HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Hillcrest Retirement Village has a Trust Grade of C, meaning it is average compared to other facilities. It ranks #156 out of 665 in Illinois, placing it in the top half of state nursing homes, and #8 out of 24 in Lake County, indicating there are only a few better options nearby. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 5 to 6 between 2023 and 2024. Staffing is a concern, rated at 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 24%, which is good compared to the state average, but less RN coverage than 78% of facilities is troubling since RNs are crucial for catching potential problems. There are also significant concerns regarding compliance, as the facility has faced $30,194 in fines, which is average, but it indicates ongoing issues. Specific incidents include a resident with Parkinson's disease and a history of falls who had unwitnessed falls in the dining room and her room without adequate follow-up or revision of her care plan. Another serious incident involved a nurse failing to report a potential injury promptly, which resulted in a delay in care and increased pain for the resident. Additionally, there was a situation where a resident attempted to leave the facility and became agitated, raising concerns about supervision and safety. Overall, while there are strengths in the overall rating and some staffing retention, the facility has notable weaknesses in care and oversight that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Illinois
- #156/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $30,194 in fines. Higher than 88% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Low Staff Turnover (24%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (24%)
24 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R93's Face sheet dated 9/24/24, shows R93 has diagnoses including (but not limited to) Parkinson's disease, dementia, and epi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided care and services who r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a blender pitcher used to puree lunch was sanitized before use. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R22, R26, R34, R72) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. R93's Care Plan created on 3/7/24, shows R93 has an indwelling catheter.
On 9/24/24 at 9:16 AM, R93 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. R93 was wearing shorts that rested just above her knee ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a nurse reported a potential injury promptly to another nurse or physician. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for quali...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to safely transport a resident in a wheelchair for 1 of 3 (R1) residents in the sample of 10 reviewed for accidents/incidents. This failu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities per resident preferences for a res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services to 1 of 3 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident for psychological services for a resident with dep...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident's medication for her chronic obstru...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were kept out of the danger zone (below 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold foods, and 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R3's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including: unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, schizoaffective disord...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy while performing incontinence care for 1 of 22 residents (R68) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 22.
The ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Passive Range of Motion (PROM) to prevent a re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter bag was not touc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a duration stop date for a residents' psychotropic medication this applies to 1 of 5 resident (R80) reviewed for psychotropic medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to follow a physician's order to give the appropriate dose of insulin resulting in a significant medication error for 1 of 7 (R93) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 harm violation(s), $30,194 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 5 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $30,194 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade C (50/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Hillcrest Retirement Village's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Hillcrest Retirement Village Staffed?
CMS rates HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 24%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hillcrest Retirement Village?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 5 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Hillcrest Retirement Village?
HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 140 certified beds and approximately 119 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ROUND LAKE BEACH, Illinois.
How Does Hillcrest Retirement Village Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (24%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hillcrest Retirement Village?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Hillcrest Retirement Village Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Hillcrest Retirement Village Stick Around?
Staff at HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 24%, the facility is 22 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 25%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Hillcrest Retirement Village Ever Fined?
HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE has been fined $30,194 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Illinois average of $33,381. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Hillcrest Retirement Village on Any Federal Watch List?
HILLCREST RETIREMENT VILLAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.