CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Concordia Village Care Center has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice, though not without its flaws. It ranks #26 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and is the top option out of eight in Sangamon County. The facility's performance is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2024. Staffing is a strength, rated 5 out of 5 stars, but with a turnover rate of 51%, which is average for the state. However, they have faced some concerning incidents, such as delays in assessing and treating a resident's humeral fracture and failures in administering medications as prescribed, which led to negative behavioral effects. Overall, while the nursing home has strong staffing and a good trust grade, families should be aware of the recent deficiencies and incidents that could impact resident care.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #26/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,678 in fines. Higher than 91% of Illinois facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 69 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of medications for 2 of 51 residents (R42, R115) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 29.
Findings includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene, post a needed isolation sign, and use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 2 of 24 residents (R40, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to label and date food products, restrain hair, and ensure resident use refrigerators are only used for residents to prevent foo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assessment and treatment of humeral fracture in 1 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as prescribed, as well as at the time frame as ordered, for 2 of 5 residents, (R32, R104) reviewed for medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinence care for 4 of 4 (R6, R1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R31's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R31 is severely cognitively impaired, frequently incontinent of urine, and occasionally in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On 9/19/2023 at 10:09 AM, the medication storage room was inspected. There was a refrigerator containing medications. V8, Lic...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for 5 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to safely secure and store medications in a locked medication cart, failed to dispose of expired medications in the medication c...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Concordia Village's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Concordia Village Staffed?
CMS rates CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Concordia Village?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Concordia Village?
CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 62 certified beds and approximately 50 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SPRINGFIELD, Illinois.
How Does Concordia Village Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Concordia Village?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Concordia Village Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Concordia Village Stick Around?
CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is 5 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Concordia Village Ever Fined?
CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER has been fined $8,678 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,166. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Concordia Village on Any Federal Watch List?
CONCORDIA VILLAGE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.