NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Nokomis HC & Senior Living has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #586 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois places it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and it is the least favorable option in Montgomery County at #5 out of 5. The facility is showing signs of improvement, with a decrease in reported issues from 17 in 2023 to 10 in 2024, but serious concerns remain, including failures to follow doctors' orders for therapy services, leading to distress for some residents, and a delay in necessary medical testing for a resident. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, which is significantly better than the state average; however, the overall staffing rating is still poor at 1 out of 5 stars. Families should be aware of the $34,418 in fines, which is average but suggests some compliance issues, alongside concerning incidents of abuse that resulted in psychological harm to residents.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #586/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $34,418 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 27 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 27 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to keep the medication preparation room free of ants whe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain conduct pre-employment screening, including the Illinois and National Sex Offender Registry, the Illinois Department of Corrections ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide a RN (Registered Nurse) 8 hours a day 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents in the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed keep their emergency medication kit sealed after use. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living in the facility i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure repairs were made to the environment to provide peace of mind to residents. This failure has to potential to affect al...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance required to prevent accidents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow doctors orders for therapy services for 6 out of 6 (R1, R3, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0774
(Tag F0774)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation from the emergency room where R2 received laboratory services for one of three (R2) residents reviewed for transport...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide therapy services for 6 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, R8, R9) reviewed for therapy services.
Findings include:
On 3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Director of Nursing on a full-time basis, and a Registered Nurse for 8 consecutive hours a day. This failure has ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
7 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to collect a Urinalysis in a timely fashion, causing a delay in treatment for Extended-Spectrum Beta Lactamases, (ESBL), which is an infection...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 4 out 4 (R25, R179, R180, R181) residents, Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage and/or the Notice o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit MDS, (Minimum Data Set), within 28 days of Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for 4 of 4 (R18, R21, R24, R27) in a sample of 30 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure medications requiring refrigeration were kept at an acceptable temperature for 9 of 9 residents (R1, R7, R8, R9, R10, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse, for 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. this deficient practice has the potential to affect all...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of Certified Nursing Assistant at least once every 12 months. This deficient practice has the potential to af...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report allegation of abuse delaying the investigation for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for reporting of abuse allegations i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse to protect residents from potential future abuse for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for inve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Director of Nursing on a full time basis. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents in the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employee a full time Director of Nurses and provide 8 hours of continous Registered Nurse coverage. This failutre has the pot...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to provide pressure relief and follow physician's orders...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to revise resident's care plans to address resident's current needs fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R30's New admission Information, dated 12/1/22, documents R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
R30's Care Plan, dated...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R1's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R1 is cognitively intact (BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15) and requires extens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON) and failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day 7 days a week. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), $34,418 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 27 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $34,418 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (20/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Nokomis Hc & Senior Living's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Nokomis Hc & Senior Living Staffed?
CMS rates NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Nokomis Hc & Senior Living?
State health inspectors documented 27 deficiencies at NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING during 2023 to 2024. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 24 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Nokomis Hc & Senior Living?
NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PETERSEN HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 0 residents (about 0% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NOKOMIS, Illinois.
How Does Nokomis Hc & Senior Living Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nokomis Hc & Senior Living?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Nokomis Hc & Senior Living Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Nokomis Hc & Senior Living Stick Around?
NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Nokomis Hc & Senior Living Ever Fined?
NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING has been fined $34,418 across 2 penalty actions. The Illinois average is $33,423. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Nokomis Hc & Senior Living on Any Federal Watch List?
NOKOMIS HC & SENIOR LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.