SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB

120 SOUTH LAND STREET, HARRISBURG, IL 62946 (618) 252-7405
For profit - Limited Liability company 142 Beds WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
33/100
#283 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Saline Care Nursing & Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care quality. With a state rank of #283 out of 665, they are in the top half of Illinois facilities, but their county rank of #2 out of 4 suggests limited local options for better care. The facility's trend is stable, having reported 4 issues in both 2024 and 2025, but this consistency does not indicate improvement. Staffing is a major weakness, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and concerning RN coverage that falls short compared to 91% of Illinois facilities, although they have a low staff turnover rate of 0%, which is a positive sign. Notably, there are serious deficiencies, including a critical incident where a resident went without nutrition for 16 days, leading to significant weight loss and hospitalization for malnutrition, as well as failure to ensure residents were free from neglect and abuse, highlighting significant risks in resident care.

Trust Score
F
33/100
In Illinois
#283/665
Top 42%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
4 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$67,538 in fines. Higher than 89% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Illinois average (2.5)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Federal Fines: $67,538

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. The past non-compliance occurred between 03/31/25 and 04/07/25. Findings include: 1. R1's admission Record dated 04/17/25 documents an admission date of 05/04/24 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, heart failure, unspecified osteoarthritis, and chronic kidney disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicates R1 has moderately impaired cognition. Section GG documents R1 is independent with most ADL (Activities of Daily Living) functions. R1's Care Plan documents a focus area of Peer pushed resident to the ground before staff could intervene with a date initiated of 03/31/25. Interventions for this focus area include: 1. N.O (new order) received for new pain medication, 2. Peer was removed from the area. Resident was assessed for injuries by charge nurse. 3. Per facility protocol MD (Medical Doctor) and Administrator updated r/t (related to) incident. N.O. received for (Local Mobile X-ray) Xray. 4. Resident was sent to (Local Hospital) for evaluation r/t complaints of pain. Negative findings with x-rays of lumber spine and hips. 5. Staff to attempt to limit contact between the two residents. Social Service or designee to follow up with resident to ensure that he feels safe in his home. R2's admission Record dated 04/17/25 documents an admission date of 02/23/21 with diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, Paranoid schizophrenia, and unspecified psychosis. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents Supervision and set-up help with ADL functions. R2's Care Plan documents a focus area of (R2) pushed peer before staff could intervene r/t reside got in his face. Date initiated 03/31/25. Interventions for this focus area include: 1. 1:1 completed with resident (BIMS score 15) related to inappropriateness of actions and the need to get to charge nurse or CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) to discuss issues he is having with peer, to leave the area and talk with staff. 2. MD and Administrator notified of incident. Social Service spoke with resident. 3. MD updated related to event and medication change ordered fluid restriction added. 4. Staff immediately separated the 2 residents. R1's Progress Notes dated 03/31/25 at 7:14AM by V8 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) documents in part (R1) in dining room by serve out station. Heard a thump from a cup hitting the ground. Then heard residents yelling back and forth. Staff Attempted to intervene. Before this writer could make it to the residents, (R1) was in the motion of falling backwards. (R1) fell backward and landed on buttocks. Peer immediately removed from dining room. (R1) assessed with complaint of hip pain. No contact with head. R2's Progress Note dated 03/31/25 at 7:13AM by V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents This writer was passing medications when I heard some commotion behind me. (R2) slammed his cup down on the table and it flew on the floor, and he started yelling. Other resident (R1) started yelling back at resident. Staff tried to intervene between both residents. (R2) pushed (R1) down on the ground. (R1) fell on back. (R2) was removed from the dining room until further notice. This writer contact (Psychiatric NP) and Informed (R2's Primary Physician) of resident to resident. A Report titled Illinois Department of Public Health Initial Report dated 04/05/25 at 7:00AM documents: Date of Incident 03/31/25. Time of Incident 7:00AM. Resident Name: (R1) and (R2). Final report: (R2) a 67 y/o (year old) male with a diagnosis of Paranoid schizophrenia within the dining room when he had a verbal issue with a peer. (R1) a 75 y/o male with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. (R2) then made contact with (R1) and (R1) stepped back and lost his balance. Both residents were assessed by nursing. (R2) is alert to self with a BIMS of 15 and is ambulatory without devices. (R2) is on a 1800cc (cubic centimeters) fluid restriction. (R2) was in the dining room and was holding a coffee cup when he threw the cup onto the floor. (R2) was upset that he could not have multiple cups of coffee due to his fluid restriction. (R2) was very delusional and making statements about the coffee and who owns the coffee and informed administrator later that (R1) told him that he owned the coffee, and he could not have any of his coffee. (R1) is alert to self and has a BIMS score of 12 and is ambulatory. (R2) thought that (R1) said that he could not have any coffee. (R2) then became more delusional and made contact with (R1) resulting in him stepping backwards and losing his balance. (R1) fell onto his back. Residents were separated and both were assessed. (R1) complained of pain in his hip and was sent for x-rays and were negative. The (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) was notified of the incident and reviewed both residents' medications. (R2) has been very delusional, and a medication increase has been initiated. The administrator spoke with (R2) and he stated that he was upset that peer stated that he owns the coffee and that he could not have any. Explained to resident that he is on fluid restriction and that he had all the coffee that was allowed on the restriction and that he needed to follow the physician orders and informed him that the peer does not own the coffee. Social Service will meet with (R1) 3 times a week for 2 weeks. (R2) had the medication changed and will be monitored for 14 days. Social Service will meet with (R2) 3 times a week for 2 weeks both charts and behavior tracking have been reviewed. On 04/16/25 at 10:25AM, R1 stated that he did have an altercation with R2 on 03/31/25. R1 stated that R2 was in the dining room yelling and hitting his coffee cup on the counter and then threw the coffee cup. R1 said he told R2 to stop hitting his cup and throwing it. R1 said that R2 then turned around and shoved him and he fell on his buttocks and back. R1 said after he fell, he was having some pain, and the nursing staff did send him over to the local hospital to be checked out and they didn't find any breaks or fractures. On 04/16/25 at 12:21PM, R2 stated that he remembers the day that him and R1 got into an altercation on 03/31/25. R2 said that he was wanting another cup of coffee, and he was trying to get staff to give him another cup. R2 said staff was telling him that he couldn't have another cup right that second. R2 said that he got mad and threw his coffee cup and then R1 got in his face and told him he didn't need to be doing all that. R2 said that R1 was a bigger guy, and he didn't want him in his face, so he pushed R1 back and R1 fell. R2 said that he knows that he should not have pushed R1. R2 said that he was mad about not getting his coffee and when R1 got in his face and was much bigger than him he wanted R1 out of his face and just tried to get him away from him not make him fall. On 04/16/25 at 12:23PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she was working on 03/31/25 when R1 and R2 had an altercation. V4 said R2 was in the dining room and had already had a cup of coffee and he is on a fluid restriction. V4 said that R2 was hitting his cup on the table and threw his cup and then R1 got up and walked over to R2 and told R2 he didn't need to be hitting his cup and throwing things. V4 said that R1 was close to R2's face and R2 kept telling R1 to get out of his face. V4 said that R1 went to step back and fell. V4 said that she didn't see R2 push R1. V4 said that R2 had been having increased delusions for the past couple of days and seemed more agitated. V4 said that after the altercation she did contact the psychiatric Nurse Practitioner and she gave a new order to increase R2's medication related to the increased delusions. 2. R3's admission Record dated 04/17/25, documents an admission date of 11/12/21 with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's, major depressive disorder, other schizophrenia, generalized anxiety, and pica in adults. R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C under staff assessment for mental status short term memory problems and long-term memory problems. Section GG documents walking as supervision. R3's Care Plan documents a focus area in part of (R3) will wonder the halls, she will pace from one side of the unit to another with a date initiated of 10/27/24. Documented interventions include: 1. Attempt bringing resident to a high visibility area. 2. Redirect resident when wandering into other residents' rooms. 3. (R3) wanders on the unit sometimes will have accident with her bowels while she is wandering. She does not like to wear a brief she will take it off. R4's admission Record dated 04/17/25 documents an admission date of 11/27/20 with diagnoses including: schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. R4's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R4 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents Supervision with most ADL functions. R4's Care Plan documents a focus area of (R4) has delusions 5X's a week Dx (diagnosis) : schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder with a date initiated of 11/20/24. Documented interventions include: 1. (R4) has delusions 5x's a week attempt to turn conversations to reality based. 2. Offer snacks or drink 3. Offer resident to sit outside weather permitting. Another focus area of (R4) is/has potential to be verbally aggressive date initiated of 05/22/24. Documented interventions include: 1. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness 2. Analyze of key times, places, circumstances, trigger, and what de-escalates behavior and document. 3. Assess and anticipate resident needs, food thirst, toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain, etc. A Report titled Illinois Department of Public Health Initial Report dated 04/13/25 at 8:00PM documents date of incident 04/07/25 and time 10:00AM. Residents Name R3 and R4. Final report: On 04/07/25 at 10:00AM staff witnessed (R4) 71 y/o male with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and vascular dementia, make unwanted contact with (R3) 71 y/o female with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's, while in the hallway. Residents were immediately separated and assessed for injuries. No injuries were noted to either resident. (R4) is up and ambulatory on the unit. (R4) is alert with a BIMS of 15. (R4) was coming out of the bathroom when he saw a peer, (R3) walking down his hall. Per staff (R4) then makes contact with (R3's) chest area after he came out of the bathroom. Staff immediately separated the residents. (R4) denied that anything happened, but then stated he would not do that again. (R3) is up ambulatory throughout the unit. (R3) is alert to name and a BIMS is unable to be completed. (R3) went down a hall that she normally does not ambulate down when a peer, (R4) came out of the bathroom and made contact with (R3's) chest area. Staff intervened and assisted (R3) from the area. (R3) was assessed by the nurse with no injuries noted. The physician was notified, and a urinalysis was ordered as (R4) was making some delusional statements. The urinalysis was positive, and the physician has ordered medication. An appointment is scheduled for 04/22/25 for an appointment with urologist. Social Service meet with (R4) 3 times a week for 2 weeks. (R4's) chart and behavior charting have been reviewed. (R3) had no injuries. (R3's) chart and behavior charting have been reviewed. Social service to meet with (R3) 3 times a week for 2 weeks. (R3) is on 15-minute checks. R3's Progress Note dated 04/07/25 at 11:07AM by V6 documents in part Housekeeper came to nurse to inform resident had been hit in the chest by peer. Housekeeper stated, 'Peer came out of the bathroom and went up to (R3) and hit her in the chest' housekeeper immediately separated them. On 04/16/25 at 12:35PM, R4 stated he does remember the altercation between him and R3 on 04/07/25. R4 stated that R3 kept coming down his hallway which is an all-males hallway. R4 said that he told R3 that she needed to go back to her hallway. R4 said that he went to the bathroom and when he came out of the bathroom that R3 was right there. R4 said that he pushed R3 in the chest to get her to go back to her hallway. R4 said that he did not hit R3 in the chest, but that he did push her. R4 said that he would never hurt anyone on purpose. R4 said that he did have an infection in his urine which was probably making him not act like himself that day. On 04/17/25 at 1:15PM, V13 (Housekeeper) stated that R4 got to the bathroom to brush his teeth and when he came out of the bathroom R3 was coming down the hall. V13 said that R4 was telling R3 that it wasn't her hall that that she needed to go back to her hallway. V13 said that R4 then pushed R3 in the chest area and told her that she needed to go back to her hallway. V13 said that she couldn't tell how hard R4 pushed R3 in the chest. V13 said that R4 was just trying to get R3 back to her hallway. On 04/17/25 at 2:00PM V1 (Administrator/ADM) stated that after R1, R2, R3, and R4's altercations that they have social service meet with those residents 3 times a week for 2 weeks. V1 said they did medication reviews on R1, R2, R3, and R4. R2's medication was increase related to his delusions per the Psychiatrist Nurse Practitioner. V1 said that R3 was placed on 15 Minute checks to monitor her. R1 and R2 no longer sit at the same table and are not allowed on the same hallway. V1 said that R4 was checked for a urinary infection, and he was positive for a urinary tract infection and R4 is currently being treated with antibiotics and has an appointment to see a urologist on 04/22/25. V1 said that R1 and R2 are not allowed to smoke at the same time. V1 said that the facility has taken every step to try to prevent any further altercations between these residents and all residents. V1 said that they try doing increased activities to help keep residents busy. V1 said that on 03/31/25 they had an IDT (Interdisciplinary Team)/QA (Quality Assurance) Meeting to discuss the altercation between R1 and R2. V1 said they also had an IDT/QA meeting on 04/07/25 to discuss R3 and R4's altercation. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention dated 08/16/2019 documents The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of its residents and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance: 1. Social service to meet with R1, R2, R3, and R4 3 times a week for 2 weeks. 2. R1 and R2's medications were reviewed on 03/31/25 and R2 received a medication increase on Divalproex sodium which is used to treat his paranoid schizophrenia. 3. R1 and R2 have been moved to different tables in the dining room and on halls since 03/31/25. 4. R1 and R2 have different smoke times initiated on 03/31/25 5. R3 was placed on 15-minute checks on 04/07/25. 6. R4 was checked for urinary tract infection on 04/07/25. 7. The facility had an IDT/QA meeting on 03/31/25 to discuss the altercation between R1 and R2. In attendance was V1 (Administrator), V10 (Assistant Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), V8 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON), V11 (Infection Preventionist/IP), V3 (Social Service/SSD), and V12 (SSD). Notes document in part The psychiatric NP (Nurse Practitioner) was notified of the incident and reviewed residents' medications. R2 is on a fluid restriction and becomes very upset when he cannot have extra drinks. R3 has been very delusional, and a medication increase has been indicated and will be monitored for 14 days. A root cause R2 upset over fluid restriction and not being able to have more coffee and becomes more delusional when he thought R1 stated that he owned the coffee and could not have any. R2 reminded that he needs to follow physician orders for his fluid restriction. 8. The facility had an IDT/QA meeting on 04/07/25 to discuss that altercation between R3 and R4. In attendance was V1, V10, V2, V8, V11, V3, and V12. Notes documents in part R3 had no injuries. R3's chart and behavior charting were reviewed. Social service will meet with her 3 times a weekly for 2 weeks. R3 is on 15-minute checks. Cause is R3 was walking on a different hallway and R4 was having increased delusions related to UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). R4's physician was notified, and a urinalysis was ordered as R4 was making some delusional statements. The urinalysis was positive, and the physician has ordered medication. An appointment is scheduled for R4 on 04/22/25 for an appointment for urologist. Social service will meet with R4 3 times a week for 2 weeks. R4's chart and behavior charting have been reviewed. Root cause is R4 has increased delusions r/t UTI.
Apr 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one (R81) of one resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one (R81) of one resident reviewed for hygiene in the sample of 41. Findings include: R81's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 01/04/2023. R81's admission Record documents diagnosis in part Type 2 Diabetes, Other Lack of Coordination, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Psychomotor Deficit. R81's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 07 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Section GG of that same MDS documents resident is substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene which includes in part washing and drying of hands. R81's Care Plan documents R81 has an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit with an initiation date of 05/22/2024. On 03/31/2025 at 12:57 PM, V3 (Family Member) was observed cleaning under R81's fingernails. R81's nails had a large amount of black substance under her nails that had a strong odor. V3 stated he had been asking for 2 weeks for someone to clean under R81's nails and they have not been cleaned. On 04/03/2025 at 12:27 PM, V3 stated he couldn't recall who he talked to about R81 needing her nails cleaned but did recall asking nursing staff several times. On 04/2/2025 at 09:06 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated they clean nails when they give residents showers and V4 stated residents get showers 2 times a week. V4 stated she would have cleaned under R81's nails when she showered her last, which V4 stated she thinks it was a week or more ago. On 04/02/2025 at 09:08 AM, V5 (CNA) stated R81 does not usually clean herself well, so she does require assistance. V5 stated she cleans nails when she showers residents, but she has not showered R81 in over a week. On 04/02/2025 at 09:10 AM, V6 (CNA) stated R81 can do some personal hygiene by herself but does need assistance to finish. V6 stated she doesn't remember when she provided nail care for R81 but stated it was sometime previous week. On 04/02/2025 at 09:19 PM, V7 (CNA) stated R81 will ask to do some personal hygiene but does still require assistance. V7 states activities take care of nail cleaning and trimming but if dirty nails are observed they should be cleaned during showering. On 04/02/25 at 12:50 PM, V8 (Activities Aide) stated they do nails on Wednesdays and Fridays of every week. They remove polish and polish nail. V8 stated they clean nails once or twice a month by soaking them. On 04/02/25 at 12:50 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated they do not have a specific day or time they clean nails or a set schedule. V2 stated they try to do it on days they are well staffed. V2 stated she will tell staff at the beginning of the day to do nail care on residents during that day. V2 stated nails should also be checked during showering. V2 stated if a family member tells a staff member that a residents fingernails need to be cleaned then that staff member should either clean the nails or ask someone else to do it. On 04/02/25 at 12:23 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated residents get showers twice a week. R81's Shower sheets documents R81 received showers on 03/17/2025, 03/20/2025, 03/21/2025, and 03/28/2025. These sheets did contain any information related to R81's fingernails. A policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of dated February 2018 documents The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmer and to prevent infections. Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident . General Guidelines: 1. Nail care includes regular cleaning and regular trimming .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, assess, and treat wounds for 1 of 5 (R92) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, assess, and treat wounds for 1 of 5 (R92) residents reviewed for wounds in the sample of 41. Findings Include: R92's admission Record with a print date of 4/3/25 documents R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cellulitis, sepsis, hypertension, hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis of liver, and urinary retention. R92's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating R92 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R92 requires substantial/maximal assistance of staff for bed mobility and has pressure ulcers, deep tissue injuries, and skin tears. R92's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of At risk for alteration in skin integrity. Date Initiated: 10/25/24. This same Focus area documents the following interventions all initiated on 10/24/24, Educate resident and family on skin conditions and prevention of skin breakdown .Float heels while in bed Incontinence care. Apply barrier cream Monitor labs that can affect skin .Notify dietary as needed Observe for signs and symptoms of skin breakdown/infection Pressure reducing cushion to wheelchair Pressure relieving mattress .Provide supplements as ordered Skin assessment on admission and weekly .Treatment orders: see POS (physician order sheet) and skin and wound tab . On 4/3/25 at 11:06 AM, V11 (Registered Nurse/RN) was observed administering treatments with V16 (Regional Nurse), V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), and V17 (Wound Specialist). R92 had multiple open areas on the sacrum that were identified as pressure ulcers with previous treatment orders in place. The areas were cleaned and treated as ordered by the physician using current standards of practice. After R92's sacrum was assessed and treated this surveyor asked V11 (RN) and V18 (CNA) if that was the only open areas/wounds R92 had and they responded, Yes. As they were repositioning R92, this surveyor noted active bleeding in R92's groin and asked V11 and V18 about it. V17 (Wound Specialist) identified the area as a skin tear and gave orders for treatment of the area. V11 (RN) administered the treatment as ordered per current standards of practice. During treatment of the skin tear, this surveyor noted a separate area just below R92's buttock that was open. This surveyor brought this area to the attention of V11 (RN) who got V17 (Wound Specialist) who had left the room after giving orders for the skin tear. V17 (Wound Specialist) assessed the area below R92's buttocks and gave orders for a treatment. V11 (RN) treated the area per current standards of practice. After the area was treated this surveyor asked to see R92's feet and heels. V18 (CNA) removed R92's socks and this surveyor noted an open area that was covered with eschar and the surrounding tissue was red on the outer aspect of R92's right ankle. There was a dressing covering the inner aspect of R92's right ankle. Again, V11 (RN) got V18 (Wound Specialist) who had left R92's room. V17 (Wound Specialist) removed the dressing to the inner aspect of R92's ankle, assessed both areas, gave orders for the areas and again left the room. V11 (RN) hand sanitized, donned gloves, cleaned the area on the inner aspect of R92's ankle, without changing gloves or hand sanitizing, V11 then cleaned the wound on the outer aspect of R92's ankle. V11 doffed his gloves and hand sanitized and treated the inner aspect and outer aspect, again without changing his gloves or hand sanitizing between the two areas. This surveyor then asked to do a skin check on R92's upper body. After removing R92's shirt a skin tear was noted to R92's right elbow. There was no treatment in place on this area. Again V11 (RN) got V17 (Wound Specialist) who had left the room, V17 assessed the area on R92's right elbow and gave treatment orders. R92's Skin and Wound Evaluation dated 3/26/25 documents a deep tissue injury on R92's sacrum acquired in house. This same assessment does not document any of the other areas noted during the observation. R92's Wound Specialist Note dated 3/27/25 documents R92 had an unstageable deep tissue injury to his sacrum and a skin tear to his left hand. The other areas noted during the observation were not documented on this assessment. R92's Order Summary Report dated 4/3/25 documents a physician order to clean left inner ankle with wound cleaner, pat dry, and apply hydrocolloid every three days and as needed with a start date of 4/3/25 and an order to clean wound on the sacrum, pat dry, apply hydrocolloid dressing every three days and as needed. There are no orders documented on the Order Summary Report for the other wounds noted during the observation. R92's Progress Notes document on 4/2/25, New order obtained-left inner ankle- cleanse with wound cleaner. Pat dry. Apply hydrocolloid. Change every 3 days and PRN (as needed) . There is no assessment and/or measurement of this area documented in R92's medical record. R92's Skin Observations: Comprehensive CNA Shower Review dated 4/2/25 documents one open area on R92's left foot and documents under Charge Nurse Assessment: MD (Physician) aware-see wound Dr (doctor) tomorrow- tx (treatment) in place. R92's Physician Telephone Orders dated 4/2/25 documents an order to see wound dr (doctor) for left foot wounds duoderm every three days. R92's report titled Other dated 4/2/25 documents under Nursing Description, Resident has a new open area to right inner ankle. Area assessed and noted granulation tissue with no drainage or odor noted. Notified (name of primary physician) and he gave new orders to cleanse with wound cleaner. Pat dry-Apply Hydrocolloid. Change every 3 days and PRN (as needed) and wound doctor to see and fully assess in the morning on 4/3/25. R92's Wound Specialist Progress note dated 4/3/25 documents the following wounds, 1. Stage 2 pressure wound to sacrum that measures 6.5 x 8.9 x 0.2 cm (centimeter), 2. skin tear left dorsal hand that measures 0.5 x 0.9 x 0.2 cm, 3. skin tear of right groin that measures 3.5 x 2.4 x 0.2 cm, 4. unstageable deep tissue injury right lateral ankle that measure 1.1 x 0.9 x not measureable cm greater than one day in duration, 5. non pressure wound of right upper medial foot that measures 1.5 x 2.1 x 0.2 cm greater than one day in duration, and 6. skin tear wound of right forearm that measures 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.2 cm greater than one day in duration. On 04/03/25 at 2:24 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she would expect newly identified wounds to be measured, assessed, and an incident report to be filed out. V2 stated she would expect nursing staff to change their gloves and hand sanitize after cleaning and/or treating a wound and before cleaning/treating another wound. The wound policy provided to this surveyor titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries dated July 2017 documents, .Any areas identified while performing or assisting with personal care or ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) charge nurse will be notified f. Nursing will do a complete review of the area and notify the physician for further orders/treatments/assessments. g. Assessments of new wounds will be completed within 24 hours and/or according to physician orders
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R13, R56, and R97) reviewed for room size in a sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R13, R56, and R97) reviewed for room size in a sample of 41. Findings include: On 4/1/25 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that Side 2 of the facility has a room size waiver assessment. V1 stated these rooms are Medicare/Medicaid certified for two residents. V1 stated rooms 203-206, 208-209, 211-212, 215-220, 222-227, 229-231, 234-235, 238-239, 241-242, 244-248 are all waivered rooms and don't meet the proper room size. On 4/3/25 at 1:56 PM, V13 (Maintenance Director) stated R13 and R56's room was less than 80 square feet per resident, which is less than the requirement. V13 used the measuring tape to measure the length and width of R13 and R56's room and stated, 12.5 by 12 feet, indicating that the rooms were 150 square (sq.) feet (ft.), or 75 sq. ft. per bed. The measurements did not include the closet and bathroom. A that time R13 and R56 were both in their room. The smaller sized room contained two beds and two nightstands. On 4/3/25 at 1:56 PM, R13 and R56 who were both alert to person, place and time stated they are ok with their room size and do not have problems with it. On 4/3/25 at 2:04 PM, V13 stated R97 and R1's room was less than 80 square feet per resident, which is less than the requirement. V13 used the measuring tape to measure the length and width of R97 and R1's room and stated, 12.5 by 12 feet, indicating that the rooms were 150 square (sq.) feet (ft.), or 75 sq. ft. per bed. The measurements did not include the closet and bathroom. R97 and R1 were both in their room. The smaller sized room contained two beds and two nightstands. On 04/03/25 at 2:04 PM, R97 and R1 who were both alert to person, place and time stated they are fine with their room. An undated facility room roster provided by V1 on 03/31/25, documents R13, R56, R97, and R1 reside in the rooms observed and measured by V13. Review of 6 months of Resident Council meeting minutes indicated no concerns related to the size of the rooms.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident care areas clean and in a good state of repair for 5 (R3, R4, R6, R8 - R20) of 16 residents reviewed for homelik...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident care areas clean and in a good state of repair for 5 (R3, R4, R6, R8 - R20) of 16 residents reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 20. Findings Include: On 09/24/2024 at 9:54 A.M. an observation in the 100-hall shower room revealed the following: shower stall had a black / orange substance around the caulking strip area between the wall and the floor. The black substance was observed as being around both side walls and the back wall of the shower stall. The vinyl liner for the shower curtain was observed as having black speckles on the bottom 12 inches. The vinyl liner also had an orange / brown substance on the bottom 6 inches of it. The legs of the shower chair had a orangish / black substance above the wheels. On 09/24/2024 at 11:32 A.M. V4 (Family member) stated the facilities shower rooms are gross and are filled with mold. V4 stated she expressed her concern in the last care plan meeting she had with the facility on 08/29/2024. V4 stated she showed V2 (Director of Nursing) and V12 (Social Service) pictures of the shower room and the shower room curtain liner. V4 stated she was told that it wasn't mold and there had been nothing done about the shower curtain liner. On 09/24/2024 at 12:03 P.M. V5 (Housekeeping Supervisor) was observed cleaning the shower stall on the 300-hall shower room. V5 stated she is not sure what the black / orange substance is that is on the stripping of the shower stall where the wall and floor meet. V5 stated the facility has tried removing it with different cleaning products including bleach. V5 stated that she has been unsuccessful as she thinks it is the glue coming through. V5 stated the shower rooms are cleaned at least daily and more often if needed. V5 stated that the facility is in the process of preparing to remodel all three shower rooms. On 09/24/2024 at 12:31 P.M. V1 (Administrator) stated she does not think the discoloration in the shower rooms is mold. V1 stated they have sprayed it with bleach, and it does not change the color or make it where it will come off. V1 stated she feels that is the glue from the tiles and stripping causing the black appearance. V1 stated it is very sticky and won't come off. On 09/24/2024 at 2:50 P.M. V1 and V9 (Regional Nurse) were shown the shower curtain liner on 100 halls. V1 stated that she was unaware that there was soap scum build up on the back of the shower curtain liner. V1 stated they will immediately take them down. V1 stated the buildup on the shower chair legs was not mold it was soap scum. V1 stated that she has no complaints from residents or families about the condition of the shower rooms. On 09/25/2024 at 8:56 A.M. the 100-hall shower room was observed to have a new vinyl liner with the shower curtain. On 09/25/2024 at 08:30 A.M. V1 stated that all of the shower chairs are being taken outside and being power washed. V1 stated that this occurs twice a month for each side. V1 stated that the facility is getting ready to start a remodel on three of the shower rooms. V1 stated they are waiting for all the materials to be delivered so the project can get started. On 09/25/2024 at 9:01 A.M. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she was in the care plan with V4. V2 stated she remembers V4 telling them about the shower room but does not remember V4 stating issues with the shower curtain or liner. V2 stated after the care plan meeting, she looked at the shower and does not believe it is mold. V2 stated she believes it is glue coming through. V2 stated the facility is getting ready to start a remodel on all three shower rooms. On 09/25/2024 at 9:35 A.M. V1 stated that all housekeeping staff have been instructed to monitor the liners in the shower room and to change them as needed. Facility Census sheet printed 9/24/24 documented R3, R4, R6, R8 - R20 live on the 100 hall.
Apr 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) st...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status reflected resident wishes as desired throughout the Electronic Health Record for 1 (R56) of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 43. The Findings Include: R56's Facesheet with a print date of [DATE] documents R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and influenza. R56's POLST form dated [DATE] documents under Orders for Patient in Cardiac Arrest, a check mark next to, No CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation): Do Not Attempt Resuscitation . On [DATE] at 9:19 AM, a review of R56's electronic health record documents a physician order that indicates R56's POLST states as Full Code. On [DATE] at 12:07 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated R56's Power of Attorney changed R56's status from full code to DNR (do not resuscitate) on [DATE]. V1 stated they changed it everywhere in the electronic health records but they didn't put the new POLST status in R56's physician's orders. R56's undated Physician Orders List with active orders only provided to this surveyor by V1 (Administrator) does not document a physician order related to advance directives. The untitled and undated physician order provided to this surveyor by the facility documents a physician order of Full Code with a start date of [DATE], a discontinue date of [DATE], and a last modified date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 1:15 PM, V1 stated she discontinued the order after the discrepancy was brought to her attention by this surveyor. The facility Advance Directives Policy dated 12/2016 documents, Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy 19. The Director of Nursing Services or designee will notify the attending Physician of advance directives so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care. The Attending Physician will not be required to write orders for which he or she has ad ethical or conscientious objection.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately report Registered Nurse (RN) hours to the payroll-based journal. This has the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately report Registered Nurse (RN) hours to the payroll-based journal. This has the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of Staffing Data Submission Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) found at, https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/nursing-home-improvement/staffing-data-submission and last modified 9/23/23 stated, .CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) has developed a system for facilities to submit staffing information - Payroll Based Journal (PBJ). This system allows staffing information to be collected on a regular and more frequent basis than previously collected. It is auditable to ensure accuracy. Review of the facility's PBJ report for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31), documented No RN hours on the following dates: 10/07/23, 10/08/23, 10/22/23, and 12/28/23. Nursing schedules reviewed for RN coverage on 10/7/23, 10/8/23, 10/22/23, and 12/28/23 documented coverage was provided by V1 (Administrator), who was a contracted Registered Nurse at the facility during that time. On 04/05/24 at 10:54 AM, V1 confirmed that she did work the days in question as the Registered Nurse at the facility, although the origination of discrepancy in the PBJ hours reported cannot be determined at this time. The Long Term Care Facility application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 4/2/24, documented 104 residents reside in the facility.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R23, R46, R64, R72) reviewed for room size in a samp...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of living space for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R23, R46, R64, R72) reviewed for room size in a sample of 43. Findings include: An observation on 4/3/24 at approximately 3:14 pm, revealed R23 is in his room alone currently but will have his roommate back after his therapy is completed. It was a smaller sized bedroom with two beds and 2 night stands and had a limited area to move around inside the room. An observation on 4/3/24 at approximately 3:18 pm, revealed R46 was in his room alone with no roommate at this time. It was a smaller sized bedroom with two beds and 1 night stand and a recliner. The room had limited area to move around inside. An observation on 4/3/24 at approximately 3:20 pm, revealed that R64 was in the bedroom alone. It was a smaller sized bedroom with one bed, one recliner and 1 night stand. The room had limited area to move around inside. An observation on 4/3/24 at approximately 3:25 pm, revealed that R72 and R3 were in a room together. It was smaller sized bedroom with 2 beds and 2 night stands. This room had limited area to move around inside. During a tour with the V2 (Maintenance Director) on 4/3/24 at 3:14pm, V2 was asked to measure R3, R23, R46, R64 and R72's bedroom sizes. V2 used the measuring tape to measure the length and width of R3, R23, R46, R64 and R72's room and stated, 12.5 by 12 feet, indicating that the rooms were 150 square (sq.) feet (ft.), or 75 sq. ft. per bed. The measurements did not include the closet and bathroom. During an interview on 4/3/24 at approximately 3:30pm, when asked about the size for two-resident bedrooms, V2 stated that he is unsure of the required square feet for resident rooms and has never measured the rooms before. On 4/2/24 at 2:30pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that Side 2 of the facility (where R3, R23, R46, R64 and R72 reside) has a room size waiver assessment. V1 stated that most of these residents do not have roommates but are still certified for two residents. V1 stated rooms 203-206, 208-209, 211-212, 215-220, 222-227, 229-231, 234-235, 238-239, 241-242, 244-248 are all waivered rooms and don't meet the proper room size. A facility room roster provided by the facility on 4/2/24 and dated 4/1/24, documents that R3, R23, R46, R64 and R72 reside in the rooms observed and measured by V2. Inquiries regarding the size of these rooms during the survey from 04/02/24 to 04/05/24, found no concerns or negative interviews from residents or families of residents who reside in the waivered rooms. During interview, on 04/03/24, R3, R23, R46, R64 and R72 all voiced no concerns with the size of their rooms during interviews. Review of 6 months of Resident Council meeting minutes indicated no concerns related to the size of the rooms.
Jun 2023 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable nutritional and hydration parameters for a non-...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable nutritional and hydration parameters for a non-verbal resident with a diagnosis of dysphagia for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for nutrition and hydration in a sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a significant weight loss of 5% in 1 week due to not receiving nutrition for 16 days, with subsequent hospitalization for malnutrition, critically low potassium levels, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. A reasonable person not being provided any form of nutrition for 16 days would react with feelings of emotional/psychological distress, weakness, anxiousness, as well as discomfort or cramping related to hunger pangs. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 5/20/23, when the facility failed to provide nutrition and adequate hydration to R1 for 16 days leading to R1's significant weight loss of 5% in 1 week, and subsequent hospitalization for malnutrition, critically low potassium levels, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. V1(Administrator in training) and V22 (Director of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 6/22/23 at 11:12am. This surveyor confirmed by record review and interview that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 6/23/23 at 8:00am, but non-compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet in the medical record documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, unspecified affecting unspecified side, dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase) following other cerebrovascular disease, aphasia, and Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. R1's June 2023 Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents an order dated 1/20/23 for a pureed diet with NTL (nectar thickened liquids) and assist with meals as needed. R1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] in Section B, Hearing, Speech & Vision documents R1's speech clarity as No speech - absence of spoken words. Subsequent MDS assessments dated 4/14/23 and 5/30/23 document R1's speech clarity as Unclear Speech - slurred or mumbled words. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/30/23 documents in Section C, Cognitive Patterns, that R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 99, indicating R1 was unable to complete the interview. The same MDS assessment documents in Section G, Functional Status, documents that the self-performance and support provided under the section Eating as Activity did not occur-activity did not occur or family and/or non-facility staff provided care 100% of the time for that activity over the entire 7 day period. A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record authored by V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 5/20/23 at 1:54 PM documents in part Resident (R1) started coughing during breakfast and lunch today that caused her to expel her food up both meals and for the past couple days she needed to be suctioned following 2 meals which she was and tolerated well. I called primary care today and talked to the Dr (doctor) on call which is (V35- Nurse Practitioner) she said to send to the emergency room. Ambulance called and was transported to (local hospital #1). R1's ED (Emergency Department) Discharge Instructions dated 5/21/23, authored by V24 (emergency room Physician) documents a final diagnosis of dysphagia, concern for aspiration. Discharge Instructions document that R1 is on 125 cc (cubic centimeters) of D5 (Dextrose 5%) 1/2 NS (Normal Saline) 20 KCl (Potassium Chloride), needs swallow evaluation, please contact the facility physician to order swallow evaluation, this needs to be done tomorrow morning, keep the patient NPO (nothing by mouth) until the swallow eval is done, check blood sugar, fingerstick, every 6 hours, and follow up with PCP (Primary Care Physician) in 24 hours. A Miscellaneous Nursing Note from the hospital records dated 5/21/23 documents spoke with (name of facility). Nurse reports that they have the capability to do swallow evals in their facility Monday through Friday. (Name of facility) also, has the capability to give IV fluids. I spoke with provider and he is willing to send (R1) back to (name of facility) as long as they are comfortable with the IV fluids and NPO status. Attempting to return call to (name of the facility). The Nursing Note further documents pt (patient) to be discharged back to the facility. Report called to (V18- Licensed Practical Nurse). A Nurse's Note dated 5/21/23 at 11:52 AM documents in part that (R1) returned from (local hospital #1) at 2050. New orders for IV fluids. A Nurse's Note dated 5/22/23 at 2:00 AM documents in part Resting in bed at this time. HOB (head of bed) elevated 30 degrees. #20 gauge IV patent in left hand. No redness or swelling noted, flushes without difficulty. N.O. (new order) from (local Hospital #1) to start D5 ½ NS 20KCl at 125 mL (milliliters) per hr (hour) until morning. IV fluids running per orders. Keep NPO until swallow eval ordered and done. R1's June 2023 POS documents orders dated 5/22/23 for a swallow eval next available Dx (diagnosis): dysphagia, keep NPO until swallow eval is done, and check blood glucose Q (every) 6 hours and an order dated 5/23/23 for Dextrose 5%- 0.45%NaCl (Sodium Chloride) IV (Intravenous) solution at 125mL/ hour. On 6/21/23 at 8:30 AM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said that she admitted R1 back to the facility after the 5/21/23 trip to the emergency room. V18 said she was specifically told a swallow exam by the hospital. V18 said that she told them that they could do a bedside swallow test but could not do a barium swallow or a video test. V18 said that she put R1 on the doctors list for rounds. V18 said that R1 was ordered to be NPO at that time. V18 said the doctor does rounds on Wednesdays and Fridays and sometimes the weekend and they usually clip the hospital orders on the list and put them in a folder labeled MD (Medical Doctor) rounds. V18 said that R1 came back on IV fluids and the hospital sent a bag of fluids with her. V18 said the fluids were D5 1/2 NS. V18 said that when she hears swallow evaluation to her that means to have a speech therapy evaluation not video or barium swallow test. V18 said when she received report from the hospital, a video or barium swallow test was never mentioned. V18 said the folder for physician rounds, that included R1's hospital records, was left at the nurse's station. V18 said that on 5/18/23 she had to suction R1. V18 said that there was no food in what she suctioned. V18 said it was clear frothy phlegm. Nurse's Notes dated 5/21/23, 5/22/23, 5/23/23, 5/24/23, 5/25/23, 5/26/23 and 5/27/23 all document that R1 continues to be NPO until the swallow evaluation is completed. A Nurse's Note dated 5/30/23 at 9:26 AM, documents that R1 has left the facility to have a swallow eval done. A hospital Fluoroscopy Esophagram Report (from local hospital #2) documents the reason for the exam as dysphagia with an order dated 5/22/23 by V21 (Physician). The Fluoroscopy Esophagram results dated 5/30/23 at 9:48 AM, documents under findings that the patient was unable to swallow barium. There is a history of aspiration. This is a non-diagnostic exam. Is suggested that the patient be scheduled for a video swallow with speech pathologist to evaluate which consistencies the patient can tolerate without aspiration. On 6/14/23 at 7:00am, V3 (DON/Director of Nurses) said that they tried to get a barium swallow done for R1 but the 2 local hospitals could not do it. V3 said they did get an appointment for 5/30 but that R1 would not swallow the barium so it could not be completed. V3 said that V21 saw R1 at the facility on 5/31/23 in the morning and was unsure what the family's choice would be- hospice or feeding tube and then the family made the decision to get a feeding tube that same afternoon. V3 said they were following physician orders by keeping R1 NPO since that is what he ordered. A Nurse's Note by V3 dated 5/31/23 at 12:56 AM documents (R1) remains NPO. She was unable to complete swallow eval today. (V21) is aware of study failure. Awaiting further orders. IV site to left upper arm patent and clear without evidence of infiltration. D5 0.45%NS infusing at 125mL per hour. Glucose readings wnl (within normal limits). Oral care provided. A facility Progress Note dated 5/31/23 by V21 (Physician) documents under plan that Orders reviewed and signed and continue current regimen. Patient (R1) has been in and out of the hospital emergency room several times over the last couple weeks. (R1) was diagnosed with progressively worsening dysphagia to the point that she is been kept NPO due to constant aspiration. We would attempt esophagram and she was unable to do due to dysphagia. Staff has been in contact with (V36 Power of Attorney-POA/ Family). (V36) is contemplating hospice versus PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube feeding. Patient has been on IV fluids. Patient is non-verbal but does not show any signs of discomfort or pain. As soon as the family decides we will proceed with orders. A Nurse's Note dated 5/31/23 at 11:43 AM documents TC (telephone call) to (V36) in regards to being placed on hospice service or have a feeding tube placed. (V36) said she wants a feeding tube placed and doesn't want her on hospice care. A Wound/ Weight Meeting Note authored by V32 (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 6/1/23 at 10:34 AM documents in part Current weight 113.6 lbs (pounds) which is 6.2 lbs loss since being placed on NPO status with IV D5 1/2NS continuous at 125 mL/hr, pending swallow study, which she failed. Call placed to (V36) regarding options of feeding tube placement or hospice care. (V36) has opted for feeding tube. MD notified and PEG tube placement is pending . A Nurse's Note dated 6/1/23 at 2:06 PM documents June 8th at 2 PM (local hospital #3) for G (gastrostomy) tube placement. On 6/25/23 at 9:00am, V3 (DON) said that they were able to get another appointment at another local hospital for G tube placement on 6/8/23. V3 said that V21 was able to find a surgeon to place the feeding tube and sent R1 to the hospital on 6/6/23. R1's admission History and Physical (from local hospital #3) dated 6/6/23 under the section HPI (history of present illness)/ Subjective documents in part that R1 presents with traumatic brain injury, aphasia, dysphagia, spastic right hemiparesis was brought into ER (Emergency Room) today from the nursing home for possible PEG tube placement .(V36) stated that (R1) has been without food for 2 weeks since an episode of aspiration. She has been awaiting evaluation by speech therapist .Routine labs obtained today show severe hypokalemia 1.8. UA (urinalysis) is pending. Chest X-rays unremarkable for cardiopulmonary pathology. Under the section Plan it documents traumatic brain injury with spastic right hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia on puree with inconsistent swallow and history of aspiration with poor oral intake, anorexia and dehydration with severe electrolyte derangement, hypokalemia, monitor on telemetry, check magnesium as well and replete all electrolytes, Speech and Swallow eval, NPO, D5NS with KCL (potassium) at 100 mL/hr. General surgery consulted for a PEG tube placement. A document titled ST (Speech Therapy) Bedside Swallow Evaluation from the hospital records dated 6/7/23 by V14 (Hospital Speech Therapist at local hospital #3) document an impression of moderate oral dysphagia and pharyngeal dysphagia suspected. A pureed diet with nectar thickened liquids was recommended and a goal of R1 participating in dysphagia treatment in order to further determine safest and least restrictive diet level. An inpatient speech therapy note by V14 dated 6/12/23 documents that R1 swallowed nectar thickened liquids and pureed consistencies with no overt signs and symptoms of aspiration and speech therapy was not needed at this time due to R1's goals were met and a recommendation was made for discharge to a skilled nursing facility. A Nutritional Assessment in the hospital records dated 6/9/23 document that R1 meets ASPEN (American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition) criteria for severe protein calorie malnutrition related to inability to consume adequate nutrition as evidenced by patient with aspiration two weeks ago and reportedly uncooperative with previous SLP (Speech and Language Pathologist) evaluation who has been without food for two weeks and presents with critical hypokalemia 1.8 and critical hypophosphatemia 0.7 as well as (by mouth) intake 0% of estimated needs for 2 weeks, significant fat wasting noted per NFPE (Nutrition Focused Physical Exam): moderate orbital pad, significant muscle wasting per NFPE: moderate clavicular, moderate dorsal hand/interosseous. Under the section Evaluation it documents that R1 is tolerating diet order of pureed diet and nectar thickened liquids as recommended by SLP (Speech-Language Pathologist) based on bedside evaluation, ate 75% of lunch and dinner yesterday (6/8/23), and ate 100% of breakfast this morning (6/9/23). On 6/15/23 at 10:46 AM, V14 (Hospital Speech Therapist at local hospital #3) said that speech therapy makes the recommendation for a resident to be NPO (nothing by mouth). V14 said you cannot leave someone without eating for that long. V14 said she did a bedside swallow evaluation on R1 when she was admitted to the hospital and that R1 was safe for PO (by mouth) intake and could have eaten if R1 was seen by speech therapy. V14 said she is not sure why R1 was not seen at the facility. V14 said they were going to put a feeding tube in a lady that did not need it. V14 said that R1 is still in the hospital and is on a full pureed diet and is doing great and has had no feeding tube. On 6/15/23 at 10:30 AM, V12 (Contracted Speech Therapist for facility) said that she could have done a bedside swallow evaluation on R1 if it was ordered by the Physician but that she never received any order or information for R1. On 6/15/23 at 10:35 AM, V13 (Director of Rehabilitation/COTA/Certified Occupational Therapist) said a bedside swallow evaluation could have been done but was not ordered by the physician. On 6/20/23 at 11:35am, V3 said that the Dietician saw R1 at the facility on 5/19/23. V3 said that the dietician was not here while R1 was NPO, therefore did not see R1. V3 also said that R1 received her medications crushed in applesauce and did not receive any of them while she was NPO. V3 said that V21 was aware. A facility document labeled Vital Signs Grid documents that R1 weighed 119.8 on 5/24/23 and 113.6 on 5/29/23, a weight loss 6.2 pounds (5.2%), in 5 days. There were no interventions or dietary notes documented in R1's medical record to address this weight loss. On 6/20/23 at 2:06 PM, V23 (RD/Registered Dietician) said she was not aware of R1's weight loss during that time. V23 said unfortunately she was not made aware that R1 was NPO for 16 days. V23 said she saw R1 on 5/19/23 and she was eating. V23 said she would have expected to have been notified that R1 was going that long without eating since R1 needed a liquid nutrition rather than just IV fluids for hydration. On 6/20/23 at 8:25am, V21 (Physician) said that R1 had had 2-3 episodes of aspiration. V21 said he sent R1 to a local hospital emergency room and doesn't understand if they were unable to do any kind of swallow testing, then why did they not send her to a facility where it could be done. V21 said he tried and tried to find someone to place a feeding tube with no success and finally found one and that is why they sent R1 out on 6/6/23. V21 said he did not realize that R1 went 16 days without eating and said he is not surprised about the weight loss. V21 said he doesn't know what else he could have done. V21 said that as soon as V36 made the choice of putting in the feeding tube, they called all over southern Illinois trying to get someone to put the tube in. V21 said no one from the facility asked about a bedside swallow eval to be done at the facility. V21 said he was aware the facility had Speech Therapy but did not know what their hours were. A letter dated 6/19/23 provided by V22 (Director of Operations) from V21's office and signed by V21, documents In my medical opinion, the risk of aspiration posed by conducting a bedside swallowing evaluation was greater than the risk of remaining NPO pending the swallowing study that was originally ordered. R1 was monitored while NPO for dehydration and glucose readings remained within parameters. Given her history of aspiration with resultant pneumonia maintaining her NPO status and IV therapy pending definitive evaluation and treatment of her dysphagia was deemed the safest course of action. On 6/15/23 at 9:00 AM, V22 said that they did what the physician ordered. V22 said the physician (V21) ordered R1 to be NPO. V22 said they scheduled R1 for a barium swallow on 5/30/23 but R1 did not swallow the barium. V22 said they then had an appointment for 6/8/23 and that is the soonest they could get an appointment then sent R1 out on 6/6/23. V22 said he does not know what else they could have done. R1's Care Plan documents a Care Plan Description of Nutritional Risk difficulty swallowing with a Goal of Maintain or improve weight and health status with a start date of 5/22/23. Documented interventions include: diet as ordered (start date 5/22/23), provide adaptive equipment as needed (start date of 5/22/23), weight as ordered (start date of 5/22/23), swallow eval as ordered by physician (start date of 5/22/23), NPO until swallow eval completed (start date 5/22/23), IV fluids per orders (start date of 5/23/23), transfer to (local hospital) for PEG tube placement (start date 6/6/23), and fortified pudding per orders once clearance after swallow study (start date 5/24/23). There were no orders, interventions, nor documentation in R1's medical record for a referral to the dietician, speech therapy, or orders for blood work to monitor R1's electrolytes during the 16 days that R1 was on NPO status. There is no documentation in R1's medical record that R1 received any nutrition, orally or parentally, from 5/20/23 until R1's hospitalization on 6/6/23. The surveyor confirmed through interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy that began on 5/22/23 was removed on 6/23/23 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: *All licensed staff and department heads have been educated to ensure if there are reports of change in swallowing or decrease in nutrition for any resident, they are to ensure that the proper referral gets sent to the corresponding interdisciplinary team member. Education was provided by V22 and V3. *Completed on 6/20/2023 and morning of 6/21/2023, all licensed staff and department heads have been educated on receiving the information needed for the immediate care of the resident's needs. All orders, for initial admission, change of condition, or readmission, are to be clarified with residents' Attending Physician, and documented to ensure all orders are transcribed accurately and implemented. Education was provided by V22 and V3. *Electronic medical records have been reviewed to identify residents that may be affected by the same deficient practice and have a diagnosis of dysphasia and aspiration. Care plans have been reviewed to ensure the interventions put into place are appropriate and effective. This was completed by the V22. Completed at 12:13p 6/22/23. *On 6/22/23 at 1:32 PM, the QA (Quality Assurance) team was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and the abatement plan that has been put into place. The QA team will review the results of the daily audits once per week for 2 weeks, then monthly for two months to ensure plan of correction is effective.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: a) protect a resident from neglect when they failed to maintain ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: a) protect a resident from neglect when they failed to maintain acceptable nutritional and hydration parameters for a non-verbal resident with a diagnosis of dysphagia for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect in a sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a significant weight loss of 5% in 1 week due to not receiving nutrition for 16 days, with subsequent hospitalization for malnutrition, critically low potassium levels, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance; and b) failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect in a sample of 9. The findings include: a.) R1's Face Sheet in the medical record documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, unspecified affecting unspecified side, dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase) following other cerebrovascular disease, aphasia, and Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. R1's June 2023 Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents an order dated 1/20/23 for a pureed diet with NTL (nectar thickened liquids) and assist with meals as needed. R1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] in Section B, Hearing, Speech & Vision documents R1's speech clarity as No speech - absence of spoken words. Subsequent MDS assessments dated 4/14/23 and 5/30/23 document R1's speech clarity as Unclear Speech - slurred or mumbled words. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/30/23 documents in Section C, Cognitive Patterns, that R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 99, indicating R1 was unable to complete the interview. The same MDS assessment documents in Section G, Functional Status, documents that the self-performance and support provided under the section Eating as Activity did not occur-activity did not occur or family and/or non-facility staff provided care 100% of the time for that activity over the entire 7 day period. A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record authored by V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 5/20/23 at 1:54 PM documents in part Resident (R1) started coughing during breakfast and lunch today that caused her to expel her food up both meals and for the past couple days she needed to be suctioned following 2 meals which she was and tolerated well. I called primary care today and talked to the Dr (doctor) on call which is (V35- Nurse Practitioner) she said to send to the emergency room. Ambulance called and was transported to (local hospital #1). R1's ED (Emergency Department) Discharge Instructions dated 5/21/23, authored by V24 (emergency room Physician) documents a final diagnosis of dysphagia, concern for aspiration. Discharge Instructions document that R1 is on 125 cc (cubic centimeters) of D5 (Dextrose 5%) 1/2 NS (Normal Saline) 20 KCl (Potassium Chloride), needs swallow evaluation, please contact the facility physician to order swallow evaluation, this needs to be done tomorrow morning, keep the patient NPO (nothing by mouth) until the swallow eval is done, check blood sugar, fingerstick, every 6 hours, and follow up with PCP (Primary Care Physician) in 24 hours. A Miscellaneous Nursing Note from the hospital records dated 5/21/23 documents spoke with (name of facility). Nurse reports that they have the capability to do swallow evals in their facility Monday through Friday. (Name of facility) also, has the capability to give IV fluids. I spoke with provider and he is willing to send (R1) back to (name of facility) as long as they are comfortable with the IV fluids and NPO status. Attempting to return call to (name of the facility). The Nursing Note further documents pt (patient) to be discharged back to the facility. Report called to (V18- Licensed Practical Nurse). A Nurse's Note dated 5/21/23 at 11:52 AM documents in part that (R1) returned from (local hospital #1) at 2050. New orders for IV fluids. A Nurse's Note dated 5/22/23 at 2:00 AM documents in part Resting in bed at this time. HOB (head of bed) elevated 30 degrees. #20 gauge IV patent in left hand. No redness or swelling noted, flushes without difficulty. N.O. (new order) from (local Hospital #1) to start D5 ½ NS 20KCl at 125 mL (milliliters) per hr (hour) until morning. IV fluids running per orders. Keep NPO until swallow eval ordered and done. R1's June 2023 POS documents orders dated 5/22/23 for a swallow eval next available Dx (diagnosis): dysphagia, keep NPO until swallow eval is done, and check blood glucose Q (every) 6 hours and an order dated 5/23/23 for Dextrose 5%- 0.45%NaCl (Sodium Chloride) IV (Intravenous) solution at 125mL/ hour. On 6/21/23 at 8:30 AM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said that she admitted R1 back to the facility after the 5/21/23 trip to the emergency room. V18 said she was specifically told a swallow exam by the hospital. V18 said that she told them that they could do a bedside swallow test but could not do a barium swallow or a video test. V18 said that she put R1 on the doctors list for rounds. V18 said that R1 was ordered to be NPO at that time. V18 said the doctor does rounds on Wednesdays and Fridays and sometimes the weekend and they usually clip the hospital orders on the list and put them in a folder labeled MD (Medical Doctor) rounds. V18 said that R1 came back on IV fluids and the hospital sent a bag of fluids with her. V18 said the fluids were D5 1/2 NS. V18 said that when she hears swallow evaluation to her that means to have a speech therapy evaluation not video or barium swallow test. V18 said when she received report from the hospital, a video or barium swallow test was never mentioned. V18 said the folder for physician rounds, that included R1's hospital records, was left at the nurse's station. V18 said that on 5/18/23 she had to suction R1. V18 said that there was no food in what she suctioned. V18 said it was clear frothy phlegm. Nurse's Notes dated 5/21/23, 5/22/23, 5/23/23, 5/24/23, 5/25/23, 5/26/23 and 5/27/23 all document that R1 continues to be NPO until the swallow evaluation is completed. A Nurse's Note dated 5/30/23 at 9:26 AM, documents that R1 has left the facility to have a swallow eval done. A hospital Fluoroscopy Esophagram Report (from local hospital #2) documents the reason for the exam as dysphagia with an order dated 5/22/23 by V21 (Physician). The Fluoroscopy Esophagram results dated 5/30/23 at 9:48 AM, documents under findings that the patient was unable to swallow barium. There is a history of aspiration. This is a non-diagnostic exam. Is suggested that the patient be scheduled for a video swallow with speech pathologist to evaluate which consistencies the patient can tolerate without aspiration. On 6/14/23 at 7:00am, V3 (DON/Director of Nurses) said that they tried to get a barium swallow done for R1 but the 2 local hospitals could not do it. V3 said they did get an appointment for 5/30 but that R1 would not swallow the barium so it could not be completed. V3 said that V21 saw R1 at the facility on 5/31/23 in the morning and was unsure what the family's choice would be- hospice or feeding tube and then the family made the decision to get a feeding tube that same afternoon. V3 said they were following physician orders by keeping R1 NPO since that is what he ordered. A Nurse's Note by V3 dated 5/31/23 at 12:56 AM documents (R1) remains NPO. She was unable to complete swallow eval today. (V21) is aware of study failure. Awaiting further orders. IV site to left upper arm patent and clear without evidence of infiltration. D5 0.45%NS infusing at 125mL per hour. Glucose readings wnl (within normal limits). Oral care provided. A facility Progress Note dated 5/31/23 by V21 (Physician) documents under plan that Orders reviewed and signed and continue current regimen. Patient (R1) has been in and out of the hospital emergency room several times over the last couple weeks. (R1) was diagnosed with progressively worsening dysphagia to the point that she is been kept NPO due to constant aspiration. We would attempt esophagram and she was unable to do due to dysphagia. Staff has been in contact with (V36 Power of Attorney-POA/ Family). (V36) is contemplating hospice versus PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube feeding. Patient has been on IV fluids. Patient is non-verbal but does not show any signs of discomfort or pain. As soon as the family decides we will proceed with orders. A Nurse's Note dated 5/31/23 at 11:43 AM documents TC (telephone call) to (V36) in regards to being placed on hospice service or have a feeding tube placed. (V36) said she wants a feeding tube placed and doesn't want her on hospice care. A Wound/ Weight Meeting Note authored by V32 (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 6/1/23 at 10:34 AM documents in part Current weight 113.6 lbs (pounds) which is 6.2 lbs loss since being placed on NPO status with IV D5 1/2NS continuous at 125 mL/hr, pending swallow study, which she failed. Call placed to (V36) regarding options of feeding tube placement or hospice care. (V36) has opted for feeding tube. MD notified and PEG tube placement is pending . A Nurse's Note dated 6/1/23 at 2:06 PM documents June 8th at 2 PM (local hospital #3) for G (gastrostomy) tube placement. On 6/25/23 at 9:00am, V3 (DON) said that they were able to get another appointment at another local hospital for G tube placement on 6/8/23. V3 said that V21 was able to find a surgeon to place the feeding tube and sent R1 to the hospital on 6/6/23. R1's admission History and Physical (from local hospital #3) dated 6/6/23 under the section HPI (history of present illness)/ Subjective documents in part that R1 presents with traumatic brain injury, aphasia, dysphagia, spastic right hemiparesis was brought into ER (Emergency Room) today from the nursing home for possible PEG tube placement .(V36) stated that (R1) has been without food for 2 weeks since an episode of aspiration. She has been awaiting evaluation by speech therapist .Routine labs obtained today show severe hypokalemia 1.8. UA (urinalysis) is pending. Chest X-rays unremarkable for cardiopulmonary pathology. Under the section Plan it documents traumatic brain injury with spastic right hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia on puree with inconsistent swallow and history of aspiration with poor oral intake, anorexia and dehydration with severe electrolyte derangement, hypokalemia, monitor on telemetry, check magnesium as well and replete all electrolytes, Speech and Swallow eval, NPO, D5NS with KCL (potassium) at 100 mL/hr. General surgery consulted for a PEG tube placement. A document titled ST (Speech Therapy) Bedside Swallow Evaluation from the hospital records dated 6/7/23 by V14 (Hospital Speech Therapist at local hospital #3) document an impression of moderate oral dysphagia and pharyngeal dysphagia suspected. A pureed diet with nectar thickened liquids was recommended and a goal of R1 participating in dysphagia treatment in order to further determine safest and least restrictive diet level. An inpatient speech therapy note by V14 dated 6/12/23 documents that R1 swallowed nectar thickened liquids and pureed consistencies with no overt signs and symptoms of aspiration and speech therapy was not needed at this time due to R1's goals were met and a recommendation was made for discharge to a skilled nursing facility. A Nutritional Assessment in the hospital records dated 6/9/23 document that R1 meets ASPEN (American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition) criteria for severe protein calorie malnutrition related to inability to consume adequate nutrition as evidenced by patient with aspiration two weeks ago and reportedly uncooperative with previous SLP (Speech and Language Pathologist) evaluation who has been without food for two weeks and presents with critical hypokalemia 1.8 and critical hypophosphatemia 0.7 as well as (by mouth) intake 0% of estimated needs for 2 weeks, significant fat wasting noted per NFPE (Nutrition Focused Physical Exam): moderate orbital pad, significant muscle wasting per NFPE: moderate clavicular, moderate dorsal hand/interosseous. Under the section Evaluation it documents that R1 is tolerating diet order of pureed diet and nectar thickened liquids as recommended by SLP (Speech-Language Pathologist) based on bedside evaluation, ate 75% of lunch and dinner yesterday (6/8/23), and ate 100% of breakfast this morning (6/9/23). On 6/15/23 at 10:46 AM, V14 (Hospital Speech Therapist at local hospital #3) said that speech therapy makes the recommendation for a resident to be NPO (nothing by mouth). V14 said you cannot leave someone without eating for that long. V14 said she did a bedside swallow evaluation on R1 when she was admitted to the hospital and that R1 was safe for PO (by mouth) intake and could have eaten if R1 was seen by speech therapy. V14 said she is not sure why R1 was not seen at the facility. V14 said they were going to put a feeding tube in a lady that did not need it. V14 said that R1 is still in the hospital and is on a full pureed diet and is doing great and has had no feeding tube. On 6/15/23 at 10:30 AM, V12 (Contracted Speech Therapist for facility) said that she could have done a bedside swallow evaluation on R1 if it was ordered by the Physician but that she never received any order or information for R1. On 6/15/23 at 10:35 AM, V13 (Director of Rehabilitation/COTA/Certified Occupational Therapist) said a bedside swallow evaluation could have been done but was not ordered by the physician. On 6/20/23 at 11:35am, V3 said that the Dietician saw R1 at the facility on 5/19/23. V3 said that the dietician was not here while R1 was NPO, therefore did not see R1. V3 also said that R1 received her medications crushed in applesauce and did not receive any of them while she was NPO. V3 said that V21 was aware. A facility document labeled Vital Signs Grid documents that R1 weighed 119.8 on 5/24/23 and 113.6 on 5/29/23, a weight loss 6.2 pounds (5.2%), in 5 days. There were no interventions or dietary notes documented in R1's medical record to address this weight loss. On 6/20/23 at 2:06 PM, V23 (RD/Registered Dietician) said she was not aware of R1's weight loss during that time. V23 said unfortunately she was not made aware that R1 was NPO for 16 days. V23 said she saw R1 on 5/19/23 and she was eating. V23 said she would have expected to have been notified that R1 was going that long without eating since R1 needed a liquid nutrition rather than just IV fluids for hydration. On 6/20/23 at 8:25am, V21 (Physician) said that R1 had had 2-3 episodes of aspiration. V21 said he sent R1 to a local hospital emergency room and doesn't understand if they were unable to do any kind of swallow testing, then why did they not send her to a facility where it could be done? V21 said he tried and tried to find someone to place a feeding tube with no success and finally found one and that is why they sent R1 out on 6/6/23. V21 said he did not realize that R1 went 16 days without eating and said he is not surprised about the weight loss. V21 said he doesn't know what else he could have done. V21 said that as soon as V36 made the choice of putting in the feeding tube, they called all over southern Illinois trying to get someone to put the tube in. V21 said no one from the facility asked about a bedside swallow eval to be done at the facility. V21 said he was aware the facility had Speech Therapy but did not know what their hours were. A letter dated 6/19/23 provided by V22 (Director of Operations) from V21's office and signed by V21, documents In my medical opinion, the risk of aspiration posed by conducting a bedside swallowing evaluation was greater than the risk of remaining NPO pending the swallowing study that was originally ordered. R1 was monitored while NPO for dehydration and glucose readings remained within parameters. Given her history of aspiration with resultant pneumonia maintaining her NPO status and IV therapy pending definitive evaluation and treatment of her dysphagia was deemed the safest course of action. On 6/15/23 at 9:00 AM, V22 said that they did what the physician ordered. V22 said the physician (V21) ordered R1 to be NPO. V22 said they scheduled R1 for a barium swallow on 5/30/23 but R1 did not swallow the barium. V22 said they then had an appointment for 6/8/23 and that is the soonest they could get an appointment then sent R1 out on 6/6/23. V22 said he does not know what else they could have done. R1's Care Plan documents a Care Plan Description of Nutritional Risk difficulty swallowing with a Goal of Maintain or improve weight and health status with a start date of 5/22/23. Documented interventions include: diet as ordered (start date 5/22/23), provide adaptive equipment as needed (start date of 5/22/23), weight as ordered (start date of 5/22/23), swallow eval as ordered by physician (start date of 5/22/23), NPO until swallow eval completed (start date 5/22/23), IV fluids per orders (start date of 5/23/23), transfer to (local hospital) for PEG tube placement (start date 6/6/23), and fortified pudding per orders once clearance after swallow study (start date 5/24/23). There were no orders, interventions, nor documentation in R1's medical record for a referral to the dietician, speech therapy, or orders for blood work to monitor R1's electrolytes during the 16 days that R1 was on NPO status. There is no documentation in R1's medical record that R1 received any nutrition, orally or parentally, from 5/20/23 until R1's hospitalization on 6/6/23. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedures (dated 8/16/19) documents the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. The facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect or abuse of our residents. Under the section titled Definitions, neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. b). R2's face sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, hallucinations, unspecified, Essential (primary) hypertension, bilateral transient visual loss, bradycardia, unspecified. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents in section C, Cognitive Patterns, a (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99, indicating that an interview could not be conducted due to resident is rarely/never understood. The IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Incident report labeled Final report dated 5/31/23 documents that on 5/26/23 at 11pm, V2 (Administrator) received a call from a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) reporting an allegation of abuse that took place between the nurse in charge and R2. V19 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was removed from the floor by V2 and asked to write a statement. Immediate assessment of residents was given by V3 (DON/Director of Nurses) with no injuries noted. Police were called and two officers arrived and interviewed V19, then viewed video footage along with the owner (V1) and interviewed R2. The nurse (V19) was suspended pending outcome of investigation. Physician, POA (Power of Attorney), Ombudsman, and police were notified. Head to toe assessment completed on R2 with no injuries noted. R2 did not recall anything happening tonight. V19 was interviewed by V1 (Owner) Administrator and police. V19 stated she was trying to keep R2 from getting all the snacks. V19 said she was following training that she had been given at a psychiatric hospital. It was explained to V19 that we do not put our arms around residents and escort them down hallways. V19 was suspended pending the investigation. The investigation determined R2 was seeking snacks from the snack cart and V19 told her to stop because she was taking all the snacks. V19 moved R2 away from the snack cart and then started to argue with R2. V19 then escorted R2 to a chair, had her sit down. R2 then attempted to obtain snacks from the nurse's cart. V19 then took R2 by the arms with her (V19) around her and led her (R2) to hallway leading to resident's room. Resident interviews were conducted with no resident reporting knowledge of incident or that they witnessed incident. Staff interviews indicate witnessing V19 arguing and escorting R2 to her hallway leading to R2's room with her arms around her. Based on employee statements, V19 interacted with R2 in an inappropriate manner, along with a direct violation of training provided to her as an employee, and facility protocols. Due to the outcome of this investigation, her (V19) employment will be terminated. On 6/14/23 at 5:45 AM, V1 (Owner) said that V19 (LPN) was holding R2 from behind with her arms around her. V1 said that V19 took R2 away from the area the snacks were in and then shoved R2 on her shoulders and walked away. V1 said that they have video footage of the incident, but cannot go back that far to view it now. V1 said that V19 was immediately fired. On 6/14/23 at 5:50 AM, V26 (CNA) said she witnessed V19 put arms around R2 and push her up the hall and was yelling at her. V26 said another staff had reported it to the Administrator. On 6/14/23 at 6:05 AM, V27 (CNA) said she was there for the incident between V19 and R2. V27 said she saw V19 put her arms around R2 and take her up the hall and was yelling at her. V27 said she felt this was wrong and she called the Administrator and reported it. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedures (dated 8/16/19) documents under the section titled Definitions, abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.
Jan 2023 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently and accurately weigh residents and ensure...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently and accurately weigh residents and ensure residents with a history of weight loss received ordered supplements with meals for 4 of 13 residents (R70, R90, R94, and R96) reviewed for nutrition status in a sample of 49. This failure resulted in R70 who had a history of severe weight loss continuing to have an 10 % (significant weight loss) in the past six months. Findings include: 1. R70's face sheet documented an admission date of 11/12/21 and diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder. R70's 12/9/22 MDS (Minimum Data Set) documented a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R70's Physician Orders documented: 8/23/22 order for whole milk at all meals, 8/23/22 order for add 2 butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper, 12/31/22 order for give ice cream or sherbet at lunch and supper. R70's nutritional risk care plan start date 11/12/21 documented interventions: 8/23/22 whole milk served at all meals, 6/1/22 give ice cream or sherbet at lunch and supper, 8/23/22 add butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper. R70's unnamed weight log printed 1/31/23 documented weights as: 2/21/22 165.0 pounds, 3/9/22 165.4 pounds, 4/10/22 154.4 pounds, 5/9/22 154.2 pounds, 6/10/22 149.8 pounds, 7/7/22 151.2 pounds, 8/15/22 148.7 pounds, 8/29/22 149.2 pounds, 9/5/22 150.6 pounds, 10/3/22 146.5 pounds, 10/10/22 144.4 pounds, 10/17/22 143.9 pounds, 10/25/22 144.9 pounds, 10/31/22 142.6 pounds, 12/10/22 140 pounds, 1/11/23 139.4 pounds, 1/29/23 136 pounds. This represents an approximate 8.54% (Significant weight loss) in the previous six months. R70's 6/29/22 progress note made by V4 Registered Dietitian (RD) documented in part .RD Wt (Weight) Note: Wt: 6/10 149.8# . resident is showing a wt loss of 9.4% in 3 months (3/9 165.4#), loss of 13.7% in 6 months (121/5 sic. (12/5) 173.6#) . remains on regular diet with ice cream/ sherbet at lunch and supper . suggest to change milk served to whole and add 2 butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper for added calories . R70's 8/21/22 progress note made by V4 (RD) documented in part .RD Wt Note: . WT: 8/15 148.7# . resident showing loss of 10% in 6 months (2/21 165#) . remains on diet plan of regular with ice cream or sherbet at lunch and supper . at this time will suggest to please add weekly wts to monitor weight fluctuations and change milk served to whole and add 2 butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper for added calories R70's 1/26/23 progress note made by V5 (RD) documented in part . RD Weight Review . WT- 139.4# . Resident is showing a gradual weight loss over the past 6 months (148.7# on 8/15/) . (R70) does have pertinent dx (diagnosis) of Alzheimer's and Schizophrenia, on Clonazepam and Risperidone which can affect intakes and weights . She is confused at all times, often wandering all around facility which can also contribute to weight decline (increase energy expenditure) .supplements/ supplemental foods in place to add extra calories. Current order: whole milk at all meals, 2 butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper . ice cream or sherbet at lunch and supper . On 1/24/23 at 1:07 PM, R70 was sitting in the dining room and was served a noon time meal tray with chicken, rice, broccoli and cheese, tea, coffee, and pureed fruit. No butter or ice cream was served to R70. R70's ice cream was observed to be in a bag at the serving station with R70's name on it. On 1/26/23 at 1:16 PM, R70 was sitting in the dining room and was served the noon time meal consisting of Meat loaf, hashbrowns, green beans, dinner roll, apple sauce, lemonade, tea, ice cream, and one pat of butter open by her plate but not used. No milk was served to R70 and no butter was put on her hot vegetables. R70's 1/26/23 meal ticket documented in part ice cream or sherbet; 2 pats butter to hot vegetables . whole milk . On 1/26/23 10:58 AM, V5 (RD) said if R70 did not receive the two pats of butter to hot vegetables, ice cream, and whole milk R70 would not have received approximately 300 calories. V5 said if staff are not serving all the ordered items to residents it could contribute to weight loss. V5 said R70 has had a gradual weight loss over a period of several months. V5 said she expected all staff to follow the resident's diet orders. 2. R94's face sheet documented an admission date of 7/27/22 and diagnoses including: memory deficit following unspecify cerebrovascular disease, secondary hypertension, hyperlipidemia muscle weakness, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia. R94's 10/28/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R94's Physician Orders documented a 1/25/23 order for 2 pats of butter to vegetables at noon and supper meals. R94's Nutritional Risk care plan with a start date of 7/27/22 documented interventions: 7/27/22 diet as ordered. R94's unnamed weight log printed 1/31/23 documented: 7/27/22 185 pounds, 8/1/22 188.4 pounds, 9/5/22 191.2 pounds, 10/10/22 184.1 pounds, 11/7/22 184.9 pounds, 12/10/22 182 pounds, 1/12/23 165.8 pounds, 1/25/23 164 pounds. R94's 1/26/23 meal ticket documented in part . 1ea (each)/ 1 tsp (teaspoon) - Dinner Roll/ Margarine . 2 pats of butter on hot vegetable . On 1/26/23 at 1:23 PM, R94's noon time meal of meat loaf, hash browns, green beans, a dinner roll, and applesauce was delivered to his room with only one pat of butter on his tray. On 1/26/23 at 1:53 PM, V7 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) reviewed R94's 1/26/23 noon meal ticket with the surveyor and said R94 should have received two butters on his noon time meal tray. On 1/26/23 at 3:40 PM, V5 (RD) said on the 1/26/23 noon time meal R94 should have received three pats of butter (1 for the dinner roll and 2 on the hot vegetables.) On 1/27/23 at 2:12 PM, V4 (RD) said the intervention of adding 2 pats of butter is ensured by watching meal service. V4 said the staff member delivering the resident's tray is responsible for ensuring residents with an order for 2 pats of butter on hot vegetables has the butter delivered. On 1/31/23 at 12:06 PM, V5 (RD) was asked why there was no RD review note when R94 had a 7.1 pound weight loss (3.7%) from 9/5/22 at 191.2 pounds to 10/10/22 at 184.1 pounds V5 responded she did not know why there was no RD review. V5 said the RD will run a weight report to review all monthly and weekly weights in the facility and any changes will be captured in that report. V5 said she was not familiar with R94 and if weight fluctuations were normal and if a 3.7% loss in a month would require a RD review. R94's 1/25/23 progress note from V5 (RD) documented in part .RD Weight & Quarterly Review . Wt (weight) 165.8# (pounds) (1/12) . Resident is showing significant weight loss of 10.4% x 6 months (185# on 7/27) and 9.9% x3 months (184.1# on 10/10). Staff shared with RD an updated wt from today (1/25)- 159.6# which represents some further weight loss . Due to weight loss, would recommend starting . adding 2 pats of butter to hot vegetable sides at lunch and supper for extra calories. Monitor weights and intakes: Refer to RD as needed. R94's Progress noted dated 1/26/23 at 7:02 AM documented in part .RD reviewed weights for (R94) and suggested added 2 pats of butter to hot vegetables and health shake at Breakfast. Dr. (Doctor) notified and approved new orders. Tray card and snack list has been updated . The facility's October 2017 Therapeutic Diet policy documented in part . 2. A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by the resident's attending physician (or non- physician provider). The attending physician may delegate this task to a registered or licensed dietitian . 4. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet . 3. R76's face sheet documents a date of admission to the facility on 5/5/21. This same face sheet documents R76 has diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, other schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. R76's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/13/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 99, indicating R76 has severe cognitive impairment. Section G of the same MDS notes that R76's self-performance for eating is extensive assistance and support given is one- person physical assist. The same MDS notes that for transfers, walk in room, walk in corridor, locomotion on and off unit, R76's support provided is extensive assistance and one-person physical assist. R76's MDS also notes that she uses a wheelchair as a mobility device and her balance during transitions and walking is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. On 1/31/23, V1 (Administrator) said that R76 uses a wheelchair and requires staff assistance but R76 is also impulsive and will get up without asking for assistance. V1 said that R76 has an unsteady gait. R76's care plan with a start date of 5/5/21 documents a focus area of Nutritional Risk, with history of refusing some meals, diabetic, low Vitamin D. The goal listed on the same care plan is to maintain or improve weight and health status. Some of the interventions listed on R76's care plan include diet as ordered, encourage oral intake, provide non-distracting eating environment as needed, weights as ordered. R76's Physician Orders List documents an order dated 5/6/21 for LCS (low concentrated sweets), NAS (No added salt), mechanical soft diet. This document also notes an order dated 6/19/21 for weekly weights. On 1/32/23 at 9:35am, V1 said that the 6/19/21 order for weekly weights should have been discontinued and the original order should have said weekly weights times 4, then monthly, and then only back to weekly when the RD (Registered Dietician) recommends them. V1 said this is how they do all admissions. The same physician order list documents an order on 12/16/22 for whole milk with meals, add ice cream to supper and on 1/26/23 to add 2 pats of butter with hot vegetables, health shakes BID (twice daily) between meals. R76's Vital Sign Grid documents that on 1/29/22, R76 weighed 129.6 pounds (lbs) and approximately one year later on 1/25/23, R76 weighed 118 lbs. R76 was sometimes being weighed weekly and sometimes monthly during this time frame. R76's vital sign grid documents the following additional weights: 01/08/22: 129.2 lbs 01/11/22: 140.2 lbs 01/15/22: 126.4 lbs 01/29/22: 129.6 lbs 05/09/22: 131 lbs 06/10/22: 119 lbs 06/23/22: 138 lbs 07/07/22: 134.8 lbs 08/15/22: 149.1 lbs 10/29/22: 147.8 lbs 11/07/22: 123.8 lbs 11/19/22: 126.9 lbs 12/10/22: 128.3 lbs 12/26/22: 120.1 lbs 12/31/22: 116.8 lbs 01/11/23: 116 lbs 01/25/23: 118 lbs 01/29/23: 127 lbs R76's progress note written by V4 (Registered Dietician/RD) documents on 10/29/22, RD Quarterly Nutritional Review: HT (height) 63, WT (weight) 10/10 147.8#, BMI (Body mass index) 26.3 noted that HTN (hypertension), anxiety disorder, T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) schizophrenia, h/o (history of) UTI (urinary tract infection) noted with medication of: Aricept, HCTZ (hydrochlorothiazide), quetiapine, ativan, levothyroxine, escitalopram, melatonin, pravastatin, metformin and others, is tolerating a diet plan of NAS (no added salt), LCS (low concentrated sweets) mechanical soft with intakes reported around 50-100%. Resident is reported to eat in the main dining area and feeds herself. Wts (weights) are showing gradual increase in the last 6 months and currently stabilizing round 147-149#, Present wt range is within desirable per BMI . at this time diet plan remains appropriate and no changes requested. Refer to RD as needed. R76's Vital Sign Grid documents the next weights after the 10/29/22 RD Quarterly Nutritional Review were on 11/7/22 (123.8 lbs) and 11/19/22 (126.9 lbs). This shows a 24 pound weight loss in 9 days, from 147.8 lbs on 10/29/22 to 123.8 lbs on 11/07/22. R76's progress note documents on 11/25/22 RD wound/wt Review: HT: 63, WT/CBW (weight/current body weight): 126.9#, BMI: 22.5 resident is reviewed related to showing significant wt loss 14.1% in last month (10/10 147.8#) and loss of 14.9% in the last 3 months (8/15 149.1), .noted wts had been fluctuating 130-150# range and at this time noted in upper 120# area diet plan remains on LCS, NAS, mechanical soft and intakes are reported around 100% of meals and fluids around 480ml (milliliters) at this time will request to please recheck wt and place resident on weekly weights. No change in diet plan at this time with intakes noted .monitor weekly wts and refer to RD as needed. There is no evidence to show that R76's weight was rechecked at this time. R76's weight grid documents that the next weight after the 11/25/22 recommendation to re-weigh her was 126.2 lbs on 11/30/22. There are no weights documented again until 12/10/22. R76's progress note by V4 dated 12/15/22 titled RD WT note documents HT: 63, WT: 12/10 128.32#, BMI: 22.8 noted that resident is showing wt loss in the last 3 months of 13.9% (8/15 149.1#) .noted diet plan of mechanical soft LCS, NAS and intakes are around 100% of meals .at this time will request to please add to weekly wts to monitor and please change milk served to whole and add ice cream to supper for added calories, continue to monitor intakes and wts and refer to RD as needed. R76's weight grid documents the next weights are as follows: 12/26/22 - 120.1 lbs, 12/31/22 - 116.8 lbs, 1/11/23 - 116 lbs and on 1/25/23 - 118 lbs. R76's progress note by V4 documents on 1/25/23 RD weight/Wound & Quarterly Review: HT: 63, Wt: 116.0#, BMI: 20.55 Resident showing significant weight loss of 13.9% x(times) 6 months (134.8# on 7/7) and 21.5% x3 months (147.8# on 1010/22) .resident remains on LCS, Mech soft diet with thin liquids. She feeds herself with meal intakes averaging 75-100% per record. For extra calories, resident receives whole milk at meals and ice cream at supper. Per discussion with staff, resident is very active. Self propels in wheelchair all around facility. Amount of activity is likely contributing to weight decline and increasing R76's needs .would recommend adding extra 2 pats butter to hot vegetable sides at lunch and supper and start health shake as snack between meals at 10am & 2pm. Continue rest of nutrition plan monitoring weights and intakes. RD will follow routinely but please consult as needed. R76's diet card dated 1/26/23 documents LCS (low concentrated sweets), dental soft (mechanical soft), thin liquids. The same diet card also notes milk - 4 fluid ounces (oz), #8 dip - Ground Meatloaf w/ (with) gravy. #8 dip/2oz gvy (gravy) - Mashed potatoes and gravy, 4oz spdl (spoodle) - soft country cooked country chpd (chopped) [NAME] Beans - No bacon, 1 ea (each)/1 tsp (teaspoon) - Dinner Roll/margarine, 4oz spdl - cinnamon peaches, 1 cup diet beverage. Additional notes on R76's diet card list to add ice cream, 2 pats butter to hot vegetable, whole milk. On 1/26/23 at 12:15pm, R76 was noted to propel herself to the dining table and remained at the table until her meal was served at 12:30pm. At 12:30pm, R76's meal tray was noted to have cut up meatloaf with no gravy, mashed potatoes with no gravy, green beans without 2 pats of butter, and no dinner roll with margarine. R76 was observed at this time to consume 100% of her meal. On 1/26/23 at 12:30pm, when questioned about R76's diet card, V7 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) stated that they were out of gravy and then went to get 2 pats of butter and put this on R76's vegetables. No dinner roll with margarine was ever brought back to R76. On 1/26/23 at 12:35pm, V6 (CNA) said they frequently do not go by the menu. She stated if they are out of something, they substitute it. V6 also said that R76 almost always consumes 100% of her meals and they document her intakes with every meal. On 1/26/23 at 11:17am, V1 (Administrator) stated that the process for weighing residents is that the weekly weights have to be done by Sunday. V1 said that the weights are then sent to the nursing director, and they are reviewed. V1 said if there are any weights that are really off, they have staff go re-weigh them. V1 said the problem with the weights being off is that V4 (Registered Dietician) thought she would be helpful and enter them without sending them to the nursing director, and that lead to missing weight loss and residents not getting re-weighed. On 1/27/23 at 2:12pm, V4 said she can't explain (R76's) 24-pound weight loss in 1 week. V4 said if there is a weight really off, she would ask for them (residents) to be re-weighed. V4 said she would not know if weekly weights were not being done usually until the next month when she comes back. V4 said in her notes she says refer to RD if needed and therefore would expect the facility to let her know of the weight. V4 said there are a lot of variances with being weighed .type of scale, location, whether they have had a bowel movement, the time of day. V4 said she looks at a trend with weights and if she notices a weight off, she would ask for a re-weigh and if not she would make a recommendation. On 1/31/23 at 8:35am, V1 stated that R76 is eating all the time and gets a lot of snacks. V1 said there is no way R76 lost that much weight in a week (in reference to the 24- pound loss from 10/29/22 to 11/7/22) and should have been re-weighed. V1 stated that they use a wheelchair scale on side 2. It can also be used as a standing scale. V1 said she believes the problem with (R76's) big weight loss in 1 week is due to staff not subtracting the wheelchair when they weigh residents. 4. R96's facility Face Sheet with a print date of 1/27/23 documents R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and nutritional deficiency. R96's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/19/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R96 is cognitively intact. R96's current Care Plan dated 8/19/22 documents a focus area of At risk for fluid imbalance/weight loss. This same care plan includes the following interventions, weights as ordered (8/19/22), two butters to hot vegetables at lunch and supper (8/23/22), whole milk with meals (11/9/22), house shakes with ice cream at 10am, 2pm, and 6pm (11/9/22), add ice cream to lunch and supper (11/9/22), double portions at meals (11/9/22), Boost drink (11/9/22), mirtazapine as ordered for appetite (1/4/23). R96's progress notes documents on 11/26/22, RD (Registered Dietitian) QUARTERLY REVIEW: HT (height): 68, WT (weight)/CBW (calculated body weight): 121.5# (pounds), BMI (Body Mass Index): 18.5 noted resident for quarterly nutritional review and at this time with dx (diagnosis) of pancreatic cancer w/ s/p (with status post) wipple procedure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), anxiety disorder, depression, HTN (hypertension). medications include: selenium, venlafaxine, bupropion, and others. currently on po (oral) diet plan of regular with thin liquids, whole milk at meals, ice cream at lunch and supper, 2 pats butter to hot vegetables at lunch and supper, double portions at meals along with house shakes with ice cream at 10a/2p/8p. intakes of meals currently 50-75% with fluids around 480 ml (milliliter). noted as of 11/9 tube for feeding was removed. resident wt is to be monitored weekly. at this time wts are showing progressive gain since removal of tube from 116.2# on 11/9 to present wt of 121.5#. no skin or lab concerns reported. also informed that daughter provides resident boost shakes and other snacks for her to keep in her room . at this time no change in diet plan. continue with weekly wts and refer to RD as needed. R96's Progress Notes dated 12/08/22 documents, Wound and weight meeting held today. Current weight is 120.9 which is a 1 lb gain from last weight. Current diet is regular with whole milk at meals, ice cream with lunch and supper and health shakes at snack time three times daily. She eats meals in her room independently. Family has provided snacks to keep in her room. She has recently started PT (Physical Therapy) and is more physically active. She will remain on weekly weight monitoring at this time. (Name of physician and family member) are aware of current weight, diet, and treatment plan. R96's progress notes document on 1/25/23 RD WEIGHT REVIEW: Ht (height)-68, Wt (weight)-112.0#, BMI- 17.03. Resident is showing significant weight loss of 7.9% x3 months (121.6# on 10/10) and 7.4% x1 month (120.9# on 12/5). Resident's PMH (past medical history) includes pancreatic cancer s/p wipple procedure, COPD, anxiety disorder, depression, HTN. Hx (history) of J-tube for supplemental tube feedings- removed 11/9 due to consistent tolerance of PO (oral) diet . No wounds/skin issues. (R96) continues on regular diet as tolerated with thin liquids. She (R96) feeds herself, typically eats in her room and meal intakes vary with average 25-75%- best at supper. She (R96) has reported a poor appetite. She is receiving a variety of supplements and supplemental foods to support her weight. Current orders: whole milk at meals, ice cream at lunch and supper, 2 pats butter to hot vegetables at lunch and supper, double portions at meals, and house shakes with ice cream at 10a/2p/8p. In addition, her daughter brings in snacks and Boost shakes for resident to keep in her room. Due to resident's weight loss and report of poor appetite, she was started on Mirtazapine on 1/4. She feels it is starting to help her feel more hungry and her intakes are showing some improvement. Feel that current nutrition plan is appropriate to support resident's weight, especially with initiation of appetite stimulant. Continue to monitor weights and intakes; RD will follow routinely but please consult as needed. R96's untitled weight report printed 1/27/23 includes the following weights, 8/21/22- 119.4 lbs. (pounds), 9/5/22- 118.0 lbs., 10/04/22 - 120.6 lbs., 11/07/22- 120.2 lbs., 12/27/22 - 113.2 lbs., 1/11/23 - 112.0 lbs., and 1/25/23 - 114.0 lbs. R96's Vital Signs Grid with a print date of 1/31/23 include the following weights, 11/14/22 - 118.9 lbs., 11/26/22 - 121.5 lbs., 11/28/22- 119.9 lbs., 12/05/22 - 120.9 lbs., 12/10/22 - 120.8 lbs., 12/17/22 - 115.3 lbs., 1/2/23 - 112 lbs., 1/11/23 - 112 lbs., 1/29/23 117 lbs. This indicates R96 had a weight loss of 7 pounds (5.8%) from 11/07/22 to 12/27/22 and weight gain of 5 pounds (4.09%) from 1/11/23 to 1/29/23. On 01/24/23 at 9:30 AM, R96 was observed sitting on the side of her bed with a meal tray on her bedside table. R96's tray had partially eaten scrambled eggs and a whole piece of sausage. R96's meal tray also had a bowl of mostly eaten dry cereal. There was a small cup of thick milk shake type drink on R96's tray. There were no other glasses located on R96's meal tray or bedside table. R96 stated she had weight loss, but they had started her on an appetite stimulant. When asked if she preferred to eat her cereal dry without milk, R96 stated she doesn't always get served milk and sometimes she has to ask for it. R96 stated if she asks for it the staff will say they will get it and then never come back. R96 stated she was not served any liquids with this meal other than the shake type drink. On 01/24/23 at 12:59 PM, R96 was served chicken, rice, broccoli with cheese, oranges, and tea. There was no milk on R96's tray. R96 asked for milk and unknown staff returned with a glass of milk. There was no ice cream observed on R96's meal tray. On 01/27/23 at 08:30 AM, R96 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed with a partially eaten breakfast tray in front of her. R96 was eating dry cereal with no milk. There was an empty glass observed on R96's meal tray that appeared to have had milk in it. When asked if she was served milk R96 stated she was but she had drunk it, since she was thirsty. R96 stated they had forgotten to bring her milk at supper on 1/26/23. When asked if she would like milk for her cereal R96 stated she would. This surveyor reported to the nursing staff passing meal trays R96 would like some milk for her cereal. R96's undated meal ticket documents R96 is to be served a regular diet with 2 pats butter to vegetable (lunch and supper), double portions to meals. Under Notes the same meal ticket documents, Send ice cream with empty glass, whole milk, 2 pats of butter on hot vegetables, double portions, whole milk all meals. R96's Physician Orders dated 01/2023 includes the following dietary orders, 8/20/22- regular diet as tolerated, 8/23/22- whole milk with meals, 11/09/22- add ice cream to lunch and supper, and mirtazapine 15 milligrams once daily. On 01/26/23 at 3:42 PM, when asked why R96 was not served milk and/or ice cream, V1 (Administrator) stated, I don't know. I didn't serve her meals. When asked if she would expect R96 to be served ice cream and milk as recommended by the dietitian V1 stated, It should have been served. On 01/26/23 at 3:08 PM, V4 (Dietitian) stated R96 is to have whole milk served at all meals. V4 stated R96 is to have ice cream served at lunch and supper and then a health shake with ice cream at 10 AM, 2:00 PM, and 6:00 PM. This surveyor reviewed with V4 observations of breakfast on 1/24/23 with no milk served to R96 and lunch on 1/24/23 when R96 had to ask for milk and was not served ice cream. When asked if not getting her supplements as recommended would have an impact on R96's weight, V4 stated the supplements would provide extra calories but it could be a combination of factors causing the weight loss. V4 stated they would have to investigate further to determine if that was causing the weight loss. On this same date at this same time, V5 (Dietitian) stated she was aware of R96's weight loss and that an appetite stimulant had been started. V5 stated R96's weights were trending up since starting the stimulant. 01/31/23 at 9:28 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated when she spoke with R96 in December 2022, related to her weight loss, R96 reported she didn't have an appetite. V1 stated they contacted R96's physician and he gave them an order for an appetite stimulant that wasn't covered by R96's insurance. V1 stated then they contacted the physician a second time for a different appetite stimulant. V1 stated that is when mirtazapine was ordered. On 1/26/23 at 12:40pm, V6 (CNA) said that when they weigh a resident, they use the wheelchair scale. If a resident is able to walk they stand on it, if not they push the resident in the wheelchair on the scale. V6 said they have to subtract the weight of the wheelchair after weighing a resident in a wheelchair.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0800 (Tag F0800)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident to make choices pertaining to their d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident to make choices pertaining to their diet needs by providing requested food items for 1 out of 13 (R42) residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 49. Findings include: R42's facility Face Sheet with a print date of 1/26/23 documents R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/11/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R42 is cognitively intact. R42's Care Plan under At Risk for Complications From Diabetes : Baseline CP (Care Plan) Nutrition with a start date of 7/12/22 documents interventions as: Current diet: See POS (Physician Order Sheet), Monitor blood sugar and monitor for signs and symptoms of hyper/hypoglycemia, Monitor meal percentage intake, and offer bedtime snack. R42's Physician Order List documented a 7/12/22 diet order for regular consistency/ consistent carb diabetic diet with snacks at 10 AM, 2 PM, and 10 PM. R42's Departments Notes dated 1/2/23 at 6:42 PM by V15 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documents, Resident (R42) walked up to where they were serving out food with his plate. One on one with (R42) he could not go up where they were serving. (R42) told this writer to shut up. (R42) sit down (sic). Asked (R42's) nurse if he could have extras. She said his (R42's) blood sugars had been running high at night. They had potatoes and yams (sic). Tried educating (R42) on his diet and DM (diabetes mellitus). (R42) said he didn't care about his sugar. Told him that we did. (R42) asked this writer what my name was. I told him. (R42) said I'm going to tell my daughter. This writer called and updated Admin (administrator) (V1). R42's Departmental Notes dated 1/13/23 at 2:53 PM by V16 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documents, At lunch I observed this resident (R42) tell male peer sitting at this table that if he didn't want his food, he (R42) will take it. Other resident eats slow and stopped eating and handed his nearly full plate to (R42) who scraped off food into his plate. (V16 (LPN)) .went to tell them both that cannot do that, and this resident (R42) started screaming. Screaming and cursing us (sic). I have talked to both residents before about this, but they continue to do the same. On 1/27/23 at 9:07 AM, R42 stated if you ask for more food after the meal rarely do you get anything else. Most of the time they just ignore me. I'm hungry often. I don't know why they can't give me more, they have it right there (meaning the steam table serving area in the dining room). On 1/26/23 at 12:15 PM, V15 (LPN) said on 1/2/23 serving staff came to ask her if R42 could have extra food after R42 had finished his meal tray. V15 said all that was left on the steam table was mashed potatoes and yams. V15 said R42's blood sugar had been running in the 300s and would have to get extra insulin coverage. V15 said she told R42 he could not have any second helping and R42 became angry and started cursing at V15. V15 said if a diabetic resident asks for more food after finishing their meal it would depend on what their blood sugar was if they would be allowed more. On 1/26/23 at 12:06 PM, V16 (LPN) said if a resident was to ask for second helping after they have eaten their meal facility staff should come ask the nurse if the resident may have more food. V16 stated if they wanted an extra piece of cake and their blood sugar was running high I would say no. I would educate them to substitute a protein. V16 said R42 was alert and oriented, sometimes forgetful, and not delusional. On 1/26/23 at 3:40 PM, V4 Registered Dietitian (RD) said if a resident eats all of their meal and tells staff they are still hungry she expected staff to give them an extra portion as long as it was included on the resident's diet plan. V4 said if the resident is diabetic, carbohydrate intake should be monitored. V4 said a resident should be educated on dietary restrictions, but have the right to choose if they want something. V4 said she did not expect any staff to tell a resident asking for more to eat no may not have something. On 1/27/23 at 2:50 PM this surveyor reviewed with V14 (Physician), R42's request for extra food and high carbohydrate food items that was denied by the facility since R42 was diabetic. V14 stated they could adjust the medications to accommodate R42 eating extra food and/or eating food high in carbohydrates. V14 stated R42's last hemoglobin A1C was 9.4 which is not fabulous but if R42 is hungry they should allow him to eat. V14 stated if they need to adjust the medications they can. The facility's December 2016 Resident Rights policy documented in part . 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include resident's rights to: . e. self-determination . bb. Be informed of safety or clinical restrictions or limitations related to care and diets; inform the resident of the best course for their care, ie refusal of treatments, medications, not following diets, etc .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R44's facility Face Sheet with a print date of 1/26/23 documents R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R44's facility Face Sheet with a print date of 1/26/23 documents R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, morbid obesity, and dependence on renal dialysis. R44's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/30/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R44 is cognitively intact. R44's Physician Orders documented a 11/27/22 order for a renal low concentrated sweets diet. On 1/26/23 at 1:03 PM, R44 was sitting in the dining room and was served meatloaf without ketchup sauce on top, hashbrowns, green beans, and apple sauce. R44 said she was not supposed to have the potatoes and was supposed to receive buttered noodles. R44 said she was on dialysis and was on a renal diet. R44's 1/26/23 meal ticket documented R44 was supposed to receive buttered noodles instead of the hashbrowns served at the noon time meal. On 1/26/23 at 3:40 PM, V4 Registered Dietitian (RD) said a resident on dialysis would be recommended to be placed on a renal diet. V4 said a renal diet would limit protein, phosphorus, potassium, and sodium. V4 said examples of things limited would be potatoes, tomatoes, milk, meat, and oranges. On 1/31/23 at 12:06 PM, V5 Registered Dietitian (RD) said she expected resident diet orders to be followed. V5 said R44 was aware of what items were supposed to be restricted, but if a confused resident or resident who was unaware of restricted items, they could potentially be eating what was served that was outside of their ordered dietary substitutions. V5 said if a resident on dialysis was eating several meals that were not correctly served with the renal diet substitutions the residents lab values could be affected. The facility's October 2017 Therapeutic Diets policy documented in part .2. A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by residents attending physician . the attending physician may delegate this task to the registered or licensed dietitian as permitted by state law . 4. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet . The facility's undated Renal Precautions documented in part .1. When Renal Precautions are used as a care planning strategy, the following meal modifications are offered to the resident and with their agreement added the to individuals meal card: . d. Potatoes and potato products are limited to one serving at lunch and/ or supper . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were followed for 2 of 10 (R44 and R45) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 49. Findings Include: 1. R45's facility Face sheet with a print date of 1/27/23, documents R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, cerebral infarction, dementia, heart failure, and anemia. R45's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/18/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03, which indicates a severe cognitive impairment. R45's undated Physician Orders List documents the following physician order, Diet upgrade to mechanical soft with ground meat, thin liquids. On 1/26/23 at 12:38 PM, R45 was observed eating the noon meal. R45 was eating a whole piece of meatloaf with ketchup on top of it, mashed potatoes, green beans, dinner rolls, and applesauce. R45 had completed approximately 40% of his meal at this time. R45's meal ticket that was observed laying on the table next to R45's meal tray and documented R45 was to get ground meatloaf with gravy. This surveyor brought to the attention of V3 (Director of Clinical) the discrepancy in R45's meal ticket, and the whole meatloaf with ketchup, R45 was served. V3 took R45's meal tray and replaced it with a meal tray that had meatloaf that was ground with what appeared to be gravy on top of the meatloaf. On 1/26/23 at 3:18 PM, V4 (Dietitian) stated whatever R45's meal ticket documented is the meal R45 should have been served.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow dietary menu portion sizes for 13 of 13 residents (R4, R10, R19, R27, R48, R52, R55, R57, R63, R71, R73, R76, and R311)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow dietary menu portion sizes for 13 of 13 residents (R4, R10, R19, R27, R48, R52, R55, R57, R63, R71, R73, R76, and R311) reviewed for nutrition out in a sample of 49. Findings Include: On 1/26/23 at 12:32 PM the noon time meal service was started with meat loaf, hash browns, green beans, a dinner roll, and applesauce being served. Residents with puree or mechanical soft diets were served mashed potatoes for substitution for the hash browns. The scoop of mashed potatoes being served appeared to be a very small amount, approximately the scoop size of a golf ball. On 1/26/23 at 1:23 PM, V12 (Dietary Aide) said all the residents who had a pureed or mechanical soft diet were served mashed potatoes. V12 said she was unsure what size scoop was being used to portion out the mashed potatoes. V12 was not able to find the scoop size on the portion scoop. On 1/26/23 at 1:28 PM, V11 (Dietary Manager) identified the scoop used for the mashed potatoes as a #20 scoop. V11 said the #20 scoop measured out 1.7 ounces. V11 said the recipe documented a #8 scoop was supposed to be used. V11 said a #8 scoop measured out 2 ounces. On 1/26/23 at 3:40 PM, V5 Registered Dietitian (RD) said she expected facility staff to follow recipes with correct portion scoops. V5 said a #8 scoop measured out half a cup. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet for 1/26/23 documented a #8 scoop was supposed to be used for the mashed potatoes. On 1/26/23 a list was requested from the facility of all residents who were currently being served a mechanical soft or puree diet for lunch that day. Face sheets and Physician's order sheets were provided for R4, R10, R19, R27, R48, R52, R55, R57, R63, R71, R73, R76, and R311's After a review of the current Physician's Order for January 2023 for R4, R10, R19, R27, R48, R52, R55, R57, R63, R71, R73, R76, and R311's the diet breakdowns were as follows: R10, R48, R52, R55, R57, R63, R71, R73, R76, and R311's were ordered a mechanical soft diet; R4, R19, and R27 were ordered a puree diet. On 1/31/23 at 10:34 AM, V13 (Chief Executive Officer) said the facility was unable to produce a portion scoop size grid because there was not one accessible to staff and there was not one in the facility. According to https://foodbuyingguide.fns.usda.gov/Content/TablesFBG/Table13_FBG.pdf , Table 13: Sizes and Capacities of Scoops documented a #8 scoop as half a cup and a #20 scoop as three and one third tablespoons.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $67,538 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $67,538 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 33/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Saline Care Nursing & Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Saline Care Nursing & Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Saline Care Nursing & Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, 9 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Saline Care Nursing & Rehab?

SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 142 certified beds and approximately 110 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HARRISBURG, Illinois.

How Does Saline Care Nursing & Rehab Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Saline Care Nursing & Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Saline Care Nursing & Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Saline Care Nursing & Rehab Stick Around?

SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Saline Care Nursing & Rehab Ever Fined?

SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB has been fined $67,538 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Illinois average of $33,754. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Saline Care Nursing & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

SALINE CARE NURSING & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.