ALLURE OF GENESEO
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Allure of Geneseo has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is decent and slightly above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #210 out of 665 in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 5 in Henry County, indicating that only two local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, increasing from 7 issues in 2024 to 8 in 2025. Staffing is a notable weakness here, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 41%, which, while below the state average, still suggests instability. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and the facility offers average RN coverage, indicating some level of nursing oversight. However, there are concerning incidents documented by inspectors. For example, opened food items were not dated, which poses a risk to residents, and there were cleanliness issues in the kitchen, such as dust and debris on equipment. Additionally, drinks were served at improper temperatures, and the facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager, which is essential for maintaining food service standards. Overall, while there are some strengths, families should carefully consider these weaknesses when researching Allure of Geneseo.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Illinois
- #210/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by ensuring clothing attire was clean and free of debris for one resident (R47) reviewed for dig...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply physician-ordered compression stockings for one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R7's current medical record documents R7's diagnoses to include: History of falling, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask and nebulizer tubing was changed every 72 hours and stored in a bag between uses and ensure oxygen tub...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review facility staff failed to disinfect a shared glucometer between resident use for three of three residents (R6, R11 and R25) reviewed for infection cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened food items were dated upon opening and ensure areas in the kitchen were clean. This failure has the potential t...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R219's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 2/16/2025 at 6:06 PM documents R219 was sent to the local emergency room due to a recent...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R219's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 2/16/2025 at 6:06 PM documents R219 was sent to the local emergency room due to a recent...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy during incontinent care for one resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer one resident (R20) for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after onset of new possible serious mental illness of fiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Physician Order Report Summary indicates R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Dis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist two residents (R25, R26) at risk of malnutrition...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have any indication for use for an antipsychotic medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 1. Facility Policy/Safe Resident Handling/Transfers dated 2023 documents: All residents require safe handling when transferred t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve drinks at palatable temperatures. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 resident who currently reside in the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to respond timely to a call light for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for call lights, in a sample of 28.
FINDINGS INCLUDE:
The facility polic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a designated smoking area was located an adequate distance from a resident's room to allow the resident the choice to open the windo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
3. R19's Restorative Nursing Assessment, dated 10/6/22, documents an impairment of one side of upper and lower extremities. This form documents to continue restorative program: Passive Range of Motion...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow facility protocol for the administration of i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a rational for the continued use of an antibiotic for one of one resident (R19) reviewed for unnecessary antibiotic use in a sample...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager. This failure has the potential to affect all 56 currently residing in the facility.
Findings include:
T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure equipment in the kitchen was clean, opened food items were dated, and expired food items were discarded. This failure h...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 41% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Allure Of Geneseo's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ALLURE OF GENESEO an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Allure Of Geneseo Staffed?
CMS rates ALLURE OF GENESEO's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Allure Of Geneseo?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at ALLURE OF GENESEO during 2022 to 2025. These included: 20 with potential for harm and 2 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Allure Of Geneseo?
ALLURE OF GENESEO is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GENESEO, Illinois.
How Does Allure Of Geneseo Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ALLURE OF GENESEO's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Allure Of Geneseo?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Allure Of Geneseo Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ALLURE OF GENESEO has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Allure Of Geneseo Stick Around?
ALLURE OF GENESEO has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Allure Of Geneseo Ever Fined?
ALLURE OF GENESEO has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Allure Of Geneseo on Any Federal Watch List?
ALLURE OF GENESEO is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.