6 stated that he guesses it's the season for it. R6 stated that he does not have a fly swatter or anyway to get rid of the flies in his room. On 8/10/2023 at 12:59 V3, Registered Nurse, stated that R6 is alert. V3 stated that R6 has Parkinson and dementia. V3 stated that if asked direct questions R6 would be able to answer questions appropriately. 3. R2's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R2 is cognitively intact and requires assistance with ADL's. On 8/8/2023 at 3:41 PM R2 sitting in bed with 5 flies on bed. Observed fly on both lower legs. R2 observed swatting at flies with hands. R2 stated that he hates the flies. R2 stated that he had a fly swatter but does not have one at this time. R2 stated that they land on him, and he does not like that. R2 stated that he has told the girls about them, but they are still here. 8/9/2023 at 3:38 PM observed flies in room on R2's bed and flying around room. On 8/10/23 at 9:08 AM observed multiple flies in R2's room. 2 flies observed on R2's right leg, 1 fly on R2's right arm and 1 fly on the foot board. 4. R1's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R1 is cognitively intact and requires staff assistance with ADL's. On 8/8/2023 at 3:48 PM R1 lying in bed with 3 flies on face and head. R1 was swatting at flies and the flies continued to land on R1's face, lips and covers. On 8/8/2023 at 3:51 PM R1 stated that the flies are horrible. R1 stated that she can't get rid of them. R1 stated that she has nothing to kill them with. R1 stated that this is miserable. On 8/9/2023 at 3:40 PM Observed R1 lying in bed with eyes closed and cover up to neck. Observed 2 flies on R1's headboard and 1 fly on R1's cover. On 8/10/2023 at 9:10 AM R1 lying in bed with fly on cover, fly on footboard and fly on bedside table. On 8/8/2023 at 12:00 PM V1, Administrator, stated that the facility does not have a pest problem. V1 stated that the pest control company was recently at the facility for monthly maintenance. On 8/10/2023 at 9:21 AM When asked if there was a fly problem V8, Dietary Manager, stated that they do have flies. V8 stated that this is because of the truck. V8 stated that when the truck is delivering food they keep the door open, and flies come in. V8 stated that they have no more flies than a home. On 8/10/2023 at 1:38 PM observed flies at the nurse's station. On 8/10/2023 at 1:39 PM stated that the fly problem depends on how often and how long the employee entrance door is opened. V3 stated that when she sees them, she lets housekeeping know and they try to take care of it. On 8/10/2023 at 1:45 PM V9, Maintenance Director, stated that there has been a fly problem. V9 stated that he has been spraying insect spray to try to kill them. V9 stated that he is not sure where the flies are coming in from. V9 stated that when he puts in an air conditioner and makes sure that the window is sealed. V9 stated that the only other thing is to make sure the residents don't have open food in the room as this could attract them. V9 stated that he could not know the name of the spray and did not have a bottle stated that he poured it into a bottle and wrote insect spray on the bottle. When asked if the fly problem has gotten better V9 stated that he doesn't know because he has only been at the facility since April. On 8/10/2023 at 2:00 PM V4, LPN, stated that there are flies. V4 stated that she is not sure what they are doing for them (fly). V4 stated that whatever it is. It isn't working. The facility's Insect and Pest Control Policy, not dated, documents This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the buildings kept free of insects and rodents.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse, (RN), in the role of full ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse, (RN), in the role of full time Director of Nursing, (DON), coverage in the facility from June 2023 to August 9, 2023. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility's Schedule, dated June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023 documents, V2, Regional DON, was only at the Facility on 6/7/23, 6/13/23, 7/4/23, 7/6/23, 7/7/23, 7/10/23, 7/11/23, 7/18, 7/21/23, 7/23/23, 7/24/23, 7/25/23, 7/26/23, 7/27/23, 8/1/23, 8/2/23, 8/8/23. On 8/8/2023 at 12:30 PM V1, Administrator, stated, that the Census was 55. V1 stated, that they have a Regional DON, V2. V1 stated, that they have RN, (Registered Nurse), coverage and V2 assists with this coverage. On 8/9/2023 at 12:37 PM V1 stated, that V7, RN, was the previous DON. V1 stated, that last day was June 20th, 2023. V7 stated, that she is actively looking for a DON. V7 stated, that she is advertising, utilizing social media, inquiring at social events. V1 stated, that she has not had any interest as of yet. V1 stated, that the nurses don't want the responsibility once they are told what the position entails. On 8/9/2023 at 9:55 AM V3, RN, stated, that she works everyday but 1. V3 stated, that she is on 6 off 1. V3 stated, that she works 6AM to 2 PM. V3 stated, when she is off V2 is at the facility. V3 stated, that V2 does not work the floor, but V2 is in the building for the RN coverage. On 8/9/2023 at 10:00 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), stated, that V2 is the Director of Nursing. V2 stated, that V2 is at the facility often and helps on the floor. On 8/9/2023 at 10:05 AM V5, Certified Nurse Assistant, (CNA), stated, that she is not sure of the DON name. On 8/9/2023 at 10:08 AM V6, CNA, stated, that the DON was V1. On 8/9/2023 at 10:25 AM V1 stated, that V1 comes to the facility on the days that V3, RN, is off and when she is in the area. V1 stated, that V2 is included in the RN coverage. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 8/8/23, documents, that there are 55 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Nurse Staffing policy, not dated, documents that It is the policy of [NAME] Health Care to provide sufficient licensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental Abd psychosocial wellbeing of each resident.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely toileting assistance to prevent incontinence episode...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely toileting assistance to prevent incontinence episodes in order to maintain dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 8. Findings include: 1. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 7/19/2023 documents R1 arrived at the facility from the local hospital with a primary diagnosis of a fracture right hip. R1's Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is continent of bowel and bladder. R1's Skilled Progress Note dated 7/23/2023 documents R1 is continent. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is occasionally incontinent of bladder. On 8/1/2023 at 9:06 AM V4, R1's Daughter in Law, stated R1 was continent prior to coming to the Facility. V4 stated the staff made R1 lay in urine for hours on end. V4 stated R1 called her and said, I'm laying here in a puddle of pee and had to wiggle her way down to the end of her bed to get to her wheelchair so R1 could get out of the urine. On 8/1/2023 at 9:15 AM, R1 stated, I am not usually incontinent, but I was because I had to wait. I started crying and called my daughter in law. It was terrible. It was crazy. I had to wear the diaper because I couldn't get to the bathroom in time. I was left wet with pee. On 8/1/2023 at 3:30 PM, V12, MDS/Care Plans stated, I think (R1) was incontinent at times. She could tell you when she had to go and had a bedside commode. She was primarily continent but was incontinent maybe 1 or 2 times while she was here. On 8/3/2023 at 8:45 AM, V13, Physical Therapy, stated R1 complained to V13 about not being changed. V13 stated R1 told V13 it would take 3 hours for R1 to get changed. V13 stated V13 assisted R1 to the bathroom and R1 was continent. V13 stated she did observe a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) providing incontinent care to R1. On 8/3/2023 at 2:40 PM, V1, Administrator stated she would expect a resident who was continent of urine upon admission, to remain continent. V1 added, I would except them to still have the dignity they had upon admission, at all times. The Resident's Rights Booklet, undated, documents, Your rights to dignity and respect- You have the right to make your own choices. Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life.
May 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse, (RN), in the role of full time Director of Nursing, (DON), since July 2022. This has the potential...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse, (RN), in the role of full time Director of Nursing, (DON), since July 2022. This has the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 5/22/2023 at 9:10 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, the DON position is vacant. V1 added, that there is a Regional DON, (V3), that comes at least weekly. V1 stated, V4 is the RN for the day. On 5/22/2023 at 10 AM, V4, RN, stated, she works everyday except Tuesdays, and that V3 fills in those days. On 5/22/2023 at 11:20 AM, V10, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), stated, there is not a DON at the Facility. On 5/22/2023 at 1:05 PM, V1 stated, We had a ADON, (Assistant Director of Nursing), who quit in March, (2023), but she wasn't an RN, she was an LPN. We interview people for the DON position but, when they find out the duties, they aren't interested. I started back in July, (2022), and we haven't had a DON since then. The Facility's Schedule, dated May 2023 documents, V3, Regional DON, was only at the Facility on 5/2/23, 5/9/2023, 5/13/2023, and 5/16/23. It further documents, V3 is scheduled to work 5/23/23 and 5/30/2023. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 5/22/23, documents, that there are 57 residents residing in the facility.
Feb 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to notify residents' health care providers and family representatives of COVID-19 positive results for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R3,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to notify residents' health care providers and family representatives of COVID-19 positive results for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R3, R5, R19) reviewed for notification in the sample of 19. Findings include: 1. The Facility's COVID Positive Residents list documents R1 tested positive for COVID on 1/18/23. R1's Medical Record, including Nurse's Notes, does not document that R1's Physician, Nurse Practitioner, R1's resident representative or family was notified of COVID-19 status. 2. The Facility's COVID Positive Residents list documents R3 tested positive for COVID on 1/20/23. R3's Medical Record, including Nurse's Notes, does not document that R3's Physician, Nurse Practitioner, R3's resident representative or family was notified of COVID-19 status. 3. The Facility's COVID Positive Residents list documents R5 tested positive for COVID on 1/24/23. R5's Medical Record, including Nurse's Notes, does not document that R5's Physician, Nurse Practitioner, R5's resident representative or family was notified of COVID-19 status. 4. The Facility's COVID Positive Residents list documents R19 tested positive for COVID on 1/18/23. R19's Medical Record, including Nurse's Notes, does not document that R19's Physician, Nurse Practitioner, R19's resident representative or family was notified of COVID-19 status. On 2/1/23 at 12:30 PM, V33, Regional Administrator, stated, When a resident tests positive for COVID, I expect the nurse to document in the medical record that the resident's provider, either Nurse Ppractitioner or Physician was notified of their COVID positive status. The Facility's Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy revised 12/7/17 documents, The facility and/or facility staff shall promptly notify appropriate individuals (i.e. Administrator, DON [Director of Nursing], Physician, HCPOA [Healthcare Power of Attorney], etc.) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and document vital signs and lung sounds for res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and document vital signs and lung sounds for residents positive for COVID-19 per the facility COVID policy for 4 of 19 residents (R3, R11, R17, R18) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 19. Findings include: 1. R18's Medical Record dated 1/24/2023 at 11:30 AM documents staff notified her family that R18 was COVID positive. 1/24/2023 one completed COVID assessment completed, 1/25/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/26/2023 one completed COVID assessment and two incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/27/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/28/2023 one completed COVID assessments documented, 1/29/2023 one completed COVID assessment and one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/30/2023 one complete and two incomplete COVID assessments documented and 2/1/2023 one completed COVID assessment documented. On 1/31/2023 at 9:20 AM, R18's door was wide open and had an contact isolation sign on the door. R18 sat in her chair in her room and was coughing at that time of the observation. R18 wasn't interviewable, she didn't respond to the IDPH surveyors questions. 3. R3's Nurse's Notes dated 1/20/2023 at 1:00 documents resident tested positive COVID rapid swab. Nurse practitioner (NP) aware. R3's Medical Record documents 3 incomplete COVID assessments dated 1/20/2023, 1/21/2023 1 complete COVID assessment documented, 1/22/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/23/2023 through 1/25/2023 no COVID assessments documented, 1/26/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented. No other COVID assessments documented after 1/26/2023. On 1/31/2023 at 9:00 AM, R3 was observed with his door wide open. He was sitting in his wheelchair and his head was laying on his bed. R3 stated I feel like s**t on a shingle. R3 had a cough at that time. 4. R17's Nurse's Note dated 1/17/2023 at 2:00 PM documents resident tested positive for COVID NP notified. R17's Medical Record dated 1/17/2023 documents one completed COVID assessment, 1/18/2023 no COVID assessments documented, 1/19/2023 one completed COVID assessment documented, 1/20/2023 no COVIDassessments documented, 1/21/2023 one completed COVID assessment documented, 1/22/2023 one completed COVID assessment documented, 1/23/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment and two completed COVID assessment documented, 1/24/2023 one completed COVID assessment documented, 1/25/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/26/2023 one completed COVID assessment and two incomplete COVID assessments documented, 1/27/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/28/2023 no COVID assessments documented, 1/29/2023 one incomplete COVID assessment documented, 1/30/2023 2 incomplete COVID assessments documented. No other COVID assessment documented after 1/30/2023. On 2/2/23 at 4:10 PM, R17 was observed lying in bed in room watching television. No COVID symptoms observed. 5. R11's Nurse's Note dated 1/16/2023 at 5:00 PM documents res (resident) c/o complaint of feeling malaised (extremely tired.) Res noted to have a cough and runny nose. Resident noted to have low grade temp (temperature) of 99.1. This writer is agency and does not have access to computer program. This writer asked the 200 hall nurse to message MD (physician.) PRN (whenever necessary) APAP (Tylenol) administered to treat fever. No response from MD at this time. R11's Nurse's Note dated 1/17/2023 at 1:27 PM documents (+) COVID. No further assessment was documented. On 1/31/23 at 11:35 AM, R11 was observed lying in bed in her room. No COVID symptoms observed. R11's Medical Record documents one complete COVID assessment documented 1/17/2023, no COVID assessments documented 1/18/2023, one complete COVID assessment documented 1/19/2023, 2 complete COVID assessments documented 1/20/2023 at 1:00 PM, one complete COVID assessment documented 1/21/2023, one complete COVID assessment documented 1/22/2023, one complete and one incomplete COVID assessment documented 1/23/2023, one complete COVID assessment documented 1/24/2023, one incomplete COVID assessment documented 1/25/2023, one complete and 2 incomplete COVID assessments documented 1/26/2023, one incomplete COVID assessment documented 1/27/2023, one complete COVID assessment documented 1/28/2023, one incomplete COVID assessment documented 1/29/2023 and one incomplete COVID assessment documented 1/30/2023. On 2/1/2023 at 12:30 PM, V1, Administrator and V33, Regional Administrator, stated they expected staff to follow the facility policies including the COVID policies. V33 stated when a resident tests positive for COVID she expects staff to assess the resident once a shift and to document the assessment on the COVID form. The COVID form has symptoms of COVID for staff to check off and also assess the COVID positive resident's vital signs including blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respirations and lung sounds. The COVID assessment should be in the resident's medical record but some facilities have all resident COVID assessments on a clipboard at the nurse's station. Some nurses document the COVID assessment in the resident's nurse's. On 2/2/23 at 9:40 AM, V34, [NAME] County Health Department Nurse, stated, During a COVID outbreak at a residents should be monitored at least daily, including temperature, respiratory status, and pulse ox (oximetry). The Facility's COVID-19 Control Measures Policy, revised 11/7/2022 documents initiate temperature, pulse, respiration and pulse oximetry every shift, for all residents, when a resident has been confirmed positive for COVID-19, suspected of having COVID-19 or had prolonged close contact with someone with COVID-19. Increase monitoring of temperature, pulse, respiration, pulse oximetry and respiratory status for residents who have been confirmed with COVID-19 or suspected of having COVID-19, to every 4 hours.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide vaccination against COVID-19 for 5 of 5 consenting resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide vaccination against COVID-19 for 5 of 5 consenting residents (R1, R12, R13, R14, R15) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination in the sample of 19. Findings include: 1. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R16 is moderately cognitively impaired. R1's Resident COVID-19 Consent signed by R1 on 12/7/22 documents, As a resident of this facility, you are afforded the opportunity to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by CDC (Centers for Disease Control). According to our records, (R1) is due for COVID-19 vaccine. I am requesting that (R1) a resident of (Facility) receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The Facility's COVID Vaccination List for Residents provided on 1/31/23 does not document R1 has had any COVID-19 vaccinations. 2. R12's MDS dated [DATE] documents R12 is cognitively intact. R12's Resident COVID-19 Consent signed for R12 by V14, Social Services Director, on 11/28/22 documents, As a resident of this facility, you are afforded the opportunity to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by the CDC. According to our records, (R12) is due for COVID-19 vaccine. I am requesting that (R12) a resident of (Facility) receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The Facility's COVID Vaccination List for Residents provided on 1/31/23 does not document R12 has had any COVID-19 vaccinations. 3. R13's MDS dated [DATE] documents R13 is severely cognitively impaired. R13's Resident COVID-19 Consent given by Durable Power of Attorney via phone on 12/7/22 documents, As a resident of this facility, you are afforded the opportunity to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by the CDC. According to our records, (R13) is due for COVID-19 vaccine. I am requesting that (R13) a resident of (Facility) receive a COVID-19 vaccine and receive a COVID-19 booster. The Facility's COVID Vaccination List for Residents provided on 1/31/23 does not document R13 has had any COVID-19 vaccinations. 4. R14's MDS dated [DATE] documents R14 is moderately cognitively impaired. R14's Resident COVID-19 Consent initialed by R14 on 11/28/22 documents, As a resident of this facility, you are afforded the opportunity to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by CDC. According to our records, (R14) is due for COVID-19 vaccine. I am requesting that (R14) a resident of (Facility) receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The Facility's COVID Vaccination List for Residents provided on 1/31/23 does not document R14 has had any COVID-19 vaccinations. 5. R15's MDS dated [DATE] documents R15 is cognitively intact. R15's Resident COVID-19 Consent signed by R15 on 11/28/22 documents, As a resident of this facility, you are afforded the opportunity to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by CDC. According to our records, (R15) is due for COVID-19 vaccine. I am requesting that (R15) a resident of (Facility) receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The Facility's COVID Vaccination List for Residents provided on 1/31/23 does not document R15 has had any COVID-19 vaccinations. On 1/31/23 at 11:52 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, (R1, R12, R13, R14, and R15) all have consented to the COVID-19 vaccine. (V2), the Regional Director of Nursing, will be giving them when she is back in the Facility. I don't know why they were not given before. On 2/1/2023 at 12:30 PM, V33, Regional Administrator, stated she was unaware of any residents consenting to the COVID vaccine and not receiving it. She was unable to state how soon residents should be given the vaccine after consenting, but stated it should be done pretty quickly and two months was not an acceptable time frame. The Facility's COVID-19 Vaccine Policy and Procedure revised 11/7/22 documents, Nursing home leadership is responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining these policies and procedures. COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to all residents (or their representative if they cannot make health care decisions) and staff per CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines unless such immunization is medically contraindicated or the individual has already been immunized. The facility will maintain documentation for all residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, including the primary series, boosters and additional doses. The information to be documented includes: The staff person, resident or representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine. Whether the staff person, resident or their representative consented to the vaccine. If yes, which vaccine was administered, which dose was administered, any additional doses or boosters administered, date of vaccination. If no, reason for and documentation of refusal.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent/contain the spread of COVID-19 by failing to pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent/contain the spread of COVID-19 by failing to perform hand hygiene, keep biohazard containers closed, appropriately remove personal protective equipment (PPE), keep doors of COVID positive resident rooms closed, and ensure COVID positive residents appropriately wear a face mask while out of their room. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents dated 1/2023 documents 32 of 55 residents tested positive for COVID-19 between 1/17/2023 and 1/24/2023. The Facility's Infection Control Log, dated 1/2023 has no documentation of residents that were COVID-19 positive. On 1/31/2023 at 8:45 AM, cardboard boxes labeled biohazard were located in the hall near rooms 202, 204, 206, 301, 315, 316 and across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cardboard boxes had no lids and each box had soiled linen in it. All these rooms had a contact isolation sign on the door except room [ROOM NUMBER] which had a droplet isolation sign on the door. 1. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents R18 was COVID positive on 1/24/2023. On 1/31/2023 at 9:20 AM, R18's door was wide open and had a contact isolation sign on the door. R18 sat in her chair in her room and was coughing. R18 did not respond to questions. There was no isolation bin outside R18's room. 2. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents R5 and R6 were roommates, and both tested positive for COVID on 1/24/2023. On 1/31/2023 at 10:05 AM, V8, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated staff wear personal protective equipment (PPE) of goggles, gloves, gown and mask into COVID positive resident rooms and they remove the gown and gloves when they exit the room and place it in the biohazard box outside of the resident's rooms. V8 had on an N95 mask and goggles at the time of the interview. On 1/31/2023 at 10:20 AM, R5 was sitting up in her wheelchair in the hallway, her face mask hung from her chin. On 1/31/2023 at 10:40 AM, V8, CNA propelled R5 from the 200 hall nurse's station to R5's room. V8 entered R5's room failing to don a gown or gloves and closed R5's door behind her. At 10:45 AM, V8 exited R5's room and failed to wash her hands or use hand sanitizer. On 1/31/2023, R5's resident room door was observed in the open position at 10:20 AM and 1:00 PM. On 2/2/2023 R5's resident room door was observed in the open position at 9:10 AM. 3. On 1/31/2023 at 10:15 AM, V9, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), had an N95 mask on and donned a disposable gown and gloves then entered R7's room. R7's room had a contact isolation sign on the door. V9 exited R1's room with the same disposable gown on, walked to the 200 hall nurse's station and back to R7's room and threw the disposable gown in a trash barrel outside of R1's room. V9 didn't wash her hands or use hand sanitizer after exiting R7's room. 4. On 1/31/2023 between 9:40 and 10:10 AM, V10, Housekeeper, entered rooms across from the 200 hall nurse's station. V10 entered resident's rooms with contact isolation signs on the door including R2's, R7's, and R8's rooms with no gown, gloves or goggles on. V10 went in and out of isolation rooms with a broom and mop. V10 didn't wash his hands or use hand sanitizer after leaving each resident isolation room. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents R8 tested positive for COVID on 1/23/2023 and R2 and R7 tested positive for Covid on 1/24/2023. 5. On 1/31/2023 at 9:00 AM, R3's door to his room was wide open. R3 was sitting in his wheelchair with his head laying on his bed. R3 stated I feel like s**t on a shingle. R3 had a cough at that time. R3's roommate, R4 stated they both have COVID and they are on lockdown. On 1/31/2023, R3's room door was observed wide open at 12:58 PM and 1:30 PM. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents R3 and R4 tested positive for COVID on 1/20/2023. 6. On 1/31/2023 at 3:30 PM, V35, Registered Nurse (RN) was in the doorway of R1 and R16's room. There was a droplet isolation sign on the door. R1 and R16's door was wide open, and the medication cart was in front of the door. V35 had on gown, gloves and an N95 mask, she wasn't wearing goggles. Observation of V35 in R1 and R16's room showed she didn't change gloves, wash her hands or apply hand sanitizer between providing care to the residents. V35 exited the room with the gown on, then removed it in the hallway and placed it in a barrel that wasn't labeled biohazard. V35 stated there are 2 residents (R1 and R16) in the room and both residents have COVID. V35 didn't wash her hands or apply hand sanitizer after leaving R1 and R16's room. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents residents R1 and R16 tested positive for COVID on 1/18/2023. On 1/31/2023 at 12:45 PM V15, Housekeeping Supervisor, stated he washes all plastic bags that come into the laundry room and not in a barrel separately than the individual bags because the individual bags come from the biohazard cardboard boxes and they are from COVID positive residents. He washes Covid bags of soiled clothes twice and they do not intermingle COVID + residents' and COVID negative residents' clothes together. On 1/31/2023 at 3:45 PM, V15 stated he had no knowledge of staff putting gowns from COVID positive resident rooms in a laundry barrel, that would be washed with non-COVID resident clothes and therefore would cross contaminate that's why COVID positive laundry should be placed in the biohazard box which is located outside the resident's room. On 2/2/23 at 9:40 AM, V34, [NAME] County Health Department Nurse, stated, We were not informed of any COVID positive staff members or residents at (Facility). They should have called us so we could enter the information in the state database. They should have been sending us line lists daily. Staff should be wearing full PPE, including N95 respirators, gown, gloves, and eye protection. If a resident with suspected or known COVID had to leave the room for any reason, they should be wearing a mask. Observations dated 1/31/2023 through 2/2/2023 showed no alcohol-based hand gel available at the facility. On 1/31/2023 at 8:30 AM, V1, Administrator, stated V2, Regional Director of Nurses (DON), comes to the facility a few times a week and V3, is the Interim weekend DON. V4 is an LPN and the Resident Care Coordinator. V1 stated she believes V2 notified the department of health regarding the COVID outbreak and they stated to do normal protocol. V1 stated V2 and V3 share the role of the facility's infection control preventionist. On 2/1/2023 at 12:30 PM, V33, Regional Administrator, stated she is at the facility a few times a month, she has no set schedule or rotation, she has multiple facilities that she goes to and tries to be at each facility at least one or two days a month. V33 stated staff are expected to wear a gown, goggles/face shield, and gloves when they enter a COVID positive resident's room. V33 state the Facility's COVID transmission rate has been high/substantial for the month of January 2023 so when staff are within 6 feet of a COVID positive resident she expects staff to wear goggles or a face shield. The biohazard boxes do not have to have a red liner in them laundry knows which resident's laundry is COVID positive versus COVID negative residents because all COVID positive residents' laundry is delivered to the laundry room in bags and COVID negative residents laundry are delivered to the laundry room in a barrel. V33 stated she was not aware staff put gowns they wore in the COVID positive resident's room in a barrel because then laundry staff wouldn't know to wash the linen separately and not cross contaminate with COVID positive residents laundry. V33 stated V2 and V3 share the infection control preventionist title and responsibilities. V33 stated she didn't know why 32 resident contracted COVID from January 17th through January 24th, 2023. V33 stated a lot of times people don't have symptoms of COVID and the 200 hall residents are active in the community so they have out of facility outings often which could have introduced COVID to the building. V33 stated she expected staff to follow all facility policies including all COVID policies. The Facility's COVID-19 Control Measures Policy, revised 11/7/2022 documents purpose: to prevent transmission of the COVID-19 virus and to control outbreaks. Ensure availability of supplies including alcohol-based hand gel. All healthcare personnel (HCP) are to perform hand hygiene upon entrance to the facility, prior to entering a resident room, when exiting a resident's room and after direct contact with residents or potentially contaminated surfaces (high touch areas.) In the event of a facility outbreak, all HCP must wear N95 masks and eye protection when caring for all residents and/or are in the area where they may encounter residents, until initial testing indicates that no further cases are present. If an additional resident or HCP has a positive test during initial outbreak testing, HCP must continue to wear an N95 mask and eye protection until 14 days have passed with no further positive cases. For facilities residing in a county where the Community Transmission Level is high, HCP providing services to residents and/or in a resident care area, must wear a facemask and eye protection. When Community Transmission Levels are high, residents out in the facility or in the presence of others, should be encouraged to wear a face covering, especially if the resident is at high risk for severe illness. If a resident is unable to wear a face covering, then a face shield could be utilized. Change gloves and gowns after contact with a resident and perform hand hygiene. Wear an N95 mask, gloves, gown eye protection when entering a room or when working within 6 feet of residents on droplet precautions. Remove PPE when leaving the resident's room and perform hand hygiene. Doors should remain closed for residents who have a positive Antigen or PCR or are suspected of having COVID-19. Maintain Infection Control Logs. Review tracking daily for any patterns or trends. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents Form (CMS 672), dated 1/31/2023, documents that the facility has 55 residents living in the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0886 (Tag F0886)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to perform COVID-19 testing in accordance with the Facility COVID-19 T...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to perform COVID-19 testing in accordance with the Facility COVID-19 Testing Policy. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: The Facility's Staff Covid Positive List provided on 2/1/23 documents V16, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA), and V17, Therapy Staff, tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/17/2023. From 1/19/23 to 1/24/23, V1, Administrator, V7, CNA, V15, Housekeeping Supervisor, and V18-V20, CNA's, also tested positive for COVID-19. The Facility's Resident Covid Positive List provided on 1/31/23 documents 32 residents tested positive for COVID-19 from 1/17/23 to 1/24/23. On 1/31/23 at 8:30 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, (V4, Resident Care Coordinator/Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) is responsible for testing residents and staff for COVID, and she's not here today. They are testing residents and staff twice a week, but I don't know which days. (V4) will be able to tell you. I believe (V2), Regional Director of Nursing, notified the health department regarding the outbreak, and they told us to follow our normal protocol. On 2/1/2023 at 9:45 AM, V4 stated she started working at the facility on 1/16/2023 at which time there were no COVID positive residents in the Facility. V4 stated she was training on 1/16/23 and 1/17/23, then COVID hit the fan on 1/18/23. 14 stated, (V16), CNA didn't feel well and tested positive for COVID. I started testing residents for COVID on 1/18/23. To my knowledge, the floor nurses were responsible for testing staff. V4 pointed to the Facility's Midnight Census report and stated, I put a check mark next to residents that tested negative and circled the residents who tested positive. On 2/1/23 at 12:30 PM, V33, Regional Administrator, stated, When staff or residents test positive for COVID, it is considered day zero. They start testing all staff and residents 24 hours later, then on days 3 and 5. On 2/2/23 at 9:40 AM, V34, [NAME] County Health Department Nurse, stated, We were not informed of any COVID positive staff members or residents at (Facility). Testing should have been done after 24 hours, then again in 48 hours, if negative, and then again in 48 hours, if negative, so basically days 1, 3 and 5. Testing of residents and staff should have been done regardless of vaccination status. The Facility was unable to provide documentation of COVID-19 staff testing for the first five days of the outbreak, 1/17/23-1/22/23, or for 1/28/23. The Facility provided documentation for resident testing on 1/17/23, 1/18/23, 1/20/23, and 1/24/23. There was no documentation for 1/22/23 which would have been Day 5 of the outbreak. The Facility's Staffing Sheet dated 1/23/23 documents V22, CNA, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), V24-V25, CNA's, and V26-V27, LPN's, worked at the Facility on 1/23/23. The Facility's Staff COVID Testing List does not document any COVID-19 test results for V22-V27. The Facility's Staffing Sheet dated 1/24/23 documents V9, LPN, V20, CNA, V26, CNA, V28, LPN, V29, LPN, V30, CNA, and V31, CNA, worked at the Facility on 1/24/23. The Facility's Staff COVID Testing List does not document any COVID-19 test results for V9, V20, V26, or V28-V31. The Facility's Staffing Sheet dated 1/25/23 documents V7-V8, CNA's, V12, LPN, and V18, CNA, worked at the Facility on 1/25/23. The Facility's Staff COVIDTesting List does not document any COVID-19 test results for V7-V8, V12, or V18. The Facility provided a hand written Facility Testing for COVID list that was not dated and contained only the first name of day shift employees. There were 9 employee names listed with (-) beside each name. The column listed Eve (Evening) Shift did not list any names. On 2/1/23 at 12:30 PM, V1, Administrator, stated she expects staff to follow all policies regarding COVID. The Facility's Testing of Staff and Residents Policy revised 11/7/22 documents, Purpose: To enhance efforts to keep COVID-19 from entering and spreading through our facility. Upon notification of a single new case of facility associated COVID-19 infection in any staff member or resident, all staff and residents should have a series of (3) three viral tests. The first test should be completed, not earlier than 24 hours from time of exposure, if negative repeat testing 48 hours after initial test and if negative after 2nd test, repeat testing in another 48 hours. (This will usually be days 1, 3, and 5 with date of exposure being day 0). Facility must document date resident or staff member was tested and type of testing used (Antigen/PCR), the date test results received and results of the test. For an outbreak of COVID-19 (1 confirmed test for COVID-19 of a HCP (health care provider) or a resident), facility must document the date the case was identified, the date that all residents and staff are tested, type of testing used and the results of the testing. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents Form, (CMS 672), dated 1/31/2023, documents there are 55 residents living in the Facility.
Nov 2022 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to assess and conduct root cause analysis of falls and implement progre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to assess and conduct root cause analysis of falls and implement progressive interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 falling and sustaining a hip fracture. Findings include R2's Cumulative Diagnoses Log in R2's paper medical record undated documents diagnoses of essential hypertension, cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and schizophrenia. R2's Cognitive assessment dated [DATE] document, R2 was severely impaired for cognition and activities of daily living. R2's Psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] and 9/22/2022 document R2 has severe impairment in judgement, and safety awareness. R2's Discharge Evaluation dated 2/16/2022 and 9/22/2022 document R2 was forgetful and had safety awareness. R2's Discharge Evaluation dated 6/27/2022 and 9/22/2022 document R2 has a history of falls in the last 30 days. R2's Medical Records does not have a Fall assessment completed for R2 before 9/7/2022. R2's emergency room visit dated 3/1/2022 documents, Chief complaint: Fall. Patient is a [AGE] year-old male presenting to our facility after he slipped out of a chair at a nursing home. I spoke with the nurse at the facility, and she states that the patient was found on the floor near to his wheelchair as if he had slipped out of the chair this morning. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 4/27/222 documented Resident was in the T.V. room when I heard resident fall. It was unwitnessed. Full assessment done. The Nurse's Note did not document R2 sustained injury from this fall. R2's Care Plan was not revised with any interventions to address R2's fall on 4/27/22 or progressive interventions to prevent future falls. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] document R2 was severely impaired for cognition. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 5/20/2022 at 5:20 PM, documents Resident fell in hallway, trying to walk, unwitnessed fall. The Nurse's note documented neuro checks were started and family and physician were notified. The Nurse's Note did not document what the facility put into place after this fall to prevent R2 from future falls. R2's Nurse's Notes dated 5/20/2022 at 5:30 PM, Resident got out of bed and fell again. EMT (Emergency Medical Technician) called to transport to hospital. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 5/20/22 at 10:15 PM, documented R2 had no injuries and would be returning to the facility. R2's Care Plan does not document this fall and his medical records do not document any progressive interventions for either of his two falls on 5/20/2022. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 5/23/2022 at 5:35 AM, document Environmental manager reported resident was on the floor, this nurse assessed resident and found abrasion on right side lower back, MD, DON, Administrator and (family) notified. The Note documents EMT (Emergency Medical Technician) called and left facility at 3:50 PM to transfer to (Hospital). R2's Nurse's Notes dated 5/23/2022 at 10:21 PM, documents Placed a call to (Hospital) to check on resident status. Spoke to his nurse and was informed resident was admitted c (with) hip fx. (fracture), subacute CVA et (and) fall. R2's Care Plan and Medical Records does not document any progressive interventions for R2's fall on 5/23/2022. R2's Hospital Procedure Note dated 5/24/2022 document a displaced right hip femoral neck fracture subacute. R2's Hospital Discharge Records dated 5/29/2022 at 1:42 PM, documents, Visit reason: Right hip fracture, CVA subacute fall. Medical Problem: Closed displaced fracture of the neck of right femur, acute cerebrovascular accident, fall. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 8/29/22 at 4:10 PM, documents FOF (found on floor) on knees in dining room. No injuries to pt.'s (patient's) knees. See incident report for falls. The facility had no documentation of this incident report to review. R2's Care Plan was not revised after this incident to address progressive interventions to prevent R2 from potential future falls. R2's Nurse's Note, dated 9/1/22 at 3:40 PM documents Resident FOF (found on floor), assessed no apparent injuries. Assisted to w/c (wheelchair) per (full body mechanical) lift accompanied by multiple staff. R2's Care Plan, revised on 9/1/22, documents r/t (related to) fall, pressure alarm for chair. R2's Hospice Discharge summary dated [DATE] document under health history- history of falling. Summary of Care: Patient admitted to hospice after sustaining a fall and broken hip. During hospital admission patient found to have CVA (cerebral vascular accident). R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 17 (Score of 10 points or more equal to high risk for falls). R2's Progress's Notes dated 9/7/2022 document, Resident was sitting in wheelchair in TV room and chair alarm sounded. This nurse went to assist resident to scoot back in his wheelchair, resident fell forward onto floor. Resident did not hit his head and no visible injuries were observed. R2's Care Plan, revised on 9/7/22, documented r/t fall, pressure alarm for chair (and) keep in visual when out of bed. R2's Quality Improvement Review Note dated 10/6/2022 at 9:00 AM, documents, IDT meeting held related to fall 10/5/2022 with small abrasion to right forehead. Resident dizzy, neuro checks were initiated. Resident sent to ER (emergency room) for evaluation and returned. Continue with neuro checks. Reeducated resident of the importance of using a call light for assistance. There is no documentation in R2's Nurse's Note that R2 fell on [DATE]. There is no documentation of R2's fall on 10/5/2022 on the facility's fall log. R2's Medical Records do not have any other documentation including the incident reports documenting this fall. R2's Care Plan was not revised after this fall with progressive interventions to prevent future falls. On 11/10/2022 at 9:35 AM, the facility provided an incident report and R2 was documented for an incident on 9/1/2022 at 3:35 PM, fall in dining room, no injury and 9/17/2022 at 3:00 PM, falling at Recreation Room, No injury. No other incident reports were provided. There was no documentation in R2's medical record he fell on 9/17/22. On 11/10/2022 at 2:41 PM, V8, Corporate assisting with Director of Nursing duties stated, For any fall I would expect staff to notify the physician and Power of Attorney of the fall and wait for orders from the doctor. All falls should be charged in the Nurse's Notes and all falls should be addressed at the Quality Assurance Meetings and the Care Plan updated to address the fall. On 11/10/2022 at 2:52 PM, V1, Administrator stated, Whenever a resident falls I expect all staff to assess the residents, get the resident comfortable, complete a nursing report, notify the physician and POA and incorporate any follow up with any physician orders. I expect this to all be documented in the Nurse's Notes and fall reporting. We do a quality assurance every morning and we do updates and would address any falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator would then update the care plan to reflect the care and interventions that were put in place. I am not sure why those things are not in place for (R2). This is the only Care Plan we have for (R2). On 11/10/2022 at 3:03 PM, V10, Speech Therapist stated, Physical Therapy staff have already left for the day. I worked with (R2) a little but he was very confused and was not able to communicate with me except yes or no questions and his answers would always fluctuate. He had some severe communication deficits. I am not sure if he could tell you what was going on with him. Again, very confused. On 11/15/2022 at 11:29 AM, V11, Family of R2 stated, My father had a history of falls, and he could not verbally speak or tell you what was going on with him. Whenever he would fall, I would get a call telling me he had fallen but I never had any Care Plan meetings talking about his falls or anything the facility was doing to make sure he was safe and anything they were doing to prevent him for falling. Then he kept falling and fell and broke his hip. On 11/15/2022 at 11:48 AM, V3, Registered Nurse stated, I work, by choice. I am the Registered Nurse working here all but maybe 2 or 3 days a month. I usually worked weekends too. We currently do not have a full time Director of Nursing. (R2) was unsteady on his feet before his amputation. He could not talk to you really and he had some good days and bad days. Some days he could answered 'yes ma'am' to you other days he could not respond. I do not remember anything related to if he was at a fall risk or if he had any falls with injury honestly, I do not remember. On 11/15/2022 at 12:13 PM, V12, Nurse Practitioner stated, For any falls I would expect the facility to contact us, document the falls in the Nurse's Notes and address interventions and always document in the Care Plan. I am not sure what happened with (R2) and why his falls were not documented. The Facility Fall Policy with a revision date of 11/10/2018 documents, To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. Assessments of Fall Risk will be completed by the admission nurse at the time of admission. Appropriate interventions will be implemented for residents determined to be at high risk at the time of admission for up to 72 hours. The admitting nurse will assign the temporary risk category. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. The unit nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the nurse's notes or on an AIM for Wellness form along with any new intervention deemed to be appropriate at the time. The unit nurse will also place any new intervention on the CNA (certified nursing assessment) assignment worksheet. Report all falls during the morning Quality Assurance meetings Monday through Friday. All falls will be discussed in the Morning Quality Assurance meeting and any new interventions will be written on the care plan.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was working in the facility on 11/1/2022 and that there was a full time Director of Nursing (DO...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was working in the facility on 11/1/2022 and that there was a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Staffing schedules were reviewed from 11/1/2022 to 11/9/2022 and document there was no RN coverage on 11/1/2022. On 11/9/2022 at 8:30 AM, V3, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, I work, by choice, all month, all but maybe 2 or 3 days a month. I usually work weekends too. (V1, Administrator) is really good about calling people if we have anyone call off. I am the only RN working in the building. But we do have corporate working as the interim Director of Nursing (DON). (V2, Interim DON) and (V8, Corporate Nurse) share the hours for the DON position. During this survey on 11/9/2022 V3, RN was the only Registered Nursing working in the facility. There was no DON working in the building. On 11/9/2022 at 1:39 PM, V1, Administrator stated, We did not have a RN working on 11/1/2022. (V3) is really good about working but we are in the process of trying to hire more Registered Nurses and a full time Director of Nursing (DON). On 11/9/2022 at 2:28 PM, V8, Corporate stated, I know we are supposed to have a RN working at least eight hours a day, seven days a week. We did not have any RN coverage on 11/1/2022. We have an interim DON and I work a couple days and week and (V2) works a couple days of week. We are hoping to hire a DON soon. The Facility Assessment, dated 9/9/2022, documents, To ensure a thoroughness, individuals involved in the facility assessment should at a minimum include an administrator, a representative of the governing body, the medical director, and the director of nursing. Review expectations for minimum staff requirements at the federal and state level. Federal law requires nursing homes to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents, to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 11/9/2022 documented the facility had a census of 61 residents. The CMS 672 documented of the 61 residents 28 residents are on urinary toileting program, 28 residents are occasionally incontinent of bladder, and 17 occasionally or frequently incontinent of bowel. The CMS 672 documents 1 resident is bedfast all or most of time, 34 residents are in a chair all or most of the time, and 34 residents needs assistance with ambulation or assistive devices. The form also documents there are 50 residents on psychoactive medication, 35 antipsychotic medication, 20 residents on antianxiety medication, 38 on pain medication 1 resident needing suctioning, 13 residents needing injections, and 10 residents needing respiratory treatments.
Oct 2022 10 deficiencies 3 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely identify, assess, monitor and provide treatment...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely identify, assess, monitor and provide treatments for pressure ulcer treatment and prevention for 1 of 3 residents (R59) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R59 developing 3 facility acquired pressure ulcers requiring a right above the knee amputation. Findings Include: R59's Facesheet documents admission to facility on 2/3/2021 with diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension with heart failure, dysphagia following cerebral infarction (stroke). R59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R59 is at risk for pressure ulcers but had no pressure ulcers present. R59's MDS also documents he is totally dependent on staff for bed mobility and all ADLs (activities of daily living), and has impairment on lower extremity one side. R59's Nursing Assessment sheet dated 5/29/2022 has no documentation of pressure ulcers. R59's Physician Order Sheets (POS) dated 5/29/2022 documents skin checks weekly Sunday 2-10 (on evening shift). R59's Nurse's notes dated 5/2/22-6/4/22 have no documentation of the presence of any issues with R59's heels. R59's Nurse's notes dated 6/5/2022 documents (R59) has 2 pressure ulcers to bilateral heels. Left heel 7X5 (w), 3X3 (L), Right 3X10 (w), 7X3 (L) with eschar. R59's Nurse's notes dated 6/5/2022 documents, Clean right and left heel ulcers with normal saline and apply Neosporin ointment and non adhesive dressing daily for 5 days. R59's Physician Order (PO) also documents this same order. R59's PO dated 6/6/2022 documents, Povidine iodine 10% solution apply to left and right heel daily. R59's 6/2022 Treatment Administration Records (TAR) Weekly Summary documents 6/5/2022 Right heel- pressure ulcer 3x10 (w), 7x3 (L) Eschar, Left heel- pressure ulcer 7x5 (w) 3x3 (L) red and inflamed. No other documentation of weekly summary of pressure ulcers on 6/2022 TAR. R59's Nurse's notes dated 6/6/2022 documents (R59) has black mark on left heel and red mark on right heel. (Wound doctor) viewed marks and ordered betadine to both heels daily. R59's Nurse's Notes, dated from 6/7/22-10/9/22, have nothing documented about R59's bilateral heel pressure ulcers. R59's 7/2022 TAR has no documentation of weekly summary of pressure ulcers. R59's TARs regarding weekly skin checks shows no skin checks completed on 6/12/2022, 6/19/2022, 6/26/2022, 7/3/22, 8/7/22, 8/14/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/17/2022, 9/24/2022. R59's TAR regarding betadine to bilateral heels shows no treatments on 6/17/2022, 6/20/2022, 6/26/2022, 6/30/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/11/2022, 9/12/2022, 9/13/2022, 9/14/2022, 9/15/2022, 9/16/2022, 9/17/2022, 9/18/2022, 9/19/2022, 9/21/2022, 9/22/2022, 9/23/2022, 9/24/2022, 9/25/2022, 9/26/2022. R59's Wound physician notes dated 8/2/2022 document Site 1 Unstageable DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin of greater than 73 days duration. Wound size 2 x 3 x Not measurable cm (centimeters). Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable DTI of the Right heel partial thickness with intact skin of greater than 62 days duration. Wound size 4 x 5 x Not measurable cm. Continue betadine twice daily. Etiology of both: pressure. Factors complicating wound healing: Diabetes Mellitus. This was the first visit by wound physician. https://npiap.com/page/PressureInjuryStages documents the definitions, Unstageable Pressure Injury: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar. If slough or eschar is removed, a Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injury will be revealed. Stable eschar (i.e. dry, adherent, intact without erythema or fluctuance) on the heel or ischemic limb should not be softened or removed. Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration Intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration or epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood filled blister. Pain and temperature change often precede skin color changes. Discoloration may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone-muscle interface. The wound may evolve rapidly to reveal the actual extent of tissue injury, or may resolve without tissue loss. If necrotic tissue, subcutaneous tissue, granulation tissue, fascia, muscle or other underlying structures are visible, this indicates a full thickness pressure injury (Unstageable, Stage 3 or Stage 4). R59's Wound physician notes dated 8/9/2022 document Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. Continue betadine twice daily. No change in wound size or wound progress. Site 2 Unstageable due to necrosis of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Surgical excisional debridement procedure performed on right heel wound. R59's Wound physician notes dated 8/16/2022 document Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. Wound size 2 x 1 x not measurable cm. Continue betadine twice daily. Wound progress: improved. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound size 4 X 5 X not measurable cm. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Wound physician notes dated 8/23/2022 documents Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Wound physician notes dated 8/30/2022 documents Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound size 4 X 4 X not measurable cm. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. Wound progress: improved. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Wound physician notes dated 9/6/2022 documents Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Nurse Practitioner progress notes dated 9/8/2022 documents Skin normal temp and color. R59's Nurse Practitioner progress notes dated 9/12/2022 documents Skin normal temp and color. R59's Wound physician notes dated 9/14/2022 documents Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Wound physician notes dated 9/20/2022 documents Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left lateral heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. Surgical excisional debridement procedure performed on right heel wound. Site 3 new Unstageable DTI of the left medial heel partial thickness with intact skin of greater than 2 days duration. Wound size 3 x 3 x not measurable cm. Etiology: pressure. Betadine twice daily. R59's Care Plan, start date 9/20/2022 and reviewed 9/22/22, documents Pressure Ulcer Present. Braden score 21 (Total score of 12 or less represents HIGH RISK for pressure ulcer). Risk factors include incontinent of bowel and bladder and needing assistance for transfers. Interventions include, assess for cause of pressure of pressure ulcer. Observe for pressure cause friction and contributing factors. Complete avoidable/Unavoidable pressure ulcer assessments as needed to investigate contributing factors and preventions interventions used. Nurse to measure and monitor wound status progression or deterioration every week. Notify Medical Doctor (MD) and family of changes, Document physician response. Treatments as ordered. Pressure relieving device in wheelchair and pressure reducing mattress. Pressure reduction boot when in wheelchair. Float heels when in bed. Skin risk assessment. Braden scale weekly for 4 weeks upon admission or readmission and then quarterly and as needed. R59's medical record has no documentation of a Pressure Ulcer Care Plan prior to the one initiated on 9/20/22 although R59 was identified with pressure ulcers on 6/5/22. R59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R59 is at risk for pressure ulcers, has 3 unstageable pressure injuries presenting as deep tissue injuries, none of which were present on admission. R59's MDS also documents he is totally dependent on staff for bed mobility and all ADLs (activities of daily living), and has impairment on lower extremity one side. R59's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) regarding weekly skin checks shows no skin checks completed on 6/12/2022, 6/19/2022, 6/26/2022, 7/3/22, 8/7/22, 8/14/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/17/2022, 9/24/2022. R59's TAR regarding betadine to bilateral heels shows no treatments on 6/17/2022, 6/20/2022, 6/26/2022, 6/30/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/11/2022, 9/12/2022, 9/13/2022, 9/14/2022, 9/15/2022, 9/16/2022, 9/17/2022, 9/18/2022, 9/19/2022, 9/21/2022, 9/22/2022, 9/23/2022, 9/24/2022, 9/25/2022, 9/26/2022. R59's Wound physician notes dated 9/27/2022 document Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left lateral heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. Wound size 3.8 X 4.1 X not measurable cm. Wound progress: improved. Add Alginate Calcium with Kerlix (gauze wrap) once daily, Change betadine to once daily. Surgical excisional debridement procedure performed on right heel wound. Site 3 Unstageable DTI of the left medial heel partial thickness with intact skin. Wound size 3 x 2.8 x not measurable cm. Wound progress: improved. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Physician Order Sheets dated 9/27/2022 documents Right heel betadine and alginate and gauze wrap daily. R59's Wound physician notes dated 10/4/2022 document Site 1 Unstageable DTI of the left lateral heel partial thickness with intact skin. Wound size 1.6 x 1 x not measureable. Wound progress no change. Continue betadine twice daily. Site 2 Unstageable (due to necrosis) of the right heel full thickness. Wound has thick adherent black necrotic tissue 100%. Wound size 4 X 4 X not measurable cm. Wound progress: no change. Continue Alginate Calcium with Kerlix once daily and betadine once daily. Surgical excisional debridement procedure performed on right heel wound. Site 3 Unstageable DTI of the left medial heel partial thickness with intact skin. No change in wound size or wound progress. Continue betadine twice daily. R59's Nurse Practitioner progress notes dated 10/10/2022 documents presents for nursing report that Right heel wound has increased drainage and odor. Nursing reports he has been followed by (Wound Consultant) for wound care. Skin: right heel with large unstageable wound moderate amount of serosanguinous drainage, right foot is red and warm to touch, + odor. Left heel with blister and blister to left great toe. Assessment and plan: right and left heel wound: concern for sepsis vs osteomyelitis. Transfer to ER (emergency room) for further care of wounds to bilateral heels. R59's Nurse's notes dated 10/10/2022 (R59) sent to ER due to wound on right heel having a foul order. R59's Hospital H&P (history and physical): HPI History of Present Illness report dated 10/10/2022 at 4:15PM documents Chief Complaint right foot wound. It continues, R59 presents for evaluation of a malodorous, nonhealing right foot wound. Plan x rays of the foot showed multiple pockets of gas and recommends were to proceed with right above the knee amputation urgently. It further documents a right above the knee amputation was performed without complications. Assessment and plan 1. Severe sepsis 2. Necrotizing soft tissue infection 3. Diabetic infection of right foot: Status post above-the-knee amputation. He has large unstageable pressure ulcer on the left heel. R59's hospital discharge Patient Signature Page, given to patient on 10/13/22, documents R59 was seen for: Severe sepsis, cellulitis of right foot, acute hypernatremia. R59's Nurse's notes dated 10/13/2022 documents (R59) readmitted with right above the knee amputation (AKA). Waffle boot to left foot with heel protector. Stump sock to right AKA. On 10/19/2022 at 1:15PM, R59's right above the knee amputation Wound site was clean and dry with sutures intact. No drainage observed. Left heel appeared soft, intact and red with minimal drainage. On 10/20/2022 at 3:50PM, V20, Nurse Practitioner, stated, Our practice wasn't following (R59)'s wounds because he was being followed by a wound company. I am the one who sent (R59) out to the hospital. I asked the nurse taking care of (R59) the day he went out, how long his wound had smelled and she said just that day. It is hard to say if missing a treatment would have contributed to the gangrene. I would expect treatments to be completed as ordered. I would also expect the care plan to be updated so everyone is aware of changes. On 10/21/2022 @ 9:15AM, V4, Infection Preventionist, stated I was the nurse the day (R59) went out. Staff noticed the smell and thought (R59) just needed a shower. I had the Nurse Practitioner look at it and she sent him out. On 10/20/2022 at 2:30PM, V17, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated I knew his foot looked bad because it was black. It smelled terrible the day he went out. I didn't smell it before that. The Facility's Decubitus Care/ Pressure Areas policy and procedure, revised 1/2002, documents, Policy: To ensure a proper treatment program has been instituted and is being closely monitored to promote the healing of any pressure ulcer, once identified. It continues, Procedure: 1. Upon notification of skin breakdown, an Newly Acquired Skin Condition report will be completed and forwarded to the Director of Nurses. 2. The pressure area will be assessed and documented on the Pressure Sore Record form. And, 3. Notify the physician for treatment orders. 4. Documentation of the pressure area must occur upon identification and at least once each week on the Pressure Sore Record. 5. Reevaluate the treatment for response at least every two (2) to four (4) weeks. Most pressure areas will respond to treatment in this amount of time. If no improvement is seen in this time frame, contact the physician for a new treatment order. 7. Initiate problem on care plan.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for 1 of 4 residents (R111) reviewed for elopem...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for 1 of 4 residents (R111) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 42.This failure resulted in R111 leaving the facility on 12/11/2021 without any of the staff attempting to stop him or alerting any staff he was leaving. R111 left the facility unnoticed without staff intervention. Findings include: R111's Progress Notes dated 11/9/2022 at 6:36 PM, documents, Resident is a new admit from (Hospital). He was admitted on [DATE] for a fall. He was found in his garage. No injuries substantiated. Increased confusion noted from family. Diagnosis of: kidney disease, HIV positive, HTN (hypertension), nephrectomy. He is orientated to himself. He is ambulatory but has issues with balance. R111's Elopement Evaluation dated 11/9/2022 documents: Resident is able to exit the building; requires assistance once outside the building; poor decision making; inability to identify safety needs; severe mental illness. R11's Score 6, High Risk= 5-10. R111's Care Plan documents a diagnosis of dementia. R111's Cognitive Assessment for November 2022 documents R111 was moderately impaired for cognition. 111's Nutritional Assessment documents a diagnosis of altered mental status, dementia, malnutrition, nephrectomy and AIDS. R111's Psychosocial Social Service Progress Notes dated 12/3/2021, Resident entered Social Service Office to inquire about his car. Social Service Director (SSD) reminded resident that his car was at his house in the garage and SSD also reminded resident that resident was very thankful. R111's Care Plan with a start dated of 11/22/2021 documents (R111) discharge not feasible due to care needs. R111's care plan with a goal date of 3/12/2022 for Behavior documents, (R111) may seek to leave home. Related diagnosis include: Altered mental status due to metabolic encephalopathy. Desires discharge from facility. Brief Interview Mental Status of 9 (9 out of 15= moderately impaired cognition) on admission assessment. (R111) has a cell phone and is able to make and receive calls independently. Validate (R111's) desires to leave the facility. Allow him to verbalize feelings. Seek to resolve any concerns. Educate (R111) on the need to sign out of the facility if going out on leave. R111's Psychosocial Social Service Progress Notes dated 12/2/2021, Friend in facility visiting resident and he asked to speak with myself (V14) (SSD) friend came to SS (social service) office and introduced himself (V14) and he began providing information about resident's family and informed friend that family relationships was beyond my practice and that my jobs was to ensure that resident was taken care of while in our facility friend then stated that upon discharge that resident could move with him and his mother. SSD informed friend that she (SSD) would inform resident of his friend's offer and he was very thankful. Very thankful. R111's Nurse's Notes dated 12/11/2021 at 11:17 AM, I was informed that resident did not return from out on pass. I immediately drove to the facility at this time, already notified corporate, and called all department heads, resident's brother, and police while staff did an outdoor facility grounds and neighborhood search. Staff had thought resident went out on pass but not sure of the visitor he left with. On 10/21/2022 at 9:10 AM, V4, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, I remember I got a phone call in the middle of the night telling me (R111) was missing. Those are my notes in his chart documenting the elopement. We think (R111) left with a visitor. We have a locked door that needs a code in order to open the doors. We are not allowed to give the code out to anyone including visitors. We are supposed to assist them. We discussed it at the meeting and we do not know how (R111) got out of the facility. On 10/21/2022 at 12:34 PM, V28, Housekeeping/ Activities, stated, I remember working that night and I saw (R111) with his bags packed. He told me his boyfriend was coming to pick him up and take him home. I did not see him leave or help him with the code to get out. We are not to ever give out the door codes to visitors. I never questioned him about leaving or checking to see if he was okay to go home. I was pushing my laundry cart and just making conversation. R11's Incident Report dated 12/15/2021 document, On 12/11/2021 at 10:30 PM, staff reported that (R111) was out on a visit and had not returned to the facility. Investigations began immediately including notifications to police, physician and family. During this investigation, staff and alert residents were interviewed. Two housekeepers stated they saw (R111) leave out the door by Nurse's station rolling a Suit Case and was with another male whom was there visiting with (R111) around 2:30 PM. The oncoming Nurse received report from previous Nurse. The nurse that come on shift asked where the Resident was at because he was not in the room and the Nurse stated that the Resident was out on a visit and had not yet returned. When resident's brother was called to inquire when resident would be returning, he stated that (R111) was not with him and he was not sure who visited him earlier. The oncoming Nurse immediately contacted Administrator and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), to notify them that the resident was out of the facility and had not returned, head count completed and (R111) was not counted. Staff immediately looked outside, looked in all rooms, bathrooms, storage areas, closets, laundry area etc. Staff and alert residents were interviewed for possible sightings. Facility conducted a thorough search of the grounds including outdoor shed, staff members worked together to sweep each consecutive room to avoid possibility of resident moving to adjacent room undetected. ADON, Administrator was called immediately. Investigation began immediately including notification to police, physician and family. Staff searched parked cars, ditches, expanding search through the neighborhood by foot and car also. Police were given a description of resident and clothing worn and they immediately began assisting with search. Search was done of facility, grounds and expanding search through community by foot and car. Police notified the facility that they sent ping to the Residents cell phone to track his location. Administrator contacted every possible contact for the Resident. The following morning 12/12/2021 at 9:33 AM. (R111) made contact with facility Social Service (V10) and informed her that he was at his Residence and that he was safe. He informed Social Service that he left the facility with his friend on 12/11/2021 and that his friend will be staying with him and helping him at home. On 12/12/2021 at 9:33 AM, Social Service Director informed (R111) that she would meet him at his residence and the resident agreed to that. Resident informed SSD that he did not want to come back and that he wanted to stay at his residence with his friend. Resident signed Against Medical Advise (AMA) and gave the resident the rest of his belongings. Family, and Physician notified. R111's medical records does not document any outing visit he took on 12/11/2021. R111's Interdisciplinary Summary dated 12/11/2021, At facility calling resident family and friends. Family and friends did respond and stated that they hadn't heard from resident. Informed both parties to have resident call. Facility to confirm his safety. On 10/20/2022 at 11:34 AM, V10, Social Service Director, stated, When (R111) came into the facility, he had a lot of confusion. He was HIV positive, he had hypertension. He was very confused and was always wanting to know where his car was. He liked to play the piano and he would have visitors come and visit him. His son would come and other male friends. One Saturday in December, I got a call from (the former Administrator) because (R111) was missing. I was not working that day so I cannot say how he got out of the facility. All I know is that he got out on the afternoon because some housekeepers saw him leave the building with another person. As soon as I got the call, I came in and started call his cell phone and family. The family did not know where he was at. The next day, (R111) called me and told me he was safe and I went to his house. I never went inside his house. There was another man there and he was yelling out at me and telling me (R111) was not going back to our facility and he was going to take care of (R111). He (the other man) said he was staying with him (R111) and he (R111) was not going back. I tried to talk to (R111) and he nodded to everything the other man was saying. I do not know the name of the man that was yelling at me. I think it was his partner but that is just a guess. I asked (R111) if he wanted to come back and he shook his head 'no' and then (I) asked him to sign the Against Medical Advice (AMA) papers and he did and I left. R111's elopement and medical records do not document who was at R111's house and who stated they would be assisting with his care. There was no name or person identified by the facility assisting R111 with his care. On 10/21/2022 at 9:01 AM, V25, Activities, stated, I was working in the business office the day (R111) eloped. I do not know how he got out of the building. That night, I got a call telling us he was missing, but I was not aware of anything while I was working that Saturday. On 10/21/2022 at 9:46 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, I was not here working at the time (R111) eloped from the facility. I would expect statements to be included from staff working that day of what they saw and interviews documenting it. I would expect the administrator to view the cameras to see what happened and how (R111) even got out of the building. Staff are to never give out codes to visitors. Our cameras are only good for seven days so I cannot even tell you what was on the camera. I would expect staff to never give out codes and for staff to never assist a resident with leaving without checking with others to make sure they are cleared to leave. The Facility Missing Resident Policy with a revision dated 8/13/2014, documents, It is the policy of (Facility) that reasonable precautions are taken to minimize the risks of resident elopement attempts. Reasonable precautions include, but are not limited to door alarms, personal door alarm activities devices, staff intervention, staff education regarding response to door alarms and individual resident intervention. It is the policy of (Facility) to demand immediate response to elopement attempts, door alarm activation and participating in search attempts in the event that a resident is deemed missing. The Door Alarm Policy with a revision date of 10/2006 documents, It is the policy of the (Facility) to ensure resident safety and security through the use of door alarms. Door alarms require immediate attention and response by facility staff to ensure the safety of all residents. Disengaging the alarms is not allowed until the reason for activation is determined. Steps to be taken: Go directly to the door where the alarm is sounding. Go completely outside the door to view the environment. Initiate a search of the immediate area if no resident or visitor is visualized. Instruct visitor or vendors how to properly disengage the alarm before leaving the facility. Conduct an immediate count of all residents. Initiate the Missing Resident Policy when unable to account for all residents. B. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a safe transfer for a dependent resident for 1 of 6 residents (R9) reviewed for falls in the sample of 42.This failue resulted in R9 falling out of a full mechanical body lift. Findings include: R9's Nurses Notes dated 8/4/22 at 2:00 PM document, Resident had a fall. She fell out of the (full body mechanical lift) sling. Staff stated that one of the straps was not connected while lifting her up. She has bilateral 4 inches of scratches to elbow. No other injury noted. NP (Nurse Practitioner) was notified . She was in the building. Administrator was notified. Resident is on 15 minute checks and neurochecks. Resident is laying in bed at this time. X-rays was ordered to sacrum, coccyx, lumbar spine, x-rays bilateral elbows. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she is severely cognitively impaired. It also documents she is dependent on staff for transfers. R9's Care Plan dated 7/13/22 documents, (P) Problem: Resident has risk factors that require monitoring and intervention to reduce potential for self injury. (Consider medical conditions, sensory alterations, balance, gait, assistive devices, cognition, mood/behavior, safety awareness, compliance, medications, restrictions, restraints). A new approach added to this care plan dated 8/4/22 documents, Related to fall, staff to ensure that resident understands transfer process. On 10/19/22 at 1:35 PM, V7, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she was the nurse on 8/4/22 and documented R9's fall. V7 stated (V11) and (V12) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were transferring R9 when she had a fall from the full body mechanical lift. V7 stated R9 fell to the floor and she thinks R9 was caught and lowered to the floor by the CNAs. On 10/19/22 at 2:00 PM, V1, Administrator, presented R9's document, Quality Improvement Review dated 8/5/22 at 9:30 AM which documents, QA (Quality Assurance) committee meet to review fall on 8/4/22, staff reported resident fell out of (full body mechanical lift) sling b/c (because) one of the straps was not connected. Resident sustained bilateral scratches to elbow, no other injury noted. Resident complained of no pain or discomfort, was placed on 15 minute checks with neuro checks. Staff educated on transfer process and proper sling placement. X-rays were ordered with no findings. R9's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 22 indicating she is high risk of falls. R9's x-ray reports dated 8/4/22 of coccyx/ sacrum/lumbar region and right and left elbows document R9 did not have any fractures from her fall. On 10/19/22 at 3:48 PM, V11, CNA, during phone interview, stated she and another CNA (V12) were transferring R9 from her chair to the bed when R9 fell on 8/4/22. V11 stated V12 had attached the straps of the sling to the lift. V11 stated she was observing and controlling the remote to lift R9 out of her chair. V11 stated they had just lifted R9 and removed her chair from under her and one of the straps on the side of the sling just snapped out and R9 fell to the floor onto her butt. V11 stated R9 was not that high, but they were not able to slow her fall and she fell directly to the floor. V11 stated R9 had complained of pain to her elbows or ankles, she could not remember which, but any injury she sustained was minor. V11 stated she did not help transfer R9 from the floor to her bed but three staff lifted R9 from the floor without the mechanical lift and placed her in her bed. V11 stated she had not received any training on using the full body mechanical lift, but was just told briefly how to use it during her orientation. On 10/19/22 at 3:59 PM, V12 stated she and V11 were transferring R9 from her chair to her bed when R9 fell from the (full body mechanical lift). V12 stated R9 was already hooked up to the lift when she walked into R9's room. V12 stated that was her first day working in the facility and she did not know why they had V11 training her because V11 was a brand new CNA herself. V12 stated she thinks V11 had not hooked up the sling straps to the mechanical lift correctly and that is why R9 fell from the sling. V12 stated R9 was not very high in the air when she fell and she did not think R9 was injured. V12 stated she had experience using full body mechanical lifts during her time as a CNA but did not receive any instructions from the facility regarding their policy for using the lift. V12 stated after R9's fall, V7, LPN, did educate her and V11 on using the lift. V12 stated she, V7, LPN and V6, CNA, lifted R9 from the floor and put her into her bed after her fall. The facility's policy, Mechanical Lift revised 10/30/08 documents, Policy: The mechanical lift may be used to lift and move a resident with limited ability during transfer while providing safety and security for residents and nursing personnel. Under Procedure it documents, 9. Attach the appropriate colored loops on the bars.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for 1 of 25 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for medication (R8) in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R8's significant med errors of missing two doses of insulin with subsequent need for transfer to the emergency room (ER) due to elevated blood sugar. Findings include: R8's Undated Face Sheet documents she was admitted on [DATE]. R8's Care Plan, dated 4/15/2022 and reviewed 7/13/2022 R8's care plan did not address R8's had diabetes or any goals or approaches. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8 iscognitively impaired and has a diagnosis of diabetes. R8's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 9/26/2022 documents Lispro 5 units subq (subcutaneous) TID (three times a day) with meals breakfast and lunch. Glargine 20 units subq at bedtime (HS.) There was no sliding scale insulin order on the readmission POS dated 9/26/2022. R8's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 9/26/2022, documents Lispro 5 units subq TID with meals breakfast and lunch. There was no documentation Lispro insulin was administered at 4:00 PM on 9/26/2022 and no documentation glargine insulin 20 units was administered at 8:00 PM. R8's Nurse's Note, dated 9/26/2022, has no documentation of why R8 didn't receive the two doses. R8's Nurse's Notes dated 9/27/2022 at 11:20 AM document notified MD (physician) via internal electronic system of elevated blood glucose reading high. N.O. (new order) given to give 10 units Humalog subq now and to recheck reading in 1 hour. 12:30 PM rechecked resident blood glucose at this time. Blood glucose reading hi. Notified MD via internal electronic system. N.O. send to ER and give 5 units. 1:00 PM called EMS (Emergency Medical Services)/ambulance for transport. Called local hospital with report. Called 911 for transport. 1:32 PM Resident left facility via ambulance with emergency medical technicians (EMTs) x4. R8's ER Visit Note, dated 9/27/2022 documents HPI (history of present illness) patient is an [AGE] year-old female who presents ER with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar.) Apparently today at the nursing home her blood sugars have been running in the 400s and they cannot get it controlled with her new sliding scale insulin. Nursing home contacted and they did not give the patient (R8) her Lantus (glargine insulin) last night. Blood sugar coming down with 1 dose of insulin 10 units. We will have patient's home Lantus tonight and inform the nursing home that they can readminister tomorrow. Additional instructions: your blood sugar was elevated because you did not receive your Lantus last night. You were given your home Lantus dose while in the ER today. R8's POS, dated 9/26/2022 documents no physician's order for sliding scale insulin. On 10/20/2022 at 12:45 PM, V13, Consultant RN (Registered Nurse), stated she expects staff to administer medications per physician's orders. V13 stated when a resident is readmitted to the facility, she expects staff to document a nurse's note to state the resident was readmitted , so all staff know the resident is back in the facility. V13 stated the facility holds resident's bed and medications for 14 days when they are discharged . V13 stated the 14th day the medications are returned to the pharmacy. V13 stated if R8 was discharged on 9/12/2022 and readmitted on [DATE], that was 15 days so her medications would have to be reordered from the pharmacy and she expected the medications to be available at the facility within a few hours of the resident being back at the facility. V13 stated insulin is considered a significant medication because if the resident misses a dose of insulin the resident's blood sugar can quickly plummet. V13 stated she expected staff to either retrieve insulin from the facility's insulin emergency kit or call the pharmacy and get a STAT (immediately) run from the pharmacy to deliver the insulin so the resident doesn't miss a dose. When staff obtain insulin from the facility's emergency kit or contact pharmacy for a STAT delivery of insulin, she expects staff to document a nurse's note, so staff know what has been done to ensure the resident gets the physician prescribed medication. V13 stated if the box for the corresponding date is blank on the resident's MAR that means the medication wasn't administered. On 10/20/2022 at 3:45 PM, V20, Nurse Practitioner (NP), stated when a resident is readmitted to the facility if the resident was on the medication in the past, she expected the medication to be immediately available to the resident and if the medication was not available, she expected staff to utilize the facility's insulin emergency kit to ensure the physician order medication in a timely manner. V20 stated she expected staff to document physician's orders correctly and to administer insulin as prescribed. V20 stated she wasn't aware R8 missed two doses of insulin on 4/26/2022, she stated the insulin should have been available and administered per physician's orders. V20 stated insulin is considered a significant medication because of what can occur if the resident doesn't receive a scheduled dose which includes diabetic coma. The Facility's Medication Administration Policy revised 11/18/2017, documents each facility shall establish a policy for the routine time of medication administration. Medications must be prepared and administered within one hour of the designated time or as ordered. Medications must be identified by using the 7 rights of administration which includes right resident, right drug, right dose, right consistency, right time right route and right documenation. After a medication is given, record the date, time and name of drug, dose and route on the resident's individual MAR. Document any medications not administered for any reason by circling initials and documenting on the back of the MAR the date, the time, the medication and dosage and the reason for omission and initials. If the medication is not available for the resident, call the pharmacy and notify the physician when the drug is expected to be available. Nofiy the physician as soon as practical when a scheduled dose of a medication has not been administered for any reason.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents (R8) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42. Findings include: R8's Care Plan documents no documentation of injury of unknown origin or abuse was addressed on her care plan. R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documents resident is severely cognitively impaired, limited assistance of one-person physical assist for eating and bed mobility. Extensive assistance of one-person physical assistance for transfers, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Mobility device: wheelchair. On 10/18/2022 at 10:50 AM, R8 resident was sitting in wheelchair in her room. R8 had a dark purple bruise on her right hand, she was unable to say how the bruise occurred. R8 didn't know her name and responded, I'm fine to all questions asked. R8's Nurse's Note, dated 7/5/2022 at 4:35 PM documents, This nurse was in resident's room talking with her daughter I noticed a small amount of bright red blood on resident's sheet, pulled sheet back and noticed a circular wet blood and noticed a circular wet blood spot on geri glove, pulled back geri glove gently to reveal a purpura area to right forearm with a rolled back skin flap fresh and moist. NSS (normal saline solution) to roll skin flap almost all the way closed patted dry with gauze steri strips applied covered with non-adherent pag and covered with ABD pads x 2. 7:12 PM administrator notified. 7:19 PM NP (nurse practitioner) notified via the internal electronic system. R8's Nurse's Note, dated 7/11/2022 at 7:40 PM documents, Daughter visited and concerned about bruise on left bicep. Stated she will talk to administrator. Staff will continue to monitor. R8's Nurse's Note, dated 10/14/2022 at 9:24 AM documents, Notified MD (physician) of bruising and bleeding noted to lower right leg cleansed area and covered with dressing notified MD. N.O. (New Order) received for treatment notified family representative of skin tear to skin noted N.O. and also place on treatment MAR (medication administration record.) On 10/10/2022 at 2:00 PM, V1, Administrator, stated, I have no investigations regarding the skin tears or bruising that (R8) sustained for the last year. I guess I'm not able to rule out abuse if there are no investigations. On 10/20/2022 at 2:15 PM, V8, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN,) stated, I report bruises and skin tears to the administrator immediately and I follow the administrator's instructions as far as starting an investigation. On 10/20/2022 at 2:20 PM, V17, CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant), and V19, CNA, stated, When we find bruises or skin tears on a resident, we report it directly to the charge nurse and they report it to the administrator. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 11/28/2016, did not address injuries of unknown origin. The facility's Undated Policies & Procedure for Injuries of Unknown Origin documents all injuries of unknown origin will be investigated to determine the potential cause of the injury. Upon identification of the cause, interventions will be established to prevent any further injury by the IDT (interdisiplinary team) or Administrator. All injuries of Unknown Origin will be discussed at the daily QA (quality assurance) meeting. Upon identifying an injury of unknown origin, the following will be completed: assessment of the type of injury and how injury may have occurred, completion of Quality Care reporting form, completion of skin tear/bruise investigation report, notify the Administrator or the Director of Nursing (DON.) Assessment of the type of injury and how injury may have occurred. Possible abuse - begin following the Abuse Prevention Program.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly treat Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) with eff...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly treat Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) with effective antibiotics, and failed to provide complete and adequate incontinent care for 1 of 6 residents (R9) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) in the sample of 42. Findings include: On 10/18/22 at 11:45 AM, V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), donned gloves and pulled R9's pants down and off her legs. V6 then pulled tabs to open R9's incontinent brief and R9 was visibly soiled with bowel movement. V6 wiped R9's peri area with her soiled incontinent brief as he tucked the soiled incontinent brief down between her thighs and under her buttocks, pulling the incontinent brief from beneath her. When V6 pulled the incontinent brief from under R9, feces got on the mechanical lift sling that was still under R9. V6 wiped some of the fecal material off R9's buttocks and rectum, then rolled her back onto her back and onto the soiled sling. V6 removed his gloves which were visibly soiled with feces and donned new gloves without performing hand hygiene. V6 then took a soapy washcloth and wiped R9's right and left groin, wiping from back to front, and rewiping clean areas a second time with same soiled washcloth. V6 then wiped from back to front, starting around R9's rectum and wiping up and over her vagina with fecal material observed on the washcloth. V6 rewiped the area twice using the same back to front motion and re-contaminating R9's vaginal area with soiled wash cloth. V6 then rinsed the area with clean washcloths, using the same back to front motion. V6 then rolled R9 onto her right side and wiped the fecal material from her buttocks but did not wash her lower back which had also had fecal material on her skin and her shirt. V6 removed R9's shirt which was soiled with feces and put it over her head. Without removing his soiled gloves and performing hand hygiene, V6 put another clean shirt and incontinent brief on R9, after pulling the soiled pad out from underneath her, but not rewashing her buttocks that had been laying on the soiled pad. V6, with the same gloves, pulled up R9's sheet and blanket and adjusted her pillow under her head. V6 removed his gloves and discarded them in a trash bag, tied it closed and tied the bag of dirty linens and exited R9's room without performing hand hygiene. R9's medical record documents she was treated for UTIs in August and September 2022. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she is severely cognitively impaired and is dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. The MDS documents R9 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R9's Care Plan dated 4/16/22 documents, Alteration in Bladder Elimination as related to incontinence with the goal of: Will be free from infection x 90 days. Interventions for this Care Plan include: Toilet and/or change padding and give proper hygiene before/after meals, upon rising, upon request, before retiring for the evening, after napping and as needed for incontinence. R9's Nurses Note dated 7/27/22 at 10:40 AM documents: Per FNP (Family Nurse Practitioner) UA (Urinalysis) and C&S (Culture and Sensitivity). R9's Physician Order dated 7/27/22 documents the order: Urinalysis R9's Nurses Note dated 8/7/22 documents: Spoke to MD/NP (Medical Director/Nurse Practitioner) pertaining to labs via HUCU (electronic reporting system). N.O. (New order) for Cefpodoxine (antibiotic) Cefpodoxine 200 mg po (by mouth) BID (twice a day) x 7 days. R9's Laboratory Result dated 8/7/22 documents R9's urine specimen that was ordered on 7/27/22 was collected on 8/2/22 (R9's urine specimen was not collected until 5 days after it was ordered). R9's Physician Order dated 8/7/22 documents the order: Cefpodoxine 200 mg po (by mouth) BID (twice a day) for 7 days). This treatment for R9's UTI did not start until 10 days after the MD (Medical Doctor) ordered her urinalysis on 7/27/22. R9's Physician Order Sheet documents the order dated 9/2/22: UA and C&S related to bladder incontinence and discomfort. R9's Physician Order Sheet includes an order dated 9/8/22: Cipro 250 milligram (mg) every 12 hours for 3 days for +(positive) UA. Awaiting C&S. R9's Nurses Notes dated 9/8/22 at 10:00 AM documents: Per (NP) Cipro 250 mg every 12 hours for 3 days abnormal UA. Awaiting C&S. R9's Nurses Notes dated 9/9/22 at 5:15 AM documents: Cipro related to UTI initiated this shift. No adverse side effects noted. R9's UA and C&S lab report dated 9/12/22 documents R9's urine for urinalysis ordered on 9/2/22 was not collected until 9/5/22 and documents R9 had a UTI with the causative organism identified as Eschericia Coli. The culture and sensitivity report documents the infection was resistive to Cipro, which had already been administered before the culture and sensitivity was completed to determine what bacteria was causing the infection. R9's Physician Order dated 9/12/22 documents the order: Macrobid 100 mg every 12 hours for 5 days. On 10/20/22 at 3:30 PM, V1, Administrator, stated the facility's lab comes every day. She stated she would expect the nurse to collect a urine specimen and have it ready on the next collection date after the order is received. On 10/20/22 at 3:39 PM, V13, Registered Nurse (RN) Consultant, stated it is the policy of the facility to not start an antibiotic until the culture and sensitivity report comes back to ensure the infection is treated with the correct antibiotic. On 10/21/22 at 2:55 PM, V27, Consultant Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she would expect staff to perform hand hygiene and don gloves before starting incontinent care and then doff gloves and perform hand hygiene any time gloves become soiled. She stated when performing incontinent care for a female resident, the staff should wipe the resident from front to back and make sure resident is thoroughly cleaned before putting clean clothes and new incontinent brief on. V27 stated staff should wash their hands upon entering a resident's room and again before leaving the room after care is provided. The facility's policy, Perineal Cleansing, undated, documents, Policy: To eliminate odor, to prevent irritation or infection and to enhance resident's self esteem. Female Resident: 12. Wash pubic area including upper inner aspect of both thighs and front portion of perineum. a. Use long strokes from the most anterior down to base of labia. b. After each stroke, refold the wash cloth to allow use of another area. 17. Wash peri-anal area thoroughly with each stroke beginning at the base of the labia and extending up over the buttocks. The policy includes, Note: The basic infection control concept for peri-care is to wash from the cleanest area to the dirtiest area. The facility's policy, Standard Precautions-Isolation, undated, documents: Policy: Standard precautions will be instituted to prevent the spread and contamination of pathogenic microorganisms in a manner that voids transfer to residents, personnel and environment. Definition: Standard precautions designed to reduce the risk of transmission pathogens from moist body substances and applies them to all resident receiving care in health facilities regardless of their diagnosis or presumed infection status. Standard Precautions apply to : 1. Blood 2. All body fluids, secretions, and excretions except sweat; regardless of whether or not they contain blood. 3. Non-intact skin 4. Mucous membranes . Standard Precautions are designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms from both recognized and unrecognized sources of infection in facilities. Procedure: 1. Hand Washing: Wash hands after touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions and contaminated items, whether or not gloves are worn. Wash hands immediately after gloves are removed between resident contacts and when otherwise indicated to avoid transfer of microorganism to other residents or environments. It may be necessary to wash hands between tasks and procedures on the same resident to prevent cross-contamination of different body sites. 3. Gloves: Wear gloves (clean, non-sterile gloves are adequate) when touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions and contaminated items. Put on clean gloves just before touching mucous membranes and non-intact skin. Change gloves between tasks and procedures on the same resident after contact with material that may contain a high concentration of microorganisms. Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching noncontaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before going to another resident and wash hands immediately to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other residents and environments.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reduction for 1 of 6 residents (R19) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic meds in the sample of 42. Findings include...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reduction for 1 of 6 residents (R19) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic meds in the sample of 42. Findings include: R19's Pharmacy Review Recommendations for the month of 8/10/2022, document, Please attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) to trazodone 25 mg (milligrams) every other HS (bedtime) with the end goal of discontinuation, while concurrently monitoring for reemergence of insomnia and withdrawal symptoms. Rationale for Recommendations: A GDR should be attempted in 2 separate quarters, with at least 1 month between attempts, within the first year in which an individual is admitted on a psychotropic medications or after the facility has initiated such medication, and then annually unless clinically contraindicated. There was no signature on this form indicating V24, Psychiatric Physician, had accepted and or refused the pharmacy recommendations for R19. R19's Pharmacy Review Recommendations dated 10/11/2022 documents, Repeated recommendations from 8/10/2022. Please respond promptly to assure facility compliance with Federal regulations. (R19) has received for trazadone 25 mg HS, for insomnia, from 5/2020. Recommendations: Please attempt a GDR to trazodone 25 mg every other HS with the end goal of discontinuation, while concurrently monitoring for reemergence of insomnia and withdrawal symptoms. Rationale for Recommendations: A GDR should be attempted in 2 separate quarters, with at least 1 month between attempts, within the first year in which an individual is admitted on a psychotropic medications or after the facility has initiated such medication, and then annually unless clinically contraindicated. There was no signature on this form indicating V24 had accepted and or refused the pharmacy recommendations for R19. R19's Physician Order Sheets (POS) for the month of August and September 2022 documents R19 was ordered 50 mg of trazadone, take ½ tablet by mouth at bedtime for sleep insomnia. (Order date was 11/26/2021). R19's medical records do not have a current October POS for 2022. R19's Psychiatric consultation dated 9/23/2022 documents trazadone 25 mg, it does not document anything related to the pharmacy recommendations. On 10/21/2022 at 10:40 AM, We do not have a Director of Nursing (DON) working in the facility and have not had one since June 2022. I am not finding a lot of GDR from the pharmacy and that is something if we have a DON that they would be in charge overseeing it. If the Pharmacy Recommendation is blank then I would say it was not given or done to the Doctor. I would expect the form to be accepted or declined but not blank. The Psychotropic Medication Policy with a revision date of 11/28/2017 documents, It is the policy of this facility that resident shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Reductions should be attempted at least twice in one year, unless the physician documents the need to maintain the resident regimen according to the Regulator Guidelines for such.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. The Facility's Resident Infection Control and Antimicrobial Log dated 2/2022 has no documentation of an organism or infection for R31 for 2/1/2022. The log documents he was on the antibiotic Ampici...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. The Facility's Resident Infection Control and Antimicrobial Log dated 2/2022 has no documentation of an organism or infection for R31 for 2/1/2022. The log documents he was on the antibiotic Ampicillin 500 mg QID (four times a day) for 7 days. R31's POS dated 2/1/2022 documents an order for Ampicillin 500 mg QID for 7 days. R31's MAR dated 2/1/2022 documents staff administered Ampicillin 500 mg QID on 2/1/2022 through 2/8/2022. R31's UA and culture and sensitivity (C&S) was requested on 10/20/2022 at 4:20 PM. No C&S report was provided to justify the use of Ampicillin and no UA or C&S was provided. On 10/21/2022 at 12:21 PM, V27, Consultant LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), stated she couldn't find R31's UA or C&S for 2/1/2022. 3. The facility's Infection Control Log dated 2/26/2022, documents R30 was diagnosed with a UTI and was administered Bactrim DS. Bactrim DS was discontinued on 2/27/2022 after culture and sensitivity results. On 10/21/2022 at 12:30PM, V1, Administrator, stated the facility is unable to produce documentation of R30's urinalysis and culture and sensitivity lab results for 2/2022. V1 stated We are not able to find any documentation about R30 having a UTI in February of 2022. Based interview and record review the facility failed to provide tracking and trending for antibiotic stewardship program surveillance to monitor trends and patterns in infections and antibiotics use that might not be noticed otherwise and to identify early onsets of infections and monitor antibiotic use for 4 of 9 residents (R9, R30, R31, and R159) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. R159 was not documented on the Resident Infection Control Log for the month of May 2022 for a urinary tract infection (UTI). The organism identified was E-coli. The log documents Cipro 500 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for 7 days. On 10/20/2022 at 4:14 PM, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, (R159) was on an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection back in August early September and she thinks May too. She gets urinary tract infections a lot. On 10/20/2022 at 3:57 PM, V13, Consultant Registered Nurse (RN), stated, We do not have any Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) Reports or a urinary analysis (UA) for (R15) for May, 2022. R159's Physician Order Sheets (POS) does not document an order for Cipro for R159 for May 2022. R159's Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated May, 2022 document R159 was taking Cipro 500 mg every 12 hours for six days in May. 4. The facility's Resident Infection Control and Antimicrobial Log dated August 2022 documents R9 had an infection with the onset date of 8/8/22 and resolution date of 8/14/22 but did not document the infection related diagnosis or site (UTI/urine) and did not identify the organism causing the infection. R9's Physician Order Sheet documents the order dated 9/2/22: UA and C&S related to bladder incontinence and discomfort. R9's Nurses Notes dated 9/8/22 at 10:00 AM documents: Per (Nurse Practitioner) Cipro 250 mg every 12 hours for 3 days abnormal UA. Awaiting C&S. R9's Nurses Notes dated 9/9/22 at 5:15 AM documents: Cipro related to UTI initiated this shift. No adverse side effects noted. R9's MAR dated 9/1/22 to 9/30/22 documents she received Cipro 250 mg twice a day on 9/9/22, 9/10/22 and 9/11/22 before the facility received her urine culture and sensitivity ordered on 9/2/22. R9's UA and C&S lab report dated 9/12/22 documents R9's urine for urinalysis ordered on 9/2/22 was not collected until 9/5/22 and documents R9 had a UTI with the causative organism identified as Escherichia Coli. The culture and sensitivity report documents the infection was resistive to Cipro, which was already administered before the culture and sensitivity was completed to determine what bacteria was causing the infection. A new order dated 9/12/22 documents the order: Macrobid 100 mg every 12 hours for 5 days. On 10/20/22 at 03:30 PM, V1, Administrator, stated the facility's lab comes every day. She stated she would expect the nurse to collect a urine specimen and have it ready on the next collection date. On 10/20/22 at 3:39 PM, V13, Registered Nurse (RN) Consultant, stated it is the policy of the facility to not start an antibiotic until the culture and sensitivity report comes back to ensure the infection is treated with the correct antibiotic. The facility's policy, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, reviewed 12/10/21, documents, Purpose: To improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This will be accomplished utilizing the core elements. Core Elements for Antibiotic Stewardship: Leadership Commitment: Demonstrates support and commitment for safe and appropriate antibiotic stewardship. The facility's policy, Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring revised 12/7/18 documents, It is the policy of the facility to do routine surveillance and monitoring of the facility to determine if compliance with work practices and care of protective clothing and equipment is maintained. The policy further documents, 2. Monitoring of the day to day operation of the Infection Control Program will be conducted by the DON (Director of Nursing). Included in these duties are: A. Investigation and implementation of controls to prevent infections in the facility. f. Updates the Infection Control Log on a daily basis in order to analyze data and identify trends that would indicate need for additional controls to prevent any further spread of an infection.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 6...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 60 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 10/18/2022 at 8:26 AM, on a cart in the kitchen were 4 five pound (lb) bags of chicken breast nuggets and three 5 lb bags of grilled marinated chicken thawing on the cart. The bags were sweating with drops running down them. On 10/18/2022 at 8:28 am, in the walk in fridge there were two clear three quart containers of a red substance with beans inside without any date or label on them. There was a 3 quart container with a red sauce that did not contain any date or label. On 10/18/2022 at 8:28 AM, on the second shelf in the refrigerator was a sleeve of unpasteurized eggs sitting in a carton. There were approximately a dozen eggs being stored above the butter and margarine. On 10/18/2022 at 8:30 AM, there was a tray full of 4 ounces glasses (nine of the glasses) that were sitting on a tray and were not covered and were being exposed to the air and did not contain any dates or labels. On 10/18/2022 at 8:32 AM, in the dry storage area there was a large industrial container approximately 5 gallons that contained a white power ingredient and another large clear industrial container containing a brown dry ingredient, there were no dates or labels on these containers. On 10/18/2022 at 9:11 AM, V21, Cook, stated, We leave the nuggets out like that so they cook faster because they are more thawed out. On 10/8/2022 at 9:22 AM, V22, Dietary Manager, stated, I would expect all of the containers that are open in the refrigerator to be dated and labeled. I would expect everything in the dry storage to be dated and labeled as well. I would expect frozen food to stay in the freezer until staff are ready to use it. The Refrigerator and Freezer Storage Policy dated 10/2014 documents, It is the policy of (Facility) that any item to be placed in the refrigerators and freezers must be covered, labeled and dated with a date-marking system that tracks when to discard perishable foods. [NAME] container with name of item. [NAME] the date that the original container is opened or date of preparation. Label refrigerated, potentially hazardous food prepared and shelf for more than 24 hours with the day/date by which the food shall be consumed or discarded (maximum of 7 days from time of preparation). The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 10/18/2022 documented the facility had a census of 60 residents.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

2. The Facility's Resident Infection Control and Antimicrobial Log dated 2/2022 has no documentation of an organism or the type of infection for R31. The log dated 2/1/2022 documents the use of the an...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. The Facility's Resident Infection Control and Antimicrobial Log dated 2/2022 has no documentation of an organism or the type of infection for R31. The log dated 2/1/2022 documents the use of the antibiotic Ampicillin 500 mg QID (four times a day) for 7 days. (The other areas on the form were blank.) 3. The facility's Infection Control Log dated 2/26/2022, documents R30 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and was administered Bactrim DS. Bactrim DS was discontinued on 2/27/2022 after culture and sensitivity results. On 10/21/2022 at 12:30PM, V1, Administrator stated the facility is unable to produce documentation of R30's urinalysis and culture and sensitivity lab results for 2/2022. V1 stated, We are not able to find any documentation about (R30) having a UTI in February of 2022. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 10/18/2022 documented the facility had a census of 60 residents. A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing surveillance and monitoring of infections and to complete a monthly tracking log to aid in the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents living in the facility. B. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform adequate hand hygiene and glove changes while performing incontinent care for 1 of 3 residents (R9) reviewed for infection control practices in the sample of 42. A. Findings include: 1. R159 was not documented on the Resident Infection Control Log for the month of August, 2022. No infection and or organism was documented for R159 for the month of August 2022. R159's Nurses Notes dated 8/21/2022 at 12:15 PM, Resident continues antibiotic therapy related cefuroxime axetil 250 milligrams (mg) by mouth for seven days. No adverse reaction noted. On 10/20/2022 at 4:14 PM, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, (R159) was on an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection back in August early September and I think May. She gets urinary tract infections a lot. B. Findings include: On 10/18/22 at 11:45 AM, V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), pulled tabs to open R9's incontinent brief and R9 was visibly soiled with bowel movement. V6 wiped R9's peri area with her soiled incontinent brief as he tucked the soiled diaper down between her thighs and under her buttocks, pulling the incontinent brief from beneath her. When V6 pulled the diaper from under R9, feces got on the mechanical lift sling that was still under R9. V6 wiped some of the fecal material off R9's buttocks and rectum, then rolled her back onto her back and onto the soiled sling. V6 removed his gloves which were visibly soiled with feces and donned new gloves without performing hand hygiene. V6 then took a soapy washcloth and wiped R9's right and left groin, wiping from back to front, and rewiping clean areas a second time with same soiled washcloth. V6 then wiped from back to front, starting around R9's rectum and wiping up and over her vagina with fecal material observed on the washcloth. V6 rewiped the area twice using the same back to front motion and re-contaminating R9's vaginal area with soiled wash cloth. V6 then rinsed the area with clean washcloths, using the same back to front motion. V6 then rolled R9 onto her right side and wiped the fecal material from her buttocks but did not wash her lower back which had also had fecal material on her skin and her shirt. V6 removed R9's shirt which was soiled with feces and put it over her head. Without removing his soiled gloves and performing hand hygiene, V6 put another clean shirt and incontinent brief on R9, after pulling the soiled pad out from underneath her, but not rewashing her buttocks that had been laying on the soiled pad. V6, with the same gloves, pulled up R9's sheet and blanket and adjusted her pillow under her head. V6 removed his gloves and discarded them in a trash bag, tied it closed and tied the bag of dirty linens and exited R9's room without performing hand hygiene. R9's Medical Record documents she was treated for Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in August and September 2022. R2's Care Plan dated 4/16/22 documents, Alteration in Bladder Elimination as related to incontinence with the goal of: Will be free from infection x 90 days. Interventions for this Care Plan include: Toilet and/or change padding and give proper hygiene before/after meals, upon rising, upon request, before retiring for the evening, after napping and as needed for incontinence. R9's Urinalysis (UA) and Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) lab report dated 9/12/22 documents R9 had a UTI with the causative organism identified as Eschericia Coli. On 10/21/22 at 2:55 PM, V27, Consultant Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she would expect staff to perform hand hygiene and don gloves before starting incontinent care and then doff gloves and perform hand hygiene any time gloves become soiled. She stated when performing incontinent care for a female resident, the staff should wipe the resident from front to back and make sure resident is thoroughly cleaned before putting clean clothes and new incontinent brief on. V27 stated staff should wash their hands upon entering a resident's room and again before leaving the room after care is provided. The facility's policy, Standard Precautions-Isolation, undated, documents: Policy: Standard precautions will be instituted to prevent the spread and contamination of pathogenic microorganisms in a manner that voids transfer to residents, personnel and environment. Definition: Standard precautions designed to reduce the risk of transmission pathogens from moist body substances and applies them to all resident receiving care in health facilities regardless of their diagnosis or presumed infection status. Standard Precautions apply to : 1. Blood 2. All body fluids, secretions, and excretions except sweat; regardless of whether or not they contain blood. 3. Non-intact skin 4. Mucous membranes . Standard Precautions are designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms from both recognized and unrecognized sources of infection in facilities. Procedure: 1. Hand Washing: Wash hands after touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions and contaminated items, whether or not gloves are worn. Wash hands immediately after gloves are removed between resident contacts and when otherwise indicated to avoid transfer of microorganism to other residents or environments. It may be necessary to wash hands between tasks and procedures on the same resident to prevent cross-contamination of different body sites. 3. Gloves: Wear gloves (clean, non-sterile gloves are adequate) when touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions and contaminated items. Put on clean gloves just before touching mucous membranes and non-intact skin. Change gloves between tasks and procedures on the same resident after contact with material that may contain a high concentration of microorganisms. Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching noncontaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before going to another resident and wash hands immediately to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other residents and environments. The facility's undated policy, Hand Washing documents, All staff will properly wash hands, as washing hands as promptly and thoroughly as possible between patient contacts and after contact with blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, and equipment or articles contaminated by them is an important component of infection control and isolation precautions.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the Facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 20 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the Facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 20 of 42 residents (R5, R6, R12, R14, R16, R18, R23, R25, R27, R28, R29, R32, R37, R41, R46, R47, R48, R49, R53 and R56) reviewed for room size in the sample of 42. Findings include: The Facility has 30 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 75 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches. All these rooms are certified for Medicare and Medicaid. These rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER], 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 116, 120, 201, 202, 203, 204, 303, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, 313, 314, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322 and 323. The facility has 8 two bed resident rooms which provide only 77.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms, measure 12 feet one inch by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 72 inch offset. These rooms are as follows: Rooms 207, room [ROOM NUMBER], 209, 214, 216 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Facility has 3 two-bed resident rooms which provide only 76.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 12 feet by 12 feet six inches with an additional 10 inch by 48 inch offset, These Rooms are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] which is now the Break Room, 119 which is now the Activity Room. The facility has 2 two bed rooms which provide only 78.5 square feet per resident bed. According to historical data and current room measurements, these rooms measure 15 feet by 10 feet six inches. There rooms are as follows: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. During observation from 10/18/2022 through 10/20/2021, the following residents were in the above rooms which do not have 80 square feet per resident bed: (R5, R6, R12, R14, R16, R18, R23, R25, R27, R28, R29, R32, R37, R41, R46, R47, R48, R49, R53 and R56)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 9 harm violation(s), $207,971 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 51 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $207,971 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 0/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Evercare Of Collinsville's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Evercare Of Collinsville Staffed?

CMS rates EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Evercare Of Collinsville?

State health inspectors documented 51 deficiencies at EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 9 that caused actual resident harm, 38 with potential for harm, and 3 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Evercare Of Collinsville?

EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 94 certified beds and approximately 83 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLLINSVILLE, Illinois.

How Does Evercare Of Collinsville Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Evercare Of Collinsville?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Evercare Of Collinsville Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Evercare Of Collinsville Stick Around?

EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 7 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Evercare Of Collinsville Ever Fined?

EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE has been fined $207,971 across 3 penalty actions. This is 5.9x the Illinois average of $35,159. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Evercare Of Collinsville on Any Federal Watch List?

EVERCARE OF COLLINSVILLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.