AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG

1000 WEST SLOAN STREET, HARRISBURG, IL 62946 (618) 252-0351
For profit - Corporation 68 Beds AXIOM HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
25/100
#457 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Axiom Healthcare of Harrisburg has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #457 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois places it in the bottom half statewide, and it ranks #3 out of 4 in Saline County, meaning there is only one local facility that is rated better. The facility's performance appears stable, with 22 issues documented in both 2024 and 2025. Staffing is a major concern, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 58%, which is above the state average. While there have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign, the nursing home has less RN coverage than 79% of facilities in Illinois, which may lead to missed health issues. Serious incidents include failures to properly assess and treat pressure ulcers for residents, resulting in severe injuries. Overall, families should weigh these significant weaknesses against the lack of fines when considering Axiom Healthcare of Harrisburg for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
25/100
In Illinois
#457/665
Bottom 32%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
6 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 6 issues
2025: 6 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Chain: AXIOM HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents living ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents living in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's Resident Daily Census Report document dated 8/27/2025, documents 35 residents residing in the facility. Review of the nursing schedules for June and July document that no RN was on shift on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025 for 8 consecutive hours.On 8/27/2025 at 2:22 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she is not aware if there had been any Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025. V2 stated, there are no RN hours documented on the schedule for those days.On 8/28/2025 at 11:51 AM, V14 (Regional Reimbursement Specialist) stated the facility did not have registered nurse coverage for 8 hours a day, seven days a week on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025.On 8/28/2025 at 11:53 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not have registered nurse coverage for 8 hours a day, seven days a week on 6/8/2025, 7/4/2025, 7/5/2025, 7/6/2025 and 7/11/2025. V1 stated the facility follows the federal and state staff regulations and does not have a staffing policy.
Mar 2025 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess, follow physician orders, and implem...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess, follow physician orders, and implement interventions to prevent and/or treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 (R78) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 26. This failure resulted in R78's Stage 4 pressure ulcer not being treated as ordered by the physician from 3/11/25 to 3/20/25 (nine days) and unstageable pressure ulcers to bilateral heels not being assessed and/or treated from 3/11/25 to 3/20/25 (9 days). Findings Include: R78's admission Record with a print date of 3/20/25 documents R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, benign neoplasm of prostate, and vascular dementia with a diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy identified on 2/15/25. R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R78 is at risk of developing pressure ulcers and documents R78 has one Stage 1 pressure ulcer and two unstageable pressure ulcers. The Skin and Ulcer/Injury Treatments on this MDS are documented as, Pressure reducing device for bed, Turning/repositioning program, Pressure ulcer/injury care, Application of nonsurgical dressings, Applications of ointments/medications, and Application of dressings to feet. R78's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 16, which indicates R78 is not at risk of developing pressure ulcers. R78's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have pressure ulcer to coccyx, r/t (related to) Immobility Date Initiated: 02/15/2025. This Focus area includes the following interventions implemented on 2/15/25, Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness Assess/record/monitor wound healing Weekly Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declined to MD (physician) .Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including: transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning .Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown .Inform the resident/family/caregivers of any new area of skin breakdown .Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record .Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx (signs/symptoms) of infection, wound size (length x width x depth), stage .Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated The resident needs assistance, reminder to turn/reposition at least every 2 hours, more often as needed or requested. Res (resident) will refuse at times Treat pain as per orders prior to treatment/turning etc. to ensure the resident's comfort Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue and exudate R78's Order Recap Report dated 2/1/25 to 3/31/25 includes the following physician orders: Start date 3/11/25 Heel protectors and heels floated when in bed every day and night shift. Start date 2/16/25 and end date 2/28/25.Coccyx 4 x (by) 5 cm (centimeter) shearing. Cleanse with NS (normal saline). Pat dry. Apply zinc barrier cream q (every) shift and PRN (as needed) until healed as needed for shearing and every day and night shift for shearing. Start date 3/14/25. Cleanse site to sacrum with NS or wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply Border gauze daily every day shift for [sic] promote wound healing. Start date 3/11/25 end date 3/13/25. Cleanse site to coccyx with NS or wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply Border gauze daily every day shift. Start date 2/16/25 end date 2/28/25. B/L (bilateral) heels: deep tissue injury: skin prep q shift until healed. every day and night shift for deep tissue injury. Start date of 3/11/25 and end date of 3/13/25. Apply Border gauze dressing to Right hip daily every day shift. Start date of 2/16/25 and end date of 2/28/25. Right ankle; pressure area: skin prep daily and cover with foam dressing daily and PRN until healed. as needed for pressure area. And every day shift for pressure area. Start date 2/16/25 and end date of 2/28/25. Resident to wear B/L heel protectors and float heels when in bed as resident tolerates. Deep tissue injury. every day and night shift for deep tissue injury. On 03/17/25 at 9:25 AM, R78 was lying in his bed wearing heel protector boots on bilateral feet, with a sheet covering portions of his body. R78 stated he had a pressure ulcer on his buttocks that he acquired during a recent hospital stay. R78's Skin-Other Skin Condition Report dated 2/15/25 documents an area on coccyx, right buttock, and left buttock with no description, assessment, and/or measurements of the areas. R78's Skin-Pressure/Diabetic/Venous/Arterial Wound Report dated 2/16/25 identifies the report as an admission assessment with the following assessment of the pressure areas documented, 1. unstageable pressure area to coccyx that measures 4 x (by) 5 x 0 cm (centimeters), 2. Stage 1 pressure injury to left hip that measures 7 x 6 x 0 cm, 3. deep tissue injury to bilateral heels with no measurements, described as deep red and mushy. 4. right ankle closed pressure area that measures 5 x 5 cm. R78's Progress Notes document: 2/18/25 .New skin issue. Location: Rear left trochanter (hip) Pressure ulcer/injury. Wound was present on admission. Signs and symptoms of infection: None. Painful: No. Measurements not documented as part of this assessment. Reason measurements not documented as part of this assessment: Measurements not due at this time. Skin Note: admitted with pressure areas to L (left) hip, bilat (bilateral) ankles, bilat heels, coccyx. There is no assessment and/or measurement of the areas documented in this progress note. 2/26/25 .Skin #001: skin issue has not been evaluated. Location: Rear left trochanter (hip) Issue type: Pressure ulcer/injury. Wound was present on admission. #002 Skin issue has not been evaluated. Location: Rear left trochanter (hip) .Issue type: Pressure ulcer/injury. Wound was present on admission. (duplicate of issue#001) #003: New skin issue. Location: Left heel .Reddened Red wound was present on admission. #004: New skin Issue: Location. Right heel .red wound was present on admission. #005: New skin Issue. Location: right plantar foot .Right ankle issue type: Pressure ulcer/injury Unstageable .Wound was present on admission. Measurements not documented as part of this assessment. There is no further assessment or measurements documented in this progress note. 2/27/25 (V6/Wound Specialist) here and seen res (resident) new orders received. 2/27/25 Resident experiencing altered LOC (level of consciousness) .MD (Physician) notified. T.O. (telephone order) Send to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) R78's Order Recap Report dated 2/1/25 to 3/31/25 includes the following physician order with a start date of 2/27/25 and an end date of 2/28/25. Silvadene External Cream 1% (Silver Sulfadiazine) apply to sacrum topically every day shift for wound cleanse with wound cleanser pat dry and apply Silvadene, collagen, calcium alginate and dry dressing to wound on sacrum. R78's Wound Specialist note dated 2/27/25 documents, Patient seen on 2/27/25, however, I couldn't put an official note for lack of vital information on the visit of 2/27/25. The patient had an open area on the buttock that measured 3 x 2 with a treatment of Silvadene, collagen, calcium alginate, and dry dressing. R78's Admission/re-admission Observation dated 3/11/25 documents the following assessment under skin integrity, Right trochanter (hip) 6 x 6 cm Unstageable, Sacrum 3 x 2 cm Stage 1. There is no other skin assessment documented on this report. R78's Wound Specialist Report dated 3/13/25 documents a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to R78's coccyx that measured 2.5 x 1.6 x 0.4 cm with an order for a treatment of calcium alginate, collagen powder, silver Sulfadiazine and a gauze island dressing to be applied daily. R78's Progress Notes document: 3/14/25 .Skin Issue: #001: Skin issue has been evaluated. Location: Left heel .red wound was present on admission .#002: Skin issue has been evaluated. Location: Right heel red wound present on admission .#003: Skin issue has not been evaluated. Location: Right plantar foot Pressure ulcer/injury Unstageable .Wound was present on admission. #004: Skin issue has not been evaluated. Location Rear left trochanter (hip) .Pressure ulcer/injury. Wound was present on admission There are no description/assessment/measurements of the pressure ulcers in this progress note. R78's Progress Notes do not document assessment and/or measurements of R78's pressure ulcers. On 03/19/25 at 11:00 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) removed a dirty bandage from R78's sacrum that was dated 3/18/25. V8 changed her gloves and hand sanitized then cleaned the area that was open with red/pink tissue in the center of the wound and surrounding the open area. V8 cleaned the area with wound cleanser and covered with a border foam dressing. V8 stated that was the only treatment R78 had. This surveyor asked to observe R78's hip and heels. R78's left hip was free of obvious skin breakdown. R78's right hip had an approximate softball size discolored area on the bony prominence. V8 touched the area and stated it was blanchable and stated V6 (Wound Specialist) had seen the area and it healed out. R78's right heel was observed, and the skin appeared within normal limits, but it was slightly mushy when touched by V8. V8's right outer ankle was red and irritated looking when V8 touched the area it blanched. V8 lifted R78's left leg up out of the boot. R78's left heel was mushy and not in a normal heel shape. The heel was indented and appeared very soft. V8 pushed on the left heel and the skin and underlying tissue held the indented shape after V8 pushed on it. V8 stated it was mushy and did not blanch. R78 stated he always wears the boots to prevent skin breakdown. On 03/19/25 at 11:40 AM, when asked to see the wound log, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she was behind on it. When asked if she had seen R78's pressure areas, V2 stated she had once but she was off sick last week, so she didn't see them last week. This surveyor reviewed R78's physician orders with V2 and they do not document an order for treatment to the left heel, right ankle, or right hip since his admission back to the facility on 3/11/25. V2 stated she would have to review his record before she could give this surveyor any information related to the pressure areas. On 03/19/25 at 1:52 PM, V8 (LPN) stated R78's heels have been soft since he returned from the hospital on 2/27/25. V8 stated R78 had a treatment to his right hip but it looks better since they discontinued the treatment. This surveyor reviewed V6 (Wound Specialist) note dated 3/13/25 and asked why the new treatment order was not followed. V8 stated she didn't have access to V6's orders and/or progress notes. V8 stated V2 (Director of Nurses) usually prints off V6's progress notes and gives them to the nurse working on the floor so they can process any new orders. On 03/19/25 at 4:27 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she would expect the nurse's to complete thorough assessments and to obtain and follow physician orders. V2 stated she is not normally behind on the wound log but right now she is. V2 stated the treatment V8 administered to R78 was not the most recent physician order. V2 stated she called V10 (Physician) and notified him they had not followed V6's most recent treatment recommendations. When asked if R78's pressure ulcer/injuries had improved or declined, V2 stated she would say the area on R78's coccyx looked more like a pressure and not a shear as it was originally classified, so she would say it had worsened. V2 stated she didn't think the area on his hip had worsened and it was blanchable when she assessed him. V2 stated she also assessed R78's heels. V2 stated they were soft not blanchable and not in good shape. V2 stated the left heel was definitely mushy and could rapidly deteriorate. When asked if R78's heels had improved or declined, V2 stated she wouldn't be able to tell because they did not have a previous thorough assessment. R78's Skin-Other Skin Condition Report dated 3/19/25 documents the following pressure ulcers, Right trochanter (hip)- 6 cm x 6 cm brown discoloration blanchable, not open, no drainage, Right ankle (outer) -2 cm x 1.5 cm reddened area, blanchable, not open, no drainage, Right heel - 6 cm x 5 cm soft, mushy heel, not open non blanchable, Left heel - 2 cm x 2 cm soft, mushy heel, not open, non-blanchable, sacrum- 1.5 cm x 1 cm x 0.1 cm, stage 4 pressure ulcer, scant amt (amount) of drainage, no odor, 100% granulation tissue. Under Treatment/Pain Assessment this report documents, Awaiting treatment orders for areas except coccyx. Coccyx treatment order clarified from (V10/Physician) d/t (due to) unable to contact (V6/Wound Specialist) at this time. (V10) notified of (V6's) order from 3/13/25 but order in place in facility not matching order from (V6). (V10) clarifies order to cleanse coccyx with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply SSD 1%, collagen, calcium alginate, cover with border gauze daily. Order processed. On 3/20/25 at 9:56 AM, V6 (Wound Specialist) stated when he first saw R78 he didn't have access to the electronic records and his notes fell through the crack. V6 stated he saw R78 two weeks later and put a progress note in the system. V6 stated he assessed the pressure area on R78's buttocks and thought he looked at his heels. V6 stated floating his heels would be the treatment for the pressure areas on his heels although if the nurse wanted it, he could prescribe skin prep, although it isn't really advised. V6 stated the facility skin checks only mark when there is an actual open area and not when it is just red. V6 stated he would expect the facility to implement his orders and recommendations for interventions. V6 stated the area would heal much faster if they followed his current treatment orders. The facility Pressure Injury and Skin Condition Assessment policy dated 11/28/12 documents, Purpose: To establish guidelines for assessing, monitoring and documenting the presence of skin breakdown, pressure injuries and other ulcers and assuring interventions are implemented. Pressure and other ulcers (diabetic, arterial, venous) will be assessed and measured at least every seven (7) days by licensed nurse and documented in the resident's clinical record 7. At the earliest sign of a pressure injury or other skin problem, the resident, legal representative, and attending physician will be notified. The initial observation of the ulcer or skin breakdown will also be described in the nursing progress notes .10. Pressure injuries and other ulcers (arterial, diabetic, venous) will be measured at least weekly and recorded in centimeters in the resident's clinical record. 11. A wound assessment for each identified open area (sic) will be completed and will include: a. Site location, b. Size (length x width x depth) c. Stage of pressure ulcer d. Odor e. Drainage f. Description g. Date and initials of the individual performing the assessment 18. A licensed nurse shall observe condition of wound incision daily, or with dressing changes as ordered. Observations such as drainage, dehiscence, redness, swelling, or pain will be documented in the nurse's notes. If observations are acute, physician and responsible will be notified by charge nurse
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 2 (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 2 (R7) residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 26. Findings Include: R7's admission Record with a print date of 3/20/25 documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, depression, hypertension, and low back pain. R7's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/19/25 documents R7 has a severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents R7 has a history of falls without serious injury. R7's Investigation Report for Falls documents the following falls. 11/24/24 documents R7 was found lying on her back in the lobby. The intervention implemented was a physical therapy and occupation therapy evaluation and treatment. 12/20/24 documents R7 was found across from her room in the hall sitting on the floor. The intervention implemented was to check her frequently when in bed and to use a pad alarm instead of a tab alarm. 1/25 (did not document full date) documents R7 was found sitting on the floor next to her bed. The area of concern identified was that her room needed to be closer to the nurse's station and the intervention implemented was bed low to floor. 1/3/25 documents R7 was found seated by a vacant bed. The intervention implemented was a later wake up time as she seeks to get into vacant beds when she is gotten up too early. 1/14/25 documents R7 was found lying on her left side on the floor with her head by the head of her bed and her feet by the door. The intervention implemented was to change her trazadone to bedtime, discontinue the valium, Ativan at bedtime and to offer snacks/drinks when restless. R7's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area of I have had an actual fall with minor injury r/t (related to) Poor Balance, Unsteady gait. Date Initiated: 11/24/2024. The interventions for this Focus Area include, New intervention: Fall mats on both side of the bed. Date Initiated: 1/25/25. On 03/17/25 at 1:24 PM, R7 was observed laying in a bed that was low to the floor, with a floor mat on the floor next to the left side of the bed. On 03/20/25 at 10:40 AM, R7 was observed in bed that was low to the floor with no mats on floor next to bed. V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Care Plan Coordinator) was present during observation and after reviewing R7's current fall interventions, stated R7 should have fall mats on the floor on both sides of her bed. The facility Fall Prevention Program policy dated 11/21/17 documents, Purpose: to assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Programs will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The Facility schedule for February and March 2025 documents there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 2/1/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/22/2025, 2/28/2025, 3/1/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/14/2025, 3/15/2025, 3/22/2025, and 3/29/2025. On 03/17/2025 at 9:25 AM, R78 states there isn't enough staff at times. On 03/19/2025 at 4:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, they don't have RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 day a week. V2 stated, they usually lack Saturdays, and some Sundays are covered. V2 said they have a RN that works as needed who does every other Sunday. On 03/19/2025 at 4:11 PM, V2 stated, there was no RN coverage on 2/1/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/22/2025, 2/28/2025, 3/1/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/14/2025, 3/15/2025, 3/22/2025, and 3/29/2025. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 03/17/2025 documents the current census is 26.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 of 8 residents (R3, R6, R12, R13, R18, R23, R24, and R80) reviewed for room size in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 3/20/25 at 8:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) measured rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 10 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 10 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6 sq. ft. (72.3 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.1 sq. ft. (76 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 315.7 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 314.6 sq. ft. (78.7sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 307.1 sq. ft. (76.8 sq. ft. per bed) A Daily Census provided by the facility and dated 3/17/25 documents R3, R6, R12, R13, R18, R23, R24, and R80 reside in the rooms listed above. There were no residents assigned to rooms 105, 109, or 110. During the survey from 3/17/25 to 3/20/25, no residents were observed to reside in rooms 105,109, and 110, confirming these rooms were unoccupied. room [ROOM NUMBER] was equipped with 2 beds, 3 nightstands and 3 dressers (rather than the 4 beds for which that room is certified). room [ROOM NUMBER] was equipped with only 3 beds, an oversized recliner, 4 nightstands, and 2 dressers (rather than the 4 beds for which that room is certified). rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] both included 4 beds and 4 nightstands. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were both being utilized as storage. room [ROOM NUMBER] was equipped with 4 beds, 6 nightstands, and 1 recliner. room [ROOM NUMBER] was equipped with 3 beds, 1 recliner, 1 dresser, 5 nightstands, and two mini refrigerators. Observations of the undersized resident rooms found the rooms adequate to meet the medical and personal needs for the residents assigned to these rooms, as they were not currently being utilized as 4-bed rooms. Inquiries regarding the size of these rooms during the survey from 03/17/25 to 03/20/25, found no concerns or negative interviews from residents who reside in the waivered rooms. On 03/20/25 between 9:27 AM and 10:03 AM, R3, R6, R12, R13, R18, R23, R24, and R80 all voiced no concerns with the size of their rooms during interviews. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes from the past 6 months indicated no concerns related to the size of the rooms.
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide doctor ordered wound care for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for wound care in a sample of 9. Findings included: R5's admission Rec...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide doctor ordered wound care for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for wound care in a sample of 9. Findings included: R5's admission Record documented an admission dated of 11/27/2024 with diagnoses in part of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus with diabetic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, muscle wasting and atrophy and acquired absences of left and right legs below the knee. R5's MDS (minimum data set) dated 12/26/2024 documented R5's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 total which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. The MDS documented R5 is dependent on staff for all toileting, bathing and dressing tasks and needs partial/moderate assistance with all personal hygiene tasks. On 1/21/2025 at 11:00pm, R5 said he has developed a wound on his penis and his doctor has ordered his wound treatment to be done twice per day since 1/8/25, but usually the nursing staff only performs his wound care one per day. R5 said he has spoken with the nursing staff about getting his treatment done twice per day, but it still doesn't get completed. R5 said his wound is getting better despite his treatment not being done twice per day. R5's POS (Physician's order sheet) dated 1/1/25 through 1/31/25 documents the following order: 1/8/25 Santyl ointment 30 grams, cleansed penis with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Santyl BID (twice per day). R5's TAR (Treatment administration record) dated 1/8/25 through 1/31/25 documented R5 missed the following treatments: 1/12/25 (6p), 1/13/25 (6p), 1/14/25 (6a), 1/14/25 (6p), 1/18/25 (6p) and 1/19/25 (6p). No further documentation was noted on the TAR as to why R5's has missed these treatments. A review of R5's progress notes for January 2025 did not document R5 refusing care. On 1/21/2025 at 2:00pm, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said R5 has not been getting his treatments twice per day. V6 said she did not know why he's not getting the treatments as ordered by his doctor. V6 said if R5 refused his treatment, the nurse is supposed to document the refusal on the back of the TAR. V6 said she has not seen R5 refused to get his wound care done. On 1/21/2025 at 10:45am, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said R5 tells her he does not get his wound care provided twice per day because the nursing staff won't do it. On 1/23/2024 at 10:45am, V1 (Administrator/LPN) said R5 should have been receiving his wound care twice per day as ordered by his doctor and did not know why R5 has been missing his treatment. V1 said she suspects R5 has been refusing and the staff are not documenting the refusals correctly. V1 said when residents refuse care staff should document the care refusal in the residents chart. V1 reviewed R5's chart and could not find any refusals of care documented for January 2025.
Mar 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a medical provider of an out of therapeutic range PT/INR (Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio) lab result for one (R7) o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a medical provider of an out of therapeutic range PT/INR (Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio) lab result for one (R7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 18. Findings include: R7's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 12/4/23 and listed diagnoses including a history of Cerebral Infarction and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. R7's Physicians Order Sheet for March 2024 documented an order dated 3/18/24 for Coumadin 4mg (milligrams) by mouth at bedtime Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, alternating with Coumadin 3mg. by mouth at bedtime on Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and a 12/26/23 order for, PT/INR (to be drawn) weekly. A Lab Report dated 3/26/24 documented, Coagulation: PT-37.6 (reference range 9.8-12.2 seconds). INR-3.8 (reference range 0.9-1.2). Handwritten on this document was, 3/26/24, 18:00. Called (V10/Physician's) office. Awaiting call back, and 3/27/24 14:25: Spoke with (V10's) Nurse, states (she) will call back (when) (V10) is in the office. On 3/26/24 at 9:45am, R7 was in her room lying in bed. R7 was alert but oriented only to herself. On 03/28/24 at 09:10 AM, V9 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R7 gets her PT/INR drawn weekly to monitor the Coumadin. V9 stated R7 is at baseline functioning and is not showing any side effects of coumadin therapy. V9 stated V10 was in the building on 3/26/24 to sign order sheets and did not give any new orders on R7. V9 stated they had not yet received the lab result when V10 was there. V9 stated staff unsuccessfully attempted to contact V10 on 3/26/24 and 3/27/24. V9 stated he has not tried to call V10 today, but he will now do so. On 3/28/24 at 9:26 AM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated V10 is also the facility's Medical Director. V2 stated staff should have tried calling V10's cell number or contacting the on call physician. On 3/28/24 9:34 AM, this surveyor was present when V9 called V10's office. V9 told V10's staff he needed to speak to V10 emergently and gave staff the lab results. V9 stated V10's staff consulted with V10 who gave orders to hold one dose of the coumadin and resume it at 3mg. daily thereafter. V9 then documented the interaction on a Telephone Order Sheet. A Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy dated 12/7/17 stated, The facility and/or facility staff shall promptly notify appropriate individuals (Administrator, Director of Nurses, Physician, Guardian, Health Care Power of Attorney) of changes in the residents medical/mental condition and/or status. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on call physician when there has been: M. Abnormal lab findings.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This has the potential to affect all 19 residents residing in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This has the potential to affect all 19 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: On 3/26/24 at 1:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is not able to provide any documentation of minutes or attendance sheets for the facility's quarterly QAPI meetings. V1 further stated she started her employment at this facility in September 2023 and no QA information was available because she has not held a QAPI meeting since being employed. During the survey, a review of facility records revealed no documentation quarterly QAPI meetings were held. No meeting minutes or attendance sheets were found. The facility was unable to provide reproducible evidence QAPI meetings had been scheduled or occurred. The facility's QAPI Plan revised on 12/1/2022, documents Aspects of services and care are measured against established performance goals. Key monitors are measured and trended on a quarterly basis. The QAPI Committee analyzes performance to identify and follow-up on areas of opportunity. The Long Term Care Facility application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 3/26/2024, documents 19 residents reside in the facility.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 8 of 8 residents (R2, R7, R9, R11, R12, R14, R15, R16) reviewed for room size in a sample of 18. Findings include: On 3/27/24 at 12:20 PM, this surveyor accompanied V3 (Maintenance Supervisor) for the purpose of measuring the 10 resident rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 10 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 10 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6 sq. ft. (72.3 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.1 sq. ft. (76 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 315.7 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 314.6 sq. ft. (78.7sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 307.1 sq. ft. (76.8 sq. ft. per bed) A Daily Roster provided by the facility and dated 3/26/24 documents that R2, R7, R9, R11, R12, R14, R15, and R16 reside in the rooms listed above. There were no residents assigned to rooms 106, 109, 211 or 212. During the survey from 3/26/24 to 3/28/24, no residents were observed to reside in rooms 106, 109, 211 and 212, confirming these rooms were unoccupied. room [ROOM NUMBER] was equipped with only 2 beds, an oversized recliner, 2 nightstands, and 2 dressers (rather than the 4 beds for which that room is certified). Rooms 103, 104, 105, 107, 109, 110, 211, and 212 were each equipped with only 2 beds, 2 nightstands, and 2 dressers (rather than the 4 beds per room for which these rooms are certified). Observations of the undersized resident rooms found the rooms adequate to meet the medical and personal needs for the residents assigned to these rooms, as they were not currently being utilized as 4-bed rooms. Inquiries regarding the size of these rooms during the survey from 03/26/24 to 03/28/24, found no concerns or negative interviews from residents or families of residents who reside in the waivered rooms. During interview, on 3/26/24, R2, R7, R9, R11, R12, R14, R15, and R16 all voiced no concerns with the size of their rooms during interviews. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes from the past 6 months indicated no concerns related to the size of the rooms.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sinks in working order for 2 of 6 residents, (R1 and R6) reviewed for environment in the sample of 6. Findings: 1. On 2/13/2024, at...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sinks in working order for 2 of 6 residents, (R1 and R6) reviewed for environment in the sample of 6. Findings: 1. On 2/13/2024, at 9:15 AM, in R1's room there was a sign covering R1's sink that stated out of order. On 2/13/2024, at 10:30 AM, R1 who was alert to name walked this surveyor to his room. When asked what happened to his sink R1 said it was broke. When asked where he washed his hands he pointed and said, I use a bathroom sink down the hall. 2. On 2/13/2024, at 9:18 AM, R6's bathroom sink was noted to be clogged with dirty water. On 2/13/2024, at 9:40 AM, R6 who was alert to person, place and time stated he has problems with his bathroom sink clogging up daily. R6 stated the maintenance person must come daily and unclog his bathroom sink. On 2/13/2024, at 10:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated V9 (Regional Maintenance) is coming to the facility on Thursday afternoon, 2/15/2024, to check on R1's bathroom sink. V1 stated the issue is a plumbing issue. V1 stated V9 is bringing more equipment with him to help resolve the plumbing issue. V1 stated the broken sink in R1's room has been like that since she came in September 2023. V1 stated the regional office has known about the broken sink since September 2023. On 2/13/2024, at 10:45 AM, V2 (Maintenance) stated he has been working here 3 months and he has called 2 plumbing companies in the area to come and check out the plumbing/pipes in the facility. V2 stated one of the companies was supposed to come out 2 weeks ago but never showed up and he has not heard back from the other company. V2 stated he has called multiple times to the companies and has no documentation available that these companies have been called. V2 stated V9 (Regional Maintenance) is scheduled to come here on 2/15/2024, in the afternoon to look at the plumbing issues in the facility and help resolve them. V2 stated he must run a snake down R6's bathroom sink daily because it clogs up.
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate skin assessments and/or ensure preven...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate skin assessments and/or ensure preventative treatment and services were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 developing unstageable DTI's (deep tissue injuries) to the right and left heel with undetermined thickness. The findings include: R1's face sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Physician's orders dated 12/4/23-12/31/23 list some of R1's diagnoses as UTI (urinary tract infection), A-Fib (Atrial fibrillation), HTN (hypertension), seizure disorder, dementia, AKI (Acute kidney injury), and HLD (hyperlipidemia). R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/8/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS, in Section GG, documents R1 is dependent for rolling left and right in bed, sit to lying, lying to sitting on the side of bed, chair/bed to chair transfers. Section M documents R1 is at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries and has one or more unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. Section M also documents R1 was given a pressure reducing device for the bed and put on a turning and repositioning program. R1's section M contained no other documentation regarding pressure ulcers. R1's care plan dated 12/18/23 document a focus category of dependent for transfer/mobility-Unable to assist/Assists only minimally and includes documented interventions of Bed Mobility-The resident is totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed and T&P (turn and position) q (every) 2 hours while awake. The focus category documents per Braden Risk Score-High, resident has risk factors may lead to pressure ulcer formation. The following interventions are documented: CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) to assess skin during cares and head to toe during shower/bed bath, report any reddened or open areas to nurse, daily skin check for impairment/issues, report any new areas of impairment to practitioner for follow up, encourage/assist to prop pressure areas to avoid contact skin to skin or prolonged contact with surfaces, as resident allows, float heels while in bed, as resident allows while awake, turn and reposition, as resident allows while sleeping, turn and reposition, pressure reducing cushion while in bed, and pressure reducing cushion while up in chair. R1's Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] documents the following for pressure areas: small area on back et (and) along spine, small area on sacrum, areas to bilateral heels signed by V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk dated 12/4/23 documents a score of 8, which indicates R1 is at high risk for developing pressure ulcers and is signed by V8. The same assessment under wound review documents Y (yes) to the question of Does the resident currently have an unresolved pressure ulcers? (If yes, please see weekly wound measurement) Under Skin Treatment Review: Indicate all used in the last 7 days float heels is marked as being used. V8's nurse progress note dated 12/4/23 at 10:00pm, documents a Body Assessment was completed, and R1 has reddened pressure areas on back, spine, sacrum, et (and) bilateral heels. Right heel has a 0.5 x 1 cm (centimeter) scabs intact. R1's nursing summary dated 1/16/24 and signed by V8 notes for skin care, pressure relief mattress and heel protectors and notes heels are soft. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk documented by V9 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 12/11/23, 12/18/23, 12/25/23 and 1/1/24, all document a score of 15, which indicates R1 is at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. The wound review section for all of the above dates has a line drawn through the column which asks, Does the resident currently have any unresolved pressure ulcers? R1's Physician's Orders dated 12/4/23 to 12/31/23 documents R1 is a moderate skin risk and documents an order of weekly skin assessment with note on Monday shift 2-10. R1's Physician's orders dated 1/1/24-1/31/24 document an order dated 12/4/23 for weekly skin assessment with note on Monday 2-10 shift and a new order dated 1/29/24 for daily skin checks on 6-2 shift. R1's Skilled Progress notes from 12/4/23 to 1/22/24 indicate there was no documentation of wound location, measurements, drainage or treatment. A Skilled Progress note dated 1/23/24 at 1:30pm by V9 documents N.O. (new order) received from wound physician to apply betadine to bilateral heels bid (twice a day), son notified. A Skilled Progress Note dated 1/30/24 at 9:00am by V7 (RN/Registered Nurse) documents pressure areas to bilateral heels remain but appear to be improving. Tx (treatment) to bilateral heels performed. There was no documentation noted from 1/23/24 to 1/30/24 of wound location, measurements, drainage or treatment. R1's TARS (Treatment Administration Record) dated 12/4/23-12/31/23 document weekly skin assessments on Monday 2-10 shift. Initials indicating assessment were completed were documented on the following dates: 12/4/23, 12/11/23, 12/18/23, 12/19/23, and 12/25/23. The back of the TAR documents a skin assessment on 12/19/23 and notes skin assessment performed post shower and no new areas observed and signed by V7. There were no other skin assessments documented on the back of the TAR or in the nurse progress notes. There was no documentation noted under location, stage, diameter, depth/shape/type, color or drainage. R1's TARS dated 1/1/24-1/31/24 were reviewed and document skin assessments were initialed as being completed on the following dates: 1/1/24, 1/8/24, 1/15/24, 1/22/24, and 1/23/24. The skin assessment on the back of the TAR on 1/1/24, 1/8/24, 1/15/24, and 1/22/24 all document no new skin issues under progress/comments. On 1/23/24 under progress/ comments it documents Skin assessment performed post shower. Pressure areas remain to bilateral heels. No new areas observed. There was no documentation noted under location, stage, diameter, depth/shape/type, color or drainage. R1's Initial Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 1/25/24 by V12 (Wound Physician) documents R1 has an unstageable DTI of the right heel, undetermined thickness. Etiology is noted as pressure with a duration of > (greater than) 6 days. The wound measurement to the right heel is noted as 2.5 x 3 x not measurable cm (centimeters), exudate: none and skin: intact with purple/maroon discoloration. The same evaluation also documents an unstageable DTI of the left heel, undetermined thickness, with a documented etiology of pressure with a duration of > 6 days. The wound measurement of the left hell is noted as 0.9 x 0.9 x not measurable cm, exudate: none, skin: intact with purple/maroon discoloration. On 1/26/23 at 8:30am, R1's skin check, completed by V9 (LPN), was observed. There were no wounds observed to R1's back or spine. R1's coccyx is lightly reddened. R1's left heel has an approximately 1-centimeter (cm) x 1 cm black area, then a 4 cm x 3 cm boggy area around bottom of heel and is darker pink in color. R1's right heel has 4 cm x 3 cm black area with a small area of yellow tissue in the middle. There was no drainage noted from either wound. The surrounding tissue on both wounds is light red. On 1/26/24 at 8:40am, R1 was observed lying in bed without heel protectors on. V10 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) then applied heel protectors. On 1/26/24 at 9:00am, V1 (Administrator) said she did not have any wound notes or wound assessments on R1 prior to 1/25/24. On 1/26/24 at 12:51pm, V8 (LPN) said she admitted R1 to the facility. V8 said R1 did not have an open area on her left heel but did have a scabbed area on her right heel. V8 said R1's heels were boggy. V8 said R1 had heel protectors on at first, then she wasn't wearing them. V8 said she did not contact the physician regarding the open areas on R1's body when she admitted her. V8 said she did not look at R1's heels and did not measure them after she admitted her. V8 said she did sign off as doing a skin assessment but did not do an assessment or look at her heels. V8 said she would consider heels to be a part of a skin assessment. On 1/26/24 at 12:31pm, V7 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she was shown R1's wounds by Physical Therapy. V7 said R1 usually gets her showers on the evening shift, and she usually does not do the skin checks on her since they are done on 2-10 shift. V7 said she did report the wounds to V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) and he was supposed to get ahold of the V12 (Wound Physician). V7 said she knew R1 was admitted to the facility with a wound as she did read her admission assessment. V7 said she did not call the physician since she assumed V9 called him. On 1/26/24 at 9:05am, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said he guesses they just dropped the ball on R1's wound care. V9 said he asked staff if they saw an ulcer on R1's feet because some were charting it and some were not. V9 said he became aware of the ulcers on her heels on 1/23/24 and he called physician and V12 (Wound Physician). V9 said the wound physician came to see R1 on 1/25/24. On 1/26/24 at 9:30am, V9 said they just missed the wounds and he just found out about them. V9 said the wounds were not charted on due to staff thinking he knew about them, and he didn't or he would have notified the physician and got orders for wound care. On 1/26/24 at 10:14am, V5 (LPN) said she was aware of the open areas on R1's heels. V5 said she did keep R1's heels floated. V5 said she was aware on 1/18/24 as her and V9 spoke about it, and she did not call the physician. V5 said she figured someone else had called him. V5 said she just did a check mark on R1's skin assessment and did not do a note or an assessment. V5 said she did pass it on about her heels and guesses she didn't know where it went from there. V5 said she thinks it was on 1/18/24. V5 said she would expect a resident's heels to be a part of a skin assessment. On 1/26/24 at 11:30am, V6 (Regional Quality Assurance) said she would expect heels to be a part of a skin assessment and it to be documented on the back of the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) or in the nurses note. The facility policy titled Pressure Sore Prevention Guidelines (Revised 4/06) document The nurse will complete a skin assessment on all residents upon admission then weekly for four weeks .The following guidelines will be implemented for any resident assessed at a Moderate Risk or High Risk, Some Interventions listed for high risk include turn and reposition every 2 hours, special mattress, positioning devices prn (as needed), daily skin checks. The same document notes turn and reposition every 2 hours, weekly skin checks, care plan entry. The same document states Any resident scoring a high or moderate risk for skin breakdown will be noted on the treatment sheet and signed off by the nurse. In addition, a brief weekly narrative will be completed describing the resident's skin condition on the back of the treatment sheet. A facility policy titled Decubitus Care/Pressure Areas (revised 5/07) documents it is the facility policy to ensure a proper treatment program has been instituted and is being closely monitored to promote the healing of any pressure ulcer, once identified. The document lists the procedure as 1. Upon notification of skin breakdown, a newly acquired skin condition report will be completed and forwarded to the Director of nursing. 2. The pressure area will be assessed and documented on the Treatment Administration Record. 3. Complete all areas of the TAR-Document the size, stage, site, depth, drainage, color, odor and treatment (upon obtaining from the physician), Document the status of the pressure ulcer, Document the color, 4. Notify the physician for treatment orders, 5. Documentation of the pressure area must occur upon identification and at least once a week on the TAR.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This failure has the potential to affect all 20 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/25/24 at 10:40am, V1 (Administrator) said she thinks they are doing better with RN/Registered Nurse Coverage. V1 said they now have an RN that comes in when needed. V1 said they do not currently have a DON/Director of Nurses and have not had one in about a month or so. On 1/25/24 at 12:30pm, V5 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said they do not have a DON/Director of Nurses. The facilities January 2024 licensed nursing schedule documented no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 1/5/24, 1/6/24, 1/12/24, 1/13/24, 1/19/24, 1/20/24, 1/25/24, and 1/26/24. On 1/25/24 at 11:00am, V1 verified there was no RN coverage in the facility on the above listed dates. On 1/25/24 and 1/26/24, there were no RN's observed working in the facility during the survey. Facility Document labeled Nurses Midnight Census dated 1/25/24 note there are 21 residents, with 1 resident in the hospital for a total of 20 residents residing in the facility. The facility's undated Facility Assessment Tool documented the facility required 1 full time RN to serve as DON.
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse services at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This affects all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/23 at 10:52 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) said she was the only licensed nurse working on the floor. V8 said the facility did not currently have a Director of Nursing (DON). The facility's December 2023 licensed nursing schedule documented no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on: 12/2/23, 12/8/23 12/9/23, 12/14/23, 12/15/23, 12/16/23, 12/21/23, 12/22/23, and 12/28/23. On 12/29/23 at 11:23 AM, V1 (Administrator) verified there was no RN coverage in the facility on the above listed dates. On 12/29/23 at 8:32 AM, V1 stated the facility had not had a full time Director of Nursing (DON) since 12/6/23. V1 said no staff were interested in taking the position because they don't want to take call. V1 said the facility had been advertising for the position online but no one had shown interest. V1 said there was a possibility there was a nurse from a sister facility who had shown interest and it was a possibility she would take the position in the future. The facility's undated Facility Assessment Tool documented the facility required 1 full time RN to serve as DON. The facility Roster Matrix with print date of 12/19/23 documents there are 23 residents residing in the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical grade gloves for resident care. This affects all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical grade gloves for resident care. This affects all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/27/23 at 11:29 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) and V5 (CNA) said the facility had one Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) storage room. V4 and V5 said the only gloves available from the PPE storage room were vinyl food handler gloves. Boxes of food handler gloves were observed being used for resident care around the facility. On 12/27/23 at 11:57 AM, V1 (Administrator) said facility nursing staff had been using the vinyl food handlers gloves for about a month due to the medical supply company having gloves on back order. V1 said due to the facility not being able to acquire medical grade gloves, the food handler gloves were better than no gloves. V1 said she had not tried to contact the local health department for assistance with acquiring PPE. On 12/27/23 at 1:03 PM, V7 (Health Department Director of Nursing) said the local health department no longer was assisting facilities to acquire PPE. V7 said a facility was to contact the State of Illinois if they needed assistance. On 12/29/23 at 9:29 AM, V9 (Medical Supply Company Operator) said the facility had received a shipment of gloves on 8/1/23 including 1 case of small gloves and 2 cases of extra-large gloves, again on 9/1/23 including 1 case of medium gloves, and again on 10/1/23 including 1 case of large gloves. V9 said the facility had not ordered any gloves on back order and further stated he was not aware of any back orders on any gloves provided by the medical supply company. V9 said he had checked the product numbers of gloves previously ordered by the facility and all showed they were in stock. On 12/29/23 at 8:59 AM, 5 resident rooms noted to be on contact and droplet precautions due to being positive for Covid-19 had PPE bins outside their doors with boxes of food handlers gloves on them. The PPE storage room contained a case of medium food handler gloves, a case of large food handler gloves, and 9 boxes of small food handler gloves. The facility provided an undated informational sheet from the food handler glove manufacturer that documented in part . This product complies with FDA 21 CFR 175 as safe for food contact. This product is general purpose and is not intended for medical use . The facility Roster Matrix with print date of 12/19/23 documents there are 23 residents residing in the facility.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control of rodents. This has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control of rodents. This has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 10:10 AM V2 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said the facility had a chronic mouse problem. V2 said R6's room had mice. V2 said she had reported the mice to V1 (Administrator). On 12/12/23 at 2:50 PM V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) said she had seen mice all around the facility. V5 said she had reported it to the nurses, V1, and V6 (Maintenance Director). V5 said she had heard there was a staff member who found a mouse in a resident's bed but could not recall which staff member or the specific resident. 1. R6's face sheet documented an admission date of 1/20/18. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented diagnoses including: hypertension, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness (generalized), cellulitis of right lower limb, difficulty in walking, venous insufficiency. R6's 11/3/23 Cognitive Assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 12/12/23 at 10:24 AM R6's room was observed to have a large amount of mouse droppings around the perimeter of the room and under R6's bed. On 12/12/23 at 10:28 AM R6's room was set up like a sitting area and had a large amount of mouse droppings around the perimeter of the room. On 12/12/23 at 10:41 AM the hand washing sink in the kitchen was observed to have two mouse droppings on it. The dry good storage room was observed to have a large amount of mouse droppings and whitish-brown small, shredded material that looked like shredded cardboard. Mouse droppings were observed sparsely on the shelves of the dry good storage area. 2. R4's face sheet documented an admission date of 9/11/23. R4's POS documented diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension. R4's 11/2/23 MDS (Minimum Data Set) documented a BIMS score of 14, indicating R4 was cognitively intact. On 12/12/23 at 11:52 AM R4 said he saw a mouse in his room two days prior to this investigation. R4 said he had a mouse living in the closet in his room. R4 said he usually ate in his room and the mouse would come out at night to eat the crumbs he dropped during the day. R4 said he had told several staff members. R4 said he had mice in his room so long he had started to name them. 3. R5's face sheet documented an admission date of 10/11/22. R5's POS documented diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, homelessness, asthenia, diabetic polyneuropathy associated with type 2 diabetes. R5's 10/19/23 Cognitive Assessment documented a BIMS score of 13, indicating R5 was cognitively intact. On 12/12/23 at 11:55 AM R5 said he had two mice in his room regularly. R5 said he had seen the mice in his room two days prior to this investigation. On 12/12/23 at 3:09 PM V6 (Maintenance Director) said he had been employed at the facility for three weeks prior to this investigation. V6 said he did not have a log of work orders. V6 said when he received a work order he would fix the problem and throw the work order away. V6 said he had called the pest control company to come to the facility for an extra visit approximately two weeks prior to this investigation. The facility's 11/20/23 pest control company report documented 3 mechanical rodent traps and 8 rodent bait stations without activity. The facility's Nurses Midnight Census dated 12/12/23 documented a census of 23 residents. The facility's undated Insect and Pest Control Policy documented in part . It is the policy to contract with a duly licensed exterminating service to protect and/ or control against infestations of insects and rodents. A preventative treatment, both interior and exterior, shall be applied at least once every month. Treatments will be applied more often if required . The following procedures shall apply regarding pest control: 1. Any employee observing insects or rodents of any kind shall inform their supervisor giving the exact location and type of infestation. 2. The employee shall fill out a work order form and give it to the maintenance person. 3. The maintenance person shall contact the pest control company for eradication .
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight hours a day, seven days a week: and failed to have a Registered Nurse to serve as a Dir...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight hours a day, seven days a week: and failed to have a Registered Nurse to serve as a Director of Nursing on a full-time basis. This has the potential to affect all 21 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: V1 (Administrator) stated, the facility currently does not have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. However, they have hired a Director of Nursing (DON) that is starting next week. V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/MDS) stated, the facility does not have a Registered Nurse seven days a week for at least eight hours a day. V4 stated they did hire a DON that is starting next week. The facility schedule titled, October 2023 documents the facility did not have a RN working on: 10/07/23, 10/12/23 - 10/14/23, 10/19/23 - 10/21/23. The facility document titled, September 2023 documents the facility did not have a RN working on: 09/04/23 - 09/06/23, 09/11/23, 09/12/23, 09/21/23, and 09/28/23. There is no DON listed on the schedule or DON hours for October 2023. The facility's document titled, Nurses Midnight census dated 10/25/23 documents 21 residents reside at the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0802 (Tag F0802)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff. This has the potential to affect a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff. This has the potential to affect all 21 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: On 10/26/23 at 11:45 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, V12 (Previous Dietary Manager) quit on 09/11/23 and they hired V3 (Dietary Manager) on 10/12/23. V1 said that on 09/08/23, 10/02/23, 10/03/23, 10/04/23, V13 (Registered Dietician) helped in the kitchen. V1 said that on 09/25/23 through 09/27/23, and 09/29/23, V14 (Dietary Manager from another facility) helped in the kitchen. On 10/11/23 through 10/13/23, V15 (Dietary Manager from another facility) helped in the kitchen, and on 09/10/23 through 09/13/23, 09/21/23, 09/28/23, and 09/30/23 through 10/08/23 there was no one scheduled for dietary. V1 said that on 09/15/23, 09/16/23, 09/18/23, 09/19/23, 09/20/23, 09/22/23, 09/24/23 through 09/27/23, 09/29/23 and 10/08/23 there was one person scheduled for dietary services. V1 stated, V1 and V2 (Business office manager/Social Service Director), V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator), V16 (cook), V17 (dietary aide), V18 (previous Activities Director) helped in the kitchen. On 10/25/23 at 1:42 PM V6 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated, she did help in the kitchen during the timeframe the kitchen did not have any staff. She did not cook but she helped with drinks and the dietary cards. On 10/25/23 at 1:47 PM V2 (Business Office Manager/Social Services Director) stated, she was hired on October 2, 2023. V2 stated her first week of work she worked in the kitchen. V2 said she did not have any true kitchen experience but she sure learned a lot about mechanical soft diets and how to make puree foods. On 10/25/23 at 12:55 PM V5 (Registered Nurse) stated, V9 (dietary) started as needed to help in the kitchen but she did not have any dietary experience. V5 said they did not have any staff in the kitchen. V5 stated she knows V1 (Administrator), V2 (BOM/SSD), V6 (CNA) and other worked in the kitchen. On 10/25/23 at 2:55 PM V10 (Speech Therapy) stated, there was a period that they did not have dietary staff, staff from other positions did step into rolls that were not their jobs. On 10/25/23 at 1:30 PM V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/MDS) stated, he did assist in the kitchen when they had no dietary staff. V4 said he followed the menu to the best of his/their ability. V4 said some of the dietary staff quit, and some were terminated due to no call/no shows. The facility document titled, work schedule for the week of [DATE] - 16 Dept (Department) Dietary documents: no staff scheduled for 09/10/23 - 09/13/23 and only V18 (dietary) scheduled from 5 - 1 (5:00 AM - 1:00 PM) on 09/15/23 and only V17 (dietary aide) scheduled 6 - 6 (6:00 AM - 6:00 PM) on 09/16/23. The facility document titled, work schedule for the week of [DATE] - 23 Dept (Department) Dietary documents, only V16 (Cook) working 5 - 6 (5:00 AM - 6:00 PM) on 09/18/23 - 09/20/23 and no staff scheduled on 09/22/23 and only V17 (dietary aide) working 6 - 6 (6:00 AM - 6:00 PM) on 09/23/23. There is no documentation of a dietary schedule for 09/30/23 - 10/08/23. V1 (Administrator) stated, V16 (cook) quit on 09/19/23 and V17 (dietary aide) quit on 09/25/23. V1 said the schedule of 09/24/23 - 09/30/23 is not what was worked, only the 09/24/23 was worked by the facilities dietary staff. V1 said there was no schedule for 09/30/23 - 10/08/23 because they did not have any dietary staff to put on it. V1 stated she worked in the kitchen most of those days. The facility assessment dated [DATE] documents: Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies: Staff type: Identify the type of staff members, other health care professionals, and medical practitioners that are needed to provide support and care for residents. Potential data sources include staffing records, organization chart, and Payroll-Based Journal reports. Considering the following type of staff and other professionals/practitioners, list (or refer to or provide a link to) your staffing data, directories, organization chart, or other lists that show the type of staff needed to care for your resident population. Administration (e.g., Administrator, Administrative Assistant, Staff Development, QAPI, Infection Control and Prevention, Environmental Services, Social Services, Discharge Planning, Business Office, Finance, Human Resources, Compliance and Ethics), Nursing Services (e.g., DON, RN, LPN or LVN, CNA or NAR, medication aide or technician, MDS nurse), Food and Nutrition Services (e.g., Director, support staff, registered dietician). Staffing plan: 3.2. Based on your resident population and their needs for care and support, describe your general approach to staffing to ensure that you have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time. Food and nutrition services staff: with 3 documented. The facility's document titled, Nurses Midnight census dated 10/25/23 documents 21 residents reside at the facility.
Jun 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure residents reside in an environment free of rodents. This has the potential to affect all 22 residents who live in the facility. The Findings Include: On 06/28/23 at 8:18 AM, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and location. R2 stated he has seen mice in his room at the door to his closet, has watched them run out of his room and go across the hall into R1's room, or down the hall to R5's room. R2 stated the mice run around especially when it rains - We have some sticky strips out, but I don't know if they've ever caught a mouse on the sticky strip. There were no open food items in R2's room currently. On 06/28/23 at 8:21 AM, R3 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and location. R3 stated he sees 2-3 mice every now and then. R3 stated he did catch 2 in his waste that could not get out so staff took them outside and disposed of them. R3 confirmed the facility puts out traps. There were no open food items in R3's room currently. On 06/28/23 at 9:37 AM, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and location. R1 stated there are mice in the building and wished they could get some (brand name poison) and hide it so the residents can't see it in the rooms. R1 stated then when the mice eat it, they would die, but V12 (Maintenance) needs to seal the cracks in the building. R1 said he has asked V12 about doing that or using caulk to seal the holes. R1 said sometimes the sticky strips don't work because the mice run right over them. R1 stated he has told V12 he needs more help because one person alone cannot fix this building the way it needs to be fixed. R1 stated there are gaps around the doors leading to the outside and they need to get new doors. R1 continued, Mice do bite and they carry disease and I don't want to get bit. When asked, R1 confirmed he has seen a mouse on his silver half bedrail but he was playing games on his tablet at his bedside table and was not in the bed at the time. R1 stated he tapped his foot on the floor and the mouse ran. R1 could not provide an exact date when this happened but stated it has been within the last month. R1 did not have any open food items in his room. On 06/28/23 at 11:00 AM, R4 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and location. R4 confirmed he has seen mice in his room as recent as last night. R4 stated it ran from his room across the hall to R1's room. R4 was not sure if the facility was doing anything about it, but also stated he had not complained about it. R4 confirmed he, R2, and R3 are keeping their food and snacks sealed and thinks maybe that helps. On 06/28/23 at 11:30 AM, R5 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and location. R5 confirmed she had seen mice in her room. R5 stated they go along the wall where her air conditioner and dresser are, come around the edge of the wall by her short dresser and night stand and get in the drawers. R5 stated she checks the drawers daily and cleans the mouse droppings. R5 stated she does not keep food there so she doesn't know what they're after. R5's short dresser was observed to have mouse droppings in the first and third drawer. R5 also had mouse droppings in the drawer of her night stand. R5 stated the facility knows about the mouse problem. R5 had no open food items in her room or in her furniture drawers. On 06/28/23, the following staff interviews were conducted: At 8:06 AM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated both the pest control company they use and the facility have placed mouse bait stations and glue strips inside and outside the facility. V6 stated this has been effective and they have caught several mice. At 8:09 AM, V9 (Housekeeping) stated she has observed mice in the kitchen. V10 (Housekeeping) stated she has seen mice in the laundry room. V9 and V10 both stated they check the glue strips in the facility daily and when they catch a mouse, they dispose of it and place a new glue strip. V9 and V10 stated residents will also tell them when they see a mouse and they put the white mouse bait boxes in the room out of sight such as under the chairs or under the radiator. At 8:11 AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) confirmed the facility has mice, she has seen them, and is terrified of them. V13 stated the mouse problem is nothing new, but they did change the kind of traps they were using. At 8:23 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated she has worked in the facility for 2 weeks now and has seen a mouse in V1's (Administrator) office. V3 confirmed V1 has glue strips in her office. At 8:31 AM, V2 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN/Minimum Data Set Coordinator - MDS) confirmed they do have an active pest control company that comes to the facility on a regular basis. V2 stated he has not personally seen a mouse in his office for 2-3 weeks but is aware there have been reports of mice in other areas of the facility. V2 stated they have attempted to educate residents about not leaving snacks and food out. At 8:35 AM, V14 (CNA) stated the only location she had personally seen mice was running from R2-R4's room across the hall to R1's room. V14 stated the facility has been placing silver box type mouse traps and sticky traps. V14 added that she does know therapy caught a mouse on a sticky strip. V14 stated she believed the facility was doing everything they could to try and correct the problem. At 8:40 AM, V12 (Maintenance) stated he works more than one job, and was at his other job when this facility called and asked him to come in. V12 stated he had not always known the facility to have a mouse problem like this but there are a few residents who will not pick up food and will leave it out. V12 confirmed he has seen mice in R2-R4's room and R1's room and stated it has gotten worse in the last couple of months, in his opinion. V12 stated the pest control company is aware and are putting traps outside and inside, supplying black glue strips, and service the facility monthly and as needed. V12 stated he had personally gone and bought the white cardboard box type mouse traps because they can't put the glue strips in the resident's room due to being a hazard. V12 stated the glue strips are placed in the kitchen, behind the nursing station, laundry, and in offices where residents will not encounter them. At 8:50 AM, V1 stated she saw a mouse in her office in May 2023 but has not personally seen any since one was caught on a sticky strip around that time. V1 stated she did know V10 caught several mice last week on the sticky strips. At 9:00 AM, V15 (Therapy) stated the mice are everywhere in the building and confirmed he caught a mouse in the therapy room on the glue strip this morning that he disposed of. V15 stated the traps do attract mice and they are not as bad as they were the last few weeks. V15 stated he puts bread on the strip because he wants to catch the mice to try and prevent them from running all over the desks and equipment in the therapy room. V15 stated he sanitizes everything each morning, and before staff leave for the day, they do a walk through and try to ensure there are no food or snacks left in the open to further attract mice. V15 stated he knows it doesn't stop it from happening but believes it helps. V15 stated it might take some money but the building would have to be gone over and repaired to take care of the issue completely. V15 stated his fear is that one day a resident will be bitten by a mouse. At 9:51 AM, V11 (Housekeeping) stated he had seen mice mainly in the laundry room. On 06/28/23 at 11:47 AM, V17 (Pest Control) was left a message for a return phone call. On 06/28/23 at 9:51 AM, V12 was no longer in the facility so this surveyor accompanied V11 for the purpose of measuring various locations throughout the facility observed to have cracks, holes, and gaps and are described as follows - Three separate exterior double glass doors leading directly into the facility from the outside had a visible gap down the middle of the doors to the ground when closed, measuring 1/2 inch at the widest point at the bottom of the doors/floor, making it accessible for rodents to enter the facility. These doors were located at the South entrance into the lobby, East resident hall doors, and the East resident dining room doors. V11 measured the exterior door to the laundry room which had a hole at the base of the wooden door/frame also measuring 1/2 inch. The rubber baseboard strip was detached from the wall at the floor and V11 was able to pull the strip completely away from the door frame exposing a large hole to the outside. Lastly, the door leading from the laundry room into the facility's [NAME] resident hallway was severely gapped at the bottom measuring 1/2 inch and traveling along the bottom of the door to the largest gap measuring 1 1/2 inches. This would allow rodents access from the exterior laundry room door, through the laundry room, and into the resident hallway. On 06/28/23 at 1:45 PM, this surveyor walked around the outside perimeter of the facility. Along the front of the facility hugging the brick, was a line of tall grass approximately 10 inches in height that was obviously too close for a lawn [NAME] to cut but would be easily accessible by finishing up with a weed eater. The back of the building had sporadic tall weeds. The exterior door to the laundry room was in disrepair, observed to have a large area of rotten, broken/splintered wood with some missing chunks where the door meets the frame and a visible hole at ground level leading into the laundry room. This too, would be easy access for rodents. On 06/28/23 At 1:55 PM, stored in the unoccupied room beside R2-R4's room were 7 beds, 4 storage cabinets, a loveseat, a chair, 2 trash cans, a shop-vac, 1 bedside table, 2 televisions, with one of the 7 beds being full of books, puzzles, mirrors, and other decorative items. Also, stored in the room beside R1's room were 5 beds, five 5-gallon paint tubs, 1 paint can, 4 storage cabinets, 1 dresser, a box fan, 3 chairs, a floor slider, a vase, a wheelchair pedal, and other miscellaneous items. On 06/28/23 at 3:25 PM, the door in the kitchen leading to the outside had a gap along the bottom of the door and some chipped areas in the wood that would allow access for pests/rodents. The widest gap in this area was 1/2 inch. On 06/28/23 at 4:00 PM, V1 stated she had repeatedly asked management to provide additional maintenance for the facility, had asked for the damaged doors to be replaced, and had asked that the overwhelming number of cracks, holes/gaps in the building be fixed as they were the source allowing pests and rodents access to the entire facility. V1 stated she was told by management that she and her team needed to step up, work harder, and put out more bait traps. V1 stated they were already doing everything that could be done, but until the building was properly repaired it would not alleviate pests and rodents entering the facility and having access to residents. On 06/29/23 at 1:15 PM, V1 confirmed V18 (Corporate Maintenance) had been to the facility last year at which time a new exterior laundry door and exterior kitchen door was requested. V1 stated the last and most recent time these same two doors were requested was in March of 2023 and nothing had been done to date. The website - https://www.victorpest.com/articles/how-do-mice-fit-in-such-small-spaces - indicates mice are able to fit into a space as small as a number 2 pencil, which is approximately 1/4 inches. The Resident Council Minutes from 05/23/23 document residents' concerns regarding mice as - Maintenance: Mice . wish maintenance was here throughout the day. Comments/Suggestions: Need a full-time maintenance man . The Resident Council Minutes from 06/13/23 document residents' concerns regarding mice as - Maintenance: (V12's name) needs to step game up, fix building, mice, grass. Comments/Suggestions: New maintenance man . The facility Pest Control Summary of Service dated 05/30/23 included - Recommendations: Area/Device - Perimeter Inspection: Door gap/damage noted that allows pest access. Please repair to prevent pest entry. Severity: Medium. Status: Pending. Date: 03/07/23. Area/Device - Kitchen Inspection: Door gap/damage noted that allows pest access. Please repair to prevent pest entry. Severity: Medium. Status: Pending. Date: 03/07/23. General Comments: I serviced and inspected the areas with rodent activities. There were rodent activities found in the kitchen. I spoke with (V1 name) about the facility and service today. I replaced and added monitoring devices in the facility for rodents. I will follow-up with this situation . The facility Pest Control Summary of Service dated 06/20/23 included - Recommendations: Area/Device - Laundry Inspection: Door gap/damage noted that allows pest access. Please repair to prevent pest entry. Severity: High . ILT (Insect Light Trap) 001. Insect light trap of not working properly. We suggest purchase of new bulbs for effective control. Severity: Medium. Exterior: Door gap/damage noted that allows pest access. Please repair to prevent pest entry. Severity: High. Exterior: Weeds/grass in area need to be treated to eliminate. Severity: High . Kitchen Inspection: Door gap/damage noted that allows pest access. Please repair to prevent pest entry. Severity: Medium. Pending: 03/07/23 . General Comments: I serviced and inspected the areas with rodent activities and insect activities. There have been reports of rodent activities in the facility and there was a mouse reported in the dining area by the kitchen door. I placed monitoring devices in the kitchen area for such issues. During the service today, I noticed the door to the sprinkler room need repaired. I highly recommend having the door repaired. During the service today I noticed a mouse run under the door into the laundry room. This door also has gaps. I highly recommend having this door fixed as well. I spoke with (V2's name) about the facility and he will pass the findings on to (V12's name). (V12's name) was not at the facility today . An undated facility policy titled, Physical Plant and Environmental Policy and Guidelines includes - Policy Statement: It is of the utmost importance to provide a safe, hospitable, clean and organized facility and grounds to ensure an environment that is conducive to providing the best care, comfort and home-like surroundings for residents. A well-maintained building and environment is also important for creating safe work surroundings across all departmental staffing and their ability to effectively, and efficiently provide care and great living environment to all residents and all necessary resources to do so. The building and grounds must be maintained in the best presentable state and must be done so through routine maintenance and upkeep, housekeeping, and ensuring compliance with current federal, state, local and NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) codes . Policy Implementation: The facility Administrator must ensure that the overall scope and effective procedures are followed by each departments supervisors and staff or request of approved contractors for creating and maintaining a safe and comfortable environment for the residents, visitors and staff. Under Maintenance/Approved Contractors: the policy states . Routine care and repairs to interior finishings - repairing ceiling/wall damage, painting, floor; . Insect and rodent control; Secured and organized mechanical rooms and storerooms; . Routine grounds clean-up of litter, maintaining landscaping, and lawn mowing; Secured exterior doors; . Maintain essential supplies and parts . An undated facility policy titled Insect and Pest Control Policy documents: It is the policy of (Name of Corporation) to contract with a duly licensed exterminating service to protect and/or control against infestations of insects and rodents. A preventative treatment, both interior and exterior, shall be applied at least once every month. Treatments will be applied more often if required. Chemicals, materials and equipment used to control insects and rodents will be provided by the Vendor and will be in accordance with current Federal and State specifications for use in nursing homes. Methods of application shall be in accordance with current Federal and State regulations and manufacturers recommendations. The Vendor shall provide the facility with Material Safety Data Sheets for all products used. Under Procedure: The following procedures shall apply regarding pest control: 1. Any employee observing insects or rodents of any kind shall inform their supervisor giving the exact location and type of infestation. 2. The employee shall fill out a work order form and give it to the maintenance person. 3. The maintenance person shall contact the contracted pest control company for eradication.
May 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0661 (Tag F0661)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a recapitulation of stay at the facility for 1 of 1 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a recapitulation of stay at the facility for 1 of 1 resident (R26) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 22. The Findings Include: R26 profile face sheet documents that R26 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acquired absence of left leg, below knee. R26's nursing progress notes document that on 3/21/23 R26 was discharged from facility and left with husband in personal vehicle at 12:05. Discharge instructions and medications reviewed and sent with resident. A Discharge Evaluation was found in R26's medical record but was blank. On 5/11/23 at 10:00 AM, V2 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated that there was not a completed discharge evaluation on R26. On 5/12/23 at 9:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R26 was admitted for a very short time and was here for her home to be made handicap accessible, and when she found out she could leave there was not a lot of notice. V1 confirms the only information on R26's discharge is in the progress note dated 3/21/23. V1 stated at this time that she expects all discharged residents to have the discharge summary completed by all departments.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents blood sugar prior to administering fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents blood sugar prior to administering fast-acting insulin for 1of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for insulin administration a sample of 22. The findings include: R23's document labeled Profile Face Sheet notes that R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's Profile Face Sheet documents diagnoses including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, unspecified open wound, left lower leg. R23's Physician's Orders note an order dated 4/3/23 for Insulin Lispro 100 units/ml Inject 5 units Sub Q (subcutaneous) three times daily 6am, 11am, 4pm. R23's Physician's Orders dated 4/3/23-4/30/23 and 5/1/23 to present do not document any orders to check R23's blood sugar. R23's facility progress note dated 4/4/23 written by V8 (Physician) document under Plan .will monitor blood sugars closely and adjust insulin as necessary. On 5/9/23 at 11:15am, R23 was observed being administered 5 units of Humalog insulin without a blood sugar test being performed. R23's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/10/23 documents in Section C, that R23 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 which indicates R23 is cognitively intact. On 5/12/23 at 11:10am, R23 said that the nurses did check her blood sugars at the hospital before she was admitted to the facility but does not remember how often or what they were. R23 said she was more focused on her pain and the wound on her leg. On 5/12/23 at 11:40am, V10 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she was the nurse that admitted R23 on 4/3/23. V10 said she faxed the orders to the physician (V8) and just did not think about asking about getting an order to get R23's blood sugars checked. On 5/12/23 at 2:15pm, V3 (RN) said they are not doing blood sugar checks on R23. When asked how they know what R23's blood sugar is she responded, We don't. On 5/11/23 at 2:45pm, V9 (Regional Quality Assurance Nurse) said she is a nurse and would not feel comfortable giving a resident Humalog insulin without knowing what the resident's blood sugar is. On 5/11/23 at 2:25pm, V2 (MDS/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) said V8 (Physician) did not want any blood sugars ordered and that he was asked on the resident's admission and declined. V2 said that they do labs on R23 every 3 months. On 5/12/23 at 11:20am, V2 said he took report from the hospital prior to R23's admission and was told that R23 received blood sugar checks ac (before meals) and hs (bedtime) and received 5 units of Lispro (Humalog) insulin with each meal. On 5/11/23 at 2:36pm, V8 (Physician) said he thought that R23 was getting blood sugar checks prior to insulin being given and that R23 should be getting blood sugar checks prior to the administration of the insulin. V8 said he was going to call the facility and get them ordered. A document is R23's Medical Record labeled with the local laboratory company and the facility name document that a Glyco-HgbA1C lab test was collected on 4/25/23 and a result of 5.8, with a documented normal range of 4.1-6/1%. The website https://www.humalog.com/fast-acting-mealtime-insulin#about-mealtime-insulin, documents under the section titled Managing Blood Sugar that when using mealtime insulin like Humalog, you must test your blood sugar (glucose). For example, you may need to test before and after meals and at bedtime. Your doctor will tell you when and how often you should test.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Director of Nursing for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Director of Nursing for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 05/9/23 at 10:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility currently does not have a Director of Nursing (DON) and has not since December 2022. V1 states the facility has sought to hire a DON but been unsuccessful. V1 verified the accuracy of nursing schedules provided and stated the facility does not have any nursing waivers. On 5/11/23 at 2:00 PM, V10 (Registered Nurse) stated that they do not currently have a DON on staff. On 5/9/23 at 1:00 PM, V2 (MDS) stated that they have not had a DON for quite some time but that they are interviewing for the position. During the survey from 5/9/23 to 5/12/23, there was no DON observed working at the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form provided by the facility on 5/9/23 documents 23 residents reside at the facility.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 16 of 16 residents (R1, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R15, R16, R17, R20, R21, R23, and R24) reviewed for room size in a sample of 22. Findings include: On 5/11/23 at 12:20 PM, this surveyor accompanied V7 (Housekeeping) for the purpose of measuring the 13 resident rooms that are dually certified (Medicare and Medicaid) for 4 beds per room. The 13 rooms measured less than 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) of living space per bed. The 13 room's measurements are as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.5 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 299.9 sq. ft. (75 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 311.5 sq. ft. (77.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 302.8 sq. ft. (75.7 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.7 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.4 sq. ft. (76.1 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 310.2 sq. ft. (77.6 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 289.6 sq. ft. (72.3 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 304.1 sq. ft. (76 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 315.7 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 314.6 sq. ft. (78.7sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 307.1 sq. ft. (76.8 sq. ft. per bed) room [ROOM NUMBER]: 305.6 sq. ft. (76.4 sq. ft. per bed) A Daily Roster provided by the facility and dated 5/9/23 documents that R1, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R15, R16, R17, R20, R21, R23, and R24 reside in the rooms listed above. There are no residents assigned to rooms 102, 109, 110, and 211. During the survey from 5/9/23 to 5/12/23, rooms 102, 109, 110, and 211 were observed to be unoccupied. room [ROOM NUMBER] is observed to be utilized as the therapy room. room [ROOM NUMBER] is equipped with 3 beds, bedside tables, and dressers. room [ROOM NUMBER] is equipped with 2 beds, oversized recliner, bedside tables, and dressers. Rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 109, 110, 211, and 212 were all equipped with 2 beds, bedside tables, and dressers. Observations of the undersized resident rooms found the rooms adequate to meet the medical and personal needs for the residents assigned to these rooms. Inquiries regarding the size of these rooms during the survey from 05/9/23 to 05/12/23, found no concerns or negative interviews from residents or families of residents who reside in the waivered rooms. On 5/11/23 R1, R5, R6, R10, R11, R12, R20, R21, R23, and R24 all voiced no concerns with the size of their rooms during interviews. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes from the past 6 months indicated no concerns related to the size of the rooms.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 22 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • Grade F (25/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
  • • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 25/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg Staffed?

CMS rates AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 80%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg?

State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 17 with potential for harm, and 3 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg?

AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AXIOM HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 68 certified beds and approximately 28 residents (about 41% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HARRISBURG, Illinois.

How Does Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg Stick Around?

Staff turnover at AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 80%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg Ever Fined?

AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Axiom Healthcare Of Harrisburg on Any Federal Watch List?

AXIOM HEALTHCARE OF HARRISBURG is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.