AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Avenues at Litchfield has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #115 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among five facilities in Montgomery County. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. While staffing is generally a strength, with a low turnover rate of 16%, the facility struggles with RN coverage, as it has less RN staffing than 82% of Illinois facilities, which raises concerns about adequate medical oversight. Specific incidents include instances where the facility failed to ensure an RN was present for the required 8-hour shifts, meaning there were times when residents did not receive the necessary medical supervision. Overall, while Avenues at Litchfield has commendable aspects, potential residents should be aware of its staffing challenges and past compliance issues.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Illinois
- #115/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 16% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 32 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (16%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (16%)
32 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Illinois's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were receiving the lowest effective doses, recommended by licensed pharmacists, in a timely fashion for 2 of 5 residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was at the proper holding temperature at the steam table for 4 of 12 residents (R8, R21, R23, R35) reviewed for fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was working at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 62 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0912
(Tag F0912)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 58 of 62 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R13, R14, R15, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain lab draws as ordered by the physician for monitoring therapeutic drug levels for 1 of 7 residents (R11) reviewed for unnecessary med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was working at least 8 consecutive ho...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0912
(Tag F0912)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 62 of 64 residents ( R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R13, R14, R15, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consecutive 8 hour Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store medication. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents living in the facility.
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to document and receive prior approval from the dietician before utilizing substitutions. This failure has the potential to affec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the food storage, prep, and serving area. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0912
(Tag F0912)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed for 33 two-bed resident rooms for 60 of 62 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests.
1. On 7/18/22 at 10:30 AM R38 stated that she ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 16% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 32 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Avenues At Litchfield's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Avenues At Litchfield Staffed?
CMS rates AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 16%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Avenues At Litchfield?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm and 2 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Avenues At Litchfield?
AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 65 certified beds and approximately 61 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LITCHFIELD, Illinois.
How Does Avenues At Litchfield Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (16%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avenues At Litchfield?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Avenues At Litchfield Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Avenues At Litchfield Stick Around?
Staff at AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 16%, the facility is 30 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Avenues At Litchfield Ever Fined?
AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Avenues At Litchfield on Any Federal Watch List?
AVENUES AT LITCHFIELD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.