SEMINARY MANOR

2345 NORTH SEMINARY STREET, GALESBURG, IL 61401 (309) 344-1300
Non profit - Corporation 121 Beds UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC. Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
48/100
#284 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Seminary Manor has a Trust Grade of D, indicating that it is below average and has some significant concerns. It ranks #284 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, but it is #3 out of 6 in Knox County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 5 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is better than the state average of 46%. However, the facility has concerning RN coverage, falling below 84% of Illinois facilities, indicating that residents may not receive adequate nursing oversight. Specific incidents of concern include a resident developing a severe pressure ulcer shortly after admission due to the facility's failure to implement proper care protocols and another resident being without oxygen for extended periods, leading to respiratory distress. Additionally, one resident's untreated urinary tract infection resulted in a serious hospitalization for sepsis. While the staffing turnover is lower than average, the presence of serious health risks raises significant concerns about the overall care quality at Seminary Manor.

Trust Score
D
48/100
In Illinois
#284/665
Top 42%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
5 → 9 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$11,180 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 5 issues
2025: 9 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Illinois average (2.5)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $11,180

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0569 (Tag F0569)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: (1) return resident trust fund balances for 46 residents (R1, R5-R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: (1) return resident trust fund balances for 46 residents (R1, R5-R49) reviewed for trust fund balances after being discharged /expired 30 days; and, (2) provide notification or trust fund balances reaching $200 less than the SSI/Supplemental Security Income resource limit for three residents (R2, R3, and R4), of 111 residents, reviewed for trust fund account balances, in a total sample of 111 residents. FINDINGS INCLUDE: 1) The facility admission Contract document: V. Deposits and Refunds: The Facility hereby acknowledges receipt of the deposit, if any, noted at the beginning of the contract. Any refund owed to the Resident for advance payments shall be paid by the Facility within forty-five (45) days after discharge or transfer or within the time frame required by State law. In the case of Medicaid residents, any such refund will be paid within thirty (30) days of the Facility's receipt of the final Medicaid payment for care of the Resident or as directed by the Department of Public Aid. The facility policy, entitled Resident Trust Fund Account, document: 10. All facilities should dispose of any remaining resident's funds in accordance with State, Medicaid and Federal specific regulations within 30 days of discharge or expiration; and Uncashed Checks: Payees will be contacted regarding checks issued to close a resident trust account that have not be cashed within 2 months of being issued. Checks will be voided and reissued as necessary. If unable to contact payees within 6 months of issuing a check that has not yet been cashed, the check will be voided and turned over to the State Unclaimed Property Division.On [DATE], at 9:00 a.m., V8/Complainant-R1's daughter confirmed money in R1 Resident Trust Fund has not been returned, within 30 days of R1's discharge on [DATE].R1's Electronic Medical Record/EMR document, R1 was admitted , to the facility, on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE].R1's admission Contract was signed, by R1, on [DATE].R1's Resident Trust Fund Current Balance Report, as of [DATE], indicates a balance of $69.00. There is no evidence in R1's record that indicates R1's remaining balance was refunded.In addition, the EMR's for R5-R49, document the following dates of discharge [or expiration/death] and the Current Balance Report dated [DATE], document the balances remaining in their trust fund account: R5-[DATE] $61.87; R6-[DATE] $52.00; R7-[DATE] $39.60; R8-[DATE] $98.01; R9-[DATE] $105.00; R10-[DATE] $37.00; R11-[DATE] $708.30; R12-[DATE] $78.00; R13-[DATE] $26.00; R14-[DATE] $10.00; R15-[DATE] $35.00; R16-[DATE] $9.00; R17-[DATE] $30.00; R18-[DATE] $10.00; R19-[DATE] $100.00; R20-[DATE] $169.00; R21-[DATE] $66.00; R22-[DATE] $36.00; R23-[DATE] $6.00; R24-[DATE] $6.00; R25-[DATE] $8.00; R26-[DATE] $120.08; R27-[DATE] $54.02; R28-[DATE] $26.00; R29-[DATE] $0.87; R30-[DATE] $40.00; R31-[DATE] $103.46; R32-[DATE] $3.00; R33-[DATE] $0.25; R34-[DATE] $47.00; R35-[DATE] $153.27; R36-[DATE] $37.00; R37-[DATE] $29.00; R38-[DATE] $1,797.00; R39-[DATE] 288.00; R40-[DATE] $150.01; R41-[DATE] $2.00; R42-[DATE] $100.00; R43-[DATE] $10.00; R44-[DATE] $48.00; R45-[DATE] $12.00; R46-[DATE] $40.00; R47-[DATE] $39.00; R48-[DATE] $46.00; and R49-[DATE] $9.97 On [DATE], at 12:00 p.m., V1 confirmed refunds are needed to be made for the residents discharged /expired. On [DATE], at 9:00 a.m., V1/Administrator confirmed V1 and V5/Corporate Accounts Receiving verified the Current Balance Report, dated [DATE], which documents resident trust fund balances. 2)) The facility policy, entitled Resident Trust Fund Account, document: 9. Notification of Responsible Party for SSI Resource Limit / Personal allowance. When a Medicaid Resident's RTF [Resident Trust Fund] account reaches $200.00 less than the SSI resource limit, the RTF Custodian will notify the Resident, Legal Representative, and Social Services. The Social Security Administration website, document the individual resource limit is $2000.00 The facility document, entitled Current Balance Report, dated [DATE] document the following individual balances which exceed the SSI resource limit: R2 $2925.88; R3 $4450.68; and R4 $3449.00. On [DATE], at 12:00 p.m., V1/Administrator confirmed R2, R3, and R4's trust fund accounts exceed the SSI resource limit. During this interview, V3/Business office Manager confirmed V3 started in V3's position four months ago; V3 is still training/learning; and V3 was unaware of the SSI resource limit. On [DATE], and 10:47 a.m., V1 confirmed there is no written documentation that R2, R3, and R4, were notified that their accounts reached the $200.00 less than the SSI resource limit.
May 2025 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0605 (Tag F0605)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue a PRN/as needed medication for one resident (R237) of 20 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs in a sample of 44. Findings ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue a PRN/as needed medication for one resident (R237) of 20 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs in a sample of 44. Findings include: Facility Pharmaceutical Procedures, revised 1/5/23, documents It is the policy of the facility to review resident's medication on a regular basis in order to provide residents with only the necessary medication for their health needs. Facility Behavior Management Committee, revised 6/1/22, documents To ensure that each residents medication regimen is free of unnecessary medications. R237's current May 2025 physician orders documents Alprazolam 0.5 mg/milligrams tablet twice a day PRN for generalized anxiety with an order date of 3/12/25. R237's medical record documents the last time R237 received Alprazolam was on 4/9/25. On 5/15/25 at 2:45 PM, V2 DON/Director of Nursing verified R237's medical record had Alprazolam ordered PRN and needed to be discontinued.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Care Plan to include a blood thinner and Insulin for one resident (R235) of 20 residents reviewed for Care Plan development in a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Care Plan to include a blood thinner and Insulin for one resident (R235) of 20 residents reviewed for Care Plan development in a total sample of 44. Findings include: Facility Care Plan Policy, revised 6/1/22, documents It is the policy of this facility to develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan as appropriate for each resident to meet a residents medical and nursing needs. R235's May 2025 Physician Orders include orders for Eliquis 5 mg/milligrams twice a day for Atrial Fibrillation, and Humalog Insulin per sliding scale four times a day for Diabetes. R235's May 2025 Medication Administration Record/MAR documents R235 is currently receiving his Eliquis and Humalog Insulin. R235's current Care Plan for May 2025 does not include R235's Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis or Eliquis, and does not include R235's diagnosis for Diabetes or Insulin. On 5/15/25 at 1:35 PM, V13 Care Plan Coordinator stated if the Eliquis and Atrial Fibrillation along with the Insulin and Diabetes was not on the Care Plan then she missed it. At that same time, V13 verified R235's Care Plan did not include the Insulin and Diabetes diagnosis or Eliquis and Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis and should.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply leg compression stockings for one resident (R69) of one residents reviewed for compression stockings in a sample of 44....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply leg compression stockings for one resident (R69) of one residents reviewed for compression stockings in a sample of 44. Findings include: Facility Staff Nurse job description, revised 6/2012, documents Responsible for working in a team approach with the nurse aides to ensure residents are receiving said services. Prepares and documents treatments which are administered to residents as prescribed by the residents physician. R69's May 2025 Physician orders documents Tubi Grips (compression stockings) BLE/bilateral lower extremities on in the AM, and off at HS/bedtime. R69's May 2025 Treatment Administration Record documents R69 has her Tubi Grips on. On 5/15/25 at 1:35 PM, R69 was up in the activity area with her bilateral pant legs pulled up with no Tubi Grips, socks, or shoes on. At that same time, V11 CNA/Certified Nurse Aid stated they got R69 up today, are responsible for putting on R69's Tubi Grips, and verified R69 did not have on her Tubi Grips and should have them on her legs. V11 then went to R69's room and verified R69's Tubi Grips were in her top dresser drawer for use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential triggers, triggers for a past trauma-related incident, or emotional support needed for one resident (R237) of one reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential triggers, triggers for a past trauma-related incident, or emotional support needed for one resident (R237) of one resident reviewed for trauma informed care in a sample of 44. Findings include: Facility Social Services Director policy, revised 9/2019, documents Provide social support for residents as needed. Assist with mood and behavior programming processes as needed. R237's medical record documents the following diagnoses: Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, and Hallucinations. R237's Social Assessment, dated 3/18/25, documents When a young child (R237's) parents separated and she went into an orphanage for awhile. Eventually, (R237's) parents got back together and took her back, then forced her to go back to school when she didn't want to. R237 was also Sexually Assaulted and experienced a Tornado. This form does not document any potential triggers or emotional support needed for R237. R237's current Care Plan for May 2025 and medical record does not document R237's potential triggers or emotional support needed for her past trauma. On 5/15/25 at 1:25 PM, V12 Discharge Planner stated social services was off work this week but confirmed (R237's) Care Plan and medical record did not address (R237's) potential triggers, or emotional support needed to prevent re-trauma. On 5/15/25 at 4:04 PM, V7 Administrator sent an email to indicate the facility did not have a policy on trauma informed care.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly QAPI/Quality Assessment Plan Improvement meetings. This has the potential to affect all 97 residents living in the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly QAPI/Quality Assessment Plan Improvement meetings. This has the potential to affect all 97 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Facility QAPI Plan, dated 3/31/25, documents The Committee is responsible for meeting on a quarterly basis. Facility provided QAA sign in sheets dated 3/6/25 and 4/24/25. No other QAA sign in sheets were available to review after the previous survey date of 8/7/24. On 5/13/25 at 12:53PM, V1 Administrator provided two QAA sign in sheets for the past year of QAA meetings. At that same time, V1 stated she cannot find any QAA sign in sheets prior to March 2025. V1 stated when V1 temporarily left in July 2024, QA meetings were not being held in her absence. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 671 Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 5/13/2025, signed by V1, document 97 residents reside in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, monitor and review antibiotic use for five of five residents (R25, R40, R47, R74, R297) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, monitor and review antibiotic use for five of five residents (R25, R40, R47, R74, R297) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 44 residents. This failure has the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility with a current census of 97 residents. Findings include: The Infection Control policy revised 12/17/19 documents the Infection Control Committee shall be responsible for surveillance or known nursing home potential infections, the review and analysis of actual infections, the promotion of a preventative and corrective program designed to minimize infection hazards. Follow the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and develop a practical system of reporting, evaluating and keeping records of infections in order to provide an indication of an outbreak level of nosocomial infections and trace the source. The Infection Control Committee reviews the system for reporting, evaluation and keeping records of infections among residents in order to provide an indication of the endemic level of all nosocomial infections to trace the source of infection and to identify epidemic or potential epidemic situations. Nursing staff will develop weekly reports on antibiotics including a review to ensure appropriate use of antibiotics. The Antibiotic Stewardship policy revised 12/18/19 documents the purpose of the program is to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics, improve resident outcomes and lessen adverse events. The facility will track antibiotic use daily. The facility will ensure the pharmacy reviews all antibiotic usage appropriateness. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] Form 671 [Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid], dated 5/13/2025, signed by V1/Administrator, document 97 residents reside in the facility. 1. R25's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated May 2025 documents Macrodantin (antibiotic) was ordered on 9/24/24 for a Urinary Tract Infection and continues to be administered daily. R25's Progress Note dated 9/18/24 documents a response to an inquiry regarding the stop date of the antibiotic made on 9/17/24 was that the antibiotic was a maintenance dose for a history of Urinary Tract Infections and no stop date was ordered. The Infection Tracking Log dated January, February, March, April and May 2025 did not include R25's antibiotic or indication for use. The Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations dated January, February, March, April and May 2025 did not include an evaluation for R25's Macrodantin prophylactic antibiotic appropriateness. 2. R40's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated May 2025 documents Macrobid (antibiotic) was ordered on 2/21/25 for preventative use for Urinary Tract Infections and was administered daily until discontinued on 5/15/25. The MAR documents Levofloxacin (antibiotic) was ordered on 5/12/25 - 5/14/25 and 5/15/25 - 5/21/25 for a Urinary Tract Infection. R40's Progress Note dated 12/2/24 documents R40's physician ordered Macrobid daily for preventative use for frequent Urinary Tract Infections. The Infection Tracking Log dated February, March, April and May 2025 did not include R40's Macrobid antibiotic or indication for use. The Infection Tracking Log documents R40 had a Urinary Tract Infection on 5/10/25 and 5/15/25 and indicated a Culture, Laboratory Test or Radiology Exam was conducted although did not identify the test results/organism (results of the culture) and/or appropriateness of the antibiotic. The Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations dated March, April and May 2025 did not include an evaluation for R40's Macrobid antibiotic appropriateness. 3. The Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations dated March 2025 documents an evaluation of R47's Cephalexin (antibiotic) 3/6/25 - 3/13/25 for a diagnosis of Cough. The Infection Tracking Log dated March, April and May 2025 did not include an entry for R47's infection. 4. R74's Progress Note dated 3/20/25 documents to obtain a urinalysis and start Keflex for seven days until urine culture and sensitivity results come back; and 3/22/25 documents to start Cipro for three days for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. The Infection Tracking Log dated March 2025 indicated a Culture, Laboratory Test or a Radiology Exam was conducted although did not identify the test results/organism and/or the appropriateness of the antibiotic nor the antibiotic ordered on 3/31/25. The Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations dated March, April and May 2025 did not include an evaluation for R74's Keflex or Cipro antibiotic appropriateness. 5. R297's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated April 2025 documents Fluconazole (antifungal) was ordered 4/4/25 - 4/9/25 for a rash and nonspecific skin eruption; Azithromycin (antibiotic) was ordered 4/10/25 - 4/14/25 for Atelectasis; Cefpodoxime (antibiotic) 4/15/25 - 4/19/25 for Acute Cystitis; and Levofloxacin (antibiotic) 4/21/25 - 4/27/25 for Acute Cystitis. R297's Progress Note documents on 4/4/25 Fluconazole (anti-fungal) was ordered for four days due to redness and tenderness in the peri-area; on 4/10/25 received order for Azithromycin (antibiotic) received per chest x-ray results; on 4/13/25 completed antibiotic for Pneumonia; on 4/14/25 a new order for Vantin/Cefpodoxime (antibiotic) was ordered for Acute Cystitis; on 4/18/25 remains on antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Infection; on 4/24/25 was treated for a Urinary Tract Infection for Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL/antibiotic resistant bacteria/organism); and on 4/25/25 a chest x-ray was conducted. The Infection Tracking Log dated April 2025 documents on 4/10/25 and 4/14/25 a Culture, Laboratory Test and/or Radiology Exam was conducted although did not identify the test results/organisms nor the antifungal on 4/6/25 and antibiotic ordered for treatment on 4/10/25. The Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations dated April and May 2025 did not include an evaluation for R297's antifungal or Levofloxacin appropriateness. On 5/15/25 at 1:30 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist) stated she only reviews and monitors residents on prophylactic antibiotics when they are first initiated and does not continue monitoring. V3 agreed the Infection Tracking Log did not track the Culture, Laboratory Test or Radiology Exam results, the log was not complete and the Pharmacist's Summary of Recommendations was not inclusive of all antibiotics or antifungals ordered. V3 agreed tracking the source of infections to identify epidemic or potential epidemic situations was not being conducted. On 5/15/25 at 2:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the Infection Prevention Program has struggled with getting the required infection information in the new tracking system and ensuring it's accuracy.
Feb 2025 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development and worsening, conduct a pressure ulcer risk assessment once a week for four weeks after admission, obtain a treatment for a newly identified pressure ulcer, and accurately and thoroughly assess pressure ulcers weekly for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers in the sample of five. These failures resulted in R1 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel six days after admission to the facility and R2 developing a stage three pressure ulcer to the right heel and an unstageable pressure ulcer to the inner ankle that required autolytic debridement (using own body's enzymes to remove dead tissue) and caused R2 severe pain. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Protocol dated 10-24-22 documents Objective and Purpose: To ensure that measures are taken to prevent skin breakdown and to provide guidelines for treatment of any pressure injury or pressure ulcer that might develop. Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. A pressure injury will present as intact skin and may be painful. A pressure injury will present as an open ulcer. The appearance of which will vary depending on the stage and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. Soft tissue damage related to pressure and shear may also be affected by skin temperature and moisture, nutrition, perfusion, co-morbidities, and condition of the soft tissue. Principles: 1. A skin assessment is completed on all residents upon admission and weekly for the first four weeks after admission, quarterly, and whenever there is a change in the resident's condition. 2. An individualized plan of care will be developed for the resident following the guidelines of the assessment. 3. All high and moderate risk residents will be assessed for the needs of the items below. If the intervention is initiated, it will be added to the care plan. A. Special mattress and wheelchair cushions. B. PROMS (Passive Range of Motions). C. Protein and/or Nutritional Supplements. D. Turning and positioning schedule. E. Skin Checks. F. Elbow/heel protectors/bridging of heels. 6. When a resident is admitted to the facility or develops a pressure injury in the facility, the following will occur: A. Assess the pressure injury for location, size, wound bed, drainage, odor, tunneling, undermining or sinus tract, wound edges/surrounding tissues, and pain at site. B. Determine the injury's current stage of development: Stage One Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin. Stage Two Pressure Ulcer: Partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink, or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not viable. Granulation tissue, slough, and eschar are not present. Stage Three Pressure Ulcer: Full thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissues are epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and or/eschar may be visible but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. If slough or eschar obscures the wound bed, it is an unstageable pressure ulcer/pressure injury. Unstageable Pressure Ulcer: Full-thickness ski and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage with the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar. Stable eschar (dry, adherent, intact without erythema or fluctuance) should only be removed after careful consideration and consultation with the resident's physician, or nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist. Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue, this area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer, or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue, This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone-muscle interface. C. Notify the physician of the above assessment and obtain orders for treatment of pressure ulcer/injury. If pressure ulcer/injury is showing no improvement, Physician will be notified so change of treatment may be obtained, E. Care plan will be established for treatment of existing pressure ulcers/injuries. G. For pressure ulcer with drainage the physician will be notified, and culture obtained if ordered. Pressure Injury and Treatment Protocol: H. Weekly measurements will be conducted and entered in the chart under wound management. J. Turning and repositioning assistance will be given to those residents that are unable to reposition themselves. K. Special devices will be used to relieve pressure, L. All treatment and charting of pressure ulcers/injuries will be done by licensed staff. R1's admission Record documents R1 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of a Left Femur Fracture, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Lack of Coordination, and Weakness. R1's Procedure and Surgeon Notes dated 12-2-24 document R1 received a left hip open reduction internal fixation with intramedullary implant repair to repair R1's left hip fracture. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment dated [DATE] (Admission) and 12-31-24 document R1 was at risk of developing a pressure ulcer. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 was cognitively intact and had no pressure ulcers on admission [DATE]). This same MDS Assessment documents R1 developed a facility acquired stage II pressure ulcer. R1's Medical Record does not include evidence of a Braden Scale being completed every week for four weeks after R1's admission, as instructed by the facility's Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Protocol. R1's Progress Notes dated 12-11-24 and signed by V5 (Prior Director of Nursing) document, While dressing (R1) for the day (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) notified this nurse of area to (R1's) left heel. Area is a 3.5 cm (centimeter) by 3.7 cm fluid filled blister, not draining, surrounded by pink normal skin. Area cleansed, skin prepped, and border foam applied for protection. Foot floated while CNA finished dressing (R1). Recommendation to continue above treatment and apply moon boot forwarded to (Clinic). R1's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documents, (R1) was noted to have a left heel blackish blister upon admission (hospital admission [DATE]). Likely 2/2 deep tissue injury (full-thickness deep tissue injury) causing some localized bleeding resulting in a blood blister. ABI (Ankle-Brachial Index) normal to left lower extremity. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-12-25 and signed by V6 (Wound Nurse) document, (R1's) wound measurement area to (R1's) L (left) heel. Area is a 4 cm x 5 cm fluid filled blister, not draining, surrounded by pink normal skin. Area cleansed, skin prepped, and border foam applied for protection. Foot floated while CNA finishes dressing (R1). The facility's Weekly Wound Reports dated 12-18-24, 12-25-24, and 1-8-25 document R1's wound to the left heel as a stage one Pressure Injury. The facility's Weekly Wound Report and R1's Medical Record/Progress Notes do not include a weekly assessment of R1's wound to the right heel for the week of 1-1-25 through 1-7-25. R1's Care Plan dated 12-5-24 (Admission) through 1-14-25 (Discharge) documents, Problem: (R1) is at increased risk for pressure ulcers related to decreased mobility and generalized muscle weakness following recent illness and hospitalization. Goal: (R1) will have decreased risk for skin breakdown during this quarter. Interventions: Assist (R1) with turning and re-positioning. Pressure reducing device in wheelchair and bed. Provide incontinence care after each incontinent episode. Therapy as ordered. This same care plan does not include R1's new onset of a pressure ulcer to the left heel with goals or interventions to treat and prevent the left heel pressure ulcer from declining or prevent further pressure ulcer development. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-15-25 document R1 was discharged to another long-term care facility per the family's request. On 1-28-25 at 9:37 AM V8 (R1's Family Member) stated, Anytime I would visit (R1) when she was admitted to the facility, she would not have a heel boot on. On 1-29-25 at 9:10 AM R1 was living in another long-term care facility and was interviewed by phone. R1 stated, I broke my right hip and could not move my leg on my own while in bed. I could not feel my heels at all due to the swelling. The staff never elevated my feet off the bed, and I did not get those jelly filled (heel protection) boots until after I got the sore to my left heel. I did not wear shoes while in bed or while in the recliner. When I was in the recliner my heels would be lying on the footrest. On 1-29-25 at 9:45 AM V6 (Wound Nurse) stated, I categorized (R1's) left heel pressure ulcer as a stage one throughout (R1's) stay here. I did not know if a pressure ulcer was black or purple that it was considered unstageable. I have not had a lot of wound training. There were a lot of staff off around Christmas, so no wounds got assessed from 12-25-24 through 1-7-25. On 1-29-25 at 1:50 PM V16 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, I am sorry. I am behind a month on care plans. (R1's) Care Plan was never updated to include pressure relieving interventions to prevent pressure ulcers to (R1's) heels and was never updated once (R1) developed a new pressure ulcer to the left heel with goals to prevent the pressure ulcer from worsening and prevent further pressure ulcers. On 1-29-25 at 2:10 PM V7 (Nurse Practitioner) stated, (R1's) pressure ulcer to the left heel was probably caused by pressure when (R1) would be sitting in her recliner. When sitting in the recliner, (R1's) heels would by lying on the footrest. On 1-29-25 at 2:18 PM V15 (Prior DON/Director of Nursing) stated, (R1) was in bed quite a bit and did not have a wound to her heel on admission. (R1's) heels would be on the bed and that is what caused the pressure ulcer to (R1's) right heel. (R1) had a broken left hip. On 12-11-24 a CNA found a wound to (R1's) left heel and reported it to me. I assessed the wound and noted the wound to be a 3.5 cm by 3.7 cm fluid filled unstageable blister caused by pressure. On 1-29-25 at 2:30 PM V10 (MDS Coordinator) stated, I am responsible for completing the Braden Scale Assessments and I have been behind. (R1) was supposed to have a Braden Score completed on admission and every week for four weeks after admission. (R1) only had a Braden Scale Assessment completed on admission and did not have one completed for the next three weeks after admission. On 2-3-25 at 10:00 AM V17 (Therapy Director) stated, When (R1) had admitted here the beginning of December 2024 (R1's) legs were so heavy from the fluid build-up. (R1) could not lift her legs or feet up off the bed by herself. (R1) also had groin pain whenever trying to lift her legs up. (R1) needed moderate assistance of staff to raise her legs and feet off the bed and turn and re-position while in bed. 2. R2's current Physician's Orders document R2 has the diagnoses of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure and Cerebrovascular Disease. R2's MDS Assessments dated 11-25-24 and 12-5-24 document R2 is severely cognitively impaired and had no pressure ulcers. R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment dated [DATE] (Admission) documents R2 was not at risk of developing pressure ulcers. R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 was at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. R2's Care Plan dated 11-18-24 (re-admission to facility) through 12-12-24 (date of pressure ulcer development to right heel) does not include pressure ulcer relieving interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development once R2 was identified by the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk Assessment (dated 11-18-24) as being at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. R2's Event Details and Progress Notes dated 12-12-24 and signed by V6 (Wound Nurse) documents, Pressure Injury to Right Heel. Orders: Right heel cleanse area, apply Medi-honey and mepilex to be changed daily. (R2) has an area on his right heel that measures by 5 cm x 4 cm. R2's Medical Record dated 12-12-24 only includes a measurement of R2's newly developed right heel pressure ulcer and does not include any further description of the pressure ulcer's wound bed, drainage, odor, tunneling, undermining or sinus tract, or wound edges/surrounding tissues. The facility's Weekly Wound Report and R2's Medical Record/Progress Notes do not include a weekly assessment of R2's wound to the right heel for the week of 1-1-25 through 1-7-25. R2's Wound Management Progress Notes dated 1-22-25 and signed by V6 document, (R2) has an area on his right heel that measures 2.4 cm by 3.4 cm and an area to his right medial ankle measuring at 2.4 cm by 2.0 cm. Both have serosanguinous (drainage of blood and serum) drainage between minimal and moderate. Both Stage II. R2's Medical Record does not include documentation of V4 (R2's Physician) being notified of R2's pressure ulcers having drainage or an order to treat the newly developed pressure ulcer to R2's right inner ankle on 1-22-25. R2's Physician's Order and Treatment Administration Records dated 1-22-25 through 2-4-25 do not include a physician's order to treat R2's right inner ankle pressure ulcer or evidence of a treatment being performed to R2's right inner ankle pressure ulcer. R2's Wound Visit Notes dated 2-5-25 and signed by V19 (Clinical Wound Care Nurse) document, Wound Right, Medial Heel is a Stage Three Pressure Ulcer acquired on 12-12-24 and had received a status of not healed. Initial wound encounter measurements are 2 cm length by 1.2 cm width, by 0.3 cm depth. There is a moderate amount of drainage noted. Wound bed had 76-100 percent granulation (healing tissue), 1-25 percent slough (dead tissue). Debridement Performed: Autolytic. Wound Right, Medial Ankle is an Unstageable Pressure Injury obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss. Pressure ulcer acquired on 1-22-25 and had received a status of non-healed. Initial wound measurements are 2 cm length by 1.5 cm width by 0.3 cm depth. There is a moderate amount of serous drainage noted. Wound bed had 1-25 percent granulation, 76-100 percent slough, Debridement performed: Autolytic. On 1-29-25 at 9:50 AM R2 was lying in bed with a cushioned heel protecting boot to R2's right foot. R2's left foot was lying directly on the bed. R2 had an uncovered pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle and a dressing dated 1-28-25 to the right heel. V6 (Wound Nurse) removed the dressing to R2's right heel and measured both pressure ulcers to R2's right heel and right inner ankle. R2's right inner ankle pressure ulcer measured 2.3 cm by 2.7 cm and was covered in 100 percent slough with a moderate amount of serosanguinous drainage. R2's right heel pressure ulcer measured 1.6 cm x 2 cm with 50 percent granulation tissue and a moderate amount of serosanguinous drainage. V6 proceeded to cleanse both pressure ulcer with normal saline, applied Medi honey, and covered with gauze. During the treatment R2 was hollering out in pain stating, My foot hurts! My foot hurts! On 1-29-25 at 10:00 AM V6 (Wound Nurse) stated, I noticed (R2) had a new pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle last week (1-22-25). The right inner ankle wound had drainage last week but did not look this bad and I do not remember the wound having slough last week. (R2) usually always has pain when I change his dressings. I do not recall if the physician was notified of (R2's) wounds to the right heel and right inner ankle having drainage. I have caterogorized both of (R2's) pressure ulcers to the right foot and right inner ankle as stage two's. On 2-10-25 at 9:20 AM V6 stated, There is no documentation of a treatment order being obtained to (R2's) right ankle pressure ulcer or documentation of a treatment being performed to (R2's) right ankle pressure ulcer on (R2's) treatment administration record. On 2-10-25 at 11:00 AM V4 (Physician) stated, Both of (R1) and (R2) heels should have had off-loading to prevent the pressure ulcers from developing. That is basic to prevent pressure ulcers. Around three months ago the wound nurse was very active there about letting me know if there were changes to wounds. For the past three months I have not had a lot of communication with the facility about the residents' pressure ulcers. (R1's) pressure ulcer should not have been categorized as a stage one. (R1's) pressure ulcer to the heel would have been an unstageable pressure ulcer. (R2's) pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle should have been categorized as unstageable.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the level of Oxygen in a portable Oxygen tank for a reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the level of Oxygen in a portable Oxygen tank for a resident diagnosed with Congestive Heart Failure, ensure a continuous Oxygen supply was administered as ordered by the Physician, and failed to perform an assessment after a resident went without Oxygen and experienced respiratory distress and a low pulse oximetry reading for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for Oxygen use in the sample of five. These failures resulted in R1 being without oxygen for 20 minutes on one occurrence and 10 minutes on second occurrence, which caused R1 to experience chest pain, shortness of breath, feelings of being smothered and imminent death. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Therapy and Safety policy dated 4-9-20 documents Area: Nursing. It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe environment for residents, staff, and the public. Purpose: To provide a source of oxygen to persons experiencing an insufficient supply of same and to address the use and storage of oxygen and oxygen equipment. Staff responsible: Director of Nursing, Staff Nurse, Nurse Aides. Oxygen Therapy: M.D. (Medical Doctor) will provide: When to use, how often, liter flow, and whether to use cannula or mask. Document date, time, flow rate, frequency, and results of oxygen therapy in medical record. Address use of oxygen in care plan. Oxygen in Use: Licensed staff using oxygen equipment will be trained in its operation, safety precautions, and manufacturer's instructions for using equipment. R1's admission Record documents R1 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of a Congestive Heart Failure, Weakness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Dependence on supplemental oxygen, Atrial Fibrillation, and Chronic Fatigue. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment documents R1 was cognitively intact. R1's Physician's Orders dated 12-5-25 through 12-7-24 document, Oxygen at five liters per nasal cannula continuously for Shortness of Breath. R1's Physician's Orders dated 12-7-25 through 12-23-24 document, Oxygen at four liters per nasal cannula continuously for Shortness of Breath. Oxygen Saturation every shift-titrate oxygen to maintain above or equal to 90% (percent). R1's Physician's Orders dated 1-3-25 through 1-10-25 document, Oxygen at five liters per nasal cannula continuously. R1's Physician's Order dated 1-10-25 and signed by V14 (Pulmonologist) document, Keep (R1) at six liters of oxygen. May titrate to keep oxygen saturation above 89%. R1's Nephrology Physician's Progress Notes dated 1-6-25 and signed by V8 (R1's Nephrologist) documents, (R1) has not been brought in with her required amount of supplemental oxygen with oxygen saturations around 80 percent. R1's Care Plan from admission [DATE]) to discharge (1-14-25) does not address R1's oxygen needs or goals. R1's Progress Notes do not include any documentation of an assessment performed after R1 went without oxygen on 1-6-25 or any other occurrences of R1 going without her physician ordered oxygen. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-15-25 document R1 was discharged to another long-term care facility per the family's request. On 1-28-25 at 9:37 AM V13 (R1's Family Member) stated, On 1-6-25 I met (R1) and (V12/Transport) at (V8's) office. Upon arrival, I questioned how much oxygen was available. The driver (V12) replied they had one oxygen unit. I expressed this was inadequate for (R1's) needs. (V12) told me to call if (R1) needed more oxygen. When in (V8's) office I noticed (R1's) oxygen tank was empty. The staff came in and (R1's) pulse oximetry was 80 percent and (R1) was cyanotic, slurring her words, and complaining of back and arm pain. (V8's) instructions were to take(R1) to prompt care. (V8's) secretary stated that she had called (V12) and was told (V12) was filling an oxygen tank right then. From the time (V8's) secretary called for more oxygen to when (V12) came with the oxygen was 20 minutes. During dinner on 1-12-25 (R1's) oxygen tank again went empty. It was empty for more than ten minutes. (R1) started to become symptomatic. Another resident's family member (V9) noticed (R1) in distress and went to get a nurse. The nurse returned without an oxygen tank. After what was described as what seemed like a long time an unknown CNA returned with a replacement oxygen tank. No vital signs were recorded in (R1's) medical record and no progress or assessment was made about the occurrence. I was scared for (R1's) life while she was at that facility, and we decided to move (R1) to a different facility. On 1-28-25 at 2:15 PM V12 (Transport) stated, I am not certified. On 1-6-25 I took (R1) to her appointment with (V8). (V13/R1's Family Member) road with me in the van to the appointment. I took one portable oxygen tank with us to the appointment. (V13) told me I should take two tanks. I spoke to a nurse, and she told me I only needed one oxygen tank. I do not remember what nurse I spoke to. I filled (R1's) tank before the appointment. I dropped (R1) off for her appointment and went back to the facility. Around an hour to an hour and a half later, I got a call from the receptionist at (V8's) office saying I needed to get to their office fast because (R1) ran out of oxygen and was having a hard time breathing. I got a new oxygen tank and went to (V8's) office. (V13) was outside and waiting on me. I disconnected (R1's) oxygen tubing from the empty tank and attached the oxygen to the new tank. I turned the dial to five liters as that is what (V8) said (R1) needed. I brought (R1) back to the facility and a CNA took (R1) to her room. Some of the portable oxygen tank's gauges do not work. On 1-29-25 at 9:10 AM R1 was living in another long-term care facility and was interviewed by phone. R1 stated, I ran out of oxygen three or four times while living at that nursing home (the facility). One time at suppertime, I started to feel funny and checked my oxygen tubing. No oxygen was coming out. No staff were in the dining room, so I asked a visitor who was in there to go get me help. I felt like I was going to pass out and started having chest pain. It is the worst feeling when you cannot breathe. I was short of breath and felt like I was being smothered. It felt like forever before someone got me an oxygen tank. I was lucky the visitor was there to help me. When I went to the doctor (1-6-25) I was in the office and my oxygen tank ran out. I started turning purple and my eyes were twitching. I had chest pain. My son (V13) kept telling me to deep breath. I don't know what it feels like to die, but I know I felt close to it that day. It took 30 minutes for the facility to get me oxygen. The staff did not make sure I always had oxygen. On 1-29-25 at 10:40 AM V9 (Visitor) stated, I was in a private dining room on 1-12-25 with my parents and another resident (R1). (R1) was the only other resident in this dining room. There were no staff present in this dining room. (R1) told me, I need help! (R1) was panicked and having a hard time breathing. I went and found a staff member and told them (R1) needed oxygen. (R1) was trying to deep breath and it looked like (R1) was struggling to breath. It took a nurse around ten minutes to get (R1) oxygen. It really scared me. On 1-29-25 at 11:05 AM V20 (Oxygen Supply Company Representative) stated, The portable oxygen tanks are older and some of the gauges do not work properly and the tanks do not have the volume to fill completely, making them not last as long as they should. If a patient is on five liter of oxygen, an oxygen concentrator should really be used to prevent a patient from running out of oxygen. On 1-29-25 at 2:10 PM V7 (Nurse Practitioner) stated, (R1) should not have run out of oxygen with her diagnoses. Running out of oxygen would cause (R1) to become short of breath and her pulse oximetry to drop. (R1) should have been on an oxygen concentrator and not on a portable oxygen tank. On 1-29-25 at 2:18 PM V15 (Prior DON/Director of Nursing) stated, I was not aware of (R1) running out of oxygen or experiencing shortness of breath or other symptoms from running out of oxygen. If (R1) went without oxygen a nurse should have done an assessment of (R1) and documented the occurrence in (R1's) progress notes. On 1-29-25 at 2:40 PM V21 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, We (facility staff) really do not have a set schedule on when to check residents to make sure their oxygen tanks are full. I just check periodically, and if the oxygen tanks are empty I fill them. The portable oxygen tanks do not last long. On 1-30-25 at 11:55 AM V14 (Pulmonologist) stated, I saw (R1) in my office and (R1) was very upset and said she ran out of oxygen several times. (R1) is [AGE] years old and requires supplemental oxygen at all times. (R1) has multiple heart concerns and has Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Valvular Heart Disease, and Congestive Heart Failure. At absolutely no time should (R1) have ran out of oxygen. There is no excuse that the facility could have for (R1) to go without oxygen at any time. Any amount of time that (R1) would go without oxygen could result in (R1's) oxygen levels dropping and would be devastating and detrimental to (R1's) health. It could result in (R1's) death. (R1's) oxygen saturations should never drop below 89 percent.
Aug 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

2. R18's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents the following: Mirtazapine (antidepressant) 30mg (milligrams) by mouth daily, Bupropion HCL (hydrochloride) (antidepressant) 300mg by mouth daily, and Se...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. R18's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents the following: Mirtazapine (antidepressant) 30mg (milligrams) by mouth daily, Bupropion HCL (hydrochloride) (antidepressant) 300mg by mouth daily, and Sertraline (antidepressant) 150mg by mouth daily. On 8/7/24 at 10:00AM V2/Director of Nursing stated she is the individual responsible for managing psychotropic medications for the residents in the facility. V2 stated R18 is not a harm not herself or others. V2 stated she is not sure why R18 is taking three antidepressants, and verified that this information was not documented in R18's medical record. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document justification for the use of duplicative antidepressant therapy for one of five residents (R18) and failed to document the justification for reinstating an antipsychotic for one resident (R60) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of thirty. Findings Include: The facility's Psychopharmacologic Drug Usage Procedure, dated 10/18/17, documents Definition: A psychopharmacologic Drug is any medication used for managing behavior, stabilizing mood, or treating psychiatric disorders. This includes the following types of drugs: antipsychotic, antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, and sedatives/hypnotics. Procedure: Use of psychopharmacological medications requires assessment by the attending physician, and specific orders must be written by the attending physician with supporting diagnoses. 2. Psychopharmacological medication usage must be reassessed at least every 90 days and include rationale for continuing the medication. 7. Documentation of behaviors and conditions requiring the use of these mediations must be done on routine basis, as well as medication response and adverse consequences. 1.) R60's admission Physician Order Sheet dated 5/10/2021 documents that R60 was admitted to the facility on the anitpsychotic medication Olanzapine 5 mg (milligrams) every night for Dementia with Delusions and Agitation. R60's Medication Regime Review from Pharmacy dated 8/3/23 documents a recommendation for the doctor to discontinue the use of the antipsychotic medication Olanzapine due to no documented behaviors to justify the use of it. The Physician accepted the recommendation so the medicine was discontinued. R60s nurse notes document that on 5/8/24 R60's daughter stated that when (R60) stayed the weekend with her that she was argumentative with her and accusatory. Daughter states that is what happens when they try to reduce their medication. R60's nurse's notes document that on 5/4/24 at 1:40 PM R60 was standing in the front entry telling staff she was going on a walk she was reminded that she needs staff to assist her that she became agitated with staff. She offers statements of missing clothing items. R60's Nurse Notes on 5/4/24-5/29/24 document several episodes of R60 yelling at staff regarding missing clothing, becoming angry and agitated with staff. There is no documentation of R60 having delusions or halluciantions. R60's Physican Order Sheet for June 2024 documents that R60 was put back on antipsychotic medication Olanzapine 2.5 mg (milligrams) every 12 hours as needed for agitation and delusions. R60's Physican Order Sheet for June 2024 documents that R60 was put back on antipsychotic medication Olanzapine at 5 mg every night for failed gradual dose reduction with return of agitation and delusions. On 8/6/24 at 10:00 AM V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed that R60 was upset about laundry that indeed was missing and some were ruined by the laundry dpartment and replaced by facility. V3 stated that R60 was obsessed about her missing clothes and was very angry and upset. V3 stated The daughter also wanted her back on her regular dose of medicine. On 8/6/24 at 10:15 AM V2 (DON) also confirmed that R60's clothes that she accused people of stealing were missing, that they were at the daughters house after a home visit. V2 also confirmed that the facility had ruined some of R60's clothes and she became very upset and was yelling at staff. V2 confirmed that the things that R60 was upset about were actually happening, therefore would not be considered delusions or hallucination.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask and nebulizer tubing was changed every seven days and stored in a bag between uses for two residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask and nebulizer tubing was changed every seven days and stored in a bag between uses for two residents (R2 and R18) and failed to ensure Oxygen tubing was changed every seven days for two of four residents (R2, R34, and R62) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 30. Findings include: The facility's Nebulizer Treatment Administration, dated 01/2003, documents Purpose: 1. For delivery of liquid aerosol medication, as prescribed by a physician. 2. To aide in expectorations of secretions. Equipment: 1. Nebulizer unit. (Consists of (1) Medication container, (2) Nebulizer T-piece, and (3) Mouthpiece.) 2. O2 (Oxygen) tubing. Procedure: 15. O2 tubing used only for intermittent nebulizer therapy must be changed weekly. If used more often, such as for receiving O2, replace tubing every 48 hours. 16. Disposable nebulizers must be replaced every 15 days. The facility's Oxygen Therapy, dated 3/16/17, documents Objective: 1. To provide a source of oxygen to persons experiencing an insufficient supply of same. Procedure: 7. Oxygen set-up (cannula/mask, tubing) must be exchanged every seven days. Documentation: 1. Date, time, flow rate, frequency, and results of oxygen therapy in Medical Record. 1. R18's current POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents a Physician order for Albuterol Sulfate Solution 0.62 milligram/3 milliliter one vial inhalation orally four times a day as needed. On 8/4/24 at 9:30 AM R18's nebulizer tubing and nebulizer mask was lying on R18's nightstand un-bagged and dated 6/20/2024. On 8/4/24 at 9:23 AM V4/Registered Nurse confirmed R18's nebulizer tubing and nebulizer dated 6/20/24 and un-bagged. V4 stated, Nebulizer masks and nebulizer tubing should be changed at least every seven days and bagged after use. 2. 08/04/24 08:00AM R2's oxygen tubing was coiled up on bedside chair and attached to nebulizer machine dated 5/28. 3. On 8/4/24 at 8:05 R34's Oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were on the floor in his room with no date on the oxygen tubing. R34 was not in his room at the time and the tubing was connected to an oxygen tank inside of his room and it was running. On 08/04/24 at 8:30 AM R34 was in the dining room with a small oxygen tank on the back of his wheelchair with oxygen tubing that had no dates on it. 4. On 08/04/24 R62's Oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were on the floor in her room with no date on the oxygen tubing. R62 was not in her room at the time and the tubing was connected to an oxygen tank inside of his room and it was running. On 08/04/24 at 8:30 AM R62 was in the dining room with a small oxygen tank on the back of her wheelchair with oxygen tubing that had no dates on it.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that wound care supplies were disinfected after each resident's wound cares. This failure has the potential to affect res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that wound care supplies were disinfected after each resident's wound cares. This failure has the potential to affect residents (R34, R57, R62, R67, R80, R199) that receive wound cares in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Standard Precautions policy facility's Wound Care policy, dated 08/2009, documents Standard Precautions are based on the principle that all blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin, and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. On 08/06/24 at approximately 1:00pm, V2 DON (Directed of Nurses), provided a Wound Summary Report, dated 08/05/2024, listing residents receiving wound care in the facility. The facility's Wound Care policy, dated 03/2004, documents, **Standard Precautions Must Be Followed During Care of Wounds. ** R80's medical record documents diagnoses including Insulin Dependent Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage three. R80's Treatment Administration Record documents. Wound Care to Upper Gluteal Region: 1) Clean and dry area well. 2) Apply thin layer of zinc paste over open areas. 3.) Place bordered foam dressing. 4) Change daily and as needed. R80s Physicians Progress Note by resident's physician (V9), dated 8/5/24, documents under Chief Complaints: Pressure Ulcer and Assessment includes: Pressure Ulcer Left Buttock. V9 Dr. Wagner's Plan documents, I would put a moisture barrier this wound followed by a (bordered foam dressing). On 8/5/24 at approximately. 10:05am, R80 was laying on their left side and R80's waterproof, bordered dressing, dated 8/4/24, was intact to R80's coccyx and left buttock area. On 8/5/24 at 10:25am V3, Wound Nurse and ADON, Assisted Director of Nurses, gathered wound supplies and completed R80's daily wound care as ordered, to include cleansing R80's wound with an eight-ounce spray bottle of wound cleanser, using spray at close proximity to R80's open wound. After completion of R80's wound care, V3, ADON, returned wound cleanser spray bottle to the top treatment cart in the Medication Room without disinfecting the wound cleanser bottle. V3 stated that the multi-use spray wound cleanser is used for multiple residents' wound cared treatments and returned to the treatment cart. On 8/6/24 at 10:45am V6, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), verified that spray wound cleanser bottles are used for multiple residents' wound care and stored in the Medication Room or on the top of the treatment cart. On 8/7/24 at approximately 8:30am, V2, DON (Director of Nurses), stated that the wound cleanser bottles used for wound care throughout the facility, are considered community property and used for multiple residents' wound cares.
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately notify the physician to obtain a treatment...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately notify the physician to obtain a treatment for a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for UTI's in the sample of three. These failures resulted in R1's UTI being left untreated for 12 days and R1 experiencing increased moaning, pain, and discomfort. This resulted in R1 being sent to the emergency room and admitted to the local hospital for four days to receive treatment with intravenous antibiotics for the diagnosis of Sepsis secondary to a UTI. Findings include: The facility's Lab/Diagnostics Policy dated 11-28-17 documents, Policy: It is a policy of the facility to provide means of quality diagnostic lab services for the residents. Purpose: To provide residents a means of diagnostic service promptly and conveniently. Procedure: 1.Provision for Diagnostic Services: d. Any abnormal lab results upon receipt by the facility nurse will be promptly reported to the to the ordering Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner or Clinical Nurse Specialist. Any new orders received as a result will be referred to on the lab slip, orders and in the nurse's notes; g. the lab result will have on it the ordering Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner or Clinical Nurse Specialist's name, date and time and the notifying Facility Nurse's signature. The facility's Change in a Resident's Condition Policy dated 12/02 documents, Purpose: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, and/or resident's representative, and his or her attending physician of changes in the resident's condition and/or status. Procedure: 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician when: b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; e. Deemed necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident. On 1-2-24 at 10:03 AM R1's door had a sign indicating R1 was in contact/droplet precautions. R1 was lying in bed with the head of bed raised. R1 was grimacing in pain holding her stomach and stated she needed to use the bathroom. R1 had a brief on, her pants were around her ankles, and R1 appeared restless. R1's current Face Sheet documents R1 has the following diagnoses: Dysuria, Retention of Urine, and UTI. R1's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 1-2-24 documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's Nurses Note dated 11-21-23 and signed by V7/RN (Registered Nurse) documents, (R1) yelling out, crying and moaning in pain. (R1) reports all over general discomfort, PRN (as needed) tramadol administered this am (morning). R1's Nurses Note dated 11-23-23 and signed by V6/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) documents, This nurse (V6) collected the urine specimen that was needed due to dysuria (painful urination). R1's Urinary Culture and Sensitivity final result dated 11-25-23 documents R1 had greater than 100,000 CFU (Colony-Forming Units)/ML (Milliliters)/Klebsiella Aerogenes (bacterial infection of the urine). R1's Nurses Notes dated 11-25-23 (date of final urinary culture and sensitivity) through 12-6-23 do not include any documentation of the facility notifying the physician or obtaining a treatment regarding R1's urinary culture and sensitivity results, dated 11-25-23, indicating R1 had a urinary tract infection. R1's Nurses Note dated 12-7-23 and signed by V5/LPN documents, Per (V8/R1's Primary Physician) N.O. (New Order) for Septra-DS (Double Strength/antibiotic) one tab BID (Twice a Day) PO (by mouth) times 10 days for UTI. R1's Nurses Note dated 12-8-23 and signed by V10/LPN documents, (R1) appears anxious- moaning and crying out. When (R1) asked if she is in pain- (R1) points to her stomach and states her hips hurt. PRN Tramadol administered with little effect. Resident refused dinner tonight and would not sit appropriately for staff to assist with eating. PO fluids encouraged. R1's Nurses Note dated 12-9-23 and signed by V10/LPN documents, (R1) started to get restless and agitated at approximately 9:30 AM. (R1) sliding herself down in wheelchair and holding her knees. Appears to be in pain. (R1) stated that she has pain all over. (R1) would not sit in chair to eat lunch and did not have any intake at lunch. (R1) assisted to bed and PRN Tramadol administered. R1's Nurses Note dated 12-9-23 and signed by V10/LPN documents, (R1) up in chair for supper and started moaning and crying out. (R1) sliding down in her wheelchair. (R1) stated that her back is hurting and she has pain all over. (R1) assisted back to bed for comfort. R1's Nurses Note dated 12-9-23 and signed by V7/RN documents, (R1) moaning, crying and thrashing around in bed. Upon entering room (R1) observed with clothing removed, blankets on floor, and water pitcher on floor. (R1) restless. Face red/flushed. Unable to follow commands. (R1) does report generalized discomfort. T (Temperature) 102.2 P (Pulse) 42 O2 (Pulse Oximetry) 87% (percent) RA (Room Air) BP (Blood Pressure) 142/87. PRN tramadol and Tylenol administered. (R1) continues on antibiotic therapy for UTI. (V8) notified with verbal orders received to send (R1) to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. R1's Hospital Note dated 12-9-23 documents R1 was admitted to the local hospital to treat Sepsis secondary to UTI with intravenous antibiotics given 12-9-23 through 12-12-23. This same form documents, (R1) is an [AGE] year-old female with a history of UTI, sleep apnea, hypertension, GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), Hyperlipidemia, Parkinson's disease with underlying Dementia, Asthma being admitted to (Local Hospital) on 12-9-23 with a chief complaint of altered mental status. (R1) came from (The Facility) where she was diagnosed with a UTI on 11-23-23. Unfortunately, facility lost the paperwork and did not start treatment until 12-7-23. In the ER (R1) was noted to be septic and sepsis protocol was started. On 1-2-24 at 11:15 AM V4 (Infection Preventionist) stated, (R1) had a history of UTI's. (R1) started to have dysuria on 11-23-23 and we got orders to obtain a UA. The UA final culture came back to the facility on [DATE] as (R1) having a UTI with greater than 100,000 colonies of Klebsiella (bacteria of the urine). There is no documentation of the physician being notified or a treatment order being obtained for (R1's) UTI from 11-25-23 through 12-6-23. The physician should have been notified immediately on 11-25-23 to obtain an order to treat (R1's) UTI. I do not know how it slipped through the cracks. On 12-7-23 (V8) called the facility and ordered Septra DS to treat (R1's) UTI. On 1-2-24 at 11:30 AM V8 (R1's Primary Physician) stated, When the facility got (R1's) final UA culture results on 11-25-23, I should have been notified of the results immediately so I could have given an order to start (R1) on antibiotics immediately for a UTI. I am available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The nurses could have called me anytime to report (R1's) UA results. I noticed (R1) had a UTI according to the UA culture on 12-7-23 and called the nursing home immediately to give an order to start (R1) on Bactrim DS (Septra DS) to treat (R1's) UTI. (R1's) UTI should have been treated immediately on 11-25-23. I cannot deny that if (R1's) UTI was treated immediately it would have kept (R1) from developing further symptoms, becoming septic, and needing hospitalization to treat (R1's) urinary sepsis. The problem is continuity of care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive urinary tract infection care plan for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for UTI's (Urinary Tract Infection...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive urinary tract infection care plan for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for UTI's (Urinary Tract Infection's) in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan Policy dated 6-1-22 documents, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a base line care plan, a comprehensive person-centered care plan as appropriate for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. In the event that the comprehensive assessment and comprehensive care plan identified a change in the resident's goals, or physical, mental, or psychosocial functioning, which was otherwise not identified in the baseline care plan, those changes shall be incorporated into an updated summary and provided to the resident and resident's representative. 1. R2's Physician's Order dated 1-1-24 documents, Levofloxacin 500 mg (milligrams) one time daily for the diagnosis of UTI. R2's current Care Plan does not contain a comprehensive care plan to address R2's goals and interventions to treat R2's UTI. 2. R3's Physician's Order dated 12-30-23 documents, Keflex 500 mg twice daily for seven days for the diagnosis of UTI. R3's current Care Plan does not contain a comprehensive care plan to address R2's goals and interventions to treat R2's UTI. On 1-2-24 at 12:00 PM V11 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, R2 and R3 were diagnosed with UTI's when I was not working. There is no one in the facility to develop care plans when I am not working. R2 and R3 do not have care plans addressing their UTI's.
Jun 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a residents pressure u...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a residents pressure ulcer on a MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for one of two residents (R29) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 44. Findings include: On 05/31/23 at 12:47 PM, V5 (Wound Nurse) removed the pressure relieving boot from R29's right foot. R29 had a dry irregular shaped open area, dark pink in color, to R29's right outer heel. R29's Care plan dated 4/3/23, documents, R29 is at increased risk for pressure ulcers related to decreased mobility, generalized muscle weakness following recent illness and hospitalization. The care plan also documents that R29 has a wound to her right heel. R29's Wound Management report, dated 6/1/23, documents that R29 has an unstageable pressure ulcer to her right heel that measures 0.7 cm (centimeters) x 0.6 cm and was identified on 1/10/23. R29's MDS, dated [DATE], 2/10/23, 2/20/23 & 3/26/23, document in Section M Skin Conditions that R29 does not have any unhealed pressure ulcers. On 06/01/23 at 9:14 AM, V5 stated, (R29's) pressure ulcer was identified on 1/10/23. On 06/01/23 at 10:31 AM V6 (MDS/Care plan coordinator) confirmed that R29's pressure ulcer was not documented on R29's 1/25/23, 2/10/23, 2/20/23 & 3/26/23 MDS.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing the use of insulin for one of one residents (R2) reviewed for insulin in the sample of 44. Fin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing the use of insulin for one of one residents (R2) reviewed for insulin in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan Policy, dated 6/1/22, documents, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a Base Line Care Plan, a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, and conduct Care Plan Meetings as appropriate for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. R2's Physician's orders, dated 5/31/23, document that R2 has orders to receive the following medications for the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic neurological complications: Levemir insulin 44 units daily at 8:00 a.m.; Levemir 34 units daily at 8:00 p.m.; Novolog per sliding scale four times a day. R2's current care plan as of 5/31/23 has no documentation of a comprehensive care plan addressing R2's use of insulin. On 06/01/23 at 10:31 AM V6 (MDS/Care plan coordinator) confirmed that R2 did not have a comprehensive care plan for R2's use of insulin.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to failed to wear the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during the serving of food, failed to discard expired food, and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to failed to wear the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during the serving of food, failed to discard expired food, and failed to maintain cleanliness of a refrigerator used for the storage of resident food. This failure has the potential to affect all 18 residents (R4, R15, R26, R32, R33, R36, R40, R41, R48, R52, R54, R58, R66, R68 and R177 through R180) currently residing on the facility Dementia Unit. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Hair and [NAME] Restraint Procedure, dated (08/19) directs staff, A hair restraint should cover all hair, from hairline to hairline; no bangs or hair on side or back should be hanging out. Hair restraints must be worn at all times, by all staff, when in the main kitchen, dish machine area and satellite pantries. The facility policy, Food Storage and Labeling Procedure, dated (revised) 9/22 directs staff, Discard any item past the use-by-date or expiration date. The facility form, Kitchen Cleaning Schedule, directs staff, Sunday, Wednesday and Friday: Clean (Dementia Unit) refrigerator. On 5/30/23 at 11:31 A.M., V7/Dietary Aid was in the facility Dementia Unit satellite pantry, plating food for the Unit residents. At that time, V7's hair net did not completely cover V7's hair. Both sides of V7's hair was uncovered. At the same time, V8/Unit Manager was seated at a desk, during food service, with no hair net in place. An observation of the Unit refrigerator, located in the satellite pantry, contains two expired containers of orange sherbet (December 22, 2022) and a large blue cold pack, in the door of the freezer. V8/Unit Manager verified the expired food and the presence of the cold pack. The outside of the refrigerator had dirty brown streaks on the door. The grill on the bottom, inside of the refrigerator was covered with brown, dried food. At that time, V8/Unit Manager stated, (V7/Dietary Aide)'s hair should all be covered by her hair net. When asked if she should be wearing a hair net during food services, V8/Unit Manager was unable to answer. On 5/31/23 at 11:51 A.M., an observation of the facility Dementia Unit satellite pantry with V1/Administrator and V4/Dietary Manager verified the presence of dried food in the refrigerator and the presence of the blue cold pack in the freezer. V1/Administrator stated the room was an all- purpose room used for storage and for resident food distribution. V4/Dietary Manager stated that kitchen staff were responsible for cleaning the refrigerator every 3 days. V4/Dietary Manager was unable to state when the refrigerator was last cleaned.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 38% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 17 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $11,180 in fines. Above average for Illinois. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 48/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Seminary Manor's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SEMINARY MANOR an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Seminary Manor Staffed?

CMS rates SEMINARY MANOR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Seminary Manor?

State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at SEMINARY MANOR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Seminary Manor?

SEMINARY MANOR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 121 certified beds and approximately 97 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GALESBURG, Illinois.

How Does Seminary Manor Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SEMINARY MANOR's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Seminary Manor?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Seminary Manor Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SEMINARY MANOR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Seminary Manor Stick Around?

SEMINARY MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Seminary Manor Ever Fined?

SEMINARY MANOR has been fined $11,180 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,191. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Seminary Manor on Any Federal Watch List?

SEMINARY MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.