SPRING CREEK

777 DRAPER AVENUE, JOLIET, IL 60432 (815) 727-4794
For profit - Corporation 168 Beds SABA HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
8/100
#404 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Spring Creek nursing home in Joliet, Illinois, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. With a state rank of #404 out of 665 facilities, they are in the bottom half of Illinois, and #10 out of 16 in Will County, meaning there are only a few local homes that perform better. The facility's situation is improving, as they reduced their issues from 10 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, but it still has serious weaknesses, especially in staffing, which received a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars. Notably, there are concerning incidents reported, such as a resident requiring CPR after a critical nursing error and another sustaining burns from hot liquids due to a lack of supervision. While the facility has a relatively low staff turnover at 37%, indicating some stability, the overall care environment raises significant red flags for families considering placement here.

Trust Score
F
8/100
In Illinois
#404/665
Bottom 40%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
37% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$115,684 in fines. Higher than 93% of Illinois facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
36 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (37%)

    11 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 37%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $115,684

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: SABA HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 36 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 3 actual harm
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely ambulance transfer for a resident experiencing respiratory distress. This applies to 1 resident (R1) reviewed for change ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely ambulance transfer for a resident experiencing respiratory distress. This applies to 1 resident (R1) reviewed for change in condition in a sample of 4. The findings include: On 6/26/25 at 11:47 AM, V6 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said on 6/22/25, R1 requested to go the emergency room multiple times because she was short of breath and didn't feel well. V6 said she called for a routine ambulance for R1, but the ambulance dispatcher told her to call 911 due to R1's abnormal vital signs. Nursing Progress Note dated 6/22/25 at 20:30 documents R1's vitals were as follows: Blood pressure 79/49, heart rate 103, respiratory rate 18, and oxygen saturation 79% on 4 liters per nasal cannula. V6 said that when she increased R1's oxygen, R1 did not say she felt better and R1 told her to call 911. On 6/27/25 at 2:25 PM, V12 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) said for a change condition related to respiratory distress, nursing staff should not wait and should call 911 without delay. On 6/27/2025 at 11:10 AM, V8 (LPN) stated R1 is alert an oriented and has a lot of respiratory issues with her quadriplegia diagnosis and she has a hard time coughing. V8 stated if vital signs change all at once, she would call 911. On 6/27/2025 at 1:30 PM, V9 (LPN) stated if a resident has a decrease in blood pressure with increased heart rate and is complaining of difficulty breathing, that warrants a 911 call. V9 stated R1 is a full code and she would not hesitate to call 911. On 6/26/25 at 12:28 PM, V4 (EMT/Emergency Medical Technician) said V20 (Ambulance Dispatcher) advised V6 (LPN) to call 911 due to the time it would take for ambulance to arrive, but V6 said she was going to try other ambulance companies instead. V4 said V6 called V20 back 20 minutes later requesting their service again. V4 said when she arrived at the facility on 6/22/25, there was no nurse present at R1's bedside and R1 was observed gasping for air. V4 said at 9:15 PM upon her arrival to facility, R1's vital signs were as follows; heart rate 108 bpm (beats per minute); respirations 28 bpm (breaths per minute); blood pressure was critically low at 66/46 mmHg (millimeters of mercury), and oxygen saturation was 91% on 5 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. V4 said R1 told her that she was not usually on oxygen. Upon assessment, V4 noted R1 with diminished breath sounds in all fields. V4 said she was concerned R1's lungs sounded junky (congested). V4 said V6 did not mention why she didn't call 911. V4 said she started a breathing treatment right away and R1 was transferred to the hospital. Per V4, she was concerned because R1 is paraplegic and is unable call 911 herself. On 6/27/2025 at 2:45 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated if an ambulance dispatcher said to call 911 instead of waiting for routine ambulance transport due to a resident's condition and vital signs, staff need to call 911. V2 said if something is off with a resident and it looks like it could be an emergency and the resident is requesting 911, the nurse should just call 911. On 06/29/25 at 2:39 PM, V19 (NP/Nurse Practitioner) said that on 6/22/25, she was notified about R1 after she was transferred to the emergency room. V19 said that if a resident's vital signs show a drop in blood pressure, a rise in heard rate, a drop in oxygen saturation (to the 70s), and an increased need for oxygen, her expectation would be for the nurse to send the resident out via 911. Per V19, the risk involved in waiting for routine ambulance transportation instead of calling 911 is that the resident could deteriorate and may even code (go into cardiac or respiratory arrest). R1's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows an advanced directive order for Full Code. R1's Face Sheet shows medical history of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis, shortness of breath, and quadriplegia. R1's Care Plan dated 6/06/25 shows R1 is at risk for respiratory complications due to history of pneumonia, centrilobular emphysema, and repeated hospitalizations related to shortness of breath. Care Plan interventions include staff responding promptly to all requests for assistance and anticipating R1's individual needs, monitoring for signs and symptoms of infection, and notifying R1's physician for any significant changes with the goal to improve respiratory status and be free from respiratory distress. The facility's policy titled; Emergency Care last reviewed January 2025 lists Acute Respiratory Distress as an example of residents' urgent and critical care needs. The facility's policy states the protocol for managing residents with Acute Respiratory Distress includes assessing the airway, repositioning in high fowler's position, giving respiratory treatment as ordered, and calling 911.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a tunneled PICC (Peripherally Inser...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a tunneled PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). This applies to 1 resident (R1) reviewed for central intravenous catheter line care in a sample of 1. The findings include: On 6/26/25 at 9:57 AM, V3 (Hospital RN/Registered Nurse) said when R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], R1's PICC line dressing was dated 5/28/25 (22 days earlier). V3 said PICC line dressings are supposed to be changed every 7 days. R1's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows she has a right upper chest dual lumen tunneled PICC with order for weekly site care, cap change, and dressing change. R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for the month of June shows documentation V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) changed R1's dressing on 6/10/25 and 6/17/25. Both R1's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) and MAR for the month of June do not show any documentation of PICC line cap changes. On 6/27/25 at 11:11 AM, V8 (LPN) said central line dressings are changed when the resident is admitted , and then every 7 days after that, but V8 does not provide central line care including dressing or cap changes because an RN (Registered Nurse) has to do it, not an LPN. V8 said she has never received any training in the facility on changing central line dressings. V8 said she does not know how often PICC line caps need to be changed because the RNs take care of it. V8 said alcohol caps for central lines are hard to come by, but when they have some available, they use them. On 6/27/25 at 1:03 PM, V8 said if she documented something on the MAR or TAR it means she did it. V8 then stated she did document in R1's MAR that she changed her PICC line dressing on 6/10/25 and 6/17/25, but she did not change the PICC lines dressing on those dates. V8 said she would have asked an RN to change R1's PICC line dressing, but she doesn't remember who she asked. V8 said she might have forgotten to double check if R1's PICC dressing was changed. On 6/27/25 at 2:42 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said central line dressings are to be changed upon admission and every 7 days thereafter. V2 said if a nurse signs off a task was done on the MAR or TAR, it means that nurse completed the task. V2 said an LPN cannot change a central line dressing, it needs to be an RN. V2 said the she herself and another RN provide annual education on central line care to nurses, but she is not sure how often PICC line caps need to be changed or if alcohol caps are used on central lines. V2 said they do not have residents that have central lines often and it has been brought to their attention that nurses need to be reeducated on central line care. On 6/27/25 at 2:39 PM, V19 (NP/Nurse Practitioner) said she is providing care for R1 and she expects the facility staff to follow their policy regarding central line care, dressing changes, and cap changes. V19 said if central line dressings and/or caps are not changed as ordered, there is a risk of central line infection for the resident. The facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Preventing Intravenous Catheter-Related Infections last revised 9/1/2016 states, Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to maximally reduce the risk of infection associated with indwelling intravenous (IV) catheters .Catheter Site Dressing Regimens: 1. Change initial dressing after catheter placement within 24 hours .4. Change . dressings . every 5-7 days or PRN if damp, loosened, or visibly soiled. This does not require a physician's order .Replacement of Administration Sets, Needleless System Equipment: .2. Replacement of the Needleless System Equipment .b. Change needleless connections devices if there is blood or debris in the connector, before obtaining blood samples for culture, after blood draws, upon contamination, and in accordance with manufacturer recommendations .Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: .2. Any interventions that were done (dressing change, cultures, etc.) .
Mar 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement safety interventions and provide supervision to prevent a resident from injury when drinking hot liquids. This fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement safety interventions and provide supervision to prevent a resident from injury when drinking hot liquids. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining 1st and 2nd degree burns to her chest. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dependent assistance with feeding in a sample of 4. The findings include: R1's electronic health record showed that on 3/9/25, R1 was sent to the local community hospital for evaluation and treatment to burns on her chest. R1 has diagnoses including quadriplegia (loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs), C5 - C7 complete. On 3/18/25 at 10:50 AM R1, who is alert and oriented, was in her bed with a picture of water and a large cup of ice coffee with extra-long flexible straws that reached R1's mouth. R1 said that on 3/9/25 she was alone drinking her hot cup of coffee. The cup of coffee did not have a lid on the cup, and she used a straw to drink it. R1 said coffee came out of the straw and burned her chest and she was sent to the emergency room for the burns. R1's 3/13/25 11:12 AM Nursing Progress Note showed that on 3/9/25 R1 was sent to the emergency room for burns to her chest due to coffee spillage. The progress note showed that R1 said that the coffee came out of the straw and on to her chest. R1's emergency report of 3/9/25 showed that the left side of R1's chest wall, and along the left side of the clavicle had 1st and 2nd degree burns with 2 areas of blistering. R1's 9/25/24 Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study recommendations showed, supervision 1:1, and liquid viscosity thin, no straws. R1's 3/9/26 MDS (Minimum Data Set) section GG showed that R1 is dependent on staff for eating. R1's 2/17/25 care plan showed R1 is at risk for aspiration with interventions of no straws and assess for residual food in mouth. R1's 3/10/25 Wound Notes showed that R1 had 15.2 cm x 16.8 cm burns to upper chest with a surface area of 255.36 cm, along with fluid filled blisters. The report showed an order for Silver Sulfadiazine to be applied twice a day for 30 days. On 3/18/25 at 2:08 PM, V4 CNA (Certified Nurse's assistant) said that on 3/9/25 around 10 - 1030 am R1 asked her to warm up her cup of coffee. V4 said she warmed the coffee up in the microwave for 30 seconds and gave it back to R1. V4 said that R1 said it was still not hot enough and V4 said she warmed it up again for another 30 seconds. V4 said that R1 tested it again, and this time R1 said it was okay. V4 said the cup of coffee was without a lid and had a straw in it. V4 said she left R1 with the cup of coffee to drink it unsupervised. V4 said about 10 minutes later she was told that R1 had burned herself from the coffee. On 3/18/25 at 2:35 PM, V5 (Nurse) said that on 3/9/25 R1 was heard screaming and saying she had burnt herself from her coffee. V5 said that there was a cup of coffee in front of R1 with no lid and a straw in the cup. V5 said that R1's gown was soaked with coffee and her chest from her breast to her neck was with redness. V5 said that she called the doctor and the EMT (emergency medical team). On 3/18/25 at 1:43 PM V3 (Speech Language Pathologist) said he does not recommend anyone drink hot coffee from a straw unsupervised for safety issues. V3 said that staff should have only given R1 sips of hot coffee from a cup without a straw. On 3/18/25 at 2:50 PM, V6 NP (R1's Nurse Practitioner) said that R1 had a swallow study in 2024 and it recommended that R1 not use a straw. V6 said that staff should have been helping R1 drink hot coffee without using the straw. V6 said that if staff had been there, they would have taken the straw away and R1 would not have gotten burned. On 3/18/25 at 4:52 pm V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said that R1 was drinking hot coffee out of a cup with no lid with a straw and was unsupervised. V2 said that if R1 had not been drinking out of a cup with no lid, through a straw, without supervision, R1 would not have gotten burned. V2 said that her expectations are that the staff maintain supervision while drinking hot coffee. On 3/18/25 at 5:10 PM V1 (Administrator) said that R1 should not have been drinking hot coffee out of a straw unsupervised. V1 said that because staff allowed R1 to drink hot coffee with a straw unsupervised it caused her to get 1st and 2nd degree burns to her chest. The facility's Feeding and Assisting Residents to Eat policy dated 1/25 shows that the facility staff shall follow safe practices in feeding or assisting residents during mealtimes. The policy showed that staff may offer a straw if it is not contraindicated.
Oct 2024 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check R15's G-tube (Gastrostomy) placement prior to administration of G-tube feeding and administer the feeding at the ordere...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check R15's G-tube (Gastrostomy) placement prior to administration of G-tube feeding and administer the feeding at the ordered rate. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for G-tube feeding administration in a sample of 26. The findings include: R15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, dysphagia, and gastrostomy. R15's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated August 9, 2024 showed R15 was NPO (Nothing By Mouth). R15's POS also showed R15 had an Enteral Feed Order every shift Vital 1.5 [at] 75 ml/hr [times] 20 hours (or until total volume of 1500 cc in 24 hours) via G-tube. Stop at 6 am. Start at 10 AM. Hold if residual [greater] 100. Enteral Feed Order every shift check tube placement and function [every] shift. Check residual before administering feeding; hold if residual [greater] 100 ml. On October 22, 2024 at 10:43 AM, R15's G-tube was started and was running at a rate of 70 ml/hr (Milliliters per Hour). At 11:06 AM, V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) came to R15's room, turned off her G-tube feeding, and transferred R15 to her high back wheelchair. R15 was taken from her room to the dining room without the G-tube feeding. At 12 PM, R15 was observed in the dining room without the G-tube feeding connected. On October 23, 2024 at 11:01 AM, R15 did not have the G-tube feeding connected or started. At 11:14 AM, V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) came to R15's room to start the G-tube feeding. V8 put her stethoscope on and pushed air into the G-tube with the piston syringe to check for placement. V8 did not check the residual by aspirating the stomach contents prior to starting R15's G-tube feeding. V8 then restarted the feeding pump, which was already set to the rate of 70 ml/hr and started the feeding. At 3:33 PM, R15's G-tube feeding was still running at 70 ml/hr. The surveyor checked the label of the bottle, and V8 had written the rate of 75 ml/hr on the sticker. On October 24, 2024 at 10:12 AM, V11 (LPN) started to set the G-tube feed up for R15. V11 began to flush 300 ml of water into the G-tube. V11 did not check placement by checking for residual prior to flushing the G-tube with water. V11 attached the tubing to R15's G-tube port, said R15's rate was 70 ml/hr, turned the pump on, which was programmed to 70 ml/hr, and started the feeding at a rate of 70 ml/hr. On October 24, 2024 at 12:47 PM, V11 (LPN) said she should have checked the placement by either auscultating or by withdrawing the contents. V11 said she should have checked the placement prior to starting the feeding. V11 also said R15's formula feed rate was 75 ml/hr, which was what was written on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). V11 said she just turned the machine on and should have checked the machine prior to leaving the room. V11 checked R15's POS, and said the other G-tube resident received 70 ml/hr. V11 said R15 was supposed to be weighed depending on the doctor's orders, and V11 was a weekly weight on Tuesdays. V11 said the last weight documented was 177.8 pounds on October 3, 2024. At 1 PM, V11 went to R15's room and looked at R15's pump and said she normally had it at 75 ml/hr and the rate must have been what was on previously. V11 said she would correct the rate and should have checked placement by checking the residual. At 1 PM, V11 said the nurse was responsible to make sure the CNAs were getting the weights. On October 24, 2024 at 12:56 PM, V16 (LPN) said prior to starting a G-tube feeding, she would assess the bowel sounds and check for placement by pushing 10 cc [milliliters] of air through the syringe. V16 said she also checked by pulling back to check for residual. V16 said if there was more than 100 ml, she would hold the feeding and call the doctor. V16 said she would check the POS to know which rate the resident was supposed to get. On October 24, 2024 at 1:32 PM, V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) said to check for placement, the nurse should pull back to check for residual volume to be less than 60 ml. V3 said for R15, the nurse would hold the feeding and notify the physician if the residual volume was more than 100 ml. V3 said if the nurse did not check for residual prior to starting a feeding, the resident could experience emesis, and the G-tube could have shifted and popped out. V3 said the facility staff should not push air to check for placement. On October 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said it was her expectation that the nurses aspirate and then return the feeding to check the residual prior to starting a G-tube feeding. V2 said pushing air in and auscultating was an old practice. V2 said pushing air and not checking for residual was not how to check for placement. V2 said the staff should check for placement to make sure the feed was going to the right place. V2 said the resident could have an adverse effect if the feed goes somewhere it was not supposed to go. V2 also said the staff should check the doctor's orders to confirm the rate the resident was supposed to be on. V2 said the staff should be programming the pump themselves, not just restarting the feed. V2 said the risk was it could result in the resident not getting enough nutrition they were needing. The facility's Gastrostomy or Jejunostomy Feedings policy dated September 2020 showed to Refer to MAR for orders for feeding amount frequency and water flushes before beginning .Do not give feeding if resident indicates any distress or retention. Residual or retention can lead to regurgitation or aspiration .Insert barrel of syringe into tube. Aspirate tube to check for placement and for excess residual. Because amount of residual may affect volume of formula to be given, consult with physician regarding orders for specific resident. The facility's Weight Assessment and Interventions policy revised January 2024 showed Ensure that residents are monitored for undesirable weight loss or gain so appropriate interventions can be put in place in a timely manner.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 30 oppo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 30 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 10% error rate. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R82) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: On 10/23/24 at 8:05 AM V15 (Registered Nurse) administered one tablet of Folic Acid 1000 mcg, one tablet of Torsemide 20 mg, one tablet of Soaanz (Torsemide) 60 mg to R82. V15 did not administer Ezetimibe 10 mg to R82 as ordered. On 10/23/24 at 12:15 PM V15 stated Torsemide and Soaanz are the same thing. V15 stated she administered Torsemide 20 mg and Torsemide 60 mg to R82. V15 stated she did not administer Ezetimibe 10 mg to R82 due to the resident not having any, but she signed it as given in the MAR (MAR/Medication Administration Record). R82's Order Summary Report for October 2024 showed R82 was prescribed Ezetimibe 10 mg one tablet by mouth in the morning, Folic Acid 400 mcg one tablet by mouth in the morning, and Torsemide 60 mg one tablet by mouth in the morning. R82's Order Summary Report for September 2024 showed Torsemide 20 mg was discontinued on 09/28/2024. R82 did not have active orders for Torsemide 20 mg. R82's MAR did not show Torsemide 20 mg. On 10/24/24 at 2:11 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) residents should not receive another dosage of medication other than what is prescribed. It is not following the doctor's orders. Medications that have been discontinued should not be in the med cart. Adverse reactions could happen, depending on the medications. If medications are not available, the nurse should obtain the medication from the Nexus machine. If the medication is not in the Nexus machine, we would call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. The nurse should not sign out a medication stating it was administered if it was not given. R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lymphedema, and atrial fibrillation. R82's MDS (MDS/Minimum Data Set) dated 09/04/24 showed R82 was cognitively intact. The Facility's Policy for Administering Medications issue date 1/1/2020 showed Purpose: To ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with physician orders and state/federal regulations. Procedure: 3. Medications shall be administered in physician's written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. 9. Should a drug be withheld, refused, or given other that at the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR space provided for that particular drug and document a rationale.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 10/22/24 at 10:25 AM R56's personal refrigerator in her room contained six oranges that were old, soft, brown, with mold o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 10/22/24 at 10:25 AM R56's personal refrigerator in her room contained six oranges that were old, soft, brown, with mold on them. One 16-ounce container of half and half with an expiration date of 07/19/24. One half pint of two percent milk with an expiration date 09/09/24. One cup of vanilla pudding with an expiration date 07/24/24. The refrigerator was cluttered and sticky. The freezer was filled with ice and contained six pot pies, and two frozen pizzas. R56 stated she eats the food in the refrigerator and freezer. R56 stated housekeeping cleans her refrigerator. R56 stated she did not know the last time they cleaned it. R56 stated she is unable to clean it on her own. On 10/24/24 at 10:41 AM The refrigerator continued to contain six oranges that were old, soft, brown, and mold on them. One 16-ounce container of half and half with an expiration date of 07/19/24. One half pint of two percent milk with an expiration date of 09/09/24. One cup of vanilla pudding with an expiration date 07/24/24. The refrigerator remained cluttered and sticky. The freezer continued to be filled with ice and the six pot pies, and two frozen pizzas. On 10/24/24 at 10:42 AM V9 (Housekeeper) stated she is the housekeeper for R56's room. V9 stated she is supposed to clean the residents refrigerator out. V9 stated she does not know why R56's refrigerator was not cleaned out. On 10/24/24 at 10:49 AM V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated R56 should not have old or expired food in her refrigerator. V3 stated R56 could get sick, food poisoning, or diarrhea. V3 stated the fruit in R56's refrigerator is not edible and the milk and is not drinkable. V3 stated the housekeeping department is responsible for cleaning the refrigerators. The refrigerators should be checked weekly and cleaned as needed. R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and chronic pain syndrome per the face sheet. R56 MDS dated [DATE] showed R56 was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed R56 had an impairment on one side of her upper and lower extremity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired food items, clean the refrigerator, complete temperature logs, and have a thermometer in residents' personal refrigerators in their room. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R14, R56, R95) in a sample of 26 reviewed for refrigerators. The findings include: 1. On 10/22/24 at 10:51 AM, R95 was in her room. Inside, she had a small refrigerator with some bottles of soda. There was no thermometer inside. R95 did not have a log sheet as well. R95 stated her refrigerator was new and she had never seen staff check her refrigerator. R95's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/15/24 shows a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which means she is cognitively intact. 2. On 10/22/24 at 11:00 AM, R14 stated the staff don't check her refrigerator or remove expired items. R14 told surveyor she didn't know that she had a lot of expired food in her fridge. She had surveyor throw them out in her garbage can. Inside her refrigerator, the following items were found: Two (1/2 pint) cartons of vitamin D whole milk with a best by date of 10/18/24, 2 French vanilla cartons of yogurt that expired on 9/16/24, 1 vanilla [NAME] drink that expired on 10/21/24, 2 cartons of yogurt that expired on 10/13/21, 1 carton of key lime pie flavored yogurt that expired on 9/25/24 and 1 low sugar tropical fruit drink that expired on 9/28/24. R14 did not have thermometer in the fridge. On 10/23/24, V1 (Administrator) submitted copies of temperature log sheets for resident refrigerators from housekeeping. There was no log sheet for R14. R14's MDS dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score of 15, which means she is cognitively intact. On 10/24/24 at 9:34 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, Housekeeping is responsible for checking the residents' refrigerators. There should be a thermometer in each fridge. They should be doing the log sheets. They should also remove any expired items. Facility's policy titled Policy & Procedure-Food Brought into the Facility by Friends/Family/Others (Outside Sources) for Residents (10/2023) documents the following: Procedure: 1. Any food or beverage brought into the facility by friends/family/others for resident consumption will be encouraged to be checked by a nursing staff member. Any suspicious or obviously contaminated items (due to appearance/odor or expiration date that has passed-if the food is packaged by the manufacturer) will be discarded immediately. An explanation will be provided to the party who brought it in. 3. Facility staff will monitor resident rooms and resident personal refrigerators for safety needs. 5. All refrigerators in use in the facility have an internal thermometer to monitor temperature. All refrigerators have their internal temps recorded daily.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 6. On 10/22/24 at 11:08 AM, a bottle of bisacodyl 5 mg (milligram) stimulant laxative was seen on the bedside table of R32. On 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 6. On 10/22/24 at 11:08 AM, a bottle of bisacodyl 5 mg (milligram) stimulant laxative was seen on the bedside table of R32. On 10/24/24 at 9:40 AM, R32 said she takes the bisacodyl when she is constipated. R32 said she last took the bisacodyl about a week prior and did not tell her nurse that she took it. R32 said her nurse will also give her a stool softener when she asks for it. On 10/24/24 at 1:53 PM, V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said all of her residents (including R32) get their medications from her, there are no residents that can keep their medications at the bedside. V8 said the risk with residents keeping medications at the bedside include: over-medicating, drug interactions, and another resident wandering into the room and taking the medication. On 10/24/24 at 2:28 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said there are currently no residents in the building that are able to keep oral medications at the bedside to self-medicate. V2 said the harm in residents self-medicating includes drug interactions with their other prescribed medications and other residents coming into the resident's room and taking the medications left sitting out. R32's Face Sheet shows a diagnosis of constipation. R32's POS (Physician Order Sheet) does not show a current order for bisacodyl stimulant laxative. R32's POS shows an order dated 5/20/24 for Sennosides- Docusate Sodium tablet 8.6-50 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for constipation and an additional order dated 5/21/24 for Sennosides-Docusate Sodium tablet 8.6-50 MG 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for constipation scheduled. The facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications effective 10/25/14 states, Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly .The medication supply is accessible only by licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for medications brought from home and to be placed at the bedside. The facility also failed to complete self-administration of medication assessments for residents. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R14, R32, R53, R70, R91, R103) reviewed for medications in a sample of 26. The findings include: On 10/22/24 the following observations were made during initial tour: 1. On 10/22/24 at 10:35 AM, R70 was lying in bed. On his bedside table, there was a Lidocaine pain relief roll on, a container of smooth antiacid tablets, and two Bactine Max Pain Relieving Cleansing sprays. R70 stated that he brought these from home and it's always kept in his room. R70 stated no one assessed him if he could take the medications. Review of R70's POS shows that he has no orders for these medications and no order for them at the bedside. Review of R70's electronic medical record shows there was no self-administration of medication assessment done. R70's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/17/24 shows a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which means he is cognitively intact. 2. On 10/22/24 at 11:00 AM, on R14's bedside table, there was a Deep Sea saline nasal moisturizing spray. R14 stated it's always kept in her room and she administers it by herself. Review of R14's POS shows she has an order for the nasal spray, but there is no order for it to be at the bedside. Review of R14's electronic medical record shows there was no self-administration of medication assessment done. R14's MDS dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score of 15, which means she is cognitively intact. 3. On 10/22/24 at 11:05 AM, on R53's bedside table there a sodium chloride nasal spray, artificial tears eye drops and genteal tears eye drops. R53 stated she brought them from home. She stated she administers it by herself. Review of R53's POS shows she has no orders for the medications and no orders for them to be at the bedside. Review of R53's electronic medical record shows there was no self-administration of medication assessment done. R53's MDS dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score of 15, which means she is cognitively intact. 4. On 10/22/24 at 11:25 AM, on R91's shelf, there was a Nystatin topical powder. R91 stated, It's always kept here. Review of R91's POS shows she has an order for the medication, but no order for it to be at the bedside. Review of R91's electronic medical record shows there was no self-administration of medication assessment done. R91's MDS dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score of 15, which means she is cognitively intact. 5. On 10/22/24 at 11:55 AM, on R103's bedside table there was a Deep Sea nasal spray. R103 stated that it's always kept in her room and she administers it by herself. Review of R103's POS shows there is order for the nasal spray and no order for it to be at the bedside. Review of R103's MDS dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score of 15, which means she is cognitively intact. Review of 103's electronic medical record shows there was no self-administration of medication assessment done. R14, R53,70, R91, and R103 did not have any care plans discussing self-administration of medications. On 10/22/24 at 12:30 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated, Meds brought from home should have orders for them. Any medication that is left in the resident's room should have orders for it to be at the bedside. The resident has to be assessed if he or she can safely administer the medications. I'm the one who does it, not the nurses on the floor. The assessments are in the electronic medical record. I don't have any residents that currently self administers medications. Facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications Procedure (9/2020) documents the following: 1. Residents who request to self-administer drugs will be assessed at the time of admission or thereafter, to determine if the practice is safe. This will include documentation when medications are used. 2. The assessment results will be discussed with the attending physician and an order obtained to self administer, if appropriate. 8. Drugs in the room should be written on the medication record as may keep at bedside and the expiration date. 11. Drug storage is the responsibility of the nursing staff, even when the resident self administers. 12. A care plan indicates the resident's self administering of medications.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply splints and braces to residents who required th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply splints and braces to residents who required them. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R11, R15) reviewed for splints and braces in a sample of 26. The findings include: 1. On October 22, 2024 at 1:12 PM, R11 was sitting in bed and the fingers on her right hand were curled inwards and she was unable to open them without assistance. R11 did not have a splint or brace applied. On October 23, 2024 at 9:56 AM, R11 did not have a splint or brace on. On October 24, 2024 at 12:44 PM, R11 did not have a splint on the right hand. R11's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic pain, cerebral infarction, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and altered mental status. R11's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated April 18, 2024 showed an order for [patient] to wear right resting hand splint during the day as tolerated. R11's Restorative assessment dated [DATE] showed R11 had Range of Motion impairment in the right upper and lower extremity and was recommended a splint/brace by the restorative nurse. R11's care plan dated April 19, 2024 showed Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and would benefit form wearing right resting hand splint during the day as tolerated to prevent further contracture of the right wrist/hand. On October 24, 2024 at 1:53 PM, V12 (Restorative Nurse) said R11 was supposed to wear the splint during the day as tolerated, and the splint should be on. V12 said if the splint was not applied, it could increase the contraction. 2. On October 23, 2024 at 11:57 AM, R15 was lying in bed and there was no palm protector on the left hand. At 2:54 PM, R15 had the palm protector on the left hand but not on the right hand. On October 24, 2024 at 9:47 AM, R15 was in the dining room in her high back wheelchair, and neither hand had the palm protectors on them. R15's face sheet showed R15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, contracture of muscle, multiple sites, right hand and left hand, and need for assistance with personal care. R15's POS dated October 10, 2024 showed to Apply palm protector to bilateral hands. Check skin for redness, irritation, or skin breakdown. As tolerated. The POS also showed an order dated August 15, 2024 showing to Apply palm protector to left hand. Check skin for redness, irritation, or skin breakdown. As tolerated every day shift related to contracture, left hand. R15's care plan dated August 13, 2024 showed R15 would benefit from participation in the splint/brace program. [R15] to wear bilateral palm protectors [due to] muscle stiffness manifested by [diagnosis] of CVA (Cardiovascular Accident) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis. R15's Restorative assessment dated [DATE] showed R15 was recommended to continue splint/brace usage. On October 24, 2024 at 1:53, V12 said she had not had a chance to put R15's splints on that day and when she had gone to her room, R15 was already in the dining room. V12 said R15 wore palm protectors, and it was not supposed to be off. V12 said the night CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistant) took them off to give her hands a chance to breathe, but the orders did not say to remove them. V12 said if the palm protectors were not on, it could cause her hands to contract. V12 said she would expect the nighttime staff to keep it on unless they were doing hygiene. V12 said she would expect them to put them back on after the hygiene was completed. On October 24, 2024 at 12:56 PM, V16 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said if there were orders for splints, they should be on the residents. V16 said if the residents were refusing to wear their splints, the staff should be documenting refusals. On October 24, 2024 at 1:20 PM, V17 (CNA) said the restorative staff were the ones who knew who had the splints and would put them on the residents. On October 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said the residents should have splints and palm protectors on. V2 said if the residents refuse to wear them, they should document refusal and the resident should be care planned for refusing to wear the splints or palm protectors. The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) policy dated September 2020 showed to Use orthotic device as ordered and Apply splint safely and with correct position.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On October 22, 2024 at 10:32 AM, R15's was lying in a low air loss mattress and was angled in the reverse Trendelenburg posit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On October 22, 2024 at 10:32 AM, R15's was lying in a low air loss mattress and was angled in the reverse Trendelenburg position and the bed was not in a low position. V15 (RN/Registered Nurse) was disconnecting R15's G-tube (Gastrostomy) tube feeding and then left the room with R15's bed high. On October 23, 2024 at 9:45 AM, R15's bed was about three feet high, which was not in the lowest position. R15 did not have fall mats and her call light was behind the resident, out of reach to the resident. At 11:01 AM, V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) came to R15's room to provide repositioning for R15 and did not lower the height of the bed, which was about four feet high off the ground. At 11:24 AM, V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) started R15's feed and left her bed about four feet off the ground. R15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, contracture of muscle, multiple sites, and a history of falling. R15's care plan dated August 13, 2024 showed [R15] is at risk for falls [related to] other injury of unspecified kidney disease; depressive episode; pressure ulcer of sacral regional stage 3; [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; diabetes mellitus with neuropathy; aphasia following cerebral infarction; contracture of [right] shoulder, left elbow, bilateral hip, knee, and ankle; retention of urine, history of falling [As Evidenced By] inability to use call light or request staff assistance. R15's Fall Risk Review dated September 2, 2024 showed R15 was a moderate fall risk. On October 24, 2024 at 1:53 PM, V12 (Restorative Nurse) said R15's bed should be in the low position and should not be elevated if no one is in the room. 5. On October 22, 2024 at 10:52 AM, R47 was lying in bed which was about four feet off the ground. R47 had one fall mat folded up and behind the head of the bed, against the wall. On October 23, 2024 at 10:05 AM, R47's bed was at the same height, and no fall mats were in place or found in the room. On October 24, 2024 at 9:49 AM, R47's bed was around three feet off the ground and there were no fall mats in place. R47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, and dysarthria. R47's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated August 1, 2024 showed R47 had moderate cognitive impairment. R47's care plan dated January 26, 2024 showed [R47] is at risk for falls [related to Cardiovascular Accident] with hemiplegia. [R47] prefers to keep bed in high position .with interventions including Floor mats on both sides of the bed. R47's Fall Risk Review dated August 1, 2024 showed R47 was a moderate fall risk. On October 24, 2024 at 1:53 PM, V12 said R47 liked his bed high, and they have spoken to him about the height of the bed. V12 said they were supposed to put floor mats on both sides of R47's bed when he was in bed, and she was not aware they were not in place. On October 24, 2024 at 12:47 PM, V11 (LPN) said the height of the bed should be in the lowest position for residents on fall precautions as it was a shorter distance if the resident did fall and could cause less injury. V11 said if the resident was care planned for fall mats, they should be in place. On October 24, 2024 at 12:56 PM, V16 (LPN) said the height of the bed should be at the lowest position and this would prevent them from falling from higher heights and if the resident's fall prevention interventions include fall mats, the fall mats should be in place. V16 said the fall mats were to soften the fall. On October 24, 2024 at 1:20 PM, V17 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said the resident's bed should not be in a high position. V17 said if a resident was a fall risk, the bed should be low, the rails should be up, and the fall mats should be in place. V17 said the fall mats help the resident not hit their head on the floor. V17 said R47 liked his bed high up but said he does have fall mats. At 1:24 PM, V17 looked at R47's bed and said she did not pay attention to see if he had his fall mats in place. On October 24, 2024 at 1:32 PM, V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) said there should be fall mats in place if there was a care plan for fall mats to be in place. On October 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM, V2 (DON) said the bed should be in the lowest position if residents were at risk for falling. V2 said R47 would manipulate his own bed height and preferred to be up high. V2 said fall mats should be in place if it was in his care plan as an intervention, as the fall mat was used to try to reduce the risk for injury. The facility was unable to provide a Fall Prevention policy. The facility provided a Safety and Supervision of Residents policy dated September 2022 which showed, Implementing interventions to reduce accident risks and hazards shall include the following: a. Communicating specific interventions to all relevant staff; b. assigning responsibility for carrying out interventions; d. ensuring that interventions are implemented .Monitoring the effectiveness of interventions shall include the following: a. ensuring that interventions are implemented correctly and consistently. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions that would prevent fall injuries and cigarette smoking hazards this applies to 6 of 11 (R15, R32, R46, R47, R73 and R93) residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R46 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that includes cellulitis of the right lower limb, muscle wasting, protein calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia/ hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, glaucoma, hypertension and legal blindness. R46's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/25/24 indicates he cognitively intact and uses a manual wheelchair for mobility. Per the MDS R46 has impairment to on side of his upper extremities and require partial staff assistance with mobility. On 10/24/24 at 09:36AM, (R46) was being pushed by activity staff onto the smoking patio. R46's wheelchair did not have footrests attached to his chair. R46 was attempting to hold his feet off the ground as he was being pushed. While being pushed by staff R46's feet hit a raised section of the concrete. R46 yelled out watch my feet. 2. R73 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that includes vascular dementia with agitation, peripheral vascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, localized swelling mass and lump to bilateral lower limbs. R73's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/12/24 indicates he has severe cognitive impairment and does not use any assistive devices for mobility. R73's current care plan states he demonstrates movement behavior that maybe interpreted at pacing or roaming related to the diagnosis of dementia and problems understanding the immediate environment. R73 demonstrates cognitive impairment related to dementia. Symptoms are manifested by poor insight, reasoning, and impulse control. R73's fall assessment dated [DATE] shows he takes 1-2 medications that may impact his fall risk, has poor vision without glasses, is ambulatory, incontinent, disoriented x 3 (person, place and time) at all times, exhibits loss of balance while standing, balance problems while walking, changes gait when walking through doorways and has decreased muscle coordination. On 10/22/24 at 11:27 AM, the room occupied by R73 had two beds. The unoccupied bed 2 being stored did not have a mattress and the metal bed frame was exposed. 3. R93 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that includes dementia, anxiety, hypertension, muscle weakness, restlessness and agitation. R93's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/8/24 indicates she has severe cognitive impairment and does not use a mobility device. R93's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] shows she takes 1-2 medications that may impact her fall risk, ambulatory, incontinent, has a decrease in muscle coordination and has 1-2 predisposing conditions. On 10/22/24 at 11:18 AM, R93 was walking the third-floor hallways without shoes and wearing regular socks without skid protection. On 10/24/24 at 01:59 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated R73 is ambulatory and does not have a roommate. Maintenance is responsible for making sure bedframes have a mattress in place. A metal bed frame without a mattress is not safe. Someone may attempt to sit on the frame and could potentially be injured. Ambulatory resident should have nonskid socks or well-fitting shoes to prevent fall injuries. V2 DON stated R46 is blind and can self-transfer short distances, but he does not generally walk. R46 would not be walking from his room to the patio to smoke. He normally has footrests on his wheelchair and should have them in place if he is being pushed by staff in his wheelchair. On 10/24/24 at 02:54 PM, V10 Activity Aide stated R46 placed himself in his wheelchair. V10 stated she rolled him out to the patio to smoke. V10 stated she didn't know if he had footrests for his wheelchair. R46 feet were dragging and caught on the cement, but the issue was R46's not hers. V10 stated she may have overlooked the bump in the cement. V10 stated she did not know if having footrests would have made a difference to keep his feet up. V10 stated she is not a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and not responsible to put footrests on the wheelchair. V10 stated she was not trained in wheelchair safety as she works in the activities department. The facility policy Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 9/2022 states the facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety, supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility wide priorities. Employees shall be trained and in-serviced on potential accident hazards ad how to identify and report accident hazards and try to prevent avoidable accidents. 6. On 10/22/24 at 11:08 AM, a lighter that said keep your spirit high was found on the bedside table of R32 next to an aerosol spray can of body spray. On 10/24/24 at 9:40 AM, R32 said she does not smoke cigarettes, she only smokes weed. R32 said she had never been assessed for safe smoking. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/1/24 shows her cognition is intact. R32's Care Plan initiated on 5/9/24 states the resident will be monitored to fully assess compliance and ability to smoke independently. R32's most current Smoking Risk Review assessment dated [DATE] was competed by V5 (SSD/Social Services Director), which shows R32 may not be capable of handling/carrying any smoking materials and requires supervision when smoking. On 10/23/24, during the survey, V5 (SSD) revised R32's Care Plan, after being made aware of R32 having a lighter in her possession. V5 revised R32's Care Plan on 10/23/24 to say that R32 demonstrated compliance with safe smoking. V5 updated R32's Care Plan without completing a new Smoking Risk Review Assessment. On 10/24/24 at 12:23 PM, V5 (Social Services Director) said he was unsure if R32 smoked or not, as he did not always go outside with the smoking residents. On 10/24/24 at 1:53 PM, V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said R32 requires supervision with smoking and her last smoking assessment on 10/1/24 said R32 may not be capable of carrying smoking materials. On 10/24/24 at 2:28 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said if a resident is not safe to smoke independently, their smoking materials should be kept with the staff, so they do not attempt to smoke without supervision, risking their safety. The facility's undated policy titled, Facility Smoking Safety Policy states, Policy Objective: To provide a safe and healthy living environment with respect for the health and well-being needs of each resident, staff member, and visitor. It is also the objective of this policy to communicate to each resident that they are responsible for following each rule and on-going compliance with this policy. Guidelines: 1 .The facility has the right to enforce a policy prohibiting residents from keeping any smoking materials in his/her possession for health, safety, and security reasons .3. Smokers will be evaluated to determine their ability to comply with safety rules and their ability to carry smoking materials. Residents requiring supervision shall receive this monitoring consistent with their assessment and plan of care .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to staff Registered Nurses (RNs) 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to staff Registered Nurses (RNs) 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility's 671 (Long Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid) dated October 22, 2024 documents a total of 107 residents in the facility. On October 23, 2024 at 3:11 PM, the surveyor and V18 (Scheduler/CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) went over the schedule from September 28, 2024 through October 23, 2024. V18 said there were managers on call every weekend, which included V2 (DON/Director of Nursing), V3 (RN), V19 (Wound Care Nurse/RN), V7 (Infection Preventionist/LPN), V18 (Scheduler/CNA) and V12 (Restorative Nurse/LPN). -On Sunday, September 29, 2024, the schedule showed there was no RN in the facility for 24 hours. The on-call manager schedule showed V18 was on call the weekend of September 29, 2024. -On Sunday, October 13, 2024, the schedule showed there was no RN in the facility for 24 hours. The on-call manager schedule showed V2 (DON) was on call the weekend of October 13, 2024. -On Saturday, October 19, 2024, the schedule showed there was no RN in the facility from 12 AM until 11 PM. At 11 PM, an RN came to the facility, but did not meet the standard requirement of RNs on site for 8 hours consecutively. The on-call manager schedule showed V19 was on call the weekend of October 19, 2024. On October 24, 2024 at 1:47 PM, V3 (ADON) said she worked Monday through Friday and did not work on the weekends unless something was happening at the facility. V3 said she did not work September 29, 2024, October 13, 2024, or October 19, 2024. On October 24, 2024 at 1:48 PM, V19 (RN) said she worked Monday through Friday and did not work on the weekends unless necessary. V19 said V3 and V19 had not had to come to the facility in September or October 2024 when they were on call. On October 24, 2024 at 3:08 PM, V2 (DON) said she did not have documentation to show she was in the facility on September 29, 2024, October 13, 2024, or October 19, 2024. V2 said it was a goal to have an RN in the facility for 8 hours a day, but for weekends, she would need to check and get back to the surveyor on the answer. On October 24, 2024 at 3:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) said he was aware the facility needed to have RNs in the building minimally 8 hours a day. V1 said he was not aware there were days there were no RNs in the building. The facility's Registered Nurse Staffing policy dated January 2024 showed The facility shall ensure that a Registered Nurse is available for supervision in the facility .The facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, except when waived.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a cognitively impaired resident, while outdo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a cognitively impaired resident, while outdoors, to prevent prolonged sun exposure that resulted in burns to the skin. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for improper nursing care. This failure resulted in R1 obtaining full thickness burns to the upper back and posterior neck due to prolonged sun exposure. The findings include: R1 was identified by the facility with a skin condition incident report dated July 28, 2024, and identified on the facility wound report as a resident with full thickness skin injury. R1's New Skin Condition report, dated July 28, 2024, written by V9 (RN) showed R1 was noted with blisters left shoulder to mid back. The report also showed R1 required a cream be applied to R1's face and arms. On September 9, 2024, at 2:43 PM, V9 stated that she recalls R1's face and arms were also discolored and required treatment and stated the skin injuries were determined to be caused by sunburn. R1's Initial Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated July 29, 2024, documented by V3 (Wound Physician) identified a burn wound to the left upper back full thickness that measured 5.3 x 14.3 x 0.1 cm (centimeters) that required debridement and identified a second wound burn wound to the posterior neck full thickness that measured 2.1 x 1.5 x 0.1 cm. On September 9, 2024, at 3:05 PM, V3 stated the cause of R1's wounds were from sunburn due to prolonged sun exposure. V3 identified R1 as having dementia and stated to prevent sunburn, facility staff should know how long R1 was exposed to the sun especially since R1 was cognitively impaired. V3 stated R1's dementia had also resulted in delayed wound healing due to R1's behavior of removing the wound dressing and not eating resulting in weight loss. R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease unspecified, fibromyalgia, basal cell carcinoma of the skin overlapping sites, chronic pain syndrome, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 25, 2024, showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired, and required assistance with ADL's including dependent on staff assistance for bathing, required substantial staff assistance with dressing, toileting and personal hygiene, supervision with bed mobility, transfer and walking 150 feet and set up assistance with eating. On September 9, 2024, at 3:54 PM, V13 (LPN) stated she worked on July 28, 2024, during the day shift on R1's unit. V13 stated the door to the patio was left unlocked so independent residents and staff were able to exit at any time. V13 stated R1 was able to ambulate independently and liked to go outside a lot. V13 stated it was possible for R1 to go outside and staff may or may not have known when R1 did go out. On September 9, 2024, at 11:50 AM, R1 was seated in a reclining padded wheelchair, in the dining room and being fed an ice slushy drink by V6 (CNA) with V7 (CNA) in attendance. V6 stated R1's condition is declining, R1 is not eating, and she is walking less and R1 use to independently walk around the unit and liked to go outside on the patio. V7 stated R1 was able to ambulate independently and like to go outside at the time R1 was found with the sunburn. R1's progress note dated September 6, 2024, at 1:54 PM, written by V5 (LPN) showed R1 was noted to be walking down the hallway when staff noted a skin tear to R1's left forearm, with an unknown etiology. On September 9, 2024, at 4:10 PM, V14 (Activity Assistant) stated on July 28, 2024, she worked from 8:30 AM until 4:45 PM and supervised the patio during the smoking breaks, as she does as part of her daily work assignment. V14 stated the patio doors are kept unlocked however V14 takes smoking group outside for 15-20 minutes at a time during the smoking times of 9:30 AM, 11:30 AM, 2:00 PM, and 4:30 PM. V14 stated when the smoking group is over V14 returns to do her activity groups inside the building. V14 stated other than the assigned smoking breaks staff are not assigned to supervise outside. V14 stated she has worked in the facility for 5 months and is unsure who R1 is. R1's care plan with date initiated of January 29, 2024, problem statement showed R1 was known to have a movement behavior which may be interpreted as wandering, pacing, or roaming and had problems understanding the immediate environment. R1's care plan had an intervention added to the care plan on June 25, 2024, that showed If the resident leaves the building, goes in a peer's room, or becomes aggressive, redirect by: Walk in the same direction as the resident. Do not initially try to force the person to change direction. Chat with the resident about his/her theme. Eventually, use a strategy such as therapeutic fib to bring the person to the area where you would like him or her to be. On September 9, 2024, at 4:03 PM, V2 (DON, Director of Nursing) stated there is no investigation regarding how long R1 was outside in the sun, and when and how long the sun exposure occurred prior to the sunburn and remains unknown. V2 did state the patio door was unlocked and remains unlocked during daytime hours. V2 stated the redness to R1's upper back and neck was first reported during the evening shift (3PM-11PM) on July 27, 2024, the redness then developed into blisters on July 28, 2024. V2 stated there is not a log of when people go outside the patio door to determine how long someone such as R1 was subjected to sun exposure, even during the weather change to hot, sunny weather. V2 stated that R1's caregivers were unable to identify the amount of time or when R1 was on the patio exposed to the sun that resulted in the sunburn. V2 stated there is no facility policy regarding Supervision of Residents while outdoors on the patio.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0567 (Tag F0567)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (R1) access to their funds as pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (R1) access to their funds as per their request. Finding include: R1 is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/17/24 with diagnoses including infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, hypertension, hypoglycemia, hepatitis C, and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. On 5/29/24 at 11:38am, V1 (Administrator) said that he spoke with R1 about a month after he was discharged and R1 said that he was looking for his Trust Fund money. V1 said he had told R1 that if he confirmed that the money was due to him, the facility would send him a refund check in the mail. V1 verified that R1's Trust Fund account showed that 60 dollars remained in the account. On 5/29/24 at 1:02pm V4 (Director of Accounts Receivable) verified that R1 had the funds in his account and the facility should have sent R1 the money. R1's Resident statement 11/03/23 - 5/1/24 showed an ending balance on 5/1/24 in the amount of $60.04.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents safe from resident to resident abuse. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents safe from resident to resident abuse. R2 pushed R1, causing R1 to fall. R2 also was physically abusive to R3. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for abuse from a total sample of 5. The findings include: Incident report dated April 17, 2024, R1 and R2 had an altercation, the actual time of the incident was not documented but the report shows that it happened after breakfast. R1 walked to her bedroom and was approached by R2. The encounter resulted to R1 falling on the floor. Hospital record dated April 17, 2024, shows that R1 was sent to emergency department after a fall and the nursing home staff reported to the paramedics that R1 was inadvertently knocked down by another resident at the nursing home who was being disruptive. R1 was released later back to the facility with no significant injuries. Physician Progress Notes dated April 22, 2024, documents that R1 had a physical altercation with another resident the previous week. The note continues to document that R1 fell, hit her head. On April 30, 2024, at 11:25 AM, R1 was in her bedroom, sitting on her recliner. R1 stated that another resident pushed her, she fell, and hit her head on the floor. R1 was unable to recall the name of the resident. There was bruising to her right temporal area and right side of her face by her right ear. R1 also said she went inside her bedroom when there is no activity because she didn't want to be around that resident (R2) who attacked her. Face sheet shows R1 is 83 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with other behavioral disturbance, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness status unknown, initial encounter, and repeated falls. Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 which means that R1 has moderate impairment in cognition. Face sheet shows R2 is 77 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, major depressive disorder, and deaf non-speaking. Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] shows that she has a BIMS score of 7 which means that R2 has severe impairment in cognition. Incident report dated February 26, 2024, at around 5:00 PM, shows that R1 and R2 just finished their dinner. R1 and R2 were sitting next to each other as they had done for months. At that moment, there was a misunderstanding between these residents which led R2 to strike R1 in the face and lip. According from R1, R2 was petting her stuffed animal and she told R2 to give her back her stuffed animal, the next thing R1 knew R2 hit her. R1 later realized that she had mistaken R2 for someone else that is why she demanded R2 to return her stuffed animal. R1 did not require any special treatment to address the cut to her face. On April 30, 2024, around 9:30 AM, On April 29, 2024, at 1:43 PM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated prior to the (4/17/24) incident R1 was in the dining room and stated that if R2 goes to her room she will give her a black eye because she kept stealing her stuff. R2 got upset when she saw that R1 was talking about her. They started arguing, they were separated by staff. V6 (CNA) was helping another resident in a rest room next to the dining room and it was also along the hallway where R1's bedroom was. V6 heard screaming and saw R2 walking towards the dining room. V6 called the attention of V5. R2 started gesturing with her hand that she pushed R1. V5 went inside R1's bedroom and found her (R1) sitting on the floor with her walker tilted and leaning on her. R1 said that R2 pushed her. R1 also said that R2 was taking her teddy bear. R2 said that R1 hit her first. V6 assumed that R2 went to R1's bedroom to take her teddy bear. R1 pushed her and R2 pushed her back. R1 was crying and screaming She hit me! She hit me! R2 likes stuffed animals, and she tends to take other resident's stuffed animals. On April 29, 2024, at 1:14 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), stated she was alerted by the staff that there was an altercation that happened between R1 and R2. On April 17, 2024, R1 was found on the floor with the right side of her head bleeding. According to V2, R1 was very protective of her bedroom and her belongings and R1 had a habit of confronting individuals entering or coming close to her room. R1 would at times would tell other residents if they touched her belongings, she would hit the person. R2 is totally deaf and uses sign language to communicate. R2 gestured in sign language about what happened, but nobody could understand her explanation because R2's communication boards were misplaced. V2 also stated that R2 has a different kind of wandering behavior. R2 is familiar with the unit layout. R2 enjoys walking. V2 added that R2 has a behavior of going to other resident's bedroom to take other resident's belongings. R2 was discharged for psychiatric care after the incident. On April 29, 2024, at 2:57 PM, V8 (CNA) stated that she had never taken care of R2, but she had taken care of R1. V8 described R 1 as pleasant and cooperative. R1 was very nice person and did not argue with other residents unless someone took her belongings. According to V8, R1 would scold the person taking her items, but she was never physically aggressive. On April 30 at 11:00 AM, V17 (CNA) stated that R1 was feisty when another resident takes her items but R1 would not physically hurt anyone. V17 add that R2 has a behavior of entering other resident's rooms to take their personal belonging. V17 stated that on February 26, 2024 that R1 and R2 were in the dining room, when R1 started talking and gesturing a threat to R2. R2 got upset with her and slapped her. They tried to separate them from the table, but R2 kept coming back on the same table where R1 sits. V17 stated that the staff try to watch R2 as much as they can but it's impossible because they have other residents to care for. There's no way they can stop her from roaming around and keeping her out of other resident's rooms. After the 2nd incident happened on 4/17/24 between R1 and R2, R1 spent the majority of her time in her bedroom away from R2. R2's progress notes for February 26, 2024 document that at 4:26PM, staff heard a commotion in the dining room and it was noted that R2 punched R3 in the face. 2. Face sheet shows that R3 is 79 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. R3's Significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] shows that her BIMS score was 9 which means that R3 has moderate impairment in cognition. R3's progress notes dated March 20, 2024, at 4:15 PM shows that R3 activated her call light and, staff found another resident (R2) in the bedroom. R3 stated that the other resident (R2) slapped her on her right arm. No noted injury, but R3 did say that she was having some discomfort to the area no acute injury was noted. On April 30, 2024, at 11:20 AM, R3 was resting in bed and she remembered being hit by another resident. On April 30, 2024, at 1:46 PM, V14 (Nurse) stated that on March 20, 2024, R2 was seen inside R3's bedroom. V14 was unsure what R2 was doing there or what she did. However, R3 stated that she was slapped by R2.
Dec 2023 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supportive devices to residents to prevent fu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supportive devices to residents to prevent further reduction in ROM (Rand of Motion). This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R9, and R57) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis from a stroke affecting the right dominant side, and depression. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated September 29, 2023, showed R2 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive to total assistance from facility staff for most ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). The MDS continued to show R2 had a functional limitation in range of motion in one upper extremity. R2's care plan dated October 26, 2023, showed, [R2] requires placement of palm protector to the right hand daily as tolerated related to diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated October 26, 2023, including, Staff will place palm protector on right hand in the morning and remove at bedtime as tolerated. R2's Order Summary Report dated December 13, 2023, showed R2 had an order to apply a right palm protector daily as tolerated. On December 11, 2023, at 10:19 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2 did not have a right palm protector in place. On December 12, 2023, at 10:41 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2 did not have a right palm protector in place. On December 13, 2023, at 8:58 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2 did not have a right palm protector in protector in place. On December 13, 2023, at 9:16 AM, V10 (Director of Rehab) said R2 received Occupational Therapy from October 9, 2023, to November 19, 2023. V10 said R2 had a contracture of her right wrist and would benefit from an orthotic. V10 said on October 26, 2023, therapy applied a palm protector on R2's right hand due to a contracture and R2's nails digging into her palm. V10 continued to say R2 allowed therapy to apply the palm protector during therapy sessions. V10 said once R2 was finished with therapy, it was restorative's responsibility to apply or delegate for someone to apply R2's palm protector daily. On December 13, 2023, at 9:44 AM, V11 (Restorative Nurse) said restorative is responsible for applying palm protectors. V11 continued to say application of R2's palm protector should be documented in the medical record. As of December 13, 2023, at 9:44 AM, the facility does not have documentation to show facility staff applied R2's palm protector or R2 refused to have her right palm protector applied. On December 13, 2023, at 12:37 PM, V11 said there is no documentation of facility staff applying R2's right palm protector before today. On December 13, 2023, at 2:05 PM, V10 said R2 could not wear an orthotic brace so therapy recommended a right palm protector. R2's right palm protector will help prevent R2 from getting a worsening contracture. 2. R9 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, based on the face sheet. R9's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated September 10, 2023 showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required extensive to total assistance from the staff with her ADLs (activities of daily living). The same MDS showed that R9 had functional limitation in range of motion on both sides of her upper extremities. On December 11, 2023 at 11:15 AM, R9 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R9 was unable to extend her left hand fingers without the assistance of V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R9 had a palm protector on her right hand but no device/splint on the left hand. V6 stated that R9 only uses a palm protector on her right hand and no device being used on the left hand because R9 cannot extend her left hand fingers. On December 11, 2023 at 1:20 PM, R9 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R9 was unable to extend and/or open her left hand fingers. R9 had a palm protector on her right hand but no device/splint on the left hand. On December 12, 2023 at 9:20 AM with V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing), R9 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R9 was unable to extend and/or open her left hand fingers. V3 stated that R9's left was contracted. R9 had no device/splint on the left hand. R9's active order summary report showed an order dated December 7, 2023 to, Apply palm protector to left hand. Check skin for redness, irritation, or skin breakdown. On at 11am Off at 3pm. On December 13, 2023 at 9:52 AM, V10 (Director of Rehab) stated that the staff should apply the left hand palm protector to R9 as ordered for comfort, skin protection (prevent digging of the nails to the palm) and to prevent further contracture of the left hand. 3. R57 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. R57's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance from the staff with regards to personal hygiene. The same MDS showed that R57 had functional limitation in range of motion to one side of her upper extremities. On December 11, 2023 at 10:45 AM, R57 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R57 had visible right arm and hand weakness. R57 stated that she cannot move the right side of her body, including her right arm and hand due to stroke. R57 had no splint and/or adaptive device on her right arm and/or hand. R57 stated that staff sometimes apply the splint on her right hand, but not on a daily basis. R57 then pointed at the location where her right hand splint was placed, which was on top of her bedside table. On December 12, 2023 at 9:24 AM, R57 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R57 had visible right arm and hand weakness. R57 had no splint and/or adaptive device on her right arm and/or hand. According to R57, the facility staff did not apply the splint on her right hand on December 11, 2023 and pointed at the location where her right hand splint was placed, which was on top of her bedside table. V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) was present during the entire observation and interview of R57. R57's active order summary report dated October 9, 2023 showed an order for, pt (patient) will wear right resting hand splint as tolerated for 4-6 hours a day after hygiene and ROM (range of motion) to R (right) hand. Check at least every 2 hours for proper fit/positioning, skin integrity/redness and comfort. R57's active care plan initiated on November 14, 2023 showed that the resident will benefit from application of the right hand resting splint related to hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side. The same care plan showed multiple interventions including, [R57] to wear splint everyday as tolerated. On December 13, 2023 at 9:50 AM, V10 (Director of Rehab) stated that based on the occupational therapy notes dated September 6, 2023, R57 needed to wear her right resting hand splint to improve her ROM in the metacarpals (palm bones) and prevent further contracture. According to V10, the staff should follow the physician's order to apply the right resting hand splint because R57 had right hand contracture. On December 13, 2023 at 9:56 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that resident's with ordered splints or any adaptive devices should be applied as ordered to prevent further contracture of the affected site.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to supervise a resident that is id...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to supervise a resident that is identified needing supervision for smoking and ensure that direct care staff are trained and aware of R50's smoking interventions. The facility also failed to ensure that a resident (R181) that is identified as a high risk for fall is supervised and monitored to prevent falls. This applies to 2 of the 3 residents (R50 and R181) reviewed for accidents/hazards in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, nicotine dependence, and depression. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/30/23, shows R50 is cognitively intact. The same MDS shows R50 requires total dependence on facility staff for transfers between surfaces and requires extensive assistance from facility staff for bed mobility. Review of R50's record indicates numerous examples of noncompliance with the facility's smoking policy. R50's noncompliance was documented as incidents of smoking in his room to carrying his own smoking supplies (facility was to hold cigarettes and lighter) to smoking unsupervised on the smoking patio. R50 was provided education about the policy and staff have attempted numerous times to remove smoking materials. R50 often refuses to give up materials to staff. In addition, the facility served R50 with an involuntary discharge order for smoking violations that was denied by the administrative law judge. On December 12, 2023, at 11:51 AM, R50 was resting in bed. R50's bedroom was cold with the window opened. There was a smell of cigarette smoke in his room. R50 said that he smokes half a pack of cigarettes a day, he is allowed to keep his cigarettes and lighter, and he could smoke anytime he wants to. On December 12, 2023, at 2:30 PM, R50 was propelling in the hallway. R50 stated that he came from the patio where he smoked. R50 was noted with his box of cigarette and his lighter. R50 also said that he keeps his own cigarette and lighter at bedside. On December 12, 2023, at 5:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) and surveyor observed R50 in his room. R50 admitted that he has cigarettes but refused to tell where he gets his cigarette from. R50 also said that he keeps his cigarette at bedside. V1 opened the bedside drawer and found 2 boxes of cigarettes in R50's bedside drawer. One box was empty, and the other box had 4 or 5 sticks of cigarettes. V1 told R50 that he cannot keep it in his bedroom. R50 got upset and became loud. R50 refused to surrender his lighter. On December 12, 2023, at 3:25 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that he shouldn't have the smoking materials with him. He was educated multiple times but was non-compliant. R50 does not voluntarily give it to the staff (smoking materials). Staff does frequent rounding. Facility already brought R50 to court for involuntary discharge, but the facility was denied the ability to discharge the resident. According to V2, R50 would find a way to get a cigarette somewhere. As additional precautionary measure, they placed a smoke detector in his bedroom. On December 12, 2023, at 4:53 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that he told his staff to do random check of R50's bedroom. R50 doesn't have money. The staff is supposed to give him 1 stick of cigarette at a time. According to V1, R50 does not surrender to staff his cigarettes. V1 added that he believed that one of the other residents is giving the cigarettes to R50. V1 also stated that the family are the one who buys cigarettes for the residents, and it is not possible to monitor R50 24/7. He gets very aggressive when staff take the cigarette from him. On December 13, 2023, at 10:36 AM, V14 (Activity Aide) said R50 resides on the second floor and no residents on the second floor require supervision while smoking. V14 continues to say R50 can keep his cigarettes and his lighter and go down whenever he wants to smoke. On December 13, 2023, at 10:50 AM, V15 (Activity Aide) said R50 is not a resident they supervise for smoking. On December 13, 2023, at 10:47 AM, V13 (Social Services Director) stated that R50 needs assistance to get out of the bed. R50 has right sided weakness. When R50 sits on the wheelchair, he could propel himself everywhere. R50 has history of not following smoking rules. He was smoking in his room and smoking in non-designated smoking area. But that was in the past. He smokes half a pack a day. V13 had never seen R50 buy cigarettes outside, but V13 was not sure where R50 got the cigarettes. V13 also said that he did R50's smoking assessment today, there was an error with the assessment, it should have been updated. V13 based his assessment from November 8, 2023, to the present and since then, R50 did not have incident of unsafe smoking. The basis of quarterly assessment is to monitor a resident's behavior for 3 months. The intervention placed for R50's smoking behavior is to meet with R50 to review and discuss smoking rules, 30 days of suspended smoking, supervised smoking, finding the root cause of the problem, and another positive intervention is meet the ombudsman and see if the ombudsman can talk to R50 the importance of safe smoking. September 28, 10:15 PM: V13 (Social Service Director) went to R50's bedroom to speak with him regarding the smell of cigarette smoke coming from his bedroom. R50 responded Yes, I have been smoking in my room, I only took a few puffs of the cigarette. V13 reminded R50 that there is no smoking allowed in the facility and V13 reviewed the smoking policy with R50. September 29, 2023: V12 (Infection Preventionist Nurse) smelled cigarette smoke and saw haze in hallway. Upon opening the bedroom door, smoke billowed out of the room, R50 was sitting in bed with a smile on his face. Reminded R50 that he is not to smoke in his room. V12 attempted to remove smoking materials and R50 gripped in hand and became verbally aggressive. November 2, 2023: V13 (Social Service Director) found R50 with cigarette butts and ashes on his breakfast tray, R50 admitted to V13 that he was smoking in his room. V13 discussed how unsafe smoking in his room is, R50 said he would try harder. Continue to monitor as needed. November 8, 2023: V1 (Administrator) found cigarette butt on R50's bedside table and ashes on the floor. R50 admitted to V1 he was smoking in his room. Administrator confiscated cigarettes and lighter. R50 educated on smoking policy again. November 15, 2023, 11:35 AM: V19 (Nurse) educated R50 about facility rules and times regarding smoking, R50 verbalized understanding. R50's smoking care plan revised on 8/3/22, shows R50 has a diagnosis of nicotine dependence and a history of smoking in his room on 7/21/22. The same care plan continues to show multiple interventions dated 8/9/22, including Offer/provide a copy of the facility safe-smoking policy and explain the policy so the resident is fully aware of all obligations and conduct a 'Smoking Safety Assessment' as necessary. Facility documentation titled Smoking Risk Review dated 7/3/23, shows R50 was assessed he may not be capable of handling/carrying any smoking materials and requires supervision when smoking. V14 or V15 (Activity Aides) were not aware that R50's smoking materials needed to be kept with the facility and R50 needed to be supervised while smoking. The facility's undated policy titled, Facility Smoking Safety Policy, shows residents who smoke are evaluated to determine their ability to comply with safety rules and their ability to carry smoking materials. The policy shows residents who are non-compliant, potentially dangerous, exercise poor judgement, and show a lack of concern for the welfare of others will be counseled and the facility can limit and restrict access to smoking products, matches, and lighters. The policy shows the following behaviors and/or conditions will jeopardize and cause revocations of independent privilege's: smoking in non-designated areas, such as resident rooms, and self-harmful behaviors, such as burning clothes. All residents interested in retaining smoking privileges must follow the guidelines set forth in this policy. 2. Face sheet shows that R181 is 73 years who has multiple medical diagnoses to include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, schizophrenia, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and history of falling. R181's admission MDS dated [DATE], shows that R181 uses wheelchair for mobility and requires substantial/maximal assistance for sit to stand, ambulation, and toilet transfer. On December 11, 2023, at 10:44 AM, R181 was observed on the bathroom floor. R181 stated that she hit the left side of her face. There was discoloration noted on the peri-orbital area of her left eye. The call light in the bathroom was tied to the armrest of the raised toilet seat and was not within reached of R181 while she was lying on the floor. Nobody could tell how R181, got into the toilet by herself. On December 11, 2023, at 11:55 AM, R181 was resting in bed and was unable to tell how she fell and where she fell. V34 (CNA) stated that R181 is a risk for fall, she requires extensive assistance with activities of daily living care. On December 11, 2023, at 12:01 PM, V33 (Housekeeper) stated that she (V33) was cleaning the bedroom when she opened the bathroom door to empty the garbage can. V33 saw R181 sitting on the toilet asleep, there was no staff beside her or near her. When she returned the garbage can to the bathroom, as soon as she turned around and closed the door, V33 heard R181 fell on the floor. V33 opened the door and saw R181 on the floor. On December 12, 2023, at 1:58 PM, R181 was sitting on the toilet with V9 (CNA) by her side. At 2:00 PM, V9 left R181 alone on the toilet sitting. At 2:04 PM, R181 stood up from the toilet and walked unsteadily to her wheelchair. As R181 sat down, V9 came back to the room and assisted R181 back to the toilet to give her a peri-care. V9 assisted R181 to stand up, V9 was standing behind the wheelchair, while R181 was in front of the wheelchair. V9 did not put a gait belt around R181 when she stood up for peri-care. On December 12, 2023, at 3:40 PM, V2 (DON) stated that staff can't leave a resident alone in the bathroom at any given time, if a resident is identified as a high risk for fall. The staff should be with the resident during that time for safety measure. On December 13, 2023, at 12:57 PM, V16 (CNA) stated that R181 is confused, though she's able to verbalize needs, she would wake and think that she had to go to work. V16 saw R181 once getting up by herself. R181 was able to propel herself to different places. R181 would usually ask V16 to go to the bathroom with her. R181 could stand up and pivot to transfer from wheelchair to the bathroom. They are supposed to put gait belt around everyone who needs supervision or assistance with toileting, as safety precaution. A lot of the times R181 was sleepy. She falls asleep quickly. R181 is a high risk for fall. When V16 is assigned to R181 she does not leave R181 on her own even for a minute because R181 tends to stand up and walk back in the wheelchair. She has history of fall incidents. On December 13, 2023, at 1:20 PM, V19 (Nurse) stated that R181 is a high risk for fall. When V19 is assigned to R181, V19 keeps her at the desk because she is a high fall risk. R181 can't be left on her own especially in her room while she's sitting on her wheelchair. She would try to get up by herself which is unsafe. R181 can make her needs known but she is confused and forgetful. On December 13, 2023, at 1:53 PM, V8 (CNA) stated that R181 had fallen before near the nurses' station. V8 left R181 there at the nurses' station so the nurses can watch her while V8 attended to other residents. According to V8, R181 moves fast, she propels herself in her room and tends to transfer without calling for help. R181 is not aware of safety. Even when she's left in bed on her own, she could stand up and fall. R181's active care with revision date of December 11, 2023, shows that R181 has history of falls, believes she is more independent than capable and can be forgetful. R181 is up as tolerated, can benefit with staff assistance due to decreased balance and poor safety awareness. The same care plan shows multiple interventions which include to ensure call light is within reach and anticipate and meet individual needs of R181.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer residents the pneumococcal vaccine according to CDC (Centers ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer residents the pneumococcal vaccine according to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R22 and R39) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. The EMR showed R22 was a [AGE] year-old resident, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, heart disease, and alcohol abuse. On December 12, 2023, at 1:23 PM, V12 said R22 has only received the PPSV23 (Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine) in 2018. V12 continued to say R22 had not been offered another pneumococcal vaccine because R22 received the PPSV23 after he was 65-years-old and did not need another vaccination. R22's Immunization Report dated December 13, 2023, showed R22 received the PPSV23 on August 29, 2018. As of December 13, 2023, at 12:30 PM, the facility does not have documentation to show R22 had been offered an additional pneumococcal vaccine. 2. The EMR showed R39 was an [AGE] year-old resident, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, cardiomyopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart disease. On December 12, 2023, at 1:29 PM, V12 said R39 has only received the PPSV23 and has not been offered another pneumococcal vaccine because his pneumococcal vaccinations are complete. R39's Immunization Report dated December 13, 2023, showed R39 received the PPSV23 on March 30, 2021. As of December 13, 2023, at 12:30 PM, the facility does not have documentation to show R39 had been offered an additional pneumococcal vaccine. On December 13, 2023, at 12:30 PM, V12 said the facility follows CDC recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations. V12 continued to say R22 and R39 should have been offered an additional pneumococcal vaccination. The CDC's Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated March 15, 2023, showed adults over [AGE] years old who have only received PPSV23 should receive either the PCV20 (Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine) or the PCV15 (Pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine). The facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccination dated October 2023, showed, General: The most effective way to treat pneumococcal disease is to prevent it through immunization . Guideline: 1. Nursing will assess the pneumococcal vaccination status of each resident upon admission/readmission, and as necessary. It is recognized that the immediate admission period is one of high complexity and potentially complicated by resident instability. For these reasons, a flexible approach should be taken regarding timing of vaccination. The assessment of a resident regarding their immunization status (and determination of vaccine need) should be initiated at the time of admission and completed as soon as possible following the assessment. Administration could potentially be delayed due to issues of medical stability. In any event, it is reasonable to expect administration and documentation of pneumococcal vaccine by the first quarterly assessment OR patient discharge, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. Document any refusal and historical information, if any. 2. Nurse will provide education regarding pneumococcal vaccination, and administer the vaccine when indicated, unless refused by the resident or responsible party. Facilities must document the resident was assessed, educated, offered the vaccine, or declined due to refusal or contraindication. The consent serves as the education tool for the vaccine .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assist residents identified as needing a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R2, R9, R45, and R58) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis from a stroke affecting the right dominant side, and depression. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated September 29, 2023, showed R2 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS continued to show R2 required extensive assistance from facility staff for personal hygiene and was dependent on facility staff for bathing. R2's ADL care plan dated September 30, 2023, showed [R2] has a self-care deficit (ADLs/mobility) generalized weakness, hemiparesis/hemiplegia, impaired cognition, multiple comorbidities. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated September 30, 2023, including Resident is dependent with ADL care; provide total assistance in all aspects of hygiene/dressing. On December 11, 2023, at 10:19 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2's right hand fingernails were long and R2's left hand fingernails were long and jagged with a black substance underneath them. On December 12, 2023, at 10:41 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2's right hand fingernails were long and R2's left hand fingernails were long and jagged with a black substance underneath them. On December 13, 2023, at 8:58 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2's right hand fingernails were long and R2's left hand fingernails were long and jagged with a black substance underneath them. On December 13, 2023, at 1:34 PM, V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) said R2's fingernails need to be cleaned and cut. V3 continued to say facility staff cut a resident's fingernails when giving the resident a shower or bath. V3 said if a resident refuses to have their fingernails cut, the facility staff should document the refusal on the shower sheet. R2's Bath and Skin Report Sheet for October 1, 2023, to December 13, 2023, showed R2 had her nails trimmed on October 4, 2023, and refused her nails to be trimmed on November 15, 2023. The facility does not have documentation to show R2's nails were trimmed or R2 refused to have her nails trimmed during any of her other showers or baths. 2. R9 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, based on the face sheet. R9's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated September 10, 2023 showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required extensive assistance from the staff with regards to personal hygiene. The same MDS showed that R9 had functional limitation in range of motion on both sides of her upper extremities. On December 11, 2023 at 11:15 AM, R9 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R9 was unable to extend her left hand fingers without the assistance of V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R9 had a palm protector on her right hand. R9's fingernails were long, jagged and with black substances underneath several of her fingers. R9 stated that she wanted the staff to trim and clean her fingernails. V6 was present during the observation. R9's active care plan initiated on December 7, 2023 showed that the resident was dependent on staff for ADL (activities of daily living) task. The same active care plan showed multiple interventions including provision of assistance with all ADLs including personal hygiene. Further review of R9's active care plan initiated on December 7, 2023 showed that the resident had self-care deficit related to hemiparesis and hemiplegia. The same care plan showed multiple interventions including, [R9] is dependent with ADL care; provide total assistance in all aspects of hygiene. 3. R45 had multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia without behavioral disturbance, based on the face sheet. R45's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance from the staff with regards to personal hygiene. On December 11, 2023 at 11:44 AM, R45 was sitting in his wheelchair inside the unit activity/dining area. R45 had overgrown facial hair. R45 wanted the staff to shave him. R45 commented, Yes, I need shaving, it is time after resident felt his facial hair. R45's active care plan initiated on October 8, 2023 showed that the resident had self-care deficit. The same care plan showed multiple interventions including provision of extensive staff assistance for grooming. On December 12, 2023 at 5:55 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that it is part of the nursing care and service to assist in shaving resident's needing assistance. V2 acknowledged that the nursing staff should have assisted R45 with shaving to prevent overgrown facial hair and to maintain personal hygiene. 4. R58 had multiple diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and dementia with mood disturbance, based on the face sheet. R58's significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance from the staff with regards to personal hygiene. On December 11, 2023 at 10:22 AM, R58 was in bed sleeping. R58's fingernails were long, jagged and with black substances underneath several of his fingernails. V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was present and was aware of the condition of R58's fingernails. R58's active care plan initiated on November 6, 2023 showed that the resident had self-care deficit. The same care plan showed multiple interventions including, [R58] is dependent with ADL care; provide total assistance in all aspects of hygiene/dressing. On December 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM, V2 stated that it is part of the nursing care and services to assist residents needing assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living), like trimming and cleaning the fingernails, and shaving to ensure cleanliness and maintain hygiene.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary urinary catheter insertion and fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary urinary catheter insertion and failed to render peri-care in a manner that would prevent infection. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R50, R58, R63, R181) reviewed for urinary catheter and peri-care in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R63 is 73 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include urinary retention, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, sepsis, unspecified organism, and type 2 diabetes. On December 12, 2023, at 1:04 PM, V7 (Nurse) changed R63's indwelling urinary catheter because it was clogged. V7 retracted the penile foreskin of R63. There were unidentified white substances/sedimentations surrounding the head and neck of the penis. V7 wiped the area with betadine swabs, however, V7 did not completely removed the white sediments. When the state representative inquired about the remaining residues around the penis, V7 stated that they don't have a lot of betadine swabs in the catheter set. V7 then picked up one of the soiled betadine swabs and re-used it to remove the remaining sediments. V7 inserted the catheter tube, and as the urine flowed out of the catheter, V7 injected the distilled water to inflate the balloon. When V7 attached the catheter to the urinary tube, the urine flow stopped. V7 repositioned the external catheter tube to see if the urine would come out but nothing happened. V7 proceeded to aspirate the distilled water from the balloon to deflate it, then she slightly slid the internal urinary catheter back and forth to reposition. There was a small amount of urine that flowed down to the catheter which was thick with sediments. V7 injected distilled water again to the balloon. During the catheter insertion, it was noted that the anchor was loose. V7 removed the loose anchor and did not place a new one. On December14, 2023, at 2:10 PM, R63 was resting in bed, his indwelling urinary catheter remained unsecured. On December 12, 2023, at 5:32 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that staff must wash their hands prior to procedure. Clean the peri-area, prior to removal of the catheter, perform a sterile cleaning prior to insertion of catheter. The staff cannot move the catheter back and forth when it's already inserted to the resident. He has history of UTI; staff should perform a strict sterile technique during catheter insertion. To prevent infection. Facility's undated Policy and Procedure for Foley Catheterization and Removal shows: 5. Insertion Procedure: Follow approved sterile technique. 7. Secure catheter to drainage system and attached to thigh, for male resident, draped loosely and tape, or use leg strap to avoid pressure between thighs or tape on either side of lower abdomen to prevent [NAME]-scrotal fistula. 2. Face sheet showed that R50 is 63 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. On December 12, 2023, at 1:33 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R50 who was wet with urine and had a bowel movement. V8 wet half of the bath towel and handed it to R50 to wipe his frontal perineum. Using his left non-dominant side, R50 wiped his pubic, perineal, and scrotal area in an up and down stroke about 3 to 4 times, then he handed the towel back to V8. There was a strong urine odor that came from R50's peri-area. V8 used the same wet side of the towel to wipe R50's lower back, buttocks, and rectum. V8 did not offer or ensure to clean R50's groins. 3. On December 12, 2023, at 1:58 PM, V9 (CNA) assisted R181 to the toilet where she had a bowel movement. After R181 used the toilet, V9 cleaned R181's rectum, then she pulled the incontinence brief back in place, assisted to put R181's pants back. V9 did not clean the frontal perineum of R181. On December 12, 2023, at 6:02 PM DON stated that staff should clean appropriately, do not use the same part of towel to clean a different part of the body. Ensure that all parts of the perineum were cleaned. This is to prevent infection, cross contamination, and skin breakdown. 4. On December 12, 2023 at 9:40 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V4 (wound care nurse) turned and repositioned R58. R58's disposable brief was wet with urine. V5 used a hand towel wet with water to clean R58. V5 wiped from the pubic area down to the penis and scrotal area, once in a quick downward motion, wiping only one side, then to the rectal and buttocks. V5 did not clean R58's urethral opening, entire penis and entire scrotum. After V5 provided incontinence care to R58, V4 proceeded to provide wound treatment to the resident, then V4 and V5 applied a new disposable brief to R58. On December 12, 2023 at 5:44 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that all residents should be provided with appropriate bladder incontinence care to ensure cleanliness, maintain hygiene and to prevent odor. According to V2 for male resident's regardless, if circumcised or not, the resident's penis should be cleaned properly during incontinence care by making sure that it is cleaned from the tip of the penis using circular motion and working outward. V2 also stated that not only one side but the entire penile shaft and scrotum should also be cleaned. V2 added that wiping the male perineal area including the penis and the scrotum once with a quick downward motion does not ensure that the resident was properly cleaned. Thee facility's policy and procedure regarding perineal/incontinence care last reviewed by the facility on November 2023 showed under purpose, To provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, prevent infections and skin irritation, and observe the resident's skin condition. The same policy under procedure showed in-part, 10 .b. For male residents, retract the foreskin if uncircumcised then clean the tip of the penis using a circular motion starting with the urethra and working outward. i. The shaft, scrotum, rectal area and buttocks should be cleansed as well. 11. Use a clean area of cloth for each area cleansed. 12. Assure all areas affected by incontinence have been cleansed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of catheter and incontinenc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of catheter and incontinence care. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R50, R58, R63, R181) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. On December 12, 2023, at 1:04 PM, V7 (Nurse) changed R63's indwelling urinary catheter. V7 inserted the catheter tube and injected distilled water to the balloon. When the flow of urine stopped, V7 repositioned the external catheter but nothing happened. V7 aspirated the distilled water to deflate the balloon and re-adjusted the catheter. While wearing same gloves, V7 opened a sealed bottle of distilled water then V7 changed her gloves without hand hygiene. V7 took the used syringe and use it to aspirate from the clean distilled water bottle to re-inflate the catheter balloon. V5 adjusted the external catheter tube, arranged the toiletries, and distilled water on top of the bedside table, touched the rolling table, touched the side rails, and straightened bed linen and blanket while wearing same gloves. 2. On December 12, 2023, at 1:33 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R50 who was wet with urine and had a bowel movement. V8 wiped R50's back perineum, removed soiled incontinence brief and bed linens, cleaned the soiled mattress, and applied clean incontinence brief. V8 carried the soiled linen to the soiled hamper, then she changed her gloves without hand hygiene and assisted to dress and transfer R50 to the wheelchair. V8 did not perform hand hygiene during the process of incontinence care and in between task. 3. On December 12, 2023, at 1:58 PM, V9 (CNA) assisted R181 to the toilet where she had a bowel movement. After R181 used the toilet, V9 cleaned R181's rectum, then she pulled the incontinence brief back in place, assisted to put R181's pants back on, removed her gloves and propelled R1 to the hallway without hand hygiene. On December 12, 2023, at 6:04 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that the staff must wash hand and change gloves in between task during provisions of ADL care to prevent infection. 4. On December 12, 2023 at 9:40 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V4 (wound care nurse) turned and repositioned R58. R58's disposable brief was wet with urine. With her gloved hands, V5 provided incontinence care to R58. After providing incontinence care to R58, V5 did not remove her used gloves and proceeded to assist with turning and repositioning R58 in bed for the wound treatment. After the wound treatment, V4 and V5 turned and repositioned R58. V5 also straightened R58's linens, assisted in changing R58's gown and placed pillow under R58's left side to position the resident, while using the same soiled gloves that she used to provide incontinence care to R58. On December 12, 2023 at 5:44 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that when nursing staff are performing dirty to clean task, the staff should always remove their used gloves, perform hand hygiene by either handwashing or use of alcohol-based hand rub, then apply a new pair of gloves before proceeding to perform clean task. According to V2, after V5 performed incontinence care to R58, V5 should remove her used/soiled gloves, perform hand hygiene, then put on a new pair of gloves before handling the resident and resident's linens, gown and pillow, to prevent cross contamination and potential infection. The facility's policy and procedure regarding perineal/incontinence care reviewed by the facility in November 2023 showed in-part under procedure, that after providing incontinence care to the resident, 13. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene and 14. Apply clean gloves then proceed with the resident's care.
Sept 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to show mechanical lift slings were bei...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to show mechanical lift slings were being routinely inspected and failed to follow the facility's policy to use two caregivers while transferring a resident with a full body mechanical lift device. These failures resulted in resident falls during transfer with a mechanical lift device. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. On September 5, 2023 at 10:07 AM, R1 was lying in bed. R1 said he has a history of a stroke and is unable to use the right side of his body, including both his upper and lower extremities on his right side. R1 continued to say on August 31, 2023, two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were transferring him from his bed to a shower chair using a full body mechanical lift device and a sling. R1 said his full body was in the mechanical lift sling, and after he was lifted off of the bed using the mechanical lift, and was hovering over the floor, the CNAs pushed the mechanical lift over to the shower chair across the room. The full body sling suddenly broke free from the mechanical lift. R1 said one of the loops attached to the mechanical lift tore, and as he started to fall from the sling, a second loop also tore, and he fell to the floor experiencing severe pain in his right foot and hand. R1 continued to say he was sent to the local hospital shortly after falling and returned to the facility with minor bruising but no other injuries. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting his right dominant side, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, history of falling, gastrostomy, major depressive disorder, insomnia, sacral pressure ulcer, feeding difficulties, urine retention, and cerebral infarction. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 31, 2023 shows R1 has moderate cognitive impairment, is totally dependent on two facility staff members for transfers between surfaces, is totally dependent on one facility staff member for locomotion on the unit, toilet use, and bathing, is able to eat with supervision, and requires extensive assistance with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1's MDS continues to show R1 has functional limitation in range of motion on both the upper and lower extremities on one side of his body and uses a wheelchair for mobility. R1's care plan for self-care deficit, initiated January 17, 2023 shows multiple interventions including, Mechanical lift for transfers initiated August 30, 2023. On August 31, 2023 at 3:00 PM, V8 (RN-Registered Nurse) documented, The writer was informed by the CNA that the resident had fell from the [mechanical lift]. The writer received the resident lying on his back on the floor. No s/s (Signs/Symptoms) of distress. No open wound. V/S (Vital Signs) obtained. The resident denied any pain/discomfort of hitting his head. The resident is receiving a blood thinner. Per facility protocol the resident was sent out to the ER (Emergency Room) at [local hospital]. The DON (Director of Nursing), MD and family aware. R1's hospital documentation dated August 31, 2023 shows X-rays of R1's right ankle, right femur, pelvis, right ribs, and right shoulder were negative for fracture. No other injuries were documented. The facility's fall incident report dated August 31, 2023 shows R1 sustained a fall during assisted transfer [mechanical lift] sling malfunction. On September 5, 2023 at 1:10 PM, V9 (CNA) said, On August 31, I had prepped [R1] for a shower. I put the mesh sling under [R1] while he was lying in bed. Then I went and got [V5] (CNA) to help me do the actual transfer to the shower chair. [V5] attached the loops of the mechanical lift sling to the mechanical lift on [R1's] right side, and I attached the loops on his left side to the mechanical lift. After lifting the resident from the bed, he was dangling from the mechanical lift, while lying in the mesh sling. I got about halfway across the room towards the shower chair and the loop on the sling just snapped. It was a quick snap and [R1] started to slide out of the sling. Before he touched the ground, the second loop snapped. It was a quick snap, and he fell to the ground. I was really confused on what happened and I checked the sling and it had torn from the loop. I had gotten the sling from my linen cart. I would not know about inspecting the sling. On September 5, 2023 at 11:23 AM, V5 (CNA) said, On August 31, I was helping with the transfer of [R1] from the bed to the shower chair with the mechanical lift. We lifted the resident off the bed using the mechanical lift. When the lift was moved with him in it, the loop connected to the body sling and the mechanical lift seemed like it just exploded. It just ripped off of the sling and the resident slowly hit the floor. The loop tore away from the mesh material of the sling. I have never been told to inspect the sling or write my inspection down on paper. I assumed that was the job of the people in the laundry room. On September 5, 2023 at 9:52 AM, V6 (Director of Housekeeping) said, The mechanical lift slings are washed in cold water without bleach and are air dried. Prior to today, we did not inspect the mechanical lift slings for tears or frayed edges. As of today, I think we will be starting a new inspection process, but we have not started doing that yet. On September 5, 2023 at 2:09 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said, [R1] fell from the [mechanical lift] while he was in the mesh shower sling, suspended in the air. The loop on the sling tore from the area where the sling straps are sewn to the mesh sling. The sewn part just gave away. V2 continued to say, at the time of R1's fall on August 31, 2023, the facility did not have a system in place to show all mechanical lift slings and lift equipment were routinely inspected as shown in the facility's policy. 2. On September 5, 2023 at 11:31 AM, R2 was sitting in a wheelchair outside of the facility, on the patio. A mechanical lift sling was underneath R2, between R2's body and the wheelchair. R2 said he fell from the mechanical lift several months ago when the strap broke while he was being lifted. The EMR shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2 has multiple diagnoses including, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, supraventricular tachycardia, diabetes, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right side, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. R2's MDS dated [DATE] shows R2 is cognitively intact, is totally dependent on two facility staff members for transfers between surfaces, is totally dependent on one facility staff member for toilet use, and bathing, requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, and supervision with eating and locomotion. R2's MDS continues to show R2 has functional limitation in range of motion of both the upper and lower extremities on one side of his body and uses a wheelchair for mobility. On April 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM, V10 (RN) documented: CNA stated [R2] fell from [mechanical lift] sling. Upon arrival [R2] stated he bumped his head. No active bleeding. Patient assisted x 4 staff with a sheet back safely to wheelchair. Placed call to family, left message on voicemail to call facility. Patient informed that he was going to be sent to ER for tx/eval (Treatment/Evaluation), but he was adamant on not going Administrator made aware of [R2] decision and spoke with patient. MD states he will be in today and will speak with [R2]. Placed on neuro checks, at this time noted a raised area to back of head. Site is closed. Ice pack applied. The facility's fall incident report dated April 16, 2023 shows: Incident Description: CNA notified nurse [R2] was on the floor and reported patient had fallen from [mechanical lift]. Patient stated he fell from [mechanical lift] and bumped his head. On September 5, 2023 at 2:50 PM, V2 (DON) said R2 was being transferred by one CNA (V3) using a mechanical lift when the full body sling ripped. V2 continued to say two facility staff members should be present when a resident is being transferred using the mechanical lift. On September 5, 2023 at 3:00 PM, V3 (CNA) said, [R2] was lying on top of the full body sling in his bed. I was putting him on the [mechanical lift] and I raised him up high in the air, using the mechanical lift and one of the loops ripped off of the sling, near the resident's head. I was alone when I did the transfer because I could not find anyone to help me. The sling did not break at the strap, it broke away from the sling fabric. The straps appeared good, but I did not inspect the sling fabric or the part where the strap is connected to the sling. I never check the sling fabric, I just check the straps, and they seemed fine, but I never thought to check the fabric. When the sling broke, the resident fell to the side, onto the floor and onto his hip. On September 5, 2023, V2 (DON) provided the undated manufacturer's Full Body Sling Instruction Manual. The manual shows: Warning: Carefully inspect the sling before each use for wear and damage to seams, fabric, straps, and strap loops. Torn, cut, frayed or broken slings can fail, resulting in serious personal injury to the user. Use only slings that are in good condition. Discard and destroy old, unusable slings. The facility's policy entitled; Limited Lifting Resident Handling Policy dated 11/2022 shows: Policy: 1. Mechanical lifting devices shall be used for any resident needing a two person assist. Except during emergency situations or unavoidable circumstances, manual lifting is not permitted.4. Mechanical lift equipment shall undergo routine maintenance checks by the nursing and maintenance staff to ensure that equipment remains in good working order. 5. The transferring needs of residents will be assessed on an ongoing basis and designated into one of the following categories: 0 = Independent, 1 = 1-person transfer (25% or less assistance from the caregiver), 2 = 2-person transfer (ONLY when use of sit to stand lift not possible), SS = Sit to Stand lift with 1-2 caregivers, H = Mechanical Lift (brand name of mechanical lift) with 2 caregivers.8. The policy will be followed at all times. Failure to comply will result in disciplinary action at Management's discrepancy .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0776 (Tag F0776)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a CT (Computerized Tomography) Scan as o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a CT (Computerized Tomography) Scan as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 4. The findings include: On September 13, 2023 at 9:53 AM, R4 was sitting in wheelchair. R4 said she was having pain in her left shoulder back in May 2023. R4 said, The doctor ordered a CT scan of my shoulder, but it was never done. The hospital called me on the telephone to tell me the test was scheduled for May 18, 2023, and I gave the information to the nurse to schedule the transportation. The date came and went, and it was never done. I felt they were trying to ignore it. I didn't think they cared about it. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4 has multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, severe depression, anxiety disorder, diabetes, chronic ulcer of the left calf, insomnia, complex regional pain syndrome, suicide attempt, asthma, and nicotine dependence. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 14, 2023 shows R4 is cognitively intact, requires limited assistance with bathing and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). On May 1, 2023 at 11:28 AM, V12 (NP-Nurse Practitioner) documented: Left shoulder pain. This is a [AGE] year-old female patient with chronic pain who is here for long-term care. She c/o (complained of) left shoulder pain . Impression: Left shoulder pain; she had X-ray recently which is reported to be negative; [R4] c/o pain is worsening . Plan: CT of left shoulder without contrast ordered . The EMR shows the following order dated May 1, 2023: CT scan without contrast of left shoulder one time. The facility's Order Audit Report dated September 12, 2023 shows the order was created by V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) on May 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM and discontinued on May 20, 2023. The facility does not have documentation to show the resident received the CT scan as ordered by the physician. On September 12, 2023 at 12:41 PM, V1 (Administrator) said, The resident did not get the CT scan done. It looks like the problem was when [R4] told the nurse about the transportation to be set up, somehow, somewhere it did not get set up. The order was given, and it was not done. As to why, [R4] told the nurse the date of the scan, and the nurse did not follow through. The nurse will give a sheet to the receptionist, and the receptionist is the one who sets up the transportation. That piece fell apart and it never happened. The part from the nurse to the receptionist never happened. No one followed up. The physician was never notified. On September 13, 2023 at 11:51 AM, V2 (DON) said, We should have scheduled [R1's] CT scan and her transportation. It was our responsibility, and we did not do it. I called the hospital yesterday, and they said the resident had a CT scan of her shoulder scheduled for May 18, 2023 but she did not show up, so it was never done.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0778 (Tag F0778)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided assistance to obtain transportation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided assistance to obtain transportation to a physician-ordered CT (Computerized Tomography) Scan. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 4. The findings include: On September 13, 2023 at 9:53 AM, R4 was sitting in wheelchair. R4 said she was having pain in her left shoulder back in May 2023. R4 said, The doctor ordered a CT scan of my shoulder, but it was never done. The hospital called me on the telephone to tell me the test was scheduled for May 18, 2023, and I gave the information to the nurse to schedule the transportation. The date came and went, and it was never done. I felt they were trying to ignore it. I didn't think they cared about it. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4 has multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, severe depression, anxiety disorder, diabetes, chronic ulcer of the left calf, insomnia, complex regional pain syndrome, suicide attempt, asthma, and nicotine dependence. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 14, 2023 shows R4 is cognitively intact, requires limited assistance with bathing and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). The EMR shows the following order dated May 1, 2023: CT scan without contrast of left shoulder one time. The facility's Order Audit Report dated September 12, 2023 shows the order was created by V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) on May 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM and discontinued on May 20, 2023. The facility does not have documentation to show R4 was transported from the facility to the hospital for the physician ordered CT scan. The facility does not have documentation to show the resident received the CT scan as ordered by the physician. On September 12, 2023 at 12:41 PM, V1 (Administrator) said, It looks like the problem was when [R4] told the nurse about the transportation to be set up, somehow, somewhere it did not get set up. The order was given, and it was not done. As to why, [R4] told the nurse the date of the scan, and the nurse did not follow through. The nurse will give a sheet to the receptionist, and the receptionist is the one who sets up the transportation. That piece fell apart and it never happened. The part from the nurse to the receptionist never happened. No one followed up. On September 13, 2023 at 10:30 AM, V11 (Receptionist) said she schedules the transportation for all residents in the facility requiring transportation to appointments outside of the facility. V11 reviewed her transportation records and said she does not have a requisition from the nurse to arrange transportation for R4's CT scan in May 2023. On September 13, 2023 at 11:51 AM, V2 (DON) said, We should have scheduled [R1's] CT scan and her transportation. It was our responsibility and we did not do it.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

F812 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This applies to 83 out of 89 residents that rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
F812 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This applies to 83 out of 89 residents that receive food from the facility kitchen. Findings Include: On 7/18/23 at 9:30 AM, during a tour of the facility kitchen with V3 (Dietary Manager), two open bags of meat cubes identified by V3 as turkey were not labeled and had an accumulation of frost inside the bag, an open clear bag identified by V3 as breaded fish 6 pieces were in a clear bag without a label or date, ten packages eight count of waffles did not have any label or date, an open bag of cabbage and carrots in the cooler dated 7/4/23, two thirty-pound boxes of scrambled egg mix were thawing in the cooler over four fresh melons. An 11-pound tub of grape jelly delivered on 6/7/23 no open on or use by date. a four-pound bag of corn meal open with no date, a grocery bag of dry red chili peppers and a small unlabeled container of creamy yellow and liquid yellow substance identified as lard was in a clear bin that V3 stated belonged to the employees. An open bag of breadcrumbs dated 4/4 V3 stated the breadcrumbs are good for three months. A bag of egg noodles no label. A fifty-pound bag of quick oats open no date noted. A storage bin with white rice dated 11/2 shelf life 2/2. Tuna 66.5 oz can was dented. On 7/18/23 at 3:54 PM, V9 (Kitchen Worker) stated she does not throw out food if something is expired she reports it to V3. On 7/19/23 at 11:11 AM, V4 (Dietician) stated food items should be labeled with the day it comes in. Opened items should at least have an opened-on date. Dented cans should not be used because they can cause food borne illnesses. Dented cans should be put aside or thrown out. On 7/19/23 at 3:25 PM, V3 stated food should be labeled with a received-on date, opened on, and use by date. Employee food items should not be stored in the facility kitchen. The bags of cubed turkey, shredded cabbage with carrots were thrown out because they were no longer good to use. Items that are not stored in the original manufacture packaging should be labeled with what it is, the opened-on date and use by date. V3 stated he did not have a document on how food should be stored. The facility Dating & Labeling policy PHF/TCS (Potentially Hazardous Foods / Time Temperature Control for Safety) dated 11/2022, states food will be stored in the refrigerator for a maximum of 7 days. The count begins the day the food was prepared, or a food commercial container was opened. All items not in their original container will be labeled. Food labels should include the common name of the food or a statement that clearly and accurately identifies it. The undated Food Storage policy states all food being stored shall be protected against contamination from dust, rodents, and other vermin. All stored food products will be covered, identified, and dated. Dating of potentially hazardous foods shall indicate the last day the item can be consumed. Meats and other items stored in the refrigerator during the thawing process or already thawed will be stored on the lower shelves but above the six-inch level. No foods are to be stored below thawing food items. The policy Guidelines for Labeling Unopened and Opened Food Items dated 4/2023 states, foods will be labeled upon delivery to the facility and then labeled with an opened and use by date according to the food storage guidelines or use-by-date on the container. Any items past the use by date will be discarded of immediately. All foods that are opened are to be wrapped or put in a sealed container for storage to prevent contamination.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure faxed physician medication orders were transcribed into the resident's physician orders in the electronic medical record. This failu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure faxed physician medication orders were transcribed into the resident's physician orders in the electronic medical record. This failure affected 1 out of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1 was initially admitted to the facility from the hospital on 1/14/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and multiple subsegmental pulmonary emboli (blood clots), chronic kidney disease, and gastrostomy (G-tube). R1's 4/30/23 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 11, indicating that R1's cognition is moderately impaired. On 7/3/23 at 1:54 PM, interviewed R1 regarding his blood thinner, Eliquis. R1 stated, I (R1) was told the order stopped, and they stopped giving it to me. R1 added that his (R1) hematologist told him that he (R1) would be on the medication For the rest of my life. On 7/3/23 at 12:04 PM, V15 (R1's Family Member) stated that when R1 was transferred to the hospital on 6/13/23, she (V15) was notified by the hospital nurse that R1's medication list from the facility did not include Eliquis, just Aspirin. V15 added that V1 (Administrator) told her (V15) that there was a fax from R1's hematologist that was never entered into the electronic medical record by the nurse. Review of R1's progress notes confirmed that R1 was sent to the hospital on 6/13/23. R1's 6/16/23 Hospital Discharge Instructions documented, in part, Updated medications, take these: current Apixaban (5 mg oral tablet) 1 tab (tablet) oral 2 times a day, medication not on (Facility) list, however patient's POA (Power of Attorney) (V15) states patient has been on this medication since January. Review of R1's Physician Order Summary (POS) confirmed that the Apixaban was initially ordered on 1/14/23 upon R1's admission to the facility. R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for the month of June showed that R1 received his (R1) Eliquis until 6/9/23 and did not receive it again at the facility until R1's return from the hospital on 6/16/23. The order was documented as Apixaban (Eliquis) Oral Tablet 5 mg give 1 tablet via G-tube two times a day for blood thinner until 6/9/2023 23:59 (11:59 PM). R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed a written physician order with a fax transmittal date of 3/9/23 authored by V17 (R1's Hematologist) which documented, Continue Eliquis 5 mg BID (twice a day). On the bottom of the scanned order was written, 3/9/23 noted with V3's (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) initials. On 7/3/23 at 3:29 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that R1's Eliquis order upon initial admission to the facility on 1/14/23 contained a stop date of 6/9/23. V1 added that when R1 had a visit with a new hematologist in March, a fax was sent to continue the same order for Eliquis. V1 stated that when the nurse checked the orders, she didn't realize that there was a stop date entered for the Eliquis and since the order was for the same dose and frequency, no changes were made to the orders. On 7/3/23 at 3:55 PM, V3 (ADON) confirmed that she (V3) reviewed the 3/9/23 faxed orders from V17. V3 acknowledged that the previous order for Eliquis (with the stop date) should have been discontinued and a new order should have been entered without a stop date. On 7/5/23 at 11:57 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that the expectation of nursing staff is to carry out physician orders. V2 added that a faxed physician order should be entered into the POS. The facility Policy and Procedures Physician Orders dated 11/22 documented, in part, Purpose: To provide guidance to ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards .Written/Faxed Orders: . 4. The licensed nurse is required to record the order in PCC (Point Click Care, electronic medical record), the POS and on the appropriate MAR/TAR (Treatment Administration Record).
May 2023 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with a pureed diet as ordered by the physician. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with a pureed diet as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in R1 being found unresponsive while eating, requiring the Heimlich maneuver and CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation). R1 required admission to the local hospital intensive care unit and expired at the hospital on April 25, 2023. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on April 7, 2023 when V6 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) discontinued R1's pureed consistency diet. V1 (Administrator), V2 (DON-Director of Nursing), and V19 (Regional Nurse Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on May 18, 2023 at 2:48 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on May 18, 2023 at 6:48 PM, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 3. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on April 19, 2023 and did not return to the facility. R1 had multiple diagnoses including, polyarthritis, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, left heel pressure ulcer, sacral pressure ulcer, altered mental status, hydronephrosis, anxiety disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, lack of coordination, and history of falling. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 29, 2023 shows R1 had severe cognitive impairment, was totally dependent on facility staff for transfers between surfaces, locomotion on the unit, toilet use and bathing, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and eating. R1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Facility documentation shows R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] to March 23, 2023 due to dehydration, urinary tract infection and altered mental status. R1 returned to the facility on March 23, 2023. Hospital discharge instructions show orders for a pureed diet upon hospital discharge. On March 21, 2023 at 2:47 PM, V9 (Hospital SLP-Speech Language Pathologist) documented: Recommendations/discharge: Swallow Precautions Recommendation: Allow extra time to swallow, clear pocketing left, clear pocketing right, fed only by trained staff/family. Small bites of food. Diet Consistency Recommendation: Dysphagia Pureed Supervision Swallow Recommendation: 1:1. Barriers to Safe Discharge SLP: Safety awareness, medical diagnosis, cognitive impairments, severity of deficits, aspiration risk - possible, 1:1 feeder, dysphagia requiring food/liquid modification, requires safe swallow protocol/techniques. Other short-term goals #1: Patient will tolerate dysphagia puree diet with thin liquids with no clinical s/s (signs/symptoms) of aspiration, #2 reassess for upgrade potential with improved bolus control. The EMR shows R1 returned to the facility on March 23, 2023. Physician orders dated March 23, 2023 show R1's diet order as pureed consistency general diet. The EMR shows on April 7, 2023, V6 (LPN) discontinued R1's pureed consistency diet. V6 documented the reason for the order change: Wrong diet. V6 changed R1's diet order from a pureed diet consistency to a regular consistency diet. V6 documented the diet order change was obtained from V13 (Physician). The facility does not have documentation to show a speech evaluation was done to ensure a regular consistency diet was safe for R1. The facility does not have documentation to show V6 (LPN) discussed the diet order change with a physician, nurse practitioner, or V11 (POA-Power of Attorney for R1) prior to the diet order change. The facility's Day at a Glance for General Diets, Week 3 Wednesday, printed May 2, 2023 shows the dinner menu served on April 19, 2023 to residents on a general, regular consistency diet included, chicken breast tenders, barbecue sauce, rice pilaf, seasoned corn, mandarin oranges, bread, margarine, milk, coffee/hot tea, and condiments. On April 19, 2023 at 8:04 PM, V6 (LPN) documented: Around 6 PM during dinner time, the resident assistant came to the nurse's station and stated that the resident was unresponsive while eating dinner. Writer rushed to the dining room and noted that the resident was sitting in the dining room table with her plate @ (at) about 80 percent eaten and she was not responding when her writer called her name. Writer noted that the food was coming out of her mouth and her glass of juice was empty. Writer checked her pulse, and it was present. Writer called for help and the Heimlich maneuver was started right away and also finger was used to remove food out of the resident mouth. Writer noted that the food was coming out her mouth. 911 was called and resident was moved to a safer and clear area. During that time an EMT [Emergency Medical Technician] personnel was at the facility, he came, and we all brought resident on floor and started CPR and a [bag valve mask] was also used. Paramedic personnel arrived as quick as possible and took over. Resident had a pulse of 86. Writer called [V10] (NP-Nurse Practitioner) and left a message, [V11] (POA) was notified as well as [V2] (DON) and [V1] (Administrator). Resident was taken to the nearest [hospital]. Local fire department documentation dated April 19, 2023 shows upon arrival and assessment of the resident, R1's airway was completely obstructed and R1's pulses were absent. R1's hospital documentation shows R1 was admitted to the emergency room on April 19, 2023 with CPR in progress. On April 20, 2023 at 8:10 AM, V7 (Hospital Physician) documented, Out of hospital cardiac arrest - likely due to choking/aspiration of dinner food. V7's documentation continues to show, We will get neurologic and pulmonary input on [R1]. I feel she suffered significant anoxic insult to her brain. Her prognosis is grim. If no neurologic improvement in the next several days we will need to speak with family regarding aggressiveness of this care and possible withdrawal of life support. Hospital documentation continues to show R1 expired at the hospital on April 25, 2023. R1's death certificate with cause of death is pending with the coroner due to continued investigation into the cause of R1's death. On May 15, 2023 at 2:54 PM, V14 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said, I was not there when they discovered her choking. I heard the nurse call the other nurse. I noticed [R1] had chicken chunks on the front of her shirt and her head was down, and the nurse said bring her out of the dining room, and they were trying to see if she had anything in her mouth. They called a code blue. There happened to be a fireman in the building that day, and I ran to get him. When he came to the floor he said we had to get her out of the [high back wheelchair] and down to the floor. I don't know what happened after that because I went to hold the elevator for the paramedics. On May 15, 2023 at 3:16 PM, V15 (CNA) said, I was passing dinner trays in my hallway, and I saw them wheeling [R1] out of the dining room in her chair. She was unresponsive. She was slumped over, and they were yelling her name. When the fireman arrived from the other floor, he said let's move her to the floor and let's do compressions. We did chest compressions because she was unresponsive. I did CPR with the fireman until the paramedics arrived. On May 15, 2023 at 3:56 PM, V16 (LPN) said, What I found was [R1] had her eyes open, and I could see an exchange of air. I thought we should look at her outside of the dining room, so we moved her wheelchair to the hallway. At that point I did not hear an exchange of air, but I noticed she started doing the universal choking sign, and I looked to do a sweep of her mouth. I used a spoon to sweep the inside of her mouth, and there were chunks of chicken coming from inside her mouth onto the spoon. Because of the size of the chair she was sitting in, I could not reach around the resident to do the Heimlich maneuver, so I approached her from the front and pushed on her abdomen, and when I did that, food started to come up and out of her mouth. I heard some air exchange and once I did that, her eyes closed. Her pulse went from thready to none. We called 911. We identified there was an occlusion and kept checking for a pulse. We started CPR. She was eating chicken tenders for dinner and evidently drank some red juice because what came out was red juice and chewed food. On May 16, 2023 at 1:06 PM, V6 said, [R1] was on a regular consistency diet before she went to the hospital. When she came back she was on a pureed diet. She was not eating her food. She kept repeating, I don't eat pureed food. She was not eating, and she was refusing her food. She was not eating, nor touching her food. She was asking why she had to eat a pureed diet. I changed the order to a regular consistency diet. I do not know who I got the order from to change her diet. I just cannot recall. I know I put the reason for the diet change was because she was on the wrong diet. She was on a regular diet before she went to the hospital. When she choked, that was the first time in my nursing career that I have had a code blue situation. On May 16, 2023 at 1:57 PM V13 (Physician) said, The staff usually puts my name on every order they enter. The normal practice would be to do a swallowing evaluation. I would never give an order to go from a pureed diet to a regular consistency diet. [R1] should have had a swallow evaluation before her diet was changed. No, I did not give that order, unless there was a swallow evaluation done at that time. She was in the process of eating and food got into her trachea. It is my expectation they provide the diet as ordered. On May 16, 2023 at 12:20 PM, V10 (NP) said, I would not have given an order to upgrade from a pureed diet to a regular consistency diet. If the nurses ask about changing her diet, and not eating the pureed food, I will always say have a speech evaluation. I would never say put her on a general diet if I don't know her swallowing capabilities. If that nurse put in an order, there should be a progress note to follow. Normally, they would put in a note saying who they talked to, and they said it was okay to place this order for this diet. She needed to be assisted with meals, based on her encephalopathy and past history. She needed to be closely monitored. On May 16, 2023 at 12:42 PM, V12 (NP) said, I do not remember giving an order to go from a pureed diet to a general diet. [R1] would not be able to be upgraded until she was evaluated by speech therapy. Obviously, she was on a pureed diet for a reason, and she would need to be reevaluated. She would have to be evaluated by speech therapy first. On May 16, 2023 at 11:52 AM, V17 (ST-Speech Therapist) said, I did not see [R1] after her speech evaluation in February, which was before her most recent hospitalization. I usually get flagged to screen the resident if they come back to the facility on a pureed diet. I did not get any information about [R1] being on a pureed diet. Nursing is not supposed to change the diet order. You should never jump two diet consistencies like that. You would go from pureed diet to a mechanical soft diet and if the resident tolerates it, then you can try the regular consistency diet. The resident would need to be evaluated with each diet change. No one ever reached out to me about her diet change. The facility's Diet Order policy reviewed on 11/22 shows: General: To ensure that residents receive their specific diets. Guidelines: 1. Upon admission, the nurse will receive a diet order. 4. If a resident is not able to tolerate the diet, the nurse will alert the physician or nurse practitioner for a change in diet and possible Speech Therapy Evaluation. 5. If there is a change in the resident's diet per the physician or nurse practitioner order, the nurse may explain the change to the resident and/or resident's representative. 6. If the resident refuses to follow the diet that is written, the resident and resident's representative should be educated on the reason for the diet and consequences of not following the diet. This should be documented in the nursing notes.9. If the resident refuses to eat, the physician is notified to discuss options with the resident and/or their responsible party. The facility's Diet Manual, approved by the facility on October 13, 2021 shows the following policy developed 4/2017. Policy: Diet Orders - Policy: The facility will offer house standard diet orders. The diets available will be reflected in the diet manual. Procedure: Upon resident admission or diet change, the nurse will verify the diet order with the physician. The facility presented a removal plan on May 18, 2023 at 3:57 PM, to remove the immediacy. The survey team reviewed the removal plan and was unable to accept the plan to remove the immediacy. The removal plan was returned to the facility for revisions. The facility presented a revised removal plan on May 18, 2023, and the survey team accepted the removal plan on May 18, 2023 at 6:48 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on April 7, 2023 was removed on May 18, 2023 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: All nursing staff were re-educated on following physician orders, properly transcribing physician orders, not changing orders without physician notification and approval, and referral to the Speech Therapist as indicated for referrals and evaluation of diet upgrades. The Administrator/DON/ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing) completed the education. Staff who were educated via phone will sign the education prior to the beginning of the next shift worked. New hires will be educated during orientation. Agency staff will be educated prior to shift. All nursing staff not available in person have been re-educated via phone prior to the beginning of the next shift worked and will be re-educated prior to the start of the shift. All new admissions, readmission, and with change in condition related to the resident's swallowing abilities and/or diet appropriateness will be referred to the Speech Therapist. A house audit was completed on May 18, 2023 to ensure that all residents are receiving the correct diet as ordered by the physician. Audit included comparison of resident's most recent admission/readmission discharge physician orders and compared to EMR report by selecting all active, and discontinued orders to ensure correct physician ordered diet is followed in resident's plan of care and correctly transcribed in resident's physician orders. After confirmation of correctly transcribed physician diet order, an audit was completed to ensure correct transcription to facility's dietary software system that contains resident's diet tickets used by kitchen staff when preparing resident's meals. Speech therapy recommendations were also reviewed to ensure correct diet is reflected in physician orders. A random weekly audit of five (5) residents including admission and readmissions is being performed for two months to ensure the resident's diet orders are correctly transcribed by the licensed nurse, as ordered by the physician. Discrepancies of diet orders transcribed by the nurse shall require re-education by Administrator/DON/ADON and ongoing weekly audits to ensure transcription of physician orders and changes in diet orders are completed with physician notification. A chart audit of new admissions and readmissions will be done within 24 hours to ensure the resident is receiving the correct diet. A root cause analysis was conducted to identify barriers and further education needed. Audits will be completed by Administrator/Nursing Management and an analysis presented to QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement). All audits will be analyzed and reviewed in QAPI. This is overseen by the Medical Director and Administrator. Audits will continue for no less than two months and QAPI will determine if the audits will continue at that time. The QAPI committee will determine the need for further audits or sunset the audits after the two months.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing when a nurse changed a resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing when a nurse changed a resident's diet order from a pureed consistency diet to a regular consistency diet without obtaining a physician's order and without following the facility's policy. This failure resulted in R1 being found unresponsive while eating, requiring the Heimlich maneuver and CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation). R1 required admission to the local hospital intensive care unit and expired at the hospital on April 25, 2023. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing in the sample of 3. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on April 19, 2023 and did not return to the facility. R1 had multiple diagnoses including, polyarthritis, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, left heel pressure ulcer, sacral pressure ulcer, altered mental status, hydronephrosis, anxiety disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, lack of coordination, and history of falling. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 29, 2023 shows R1 had severe cognitive impairment, was totally dependent on facility staff for transfers between surfaces, locomotion on the unit, toilet use and bathing, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and eating. R1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Physician orders dated March 23, 2023 show R1's diet order as pureed consistency general diet. The EMR shows on April 7, 2023, V6 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) discontinued R1's pureed consistency diet. V6 documented the reason for the order change: Wrong diet. V6 changed R1's diet order from a pureed diet consistency to a regular consistency diet. V6 documented the diet order change was obtained from V13 (Physician). The facility does not have documentation to show a speech evaluation was done to ensure a regular consistency diet was safe for R1. The facility does not have documentation to show V6 (LPN) discussed the diet order change with a physician, nurse practitioner, or V11 (POA-Power of Attorney of R1) prior to the diet order change. The facility's Day at a Glance for General Diets, Week 3 Wednesday, printed May 2, 2023 shows the dinner menu served on April 19, 2023 to residents on a general, regular consistency diet included, chicken breast tenders, barbecue sauce, rice pilaf, seasoned corn, mandarin oranges, bread, margarine, milk, coffee/hot tea, and condiments. On April 19, 2023 at 8:04 PM, V6 (LPN) documented: Around 6 PM during dinner time, the resident assistant came to the nurse's station and stated that the resident was unresponsive while eating dinner. Writer rushed to the dining room and noted that the resident was sitting in the dining room table with her plate @ (at) about 80 percent eaten and she was not responding when her writer called her name. Writer noted that the food was coming out of her mouth and her glass of juice was empty. Writer checked her pulse, and it was present. Writer called for help and the Heimlich maneuver was started right away and also finger was used to remove food out of the resident mouth. Writer noted that the food was coming out her mouth. 911 was called and resident was moved to a safer and clear area. During that time an EMT [Emergency Medical Technician] personnel was at the facility, he came, and we all brought resident on floor and started CPR and a [bag valve mask] was also used. Paramedic personnel arrived as quick as possible and took over. Resident had a pulse of 86. Writer called [V10] (NP-Nurse Practitioner) and left a message, [V11] (POA) was notified as well as [V2] (DON-Director of Nursing) and [V1] (Administrator). Resident was taken to the nearest [hospital]. Local fire department documentation dated April 19, 2023 shows upon arrival and assessment of the resident, R1's airway was completely obstructed and R1's pulses were absent. R1's hospital documentation shows R1 was admitted to the emergency room on April 19, 2023 with CPR in progress. On April 20, 2023 at 8:10 AM, V7 (Hospital Physician) documented, Out of hospital cardiac arrest - likely due to choking/aspiration of dinner food. V7's documentation continues to show, We will get neurologic and pulmonary input on [R1]. I feel she suffered significant anoxic insult to her brain. Her prognosis is grim. If no neurologic improvement in the next several days we will need to speak with family regarding aggressiveness of this care and possible withdrawal of life support. Hospital documentation continues to show R1 expired at the hospital on April 25, 2023. R1's death certificate with cause of death is pending with the coroner due to continued investigation into the cause of R1's death. On May 15, 2023 at 3:56 PM, V16 (LPN) said, What I found was [R1] had her eyes open, and I could see an exchange of air. I thought we should look at her outside of the dining room, so we moved her wheelchair to the hallway. At that point I did not hear an exchange of air, but I noticed she started doing the universal choking sign, and I looked to do a sweep of her mouth. I used a spoon to sweep the inside of her mouth, and there were chunks of chicken coming from inside her mouth onto the spoon. Because of the size of the chair she was sitting in, I could not reach around the resident to do the Heimlich maneuver, so I approached her from the front and pushed on her abdomen, and when I did that, food started to come up and out of her mouth. I heard some air exchange and once I did that, her eyes closed. Her pulse went from thready to none. We called 911. We identified there was an occlusion and kept checking for a pulse. We started CPR. She was eating chicken tenders for dinner and evidently drank some red juice because what came out was red juice and chewed food. On May 16, 2023 at 1:06 PM, V6 said, [R1] was on a regular consistency diet before she went to the hospital. When she came back she was on a pureed diet. She was not eating her food. She kept repeating, I don't eat pureed food. She was not eating, and she was refusing her food. She was not eating, nor touching her food. She was asking why she had to eat a pureed diet. I changed the order to a regular consistency diet. I do not know who I got the order from to change her diet. I just cannot recall. I know I put the reason for the diet change was because she was on the wrong diet. When she choked, that was the first time in my nursing career that I have had a code blue situation. V6 was asked multiple times during this investigation who she obtained the order to discontinue R1's pureed diet and upgrade R1's diet consistency to a regular consistency diet. Each time V6 was asked, her response was Hmmm, I just don't know. On May 16, 2023 at 1:57 PM, V13 (Physician) said, The staff usually puts my name on every order they enter. The normal practice would be to do a swallowing evaluation. I would never give an order to go from a pureed diet to a regular consistency diet. [R1] should have had a swallow evaluation before her diet was changed. No, I did not give that order, unless there was a swallow evaluation done at that time. It is my expectation they provide the diet as ordered. On May 16, 2023 at 12:20 PM, V10 (NP-Nurse Practitioner) said, I would not have given an order to upgrade from a pureed diet to a regular consistency diet. If the nurses ask about changing her diet, and not eating the pureed food, I will always say have a speech evaluation. I would never say put her on a general diet if I don't know her swallowing capabilities. If that nurse put in an order, there should be a progress note to follow. Normally, they would put in a note saying who they talked to, and they said it was okay to place this order for this diet. On May 16, 2023 at 12:42 PM, V12 (NP) said, I do not remember giving an order to go from a pureed diet to a general diet. [R1] would not be able to be upgraded until she was evaluated by speech therapy. Obviously, she was on a pureed diet for a reason, and she would need to be reevaluated. She would have to be evaluated by speech therapy first. On May 16, 2023 at 11:52 AM, V17 (ST-Speech Therapist) said, I did not see [R1] after her speech evaluation in February, which was before her most recent hospitalization. I usually get flagged to screen the resident if they come back to the facility on a pureed diet. I did not get any information about [R1] being on a pureed diet. Nursing is not supposed to change the diet order. You should never jump two diet consistencies like that. You would go from pureed diet to a mechanical soft diet and if the resident tolerates it, then you can try the regular consistency diet. The resident would need to be evaluated with each diet change. No one ever reached out to me about her diet change. The facility's Diet Order policy reviewed on 11/22 shows: General: To ensure that residents receive their specific diets. Guidelines: 1. Upon admission, the nurse will receive a diet order. 4. If a resident is not able to tolerate the diet, the nurse will alert the physician or nurse practitioner for a change in diet and possible Speech Therapy Evaluation. 5. If there is a change in the resident's diet per the physician or nurse practitioner order, the nurse may explain the change to the resident and/or resident's representative. 6. If the resident refuses to follow the diet that is written, the resident and resident's representative should be educated on the reason for the diet and consequences of not following the diet. This should be documented in the nursing notes.9. If the resident refuses to eat, the physician is notified to discuss options with the resident and/or their responsible party. The facility's Diet Manual, approved by the facility on October 13, 2021 shows the following policy developed 4/2017. Policy: Diet Orders - Policy: The facility will offer house standard diet orders. The diets available will be reflected in the diet manual. Procedure: Upon resident admission or diet change, the nurse will verify the diet order with the physician.
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to notify a resident's responsible party of a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition notification in the sample of 5. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was sent to the local hospital on January 17, 2023 and returned to the facility on January 22, 2023. Hospital documentation dated January 17, 2023 shows R1's hospital admission diagnoses included UTI (Urinary Tract Infection)/sepsis, possible pneumonia, hypotension, acute on chronic kidney disease, low magnesium, low potassium, and urinary retention. The facility's EMR continues to show R1 has multiple diagnoses including, chronic kidney disease, BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) with lower urinary tract symptoms, retention of urine, fatty liver, paranoid schizophrenia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, muscle weakness, anemia, hypertension, depression, anxiety, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 16, 2023 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, is able to eat with supervision, and requires extensive assistance with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 has an indwelling urinary catheter and is frequently incontinent of stool. On January 17, 2023 at 11:44 AM, V6 (RN-Registered Nurse) documented, This nurse was called to room for resident appearing sleepy. Resident was found in bed, slow to respond, oxygen cannula not in place, and resident legs hanging off of the bed. Vitals were taken 74/50 BP (Blood Pressure), 110 HR (Heart Rate), 87% O2 (Oxygen Saturation), 21 RR (Respiratory Rate). Oxygen was reapplied (94%). This nurse called 911. [V11] (Physician) was paged. Resident sent to [Local Hospital] ER (Emergency Room. Report was given to RN. The facility does not have documentation to show V4 (Sister/Guardian of R1) was notified of R1's change in condition or transfer to the local hospital. On January 23, 2023 at 10:21 AM, V6 (RN) said she did not recall notifying V4 of R1's change in condition. On January 23, 2023 at 11:52 AM, the EMR was reviewed with V1 (Administrator) and V8 (SSD-Social Service Director). V1 confirmed the EMR did not show a next of kin, power of attorney or guardian contact information for R1. V1 continued to say, Whoever does the admission should ensure contact information is put in the medical record, and then social services should follow up. The transfer of information from the hospital paperwork to our system and the lack of our due diligence was lacking in this case. Our corporate office took the information from the hospital referral. The corporate person did not put the information into the computer. That is what we use to complete the resident's face sheet. That's the process. We did not do it in this case, so the nurse must not have seen a number to call. However, the contact information was in the hospital records attached to the resident's medical record so we should have made sure the information was added to [R1's] medical record. On January 24, 2023 at 9:36 AM, V4 (Sister/Guardian of R1) said, No one called me to tell me my brother (R1) had a change in condition or went to the hospital ER on [DATE]. I had no idea his medical condition changed enough for him to be sent to the hospital. I eventually found out when one of the workers from the group home where [R1] usually resides, called me, and told me about it. No one from the facility called me to tell me he went to the hospital. The facility's policy entitled Change in Resident's Condition, dated 10/03 and reviewed 6/21 shows: General: It is the policy of the facility, except in a medical emergency, to alert the resident, resident's physician/NP (Nurse Practitioner) and resident's responsible party of a change in condition. Responsible Party: RN, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse, Social Services. Policy: .3. Once the physician/NP has been notified and a plan developed, the nursing or social service staff will alert the resident and family of the issue and any physician orders. 4. The communication with the resident and their responsible party as well as the physician/NP will be documented in the resident's medical record or other appropriate documents .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters received urinary catheter care/hygiene and failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was positioned below the resident's bladder and emptied when filled with urine. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, and R5) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 5. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was sent to the local hospital on January 17, 2023 and returned to the facility on January 22, 2023. Hospital documentation dated January 17, 2023 shows R1's hospital admission diagnoses included UTI (Urinary Tract Infection)/sepsis, possible pneumonia, hypotension, acute on chronic kidney disease, low magnesium, low potassium, and urinary retention. The facility's EMR continues to show R1 has multiple diagnoses including, chronic kidney disease, BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) with lower urinary tract symptoms, retention of urine, fatty liver, paranoid schizophrenia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, muscle weakness, anemia, hypertension, depression, anxiety, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 16, 2023 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, is able to eat with supervision, and requires extensive assistance with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 has an indwelling urinary catheter and is frequently incontinent of stool. On January 23, 2023 at 10:21 AM, R1 was lying in bed. R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place, draining to a large collection bag. V6 (RN-Registered Nurse) and V7 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said they were changing the large urine collection bag to a smaller leg bag and using elastic straps to affix the bag to R1's leg for mobility purposes. V6 (RN) and V7 (CNA) said R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter prior to his transfer to the local hospital on January 17, 2023 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling urinary catheter. On January 12, 2023 at 3:18 PM, V5 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) documented R1 pulled out his indwelling urinary catheter around 8:00 AM. V5 inserted a new indwelling urinary catheter, and around 11:00 AM the same day, R1 again removed the indwelling urinary catheter stating, he doesn't need it. V5 did not document if she reinserted a new indwelling urinary catheter. On January 15, 2023 at 3:50 PM, V9 (RN) documented R1 had a new indwelling urinary catheter inserted. The EMR shows the following order dated January 11, 2023: Catheter care every shift during routine CNA care. On January 24, 2023 at 10:46 AM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said facility staff should document indwelling urinary catheter care is completed every shift on the TAR (Treatment Administration Form). The facility does not have documentation to show facility staff provided catheter care to R1 every shift as ordered by the physician. 2. On January 23, 2023 at 2:33 PM, R4 was lying in bed, turned slightly to her right side. An indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was attached to R4's bed frame on R4's right side. R4 said in addition to her indwelling urinary catheter, she has a colostomy due to a history of colon cancer. R4 said, I cannot say when the last time was I had a shower or bed bath, or the last time a staff member cleaned my catheter or genital area, but it has been a long time. The catheter feels sticky and gets uncomfortable. I feel like I have a UTI right now and no one is doing anything about it. I told the nurse last week that I felt like I had a UTI and she said, well you just got off an antibiotic, what do you want us to do about it and no one is doing anything about it. The EMR shows R4 was admitted to the facility in June 2021. R4 has multiple diagnoses including, colon cancer, multiple sclerosis, pulmonary embolism, DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) of the lower extremity, gross hematuria, diabetes, colostomy, major depressive disorder, colostomy, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, paraplegia, and continuous leakage. R4's MDS dated [DATE] shows R4 has moderate cognitive impairment, is totally dependent on facility staff for transfers between surfaces, dressing, toilet use and bathing, requires extensive assistance with bed mobility and personal hygiene, and supervision with eating. R4 has an indwelling urinary catheter and a colostomy. The EMR shows an order dated December 22, 2022 for Ciprofloxacin 500 mg. (Milligrams) twice a day for a urine infection, for seven days. R4 received the medication as ordered. R4's care plans were reviewed. R4's care plan, initiated June 2, 2021 shows R4 is at risk for infection or complications R/T (Related To) catheter use. Care plan interventions dated June 2, 2021 include Render catheter care every shift (Notify nurse of any skin issues). Good peri care - being careful not to pull tubing. The facility does not have documentation to show R4 has received indwelling urinary catheter care every shift as shown on R4's care plan. 3. On January 23, 2023 at 2:51 PM, R5 was lying on his right side in his bed. R5's left leg was resting directly on top of his right leg. The head of the bed was flat. R5 was wearing shoes, socks, and pants. A large bulge was noticeable through R5's pants, on his left leg, below his left knee. V6 (RN) came to R5's room and lifted R5's pant's leg and exposed a urine collection leg bag, strapped to R5's left leg. The bag was bulging, the plastic collection bag appeared taut, and filled with clear yellow urine. The markings on the side of the collection bag showed Approx Vol. ml (Approximate Volume Milliliters) 25 to 600. V6 obtained a urinal and emptied the urine collection bag. V6 stated 800 milliliters of urine drained from the leg bag into the urinal. V6 pulled back R5's waistband and showed R5 had a suprapubic catheter. The EMR shows R5 was admitted to the facility in August 2020. R5 has multiple diagnoses including, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), anemia, gastritis, dysphagia, personal history of UTI, acute DVT of the right extremity, insomnia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, psychosis, left foot drop, violent behavior, and auditory hallucinations. R5's MDS dated [DATE] shows R5 is cognitively intact, requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers between surfaces, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing. R5 requires supervision with locomotion on and off the unit and eating. R5 uses a wheelchair for mobility. R5 has an indwelling urinary catheter and is occasionally incontinent of stool. R5's care plan, initiated June 13, 2020 shows R5 is at risk for complications related to catheter use, due to urinary obstruction/retention/neurogenic bladder. An intervention dated July 25, 2022 shows Empty [indwelling urinary catheter collection bag] every shift. The facility does not have documentation to show R5's urine collection bag is emptied every shift. On January 2, 2023 at 1:34 PM, V10 (NP-Nurse Practitioner) documented R5 has multiple diagnoses including recurrent UTIs. On January 24, 2023 at 11:30 AM, V2 (DON) said, If [R5] is lying in bed, then the collection bag strapped to his leg should be changed to the larger drainage bag. His urine collection bag should be emptied and not allowed to get to the point of bulging with urine. V2 continued to say the urine collection bag should be below the level of R5's bladder. The facility's policy entitled Urinary Catheter Care, dated 12/2020 shows: Purpose: To establish guidelines to reduce the risk of or prevent infections in resident with an indwelling catheter. Standards: .6. Catheters shall be positioned to maintain a downhill flow of urine to prevent a back flow of urine into the bladder or tubing, during transfer, ambulation, and body positioning.13. Catheter drainage bags will be emptied one time on each shift or as needed, using a separate collecting container for each resident's drainage bag.16. Each resident with an indwelling catheter will receive perineal and catheter care with soap and water during routine care .
Jan 2023 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

3. On 1/10/23 at 1:35 PM, during the initial tour on the 2nd floor, R23 had a bottle of Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg (Micrograms) nasal spray on her bedside table. On 1/11/23 at 11:16 AM, R23 said sh...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. On 1/10/23 at 1:35 PM, during the initial tour on the 2nd floor, R23 had a bottle of Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg (Micrograms) nasal spray on her bedside table. On 1/11/23 at 11:16 AM, R23 said she would use the nasal spray a couple times a day, but it was taken out of her room on 1/10/23 because it wasn't supposed to be in her room. R23's current electronic POS (Physician Order Sheet) was reviewed. The POS documents that R23 did not have an order for the medication that was at bedside. R23 also did not have an order to self-administer medications. Record review was completed, and no self-administration of medication assessment was found. R23's care plan dated 10/17/22, was also reviewed and did not show that R23 had a care plan to self-administer medication. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications and obtain physician orders for residents' medication to be at the bedside. This applies to 3 of 9 residents (R23, R47, and R180) reviewed for medications in the sample of 27. Findings include: 1. On 01/10/23 at 10:41 AM, 2 unopened bottles of Timolol Maleate 0.5%, (medicated eye drops) and 1 opened, and 1 unopened bottle of Azelastine drop 0.05% (medicated eye drops) was found in R47's personal refrigerator. On R47's bedside cabinet was 1 opened bottle of Fluticasone Propionate 50mcg (nasal spray). On 01/12/23 at 10:14 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said there should not have been medications left in R47's room. V2 said R47 does not have an order for self-medication. V2 said that after the medication was found in R47's room, V2 got orders for R47 to self-medicate for the eye drops but not the nasal spray. V2 said after she got the self-medication orders, she did a self-medication assessment on R47. On 1/11/23 a review of R47's electronic health record showed that on 1/10/23 at 12:30pm a Self-medication review was done (after the medications were found), on 1/10/23 at 12:39pm R47's Order Audit Report for Azelastine HCL 0.05% and Timolol Maleate 0.5%, (medicated eye drops) showed an update was made by V2 (DON) to unsupervised, and R47's care plan was updated on 1/10/23 for self-administer medication-initiated. 2. On 01/10/23 at 11:19 AM 1 container of antifungal powder 2%, 1 tube of Zinc Oxide ointment 20%, and 7 packets of Peri-Guard ointment was found on R180's dresser. On 01/12/23 at 10:08 AM, V2 (DON) said R180 should not have had medications on her dresser because she does not have an order to self- medicate. On 1/11/23 a review of R180's electronic medical records showed no order for R180 to self-medicate, no self-medication assessment and R180's care plan did not show any focus on self-medication. The facility's policy, Self-Administration of Medications Procedure, dated 9/2020 showed, the resident who request to self-administer drugs will be assessed at that time to determine if the practice is safe. The assessment results will be discussed with the attending physician and an order obtained to self-administer if appropriate. Bedside storage may be permitted when the assessment demonstrates the practice is safe. Drugs in the room should be written on the medication record as may keep at bedside and the expiration date. Drug storage is the responsibility of nursing staff even when the resident self-administers.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) who require assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. This appl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) who require assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R26, R33, R73, R181, and R330) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 1/10/23 at 2:09 PM, R33 was observed with facial hair. R33 said she wanted her facial hair removed and was not ok with having facial hair. On 1/11/23 at 10:54 AM, R33 said staff had cleaned her up today and they were supposed to remove her facial hair but didn't. On 1/12/23 at 9:35 AM, R33 was still observed with facial hair. On 1/12/23 at 9:24 AM, V5 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said she does nail care and cleans facial hair when giving residents their showers. V5 said the length of R33's facial hair was not acceptable. On 1/12/23 at 10:44 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said residents are shaved on their shower days and as needed. V2 also said her staff should be asking the residents if they want their facial hair removed. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/31/22, showed R33 was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. R33's care plan dated 1/4/23, shows staff will provide extensive assistance for dressing, grooming, and hygiene tasks. The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) policy dated 9/2020, documents the following: Interventions may include maintaining personal hygiene, including planning the task and gathering supplies, combing and/or styling hair, shaving or applying makeup. 2. On 1/10/23 at 1:53 PM, R73 was observed with long facial hair and jagged, dirty fingernails. R73 said he had asked the activities staff to cut his nails and was told the activities staff only apply nail polish. On 1/11/23 at 10:51 AM, R73 was observed with long facial hair and dirty, jagged fingernails measuring half an inch. On 1/12/23 at 10:44 AM, V2 said nails and grooming are done on shower days and as needed. V2 said the staff should be asking the residents if they want to be shaved or need nail care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/31/22, showed R33 required supervision from staff for personal hygiene. R33's care plan dated 12/29/22, shows R33 has a self-care deficit and is at risk for decline in dressing, grooming, and hygiene functioning. 3. On 1/11/23 at 8:39 AM, R330 was observed with long facial hair. R330 said he wanted to be shaved, especially the mustache as it was getting in the way of his eating. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/3/23, showed R330 required extensive assistance from staff for personal hygiene. R330's care plan dated 12/31/22, shows R330 has a self-care deficit and staff will provide R330 with extensive assist for completion of grooming, hygiene, and shaving. 4. On 01/10/23 at 11:38 AM, R26 was in her bathroom and V8 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing incontinent care for R26. R26's hair was observed greasy, and her adult brief was observed heavily soaked. V8 was observed with a soapy washcloth wiping the front of R26's perineal area several times without flipping the cloth or changing it. V8 then was observed using the same cloth wiping R26's rectal area with the same cloth without flipping the side or cleaning the cloth. V8 then put a clean brief on R26. On 1/11/23 at 9:28am R26 was observed in the dining room with greasy hair, clothes, face and hands dirty with orange substances on them. R26's 9/14/22 care plan showed that she has a self-care deficit in ADLs (Activities in Daily Living) due to impaired cognition and requires extensive assistance in hygiene. On 01/12/23 at 09:19 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said R26's hair should have been cleaned even if it is not her shower day. V2 said V8 CNA should have only wiped once with a different part of towel each time because it is the proper way to clean and it can cause cross contamination if you don't. 5. On 01/11/23 at 11:47 AM, V13 and V14 (CNAs) were performing incontinence care for R181. At this time R181 feet were observed with dry flaking skin and her toenails were observed long and curling. While V13 was performing incontinence care for R181, V13 was observed using the washcloth wiping it 3 times in R181's perineal area without changing or folding the cloth between wipes. R181's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/28/22 section G showed that R181 requires extensive assistance with personal hygiene. On 01/12/23 at 09:26 AM V2 (DON) said V12 should have changed the towel for each wipe. V2 said the staff should apply moisturizer to R181's feet and R181 should be scheduled to be seen by a podiatrist.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow its G-Tube (Gastrostomy) and blood glucose policy. This applies to three of three residents (R9 reviewed for G-tube ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow its G-Tube (Gastrostomy) and blood glucose policy. This applies to three of three residents (R9 reviewed for G-tube medication administration, and R74 and R76 who were reviewed for blood glucose monitoring) in a sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 01/10/23 at 12:29 PM V15 (Nurse) was observed giving medication to R9's G-tube. V15 had 1 medication cup with Gabapentin 100mg crushed and Sucralfate 1 gram crushed with added 5cc of water, 1 medication cup of Simethicone 80 mg 1 tablet crushed with 5cc of added water, 1 cup of Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5-325 1 tablet crushed with 5cc of added water, and 1 medication cup of Metoclopramide 5mg/5ml 10cc (liquid). V15 did not flush with water between administering medications. On 01/12/23 09:39 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said the nurse should have not given the two medications together because they could have drug interactions. V2 said the nurse should have flushed between each medication because if not the tube can clog and mixing the medications together could cause and an adverse reaction. The facility's Medication Administration Tube Gastrostomy policy dated 2/14 showed that if more than one medication is being given at a dosing time, give each separately, flushing the tube with 10 cc of tepid water between medications. 2. On 01/10/23 at 12:08 PM V15 (Nurse) was observed performing blood glucose monitoring for R74. V15 wiped R74's finger with an alcohol wipe and then stuck R74's finger with a lancet then V18 collected a sample of blood. V18 did not wait for the alcohol to dry on R74's finger before collecting the sample of blood. 3. On 01/10/23 12:18 PM, V15 (Nurse) was observed performing blood glucose monitoring for R76. V15 wiped R76's finger with an alcohol wipe and then stuck R76's finger with a lancet then V18 collected a sample of blood. V18 did not wait for the alcohol to dry on R76's finger before collecting the sample of blood. On 01/12/23 at 10:21 AM, V2 DON said the nurse should have waited for the finger to air dry after wiping it with the alcohol wipe because it can give an inaccurate reading with it still being wet. The facility's Blood Glucose Monitoring policy dated 9/2020 showed, To provide blood monitoring for evaluating the glycemic control for blood sugar levels, prick the finger stick using lancing device wipe finger with alcohol and allow finger to dry.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one resident (R41) in a sample of 27. Findings include: On 01/10/23 at 11:51 AM, R41 was ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one resident (R41) in a sample of 27. Findings include: On 01/10/23 at 11:51 AM, R41 was in his bed and his bed was observed elevated to about 4 feet off the floor. R41 said he did not have the bed controls and he did not make the bed that high, and he does not like the bed to be that high. On 01/10/23 at 11:58am, V14 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) said, We forgot to put the bed down when we changed him at 10am today. V14 then lowered R41's bed to about 2 feet above the floor. On 01/11/23 at 10:00 AM, R41 was observed in bed and there were 5 staff leaving his room. They said that they just finished performing patient care. When they left the room R41's bed was elevated to about 3 ½ to 4 feet off of the floor. On 01/12/23 at 10:37 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said the staff should not have left R41's bed elevated for safety reasons because the resident could fall. The facilities Policy and Procedure Safety and Supervision of Residents dated September 2021 showed in Policy Statement, resident safety and supervision and assistance for accidents are facility wide priorities. Resident risk and environmental hazards include bed safety.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. On 1/10/23, R4's personal fridge was checked, and it contained blueberry yogurt that expired on 12/16/22, and a package of meat, which expired on 12/28/22. R4's fridge had a temperature log that st...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. On 1/10/23, R4's personal fridge was checked, and it contained blueberry yogurt that expired on 12/16/22, and a package of meat, which expired on 12/28/22. R4's fridge had a temperature log that started tracking temperatures from 1/10/23. On 1/12/23 at 10:44 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said housekeeping was supposed to check the temperature of the fridges daily and document it on the log. V2 said it had not been completed consistently. V2 said the CNA's (Certified Nurse Assistants) and RA's (Restorative Aides) should be checking the resident's personal fridges weekly and throwing away expired food. V2 also said if expired food was found, it meant the fridges weren't being checked. 2. On 01/10/23 at 12:00 PM, the refrigerator for R59's daily temperature log for January was blank. There were no recorded temperatures for the month of January. There was no thermometer in refrigerator. On 01/12/23 at 8:58 AM V3 ADON (Assistant Director Of Nursing) stated, resident refrigerators are to be checked and the temperature log is done by the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) daily. On 01/12/23 at 9:00 AM V19 CNA stated, I think housekeeping is supposed to take care of the resident's refrigerator, but I'm not sure. On 01/12/23 at 9:03 AM V20 CNA stated, the CNA or family will clean the fridge. maintenance does the temp log twice per week and as needed. On 01/12/23 at 9:23 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, Housekeeping was in-serviced and directed by myself this week to check the resident fridge temps. 4. On 01/10/23 at 11:51 AM, R41's personal refrigerator in his room was observed with food in it and no thermometer inside the refrigerator and no temperature sheet on the outside of the refrigerator. 5. On 01/10/23 at 10:41 AM, R47's personal refrigerator in his room was observed with 2 unopened bottles Timolol Maleate 0.5%, 1 opened and 1 unopened bottle of azelastine drop 0.05%, no thermometer inside the refrigerator and no temperature sheet on the outside of the refrigerator. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe personal food storage with the resident's refrigerator by having expired food in the resident's room refrigerator and not having a thermometer and temperature (temp) log to ensure the safe temperature inside the fridge. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R4, R41, R47, R57, and R59) reviewed for personal food storage and refrigeration in a sample of 27 Findings include: 1. 01/10/23 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed a red refrigerator in R57's room with a variety of food inside, including cheese, sauce, pudding, salsa, bread, and egg. There was no thermometer inside the fridge or temp log to monitor/document daily temperature. On 1/10/23 at 11:15 AM, R57 stated that nobody monitors her refrigerator temperature. On 1/10/23 at 11:44 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that there should be a thermometer and temp log with the resident's refrigerator to monitor the temp level. It's between housekeeping and maintenance to monitor refrigerator temps. On 01/10/23 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed V6 (Maintenance Director) placing a thermometer inside R57's refrigerator. V6 stated that housekeeping is supposed to monitor and document the temp log with the resident's refrigerator. The facility presented a food storage policy (dated 6/21) document: Refrigerator and freezer temperature readings will be recorded daily. On 1/12/23 at 1:28 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that they were not following the above policy regarding the resident's refrigerator.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 6. R23's face sheet showed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her diagnoses include personal history of urinary trac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 6. R23's face sheet showed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her diagnoses include personal history of urinary tract infections, need for assistance with personal care, and an overactive bladder. R23's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/31/22, showed R23 was cognitively intact and was totally dependent on a staff member for toileting and personal hygiene. On 1/10/23 at 1:44 PM, V5 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) provided incontinence care for R23. V5 applied gloves, wet a washcloth, and opened and placed a new garbage bag on the ground. V5 opened R23's dirty incontinence brief, applied a no-rinse spray, wiped the resident's abdominal skin fold and then both side folds along her pubic bone. V5 did not wipe V5's perineal area. V5 then placed the washcloth into the garbage bag, turned the resident to the side, and used the same washcloth to wipe the resident's buttocks and back before putting the washcloth back into the garbage bag. V5 removed the dirty incontinence brief and put it in the garbage bag. V5 took a clean incontinence brief and applied it underneath the resident, rolled the resident onto her back, and then fastened the brief in the front. V5 did not remove her gloves or do hand hygiene when going from dirty to clean. On 1/10/23 at 1:49 PM, V5 said she could have wiped the perineal area more and that gloves would only need to be changed if they were soiled. On 1/12/23 at 10:44 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said staff providing incontinence care are supposed to clean the perineal area. V2 said if staff aren't cleaning the perineal area, there's a potential for infection and excoriation of the skin. V2 also said staff should be disinfecting their hands and changing their gloves when going from dirty to clean. 3. On 01/10/23 at 12:39 PM V15 (Nurse) was administering medications to R9 Via her G-tube (gastrostomy tube). V15 opened R9's capsules of Gabapentin 100mg with ungloved hands and put it into a medication cup. Then V15 went into R9's room to administer her medications and she donned gloves and then she lifted R9's bed linen and gown to examine R9's G-tube site. V15 then picked up R9's ostomy bag that was ½ full of a yellow substance, looked at it, and laid the ostomy bag back down. V15 then proceeded to administer R9's medications via R9's G-tube before removing her dirty gloves, cleaning her hands and donning new gloves. On 01/10/23 at 01:05 PM V15, with gloved hands, then removed R9's old G-tube feeding and tubing, removed gloves, donned new gloves, hung a new feeding and tubing, hooked R9 up to the tubing and started the machine, but V15 did not clean her hands before donning the new gloves. On 01/12/23 at 09:39 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said the nurse should not have touched the capsule with her ungloved hand. V2 said the nurse should have cleaned her hands and changed her gloves after touching the resident's ostomy bag and before giving medication. V2 said the nurse should have cleaned her hands and donned new gloves before hanging new feeding and tubing. 4. On 01/10/23 at 11:38 AM, V8 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) was observed providing incontinence care for R26, in R26's bathroom. While providing incontinence care for R26, V8 was observed putting a clean adult brief and clean clothes on R26 with the same dirty gloved hands that she used to provide incontinence care. Then V8, still with dirty gloved hands, picked up R26's soiled brief off the bathroom floor, assisted R26 out of the bathroom and into her bedroom, carried the soiled brief into the hallway to dispose of it, came back into R26's room and picked up R26's sweater and put it on her, all of this was done while V8 was still wearing the same dirty gloves and uncleaned hands. V8 then removed her dirty gloves and put R26's garbage bag and dirty clothes in containers outside of R26's room in the hall. 5. On 01/11/23 at 11:47 AM V13 and V14 CNAs (Certified Nurses' Assistants) were providing incontinence care for R181. While providing incontinence care, V13 was observed using the washcloth wiping it 3 times in R181's perineal area without changing or folding the cloth between wipes. V13 then cleaned stool from R181's rectal area, applied clean brief, and then V13 removed her dirty gloves. V13 then touched the curtain in R181's room repositioned R181, put a boot on R181's left foot, repositioned R181's pillow, picked up R181's dirty gown and put it in the laundry container outside of R181's room, all with ungloved hands. The facility's Hand hygiene policy dated 11/8/22 showed, to provide guideline on proper hand hygiene techniques that will aid in prevention of the transmission of infections. wash hands after handling items potentially contaminated, before moving from contaminated site to a clean body site during resident care. Example: after providing peri-care, before applying moisture barrier or other treatment. after providing direct resident care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow current standards of infection control during incontinence care and medication administration. The facility failed to contain respiratory equipment. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R9, R23, R26, R39, R45 and R181) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 27. Findings include: 1. R45's face sheet documents the following diagnoses: localized swelling, mass and lump, trunk, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and scoliosis. R45's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/1/2022 documents that she is always incontinent with urine and bowel. R45's care plan documents that she is incontinent of urine and requires extensive staff assist for toileting/hygiene. On 1/10/2023 at 10:45 AM, V7 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) and V5 (CNA) provided incontinence care to R45. With gloved hands, V5 unfastened R45's brief. R45 just had a large amount of diarrhea. V7 took a towel and wet it in R45's bathroom sink filled with water and skin cleanser. V7 then came back to R45 and used the towel to wipe R45's vagina. V7 didn't open the labia and clean inside. With the same towel, V7 then proceeded to clean R45's buttocks. V7 then put the dirty towel in a plastic bag. V7 removed her gloves and discarded them. V7 went to the bathroom and washed her hands using skin cleanser instead of soap and/or hand sanitizer. V7 then immersed a washcloth into the sink with water and skin cleanser. V7 donned gloves and wiped R45's rectal area with the washcloth. V7 removed her gloves and went to the bathroom. Instead of using soap, V7 used skin cleanser to wash her hands instead of soap. V7 then wet another washcloth with water and hand cleanser in the sink. V7 donned another pair of gloves and wiped R45's rectum area again. V7 then removed her gloves and donned a new pair of gloves without performing any hand hygiene. V7's gloves broke. V7 then went to the bathroom and dried her hands with paper towels without doing any hand hygiene. V7 then donned a new pair of gloves. V5 wiped R45's buttocks with a washcloth. V5 didn't remove her gloves. Neither did she perform hand hygiene. With her dirty hands, V5 touched R45's clean brief. V5 noticed there was feces on R45's disposable pad. V5 with the same dirty gloves opened the door and went and got a new disposable pad. V5 then removed her gloves and donned a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. V5 wiped down R45's vaginal area, but did not separate the labia and clean inside. Then V5 put a new brief on R45. After she applied barrier cream on R45's buttocks, V7 removed her gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. Instead, V7 went to another resident's room across the hall and obtained a pair of gloves. V7 then donned the new pair of gloves. V7 put a sheet on top of R45 and put the bed up. V7 removed her gloves and left the room without performing any type of hand hygiene. 2. R39's face sheet documents the following diagnoses: muscle weakness (generalized), other symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system. R39's MDS dated [DATE] documents that she is always incontinent with urine and bowel. R39's care plan document that R39 has incontinence of bladder and/or bowel. Inventions include administering appropriate cleansing and peri-care after each incontinent episode. On 1/10/23 at 11:11 AM, V7 (CNA) provided incontinence care to R39. R39's brief was soaked with urine. V7 wet a towel in R39's bathroom sink with water and skin cleanser. V7 donned a pair of gloves. V7 then wiped R39's vaginal area and inside her vagina using the towel. R39 did not remove her gloves and perform hand hygiene. Then, with the same towel, V7 wiped R39's buttocks and inside her rectal area. V7 removed her gloves and discarded R39's soiled brief into the garbage bag. V7 did not perform any hand hygiene. V7 then donned a new pair of gloves and put a new brief on R39. V7 applied barrier cream and fastened R39's brief. V7 applied a sheet on R39. V7 then removed her gloves and tied the garbage bag. V7 went to bathroom and used skin cleanser to wash her hands. On 1/11/23 at 12:35 PM, V2 (DON) stated, When CNA's go from dirty to clean during incontinence care, they have to remove their gloves and sanitize or wash their hands. Staff are to use towels and wipes and we send them to laundry to be cleaned. Staff are to also clean inside the vaginal area. On 1/11/23 1:48 PM, V2 stated, CNA's should not use the same soiled washcloth or towel to clean one dirty part with feces to another part. They should not use skin cleanser to wash their hands. It should be the antibacterial soap. Facility's policy Perineal/Incontinence Care (1/1/2014) indicates for female residents, separate labia and cleanse on side, then the other then the center of the labia toward rectal area. 11. Use a clean area of cloth for each area cleansed. Use multiple cloths, if necessary to maintain infection control practices. Assure all areas affected by incontinence have been cleansed. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene. Apply clean gloves. Apply clean brief and reapply clothing. Discard contaminated items in approved containers. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene. Facility's policy on Hand Hygiene (1/1/2020) reflects that staff will perform hand hygiene by washing hands for at least 20 seconds with antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial soap and water and water should be performed under the following conditions: a. When hands are visibly dirty or soiled with blood or other body substances. c. Before applying gloves and after removing gloves or other PPE. d. After contact with blood, body fluids, secretions, mucous membranes or non-intact skin. f. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; example: after providing peri-care, before applying moisture barrier or other treatments. Using Alcohol-Based Hand Gel before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body side during resident care; example: after providing peri-care, before applying moisture barrier or other treatments.
Nov 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing by signing the resident TAR ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing by signing the resident TAR (Treatment Administration Record) without performing the wound care. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including: traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, diabetes, stage four pressure ulcer of left hip, depression, traumatic brain injury, and dementia. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated October 11, 2022, showed R1 was cognitively intact. On November 17, 2022, at 2:52 PM V4 (Wound Nurse) said she only works Monday through Friday, but V4 signed off R1's wound care documentation on the Saturdays and Sundays even though she was not working and did not perform the wound care. V4 continued to say she signed it off because she did not want any missing documentation on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record). On November 17, 2022, at 3:06 PM V1 (Administrator) said the staff member performing the wound care should be documenting the wound care on the TAR. V1 continued to say a staff member who did not perform the wound care should not be signing off the wound care. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022 showed R1 had a stage four pressure ulcer of the left hip. R1's EMR showed the following order dated October 8, 2022: Site left hip- betadine wet to dry: apply betadine soak gauze to wound, cover with sterile gauze sponge, cover with ABD pad [gauze dressing] and retention tape every day shift for wound care. R1's October TAR dated October 1, 2022 to October 31, 2022, showed V4 documented R1's wound care on the following Saturdays and Sundays: October 1, 16, and 22, 2022. R1's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022 showed V4 documented R1's wound care on the following Saturdays and Sundays: November 5 and November 6, 2022. 2. R2's EMR showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: paraplegia, depression, stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R2's MDS dated [DATE], showed R2 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of facility staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene. On November 17, 2022, at 3:04 PM V4 said she has come in on Mondays and R2 tells V4 his dressing had not been changed over the weekend. V4 continued to say she would sign off the wound care for the weekend even though she was not at the facility and did not change the dressing. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022 showed R2 had a stage four pressure ulcer of the coccyx. R2's EMR showed the following order dated September 4, 2022: Site - Coccyx: Cleanse with NSS (Normal Saline Solution), pat dry, insert calcium alginate with silver within the wound bed and cover with soft silicone dressing. Every day shift and every eight hours as needed. R2's October TAR dated October 1, 2022 to October 31, 2022, showed V4 documented R2's wound care on the following Saturdays and Sundays: October 1, 8, 9, 16, 22, 23, and 30, 2022. R2's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022, showed V4 documented R2's wound care on the following Saturdays and Sundays: November 5, 6, and 13, 2022. 3. R3's EMR showed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes, unstageable pressure ulcer of the left heel, and protein-calorie malnutrition. R3's MDS dated [DATE], showed R3 was cognitively intact, and was totally dependent on facility staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. On November 17, 2022, at 3:04 PM V4 said R3 cannot tell V4 whether her dressing has been changed over the weekend, but V4 would sign off the wound care was completed over the weekend. V4 continued to say she was not in the facility and did not perform the wound care herself on the weekend shifts. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022, showed R3 had an unstageable pressure injury of the left heel. The EMR showed the following order dated November 8, 2022: Santyl ointment 250 unit/gram. Apply to left heel topically one time a day for wound care. The EMR continued to show the following order dated November 2, 2022 to November 8, 2022: Left heel: cleanse area with NS (Normal Saline), pat dry, apply skin prep to peri-wound and apply santyl fluffed gauze, secure with tape daily and as needed. One time a day. R3's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022, showed V4 documented wound care on the following Saturdays and Sundays: November 5 and 6, 2022. The facility policy titled Dressing - Non-Sterile (Aseptic), dated February 17, 2020, showed: Purpose: To protect open wounds from contamination. To absorb drainage . Procedure: . 23. Initial Treatment Administration Record electronically/document.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care as ordered by the physician. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care as ordered by the physician. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for improper nursing in a sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including: traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, diabetes, stage four pressure ulcer of left hip, depression, traumatic brain injury, and dementia. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated October 11, 2022, showed R1 was cognitively intact. R1's wound care plan revised on September 27, 2022, showed The resident has an alteration in skin integrity and is at risk for additional and/or worsening of skin integrity issues by evidence of pressure injuries. He has a left pressure wound to left hip with partial skin graft and resolved left thigh donor site. The care plan continued to show the following intervention dated September 7, 2021, Administer wound care per physician orders. On November 17, 2022, at 11:37 AM R1 said his hip dressing needs to be changed every day, but it does not always get changed. On November 21, 2022, at 11:10 AM V1 (Administrator) said the nurse should document on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) as soon as possible after completing the wound care. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022 showed R1 had a stage four pressure ulcer of the left hip. R1's EMR showed the following order dated October 8, 2022: Site left hip- betadine wet to dry: apply betadine soak gauze to wound, cover with sterile gauze sponge, cover with ABD pad [gauze dressing] and retention tape every day shift for wound care. R1's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022, does not have documentation to show R1 received left hip wound care as ordered by the physician on November 17 and 18, 2022. No facility staff documented on the TAR to show R1's wound care was administered. 2. R2's EMR showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: paraplegia, depression, stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R2's MDS dated [DATE], showed R2 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of facility staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene. R2's wound care plan revised on September 27, 2022, showed The resident has an alteration in skin integrity and is at risk for additional and/or worsening of skin integrity issues related to: stage four coccyx wound. The care plan continued to show the following intervention dated August 10, 2022, Administer wound care per physician orders. On November 17, 2022, at 12:05 PM R2 said his coccyx dressing does not get changed every day. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022 showed R2 had a stage four pressure ulcer of the coccyx. R2's EMR showed the following order dated September 4, 2022: Site - Coccyx: Cleanse with NSS (Normal Saline Solution), pat dry, insert calcium alginate with silver within the wound bed and cover with soft silicone dressing. Every day shift and every eight hours as needed. R2's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022, does not have documentation to show R2 received coccyx wound care as ordered by the physician on November 17, 18, and 20, 2022. No facility staff documented on the TAR to show R2's wound care was administered. 3. R3's EMR showed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes, unstageable pressure ulcer of the left heel, and protein-calorie malnutrition. R3's MDS dated [DATE], showed R3 was cognitively intact, and was totally dependent on facility staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. R3's wound care plan revised on September 27, 2022, showed The resident is at increased risk for alteration in skin integrity related to: incontinence of bladder, diabetes, sacrum wound, venous insufficiency, protein calorie malnutrition. DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) to left heel. The care plan continued to show the following intervention dated December 1, 2021, Apply treatment per physician order as applicable. Facility documentation dated November 11, 2022, showed R3 had an unstageable pressure injury of the left heel. The EMR showed the following order dated November 8, 2022: Santyl ointment 250 unit/gram. Apply to left heel topically one time a day for wound care. R3's November TAR dated November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022, does not have documentation to show R3 received left heel wound care as ordered by the physician on November 17, 18, and 19, 2022. No facility staff documented on the TAR to show R3's wound care was administered. The facility policy titled Dressing - Non-Sterile (Aseptic), dated February 17, 2020, showed: Purpose: To protect open wounds from contamination. To absorb drainage . Procedure: . 23. Initial Treatment Administration Record electronically/document.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 37% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s), $115,684 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 36 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $115,684 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (8/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 8/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Spring Creek's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SPRING CREEK an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Spring Creek Staffed?

CMS rates SPRING CREEK's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Spring Creek?

State health inspectors documented 36 deficiencies at SPRING CREEK during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, and 32 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Spring Creek?

SPRING CREEK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SABA HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 168 certified beds and approximately 114 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in JOLIET, Illinois.

How Does Spring Creek Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SPRING CREEK's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Spring Creek?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Spring Creek Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SPRING CREEK has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Spring Creek Stick Around?

SPRING CREEK has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Spring Creek Ever Fined?

SPRING CREEK has been fined $115,684 across 1 penalty action. This is 3.4x the Illinois average of $34,236. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Spring Creek on Any Federal Watch List?

SPRING CREEK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.