ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Alden Long Grove Rehab & Health Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #206 out of 665 facilities in Illinois places them in the top half, but within Lake County, they are ranked #12 out of 24, suggesting there are better local options available. The facility's performance is improving, as their number of reported issues decreased from 7 in 2024 to just 2 in 2025. Staffing is a weak point, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars, although turnover is exceptionally low at 0%, indicating that staff members generally stay long-term. The facility has incurred fines totaling $30,533, which is concerning, and they provide average RN coverage, suggesting that while there are nurses present, there may not be enough to catch all potential issues. Specific incidents raise concerns about resident safety, including a critical finding where a resident with a history of exit-seeking fell down the stairs due to inadequate supervision and alarm systems, resulting in a serious injury. Additionally, there were serious issues with a resident's wound care not being performed regularly, as well as another resident experiencing significant weight loss without timely medical intervention. While there are some strengths, such as the trend of improvement and low staff turnover, these serious incidents highlight the need for families to consider the overall quality of care when researching this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #206/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $30,533 in fines. Higher than 60% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 35 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) received medications as ordered by a physici...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered at the ordered/scheduled time for 2 residents (R3 and R1) reviewed for medication administratio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
2. On 12/2/2024 at 12:36 PM, R37 was observed sitting up in her room in her wheelchair with a dressing wrapped around her head. R37's dressing had brownish colored drainage on the left side of her hea...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a device was applied to a contracted hand for 1 of 6 residents (R24) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 32.
Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label a resident's tube feeding in accordance with professional standards of nursing. This applies to 1 of 3 (R100) residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0777
(Tag F0777)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an x-ray was obtained in a timely manner for a resident with an acute injury. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R128) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is dependent on staff for toilet...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to schedule a urologist appointment after it was recommended by a Nurse Practitioner for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for professional standa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise one of three residents (R1) with a history of exit seekin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for a resident who is positive for COVID 19 for 1 of 3 residents (R2) rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
3. On 11/13/2023 at 12:51PM, R27 was observed laying in bed watching television with the head of bed elevated. There was a fall mattress leaning up against the wall. There was no fall mattress observe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag below the level of a resident's bladder for a resident with a history of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a dementia diagnosis was immediately redirected for 1 of 8 residents (R131) reviewed for Dementia care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were isolated and the scabies protocol was followed for 2 of 3 residents (R55 and R13) reviewed for infection control in th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer both pneumonia vaccines (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV15...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dietary supplements for residents with a hist...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve lunch on sanitized dishware. This has the potential to affect all 143 residents residing in the facility.
The findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's state guardian of behavioral chang...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify R1's State Guardian and the Ombudsman of R1's i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and monitor a resident's weights (R141) . The fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident, with a diagnosis of dysphagia, when eating. This failure applies to 1 of 30 residents (R307) reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent infect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure prescription medications were administered according to standards of practice for 2 of 30 residents (R22, R38) reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $30,533 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 24 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $30,533 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 21 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr?
ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ALDEN NETWORK, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 248 certified beds and approximately 161 residents (about 65% occupancy), it is a large facility located in LONG GROVE, Illinois.
How Does Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr Stick Around?
ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr Ever Fined?
ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR has been fined $30,533 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Illinois average of $33,384. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Alden Long Grove Rehab &Hc Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
ALDEN LONG GROVE REHAB &HC CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.