ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE

4626 OLD ORCHARD ROAD, SKOKIE, IL 60076 (847) 676-4800
For profit - Corporation 56 Beds THE ALDEN NETWORK Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
85/100
#5 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Alden Estates of Skokie has a Trust Grade of B+, which indicates it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. The facility ranks #5 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top tier of options available in the state, and #3 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning only two local facilities are rated higher. However, the trend is worsening, as the number of reported issues increased from 1 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 0%, meaning while staff retention is good, overall staffing levels may not be sufficient. Notably, the facility has no fines on record, which is a positive sign, and it boasts more RN coverage than 83% of Illinois facilities, ensuring that registered nurses are available to catch potential problems. There are serious weaknesses to consider. For example, one resident with dementia fell and sustained a femur fracture due to inadequate supervision and monitoring, indicating shortcomings in individualized care plans. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain proper documentation regarding staff COVID-19 vaccinations, which poses a risk to all residents. Lastly, there were concerns about the management of controlled medications, where proper documentation was lacking, raising questions about medication safety practices. Overall, while Alden Estates demonstrates strengths in certain areas, these incidents reveal critical areas that need improvement.

Trust Score
B+
85/100
In Illinois
#5/665
Top 1%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 77 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: THE ALDEN NETWORK

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of education and offering Covid-19 vaccination to staff, and failed to follow facility Covid Vaccination Policy rega...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of education and offering Covid-19 vaccination to staff, and failed to follow facility Covid Vaccination Policy regarding education of Covid vaccine. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/22/24 at 1:20 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing (DON)/ (IP) Infection Preventionist) stated, We do offer Covid vaccinations for staff and residents yearly. Most of the time staff goes to local pharmacies to get theirs. Most of them do not take vaccination when we offer it. I have a flu/covid clinic scheduled for next week for staff and residents. On 10/22/24 at 1:54 PM, V8, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, 'I refused the Covid vaccination last year. The last one I received was in 2022. I did not sign a declination. On 10/22/24 at 1:55 PM, V2 stated, We offer Covid and Flu vaccines to staff but we do not keep record of refusals or education. Most of staff go to local pharmacies if they want the vaccine. On 10/23/24 at 10:09 AM, V9 (Social Worker) stated, We are offered Covid and flu shots each year. I do not remember if we have to sign anything. They do an in-service on flu and Covid. On 10/23/24 at 10:19 AM, V5, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, I submitted my documentation for flu and Covid vaccinations before I started. They have not offered or given me education on Covid 19 yet. I do not know if they offer it. On 10/23/24 at 10:22 AM, V6, CNA, stated, In the beginning of Covid they offered Covid and flu. They offer flu immunization each year. The last time they offered Covid was about last year or year before. They educate us on both by in-service. I got all the Covid shots, so I signed a consent. If we declined, we had to sign a refusal. I have not receive any education this year or offered Covid 19 vaccine this year. On 10/23/24 at 10:26 AM, V3 (Business Office Manager) stated, We are offered Covid and flu shots each year. We do not have to sign a refusal for Covid, but we do sign a declination for flu if we do not want it. We can also get immunizations from outside sources, we just have to provide proof for our records. On 10/23/24 at 9:53 AM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, We are offered flu and Covid shots through facility and we have to sign a consent or refusal, but I am new in this building. I have not signed any refusals or consents for flu or Covid here at this building yet or receive any education for Covid-19 or flu. On 10/23/24 at 10:37 AM, V2 stated, So, every time there is a new Covid booster out, when staff picks up their checks, we talk about vaccine and the staff will say sign me up. If there is no new booster out, we still talk about it, but it is their choice. We talk about what is available to them. We do encourage them to take the Covid vaccine. The memo is just telling them where they can go get it. People from outside must come here to do it. The outside vendors will do staff vaccinations as well. (V3, Human Resource) will post something by the time clock and those who want the vaccine will put their name down. For flu, we do have declinations, but for Covid they do not have to sign a declination. At the beginning of Covid, they did have to sign a refusal. I do not remember when having the declination signed by the staff stopped for Covid. I usually talk about how they can get flu and Covid vaccines, and when to get it, and when to stay home as education. I can look through my binder to see if I have sign in sheets for in-services for the education part of that. On 10/23/24 at 11:32 AM, V2 provided Covid policy and stated, We do educate them if they have any symptoms and should not come to work. We do not screen employees for Covid. We do not any longer get signed declinations for Covid vaccine, but we encourage all staff to get the Covid vaccines yearly when we do the flu vaccine, or a new booster comes out. I do not have any declinations for Covid vaccine. The in-services I provided to you are the only education we offer regarding the Covid vaccine. Vaccination status is documented by getting a copy of their vaccination cards and keep copy in the binder for Covid vaccines. If staff get another vaccine, they provide us with a copy of new card/vaccine documentation for binder. On 10/23/24 at 1:56 PM, V2 was asked for documentation for screening for Covid vaccinations. V2 stated No, we do not have anything like that. We do not screen for Covid vaccine. On 10/23/24 at 2:25 PM, V2, DON/IP, provided surveyor with a report listing employees and Covid vaccination dates, but complete documentation omitted for V10 (New Staff) and V11 (Staff) and V12 (Staff) with religious exemption. Surveyor asked V2 if that was all the documentation that she had regarding Covid vaccine education, screening, and offering vaccines to employees. V2 stated, Yes the in-services I provided to you is all I have. V2 provided surveyor Covid 19 documents posted by the time clock and Memo date 01/01/2024 to all Skokie Staff stating, This is a reminder to get your COVID vaccine/boosters. Please scan below QR codes for information on the vaccines. You can easily receive your COVID vaccine/booster at your local pharmacy or at your primary care provider. If you do receive the vaccine, please bring a copy of your vaccine card to (V3, Business Office Manager). This memo had education pages that did not document risks/benefits of vaccine attached to memo, but had QR codes that goes to link with risk/benefits of each Pfizer and Moderna covid vaccines. V2 could not provide a list of staff that received this memo. In-service document provided and dated as follows (in part): Date: 7/12/23, Topic: Covid Guidance Updates, summarize what you discussed: New Hospital admission Rate Date: 1/5/24 Topic: Covid Policy Discussed: The facility will manage residents with confirmed or suspected Covid-19 infection in accordance with recommendations from the CDC, state and local health department. Date: 1/29/24 and 11/29/24 Topic: Covid-19 Symptomatic Discussed: Should individual with symptom consistent of Covid-19 have negative results from a rapid antigen test, they should remain excluded from work and/or isolated pending results of confirmatory PCR testing. Date: 1/26/24 Topic: Covid-19 Discussed: All staff members to put N96 masks on each time going to patients rooms. Proper PPR donning and doffing needs to be done Must take vitals every 4 fours. Door kept close at all times. During the course of the survey, the facility did not provide requested Covid-19 declination forms to surveyors nor staff education in-services for current 2024 (fall season) Covid-19 vaccine. The facility's policy, dated 07/2023, Covid-19 Vaccination Policy stated (in part): Policy Vaccination remains critically important in reducing risk of hospitalization and death due to Covid-19. The facility will encourage staff to remain up to date with Covid-19 vaccination, including all eligible booster doses. Education 1. The facility will provide education to all staff and residents regarding the COVID-19 vaccine they are offered, in a manner they can understand, including information on the benefits and risks consistent with the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and/or FDA (Food and Drug Administration) information. This education will at a minimum include the FDA EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) Fact Sheet or Vaccine Information Sheet for the vaccine(s) being administered.
May 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and evaluate an individualize plan to include supervision a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and evaluate an individualize plan to include supervision and monitoring to reduce the risk for falls for a resident with a dementia and poor safety awareness. This affected one of three (R1) residents reviewed for safety and fall prevention. This failure resulted in R1 having an unwitnessed fall being sent to the local hospital and treated for left femur fracture. Findings include: R1 face sheet shows diagnosis of vascular dementia, fracture of femur neck, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Parkinson disease, and history of falling. R1 fall risk evaluation assessment, dated 2/17/24, denotes a score of 8, risk factors are decreased mobility, confused, one to two falls in past three months, R1 takes medication that have a diuretics effect or increase GI (gastrointestinal) mobility, drugs that affects the thought process, drugs that create a hypotensive effect, R1 is regularly incontinent, needs assist to get to the toilet. R1's Minimum Data Set/MDS, dated [DATE] section C, shows BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 (cognitively intact), when asked the day of week, R1 coded for 0 (incorrect answer). Section GG for functional abilities and goals denotes on admission R1 walked 10 feet with supervision or touching assistance, toilet transfer denotes 04 (supervision or touching assistance), Section J denotes yes for falls within the last month prior to admission and yes for fractures related to fall in the 6 months prior to admission, yes for falls since admission, 1 is coded for major injury. Facility final incident report to the department denotes R1's name, R1's date of birth , date of admission, R1's diagnoses- included but limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and affecting right dominant side, vascular dementia, parkinson disease. R1 is a [AGE] year-old male, alert and orient x2, forgetful, able to make needs known to staff. R1 is in the facility for short term rehab status post fall at home. Description of occurrence on February 22nd, 2024 staff noted (R1) lying on the floor on his right-side. (R1) was transferred to hospital for evaluation and admitted for a diagnosis of overriding fracture of the femoral shaft. MD (medical doctor) and family made aware investigation initiated. Investigation completed interviews and record reviews were conducted (R1) is [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for physical therapy and occupational therapy for diagnosis noted above. (R1) is ambulatory using a walker with a slow steady gait. On February 22, 2024, around breakfast time (R1) was eating breakfast in his bed as his usual routine with call light within reach. (R1) voice nothing else was needed before staff left the room and was reminded to use the call light for staff assistance. The housekeeper went into the residence room to complete daily cleaning and observed resident lying on the floor. Nurse on duty was immediately notified. Per resident he needed to go to the bathroom but did not call for staff assistance. When asked why he didn't call for assistance resident didn't answer and just shrugged his shoulders. Per staff interviews resident routinely called for staff assistance when needed by activation of call light. Residents score 14 on the BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) and had no prior incidents or accidents in the facility. On 2/17/2024, 2/18/2024 and 2/21/2024, resident was educated on safety precautions and to not get up without staff assistance and to use call light. Upon resident return care plan will be reviewed and updated accordingly. R1 emergency room records, dated 2/22/2,4 shows diagnosis of fracture of left femur. Chief complaint, paperwork lists vascular dementia as a diagnosis, but he is able to give history appropriately. States he was walking with his walker, and the wheels of the walker locked up, and he fell forward/ tripped. Has pain and deformity of the L (left) hip, cannot stand or move the leg too well. No head or neck injury. Tore the skin of the L (left) arm, but has normal function, normal ROM (range of motion). No weakness. No new numbness. No neck pains. Physical exam left leg shortened and internally rotated at the hip. New left femur shaft fracture, discussed with hospitalist, will need further surgery. R1 root cause analysis for fall on 2/22/2024 denotes, on February 22, 2024, (R1) was going to the bathroom without calling for assistance. Based on the investigation the factor that contributed to his fall was right sided weakness. He stated he fell on his left side but was observed by staff on the floor on his right side. R1 progress notes, dated 2/22/24 at 8:20am, denotes, A staff member called for author's attention this morning because the staff member was passing patient's room when they saw that the patient was on the floor. Author immediately went to patient's room; patient's call light was not on. Author assessed the patient, and he is noted to be on his right side in front of the doorway. Author asked patient to describe what happen, but patient unable to give a clear story as the patient is forgetful at baseline. Patient is alert and responsive. Patient states he was walking on his own with the walker to use the bathroom when he lost his balance, patient states he did not call for any help or use his call light. Patient is currently on his right side, but patient able to recall that he fell onto his left side. Noted 2 skin tears with bleeding to the left arm. Redness is noted on patient's head, but patient states he did not hit his head. Patient neuro is intact, able to answer questions, upper extremities are strong. Patient has pain to his left leg and is unable to straighten his leg on his own at this time. Nursing staff is present with the patient and did not move patient, placed pillow behind patient's head to make him comfortable. Called 911 due to patient being on blood thinners and pain to left surgical leg for evaluation. Doctor made aware with orders to send out to (city) ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. Left arm skin tears cleansed with NSS( normal saline) and covered with dressing. Patient was transferred to (city) ER with 911. Patient's wife (name) made aware and is amenable. Doctor (orthopedic surgeon) office called, and PA (physician assistant) made aware and will alert Doctor that patient is at the hospital. Facility employee interviews denotes V6 (Unit Manger) coming from front walking to a nursing station nurse on duty asked me to help ( room number) when I walked in patient was noted laying on the floor on his right side with his left arm bleeding his walker was next to him call light was not on. (V4) and (V7) asked him what happened patient stated he was trying to go to bathroom by himself. Paramedics arrived and assisted him on the stretcher two of the paramedics lifted him by his arms and did not support his legs as they were transferring him patient was then taken to hospital. On 5/4/24 at 9:11am, V1 (R1's family) said R1 was admitted to the facility after a fall at home where he sustained a left hip fracture requiring surgery. V1 said R1 fell at home while going to the bathroom. V1 said she received a call for the facility on 2/22/24, and she was informed R1 was observed on the floor, and that he will be sent to the hospital for evaluation. V1 said R1 was diagnosed with a left femur fracture and required surgery. V1 said R1 told her he fell while going to the bathroom. V1 said she doesn't remember if R1 said he put his call light on prior to taking himself to the bathroom. V1 said R1 does need help going to the bathroom. V1 said she informed the facility R1 fell at home, and the facility was aware that R1 was a fall risk. On 5/4/24 at 11:06am, V2 (Nurse) said he was notified R1 was on the floor, he went to assess R1, R1 observed on his right side but R1 was able to communicate that he fell on his left side. V1 said R1 was not moved, and 911 was summoned to escort R1 to the hospital for evaluation. V1 said the physician and surgeon were made aware and the physician gave orders for R1. V1 said he doesn't recall where R1's walker was at that time. On 5/4/24 at 2:31pm, V3 (Director of Nursing) said R1 had an unwitnessed fall sustaining a fracture. V3 said her investigation concluded R1 got up to go to the bathroom without assistance from staff. V3 said R1 has right side weakness and he fell. V3 said she doesn't know if R1 had on shoes, she doesn't know if R1 had on skid free socks, she doesn't know if R1 tripped over something, she doesn't know if R1's urinal was available to him, she doesn't know if it was full and not able to be used. V3 said R1 was usually complaint with using the call light for assistance to the bathroom. V3 said she doesn't know what was different on that day. V3 said the facility keeps all the residents roller walkers at the bedside. V3 said it is better the resident be able to reach the walker than fall trying to reach the walker. V3 said R1 call light was within reach, attached to the side half rail. V3 said she is aware R1 had a fall at home, but she doesn't know the situation surrounding the fall. V3 said R1 has dementia. V3 said she would have to find out if R1 has poor safety awareness. V3 said she conducted the fall investigation for R1. V3 was asked, How is the facility reducing the risk for falls when the roller walker is left at the bedside for the resident to reach and use at liberty? V3 did not respond. On 5/4/24 at 2:40pm, V4 (Rehab Director) said he did not complete R1's physical therapy evaluation, but was agreeable to review the evaluation. V4 said, (R1) was referred to therapy, (R1) was evaluated, and (R1) ambulates with minimal assist meaning support of 25% is needed. Support can be provided with use of gait belt, and someone is physically there. (R1) needed support because (R1) was a fall risk, he had forward lean, he wobbled and had a weak pelvis. V3 said R1 should not be ambulating by himself. V3 said R1 had poor safety awareness, needed verbal cueing during walking. with ambulation. V4 said, The walker should not be left at the bed side because you don't want to promote the resident to use the walker. It can stay in the room but away from the resident. Facility policy titled care plans, dated 8/2020, denotes management of falls the facility will assess hazards and risk develop a plan of care to address hazards and risk, implement appropriate resident interventions, and revise the resident plan of care in order to minimize the risk for fall incidents and or injuries to the resident. Develop a plan of care to include goals and interventions which addresses residence risk factors. Risk factors may include but are not limited to the following contributing diagnosis disorders disease processes active infections other comorbidities history of fall incidents incontinence medications assistance required with ADL's gate transfer balance issue behaviors and or cognitive status. Assess and monitor resident's immediate environment to ensure appropriate management of potential hazards.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to account for the receipt of the controlled medication for one of eight residents (R10) reviewed for controlled medications in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to account for the receipt of the controlled medication for one of eight residents (R10) reviewed for controlled medications in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/08/2024 at 11:33AM during observation with V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) of the south medication cart, R127's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form did not indicate the signature of nurse receiving medication, quantity received, or date of receipt. On 02/08/2024 at 11:35AM, V7 said R127's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form should indicate the signature of nurse receiving medication, quantity received, and date of receipt. On 02/09/2024 at 10:50AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the nurse receiving the controlled medication is expected to verify the quantity received, sign, and date the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form. Review of facility's policy entitled Controlled Drug Documentation, dated 06/2022, indicated: A. Purpose: To maintain control and prevent loss and/or diversion of controlled substances. C. Procedure: 1. For each controlled substance dispensed individually, pharmacy supplies a pink proof-of-use form (Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form), pre-printed with resident and medication information. a. The nurse receiving the medication delivery will indicate on the quantity received and sign/date the accompanying proof-of-use form;
Feb 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to ensure resident received o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to ensure resident received oxygen as prescribed, and failed to properly store oxygen tubing for 1 resident [R9] of 3 [R15, R272] residents in the sample of 12 residents. Findings include, R9's medical record documents in part: admitted on [DATE], with the medical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease syncope and collapse, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Minimum data set brief interview for mental status score = 15 indicates R9 is cognitively intact. Physician order, dated 2/3/2023, respiratory oxygen per nasal cannula at 1 to 2 liters per minute continuous titrate to oxygen level is greater than 92% every shift. Care plan, dated 2/3/23, documents R9 requires oxygen therapy related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; intervention-Administer oxygen per MD orders. On 02/14/23 at 9:27 AM, R9 stated, I usually have on my oxygen, I don't know how long it has been off, I would guess it has been over an hour or more, because I'm finished with breakfast. I did not put the oxygen tubing on the couch. I've been in the bed all morning, and I cannot reach the couch from my bed. On 2/14/23 at 9:35 AM, surveyor and V4 [Registered Nurse] entered R9's room and observed R9's nasal cannula tubing lying directly on the seat of the couch. V4 stated, I'm not sure who placed (R9's) nasal canula on the couch instead of plastic bag. I don't see a plastic bag for (R9's) nasal cannula; I will go get another nasal canula and plastic bag for storage. The nasal canula lying on the seat of the couch could cause an infection. (R9) is fine; she does not receive oxygen all the time only as needed. On 2/14/23 at 1:34 PM, V4 stated, (R9) does have an order for continuous oxygen. I noticed on the shift report the physician assistant told the nursing staff to start weaning (R9) off oxygen. The nurses are responsible to remove the oxygen then record the oxygen saturation. I did not remove (R9's) oxygen, and I'm not sure who did or how long the oxygen was off. I do not see a physician order to wean (R9) off oxygen; the nurse did not place the order in. Typically, when I get information in report, I follow the plan. I did not check to see if there was a physician order. I was not the nurse who removed (R9's) oxygen today, and I am not sure who removed (R9's) oxygen or how long the oxygen was not on (R9). On 2/16/23 at 11:20 AM, V2 [Director of Nursing] stated, I been working here for 21 years as a floor nurse, but I been the Director of nursing here for 6 months. I completed one to one in-service with V4 [Registered Nurse] regarding once she receives a verbal order from the physician assistant, to get the order approved by the primary care physician and enter the order on the resident's electronic medication administration record. I also in-serviced all other nurses regarding physician orders. If a resident's oxygen is removed from their airway and not being monitored, the resident could have respiratory distress or shortness of breath. I also completed one to one in-service with V4 [Registered Nurse] regarding infection control, that oxygen nasal cannula tubing needs to be stored in a plastic bag when it is not in use to prevent infection. I also in-serviced all other nursing staff regarding infection control. If the resident oxygen tubing is not kept in a plastic bag, it could potentially cause an infection. On 2/16/23 at 1:45 PM, V1[Administrator] stated, The facility does not have a policy on oxygen tubing storage. Policy documented in part; Physician's Orders for Medication or Treatments -Medications will be dispensed and subsequently administered to a resident only upon the clear, complete, signed order of a lawfully authorized prescriber. -Verbal orders will be received only by licensed nurses or pharmacists and subsequently confirmed in writing by the prescribing physician. Each medication order is documented in the resident's medical record with the date and signature of the person receiving the order Policy: Documents in part: -Infection Prevention and Control Program The primary mission is to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Concerns
  • • 4 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Alden Estates Of Skokie's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Alden Estates Of Skokie Staffed?

CMS rates ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Alden Estates Of Skokie?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 3 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Alden Estates Of Skokie?

ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ALDEN NETWORK, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 56 certified beds and approximately 27 residents (about 48% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SKOKIE, Illinois.

How Does Alden Estates Of Skokie Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Alden Estates Of Skokie?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Alden Estates Of Skokie Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Alden Estates Of Skokie Stick Around?

ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Alden Estates Of Skokie Ever Fined?

ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Alden Estates Of Skokie on Any Federal Watch List?

ALDEN ESTATES OF SKOKIE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.