HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY

210 EAST COLLEGE, ENERGY, IL 62933 (618) 942-7014
For profit - Corporation 98 Beds HELIA HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#542 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Helia Healthcare of Energy has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care. With a state rank of #542 out of 665 facilities in Illinois and #2 out of 5 in Williamson County, they are in the bottom half overall, with only one local facility ranked higher. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, as issues increased from 13 in 2024 to 15 in 2025. Staffing is rated at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average, with a turnover rate of 48%, suggesting that staff do not stay long enough to build strong relationships with residents. The facility also faces serious issues, including failing to provide necessary mental health services that resulted in a resident voicing suicidal thoughts and engaging in self-harm, as well as a case where a resident was given the wrong medications, leading to hospitalization for hypoglycemia. While there are some average aspects, such as RN coverage, families may want to consider these significant weaknesses when researching this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#542/665
Bottom 19%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
13 → 15 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$84,882 in fines. Higher than 78% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
42 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 13 issues
2025: 15 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 48%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $84,882

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: HELIA HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 42 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 6 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors in sample of 13. This failure resulted in R1 receiving another resident's medication and being hospitalized for hypoglycemia.Findings Include:R1's Face Sheet shows documents an admission date of 10/16/2023 and includes diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Alzheimer's Disease, Iron Deficiency, Cholecystitis, Renal Insufficiency, and Diaphragmatic Hernia without Obstruction. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in section C, Cognitive Patterns, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating R1 has severe cognition impairment. R1's Progress Note dated 8/30/2025 at 8:46AM, documents Asked patient (R1) her name she said it was other residents name gave her that residents meds. BG (blood glucose) was 44 so gave orange juice with sugar to raise BG to 77. Notified ADN (V3 Assistant Director of Nursing), called ambulance, notified provider (name of provider).R1's Progress Note dated 8/30/25 at 10:35PM documents that the local hospital was contacted for an update and R1 was admitted for Hypoglycemia.On 9/5/2025 at 3:16PM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she was the nurse that accidentally gave R1 the wrong medications. V9 said prior to administering the wrong medications to R1, she saw R1 while R1 was in R1's room lying in bed. V9 stated when she checked R1's blood sugar, R1's blood sugar was 44. V9 said she provided R1 with some orange juice. V9 said after R1 drank the orange juice V9 rechecked R1's blood glucose and it had come up to 77. V9 said later in V9's shift (during morning medication pass) R1 was sitting in the dining room and when V9 asked R1 her name, R1 gave V9 the wrong name and gave the medications of the name (the name of R6) R1 gave her. V9 stated after she gave R1 the medications, a CNA stated, that is R1 not R6. V9 stated that is when she knew she made a medication error. V9 stated she could not remember what the medications were that she administered to R1 but they were R6's morning meds. V9 said when she realized the medication error had occurred, she reported this to V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and then she sent the resident to the Emergency Room. V9 stated she does not work very often because she is in school, so she is not real familiar with some of the residents. V9 stated she also had called the physician and the Power of Attorney about the incident. V9 stated she had not administered R1's medications that were prescribed for that morning ordered for 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM after realizing her error. V9 stated she just received education from V2 on the date the medication error occurred (8/30/2025), on Medication Administration.R6's Medication Administration Record shows the AM (7:00AM-10:00AM) medications ordered for R6 that was given to R1 were Colace 100mg capsule, Ferrous Sulfate 325mg tablet, Furosemide 20mg tablet, Gabapentin 100mg capsule, Januvia 100mg tablet, Levothyroxine 125 mcg tablet, Lisinopril 20mg tablet, Magnesium Oxide 400mg tablet, Metformin 500mg tablet plus 250 mg tablet to equal 750 mg total, and Vitamin D3 50mcg capsule. R1's Physician Order Sheet documents an order for Lantus Solostar Insulin of 15 units subcutaneous once a day with an order date of 10/16/2023 and an order for BS checks dated 10/16/2023 for three times a day 7AM-10AM, 11AM-1PM, and 3PM- 6PM with sliding scale Regular Insulin per results.R1's Medication Administration Record dated 8/1/2025-8/31/2025 at 4:00AM-6:00AM documents R1 received Lantus Solostar Insulin 15 units subcutaneous and documents that it was administered by V19 (Registered Nurse). On 8/30/2025 at 7:00AM-10:00AM R1's blood sugar is documented as Low. On 9/5/2025 at 11:05AM, V2 stated she was made aware of the medication error and R1 was sent to the emergency room and was admitted for Hypoglycemia. V2 stated an investigation was initiated. V2 stated that V9 was educated on Medication Administration.R1's Event Summary Report dated 8/30/2025 at 8:42AM documents the medication error under event details and the type of error as incorrect medication. This report documents under Interventions that V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) was notified and R1's blood glucose level dropped to 44 and R1 was given orange juice with sugar raising R1 blood glucose to 77 after 20 minutes. Report shows Physician was notified on 8/30/2025 at 9:00AM, Family was notified at 9:00AM, and Care Plan was reviewed at 9:00AM. Evaluation: Sent to emergency room for evaluation and treatment.On 9/5/2025 at 7:15AM, V17 (Emergency Medical Technician/EMT) stated he has gone to the facility twice to pick up R1. V17 said one time was to transport R1 to the hospital due to R1 receiving the wrong medications that were actually for another resident. V17 stated the medications that were accidently given to R1 was documented on the run report. R1's (Emergency Medical Service) Report from the local EMS agency dated 8/30/2025 documents a chief medical complaint of Accidental Medication Administration Multiple and a secondary complaint of hypoglycemia. The report documents On arrival to scene, crew received a brief verbal report from the patients nurse. Nurse reported the following; medications were administered at approx. 08:05 today, 20mg Furosemide (diuretic), Aspirin 81mg, Colace 100mg, Ferrow [SIC] Sulfate 325mg, Gabapentin 100mg, Januvia 100mg (antidiabetic), Metformin 750mg (antidiabetic), Fish oil & Vit (vitamin) D3. They noted patient appeared lethargic and more confused to baseline, noted BGL (blood glucose level) 40s, administered oral glucose/glucagon prior to EMS arrival. Patient is baseline confused due to Alzheimer's. discharged from (name of local hospital) last week for infection of wound site on antibiotics.R1's records from the local hospital document an admission date of 8/30/25 and a discharge date of 8/31/25. R1's Hospital Discharge Summary under Details of Hospital Stay documents (R1) is a [AGE] year-old woman with diabetes who lives in a group home. She was inadvertently given another resident's medications, including diabetes medications. She became hypoglycemic and was brought to the emergency room. She was given intravenous dextrose, oral nutrition and monitored with frequent AccuCheks. Her blood sugars normalized, and then she was discharged back to her nursing facility where she will resume her own previous medications.The facility policy titled Medication Administration (undated) documents under Procedures, Five Rights- Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time are applied to each medication being administered. A triple check of these 5 rights is recommended in the process of preparation of a medication for administration: 1) when the medication is selected, 2) when the dose is removed from the container, and finally 3) just after the dose is prepared and the medication put away.On 9/5/2024 at 3:10PM attempted to call V18 (Physician) but did not receive a call back.A facility policy for Medication Errors was requested from V2 on 9/5/2025 at 11:05AM. V2 stated she would see if they had one, but she was not sure. There was no policy provide by the end of survey on 9/12/25.
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for residents with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for residents with mental illness, and to maintain/improve resident's psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for behavioral services in a sample of 9. This failure resulted in R1 voicing feelings of isolation, suicidal ideations with a plan of strangulation, and engaging in self-injurious behaviors.This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 4/14/25 when the facility failed to implement increased monitoring for R1, remove hazardous objects from R1's room, and refer R1 for recommended counseling services. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/22/2025 at 9:03 AM. The surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 8/22/2025, but the noncompliance remains at Level Two due to additional time to evaluate implementation and effectiveness of training.The findings include:R1's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 4/3/2025 and includes diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Personality Disorder, Suicidal Ideations, Poisoning by unspecified drugs medicaments and biological substances, intentional self-harm, subsequent encounter, and Genetic related Intellectual Disability. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/10/025 includes a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG- Functional Abilities documents R1 is independent for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). Section D -Mood documents R1 has frequent symptoms of feeling down, depressed or hopeless. Section E-Behavior documents Behavior Symptoms documents ‘Behavior not exhibited for Other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds)A document in R1's medical record titled Crisis Intervention Clinical Assessment dated 3/22/2025 (prior to R1's admission) from a Psychiatric Consultant group documents R1 had suicidal ideation for 2-3 days, and 2 months ago tried strangling herself with a bed sheet but stopped herself. The document showed R1 had a suicidal plan, and the plan was to wrap cord or string around her neck. R1's Care Plan documents a Problem area of Behavioral Symptoms; R1 has episodes of yelling and screaming, refusing and resisting care. Agitation and angry outburst dated 8/15/2025 with a goal of R1 will not hurt self or others during episodes of aggressive behaviors and will receive adequate care by next review dated 6/30/2025. Documented interventions include meds as ordered, notify MD (Medical Doctor) as needed, observe for changes in mood/cognition and behavior, psych consult (5/14/2025) as ordered and as needed, redirect R1 as needed, and remove R1 as needed to prevent harm to self or others. R1's Care Plan also documents a Problem area of Mood State: R1 with diagnosis of Bipolar/suicide ideations, start date of 4/22/2025 and edit date of 8/15/2025. The Goal documented is R1 will voice whenever she is feeling down and depressed or anxious (suicide ideations), edit date 6/30/2025. Documented interventions include: 1. Listen to R1 and validate feelings. 2. 1:1 given weekly with social services. 3. Let Psych Nurse Practitioner know of any issues. 4. Give Medications as ordered. 5. If R1 talks of suicide ideations will follow directions as given by Nurse Practitioner or Medical Doctor, created date of 4/25/2025. R1's Care Plan also documents a Problem area of R1 will punch self in face causing self-harm with a start date of 4/25/25 and edit date of 8/15/25. The Goal documented is R1 will not cause harm to self /others when becomes upset. Documented interventions for this Problem area include: 1) listen to resident and validate feelings 2) remind resident punching self doesn't solve anything 3) try to get resident to talk through her feelings 4) remind resident we are here to help 5) give medications as ordered 6) psych Nurse Practitioner made aware of situation ASAP for direction if needed with a start date of 4/25/25 and edit date of 5/1/25.R1's Progress Notes document the following:4/14/2025: R1 sent to ER for stating she had bad thoughts, were very strong, wanting to strangle herself and began punching self in her face. Resident returned on 4/14/2025 with a recommendation to refer R1 to (Name of Counseling Service) for counseling. 4/15/2025: R1 continued to have suicidal ideations and asked to be sent to hospital stating she was going to hurt herself when staff leaves room. Resident placed on 1:1. R1 called 911 herself for transfer to local hospital. R1 was transferred to local hospital and the local hospital transferred R1 to another hospital. R1 returned to facility on 4/21/2025 with medication changes. 4/21/2025: R1 was sent back out to the local hospital for suicidal behaviors/ideations, screaming, crying out, punching self in the face and bouncing head off of the headboard. R1 returned to facility on 4/22/2024 at 4:13AM. 4/24/2025: R1 sent to ER for suicidal behaviors/ideations, hyperventilating, screaming and crying out, punching self in face, and bouncing head off of headboard. R1 called 911 herself. Transferred out of facility via ambulance. R1 returned to the facility on 4/25/2025 at 10:07AM shows R1 returned to facility shortly after leaving facility.4/27/2025: R1 was sent to ER due to R1 stating she was thinking about harming herself and reported having suicidal thoughts. Call back was received from the local hospital and R1 was being placed in a psych facility to be determined.4/29/2025: At 12:30AM R1 returned to facility. R1 was placed on 1:1 with a CNA on 4/29/25 at 11:58PM.5/23/2025: At 5:47AM R1 called 911 twice verbalizing she does not feel safe and wants to strangle herself. R1 taken to local hospital. On 5/23/2025 at 7:12AM the note documents that R1 planned to return to the facility. 6/10/2025: At 10:09PM R1 was screaming and bouncing her head off the wall. R1 was sent to the local hospital for altered mental status/ suicidal ideations/aggressive behavior toward self. On 6/11/2025 at 1:53AM R1 returned to facility and stated she wanted to strangle herself. R1 called 911 herself. 6/11/2025: At 7:24PM R1 was transferred to a behavioral health facility. On 6/17/2025 at 3:29PM R1 returned to facility with an increase in antidepressant medication. 6/24/2025: At 9:40PM R1 was screaming, moaning, beating head off the doorway and punching herself in the face. R1 transferred to the local ER. There was no note of time or date of return. 6/27/2025: At 3:39AM R1 was in her room and staff heard R1 hitting herself. R1, stated she wanted to hurt herself, then R1 started banging her head on the door frame violently. R1 stated I would rather kill myself than go to the hospital, I'm going to hang myself. R1 was sent to the hospital and returned at 4:30AM and R1 had 1:1 with a CNA. On 6/27/2025 at 5:22PM R1 transferred to local hospital for suicidal thoughts. R1 returned at 11:12PM. 7/26/2025: At 1:54PM R1 screaming and cursing at other residents, screaming and banging her head off her walls saying she was going to kill herself. R1 sent to ER at 2:17PM and returned at 5:46PM. On 7/26/2025 at 9:55PM R1 called 911 due to suicidal thoughts, R1 transferred out to local hospital. 7/27/2025: At 8:22AM R1 returns from local hospital where she was seen by a counselor. Once R1 was in her room, R1 starts screaming I'm gonna kill myself, I'm gonna hurt myself, room completely stripped to include fitted sheet. On 7/27/2025 at 8:43AM R1 loud again and attempting to strangle herself with a fitted sheet and the use of her hands, refuses out of her room to be monitored and not enough staff for 1:1. On 7/27/2025 at 9:52AM R1was sent back out to ER. R1 returned at 7:42PM.7/28/2025: At 10:55AM R1 has 1:1 monitoring.8/6/2025: At 11:09AM R1 was aggressive, disruptive behaviors, screaming and cussing and making threats that she wants to strangle herself with a sheet. R1 stated she was going to barricade herself in her room and kill herself. R1 unable to be redirected or consoled, all items (sheets, cords, blankets, pillowcases, clothes ) removed from room. R1 began gently headbutting her door frame and stating that she wants to go to the hospital. (R1) was disturbing other residents on the hall and when they yelled from their room for her to be quiet, resident threatened 2 different female residents that she ‘will punch them in their faces' and called them ‘f****ing b******.' (R1) yelled out to staff ‘I am going to barricade myself in the room and kill myself.' Staff prevented (R1) moving furniture to barricade door. (R1) held a fist up and threatened a CNA when taking her vitals, staff rotated someone monitoring behaviors for 2 hours, resident realized that her (small, baby-sized) [NAME] blanket was removed from her room and began screaming at staff to give her things back. This writer explained to (R1) that it's protocol to remove all items when someone is threatening suicidal plans. (R1) began screaming at staff that she ‘will call the cops on us for stealing if we did not give the [NAME] blanket back.' (V20-RN) was able to console resident and resident stated ‘I won't try to kill myself if I can have [NAME] back. [NAME] blanket returned to (R1) and no more behaviors observed at this time. (V3-Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) called and currently in room with resident.8/9/2025: At 8:50PM R1 was screaming and banging her head forcefully on the wall, choking self and strangling self with a blanket. R1 sent to ER and returned on 8/10/2025 at 5:32AM. 8/11/2025: At 9:03PM R1 was 1:1 at nurses' station and wanted to go to bed so R1 went to her room and started beating her head on the wall. R1 was sent to the ER for evaluation. R1 returned to facility on 8/15/2025 at 1:18AM.8/18/2025 (documented as a late entry on 8/25/25 at 9:46AM) Sweep made of (R1's) room. All Hazards removed and cords secured. Daily audit sheet completed to ensure no further hazards in room authored by V1 (Administrator).R1's Behavior Tracking Logs dated 6/20/2025 - 8/20/2025 were reviewed and document the following:6/27/25 at 2:18AM: R1 had disruptive sounds behavior with interventions, behaviors documented was disruptive sounds with interventions of redirecting, 1:1, offering food/fluids, toileting, and positioning and was ineffective. 6/30/2025 at 10:05P: R1 stated she was having bad thoughts and was biting her fingers. R1 was also punching herself in the face. Interventions of 1:1, offer food/fluids and calm environment was ineffective. No other behaviors were documented for June 2025. 7/1/2025 at 8:22AM: R1 had 1:1 that was effective for hearing or seeing things not there. 7/1/2025 at 9:05PM: R1 was yelling and crying in her room when staff checks on her, she is saying she is having racing thoughts, providing a calm environment was not effective.7/30/2025 at 9:04PM: R1 was hitting self and interventions to redirect and 1:1 was ineffective. No other behaviors were documented for July 2025.8/6/2026 at 11:37PM: R1 had behaviors of cursing at others, with redirection ineffective nor was 1:1 effective. No other behaviors documented for August 2025. R1's Physician Orders documents an order for 15-minute checks once a day and as needed for diagnosis of bipolar disorder with a start date of 4/3/25. There were no other orders documented in R1's Physician's Orders for increased monitoring.On 8/29/2025 at 4:00PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he was unsure of who took out the call light out of R1's room or when this occurred. V1 was unsure about the 15-minute checks as well.On 8/29/2025 at 4:30PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated she didn't know about the 15-minute checks for R1 but may have a few somewhere. V2 stated she didn't know when 15-minute checks started or when they ended. V2 referred this surveyor to V3 for the 15-minute checks. V2 stated she doesn't think she has any of the 15-minute check sheets.On 8/29/2025 at 5:35PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated when R1 returned to the facility on 6/27/2025 she instructed the staff to move R1 to another room and to remove all items that R1 could be used to harm herself. V3 stated they removed the call light at that time. V3 stated she did not direct them to remove the call light in the bathroom because R1 shared a bathroom with another resident. V3 stated she didn't think about the remote cord or other cords left in the room. V3 stated she did know that at one time R1 was on 15-minute checks but she didn't know when they started or how long they were for.On 8/29/2025 at 4:30PM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated R1 was in a private room prior to 6/27/2025. On 6/27/2025 R1 was returning from a hospital stay and the staff felt it would be safer for R1 to be in a room that was more visible so they moved her to another hall. V9 stated this is when they removed the call light, when R1 was placed in the different room. V9 didn't know of any other items removed but she does know they would not let R1 take any personal items that could be used to harm herself. V9 stated she did not have any 15-minute check sheets and she was not sure where they would be.On 8/29/2025 at 6:55PM, V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she doesn't recall R1 being on 15-minute checks.R1's Psychiatric Notes and Evaluations document the following:4/4/2025: R1 was seen by V21 (Master of Social Work/Licensed Clinical Social Worker) documents writer will meet with R1 on a weekly to biweekly basis for 6 months.4/7/2025: R1 was seen by V12 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) and documents continue medication and treatment plan, staff to report any behavioral changes to provider. 4/21/25: Psych note documents R1 is to follow up with (Name of Counseling Service) for counseling and send to ER (Emergency Room) immediately if R1 expresses Suicidal Ideations and or exhibits self-harm behaviors/threats.6/23/3035: documents R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from a Psychiatric/Behavioral Health Facility for wanting to strangle herself and in-house Psych visits to increase to weekly.Visits by Psychiatric group for in-house visits shows no changes in plan of care for 6/28/2025, 6/30/2025, 7/7/2025 and 7/12/2025. On 7/14/2025 and 7/21/2025 medication changes were ordered by V12. 7/28/2025: V12 documents, the provider recommends facility to find proper placement for resident where needs can by appropriately met at appropriate level of care.8/4/25: R1 was seen by V12 and documents facility currently awaiting referral responses for placement Client to continue to meet with Social Worker.8/11/25: R1 was seen by V12 with no changes in plan of care. On 8/20/2025 at 9:30AM, R1 was observed in her room resting in her bed. Observation was made of the following items present in R1's room: R1 had a large blanket on her with a medium size thin blanket lying beside her, a cord attached to the bed remote occupied by R1 and the same cord on the unoccupied bed in the room. There were two Walmart bags present on bedside table. There were cords noted to the TV and air conditioner and hanging freely. R1's bathroom had an approximately 4-foot call light cord noted and a utility pipe coming out of the wall approximately 6 inches from the ceiling. There was a folded chair leaned up against the wall in R1's room. R1 was sleeping at this time. There were no staff observed with R1 or present outside of R1's room at this time.On 8/20/2025 at 10:15AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she takes care of R1 on some of her shifts. V4 stated she caught R1 with a fitted sheet wrapped around her neck. V4 stated she got the sheet removed and stated she told R1 that she would pass out before she died doing that. V4 stated she could not remember exactly when this incident occurred. V4 stated R1 has good days and bad days. V4 stated R1 is suicidal at times.On 8/20/2025 at 10:18AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R1 was admitted from a behavioral facility up North that closed. R1 stated they do 1:1 off and on, according to R1's behaviors. V1 stated he told R1 that if she tried to strangulate herself then she would pass out before she died. This interview took place outside of R1's room. R1 was observed getting up from her bed and went into her bathroom and closed the door. On 8/20/2025 at 11:25AM, R1 stated she wants to be in a place where people are more her age. R1 stated she frequently has bad thoughts. R1 was asked to explain what she meant by bad thoughts, R1 stated, I frequently have thoughts of suicide, and the thoughts are coming more frequently now. R1 was asked if she had a plan, R1 stated, I will strangle myself. R1 stated, They took my fitted sheet and call light. R1 then started laughing. R1 stated, They caught me with the sheet around my neck and they stopped me, I was trying to do it. R1 then stated, The thought of suicide is really frequently lately. R1 was asked if there were ever staff that stayed in her room with her, R1 stated No, they never stay. R1 stated, I have good days and bad days; the bad days are really bad. R1 stated, I usually eat in my room by myself. R1 was asked what she does when she needs help. R1 stated, I am independent so I don't ask for help.On 8/20/2025 at 11:40AM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she does take care of R1 when she works. V6 stated, I have seen behaviors out of R1 like banging her head against the wall. V6 stated, I have never seen her try suicide. V6 stated R1 can be verbally aggressive to other residents especially R3. V6 stated R3 is confused but she will argue back at R1. V6 stated she was not aware of ever having 1:1 monitoring for R1.On 8/20/2025 at 11:58AM, V7 (Physician) was asked if he was familiar with R1, V7 stated Oh my God, please help with her, she is violent. V7 then stated, Is she still at the facility? V7 was asked if he was unaware of her return from the hospital and V7 stated, She has been sent out so many times I can't keep track. V7 stated she needs to be placed somewhere more fitting for her. V7 stated he gave the facility several facilities to send referrals to but evidently nobody will take her. V7 was asked if he felt like R1 was a threat to herself and others. V7 stated, Yes she is a threat to herself and to others, she hurt a staff member there by giving the staff member a head concussion. V7 was asked if he felt like R1 could possibly harm or kill herself and V7 stated, Oh, yes and I believe she tried but they caught her. V7 was asked if he felt like a call light in the bathroom and cords like remotes to the bed could be hazards for a resident with suicidal ideation. V7 stated, Of course they can, and I know they took away the sheets and I don't know that they can take everything away, but something needs to be done to assure safety for (R1), but they mainly need to get her placed somewhere more fitting and a place where she can be monitored closely. V7 stated R1 beats her head against the wall too and she could get a serious injury from that.On 8/20/2025 at 12:54PM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R1 used to be on the hall that she works but has since moved to the other hall. V8 was asked why R1 moved and V8 stated, I am not sure. When I came back to work after a couple of days off, (R1) had been moved. V8 was asked if she has ever seen behaviors with R1 while R1 resided on her hall, V8 stated she had seen behaviors like R1 banging her head against the walls. V8 stated, One time I heard R1 state she was going to kill herself, so we sent her to the hospital. V8 stated she has never seen R1 have any behaviors with other residents.On 8/20/2025 at 1:00PM, V2 (DON) came into V1's office where this surveyor was discussing R1's statement that she had frequent thoughts of suicide and had a plan of strangulation. V2 spoke up and said, I have never heard her mention that. V2 then left the room and yelled back that she was going to have R1 go to her office and sit with her. V2 then shortly came back to V1's office and summoned this surveyor to R1's room and stated that R1 stated she didn't say that. At 1:05PM, this surveyor entered the room, R1 was observed to be crying and when this surveyor asked her again about what she had said about wanting to kill herself, R1 stated she did say that. V2 and this surveyor stepped out of R1's room and V2 was asked if she felt the room of R1 was safe for someone that plans on strangulation. V2 went back into the room and looked around and noted the cords and stated, No but we did take away her sheets and call light. V2 was asked if R1 was ambulatory and V2 stated yes. V2 was then asked if R1 took herself to the bathroom independently and V2 stated yes, she does. This surveyor asked V2 to go look at R1's bathroom and see if she sees any hazards there. V2 came out of the bathroom and stated she wasn't aware there was a call light pull cord in the bathroom. V2 stated, I will cut that down right now and V2 left to go get scissors. V2 then went in the bathroom and cut the call cord. V1 then came to the hallway outside of R1's room and V2 reported that there was a call cord in the bathroom, and she cut it down. V1 stated he was unaware there was a cord in there as well. V1 stated to V2, (R1) has to be on constant 1:1 until we get her placed somewhere else, we have to for her safety. V2 stated, We will have to have department heads to take turns with her until I can get staff assigned to sit with her at all times. V1 and V2 were shown the thick metal pipe in the bathroom wall at the top above the toilet. V2 stated, Oh my I hadn't noticed that either. V2 stated, Well that is the sprinkler, and I can't do anything about that so there is that. At this time, this surveyor requested documentation of staff education for Suicidal Plan and/or Behavioral Health Care and V2 stated she has never done that type of training since she has been the Director of Nursing. V2 stated she has never trained the staff on Suicidal Plan/Threat or Behavioral Health Care. V2 stated she did not have training materials or policies on these topics and will have to get that information from corporate.On 8/20/2025 at 1:30PM, V1 requested this surveyor come to R1's room and stated, We have secured down all the cords and have taken off the remotes with cords on R1's bed and we have secured all the cords on the other bed in R1's room. All cords observed in R1's room were secured to the walls with plastic and screws. The folding chair was also removed. A staff member was observed sitting outside R1's door for 1:1 monitoring.On 8/27/2025 at 2:00PM, V1 presented an untitled document with V1's signature, a list of items and date of 8/20/2025, documenting items removed from R1's room. These items included, cords secured to wall, call cords removed from bathroom, folding chair removed, sharp objects removed, Walmart bags removed, and other hazardous items removed.On 8/20/2025 at 1:37PM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated she is involved with R1's care. V9 stated, She is something else. V9 stated, (R1) can be really good and then gets a trigger. V9 was asked what she meant by that, V9 stated, Anytime she doesn't get her way or what she wants. V9 stated the behaviors that she had mostly heard of was R1 banging her head hard against the wall. V9 stated that they took her sheets away because she said she was going to put the sheet around her neck and kill herself and V9 could not recall the date that this occurred. V9 stated she does work on care plans and some of R1's interventions were put in the wrong place on R1's Care Plan for the suicide interventions, but the interventions are 1. Listen to resident to validate comments. 2. Weekly 1:1 session with Social Services. 3. Let Psych know of issues. 4. Administer medications as ordered. 5. If resident talks of suicide, notify psych NP or MD for directions. V9 stated there was a period after a hospital return (unsure of which hospital return) when we had her on 1:1 but that was lifted by the Nurse Practitioner. V9 stated R1 has harmed a staff member and from what she heard the staff member turned around to leave R1's room and R1 slammed the door hitting the staff member in the back of their head causing a concussion. V9 stated some other behaviors are yelling, cursing, and disruptive to other residents. V9 states sometimes R1 states she has bad thoughts and R1 is encouraged to call the crisis hotline for psych but R1 refuses to call.On 8/20/2025 at 3:30PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated R1 has quite a bit of behaviors and must be sent to the emergency room as directed by V12 (Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner). V3 was asked to describe such behaviors and V3 explained behaviors as yelling, screaming, temper tantrum for lack of words, and banging her head against the wall. V3 stated R1's triggers are when R1's sister or dad do not come to the facility when she wants them to. V3 stated she has heard R1 say she has bad thoughts, and some days are bad days. V3 stated that staff reported to her that R1 stated she was going to strangle herself, so she reported this to V1 and V2. V3 stated we usually send R1 to the Emergency Room, but they send R1 right back. V3 was asked if a resident had suicidal thoughts and specifically strangulation, what are some items that should not be in the room, V3 stated any kind of cords, sheets and things of that nature. V3 stated she was not aware that R1's bathroom had a call light cord present and was unaware of the television cords. V3 stated she was unsure about the air conditioner cord or if it could be detached. V3 stated R1 has a blanket that she likes, and it is thin, but it does bring R1 comfort, so we left it with her. V3 was asked about plastic bags and V3 stated, those must have been brought in yesterday and they shouldn't be in there as she could harm herself with those. V3 stated R1 had gone shopping with her sister yesterday and that must be where those came from. V3 stated, I take suicide thoughts and attempts very seriously because you never know when they are going to do it. V3 stated R1 can go from being fine to behaviors escalating quickly but we usually know when she is escalating by the yelling and screaming. V3 stated she doesn't schedule extra staff for 1:1 but if the need arises, she calls people in to try to cover the 1:1. V3 was asked if she has had behavior training, V3 stated she has in the past but has not received training since she has been employed at this facility. V3 stated she is unaware of any behavior training in the facility.On 8/20/2025 at 3:50PM, V1 approached surveyor and said, Well we sent R1 out because of what she reported to you, and they are sending her right back. V1 was asked what his plans were for R1 when she arrives back to the facility. V1 stated, Nothing really, I am not going to do the 1:1 thing because that is what she wants and that is rewarding her behavior to me. V1 stated he must find a way to get her placed. V1 stated, I don't think (R1) is strong enough to hang herself. V1 was asked to explain what he meant by R1 not being strong enough, V1 stated I mean physically strong enough to do that. On 8/21/2025 at 9:00AM, R1 was observed resting in bed with a blanket. A staff member was observed sitting outside R1's door monitoring R1.On 8/21/2025 at 9:15AM, V10 (Social Service Director/SSD) stated she does frequent 1:1 session with R1. V10 stated I talk to her every day. V10 was asked what prompted the weekly 1:1 session with R1 and V10 stated, Mainly her diagnoses. V10 stated R1 has told her before she is having strong thoughts/bad feelings several times but always denies hearing voices. V10 said that she asked R1 what bad thoughts meant and R1 did not explain what the thoughts were. V10 stated she has tried very hard to get R1 into a better suited facility for her but continues to get denials. V10 stated she had gotten accepted into a facility and then R1 was sent to the hospital and then that facility denied her. V10 stated she was going to keep trying as R1 needs to be at a behavioral facility and with other residents her age. V10 stated she has sent out several referrals and has followed up with many, but nobody will accept R1. V10 stated she is still trying to place R1 in another facility.On 8/21/2025 at 9:33AM, V2 stated the plan for R1 was to continue to see the Psych Nurse Practitioner and send to the emergency room when behaviors arise and continue Suicide Watch. V2 stated she understood that some of the items that were in R1's room are considered a risk but V2 stated this is her home and we must follow Long Term Care Regulations. V2 stated we try to keep it like home. V2 stated we had R1 in a nice Suite but due to behaviors starting in June we had to move her to a different room for better visual checks on R1. V2 stated, We are not a behavioral facility. V2 stated I will keep R1 with 1:1 at all times until R1 is placed in a facility that is more equipped to handle a behavior resident. V2 was asked if she has done any type of training to the nursing department related to Behaviors, or Suicidal Residents and how to handle the situation if behaviors arise. V2 stated, I had training years ago, but I have never done any type of training to the staff here at the facility. I will get with Corporate and see what types of training they want me to do. V2 stated (R1) has been on 1:1 since yesterday. V2 stated she feels like R1 is manipulating the staff with her behaviors but said we still must deal with that type of behaviors as well.On 9/2/2025 at 11:52AM, V1 was asked if he knew if the referral was ever made for R1 with (Name of Counseling Center) that was recommended in the Progress Note on 4/14/25 by the hospital, V1 stated the facility does not do that and those types of referrals have to go through the hospital. V1 was asked if (Name of Counseling Center) ever comes to the facility to make visits with R1 and V1 stated no but she does have the hotline to call if ever she needs to call. V1 was asked if he knew why R1 sometimes would call 911 on her own when she is having behaviors, V1 stated she does that on her own before the nurse gets to call for help. V1 stated R1 has a phone and has the right to call the hotline as well as 911 when she wants to.On 8/22/2025 at 12:50PM, V12 (Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner) stated she visits R1 on a weekly basis and visits are held in R1's room. V12 stated, This facility is not the right placement for this type of resident with her mental health issues. V12 stated the services that R1 needs are not available here, R1 needs to be in a Psychiatric facility with clients more her age. V12 stated she was unaware of a call light cord present in R1's bathroom. V12 also stated she didn't notice all the cords present in R1's room such as cords to bed remotes, television cords, or a chair present in the room. V12 was asked if she felt those types of objects could be used to cause harm or have a successful attempt at suicide. V12 stated, Yes, they really could, and they do not need to be present in her room at all. V12 stated, Anytime someone makes the statement that they want to commit suicide and especially with a plan, should be taken very serious. V12 stated R1 has an excessive manipulatory behavior. V12 stated, I have always told the facility if (R1) ever makes the statement that she wants to die or wants to kill herself, they are to send (R1) straight to the Emergency Room. V12 stated, The facility should have never accepted this resident as she requires more services than the facility can accommodate. V12 stated R1 has behaviors if she doesn't get her way. V12 stated she is unsure what the facility will do as they have tried to place her several places, but everyone denies her. V12 stated she was not sure what the plan is for R1 at this point, but she does feel R1 has to have 1:1 at all times due to her being ambulatory and could retrieve harmful items from another resident's room. V12 stated there is a risk that R1 would harm herself if given the opportunity especially when her behaviors escalate.The facility policy titled Suicidal Threats dated [NAME][TRUNCATED]
Jul 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure prevention of misappropriation of resident property...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure prevention of misappropriation of resident property for 3 (R2, R3, and R5) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 13.The Findings Include:1.R2's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses in part of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, pain in left knee, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma of skin of scalp and neck, malignant neoplasm of esophagus.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates that R2 is cognitively intact.R2's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 12/27/24 with an end date of open ended of oxycodone 5mg (Milligrams) 1 tablet every 4 hours for pain.R2's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg administer 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN (as needed) for pain which documents on 07/08/25 an administration at 6:05PM by V6 (Registered Nurse/RN), 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and 6:22PM by V7 (RN). R2's Medication Administration History also documents oxycodone was administered 2 times by V6 on 07/12/25 both given at 6:23PM.R2's Controlled Substance Report dated 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:22PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered by V7 (RN). R2's Controlled Substance Report also documents on 07/12/25 V6 administered oxycodone 2 times, both at 6:23PM.On 07/16/25 at 3:10PM, R2 stated that he doesn't know of any problem with his medications. R2 said that when V7 (RN) works that he doesn't know what medication he is getting because she will crush all his medication up, so he doesn't know what all is in the cup. R2 said that V7 (RN) tells him that there is a pain pill in the crushed-up medications, but he doesn't know for sure. R2 said that sometimes the pain medication works, other times it doesn't.2. R3's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 06/04/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Phantom limb syndrome pain, pain unspecified, pain in left shoulder, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 11 which indicates moderately impaired cognition.R3's Physician Order Report for 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 06/04/25 and an end date of open ended for oxycodone 15mg give 1/2 tablet (7.5) every 4 hours PRN (as needed) dx (diagnosis) displaced fracture of anterior wall of left acetabulum.R3's Medication Administration History for 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents on 7/1/25 oxycodone 15mg administer 1/2 tablet was administered at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 administered at 6:19PM by and at 6:20PM both by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 administered at 6:04PM and at 6:05PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/12/25 administered 2 times at 6:21PM both by V6 (RN), and at 6:51PM by V7 (RN), on 07/13/25 administered at 6:24PM and at 6:26Pm both by V6 (RN).R3's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and 6:25 PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/04/25 at 6:11PM oxycodone every 4 hours corrected by V7 (RN) for 2 tablets comment documents correction at shift change with V6 (RN), at 6:36PM 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 oxycodone 1 tablet administered at 6:19PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:20PM by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered at 6:04PM and 6:05PM by V6 (RN), at 5:02AM V7 administered 1 tablet and at 5:16AM V7(RN) has 1 tablet documented as correction resident dropped. On 07/12/25 at 6:21PM oxycodone every 4 hours 2 tablets administered by V6 (RN) and at 6:21PM by V6 (RN) another 1 tablet administer and then V7 (RN) administered another 1 tablet at 6:51PM, at 10:38 PM V7 (RN) signed out 2 tablets and comment documents tab wasted resident dropped. On 07/13/25 at 6:24PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN) and then again at 6:26PM another 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN).On 07/21/25 at 3:06PM, R3 said that he gets his medication as ordered as far as he knows. R3 didn't have a problem with his medication administration. R3 said that he has never dropped any of his pain pills and that he always takes his medication with no problem.3. R5's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 05/28/25 with diagnoses in part of pressure ulcer of buttock, pain nondisplaced fracture of anterior wall of right acetabulum, and pain in unspecified joint.R5's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 04 which indicates R5 is cognitively impaired.R5's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 05/28/25 with an end date of open ended for oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN for dx (diagnosis) of pain.R5's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN was administered on 07/08/25 at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), again at 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and then at 6:25PM by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and again at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).R5's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:06pm by V6 (RN) and another 1 tablet administered at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), and then at 6:25PM 1 tablet administered by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).On 07/16/25 at 7:30PM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she has heard residents complain that when V7 (RN) works that they don't get the correct pill, that their pain pill will look different such as shape and color. V9 said that she has also heard that V7 (RN) is logging under other nurses' names and signing out controlled substances. V9 said that she has had residents ask why they didn't get their pain medication when V7(RN) was working. V9 said that she has reported this to V1 (Administrator) and to V2 (Director of Nursing).On 07/16/25 at 2:20PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she worked on 07/12/25 on the evening shift. V13 stated that R2 had come up and ask if he could have a pain pill and she noticed that V6 (RN) had signed out R2's Oxycodone 5mg tablets 2 times, both at 6:23PM. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R2 his oxycodone 5mg tablet 2 times at 6:23PM. V13 said that V6 (RN) told her that he did not give R2 any oxycodone that day and that he did not sign either of those administrations out. V13 said that she got to looking and noticed that R5 also had two tablets of her oxycodone signed out one after the other at 6:23PM and again at 6:24PM by V6. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R5 the oxycodone at 6:23PM and at 6:24PM she said that V6 said that he did not administer those pills at that time and he did not sign out those pills on the controlled substance report or medication administration report. V13 said that on 7/12/25 she tried to contact V1 (Administrator/ADM) but he wasn't in town, and he told her to call V2 (Director of Nursing/DON). V13 said that she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out medication under V6's name and maybe taking the drugs. V13 said that she didn't think that V6 was even in the building when the medications were being signed out. V13 said that she was not able to give R2 his oxycodone because it had already been signed out and it wasn't in the time frame for him to get another pill. V13 said that she was told not to say anything to V7 (RN) or anyone that V1 and V2 would take care of it and they had policies in place to take care of these things.On 07/16/25 at 11:45AM, V1 (Administrator/ADM) stated that now he is looking at some of the narcotic sign off sheets of R2, R3, and R5's that he does see that there is a problem and that they need to make sure to monitor the narcotics more carefully. V1 said that he did see several narcotics were signed off one right after the other when there should have been several hours in between some of those medications. V1 said that he just can't accuse someone of taking medications that they need proof and now it's brought to his attention he will monitor it closely. V1 said that on 07/12/25 that V13 (LPN) did contact him, and he told her to contact V2 (DON) he said that V13 was saying something about she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out narcotics under V6's (RN) name. V1 said they did do disciplinary action on V7(RN) along with in servicing all the nurses about not signing out medications under another nurse's name and an in-service on making sure that you have 2 nurses to witness when you destroy narcotic medications. V1 said that V7 (RN) had been destroying medications by herself sometimes. V1 said that he had the computers looked at to make sure that none of the nurses' passwords were saved and he did find out that V6's (RN) password was saved on one of the computers.On 07/16/25 at 1:15PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that she was made aware of a possible problem with V7 (RN) signing off controlled medications by V13 (LPN) on 07/12/25. V2 said that she doesn't know how V7 (RN) would have been able to sign out medication under V6's (RN) name. V2 said that V1 told her that V6's (RN) password was saved under google on a computer and they did remove the password. V2 said that she thinks V13 (LPN) called her around 9:00PM and said that V7 (RN) signed off controlled medications under V6 (RN) name at 6:23PM and that V6 (RN) wasn't in the building when the medication was signed out. V2 said they pulled V6's (RN) punch sheet, and he punched out of the building at 6:30PM. V2 said that when she came in on 07/13/25, she looked at the controlled substance reports. V2 said that they did give V7 (RN) a disciplinary action for disposing of controlled substance without another nurse to witness the destruction along with signing out medications under another nurse's name. V2 said that V7 (RN) stated that she did not sign out medication under another nurse's name. V2 said that she did see on several controlled substance report sheets that V7 (RN) marks other she said that when she looked at the controlled substance sheets that there wasn't a lot of the sheets that are marked other. V2 said that she doesn't know why there are a couple of times that V7 (RN) signed out medications right after another nurse has given the controlled medications already. V2 said that it does bear watching the narcotics more closely. V2 said that she did in-service all nurses about making sure they don't sign out medication under another nurse's name and to make sure that there are always 2 nurses present when destroying medication. V2 said that they are going to investigate the narcotics more. V2 said that V7 (RN) told her that when she does destroy medications that she has another nurse witness it.On 07/16/25 at 5:34PM, V7 (RN) stated that she did receive education from V2 about making sure that she always has two nurses present when destroying medication along with making sure that she is not signed into another nurse's name when administering medications. V7 said that she was also educated on how to amend the controlled substance sheet and medication administration history, so it doesn't look like we administered medications close together when we forget to sign out medications. V7 said that sometimes the internet will go out and then they can't chart, and it will look like they signed out medication closely. V7 said that if she was logged into V6's (RN) account when charting she did not know she was logged in as V6 (RN). V7 said that it looks like she gives R3 a lot on the controlled substance report because R3 will drop the pill sometimes or when she is punching out the oxycodone it's a half tablet and it will break apart and disintegrates when she pops it out. V7 said that she crushes R2's medications because he has swallowing problems, and she doesn't want him to choke. V7 said that she always makes sure to chart in the comment section on the controlled substance reports when she has to take an extra pill or if her or the resident drops a pill.On 07/21/25 at 1:33PM, V6 (RN) stated that he did not sign off on the controlled substance reports or on the Medication Administration Report for R2's oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that he didn't sign off on 07/12/25 at 6:23PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that at 6:23PM on 7/12/25 he had already given the keys to V7 (RN) and that he was on the way out the door and he stopped in to help another resident who was having breathing problems then went out the door. V6 said that there is no way he could have signed off those medications for sure on 07/12/25. V6 said that he did not sign out oxycodone for R3 on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM. V6 said that he did not witness V7's (RN) correction on 07/04/25 and he doesn't know how he signed off that he gave R3's medication at 6:36PM. V6 stated he wasn't even working on that side on 07/04/25. V6 said that he did not give R3 oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:04PM or at 6:05PM. V6 said that he did not give R3 on 07/21/25 any medications at 6:21PM two times. V6 stated that on 7/21/25 he did not give R3 any oxycodone at 6:24PM or at 6:26PM. V6 said that it is pi**ing him off that these are signed off under his name and he did not administer those medications at those times and dates. V6 said that he doesn't know what is going on but it's making him mad. V6 said that he follows the doctors' orders and that he doesn't give any oxycodone or pain medication at the end of his shift. V6 said that at 6PM he gives his keys to the next shift coming on and gives report and does the narcotic count.On 07/22/25 at 2:04PM, V1 stated they don't have a policy on drug diversion.The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program with a revision date of 7/2015 documents under #4. Establishing a Resident Sensitive Environment documents this facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of property within the required time frames for 3 (R2, R3, and R5) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 13The Findings Include: 1.R2's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses in part of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, pain in left knee, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma of skin of scalp and neck, malignant neoplasm of esophagus.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates that R2 is cognitively intact.R2's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 12/27/24 with an end date of open ended of oxycodone 5mg (Milligrams) 1 tablet every 4 hours for pain.R2's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg administer 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN (as needed) for pain which documents on 07/08/25 an administration at 6:05PM by V6 (Registered Nurse/RN), 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and 6:22PM by V7 (RN). R2's Medication Administration History also documents oxycodone was administered 2 times by V6 on 07/12/25 both given at 6:23PM.R2's Controlled Substance Report dated 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:22PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered by V7 (RN). R2's Controlled Substance Report also documents on 07/12/25 V6 administered oxycodone 2 times, both at 6:23PM. 2. R3's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 06/04/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Phantom limb syndrome pain, pain unspecified, pain in left shoulder, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 11 which indicates moderately impaired cognition.R3's Physician Order Report for 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 06/04/25 and an end date of open ended for oxycodone 15mg give 1/2 tablet (7.5) every 4 hours PRN (as needed) dx (diagnosis) displaced fracture of anterior wall of left acetabulum.R3's Medication Administration History for 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents on 7/1/25 oxycodone 15mg administer 1/2 tablet was administered at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 administered at 6:19PM by and at 6:20PM both by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 administered at 6:04PM and at 6:05PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/12/25 administered 2 times at 6:21PM both by V6 (RN), and at 6:51PM by V7 (RN), on 07/13/25 administered at 6:24PM and at 6:26Pm both by V6 (RN).R3's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and 6:25 PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/04/25 at 6:11PM oxycodone every 4 hours corrected by V7 (RN) for 2 tablets comment documents correction at shift change with V6 (RN), at 6:36PM 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 oxycodone 1 tablet administered at 6:19PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:20PM by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered at 6:04PM and 6:05PM by V6 (RN), at 5:02AM V7 administered 1 tablet and at 5:16AM V7(RN) has 1 tablet documented as correction resident dropped. On 07/12/25 at 6:21PM oxycodone every 4 hours 2 tablets administered by V6 (RN) and at 6:21PM by V6 (RN) another 1 tablet administer and then V7 (RN) administered another 1 tablet at 6:51PM, at 10:38 PM V7 (RN) signed out 2 tablets and comment documents tab wasted resident dropped. On 07/13/25 at 6:24PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN) and then again at 6:26PM another 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN). 3. R5's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 05/28/25 with diagnoses in part of pressure ulcer of buttock, pain nondisplaced fracture of anterior wall of right acetabulum, and pain in unspecified joint.R5's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 04 which indicates R5 is cognitively impaired.R5's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 05/28/25 with an end date of open ended for oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN for dx (diagnosis) of pain.R5's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN was administered on 07/08/25 at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), again at 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and then at 6:25PM by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and again at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).R5's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:06pm by V6 (RN) and another 1 tablet administered at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), and then at 6:25PM 1 tablet administered by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).On 07/16/25 at 7:30PM V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she has heard resident complain that when V7 (RN) works that they don't get the correct pill and that their pain pill will look different such as shape and color. V9 said that she has also heard that V7 (RN) is logging under other nurses' names and signing out controlled substances. V9 said that she has had resident ask why they didn't get their pain medication when V7(RN) was working. V9 said that she has reported this to V1 (Administrator) and to V2 (Director of Nursing).On 07/16/25 at 2:20PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she worked on 07/12/25 on the evening shift. V13 stated that R2 had come up and ask if he could have a pain pill and she noticed that V6 (RN) had signed out R2's Oxycodone 5mg tablets 2 times, both at 6:23PM. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R2 his oxycodone 5mg tablet 2 times at 6:23PM. V13 said that V6 (RN) told her that he did not give R2 any oxycodone that day and that he did not sign either of those administrations out. V13 said that she got to looking and noticed that R5 also had two tablets of her oxycodone signed out one after the other at 6:23PM and again at 6:24PM by V6. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R5 the oxycodone at 6:23PM and at 6:24PM she said that V6 said that he did not administer those pills at that time and he did not sign out those pills on the controlled substance report or medication administration report. V13 said that on 7/12/25 she tried to contact V1 (Administrator/ADM) but he wasn't in town, and he told her to call V2 (Director of Nursing/DON). V13 said that she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out medication under V6's name and maybe taking the drugs. V13 said that she didn't think that V6 was even in the building when the medications were being signed out. V13 said that she was not able to give R2 his oxycodone because it had already been signed out and it wasn't in the time frame for him to get another pill. V13 said that she was told not to say anything to V7 (RN) or anyone that V1 and V2 would take care of it and they had policies in place to take care of these things. On 07/16/25 at 11:45AM, V1 (Administrator/ADM) stated that now he is looking at some of the narcotic sign off sheets for R2, R3, and R5's that he does see that there is a problem and that they need to make sure to monitor the narcotics more carefully. V1 said that he did see several narcotics were signed off one right after the other when there should have been several hours in between some of those medications. V1 said that he just can't accuse someone of taking medications that they need proof and now it's brought to his attention he will monitor it closely. V1 said that on 07/12/25 that V13 (LPN) did contact him, and he told her to contact V2 (DON). V1 said that V13 was saying something about she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out Narcotics under V6's (RN) name. V1 said they did do disciplinary action on V7(RN) along with in servicing all the nurses about not signing out medications under another nurse's name and an in-service on making sure that you have 2 nurses to witness when you destroy narcotic medications. V1 said that V7 (RN) had been destroying controlled medications by herself sometimes. V1 said that he had the computers looked at to make sure that none of the nurse's passwords were saved and he did find out that V6's (RN) password was saved on one of the computers. On 07/16/25 at 1:15PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that she was made aware of a possible problem with V7 (RN) signing off controlled medications by V13 (LPN) on 07/12/25. V2 said that she doesn't know how V7 (RN) would have been able to sign out medication under V6's (RN) name. V2 said that V1 told her that V6's (RN) password was saved under google on a computer and they did remove the password. V2 said that she thinks V13 (LPN) called her around 9:00PM and said that V7 (RN) signed off controlled medications under V6's (RN) name at 6:23PM and that V6 (RN) wasn't in the building when the medication was signed out. V2 said they pulled V6 (RN) punch sheet, and he punch out of the building at 6:30PM. V2 said that when she came in on 07/13/25 that she looked at the controlled substance reports. V2 said that they did give V7 (RN) a disciplinary action for disposing of controlled substance without another nurse to witness the destruction along with signing out medications under another nurse's name. V2 said that V7 (RN) stated that she did not sign out medication under another nurse's name. V2 said that she did see on several controlled substance report sheets that V7 (RN) marks other and said that when she looked at the controlled substance sheets that there wasn't a lot of the sheets that are marked other. V2 said that she doesn't know why there are a couple of times that V7 (RN) signed out medications right after another nurse has given the controlled medications already. V2 said that it does bear watching the narcotics more closely. V2 said that she did in-service all nurses about making sure they don't sign out medication under another nurse name and to make sure that there are always 2 nurses present when destroying medication. V2 said that they are going to investigate the narcotics more. V2 said that V7 (RN) told her that when she does destroy medications that she has another nurse witness it. On 07/16/25 at 5:34PM V7 (RN) stated that she did receive education from V2 about making sure that she always has two nurse present when destroying medication along with making sure that I'm not signed into another nurse's name when administering medications. V2 said that she was also educated on how to amend the controlled substance sheet and medication administration history, so it doesn't look like we administered medication close together when we forget to sign out medications. V7 said that sometimes the internet will go out and then they can't chart, and it will look like they signed out medication closely. V7 said that if she was logged into V6 (RN) account when charting she did not know she was logged in as V6 (RN). V7 said that it looks like she gives R3 a lot on the controlled substance report because R3 will drop the pill sometimes or when she is punching out the oxycodone it's a half tablet and it will break apart and disintegrates when she pops it out. V7 said that she crushes R2's medications because he has swallowing problems, and she doesn't want him to choke. V7 said that she always makes sure to chart in the comment section on the controlled substance reports when she has to take an extra pill or if her or the resident drops a pill. On 07/21/25 at 1:33PM V6 (RN) stated that he did not sign off on the controlled substance report or on the Medication Administration report for R2's oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that he didn't sign off on 07/12/25 at 6:23PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that at 6:23PM on 7/12/25 he had already given the keys to V7 (RN) and that he was on the way out the door and he stopped in to help another resident who was having breathing problems then went out the door. V6 said that there is no way he could have signed off those medications for sure on 07/12/25. V6 said that he did not sign out oxycodone for R3 on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM. V6 said that he did not witness V7 (RN) correction on 07/04/25 and he doesn't know how he signed off that he gave R3 6:36PM. V6 stated he wasn't even working on that side on 07/04/25. V6 said that he did not give R3 oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:04PM or at 6:05PM. V6 said that he did not give R3 on 07/21/25 any medications at 6:21PM two times. V6 stated that he did not give R3 on 07/13/25 any oxycodone at 6:24PM or at 6:26PM. V6 said that it is pi**ing him off that these are signed off under his name and he did not administer those medications at those times and dates. V6 said that he doesn't know what is going on but it's making him mad. V6 said that he follows the doctors' orders and that he doesn't give any oxycodone or pain medication at the end of his shift. V6 said that at 6PM he gives his keys to the next shift coming on and gives report and does count. On 7/21/25 at 2:00PM, V1 (ADM) said the day on 07/12/25 that V13 reported it was hard to prove that V7 signed off those medications under V6 because the cameras were down on one hall and he couldn't see if anyone was over on that hall passing medication to the residents. V1 said that he has never dealt with drug diversion before and this is his first time. V1 said that he looks at the behavior of the employees working to see if they look like they are taking anything. V1 said that he hasn't seen anyone that looked like they are under the influence of drugs. V1 said this is his very first experience with it as a few weeks ago. V1 said that he doesn't know at what point to contact the police and he would have to talk with his supervisor. V1 said that he doesn't know when it would come to the point of contacting the local authorities. V1 said there are several discrepancies in the narcotic count sheets. V1 said that he does see where V6 signed off the narcotics on the 12th at the same time and a minute apart on R2 and R5. V1 said that he doesn't know where the medication went to. V1 said that they always encourage staff to speak up regarding any kind of abuse and they don't get in trouble for it. V1 said they encourage staff to let them know what is going on.On 07/22/25 at 11:49AM, V1 (ADM) stated that he did not submit an initial report into Illinois Department of Public Health regarding the narcotics being signed off one right after the other, because they were signed out and he didn't think anything was missing. V1 stated that he was notified by the surveyor about the medications on R2, R3, and R5 that were signed out one after the other on several dates. V1 stated that it did seem weird, and he didn't know why those medications would have been signed off like that and he didn't know where the medications were. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program with a revision date of 7/2015 documents under 8. External Reporting of Potential Abuse a. Initial reporting of allegations. If mistreatment has occurred, the resident's representative and the Department of Public Health shall be informed as soon as possible, but no later than within 24 hours of the allegation. The allegation shall either be called or faxed in to the regional Public Health Office. Public health shall be informed that an occurrence of potential mistreatment has been reported and is being investigated. and The facility shall immediately contact local law enforcement authorities (i.e. telephoning 911 where available) in the following situations:.4. When a crime has been committed in a facility by a person other than a resident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate and complete investigations of abuse allegati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate and complete investigations of abuse allegations in accordance with required time frames for 3 (R2, R3, and R5) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 13The Findings Include:1.R2's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses in part of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, pain in left knee, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma of skin of scalp and neck, malignant neoplasm of esophagus.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates that R2 is cognitively intact.R2's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 12/27/24 with an end date of open ended of oxycodone 5mg (Milligrams) 1 tablet every 4 hours for pain.R2's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg administer 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN (as needed) for pain which documents on 07/08/25 an administration at 6:05PM by V6 (Registered Nurse/RN), 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and 6:22PM by V7 (RN). R2's Medication Administration History also documents oxycodone was administered 2 times by V6 on 07/12/25 both given at 6:23PM.R2's Controlled Substance Report dated 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM oxycodone every 4 hours PRN 1 tablet was administered by V6, on 07/08/25 at 6:22PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered by V7 (RN). R2's Controlled Substance Report also documents on 07/12/25 V6 administered oxycodone 2 times, both at 6:23PM. 2. R3's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 06/04/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Phantom limb syndrome pain, pain unspecified, pain in left shoulder, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 11 which indicates moderately impaired cognition.R3's Physician Order Report for 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 06/04/25 and an end date of open ended for oxycodone 15mg give 1/2 tablet (7.5) every 4 hours PRN (as needed) dx (diagnosis) displaced fracture of anterior wall of left acetabulum.R3's Medication Administration History for 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents on 7/1/25 oxycodone 15mg administer 1/2 tablet was administered at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 administered at 6:19PM by and at 6:20PM both by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 administered at 6:04PM and at 6:05PM both by V6 (RN), on 07/12/25 administered 2 times at 6:21PM both by V6 (RN), and at 6:51PM by V7 (RN), on 07/13/25 administered at 6:24PM and at 6:26Pm both by V6 (RN).R3's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and 6:25 PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/04/25 at 6:11PM oxycodone every 4 hours corrected by V7 (RN) for 2 tablets comment documents correction at shift change with V6 (RN), at 6:36PM 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN), on 07/07/25 oxycodone 1 tablet administered at 6:19PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:20PM by V7 (RN), on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered at 6:04PM and 6:05PM by V6 (RN), at 5:02AM V7 administered 1 tablet and at 5:16AM V7(RN) has 1 tablet documented as correction resident dropped. On 07/12/25 at 6:21PM oxycodone every 4 hours 2 tablets administered by V6 (RN) and at 6:21PM by V6 (RN) another 1 tablet administer and then V7 (RN) administered another 1 tablet at 6:51PM, at 10:38 PM V7 (RN) signed out 2 tablets and comment documents tab wasted resident dropped. On 07/13/25 at 6:24PM oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN) and then again at 6:26PM another 1 tablet administered by V6 (RN). 3. R5's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 05/28/25 with diagnoses in part of pressure ulcer of buttock, pain nondisplaced fracture of anterior wall of right acetabulum, and pain in unspecified joint.R5's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 04 which indicates R5 is cognitively impaired.R5's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 05/28/25 with an end date of open ended for oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN for dx (diagnosis) of pain.R5's Medication Administration History dated 07/01/25 to 07/17/25 documents oxycodone 5mg 1 tablet every 4 hours PRN was administered on 07/08/25 at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), again at 6:06PM by V6 (RN) and then at 6:25PM by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and again at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).R5's Controlled Substance Report from 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 documents on 07/08/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:06pm by V6 (RN) and another 1 tablet administered at 6:06Pm by V6 (RN), and then at 6:25PM 1 tablet administered by V7 (RN), and on 07/12/25 oxycodone every 4 hours 1 tablet was administered at 6:23PM by V6 (RN) and at 6:24PM by V6 (RN).On 07/16/25 at 7:30PM V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she has heard resident complain that when V7 (RN) works that they don't get the correct pill and that their pain pill will look different such as shape and color. V9 said that she has also heard that V7 (RN) is logging under other nurses' names and signing out controlled substances. V9 said that she has had resident ask why they didn't get their pain medication when V7(RN) was working. V9 said that she has reported this to V1 (Administrator) and to V2 (Director of Nursing). On 07/16/25 at 2:20PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she worked on 07/12/25 on the evening shift. V13 stated that R2 had come up and ask if he could have a pain pill and she noticed that V6 (RN) had signed out R2's Oxycodone 5mg tablets 2 times, both at 6:23PM. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R2 his oxycodone 5mg tablet 2 times at 6:23PM. V13 said that V6 (RN) told her that he did not give R2 any oxycodone that day and that he did not sign either of those administrations out. V13 said that she got to looking and noticed that R5 also had two tablets of her oxycodone signed out one after the other at 6:23PM and again at 6:24PM by V6. V13 said that she contacted V6 (RN) and asked him if he gave R5 the oxycodone at 6:23PM and at 6:24PM she said that V6 said that he did not administer those pills at that time and he did not sign out those pills on the controlled substance report or medication administration report. V13 said that on 7/12/25 she tried to contact V1 (Administrator/ADM) but he wasn't in town, and he told her to call V2 (Director of Nursing/DON). V13 said that she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out medication under V6's name and maybe taking the drugs. V13 said that she didn't think that V6 was even in the building when the medications were being signed out. V13 said that she was not able to give R2 his oxycodone because it had already been signed out and it wasn't in the time frame for him to get another pill. V13 said that she was told not to say anything to V7 (RN) or anyone that V1 and V2 would take care of it and they had policies in place to take care of these things.On 07/16/25 at 11:45AM, V1 (Administrator/ADM) stated that now he is looking at some of the narcotic sign off sheets for R2, R3, and R5's that he does see that there is a problem and that they need to make sure to monitor the narcotics more carefully. V1 said that he did see several narcotics were signed off one right after the other when there should have been several hours in between some of those medications. V1 said that he just can't accuse someone of taking medications that they need proof and now it's brought to his attention he will monitor it closely. V1 said that on 07/12/25 that V13 (LPN) did contact him, and he told her to contact V2 (DON). V1 said that V13 was saying something about she thought that V7 (RN) was signing out Narcotics under V6's (RN) name. V1 said they did do disciplinary action on V7(RN) along with in servicing all the nurses about not signing out medications under another nurse's name and an in-service on making sure that you have 2 nurses to witness when you destroy narcotic medications. V1 said that V7 (RN) had been destroying controlled medications by herself sometimes. V1 said that he had the computers looked at to make sure that none of the nurse's passwords were saved and he did find out that V6's (RN) password was saved on one of the computers. On 07/16/25 at 1:15PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that she was made aware of a possible problem with V7 (RN) signing off controlled medications by V13 (LPN) on 07/12/25. V2 said that she doesn't know how V7 (RN) would have been able to sign out medication under V6's (RN) name. V2 said that V1 told her that V6's (RN) password was saved under google on a computer and they did remove the password. V2 said that she thinks V13 (LPN) called her around 9:00PM and said that V7 (RN) signed off controlled medications under V6's (RN) name at 6:23PM and that V6 (RN) wasn't in the building when the medication was signed out. V2 said they pulled V6 (RN) punch sheet, and he punch out of the building at 6:30PM. V2 said that when she came in on 07/13/25 that she looked at the controlled substance reports. V2 said that they did give V7 (RN) a disciplinary action for disposing of controlled substance without another nurse to witness the destruction along with signing out medications under another nurse's name. V2 said that V7 (RN) stated that she did not sign out medication under another nurse's name. V2 said that she did see on several controlled substance report sheets that V7 (RN) marks other and said that when she looked at the controlled substance sheets that there wasn't a lot of the sheets that are marked other. V2 said that she doesn't know why there are a couple of times that V7 (RN) signed out medications right after another nurse has given the controlled medications already. V2 said that it does bear watching the narcotics more closely. V2 said that she did in-service all nurses about making sure they don't sign out medication under another nurse name and to make sure that there are always 2 nurses present when destroying medication. V2 said that they are going to investigate the narcotics more. V2 said that V7 (RN) told her that when she does destroy medications that she has another nurse witness it. On 07/16/25 at 5:34PM V7 (RN) stated that she did receive education from V2 about making sure that she always has two nurse present when destroying medication along with making sure that I'm not signed into another nurse's name when administering medications. V2 said that she was also educated on how to amend the controlled substance sheet and medication administration history, so it doesn't look like we administered medication close together when we forget to sign out medications. V7 said that sometimes the internet will go out and then they can't chart, and it will look like they signed out medication closely. V7 said that if she was logged into V6 (RN) account when charting she did not know she was logged in as V6 (RN). V7 said that it looks like she gives R3 a lot on the controlled substance report because R3 will drop the pill sometimes or when she is punching out the oxycodone it's a half tablet and it will break apart and disintegrates when she pops it out. V7 said that she crushes R2's medications because he has swallowing problems, and she doesn't want him to choke. V7 said that she always makes sure to chart in the comment section on the controlled substance reports when she has to take an extra pill or if her or the resident drops a pill. On 07/21/25 at 1:33PM V6 (RN) stated that he did not sign off on the controlled substance report or on the Medication Administration report for R2's oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:05PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that he didn't sign off on 07/12/25 at 6:23PM for 2 administrations. V6 said that at 6:23PM on 7/12/25 he had already given the keys to V7 (RN) and that he was on the way out the door and he stopped in to help another resident who was having breathing problems then went out the door. V6 said that there is no way he could have signed off those medications for sure on 07/12/25. V6 said that he did not sign out oxycodone for R3 on 07/01/25 at 6:24PM and at 6:25PM. V6 said that he did not witness V7 (RN) correction on 07/04/25 and he doesn't know how he signed off that he gave R3 6:36PM. V6 stated he wasn't even working on that side on 07/04/25. V6 said that he did not give R3 oxycodone on 07/08/25 at 6:04PM or at 6:05PM. V6 said that he did not give R3 on 07/21/25 any medications at 6:21PM two times. V6 stated that he did not give R3 on 07/13/25 any oxycodone at 6:24PM or at 6:26PM. V6 said that it is pi**ing him off that these are signed off under his name and he did not administer those medications at those times and dates. V6 said that he doesn't know what is going on but it's making him mad. V6 said that he follows the doctors' orders and that he doesn't give any oxycodone or pain medication at the end of his shift. V6 said that at 6PM he gives his keys to the next shift coming on and gives report and does count.On 07/22/25 at 11:49AM, V1 (ADM) stated that he did not submit an initial report into Illinois Department of Public Health regarding the narcotics being signed off one right after the other, because they were signed out and he didn't think anything was missing. V1 stated that he was notified by the surveyor about the medications on R2, R3, and R5 that were signed out one after the other on several dates. V1 said that he was going to start the initial report and send it in to the Department of Public Health.On 07/22/25 at 12:14PM, an initial report was submitted to the Illinois Department of Public Health incident web portal which document residents' names as R2 and R5, Incident Category as drug diversion, police notification documents Yes, and the Date of Occurrence documents 07/21/25.On 07/23/25 at 3:14PM, V1 was notified that R3 was not listed in the initial incident report to Illinois Department of Public Health along with the date of occurrence was listed as 07/21/25 instead of 07/12/25.On 07/23/25 at 3:28PM, V1 sent in a new initial incident report into the Illinois Department of Public Health web portal that included R2, R3, and R5 with incident Category as Drug Diversion and the date of occurrence as 07/12/25.The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program with a revision date of 7/2015 documents #5. Internal reporting requirements and identification of allegations. Upon learning of the report, the administrator shall initiate an incident investigation.#7. Internal Investigation of Abuse, neglect, or misappropriation allegations and response A. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was alleged or suspected. B. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation will result in an abuse investigation. F. Final Abuse investigation report the investigator will report the conclusion of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly dispose of controlled substance medication for 2 (R2 and R3...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly dispose of controlled substance medication for 2 (R2 and R3) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 13. The Findings Include:1. R2's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses in part of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, pain in left knee, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma of skin of scalp and neck, malignant neoplasm of esophagus.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates that R2 is cognitively intact.R2's Physician Order Report dated 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 12/27/24 with an end date of open ended of oxycodone 5mg (Milligrams) 1 tablet every 4 hours for pain. R2's Controlled Substance Report dated 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 for oxycodone every 4 hours PRN (as needed) documents on 07/01/25 at 7:12PM, 07/03/25 at 4:02AM, and 07/10/25 at 12:38AM by V7 (Registered Nurse/RN) an amount of 1 tablet documents an action of correction with a reason of other and documents correction under comments. 2. R3's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 06/04/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Phantom limb syndrome pain, pain unspecified, pain in left shoulder, and chronic R3's Face Sheet dated 07/17/25 documents an admission date of 06/04/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Phantom limb syndrome pain, pain unspecified, pain in left shoulder, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 11 which indicates moderately impaired cognition.R3's Physician Order Report for 06/17/25 to 07/17/25 documents a prescription with a start date of 06/04/25 and an end date of open ended for oxycodone 15mg give 1/2 tablet (7.5) every 4 hours PRN (as needed) dx (diagnosis) displaced fracture of anterior wall of left acetabulum. R3's Controlled Substance Report for 07/01/25 to 07/20/25 for Oxycodone every 4 hours PRN on 07/03/25 at 5:07AM by V7 (RN) 1 tablet given, action as correction, comments resident dropped. On 07/04/25 at 6:11PM by V7 (RN) documents 2 tablets, action correction, comments correction at shift change with V6 (RN). On 07/06/25 at 6:30PM by V7 (RN) 1 tablet given, action as correction, comments correction. On 07/07/25 at 5:13AM by V7 (RN) 1 tablet given, action as correction, comments correction. On 07/08/25 at 5:16Am by V7 (RN) 1 tablet given, action as correction, comments res (resident) dropped. On 07/12/25 at 10:38PM by V7 (RN) 1 tablet given, action as correction, comments tab wasted, resident dropped.On 07/16/25 at 11:45AM, V1 (Administrator/ADM) state that he was notified by V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) on 07/12/25 that V7(RN) was not disposing of controlled substance with a witness. V1 stated that they did do a disciplinary action with V7 (RN) regarding making sure that when disposing of controlled substances that she has another nurse to witness the dispose of the controlled substance.On 07/16/25 at 1:15PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that on R3 that V7 (RN) stated that she signed out so many and had correction and others marked was because R3 would drop the medication a lot and V7 (RN) would have to get a new pill. V2 said that she did give V7 (RN) a disciplinary action with V7 (RN) regarding making sure when she is disposing of controlled substance, she has another nurse present to witness the disposal. V2 said that V7 told her that she did have a witness when she disposed of controlled substance, she just forgot to have them sign that they witnessed.On 07/16/25 at 5:34PM, V7 (RN) stated that she was given a disciplinary action from V2 (DON) regarding not disposing of controlled substance properly by not having a witness to observe the disposal of the controlled substance. V7 said that when she marks other or correction on the controlled substance reports that she usually always put something under the comment section. V7 said if there is nothing under the comment section of the controlled substance report for she doesn't know why. V7 said that she does have another witness when she must dispose of a controlled substance, she just forgets to have them sign the controlled substance report form. V7 said that will never happen again. V7 said that R3 will drop his controlled substance often and she will have to get another one out or the pill has disintegrated because it is only a half of tab and it falls apart easy when you pop it out.On 07/22/25 at 12:03PM, V6 (Registered Nurse) stated that he did not do a correction with V7 (RN) on 07/04/25 and that he doesn't know why his name is in the comments on R3's-controlled substance report. V6 stated that he has never witnessed or disposed of any controlled substance with V7 (RN).A documents titled Employee Disciplinary Action with a date of 07/13/25 documents employee name of V7 (RN). A description of infraction documents was noted that (V7) was not disposing of controlled substance correctly. Also she charted under another nurses name. All shifts must complete a narc (Narcotic) count to ensure accuracy. All Narcs must be destroyed per regulations including a 2nd nurse as a witness. In the future if not correction, further disciplines will follow. Supervisor's Signature is V2 (DON).The Facility policy titled Controlled Substance Disposal with no effective date documents under policy- Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substance are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. Procedures B. When a dose of a controlled medication is removed from the container for administration but refused by the resident or not given for any reason, it is not placed back in the container. It is destroyed in the presence of two licensed nurses or pharmacist and nurse, and the disposal is documented on the accountability record/book on the line representing that dose. The same process applies to the disposal of unused partial tablets and unused portions of single dose ampules and doses of controlled substance wasted for any reason.
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary supervision was provided to prevent a fall with in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary supervision was provided to prevent a fall with injury for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. This failure resulted in R1 being found in the floor resulting in mildly displaced left lateral sixth and seventh rib fractures and an acute, mildly displaced, and angulated fracture of the left femoral neck. Findings include: R1's admission Record documents an admission date to the facility of 3/16/25 with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, altered mental status, unspecified, alzheimer's disease, unspecified and dementia in other diseases classified. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS section GG documents that R1 has impairment in both sides of upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and impairment on one side for lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle foot) and uses a wheelchair as a mobility device. R1's Care Plan documented a focus area of R1 at risk for falling related to alzheimers disease/dementia, with interventions including observe frequently and place in supervised area when out of bed. On 5/2/25 at 9:40 AM, V3 (Family) stated R1 had been transferred to this facility for rehabilitation after a fracture to her right femur. V3 stated R1 had 4 falls within one month time frame that she had been in the facility. V3 stated R1 had been significantly injured in two of the falls that included a laceration to the lip and fracture to the left hip. V3 stated he did not receive any communication from the facility on R1's fall on 4/4/2025 when she had been transported to the local hospital. On 5/2/25 at 10:49 AM, V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated she was familiar with R1 and has cared for her. V11 stated R1 did have multiple falls while in the facility. V11 stated R1 did have a habit of trying to get up from her wheelchair without assistance. On 5/2/25 at 10:58 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated he was familiar with R1 and has cared for her. V5 stated R1 had a habit of trying to stand up from her wheelchair and had been at risk for falls. V5 stated R1 should not be out of staff's line of sight because of her impulsive behavior of trying to stand without assistance anytime she was in her wheelchair. V5 stated nurses are to report to another nurse when they are leaving the unit floor and CNA staff are to report to the nurse when they are leaving the unit floor so there is coverage. V5 stated, he had never had 2 staff members off the unit floor together, it should always be a rotation. On 5/2/25 at 10:59 AM, V9 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) stated, she did have direct patient care with R1. V9 stated R1 was confused and always trying to stand up from her wheelchair without assistance. V9 stated, that R1 needed constant care and if you took your eyes off of her, she would attempt to get up out of her wheelchair. V9 stated she had observed multiple times staff redirecting R1 when she would try to stand without assistance. On 5/2/25 at 11:20 AM, V8 (Physical Therapy Assistant/PTA) stated, she did have direct care with R1. V8 stated she provided services to R1 that included ambulation, balance, walking and strengthening. V8 stated R1 was very confused most of the time and did attempt to stand on her own frequently from her wheelchair. V8 stated R1 did have mulitple falls while in the facility. V8 stated R1 needed a lot of verbal cues during therapy, but would respond to them. V8 stated R1 was a fall risk and should not have been out of staff sight. V8 stated, on 4/4/2025, V6 (CNA) came to the physical therapy room to ask her to stay with R1 who had fallen in the dining room. On 5/2/25 at 12:07 PM, V7 (CNA) stated he didn't normally work with R1 and had been pulled from his usual unit to work R1's unit/hall on 4/4/2025 when R1 had been found in the dining room floor. V7 stated V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) had left R1's unit/hall (where she was assigned) to go to a different hall in the facility for a few minutes sometime after 1:00 PM. V7 stated R1 had been sitting at the dining room table with another resident when he also left the unit to go to his car outside the building to get his vital sign equipment and was gone for about 5 minutes. V7 stated he did not notify anyone that he had left the hall to go outside. V7 stated it is the facility process for CNA's to notify the nurse when leaving the floor to help make sure the floor has coverage. V7 stated there was no staff member in the dining room with R1 when he left. V7 stated when he was walking back down the hallway with V4 (LPN) around 1:14 PM when V6 (CNA) notified them that R1 had been found in the dining room floor. On 5/2/25 at 12:13 PM, V6 (CNA) stated, on 4/4/25 she had been working on R1's unit. V6 stated she had been pulled to work R1's hall that day, however, does not normally work there. V6 stated she had been in another resident's room when she heard yelling help, help, help around 1:14 PM. V6 stated when she went out to the dining room, R1 was lying on the floor and no other staff was present. V6 stated she asked V8 (Physical Therapy Assistant/PTA) to stay with R1 while she notified V4 (LPN). V6 stated she had not been aware that V4 and V7 were off the floor. V6 stated it is the facility process for nurses to notify another nurse and CNA's to notify the nurse when leaving the floor to help with coverage on the unit. On 5/2/25 at 12:55 PM, V4 (LPN) stated she had been working R1's unit hall on 4/4/2025. V4 stated R1 was at risk for falls and did attempt to stand without assistance, frequently. V4 stated she did leave the unit floor sometime after 1:00PM to get keys from another unit floor nurse. V4 stated she had not been aware that V7 (CNA) had left the unit floor after she had. V4 stated on her way back to the unit floor around 1:14 PM, she bumped into V7 heading back to the unit floor at the same time. V4 stated V6 (CNA) notified her that R1 had been found lying on the dining room floor. On 5/2/25 at 2:25 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R1 had been admitted to the facility as a fall risk. V2 stated there should be 1 nurse and 2 CNA's working each unit. V2 stated, if a nurse is leaving their unit floor they should notify another nurse in the building for coverage. V2 stated, if a CNA is leaving their unit floor then they should notify their nurse for coverage. V2 stated her expectation for staff is to follow facility process of notifying another team member for coverage when they leave the unit floor. V2 stated there should not be 2 teammates off the floor together. On 5/6/25 at 9:02 AM, V13 (Assistant DON/ADON) stated the facility will have 2 CNA's and one nurse to each unit and then a float CNA for the building. V13 stated it is the process of all staff members to notify another teammate when leaving the unit floor for coverage. V13 stated there should not be 2 teammates off the floor at the same time. R1's Fall Risk assessments dated 3/16/25, 3/17/25, 3/25/25, 3/27/25 and 4/5/25 all documented R1 was a high fall risk. R1's Progress Note dated 3/25/25 at 2:17 PM documented At 1310 (1:10 PM), this resident fell in the dining room. She was trying to get up and walk, lost her balance and fell. I and the CNA were not able to catch her. She hit her right arm with no injuries and good ROM (range of motion). Landed on her back. No injuries noted. Paperwork being done and notifications made. R1's Progress Note dated 3/27/25 at 5:50 AM documented Resident was sitting in a wheelchair at the sink in her bathroom brushing her teeth when she attempted to stand without assist. Resident was found in the floor, laying on her left side. No shortening or rotation to BLE (bilateral extremeties). Hematoma noted above the left eye. No other injuries observed. Resident placed back in wheelchair with assist x (times) 2. Spoke to (name of V9/NP). No new orders received at this time. She will be in this morning to assess Resident. Detailed message left with (name of V3/POA). Message sent through (name of messaging app) to notify Administration. Neuro's started. Fall report complete. Resident currently sitting in dining room watching television. R1's Progress Note dated 3/31/25 at 11:00 AM documented the resident was sitting in her wheelchair in her room prior to lunch. (Name) with activities witnessed the fall, she stated the resident stood up and fell face first hitting her head off the floor. Assessed resident no rom (range of motion) or shortening of extremities noted. She has a laceration to her top lip. Vitals are 146/78, P98, temp 98.3, R 20, o2 975 room air. She is stating that she is dizzy . The progress note also documented a fall mat was placed in the resident room and bed in lowest position. R1's Progress Note dated 04/04/25 at 1:31 PM documented it was recorded as a Late Entry on 4/4/25 at 4:01 PM by V4 (LPN). The progress note documented Called to dining room at approx. 1:14 PM by CNA. Resident found to be laying in floor. Resident c/o (complained of) left hip pain. (Name of ambulance company) called to transport resident to (name of local hospital) for further evaluation. R1's Progress Note dated 04/04/25 at 4:01 PM documented Called (name of local hospital) to follow up on resident. Nurse states patient will be admitted for fx (fracture) left hip. Nurse will call back with further details. The facility incident report dated 04/04/25 documented V4 (LPN) had found R1 lying on the floor in the dining room. R1 had been identified of having poor safety awareness. The resident had been sitting at the table prior to fall with brakes to wheelchair locked. V4 stated wheelchair had been found with brakes unlocked and sitting behind resident. Local hospital History of Present Illness (HPI) dated 04/04/25 at 2:16 PM documented under Chief Complaint: Patient presents with fall. This is reported to be (R1's) 3rd fall in 1 month. R1 had an unwitnessed fall. Two weeks ago, she fell and broke her proximal femur in right side. Then she fell and hit her face with sutures in the lips and third is left leg. This same document on page 8 documented a computed tomography scan dated 04/04/25 with results of mildly displaced left lateral sixth and seventh rib fractures and on page 9 under electromagnetic waves (X-ray) of the hip left included pelvis results of acute, mildly displaced, and angulated fracture of the left femoral neck. The facility Falls Management (revised 4/21/2022) documented under Policy it is the policy of (facility name) to assess and manage resident falls through prevention, investigation, and implementation and evaluation of interventions. The facility staffing policy (revised 1/2023) documented under Policy, The facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population and according to regulatory staffing requirements (CMS, IDPH). Under Procedure, 1. Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that that our resident's needs and services are met and schedules adequate staff to meet or exceed individual state requirement. 2. Licensed registered nurse and licensed nursing staff are available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services 3. Certified Nursing Assistants are available each shift to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services of each resident as outlined on the resident's comprehensive care plan.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA) of a fall and change in resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA) of a fall and change in resident's condition for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. This past noncompliance occurred between 4/5/25 and 4/5/25. Findings Include: R1's admission Record documents an admission date to the facility of 3/16/25 with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, altered mental status, unspecified, alzheimer's disease, unspecified and dementia in other diseases classified. This same document under emergency contacts listed V3 (Family) as emergency contact power of attorney for healthcare and primary financial contact. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3, indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS section GG documents that R1 has impairment in both sides of upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and impairment on one side for lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle foot) and uses a wheelchair as a mobility device. A facility incident report dated 4/4/25 documented V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) notified V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and R1's Primary Care Physician of a fall R1 sustained. On 5/6/25 at 12:23 PM, V3 (Family) stated, he is R1's POA. V3 stated, he had not been notified by the facility about R1's fall and transfer to the local hospital on 4/4/25. V3 stated, he did not have any missed calls or messages from the facility. V3 stated he received his first call about R1's fall from the local emergency room at 3:06 PM on 4/4/25. V3 stated, he then called the facility to speak with V1 (Administrator) who stated he did not know anything about R1 falling and would look into the situation. V3 stated he had to initiate all calls with the facility on 4/4/2024 with regard to R1's care, the facility did not call him. On 5/2/25 at 12:55 PM, V4 (LPN) stated, she did attempt to contact V3 (Family) twice, unsuccessfully. V4 stated, there had not been a voicemail to leave a message and did not attempt to reach other emergency family listed. On 5/2/25 at 10:58 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated, he does contact family immediately for a change in condition. V5 stated the facility policy is to notify physician and power of attorney (POA) for any resident for a change in condition. On 5/6/25 at 9:02 AM V13, (Assistant DON/ADON) stated, all nursing staff should contact the physician and POA for a resident with a change in condition, which would include a fall and being transferred to local the hospital. On 5/4/25 at 11:42 AM, V14 (LPN) stated, she would contact the physician and POA for any resident who had a change in condition. On 5/6/25 at 12:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, V4 should have contacted V3 (Family) prior to calling for an ambulance. V1 stated, R1 was unable to make her own decisions. V1 stated, he does not recall the conversation with V3 (Family). Facility Change in Condition policy (revised February 2012) documented under Definition, change in condition is defined as an improvement or decline in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status that effects less than two areas of activities of daily living This same document under Procedure, 5. The resident's designated medical contact or guardian will also be notified. In certain circumstances, the change may warrant contacting clergy or other significant persons. Nursing judgment should be used given the time of day and the severity of the resident change. Throughout the survey, the facility was unable to provide reproducible evidence that V3 was contacted by the facility prior to the hospital notifying V3 with regard to R1's fall and change in condition. Prior to this survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance: 1. Immediate Corrective Action for those affected by the deficient practice: Clinical Staff education on fall policy regarding physician and family notification completed on 4/5/25 by V2 (DON). Clinical staff educated on change of condition on 4/5/25 by V2 (DON). Individual staff educated to ensure notifications are made with falls and change in condition on by V2 (DON). 2. Process/Steps to identify others having the potential to be impacted by the same deficient practice: All residents are at risk to be affected by this deficient practice completed by V2 (DON) from 3/5/25 - 4/5/25. 3. Measures put into place/systematic changes to ensure the deficient practice does not recur: Falling audited for last 30 days to ensure documentation of notification made completed by V2 (DON) on 4/5/25. 4. DON/designee will monitor the facility activity for falls and change in condition 2 times a week for compliance for 4 weeks. DON/designee will complete a fall audit to ensure interventions, notifications made on two residents, two times weekly for four weeks to ensure compliance started on 4/5/25. V2 completed the audits completed by 5/1/25. Any concerns will be communicated to the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. 5. QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting held on 4/5/45 with V1 (Administrator), V2 (DON), V3 (Assistant DON) and V15 (Regional Director) in attendance to review falls and notification requirements.
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from employee to resident verbal abuse for 1 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from employee to resident verbal abuse for 1 of 10 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 12. The findings include: R3's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 1/4/24 with diagnoses including Muscular Dystrophy, Adjustment Disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Multiple Sclerosis and Major Depressive Disorder. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R3 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating that R3 is cognitively intact. On 4/16/25 at 10:25 AM, R3 stated the facility started a trial for vitamin IV (intravenous) bags and the first month she agreed to do it but the second month she refused it because she was having diarrhea and wasn't feeling the best. R3 stated when she refused the vitamin bag V2 (Director of Nursing) yelled at her and said she just cost the facility $1,000 dollars. R3 stated she reported it to V1 (Administrator) and he had a meeting to tell everyone what the trial for the vitamin bag was and how long it went on. R3 said the next day or so V2 apologized to her for yelling at her in the lunchroom in front of everyone. R3 said that R8 and V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) witnessed V2 yelling at her in the dining room. On 4/17/25 at 8:26 AM, R3 stated she feels safe at the facility, but she does feel like she needs to tip toe around V2. R3 stated she doesn't think she will do it again because she thinks V2 knew what she did was wrong. R3 stated she was a little embarrassed but was more angry at the situation. On 4/16/25 at 2:20 PM, R8 stated she was at the table in the dining room when V2 came to the table and yelled at R3 for not taking the IV fluids. R8 couldn't remember what exactly she said, just that she yelled at her and it was about 1 month ago. R8 was alert to person, place, and time. On 4/16/25 at 10:33 AM, R5 stated he witnessed V2 yell at R3 for refusing the IV therapy. R5 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. On 4/17/25 at 9:36 AM, V7 (CNA) stated she was in the dining room when V2 raised her voice and heard it. V7 stated R3 told V2 that she didn't want to do the IV drip because she didn't feel good. V7 stated V2 raised her voice to R3 and told her it was already paid for and she would have to charge it anyways because they already paid for it. V7 stated V2 did raise her voice at R3 and seemed angry with R3. V7 stated she was sitting across the dining room when it happened and she could hear V2, she also stated it was loud enough that people could probably hear it down the hallway. V7 stated she felt that V2 was loud and aggressive when talking to R3. V7 said that after R3 went back to her room, V7 stated she went to check on her to make sure she was okay. V7 stated she didn't think V2 should talk to any resident that way. On 4/16/25 at 12:02 PM, V4 (CNA) stated she hasn't heard staff yell at residents but V2 does have a bad attitude. On 4/17/25 at 10:14 AM, V2 stated R3 agreed to take the IV therapy at a previous date and when the IV nurse came to do the clinic in March, R3 refused the IV. V2 stated if she doesn't tell the IV therapy nurse prior to them coming to the clinic to give it, they get charged for the bag of fluids even if the resident refuses. V2 stated she had a conversation in the dining room with R3 about her refusing and told her it was only vitamins and minerals. V2 stated she told R3 if she would have told her sooner that she didn't want it, she could have taken care of it. V2 stated she shouldn't have had that conversation with R2 in the dining room. V2 stated the next day she went to R3 in the dining room and apologized. V2 said when she makes a mistake, she apologizes for it. V2 stated she can't take it back but it won't happen again. V2 stated she apologized because she felt like she should, no one told her to do it. V2 stated she apologized in the dining room in front of the residents that the original incident happened in front of because she didn't want to do it privately. V2 stated that her voice is loud sometimes. V2 stated the way she delivered the conversation maybe wasn't the best and she felt like it was a miscommunication. On 4/17/25 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated he was made aware by someone that there was a misunderstanding about the IV therapy program, but he couldn't remember who made him aware. V1 stated he scheduled an impromptu resident council meeting and explained the IV infusion program to the residents. V1 stated he was not aware of any conversation between V2 and R3. V1 stated if someone tells him about any alleged abuse there has to be an immediate intervention. V1 stated the alleged abuser is suspended immediately pending investigation and he does the investigation right away. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program (revision date 9/29/22) under Definitions documents Abuse: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology .Mistreatment: Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a resident.
Feb 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were able to choose the time they got...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were able to choose the time they got up for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 12. Findings Include: R4's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/19/25 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include repeated falls, low back pain, arthritis, and pain. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/7/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05, which indicates R4 has a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R4 requires partial/moderate assist of staff for dressing and transfers. R4's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 12/27/24 of, resident has had a decline in ADL (Activities of Daily Living) function and requires assistance with transfers and mobility. The interventions documented for the Problem area include, Have consistent approach amongst caregivers . On 2/18/25 at 6:09 AM, R4 stated nobody ever has enough staff anywhere. R4 was sitting at the dining room table drinking coffee and stated she didn't want to get up this early but they got her up anyway. On 2/18/25 at 6:18 AM, when asked why R4 was gotten up early if she didn't want to V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated they were told day shift was going to be short staffed and to get as many people up as they could. On 2/18/25 at 6:27 AM, V8 stated R4 sometimes gets up early but probably wouldn't have been up if they had not been told to get as many residents up as possible. On 2/18/25 at 3:43 PM, when asked to tell this surveyor about the conversation she had with the CNA's related to getting residents up early on 2/18/25, V16 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nurses/RN-Registered Nurse) stated she knew they had less staff than normal for day shift on 2/18/25 starting at 6:00 AM. On 2/18/25 at 3:12 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated they can't make a resident get up early if they don't want to. V2 stated staffing is good. V2 stated some days are better than others. V2 stated they don't let the resident's suffer and department heads will work the floor if they need to.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely and faile...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely and failed to ensure they had enough supplies to provide care for 4 of 5 (R1, R3, R8, R11) residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 12. Findings Include: 1. R1's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, heart disease, hypertension, urinary incontinence, and history of falling. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/8/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 requires partial/moderate assist with showers/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. This MDS documents R1 is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 11/21/23 of (R1) is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The interventions for this Problem area include, Provide incontinent care as needed. On 2/18/25 at 5:43 AM, R1 was laying in his bed. His bed sheets appeared to have a brown stain on them and his pants appeared urine soaked. R1 stated they come in through the night and change him but he doesn't remember when they came in last. On 2/18/25 at 5:44 AM, V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R1 requires assist/supervision and is very incontinent at night. V7 stated she last provided incontinence care to R1 around 2:30 AM. When asked about the linens appearing brown stained, V7 stated they have to strip R1's bed every morning. V7 stated R1 typically wakes up saturated even with a bed check at 2 AM. V7 stated they don't have enough supplies to provide care. V7 stated she doesn't have any wash cloths, no towels and they split the linens they do have with A wing. V7 stated it seemed like they are always short staffed. On 2/18/25 at 5:49 AM, V7 (CNA) assisted R1 to transfer to his wheelchair. R1's pants were saturated from his waist to his knees. The top sheet was brown stained and appeared wet, the thin plastic bed pad appeared saturated, the thicker cloth bed pad appeared saturated, and the bottom sheet was wet. V7 confirmed the bed pads and sheets were wet. R1 self-propelled himself to the nurse's station, the unknown nurse asked if he was ready for coffee. R1 self propelled to the dining room and was given a cup of coffee to drink. On 2/18/25 at 5:52 AM, V3 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated bed checks should be done every two hours. On 2/18/25 at 6:18 AM, V8 (CNA) stated they didn't have enough supplies. V8 stated there were two showers that didn't get done because she didn't have linens to complete the showers. V8 stated R1 was one of the residents who didn't get a shower. V8 stated R1 is not independent with toileting and doesn't change his own clothes if they get wet. This surveyor walked with V8 to R1 who was still sitting in the dining room in the same clothes he was in when he was transferred out of the bed at 5:49 AM. V8 asked V7 (CNA) if she changed R1 and V7 stated R1 usually changes himself so she assumed he had. The untitled paper with R1's name and dated 2/17/25 document, R1 did not get a shower with no towels or washcloths handwritten at the bottom of the paper. On 2/18/25 at 6:27 AM, R1 was taken to the bathroom by V7 and V8. R1 stood up and transferred to the toilet with assistance. R1's depend and pants were saturated with urine. V7 and V8 wet the corner of a full sized towel to wash R1's buttock and groin area and stated they were using the towel because they had no wash clothes. On 2/18/25 at 10:24 AM, V15 (CNA) stated incontinence care should be provided every two hours. V15 stated it wasn't acceptable for a resident to go four hours without being checked or provided incontinence care. On 2/18/25 at 9:44 AM, V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated incontinence care should be provided every one to two hours. When asked if going from 2 AM to 6 AM was too long a time frame for incontinence care to be provided, V13 stated in her opinion, it is too long. 2. R3's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hydronephrosis, diabetes, and a history of urinary tract infections. R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15, indicating R3 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R3 is dependent on staff for toileting, is incontinent of bowel and has an indwelling urinary catheter. R3's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 6/24/22 of, (R3) needs extensive assist x (times) 2 for activities of daily living r/t (related to) weakness. This Problem area includes an intervention of, Assist x 2 as needed with ADL's . On 2/18/25 at 8:18 AM, R3 stated they don't always have enough staff and showers don't always get done. R3 stated he wears depends, and uses a bed pan. R3 stated sometimes he has to wait to get on/off the bed pan. When asked if any care wasn't provided due to staffing, R3 stated pericare isn't consistently provided. R3 stated it should be done daily and it isn't. 3. R8's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, and diarrhea. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13, which indicates R8 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R8 is dependent on staff for toileting and is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R8's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 1/14/25 of, (R8) is incontinent of bowel and bladder and is not appropriate for a B&B (bowel and bladder) program due to impaired cognitive status. This Problem area includes an intervention of, Provide incontinence care as needed. On 2/18/25 at 7:50 AM, R8 stated they don't have enough staff to meet her needs timely. R8 stated she is incontinent at night and they occasionally come in and change her but they have so many residents and not enough staff. 4. R11's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/19/25 documents R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include osteomyelitis, fatigue, pain, anxiety disorder, heart disease, and hypertension. R11's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates R11 has a moderate cognitive deficit This same MDS documents R11 requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting. R11's current Care Plan does not document a Problem area for incontinence or activities of daily living. On 2/18/25 at 11:59 AM, R11 stated they don't have enough staff. R11 stated he uses the call light, they answer and say they will be right back, and he ends up pissing his pants because they don't come back timely. On 2/18/25 at 9:56 AM, V14 (CNA) stated linens are a big issue right now. V14 stated she had no linens to provide care. V14 stated she can't give showers or remake the beds she has stripped and is using her own personal wipes to provide incontinence care. V14 stated they don't have enough staff and they don't have the supplies they need to provide care. V14 stated when they are short staffed showers don't get done, and residents don't get turned and repositioned as often as they should. V14 stated she does her best but when she is providing care to 30 residents it is impossible to meet all of their needs timely. This surveyor walked with V14 to the linen carts and supply rooms. The C wing linen carts contained gloves, three gowns, depends, two bed pads, and a couple of sheets. There were no towels, wash cloths, or bed pads in the C wing linen closet. The main supply room on A wing had five towels, no sheets, bed pads, or wash cloths. V14 stated on Friday (2/14/25) she didn't have linens until 11 AM, then it was lunch time and she was able to get three of the eight showers done after lunch because she was working alone from 4 PM to 6 PM. On 2/18/25 at 5:33 AM, V6 (CNA) stated they don't have enough CNA's working. V6 stated there are five CNA's working tonight and there are 35 residents on A wing and around 30 on C wing. V6 stated she wasn't sure how many residents there were on the rehab hall. V6 stated incontinence care and turning and positioning isn't done like it should be when they don't have enough staff. On 2/18/25 at 6:01 AM, V5 (CNA) stated most of the time they have enough supplies. V5 stated when they run out of something she does the best she can with what she has and uses alternatives such as blankets instead of sheets. On 2/18/25 at 12:57 PM, V12 (CNA) stated the facility linens are washed off site and the truck doesn't deliver them until 9:00 AM. On 2/18/25 at 3:12 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated residents should be checked every couple of hours to see if incontinence care needs to be provided. This surveyor shared the observation and interviews related to R1's incontinence care and V2 stated she would expect R1 to be checked more often. V2 stated four to four and a half hours was too long to go without incontinence care. V2 stated if they are running low on linens they have a washer and dryer on site they can wash clothes with. V2 stated she told staff if there wasn't linens they should spray them out and get them to the laundry. V2 stated she couldn't fix what they didn't tell her. On 2/18/25 at 3:43 PM, V16 (ADON/RN-Assistant Director of Nurses/Registered Nurse) stated she knew they had less staff than normal for day shift on 2/18/25 starting at 6:00 AM. V16 stated they had three CNA's scheduled from 6 to 8 AM and then three more coming in at 8 AM. V16 stated she asked night shift to stay over for two hours. V16 stated they would have had one CNA on each unit and then the CNA staying over would have floated. When asked if that was enough to meet the needs of the residents, V16 stated, it can meet the needs but we also need two on each hall. V16 stated they had enough staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. When asked why staff and residents were telling this surveyor they didn't have enough staff, V16 stated it was probably due to all of the call in's related to the flu. On 2/18/25 at 4:09 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he hadn't had any complaints/concerns related to incontinence care and/or showers not being provided timely. V1 stated, we get to them when we can. The facility Bathing a Resident policy dated July 2014 documents, It is the policy of (name of facility) that residents will receive a shower/bath will be scheduled regularly and prn (as needed). The facility Perineal Care policy dated 7/2017 documents, Purpose: the purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide care in a timely ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide care in a timely manner for 5 of 12 (R1, R3, R4, R8, and R11) residents reviewed for sufficient staff in the sample of 12. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Midnight Census report dated 2/18/25 documents 77 residents currently reside at the facility. 1. R1's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, heart disease, hypertension, urinary incontinence, and history of falling. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/8/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 requires partial/moderate assist with showers/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. This MDS documents R1 is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 11/21/23 of (R1) is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The interventions for this Problem area include, Provide incontinent care as needed. On 2/18/25 at 5:43 AM, R1 was laying in his bed. His bed sheets appeared to have a brown stain on them and his pants appeared urine soaked. R1 stated they come in through the night and change him but he doesn't remember when they came in last. On 2/18/25 at 5:44 AM, V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R1 requires assist/supervision and is very incontinent at night. V7 stated she last provided incontinence care to R1 around 2:30 AM. When asked about the linens appearing brown stained, V7 stated they have to strip R1's bed every morning. V7 stated R1 typically wakes up saturated even with a bed check at 2 AM. V7 stated they don't have enough supplies to provide care. V7 stated she doesn't have any wash cloths, no towels and they split the linens they did have with A wing. V7 stated it seemed like they are always short staffed. On 2/18/25 at 5:49 AM, V7 (CNA) assisted R1 to transfer to his wheelchair. R1's pants were saturated from his waist to his knees. The top sheet was brown stained and appeared wet, the thin plastic bed pad appeared saturated, the thicker cloth bed pad appeared saturated, and the bottom sheet was wet. V7 confirmed the bed pads and sheets were wet. R1 self-propelled himself to the nurse's station, the unknown nurse asked if he was ready for coffee. R1 self propelled to the dining room and was given a cup of coffee to drink. On 2/18/25 at 5:52 AM, V3 (RN-Registered Nurse) stated they don't always have enough staff. V3 stated care gets provided but no extra care gets done. V3 stated bed checks should be done every two hours. On 2/18/25 at 6:18 AM, V8 (CNA) stated they had enough staff on night shift tonight. V8 stated last night (2/17/25) she worked the wing by herself. V8 stated that happens more than it doesn't. V8 stated she had 23 residents and they are high incontinence care. V8 stated R1 is not independent with toileting and doesn't change his own clothes if they get wet. This surveyor walked with V8 to R1 who was still sitting in the dining room in the same clothes he was in when he was transferred out of the bed at 5:49 AM. V8 asked V7 (CNA) if she changed R1 and V7 stated R1 usually changes himself so she assumed he had. On 2/18/25 at 6:27 AM, R1 was taken to the bathroom by V7 and V8. R1 stood up and transferred to the toilet with assistance. R1's depend and pants were saturated with urine. V7 and V8 wet the corner of a full sized towel to wash R1's buttock and groin area and stated they were using the towel because they had no wash clothes. On 2/18/25 at 8:27 AM, V9 (CNA) stated she works from 8 AM to 5:45 PM and there were two CNA's working when she arrived at 8:00 AM today. On 2/18/25 at 10:24 AM, V15 (CNA) stated incontinence care should be provided every two hours. V15 stated it wasn't acceptable for a resident to go four hours without being checked or provided incontinence care. On 2/18/25 at 9:44 AM, V13 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) stated incontinence care should be provided every one to two hours. When asked if going from 2 AM to 6 AM was too long a time frame for incontinence care to be provided, V13 stated in her opinion, it is too long. V13 stated staffing is hit or miss. 2. R3's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hydronephrosis, diabetes, and a history of urinary tract infections. R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15, indicating R3 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R3 is dependent on staff for toileting, is incontinent of bowel and has an indwelling urinary catheter. R3's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 6/24/22 of, (R3) needs extensive assist x (times) 2 for activities of daily living r/t (related to) weakness. This Problem area includes an intervention of, Assist x 2 as needed with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) . On 2/18/25 at 8:18 AM, R3 stated they don't always have enough staff and showers don't always get done. R3 stated he wears depends, and uses a bed pan. R3 stated sometimes he has to wait to get on/off bed pan. When asked if any care wasn't provided due to staffing, R3 stated pericare isn't consistently provided. R3 stated it should be done daily and it isn't. 3. R4's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/19/25 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include repeated falls, low back pain, arthritis, and pain. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/7/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 05, which indicates R4 has a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R4 requires partial/moderate assist of staff for dressing and transfers. R4's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 12/27/24 of, resident has had a decline in ADL function and requires assistance with transfers and mobility. The interventions documented for the Problem area include, Have consistent approach amongst caregivers . On 2/18/25 at 6:09 AM, R4 stated nobody ever has enough staff anywhere. R4 was sitting at the dining room table drinking coffee and stated she didn't want to get up this early but they got her up anyway. On 2/18/25 at 6:18 AM, when asked why R4 was gotten up early if she didn't want to, V8 (CNA) stated they were told day shift was going to be short staffed and to get as many people up as they could. On 2/18/25 at 6:27 AM, V8 stated R4 sometimes gets up early but probably wouldn't have been up if they had not been told to get as many residents up as possible. On 2/18/25 at 3:43 PM, when asked to tell this surveyor about the conversation she had with the CNA's related to getting residents up early on 2/18/25, V16 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nurses/RN-Registered Nurse) stated she knew they had less staff than normal for day shift on 2/18/25 starting at 6:00 AM. On 2/18/25 at 3:12 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated they can't make a resident get up early if they don't want to. V2 stated staffing is good. V2 stated some days are better than others. 4. R8's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/18/25 documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, and diarrhea. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13, which indicates R8 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R8 is dependent on staff for toileting and is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R8's current Care Plan documents a Problem area with a start date of 1/14/25 of, (R8) is incontinent of bowel and bladder and is not appropriate for a B&B (bowel and bladder) program due to impaired cognitive status. This Problem area includes an intervention of, Provide incontinence care as needed. On 2/18/25 at 7:50 AM, R8 stated they don't have enough staff to meet her needs timely. R8 stated she is incontinent at night and they occasionally come in and change her but they have so many residents and not enough staff. 5. R11's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 2/19/25 documents R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include osteomyelitis, fatigue, pain, anxiety disorder, heart disease, and hypertension. R11's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates R11 has a moderate cognitive deficit This same MDS documents R11 requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting. R11's current Care Plan does not document a Problem area for incontinence or activities of daily living. On 2/18/25 at 11:59 AM, R11 stated they don't have enough staff. R11 stated he uses the call light, they answer and say they will be right back, and he ends up pissing his pants because they don't come back timely. On 2/18/25 at 9:56 AM, V14 (CNA) stated linens are a big issue right now. V14 stated she had no linens to provide care. V14 stated she can't give showers or remake the beds she has stripped and is using her own personal wipes to provide incontinence care. V14 stated they don't have enough staff and they don't have the supplies they need to provide care. V14 stated when they are short staffed showers don't get done, and residents don't get turned and repositioned as often as they should. V14 stated she does her best but when she is providing care to 30 residents it is impossible to meet all of their needs timely. V14 stated staffing was pretty good today (2/18/25) but they called her in around 5:30 AM for a bonus shift. This surveyor walked with V14 to the linen carts and supply rooms. The C wing linen carts contained gloves, three gowns, depends, two bed pads, and a couple of sheets. There were no towels, wash cloths, or bed pads in the C wing linen closet. The main supply room on A wing had five towels, no sheets, bed pads, or wash cloths. V14 stated on Friday (2/14/25) she didn't have linens until 11 AM, then it was lunch time and she was able to get three of the eight showers done after lunch because she was working alone from 4 PM to 6 PM. On 2/18/25 at 5:33 AM, V6 (CNA) stated they don't have enough CNA's working. V6 stated there are five CNA's working tonight and there are 35 residents on A wing and around 30 on C wing. V6 stated she wasn't sure how many residents there were on the rehab hall. V6 stated incontinence care and turning and positioning isn't done like it should be when they don't have enough staff. On 2/18/25 at 3:12 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nurses) stated residents should be checked every couple of hours to see if incontinence care needs to be provided. This surveyor shared the observation and interviews related to R1's incontinence care and V2 stated she would expect R1 to be checked more often. V2 stated four to four and a half hours was too long to go without incontinence care. V2 stated she couldn't fix what they didn't tell her. V2 stated staffing is good. V2 stated some days are better than others. V2 stated they don't let the resident's suffer and department heads will work the floor if they need to. On 2/18/25 at 3:43 PM, when asked to tell this surveyor about the conversation she had with the CNA's related to getting residents up early on 2/18/25, V16 (ADON/RN) stated she knew they had less staff than normal for day shift on 2/18/25 starting at 6:00 AM. V16 stated they had three CNA's scheduled from 6 to 8 AM and then three more coming in at 8 AM. V16 stated she asked night shift to stay over for two hours. V16 stated they would have had one CNA on each unit and then the CNA staying over would have floated. When asked if that was enough to meet the needs of the residents, V16 stated, it can meet the needs but we also need two on each hall. V16 stated they had enough staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. When asked why staff and residents were telling this surveyor they didn't have enough staff, V16 stated it was probably due to all of the call in's related to the flu. On 2/18/25 at 4:09 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he hadn't had any complaints/concerns related to incontinence care and/or showers not being provided timely. V1 stated, we get to them when we can. V1 stated staffing is as good as it can be. V1 stated they had enough staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. The facility Staffing Policy dated 11/2021 documents, Policy: The facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population and according to regulatory staffing requirements .Procedure: 1. Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our resident's needs and services are met and schedules adequate staff to meet or exceed individual state requirements 3. Certified Nursing Assistants are available on each shift to provide the needed care and services of each resident as outlined on the resident's comprehensive care plan
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and treat pressure wounds for 3 (R1, R2, and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and treat pressure wounds for 3 (R1, R2, and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's Resident Face Sheet documented an admission date of 10/12/24 with diagnoses including: extradural and subdural abscess, anorexia, dysphasia, generalized epilepsy, non traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, benign neoplasm of the meninges. R1's 12/9/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's 12/9/24 MDS section M documented R1 was at risk to develop pressure ulcers/ injuries and R1 had 1 or more unhealed pressure ulcers/ injuries. R1's 12/6/25 admission Observation documented in part . Alterations in Skin . MASD- Moisture- Associated Skin Damage Describe each skin integrity condition checked in detail . right buttock, redness, and two open areas 1.0 cm long x 0.5 wide . On 1/30/25 at 12:16 PM, V4 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said she completed R1's skin assessment on 12/6/24 when R1 returned from the hospital. V4 said R1 had open wounds to his sacrum and V4 documented it in her assessment. V4 said when a resident has a new wound staff are supposed to take a picture of the wound and upload it into the electronic communication system for the medical providers to give treatment orders. V4 said she did not recall if she had notified the medical provider of R1's new wounds and V4 said she did not know how to upload pictures in the electronic communication system. V4 said she did not recall if she had notified V3 (Wound Nurse/ Licensed Practical Nurse) or V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) of R1's new wounds. V4 said after she had documented R1's new wounds she had not noticed that no treatments were ordered for R1 during her shifts post discovery. V4 said she did not recall if she had notified R1's family on R1's wounds on 12/6/24 and could not recall if R1's family had asked if R1 had any wounds. On 1/30/25 at 12:16 PM, V3 said she was not notified of R1 having any wounds by any staff until 12/25/25. V3 said prior to V5 (Wound Physician) arriving at the facility every week V3 will speak to the floor nurses to ask if any resident has any new wounds V5 needs to assess. V3 said if the nurses don't tell her of any new wounds the only other way she would be notified was if the nurse made a new event in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR). V3 said no event had been opened on 12/6/24 for R1. V3 said no wound treatments had been completed for R1 until 12/25/24 when he was seen by V5. On 1/29/25 at 3:10 PM, V5 said he was not made aware of R1's wounds until 12/25/24 when he arrived at the facility to make rounds. V5 said on 12/25/24 R1's wounds were end of life skin failure and the only treatment would be Dakin's solution for odor control. V5 said if he had been notified on 12/6/24 when they were discovered he would have ordered Dakin's Solution but the treatment would not have changed the outcome of R1's wounds. V5 said he expected staff to notify him on any new wounds within 24 hours or when he arrived in the facility to make rounds if it was found the day before he was to arrive to make rounds. V5 said he did not think it was appropriate for a facility to notify him of wounds 19 days after the wound was discovered. R1's 12/25/25 Initial Wound Evaluation & Management Summary documented in part . End-Stage Skin Failure Sacrum Full Thickness . End-Stage Skin Failure of the Left Buttock Full Thickness . Skin Tear Wound of the Right Buttock Full Thickness . R1's 12/1/24 through 12/31/24 Treatment Administration History documented a 12/25/24 order for Dakin's Solution 0.5% daily with special instructions cleanse wound to right buttock with wound cleanser or normal saline and apply Dakin's soaked gauze and cover with dry dressing. R1's 12/1/24 through 12/31/24 Treatment Administration History documented a 12/25/24 order for Dakin's Solution 0.5% daily with special instructions cleanse wound to left buttock with wound cleanser or normal saline and apply Dakin's soaked gauze and cover with dry dressing. No wound treatments orders prior to 12/25/25 were noted. R1's 1/2/25 hospital Wound Assessment Note documented in part . Scrotum MMPI (Mucous Membrane Pressure Injury), sacrum e/t b/l (and bilateral) buttocks evolving DTPI (Deep Tissue Pressure Injury) with epithelial separation noted . 2. R2's Resident Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/21/25 with diagnoses including: decreased ADL (Activities of Daily Living) function, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. R2's 1/27/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 14, indicating R2 was cognitively intact. R2's 1/22/25 hospital After Visit Summary documented a 1/21/25 Emergency Department (ED) Provider Note documenting in part . Physical Exam . Genitourinay: . Patient has stage II (2) pressure ulcer on his sacrum which extends either side to about mid buttock. There is no obvious cellulitis or purulent drainage noted R2's 1/22/25 Initial Wound Evaluation & Management Summary documented in part . Stage 4 Pressure Wound of the Left Ischium . Primary Dressing . Alginate calcium apply once daily . Collagen powder apply once daily . Silver sulfadiazine apply once daily . Stage 4 Pressure Wound Sacrum Full Thickness Primary Dressing . Alginate calcium apply once daily . Collagen powder apply once daily . Silver sulfadiazine apply once daily . On 1/29/25 at 2:10 PM, R2 said the facility was not completing any treatments or putting any dressings on R2's pressure wounds on his bottom. R2 stated he had an antiseptic lotion he had brought from home with him to the facility and was putting on his wounds when staff assisted him to the bathroom. On 1/29/25 at 2:27 PM, staff assisted R2 to the bathroom and when R2's incontinent brief was removed no dressings were present to R2's left ischial or sacral wounds. R2's incontinent brief had several small blood clots from R2's wounds. On 1/30/25 at 12:16 PM, V3 said she was the nurse who rounded with V5 every week and would put V5 treatment orders in the EMR when V5 sent his notes to the facility. V3 was asked if V5 gave verbal orders to V3 when V5 was rounding and V3 answered yes. V3 was asked why she did not put the orders in the EMR after rounding with V5 and V3 answered it was possible V5 would give a verbal order that was different than the order written on V5's notes when V5 sent them to the facility. V3 was asked what V3 would do if V5 did not send his notes for 2 to 3 days after rounding and would those residents not receive wound treatments, V3 answered she would call V5 to ask him to send his notes but was not sure if the residents would receive wound treatments due to no orders being in the resident's EMR. V3 said she was not sure why R2's 1/22/25 wound treatment orders had not been placed in R2's EMR. V3 said R2 did not have any wound treatments completed from R2 admission on [DATE] through 1/28/25. On 1/29/25 at 3:10 PM, V5 said he expected staff follow his orders for wound treatments. R2's Physician Order Report from 12/29/24 through 1/29/25 documented a 1/28/25 order for silver sulfadiazine cream 1% once a day with special instructions to cleanse wound to left ischium with normal saline or wound cleanser and apply silver sulfadiazine, collagen powder, calcium alginate and dry dressing and a 1/28/25 25 order for silver sulfadiazine cream 1% once a day with special instructions to cleanse wound to sacrum with normal saline or wound cleanser and apply silver sulfadiazine, collagen powder, calcium alginate and dry dressing. No other wound treatment orders were noted. R2's Wound Management Detail Report documented in part Wound Type . Pressure Ulcer . Wound Location . Left buttock Left ishium . Date/ Time Identified . 1/22/25 12:47 PM Created Date/ Time . 1/28/25 12:48 PM . Wound Type . Unspecified ulcer . Wound Location . Sacrum . Date/ Time Identified 1/22/25 12:49 PM Created Date/ Time . 1/28/25 12:50 PM . R2's 1/29/25 Wound Evaluation & Management Summary documented in part . Stage 4 pressure wound of the left ischium full thickness . Wound progress: . Improved evidenced by decreased surface area . Primary Dressing(s) . Alginate calcium apply once daily . collagen powder apply once daily . silver sulfadiazine apply once daily . 3. R3's Resident Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/1/25 with diagnoses including: secondary neoplasm of liver, pressure- induced deep tissue damage of sacral region. R3's 1/5/25 MDS documented a BIMS score of 13, indicating R3 was cognitively intact. R3's 1/1/25 Skin Observation documented in part . Skin Assessment . Pressure Injury/ Blister/ Open Areas . Yes- Sire (sic) and Description- sacrum . R3's 1/1/25 admission Observation documented in part . Alterations in Skin . Does the resident have any alteration(s) in skin? . MASD- Moisture- Associated Skin Damage . Describe each skin integrity condition checked in detail . sacrum redness . Does the resident have a Pressure Ulcer(s) . yes . On 1/30/25 at 12:36 PM, V4 said she had been notified on Saturday 1/25/25 by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) R3 had a wound to sacral area. V4 said the wound was dark red with darker areas inside the wound margins but was not open. V4 said she did not document R3's wound anywhere. V4 stated I was going to do what I needed to do about it like have someone take a picture of it and put it on (electronic communication system) but I got busy and completely forgot about it until Sunday or Monday. V4 said she notified V3 of R3's wound on 1/27/25 and a picture was sent to V5 for treatment orders. On 1/29/25 at 1:28 PM, V13 (R3's Family Member) said R3 had a dark wound to the sacral area for about a week. V13 presented an undated picture of R3's sacral area with a large dark red area and said this was taken about a week ago. V13 presented another undated picture of R3's sacral area with a large open wound and said it had been taken on 1/28/25. V13 said she did not know if R3's wound was being treated. R3's 1/27/25 progress note documented as a late entry on 1/28/25 at 2:41 PM by V3 documented in part This nurse spoke with (V5) regarding the wound to the resident's sacrum/ coccyx. (V5) has ordered a treatment of Dakins soaked gauze and dry dressing to be done BID (twice a day) . R3's Treatment Administration History from 1/1/25 through 1/29/25 documented an order for 1/27/25 order for Dakin's Solution 0.5% apply Dakin's soaked gauze to sacrum/ coccyx ulcer and cover with dry dressing twice daily. R3's 1/29/25 Initial Wound Evaluation & Management Summary documented in part . End- stage Skin Failure Sacrum Full Thickness . Wound Size (length x width x depth): 7.6 x 5.2 x not measurable . Primary Dressing . Foam Silicone border apply once daily for 30 days . The facility's revised 1/20/23 Wound Management Program policy documented in part .5. The facility will assess residents weekly for current skin conditions . C. If any new areas are identified, write a nurse's note describing the area found and the protocol followed to treat it . F. The nurse will measure the area; call physician to obtain appropriate treatment order, call the guardian/ family member inform him/ her, document the area on the T.A.R. (Treatment Administration Record) and initiate the treatment . The facility's revised February 2012 Change in Condition policy documented in part . Procedure: . 1. The staff person who first notices the change in condition immediately to the licensed nurse . 3. The results of the assessment, including the vital signs, signs, symptoms and any physical and/ or mental changes in condition are documented in the resident's medical record . 4. The resident's primary physician or designated alternate will be notified immediately of any change in resident's physical or medical condition, this includes: . B. Deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status. C. Need to alter treatment .
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0646 (Tag F0646)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's change in cond...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's change in condition for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for physician notification of change in condition in a sample of 7. Findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet documents an admission date of 11/4/2024 and was discharged to a local hospital on [DATE]. R1's Resident Face Sheet documents diagnoses including: Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Hypertension, Anxiety, Asthma, Dementia, and Urinary Tract Infection. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] includes a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that R1 is cognitively intact. On 1/3/2024 at 1:45PM, V5 (Ombudsman) stated she received a call from V6 (Registered Nurse-RN at Local Hospital Emergency Room) and he reported that R1 was seen in the emergency room on [DATE] in bad condition. On 1/6/2024 at 1:20PM V6 (RN at Local Hospital Emergency Room) stated he was working in the emergency room on [DATE] when R1 arrived by ambulance. V6 stated R1 was not responding and was found to have hypoglycemia with a blood sugar of 35, hypotension, and rectal temperature of 88. degrees Fahrenheit. On 1/8/2025 at 2:33PM, V10 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated she took care of R1 on the days she worked. V10 stated she worked dayshift on Wednesdays through Saturdays. V10 stated she had noticed a decline in R1 for the last few weeks before she was sent to the hospital. V10 stated R1 had a foley catheter. V10 stated she had never seen it leak. V10 stated the last few days to a week before R1 was sent to the hospital she noted R1 would only have 25cc (cubic centimeters/ milliliters) of urine output on her shift and R1 would not drink much. V10 stated she would encourage R1 to drink but she would not drink much. V10 stated R1's intake and output had declined and it was reported to the nurses. V10 stated R1 had not lived at the facility long but she did see a decline in her. On 1/8/2024 at 6:03PM, V11 (Registered Nurse) stated she took care of R1 on a regular basis. V11 stated R1's appetite was poor, and she mainly ate snacks, and her family brought snacks in all the time. V11 stated most of the time R1's urine output was between 600cc and 700 cc. V11 stated R1's intake and output had been decreasing over the last few days. V11 was asked if the physician was notified and V11 stated I don't remember if I called and notified the physician. On 1/9/2024 at 10:00 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she took care of R1 all the time. V9 stated she had seen a decline in R1's condition over the last week prior to R1 going to the hospital and even the day before she sent her out on 12/29/24. V9 stated she couldn't remember if she had notified the physician/Nurse Practitioner about the decline. V9 stated (R1) just wasn't feeling very well for a few days. V9 stated she sent R1 out because she became lethargic. V9 stated I knew she was really sick, so I sent her out. V9 stated I believe I sent a message in (name of physician notification system) after I sent her out but not sure. On 1/10/2024 at 9:06AM, V12 (Physician) stated he saw R1 when she first arrived at the nursing home but R1 has been seen mainly by V13 (Nurse Practitioner). V12 was asked if he was notified on 12/29/2024 or a few days before about R1's change in condition and V12 stated the change in condition and R1 being sent to the hospital did not seem familiar to him. V12 advised this surveyor to call V13 for further information regarding R1. On 1/10/2024 at 11:40AM, V13 stated she was familiar with R1. V13 stated R1 had several medical issues but was surprised she had passed away, but then wasn't surprised after reviewing the emergency room visit notes from 12/29/2024. V13 stated she had seen R1 on 12/19/2024 due to leg edema. V13 stated R1 appeared stable at that time. V13 stated she did not receive any text messages or any messages on (name of physician notification system) prior to, or on, 12/29/2024 regarding R1's change in condition. V13 stated she was on vacation from 12/20/2024 through 12/30/2024. V13 reviewed all of her (name of physician notification system) notes and reported on 12/22/24 that R1 was started on Linzeloid antibiotic for a Urinary Tract Infection and the culture shows the bacteria was susceptible to Linzeloid. V13 stated on 12/16/2024, R1 was started on Doxycycline antibiotics for Pneumonia. V13 stated she had sent R1 out to the emergency room about that time due to R1's oxygen levels being lower than normal. V13 stated there was another Nurse Practitioner (V14) on call for the team during her vacation and provided V14's contact information. V13 stated there were no notes documented in (name of physician notification system) regarding R1's change in condition but would need to validate that with V14. On 1/15/2024 at 1:47PM, V13 stated R1 had many comorbidities which contributed to her illnesses and death. V13 stated R1 had been treated for Pneumonia and a Urinary Tract Infection recently. V13 stated R1 had fluctuations in her [NAME] Blood Cell count frequently. V13 stated the lack of notifications did not contribute to her hospitalization and end of life events. On 1/13/2024 at 11:15AM, V14 (Nurse Practitioner) stated she had not been notified of a change in condition for R1 from the facility prior to R1 being sent to the local hospital on [DATE]. V14 stated the facility did notify her of the transfer but that was after the transfer had already happened, V14 stated she was unaware of any change in condition with R1. R1's Lab Reports provided by facility were reviewed for results of Complete Blood Counts and documents R1's WBC (White Blood Cell) count results (with a reference range of 4.0-10.5) as the following: 12/10/24 9.8, 12/15/2024 13.0, 12/17/2024 16.2, 12/24/2024 19.8, and 12/26/2024 17.4. R1's Progress notes were reviewed and there is no documentation noted of MD (Medical Doctor) or NP (Nurse Practitioner) notification of R1's change in condition or reported lab values. R1's Vital Signs flow sheet in the electronic medical record documents the following total urine output for 24 hours for the following dates: 12/23/2024 1,700 milliliters, 12/24/2024 1900 milliliters, 12/25/2024 850 milliliters, 12/26/2024 1110 milliliters, 12/27/2024, R1's 150 milliliters, 12/28/2024 250 milliliters, and 12/29/2024 200 milliliters on night shift. R1's Vital Signs flow sheet also documents the following total oral intake for 24 hours for the following dates: 12/23/2024 300 Milliliters, 12/24/2024 1,000 Milliliters, 12/25/2024 600 Milliliters, 12/26/2024 120 Milliliters, 12/27/2024 120 Milliliters, 12/28/2024 120 Milliliters. There is no documentation for R1's oral intake on 12/29/2024. The facility policy titled Change in Condition revision date of February 2022, documents It is the policy of this facility that resident change in condition will be assessed promptly and follow up activity will occur as appropriate in a timely manner. The section titled Procedure documents 4. The resident's primary physician or designated alternate will be notified immediately of any change in resident's physical or medical condition this includes Accident involving the resident, deterioration in health, mental, or psychological status, need to alter treatment, or a decision to transfer or discharge from facility . 6. Notification of physician and or responsible parties shall be documented in the clinical record as well as on the 24-hour form.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered treatments for wound care for 1 of 5 (R1) reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered treatments for wound care for 1 of 5 (R1) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet documents an admission date of 11/4/2024 and was discharged to a local hospital on [DATE]. R1's Resident Face Sheet documents diagnoses including: Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Hypertension, Anxiety, Asthma, Dementia, and Urinary Tract Infection. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents R1 requires partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and shower/bathing self; is dependent for upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear; and requires substantial /maximal assistance with roll left to right. Section I documents under active diagnoses a pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2. Section M documents R1 has a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over bony prominence, or non-removable dressing/device and has 1 unhealed Stage 4 pressure ulcer/ injury that was present upon admission/entry or reentry. R1's care plan documents a Problem of Resident is at risk for skin breakdown. Resident was admitted with wound to the coccyx with a start date of 11/4/2024. Documented interventions include: apply TX (treatment) as ordered, consult with wound specialist as needed, assess risk factors, weekly skin assessments, encourage activity, float heels, and special mattress with a start date of 11/4/24. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 11/5/2024 documents a score of 18 indicating R1 has a mild risk for skin breakdown. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 12/16/2024 documents a score of 16 indicating R1 has a mild risk for skin breakdown. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk documents score interpretation as: 19 or higher= Not at risk, no interventions at this time; 15-18= Mild risk, if other major risk factors are present e.g. (example given), advanced age, fever, poor dietary intake of protein, Diastolic blood pressure 60, hemodynamic advance to next level of risk; 13-14= Moderate risk if other major factors are present advance to next level of risk; 10-12= High risk; and 9 or less=Very high risk. R1's Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 11/27/2024 by V4 (Wound Physician) documents that R1 has a Stage 4 Pressure Wound Coccyx, full thickness measuring 5 cm (centimeters) x 5.2 cm x 1.2 cm (length x width x depth) and documents the wound progress as not at goal. This summary documents that surgical excisional debridement procedure was performed to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. The dressing treatment plan for the Stage 4 Pressure Wound to the coccyx documents to add Collagen powder once daily for 30 days, Silver Sulfadiazine once daily for 30 days; continue Alginate Calcium once daily for 30 days, gauze roll twice daily for 30 days; and discontinue Sodium Hypochlorite Solution (Dakin's Solution), and gauze sponge. R1's Wound Evaluation and Management Summary by V4 dated 12/5/2024 documents that R1 has a Stage 4 Pressure Wound Coccyx, full thickness measuring 5 cm x 4.3 cm x 1.2 cm and documents the wound as improved by decrease surface area. This summary documents that surgical excisional debridement procedure was performed to remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. The dressing treatment plan for the Stage 4 Pressure Wound to the coccyx documents to add Mupirocin Topical 2% once daily for 30 days, continue Alginate Calcium once daily, Collagen Powder once daily, gauze twice daily for 19 days, and discontinue Silver Sulfadiazine. R1's Physician Order Sheet dated 11/1/2024-1/3/2025, documents an order dated 11/6/24 for Dakin's solution 0.5%: topical; special instructions: cleanse the wound to the coccyx with normal saline/wound cleanser; apply Dakin's, gauze sponge, calcium alginate and dry dressing twice a day with a discontinuation date of 12/9/24. R1's Physician Order Sheet does not document the order to add Collagen powder once daily for 30 days, Silver Sulfadiazine once daily for 30 days; continue Alginate Calcium once daily for 30 days, and gauze roll twice daily for 30 days as documented by V4 on the Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 11/27/2024 and subsequently does not document to discontinue the Silver Sulfadiazine as documented on the Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 12/5/24. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 12/1/2024-12/31/2024, does not document any treatment order to R1's Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer to the coccyx since the order for the Dakin's Solution was discontinued on 12/9/24 per R1's Physician Order Sheet. On 1/3/2024 at 2:43PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that residents with wounds are seen by V4 (Wound Physician) weekly. V2 stated wound rounds are made by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). V2 stated V3 takes the orders from V4 (Wound Physician) and processes the orders. V2 stated she expects the nurses to perform the treatments as they are ordered by V4. V2 stated wound reports from V4 include wound assessments, including measurements, and treatments to be done for each resident. V2 stated she has not known of any issues with treatments getting done as ordered. V2 stated there is no ongoing process in place to monitor the completion of treatments. V2 stated treatments are done by the charge nurses. V2 stated R1 had wounds and she was admitted with wounds. V2 stated R1 was being seen by V4. R1's Resident Progress Notes dated 12/29/2024 at 2:52PM documents, This resident was sent to local hospital for evaluation and possible treatment. She has had change in LOC (Level of Consciousness), only alert to herself, edema of plus 3 pitting to her bilateral hips. She is 99% on 4 liters of Oxygen. On 1/6/2024 at 1:20PM, V6 (RN at Local Hospital Emergency Room) stated he was working in the emergency room on [DATE] when R1 arrived by ambulance. V6 stated during assessment of R1, R1 had a small dressing on her sacral area with a small 2x2 with some sort of cream and covered with a telfa dressing which did not even cover the wound and had no date on the dressing. V6 stated R1 had multiple lesions noted around the wound to the sacral area. On 1/7/2024 at 10:17AM, V4 (Wound Physician) stated he makes rounds weekly at the facility and assesses wounds. V4 stated he does expect the nurses to process his orders and follow his orders. V4 stated he did see R1 on 12/25/2024. V4 stated as far as he knows R1's dressings were being changed as ordered and he was unaware of anything different. V4 was asked what it meant on his report when the wound progress documents at goal. V4 stated at goal means no change. V4 stated I feel like on the 25th the sacral area (Stage 4) was without change. On 1/8/2025 at 10:40AM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated R1's new orders for stage 4 wound to coccyx was not on the December MAR (Medication Administration Record). V3 stated the nurses were doing the same treatment on the Stage 4 wound to the coccyx that was being done on other areas (blisters) to the coccyx and sacral area, which was Bactroban, Clotrimazole, and Maalox, three times a day with dry dressing. R1's December MAR was reviewed with V3. V3 validated that the last dressing order on the MAR for the Stage 4 wound to the coccyx was to cleanse the wound to the coccyx with normal saline/wound cleanser, apply Dakin's, gauze sponge, calcium alginate, and dry dressing twice daily, this order had a discontinued date of 12/9/2024 and no new orders for the stage 4 wound for the remainder of the month. V3 validated there were no orders for treatment to the Stage 4 Coccyx wound on the MAR for December 9th through December 29th. V3 validated the treatments being done by the nurses were not the correct treatments which were ordered by V4. On 1/8/2025 at 2:14 PM, V2 (DON) stated she didn't realize there was a problem with wound orders. V2 stated she was not aware that there were not orders from most of December for the stage 4 wound for R1. V2 stated the orders not being processed or the resident not receiving the ordered treatment failed on different levels. V2 stated she was going to talk with all the nurses about orders and all the wounds in the facility. On 1/8/2024 at 6:03PM, V11 (Registered Nurse/ RN) stated she took care of R1 on a regular basis. V11 stated she remembers doing packing with Dakin's solution to the stage 4 wound to the coccyx, but there were many changes to the orders to her dressing changes. V11 was asked where the treatment orders are found and V11 replied that the orders are always on the MAR and that is where she finds what treatments are supposed to be done. V11 stated she has used Calcium Alginate and Collagen on the stage 4 to the coccyx. V11 stated she believes the last treatment she did for the stage 4 coccyx was the Dakin's solution because it is on the treatment cart, and she believes there was just a new bottle delivered from pharmacy. The facility policy titled Wound Management Program revision date 1/20/2023 documents, It is the policy of this facility to manage resident skin integrity through prevention, assessment, and implementation and evaluation of interventions. Under Procedure it documents Physician Orders should be obtained and followed for each resident.
Nov 2024 11 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow orders by placing a resident on hospice and failed to get a t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow orders by placing a resident on hospice and failed to get a timely X-ray for a Covid positive resident having respiratory distress for 2 of 2 residents (R80 and R81) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 39. This failure resulted in R80 being admitted to the hospital for 5 days with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Findings include: 1. R80's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/22/24 with diagnoses including: cerebral infarction, acute kidney failure, 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, dementia, and atrial fibrillation. R80's Care Plan documents in part, Problem Start date 9/6/24, Category: Disease Process. (R80) has tested positive for Covid-19. This places resident at higher risk for severe illness to include: Acute respiratory distress and secondary infections such as pnuemonia or bronchitis: increased risk for fluid volume deficit . The following clinical symptoms have been exhibited: Cough and Maliaise/lethargy are marked. Under Approach: Start date 9/6/24. Labs per healthcare provider orders . Nursing to assess respiratory status and observe for signs and symptoms of pneumonia or acute respiratory distress such as: productive cough, elevated temperature, abnormal respiratory status, cyanosis, shortness of breath, diaphoresis. Notify healthcare provider is occurs . Vitals (to include temperature, heart rate, respirations, pulse oximetry, blood pressure) per CDC guidelines R80's physician notes document a progress note by V24 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) documenting a visit date of 09/10/24 and a subject area of: subjective HPI (history of present illness) documenting: R80 is a [AGE] year old female seen today for Covid. (R80) reports shortness of breath at times. (R80) currently has oxygen on. Chest x-ray was ordered yesterday (10/09/24) but has not been done yet. R80 denies cough, headache, fever and sore throat. The subject area listed as 'Plan:' lists: covid: acute, cxr (chest x-ray) pending, nursing staff will monitor temp (temperature) and O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation) each shift and prn (as needed), and supportive therapy, will monitor for worsening systemic infection. R80's radiology (X-ray) order by V24 documents the order was sent in verbally on 9/10/24 at 6:40 am for a PA (posteroanterior) chest, LAT (lateral) chest, and OBL (oblique) chest. Frequency: once-one time 6:30am-6:30pm. This order also documents that the order was discontinued on 9/11/24 at 9:18am based on census discharge event. This order also documents a transmission status: New order fax error during attempt to send. R80's progress note dated 9/6/24 at 9:14am documents R80's lungs sounds were diminished. There were no additional progress notes assessing R80's respiratory status until V24's physician notes documented on 9/10/24 found in R80's Clinical Record. R80's progress notes documents: On 09/11/2024 at 8:58 AM This resident (R80) was taken by family members to ED (emergency department) for decline in condition and pneumonia work-up because they are concerned for her. She has had some decline in ability to feed herself. Family of R80 stated: I took two days off work to wait for a chest x-ray and one was never done. On 11/25/24 at 10:38 AM, V26 (family) stated R80 was at the facility for rehab and contracted Covid-19 while at the facility. They went in to see her and R80 kept coughing and having a hard time breathing. She told the staff R80 was coughing, having a hard time breathing and declining and R80 kept laying there coughing and losing her breath. They stated, they would get her an order for a chest x-ray to make sure it was not pneumonia. The x-ray never happened and she became concerned and took her out and took her to the emergency room. R80 was admitted to the hospital for about 5 days. V26 stated she does not remember if she actually had a diagnosis of pneumonia or if she had an accumulation of fluid causing her not to breathe, either way, she could not breathe well. So R80 did not get her rehab while she was at the facility, they did not have enough staff while she was there they had a bunch of Covid in the building and R80 was in her room with the door shut because of the covid and she has dementia, she did not get a chest x-ray when she needed one, therefore she was not taking her back there, she went to another nursing facility after she was discharged from the hospital and it was much better. R80's hospital records document a visit date of 09/11/24 at 9:19 AM with the heading of Subjective patient (R80) with family members after she apparently was supposed to have a chest x-ray 3 days ago and did not get a chest x-ray. Patient (R80) has a history of testing positive for COVID-19 8 days ago. Patient (R80) has no specific complaints but states I am a little short of breath positive cough that sounds productive. The section titled, Narrative documents: patient (R80) is an [AGE] year old female admitted to acute with SOB (shortness of breath) and hypoxia. Patient (R80) recently tested positive for COVID-19. Upon arrival to ER (emergency room), patient (R80) was hypoxic with O2 saturation at 83% on RA (room air). The section titled, Assessment and Plan document: acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, likely secondary to COVID, chest x-ray reviewed significant edema bilaterally. IV (intravenous) Lasix 40 mg (milligrams) IV daily x 3 days. The section titled, COVID19 infection documents in part: dexamethasone started 6mg (milligrams) po (per oral) daily x 5 days. Hospital records document a discharge date of 09/16/24. On 11/21//24 at 12:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, he does not have a document showing when that order came through for R80's X-ray or exactly when V24 called and gave the order for the chest x-ray. He stated he sees the note from V24 about the order but does not know when she verbally put it in. V1 stated, sometimes x-rays can take awhile to get here. V1 confirmed that R80 did not receive an X-ray prior to leaving the facility on 9/11/24. On 11/21/24 at 12:10 PM when asked what the fax error on R80's order meant V1 (Administrator) stated, when the transmission status of a fax error occurs a notification would be sent to three different computers and the order would be automatically resent. On 11/21/24 at 12:07 PM, 12:19 PM, 3:59 PM ,V24 (NP) was attempted to be reached at both numbers listed for her, with messages left. V24 never returned a call back. On 11/22/24 at 11:14 AM, V23 (Medical Director) stated he did not have much information about R80. V23 stated he would not have any information of when V24 ordered the chest x-ray, she is not his nurse practitioner, she is the nurse practitioner for the facility. Therefore she or the facility would have that information. On 11/25/24 at 1:17 PM, V24 was attempted to be reached. V24 never returned a call back. 2. R81's face sheet documents an admission date of 11/16/24 with diagnoses including: Iron deficiency anemia, malignant neoplasm of liver, hypertension, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R81's hospital records fax transmission dated 11/15/24 documents: subject: patient referral with a comment of: referral for services. This document contains progress notes dated 11/15/24 with a section titled, plan for today awaiting appropriate placement with hospice input after discussion with V19 (family) on 11/14 oncology consult with physician was finally canceled after reassessing goals of care with V19 (family) over discussion on 11/14. These documents contains an acute care surgery consult note dated 11/12/24 at 10:47 AM documents: R81 is an 82 y. o. (year old) male with a history of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus type 2, prior CVA (cerebrovascular accident) on Eliquis, history of GIB s/p APC of AVM ([NAME] plasma coagulation for gastrointestinal bleed caused by arteriovenous malformations) in the 2nd portion of duodenum 6/24/24 who presented to (acute hospital) with complaints of progressive weakness and fatigue. R81 was found to be anemic with a hemoglobin of 5.9 requiring blood transfusion with stabilization of H/H (hemoglobin and hematocrit). GI was consulted and performed a colonoscopy on 11/11 which revealed a large nearly obstructing fungating mass in proximal ascending colon. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of the abdomen obtained and revealed a probable primary adenocarcinoma at the cecum/ascending colon with probable metastatic lesions at the pancreatic uncinate process, 2 hepatic lesions, pulmonary nodules, and metastatic lymph nodes in the right lower quadrant mesentery and second portion of the duodenum. R81 seen and evaluated at bedside. (R81) is tolerating FLD (fluid diet). R81 reports RLQ (right lower quadrant) abdominal pain. These documents contain a progress note dated 11/15/24 at 7:53 AM with a section titled, consults/procedures/tests documenting in part: Oncology 11/14 was canceled on 11/14 since after long discussion with V19 she elects hospice/comfort care (evidence of brain metastatic disease on CT (computed tomography) brain w (with) iv (intravenous) contrast). R81's hospital notes contains a document dated 11/14/24 titled, Registered Dietitian Note which documents in part: assessment comment(s): per MD (medical doctor) note, imaging showed cecal mass with metastatic disease in the mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymph nodes and distal SBO (small bowel obstruction). MD notes also state that pt (patient) family has decided in favor of hospice care. On 11/19/24 at 3:19 PM, V19 (family) stated she was under the impression R81 was already on hospice care. She thought he was coming to this facility on hospice care. On 11/19/24 at 4:55 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated R81 is not on hospice care, he talked with V19 today and he will look into getting a hospice consult for R81 set up. On 11/22/24 at 11:14 AM, V23 (Medical Doctor) stated, he has not received a message from the facility about a consult for R81 to be admitted to hospice care. He will contact the facility and check into that. R81's physician order report documents an order with a start date of 11/19/24 documenting: code status DNR (do not resuscitate) comfort measures. R81's physician order report documents an order with a start date of 11/21/2024 documenting: admit to hospice care Dx (diagnosis) malignant neoplasm of liver. The facility policy dated 07/14 titled, Obtaining and Following Physicians orders documents: it is the policy of (this facility) that physician orders will be obtained by licensed personnel and followed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the writtten notice of the resident's potential liablity for a non-covered stay (SNFABN) for 2 of 3 residents (R71 and R73) reviewed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the writtten notice of the resident's potential liablity for a non-covered stay (SNFABN) for 2 of 3 residents (R71 and R73) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R71's face sheet documents diagnosis including: fracture of left pubis, dementia, and fracture of sacrum. R71's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/05/24. R71's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form documents a discharge from Medicare Part A services prior to exhaustion of his benefit day allotment. This form documents that a written notice of the resident's potential liability for a non-covered stay (SNFABN - CMS10055) form was not provided to R71 to explain her right to appeal the decision of discharge from Medicare Part A services prior to exhaustion of her benefit days. On 11/25/24 at 4:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated they do not have the form (CMS 10055) for R71, he does not know why it was not given. R71's record review does not contain a CMS 10055 document. 2. R73's face sheet documents diagnosis including: dementia, obesity, and essential hypertension. R73's face sheet documents a admission date of 07/30/24. R73's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form documents a discharge from Medicare Part A services prior to exhaustion of his benefit day allotment. This form documents that a written notice of the resident's potential liability for a non-covered stay (SNFABN - CMS10055) form was not provided to R73 to explain her right to appeal the decision of discharge from Medicare Part A services prior to exhaustion of her benefit days. On 11/25/24 at 4:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated they do not have the form (CMS 10055) for R73, he does not know why it was not given. R73's record review does not contain a CMS 10055 document.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the diet as ordered for one (R81) of 22 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 39. Findings include: R81's face s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the diet as ordered for one (R81) of 22 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 39. Findings include: R81's face sheet documents an admission date of 11/16/24 with diagnoses including: Iron deficiency anemia, malignant neoplasm of liver, hypertension, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R81's care plan documents a category of disease process with a start date of 11/16/24 documenting: R81 has a diagnosis of cancer of: brain, bone, liver and lymph. (R81) is at risk for excessive weakness, tiredness, weight loss, pain, and depression. R81's care plan documents an approach of encourage good po (per oral) intake with a start date of 11/16/24. R81's care plan documents a problem of psychosocial well-being with a start date of 11/18/24 documenting: R81 is a new admit (admission) and is unaware of surrounding (A/O x1) (alert and oriented times one) at this time. R81's Registered Dietitian note from discharging facility dated 11/14/24 documents a diet order as: full liquid with supplement order: nutritional health drink. On 11/18/24 at 12:48 PM, R81 received a cup of broth and a cup of water for his lunch meal. On 11/19/24 at 8:10 AM, R81 received a cup of broth for his breakfast meal. On 11/19/24 at 12:52 PM, R81 received a cup of broth and a cup of water for his lunch meal. On 11/19/24 at 2:20 PM, R81 stated he was having an ok day, but he was hungry. On 11/19/24 at 3:25 PM, V19 (family) stated she does not understand why R81 can not have anything to eat, he is hungry. V19 stated it is breaking her heart that R81 is telling her he is hungry. She stated, he was eating other items at the hospital like mashed potatoes and soup. She thinks he was getting a nutritional health drink also. She stated she asked the nursing staff and they stated they were checking on his diet order, but she does not understand why it is taking so long. She stated R81 has been here since Saturday (11/16/24) and he has not had anything to eat. V19 stated, R81's cognition has been coming and going but she believes he knows he is hungry. On 11/19/24 at 4:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated V19 has talked to him about R81's diet. He stated, he will try to confirm his diet tomorrow. After being shown R81's diet order from the discharging hospital that listed a nutritional health drink as a supplement (by surveyor) he was asked if R81 could have a nutritional health drink. V1 stated, he would have to check tomorrow if he could have a nutritional health shake. On 11/20/24 at 12:26 PM, V20 (Hospital Registered Dietitian) stated R81 was given the full liquid diet by her due to the surgeons order. A full liquid diet contains liquids that are smooth that does not mean a clear liquid diet. R81 can have nutritional health drinks, thin mashed potatoes and gravy, cream soups, pudding, thin hot cereal. R81 was eating those at the hospital and was doing fine. V20 stated, she would not have expected him to receive only broth, she would have expected R81 to receive a diet that would meet R81's protein, calorie, and nutritional needs. On 11/21/24 at 1:58 PM, V18 (Dietary Manager) stated R81 did receive only broth for three and a half days, since he has been at the facility. V18 stated, she has educated her staff on the difference between a liquid diet and a clear liquid diet. V18 stated, R81 should not have received only broth. V18 stated, when the nursing staff gave her the dietary order it did not have a supplement listed on it. V18 stated, R81 is now getting a health shake, chocolate milk, cream soup or ice cream. The facility policy dated 07/14 titled, Diet Order and Communication documents: purpose: to ensure both the nursing and dietary departments are aware of any new admission diet order, change in diet order, hold trays, resident hospitalization or leave of absence. 1. The diet order and communication two part form is to be completed by the charge nurse on duty at the time a diet change is made. 2 The nurse completing the form is responsible for giving a copy of the form to the dietary department.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard expired medications for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for expired medications in the sample of 39. Findings include: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard expired medications for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for expired medications in the sample of 39. Findings include: On 11/20/24 at 11:42 AM the A Hall medication cart had a card of R8's Ultram (Tramadol) 50mg (milligrams) that documented an expiration date of 11/09/24. The Narcotic count sheet documented a dose signed out on 11/19/24 by V25 (Registered Nurse/RN). R8's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/16/23 with the following diagnoses documented in part: hemiplegia, unspecified affecting right dominant side, and idiopathic progressive neuropathy. R8's active orders as of 11/21/24 documents in part; tramadol 50 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth for moderate to severe pain every six hours, PRN (as needed). R8's MAR (Medication Administration Record) documented that a PRN (as needed) dose of Tramadol was administered on 11/19/2024 at 8:08am by V25. On 11/20/24 at 11:26am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that she had instructed the staff the day before to look at the medication carts closely and they better remove anything that was expired. Facility Policy dated 05/01/18 titled Storage of Medications documents in part, When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated .The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days unless the manufacturer recommends another date . The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering. No expired medication will be administered to a resident. All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility, regardless of the amount remaining.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to serve food at a preferred temperature for one (R53) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to serve food at a preferred temperature for one (R53) of one resident reviewed for food temperature preferences in a sample of 39. Findings include: R53's face sheet documents an admission date of 05/29/2024 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin ulcer, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg with fat layer exposed. R53's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 indicating R53 is cognitively intact. R53's order sheet documents an order with a start date of 09/26/2024 with an end date listed as open ended of regular consistency with thin liquids, ice cream at lunch, and double protein portion at all meals. On 11/19/24 at 12:43 PM, V21 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) picked up R53's plate from the serving counter and placed his container of ice cream on his plate between his vegetable and potatoes and placed a plate cover over the plate and placed on the tray in the insulated food cart. On 11/19/24 at 1:07 PM, V22 (CNA) delivered R53's plate to him and removed the plate cover. On 11/19/24 at 1:08 PM, R53 picked up his container of ice cream from off of his plate and put it on his tray table. On 11/19/24 at 1:09 PM, R53 stated his ice cream is completely melted, he is not going to eat it this way, he will just throw it away. R53 stated, it comes to him this way frequently. On 11/21/24 at 1:58 PM, V18 (Dietary Manager) stated, the CNA's should never put frozen food like ice cream or even cold food on the plate with the hot food and cover it with a plate cover. They should have put it on the tray with the drink and the dessert. V18 stated, no resident should have to eat melted ice cream, it should have been served cold.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R66's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/25/24 with the following diagnosis in part; encounter for surgical afterca...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R66's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/25/24 with the following diagnosis in part; encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, and pressure ulcer of the right buttock. R66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R6 was cognitively intact. R66's Physician's Order Sheet documents a current order, initiated on 10/03/24, for Dakin's Solution (sodium hypochlorite) solution; 0.5 %; Special Instructions: Cleanse wounds to right medial buttock with NS (Normal Saline)/wound cleanser, apply dakins soaked gauze, and cover with dry dressing twice a day. On 11/19/24 at 2:20pm, wound care was observed for R66, performed by V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R66 was eating but stated she would stop because she wanted her dressing changed at this time. V6 removed bowl of food from the resident's bed side table, pushed resident's cups to one side of the table and wiped it with a bleach wipe. V6 allowed the table to dry and then placed supplies on the table. A bottle of wound cleanser, that did not have a label on it documenting R66's name, along with a bottle of topical antiseptic rinse, with a pharmacy label with R66's name, was brought into the room in their original packaging. V6 assisted R66 onto her left side, removed the old bandage dated 11/18/24. V6 did not cleanse wound. V6 removed the contaminated gloves. V6 then removed his gown and washed his hands and left room to retrieve supplies from the treatment cart located in the hallway outside of R66's room. V6 returned to R66's room with supplies, donned a new gown, and washed hands and donned fresh gloves. V6 applied topical antiseptic rinse to gauze and started to apply the gauze to the wound bed. V6 had to continue repositioning R66 while packing the wound with gauze. V6 stopped to remove scissors from his pocket and did not cleanse or sanitize scissors or change gloves before using them to cut the gauze. V6 discarded the remaining gauze, removed gloves, cleansed his hands, applied new gloves and applied a dressing to R66's wound with the date of 11/19/24. V6 reinforced R66's dressing with tape. V6 removed his gloves and cleansed his hands. V6 removed the supplies from the bedside table, placed the bedside table in front of R66, and put the bowl of food back on R66's bedside table without cleansing the table. On 11/21/2024 at 1:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said the facility did not have a policy on wound care that he could find. The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Policies and Procedures: General Statement dated 08/2018 documents: The organization has made a commitment to prudent infection prevention and control measures by promoting the concept of compassionate, common sense resident and patient care, with an emphasis on cleanliness and infection prevention strategies. This organization has an established infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease ad infection. We strive to implement evidenced based approaches to infection prevention. The section titled, Hand Hygiene General Statement documents: Good hand hygiene is a requirement of standard precautions. Wash or sanitize hands before and after each care contact for which hand hygiene is indicated by acceptable professional practice, utilizing designated time frames and products. Hands should be washed with soap and water when they are visibly soiled, or if they have come in contact with blood or other body fluids, before or after eating or handling food, and times specified by other applicable regulations. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement infection prevention strategies while performing wound care for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R66) reviewed for wound care in a sample of 39. Findings included: 1. R1's face sheet documents an admission date of 12/6/2024 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, schizoaffective disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction and pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/6/2024, documented R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicated R1 has severe cognitive impairment and could not participate in the testing. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for care. On 11/19/2024 at 2:30pm, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse) performed wound care for R1's stage 4 sacral pressure wound. V3 (Wound Care Registered Nurse) was also present and observed V4 perform R1's wound care. V4 began by gathering some of the supplies needed for R1's care and placed them on R1's bed side table without disinfecting the table or applying a protective clean barrier. V4 then proceeded to provided R1's care by cleaning her hands and applying clean gloves. With gloved hands, V4 removed R1's dirty soiled dressing and disposed of it. Without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, V4 utilized a spray bottle of wound cleanser and gauze to cleanse R1's sacral wound. V4 walked to the treatment cart, obtained a topical cream from the drawer, removed the top of the cream and used a wooden applicator to apply the cream to R1's wound. V4 went back to the treatment cart to retrieve a clean dressing and applied it to R1's wound. V4 then reached into her uniform pocket to get bandage scissors and a pen, used both items and returned them to her pocket afterwards. V4 returned wound spray cleanser to the treatment cart and finished picking up the remaining wound care supplies all while wearing the same gloves that were used to remove R1's soiled dressing. V4 did not don or doff new, clean gloves throughout R1's dressing change. On 11/19/2024 at 3:15pm, V3 said she observed V4 cross contaminate between clean and dirty items, including contaminating the A wing treatment cart. V3 said V4 should have changed her gloves and sanitized her hands, but she did not. V3 said V4 is a new nurse at this facility and figures she was really nervous.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dignity while assisting dependent residents du...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dignity while assisting dependent residents during mealtimes for 10 of 10 residents (R4, R7, R23, R32, R51, R52, R53, R54, R60, R63) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R52's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/18/23 with the following diagnoses in part; Alzheimer's disease and unspecified dementia, severe, with anxiety. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating that R52 was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R52 is set up and clean up assistance only for eating. R52's care plan documents that R52 needs set up/supervision to substantial assistance for activities of daily living. R52's Physician's Order Report from 10/21/24-11/21/24 documents a puree diet r/t (related to) chewing and spitting food out. On 11/18/24 at 1:00pm, R52's tray was delivered, she was given multiple bowls of pureed food and she began eating with her hands. On 11/18/24 at 1:28pm, R52 continued to eat with hands and was offered no assistance. She was observed rubbing her eye in between bites. On 11/18/24 at 1:59pm, lunch observation of R52 ended, she had not been assisted with her food and continued to eat with her hands. R52's bowls were taken away while she was still eating out of them. No clothing protector was applied to R52 during lunch observation, and she was observed to have food on her clothing and hands. On 11/19/24 at 12:45pm, R52 was observed spilling vanilla nutritional shake on the table. R52 began swiping nutritional shake off table with finger and eating it. R52 was also observed eating ice cream with her fingers. R52 was grabbing the flowers on the table with her hands she had been eating with and pulling them towards her through spilled health shake. On 11/19/24 at 12:52pm, Staff walked past R52 while delivering other residents' trays, R52 continued to eat the health shake off the table with her hand. On 11/19/24 at 12:53pm, staff cleaned health shake off the table in front of R52 and applied a hospital gown as a clothing protector. On 11/19/24 1:03pm, R52 was delivered multiple bowls of food containing mashed potatoes, pureed meat, gravy, and dessert. R52 began eating mashed potatoes with her fingers. A spoon was placed in R52's mashed potatoes and fork in her dessert, no assistance or instruction was given to R52, and she continued to eat with her fingers. On 11/19/24 at 1:23pm, R52 was still eating with her fingers and staff had not prompted or assisted R52 with meal. R52 was observed with food in her hair, around her mouth and on her hands. On 11/19/24 at 1:41pm, R52 was removed from the table while still eating with her hands and without being asked if she was done. It appeared R52 did not drink any of her pink lemonade and no one offered her assistance with drinking. On 11/20/24 at 12:39pm, R52 was wearing a hospital gown as a clothing protector. On 11/20/24 at 1:08pm, R52's tray was delivered with several bowls of puree food and ice cream. R52 was offered silverware and prompted to use it. R52 began eating with her fingers, no assistance was offered. On 11/20/24 at 01:21pm, R52 continues to eat puree food with her fingers, no other assistance or prompting was offered. On 11/20/24 at 1:49pm, R52 continues to eat puree food with fingers and touch her face and hair. R52's bowls were removed while she was still eating from them. On 11/18/24 at 1:50pm, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that R52 will continue to eat with her hands. You can try to feed R52 but she will still try to get it with her hands. V16 stated R52 does not follow prompting to use silverware at all. 2. R23's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/17/23 with the following diagnoses in part; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, and unqualified visual loss, both eyes. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R23 is cognitively intact. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R23 is setup or cleanup assistance with eating. On 11/18/24 at 10:58am, R23 stated he is visually impaired and requires some assistance locating things from time to time. On 11/18/24 at 1:19pm, R23's food was sat in front of him, no other assistance was offered. R23 was seen feeling his plate, trying to determine where everything was on his plate. Another resident assisted R23 in trying to figure out what items were on his plate. She also explained to R23 that he had sour cream in his hand and that he was not given butter. On 11/18/24 at 1:24pm, R23 stated he requires a little bit of direction at mealtime. R23 stated everything is kind of blurry to him. On 11/19/24 at 12:59pm, R23 was given his tray, and he was sitting approximately 1.5 feet away from the table and his wheelchair was not locked. Other residents were prompting R23 on the location of his food. R23 was not wearing a clothing protector and was noted to be dropping food onto his lap and clothing. On 11/20/24 at 12:50pm, R23 was served six bowls of food, lids were removed but he was not instructed on where his food was, other residents were assisting him in locating his food. R23 was not given a napkin, as well as many other residents, R23 was noted to have food around his mouth and asking for a napkin to wipe his face. On 11/19/24 at 1:50pm, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated it is her expectation that staff would be assisting anyone who appears to need assistance regardless of the level of assistance their medical record states they require. 3. On 11/19/24 at 10:30 AM during resident council meeting R32, R7, R53, R63, R4, and R54 stated, they have not received a napkin with meals for over a month. All Residents were alert and oriented to person, place, and time. On 11/19/24 at 12:45 PM, R51 did not receive a napkin with her lunch. On 11/19/24 at 12:45 PM, R7 did not receive a napkin with her lunch On 11/19/24 at 1:04 PM, R60 did not receive a napkin with his lunch. R60 is alert and oriented to person, place, and time. On 11/19/24 at 1:07 PM, R53 received his lunch plate with the tulip cup containing cherry crumble stacked on top of his bread that was laying on top of his meal with the plate cover on top. When the dessert was removed from the center of his plate his bread was pushed into the rest of his food and there was an indented circle into his bread where the tulip cup of dessert was placed. He did not receive a napkin with his lunch. On 11/19/24 at 1:07 PM, R53 stated, his lunch usually arrives this way, with the dessert stacked on top of his food under the plate cover and they have not been given a napkin for over a month. On 11/20/24 at 12:40 PM, R51 did not receive a napkin with her lunch. On 11/20/24 at 12:40 PM, R7 did not receive a napkin with her lunch. On 11/20/24 at 1:10 PM, R60 did not receive a napkin with his lunch. On 11/20/24 at 1:14 PM, R53 did not receive a napkin with his lunch. The facility policy dated 10/2017 titled, Resident's Rights documents: the Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with, and access to, persons and services inside and outside the Facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R52's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/18/23 with the following diagnoses in part; Alzheimer's disease and unspec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R52's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/18/23 with the following diagnoses in part; Alzheimer's disease and unspecified dementia, severe, with anxiety. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating that R52 was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R52 is set up and clean up assistance only for eating. R52's care plan documents that R52 needs set up/supervision to substantial assistance for activities of daily living. R52's Physician's Order Report from 10/21/24-11/21/24 documents a puree diet r/t (related to) chewing and spitting food out. On 11/18/24 at 1:00pm, R52's tray was delivered, She was given multiple bowls of pureed food and she began eating with her hands. On 11/18/24 at 1:28pm, R52 continued to eat with hands and was offered no assistance. She was observed rubbing her eye in between bites. On 11/18/24 at 1:59pm, lunch observation of R52 ended, she had not been assisted with her food and continued to eat with her hands. R52's bowls were taken away while she was still eating out of them. No clothing protector was applied to R52 during lunch observation, and she was observed to have food on her clothing and hands. On 11/19/24 at 12:45pm, R52 was observed spilling vanilla nutritional shake on the table. R52 began swiping nutritional shake off table with finger and eating it. R52 was also observed eating ice cream with her fingers. R52 was grabbing the flowers on the table with her hands she had been eating with and pulling them towards her through spilled health shake. On 11/19/24 at 12:52pm, Staff walked past R52 while delivering other residents' trays, R52 continued to eat the health shake off the table with her hand. On 11/19/24 at 12:53pm, staff cleaned health shake off the table in front of R52 and applied a hospital gown as a clothing protector. On 11/19/24 1:03pm R52 was delivered multiple bowls of food containing mashed potatoes, pureed meat, gravy, and dessert. R52 began eating mashed potatoes with her fingers. A spoon was placed in R52's mashed potatoes and fork in her dessert, no assistance or instruction was given to R52, and she continued to eat with her fingers. On 11/19/24 at 1:23pm, R52 was still eating with her fingers and staff had not prompted or assisted R52 with meal. R52 was observed with food in her hair, around her mouth and on her hands. On 11/19/24 at 1:41pm, R52 was removed from the table while still eating with her hands and without being asked if she was done. It appeared R52 did not drink any of her pink lemonade and no one offered her assistance with drinking. On 11/20/24 at 1:08pm, R52's tray was delivered with several bowls of puree food and ice cream. R52 was offered silverware and prompted to use it. R52 began eating with her fingers, no assistance was offered. On 11/20/24 at 01:21pm, R52 continues to eat puree food with her fingers, no other assistance or prompting was offered. On 11/20/24 at 1:49pm, R52 continues to eat puree food with fingers and touch her face and hair. R52's bowls were removed while she was still eating from them. On 11/18/24 at 1:50pm, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that R52 will continue to eat with her hands. You can try to feed R52 but she will still try to get it with her hands. V16 stated R52 does not follow prompting to use silverware at all. 4. R9's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/16/23 with the following diagnoses in part; multiple sclerosis, restlessness and agitation, anxiety disorder and heartburn. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating that R9 is cognitively impaired. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R9 is dependent on staff for eating. R9's care plan documents that staff is to offer available substitutes if R9 has problems with the food being served and staff are to feed R9. On 11/18/24 at 1:00pm, R9's ice cream was sat in front of her uncovered, with no assistance provided at this time. On 11/18/24 at 1:10pm, R9's tray was delivered. R9's food was uncovered and sat next to R9, and no assistance was provided at this time. On 11/18/24 at 1:27pm, V16 (CNA) sat next to R9 to assist her. R9's chair back was at approximately a 30-45-degree angle and R9 was slouched down in her chair, no attempt was made at repositioning or sitting her up more before she began eating. On 11/19/24 at 12:40pm, R9 had an ice cream cup in front of her, with no one around to assist her. R9's chair back was at a 30-45-degree angle. On 11/19/24 01:07pm R9's tray was delivered, she stated she did not like chicken. V16 (CNA) began assisting R9 and asked her to try it. On 11/19/24 at 1:22pm, R9 stated she felt like she was going to choke. R9's chair back was at a 30-40-degree angle and she was slumped down in her chair. No attempt to reposition R9 was made, and V16 continued feeding her. On 11/20/24 at 1:09pm, R9's tray was sat in front of her. R9 stated, I'm hungry, can I please have some food. On 11/20/24 at 1:18pm, staff began assisting R9 with lunch. R9 stated she did not care for the food and would like a cheeseburger. Staff continued to feed her. 5. R23's face sheet documents an admission date of 10/17/23 with the following diagnoses in part; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, and unqualified visual loss, both eyes. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R23 is cognitively intact. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R23 is setup or cleanup assistance with eating. On 11/18/24 at 10:58am, R23 stated he is visually impaired and requires some assistance locating things from time to time. On 11/18/24 at 1:19pm, R23's food was sat in front of him, no other assistance was offered. R23's was seen feeling his plate, trying to determine where everything was on his plate. Another resident assisted R23 in trying to figure out what items were on his plate. She also explained to R23 that he had sour cream in his hand and that he was not given butter. On 11/18/24 at 1:24pm, R23 stated he requires a little bit of direction at mealtime. R23 stated everything is kind of blurry to him. On 11/19/24 at 12:59pm, R23 was given his tray, and he was sitting approximately 1.5 feet away from the table and his wheelchair was not locked. Other residents were prompting R23 on the location of his food. R23 was not wearing a clothing protector and was noted to be dropping food onto his lap and clothing. On 11/20/24 at 12:50pm, R23 was served six bowls of food, lids were removed but he was not instructed on where his food was, other residents were assisting him in locating his food. R23 was not given a napkin, as well as many other residents, R23 was noted to have food around his mouth and asking for a napkin to wipe his face. On 11/19/24 at 1:50pm, V2 (DON) stated it is her expectation that staff would be assisting anyone who appears to need assistance regardless of the level of assistance their medical record states they require. Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide showers and assistance with meals to 5 of 10 residents (R4, R9, R23, R39, R52) reviewed for activities of daily living in a sample of 39. Findings included: 1. R4's face sheet documents R4 was admitted to this facility on 8/22/2023 with diagnoses of chronic ulcer of the left heel, type II diabetes, cerebral infarction and peripheral artery disease among others. R4's MDS (minimum data set) dated 8/22/2024 documented R4 is dependent on staff for showering, dressing and transferring. This same MDS documented R4's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R4 is cognitively intact. On 11/19/2024 at 12:00pm, R4 said he has not had a bath or shower in over a month. R4 said he complains to R2 (Director of Nursing) about it but it doesn't do any good. R4 said the facility needs more staff to provide care for the residents. A facility document titled Shower and Daily Duty List A Wing documents R4 is scheduled to receive a shower twice per week on Wednesdays and Saturdays. R4's Point of Care Completion Summary and reveals R4 received only 2 of the 9 scheduled showers in October (10/9/24, 10/26/24) and 3 of the 5 scheduled showers in November (11/2/24, 11/6/24, 11/16/24) 2. R39's facesheet documents an admission date of 8/22/2018 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and muscle wasting and atrophy among others. R39's MDS dated [DATE] documented R39 is dependent on staff for showers, dressing and all transfers. This same MDS documents R39 with a BIMS of 15 out of 15 which indicates R39 is cognitively intact. On 11/18/2024 at 10:30am, R39 said he has missed several showers and sometimes he gets them as scheduled and sometimes he doesn't. R39 said the facility needs more staff. A facility document titled Shower and Daily Duty List A Wing documents R39 is scheduled to receive a shower twice per week on Monday and Thursdays. R39's Point of Care Completion Summary and reveals R39 received 3 of the 9 scheduled showers in October (10/10/24, 10/21/24, 10/28/24) and 2 of the 5 scheduled showers in November (11/4/24, 11/7/24) all other scheduled showers for October and November were not given. On 11/18/2024 at 12:40pm, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said the facility is very short on care staff and she can not get all her assigned showers completed. On 11/18/2024 at 12:47pm, V8 (CNA) said the facility does not have enough staff to provided residents with needed care. V8 said showers get missed frequently. On 11/20/2024 at 1:35pm, V13 (CNA) stated she agrees the facility is very short handed and needs more care staff. Everyday each hall has 8 or 9 showers assigned and the care staff can't get all the showers completed. V13 said the staff are to document when showers are completed electronically in the Point of Care section of the residents EHR (electronic healthcare record). A facility document titled Resident Council Referral form documented on 10/8/24, the resident council brought forth concerns of showers not always getting done on their scheduled days. According to this document, the administration responded with the following: Shower aide when able. On 11/21/2024 at 10:50am, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she knows showers are missed and are a problem, but they are working on it. V2 said it is her expectation for showers to be given as scheduled.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to follow dietary order ordered by the physician for 4 (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to follow dietary order ordered by the physician for 4 (R39, R43, R50 and R53) of 22 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R50's face sheet documents an admission date of 04/29/21 with diagnoses including: dementia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and history of non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with necrosis of muscle. R50's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 06 indicating R50 is severely cognitively impaired. R50's physician order report documents an order with a start date of 10/17/2024 and an end date listed as open ended of: diet: regular diet with thin liquids, double portion meats, with extra butter/margarine for added calories, whole milk TID (three times a day) with meals and super cereal at breakfast, ice cream at lunch and supper, and health shakes with B/L/D (breakfast/lunch/dinner). On 11/18/24 at 12:45 PM, for the lunch meal R50 received one piece of pork loin (3 ounces/oz), a baked potato, 4 oz of carrots, one slice of bread, one slice of angel food cake, one packet of sour cream, and one margarine. The diet spreadsheet dated Monday 11/18/2024 documents lunch: roast pork 3 oz slice, gravy 2 oz, bkd (baked) potato 1 potato, carrots 4 oz spoodle, angel food cake 1 slice, SC/chives (sour creams/chives) 1 tbsp (tablespoon), and margarine 1 each. On 11/20/24 at 1:05 PM, for the lunch meal R50 received one piece of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas 4 oz spoodle, and banana pudding. The diet spreadsheet dated Wednesday 11/20/2024 documents lunch: Salisbury steak 1 each, gravy 2 oz, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas & carrots 4 oz spoodle, banana split pke (poke cake), and brown gravy 2oz ladle. On 11/21/24 at 1:20 PM, R50 stated, she does not always get two portions of meat or protein. 2. R39's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/22/2018 with diagnoses including: Parkinson's disease, vitamin B deficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic neurological complication, non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites limited to breakdown of skin, and sepsis. R39's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 indicating R39 is cognitively intact. R39's physician order report documents an order with a start date of 02/23/2023 with an end date listed as open ended of: regular diet CC/LCS/thin (consistent carbohydrates/low concentrated sweets/thin (liquids) with double protein for all meals. On 11/18/24 at 1:15 PM, for the lunch meal R39 received one piece of pork loin (3oz), a baked potato, 4 oz of carrots, one slice of bread, one slice of angel food cake, one packet of sour cream, and one margarine. The diet spreadsheet dated Monday 11/18/2024 documents lunch: roast pork 3 oz slice, gravy 2 oz, bkd (baked) potato 1 potato, carrots 4 oz spoodle, angel food cake 1 slice, SC/chives (sour creams/chives) 1 tbsp (tablespoon), and margarine 1 each. On 11/19/24 at 1:05 PM, for the lunch meal R39 received one piece of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas 4 oz spoodle, and banana pudding. The diet spreadsheet dated Wednesday 11/20/2024 documents lunch: Salisbury steak 1 each, gravy 2 oz, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas & carrots 4 oz spoodle, banana split pke (poke cake), and brown gravy 2oz ladle. On 11/21/24 at 1:30 PM, R39 stated he does not always get two portions of protein. 3. R43's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/11/23 with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. R43's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 12 indicating R43 is cognitively moderately impaired. R43's physician order report documents an order with a start date of 10/22/24 and an end date listed as open ended of: regular diet, carb (carbohydrate) control, NAS (no added salt) with thin liquids, double eggs at B (breakfast), double portion protein at L & S (lunch and supper). On 11/18/24 at 1:15 PM, for the lunch meal R43 received one piece of pork loin (3oz), a baked potato, 4 oz of carrots, one slice of bread, one slice of angel food cake, one packet of sour cream, and one margarine. The diet spreadsheet dated Monday 11/18/2024 documents lunch: roast pork 3 oz slice, gravy 2 oz, bkd (baked) potato 1 potato, carrots 4 oz spoodle, angel food cake 1 slice, SC/chives (sour creams/chives) 1 tbsp (tablespoon), and margarine 1 each. On 11/20/24 at 1:05 PM, for the lunch meal R43 received one piece of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas 4 oz spoodle, and banana pudding. The diet spreadsheet dated Wednesday 11/20/2024 documents lunch: Salisbury steak 1 each, gravy 2 oz, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas & carrots 4 oz spoodle, banana split pke (poke cake), and brown gravy 2oz ladle. On 11/21/24 at 1:18 PM, R43 stated, she does not always receive a double portion of protein. 4. R53's face sheet documents an admission date of 05/29/2024 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin ulcer, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg with fat layer exposed. R53's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 indicating R53 is cognitively intact. R53's order sheet documents an order with a start date of 09/26/2024 with an end date listed as open ended of regular consistency with thin liquids, LCS, ice cream at lunch, and double protein portion at all meals. On 11/19/24 at 1:12 PM, R53 stated some times he gets the double portion of protein and sometimes he doesn't, it's the same with the ice cream. On 11/20/24 at 12:45 PM, for the lunch meal R53 received one piece of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas 4 oz spoodle, and banana pudding. The diet spreadsheet dated Wednesday 11/20/2024 documents lunch: Salisbury steak 1 each, gravy 2 oz, mashed potatoes #8 scoop, peas & carrots 4 oz spoodle, banana split pke (poke cake), and brown gravy 2oz ladle. On 11/21/24 at 1:58 PM, V18 (Dietary Manager) stated double portions of protein should be given to residents that have an order stating double portions of protein. Those residents that have an order for ice cream should also be given the ice cream.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to have enough staff to provided consistent care to residents. This has ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to have enough staff to provided consistent care to residents. This has the ability to effect all 76 residents living at this facility. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form CMS-671 dated 11/18/24 documents there are 76 residents living in the facility. 1. R4's face sheet documents R4 was admitted to this facility on 8/22/2023 with diagnoses of chronic ulcer of the left heel, type II diabetes, cerebral infarction and peripheral artery disease among others. R4's MDS (minimum data set) dated 8/22/2024 documented R4 is dependent on staff for showering, dressing and transferring. This same MDS documented R4's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R4 is cognitively intact. On 11/19/2024 at 12:00pm, R4 said he has not had a bath or shower in over a month and frequently misses them due to staffing issues. R4 said the facility needs more staff to provide care for the residents. R4 said he reports this to V2 (Director of Nursing) but nothing changes. R4 said he has to wait long periods of time for his call light to be answered. R4 said it happens on all shifts and staff tell him they are short handed. 2. R39's facesheet documents an admission date of 8/22/2018 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and muscle wasting and atrophy among others. R39's MDS dated [DATE] documented R39 is dependent on staff for showers, dressing and all transfers. This same MDS documents R39 with a BIMS of 15 out of 15 which indicates R39 is cognitively intact. On 11/18/2024 at approximately 10:30am, R39 said he has missed several showers and sometimes he gets them as scheduled and sometimes he doesn't. R39 said the facility needs more staff. R39 said he misses his showers due to not enough staff to help him or at least that is what he is told. R39 said he usually waits a long time for his call light to be answered and the staff tell him they are helping other people and need more help. 3. On 11/18/2024 at 12:30pm, the noon meal was ready to be served. Throughout the meal service, only one staff member (V7/Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed passing trays in the dining room and one staff was observed passing trays on the hall. At 1:00pm and while in the dining room, R9's meal tray was set in front of her and staff did not arrive to assist her with her meal until 1:27pm. At 1:15pm, R52 's meal was set in front of her. R52 began eating with her hands and did not receive guidance from staff until 2:00pm. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating that R9 is cognitively impaired. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R9 is dependent on staff for eating. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating that R52 was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG functional abilities and goals documents that R52 is set up and clean up assistance only for eating. On 11/20/2024, the noon meal was ready to be served at 12:30pm, however staff did not begin serving until 12:50pm due to no staff available to pass the meal trays. At 12:50pm, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) began serving meal trays. On 11/18/2024 at 12:40pm, V7 (CNA) said the facility is very short on care staff and she can not get all her assigned showers completed. V7 said because of the lack of staff, meal trays are hard to get passed in a timely manner. V7 said residents have to wait to be assisted with their meals until all the trays are passed out. On 11/18/2024 at 12:47pm, V8 (CNA) said the facility does not have enough staff to provided residents with needed care. V8 said showers get missed frequently and call lights don't get answered very quickly. On 11/20/2024 at 1:35pm, V13 (CNA) stated she agrees the facility is very short handed and needs more care staff. Everyday each hall has 8 or 9 showers assigned and the care staff can't get all the showers completed. V13 said the CNAs can't even get the meal trays passed and people have to wait for assistance with their meals. On 11/21/2024 at 10:50am, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she does not believe the facility is short handed and they have plenty of care staff. V2 said any resident or staff saying otherwise is lying.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment to perform dietary services. This failure has the potential to affect all 76 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment to perform dietary services. This failure has the potential to affect all 76 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 9:30 AM the kitchen back wall was missing an area of dry wall where the wall meets the floor approximately 2 feet by approximately 6 to 8 inches depending on the location. This area was an uneven broken area of drywall with an end of cement block in one area of the broken dry wall. On 11/18/24 at 9:30 AM the kitchen wall between the dish machine and the food service area contains an area on the food service side, where the communication wires are extending out of the wall to the floor where the housing is sitting on the floor. The hole in the wall where the wire housing should be located, approximately 18 inches by 4 inches, contains a build up of dirt and mold and the area around the hole on the wall approximately six inches out from the hole contains an accumulation of dirt and mold. The wiring housing sitting on the floor has an accumulation of dirt on and around it. On 11/21/24 at 1:58 PM, V18 (Dietary Manager) stated the area of wall along the floor where the drywall is missing should be repaired and the area where the wires are hanging out of the wall should be cleaned and repaired. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form CMS-671 dated 11/18/24 documents there are 76 residents living in the facility. The facility policy dated 01/2012 titled, Cleaning and Sanitation - General documents in part: policy: the kitchen will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The state and /or federal food code will be maintained on file within the food service department, and will be the basis of all sanitation and food safety practices.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe resident transfers were provided to prevent accidents for 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe resident transfers were provided to prevent accidents for 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to the right foot requiring sutures and R2 sustaining a fibula fracture. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 3/28/24, a discharge date of 4/10/24, and diagnoses including: urinary tract infection, laceration without foreign body of unspecified toe without damage to nail, metabolic encephalopathy, paraplegia, lymphedema, anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus. On 4/11/24 at 1:31 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she was called to R1's room on 4/8/24 to help transfer R1 onto his motorized wheelchair. V4 said while R1 was in the mechanical lift sling the wheelchair moved causing R1's foot to be lacerated by the bedframe. V4 said she applied pressure to R1's laceration to slow the bleeding and called for emergency services to transfer R1 to the hospital. V4 said R1's laceration looked pretty deep. On 4/12/24 at 9:57 AM, V10 (CNA) said she was assisting R1 to transfer to his motorized wheelchair on 4/8/24. V10 said that R1's motorized wheelchair was sitting parallel with the bed when R1 was transferred onto it with a mechanical lift. V10 said while staff were trying to position R1, R1 hit the controls on the motorized wheelchair causing the wheelchair to turn and R1's foot to be cut by the bedframe. V10 said once staff got R1's foot out from under the bedframe a laceration was seen with heavy bleeding. V10 said staff assisted R1 back to the bed and R1 was sent to the hospital for further treatment. On 4/12/24 at 10:16 AM, V9 (CNA) stated that on 4/8/24 she was assisting R1 to get cleaned up for the day and get R1 in his motorized wheelchair. V9 said staff used a mechanical lift to get R1 out of bed and onto the motorized wheelchair. V9 said as staff were attempting to move R1 back into the seat for better positioning the motorized wheelchair came on and moved causing R1's foot to be sent under the bedframe. V9 said once R1's foot was under the bedframe staff used the joystick control on the motorized wheelchair to move the chair back. V9 said this caused a laceration to R1's foot that was bleeding heavily. On 4/12/24 at 11:28 AM, V7 (Therapy Director) said all residents who wish to use a motorized wheelchair must be assessed by therapy for safety. V7 said R1 had not been assessed for motorized wheelchair safety when the 4/8/24 incident happened. V7 said she was not made aware R1 had a motorized wheelchair until after the 4/8/24 incident. V7 said staff should ensure the motorized wheelchair is off prior to transferring someone onto it. On 4/12/24 at 11:59 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) said she expected staff to notify her of a family bringing in a motorized wheelchair as the resident would need to wait to use it until therapy could assess the resident for safety. V2 said she expected staff to notify her if any resident family brings Durable Medical Equipment (DME) into the facility. On 4/12/24 at 1:05 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said R1's family brought R1's motorized wheelchair into the facility on 4/8/24 at approximately 10:30 AM. R1's progress note dated 4/8/24 at 12:08 PM documented in part .Between 11:15 and 11:20 AM, during a transfer from his bed to his chair using a hoyer lift, this resident sustained a deep laceration to his right 4th metatarsal. Towels were applied to his right foot to staunch the flow of blood. 911 was called for transfer to a hospital. After the bleeding slowed down to a slower continuous bleeding a pressure dressing of 4 X 4s and an abdominal pad were applied to the area. This dressing was then reinforced with tape . R1's progress note dated 4/8/24 at 5:35 PM documented in part . (Nurse Practitioner) at facility and made aware of incident. Facility notified by family that resident will require sutures. (V1 Administrator) notified. Awaiting resident return . R1's progress note dated 4/8/24 at 6:42 PM documented in part .(R1) returned from the (Hospital) about 5:30 pm, after having his right 4th metatarsal stitched with 7 internal and 7 external stitches. He is doing okay. The foot has a dressing that is intact, but since the doctor left a small opening for drainage, there is some blood coming out. This is expected, so blood won't build up under the skin or around the toe . R1's 4/8/24 hospital medical record documented in part . right foot with starburst pattern laceration overlying the 5th MCP (metacarpophalangeal) joint. 2 cm (centimeters) in diameter with approximately 3 cm length of affected skin. Laceration affects underlying facia with approximately 0.7 cm deep puncture wound just proximal to the web between fourth and fifth toes. (R1) with complete loss of feeling in both feet at his baseline .seven 4 - 0 running Vicyl internal sutures and 7 interrupted 4 - 0 nylon external sutures . The facility's June 2013 Motorized Mobility Aides in the LTC (Long Term Care) Residence- Policy Considerations documented in part .housing providers must also permit manually operated wheelchairs and other manually operated assistive devices without exception. Housing providers must also permit individuals who use power- driven mobility devices to utilize same, unless it can be shown by the housing provider that an individual's use fundamentally alters its programs, services, activities, or creates a direct threat, and/or safety hazard . 2. R2's face sheet documented an admission date of 1/17/24 and diagnoses including: dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, contusion of right ankle. R2's 1/23/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating R2 is severely cognitively impaired. R2's progress note dated 3/13/2024 at 7:00 PM documented in part . (V11, Wound Physician) in facility to round on wound to left foot at approximately (7:00 PM). Continue treatment per eTar (Electronic Treatment Administration Record). Right foot currently bruised with no swelling observed. Both (V11) and (V12 LPN) palpated foot with no observed (signs or symptoms) of pain. No complaints of pain. No new orders. (V2 DON) notified. Resident had previous fall with eye currently bruised purplish red as well . R2's progress note dated 3/14/2024 at 05:34 PM documented in part .(R2) in bed was seen by (V11) yesterday- right foot swollen, bruised and painful. Unsure of his orders. Did call (V13, Nurse Practitioner) (new order) received for a right foot and ankle x-ray. Did make POA (Power of Attorney) aware and x-ray set up for tonight . R2's 3/14/24 Patient Report of the right ankle x-ray documented in part . an oblique fracture is noted involving the distal fibula . R2's 3/14/24 incident investigation contained a note from V7 (Therapy Director/Family Member) and documented in part . I have transferred (R2) multiple times . there have been several instances where she is unable to assist with the pivot portion of a transfer. I have noticed that when she cannot assist with the pivot, her feet do get caught up in the wheels of her (wheelchair). This has happened during our transfers a few times . R2's 3/19/24 Detailed Incident Summary by V1 (Administrator) documented in part .Per the facility protocol an investigation was completed to identify the cause of the fractured extremity. It was found that the resident's (R2's) feet would become entangled in the wheelchair foot rests during transfers, and cause a twisting of the ankle . On 4/12/24 at 9:14 AM, V16 (LPN) said she was caring for R2 on 3/13/24 during the day shift. V16 said she did not see any bruising or swelling of R2's ankle during her shift. V16 said no staff reported any new injuries to R2 during her shift. On 4/12/24 at 9:39 AM, V15 (CNA) said she was caring for R2 on 3/14/24 during the dayshift. V15 said when she assisted R2 back to bed after the noontime meal she noticed bruising to R2's right ankle. V15 said when R2's ankle was moved R2 complained of pain. V15 said she reported R2's right ankle bruise and complaints of pain to V4 (LPN) immediately. On 4/12/24 at 10:07 AM, V14 (CNA) said she was caring for R2 on 3/13/24 during the dayshift. V14 said she did not see any bruising to R2 right ankle. V14 said R2 did not complain of any pain to her right ankle during transfers on 3/13/24. V14 said if she had noticed any bruising to R2's ankle she would have reported it to the nurse. On 4/12/24 at 10:43 AM, V12 (LPN) said she arrived at the facility to start her shift at 6:00 PM on 3/13/24. V12 said as she was administering medications to residents, V11 (Wound Physician) had alerted her R2 had a bruise to her right ankle. V12 said she went to assess R2 and R2's right ankle was bruised. V12 said R2's right ankle was not swollen and R2 did not complain of any pain with palpation. V12 said she notified V2 (DON) of R2's bruise and was told R2 had previously fallen, and the bruising was known about. V12 said she did not work on R2's hall often and was not aware the bruise to the right ankle was a new injury. On 4/12/24 at 11:28 AM, V7 (Therapy Director/Family Member) said she was very familiar with R2. V7 said she had transferred R2 several times. V7 said there are times R2 will not follow queuing to move R2's feet during a transfer and R2's feet will get caught up on the wheelchair. V7 said she was not sure how R2's fibula sustained a fracture. V7 said it was possible R2's foot got caught under the wheelchair pedal and R2 moved the wheelchair causing the fracture. On 4/12/24 at 11:59 AM, V2 (DON) said she did not recall V12 (LPN) notifying her of any new bruise to R2's ankle on 3/13/24. V2 said if she had been notified, she would have instructed V12 no notify V13 (Nurse Practitioner). On 4/12/24 at 1:31 PM, V4 (LPN) said on 3/14/24 staff reported to her R2 had some bruising on her right ankle. V4 said after she assessed R2 she contacted V13 (Nurse Practitioner) to obtain an order for an x-ray of R2's ankle. V4 said R2 complained of pain when the right foot was moved left and right. On 4/15/24 at 10:42 AM, V1 (Administrator) said V7 (Therapy Director) had told him of R2's feet getting tangled in the footrests on R2's wheelchair at times. V1 said in the course of his investigation of the 3/14/24 incident, no other staff had told him of R2's feet getting tangled on the footrests of her wheelchair during transfers. V1 said it was an assumption that R2's foot got entangled in R2's wheelchair's footrests causing R2's fibula to become fractured. V1 said he was not sure exactly how R2's fibula sustained a fracture. On 4/15/24 at 12:36 PM, V13 (Nurse Practitioner) said she would expect staff to notify her of any new bruises or injuries to residents. V13 said she was not notified of R2's right ankle bruise until 3/14/24 when she ordered an x-ray. The facility's February 2012 Change in Condition policy documented in part . 1. The staff person who first notices the change reports resident change in condition immediately to the licensed nurse. 2. The licensed nurse assesses the resident . signs, symptoms and any physical and/ or mental changes in condition. 3 . sign, symptoms and any physical and/ or mental changes in condition are documented in the resident's medical record. 4. The resident's primary physician or designated alternate will be notified immediately of any change in a resident's physical or medical condition, this includes: b. Deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status. C. Need to alter treatment .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medication in accordance with professional standards for 2 (R1 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for medication admin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medication in accordance with professional standards for 2 (R1 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R3's face sheet documented an admission date of 4/10/24 with diagnoses including: anxiety disorder, disorder of thyroid, pain, hypertension, nausea, depression, opioid dependence, and hyperlipidemia. R3's Physician Order Report dated 3/15/24 - 4/12/24 documented the following orders: 4/10/24 methimazole 5 mg (milligram) tablet once a morning, 4/10/24 pantoprazole 40 mg tablet once a morning, 4/10/24 roflumilast 500 mcg (microgram) tablet once a morning, 4/10/24 sulfamethoxazole- trimethoprim 800 - 160 mg twice a day. R3's 4/1/24 - 4/12/24 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the following: 4/11/24 7:00 AM - 10:00 AM V3 (RN) administered methimazole 5 mg 1 tablet, pantoprazole 40 mg 1 tab, roflumilast 500 mcg 1 tablet, sertraline 50 mg 1 tablet, sulfamethoxazole - trimethoprim 800 - 160 mg 1 tablet. 4/12/24 7:00 AM - 10:00 AM V6 (RN) administered methimazole 5 mg 1 tablet, pantoprazole 40 mg 1 tab, roflumilast 500 mcg 1 tablet, sulfamethoxazole - trimethoprim 800 - 160 mg 1 tablet. On 4/12/24 at 1:50 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) said R3's medications had not been delivered to the facility. V6 said R3's medications would probably be delivered to the facility on 4/13/24. V6 said she had administered all the over the counter medications from stock to R3. V6 said she knew the facility had an electronic medication cabinet but was not sure what medications were stored in it. V6 said she had only ever pulled a narcotic out of the electronic medication cabinet. On 4/12/24 at 2:21 PM, V5 (Pharmacy Nurse Consultant) said R3's medications had not yet been delivered to the facility as of 4/12/24 and no nurse had pulled any medications for R3 out of the electronic medication cabinet. On 4/12/24 at 2:38 PM, V6 said R3's medications were not in the medication cart when she completed the morning medication pass. V6 said she knew there were other residents with medication in the cart matching R3's medication doses. V6 said she had borrowed medications from other residents to administer to R3, and when the facility gets R3's medications, V6 would return the borrowed medications to the resident they were borrowed from. V6 said when a new resident was admitted to the facility and the pharmacy had not delivered the new resident's medications, she would borrow the important medications from other residents. On 4/15/24 at 11:14 AM, V3 (RN) said she did not recall how she obtained the medications for R3 on 4/11/24. On 4/15/24 at 1:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) said methimazole, pantoprazole, roflumilast, and sulfamethoxazole - trimethoxazole were not stock medications. The electronic medication cabinet log documented no medications had been extracted for R3. 2. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 3/28/24, a discharge date of 4/10/24, and diagnoses including: urinary tract infection, laceration without foreign body of unspecified toe without damage to nail, metabolic encephalopathy, paraplegia, lymphedema, anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus. R1's 3/12/24 - 4/12/24 Physician Order Report documented the following orders: 3/28/24 bumetanide 1 mg (milligram) 1 tablet twice a day, 3/28/24 clopidogrel 75 mg 1 tablet once a day, 3/28/24 duloxetine 40 mg 1 tablet once a day, 3/28/24 Eliquis 5 mg 1 tablet twice a day, 3/28/24 levetiracetam 500 mg 2 tablets twice a day, 3/28/24 oxybutynin 5 mg 1 tablet once a day. R1's 3/28/24 - 4/15/24 Medication Administration Report (MAR) documented: 3/29/24 7:00 AM - 10:00 AM V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) administered bumetanide 1 mg (milligram) 1 tablet, clopidogrel 75 mg 1 tablet, duloxetine 40 mg 1 tablet, Eliquis 5 mg 1 tablet, levetiracetam 500 mg 2 tablet, oxybutynin 5 mg 1 tablet. The facility pharmacy Packing Slip Proof of Delivery documented R1's medications were delivered to the facility on 3/30/24. On 4/12/24 at 2:21 PM, V5 (Pharmacy Nurse Consultant) said no medication had been pulled from the electronic medication cabinet for R3. The facility's electronic medication cabinet log documented no medications had been extracted for R3. On 4/15/23 at 10:59 AM, V2 (DON) said if a medication was unavailable, she expected staff to go to the electronic medication cabinet to extract the medication. V2 said if the medication was not stocked in the electronic medication cabinet, she expected staff to call the resident's medical provider to get an order for something that was possibly an equivalent to the medication. V2 said she expected staff to call the pharmacy to order the medications and ensure they are delivered. V2 said staff should never borrow medications from other residents. On 4/15/24 at 1:05 PM, V2 (DON) said bumetanide, clopidogrel, duloxetine, Eliquis, levetiracetam, and oxybutynin were not stock medications. The facility's 10/25/14 Medication Administration policy documented in part . 15) Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident . 6) If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, not available, or given at a time other than the scheduled time . the space provided on the front of the MAR for that dosage administration is [initialed and circled]. An explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record .
Dec 2023 10 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided per current standard...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided per current standards of practice for 2 of 8 (R25 and R34) residents reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 45. This failure resulted in R34 developing a urinary tract infection that required hospitalization on 12/10/2023. Findings Include: 1. R34's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spinal stenosis, diabetes, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, muscle wasting, atrophy, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and hypertension. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/14/23 documents R34 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R34 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents under Section I, R34 has neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. R34's Physician Order Report dated 12/14/23 to 12/21/23 documents a physician order to provide foley catheter care each shift. R34's local hospital record with an admission date of 12/10/23 documents R34 was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses that included acute encephalopathy, acute kidney injury, and urinary tract infection with hematuria. On 12/21/23 at 1:23 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated R34 was recently transferred to the hospital, and she worked the day after R34 returned to the facility. V8 stated R34 reported to her that he had not received peri care from the time he arrived back to the facility until she returned to work the next day. V8 stated R34 told her a few days later that he had not received catheter care again. On 12/21/23 at 1:28 PM, R34 stated he was in the hospital recently and diagnosed with a severe urinary tract infection. R34 stated he returned to the facility from the hospital a week ago today (12/14/23) around supper time. R34 stated they have enough staff most of the time. R34 stated when they don't have enough staff peri care/catheter care doesn't get provided. R34 stated he thought catheter care was supposed to be provided each shift and it didn't get done. R34 stated it starts stinking because the facility staff doesn't clean it. This surveyor didn't observe R34's catheter bag hanging on the bedside and clarified with R34 that he did in fact have a urinary catheter. R34 stated he did, and it should be hanging on the bed. This surveyor asked V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) to assist in finding R34's catheter bag. V12 pulled R34's blanket back and the catheter bag was observed laying on/near R34's abdomen. V12 (LPN) stated it should have been hanging on the side of the bed. V12 stated staff had assisted R34 to reposition and had forgotten to reattach the catheter bag after they assisted him. On 12/21/23 at 3:52 PM, V8 (CNA) was observed providing catheter care to R34. V8 used a washcloth with no rinse soap and wiped both sides of the penis in circular motion and outward away from the catheter insertion site. V8 then used a separate washcloth and began wiping the catheter tubing beginning at the insertion site and going downward. V8 then used the same washcloth and wiped up and down the tubing toward and away from the insertion site. On 12/21/23 at 3:50 PM, V4 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated catheter care should be provided each shift. V4 reviewed R34's treatment administration record and stated the nursing staff have signed off that catheter care is provided each shift. When asked if the licensed nurses performed catheter care, V4 stated sometimes they do and other times they oversee the certified nursing staff to ensure they provide the catheter care. After reviewing the observation of catheter care provided to R34 by V8, V4 stated she would expect staff to wipe down the catheter tube away from the meatus (insertion site). V4 stated R34 gets frequent urinary tract infections and is followed by an Infectious Disease Specialist due to the frequency of infections. On 12/22/23 at 9:15 AM, V18 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) stated that he would expect staff to follow current policies and standards of care when providing catheter care. V18 stated that improper technique when providing catheter care can contribute to urinary tract infections. The facility Catheter Care, Urinary dated 2/2012 documents, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. This same policy documents under Maintaining Unobstructed Urine Flow, .3. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder. Under Steps in Procedure the policy documents, .16. Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward . 2. R25's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 07/24/23 and listed diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). R25's Care Plan dated 11/29/23 documented problem areas, Requires contact isolation for ESBL (Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases), and (R25) has CKD and is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R25's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R25 requires partial/moderate assistance for toileting and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R25's Nursing Progress Note dated 12/17/23 documented, Resident lying in bed with head of bed elevated. New order received for Macrobid 100 milligrams one tablet twice daily for seven days for ESBL in urine. On 12/20/23 at 01:45pm, V9 (CNA), was observed providing incontinence care for R25. R25 was awake and alert only to herself. With R25 lying in bed, V9 donned gloves and removed R25's incontinence brief which was soiled with urine and feces. V9 rolled R25 to the side and wiped off some of the feces from the buttocks. Without changing gloves, V9 repositioned R25 onto her back and, using washcloths with perineal cleansing spray, wiped the perineal area three times from back to front. Again, without changing gloves, V9 touched the perineal spray bottle and a clean towel with which the perineal area was dried. V9 placed the contaminated spray bottle into R25's nightstand. At the conclusion of the procedure, V9 acknowledged she should have changed gloves after they came in contact with feces, and the perineal area should have been wiped front to back. On 12/22/23 at 08:54am, V4 (DON) stated all CNA's will be re-educated on the proper infection control techniques for incontinence care. A Perineal Care Policy dated July 2017 stated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the residents skin condition. 9. For a female resident, wet washcloth and apply soap or a skin cleansing agent. wash perineal area, wiping front to back.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to answer call lights for residents needing assistance in a timely mann...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to answer call lights for residents needing assistance in a timely manner to promote dignity and respect for 3 of 3 residents (R31, R34, and R64) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 45. Findings Include: 1. R34's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spinal stenosis, diabetes, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, muscle wasting, atrophy, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and hypertension. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/14/23 documents R34 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R34 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents under Section G that R34 requires two person physical assist for toileting. On 12/21/23 at 1:28 PM, R34 stated they have enough staff, most of the time. R34 stated he uses a bed pan when he needs to have a bowel movement. R34 stated the facility staff answer call lights pretty quickly or as quickly as they can. R34 stated it takes them 10 minutes or longer to answer the call light at times but was not able to give a specific time frame. R34 stated he has been incontinent of bowel when it took staff longer to answer the call light. On 12/21/23 at 2:50 PM, V4 (Director of Nurses) stated she hadn't had any complaints of staff not answering call lights timely. 2. On 12/21/23 at 11:41 AM, R64 stated she waited 1 1/2 hrs. for ice water last night. R64 stated she is unsure of the staff members names, but it was 2 different girls who had responded to her call light in the 3 times she had pushed it in an attempt to get a drink of water. R64 stated she was going to bed and her mouth was dry. R64 stated her water pitcher was empty, so she turned on her call light for assistance. R64 stated a female responded and told her they were busy with someone else right now and would get it for her in a bit. R64 stated she waited 30 minutes, and staff never returned. R64 stated she pushed her call light again, in which another female aide answered the light, turned the light off and said she would get it for her in just a minute. R64 stated she told the girl she had already been waiting and really just wanted a drink so she could go to bed. R64 stated another 30 minutes went by with no staff returning, so she pushed the call light again. R64 stated this time both girls responded, and she again asked for water. R64 stated she was told they forgot, and they then went to get her water. R64 stated she knows the timeline it took staff to respond, as she watched the clock on her wall. R64 is observed as having a functioning clock on her wall. R64 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation during this interview. R64 stated she doesn't know the names of the female staff who responded to her call light. 3. On 12/20/23 at 01:51 PM, R31 stated on night shift especially, call lights are slow to be answered by staff. R31 stated he has waited at times 30 and 60 minutes to get off the toilet. R31 stated he isn't supposed to transfer himself but has done so once in the past due to being so uncomfortable sitting on the toilet for such a long period of time waiting for staff. R31 was observed as being alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation during this interview. The facility Answering Call Light policy dated 7/2014 documents, The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. Under General Guidelines the policy documents, .8. Answer the resident's call lights as soon as possible.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of resident weight loss for 3 of 6 residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of resident weight loss for 3 of 6 residents (R25, R42, R70) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 45. Findings include: 1. R25's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 07/24/23 and listed diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). R25's Care Plan dated 11/29/23 documented a problem area, (R25) Requires a mechanically altered diet with a diagnosis of Dysphagia. (R25) is at risk for potential weight loss due to Anorexia, with a corresponding intervention, Monitor/record weight. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) and family of significant weight change. R25's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R25 eats independently and requires a mechanically altered diet. R25's Weight Record documented a 12/5/23 weight of 149.5 lb. (pounds) and a 12/13/23 weight of 131.5 lb. There was no documentation in the medical record that R25's Physician had been notified of the weight loss. On 12/21/23 at 12:28pm, V4, Director of Nursing/DON, acknowledged R25's Physician should have been contacted about the weight loss and she would look for documentation that this was done. At the conclusion of the survey on 12/22/23 at 3:00pm, the facility had not produced the documentation. 2. R42's face sheet documented an admission date of 8/11/23 and diagnoses including: cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attacks, sepsis, type 2 diabetes, hypoglycemia, vitamin D deficiency. R42's 11/19/23 MDS documented a BIMS score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R42's Physician Order Report documented an 8/11/23 diet order for regular diet with thin liquids. R42's 11/23/23 care plan documented R42 is at risk for impaired nutrition with an intervention of dietitian to evaluate chart as warranted and recommend nutritional needs to provider. R42's Vitals Report documented: 8/11/23 weight of 189 pounds, 8/12/23 186 pounds, 8/14/23 187 pounds, 8/29/23 196 pounds, 10/24/23 194.5 pounds, 12/5/23 151.8 pounds, 12/18/23 149.2 pounds. R42's Vitals Report documented the 8/29/23, 10/24/23, and 12/5/23 weights were obtained on the wheelchair scale. R42's 10/24/23 weight of 194.5 pounds to 12/5/23 weight of 151.8 pounds was a loss of 42.7 pounds (21.95%) in 6 weeks. R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not document contacting the dietitian or physician regarding R42's weight loss. 3. R70's face sheet documented an admission date of 8/23/23 with diagnoses including: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, gastrostomy, dysphagia, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, major depressive disorder. R70's 10/25/23 care plan documented in part . at risk for malnutrition (due to) worsening Parkinson disease with interventions including .notify (Medical Doctor as needed) . R70's 10/21/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R70 was cognitively intact. R70's Physician Order Report 11/21/23 through 12/21/23 documented a 12/5/23 order for regular diet with nectar thickened liquids, a 12/14/23 order for Jevity 1.5 liquid feeding at 50 milliliters (ml) per hour from 7:00 PM to 5:00 AM, and an 8/23/23 order for weekly weights. R70's Vitals Report documented: 8/29/23 weight of 136.5 pounds, 10/18/23 115 pounds, 10/24/23 117 pounds, 10/25/23 117 pounds, 10/26/23 117.5 pounds, 10/27/23 117 pounds, 11/21/23 109.4 pounds, 12/5/23 111.8 pounds. R70's 10/27/23 weight of 117 pounds to 11/21/23 weight of 109.4 pounds was a weight loss of 7.6 pounds (6.5%) in 25 days. R70's EMR did not document any notes regarding contacting the registered dietitian or the physician regarding R70's weight loss. On 12/22/23 at 11:37 AM, V4 (DON) said the facility policy documented a committee was supposed to review the resident's serial weights but there was no committee. V4 said she and V2 (Dietary Manager) were responsible for reviewing resident's serial weights. V4 said anything over 5% weight loss should be reported to the resident's physician. When V4 was asked why R42 and R70's weekly weights were not completed V4 said she was unsure, and the Certified Nursing Assistants were lazy. V4 said she was unsure why staff had not contacted R42 and R70's physician. On 12/22/23 at 11:29 AM, V18 (Physician) said he expected the facility to report any significant weight changes to him. V18 said he was not aware of the facility reporting R42 or R70's weight loss to him. The facility's Change in Condition Policy with a revision date of February 2012 documented in part .resident change in condition will be assessed promptly and follow up activity will occur as appropriate and in a timely manner . 2. The licensed nurse assesses the resident including vital signs, signs, symptoms and any physical and/ or mental changes in condition. 3. The licensed nurse assesses the resident including vital signs, signs, symptoms and any physical and/ or mental changes in condition are documented in the resident's medical record. 4. The resident's primary physician or designated alternate will be notified immediately of any change in resident's physical or medical condition, this includes: . b. Deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status. C. Need to alter treatment (i.e., need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences or to commence new form of treatment) . 6. Notification of physician and/ or responsible parties shall be documented in the clinical record as well as on the 24 hour report form. Status changes, which are not significant enough to be reported, must also be documented in the medical record . 11. All changes of condition must be completely and objectively documented in the clinical chart .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R34's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spinal ste...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R34's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spinal stenosis, diabetes, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, muscle wasting, atrophy, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and hypertension. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/14/23 documents R34 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R34 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents under Section G that R34 is totally dependent on staff for bathing. R34's Care Plan dated 12/15/23 documents a Problem area with a start date of 05/12/22 of R34 needs extensive assist x (times) 2 for activities of daily living r/t (related to) weakness. The Approach's for this Problem area include, Assist x 2 with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) et (and) x 2 stand pivot transfers. There are no specific interventions documented for showers on R34's care plan. R34's Point of Care History dated 12/1/23 to 12/22/23 documents R34 received assistance with a shower on 12/07/23. There is no documentation of any other showers from 12/01/23 to 12/21/23. On 12/21/23 at 1:23 PM, V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated they have enough staff most of the time. V8 stated when they don't have enough staff showers don't always get done as they should. V8 stated they document showers in the resident electronic records. On 12/21/23 at 1:28 PM, R34 stated he doesn't get showers very often. R34 stated he got one last Saturday (12/16/23) and hasn't gotten once since. R34 stated he thought the reason he doesn't get showers routinely is because he requires a mechanical lift for transfers which means two staff have to assist him. R34 stated he was supposed to get showers on Mondays and Thursdays. On 12/21/23 at 3:50 PM, V4 (Director of Nurses) stated R34's shower sheet documents R34 has received assistance with bathing one time from 12/01/23 to 12/21/23. V2 stated R34 was in the hospital during that time frame for four days. V2 stated R34 should receive assistance with showers/bathing on Monday and Thursdays and she would expect him to get showers as scheduled. The facility Bathing a Resident policy dated 7/2014 documents, It is the policy of (name of facility) that residents will receive a shower/bath will be scheduled regularly and prn (as needed). Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance and failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for 3 of 4 (R8, R34, and R132) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of 45. Findings Include: 1. R132's Care Plan dated 10/27/23 documented a problem area, admitted to (the facility) for long term care. I require a Baseline Care Plan identifying care needs, risks, strengths and goals within the first 48 hours, with a corresponding approach, Nutrition: I will eat regular meals. I will eat in the dining room. My fluids are regular. I need limited assist with eating. My weight is at risk for weight loss. R132's Medical Record contained no documentation of Physicians diet orders, weight orders, nor any Dietary department documentation. R132's Weight Record documented the following: 10/31/2023 175.4 lbs. (pounds), 11/03/2023 174 lbs. 11/07/2023 173.9 lbs. 12/05/2023: 171.0 lbs. On 12/19/23 from 12:22pm through 12/19/23 at 1:08pm, continuous observations were made of R132 during lunch service. On 12/19/23 at 12:22PM, R132 was lying in bed with the head of the bed flat. R132 was alert only to herself. An untouched lunch tray consisting of a chicken breast, peas, mashed potatoes, and pudding, all of regular texture, along with glasses of water and iced tea, was on the overbed table sitting next to the bed, but not within the residents reach. The cover had been removed from the plate, but the chicken had not been cut up. R132 was moaning and gesturing toward the meal tray. On 12/19/23 at 12:40 PM, R132 had still not received feeding assistance and her moaning could be heard out into the hall. V4 (DON) walked by the room to answer a call light for the resident who lives next door to R132. V4 glanced into R132's room but did not intervene. On 12/19/23 at 12:42 pm, R132's moaning could again be heard in the hallway. V3 (Activity Director) walked by R132's room but did not intervene. On 12/19/23 at 12:50 PM, V3 again walked by R132's room but did not intervene. On 12/19/23 at 01:08 pm, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) walked into R132's room and walked directly out with the untouched tray. The Surveyor asked V7 if R132 is to be fed by staff and if she was fed lunch today. V7 stated R132 tries to feed herself at times. The Surveyor pointed out to V7 that R132 had been unable to reach the tray. V7 did not respond but took the tray for disposal. On 12/20/23 at 01:16 PM, R132 was observed being fed by V8 (CNA). V8 stated R132 usually requires substantial feeding assistance, and her appetite has been very poor. R132 was observed accepting fluids but refusing all foods. V8 stated she did work during lunch service on 12/19/23, but V7 was assigned to feed R132 that day. On 12/20/23 at 02:24 PM, V2 (Dietary Manager) acknowledged there were no Physicians diet orders in R132's chart and no initial dietary notes. V2 stated on the resident's admission on [DATE], V2 was informed verbally by the Assistant Director of Nursing at the resident's previous facility that R132 is to receive a regular diet with thin liquids, and that is what R132 has been receiving. V2 acknowledged the accepted practice is that the resident's Physician orders the diet. V2 stated she was not sure how long after admission the Registered Dietician (RD) has to do the initial Dietitian Assessment, but the facility has had an influx of new residents in October, and they only have the services of the RD 8 hours per month. V2 stated V2 is to do the Initial Nutrition Assessment, which is to be done within 3 to 5 days after admission and acknowledged she had not yet completed it. V2 stated as far as she is aware, R132 is eating good and has not had any weight loss. On 12/21/23 at 09:32 AM, V4 (DON) stated R132 is at high risk for weight loss. V3 stated the facility's policy on weight documentation is that the resident is weighed on the day of admission, the second day and the third day, then weekly for three weeks, then at least monthly or as ordered. V3 stated she was unaware R132 had not been weighed per policy and she was unaware R132 had not been assisted with lunch on 12/19/23. On 12/22/23 at 08:56am, V4 stated she re-educated CNA staff about feeding and meal supervision and assistance as well as following the facility's weight policy. A Weight Management Program Policy dated July 2014 documented, It is the policy of (the facility) to manage resident weight through prevention, assessment, and implementation of interventions. Procedure: 1. Upon admission/readmission, quarterly, and with a significant change. 8. The DON or his/her designee will list all residents who have had a weight loss or gain greater than five pounds, poor intake, pressure ulcers, chewing or swallowing problems, receive tube feedings, all new admissions, all readmissions, or abnormal lab results will be given to the RD for assessment and recommendations. 9. The DON will then distribute the RD recommendations per wing to the charge nurse. The charge nurse will notify the attending Physician of the current resident condition and of the RD's recommendations and document the Physicians order on the Physicians Order Sheet and the 24 hour report sheet. The charge nurse will then initiate a Diet Order and Communication Form to the Dietary Manager who will chart the change in the dietary progress note and to the Minimum Data Set Coordinator to update the Care Plan. A Dietary Order and Communication Policy dated July 2014 documented, Purpose: To ensure both the nursing and dietary departments are aware of any new admission diet order, change in a diet order, hold trays, resident hospitalization, or leave of absence. Procedure: 1. The Diet Order and Communication two part form is to be completed by the charge nurse on duty at the time a diet change is made. 2. The nurse completing the form is responsible for giving a copy of the form to the dietary department. 2. R8's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 10/16/23 and listed diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (MS). R8's Care Plan dated 11/28/23 documented a problem area, Resident is at risk for weight loss, with a corresponding intervention, Provide setup help, cueing, physical help, etcetera assistance for meals as needed. R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R8 requires substantial/maximal assistance for eating and experiences problems with loss of liquids and solids from the mouth when eating or drinking. On 12/19/23 at 10:54am, R131 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and purpose. R131 stated she has observed R8 not getting needed feeding assistance from staff and has observed other residents trying to feed R8. On 12/19/23 at 12:17pm, R8 was in the dining room for lunch service and was alert and oriented to person, place, time and purpose. R8 was observed to exhibit limited control of her upper body. R8 was observed being fed a puree meal 100 percent by staff, and R8 made no attempt to feed herself. R8 stated she is always fed last, and, There have been a couple times I haven't been fed at all because they (staff) forgot about me, and R8 stated there have been occasions when other residents attempted to feed her. R8 stated she has not had any episodes of choking or other negative outcomes during these attempts. On 12/20/23 at 02:13pm, V4, Director of Nurses, stated R8 requires extensive feeding assistance and is at risk for weight loss. V3 stated she was unaware of R8's report of not being fed or having other residents attempt to feed R8. V3 stated the facility does not have a Feeding Policy or Activities of Daily Living Policy for review, but it is not an acceptable standard of practice for residents to feed each other. A Weight Management Program Policy dated July 2014 documented, It is the policy of (the facility) to manage resident weight through prevention, assessment, and implementation of interventions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure immunizations were administered per current standards of prac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure immunizations were administered per current standards of practice for 1 of 5 (R45) residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 45. Findings Include: R45's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle wasting and atrophy, hypertension, diabetes, and morbid obesity. R45's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/15/23 documents R45 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R15 is cognitively intact. R45's Preventative Health Care Report dated 10/1/22 to 12/21/23 documents under pneumococcal vaccine dated 10/10/23, Not recommended at this time. On 12/22/23 at 9:00 AM, R45 stated he would like to receive the Prevnar immunization, should he be eligible. On 12/21/23 at 12:20 PM, V11 (RN Case Manager) stated R45 has not had the Prevnar 20 vaccine. V11 stated he believed R45 should have had it and it was just missed. V11 stated he was in the process of getting it scheduled for R45 to receive. On 12/21/23 at 3:50 PM, V4 (Director of Nurses) stated they were in the process of ordering and getting consents for the Prevnar 20 vaccines. V2 stated they started the process about three weeks ago. The facility Pneumococcal Vaccine policy dated 2/11/22 documents, It is the policy of (name of facility) that all residents are protected from incident of pneumonia by obtaining pneumococcal vaccines, if desired per CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines. Under Procedures the policy documents, 1. Upon admission, the facility will attempt to determine when the last pneumococcal vaccine was received by the resident. 2. Who: Adults aged 65 years and older who have not received a pneumococcal vaccine or whose vaccine history is unknown. Adults aged 19-64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not previously received a pneumococcal vaccine or whose medical history is unknown. Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations: 1 dose of PCV 12 (Prevnar 20) or 1 dose of PCV 15 (Prevnar 15) .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a functioning call system for 1 (R11) of 24 residents reviewed for call systems in the sample of 45. Findings Include: On 12/19/23 at 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a functioning call system for 1 (R11) of 24 residents reviewed for call systems in the sample of 45. Findings Include: On 12/19/23 at 10:21 AM, R11 was observed sitting on the side of her bed, yelling for help, as she had visibly been incontinent of bowel. R11's call light was observed as being activated, but not illuminating on the light above the outside of R11's door. On 12/19/23 at 10:23 AM, V20 (CNA) responded to R11's yelling. R11 told V20 she was dirty. V20 was notified of the potentially malfunctioning call light, in which she wiggled the call light cord at the wall plug in, in which the light then flickered on and off with cord movement. V20 stated it might be when the recliner is pushed up against it, it caused it not to work. On 12/19/23 at 10:55 AM, V5 (Maintenance) was observed walking through the hallway, looking at call light bulbs above resident doors, stating he was doing his weekly bulb check. V5 stated he is unaware of any call light concerns. V5 was notified of the observed call light concerns with R11. V5 stated it's probably just not connected to the wall good, and he will check on it. On 12/21/23 at 11:43 AM, R11's call light was attempted to be illuminated. The light above the outside of R11's door was again observed as not lighting up in the hallway. The other call located in R11's room for her roommate was observed as properly functioning. V5 (Maintenance) was notified of the call light concern. On 12/21/23 at 12:20 PM, V5 stated that he replaced the call light cord to R11's light, and the call light is now functioning.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 4 residents (R26, R30, R36, and R64) reviewed for environment is a sample of 45. Findings Include: On 12/21/23 at 2:27 PM, a tour was conducted with V5 (Maintenance) noting the following findings in which V5 provided the size dimensions given: -The room occupied by R26 has an approximate 2 inch wide circular hole in the closet door. -The room occupied by R30 and R64 has multiple paint chipped and peeling areas approximately 4 foot x 4 foot on the walls. -The room occupied by R36 has non-functioning blinds, which are observed as being diagonally raised across the window and the door handle sticks, requiring twisting force to open. V5 stated with the exceptions of room [ROOM NUMBER] needing painting completed, he was not aware of any of the repairs needing made. V5 stated normally, staff verbally communicate to him any maintenance concerns they may have or leave him a note if he isn't at the facility. V5 stated he will get the repairs made. V5 stated the facility has been in the process of painting areas and just hasn't made it to all rooms yet. The facility resident roster (updated) provided on 12/19/23 documents that R26, R30, R36, and R64 reside in the rooms observed. On 12/22/23 at 9:15 AM, V4 (Director of Nursing) confirmed that residents are subject to change rooms throughout the facility in order to meet current needs. Review of the facility policy titled, Routine Maintenance Policy with a revision date of 8/16/22 documented, Maintenance staff is responsible to ensure that preventative, routine maintenance is completed in compliance with applicable life safety standards and needs of the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 12/21/23 at 11:41 AM, R64 stated she waited 1 1/2 hrs. for ice water last night. R64 stated she is unsure of the staff mem...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 12/21/23 at 11:41 AM, R64 stated she waited 1 1/2 hrs. for ice water last night. R64 stated she is unsure of the staff members names, but it was 2 different girls who had responded to her call light in the 3 times she had pushed it in an attempt to get a drink of water. R64 stated she was going to bed and her mouth was dry. R64 stated her water pitcher was empty, so she turned on her call light for assistance. R64 stated a female responded and told her they were busy with someone else right now and would get it for her in a bit. R64 stated she waited 30 minutes, and staff never returned. R64 stated she pushed her call light again, in which another female aide answered the light, turned the light off and said she would get it for her in just a minute. R64 stated she told the girl she had already been waiting and really just wanted a drink so she could go to bed. R64 stated another 30 minutes went by with no staff returning, so she pushed the call light again. R64 stated this time both girls responded, and she again asked for water. R64 stated she was told they forgot, and they then went to get her water. R64 stated she knows the timeline it took staff to respond, as she watched the clock on her wall. R64 is observed as having a functioning clock on her wall. R64 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation during this interview. R64 stated she doesn't know the names of the female staff who responded to her light. 3. On 12/20/23 at 01:51 PM, R31 stated on night shift especially, call lights are slow to be answered by staff. R31 stated he has waited at times 30 and 60 minutes, waiting to get off the toilet. R31 stated he isn't supposed to transfer himself but has done so once in the past due to being so uncomfortable sitting on the toilet for such a long period of time waiting for staff. R31 was observed as being alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation during this interview. Review of the facility Resident Council Referral Form dated 10/12/23 documented a concern identified during the resident council meeting as, Res. (Residents) stating from 6-7 PM staff busy & not helping & using cell phones during care. Review of the facility Resident Council Referral Form dated 11/9/23 documented a concern identified during the resident council meeting as, Long waits on meds at night . CMS form 671 dated 12/20/23 documents there are currently 74 residents living in the facility. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to provide needed care in a timely manner. This failure affected (R31, R34 and R64) and has the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. R34's undated Resident Face Sheet documents R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spinal stenosis, diabetes, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, muscle wasting, atrophy, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and hypertension. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/14/23 documents R34 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R34 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents under Section G that R34 is totally dependent on staff for bathing and requires physical assist of two staff for toileting. R34's Care Plan dated 12/15/23 documents a Problem area with a start date of 05/12/22 of R34 needs extensive assist x (times) 2 (assist) for activities of daily living r/t (related to) weakness. The Approach's for this Problem area include, Assist x 2 with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) et (and) x 2 stand pivot transfers. On 12/21/23 at 1:23 PM, V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated they have enough staff to meet the needs of the residents, most of the time. V8 stated R34 told her he hadn't been provided care after returning from the hospital one afternoon until she returned to work the next day. V8 stated R34 reported to her peri care/catheter care had not been provided. V8 stated showers are not provided as scheduled when they don't have enough staff. On 12/21/23 at 1:28 PM, when asked if they had enough staff to provide the care he needed, R34 stated, most of the time. When asked what care didn't get provided, R34 stated peri care. R34 stated he had a catheter, and it would stink when they didn't clean it. R34 stated he thought it was supposed to be done every shift and it wasn't. R34 stated he also didn't get showers like he was supposed to. R34 stated he was supposed to get showers on Mondays and Thursdays. R34 stated he got a shower on Saturday, 12/16/23 and hasn't had another this week. When asked why he thought they weren't assisting him with showers, R34 stated he thought it was because it was hard for them to transfer him since they had to use a mechanical lift and it required two people to get him up. R34 stated staff answer the call lights pretty quickly or as quickly as they can. R34 stated it would take 10 minutes or longer for staff to answer it. R34 was not able to give a more specific time frame. R34 stated he had incontinent episodes of bowel while waiting for staff to answer the call light. R34's Point of Care History dated 12/1/23 to 12/22/23 documents R34 received assistance with a shower on 12/07/23. There is no documentation of any other showers from 12/01/23 to 12/21/23. On 12/21/23 at 3:50 PM, V4 (Director of Nurses) stated R34's shower sheets document R34 received assistance with one shower from 12/01/23 to 12/21/23. V4 stated R34 was in the hospital for four of those days. V4 stated R34 should receive assistance with showers on Mondays and Thursdays and she didn't know why he hadn't received assistance with showers. V4 stated she would expect staff to provide showers as scheduled. V4 stated they have enough staff to provide the needed care to the residents. V4 stated she had not had any complaints that call lights weren't being answered timely and/or incontinence care wasn't being provided. The facility Staffing policy dated 11/2021 documents, The Facility provides staffing to meet the needed care and services for our resident population and according to regulatory staffing requirements.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare meals as indicated per the facility menu. This failure has the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare meals as indicated per the facility menu. This failure has the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. On 12/20/23 at 01:40 PM, R131 who was alert to person, place and time; and stated portion sizes of food are inconsistent at times. R131 stated she has spoke with V2 (Dietary Manger) regarding her concerns and feels she is making a good faith effort to get them resolved. Review of the lunch menu for 12/20/23 read as follows: Meatloaf, Mashed Potatoes, [NAME] Beans, Wheat Bread, Cherry Chocolate Bar, Margarine, Coffee/Tea. On 12/20/23 at 12:38 PM, V6 (Cook) was observed slicing multiple sizes of meatloaf slices in the baking pan. V6 stated 4 oz (ounces) is the meatloaf portion served. V6 was asked to confirm the 4 oz amount, when she looked at the recipe and stated she meant 3oz. V6 was asked to weigh a piece of the meatloaf, which measured 5.2 oz. V6 was observed then adjusting the portion size to smaller, more symmetrical pieces. Tray line was observed in its entirety with no bread, bread substitute, or margarine being served to any residents. V6 stated that the facility is out of bread and confirms she offered no bread substitute at this meal. Additionally, in reviewing the meatloaf recipe, 2oz brown gravy was to be applied to the mechanical soft meatloaf servings. No gravy was prepared or offered during this meal, as confirmed by V6. V6 stated she didn't need to add the gravy because the meatloaf had ketchup on it. On 12/20/23 at 01:26 PM, V2 stated her expectation would be for the recipe to be followed including adding gravy to the mechanical soft meatloaf. V2 confirmed that the facility is out of bread and an alternative such as crackers should have been offered. On 12/20/23 at 01:45 PM, R131 & R43 stated bread is rarely served, even if on the menu. R43 who was alert to person, place and time stated, hard to miss something you aren't used to having. On 12/21/23 at 02:13 PM, V10 (Registered Dietitian) stated she would expect for staff to follow the recipes as ordered, including the serving size and texture. V10 was notified that gravy was not served with the mechanical soft meatloaf, as well as the meatloaf not being chopped up, which would be unacceptable. V10 stated that gravy should be available each meal to provide the required consistency for residents. 2. R48's face sheet documented an admission date of 7/21/23 and diagnoses including: nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dementia, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder. R48's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented a 7/21/23 order for mechanical soft diet with thin liquids. R48's 9/23/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 12/20/23 at 12:56 PM R48 was sitting in the dining room and was served a noon time meal tray by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) containing a whole piece of meat loaf, mashed potatoes, green beans, and chocolate pudding. V19 set up R48's meal in front of R48 and cut the piece of meat loaf into large chunks. R48 was observed picking up the large pieces of meatloaf on his fork and biting pieces off. On 12/22/23 at 10:23 AM, R48 said the meats on his meal trays were usually not ground up. R48 said he has trouble swallowing the meats served not mechanically altered. R48 said he had choked recently on the unaltered meats served but did not require any staff to intervene and was able to clear his airway on his own. 3. R4's face sheet documented an admission date of 8/22/23 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dementia, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder. R4's 8/26/23 MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating R4 was cognitively intact. R4's POS documented an 8/23/23 diet order for a mechanical soft diet. On 12/20/23 at 1:09 PM, R4 was lying in bed in his room. V19 (CNA) served R4's noon time meal tray containing meatloaf, mashed potatoes, green beans, and chocolate pudding. V19 cut R4's meatloaf up into large chunks then left R4's room shutting the door. R4's door was then cracked open for observation of R4 eating. R4 was observed lifting large chunks of meatloaf on his fork to his mouth biting off pieces. No staff were observed on R4's hallway until V21 (CNA) returned to pick up R4's meal tray at 1:23 PM. On 12/21/23 at 2:07 PM V10 (Registered Dietitian) said she expected the facility to follow diet orders. V10 said she expected the facility to follow the recipe for mechanically altered foods. The facility's recipe for ground meatloaf printed on 10/2/23 documented in part .1. Prepare regular recipe as directed. 2. Remove amount of cooked meatloaf and place in a food processor. Grind to desired texture . 3. Serve #8 scoop of meatloaf with 2 (fluid ounces) of gravy . The facility's undated Consistency Modified Diets policy documented in part . Mechanical Soft . This diet is used for patients/ residents with limited chewing ability. Foods menu include: ground moist meats, poultry and fish (without bones), canned fruits and vegetables, well- cooked, soft vegetables, finely chopped fresh fruits and vegetables as tolerated, soft breads and desserts These foods and other may or may not be allowed based on individual patient/ resident tolerance. The portion units used in the recipe preparation. As a general rule, 3 (ounce) of protein when ground becomes a #8 scoop and 4 (ounces) of protein when ground becomes a #6 scoop . 4. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 11/2/2022 with diagnoses including: Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, angina, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and non-pressure skin issues, chronic wounds to buttocks foot and other areas of concern. R1's Physician Orders Sheet (POS) documented a 2/23/2023 diet ordered as Low Concentrated Sweets (LCS), thin liquids, whole milk with meals, sugar free health supplement twice a day (breakfast and lunch), and double protein portions with all meals. R1's MDS has documentation that R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) resulted a score of 14, meaning R1 is cognitive intact. On 12/20/23 at 1:07 PM, V19 (CNA) served R1's noon time meal tray on a lipped plate containing a single portion of meatloaf, mashed potatoes, green beans, and chocolate pudding. On 12/21/23 at 2:07 PM V10 (Registered Dietitian) said she expected any resident with an order for double protein would receive a meal tray with double portions of whatever protein was being served that meal. V10 said R1 should have received a double portion of meatloaf on 12/20/23. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicare dated 12/20/23, documented 74 residents reside in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in clean and sanitary condition, and effectively sanitize equipment and work surfaces. This failure has th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in clean and sanitary condition, and effectively sanitize equipment and work surfaces. This failure has the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/19/23 at 09:45 AM, V6 (Cook) was asked to check the sanitizer concentration level of the dishwasher. V6 was observed dipping a chlorine sanitizer test strip into the dishwasher water at multiple times of the wash cycle, never registering sanitizer. V6 was then observed holding the strip in the dishwater water throughout the entire dishwasher cycle, demonstrating varying colors present on the strip throughout the cycle beneath the water. V6 stated she will have maintenance check the dishwasher to see why she's having trouble getting the test strips to register. A basin of foggy water with soap bubbles and rags present in the water was then observed sitting in the 3rd compartment of the 3-compartment sink. V6 stated this water is used to wipe down surfaces in the kitchen, such as counter tops, the refrigerator, etc. V6 was asked to test the sanitizer water, in which she immediately dumped the water down the drain and stated she would make a new basin. V6 was observed pouring 3 capfuls of ultimate sanitizer in the basin with approximately 4 cups of water. V6 dipped a chlorine strip in the water. No color was observed to strip noted. V6 then began pouring more sanitizer into bucket without measuring, again, with no color to the strip noted. V6 stated she didn't know what was wrong and acknowledges she usually makes sanitizer water for kitchen use. V6 stated she has had no trouble in the past getting the strips to register for the dish washer or sanitizer bucket. On 12/19/23 at 09:58 AM, two fryers were observed in the kitchen as having a large amount of food debris on lids and a sheet pan was under the fryers, along with the lids being coated with grease. Upon lifting the lids, a layer of food particles was floating in the grease. V6 stated the last time the fryers were used was on 12/17/23 when chicken tenders were served. On 12/19/23 at 11:35 PM, V2 (Dietary Manager) stated the dietary staff check the dish machine sanitizer levels twice a day and document those levels, but she also checks them too. V2 stated V5 (Maintenance) had checked the dish machine sanitizer this morning after V6 stated she was unable to get it to properly register. V2 stated she believes that V6 just wasn't checking the water at the right time as V6 found no problem with the sanitizer level. V2 was observed dipping a chlorine test strip into a basin of sanitizer solution, which she stated was used to wipe down kitchen surfaces. The strip was not observed turning any color, remaining white. V2 dumped the water and stated she will just make a new batch. V2 stated that for the sanitizer water she uses a splash of bleach and a little (name brand dish detergent), V2 was observed making such solution. V2 was observed dipping a chlorine strip into the water, registering a level between 50-100. V2 was notified that V6 attempted to make a basin of sanitizer this morning using a product labeled ultimate sanitizer. V2 stated she wasn't sure about using that product, this is just how she does it. On 12/19/23 at 11:40 AM, V2 (Dietary Manager) stated that she acknowledges the fryer in the kitchen was needing cleaned, with food particles, grease to the outside of the appliance along with food particles floating in the grease inside the fryer. V2 stated the facility is waiting on new grease to come in and has told staff to just not use it for now, but stated she will get it cleaned today. V2 was also shown the wire mesh covering the wall fan in the kitchen containing a thick layer of dust. V2 acknowledged the fan cover needed cleaned or replaced. On 12/20/23 at 11:17 AM, V2 stated after searching the dish washer manual, she has found for their low temperature dish machine, the sanitizer level should register between 50 - 100 ppm (Parts Per Million) of chlorine. V2 stated she will be doing an in-service with staff regarding proper technique to check sanitizer levels. V2 acknowledged that at times as documented on their December PPM Record of Low Temperature Sanitizing Dish Machine, 10 notations of the level being 200 ppm are documented. This same record documents blank notations for the following, indicating sanitizers levels were not checked: AM- 12/3, 12/4, 12/8, 12/12, 12/13, 12/15, 12/16, 12/17, 12/18; PM- 12/3, 12/7, 12/12, 12/16. Review of the sanitizer manufacturer manual for, Low Temperature Dish machines and Third Tank Sanitization documented to, Sanitize using 50 ppm. Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Sanitation - General documented, The kitchen will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The state and/or federal food code will be maintained on file within the food service department and will be the basis of all sanitation and food safety practices. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicare dated 12/20/23, documented 74 residents reside in the facility.
Feb 2023 3 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess for the safety of a personal rocking chair and cushion for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess for the safety of a personal rocking chair and cushion for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for an accident in a sample of 9. This failure resulted in R3 falling from the rocking chair sustaining a laceration to the forehead and a fracture of the C2 vertebra requiring local hospitalization and subsequent transfer to an out of state hospital. The findings include: R3's Face Sheet documents he admitted to this facility on 08/26/22 with diagnoses to include - diabetes mellitus II (DMII), atrial fibrillation, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), urinary incontinence, with additional diagnosis of repeated falls dated 10/26/22. R3's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/18/22, section C (Cognitive Patterns) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14, indicating R3 was cognitively intact. Section G (Functional Status) documents R3 required extensive assistance with two or more persons for transfers. R3's balance between transitions and walking was assessed as not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. R3's Care Plan documents Problem Start Date: 08/26/2022; Category: Falls. Resident is at risk for injuries r/t (related to): Hx (history) of falls, Edited: 12/05/2022; Long Term Goal Target Date: 1/25/2022. Resident will be free of fall related injuries by next review date. Created: 9/28/2022. R3's Care Plan also documents Approach Start Date: 08/31/2022. Approach End Date: 11/25/2022. Remind (R3) not to lean forward when sitting in wheelchair. Approach Start Date: 10/24/2022 Ensure b/l (bilateral) leg rest on w/c (wheelchair) for transporting. Created: 10/24/2022. Approach Start Date: 2/02/2022 Enc (encouraged) resident not to sit in rocker in room due to safety concerns of his falling. Created: 12/05/2022. R3's admission Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 7, indicating R3 is at moderate risk for falls. (Scoring: 0-5 Total Points = Low Fall Risk, 6-13 Total Points = Moderate Fall Risk, >13 Total Points = High Fall Risk). R3's Transfer Assessment observation details dated 08/26/22 documents Is the resident independent in transfers and ambulation? No, Is resident able to bear weight well during transfers, do they have history of being able to bear weight? No, and Is resident predictable, cooperative, and able to follow directions? Yes, Use gait belt with 2 assists during all transfers. R3's progress note dated 08/31/22 at 2:30 PM, documents R3 experienced an unwitnessed fall in his bathroom to include - . upon entering room nurse witness patient lying on left side on floor. Patients' wheelchair was in bathroom facing as if patient was coming out of bathroom. When nurse was performing head-toe assessment, nurse asked patient how he fell. Patient stated, 'he was trying to pick up a piece of garbage off floor and took a tumble.' Nurse note patient had small abrasion to left side of forehead with some dried blood coming from scratch. Nurse asked patient is he was having any other pain, and patient stated 'No'. Nurse had patient perform active range of motion to upper and lower extremities, patient could only perform to normal self, nurse noted no inward rotation or deformities to hips/legs, so nurse perform passive range of motion to make sure he was not hurting in joints . R3's Event Report dated 08/31/22 includes in house treatment of a 1 cm (centimeter) abrasion to the forehead with a root cause for fall described as, confusion, and weakness. Patient trying to use restroom and too weak to stand. The post fall intervention documented on R3's Event Report dated 08/31/22 was to educate resident to use call light and check on resident. R3's Transfer assessment dated [DATE] includes Is resident predictable, cooperative, and able to follow directions? No; Mechanical lift stand assist with all transfers; Use full body/mechanical lift for all transfers . R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 21 points indicating R3 is a high risk for falls. R3's progress note dated 10/24/22 documents While being taken to dining room for dinner via wheelchair, resident had his feet up. He suddenly put them down. Wearing soft soled shoes which caused him to suddenly go forward falling on the carpet. Sustained a hematoma and 2 cm laceration to right forehead. Also, a 2 cm laceration to bridge of nose. The skin on nose has carpet burn. Left hand with a 7 cm laceration to posterior hand. Steri-strips applied. A 2.5 cm laceration to left ring finger and a 1 cm laceration below that one. A 2 cm laceration to tip of left ring finger. Wedding ring removed and placed in narcotic drawer. Ice applied to right forehead and nose. Call placed to nurse practitioner who ordered x-rays of facial area and nose .will ensure leg rest are intact when resident in wheelchair. Will continue to monitor. R3's Event Report dated 10/24/22 documents Conclusion with root cause: Being t/p (transferred/pushed) without leg rest on bl (bilateral). Rubber soled shoes on. Had his legs up initially, but then put them down causing him to tumble forward to the carpet. Will ensure he is t/p with bl leg rest intact. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 13, indicating R3 remains at high risk for falls. R3's progress notes dated 12/02/2022 at 10:05 AM documents guest observed on floor in room, lying on stomach with forehead on feet of bedside table, lying in puddle of blood. This nurse rolled guest off bedside table and assessed forehead, had a 4 cm by 2 cm laceration to R (right) forehead above eyebrow. Guest (R3) told this nurse the year, day of week, and who the president of the US (United States) is, he also stated, 'I was sitting in rocking chair and fell asleep that's when I was on the floor, pressure applied to forehead to stop bleeding then ice was applied. (V2 - Director of Nursing - DON) called ambulance services for transportation to hospital for eval (evaluation). R3's Initial Incident Report dated 12/03/22 at 12:45 PM includes: . STATUS: On 12/2/22 Resident (R3) Dx (diagnosis) of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit. Was observed by Nurse in the floor of his room. Resident stated he fell asleep in his rocking chair and fell forward. Nurse assessed resident. Resident had laceration to area above right eyebrow. Resident sent to hospital for evaluation. At hospital resident received x-ray of neck. On 12-3-22 facility received notification of x-ray findings of an odontoid fracture of cervical spine C2 vertebrae .Investigation started. R3's Final Incident Report dated 12/03/22 at 12:45 PM includes: .Type of Occurrence: Serious Injury . On 12-3-22 Nurse heard resident calling from room. Nurse got to resident room and observed resident (R3) laying on floor on stomach with head against base of bedside table. Nurse immediately began to assess and tend to resident. Resident stated he was in his rocking chair, fell asleep, and had fallen forward out of rocking chair. Resident had 4 cm by 2 cm laceration to right forehead above eyebrow. Nurse applied pressure. Called ambulance. Resident sent to hospital for evaluation. All staff statements find that resident was heard calling out and was observed on floor in front of rocking chair. Resident statement tells that resident was in rocking chair prior to fall and fell asleep 'that is when I was going to the floor' per resident. Rocking chair has been removed from resident room with approval from family and resident. Spoke to family about replacing chair with recliner .This is the final report. On 02/15/23 at 9:42 AM, V6 (CNA - Certified Nursing Assistant) stated he remembered the incident on 12/02/22 when R3 fell and was working that day. V6 stated R3 had fallen from his rocker and the lift aid cushion was in the seat of the rocker at the time of R3's fall. V6 stated the facility did an investigation and took statements. V6's written statement dated 12/02/22 documents the following - V6 last provided care to R3 at 9:30 AM; R3 found on floor for unwitnessed fall; R3 was not usually assigned to V6; R3 was assigned to V6 at time of incident; and R3 was dry at time of incident. V6's written statement further documents Resident (R3) was placed in his rocking chair that had a cushion from the family that resident was sitting on. Assisted with transfer. Bedside table was placed in front of resident. Resident was asked if he needed anything else, he didn't, so left the room. After leaving resident approximately 30 minutes later (activities) found resident on floor. On 02/15/23 at 11:59 AM, V19 (Rehab Director/Occupational Therapist) stated she evaluated (R3) on 08/30/22. I assessed transfers and self-care. (R3) did fine transferring with one person, he was able to get up on his own. Then, (R3) went out to the hospital and came back on 09/11/22. (R3) required 2 plus (person) assist at that time. V19 stated she recommended the sit-to-stand device which was safer for nursing/CNA's and R3 loved this. V19 stated progress was very slow and due to Medicare rules of non-progression and plateau he was discharged from therapy on 10/27/22. V19 verified R3 did have a wooden rocking chair from his home with a cushion. V19 said the cushion was removable and the family moved it around. V19 said the cushion was spring loaded as a sort of assist when standing from a sitting position. V19 stated a cushion like that would never be recommended by therapy. V19 said that the family requested a Care Plan meeting and they had one on 11/30/22. V19 said that R3 wanted to stay up in his rocker all day long, but the family was complaining about wounds, so V19 recommended R3 use a recliner, which the family was going to bring in a lift recliner. V19 said that they recommended on 11/30/22 that the family remove the rocker. V19 said it was not a safety suggestion, it was more for the elevation of the legs and compliance with that which would have been accomplished with the lift chair. V19 said the rocker was more for the family when they visited. V19 stated the sit-to-stand device would have been appropriate to transfer to and from his rocking chair. V19 confirmed R3's rocking chair was not assessed for safety during his stay. On 02/15/23 at 11:47 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that two days prior to R3's fall, the facility held a Care Plan meeting on 11/30/22 that included V28 (Family Member/POA - Power of Attorney). V1 said that R3 did have a wooden rocking chair with a cushion that the family brought to the facility for R3 to use. V1 said the cushion was not a normal cushion, it was a type of lift assist cushion to help with getting up from the rocking chair. V1 stated that V28 was told during the Care Plan meeting that they did not recommend R3 to continue using this cushion and it was not good for R3 to use the cushion in the rocking chair. V1 said that they asked the family to please take the cushion and chair home. A printed description of the lift assist cushion was provided by the facility and describes the cushion as a Portable self-powered seat lifts to help you out of any chair. Easily transition from sitting to standing with the aid of this self-powered lift assist cushion. Simple hydraulic mechanisms gently lifts you as you stand. On 02/15/23 at 10:24 AM, V28 (Family Member/POA - Power of Attorney) said The day we had planned to move him . was the day they called and said he fell out of his rocker, and they sent him out. When I was waiting with him in the ER (Emergency Room), the doctor came in and told me his neck was broken. (Local hospital) was going to transfer him to (out of state hospital) for treatment. He was transported by ambulance.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor fluid intake as ordered for 1 (R7) of 3 residents reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor fluid intake as ordered for 1 (R7) of 3 residents reviewed for physician's orders in a sample of 9. The findings include: R7's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 01/29/23 with the following diagnoses in part - Chronic Kidney Disease (CD), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BP), Diabetes Mellitus type II ([NAME]), and disorder of kidney/ureters. R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating R7 has severe cognitive impairment. Section G-Functional Status documents that R7 requires supervision with limited assistance of 1 person for all activities of daily living. R7's cumulative Physician Order Sheet includes orders to monitor and record R7's fluid intake daily for breakfast, lunch, and dinner - Start date 1/19/23, Discontinue date 02/16/23. R7's electronic record under Vital Signs - Intake - Fluids documents the first fluid intake of 500 ml (milliliters) dated 01/27/23 at 7:26 PM. There is no documentation in R7's electronic record of fluid intake being recorded from 01/19/23 - 01/26/23, or from 01/28/23 - 02/04/23. R7's record documents he was out to the hospital for evaluation and treatment from 02/05/23 to 02/07/23. The next fluid intake is recorded beginning 02/13/23 through 02/16/23. On 02/16/23 at 9:55 AM, V18, ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) was asked if there was any other location staff might record resident fluid intake. V18 stated vitals are recorded electronically but believed there might be a logbook and V2 (DON) might have that information. When asked about the physician's orders to monitor and record R7's fluid intake, V18 confirmed the order stating it was daily for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. On 02/16/23 at 10:00 AM, V2 was asked how resident fluid intake was recorded and responded that everything was recorded electronically in the resident record. When asked if they had a logbook for vitals, she stated she was not aware of one. On 02/16/23 at 11:30 AM, V2 brought this surveyor two pieces of paper she stated was from a logbook she was not aware staff used. Upon inspection, the unsigned document titled Intake and Output Record labeled with R7's name had been completed across all three shifts (10:00 PM - 6:00 AM, 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM, and 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM) from 02/07/23 through 02/20/23. It was noted that on 02/07/23 fluid intake was recorded for the 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift - a time R7's record indicated he was in the hospital. When asked why fluid intake had been recorded for future dates, V2 stated she didn't know that it had been reordered and it should not be already filled out. At this time, V2 was asked to provide the logbook. V2 stated she did not know where it was at that moment. R7's Intake and Output Record documents different amounts than what is recorded for the same dates in the electronic record under Vital Signs - Intake - Fluids. On 02/16/23 at 11:45 AM, V8, RN (Registered Nurse) was shown copies provided of R7's Intake and Output Record. V8 stated the logbook containing the Intake and Output Record was at the nurse's station and provided the logbook for review at this time. When asked who records on the log, V8 stated the nurses use this book for various things such as communication, x-rays, and transport schedules. V8 was asked if she had used the log and she stated she had but was unsure which dates and pointed out what, looks like my handwriting. When asked why R7 was the only resident in the book, V8 stated that R7 was the only resident currently being monitored for fluids/dehydration. On 02/16/23 at 1:00 PM, V18 stated normally if the staff write vitals or something down on a piece of paper for whatever reason - like if the computer was down - it gets put in the computer as soon as possible. When told that V8 reported that R7 was the only resident being monitored for fluid intake/dehydration. R7's Nurse's Note dated 02/05/23 at 5:48 AM documents RN in patient room to administer medication patient found in bed with laceration to right eyebrow with moderate amount of blood. Patient states he was trying to get up to go to the bathroom and his feet came out from under him .EMS (Emergency Medical Services) notified of need to transfer and en route to facility at this time . R7's Nurse's Note dated 02/05/23 at 10:59 AM documents Resident being admitted with dehydration, closed fx (fracture) of right eye, laceration to right eyebrow with 5 staples . R7's Nurse's Note dated 02/07/2023 at 12:22 PM documents received report RN at (local hospital) . patient was dehydrated and discontinued diuretics . R7's Nurse's Note dated 02/07/2023 at 1:50 PM documents guest arrived to facility via ambulance services. A daily Progress Note in R7's hospital records dated 02/06/23 document under plan renal failure 'probably due to dehydration' improving with intravenous fluids.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure coverage was provided by a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to effect all 47 residents livi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure coverage was provided by a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to effect all 47 residents living in the facility. The findings include: The facility schedules dated 11/04/22 through 02/16/23 were reviewed. There was no RN coverage documented for Saturday 12/10/22, Saturday 12/24/22, or Saturday 01/07/23. The facility census report dated 2/14/23 documents a census of 47 residents. On 02/17/23 at 11:04 AM, V18, ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed the facility was without RN coverage on these dates and the facility did not have a policy regarding RN coverage.
Nov 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care and treatment consistent with resident care plans an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care and treatment consistent with resident care plans and physicians' orders to administer prescribed medications for 4 (R14, R18, R23, and R24) of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 22. Findings include: On 11/1/22 at 8:10 AM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said that some of the medications for R14, R18, R23, and R24 with administration times of 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM were not initialed as being administered by V13 (LPN) who worked midnight shift on the morning of 11/1/22. V7 said that V13 did not mention that there were medications that were not administered. V7 said that V13 is new, so maybe V13 didn't know that they were supposed to be administered. V7 said that she reported it to V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) and they were going to reach out to V13 to find out if the medication was administered. On 11/1/22 at 2:30 PM, V2 said that she had not been in contact with V13. V2 said that she left V13 a voicemail to return her call this morning and has not received a return phone call. V2 said that she notified the doctor of the missed doses of medication. 1. R24's Resident Face Sheet documents that R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, myalgia (unspecified site), other specified arthritis (unspecified site), and radiculopathy, cervical region. R24's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) for November 2022 documents an order dated 6/17/22 for acetaminophen 325mg tablet, administer 650 mg three times a day with an administration time of 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM, an order dated 10/25/19 for baclofen 10mg orally three times a day with an administration time of 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM, and carbidopa-levodopa tablet 25-100mg, administer 2 tabs orally three times a day with an administration time of 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM. R24's POS also documents an order dated 8/8/22 for pain scale every (q) shift, twice a day. R24's MAR for November 2022 contained no initials for the 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM dose of acetaminophen, baclofen, and carbidopa-levodopa. There is no documentation on R24's MAR indicating the medications were given. R24's TAR for November 2022 documents that R24's pain scale level is 0, on a 0-10 pain scale, on the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift and the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift on 11/1/22. R24's Care Plan (start date 8/21/20) documents that R24 has complaints of pain related to (R/T) spinal stenosis, history (HX): back surgery, low back pain, buttock ulcers with documented approaches of administer medications: (acetaminophen) as ordered. Evaluate/record/report effectiveness and any adverse side effects. 2. R14's Resident Face Sheet documents that R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain, unspecified, and encounter for palliative care. R14's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) for November 2022 documents an order dated 1/16/22 for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligram (mg) tablet orally every 6 hours with a documented administration time of 5:00 AM. R14's POS also documents an order dated 8/8/22 for pain scale every (q) shift, twice a day. R14's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2022 documents V3's initials in parenthesis, indicating the medication was not administered, for the 5:00 AM dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen. Below the order on the MAR is a notation under the section Reason that documents Not Administered: Other Comment: NP (Nurse Practitioner) made aware. R14's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November 2022 documents that R14's pain scale level is 0, on a 0-10 pain scale, on the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift and the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift on 11/1/22. R14's Care Plan (start date of 11/23/21) documents that R14 has complaints of chronic pain related to (R/T) neuropathic pain in affected side with documented approaches of administering medications as ordered, including hydrocodone-acetaminophen. 3. R18's Resident Face Sheet documents that R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other specified arthritis. R18's POS for November 2022 documents an order dated 1/5/22 for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg tablet orally three times a day with a documented administration time of 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM. R18's POS also documents an order dated 8/8/22 for pain scale every (q) shift, twice a day. R18's MAR for November 2022 documents V3's initials in parenthesis, indicating the medication was not administered, for the 4:00 AM to 6:00 AM dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen. Below the order on the R18's MAR is a notation under the section Reason that documents Not Administered: Other Comment: NP made aware. R18's TAR for November 2022 documents that R18's pain scale level is 0, on a 0-10 pain scale, on the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift and the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift on 11/1/22. R18's Care Plan (start date 6/11/19) documents that R18 has pain/risk for pain with a documented approach to administer medications as ordered and evaluate the effectiveness of pain management interventions. 4. R23's Resident Face Sheet documents that R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other specified arthritis and other chronic pain. R23's POS for November 2022 documents an order dated 7/15/22 for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg tablet orally every 6 hours with a documented administration time of 5:00 AM. R23's POS also documents an order dated 8/8/22 for pain scale every (q) shift, twice a day. R23's MAR for November 2022 documents V3's initials in parenthesis, indicating the medication was not administered, for the 5:00 AM dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen. Below the order on R23's MAR is a notation under the section Reason that documents Not Administered: Other Comment: NP made aware. R23's TAR for November 2022 documents that R23's pain scale level is 0, on a 0-10 pain scale, on the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift and the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift on 11/1/22. R23's Care Plan (start date of 3/11/21) documents that R23 has complaints of acute pain related to (R/T) abdominal area (abd. area) with documented approaches of encourage resident to request pain medication before pain becomes unbearable and administer medications: as ordered. On 11/2/22 at 1:15 PM, V2 (DON) said that she did get in touch with V13 last night and V13 said that she did not administer the above medications to R14, R18, R23, and R24. The facility policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration (revision date 1/1/13) documents in section 5.4 administer medications within timeframes specified by facility policy and in section 6.1 document necessary medication administration/treatment information (e.g., when medications are opened, when medications are given, injection site of a medication, if medications are refused, PRN (as needed) medications, application site) on appropriate forms.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 6 harm violation(s), $84,882 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 42 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $84,882 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 0/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Helia Healthcare Of Energy's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Helia Healthcare Of Energy Staffed?

CMS rates HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Helia Healthcare Of Energy?

State health inspectors documented 42 deficiencies at HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 6 that caused actual resident harm, and 35 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Helia Healthcare Of Energy?

HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by HELIA HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 98 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ENERGY, Illinois.

How Does Helia Healthcare Of Energy Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Helia Healthcare Of Energy?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Helia Healthcare Of Energy Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Helia Healthcare Of Energy Stick Around?

HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Helia Healthcare Of Energy Ever Fined?

HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY has been fined $84,882 across 3 penalty actions. This is above the Illinois average of $33,928. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Helia Healthcare Of Energy on Any Federal Watch List?

HELIA HEALTHCARE OF ENERGY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.