BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns. With a state rank of #227 out of 665, they are in the top half of Illinois facilities, but the overall low trust score raises red flags. The facility's trend is stable, maintaining 6 reported issues in both 2024 and 2025, but this stability is concerning given the severity of some incidents. Staffing is rated below average at 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 42%, which is slightly better than the state average but still indicates potential instability. Alarmingly, the facility has incurred $447,600 in fines, a figure that is higher than 99% of Illinois facilities, signaling repeated compliance issues. Specific incidents include a critical failure where a resident fell from an open window and was found unresponsive, leading to their death. Additionally, another resident was not provided with timely emergency assistance after showing signs of a serious medical condition, resulting in the need for immediate intubation. Lastly, there was a serious lapse in notifying a physician about a resident's deteriorating condition, which led to a hospital visit and ultimately the resident's death. While some aspects of care may be adequate, these troubling incidents and the overall trust grade suggest that families should exercise caution when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #227/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $447,600 in fines. Higher than 74% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 38 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 38 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their change in condition policy by not calling advance life support services (911) for two hours after R48 who was found with an al...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0557
(Tag F0557)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with dignity during mealtime. This affected one of three residents (R5) reviewed for dignity.
Findings Inc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate call light and accessibility to a call light for one resident who was identified with self-care deficit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care at least every two hours. This affected one of three residents (R5) reviewed for incontinence care.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders by not applying splint or bra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Food Safety and Sanitation Policy by dietary staff using gloved hand to directly scoop a piece of cornbread after ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's decrease in blood pressure an...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident after experiencing...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the Wound Care Plan by not implementing effective interventions to prevent further alteration in skin integrity. This f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the Medication Policy by not labeling medication bottles with the opened date. This failure affected 3 residents (R24, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0575
(Tag F0575)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to display in a public and accessible location, the [NAM...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments and/or prevention interventions were implemented and/or completed, as ordered, for 3 of 3 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 37 the residents currently residi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0573
(Tag F0573)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a medical record request made by a resident's power of attorney. This failure applied to one (R4) of one resident reviewed for r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their protocols and have interventions in place for one res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0774
(Tag F0774)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist the resident in making transportation arrangements, resulting in the resident missing a post-operative follow up appoin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 7-29-2023 6:00am V4- (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed to be in R6's room telling the patient, I am the only one here, you ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders in the administration of tube feedings for four (R1, R2, R7, and R11) residents and failed to adminis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for tube feedings by not administering tube feedings per physician orders; failed to document that physic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff on duty to meet resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse in the buil...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine the necessary resources required to be able to provide residents with the neces...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
12 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective pain management for one resident's (R139) with severe pain of one resident reviewed for pain in a sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a hospice plan of care to a resident for one of three residents (R23) reviewed for hospice care in a sample 12.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to a resident with limited range of motion for one of three residents (R7) reviewed for contractures in a sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a written order for an indwelling catheter for one of two residents (R 89) reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to a resident on a feeding tube for one of two residents (R23) reviewed for tube feeding in a sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of any significant medication errors for one of six residents (R15) observed for medication ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and monitor the temperature of the medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date open food items in the kitchen's freezer and failed to air dry food preparation equipment. This deficiency has the potent...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0847
(Tag F0847)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to state in their arbitration rider contract agreement that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign the arbitrat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
On 05/23/2023 at 11:30AM and 11:45AM during blood glucose monitoring observation, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed placing the blood glucose machine on the bedside tables of R89 and R15 not...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect two of two resident R15 and R140 reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide influenza/Pneumococcal immunization as required or appropriate for five of five residents R11, R12, R15, R31 and R140 reviewed for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's Health Care Power of Attorney of a COVID positiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record the facility failed to avoid an accident by not ensuring that the window safety latch...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Code Blue policy and practice by not announcing a code ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record the facility failed to immediately conduct a comprehensive assessment and immediately activate 911...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 42% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 6 harm violation(s), $447,600 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 38 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $447,600 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (3/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 38 deficiencies at BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 6 that caused actual resident harm, 30 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center?
BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 72 certified beds and approximately 50 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in OAK PARK, Illinois.
How Does Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center Stick Around?
BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center Ever Fined?
BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER has been fined $447,600 across 36 penalty actions. This is 11.9x the Illinois average of $37,555. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Berkeley Nursing & Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
BERKELEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.