ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE

300 NORTH RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL 60016 (847) 297-5900
Non profit - Church related 68 Beds ASCENSION LIVING Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
88/100
#14 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Ascension Nazarethville Place has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #14 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #4 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility's performance has been stable, with only one issue noted in both 2022 and 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 26%, which is significantly better than the state average of 46%. While there are notable strengths, such as good RN coverage that exceeds 93% of state facilities and no fines on record, there are also weaknesses. For example, a serious issue was identified where the facility failed to prevent a resident's pressure ulcer from worsening, resulting in a stage IV ulcer requiring antibiotic treatment. Additionally, a concern was noted regarding the improper disposal of expired insulin pens, which could risk the health of residents relying on this medication. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses as they consider care options.

Trust Score
B+
88/100
In Illinois
#14/665
Top 2%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 76 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 1 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (26%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (26%)

    22 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: ASCENSION LIVING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and dispose of expired insulin medication per ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and dispose of expired insulin medication per the facility policy for Insulin Pens. The facility failed to remove the insulin pen after 28 days of opening per manufacturer recommendation. This deficiency affects one of two medication carts (2nd Floor Middle Cart) reviewed for Safe Medication Storage. This failure affected 1 (R63) of 3 residents reviewed for medication label and storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:00AM, surveyor observed 2nd Floor Middle Cart [NAME] with V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) and discovered an expired Lantus Kwikpen dated [DATE] - [DATE], Lot#4F9646A. When asked V5 (Registered Nurse) responded that it should have been disposed of after 28 days and wasn't sure why it was still in the medication cart. When asked if it was used recently for R63, V5 (RN) checked the EMAR and confirmed that it was used the previous night by the evening nurse. V5 (RN) did remove and dispose of the expired Lantus Kwikpen from the medication cart while in the presence of the surveyor. V5 (Registered Nurse) stated that she was going to let pharmacy know about the expired insulin medication for R63. R63's EMAR on [DATE] at 9:57PM showed she received 7units of Lantus Insulin On [DATE] at 11:30AM, informed V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), V2 states that depending on the brand of insulin pens once opened they are good for 28/30 days and newer brands can be used even longer. V2 (DON) states that nurses are educated on insulin administration and are instructed that insulin pens are only good for 28/30 days after first use. V2 (DON) states the facility had an all-nurse staff in-service within the last 2-3 weeks. When asked how often carts are audited and by whom V2(DON) states monthly audits are performed by pharmacy and shift nurse should check the medication cart for medications that are expiring the next 3-4 days to insure they are refilled. V2 (DON) states he had R63 assessed vitals, blood glucose, and all within normal limits. V2 (DON) states he called R63's POA to inform them that a expired insulin was administered. V2 (DON) states R63 reports feeling fine, no issues or concerns. On [DATE] at 1:59 PM, surveyor attempted to call V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) regarding patient care on the evening of [DATE] for R63. Left voicemail. Medication administration records from ([DATE] through [DATE]) showed evening administrations of Lantus insulin (7 units) for R63 as of start date of [DATE]. Facility's policy on Medication Storage ( Rx Insulin Pen Policy date of last review [DATE]) Policy: It is the policy of this facility to safely dispense insulin pens when prescribed in this facility. II. Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the safe dispensing of insulin pens to this facility. V. Procedure: Described in policy 4. Pharmacy will affix two auxiliary labels, the first will indicate that nursing should Refrigerate unopened pens upon receipt from the pharmacy, and the second label allows for nursing to write the date that the pen was first opened for use, and the date the pen must be discarded, based on Appendix A document.
Nov 2022 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions in preventing the developmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions in preventing the development of a pressure ulcer in relation to repositioning and skin monitoring for one (R12) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 26. This deficiency resulted in R12's stage III pressure ulcer in the coccyx area worsen to stage IV pressure ulcer with ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy. Findings include: R12 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure; Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Unspecified Site; Dysphasia, Oropharyngeal Phase; and Unsteadiness on Feet. According to MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/25/2022 under Section C, R12 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 indicating a moderately impairment of cognitive functioning. According to MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/25/2022 under Section G, R12 requires extensive assist of two + person physical assist in Bed Mobily including turning side to side. According to MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/25/2022 under Section M, R12 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and has one stage four pressure ulcer that was not present upon admission. On 11/14/22 at 11:04 AM Surveyor observed R12 lying in bed in supine position. R12 utilizing low air loss mattress, set up to static mode. Upon interview R12 stated, I have a wound on my behind. Per record review, progress note completed by V14 (Registered Nurse) dated 10/15/2022 reads in part, Stage III wound in coccyx area. 2cm x 3cm x 05cm. Cleaned and secured. Will endorse to next shift. No previous documentation pertaining R12's wound present. On 11/15/22 at 9:47 AM Surveyor observed R12's wound dressing change. V8 (Registered Nurse, corporate/mobile MDS) and V9 ((Licensed Practical Nurse) performed dressing change. V8 (RN) stated, Wound clinic has been following R2's wound. R12 has a stage IV pressure ulcer on coccyx. It is also infected, which R12 gets antibiotics for. I'm just helping lately with wound care, since the Assistant Director of Nursing has been gone; it used to be the ADON who took care of wounds at the facility. ADON been gone since the beginning of October of this year. V9 (LPN) stated, ADON was a wound care nurse from Monday to Friday and staff nurses would do wound care on the weekends. ADON did rounds with wound doctor as well. Wound dressing change observed, wound measurements 4cmx5cmx2.5cm appearing as tennis ball size with additional underlining and tunneling. Wound dressing changed per order. Plan of Service dated 10/21/2022 reads in part, Santyl ointment coccyx wound cleanse with normal saline, apply nickel layer of Santyl, pack with Calcium Alginate and cover with boarded foam dressing daily and PRN. On 11/15/2022 at 10:02 AM Surveyor interviewed V9 (LPN), V9 stated, Nursing staff usually checks the residents' body, including skin assessment, daily. R12 developed some skin redness at some point, and preventative dressing was utilized at that time. Surveyor clarified how could R12 develop such significant wound, V9 (LPN) stated, Lack of supplements or repositioning could cause a pressure ulcer to develop. R12 is also on antibiotic therapy for suspected osteomyelitis. There is no wound doctor in the facility, R12 has appointments every Friday with the wound doctor, and she has seen infection disease doctor as well. Plan of Service dated 11/10/2022 reads in part, Cefdinir 300mg capsule, take 1 capsule by mouth every 12 hours for 14 days. Per record review, progress note completed by V11 (wound doctor) dated 10/21/2022 reads in part, Pressure ulcer to coccyx, measurements 5cm x 4cm x 2.5cm with undermining. You need to relieve the pressure as best as possible; this is achieved by repositioning every 2 hours. Per record review, progress note completed by V11 (wound doctor) dated 10/28/2022 reads in part, The wound measures 4.8cm x 4cm x 2.6cm. There is no tunneling or undermining noted. Wound cultures reviewed and noted to have proteus mirabilis sensitive cephalosporins, refer to infectious disease for possible osteomyelitis noted on the x-ray sacrum. Cefdinir prescribed for patient. Per record review, progress note completed by V11 (wound doctor) dated 11/04/2022 reads in part, The wound measures 4cm x 4cm x 2.4cm. Per record review, progress note completed by V11 (wound doctor) dated 11/11/2022 reads in part, The wound measures 3.8cm x 3.8cm x 2.4cm. There is undermining starting at 7:00 and ending at 9:00 with a maximum distance of 2cm. Per record review, progress note completed by V13 (infectious disease doctor) dated 11/10/2022 reads in part, [R12] referred for evaluation due to concern for osteomyelitis in the sacrum. Sacrococcygeal wound pressure ulcer stage IV [with] possible osteomyelitis underlying the wound bed with bony changes on x-ray. Continue with oral Cefdinir without stopping for the next 2 to 3 weeks. On 11/15/22 at 10:18 AM Surveyor interviewed V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant), V10 stated, If I see any resident skin changes, I notify a nurse, even if it's a little redness. I check residents' skin daily, when I perform incontinence care, which is about every 2 hours. I noticed that R12 had a blister forming in late September 2022, so I notified nurse on duty. Assistant Director Of Nursing was also aware of R12's skin assessment change. V10 (CNA) further indicated that there were multiple management changes in early October 2022 and R12's wound must have gotten overlooked. On 11/15/22 at 11:48 AM Resident noted in supine position, air mattress activated in static mode. On 11/15/22 at 1:52 PM Resident remaining in supine position. Plan of Service dated 10/16/2022 reads in part, Reposition every 2 hours. Plan of Service dated 10/30/2022 reads in part, Turn and reposition every 2 hours and document the turning schedule. On 11/16/2022 at 1:43 PM Surveyor interviewed V12 (acting Director of Nursing), V12 stated, Wound can develop due to several reasons, it's based on individual case though, wounds can develop due to residents' weakness, thin skin, poor nutrient intake, supplements and medications. We look at the patient as a whole and see if they are at risk. To prevent wound development staff should make sure individually based preventative devices are in place, barrier cream is being utilized, incontinence care is provided, including every 2 hours checks for wetness, and repositioning, especially bed ridden residents. On 11/16/2022 at 2:00 PM V1 (administrator) presented Root Cause Analysis pertaining to R12's wound development, no date provided, document reads in part, What human factors were relevant to the outcome? Previous Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing did all skin assessments, evaluations, and treatments. Documentation not always completed. Was the staff properly qualified and currently competent for their responsibilities at the time of the event? [Facility] floor nursing staff were qualified to do skin evaluation and documentation but were told by previous Director of Nursing that they were not allowed to do it. On 11/16/22 at 2:50 PM Surveyor interviewed V11 (Wound Doctor), V11 stated, Stage IV pressure ulcer could develop due to lack of reposition or poor nutrition. There are other factors such as aging frail skin. Incontinence care plays a big role, especially in the sacral area where a wound gets contaminated easily. Frequent repositioning and incontinence care would help with wound deterioration. Care plan for Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity related to Decreased Mobility, Bowel and Bladder Incontinence, dated 02/21/2022 reads in part, Daily skin inspections, report any changes in skin or signs of possible skin breakdown; Assist R12 with turning and repositioning at regular intervals and as needed. Care plan for Impaired Skin Integrity as evidenced by Pressure Ulcer to Coccyx dated 10/15/2022 reads in part, Daily skin check and record; Assist with turning and repositioning at regular intervals and as needed. Pressure Injury Assessment/Treatment policy dated 12/2016 reads in part, The pressure injury treatment program should focus on the following strategies: Resolution of current pressure injuries and prevention of additional pressure injuries; Managing and preventing bacterial colonization and infection. Interventions/Care Strategies: Eliminate or reduce the source of pressure using positioning techniques; Preventative measures to reduce the risk of further tissue loss; Managing and reducing the risk of infections; Interventions that increase the potential for healing.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
  • • 26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • 2 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Ascension Nazarethville Place's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Ascension Nazarethville Place Staffed?

CMS rates ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 26%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Ascension Nazarethville Place?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 1 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Ascension Nazarethville Place?

ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASCENSION LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 68 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DES PLAINES, Illinois.

How Does Ascension Nazarethville Place Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (26%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ascension Nazarethville Place?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Ascension Nazarethville Place Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Ascension Nazarethville Place Stick Around?

Staff at ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 26%, the facility is 20 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 7%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Ascension Nazarethville Place Ever Fined?

ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Ascension Nazarethville Place on Any Federal Watch List?

ASCENSION NAZARETHVILLE PLACE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.