MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE

6955 STATE ROUTE 162, MARYVILLE, IL 62062 (618) 288-5999
Non profit - Corporation 132 Beds UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC. Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
65/100
#165 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Manor Court of Maryville has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not outstanding compared to other facilities. It ranks #165 out of 665 in Illinois, placing it in the top half of nursing homes, and #4 out of 17 in Madison County, suggesting only three local options are better. The facility's trend is improving, with the number of reported issues decreasing from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 43%, which is slightly below the state average, indicating that staff members tend to stay longer and build relationships with residents. While there have been no fines recorded, some concerning incidents were noted, such as a resident experiencing a fall that resulted in a fractured arm due to inadequate treatment, and another resident suffering significant weight loss because of poor monitoring and intervention. Additionally, staff were found not to properly use personal protective equipment, which could risk the spread of infections among residents. Overall, while there are notable strengths in staffing stability and absence of fines, there are serious concerns regarding care and safety that families should consider.

Trust Score
C+
65/100
In Illinois
#165/665
Top 24%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
43% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (43%)

    5 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 43%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents she was admitted to the facility 5/4/23 with a pertinent medical diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, unspecified Severity with Anxiety. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents (R2) has severe cognitive impairment, no verbal or physical impairment, no rejection and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 6/20/25 (R2) reported that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) V10 pushed her. The alleged abuse was investigated by facility staff and was unfounded. On 6/26/25 at 3:35 PM (V10) denied pushing (R2) and stated that (R2) pushed her instead. On 7/8/25 at 9:00 AM V1 Administrator stated he was out due to illness, and he was the only one with access to report the abuse. It was investigated but was not reported to Illinois Department of Public Health. The facility's policy on Abuse revised 08/16 documents if the matter involves alleged abuse or neglect of a resident or serious bodily injury the Administrator or designee shall provide the Illinois Department of Public Health with initial notice of the alleged abuse or serious bodily injury as soon as possible but not more than 2 hours after the matter becomes known or no later than 24 hours, if the allegation involves abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly transcribe and administer discharge orders regarding medic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly transcribe and administer discharge orders regarding medications for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for medications in the sample of 9. The Past Non Compliance occurred 6/10/25 to 6/24/25. Findings include: R4 's Face sheet undated documents an admittance date of 5/27/25 with pertinent medical diagnoses of Osteomyelitis of vertebra Thoracic region, Chronic Systolic (congestive) heart failure (5/27/25) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified (5/27/25). R4's Minimum Date Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact, and the medications taken are in the class of antidepressant, anticoagulants, opioids, and antibiotics. R4's Hospital Medical discharge records from area hospital dated 5/8/25 -5/27/25 documents hospitalized problems as Chronic Midline Thoracic back pain, Bacteremia due to Enterococcus, Osteomyelitis of Thoracic Spine, Pacemaker Infection-(Pacemaker removed), Suspected Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) in hospitalized patient and Fall. R4's hospital medical discharge records dated 5/8/25-5/27/25 documents discharge medications as Albuterol, Ampicillin 100 Milligram/Milliliter injection, Breztri Aerosphere 160-9-4.8 Microgram actuation inhaler, Carvedilol 12.5 Milligram, Ceftriaxone, Cholecalciferol, Famotidine, Ferrous Sulfate, Fluticasone Propionate, Gabapentin, Hydrocortisone 1% cream, Hydroxyzine, Lidocaine 5%, Loraepam, Methocarbamol, Ondansetron, Oxycodone, Polyethylene Glycol, Rosvastatin, Sertraline, Trazadone and Warfarin. Discharge instructions included to stop medications Cyclobenzapine, Furosemide and Spironolactone. The medication Carvedilol was stopped due to low blood pressure but resumed 5/26; Spironolactone was placed on HOLD due to low Blood pressure initially and now to worsening of her renal function. This medication will be resumed as indicated by primary care physician and cardiologist. No reasoning was included for stopping the medication Furosemide. R4's Nurse Progress notes dated 5/27/25 documents R4 was admitted to the facility from a local hospital and was sent back out to an area hospital on 5/28/25 due to complaints of Shortness of Breath (SOB). R4's Hospital Medical discharge records from local hospital dated 5/28/25-6/10/25 documents hospitalized problems as Chronic Midline Thoracic back pain, Bacteremia due to Enterococcus, Osteomyelitis of Thoracic Spine, Pacemaker Infection- (Pacemaker removed), Suspected Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) in hospitalized patient and Fall. R4's hospital discharge medications from area hospital dated 5/28/29-6/10/25 are documented as: Furosemide 40 Milligrams daily, Ampicillin Sodium 2 gram reconstituted solution, Carvedilol 3.125 Milligram tablet daily, Ceftriaxone 2 gram reconstituted solution, Saccharomyces Boulardill 250 Milligram capsule daily, spironolactone 25 Milligram Daily, Sertraline 100 Milligram Daily, 50 Milligram 50 Milligram at bedtime, Famotidine 40 Milligrams daily, Rosuvastatin 40 Milligram, Carvedilol 12.5 Milligram every 12 hours, Diphenhydramine 50 Milligram capsule, Budesonide-Glycopyr-formoterol 160-9-4.9 Micrograms Actuation HFA Aerosol Inhaler, Albuterol Sulfate 90 Micrograms / Actuation, Cyclobenzapine 10 Milligram tablet, Ampicillin 2 gram reconstituted solution, Fluticasone Propionate 50 Micrograms/ Actuation Suspension Spray, Warfarin 4 mg Daily, Hydrocortisone 1% cream, Lidocaine 5% adhesive patch every 12 hours, Polyethylene glycol 3350 17 gras daily, Ceftriaxone 2 gram reconstituted solution, Ferrous Sulfate 325 Milligram Daily, Gabapentin 300 Milligram capsule three times/day, Hydroxzine 10 Milligram every 4 hours as needed, Ondansetron 4 Milligram tablet, disintegrating every 8 hours as needed. Lorazepam 0.5 Milligram (0.25 Milligram every 6 hours as needed, Oxycodone 15 Milligram (7.5 Milligram every 4 hours as needed). HOLD Budesonide-Glycol-Formoterol 160-9-4.8 Microgram/Actuation HFA Aerosol Inhaler until seen by Primary Care Provider (PCP); DISCONTINUE Warfarin 3 Milligram tablet Tuesday-Thursday, 4.5 Milligram Monday, Wednesday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. On 7/1/26 at 12:36 PM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated they did not have any medication errors in the past 3 months. She did review the orders after the family did complain about R4 not receiving the specific medication Furosemide and did not see the order. On 7/3/25 at 10:00 AM V20 Nurse Practitioner stated the doctor sees the residents first and the nurse practitioners come in next. They try to review medical records prior to seeing the resident but a lot of the times the medical records are not available. We do review the electronic records but that is only helpful if the information has been put into the system. That is what happened with R4. The hospital discharge medications were not entered into the system. She (V20) only became aware that the resident was not receiving Lasix after R4's son brought it to her attention. It was clearly an error. No harm was done, however, the potential for harm was present due to possible fluid overload. Fluid overload can cause lung and/or heart problems. (V20) Nurse Practitioner had not encountered this problem with the facility before and do believe staff do provide good care. On 7/3/25 at 11:30 AM R4's admission nurse (V22) Licensed Practical Nurse stated when a resident is admitted , the hospital records are reviewed with doctor or NP. The facility usually has 2 nurses review the orders to ensure all orders have been entered correctly. We also have another nurse that audit the case to ensure all medications are captured. Uncertain how all R4's medications were not transcribed. On 7/3/25 at 3:30 PM V23 Registered Nurse stated she is the auditing nurse that goes over all orders for admissions or re-admissions. V23 (RN) stated she was on vacation the day that R4 was re-admitted to the facility. It was her understanding that either the Director of Nursing of Assistant Director of Nursing would take care of auditing admissions or re-admissions. Upon her (V23's) return to work R4's was not included in the stack of admissions that needed to be reviewed. On 7/3/25 at 4:30 PM R3 Assistant Director of Nursing stated the facility already had a system in place where 2 nurses would go over the orders during admission and the auditing nurse would review all admissions the next day. That check and balance worked until the auditing nurse went on vacation and this case fell through the cracks. After I became aware of the problem, I agreed to audit the admissions or re-admissions in the absence of the auditing nurse. On 7/8/25 at 1:40 PM V1 Administrator stated the facility instituted a check and balance system to avoid any potential issues of missing medication with 2 nurses being involved in the admission process and the bridge nurse to audit admissions. We have added the Assistant Director of Nursing to that process to cover when the bridge nurse is off work. We did investigate the incident and initiated a Plan of Correction. The facility's policy Medication Administration Using eMAR revised 11/11 documents the objective it to provide the resident with those medications deemed necessary by the physician to improve and/or stabilize specified diagnosis of the resident. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance. This tag was corrected on 6/24/25 This Plan of Correction in response to the statement of deficiency demonstrates our good faith and desire to continue to improve the quality of care and services rendered to our residents. This plan of correction constitutes a written allegation of compliance with Federal Medicaid and Medicare requirements. The Following Plan of Corrections was developed to ensure future compliance with all medication orders upon admission. 1) Two nurses will review the discharge orders for all new admissions and readmissions together going line by line of the discharge order summary sheet. 2) The RN Bridge nurse will review all admission and readmission orders within 48 hours of admission and correct any identified issues. 3) The ADON will be clearly designated to perform the reviews of the clinical records within 48 hours of admission if the RN Bridge nurse is unavailable for any reason. 4) The Licensed staff were inservice on 6/24/25 regardig the admission process, including two Licensed nurses to review all discharge orders from hospital. 5) The ADON will perform no less than two audits of the admissions and/or readmissions weekly for no less than 4 weeks. The QAPI will include these audits when they meet monthly and determine if further interventions are necessary.
Nov 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to prevent resident physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R54) reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to prevent resident physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R54) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 39. Findings include: R54's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated February 2024 documents a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease with late onset, wedge compression fracture vertebrae, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, stent 1999 & 2004, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance and anxiety, conductive hearing loss, age related osteoporosis. R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R54 was severely impaired for cognition for activities of daily living. R54's Care Plan dated 11/9/2022 documents Problem: (R54) has chosen to receive Hospice care from (Hospital) Hospice related to Alzheimer's. R54's Care Plan does not address abuse. R54's Incident Report dated 2/20/2024 at 10:15 AM, Notified by (V6, Licensed Practical Nurse), notified me that she observed a hospice aide strike resident (R54) across the head with both hands and she yelled at the hospice aide to stop, and the aide stated, 'I was pushing her head away to keep her from biting me.' 10:20 AM, V7, Hospice aide, that was identified as the alleged perpetrator was instructed not to go back into the resident care area, and a statement obtained from (V7) that stated she was providing assistance for resident and she was trying to bite me, and I insistently was pushing her way from me although I know (V6) thinks I was slapping (R54) but I wasn't'. I asked for her contact information, (V7's phone number) was given to me as a phone number and she was instructed to leave and not return until such time as I contact her and allow her back into the facility. 10:40 Resident assessed for injuries and no injuries noted. Resident unable to communicate but has no signs or distress on her face and appears calm currently. 10:55 was informed by (V6) that she notified the POA (Power of Attorney) and the Physician, no injuries were noted per assessment she stated and to her the resident does not look upset or having any distress. 10:45 AM, Notified (Local Police Department) of allegation, at approximately 11:10, an Officer came to the facility and interviewed staff and took statements from staff, information was provided about the alleged perpetrator, and case number was documented. Written statement by V6 undated documents, Call light was on and entered the room. When I entered the room (V7) slapped resident on both sides of her head simultaneously by each ear creating a 'slapping' sound. I yelled, 'Hey' Hospice CNA looked up and said, 'she bit me.' Another facility nurse and CNA came into the room. Stayed with the resident while I left to report to management. A statement undated from V7 documents, (R54) was biting me when nurse walked in the room, and I was pushing her head away from my arm. On 10/30/2024 at 9:00 AM, V6, Licensed Practical Nurse stated, I remember the CNA hospice aide (V7). (R54's) call light was going off that day and I went into her room and when I entered the room I saw (V7) slap (R54) with an open hand on both sides of her head and when she saw me she jumped back and said (R54) bit me, she bit me, like she was trying to make it okay what she had done. R54's Police Report documents, On Tuesday February 20, 2024, at approximately 11:48 A.M. I, (V11, Local Police Officer) responded to (Facility) in reference to an aggravated battery that occurred earlier that day. Upon my arrival I made contact with the site manager, identified as: (V1). (V1) stated that at approximately 10:15 A.M. a nurse witnessed a contract hospice CNA employed by (Hospice Company) smack a patient on both sides of the head above her ears with enough force to make a crack sound. (V1) identified the nurse and hospice CNA as (V7). I spoke with (V6) who stated she noticed the call light on for patient she identified as (R54). (V6) stated that (R54) is physically unable to activate the call light. (V6) stated she went to check on (R54) and upon entering the room witnessed (V7) smacking (R54) on both sides of her head above the ears with an open palm with enough force to make a crack sound. (V6) shouted, 'Hey'. The Abuse Policy with a revision date of 1/2017 documents, Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and/or physical conditions, cause physical harm, pain and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Physical abuse means the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means, whether or not the injury required medical attention, Physical abuse must include, but is not limited to such acts as: hitting, slapping, kicking, hair pulling and pinching, etc.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination for 4 of 4 residents (R16, R29, R40 and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination for 4 of 4 residents (R16, R29, R40 and R54) reviewed for food sanitation in the sample of 39. Findings include: On 10/29/2024 at 12:14 PM, in the kitchen off the 300-hall there was a small kitchenette. Inside the kitchenette was a sink for handwashing but the faucet was not in working order and no water would come out. On 10/29/2024 at 12:18 PM, V4, Dishwasher, was wearing gloves and took the following temperatures of the food on the steam table and documented in the Logbook. The mashed potatoes were documented at 114.0 F (Fahrenheit), the meat (chicken) was documented as 113.0 F regular, the pureed meat 132.0 F, the pureed vegetables (lima beans) 132.0 F and the gravy was documented at 113.0 F. V4 then proceeded to serve the food without reheating any of the items that were below 135.0 F. On 10/29/2024 at 12:19 PM, V4 stated he was not sure what temperature the food should be when hot and at the steam table but that is what he got from the kitchen, and he is not a [NAME] but rather a dishwasher. On 10/29/2024 at 12:33 PM, R29 was served mechanical meat (Chicken) covered with gravy on top of it. On 10/29/2024 at 12:39 PM, R16 was served a divided plate with pureed meat, pureed vegetable, both items topped with gravy. On 10/29/2024 at 12:40 PM, R40 was served pureed meat (chicken) covered in gravy and pureed vegetable (lima beans) covered in gravy. On 10/29/2024 at 12:43 PM, R54 was served pureed meat (chicken) covered in gravy and pureed vegetable (lima beans) covered in gravy and was served. On 10/30/2024 at 9:28 AM, the following residents were documented as receiving pureed and/or mechanical diets on the 300-hall: R16, R29, R40 and R54. On 11/1/2024 at 9:59 AM, V37, Dietician stated, I would expect all food temperatures to be taken before the food service and any temperature below 135.0 Fahrenheit, to be taken back to the kitchen and reheated to a temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Any food temperature below 135 degrees can create the perfect environment for bacteria to grow and cause somebody to get sick for food borne illness. All food below 135 degrees should not be served to residents. The Food Service/Holding Temperature Policy dated 7/12/2023 documents, To provide guidelines for safe serving /holding temperatures for foods served in the Dining Services department. Cooked meat 135 degrees (F) or higher, cooked vegetables 135 degrees or higher, soups, gravy or broths 135 degrees or higher.
Jul 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate progressive interventions to prevent falls af...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate progressive interventions to prevent falls after a resident had a fall with a fracture for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 11. Findings include: On 7/3/24 at 1:15 PM, V15 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V16 CNA provided incontinent care for R1. R1 was able to bring her own legs up onto the bed after sitting on side of bed and laying down. There was a healed scar on R2's right knee from previous surgery (no surgery after recent fall). R1 did not appear to have any pain when lifting her legs onto bed before incontinent care started. R1's undated Care Plan documents her diagnoses as: Unspecified Fracture of Left Patella, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hypertension (HTN), Dysphagia; Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)-Stage 3, Unspecified Dementia, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 4/4/24, Rash and other Non-Specific Skin Eruption (1/18/24), Dysuria, Hemiplegia Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, and Major Depressive Disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired and is dependent for toileting hygiene, positioning and transfers, she does not walk and is dependent for wheel chair (w/c) mobility and she is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's Progress Note dated 05/02/2024 at 6:03 AM documents, Resident found on the floor near bed laying underneath her covers. When this nurse ask resident what happen, she stated that I just fell out of the bed. Resident is c/o (complaining of) pain to her left knee, also c/o back pain and stated that she did hit head. Some bruising was also noted under residents left eye. Resident was sent to (local hospital) for treatment and evaluation. All parties have been notified. R1's Progress Note dated 5/02/2024 at 6:52 AM documents, Report received from (hospital staff) with (local hospital). Resident has a small fracture noted to L (left) Kneecap and will return with an Immobilizer. Follow up with Ortho. Will return to facility shortly. R1's Care Plan dated 5/5/21 documents, Resident at risk for falling R/T (related to) recent illness/hospitalization and new environment, orthostatic hypotension, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attacks) , femur fracture, impaired cognition, vision loss, CVA. The goal for this care plan documents, Resident will have decreased risk for injury related falls this quarter. Interventions for this care plan include: 7/10/23: When resident in high traffic areas, offer/assist resident into chairs from wheelchair. 5/6/21: Orientate resident to room, surrounding areas, and use of call light system. 5/6/21: Encourage resident to use side rails/enablers as needed. 5/6/21: Provide resident with specialized equipment as deemed necessary per therapy 5/6/21: Assist resident with activities of interest. There was no updated interventions on care plan for most recent fall of 5/2/24 after R1's fall resulting in fractured patella (knee cap). On 7/2/24 at 10:52 AM, V8 Care Plan Coordinator, stated she was not aware R1 had a fall with a fracture on 5/2/24. She stated she checks the Events tab in residents' medical records to check for falls. She stated she tries to watch their progress notes also, but doesn't always see all progress notes. She stated R1's Care Plan was not updated with a progressive intervention after her fall on 5/2/24 and it should have been. The facility's policy, Accidents and Incidents dated 8/2014 documents, 2. All accidents and incidents should be documented, by creating and event and attaching a progress note. Progress notes will be documented in the resident record every shift until the event is closed by the DON (Director of Nursing). All accidents/incidents need to be investigated to determine the possible cause, to assist in future reoccurrences. When a resident has been identified as a high risk of accidents/incidents, interventions will be put into place per the individual resident assessment and care plan.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to perform a diagnostic test in a timely manner to diagnose and treat a Urinary Tract Infection for 1 out of 7 residents (R8) rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to perform a diagnostic test in a timely manner to diagnose and treat a Urinary Tract Infection for 1 out of 7 residents (R8) reviewed for a Urinary Tract Infections. Findings include: According to the electronic health record (EHR) dated 6/27/2024. R8 EHR documents diagnose of Dementia, Type 2 diabetes, displaced of medial Condyle of left tibia closed fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis of liver, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, osteoporosis, overactive bladder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, spinal stenosis, anemia, vitamin D and B12 deficiency, depression, and anxiety. MDS (minimum data set) dated 5/14/2024 documents R8 having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) of 15 and dependent of functional abilities and goals. Requires maximal/substantial assist with ADLs (activities of daily living). Care Plan dated 5/14/2024 documents that R8 requires substantial maximum assistance with ADLs related to dementia. The EHR review of the progress notes documented by V23, RN (Registered Nurse) on 06/23/2024 09:40 PM interview with V10, R8's spouse, at length concerning resident's confusion would like to see ensure or some shake given or medication to help with her appetite be started to help lessen confusion. On 6/26/2024 V6, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented 06:12 PM, Resident has some confusion noted for some days now. POA, (Power of Attorney) V10 has also stated to Nurse that confusion observed. Resident repeating same questions and not usually like resident. MD (Medical Doctor) has orders to collect urinary analysis/urine. On 06/27/2024 11:57 AM, V6, LPN documented that urine specimen obtained this shift due to confusion. Urine placed on main floor in lab fridge for collection. V6 documented the resident continues to show confusion this shift with staff and spouse. Urine obtained. V6 documented on 07/02/2024 at 1:58 PM, 2nd urine specimen obtained this shift for STAT collection. R8's Urinalysis dated 7/5/24 for specimen collected 7/3/24 documents the following abnormal results: Clarity: Turbid, Protein: 1+. Urobilinogen: 2+, Nitrates: Positive, Leukocytes: 1+, Bacteria: Few, Amorphous: Present, and Mucous: Present. At 10:45 AM observed V16, CNA and V15, CNA perform perineal care related to incontinence on R8. V16 wiped back (buttocks) to front (vaginal) area of R8, was unable to obtain all of stool from inner buttocks. V16 and V15 placed a new brief on R8. On 7/2/2024 at 9:20 AM, Interview with V6, LPN stated the urine was collected 6/27/2024 and that she will check it today to see if the results of urinalysis are in yet. On 7/2/2024 at 12:30 PM, V3 LPN stated about lab results of R8's urinalysis results are needed. V3 stated she would check into that. On 7/2/2024 at 1:00 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated that the specimen was never picked up due to the lab technician was off that day and never came to get it. V2 DON stated that another urine specimen will be obtained today. On 7/2/2024 at 2:55 PM, V10 R8's husband, stated the nurse V6, LPN came in and obtained another urine for collection this afternoon. V10 stated he noticed R8 is more confused and disoriented than normal. V10 stated the confusion and disorientation started a week ago I told V6, and she did agree. V10 stated that R8 is forgetful but not this confused. On 7/3/2024 at 11:45 AM, V22 technician stated the urine for the urinalysis was received today about an hour ago and someone will be out there to pick up the specimen sometime today. Received extension to supervisor, at the lab will follow up in 30 minutes. On 7/3/2024 At 1:32 PM, spoke to V21, Supervisor stated no orders were submitted for any labs for R8 between 6/25/2024 through 6/30/2024 at this time. Policy: It is a policy of the facility to provide means of quality diagnostic lab services for the residents. Purpose: To provide residents a means of diagnostic service promptly and conveniently. Staff Responsible: 1. Director of Nursing 2. Staff Nursing 3. Procedure: 1. Provision for Diagnostic Services a. Provision has been made for promptly and conveniently obtaining required clinical laboratory, X-ray and other diagnostic services from a clinical laboratory or diagnostic service, physician's office, or hospital. b. All diagnostic services are provided only on the order of a Physician, a Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner or Clinical Nurse Specialist (if practitioners are acting in accordance with state law, scope of practice law and facility policy). The facility will follow the standards set by the Laboratory, Radiology, or other Diagnostic service in setting the Normal, Abnormal, and Critical result reference ranges for the Labs and Diagnostics ordered. Revised: 11/28/17
Dec 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0559 (Tag F0559)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide advance written notice of a room change in 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for room changes in the sample of 7. Findings include: Th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide advance written notice of a room change in 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for room changes in the sample of 7. Findings include: The Facility's Census History from 9/12/23 through 12/12/23 documents R3 changed rooms on 11/14/23. On 12/12/23 at 4:05 PM, V22, R3's Power of Attorney (POA), stated she was not informed that R3 would not be returning to her previous room after she was isolated for COVID-19. V22 stated she came in to visit R3 and discovered R3 was no longer in the same room. On 12/12/23 at 2:30 PM, V3, Minimum Data Set/MDS Coordinator/ Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, stated she was unable to locate documentation that R3's family were notified of R3's room change. On 12/13/23 at 9:25 AM, V1, Administrator, stated the Facility does not have any documentation that R3's family was notified of the room change. On 12/13/23 at 10:57 AM, V3 stated the Facility does not have a policy regarding room change notifications.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to implement progressive fall interventions to prevent ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to implement progressive fall interventions to prevent accidents/falls for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 7. Findings include: R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, chronic pain, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and muscle spasms. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 was cognitively intact and used wheelchair for mobility. The MDS did not further evaluate R4's functional abilities. R4's Care Plan initiated 1/7/19 documents, (R4) at risk for falling r/t (related to) impaired mobility, use of psychoactive medications, use of diuretic medication, dx (diagnosis) of htn (hypertension), dx of insomnia, and dx of neuropathy. R4's Fall Report dated 1/31/23 documents R4 had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom while trying to reach for a grab bar next to the toilet. The interventions added were therapy evaluation and application of new cushion and (non-slip pad) to wheelchair. R4's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented R4 was at high risk of falls. R4's Progress Note by V25, Registered Nurse (RN) on 12/11/23 at 6:30 PM documents, found pt (patient) sitting on floor in the bathroom no call light on and brake wasn't locked on the w/c (wheelchair) pt (patient) states she isn't injured no sores bruises noted to hip. Pt states that she wheeled into bathroom and slide out of w/c on to the floor. R4's Fall Report dated 12/11/23 documents R4 had unwitnessed fall wheeling into bathroom from wheelchair. R4 did not sustain any injuries. The intervention added was therapy evaluation for wheelchair positioning and cushion. On 12/13/23 at 9:35 AM, R4 stated she was transferring herself from her wheelchair to the toilet the other night when the pad on her seat slid out from the chair and she fell. On 12/13/23 at 9:37 AM, V24, Director of Rehab, entered R4's room with a cushion and (non-slip pad). V24 stated the previous (non-slip pad) might have been displaced, but she has a new one to place in R4's chair. R4 stated she had never seen that (non-slip pad) in her wheelchair before. On 12/13/23 at 1:15 PM, V1, Administrator, stated he expects the Facility to implement and follow progressive interventions and feels they always do. The Facility's Accidents and Incidents Policy dated 8/2014 documents, When a resident has been identified as a high risk for accident/incidents, interventions will be put into place per the individual resident assessment and care plan. All accidents/incidents need to be investigated to determine the possible cause, to assist in future recurrences. All staff should be part of the identification of and intervention process to assist in fall prevention.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure staff appropriately use PPE (Personal Protecti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure staff appropriately use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) to prevent the spread of infectious disease including COVID-19. This has the potential to affect all 93 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: 1. On 12/12/23 at 7:15 AM, there was a sign on the door of the Facility entrance documenting Positive Covid Cases and Masks Are Required In The Building. An additional copy of the sign was placed on the door leading into the residential part of the Facility. On 12/12/23 at 7:24 AM, V5, Registered Nurse (RN), was working at the medication cart on Bounce Back Lane without a mask. On 12/12/23 at 7:30 AM, V6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and V7, V8, and V9, Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), were all working in the Memory Lane unit and were not wearing masks. On 12/12/23 at 12:58 PM, V7, CNA, stated she was not wearing a mask because there was no COVID in that unit. On 12/12/23 at 8:35 AM, V3, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator/ Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), provided a list of residents that have tested positive for COVID since the outbreak began on 10/28/23. V3 stated R1 was the only resident isolated at that time. V3 stated residents must isolate for ten days after a positive COVID test result. The Facility's List of COVID Positive Residents documents R1 tested positive for COVID on 12/5/23. 2. On 12/12/23 at 10:04 AM, V13, CNA, exited room [ROOM NUMBER] with a surgical mask worn around her neck. The mask was not covering her nose or mouth. On 12/12/23 at 10:24 AM, V13, CNA, entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and spoke with R4 while still wearing the mask around her neck. On 12/12/23 at 10:26 AM, there were two signs on R1's door documenting Contact and Droplet precautions. There was a rack on the door containing gowns, masks, and gloves. V13, CNA, entered R1's room wearing a surgical mask. V13 was not wearing a gown, gloves, N-95 mask, or protective eyewear. On 12/12/23 at 10:28 AM, V3, entered R1's room wearing appropriate PPE and pointed to the sign on R1's door. V13, CNA, stated, I don't think (R1) has COVID. V13 stated Nobody told me. On 12/12/23 at 2:30 PM, V3, stated she expects staff to wear surgical masks any time they go beyond the double doors to the patient care area in the Facility. V3 stated if staff are going into a COVID positive room, they need to wear N-95 masks, gowns, and gloves. On 12/13/23 at 9:25 AM, V1, Administrator, stated he expects staff to wear surgical masks in all patient care areas and wear appropriate PPE in COVID positive rooms. The Facility's COVID-19 Policy revised 8/28/23 documents, Facility will follow current CDC (Centers for Disease Control)/CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) recommendations regarding masking while in an outbreak. The policy adds, Any residents that are determined to have new onset of symptoms will have the following initiated: Contact/Droplet precautions (N95 respirator) with eye protection will be initiated. Staff will wear N95 respirators, eye protection, gowns and gloves when caring for residents with COVID-19. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Form, CMS-672, dated 12/12/23 documents there are 93 residents living in the Facility.
Oct 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimen was free for unnecessary...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimen was free for unnecessary psychotropic drug use for 1 of 5 residents (R13) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications in the sample of 35. Findings include: On 10/6/2023 at 10:50 AM, R13 was sitting in television area, R13's facial features would slightly twitch/jerk as she was sitting in her wheelchair watching the dancing on the television. On 10/6/2023 at 9:05 AM, V20, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, I know (R13) has some lip smacking and facial twitches. I do not think it is getting worse. I have been here for about 8 months now. I am not aware of her having any behaviors. On 10/6/2023 at 9:11 AM, V10, RN stated, When (R13) was in the Memory Care Unit I provided care for her. She has some facial twitching in her neck and face. I am not aware of her having any behaviors. There were times she refused her medication but no behaviors that I can think of. R13's Physician Order Sheet (POS) document a diagnosis of Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with anxiety, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, shortness of breath, emphysema, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, constipation, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, gastro-esophageal, hypertension, pain, vitamin deficiency, long term care use of aspirin, depression. R13's POS documents an order for quetiapine 25 milligrams (mg), amount 1 tablet oral. Diagnosis of Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild, with anxiety at bedtime, 8:00 PM. R13's Care Plan does not address quetiapine or the use of psychotropic medication. R13's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R13 has memory problems, moderately impaired for decision making. Mood: Little interest in doing things; No behaviors, and document R13 was receiving antipsychotic, antidepressants, and hypnotic medications. On 10/5/2023 at 2:32 PM, Behavior Tracking was requested for R13. On 10/5/2023 at 3:31 PM, V1, Administrator stated, We do not have any behavior tracking for (R13). (R13) came into the facility with the quetiapine and remember some issues with the family wanting her on the medication. There is no behavior tracking for (R13). R13's Progress Notes dated 6/7/2023 at 10:40 AM, documents Resident currently having Tardive Dyskinesia. Resident is sitting in wheelchair and states not feeling well. Involuntary twitching movement noted in intervals. R13's admission Note dated 4/17/2023 at 4:16 PM, document, admitted to the facility via private car accompanied by daughter from Home. She is alert and oriented. She is here for long term placement in memory care for worsening Dementia. The Pharmacy Note To Attending Physician/ Prescriber, Pharmacist Recommended does reduction to Quetiapine 25 milligrams (mg): take ½ tablet (12.5) at bedtime. The Physician (V21) disagreed and marked an x in the box, Behavior interventions continue to be attempted, except in emergency situations, and are included in the plan of care. However, dose reductions at this time would likely impair resident's function or increase distressed behavior while continuing to pose a danger to the resident or others as supported by the following CLINICAL RATIONALE AND EVIDENCE OF THE FOLLOWING SYMPTOMS: Nothing was documented in this area. The Facility Psychopharmacological Drug Usage Procedure with a revision date of 09/08 documents, A Psychopharmacological Drug is any medication used for managing behavior, stabilizing mood, or treating psychiatric disorders. This includes the following types of drugs: antipsychotic, antidepressants, anti-anxiety meds, and sedatives/hypnotics. Documentation of behaviors and conditions requiring the use of these medications must be done on a routine basis, as well as medication response and adverse consequences. Unsuccessful reductions of medication must be substantiated by documentation, including rationale from the physician as to why the medication cannot be reduced further.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to staff enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) to provide care to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to staff enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) to provide care to the residents for 5 of 8 residents (R3, R36, R54, R79, R80) reviewed for adequate staffing in the sample of 35. This failure has the potential to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 10/4/23 at 1:54 PM, R54 stated the facility needs more CNAs, especially on the weekends. R54 stated a lot of times they only have one CNA on her hall. R54 stated her roommate is at risk for falls and when her alarm goes off, she (R54) will turn her call light on to get help for her roommate. R54 stated no one comes so she (R54) has to call the nurse's station on her phone to get help. R54's filed a grievance, dated 2/28/23, documenting that there are low staff on the weekends. The corrective action from the facility was they have hired eight nurse aides, changed the schedule to spread staffing out throughout the weekend more effectively with a team effort from all department heads to assist with scheduling and staffing on the weekends. R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R54 is cognitively intact. 2. During the group meeting on 10/4/2023 at 3:00 PM, R80 stated the staff that are here are great and they work hard but the truth of the matter is we need more staff. R80 stated It's really bad at nights. I am not sure what is going on in the world, but the truth of the matter is we need more staff working here. I am not sure what has happened, but it is not enough, and I think some of the staff get burnt out because they do not have enough help and then quit. I do not like to complain but they need more help. Our needs are not always met because there is not enough help. R80's MDS dated [DATE] document R80 was cognitively alert for decision making of activities of daily living. 3. During the group meeting on 10/4/2023 at 3:00 PM, R36 stated, My biggest complaint is that they need more help. Especially in the evenings. I have to wait and wait for staff because there is not enough help. I need help getting to the bathroom and I have had accidents for waiting for staff to come and help me. They need more help here it really is a big problem at nights. R36's MDS dated [DATE] document she is cognitively intact for decision making for activities of daily living. 4. During the group meeting on 10/4/2023 at 3:00 PM, R3 stated, This is a great place to live if you have to be in a nursing home. My biggest complaint is that they need more help. Especially in the evenings. I have to wait and wait for staff because there is not enough help. I need help getting to the bathroom and I have had accidents for waiting for staff to come and help me. They need more help here, it really is a big problem at nights. R3's MDS dated [DATE] document she is cognitively intact for decision making for activities of daily living. 5. During the group meeting on 10/4/2023 at 3:00 PM, R79 stated there is not enough help especially at night. The facility needs more staff because resident needs are not being met during the night. R79's MDS dated [DATE] document she was cognitively alert and orientated for decision making of activities of daily living. On 10/3/23 at 2:23 PM, V7, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated all of healthcare needs more staff, a lot quit during COVID and never came back. On 10/3/23 at 2:30 PM, V5, LPN, stated they have staff, but they call off, so it causes the CNAs that do come in to have to do extra work. On 10/4/23 at 2:35 PM, V13, CNA/Shift Coordinator, stated they decide how many CNAs are needed on each hallway and each shift by reviewing the census and acuity/needs of the residents. V13 stated if there are call offs, she will work the floor or call another CNA in to work. V13 stated if they have call offs and can't replace them, they work short and make it work. On 10/4/23 at 2:35 PM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON) stated call offs are a problem with CNAs. On 10/5/23 at 8:10 AM, V14, CNA, stated they are short on CNAs on day shift and it's hard to care for the facility. V14 stated the facility is hiring but they don't show up. On 10/5/23 at 8:15 AM, V15, CNA, stated some days they are short on CNAs and when they are short it makes it harder to provide care. V15 stated they have a lot of call offs or staff that don't call or show up for their shift. On 10/5/23 at 8:18 AM, V16, CNA, stated they are short on CNAs, and it makes it hard to provide care to the residents. V16 stated the facility just doesn't have enough CNAs. The Staffing policy, dated 9/18, documents staffing shall be based on the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the residents in the facility in accordance with the facility assessment, and shall be determined by figuring the number of hours of nursing time that each resident needs on each shift of the day.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain urine cultures to ensure that the appropriate antibiotic was utilized or necessary to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 4 of...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain urine cultures to ensure that the appropriate antibiotic was utilized or necessary to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 4 of 4 residents (R12, R57, R65, R91) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. The Facility Infection Control Log documents R12 had a UTI, and the hospital stated the culture was negative. R12's Progress Note, dated 3/16/23 at 1:47 PM, documents report was called from the hospital and R12 would be returning to the facility and was treated for an abnormal urinalysis (UA), but the urine culture came back negative but R12 would be continuing three more days of antibiotics. R12's Progress Note, dated 3/20/23 at 12:12 PM, documents R12 completed the antibiotic on 3/19/23 related to an abnormal UA/UTI. R12's Physician Order Sheet (POS), documents an order dated, 3/16/23, for Cefdinir 300 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) with an end date of 3/19/23. 2. The Facility Infection Control Log documents R57 had two UTIs with no organism identified on the log. R57's Progress Note, dated 4/17/23 at 3:06 PM, documents the root cause analysis related to a fall on 4/16/23 was that R57 attempted to get herself out of bed and fell. The intervention is as follows: Hospice in the building to assess resident, resident is anxious and fidgety. Resident is moving around in chair. Hospice Nurse states that he suspects that the resident has a UTI and will be starting her on an antibiotic. R57's Progress Note, dated 9/4/23 at 6:16 PM, documents that the facility talked with R12's family and they do not want the resident catheterized to obtain a urine specimen because it wouldn't be comfortable for R12, who is on hospice. Called hospice care nurse and received a new order for Cipro 500 mg BID for 10 days. R57's POS, documents an order dated, 4/18/23, for Cipro 500mg BID with an end date of 4/27/23. R57's POS, documents an order dated, 9/4/23, for Cipro 500mg BID with an end date of 9/15/23. There was no documentation in R57's record that a urine culture was obtained prior to the antibiotics ordered on 4/18/23 and 9/4/23 to ensure the antibiotic was necessary or susceptible to the organism/infection. 3. The Facility Infection Control Log documents R65 had a UTI, resulted at the urologist, results not available. R65's Progress Note, dated 10/21/22 at 5:59 PM, documents R65 was out for a urology appointment, during the appointment the catheter was changed, and a UA was obtained with no findings noted. R65's Progress Note, dated 10/24/22 at 11:42 AM, documents Urologist called and stated R65 had a UTI and started resident on Macrobid 100mg BID for 7 days. R65's POS documents an order, dated 10/24/23, for Macrobid 100mg BID with an end date of 10/31/22. There was no documentation in R65's medical record what the results of the UA/Urine culture results were to ensure that the antibiotic was necessary or was susceptible to the antibiotic prescribed. 4. The Facility Infection Control Log, documents R91 had a UTI and there was no documentation on the log that a urine culture was obtained or that an organism was identified. R91's Progress Note, dated 9/5/23 at 1:40 PM, documents the hospice nurse came to see the resident. New orders received to start Macrobid 100mg BID for 7 days for UTI. R91's last urine culture report, dated 8/10/23, documents normal skin flora. There was no documentation that a urine culture was obtained prior to R91 starting the antibiotic on 9/5/23 to ensure the antibiotic was necessary or was susceptible to the organism/infection. On 10/6/23 at 9:20 AM, V4, Infection Control Preventionist, stated she would expect that a UA/Urine culture would be obtained prior to the initiation of an antibiotic for a UTI to ensure the antibiotic is necessary and if so, the antibiotic prescribed is susceptible to the organism. The Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated 12/18/19, documents the purpose of the program is to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics, improve resident outcomes and lessen adverse events.
Sept 2022 6 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional stand...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional standards of care for a fall resulting in injury for 1 of 16 residents (R65) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R65 falling and sustaining a fractured arm which was not treated for two days. Findings include: R65's Physician Order Sheet for September 2022 documents R65 is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, elevated white blood cell count, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, other lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit and auditory hallucinations. On 9/23/2022 at 10:58 AM, R65's was residing on the dementia unit. R65 had a soft cast to her right arm. R65's Care Plan dated 8/15/2022 documents (R65) has dementia with behaviors. On 9/23/2022 at 10:59 AM, V38, Registered Nurse stated, (R65) is on the dementia unit and has poor safety awareness. She is easily confused. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/29/2022 at 4:16 PM, documents Resident had witnessed fall, playing game in dayroom with other residents, resident began walking backwards and tripped over her own feet and tried to catch herself and landed on her Right wrist, resident did not hit her head. Right wrist swelling noted. PRN (as needed) Acetaminophen administered, wrapped in ace wrap, Ice pack placed alternating on/off for 20 minutes. MD (Medical Doctor) notified, received orders to wrap/immobilize, and get STAT (right away) x-ray. R65's Progress Note dated 8/29/2022 at 8:00 PM, documents x-ray technician here at this time, x-ray done. R65's X-ray Report dated 8/29/2022 document R65 had an acute fracture of the distal radius and ulna styloid of the wrist. (2 long bone fractures close to the wrist). R65's Progress Note dated 8/30/2022 at 5:41 AM, documents Resident's bruise to Right side of eye is healing well, no swelling or redness to resident Left Knee, resident had a fall on 8/29 resulting in a Right wrist injury, resident denies any pain or discomfort at this time, this writer notices that Right wrist swollen with some redness and dark blue bruising, continuing to wait on results of x-ray related to wrist injuries. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/30/2022 at 11:25 AM, documents Edema continues to be noted to right wrist. Pain noted to area with movement. Resident currently has an ace wrap in place to area. Current x-ray results pending at this time. Resident also continues to have swelling to Left knee at this time. Resident denies pain to area. MD (Medical Doctor) previously made aware of knee. Resident able to ambulate normally and expresses no pain. Family in at this time to sit with resident. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/30/2022 at 2:29 PM, documents Power of Attorney (POA), Medical Doctor has been made aware of fracture. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/31/2022 at 11:13 AM, documents Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in unit at this time and advises Nurse to send resident out to ER (Emergency Room) to be further evaluated. Resident wrist continues to have swelling and is painful with movement. Movement to area currently limited and radial pulse very faint. This Nurse contacted ems (Emergency Medical System) at 11:17 AM to send to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation of fracture to area. POA (Power of Attorney) contacted and made aware of concerns. On 9/22/2022 at 8:58 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, If a STAT (Immediately) x-ray was ordered I would expect the turnaround time to be minimum of 3 hours. I would expect staff after three hours to be following up with the lab and finding out where the results are. Typically, the form is faxed back to us at the nurse's station. I would expect the x-ray company to call us to alert us of any critical care including a fracture. I reviewed the notes and saw that there was a delay in reporting the fracture for (R65). I am not sure what exactly happened and why it was not caught earlier. On 9/23/2022 at 10:06 AM, V36, Former Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated, I use to be the ADON but no longer work in the facility. I remember (R65) she was in the dementia unit and had poor safety awareness and was really confused. I remember I came in on a Wednesday morning and (V2, Director of Nursing) told me (R65) had a previous fall a few days later and then she just walked away. (V2) told me they took and x-ray, but she was not sure if there was any injury. I talked with the nurse, and she told me nobody got an x-ray. I went and checked on (R65) her wrist was swollen, and she had a low pulse, so I wanted them to send her (R65) next door to the hospital to get an x-ray. I sent her out and then she had two fractures. When I told (V2) she just told me 'I guess we will just take the tag for that one.' On 9/23/2022 at 11:07 AM, V37, Medical Director stated, I am not sure when I got the x-ray results or when I was notified of (R65) having pain and swelling in her wrist. The facility is usually good about notifying me. I have another patient I cannot talk. The Change of Condition Policy with a revision date of 12/02 documents, The resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of unknown source notification will be made within twenty-four hours of a change occurring in residents' condition or status.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor food intake, assess insidious weight loss and e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor food intake, assess insidious weight loss and effectiveness of interventions, and implement progressive interventions based upon this assessment to prevent continued weight loss for 1 of 5 residents (R75) reviewed for nutrition and weight loss in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R75's severe weight loss of 28.41% in 3 months. Findings include: R75's Undated Face Sheet, documented diagnoses of encephalopathy, dementia, anorexia, hypoglycemia, dysphagia (swallowing problems), congestive heart failure (CHF) and pain. R75's Care Plan, dated 8/31/2021, documents R75's current body weight was 109 pounds. R75's Care Plan documents R75's acceptable body weight is 114-146 pounds. The Goal documents Resident will achieve desired weight of 114-146 pounds. R75's Approaches documented the following approaches with the following start dates: Pureed diet start 9/22/21; Encourage oral intake of food and fluids start 8/13/21; Monitor/record weight weekly, notify physician and family of significant weight change start 8/13/21; and provide supplement of high protein supplement with fortified pudding at all times start 8/13/21. R75's Nurse's Note, dated 5/15/2022 at 6:42 PM documents resident arrived via ambulance at 5:37 PM. Resident was transferred 3 assist from stretcher to bed by EMS (emergency medical services) and staff. NG (nasogastric) feeding tube, 8 FT in place with Jevity 1.5 Cal 45 ml (milliliters)/hr (hour) continuous. No s/s (signs and symptoms) of pain or discomfort noted during assessment. R75's Nurse's Note, dated 5/16/2022 at 2:15 PM documents Hospice nurse removed NG tube per family and order from MD (physician). Resident tolerated removal well. R75's Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining (POLST) form dated 5/16/2022, had no documentation in the section regarding medically administered nutrition section. This section was not completed. R75's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documents R75 is severely cognitively impaired, no swallow disorder, height 66 inches weight 97 pounds. R75's MDS documents R75 requires extensive assistance with one-person physical assist for eating. R75's MDS documents R75 had no weight loss and was on a mechanically altered diet. R75's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated 5/16/2022 documents pureed diet as tolerated, comfort feedings if pt (patient) alert enough. R75's POS dated 5/25/2022, documents Megestrol (Megace appetite stimulate) 125 mg (milligrams)/5 ml every day. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/8/2022 at 11:02 AM documents, resident alert and very talkative during breakfast. With help of staff resident consumed around 30% of breakfast and drank approximately 1 cup of water and half apple juice. Within 5 minutes of resident telling aide 'no more,' resident had small emesis (vomit) that resulted in what she had eaten and drank. R75's POS, dated 6/8/2022 documents high protein supplement with meals. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/12/2022 at 6:30 PM, documents, Resident refused meds and a drink of water this shift. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) tried to feed resident at dinner, and she also refused to eat and drink. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/14/2022 at 3:18 PM documents, Resident ate about 5% of breakfast and drank 1 cup apple juice and refused all drinks and food for lunch. R75's Monthly Weight dated, 6/15/2022, documents R75 weighed 111.6 pounds. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/17/2022 at 1:02 PM, documents, Resident ate 1 pudding for breakfast with 2 cups ice water and refused all food for lunch but drank 1 cup water. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/20/2022 at 6:03 PM, documents, Poor appetite for supper, refused to let staff feed her. R75's Progress Note, dated 6/21/2022 at 6:45 PM, documents, Resident has refused all meals from help or staff. R75's Monthly Weight dated, 7/1/2022, documents R75 weighed 108 pounds. R75's Monthly Weight dated, 8/2/2022, documents R75 weighed 92 pounds. R75's Progress Note, dated 8/7/2022 at 8:52 AM, documents, Resident ate about 50% of breakfast and drank 25% of liquids this morning. Staff encouraged resident to drink more of her liquids, resident continued to put blanket on top of her head and refused to drink anymore. Writer of this note will continue to encourage fluids during all mealtimes. R75's Dietitian Assessment, dated 8/9/2022 at 5:09 PM documents, on a Pureed diet as tolerates with High Protein Supplement. Fortified Pudding at meals. Intakes poor. Refuses assistance at meals and refuses food and fluids. On Megace which can stimulate appetite. Weights: (8/2): 92, (7/1): 108, (5/4): 97, and (2/1): 111. Current weight is down 16# (14.8%) x/1 month and down 19# (17.1%) x/6 months. Below IBW Range 114-146. Body Mass Index: 14.85 (Underweight). History of edema, on (2) diuretics (Diagnosis CHF). Potential risk for weight changes and dehydration. Fluids encouraged and dietary offers 15+ servings/day. Skin free of open areas. No new labs to review. On Iron Supplement. Estimated Needs: 1260 calories (30 kilo-calories per kg), 1260 cc (cubic centimeters) fluids (1 cc per kilo-calories), and 42-50 gram protein (1.0-1.2 injury factor). History of weights up and down. Monitor. R75's Progress Note, dated 8/9/2022 at 4:55 PM, documents, this nurse left voicemail to resident's family to return call to facility in regards to unplanned weight loss. R75's POS dated, 8/10/2022 documents weekly weight related to unplanned weight loss. R75's Care Plan, dated 8/10/2022 documents resident has unplanned weight loss. Goal resident will have no weight changes +/- 2 pounds during this quarter. Approaches monitor weight, serve diet as ordered R75's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/10/2022 documents she weighed 93 pounds. R75's Dietitian/Quarterly Assessment, dated 8/16/2022 at 1:45 PM documents, on a Pureed diet with High Protein Supplement. Comfort feedings if alert. Fortified Pudding at meals. Intakes poor. Refuses assistance at meals and refuses food and fluids at times. On Megace which can stimulate appetite. Weights: (8/2): 92, (7/1): 108, (5/4): 97, and (2/1): 111. Current weight is down 16# (14.8%) x/1 month and down 19# (17.1%) x/6 months. Below IBW Range 114-146. Body Mass Index: 14.85 (Underweight). History of edema, on (2) diuretics (Diagnosis CHF). Potential risk for weight changes and dehydration. Fluids encouraged and dietary offers 15+ servings/day. Skin free of open areas. Labs (4/27/22): Glucose 60(L), Sodium 134(L), Potassium 5.0, Blood Urea Nitrogen 57(H), Creatinine 1.9(H), Total Protein 6.5, Albumin 3.2(L), Hemoglobin 9.5(L), and Hematocrit 28.2(L). On Iron Supplement. Estimated Needs: 1260 calories (30 kilo-calories per kg), 1260 cc fluids (1 cc per kilo-calories), and 42-50 gram protein (1.0-1.2 injury factor). History of weights up and down. Monitor. R75's MDS, dated [DATE] documents R75 is severely cognitively impaired, no swallow disorder, height 66 inches weight 92 pounds. R75's MDS documents R75 is totally dependent with one person physical assist for eating has had no weight loss and is receiving mechanically altered diet and feeding tube (nasogastric or abdominal). R75's MAR, dated 8/17/2022 documents she weighed 94 pounds. R75's Progress Note dated, 8/22/2022, documents, resident continues with poor appetite. Resident did however take around 4 bites of breakfast but then told aide that she was full and done eating. Half cup water drank. R75's MAR, dated 8/24/2022 documents she weighed 94 pounds. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/1/2022 at 6:56 PM, documents, Poor appetite continues. Resident stated she wanted some candy or cookies, but when given some soft candy resident refused saying 'I'm not hungry'. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/6/2022 at 1:04 PM, documents, resident ate approximately 5-6 bites of breakfast and 5-6 bites of lunch, 1 cup of apple juice for breakfast with half cup of water, and for lunch 1 cup apple juice. R75's Dietitian Assessment, dated 9/7/2022 at 5:20 PM documents, on a Pureed diet with High Protein Supplement. Comfort feedings as alert. Fortified Pudding at meals. Intakes poor. Refuses assistance at meals and refuses food and fluids at times. On Megace which can stimulate appetite. Weights: (9/6): 86, (8/2): 92, (6/15): 111.6, and (3/1): 108. Current weight is down 6# (6.5%) x/1 month, down 25# (22.9%) x/3 months, and down 22# (20.4%) x/6 months. Below IBW Range 114-146. Body Mass Index: 13.88 (Underweight). History of edema, on (2) diuretics (Diagnosis CHF). Potential risk for weight changes and dehydration. Fluids encouraged and dietary offers 15+ servings/day. Skin free of open areas. No new labs to review. On Iron Supplement. Estimated Needs: 1170 calories (30 kilo-calories per kg), 1170 cc fluids (1 cc per kilo-calories), and 39-47 gram protein (1.0-1.2 injury factor). Continue with diet Rx and encourage intakes. Monitor. R75's MAR, dated 9/7/2022, documents R75 weighed 87 pounds. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/8/2022 at 8:55 PM, documents, resident refused all meals this day stating 'I'm not hungry.' Resident would hold head down and staff could only get resident to take few sips of a drink. R75's MAR, dated 9/14/2022, documents R75 weighed 86 pounds. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/20/2022 at 8:12 PM, documents, resident continues with poor appetite for all meals this day. Approximately 5% total eaten this day with resident also denying most fluids. Family (who is aware of resident's decline and not eating) has called up to check on resident and was told no change in eating habits. On 9/20/2022 at 12:15 PM, staff were feeding R75 pureed food with fortified pudding and fortified milk. R75 sat in a geri chair with her head was half way under the blanket. Staff encouraged her to eat and drink. R75 ate less than 5% of the meal. On 9/21/2022 at 8:50 AM staff pureed food with fortified pudding and fortified milk. R75 sat in a geri chair, her head was under the blanket. Staff encouraged her to eat and drink. R75 ate less than 5% of the meal. On 9/21/2022 at 12:30 PM, staff were feeding R75 pureed food with fortified pudding and fortified milk. R75 sat in a geri chair, her head was laying against the chair and half under the blanket. Staff encouraged her to eat and drink. R75 ate less than 5% of the meal. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/21/2022 at 1:01 PM, documents, Appetite continues to be poor with aide of staff. Resident took around 5-6 bites for breakfast and same for lunch. Fluids encouraged with taking very little sips. Resident continued to hang down and again encouraged to lift head to eat and drink Resident would lift head a little but kept wanting head covered stating she was cold. On 9/21/2022 at 1:35 PM V24, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) and V11, CNA transferred R75 to bed using a full body lift to weigh R75. R75's weigh was 79.9 pounds. V24 and V11 stated they are familiar with R75, she doesn't ever eat well but lately R75 is eating less and less they feed her at all meals as much as she will eat. V24 and V11 both stated they don't offer R75 snacks in between meals because no one told them to do that. R75's Electronic Medical Record dated 6/15/2022 documents she weighed 111.6 pounds and 9/22/2022 documents she weighed 79.9 pounds which resulted in R75 had a 28.41% weight loss in 3 months. R75's EMR during this time period has no documentation R75's physician was notified of the significant weight loss and no additional interventions/recommendations were added from the licensed dietitian and R75's care plan was not updated during this time. On 9/21/2022 at 2:00 PM, V6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated R75 was on weekly weights in the past and then her weight was stable so they discontinued her weekly weights and reordered weekly weights in August 2022. V6 stated she documents the weekly weights in the computer. V6 stated R75 was on hospice for one day in May 2022 but the family didn't want her on hospice so it was discontinued. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/21/2022 at 6:04 PM, documents, Notified family of weight loss and continued poor appetite. Discussed options and conditions. Family would like to see if resident is a candidate for G (gastrostomy) -Tube placement. MD (physician) notified of weight loss and continued poor appetite, gave OK for GI (gastrointestinal) consult. R75's Progress Note dated, 9/21/2022 at 8:51 PM, documents, resident ate 50% of meal during dinner. Resident consumed all her mashed potatoes and chocolate pudding. On 9/21/2022 at 3:20 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated R75 is on dietary supplements ordered by the physician of fortified foods and staff feed her as much as she will eat. V2 stated every day is different with R75, some days she eats more than others. V2 stated she expects staff to document in the nurse's notes when R75 doesn't eat well. V2 stated she didn't know if staff document meal intake for R75. V2 stated the Dietary Manager does a weight report that documents 5% or more weight loss in a month and she reviews it. V2 stated the Registered Dietitian (RD) comes in weekly to review residents that have weight loss. V2 stated R75's physician recommended hospice but (R75's) family doesn't want her to be on hospice. V2 stated R75's physician would be responsible to discuss a G-Tube with R75's family and she wasn't sure if it was discussed or not. V2 stated R75 had an NG tube when she was readmitted from the hospital in May 2022, but they had to discontinue it because the facility doesn't allow NG tubes at the facility. On 9/22/2022 at 9:00 AM, V2, DON stated staff are not documenting how much R75 eats per meal. V2 stated if she doesn't eat well for a meal V2 expected staff to document that in the nurse's notes. V2 stated she doesn't know if staff are offering R75 comfort food/snack between meals, but they should and if R75 eats the snack staff should document how much of the snack she ate in the nurse's notes. R75 was on weekly weights in the past but she gained weight and the weekly weights were discontinued and were reordered in 8/2022. V2 stated R75 was on hospice for a few days but her family didn't want her on hospice, so it was discontinued. V2 stated she expected staff to follow the facility weight monitoring policy. On 9/22/2022 at 1:00 PM, V2 stated she called R75's POA to update her on R75's weight loss and asked if she wanted R75 to have a G-Tube if her physician would clear her for surgery and the POA stated she would agree to a G-Tube. On 9/22/2022 at 1:55 PM, V40, R75's Power of Attorney (POA) stated she wanted R75 to have a G-Tube for a long time. V40 stated R75 was hospitalized in May 2022, and she was readmitted to the facility a few days later with a naso-gastric tube. V40 stated R75's NG tube was removed at the facility the next day she was readmitted staff took her NG tube out because she couldn't stay at the facility with it. V40 stated she asked multiple staff about R75 getting a G-Tube, but it fell on deaf ears, no one wants to do their job. V40 stated the DON called her in the evening on 9/21/2022 and told her R75 was losing more weight and asked her if she would be ok with R75 getting a G-Tube and she said yes. On 9/23/2022 at 9:00 AM, V34, Licensed Dietitian, stated R75 she comes to the facility every two weeks. V34 stated R75 is on Megace to increase her appetite and on high protein supplement of fortified milk and pudding. V34 stated the facility doesn't document how much the residents eat so it's hard to tell how many calories she's getting. V34 stated she talks to staff when she is at the facility to see how much residents are eating. V34 stated R75 has a history of not eating well. V34 stated her weight was stable a few months ago and now she's losing weight again. V34 stated she hasn't recommended a G-Tube for R75 and she didn't have a reason why she hasn't recommended it. V34 stated she expected staff to feed R75 between meals and a bedtime snack to ensure she is getting as many calories as possible. V34 was not aware R75's current weight is down to 79.9 pounds. The facility's Weight Monitoring Policy, revised 6/2021 documents, Objective to consistently assess residents for significant weight loss or gain. Procedure record weight in the proper place in the resident's clinical record, weekly and monthly weights are recorded by dietary in Electronic Medical Record (EMR.) Licensed staff will notify the physician of the following: 5% loss in a 30-day period, 7.5% loss in a 90-day period, 10% loss in a 180-day period. Notification to the physician must be documented, and also whether or not new orders were received. Families/POA must be notified of significant weight loss. The weight committee will review all residents with significant weight losses and other residents of concern and refer to the RD (registered dietitian) as needed. The RD will review significant weight losses and any other residents referred by the weight committee on a monthly basis and make recommendations to physician as necessary. Residents that are confined to bed may be weighed with a lift scale. Responsible staff include licensed staff, CNAs, food service supervisor and the RD.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the information on the Practitioner Order for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (POLST) matched the physician's order for life sus...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the information on the Practitioner Order for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (POLST) matched the physician's order for life sustaining measures or had a physician's order for life sustaining measures in 4 of 4 residents (R23, R33, R48, R155) reviewed for advance directives in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. R23's POLST, dated 12/4/22, documents R23 wishes to be a do not resuscitate (DNR). R23's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/4/21, documents an order for R23 to be a full code. 2. R33's POLST, dated 5/13/22, documents R33 wishes to be a DNR. R33's POS, fails to document a physician's order for R33 to be a DNR. 3. R48's POLST, dated 4/22/22, documents R48 wishes to be a full code. R48's POS, dated 7/15/22, documents R48 is a DNR. 4. R155's Physician Order dated 9/8/22 documents her code status is Full Code. R155's POLST form dated the same date, 9/8/22, documents R155 directives is to be a Do Not Resuscitate status. On 9/22/22 at 9:25 AM, V19, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated if a resident is sent out to the hospital she would send their face sheet, a list of their medications (their Physician Order Sheet), any recent labs, and a copy of their POLST form. V19 stated if she entered a room and found a resident unresponsive she would look at the indicator that comes up on the computer screen for that resident that will show if they are a DNR or Full Code, and she would follow that. On 9/22/22 at 9:40 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated if a resident is sent to hospital they send that resident's Face Sheet and Physician Orders (POS). She stated the resident's code status would be on the POS. She stated she would expect the physician order, POLST form and Face Sheet to all match with the resident's code status the same on all three forms. V2 stated the nurses are responsible to enter the orders into the computer, but the Admissions Coordinator or the Social Service Director are responsible to get the POLST form signed and talk to the residents about their wishes. On 9/22/22 at 10:18 AM, V13, Admissions Coordinator, stated she is responsible to go through the Admissions Packet with residents upon admission, which includes their Advanced Directives. V13 stated she reads through the POLST form with the resident or their representative, and if the resident is alert and oriented , they are able to go ahead and sign it right then, and then she gives it to the nurses and they get a verbal signature from the physician, and then the form is given to medical records and the physician signs the form when they come to the facility. V13 stated she changes the Face Sheet after the resident or family first signs the POLST form if applicable, but she does not do anything with physician orders. The facility's policy, Advanced Directives adopted 2/18 documents, The facility shall support the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advanced directive. Procedure: Staff will determine, at the time of admission, whether or not any advanced directives are present, and make an effort to obtain pre-existing directives. Staff shall then ensure that they are placed in the resident's medical record. Pertinent facility staff and the physician shall be made aware of the existence of these directives. Documentation of the resident's Advanced Directives shall be present within the medical record and specified on the individual's Face Sheet. All Advanced Directives shall be uploaded into (electronic medical record) and stored in the resident's clinical record.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement range of motion (ROM) programs to maintain o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement range of motion (ROM) programs to maintain or prevent a decrease in mobility of the joints for 4 of 4 residents (R23, R34, R48, R50) reviewed for ROM in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. On 9/20/22 at 09:52 AM, R23 was observed with limited ROM and an inability to fully raise her arms and legs. R23's Face Sheet, undated, documents R23 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness and Patella Fracture. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R23 has impairment in ROM one side of the upper and lower extremities. R23's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) skills analysis/restorative programs, dated 5/20/22, document R23 has impairment in ROM in the left upper extremity with a mild risk of contracture development. R23's Physical Therapy (PT) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documents PT recommends R23 participates in a restorative therapy program to maintain current functional gains. Restorative range of motion program for generalized strengthening and endurance by participating in restorative therapy program by patient. R23's Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], patient is currently able to raise arms above head and raise arms straight out from shoulders. With a restorative nursing program, patient will be able to maintain participation in daily activities by performing the following restorative nursing interventions: active ROM and allow resident to assist as possible, keep hands in position to maintain support of joint. 2. On 9/20/22 at 11:25 AM, R34 was observed with limited ROM to her upper and lower extremities with an inability to fully raise her arms and legs. R34's Face Sheet, undated, documents R34 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness. R34's ADL Skills Analysis/Restorative Programs, dated 7/6/22, documents R34 has mild impairment in ROM with mild risk for contracture development. 3. On 9/20/22 at 9:59 AM, R48 was observed with limited ROM in both of her upper and lower extremities with an inability to fully raise her arms and legs. R48's Face Sheet, undated, documents R48 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness. R48's Monthly Summary of Care, dated 8/22/22, document R48 is not receiving restorative services. 4. On 9/21/22 at 10:44 AM, R50 was observed with limited ROM to her upper and lower extremities with an inability to fully raise her arms and legs. R50's Face Sheet, undated, documents R50 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness. On 9/21/22 at 1:35 PM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON), states R23, R34, R48 and R50 are not on a ROM program. On 9/22/22 at 2:30 PM, V2, DON, states she would expect a resident with limited ROM be on a ROM program. The Range of Motion (Passive and Active) policy, dated 3/2009, documents the purpose of ROM is to prevent contractures, to maintain normal range of motion, to increase joint motion to the maximum possible range, to maintain and build muscle strength, to stimulate circulation, to prevent deformities and to prevent contracture from becoming worse if they are already present.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement progressive interventions and provide super...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement progressive interventions and provide supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 16 residents (R65), reviewed for falls in the sample of 42. Findings include: R65's Physician Order Sheet for September 2022 document R65 is a [AGE] year old female with a diagnosis of Unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Elevated white blood cell count, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility; Other lack of coordination; muscle weakness; cognitive communication deficit. On 9/23/2022 at 10:58 AM, R65's room was on the dementia unit. R65 had a cast on her arm. R65's Care Plan dated 8/15/2022 documents (R65) has dementia with behaviors. R65's Care Plan with a revision date of 8/31/2022 documents, Resident at risk for falling related to recent illness/hospitalization and new environment. On 9/22/2022 at 2:41 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, I would expect all interventions for falls to be on the Care Plans. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/18/2022 at 12:50 PM, document, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) witnessed resident fall to floor extremely hard hitting face against ground and causing a CNA witnessed resident fall to floor extremely hard hitting face against ground and causing a very small skin tear to right frontal lobe. Resident assisted self from floor prior to Nurse arrival without help. Resident able to follow all commands, Range of Motion, Within normal Limits and denies any pain. Resident did hit head and has a small skin tear noted. Area was cleansed and dry dressing applied. Resident has been placing furniture in front of bathroom door stating 'I'm keeping the man out.' Hallucinations have been noted since admission date and currently has new medication orders in place. Resident eating at this time and still continues to deny pain. Current vitals 100/59, 71 pulse, 96% on RA, and 98.5 temp. Neurological checks have been put into place. POA (Power of Attorney) and MD (Medical Doctor) NP (Nurse Practitioner) made aware. R67's Care Plan does not have any interventions documented on her plan for this fall. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/18/2022 at 9:01 PM, Bruise forming where resident had unwitnessed fall. Measuring 5 centimeters (cm) x 3 cm. Light purple/red in color. R65's Evaluation Note Report for 8/1/2022 to 9/23/2022 does not document any intervention for her fall on 8/18/2022 in her Care Plan. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/19/2022 at 12:49 PM, document, Root Cause analysis related to fall on 8/18: CNA was walking with resident, resident stumbled due to shoes not fitting properly and resident fell. Intervention: Residents family contacted to bring resident some shoes that fit properly. This intervention was not documented in R65's Care Plan and there were no notes to document if the family had brought in any shoes. R65's Progress Notes dated 8/29/2022 at 4:16 PM, Resident had witnessed fall, playing game in dayroom with other residents, resident began walking backwards and tripped over her own feet and tried to catch herself and landed on her Right wrist, resident did not hit her head. Right wrist swelling noted. PRN (As needed) Acetaminophen administered, wrapped in ace wrap, Ice pack placed alternating on/off for 20 minutes. MD notified, received orders to wrap/immobilize, and get STAT (right away) x-ray. R65's Progress Note dated 8/29/2022 at 8:00 PM, x-ray technician here at this time, x-ray done. R65's Care Plan does not document any interventions for this fall. R65's Progress Note dated 8/30/2022 at 5:41 AM, Residents bruise to Right side of eye is healing well, no swelling or redness to resident Left Knee, resident had a fall on 8/29 resulting in a Right wrist injury, resident denies any pain or discomfort at this time, this writer notices that Right wrist swollen with some redness and dark blue bruising, continuing to wait on results of x-ray related to wrist injuries. R65's Problem Evaluation Notes Report dated 9/22/2022 Root cause analysis related to fall on 9/21/2022. Resident was ambulating independently from day room to resident room; stumbled and fell. Intervention: Resident encouraged to allow staff to assist with ambulation. (R65 is on the dementia unit). This was not documented on her Care Plan. The Accident/Incident Prevention Policy undated documents, When a resident has been identified as a high risk for accident/incidents, interventions will be put into place per the individual resident assessment and care plan.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriatel...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately to aid in the prevention and spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). This failure has the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 9/20/22 at 9:09 AM, V1, Administrator, states they have had a staff member test positive for COVID over the weekend, the facility is now in outbreak status. On 9/20/22 at 9:20 AM, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed at the nurses station with no eye protection on. On 9/20/22 at 9:20 AM, V6, LPN, was observed at the nurses station with eye protection on the top of her head, not covering her eyes. On 9/21/22 at 12:10 PM, V9, Dietary Assistant, was observed in the 300 hall dining room/kitchenette serving the lunch meal with no eye protection on. On 9/21/22 at 12:30 PM, V12, Housekeeper/Laundry, was observed outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with her mask down below her nose and no eye protection on. On 9/21/22 at 12:35 PM, V10, Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA), and V11, CNA, were observed in the 200 hall dining room feeding residents with no eye protection on. The COVID-19 Policy, dated 5/27/20, page 3, documents When community transmission levels are substantial or high, employees must wear a well-fitted face mask and eye protection. On 9/21/22 at 1:22 PM, The Community Transmission Rate COVID Data Tracker for [NAME] County, where the facility is located, is High. On 9/22/22 at 2:30 PM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON), states she would expect staff to wear their masks and eye protection at all times in the resident areas. The Updated guidance for nursing homes and other licensed long-term care facilities by the State of Illinois/The Illinois Department of Public Health, updated 3/22/22 documents the following: page 8 - When community transmission levels are substantial or high, at a minimum, health care personnel must wear a well-fitted mask at all times and eye protection while present in resident care areas. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (CMS Form 672), dated 9/20/22, documents there are 104 residents residing in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
  • • 43% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 18 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 65/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Manor Court Of Maryville's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Manor Court Of Maryville Staffed?

CMS rates MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Manor Court Of Maryville?

State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 16 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Manor Court Of Maryville?

MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 132 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MARYVILLE, Illinois.

How Does Manor Court Of Maryville Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Manor Court Of Maryville?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Manor Court Of Maryville Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Manor Court Of Maryville Stick Around?

MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Manor Court Of Maryville Ever Fined?

MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Manor Court Of Maryville on Any Federal Watch List?

MANOR COURT OF MARYVILLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.