SEMINARY MANOR
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Seminary Manor has a Trust Grade of D, indicating that it is below average and has some significant concerns. It ranks #284 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, but it is #3 out of 6 in Knox County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 5 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is better than the state average of 46%. However, the facility has concerning RN coverage, falling below 84% of Illinois facilities, indicating that residents may not receive adequate nursing oversight. Specific incidents of concern include a resident developing a severe pressure ulcer shortly after admission due to the facility's failure to implement proper care protocols and another resident being without oxygen for extended periods, leading to respiratory distress. Additionally, one resident's untreated urinary tract infection resulted in a serious hospitalization for sepsis. While the staffing turnover is lower than average, the presence of serious health risks raises significant concerns about the overall care quality at Seminary Manor.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Illinois
- #284/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $11,180 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: (1) return resident trust fund balances for 46 residents (R1, R5-R...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2025
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue a PRN/as needed medication for one resident (R237) of 20 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs in a sample of 44.
Findings ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Care Plan to include a blood thinner and Insulin for one resident (R235) of 20 residents reviewed for Care Plan development in a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply leg compression stockings for one resident (R69) of one residents reviewed for compression stockings in a sample of 44....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential triggers, triggers for a past trauma-related incident, or emotional support needed for one resident (R237) of one reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly QAPI/Quality Assessment Plan Improvement meetings. This has the potential to affect all 97 residents living in the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, monitor and review antibiotic use for five of five residents (R25, R40, R47, R74, R297) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the level of Oxygen in a portable Oxygen tank for a reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R18's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents the following: Mirtazapine (antidepressant) 30mg (milligrams) by mouth daily, Bupropion HCL (hydrochloride) (antidepressant) 300mg by mouth daily, and Se...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask and nebulizer tubing was changed every seven days and stored in a bag between uses for two residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that wound care supplies were disinfected after each resident's wound cares. This failure has the potential to affect res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately notify the physician to obtain a treatment...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive urinary tract infection care plan for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for UTI's (Urinary Tract Infection...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a residents pressure u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing the use of insulin for one of one residents (R2) reviewed for insulin in the sample of 44.
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to failed to wear the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during the serving of food, failed to discard expired food, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 38% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $11,180 in fines. Above average for Illinois. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Seminary Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SEMINARY MANOR an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Seminary Manor Staffed?
CMS rates SEMINARY MANOR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Seminary Manor?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at SEMINARY MANOR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Seminary Manor?
SEMINARY MANOR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 121 certified beds and approximately 97 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GALESBURG, Illinois.
How Does Seminary Manor Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SEMINARY MANOR's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Seminary Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Seminary Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SEMINARY MANOR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Seminary Manor Stick Around?
SEMINARY MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Seminary Manor Ever Fined?
SEMINARY MANOR has been fined $11,180 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,191. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Seminary Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
SEMINARY MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.