Axiom Gardens of Flora

701 SHADWELL AVENUE, FLORA, IL 62839 (618) 662-8361
For profit - Corporation 97 Beds AXIOM HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
3/100
#332 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Axiom Gardens of Flora has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #332 out of 665 facilities in Illinois puts them in the top half of the state, but they are last in their county, ranked #2 of 2 in Clay County. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 16 in 2025. Staffing is a potential weakness; the turnover rate is 69%, which is considerably higher than the Illinois average of 46%, indicating instability among caregivers. On a positive note, they have good RN coverage, exceeding 85% of facilities in the state, which is crucial for catching potential health issues. However, there are serious concerns, including a critical incident where staff failed to manage diabetes care properly, resulting in a resident requiring emergency transport due to dangerously high blood sugar levels. Another serious incident involved a resident choking due to incorrect dietary provisions, requiring hospitalization. Overall, while there are some strengths, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
3/100
In Illinois
#332/665
Top 49%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 16 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$116,199 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 16 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 69%

23pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $116,199

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: AXIOM HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (69%)

21 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 3 actual harm
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct textured diet for 1 of 19 (R2) residents revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct textured diet for 1 of 19 (R2) residents reviewed for diet in a sample of 19. This failure resulted in R2 choking and being sent to the hospital. Findings include: R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 10/28/2024 with diagnoses including in part dementia and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R2's most recent Care Plan documents a focus area of R2 has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem and interventions include in part provide and serve diet as ordered, dated 6/9/23. R2's Diet order dated 3/12/25 11:48 PM through 6/14/25 3:16 PM documents regular diet, mechanical soft texture, nectar/mildly thick consistency. R2's diet order dated 6/14/25 3:16 PM through 6/18/25 2:02 PM documents regular diet, pureed texture, nectar/mildly thick consistency. R2's current diet order started 6/18/25 2:03 PM documents regular diet, pureed texture, honey/moderately thick consistency. R2's progress note titled Health Status Note dated 6/13/25 at 12:43 PM documents Resident (R2) was sitting in the dining room eating his lunch and he ended up getting choked on a piece of sausage and went unresponsive. He was still breathing. Staff was able to remove the piece of sausage, and he is now alert and sitting up. Notified (Nurse Practitioner) who was in the dining room at the time of the event who gave orders to send to (local hospital) ER (Emergency Room). Called EMS (Emergency Medical Services) at 1235 (12:35 PM) for transport. Called to (Local Hospital) ER and gave report to RN (Registered Nurse) at 1238 (12:38 PM). Called POA (Power of Attorney) and updated her on resident (R2) being transferred to hospital. She said she would call back later to check on him if she hasn't heard anything. Transfer record, POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment), order summary, and bed hold policy sent with EMS. R2's progress note titled Health Status Note dated 6/13/25 at 12:43 PM documents EMS arrived and resident (R2) is leaving on stretcher at this time to (local hospital). R2's progress note titled Health Status Note dated 6/14/25 at 3:17 PM documents Resident (R2) noted to be having difficulty chewing and swallowing during lunch. Nursing intervention in place to downgrade diet to pureed and have ST (Speech Therapy) to eval (evaluate) and treat. Wife notified. R2's incident report titled Choking dated 6/13/25 at 12:43 PM documents under Incident Description; Nursing Description: It was brought to my attention that (R2) was down in the dining room choking on lunch. Upon entering the dining room, I observed (R2) laying on the ground with multiple staff members and NP (Nurse Practitioner) in the dining room. (R2) was purple in color but he was still breathing at the time. Resident Description: (R2) states that he got choked on the bread and sausage. Description: Staff performed Heimlich/abdominal thrusts which was successful. On 6/25/25 at 1:53 PM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated R2 was served a whole bratwurst but can't remember if it was on a bun. V3 stated while she was passing trays someone yelled out that R2 was choking. V3 stated R2 was blue/purple in the face and was staring off so she yelled for help. V3 stated the nurse came and started the Heimlich maneuver. V3 stated the nurse did the Heimlich maneuver until she got tired then she took over. V3 stated the Heimlich maneuver was not working so they laid R2 on the floor on his side and started back thrusts then V2 (Director of Nursing) came in and did a finger sweep and pulled out a piece of the bratwurst and there was still a piece in his mouth that he started chewing. V3 stated his color returned to normal and he started breathing again. V3 stated she does not know what diet R2 had ordered at the time. On 6/26/25 at 12:37 PM, V4 (Speech Therapist) stated she saw R2 prior to the choking incident and he was ordered to be on a mechanical soft diet and thickened liquids. V4 stated she was not at the facility the day of R2's choking incident but she was told he received a whole bratwurst on a bun. V4 stated a whole bratwurst is not considered a mechanical soft texture diet. V4 stated she was in the facility the next day and saw R2 and that time nursing had downgraded R2 to a pureed diet when he came back from the hospital. V4 stated the goal for R2 is to get him back to a mechanical soft diet and she will be trying that diet with R2 today. On 6/26/25 at 1:17 PM, V9 (Dietary Aide) stated she was working the day R2 choked, and she served R2 a whole brat on a bun. V9 stated R2 was ordered mechanical soft textured diet. V9 stated R2 should have received the bratwurst and bun mechanical soft texture and not whole on a bun. On 6/26/25 at 1:42 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she was notified that there was an emergency in the dining room and when she arrived in the dining room and saw R2 laying in the floor and R2 was choking. V2 stated staff were doing abdominal and back thrust and it was not working so she did a finger sweep in R2's mouth and pulled out a piece of bratwurst and some gummed up bread. V2 stated the staff sat R2 up then they performed another back thrust and R2 then started coughing. V2 stated EMS arrived shortly after that and took R2 to the local emergency room. On 6/26/25 at 2:11 PM, V12 (Cook) stated she was working the day R2 choked. V12 stated she served R2 a whole bratwurst on a bun that day. V12 stated R2 was ordered for a mechanical soft diet and received the incorrect diet texture. V12 stated R2 was supposed to get his bratwurst and bun with mechanical soft texture. On 6/26/25 at 2:44 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she was not working the day R2 choked. V1 stated she was informed R2 was served a regular texture diet, bratwurst on a bun. V1 stated R2 should have been served mechanical soft texture diet. R2's emergency department notes from local hospital dated 6/13/25 documents R2 presented from a local nursing home after a choking episode. The nursing home did the Heimlich maneuver, and they were able to expel the sausage the patient choked on. Patient did have an episode of non-responsiveness at the facility, but he was more alert once EMS arrived. The facility Diet Spreadsheet for Day 20 documents the mechanical soft diet served for 6/13/25 was ground bratwurst on bun with gravy (no raw vegetables), potato salad, baked beans, and soft chopped watermelon (no seeds). The facilities recipe for mechanical soft texture diet for 6/13/25 titled Ground Bratwurst on Bun with Gravy documents under 3. Place prepared bratwurst in a washed and sanitized food processor. Pulse/grind to the size and texture of finely ground beef. 4. Place in steam table pan and add a small amount of prepared broth or gravy to keep moist. The facility policy titled Diet Summary dated 2022 documents under Dental Soft (Mechanical Soft) Diet: Foods should be moist and fork tender. Meat is ground or chopped into bite-size pieces (1/2 inch or smaller) and should be mixed or served with gravy, broth, or another type of moistening agent.
Apr 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from neglect for one (R15) of 15 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from neglect for one (R15) of 15 residents reviewed for neglect in the sample of 15. Findings include: R15's Face Sheet documented an original admission date of 6/26/22 and readmission date of 5/10/24 and included diagnoses of morbid obesity, diabetes type 2, and congestive heart failure. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R15 has no deficits in cognition. This MDS also documented R15 has limited range of motion in both lower extremities and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. R15's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of Resident is usually able to perform ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) with maximum assist from 2 staff initiated on 8/30/23, with a corresponding intervention also initiated on 8/30/23 of Assist to transfer resident using mechanical (lift) and 2 staff members. Explain all procedures prior to starting. Advise resident what is expected of him/her during the transfer. Reassure Resident of safety as needed. Keep hand on Resident to reassure of safety if needed. Ensure lift sheet is intact and correct size for resident. May leave lift sheet under Resident if comfort in placing/removing sheet is problematic. There were no problem areas in the Care Plan to indicate R15 reports falsehoods about staff or displays manipulative behavior. There was no documentation in R15's Nursing Progress Notes about issues with R15's 3/26/25 mechanical lift transfer as documented below. On 4/3/25 at 2:55pm, R15 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R15 stated on Wednesday 3/26/25 on the 6pm to 6am shift, V19 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was transferring him from his wheelchair to the shower chair using a mechanical lift. R15 stated there were no other staff members present. R15 stated as the mechanical lift sling was moving, he was experiencing back pain and was complaining to V19 that R15 didn't feel V19 was doing the transfer correctly. R15 stated V19 was mad, threw up his hands, yelled, That's it, I quit, and walked out of the room shutting the door, leaving R15 elevated several inches away from the shower chair. R15 stated he could not reach the call light and yelled for help for about 10 minutes, until two other staff members responded and lowered him into the shower chair. R15 stated he was not injured nor emotionally traumatized by the event, as several years ago at a different facility he was dropped during a mechanical lift transfer, so nothing phases him anymore. R15 stated the following day in the afternoon, V1 (Administrator) asked him about the event, and asked him if he would be willing to work with V19 again, to which R15 stated no he would not as he didn't feel safe in his care after what happened. R15 stated he has not seen V19 since then. On 4/3/25 at 3:15pm, V23 (Registered Nurse/RN), stated when she came in on 3/27/25at 6:00am, R15 had reported to her that the previous evening, V19 left R15 hanging in a mechanical lift sling during a transfer because V19 was mad at R15. V23 stated she reported the incident to V1 that morning when V1 arrived. On 4/3/25 at 3:50pm, V1 stated she found out about the incident when she arrived for work the morning of 3/27/25. V1 stated she talked to R15 and staff about what had happened, but there was no incident report about the event as R15 told V1 he did not feel V19 had neglected or abused him. V1 stated R15 was verbally abusive to V19 and V19 left the room to de-escalate R15. V1 stated V19 has not been back to the facility as he got in an argument with another employee and V1 told him he is not welcome back. On 4/3/25 at 4:05pm, V20 (Agency RN) stated, on 3/26/25 during the 6pm to 6am shift, unsure of the time, she and V21 (CNA) were standing at the nurses' station when V19 approached, stated that R15 was, Being nitpicky about his (Mechanical lift) transfer and that he didn't want to further escalate him so V19 left the room. V20 stated within seconds, she and V21 entered the room and saw that R15 was in the mechanical lift sling, positioned several inches above the shower chair. V20 stated R15 was not injured, nor did he seem upset. V20 stated she and V21 lowered R15 into the shower chair and proceeded with his care. V20 stated V19 worked the remainder of his shift but did not go back into R15's room. V20 stated she did not notify management about what happened. On 4/3/25 at 6:00pm, V21 corroborated V20's account of the incident. V21 stated she did not notify management about the incident. V21 stated after the event, staff were re-educated on safe mechanical lift transfers. On 4/4/25 at 7:45am, V19 stated he was performing the transfer without other staff present as, That's just the way he always does it. V19 stated he had worked with R15 previously with no issues. V19 stated R15 was becoming verbally aggressive during the transfer, saying V19 wasn't doing it right, so V19 decided to calm the situation down and he would leave and get other staff to continue care. V19 stated when he left the room, R15 was already sitting in the shower chair but was still in the sling. V19 stated less than a minute elapsed between him leaving the room and other staff relieving him. V19 stated V1 later told him he could not return to the facility because, They didn't want me to get in trouble because of (R15) lying on me. He makes stuff up about staff. An Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated 10/24/22 documented, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Filing accurate and timely reports. Neglect means the failure to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, or mental anguish .Neglect means a facility's failure to provide, or willful withholding of, adequate medical care, mental health treatment, psychiatric rehabilitation, personal care, or assistance with activities of daily living that is necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness, of a resident .including deprivation of goods and services by staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to the Administrator an instance of staff to res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to the Administrator an instance of staff to resident neglect for one (R15) of 15 residents reviewed for neglect in the sample of 15. Findings include: R15's Face Sheet documented an original admission date of 6/26/22 and readmission date of 5/10/24 and included diagnoses of morbid obesity, diabetes type 2, and congestive heart failure. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R15 has no deficits in cognition. This MDS also documented R15 has limited range of motion in both lower extremities and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. R15's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of Resident is usually able to perform ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) with maximum assist from 2 staff initiated on 8/30/23, with a corresponding intervention also initiated on 8/30/23 of Assist to transfer resident using mechanical (lift) and 2 staff members. Explain all procedures prior to starting. Advise resident what is expected of him/her during the transfer. Reassure Resident of safety as needed. Keep hand on Resident to reassure of safety if needed. Ensure lift sheet is intact and correct size for resident. May leave lift sheet under Resident if comfort in placing/removing sheet is problematic. There were no problem areas in the Care Plan to indicate R15 reports falsehoods about staff or displays manipulative behavior. There was no documentation in R15's Nursing Progress Notes about issues with R15's 3/26/25 mechanical lift transfer as documented below. On 4/3/25 at 2:55pm, R15 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R15 stated on Wednesday 3/26/25 on the 6pm to 6am shift, V19 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was transferring him from his wheelchair to the shower chair using a mechanical lift. R15 stated there were no other staff members present. R15 stated as the mechanical sling was moving, he was experiencing back pain and was complaining to V19 that R15 didn't feel V19 was doing the transfer correctly. R15 stated V19 was mad, threw up his hands, yelled, That's it, I quit, and walked out of the room shutting the door, leaving R15 elevated several inches away from the shower chair. R15 stated he could not reach the call light and yelled for help for about 10 minutes, until two other staff members responded and lowered him into the shower chair. R15 stated he was not injured nor emotionally traumatized by the event, as several years ago at a different facility he was dropped during a mechanical lift transfer, so nothing phases him anymore. R15 stated the following day in the afternoon, V1 (Administrator) asked him about the event, and asked him if he would be willing to work with V19 again, to which R15 stated no he would not as he didn't feel safe in his care after what happened. R15 stated he has not seen V19 since then. On 4/3/25 at 3:15pm, V23 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated when she came in on 3/27/25at 6:00am, R15 had reported to her that the previous evening, V19 left R15 hanging in a mechanical lift sling during a transfer because V19 was mad at R15. V23 stated she reported the incident to V1 that morning when V1 arrived. On 4/3/25 at 3:50pm, V1 stated she found out about the incident when she arrived for work the morning of 3/27/25. V1 stated she talked to R15 and staff about what had happened, but there was no incident report about the event as R15 told V1 he did not feel V19 had neglected or abused him. V1 stated R15 was verbally abusive to V19 and V19 left the room to de-escalate R15. V1 stated V19 has not been back to the facility as he got in an argument with another employee and V1 told him he is not welcome back. On 4/3/25 at 4:05pm, V20 (Agency RN) stated, on 3/26/25 during the 6pm to 6am shift, she was unsure of the time, but she and V21 (CNA) were standing at the nurses' station when V19 approached, stated that R15 was, Being nitpicky about his (Mechanical lift) transfer and that he didn't want to further escalate him so V19 left the room. V20 stated within seconds, she and V21 entered the room and saw that R15 was in the mechanical lift sling, positioned several inches above the shower chair. V20 stated R15 was not injured, nor did he seem upset. V20 stated she and V21 lowered R15 into the shower chair and proceeded with his care. V20 stated V19 worked the remainder of his shift but did not go back into R15's room. V20 stated she did not notify management about what happened. On 4/3/25 at 6:00pm, V21 corroborated V20's account of the incident. V21 stated she did not notify management about the incident. V21 stated after the event, staff were re-educated on safe mechanical lift transfers. On 4/4/25 at 7:45am, V19 stated he was performing the transfer without other staff present as, That's just the way he always does it. V19 stated he had worked with R15 previously with no issues. V19 stated R15 was becoming verbally aggressive during the transfer, saying V19 wasn't doing it right, so V19 decided to calm the situation down by leaving to get other staff to continue care. V19 stated when he left the room, R15 was already sitting in the shower chair but was still in the sling. V19 stated less than a minute elapsed between him leaving the room and other staff relieving him. V19 stated V1 later told him he could not return to the facility because, They didn't want me to get in trouble because of (R15) lying on me. He makes stuff up about staff. An Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated 10/24/22 documented, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Filing accurate and timely reports. Neglect means the failure to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Neglect means a facility's failure to provide, or willful withholding of, adequate medical care, mental health treatment, psychiatric rehabilitation, personal care, or assistance with activities of daily living that is necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness, of a resident, including deprivation of goods and services by staff. Internal reporting requirements and identification of allegations: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the Administrator .Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the (state surveying agency) immediately, but not more than 2 hours after the allegation of abuse. Any incident that does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours. Under the section titled External Reporting documents The initial report to (state surveying agency) shall include the following information, if known at the time of the report: Name, age, diagnosis and mental status of the resident allegedly abused, neglected, exploited, mistreated, or from whom property was misappropriated, Type of abuse reported (physical, sexual, neglect, verbal or mental abuse, misappropriation of resident property), Date, time, location and circumstances of the alleged incident, Any obvious injuries or complaints of injury, Steps the facility has taken to protect the resident, The resident or resident's representative will also be informed of the report of an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property and that an investigation is being conducted. Five-day Final Investigation Report: Within five working days after the report of the occurrence, a complete written report of the conclusion of the investigation, including steps the facility has taken in response to the allegation, will be sent to the (state surveying agency). Name, age, diagnosis and mental status of the resident allegedly abused, neglected, exploited, mistreated, or from whom property was misappropriated, The original allegation (note day, time, location, the specific allegation, the alleged perpetrator, witnesses to the occurrence, circumstances surrounding the occurrence and any noted injuries), A summary of facts determined during the process of the investigation, review of medical record and interview of witnesses, Conclusion of the investigation based on known facts, The police report, if applicable, If the allegation is determined to be valid and the perpetrator is an employee, a separate sheet listing the employee's name, address, phone number, title, date of hire, copies of previous disciplinary actions, and current employment status (still working, suspended or terminated).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident neglect for one (R15...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident neglect for one (R15) of 15 residents reviewed for neglect in the sample of 15. Findings include: R15's Face Sheet documented an original admission date of 6/26/22 and readmission date of 5/10/24 and included diagnoses of morbid obesity, diabetes type 2, and congestive heart failure. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R15 has no deficits in cognition. This MDS also documented R15 has limited range of motion in both lower extremities and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. R15's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of Resident is usually able to perform ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) with maximum assist from 2 staff initiated on 8/30/23, with a corresponding intervention also initiated on 8/30/23 of Assist to transfer resident using mechanical (lift) and 2 staff members. Explain all procedures prior to starting. Advise resident what is expected of him/her during the transfer. Reassure Resident of safety as needed. Keep hand on Resident to reassure of safety if needed. Ensure lift sheet is intact and correct size for resident. May leave lift sheet under Resident if comfort in placing/removing sheet is problematic. There were no problem areas in the Care Plan to indicate R15 reports falsehoods about staff or displays manipulative behavior. There was no documentation in R15's Nursing Progress Notes about issues with R15's 3/26/25 mechanical lift transfer as documented below. On 4/3/25 at 2:55pm, R15 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R15 stated on Wednesday 3/26/25 on the 6pm to 6am shift, V19 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was transferring him from his wheelchair to the shower chair using a mechanical lift. R15 stated there were no other staff members present. R15 stated as the mechanical sling was moving, he was experiencing back pain and was complaining to V19 that R15 didn't feel V19 was doing the transfer correctly. R15 stated V19 was mad, threw up his hands, yelled, That's it, I quit, and walked out of the room shutting the door, leaving R15 elevated several inches away from the shower chair. R15 stated he could not reach the call light and yelled for help for about 10 minutes, until two other staff members responded and lowered him into the shower chair. R15 stated he was not injured nor emotionally traumatized by the event, as several years ago at a different facility he was dropped during a mechanical lift transfer, so nothing phases him anymore. R15 stated the following day in the afternoon, V1 (Administrator) asked him about the event, and asked him if he would be willing to work with V19 again, to which R15 stated no he would not as he didn't feel safe in his care after what happened. R15 stated he has not seen V19 since then. On 4/3/25 at 3:15pm, V23 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated when she came in on 3/27/25at 6:00am, R15 had reported to her that the previous evening, V19 left R15 hanging in a mechanical lift sling during a transfer because V19 was mad at R15. V23 stated she reported the incident to V1 that morning when V1 arrived. On 4/3/25 at 3:50pm, V1 stated she found out about the incident when she arrived for work the morning of 3/27/25. V1 stated she talked to R15 and staff about what had happened, but there was no incident report about the event as R15 told V1 he did not feel V19 had neglected or abused him. V1 stated R15 was verbally abusive to V19 and V19 left the room to de-escalate R15. V1 stated V19 has not been back to the facility as he got in an argument with another employee and V1 told him he is not welcome back. On 4/3/25 at 4:05pm, V20 (Agency RN) stated, on 3/26/25 during the 6pm to 6am shift, she was unsure of the time, but she and V21 (CNA) were standing at the nurses' station when V19 approached, stated that R15 was, Being nitpicky about his (Mechanical lift) transfer and that he didn't want to further escalate him so V19 left the room. V20 stated within seconds, she and V21 entered the room and saw that R15 was in the mechanical lift sling, positioned several inches above the shower chair. V20 stated R15 was not injured, nor did he seem upset. V20 stated she and V21 lowered R15 into the shower chair and proceeded with his care. V20 stated V19 worked the remainder of his shift but did not go back into R15's room. V20 stated she did not notify management about what happened. On 4/3/25 at 6:00pm, V21 corroborated V20's account of the incident. V21 stated she did not notify management about the incident. V21 stated after the event, staff were re-educated on safe mechanical lift transfers. On 4/4/25 at 7:45am, V19 stated he was performing the transfer without other staff present as, That's just the way he always does it. V19 stated he had worked with R15 previously with no issues. V19 stated R15 was becoming verbally aggressive during the transfer, saying V19 wasn't doing it right, so V19 decided to calm the situation down by leaving to get other staff to continue care. V19 stated when he left the room, R15 was already sitting in the shower chair but was still in the sling. V19 stated less than a minute elapsed between him leaving the room and other staff relieving him. V19 stated V1 later told him he could not return to the facility because, They didn't want me to get in trouble because of (R15) lying on me. He makes stuff up about staff. An Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated 10/24/22 documented, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Filing accurate and timely reports. Neglect means the failure to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Neglect means a facility's failure to provide, or willful withholding of, adequate medical care, mental health treatment, psychiatric rehabilitation, personal care, or assistance with activities of daily living that is necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness, of a resident, including deprivation of goods and services by staff. Under the section titled Internal Investigation documents All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation. Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents. Residents to whom the accused has regularly provided care, and employees with whom the accused has regularly worked, will be interviewed to determine whether any one has witnessed any prior abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property by the accused individual.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for one (R15) of two reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for one (R15) of two residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers in the sample of 15. Findings include: R15's Face Sheet documented an original admission date of 6/26/22 and readmission date of 5/10/24 and included diagnoses of morbid obesity, diabetes type 2, and congestive heart failure. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R15 has no deficits in cognition. This MDS also documented R15 has limited range of motion in both lower extremities and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. R15's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of Resident is usually able to perform ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) with maximum assist from 2 staff initiated on 8/30/23, with a corresponding intervention also initiated on 8/30/23 of Assist to transfer resident using mechanical (lift) and 2 staff members. Explain all procedures prior to starting. Advise resident what is expected of him/her during the transfer. Reassure Resident of safety as needed. Keep hand on Resident to reassure of safety if needed. Ensure lift sheet is intact and correct size for resident. May leave lift sheet under Resident if comfort in placing/removing sheet is problematic. There were no problem areas in the Care Plan to indicate R15 reports falsehoods about staff or displays manipulative behavior. There was no documentation in R15's Nursing Progress Notes about issues with R15's 3/26/25 mechanical lift transfer as documented below. On 4/3/25 at 2:55pm, R15 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R15 stated on Wednesday 3/26/25 on the 6pm to 6am shift, V19 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) was transferring him from his wheelchair to the shower chair using a mechanical lift. R15 stated there were no other staff members present. R15 stated as the mechanical sling was moving, he was experiencing back pain and was complaining to V19 that R15 didn't feel V19 was doing the transfer correctly. R15 stated V19 was mad, threw up his hands, yelled, That's it, I quit, and walked out of the room shutting the door, leaving R15 elevated several inches away from the shower chair. R15 stated he could not reach the call light and yelled for help for about 10 minutes, until two other staff members responded and lowered him into the shower chair. R15 stated he was not injured nor emotionally traumatized by the event, as several years ago at a different facility he was dropped during a mechanical lift transfer, so nothing phases him anymore. R15 stated the following day in the afternoon, V1 (Administrator) asked him about the event, and asked him if he would be willing to work with V19 again, to which R15 stated no he would not as he didn't feel safe in his care after what happened. R15 stated he has not seen V19 since then. On 4/3/25 at 3:15pm, V23 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated when she came in on 3/27/25at 6:00am, R15 had reported to her that the previous evening, V19 left R15 hanging in a mechanical lift sling during a transfer because V19 was mad at R15. V23 stated she reported the incident to V1 that morning when V1 arrived. On 4/3/25 at 3:50pm, V1 stated she found out about the incident when she arrived for work the morning of 3/27/25. V1 stated she talked to R15 and staff about what had happened, but there was no incident report about the event as R15 told V1 he did not feel V19 had neglected or abused him. V1 stated R15 was verbally abusive to V19 and V19 left the room to de-escalate R15. V1 stated V19 has not been back to the facility as he got in an argument with another employee and V1 told him he is not welcome back. On 4/3/25 at 3:55pm, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated mechanical lift transfers are to always be done with 2 staff members present. On 4/3/25 at 4:05pm, V20 (Agency RN) stated, on 3/26/25 during the 6pm to 6am shift, she was unsure of the time, but she and V21 (CNA) were standing at the nurses' station when V19 approached, stated that R15 was, Being nitpicky about his (Mechanical lift) transfer and that he didn't want to further escalate him so V19 left the room. V20 stated within seconds, she and V21 entered the room and saw that R15 was in the mechanical lift sling, positioned several inches above the shower chair. V20 stated R15 was not injured, nor did he seem upset. V20 stated she and V21 lowered R15 into the shower chair and proceeded with his care. V20 stated V19 worked the remainder of his shift but did not go back into R15's room. V20 stated she did not notify management about what happened. On 4/3/25 at 6:00pm, V21 corroborated V20's account of the incident. V21 stated she did not notify management about the incident. V21 stated after the event, staff were re-educated on safe mechanical lift transfers. On 4/4/25 at 7:45am, V19 stated he was performing the transfer without other staff present as, That's just the way he always does it. V19 stated he had worked with R15 previously with no issues. V19 stated R15 was becoming verbally aggressive during the transfer, saying V19 wasn't doing it right, so V19 decided to calm the situation down by leaving to get other staff to continue care. V19 stated when he left the room, R15 was already sitting in the shower chair but was still in the sling. V19 stated less than a minute elapsed between him leaving the room and other staff relieving him. V19 stated V1 later told him he could not return to the facility because, They didn't want me to get in trouble because of (R15) lying on me. He makes stuff up about staff. A Transfers-Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts Policy dated 1/19/18 documented, In order to protect the safety and wellbeing of the staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility will use mechanical lifting devices for the lifting and movement of residents. The transferring needs of residents will be assessed on an ongoing basis and designated into one of the following categories: H) Mechanical lift (trade name mechanical lift) with 2 caregivers.
Mar 2025 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a manner which promoted dignity with meal service for 1 of 17 (R35) residents reviewed for dignity in a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a manner which promoted dignity with meal service for 1 of 17 (R35) residents reviewed for dignity in a sample of 66. Findings Include: R35's admission profile documents an admission date of 1/14/2025. R35's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/20/25 Section C documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that R35 is cognitively intact. On 3/4/25 at 12:45 PM, R35 was observed in the dining room waiting on her lunch tray to be served. R35 was sitting at a table with R62. At this time R62 was eating her meal and R35 stated, This happens all the time, she gets her food and I have to wait. On 3/4/25 at 1:15 PM, R62 was observed leaving the dining room after she finished her meal and R35 was still waiting on her meal to be served. At that time R35 stated, I have asked them where my food is, and they said it is coming. I don't know why we can't be served at the same time. On 3/5/25 and 3/6/25 these same lunch time meal observations were made where R62 would get served her meal and finish eating prior to R35 being served her meal. On 3/7/25 at 1:30 PM, V4 (Dietary Manager) stated that all residents have an assigned seating system in the dining room. This is how the kitchen then orders the tray cards to serve table by table. V4 stated he hasn't updated the tray cards yet with the newer admissions to the facility. V4 stated that this is the reason R35 and R62 are not being served at the same time.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R24's admission profile documents an admission date to the facility of 10/18/2024. This same document includes the following ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R24's admission profile documents an admission date to the facility of 10/18/2024. This same document includes the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Pneumonia, and Cerebral Vascular Accident. This same document lists V21 (Family Member) as the emergency contact. R24's progress notes document that on 11/10/2024 V21 was contacted via telephone and a voicemail left with an update on R24's condition. A progress note from 11/10/24 at 8:43 AM states R24 was being transferred to local hospital to be evaluated and treated. There was no documentation in R24's medical records indicating written notice was given to R24's POA of R24's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. 3. R27's admission profile documents and admission date to the facility 4/22/2023. This same document includes the following diagnosis: adjustment disorder, unspecified dementia, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus. This same document lists V22 (Family Member) as the emergency contact. R27's progress notes document on 1/15/2025 R27 was sent to the local emergency room for evaluation post fall and was admitted and discharged back to the facility on 1/17/2025. There was no documentation in R27's medical records to indicating written was given to R27's emergency contact or R27 when R27 was sent to the hospital on 1/15/25. On 3/5/2025 at 2:05 PM, V10 (RN) stated she does not complete a written notice of transfer/discharge form with any resident upon transfer/discharge to the local hospital or mail a copy to the family. V10 stated, she is not aware of who handles this process. On 3/6/2025 at 9:00 AM, V8 (Social Service Director) stated she had not been completing written notices to residents or resident representatives of a transfer/discharge to a local hospital or sending a copy of the notice to the ombudsmen. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify residents and the residents' representatives in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital and failed send a copy of the notice to the ombudsman for 3 (R12, R24, R27) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations in a sample of 66. The findings include: 1. R12's admission record documented an initial admission date to the facility of 8/08/2023. This same document lists V19 (Family Member) as the Power of Attorney (POA). R12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a brief mental status score (BIMS) of 6 which indicates moderate cognitively impairment. On 3/5/2025 at 2:15 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated she did have R12 transferred from the facility via ambulance to the hospital on 9/5/2024 and 1/14/2025 with no written notice for the reason of the transfer/discharge to R12 or R12's family. On 3/7/2025 at 1:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is aware that the facility had not given written notice to the resident or resident representative for R12's transfer to the hospital on 9/2/2024 and 1/14/2025. V1 stated, she was not aware the facility had to send a copy of the notice to the ombudsmen. V1 stated, the facility does not have a policy for written notice to residents and resident representative for transfer/discharge notice to the local hospital. The was no documentation in R12's medical records indicating written notice was given to R12's POA of R12's transfer to the hospital on 9/5/24 or 1/14/25.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed follow physician dietary orders for 2 residents (R2, R44)....

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed follow physician dietary orders for 2 residents (R2, R44). The facility also failed to follow their weight policy, timely acknowledge, and report a weight loss greater than 5% in one month for 1 resident (R27) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 66. Findings Include: 1. R2's admission record documents an admit date of 10/14/2024. This same document includes the following diagnosis: Hyperlipidemia, bipolar disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section C Documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating he is cognitively intact. R2's current Care Plan has a focus are of: The resident has arthritis. The goal for this focus area is the resident will maintain acceptable level of comfort and mobility through the review date of 5/04/2024. Interventions for this focus area includes Encourage adequate nutrition and hydration and encourage resident to maintain weight in a normal range for height. R2's Medication Administration Record for March 2025 documents, Diet: Regular diet Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency, DOUBLE PROTEIN AT MEALS . R2's lunch tray card lists the following diet: Regular diet, thin liquids with double protein at meals. On 3/5/25 at 12:30 PM, during the lunch meal it was observed that R2 was served three Swedish meatballs. At this time R2 stated that he only got three meatballs and usually only gets one serving of meat with his meals. On 3/6/25 at 12:15 PM, during the lunch meal it was observed R2 received one serving of Chicken Cordon Blue. On 3/5/3025 at 12:21 PM, V4 (Dietary Manager) stated, R2 did not get his double protein served to him at lunch today and he did not get the double protein at lunch yesterday. V4 stated, the kitchen did miss this. 2. R27's admission profile sheet documents an admit date of 4/22/2023. This same document includes the following diagnosis: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Unspecified Dementia and Essential Hypertension. R27's current physician order sheet lists a diet order of: Controlled carbohydrate diet, Mechanical Soft, Honey Thickened liquids. R27's care plan has a focus area of: The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem. The goal is: the resident will comply with recommended diet for weight reduction daily through review date. Interventions for this focus area include explain and reinforce to the resident the importance of maintaining the diet ordered. Encourage the resident to comply. Explain the consequences of refusal, obesity/malnutrition risk factors. R27's weights are as follows: 1/1/25 204.6 pounds, 2/3/2025 202.0 pounds, 3/3/2025 184.2 pounds and a reweigh requested by surveyor on 3/6/2025 of 189.4 pounds. There is a 6.23% weight loss in one month from 2/3/25 to 3/6/25. On 3/5/2025 at 2:20 PM, when V16 (Registered Nurse/RN) was questioned why the R27's weight loss was not communicated to the Dietitian or Physician she stated that she is unsure why R27's weight was put in by V23 (Resident Care Aide) on 3/3/25 instead of V4 (Dietary Manager). V23 did not communicate this weight loss to any kitchen or nursing staff, so no one was aware the weight loss occurred. On 3/6/2025 at 1:30 PM, V16 stated that R27's weight was 189.4 pounds which showed a weight loss, so the Registered Dietitian was notified, and a supplement was ordered with meals. A Weights policy with a revision date of 10/17/18 documents 3. a re-weight should be obtained if there is a difference of 5 pounds or greater (loss or gain) since previous recorded weight. 4. A re weight should be taken as soon as possible after an unanticipated weight change is noted and prior to calling the physician .6. Undesired or unanticipated weigh gains/loss of 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in three months, or 10% in six months shall be reported to the physician, Dietician and/or Dietary Manager as appropriate 3. R44's admission record documents an admission date of 12/13/2023. This same document includes the following diagnosis: depression, constipation, and congestive heart failure. R44's care plan has a focus area of having a nutritional problem or a potential for a nutritional problem. The goal is that the resident will comply with recommended diet for weight reduction daily through review date. Interventions for this problem area include, provide, and serve supplements as ordered. R44's Medication Administration Record for March 2025 documents R44 is to have, Fortified pudding one time a day due to weight loss in the afternoon for weight loss. Start date 3/1/24. R44's diet card has a diet order of regular diet, thin liquids, and fortified pudding at meals. R44's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/20/2025 Section C has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that she is cognitively intact. On 3/4/2025 R44 had her lunch tray delivered to her room at 1:15 PM, and there was no fortified pudding on her tray. On 3/7/2025 R44 had her lunch tray delivered to her room at 1:00 PM, and no fortified pudding was provided on her lunch tray. At this time, R44 stated that she gets the pudding every now and again, but not regularly with meals. On 3/7/2024 at 1:05 PM, V4 (Dietary Manager) confirmed that R44 did not have her pudding on the tray, and he would go get one for her right now. V4 stated that she is ordered to get fortified pudding with all meals, and this must have been missed in the kitchen when serving the trays.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate records of narcotics for 1 (R15) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate records of narcotics for 1 (R15) of 6 residents reviewed for controlled substance medication in the sample of 66. Findings Include: R15's admission Record documented R15 is a [AGE] year-old with an initial admission date of 01/14/2025 to the facility. Diagnoses listed are displaced oblique fracture of right femur, multiple sclerosis, morbid obesity, symptomatic epilepsy, anemia, hyperlipidemia, chronic systolic heart failure, dementia, gastro - esophageal reflux disease, and essential hypertension. R15's order summary printed on March 7, 2025, does not document an order for oxycodone. On 03/06/2025 at 9:46 A.M. Medication cart was reviewed for east south hall with V6 (Registered Nurse). Upon doing a narcotic count there was an orange pill bottle with R15's information typed on the label found in the back of the narcotic box of the medication cart. The lid on the bottle was taped shut and the number 20 was written on the top along with the date of 01/16/2025. There was no narcotic sheet in the narcotic binder to count the narcotics on. On 03/06/2025 at 9:46 A.M. V6 stated the bottle of oxycodone in the narcotic box for R15 should have a count sheet and the nurses should be counting the pills every shift. V6 stated that she is not sure why there is no narcotic sheet to count the pills. V6 stated she thinks the medication should have been destroyed or sent home with the R15's family and not just left in the medication cart. On 03/06/2025 at 10:10 A.M. V6 stated her and V2 (Director of Nursing) destroyed the oxycodone. On 03/06/2025 at 10:26 A.M. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated it is her expectation for all narcotics to have a count sheet for all narcotics in the locked medication cart. V2 stated that all medications once they are discontinued should be discarded. V2 stated that it is her expectation for staff to not leave narcotics in the cart not accounted for. On 03/06/2025 at 4:07 P.M. V2 stated that R15 never had an order for the oxycodone. V2 stated that when R15 was admitted her family brought in home medications. V2 stated that the medication should have been sent home with the family as soon as the staff realized that there was not an order for it. Facility policy titled Narcotic Controlled Substances - Counting with a revision date of 11/26/2017. Section titled Purpose: 1. To count controlled substances with a partner to verify the accuracy of the log sheets.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored for 1 (R28) of 6 residents reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 66. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored for 1 (R28) of 6 residents reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 66. Findings include: R28's admission Record documented R28 with an initial admission date to the facility of 04/06/2021. Diagnoses listed include type 2 diabetes mellitus, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage, schizoaffective disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, epilepsy, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, chronic systolic heart failure, and essential hypertension. R28's Physician Order dated 01/04/2025 documented an order for Lorazepam (Ativan) oral concentrate 2 milligrams/milliliter. Give 1 milliliter by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety for 5 days. On 03/04/2025 at 10:15 A.M. observed medication room with V2 (Director of Nursing). There was no lock on the medication refrigerator. V2 stated they had to change the refrigerator out because it was not keeping the right temperature. Upon review of medication refrigerator there was a bottle of Lorazepam concentrate in it with R28's name on the label. V2 stated that V5 (Maintenance Director) will be in today to add a lock to it as it has Ativan in it, and it is not locked. On 03/04/2025 at 2:10 P.M. V2 stated that V5 put the lock on the fridge. V2 stated that the refrigerator in the medication room was changed out one day last week, and the lock was never put on the new one. On 03/05/25 at 09:25 AM the medication refrigerator in the medication room was observed to not have a lock on it. V2 stated that the medication refrigerator had to be changed out again last night. V2 stated that the lock should have been changed on the refrigerator. On 03/05/2025 at 9:30 A.M. V6 (Registered Nurse) stated she didn't know there was supposed to be a lock on it. V6 stated that there was not a lock on the refrigerator when she arrived at work on 03/05/2025. On 03/05/2025 at 10:00 A.M. V2 stated that it is her expectation that the medication refrigerator in the medication room be locked. Facility policy titled Medication Policy with a revision date of 07/02/2019, documented under Purpose: to ensure proper storage, labeling and expiration dates of medications, biological's, syringes, and needles. 12. Controlled Substance Storage: .12.2 After receiving controlled substances and adding to inventory, facility should ensure that Schedule II-V controlled substances are immediately placed into a secured storage area (i.e., a safe, self-locked cabinet, or locked room, in all cases in accordance with Applicable law) and double locked.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered for 1 of 17 (R9) residents reviewed for therapeutic diets in a sample of 66. The Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered for 1 of 17 (R9) residents reviewed for therapeutic diets in a sample of 66. The Findings Include: 1. R9's admission record documents an admission date of 10/28/2024. This same document includes the following diagnosis: unspecified severe dementia, depression, hypertension, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R9's current diet order on his diet card is listed as regular diet, nectar thickened liquids with notes to have small spoons with food to facilitate reduced bite size and rate of intake. Set up assist to cut up foods into bite size pieces. Plate guard used to help load utensils. R9's Medication Administrator Record for March 2025 documented R9 was to receive, Regular diet Regular texture, Nectar/Mildly thick consistency, small spoons with food to facilitate reduced bite size and rate of intake. Set up assist to cut up foods into bits size pieces. Plate guard used to help load utensils. R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/24/2025 Section K documents that R9 has a coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications. This same section documents that he is on a mechanically altered diet with a therapeutic diet ordered. R9's care plan has a focus area of having a nutritional problem or potential for a nutritional problem. The goal is that the resident will comply with recommended diet for weight reduction daily through review date of 5/29/2025. The intervention for this problem area as follows: explain and reinforce diet to the resident on the importance of maintaining the diet ordered. Encourage the resident to comply. Explain consequences of refusal and to provide and serve diet as ordered. On 3/4/2025 beginning at 12:35 P.M. continuous observation was made of R9 during lunch, during that time R9 was unable to scoop food onto spoon. R9 continued dropping food on table and hands. R9 put meatballs on spoon with is hand and used both hands to put food in his mouth. The meatballs were noted to by approximately 1 inch by 1 inch in size. Food was on the plate where the opening from the plate guard was and was noted to be spilling on the table. R9 quit eating food on plate and switched to eating apples in the cup. R9 attempted to eat a meat ball again by using both hands to put it in his mouth. At 12:47 P.M. R9 took a drink of his liquids in his cup with lids. When R9 was done eating food was all over his lap. The meal card on R9's tray documented that the lunch meal for 3/4/2025 was Swedish Meatballs, Mashed Potatoes, Capri Blend Vegetables, Baked Apples and Bread and Butter. R9's meatballs were cut in half. On 3/5/2025 the planned lunch meal was chicken cordon bleu casserole, buttered peas, dinner roll/margarine, and orange sherbet per R9's meal ticket. During the lunch meal on 3/5/2025 at 12:30 PM, R9 was served his tray with the chicken cordon blue ham pieces measuring approximately 3 inches by 3 inches and the chicken was not ground but approximately 2 inch by 2 inch pieces of chicken. On 03/05/2025 at 12:45 PM, while in the Dining Room watching over R9, V1 (Administrator) stated she is not sure why R9 must have food cut up in bite size pieces. When asked if she thought the ham on the plate looked like bite size, V1 smiled and wouldn't answer. On 03/05/2025 at 12:47 PM, V4 (Dietary Manager) stated the lunch meal on 3/5/2025 was cooked according to the recipe and it is served how it should have been. V4 stated the recipe did not call for the ham to be cut into a certain size piece. V4 had the recipe in hand and stated the chicken is supposed to be 1/2 inch diced and the ham is supposed to be chopped. V4 stated that the staff who delivered the lunch tray on 3/5/2025 should have cut anything smaller that did not appear to be bite sized. On 03/06/2025 at 1:40 P.M. V15 (Speech Language Pathologist) stated that R9 is an impulsive eater and was not taking appropriate size bites during meals. V15 stated that a bite size piece should be a half an inch square. V15 stated that she educated the staff that were present that day about cutting up bite size pieces but there was no in service form completed. V15 stated that dietary will receive a sheet with the information on it. V15 stated the sheet did not specifically say what size bite size is. V15 stated that the ham in the chicken cordon bleu casserole on 3/5/25 was larger than she would have cut it. The facility recipe for the Chicken Cordon Bleu Casserole includes the following ingredients: pasta egg noodles, cooked boneless skinless chicken breast, ham chopped, Swiss cheese slices, cream of chicken soup, milk, sour cream, margarine, breadcrumbs and parmesan cheese.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R45's admission profile sheet documents and admission date to the facility of 10/27/2023. This same document includes the fol...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R45's admission profile sheet documents and admission date to the facility of 10/27/2023. This same document includes the following diagnosis: unspecified dementia, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R45's March 2025 physician order sheet includes a treatment order for the right mid back: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply collagen and cover with bordered gauze daily and as needed. On 3/6/2025 at 10:23 AM, V12 (Infection Prevention Nurse) and V13 (Certified Nurse Assistant) completed wound care on R45 upper right shoulder. During observation, V12 donned gloves, moved the bedside table from the left side of the bed to the right side of the bed while touching an air mattress pump cord on the floor and putting her hands in her pockets. V12 then started cleaning R45's right shoulder with wound cleanser on a 4x4 gauze pad without changing her gloves or washing her hands. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (revised 11/28/2017) documents under Guidelines, 14. All facility personnel are required to routinely wash hands and use appropriate barrier prevention to prevent transmission of infections. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain aseptic technique while performing wound care for to 2 (R13 and R45) of 7 residents reviewed for wound care treatment in a sample of 66. Findings included: 1. R13 admission Record showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's admission Record documented diagnoses included: chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of the right extremity, venous insufficiency (chronic peripheral), cellulitis of right lower limb and other specified peripheral vascular disease. R13's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 1/3/2025 documented an order of right, lateral anterior leg: cut (brand name) alginate dressing to fit wound then apply silver sulfadiazine cream to wound then place (brand name) alginate dressing. Cover with gauze and wrap with kerlix and change daily. right, posterior leg: cut (brand name) dressing alginate to fit wound, apply silver sulfadiazine to wound and cover would with (brand name) alginate dressing and cover with gauze and wrap with kerlix, change daily. R13's 2/17/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) showed a score of 15, showing R13 was cognitively intact. On 3/6/2025 at 1:45 PM, V10 (Registered Nurse/RN) completed wound care treatment on R13's right lower leg. V10 observed removing old dressing from R13's right lower leg. V10 then laid R13's leg down on his bed comforter with no barrier. V10 then again raised R13's right leg up to clean the wound with normal saline and laid R13's right leg back down on his bed comforter with no barrier. V10 observed raising R13's right leg to apply silver sulfadiazine cream and again laid R13's leg down on his bed comforter a third time with no barrier during this wound care. On 3/6/2025 at 1:55 PM, V10 (RN) stated, she is not aware if R13 needed a barrier under his right leg during wound care treatment or if the facility Infection Control policy or procedure documented for one. On 03/06/2025 at 2:08 P.M. V16 (RN/Infection Prevention Nurse) stated that she would expect a barrier to be under a wound when the nurse was completing a treatment. V16 stated she would not expect a nurse to clean a wound and then place the extremity on the bed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. R62's admission profile sheet documents an admission date of 2/13/25. This document includes the following diagnosis: presence of other orthopedic joint implants. R165's admission profile sheet doc...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. R62's admission profile sheet documents an admission date of 2/13/25. This document includes the following diagnosis: presence of other orthopedic joint implants. R165's admission profile sheet documents an admission date of 2/28/2025. This document includes the following diagnosis: Parkinson's disease. On 3/4/25 at 9:20 AM, R62 and R165 were observed in their room as they are roommates. R62 and R165 were both alert to person, place, and time. At this time, R165 stated that this was her second wheelchair since she was admitted and it still won't go. R165 stated, The first one was worse, but this chair isn't any better. R165 went on to state that when she voiced her concerns about this one, she was told they will maybe have to order some new chairs. R165's chair was observed to be missing a right arm rest and the seat was worn with tears in the material all along the portion where R165's legs rest. R165 stated that she was in here after she suffered a stroke and is needing rehabilitation, but she cannot propel herself in this wheelchair and that is an issue for her as she needs to do things for herself. R62 stated that she has not had an arm rest on her chair since admit. It was observed that R62's right arm rest was missing, and a screw was sticking up where R62's would have to lay her arm. R62 stated that while she hasn't scratched her arm yet, she is worried that it will happen with that screw there. On 3/4/25 at 12:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) was notified by surveyor during the lunch meal regarding R62 and R165's wheelchair concerns. V1 stated at this time that she would have maintenance look into finding new arm rests and checking to see if they have a different wheelchair for R165 immediately. V1 stated that they will check on other residents' wheelchairs to ensure they are in good condition as well. 3. R27 's admission profile sheet documents an admission date of 11/16/2024. This document includes the following diagnosis: generalized anxiety disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Congestive Heart Failure. On 3/4/25 at 12:15 PM, R27's wheelchair was observed in the dining room to have a large chunk of the right arm rest missing. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident care areas and equipment clean and in a good state of repair for 20 (R1, R4, R7, R12, R16, R21, R22, R25, R26, R27, R31, R32, R37, R40, R50, R56, R58, R60, R62 and R165) of 20 residents reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 66. Findings Included: 1. On 3/4/2025 at 12:01 PM, V20 (Family) stated, the windowpane in the Northwest Shower Room on the closed unit has had a crack with a hole to the outside environment the runs along the bottom of the windowpane since November 2023 and the facility is aware. On 3/4/2025 at 12:03 PM observed the windowpane in the Northwest Shower Room to have a crack on the bottom of the windowpane that is all the way through to the outside environment. On 3/7/2025 at 12:09 PM, V5 (Maintenance Director) stated, he had been aware of the windowpane in the Northwest shower room needing to be replaced for a long time. V5 stated, he requested through the previous owners of the facility for the whole window to be replaced but no action had been taken by the facility. V5 stated, he had not notified the current owners about the window needing to be replaced. Facility Daily Census Sheet dated 3/4/25 documented that R1, R4, R7, R12, R16, R21, R22, R25, R26, R31, R32, R37, R40, R50, R56, R58, R60 reside on the Northwest Hall of the building where the Northwest Shower Room is located.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0712 (Tag F0712)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician visited and examined residents at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission or at least once ever...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician visited and examined residents at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission or at least once every 60 days thereafter for 64 (R57, R30, R39, R43, R56, R40, R266, R52, R54, R267, R6, R8, R38, R47, R35, R50, R4, R2, R51, R33, R10, R12, R62, R29, R19, R7, R59, R36, R3, R53, R18, R55, R27, R34, R16, R17, R165, R14, R28, R9, R46, R13, R61, R48, R31, R21, R22, R60, R268, R32, R49, R269, R23, R1, R58, R45, R24, R26, R270, R5, R41, R42, R15, and R25) reviewed for physician services in the sample of 66. Findings Include: A Medical Professionals list provided by the facility dated 3/7/25 documents 64 residents including R57, R30, R39, R43, R56, R40, R266, R52, R54, R267, R6, R8, R38, R47, R35, R50, R4, R2, R51, R33, R10, R12, R62, R29, R19, R7, R59, R36, R3, R53, R18, R55, R27, R34, R16, R17, R165, R14, R28, R9, R46, R13, R61, R48, R31, R21, R22, R60, R268, R32, R49, R269, R23, R1, R58, R45, R24, R26, R270, R5, R41, R42, R15, and R25 have V17 (Medical Director/Physician) listed as their medical doctor. On 03/07/2025 at 10:15 A.M. R34 stated he has never seen V17 in the facility. R34 stated he always gets seen by the nurse practitioner that is working with V17. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/10/25 documents that R34 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indication R34 is cognitively intact. On 03/07/2025 at 8:40 A.M. V1 (Administrator) stated that V17 only comes to the building once every three months to complete the quality assurance meeting. V1 stated that he does not see the residents. V1 stated that the Nurse Practitioner is the only one who comes into the building to see the residents. V1 stated she is not sure why V17 only comes to QAPI and not rounding on the residents. On 03/07/2025 at 9:40 A.M. V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) stated that V17 has not been to the facility to provide resident visits to any resident. V2 stated that the nurse practitioner was coming once a week to see the residents. V2 stated that she resigned a week or so ago and now there is a new nurse practitioner that is completing tele health visits for residents until the company can find a nurse practitioner to come to the facility. V2 stated that facility utilizes an app to message the nurse practitioner during the day. V2 stated that after hours there is an answering service that the facility has had no problems with. V2 stated she has never had an issue with after hours or the nurse practitioner. V2 stated she was unaware that there was a regulation that required the physician to see the resident. V2 stated she believes that V17 sees 64 of the residents in the facility. Facility undated Medical Director and Management Agreement documented Article 1 Appointment .1.2 manager understands that the function of the Facility is to provide professional medical director services to patients, and shall include, but not limited to those services set forth in Attachment A (Services). Manager is aware of the responsibilities and restrictions placed upon the operation and management of such a practice pursuant to Illinois law and regulation, and manager will be in compliance at all times with these acts and their respective regulations. Attachment A Coordinate and oversee medical care and treatment, including physician services and services of other professionals as they relate to resident care. Collaborate with Facility leadership on the supervision of compliance of attending physicians with requirements for: admission orders, timely reviews of residents' total program of care, including medications and treatments, written, signed and dated orders and progress notes at each visit.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled/available to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled/available to provide timely care to meet residents' needs. This failure has the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare & Medicaid (Form CMS-671) dated 3/4/25 documents there are currently 68 residents living in the facility. 1. R23's admission Record documented R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed are type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified asthma, supraventricular tachycardia, calculus of gallbladder, epilepsy, thyrotoxicosis, personality disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, hypokalemia, anxiety, depression, and anemia. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating R23 is cognitively intact. Section GG of R23's MDS documented that R23 required partial to moderate assistance for transfers and showering. R23's Care plan has a focus area of self-care deficit with a date of 12/30/2024. Interventions listed Provide assistance with ADL (activities of daily living) as needed. On 3/5/2025 at 10:35 AM, R23 stated, they do not have a nurse on her hall because they are considered the independent hall. R23 stated, it does take staff a long time to answer the call lights because they have to come from the closed unit. R23 stated, sometimes she will have to go find a nurse if a call light on her hall does not get answered soon. 2. R34's admission Record documented R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, anemia, aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension, and acute on chronic diastolic heart failure. R34's MDS dated [DATE], documented a BIMS of 15 indicating R34 is cognitively intact. Section GG of R34's MDS documented that R34 is dependent for showering, lower body dressing and putting on/off footwear. R34 requires substantial/maximal assistance for oral hygiene, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. Section GG documents that R34 is dependent for transfers and utilizes a mechanical lift. On 03/05/25 09:47 AM, R34 stated that there are times he has to wait over 30 minutes to get his call light answered. R34 stated that sometimes it all depends on who is working. R34 stated it is a big problem on night shift because they have less staff and usually only one nurse. R34 stated that staff that are working work really hard but can only do so much. 3. R43's admission Record documented R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed are chronic kidney disease, cerebral palsy, critical illness polyneuropathy, anemia, and depression. R43's MDS dated [DATE], documented a BIMS of 15 indicating R43 is cognitively intact. Section GG of R43's MDS documented that R 43 was partial/ moderate assistance for bathing and upper body dressing. Section GG documents that R43 is substantial/maximal assistance for lower body dressing and putting on/off footwear. R43's Care plan dated 01/09/2024 has a focus area resident is usually able to perform ADLs with max assist from staff. Interventions listed are max assist of two for transfers, max assist of two for toileting and max assist of two for turn and reposition in bed. On 03/05/2025 at 10:10 A.M. R43 stated that the staff take a long time to get to her call light. R43 stated that it is worse on night shift because they have less staff. R43 stated that there are times she waits from 30 minutes up to an hour for a call light to be answered. R43 stated the facility does not have enough certified nurse assistants to take care of them. 4. R44's admission Record documented that R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed are chronic kidney disease, acute myocardial infarction, chronic systolic(congestive) heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, depression, constipation, osteoarthritis, dementia, essential hypertension, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. R44s MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS of 15 indicating that R44 is cognitively intact. Section GG of the same MDS documented R44 is maximal assistance for showering and taking on and off footwear. R43 is partial/moderate assistance for toileting and dressing. On 3/7/25 at 12:30 PM, R44 stated that the facility staff do not answer the call lights timely throughout the day and night. R44 stated they never get there quick enough; it can take 30 minutes to an hour. On 03/06/2025 at 8:21 A.M. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that she is the one who completes the schedules for the nurses and certified nurse assistant. V2 stated she tries to have 5 to 6 certified nurse assistants (CNA) counting the unit aide. V2 stated that the staff break down for day shift is one certified nurse assistant and one unit aide for the locked dementia unit. V2 stated that there is a nurse on the unit from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday but on the weekends, they may only have a nurse for four hours during the day for the locked dementia unit. V2 stated that she tries to have 3 to 4 certified nurse assistants on the women's and men's hall. V2 stated that there are days on the schedule there are only three. V2 stated that the certified nurse assistants work 12 hours usually but there is one on day shift that works from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. V2 stated that on the days that the 8 hour shift certified nurse assistant works, no one comes in after she leaves at 3:30 P.M. V2 stated that on night shift she schedules four certified nurse assistants to work for the entire building. V2 stated that on the bottom of the schedule the line that says need is the shifts that need picked where they are short. V2 stated that herself or V12 (Registered Nurse) will cover any shift that is not covered. V2 stated that the facility utilizes an agency to help cover shifts that are not able to be covered by facility staff. V2 stated that she schedules 2 nurses for the women's and men's hall and has a nurse who covers the unit from 8 a.m. until 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday. V2 stated that after 4:30 P.M. the other nurses will pick up any care that needs to be given on the unit. V2 stated that if they cannot get another nurse to pick up the weekend shifts on the unit then the nurses who cover the other units cover that area too. V2 stated that on night shift she would like to have two full time nurses but right now they just have one who works most. V2 stated that they will have a nurse come in from 6 p.m. until 10 p.m. to help with medication pass. V2 stated that there are a few nights on the schedule that there are two nurses who work the full twelve-hour shifts. V2 stated they are trying to hire more nurses for night shift, so they always have two. V2 stated the facility is utilizing agency to help cover the cna shifts that are open. On 03/06/2025 at 9:53 P.M. V10 (Registered Nurse) stated that the facility struggles with staffing at times just like every long-term care facility that she has worked at. V10 stated that she assists with care on the unit. V10 stated that the nurses help the certified nurse assistants provide care to the residents. V10 stated that it is worse when they have call ins and can't get them covered. On 03/06/2025 at 1:22 P.M. V14 (CNA) stated they have enough staff today. V14 stated that having the number of staff they do today is not typically. V14 stated that they have had short staff issues for a while now. V14 stated there have been some staff quit and the facility hasn't been able to replace them. On 03/04/2025 at 9:30 A.M. during facility tour, the time clock was observed to have 5 sheets of white paper hanging by it. The top sheet of papers was dated 02/25/2025 and documented March Nurse Needs: sign below if you are able to help cover any of these shifts. There were 15 dates listed and no staff had signed next to them. The other papers hanging at the time clock were dated 02/25/2025 and documented March CNA Needs: Sign below if you are able to help cover any of these shifts. There were 13 shifts available for day shift and there were 60 shifts available for night shift. On the bottom of the February 2025 Day Shift CNA Schedule, there is a line with need and the following dates are listed: 02/15/2025, 02/20/2025, 02/24/2025. On the February 2025 Night Shift CNA Schedule, on the line documented as need the following dates are listed: 02/17/2025, 02/26/2025. The days that the schedule documents only two CNAs scheduled for night shift are: 02/17/2025, 02/18/2025, 02/20/2025, and 02/26/2025. The February 2025 Nurse schedule documented the following dates as having one nurse on the night shift: 02/01/2025, 02/02/2025, 02/06/2025, 02/21/2025. On 10 nights there was one nurse for 12 hours and a second nurse for the first 4 hours of the shift. The March 2025 Nurse schedule documented the following nights with one nurse on night shift: 03/01/2025, and 03/03/2025. The March 2025 CNA schedule documented the following dates as having two CNAs: 03/04/2024. Facility policy titled Personnel Policy updated on September 2024 documented under the section Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide adequate number of staff to successfully implement resident functions to meet resident needs.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely secure a resident during transport for 1 of 3 r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely secure a resident during transport for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining a 3 by 5 inches laceration to her left leg that became infected and required a wound vac. The findings included: R2's admission record documents an admission date to the facility of 9/08/2023 with diagnoses including morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, unspecified atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, bilateral legs, lymphedema, not elsewhere classified, other specified and diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly) neuropathy. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents in Section C, Cognitive Patterns, that R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R2 is cognitively intact. The same MDS section GG0170, Mobility documents the use of a motorized scooter and section I8000, Active diagnoses documents lymphedema, not elsewhere classified. R2's care plan documents a focus area of, The resident has limited physical mobility with a documented intervention of the resident uses a motorized wheelchair with supervision from staff. On 8/07/2024 at 11:33 AM, R2 was observed sitting in her recliner in her room reading a book. R2's left leg had an ace bandage wrap applied around her left lower leg with a wound vacuum in place. R2 had a scant amount of reddish colored drainage in the wound vacuum line. On 8/07/2024 at 11:35 AM, R2 stated that V12 (Social Service Director) had been transporting her in the facility van to her eye appointment. R2 stated V12 did not buckle her scooter in the van because they were not going very far from the facility. R2 stated she held on to the cup holders on both sides of her in the van during transport to and from the eye appointment. R2 stated on the way back to the facility from her eye appointment, V12 missed the street to turn on to go back to the facility and slammed on the brakes to make a turn into the local diner parking lot. R2 stated when V12 hit the van brakes, her scooter went forward, and she hit her left lower leg on a metal piece on the seat in front of her. R2 stated after hitting the seat with her leg, she looked down and she noticed she was bleeding and that there was a gash in her leg. R2 stated she requested V12 take her to the emergency room. R2 stated when they arrived at the emergency room, a nurse came outside, applied some gauze to her leg and took her in to be evaluated. R2 stated she is under the care of a wound physician at this time to help her leg heal. R2 stated that she had never asked staff to not buckle her in. On 8/08/2024 at 11:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she had not been aware that R2 was not secured in the facility van during her transport on 7/12/2024. V1 stated her previous Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing handled this investigation because she went on vacation. V1 stated V12 (Social Service Director) did tell her before that R2 did not want her scooter buckled in because it caused her scooter to be pushed backwards and she did not like it. V1 stated that V12, V13 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V14 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) are no longer employed at the facility. On 8/08/2024 at 2:00 PM, V13 (DON) stated V14 (ADON) is the person who interviewed R2 about this incident. V13 stated, she was made aware after the incident by V1 that R2's scooter was not secured in the van during transport. On 8/08/2024 at 2:10 PM, V14 (ADON) stated she was in V1's office when V12 called V1 to notify her of the incident with R2's leg. V14 stated, V12 did call V1 upon arrival to the local emergency room with R2. V14 stated, V12 notified V1 that she made a quick turn in the van which caused R2 to slide forward, hitting her leg on a metal piece on the passenger seat in front of her that caused a gash to R2's left lower leg. V14 stated, the facility had been using a van from a company that was not the normal van used for transporting residents, and when R2 and V12 returned to the facility after the emergency room visit, V1 and herself went out to the van to evaluate what caused the incident to happen. V14 stated, when they arrived at the van, R2 was observed sitting in her power chair in the back of the van, however, R2's power chair does not fit into the lock mechanisms for the wheels, like the wheelchairs would. V14 stated, R2's power chair did not have the emergency brake on either. V14 stated, she explained to V12 (Social Services Director) that she should have notified them prior to leaving the facility with R2 about her wheels not locking into place so they could have made other arrangements for transporting her. V14 stated, V12 said her and R2 were in a hurry to get to the appointment because they were running behind. R2's Statement provided with investigation documents from the facility dated 7/12/2024 documents When she turned my scooter wasn't locked in. I flew up against the seat. My leg was cut on the seat belt. My scooter just went with me. V12's statement provided with investigation documents from the facility dated 7/12/2024 documents in part, I passed (Name of Street) since I felt turn would be too sharp and tapped brakes in prep to turn into the parking lot of (local restaurant). As I tapped brakes (R2's) motorized scooter came forward to settle between the two seats. (R2) made a pained sound and I finished pulling to complete stop in parking lot. R2's local Hospital emergency room report dated 7/12/2024 documented left lateral mid leg with significant subcutaneous gash of 3 inches by 5 inches. Wound was irrigated and attempted wound closure not successful. Adaptive dressing, oral antibiotic (Cephalexin 500 milligrams orally 4 times a day) and outpatient follow up. R2's Order Summary Report dated 7/12/2024 documented referral to local wound clinic related to laceration on left lower leg below the knee. R2 ' s Progress Note dated 7/12/2024 at 2:55 PM documented to keep compression dressing on for a few days, watch for signs and symptoms of infection, Cephalexin 500 milligrams by mouth every day for seven days, elevate legs as much as possible. R2's orders from the local Wound Center Physician dated 7/17/2024 at 1:00 PM, documented wound cleanser to site one time a day and bacteria identified in unspecified specimen by anaerobe culture, left lower leg, done at wound center. R2's orders from the local Wound Center Physician dated 7/24/2024 at 2:00 PM, documented wound cleanser to site one time a day. R2's orders from the local Wound Center Physician 7/30/2024 at 12:45 PM documented, wound vac to wound continuously at 125 millimeter of mercury pressure. Change three times weekly and Cephalexin 500 milligram tablet, four times daily for 14 additional days. R2's Order Summary Report dated 7/12/2024 documented to elevate legs as much as possible every day and night shift for wound. The facility policy titled Van Usage Policy and Procedure (undated) documents under Procedure step 3 c. wear seat belts anytime the vehicle is in motion and require all passengers to wear seatbelts. d. Ensure all residents and wheelchairs are safely secured.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) by not providing showers for 3 (R33, R105, and R154) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in a sample of 30. Findings include: 1. R105's Order Summary Report documents an admission date of 12/13/23 and diagnoses including: Essential Hypertension, Presence of Coronary Angioplasty Implant and Graft, Presence of Artificial Knee Joint Bilateral, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Osteoarthritis, Presence of Heart-Valve Replacement, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, and Acute Myocardial Infarction. R105's Care Plan Screen - Admission/Baseline dated 12/14/23 documents: Cognitive Function: with the question listed of Is the resident cognitively impaired with No marked and Bathing - with Assistance marked. R105's Task List Report documents: Shower/Bathe self; Task Schedule: Monday and Thursday. On 12/18/23 at 10:45 AM R105 and R154 had messy and slightly greasy hair. On 12/20/23 at 12:15 PM, R105 had uncombed greasy hair. R105's GG ADL documentation sheet documents: R105 received a shower on 12/14 (Thursday) and 12/18 (Monday) with no other showers documented between. On 12/21/23 at 12:20 PM when R105 was shown her GG ADL Documentation sheet, R105 stated she did not get a shower on either of those days (12/14 or 12/18) that are documented on the GG ADL documentation sheet. On 12/21/23 at 1:15 PM V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated when showers are given it is documented in the electronic medical record and show up on the GG ADL documentation sheet and she does not know what the NA (not applicable) means, she might have hit it in error, but she did not give R105 a shower on that Monday (12/18). 2. R154's face sheet documents an admission date of 12/12/23 with diagnoses including: Non-Stemi Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Unsteadiness of Feet, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Other Reduced Mobility, and Muscle Weakness. R154's Care Plan with an initiation date of 12/19/23 documents R154 is usually able to perform ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) with max (maximum) hands on assist. Interventions document: Bathing/Showering: R154 is totally dependent on staff for bathing twice a week and as needed. R154's Task List Report documents: Shower/Bathe self; Task Schedule: Tuesday and Friday. R154's GG ADL documentation sheet documents: R154 received a shower on the 12th (Tuesday) with NA (not applicable) documented for the shower and refused a shower on the 19th (Tuesday) with no other showers documented between. On 12/21/23 at 1:20 PM V20 (medical records/CNA) stated documentation of the showers would be on the GG ADL documentation sheet. She stated she did not give a shower to R154 on 12/12 (Tuesday) because he did not arrive at the facility until 2:30 PM. On 12/21/23 at 1:15 PM V11 (CNA) stated R154 refused his shower on the 12/19 (Tuesday) because his bottom hurt too much, and she asked him twice. On 12/20/23 at 12:15 PM R154 had uncombed greasy hair and was unshaven. On 12/20/23 at 12:20 PM R105 stated that her and R154 haven't had a shower since they have been at the facility. R154 did not answer any questions when asked. On 12/20/23 at 12:15 PM V21 (family) stated he is not aware of R105 or R154 receiving a shower since they have been at the facility, and he has been with them almost every day. On 12/21/23 at 12:15 PM R105 stated they (R105 and R154) have not received a shower since they have been here until yesterday (12/20) not even a washcloth. 3. R33's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 02/26/23 with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Adult Pulmonary Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, Alzheimer's Disease with Early Onset, Unspecified Dementia - mild - with agitation, Delusional Disorders, Acute Coronary Thrombosis not resulting in Myocardial Infarction, Refractory Angina Pectoris, Altered Mental Status, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Disorientation. R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 3 indicating severely impaired, section GG Functional Abilities and Goals documents: OBRA/Interim Performance: tub/shower transfer (the ability to get in and out of a tub/shower) as a 4 - supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity, assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently) and Shower/bathe self: the ability to bathe self, including washing, rinsing and drying self (excluding washing of back and hair) does not include transferring in/out of tub/shower as a 03 indicating Partial/moderate assistance - helper does less than half the effort, helper lifts or holds, or supports trunk or limbs and provides less than half the effort. R33's Care Plan with a date initiated of 06/09/23 documents: R33 has an ADL self-care performance deficit with intervention documented of: Bathing/Showering- R33 requires minimal assist by one staff with bathing. On 12/18/2023, at 9:00 AM, observed R33's hair appeared greasy, not combed and generally unkempt. R33's Task List Report documents: Shower/Bathe self max assist from one staff member with Task Schedule documented as Monday and Thursday. The facility document titled, GG ADL Documentation documents R33's last shower was on 12/08 (Friday) with no shower documented on: 12/11, 12/14, and 12/18. The facility policy titled, Bath/Shower (review date 01/18) documents: Policy: To ensure adequate hygiene needs are met. A bath/shower is scheduled for all residents in the facility at least weekly.
Oct 2023 5 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for the treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for the treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus for 3 (R3, R19, R20) of 4 residents reviewed for labs in the sample of 21. This failure resulted in abnormal lab values not being immediately communicated with the physician and R3 experiencing altered mental status requiring transport to the Emergency Department where a blood glucose level of 819 was found. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 2/8/23 when abnormal Hemoglobin A1c results for R3 were reported to the facility and staff did not complete the facility procedure of notifying the physician of these values until 3/20/23. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/4/23 at 1:10 PM. The surveyors confirmed by observations, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 10/5/23 but noncompliance remains at Level Two due to additional time needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of in-service training. Findings Include: 1. Review of R3's admission Record documented his initial admission date to the facility as 9/16/21. R3's Primary Physician is listed as V13 (Physician) and Power of Attorney for care is V5 (Family Member). R3's Cumulative Diagnosis Log includes but is not limited to the following diagnoses: coronary artery disease; Dementia; Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3; Peripheral Neuropathy; Hypertension; Diabetes Mellitus II, with the date identified listed as 12/8/22. Facility policy titled, (company) Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status with an issue date of 7/1/12 documents, The facility and/or facility staff shall promptly notify appropriate individuals (i.e., Administrator, DON (Director of Nursing), Physician, Guardian, HCPOA (Health Care Power of Attorney, etc.) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The procedures stated, 1. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been: .m. Abnormal lab findings .3. Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status .5. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Facility policy titled, (company) Laboratory Tests with a reviewed date of 9/27/17 documents the facility policy as, Appropriate laboratory monitoring of disease processes and medications requires consideration of many factors including concomitant disease(s) and medications(s), wishes of the resident and family and current standards of practice. A pharmacy consultation report dated 1/27/23 stated, (Name) R3 has diabetes and does not receive medications, but an A1c (Glycated Hemoglobin) is not available in the medical record in the past 6 months. Fasting blood sugar on 11/16/22 was 213. Recommended was, Please monitor A1c on the next convenient lab day. V13 (Physician) is documented on this form as accepting these recommendations, and labs will be drawn on 2/8/23 as well as an additional order given for an A1c to be drawn in July 2023. R3's lab results documented a specimen collection date of 2/8/23, with a H (high) Hemoglobin A1c result of 9.9. The normal reference range of 4.8 % - 5.6 % is listed on this same document. The lab documented R3's estimated average glucose level to be 237, correlating with these A1c results. This lab document noted a handwritten comment of faxed 2-8-23. These labs are documented as being faxed to the facility from the local hospital on 2/8/23 at 12:42 PM as evidenced by the fax server time stamp. R3's Physician Progress note made by V13 (Physician), dated 2/8/23 documented he was seeing R3 for a routine evaluation. V13 documented R3's blood sugar levels as being controlled, running about 150. V13 documented the last A1c level was on 11/16/22 with a value of 7.3. V13 gave no new orders regarding this evaluation and does not note lab results from 2/8/23. The first documented communication with V13 regarding the 2/8/23 A1c level is on 3/20/23. Review of R3's 3/20/23 Physician Progress note made by V13 documented R3 was a diabetic with his A1c being a little high at 9.9. V13 documented R3 is post-covid, and he will look at R3 when he is well. The Disposition listed on this same note documented R3 ordered a chest x-ray and labs, which included an A1c and complete metabolic panel (CMP). R3's lab results documented a specimen collection date of 3/22/23, with a H A1c level of 10.3. The normal reference range of 4.8% - 5.6% is listed on this same document. The lab documented R3's estimated average glucose level to be 249, correlating with these A1c results. This lab document noted a handwritten comment of faxed (V19 (Registered Nurse) initials). Additional lab results with a collection date of 3/22/23, document an actual glucose level of 259. The normal range listed for this lab value is (70-100). The A1c lab is documented as being faxed to the facility from the local hospital on 3/22/23 at 11:08 AM as evidenced by the fax server time stamp. The glucose lab is documented as being faxed to the facility on 3/22/23 at 8:01 AM as evidenced by the fax server time stamp. No definitive documented communication can be confirmed that V13 was ever notified of these results. R3's Physician Progress note made by V13 on 4/3/23 documents, We looked at the laboratory . although specific labs review is not noted. No new orders were documented on this progress note. R3's Skilled Progress Note dated 3/22/23 made by V19, documented communication with V13 regarding an abnormal chest x-ray result, but no mention of labs. Nurse's Notes dated 5/15/23 at 6:00 PM documented, Resident (R3) very confused and not himself. Was reported that he was unable to feed self and dumped 2 glasses of water r/t (related to) unable to grasp items. Resident incontinent at this time. Resident unable to form sentences and speaking garbled words. Vitals obtained and blood sugar. Blood sugar reading HI >600. (Name) V13 notified and send to hospital order given. (relationship/name) V5 notified. Ambulance service called. Report called and given to ER (Emergency Room) dept. (department). Awaiting ambulance at this time. The next Nurse's Note is dated 5/15/23 at 6:50 PM, Ambulance service here along with (name/relationship) V5. Resident put on transport cart without difficulty. Both (all) departed at 7:05 PM. Will follow up with ER dept. R3's document titled, ED (Emergency Department) Events dated 5/15/23 documented the first provider evaluation was done by V23 (APRN-CNP/Advanced Practice Registered Nurse - Certified Nurse Practitioner) at 7:18 PM. Chief complaint is listed as altered mental status. V23 documented, R3 presented to the ED with EMS (Emergency Medical Services). EMS reported upon their arrival they found R3 appearing sedated and confused with some slurred speech. V23 also documented, Last known normal is unclear, as staff at the nursing home report he has been progressively more confused over the past couple of days. R3's initial labs listed in this same document note R3's Glucose level as 819 HH (extremely high). The reference range listed for the glucose level is 70 - 100 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). The Clinical Impressions as of 5/16/23 at 1:44 AM are listed as: Altered Mental Status, unspecified altered mental status type; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, without long-term current use of insulin; Dehydration. The Plan documents an insulin drip was initiated, and glycemic control was achieved. V23 noted review of R3's clinical chart documented an A1c level of greater than 7 for the past year, most recently 10.3 on 3/22/23, with no initiation of diabetic medications. R3 is documented as being admitted to hospital for continued glycemic monitoring and initiation of diabetic medications prior to discharge back to the nursing home. R3 is documented as now being conversant and oriented to person, place, time, and situation once glycemic control was achieved. R3's Medicine Discharge Summary documented an admit date to the local hospital for R3 as 5/15/23 and discharge date of 5/20/23. R3's admission and Discharge Diagnosis include the diagnosis of Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. The Hospital Course documents R3 was transported to the ED with a workup completed for a possible stroke, but no acute intercranial problems were discovered. R3's Glucose level was found to be 819, and includes the notation of, Looking back at the nursing home patient had hemoglobin A1c done 2 months ago was 10.3 which gives an average of 249. The patient was not started on medications. R3's A1c listed as being completed in the hospital on 5/16/23 at 5:17 AM document a A1c level of then 13.8. Discharge medications include the addition of subcutaneous use of insulin glargine and insulin lispro. R3's Progress Note dated 6/5/23 documented V13 (Physician) was examining R3 on this date due to a hospitalization when his blood sugar went to 800. The note goes on to say, Let me look at his sugars. We are going to go back and find out what his sugars are. We have a hemoglobin A1c too high. It is 10.3 and this was on 3/22 So, hemoglobin A1c is too high. Now, let's look at blood sugars. Now, we are going to the computer. I assume some electronic medical records. We are having trouble finding the sugars. They have totally thinned the charts getting ready for electronic medical record. They are not here. So, we are still searching. They are bound to be some place. The disposition listed in this note included new lab orders, one being an A1c. Lab results documented a specimen collection date of 6/14/23, with a H A1c level of 10.5. The normal reference range of 4.8% - 5.6% is listed on this same document. The lab documented R3's estimated average glucose level to be 255, correlating with these A1c results. This lab document noted a handwritten comment of faxed (V19 (Registered Nurse) initials). Additional lab results with a collection date of 3/22/23, document an actual glucose level of 130. The normal range listed for this lab value is (70-100). Review of R3's Clinical Record documented V13 was notified of the 6/14/23 lab results on 6/15/23, with medication order changes given. Lab results document a specimen collection date of 7/12/23, with a H A1c level of 7.9. The normal reference range of 4.8% - 5.6% is listed on this same document. The lab documented R3's estimated average glucose level to be 180, correlating with these A1c results. This lab document noted a handwritten comment of faxed. The A1c lab is documented as being faxed to the facility from the local hospital on 7/12/23 at 7:40 AM as evidenced by the fax server time stamp. The first documented communication with V13 regarding the 7/12/23 A1c level is on 8/7/23. V13 had no new orders at this time. On 10/3/23 at 9:54 AM, V13 stated he doesn't recall being notified of R3's 3/22/23 A1c level of 10.3 or glucose level of 259. V13 stated he cares for a lot of people though, so the facility should document their communication with him. V13 stated that those levels would have been results he would have had further orders for, at minimum, repeat orders. V13 was notified of his 4/3/23 progress note in which he stated he reviewed lab but does not specify which ones. V13 stated it can be suggested the 3/22/23 labs were not presented to him, given there were no new orders. V13 stated at any rate, he would expect to be notified of abnormal lab results immediately. V13 stated that uncontrolled blood sugar can lead to complications and even possible death, although he states it would have to be severe and may be a stretch. V13 confirms that a glucose level of 819 is critical and would require immediate intervention. V13 also stated he has no nurse practitioner who works with him and completes resident examinations himself. V13 stated that labs listed in the disposition section of his notes are orders he is giving. On 10/3/23 at 10:23 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated the process for labs is that all labs are faxed to the physician, and if they are abnormal a call is made to notify the physician of the level. V9 stated if the labs are normal, they are placed in the resident's record after being faxed for the physician review the next time they are in the facility. V9 stated that V13 is easy to get a hold of and a good communicator with the facility. V9 stated that R3 was not having his glucose monitored except for via labs prior to his May 2023 hospitalization. On 10/3/23 at 10:59 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that the local hospital is the only entity the facility utilized for lab testing. V2 stated the process for labs in the facility is that once labs are ordered the labs are obtained as indicated. V2 stated the hospital will fax the results of the labs to the facility. V2 stated that a nurse on duty should then fax the lab results to the physician and call the physician if the lab results are abnormal. V2 stated that the labs are always faxed to the physician so that the physician can keep a copy in their record too. V2 stated that routine labs with normal values would be placed in the resident's record for the physician to review during the next time they make rounds in the facility. V2 stated that abnormal lab values that are phoned to physician would have that communication documented in the progress notes. V2 stated that she believes it was just an error on the nurse's part that communication with the physician regarding R3's abnormal glucose/A1c labs was not documented. V2 stated that V13 is good about responding and communicating with the facility. V2 stated that glucose readings obtained by finger prick in the facility are documented on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). V2 stated that no concerns had been brought to her attention which may suggest R3 was experiencing hyperglycemia prior to his May ER visit and hospitalization. V2 confirms it is her expectation that the facility immediately contacts the physician regarding any abnormal labs or change in resident status and document such communication. V2 confirmed that lab samples obtained are obtained in a fasting nature, as they are sure to have them drawn before breakfast. On 10/3/23 at 11:35 AM, V19 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated when a physician orders labs, they are obtained, and the physician is called if the results come back abnormal. V19 stated if the results are normal, they are placed in the resident's chart for review the next time the physician is in. V19 stated that all lab results are faxed to the physician office once the facility receives them so the physician can have a copy in their records. V19 stated that generally a note should be made in the resident's progress notes that the physician has been notified of any abnormal labs and any new orders, but you know how life goes. V19 stated prior to R3's hospitalization she cannot say R3 was experiencing any signs of hyperglycemia specifically due to his intermittent confusion making it hard to tell. On 10/3/23 at 11:46 AM, V20 (RN) stated that she was the staff member who sent R3 to the hospital in May for altered mental status. V20 stated the something was just off and R3 wasn't himself. V20 stated that she was doing an evaluation trying to figure out if there was something she could note being wrong. V20 stated R3's vital signs were normal, but a finger prick glucose test was taken and just read high. V20 stated that she repeated the test, again receiving the reading of high. V20 stated she notified V13 who gave orders to send R3 to the hospital for evaluation. V20 stated that when the hospital faxes the facility lab results from specimen draws, the nurse on duty reviews the labs and faxes all the labs to the physician. V20 stated if something is an abnormal level, the physician is notified immediately by phone. V20 stated that staff are suppose to make a progress note, documenting the physician communication. On 10/3/23 at 12:47 PM, V21 (Health Information at out-of-town hospital) stated that she is one staff member who worked with V13's office. V21 stated in reviewing R3's records they received from the nursing home, she can see where an A1c level dated 2/8/23 was faxed to V13's office. V21 stated the only lab values V13's office received from the facility dated 3/22/23 was a Vitamin B12 level. On 10/3/23 at 11:59 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that a change in resident status or abnormal lab results should be communicated to the physician immediately with the communication documented in the progress notes of the resident record. V1 confirms that although requested, the facility is unable to provide communication with V13 immediately upon the receipt of R3's abnormal lab values from 2/8/23, 3/22/23, and 7/12/23. On 10/4/23 at 11:26 AM, V18 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated she worked with R3 the day he was sent to the ED. V18 stated she recalls R3 urinating a lot that day and just being out of it. V18 stated that nursing staff were aware and were monitoring him. V18 stated she had taken his Vital Signs a couple times, and they were fine. R3's Clinical Record via paper and Electronic Health Record documented no immediate communication with V13 regarding the abnormal lab results from the 2/8/23, 3/22/23, and 7/12/23 specimens. R3's Medication Administration Record via paper and Electronic Health Record documented R3 was not having his glucose monitored via fingerstick, nor receiving any medication therapy for diabetes from 2/1/23 until 5/20/23, when R3 returned from the hospital. R3's current Active Orders as of 9/28/23 documented R3 receives blood glucose monitoring four times a day. R3 is documented as receiving subcutaneous insulin glargine and insulin aspart medications for treatment of diabetes mellitus. R3's Care Plan documented a problem area of Diabetes with an initiation date of 12/8/22. Interventions include obtaining labs as ordered, and physician notification as needed. 2. R19's admission record documents an admission date of 12/10/21. This same document includes the following diagnosis Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R19 has labs dated 8/23/23 with abnormal values compared to the reference range. These labs include an elevated glucose. At the bottom of the page an unsigned note written in 'faxed' and dated 8/23/23. No further documentation is found in the chart regarding following up with the physician to ensure labs were received and if any new orders are to be carried out. 3. R20's admission record documents an admission date as 6/26/22. This same document includes the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes mellitus. R20's lab result dated 5/10/23 includes labs with abnormal ranges. These abnormal labs include an elevated glucose level. The lab results are dated 5/10/23 by V9 (LPN) as faxed to V13. On 10/5/23 at 11:30 AM, V9 stated that prior to 10/5/23 the policy was to just fax the lab results to the physician's office and no further documentation was done. The surveyor confirmed through interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy that began on 2/8/23 was removed on 10/5/23 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1) The Regional Director on 10/4/2023 in-serviced the Administrator, Director of Nurses (DON) and Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on the Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy and the Lab Policy and the importance of follow up on lab results and direct communication via telephone or during onsite provider visit until all licensed nurses are setup and trained on utilizing the secure communication app. 2) The Facility Director of Nursing, ADON and Administrator initiated in-servicing for all licensed nurses on 10/4/2023 on the Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy and the Lab Policy and directly communicating lab results on all residents as they are received. All nurses will be in-serviced by the nursing leadership prior to their next scheduled shift. 3) Facility QA team will complete a review audit of all labs received with regional clinical director on 10/5/2023. The Regional Director and Administrator verified with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) who was on site on Monday and Tuesday with the Nurse Practitioner that she has been notified of lab results and has communicated any changes to the (resident's) orders to staff. Her notes will also reflect any labs reviewed or new orders that were communicated with the staff. Nursing leadership will verify with the NP that all lab results have been promptly communicated with her. 4) R3's recent labs completed on 9/20/2023 have been reviewed and communicated to the physician. R3's labs were completely reviewed by physician at his previous visit on 8/7/2023 with no changes noted to be needed at that time and physician notes show that labs had been previously reviewed on his in-house visits to the facility. Two recent care plan meetings have been held with the family and resident (R3) regarding resident care needs with the most recent meeting having been completed on 10/2/2023. 5) Facility Administrator, DON, ADON and Regional Director initiated a facility wide lab audit on 10/4/2023 starting with requesting a list of all labs draws completed on 9/27/2023 from (local hospital) which was the last date labs were drawn at facility. 4 residents lab draws were completed, and the facility verified with NP who is on-site today that all current labs have been communicated directly and she's responded to those lab results. 6) Facility QA team is completing a lab audit going back to February 2023 to ensure that all lab results have been directly communicated to the physician and addressed and documented. Any further issues or abnormal labs noted in the lab and chart audit that facility staff cannot verify via documentation or physician notes will be relayed to the current provider to be addressed immediately and documentation completed. Lab audit of all 58 current in house residents is projected to be completed by 10/5/2023. 7) The following Quality Assurance programs have been implemented to ensure compliance: The facility DON, ADON or designee will complete a lab audit of all ordered and received labs for 4 weeks to ensure that all have been communicated with the physician and documentation is noted in resident chart. Regional Director or Regional Clinical Director will review the lab audit weekly with facility and make recommendations based on the outcome and review of the audit findings. The facility's QA team will review lab results daily at their Morning QA meeting as part of the review of the updated 24 hour report.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the proper authorities for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 21. The Findings Incl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the proper authorities for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 21. The Findings Include: On 9/27/23 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that she had allegations of R3 being tossed into bed and handled rough made to her last week by V4 (Family Member). V1 stated that she went and spoke with R3 and his roommate (R4) as he was also present during the interview with R3. V1 stated that R3 and his roommate are like brothers and speak for each other. V1 stated that what she thinks it is, is that R3 has had a decline and is awkward to handle, but still tried to help assist staff. V1 stated that at the end of her conversation, both R3 and R4 agreed staff weren't meaning to be rough. V1 stated she wrote a few notes regarding what R3 and R4 told her but did not start an investigation of abuse into the allegations. V1 confirmed at this time that she did not report this allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to the physician, family, police, or state agency and that there are no notes in the medical record regarding this event. Review of the facility's abuse policy with a revision date of 11/28/16 documents in part, VI. Internal investigation of allegations and response. 1. Once the administrator or designee receives an allegation of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property; the administrator will appoint a person to take charge of the investigation. The person in charge of the investigation will obtain a copy of any documentation relative to the incident and follow the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. 2. Following the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. The appointed investigator will follow the Resident Investigation Procedures, attached to this policy. The procedures contain specific investigation paths depending on the nature of the allegation, procedures for the investigation, interview parameters, and reporting requirements VII. External Reporting of Potential Abuse. 1. Initial reporting of allegations. The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, misappropriation of resident property, and reasonable suspicion of a crime, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State Law through established procedures. A written report shall be sent to the Department of Public Health. The written report should contain the following information, if known at the time of the report: Name, age, diagnosis, and mental status of the resident allegedly abused or neglected. Type of abuse. Date and time and location and circumstances of the alleged incident. Any obvious injuries or complaints of injury. The steps the facility has taken to protect the resident 4. Informing Law Enforcement Authorities. If there is clear evident of abuse by an employee, the Department of Public Health will notify the Health Care Worker Registry or the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of 21. The Findings Inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of 21. The Findings Include: On 9/27/23 at 10:30 AM, when the allegations of potential abuse of R3 being tossed into bed and handled rough were reported to V1 (Administrator) she stated that she had those same allegations made last week by V5 (Family Member). V1 stated that she went and spoke with R3 and his roommate R4, as he was also present during the interview with R3. V1 stated that R3 and his roommate are like brothers and speak for each other. V1 stated that what she thinks it is, is that R3 has had a decline and is awkward to handle, but still tried to help assist staff. V1 stated that at the end of her conversation, both R3 and R4 agreed staff weren't meaning to be rough. V1 stated she wrote a few notes regarding what R3 and R4 told her but did not start an investigation of abuse for the allegations. On 9/28/23 8:55 AM, V6 (Minimum Data Set/Care Plan Coordinator), stated that he cannot recall the exact date, but believes it was on 9/13/23 or 9/14/23, when V5 came to his office and stated that a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) had been rough transferring R3 from his chair to bed. V6 stated V5 was unable to give a time or name associated with the occurrence. V6 stated he told V5 he would report it to V1. V6 stated V1 is the abuse coordinator for the facility. The investigation notes provided by V1 (Administrator) dated 9/14/23 documents that at approximately 3:00 PM, V6 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) reported to her that V5 (Family Member) went to the office and told him that a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) had been rough transferring R3 from his chair to bed. V1 stated that she went to the room to speak with R3 and V5 was present at this time. This report documents that V1 asked R3 what happened because reports of roughness had been reported. R3 reported to V1 at this time that someone threw my legs in bed. R3 did not know when or who did this. R3 stated that it was not today. V1 went on at this time to talk about different scenarios or techniques of putting someone to bed. V5 said I think you are right no one was rough with him. R3 at this time has it documented that he agreed and stated, ' think you are right no one was rough. R4 stated that no one is rough with us and sometimes it is just harder for some. Review of the facility's abuse policy with a revision date of 11/28/16 documents in part, VI. Internal investigation of allegations and response. 1. Once the administrator or designee receives an allegation of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property; the administrator will appoint a person to take charge of the investigation. The person in charge of the investigation will obtain a copy of any documentation relative to the incident and follow the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. 2. Following the Resident Protection Investigation Procedures. The appointed investigator will follow the Resident Investigation Procedures, attached to this policy. The procedures contain specific investigation paths depending on the nature of the allegation, procedures for the investigation, interview parameters, and reporting requirements VII. External Reporting of Potential Abuse. 1. Initial reporting of allegations. The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, misappropriation of resident property, and reasonable suspicion of a crime, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State Law through established procedures. A written report shall be sent to the Department of Public Health. The written report should contain the following information, if known at the time of the report: Name, age, diagnosis, and mental status of the resident allegedly abused or neglected. Type of abuse. Date and time and location and circumstances of the alleged incident. Any obvious injuries or complaints of injury. The steps the facility has taken to protect the resident 4. Informing Law Enforcement Authorities. If there is clear evident of abuse by an employee, the Department of Public Health will notify the Health Care Worker Registry or the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Resident Protection Investigation Protocols. Step 1 is reviewing any written supporting documents relative to the occurrence .Step 4 Choosing Investigation Path. Step 5 Investigation Procedures. Regardless of the specific nature of the allegation (physical, sexual, verbal/exploitation/mental, theft, or neglect, the investigation shall consist of: a review of the initial written reports, completion of a written report on the status of the investigation of the occurrence, an interview with the person reporting the incident, interviews with any witnesses to the incident, an interview with the resident, where appropriate an interview with the resident's attending physician or psychiatrist, a review of medical records of any residents involved in the occurrence, if the accused individual is an employee review to the personnel file to check for references, an interview with staff members having contact with the resident and accused individual during the period of the alleged incident, where appropriate interview roommate and family members who were in the vicinity of the incident, interview other residents to which the accused individual has regular contact, interview other employees to determine if they have ever witnessed other incidents of mistreatment involving the accused individual, an interview with the accused individuals, and a review of all circumstances surrounding the incident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with wounds or residents at risk for wounds we...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with wounds or residents at risk for wounds were turned and repositioned every 2 hours for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for turning wounds in the sample of 21. The Findings Include: R1's admission record documents an admission date as 7/14/23. This same document includes the following diagnosis: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 4, intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, unspecified fracture of the shaft of the right tibia, complete traumatic amputation of left lower leg, displaced fracture of fourth cervical vertebra, anxiety disorder, acute kidney failure, weakness, other reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section C documents a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating R1 is cognitively intact. MDS dated [DATE] Section G documents R1 is totally dependent for bed mobility, transfer, dressing and toilet use. Section M of this MDS documents that R1 has one Stage 4 pressure ulcer that was present on admission. R1's Braden Scale dated 7/26/23 documents a score of 10 indicating that he is a high risk to pressure ulcers. R1's care plan documents a focus area of, Resident is totally dependent on staff for all aspects of care dated 7/28/23. The goal for this focus area is that the resident will maintain current level of function. Interventions listed for this problem area for AM and PM routine is resident is dependent on staff for all care aspects, able to make wants and needs known. Respect resident wishes if resident refuses care provide education and encouragement. If resident still refuses, report to nurse and document refusal. Under this focus area is an intervention for bed mobility is as follows: The resident is totally dependent on 2 staff for repositioning and turning in bed every two hours and as necessary. On 9/27/23 at 10:30 AM, R1 stated that the evening is when he does not get turned and repositioned as much as during the day. R1 stated that he will go to bed at night and wake up in the same position and not recall anyone ever coming in to offer to assist him in turning/repositioning. On September 27, 209/27/23 at 11:00 AM, V3 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that residents do not always get turned as they should on night shift especially, because there is not enough time/staff to get it all done. CNAs sign off at the end of your shift to make all the boxes green on the electronic medical record so you can go home as all tasks are marked off as complete. V3 states that she works all shifts day and/or night and nights have one nurse for the entire facility and then one CNAs to work the dementia unit and one sometimes two CNAs to work the 100/200 halls. On 9/28/23 at 11:45 AM, V8 (CNA) stated that R1 is only needed to be turned and repositioned every 2 hours as needed, not necessarily every 2 hours. V8 stated that R1 will refuse at times if he is comfortable and doesn't want to be bothered. V8 stated that at the end of the shift CNAs sign off in the electronic medical record that turning and repositioning was done if they had offered to do it not whether they had completed it. V8 stated that they do not sign off individually every 2 hours as they offer to turn/reposition, nor do they chart a resident refusal. On 10/3/23 at 10:23 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated at times there are not enough staff to turn and reposition people as indicated and needed. V9 stated residents who cannot provide positional changes themselves are turned at least every 2 hours. The Preventative Skin Care Policy with a revision date of 1/18 documents in part, 5. Any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown shall be turned and repositioned at a minimum of every two hours
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staffing levels were sufficient to meet resident needs. This ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staffing levels were sufficient to meet resident needs. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: On 9/27/23 at 10:20 AM, R1 who was alert to person place and time stated that there are mornings that he wakes up and hasn't been moved from the position that he went to bed in. R1 stated that they try their best. R1 stated that wounds do cause him pain and they have worsened from what his doctor has told him. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section G that R1 requires total dependence in bed mobility, transfer, dressing, and toileting use. R1's admission MDS dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating his is cognitively intact. On 9/27/23 at 11:00 AM, V3 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that not all residents get turned and positioned over night because there is at times only one CNA and one Nurse on both halls and then one CNA on the dementia wing. Residents do not always get their clothing change as they should either due to not having enough staff. On 9/27/23 at 2:00 PM, R3 who was alert to person, place and time was asked if staff tend to him timely and he stated, not always. R3 stated, Sometimes I sit in there, pointing to the bathroom and pull cord, they come 5 minutes, or they come 30 minutes. Review of R3's most recent MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section G that R3 requires extensive assistance from one-person physical assist for toilet use. On 9/27/23 at 2:00 PM, R4 stated he has witnessed R3 waiting for assistance for 30 minutes before, as evidence by watching the clock. R4 stated he has turned on his call light before to try and get help for R3 because he felt bad for him sitting in there. R4 stated sometimes they come right away, other times not. R4 is a roommate with R3. R4 is alert and oriented to person, place, and time. On 9/27/23 at 12:43 PM, V5 (Family Member) stated she has witnessed firsthand at times the facility was not able to meet the residents needs in a timely manner. V5 stated some days the facility will have staff tripping over each other and other days you can't find anyone to help. On 10/3/23 at 10:45 AM, V16 (CNA) stated that she only works day shift and comes in at 8:00 AM and can tell by the looks of the residents clothing and linens that they had not been changed or turned over the night shift. V16 stated that R1 has complained to her before that he has went all evening without being turned. On 10/13/23 at 11:40 AM, V18 (CNA) stated that they do their best to serve all the residents in a timely banner, but there are not enough staff that assist with answering call lights and resident care to get all the resident needs met. V18 went on to state that there are several residents who require a two person assist and when staff are either on break or assisting other resident needs it causes issues tending to all the residents in a timely manner. On 10/3/23 at 10:23 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated at times there are not enough staff to turn and reposition people as indicated and needed. V9 stated residents who cannot provide positional changes themselves are turned at least every 2 hours. V9 stated at times call lights are also not answered in a timely manner due to there not being enough staff to tend to everything going on. V9 stated that she has had specific complaints from residents, including R1 regarding call light timeliness. A list provided by V22 (Regional Director of Operations) on 10/4/23 indicates these following residents require the assist of 2 persons for transfers: R1, R7-R11, and R13-R18). V22 stated on this date at 1:30 PM, that R14 is not technically a two assist, however depending on her mood if she wants to help herself out can cause 2 staff to transfer her due to her weight. V22 went on to state that R17 at times is a two person assist due to behaviors that can occur. A policy titled Preventative Skin Care with a revision date of 1/18 documents in part, Any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown shall be turned and repositioned at a minimum of every two hours. A list provided by the facility dated 9/27/23 documents that 59 residents reside in the facility.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain Covid 19 when they fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain Covid 19 when they failed to ensure 1. staff donned/doffed personal protective equipment (PPE) per current standards of practice, 2. staff hand sanitized per current standards of practice when cleaning Covid 19 isolation rooms, 3. staff used designated cleaning equipment for Covid-19 isolation rooms. This failure resulted in 31 residents testing positive for Covid 19 and has the potential to affect all 57 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Daily Roster provided to this surveyor on 3/15/23 documents 57 residents currently reside at the facility. The facility Resident Covid Testing form dated 3/13/23 documents 31 residents tested positive for Covid 19 from 3/6/23 to 3/13/23. This same form includes a negative Covid 19 test result for R11 and the following positive Covid 19 test results, 3/6/23- R1, R2, R12, and R13, 3/7/23- R3, 3/8/23- R14, and 3/9/23- R15. R1's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypothyroidism, and cyst of bronchus and lung. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 09, which indicates R1 has a moderate cognitive deficit. R2's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, iron deficiency, hypertension, and osteoporosis. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 00, which indicates R2 has a severe cognitive deficit. R3's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hepatic failure and encephalopathy. R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15, which indicates R3 is cognitively intact. R4's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypokalemia, and hypertension. R4's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 00, which indicates R4 has a severe cognitive deficit. R12's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, cerebral infarct, and chronic kidney disease. R12's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 00, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. R13's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and bradycardia. R13's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14, which indicates R13 is cognitively intact. R14's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, dysphagia, and Parkinson's disease. R14's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15, which indicates R14 is cognitively intact. R15's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R15's Physician's Orders sheet dated 3/1/23 to 3/31/23 includes diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes, heart disease, dementia, and obesity. R15's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. On 3/15/23 at 12:46 PM, V4 (Infection Preventionist/IP) stated the facility was currently in a Covid-19 outbreak. V4 stated she was one of the first staff to test positive and was off work last week. V4 stated a lot of staff tested positive around 3/5/23 so they did facility wide testing on 3/6, 3/8, and 3/10/23 and staff and residents tested positive on those days. V4 stated they tested on [DATE] with no positive results. V4 stated the current PPE guidelines for the facility are to wear an N95 and eye protection throughout the facility and to also wear a gown and gloves when in Covid 19 positive rooms or on the Covid 19 positive unit. V4 stated they have two halls that are dedicated to Covid-19 residents and two halls dedicated to Covid-19 negative residents. V4 stated there are four isolation rooms on the Covid 19 negative halls that have Covid 19 positive residents in them. V4 stated all the Covid 19 positive residents are doing well and none of them have had to be hospitalized . 1. On 3/15/23 at 11:55 AM, V7 (Activities Director) was observed walking down the hall on the Covid-19 negative unit. V7 was wearing an N95 grade mask with no eye protection observed. On 3/15/23 at 12:40 PM, V7 was observed standing in the hallway outside the kitchen door in an area where residents do not reside. V7 was wearing an N95 with no eye protection. V7 stated he always wears an N95 and eye protection when in the facility, as he is saying this, V7 reaches behind him and gets a face shield off the counter and dons it. When asked why he didn't have eye protection on when observed on the Covid-19 negative unit at 11:55 AM, V7 stated he probably just forgot to put it on. On 3/15/23 at 12:24 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed entering R1 and R2's room. There was a sign observed on the door of this room that documents R1 and R2 are on Special Droplet Precautions. Prior to entering the room V6 was wearing a N95 grade mask and a face shield. V6 dons a gown and gloves then enters the room, carrying a meal tray. V6 sets the meal tray on the bedside table in front of R2 and sets the tray up. V6 then walks into the hallway without doffing the PPE and/or using hand sanitizer, and gets another meal tray off the meal cart, enters the room, and sets up the meal tray on the bedside table for R1. V6 doffs the gown and gloves prior to exiting the room and uses hand sanitizer. V6 did not doff the N95 or the face shield and did not disinfect the face shield. On 3/15/23 at 12:28 PM, V6 stated she always wears an N95 and eye protection when in the facility. V6 stated when she goes into a Covid-19 positive room she wears a gown and gloves. V6 stated she wears the same eye protection from Covid 19 positive rooms to Covid 19 negative rooms and changes her N95 daily or if it gets soiled. On 3/15/23 at 1:10 PM, V6 (CNA) was observed wearing a N95 and eye protection. V6 donned a gown and gloves and entered R1 and R2's room. V6 placed the used meal trays in a trash bag and exited R1 and R2's room with only a face shield on. After exiting the room, V6 hand sanitized and placed a new N95 on. When asked why she changed her N95 this time and not the last time she exited R1 and R2's room, V6 stated, because they have N95's in the drawers (indicating the PPE storage container located outside the room) now. When asked if she was wearing the same eye protection, V6 stated she was. On 3/15/23 at 2:04 PM, V10 (Housekeeper) stated she is given one N95 and one face shield each day and she wears it in Covid positive and Covid negative rooms on the Covid negative halls. On 3/15/23 at 3:23 PM, V7 (Activities Director) was observed on the Covid positive unit doing an activity with the residents. V7 had on gloves, gown, N95, and a face shield. The face shield was pulled up on his head so that his eyes were not covered by it. On 3/16/23 at 9:53 AM, V2 (Registered Nurse) was observed sitting at the nurse's station on the Covid 19 negative unit with her N95 pulled down under her chin exposing her nose and mouth. R11 (Covid 19 negative resident) was standing at the nurse's station within 3 feet of V2 at this time. On 3/16/23 at 1:21 PM, V4 stated she would expect staff to wear a N95 with a surgical mask over it when entering a Covid 19 positive room and remove the surgical mask when exiting. V4 stated eye protection should be disinfected when exiting a Covid 19 room. V4 stated if a resident is at the nurse's station the nurses should keep the N95 pulled up so that it covers their mouth and nose. On 3/16/23 at 2:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she would expect staff to hand sanitize between each glove change, to change the N95, and disinfect/sanitize the eye protection upon exiting an isolation room, to wear the N95 at the nurse's station if a resident is nearby, and to wear PPE according to the polices/procedures and current standards of practice. 2. On 3/16/23 at 10:15 AM, V11 (Housekeeping Supervisor) was observed cleaning R14 and R15's room. The sign on the door indicated R14 and R15 were on special droplet isolation precautions. V11 was observed changing her gloves four times while cleaning this room without hand sanitizing between each glove change. On 3/16/23 at 11:04 AM, V11 stated she didn't use hand sanitizer between glove changes, and she should have. V11 stated it is still a learning process for her since she has only been in the position since 9/2022. On 3/16/23 at 1:21 PM, V4 stated she would expect staff to hand sanitize between glove changes. On 3/16/23 at 2:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she would expect staff to hand sanitize between each glove change. 3. On 3/16/23 at 10:10 AM, V12 (Housekeeper) was observed exiting R12 and R13's room. There was a sign on the door that indicated R12 and R13 were on special droplet isolation precautions. V12 took the same broom and dustpan across the hall and used it in a Covid negative room. On 3/16/23 at 10:40 AM, V12 stated she cleaned R12 and R13's room and after cleaning it took the broom and dustpan across the hall into a Covid 19 negative room. V12 stated she had never been told anything about using the broom and dustpan from an isolation room to a non-isolation room. On 3/16/23 at 1:21 PM, V4 stated she wasn't sure what the policy was on the taking the broom and dustpan from a Covid positive room to a Covid negative room and would have to check on that. The facility Covid 19 Control Measures policy dated 11/7/22 documents under Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette/Hand Hygiene/PPE .5. In the event of a facility outbreak, all HCP (healthcare personnel) must wear an N95 and eye protection when caring for all residents and/or are in an area where they may encounter residents, until initial testing indicates that no further cases are present. If an additional resident or HCP has a positive test during initial outbreak testing, HCP must continue to wear an N95 and eye protection until 14 days have passed with no further positive cases. Under Contact Precautions-Post signage on door, the policy documents, 2. Wear gloves when there is a potential for contact with respiratory secretions or contaminated surfaces (High touch areas). 3. Wear a gown if clothing could potentially come into contact with respiratory secretions or possible contaminated surfaces. 4. Change gloves and gowns after contact with a resident and perform hand hygiene. 5. Perform hand hygiene before and after touching the resident, resident's environment and/or resident's respiratory secretions even if gloves are worn. 6. Remove PPE when leaving a residents room. Under Droplet Precautions, the policy documents, .Wear a N95, gloves, gown, eye protection when entering room or when working within 6 feet of residents on droplet precautions .6. Remove PPE when leaving residents room and perform hand hygiene.
Mar 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the administrator for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the administrator for 1 of 1 (R5) resident reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. Findings Include: R5's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, reduced mobility, and muscle weakness. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/16/23 documents R5 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 08, which indicates R5 has a moderate cognitive impairment. This surveyor attempted to interview R5 and R5 was not able to be interviewed. R5's Nurses Notes dated 2/14/23 document, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assisting res (resident) into bed/under covers. This nurse heard res stating that CNA was mean and that she had called res a 'baby' and that res 'didn't really hurt that bad so she could quit whining and shut up.' Explained to res that CNA would never say that to her and that we like having help from her. Res then state, 'Oh, well then that's ok if you like her.' Assisted Res to bed without further incident. On 03/02/23 at 2:48 PM, V1(Administrator) stated she was not aware of the incident that occurred on 2/14/23 and there was no abuse investigation that was done. On 03/02/23 at 3:14 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she spoke with V13 (RN/Registered Nurse) and V13 stated she was working on 2/14/23 with V12 (CNA). V1 stated V13 said she was following R5 and V12 into the room and R5 hadn't sat down on the bed yet when she got into the room. V1 stated, V13 said she knew V12 didn't say that to R5. When asked if she would still expect the staff to notify her of the allegation V1 stated, If they didn't feel like it was abuse, no. V1 stated she had not had any allegations of abuse against V12 and that R5 had not made allegations. On 03/03/23 at 10:58 AM, V12 (CNA) stated she took R5 to the bathroom and then back to her room to help her get back into bed. V12 stated as she was covering R5 up, R5 stated, 'You don't have to call me a baby.' V12 stated she said to R5 that she didn't call her a baby. V12 stated the nurse (V13) who was in there spoke with R5 and explained she was the CNA who took care of her all the time and R5 calmed down. V12 stated she had no idea why R5 would have said that. V12 stated R5 had made allegations in the past. V12 stated R5 always just says they call her a baby because she moans in pain. When asked if she had ever heard anyone call R5 a baby, V12 stated, Not really. When asked to clarify, V12 stated R5's peers have made comments to her because she doesn't see well and may accidentally run into them. V12 stated she had never heard staff call R5 a baby and didn't have any concerns R5 was being abused. On 03/03/23 at 11:13 AM, V13 (RN) stated she was in the room working with R5's roommate. V13 stated V12 was assisting R5 into bed and R5 started saying V12 was talking mean and calling her a baby. V13 stated she reassured R5 and told her V12 wouldn't hurt her and that they like V12. V13 stated R5 said if they like (V12) then it was ok. When asked if there was any conversation with R5 about who called her a baby, V13 stated, No, I didn't think to question her and ask her about that because after I told her we liked V12, R5 calmed down. V13 stated R5 had never made the allegation in the past. V13 stated she wasn't aware of any previous allegations against V12. When asked if she reported the allegation, V13 stated she probably just put it in the nurse's notes. V13 stated she was trained on abuse and neglect. The facility Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This includes but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse of our residents .This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including; but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability Under Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations the policy documents, Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to a supervisor and the administrator.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided for 1 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 22. This failure resulted in R5 who has had a significant weight loss of 5.38% in one month, not receiving nutritional supplements as recommended by the dietitian and ordered by the physician. Findings Include: R5's undated Profile Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, reduced mobility, and muscle weakness. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/16/23 documents R5 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 08, which indicates R5 has a moderate cognitive impairment. This surveyor attempted to interview R5 and R5 was not able to be interviewed. R5's Physician's Orders sheet dated 3/1/23 to 3/31/23 documents the following physician order, Mechanical soft diet, thin liquids, milk served at meals is to be whole, fortified pudding at lunch and supper .(supplemental ice cream) TID (three times daily), needs to have 6 cookies at bedtime. R5's undated Report of Monthly Weights and Vitals documents the following weights, 2/22- 92 pounds (lbs), 3/22- 91 lbs., 4/22- 89 lbs., 4/22- 89 lbs., 5/22- 90 lbs., 6/22- 89 lbs., 7/22- 90 lbs., 8/22- 93 lbs., 10/22- 93 lbs., 11/22- 88 lbs., 12/22- 88 lbs., 1/23- 87 lbs., 2/23- 84 lbs. R5's Dietary Notes dated 11/22/22 documents Quarterly complete. Ht. (height) 63 (inches), Wt. (weight) 88# (pounds) down 5.38% in one month. Current diet is mech (mechanical) soft, thin liquids, (fortified cereal) at breakfast, (fortified ice cream) with meals. May have special meals. 6 cookies at HS (bedtime). Blue (nonslip) mat under plate during meals for aid in eating. 150 cc (cubic centimeters) (brand name supplemental shake) TID (three times daily). May use (brand name of supplemental shake) until (brand name of supplemental shake) is back in stock. Res (resident) requires tray set up assist at meals. Feeds self. Has dentures. Intakes are R (refused) -25% at most meals .Will refer to RD (registered dietitian) due to wt loss. R5's Dietary Notes dated 11/29/22 documents, RD wt review. Ht. 63 Wts. 11/8 88#, BMI (Body Mass Index) 15.6. Currently resident reviewed R/T (related to) significant wt loss x (times) 1 mo (month) 5.38%. Wts cont (continue) to fluctuate below desirable and below 100 #(pound) range. Resident remains on mech (mechanical) soft diet with (fortified cereal) @ (at) bfast (breakfast), (fortified ice cream) TID (three times daily), and 150 ml (milliliters) (brand name supplemental shake) TID for added calories. Noted (brand name supplemental shake) are substitute until (brand name supplemental shake) avail (available). Intakes @ meals noted to fluctuate .Remains on mirtazapine to support intakes. Currently also consider changing milk served to whole and adding fortified pudding daily @ L/S (lunch/supper) for additional calories. Refer to RD as needed. R5's Dietary Note dated 1/22/23 documents, Res was re-admitted on [DATE] from (name of local hospital). Current diet is mech soft, with thin liquids, (fortified cereal) at breakfast, fortified pudding at lunch and supper, (fortified ice cream) TID and whole milk to replace menu milk, may have special meals may have 6 cookies at HS, blue (nonslip) mat at meals to aid in eating. Will refer to RD. On 3/2/23 at 12:15 PM, R5 was observed being served the noon meal. R5 was served taco salad, rice, beans, a (fortified ice cream), and ice cream. R5 fed herself independently. This surveyor did not observe fortified pudding. On 3/3/23 at 12:39 PM, R5 was observed in the dining room eating the noon meal. R5 was served a mechanical soft diet of fish and chips, coleslaw, pears, a chocolate square, a (fortified ice cream), and drinks. There was no fortified pudding observed with R5's meal. On this same day and time, V11 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R5 was not served pudding. R5's meal card was observed lying next to R5's tray. R5's meal card documented R5 was to be served a (fortified ice cream) and whole milk with each meal. The meal card did not document R5 was to be served pudding. On 03/03/23 at 1:10 PM, V16 (Dietary Manager) stated the fortified pudding did not get carried over to the new meal card. V16 stated she changed the cards in February 2023 and R5 had not been served fortified pudding since she (V16) changed R5's meal card. V16 did not remember the exact date she changed the card. V16 confirmed R5 should have been receiving fortified pudding. On 03/03/23 at 2:04 PM, V14 (Registered Dietitian) stated in January of 2023 she did a significant weight change on R5. V14 stated R5's diet order said R5 should have been getting fortified pudding at lunch and supper. When asked if R5 not getting the fortified pudding would have had an impact on R5's weight, V14 stated she wasn't comfortable answering the question when she didn't have all of the information in front of her. V14 stated she would expect the facility staff to implement the interventions as recommended by the dietitian and as ordered by the physician. On 03/03/23 at 1:21 PM, V15 (Physician) stated he didn't think not getting the pudding would make a difference in R5's weight loss. V15 stated, should she get it of course, should they have given it to her, yes, but I don't think we can say it would have made a difference. The facility Nutrition Supplements and Nourishment policy dated 10/13 documents, It is the policy of (name of organization) to provide additional calories and/or protein to residents who cannot and/or are not capable of consuming adequate nutrients through their regular meals. It is also the policy of (name of organization) to provide guidelines for the selection, ordering, use, and monitoring of nutrition supplements and nourishments. Procedure: 1. The need for a nutrition supplement and/or nourishment should be determined by the physician, nursing staff, dietitian, and/or Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) 5. Nutrition supplements and/or nourishments must be ordered by the physician and are part of the resident's diet order. Nutrition supplements are medical nutrition products and are to be served only with a physician order.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s), $116,199 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 26 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $116,199 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (3/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 3/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Axiom Gardens Of Flora's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Axiom Gardens of Flora an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Axiom Gardens Of Flora Staffed?

CMS rates Axiom Gardens of Flora's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 69%, which is 23 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Axiom Gardens Of Flora?

State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at Axiom Gardens of Flora during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, and 22 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Axiom Gardens Of Flora?

Axiom Gardens of Flora is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AXIOM HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 97 certified beds and approximately 69 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in FLORA, Illinois.

How Does Axiom Gardens Of Flora Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, Axiom Gardens of Flora's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (69%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Axiom Gardens Of Flora?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Axiom Gardens Of Flora Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Axiom Gardens of Flora has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Axiom Gardens Of Flora Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Axiom Gardens of Flora is high. At 69%, the facility is 23 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 62%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Axiom Gardens Of Flora Ever Fined?

Axiom Gardens of Flora has been fined $116,199 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.4x the Illinois average of $34,241. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Axiom Gardens Of Flora on Any Federal Watch List?

Axiom Gardens of Flora is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.