EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA

100 ROSEWOOD VILLAGE DRIVE, SWANSEA, IL 62220 (618) 236-1391
For profit - Corporation 120 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
5/100
#519 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Evervella of Swansea has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at the facility. Ranking #519 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois places it in the bottom half, and #11 out of 15 in St. Clair County suggests there are only a few local options that are better. The facility is reportedly improving its situation, with the number of issues decreasing from 12 in 2023 to 9 in 2024, but it still has a concerning 70% staff turnover rate, which is much higher than the state average. Serious incidents have been noted, including a failure to properly care for a hospice resident, which led to a leg injury, and an instance of abuse by a staff member, compromising the safety and dignity of residents. Additionally, the facility has incurred $189,638 in fines, which raises further red flags about compliance, while its RN coverage is less than 94% of Illinois facilities, meaning residents may not receive the attentive care they need.

Trust Score
F
5/100
In Illinois
#519/665
Bottom 22%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
12 → 9 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
70% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$189,638 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 12 issues
2024: 9 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 70%

23pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $189,638

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Staff turnover is elevated (70%)

22 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
Jul 2024 8 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to seek medical interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to seek medical interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (R39) reviewed for medical interventions in the sample of 37. This failure resulted in R39 having a fall and not being sent out to the hospital for 2 hours and 34 minutes and sustaining a fracture of her left ankle. Findings include: R39's Physician Order Sheet (POS) July 2024, documents a diagnosis of Pneumonia, unspecified organism; Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition; Hypertensive encephalopathy; Memory deficit following unspecified cerebrovascular disease; Unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site; Essential (primary) hypertension; Other specified nutritional anemias; dry eye syndrome of unspecified lacrimal gland; Polyarthritis, unspecified; Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis; Anxiety disorder, unspecified; Hyperlipidemia, unspecified; Overactive bladder; Pain, unspecified; Allergy, unspecified, subsequent encounter; Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified; Constipation, unspecified; Alzheimer's disease, unspecified; Personal history of COVID-19; Acute cough; Urinary tract infection, site not specified (History of); Constipation, unspecified; Pneumonia due to other specified infectious organisms; Deficiency of other vitamins; Other chronic pain; Opioid use, unspecified, uncomplicated; Unspecified fracture of left lower leg, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing; Dyspnea, unspecified; Other pancytopenia; Encounter for desensitization to allergens; Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; Hypokalemia; Altered mental status, unspecified; Unspecified open-angle glaucoma, stage unspecified; Encounter for prophylactic measures, unspecified; Vitamin D deficiency, unspecified; Vitamin deficiency, unspecified. R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R39 was moderately impaired for cognition for activities of daily living. R39's Care Plan documents, Requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) due to decreased strength and balance, decreased activity tolerance, decreased safety, impulsive, impaired cognition. Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential Start Date: 3/15/2024. R39's Care Plan: Problem: At risk for falls due to history of falls, dementia, poor safety awareness, behaviors of refusing care, medications, high blood pressure, pain, arthritis, left knee problems (gives out), poor vision, abnormal labs. 6/9/23 Fall, 7/28/2023 Fall, 03/05/2024 Fall. Resident will be free from injury/harm over the next 90 days. Target Date: 06/15/2024 (Long Term Goal). R39's Progress Notes dated 3/5/2024 at 2:50 AM, Resident found on floor beside bed, resident assessed and noted to have small lump on internal LL (left leg). Resident has complaints of pain. No other complaints of pain or injuries noted elsewhere. Resident stated when asked what occurred my legs became twisted, and I fell out of bed Neuro checks WNL (within normal limits) resident assisted back to bed per 2 staff with a gait belt. Resident continued to complain of LL leg pain, call placed to POA (Power of Attorney) who stated, it was too late in the night to send to emergency room, I want STAT (immediately) x-rays done. (V19 Nurse Practitioner) notified and ordered stat L ankle and L tib/fib x-rays. (X-ray company) notified of stat x-ray order, on call nurse notified. R39's Progress Notes dated 3/5/2024 at 2:52 AM, This nurse spoke with (V22 POA) and explained to her that (X-ray company) does not perform stat x-ray services overnight anymore and that they start x-ray services again at 8:00 AM, in the morning, and couldn't guarantee when (x-ray company) would arrive at the facility and (V22 POA) stated that's fine. This nurse explained to (V22) that resident had a small bulge in her left lower extremity and that resident was holding her leg and repeatedly stating that her leg hurt. (V22) again stated that she wanted stat x-rays done that it was too late in the night to send her to the hospital. R39's Progress Notes dated 3/5/2024 at 5:24 AM, Resident has continued to hold her left leg and scream out in pain, resident is screaming I don't care what my daughter said, I want to go to the hospital. DON notified. Left voicemail for (V22) to return call. Ambulance notified of need for transport. R39's Progress Notes dated 3/5/2024 at 10:49 AM, Resident returned to the facility via ambulance at 10:50 a.m. and was transferred to bed by EMT's. Resident is alert and oriented. Resident has a fractured L (left) ankle with a standard order for (acetaminophen). On 7/25/2024 at 9:24 AM, V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) placed the gait belt around R39's waist and as she was placing the gait belt around R39, V18's foot was touching R39's left foot, R39 yelled out, ouch you hurt my leg, I broke my leg, be careful, V18 stated, you did not break your leg. On 7/25/2024 at 9:28 AM, V18 was asked if she was positive R39 had never broke her leg and she stated she was agency and did not know anything and was not aware R39 had broken her ankle previously. R39's Final Fall Report documents, (R39) is a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Alzheimer disease, unspecified dementia with Behavioral disturbances, hypertensive encephalopathy, unspecified osteoarthritis, essential hypertension, polyarthritis, generalized anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, pain, vitamin D deficiency, unspecified severe protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Major depression disorder. According to her most recent MDS, (R39) has a BIM (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 8 (moderately impaired for cognition). (R39) resides in the facility long term with no plans to discharge. On 3/5/2024 at approximately 2:50 AM, (R39) was in her room in the bed. (R39) had pulled all the linen away from the mattress and her bilateral lower extremities became tangled in the sheets. She rolled over in the bed and fell to the floor twisting her left leg and foot. The charge nurse completed an assessment and palpated an abnormal raised area to left shin/ankle. (R39) did have complaints of pain with tactile stimuli. The charge nurse proceeded to notify the doctor and POA (Power of Attorney). The POA requested to have a STAT x-ray performed in house and refused transfer to the ER (emergency room). When scheduling the x-ray, the charge nurse was notified the STAT x-rays were no longer offered overnight, and exam would have to be scheduled for after 8:00 AM. The exam was scheduled, and the charge nurse informed the POA. The POA continued to refuse transfer to the ER at that time. At approximately 5:15 AM. (R39) continued to exhibit symptoms of pain and informed the DON (Director of Nursing). It was decided that she be transferred to the ER (Emergency Room) for treatment. The following was completed immediately: skin pain evaluation, PROM (Passive Range of Motion) to extremities (Medications evaluated), Care Plan reviewed, most recent labs reviewed, MD/POS/DON notifications, Transfer to ER (Emergency Room). Investigations completed. (R39) returned from the ER with a diagnosis of Closed fracture of Distal end of Fibula, unspecified fracture, Morphology, initial encounter. During record review and staff interviews, it was reported that (R39) often uses profanity and can be verbally aggressive at time. She had an increase in behavior over a short period. (R39) required more redirection, verbal cueing, and one-on-one care with staff including family phone calls. (R39) had been refusing to seek assistance, yelling out, making false allegations towards peers and staff, and attempting to propel herself in the wheelchair when asked to remain in common areas. (R39) reported that she wrapped in bed covers and rolled from the bed. However, it is believed that due to her cognition and poor safety awareness, (R39) was attempting to turn and position herself in the bed and was lying close to the edge when she rolled and fell. (R39) has a history of falls and bone/joint issues. It has been determined that she is at an increased risk for fractures due to a decreased bone density. R39's Initial Serious Injury Incident Report, with incident date of 3/5/2024 documents, Resident observed on floor from bed wrapped in sheet and cover. Stated that she got tangled and rolled out of bed. Sent to ER for x-ray. Fracture of distal end of fibula. Investigation started immediately. Final/Summary to follow. R39's Hospital Records dated 3/5/2024 at 6:24 AM, documents, (R39) [AGE] year-old female presenting to the ED (emergency department) from (Facility) complaining of left knee and foot pain. Patient states she fell out of bed. Episode occurred around 2:30 AM, given Tylenol. Still complained of pain. R39's Hospital records document she was given 5-325 mg (milligrams) tablet of hydrocodone-acetamonophen (Norco) (narcotic) and was given an splint/Brace immobilizer to wear as directed with no weight bearing for her fractured distal end of fibula. R39's Hospital Records dated 3/5/2024 at 6:24 AM, documents XR (x-ray ankle) left 3 or more views, XR knee left 1 of 2 views: Diagnosis: Closed fracture of distal end of fibula, unspecified fracture morphology, initial encounter. Clinical fracture of distal end of fibula, unspecified fracture morphology, initial encounter. Findings: Mildly displaced fracture of the distal left fibular shaft. On 7/25/2024 at 4:39 PM, V19 (Nurse Practitioner) stated, I was contacted by the facility on 3/5/2024 regarding (R39) having a fall and ordered a STAT x-ray. The facility never contacted me again telling me the STAT x-rays were no longer be performed overnight and or they would not be available until 8:00 AM the following morning. I normally give them a four-hour window. If the resident was still in pain and if they would have contacted me and the resident was yelling and screaming, I would know there was not much else we could do for her and would have had her sent out to the emergency room right away and would not wait. On 7/26/2024 at 5:15 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) (R39) was trying to get herself out of bed and got caught up tangled in the sheets. (R39) was complaining of pain and when we contacted her daughter, she told them not to send her out to the hospital and to get an x-ray in house. I was not present for the conversation. I was told that later (R39) was still complaining of pain and I was contacted by the nurse, and I told her to send her out. On 7/26/2024 at 9:32 AM, V31 (Registered Nurse) stated, I remember (R39) falling. I was at the nurse's station, and I heard her scream. When I went to her room, I found her sitting Indian style on the floor on her mat. Her leg had a bulge to it, and she was in pain. I called the daughter (V22) and told her I wanted to send her out and she was adamant about not wanting to send her out to the hospital and to get a STAT x-ray in the facility. I told her it would be better for her to be seen in the ED, but she refused. I do not remember much else except (R39) was screaming and was in a lot of pain and we finally sent her out. I do not remember one way or the other about calling the doctor again. The Change of Condition Reporting Policy with a revision date of 2/2018 documents, (Facility) will notify the resident's physician and the resident's representative whenever, there is a significant change in the resident's health, mental or psychosocial status. Assess the resident condition as warranted which may include, but is not limited to checking vital signs, completing a physical assessment as indicated speaking with the resident about the symptoms and noting the presence or absence of pain. Notify the physician of the change/incident/accident There is an accident (incident or unusual occurrence). Notify the physician of the change of condition/incidents/accidents/unusual occurrences and accident findings. may be reported to the physician. (Changes of condition/incidents/accidents/unusual occurrences may be reported to the physician.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for an indwelling urinary catheter to prevent infection in 1 of 4 residents (R45), reviewed for cathe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for an indwelling urinary catheter to prevent infection in 1 of 4 residents (R45), reviewed for catheters in the sample of 37. Findings include: On 7/23/24 at 9:05 AM, R45 was observed lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter in place draining cloudy yellow urine. The catheter drainage tubing was touching the floor and the drainage bag was in a privacy bag. On 7/24/24 at 1:50 PM, catheter care was observed on R45 with V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V15 (CNA). V12 completed hand hygiene and donned clean gloves and removed R45's incontinence brief. There were incontinence wipes that had been removed from the package and were sitting on top of the package with no barrier between them. V12 then took one of the wipes and wiped down the catheter tubing, then using the same wipe, wiped down the catheter tubing again touching the urethra. V12 then disposed of the wipe and attempted to get another wipe from the top of the wipe package, V12 was unable to grab the wipe and turned the wipes over several times trying to get the wipe to pull away from the others, contaminating the wipes. Then wearing the same gloves and using the contaminated wipe, V12 wiped down the outside of R45's labia. V12 then using the same contaminated gloves and not maintaining a clean/dirty field, grabbed another wipe and wiped again down the center of R45's labia, touching the urethra. V12 removed her gloves, performed hand hygiene, donned clean gloves and R45 was turned onto her left side and then her right side, cleansing her buttocks and anal area. R45 was then placed on her back and using the same contaminated gloves, V12 placed a clean incontinence brief and mesh underwear on R45, repositioned her in bed and covered her up with a blanket. R45's Face Sheet, undated, documents R45 has a diagnosis of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and Retention of Urine. R45's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/2/24, documents R45 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3, which indicates R45 has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS goes on the document that R45 is dependent with toileting, utilizes an indwelling urinary catheter and is always incontinent of bowel. R45's Care Plan, dated 1/4/24, documents R45 has the potential for UTI's due to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. R45's Progress Note, dated 1/1/24 at 8:26 AM, documents the following: During med pass Resident was observed to be flushed, diaphoretic, and un-alert. Resident could not open eyes or take medication and her face was bright red. After assessing Resident VS (vital signs) were 104.0-100.8, 104, 22, 113/55, 93%-95%. Resident was negative for COVID and BS (blood sugar) was 185. Resident was given (acetaminophen) to help with fever and air condition was turned on, then this nurse reached out to on call NP (Nurse Practitioner) who advised to send resident out for further assessment. Emergency contact, on call nurse, and DON (Director of Nurses) was made aware. Report was called to ER (Emergency Room) nurse. R45's Progress Note, dated 1/2/24 at 7:45 AM, documents the following: Call placed to (local) hospital. Resident admitted with dx of UTI and Sepsis. R45's Progress Note, dated 3/1/24 at 9:30 AM, documents the following: Resident continues on MED A. Alert with confusion this shift. Yelling out most of this shift. I have to Pee. Resident has had no urine noted in bag this AM. Resident laid down and assessed, Foley (indwelling urinary catheter) intact. Foley flushed with 60cc (cubic centimeters) of NS (normal saline) x (times) 2. Foley now patent and draining, yellow cloudy urine 900cc noted. The resident has had U/A (urinalysis) recently collected, awaiting the final results. No voiced pain. Vitals are stable. Fluids are encouraged and at the bedside. Resident now resting in bed call light within reach. R45's Progress Note, dated 3/5/24 at 11:44 AM, documents the following: FNP (Family Nurse Practitioner) responded to UA results from 3/2. Contaminated specimen. May need to change Foley and then send urine sample after clean Foley placed. Made all parties aware. R45's Progress Note, dated 3/8/24 at 1:45 PM, documents the following: Received urine C&S (culture and sensitivity) results from (facility contracted) lab. Copy faxed to (doctor) and called to verify receiving. Explained specimen taken straight from catheter and urine is cloudy with sediment. Office to call new orders to facility. R45's Progress Note, dated 4/4/24 at 7:06 PM, documents the following: Resident returned to nursing station after being lethargic @ (at) the dinner table, she responds to name and able to state her name. Responds to tactile stimulation. Blood pressure 98/62-p82-sat 97. Blood sugar at 430p was 182 now 274. No indication of pain. In bed sleeping, respiration even and non-labored. Called placed to doctor's office, message was left on the voicemail @ 7:24p.m. Will continue to assess the resident for changes in respiration and level of consciousness. R45's Progress Note, dated 4/5/24 at 1:39 PM, documents the following: (Doctor's) office notified resident sleeping more than usual. Quiet most of day. Poor appetite at meals. Urine output less than normal thru Foley catheter. Difficult to arouse. Waiting on response from (doctor). VS 97.5-81-18 122/78. R45's Progress Note, dated 4/5/24 at 4:33 PM, documents the following: ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) called with orders that was given from MD (medical doctor) to get stat labs CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), Troponin, and UA. R45's Progress Note, dated 4/6/24 at 9:54 AM, documents the following: Stat lab result received; made aware to on-call NP; received a new order for Rocephin 1gm (gram) IM (intramuscular) daily x 5 days, sub-q (subcutaneous) 1 liter of NS, RUN 100ml (milliliters)/hr (hour), repeat BMP (basic metabolic panel) and CBC in the AM; lab order carried out; made aware to on-call nurse and left (voicemail) to family. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/8/24 at 11:30 PM, documents the following: Resident returned from the hospital via ambulance transport. Resident transferred into bed 2 assist via ambulance service. Resident is sleeping w/o (without) signs of discomfort or distress. Resident returned with a new order for Cefdinir 300 mg, take 1 cap po BID (twice daily) for 7 days. Resident also returned with a newly inserted Foley 16F/10mL. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/9/24 at 2:33 PM, documents the following: Resident has increased confusion after lunch, leaning forward unable to assist herself back to position. Resident has had x2 loose stools with a moderate amount of mucous noted. Resident POA (Power of Attorney) was contacted and made aware. Requested resident to be sent to (local) hospital ED (emergency department). EMS was contacted to transfer resident to ED. MD contacted and made aware via fax. Resident clean and dry, resting in bed at this time. No s/s (signs/symptoms) of pain or distress, call light in reach. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/9/24 at 3:15 PM, documents the following: Resident transferred to (local hospital) ED via (local) EMS in stable condition. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/9/24 at 9:19 PM, documents the following: Resident returned to facility via EMS. NNO (no new orders) at this time. Abx (antibiotic) administered as prescribed. Resident afebrile. Resting comfortably in bed at this time, call light in reach. No c/o pain, discomfort, or distress noted. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/13/24 at 11:57 AM, documents the following: Remains on ABT (antibiotic) for UTI. Fax received from (local) hospital related to recent ED visit on 5/9/24. Fax showed E-Coli (Escherichia coli) in the urine with Bactrim DS and Doxycycline being two of the PO (by mouth) meds resident's results are susceptible to. Results sent to (doctor's) office and to FNP with explanation and present order for Cefdinir. Awaiting return call or fax. R45's Progress Note, dated 5/13/24 at 2:31 PM, documents the following: New order related to results from (local) hospital for urine C&S received. Doxycycline 100 BID x 7 days ordered. R45's Urine Culture, dated 3/11/24, documents R45 had Escherichia Coli and Enterococcus Faecalis in her urine. R45's U/A, dated 4/5/24, documents R45's urine was abnormal, and no culture was performed. R45's Urine Culture, dated 5/8/24, documents R45 had Escherichia Coli in her urine. On 7/26/24 at 10:00 AM, V2, DON (Director of Nurses), stated they utilize a catheter competency that goes through the steps of how catheter care should be performed. V2 stated staff are to wash their hands and put on clean gloves. Staff can perform hand hygiene with alcohol hand gel three times and then after the 3rd time, they are to wash their hands and put on clean gloves. V2 stated they are to utilize one wipe per swipe and change their gloves twice during catheter care. The Foley Catheter Care Policy and Procedure, undated documents the following: All staff will adhere to the evidence-based guidelines for the performance of routine catheter care utilizing the proper procedure to prevent urinary tract infections. Procedure: #4 - Wipe around area where catheter enters meatus in a downward motion. Use wipe only once, change wipes between each swipe.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure Physician Orders were followed and the physician was notified...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure Physician Orders were followed and the physician was notified if the orders could not be carried out for 1 of 4 residents (R65) reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 37. Findings include: R65's Physician Order Sheet (POS) for July 2024 documents a diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis; Unspecified superficial injury of unspecified great toe, subsequent encounter; Unspecified hemorrhoids (History of); Anemia, unspecified; Benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms; Chronic kidney disease, unspecified; Chronic metabolic acidosis; Depression, unspecified; Rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified; Testicular hypofunction; Unilateral primary osteoarthritis, left knee; Unspecified fall, subsequent encounter; Pain, unspecified; and Constipation. R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R65 was moderately impaired for cognition for activities of daily living. R65's Care Plan does not address weight loss and/or nutrition. R65's Nurse's Notes dated 5/17/2024 at 5:34 AM, documents, resident seen in clinic today by (V16 Medical Director) during routine rounds. New order received for Marinol 2.5mg (milligrams) by mouth twice daily. Resident & family both notified. Order processed & carried out. R65's Dietary Note dated 5/28/2024 at 10:31 AM, Dietitian weight note. [AGE] year-old male triggering for significant (-9#; -8.5%) weight loss x 30 days. BMI (body mass index). R65'S Nursing Notes dated 5/30/2024 at 2:00 PM, IDT (Intradisciplinary Team) weight meeting held. Resident noted with 9.4% loss in 3 months. Resident had order for Marinol for appetite, but medication is on backorder with pharmacy unsure of availability date. Pharmacy recommendation sent to MD (Medical Director). Supplements ordered, alternatives and snacks offered. Resident will request item, take 1-2 bites and then state he is done. R65's Progress Notes dated 5/31/2024 at 11:41 AM, documents, Fax sent to (V16's) office regarding new order received to start Remeron 7.5 mg. New order was to replace Marinol 2.5 mg, but resident is already prescribed Remeron. Awaiting response. R65's dietary notes dated 5/31/2024 at 11:41am, Dietitian weight note: 84 YOM (year old male) triggering for significant (-9#; -8.5%) wt (weight) loss x 30 days. CBW 97# (5/7/24), BMI 13.15 underweight for age, weight history [DATE]#, [DATE]#, [DATE]#, [DATE]#, [DATE]#, [DATE]#. Diet/Meds reviewed, Marinol 2.5mg BID, prednisone BID. No recent uploaded labs to review. Continue with current nutrition therapy General/Regular with House supplement 60ml/4x per day (480kcal/19gm protein) and (nutritional supplemental dessert) (270kcal/9gm protein per serving) with meals. Noted poor meal intakes and refusing supplements, nutrition therapy as ordered will exceed needs if consumed. Recommend continue with nutrition therapy as ordered, assistance with meals and encourage fluids throughout the day. Continue to monitor nutritional parameters and refer to RD (Registered Dietician) prn (As needed). R65's Dietary Notes dated 2/20/2024 at 10:54 AM, Dietitian weight note: (R65) who triggers for significant (-12#; 10.2%) weight loss x 90 days. BMI 14.37 underweight for age. Weight history November 2023 112# On 7/26/2024 at 9:03 AM, attempted to call Medical Director and left a message but no message was returned. The Medication Administration Policy with a revision date of 12/2020 documents, (Facility) will administer medications per a standardized liberal schedule except when the physician's order dictates it to be given another time. Manufacture's recommendations will be considered when scheduling certain medications. Residents' preferences and quality of life issues will be considered in medication administration schedules as much as is safe and practicable.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to monitor medications to ensure the resident is not rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to monitor medications to ensure the resident is not receiving unnecessary medications for one of five residents (R67) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 37. Findings Include: R67's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated [DATE] documents R67 has moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making. R67's EHR (Electronic Health Record) dated [DATE] documents R67's Unspecified Dementia Unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, mood, disturbance, and anxiety. Vascular Dementia Unspecified Severity with behavioral disturbance, Restlessness and Agitation, and Major Depressive Disorder Single Episode Unspecified. Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review dated [DATE] documents Regarding Previous Pharmacy Recommendation from [DATE] (V30 Consulting Psychiatrist) marked, signed and dated [DATE] to discontinue PRN (as needed) Haldol however this order is still active on the POS (Physician Order Sheet) Please discontinue as PRN antipsychotics can only be ordered for 14 days. Haldol was Scheduled (not PRN) on [DATE]. Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated [DATE] documents this hospice resident continues to have a PRN order for the antipsychotic Haldol. Resident (R67) also has routine Haldol order. However, CMS (Central Management Service) considers the PRN use of antipsychotics inappropriate as of [DATE]. The Maximum order for an antipsychotic is 14 days and a new order can only be written with a) Direct physical assessment by the Physician b) documents clinical rationale for the new order which includes what is the benefit of the medication to the resident and has the resident's expressions or indications of distress improved as a result of the PRN. Agree discontinue Haldol PRN. Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review dated [DATE] V30 Consulting Psychiatrist marked, signed, and dated [DATE] to discontinue PRN Haldol please discontinue as PRN Antipsychotic orders can only be ordered for 14 days. Haldol was scheduled [DATE]. R67's Medication Administration History (MAR) dated [DATE] documents that R67 is receiving Buspirone 15mg (milligrams) twice a day for Major Depressive Disorder, Quetiapine 100mg twice a day for restlessness and agitation. Sertraline 100mg twice a day for Major Depressive Disorder, Haloperidol Lactate concentrate 2mg/ml 1ml (milliliter) every 8 hours for Vascular Dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances, Lorazepam 1mg at bedtime for Restlessness and agitation. R67's July MAR documents R67 is receiving the same medications. R67's Behavior/Intervention Monthly Flow Record dated [DATE] to [DATE] documents depression was only completed 4 times on the day shift with no behaviors, twice on evening shift with no behaviors, and thirteen times on the night shift with one behavior with redirection. R67's Behavior/Intervention Monthly Flow Record dated [DATE] through [DATE] was only completed 15 days with her being returned to her room [ROOM NUMBER] times for restlessness. The monthly Flow sheet also documents that she was behavior tracked 10 times on the night shift for restlessness and she was redirected twice. R67 Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents Pt (patient) is awake with confusion answers some questions appropriate awoke to follow commands anxious trying to get out of her chair. She was refusing medications yesterday and throwing things. R67 Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient increase somnolence Ativan given prior to shift. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] patient confused poor to fair appetite intermittent restlessness no agitation. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient sleeping prior to visit some restlessness noted easily redirected. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient alert to self-able to follow commands can track with eyes. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient alert to self-patient can answer questions that are simple patient follows commands. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient sleeping 16 to 18 hours in 24 hours patient alert to self-tracks with eyes follow commands. R67's Hospice Plan of Care Note dated [DATE] documents patient will become anxious with care at times. R67's Hospice Plan of Care [DATE] documents appetite poor patient sleeping addition of Haldol more effectively manage symptoms. R67's Facsimile Sheet dated [DATE] she has a diagnosis of severe vascular dementia with behaviors disturbances. R67's Electronic Health Record documents R67's medications are Buspar 15mg BID ordered on [DATE], Haldol Concentrate 1ml po QD ordered on [DATE]. Seroquel 100mg BID ordered on [DATE]. Ativan 2mg Q4 HR PRN ordered on [DATE]. Ativan 1mg PO QD 8 PM. On [DATE] at 1:50 PM V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated I assist her (R67) with feeding I assist her with incontinent care. Her husband just recently died, and sometimes she will call out for him. She is not violent. She does not cause any problems. She does not hallucinate. On [DATE] at 1:55 PM V15 (CNA) stated sometimes she sees things that are not there. She reaches for things on the floor. Sometimes she sleeps a lot sometimes no. On [DATE] at 2:00PM V27 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she was sleeping a lot, easy to arouse. She took her medications. Sometimes she is in bed. Sometimes she is in the Geri chair with no issues. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM V28 (LPN) stated we mostly monitor her for safety. She sleeps throughout the night on low bed. On [DATE] at 2:02 PM V26 (CNA) stated she's a feeder, not with it. We do what we know she needs. No, she does not see things. Sometimes she can feed herself. The Facility Policy Psychotropic Drug Orders undated documents in order to ensure Psychotropic drugs are used appropriately according to physician's order and to protect residents' rights. (The Facility) will follow uniform procedures. Psychotropic drugs are used for documented resident's need and not staff convenience. Residents will not be given unnecessary drugs including excessive dose, duplicative therapy, for excessive duration without adequate monitoring, without adequate indication for it's use or in the presence of adverse consequences that indicate the drug should be reduced or discontinued. Informed consent will provide for dosage changes to establish the lowest effective dose that will achieve the desires outcome. The informed consent will include benefits and side effects.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure there was a RN (Registered Nurse) working in the facility for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure there was a RN (Registered Nurse) working in the facility for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 7/23/2024 at 9:00 AM, Schedules were requested for the past 14 days, including Registered Nurse (RN). The schedule coverage did not document any RN working on 7/13/2024 and 7/14/2024. The PBJ (payroll-based journal) Report for the second quarter (January 1- March 31) of 2024 documents concerns for RN coverage and one star rating for fiscal quarter 2, 2024 for the facility. On 7/23/2024 at 10:11 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, I am a Registered Nurse along with the Director of Nursing. I know we are currently trying to hire more RNs and we struggle on the weekends. I know we are supposed to have a RN on duty every day for 8 consecutive hours every day. On 7/23/24 at 11:34 AM V1 (Administrator) stated I am going to be honest we did not have a Registered Nurse (RN) for 7/13/2024 and 7/14/2024. We are in the process of attempting to hire more Registered Nurses. I hired two RNs, and they did not even last a day. I am not going to lie I know the weekends are where we are getting hit. I am just having issues finding staff. The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents, Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies. Nursing Services, RN. Great need for RN's and continued struggle. Areas Facility Assessment Informed, Action to be taken/already taken this year, Need RNs to stabilize nursing department. On 7/24/2024 at 4:18 PM, V2, Director of Nursing stated there was no staffing policy. The 672 Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 7/24/2024 documents, there are 82 residents living in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an air gap present for the ice machine in the kitchen. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents living in the fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an air gap present for the ice machine in the kitchen. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 7/23/2024 at 4:24 PM, the ice machine in the kitchen had no air gap present. The white drainage hose from the ice machine went directly into the round drain hole with no air gap present. This allows for potential backflow into the ice machine from the sewage drain. On 7/23/2024 at 4:28 PM, V11 (Dietary Manager) stated, I see the hose going into the drain I did not realize or think about any backflow. We use this ice for all of the residents' drinks during meal services. The State Plumbing code Section 750.290 document, Ice Dispensing Ice for consumer use shall be dispensed only with scoops, tongs, or other ice-dispensing utensils or through automatic self-service ice-dispensing equipment. Ice-dispensing utensils shall be stored on a clean surface or in the ice with the dispensing utensil's handle extended out of the ice. Between uses, ice transfer receptacles shall be stored in a way that protects them from contamination. Ice storage bins shall be drained through an air gap. Section 750.1080 Backflow, The potable water system shall be installed to preclude the possibility of backflow. Devices to protect against backflow and back siphonage shall be installed at all fixtures and equipment where an air gap at least twice the diameter of the water inlet is not provided between the water outlet from the fixture and the fixture's flood-level rim and wherever else backflow or back siphonage may occur. A hose shall not be attached to a faucet unless a backflow prevention device is installed. Section 750.1100 Drains a) Commercial dishwashing machines, dishwashing sinks, pot washing sinks, pre-rinse sinks, silverware sinks, bar sinks, soda fountain sinks, vegetable sinks, potato peelers, ice machines, steam tables, steam cookers, and other similar 29 30 30 30 29 30 30 29 29 Installed Cross-connected Siphonage Backflow Installed Backflow Back-siphonage Installed *Keyed to IDPH Retail Food Establishment Inspection Report 67 fixtures shall be indirectly connected in compliance with 77 Ill. Adm. Code 890.1410(a). The only exception shall be when such fixtures are located adjacent to a floor drain, the waste may be directly connected on the sewer side of the floor drain trap provided the fixture waste is trapped and vented as required by the Illinois Plumbing Code (77 Ill. Adm. Code 890) and the floor drain is located within four feet horizontally of the fixture and in the same room. The indirect piping from the fixture to the air gap shall not exceed five (5) feet developed length. All indirectly connected fixtures shall discharge to a vented trap located in the same room in compliance with 77 Ill. Adm. Code 890.1410(a). In the case of direct connection, no other fixture waste shall be connected between the floor drain trap and the fixture protected. b) Drain lines from equipment shall not discharge wastewater in such a manner as will permit the flooding of floors or the flowing of water across working or walking areas or into difficult-to-clean areas, or otherwise create a nuisance. The 672 Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form (CMS 671) dated 7/24/2024 documents, there are 82 residents living in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0836 (Tag F0836)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had passed their required licensure exam...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had passed their required licensure exam for Licensed Practical Nurse before allowing them to work in the facility in the capacity of a license-pending graduate practice nurse. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/25/24 at 9:00 AM V29 (Assistant Administrator) provided employee files for V10 (Graduate Practice Nurse/GPN) and V23 (GPN). According to their files, V10 and V23 were hired for the positions of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) but their employee files did not include confirmation by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation that either V10 or V23 have a valid LPN license or a copy of their license. On 7/25/24 at 9:50 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated V10 and V23 are working as license pending LPNs. She stated they have passed some medications under the supervision of the LPNs who are working the floor. She stated they have not taken their test to obtain their LPN license yet and never work independently. She stated that she only schedules them to work when either she or V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) is working because V10 and V23 have to work under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN). On 7/25/24 at 9:55 AM V1 (Administrator) stated they hired V10 and V23 to work as license pending because it is very difficult to hire nurses so they hired them so they will fill in LPN slots when they are licensed. V1 stated until V10 and V23 are licensed, they are being orientated and doing observations with other nurses. V1 stated she was not aware V10 or V23 had not already taken their tests for LPN licensure, or that they were not even scheduled to take their tests. V1 stated she was not aware that V10 or V23 had administered medications to residents because they were only supposed to be shadowing V2 or the other nurses and should not be passing medications. V1 stated she does not have a job description for GPN position and does not have a policy regarding GPNs, but just goes by what the regulations say. On 7/25/24 at 11:30 AM V10 (GPN) was observed in the facility wearing a Staff Identification Badge that identified her as Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). V10 stated she is a GPN and has not taken her test to become an LPN and stated she has no plans to take the test yet. V10 stated she is not going to take the test until she is ready and stated she is not ready. V10 stated she has administered medications to some of the residents in the facility and signs out the medications she administers in the residents' electronic Medication Administration Records (e-MARs). V10 stated she does not do any other LPN duties besides passing medications which she does under the direct supervision of V2. She stated she is mostly doing observations with other nurses. V10 stated she has been working in the facility for a few weeks. On 7/25/24 at 3:30 PM V10's employee file was reviewed. V10's Payroll Authorization and Employee Pay Change & History form documents V10's job description as LPN and documents the effective date as 6/27/24 as a new hire. V10's Emergency Contact Form dated 6/27/24 documents her position as LPN. On 7/25/24 at 11:33 AM V23 (GDR) stated she has administered medications to residents under the supervision of V2. V23 stated when she passed medications, she passed to 7 or 8 residents in the dining room, and she signed out the medications in the residents' e-MARs. V23 stated she has not registered to take her test to obtain her LPN license because she stated she does not feel like she is ready to take the test yet. She stated she has been working in the facility as a GPN for about a month. V23 was wearing an employee ID badge that identifies her as an LPN. V23's Application for Employment dated 6/19/24 documents GPN under the question, What job are you applying for? V23's Payroll Authorization & Employee Pay Change & History form documents, under job description: LPN, with effective date of 6/24/24 as a new hire. On 7/25/24 at 3:27 PM V29 (Administrative Assistant) stated she does background checks on all the new hires in the facility. V29 stated she has asked V10 and V23 when they are planning to schedule their tests to obtain their LPN license and they have never given her a definite answer. She stated the facility has never hired any GPNs before while she has been employed, and if someone did not have a license they had to work as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) until they could provide a license. V29 stated the only information she received from V10 and V23 was what is on their applications. She stated she does not have any documentation that they completed LPN schooling. V29 stated she did bring up her concerns regarding V10 and V23 working as GPNs but was told by V1 (Administrator) that it was fine. V29 stated they do not have a job description for the position of a GPN. V29 confirmed V10 and V23 are paid LPN wages. On 7/25/24 at 3:33 PM V2 stated both V10 and V23 graduated from (local school of nursing) and they showed her emails that confirmed they are eligible to take the test to obtain their LPN license. She stated they got the letter after they graduated, and they have time before they have to take their tests, and neither of them are ready to take the test yet. V2 stated, I messed up. I gave my permission for them to pass medications under the supervision of the other nurses. I didn't know this was not allowed. The other nurses who are orienting V10 or V23 log into the e-MARS and when V10 or V23 administer a medication, they check them off, but it is under the LPN's log in. V2 stated V10 and V23 do not have accesses of their own to log into the e-MARs. V2 stated she was not aware that the regulations do no allow GPNs to work as license pending. until they take and pass their LPN test. V2 confirmed that V10 and V23 were supervised by herself, V3 (ADON) or one of the LPNs who were orientating V10 and V23. She stated they were not always directly supervised by her, but either she or V3 were in the facility when V10 and V23 were working. The Illinois General Assembly Public Act [PHONE NUMBER], Section 55-10(d)1, 2,3,4 documents, (d) A licensed practical nurse applicant who passes the Department-approved licensure examination and has applied to the Department for licensure may obtain employment as a licensed-pending practical nurse and practice as delegated by a registered professional nurse or an advanced practice registered nurse or physician. An individual may be employed as a license-pending practical nurse if all of the following criteria are met: (1) He or she has completed and passed the Department-approved licensure exam and presents to the employer the official written notification indicating successful passage of the licensure examination. (2) He or she has completed and submitted to the Department an application for licensure under Section as a practical nurse. (3) He or she has submitted the required licensure fee. (4) He or she has met all other requirements established by rule, including having submitted to a criminal history records check. The CMS form 671, Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 7/24/24 documents there are 82 residents residing in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to follow CDC Infection Control Guidelines during an COVID outbreak and staff providing patient care were not wearing the proper ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to follow CDC Infection Control Guidelines during an COVID outbreak and staff providing patient care were not wearing the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). This has the potential to affect 82 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 7/24/24 at 8:12 AM, R36's room had PPE (Personal Protective Equipment, Gowns, Gloves, Face shields and mask), on the outside of his door. On 7/24/2024 at 8:15 AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) entered R36's room and was only wearing a N95 mask. V10 was not wearing any gown or any eye protection. On 7/24/2024 at 8:18 AM, V10 left R36's room and walked into the main dining room and began assisting with breakfast meals. V10 was carrying trays to the residents in the main dining room. On 7/24/2024 at 9:02 AM, V10 stated I did not realize (R36) was on droplet precautions. I found out later he was COVID positive. I guess I was not looking at the door and did not see he was on contact isolation. I should have been wearing a gown and eyewear. On 7/26/2024 at 10:12 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, I would expect any staff in COVID positive rooms to be in full PPE, N95 mask, gown and faces shield or goggles. On 7/24/24 at 8:05 AM V1 (Administrator) stated R23 tested positive for COVID this morning along with 2 other residents. On 7/24/24 at 8:10 AM R23's door had PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) caddy hanging on her door with gloves, face masks, gowns and N95 masks on it. V9 (Housekeeper) was in R23's room cleaning and was observed walking in and out of the room to grab items off her housekeeping cart which was parked right in front of the door. V9 was wearing a gown, gloves and N95 mask, but no eye protection. After she went back in room to wipe off table and walked back to cart, she looked at the sign on R23's door indicating R23 is on droplet and contact isolation. V9 stated, Yes, I should be wearing a face shield also when I am in R23's room. R23 was in her bed in the room while V9 was cleaning her room. R23's Physician Order dated 7/24/24 documents: COVID positive charting, s/s (signs and symptoms) of COVID, respiratory assessment, and full set of vitals every 4 hours while on isolation. Contact and droplet isolation precautions for COVID 19. On 7/26/24 at 12:45 PM V1 (Administrator) provided the following policies when asked for their most up to date policies regarding infection control practices and use of PPE: The facility's undated policy, Droplet Precautions, documents, Objective: Droplet Precautions will be used for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms transmitted by droplets that can be generated by the resident during coughing sneezing, talking, etc. Transmission of the droplets require close contact between source and recipient because droplets do not remain suspended in the air and generally travel short distances (3 feet or less). Droplet transmission involves contact of mucous membranes of the nose or mouth of a susceptible person with the infectious droplets. The facility's policy, Infection Control--Fundamentals of Isolation Precautions revised 5/19/04 documents, Policy: In order to decrease the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms, (facility) will follow fundamentals of isolation precautions according to CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines and IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) regulations. Personal Protective Equipment-Masks, Respiratory Protection, Eye Protection, Face Shields: A mask that covers both nose and mouth, and goggles or a face shield will be worn by staff during procedures and resident care activities that are likely to generate splashes or sprays of blood, body fluids, excretions, or secretions to provide protection of the mucous membranes of the caregiver's eyes, nose, and mouth from contact transmission of pathogens. A mask which covers both nose and mouth will be worn to provide protection for the caregiver when a resident is on droplet precautions. This provides protection against spread of infectious large particles droplets that are transmitted by close contact and generally travel only short distances (up to three feet). The CMS form 671, Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 7/24/24 documents there are 82 residents residing in the facility.
May 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly care for a hospice resident with Dementia residing at the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly care for a hospice resident with Dementia residing at the facility for Respite Care, including Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Medication Administration for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for proper nursing care. This failure resulted in R2 having significant behaviors resulting in R2 obtaining a leg injury. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a 5-day Respite stay and was discharged on 5/7/24. R2's diagnosis include Dementia and Parkinsonism. R2's Care Plan and Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not completed due to short stay at the facility. R2's admission Functional Ability Assessment, dated 5/2/24, documented that R2 was dependent on staff for all ADLs, and mobility. On 5/9/24 at 9:53 AM, V5 (R2's Daughter) stated (R2) went to the facility last Thursday (5/2/24) for Respite Care for five days as I had to go out of town. When he got there, the Hospice Nurse did a Tuck-In assessment on him, and he was fine and without injuries. On Friday (5/3/24), the Hospice bath lady went and gave (R2) a bath, and she didn't notice anything wrong with him either. The facility called me on Saturday (5/4/24) and said that (R2) scratched his leg, which I told them he does that when he is anxious and to give him his anxiety medication. On Sunday (5/5/24), my aunt visited (R2) and told me that he had a bandage covering the lower left shin and when I called the facility to ask about it, they told me he was banging his legs against the rail and caused a scratch. I told them to put something on the rails to avoid him hurting himself. Then on Monday (5/6/24), the Hospice bath lady noticed bruising and the wound on his legs. I sent all his medications with him to the facility and only one medication was given the entire time he was there. They gave him his Seroquel every day, but they did not give any of his anxiety medications. He has Clonazepam and Lorazepam for his restlessness and anxiety. The Director of Nursing (DON) called me yesterday (5/8/24) after they spoke with the Hospice team about (R2), and she told me she did an investigation and afterwards, fired one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and suspended two nurses. On 5/9/24 at 12:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that R2 was admitted for a five-day Respite stay and the family brought scheduled and as needed (PRN) medications with him. V1 stated that R2 was discharged in the morning of Tuesday (5/7/24) and his daughter (V5) called them later that day and herself and V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) talked to her about her concerns. V1 stated that R2 wasn't in the same condition going home as he was when admitted . V1 stated R2 had multiple areas of bruising/injury to his legs and was not clean when he was discharged . V1 stated that the nurse had called V5 and told her that R2 had a scratch on his leg and when R2 got home, his leg wound was much more extensive than a scratch. V1 stated that V5 did state that R2 scratches himself when he is anxious, but this was much worse than a scratch. V1 stated that they reviewed R2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and that R2 did not receive any of his PRN anxiety medications while he was in the facility. V1 stated that V5 was very unhappy about R2's condition and V1 stated she understands why and that R2's care was unacceptable. V1 stated that she talked to the CNA who was responsible for cleaning R2 prior to discharge and ended up terminating his employment because of R2's condition at discharge. V1 stated she then disciplined the nurses, one nurse for documenting R2's wound as a scratch, when it was much worse, and the other nurse who was responsible for R2 the day of his discharge. V1 stated that they also talked to the Hospice Nurse about R2's stay and they concurred with V5's description of R2's leg wound. V1 stated that best practice was not followed, and she was embarrassed about the situation. V1 stated that this was not what she would expect from her nurses and CNAs. On 5/9/24 at 11:15 AM, V2 (DON) stated that she spoke with the Hospice Nurse who explained the concerns with R2's condition at discharge. V2 stated that the daughter was told of a scratch on R2's leg and was not told of the extent of the injury. V2 stated she called V5 yesterday (5/8/24) and V5 described things to her that she felt was not best practice and not what a normal nurse would do. V2 stated that the bedrails go halfway down the bed, so R2 was able to bend his legs up and, being restless, was able to hit his legs on the siderails, causing his injury. V2 stated that she suspended the two nurses and will be reeducating them, and all staff, when they return. On 5/9/24 at 1:10 PM, R8 (R2's previous roommate) stated that R2 was always talking, yelling, and was restless in his bed. On 5/9/24 at 1:18 PM, V7 (CNA) stated that she took care of R2, and he would only answer questions with a one-word answer. V7 stated that R2 would yell while in his bed and it was usually about pancakes. On 5/9/24 at 3:08 PM, V6 (Hospice Nurse) stated (R2) arrived at the facility on Thursday (5/2/24) and I went in to do an assessment on him. (R2) was in good spirits, was calm, in no distress, and had no skin issues. I went over his orders for his Respite stay with the nurse. On Monday (5/6/24) V5 (R2's daughter) came home from out of town early because she received a phone call from the nurse at the facility that (R2) had scratched his leg. (V5) called me and asked me if I would go see (R2) so I did. When I got to the facility, (R2) had an area to his left leg that was reddened, he was very anxious and restless, so I asked the nurse to give him a dose of his PRN medication, so she did, and I called (V5) and updated her. His order was for Ativan 0.5 MG every four hours PRN, and normally gets Ativan three times per day at home. (R2) got back home on Tuesday (5/7/24) and (V5) notified me that he got home and had dried stool on him and had marks on his legs. The facility was given a case of (nutritional supplement drink) to give to (R2) because he usually drinks five to six of them a day, there was only two of them missing out of the case. (V5) asked me to follow-up on what happened at the facility, so I called the facility and spoke with V2 (DON), who looked in (R2's) chart and said that (R2) hit his leg on a bedrail. I updated (V5), my managers, and let (R2's) Practitioner know and received orders to treat (R2's) leg. (R2) had several scabs on his right leg from his knee down to his ankle and had a large, reddened area to his right knee and hip. (R2's) right leg had an 8 CM long reddened area to his left shin with open areas of blood and Serosanguineous fluid, it appeared similar to a sheering injury where a few layers of skin were sheared off. We are cleaning the wound and applying (name brand of a dressing) and wrapping with (gauze wrap) every two to three days and PRN. R2's Braden Scale Assessment, dated 5/2/24, documented that R2 was a High Risk for skin impairments. R2's Skilled Nursing Assessment, dated 5/7/24, documented, Behavioral Symptoms-Short tempered/easily annoyed: Yes, and Behavioral Symptoms-Fidgety or restless: Yes. R2's Nursing Note, dated 5/2/24 at 10:22 AM, documented, admitted to facility from home for five-day Respite Care. Transported by ambulance from home. Remains on service with (Hospice Company). Bedbound, reported by EMT's (Emergency Medical Technician) resident has not been in w/c (wheelchair) since February. Non-weight bearing. Alert and oriented to self. May respond with yes or no, but no conversation. Inc. (incontinent) of B&B (bowel and bladder). Total care needed. Meds brought by EMT's. Dr. notified of respite admit. R2's Nursing Note, dated 5/4/24 at 11:48 PM, documented, Skin check complete. Upper extremities and body are clear of any concerns. BLE (bilateral lower extremity) have abrasions and discoloration. Left shin has a clean, dry, and intact dressing. 2nd left toe have (sic) 2 scabs. Right greater toe have (sic) one small scab. Right malleolus have (sic) a old scab noted. R2's Nursing Note, dated 5/4/24 at 12:09 PM, documented, This nurse noted resident's leg was rubbing against bed rails causing skin abrasion measuring 8.5 CM (centimeter) x 6 CM; no bleeding noted; area was cleansed and tx (treatment) in place; made aware to hospice nurse and resident's daughter. R2's Physician Order (PO), dated 5/2/24, documented, Lorazepam 0.5 MG (milligram) Q (every) 4 hrs (hours) PRN. R2's PO, dated 5/2/24, documented, Clonazepam 0.5 MG Q 6 hrs PRN. R2's PO, dated 5/2/24, documented, Quetiapine 50 MG BID (twice daily) 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R2's PO, dated 5/2/24, documented, Olopatadine 1 drop to each affected eye Q 6 hrs PRN. R2's PO, dated 5/6/24, documented, Cleanse left leg shin with wound cleanser, then apply double layer (name brand of a dressing) then wrap with (gauze wrap); change daily and PRN. R2's Event Report, dated 5/4/24, documented, Description: Skin abrasion. Event Details: Skin Tear/Laceration. Activity during skin tear/laceration occurrence: Friction in bedrails. Interventions: Cleansed with wound cleanser, apply (name brand of a dressing) or hydrogel and wrap with (gauze wrap) (no skin flap). Evaluation: Event still open. The facility's investigation into R2, dated 5/9/24, documented, During our investigation, (V5) called the Administrator and talked about concerns. She stated that the nurse who called about the abrasions on the legs did not adequately describe what she witnessed upon the resident returning home. She also stated that when she spoke with the nurse, (V16), she let her know that (R2) gets anxious and that there were medications ordered to take care of anxiety. Upon reviewing the MAR (Medication Administration Record), it was noted that one dose of Lorazepam was given throughout his stay for anxiety. (V16) stated that when she took care of him, that he did not appear in any distress and that she did not feel he was displaying signs of anxiety. (V5) also stated that (R2) now had pink eye and that his PRN medications for eyes were not given. In reviewing the progress notes and orders, it appears that (R2) has order for Natural Tears and an antihistamine eye drop. There is no indication in the notes that the resident required this PRN medication during his stay. (V5) alleged that (R2) was soiled upon return home. Resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and we feel it would be difficult to determine when this incontinence occurred. The progress notes revealed skin assessments and events. A treatment was put into place and the measurements were documented. It is also noted that sheets were applied to the bedrail and pillows were placed between the rail and mattress to attempt prevention of skin issues. While reviewing documentation, (R2) did not have any decreases in cognition during stay and he had no symptoms of pain or distress. Administrator, DON, and ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses), interviewed CNA (V17), LPN (V16), and LPN (V18). Disciplinary actions were taken at the discretion of the facility. Because (V5) felt as if the expectation of her father's care was not met, the facility determined disciplinary action was necessary to stress the importance of customer satisfaction. The Facility's Respite Care Policy, dated 11/2023, documented, 1. It is the facility's responsibility to provide medical care when needed in the absence of family. It continues, 6. The residents may bring in their own medications to be used during their stay at (the facility) if the stay is for 14 days or less. Respite stays beyond 14 days will require medications be ordered from (the facility's) pharmacy. The Nursing staff at (the facility) will dispense all medications.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 78 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 78 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The facility's schedule for 9/20/23 through 10/3/23 documented that the facility did not have a RN in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 9/20/23, 9/21/23, 9/24/23, 9/25/23, 9/26/23, 9/27/23, 9/28/23, 9/29/23, 9/30/23, 10/1/23, 10/2/23 and 10/3/23. The facility's schedule dated 9/1/23 through 9/14/23 documented the facility did not have a RN in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 8/2/23, 8/3/23, 8/6/23, 8/12/23 and 8/14/23. On 10/5/23 at 2:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, we have applications, and we will start interviewing soon for RNs. On 10/5/23 at 2:35 PM, V7 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) stated, We are trying to get RNs, but it is hard. The facility policy entitled Direct Care Staffing dated 12/2012 documents the facility will comply with staffing requirements set forth by the state and federal requirements to meet the needs of its residents. The facility's Room Roster/census dated 10/3/23 documents there are 78 residents in the facility.
Jun 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

5. R2's Physician Order dated 02/21/22 documents repeated falls. R2's Care Plan dated 03/28/19 documents Problem: At risk for falls due to decreased strength and balance, decreased safety. Is independ...

Read full inspector narrative →
5. R2's Physician Order dated 02/21/22 documents repeated falls. R2's Care Plan dated 03/28/19 documents Problem: At risk for falls due to decreased strength and balance, decreased safety. Is independent with bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, locomotion, uses her rollator walker, educated on wearing non-skid socks. Res (resident) has been educated from staff to use call light and ask for help prior to walking in room and res refuses to use call light and ask for help. 6/9/22 fall no injuries, R2 refuses to wear non-skid slippers. Son stated he will be in on 6/10 to bring up new non-skid sole slippers/shoes. 6/10/22 fall educated to press call light and wait for assistance. 7/11/22 slid while trying to stand. Intervention: R2 was educated multiple times from staff to use call light for assistance, wear gripper socks. 4/17/23 res found on floor in front of toilet, no injuries noted. Tennis shoes on but, came off during fall. Resident is non-compliant with all safety interventions. 5/29/23 Res found sitting on floor in front of bathroom door, shearing noted to buttock. Intervention, educated to use call light. R2's Care Plan dated 03/28/19 documents Problem: Continued, resident is at risk for falls d/t (due to) decreased strength, balance and decreased safety awareness. 8/23/22 R2 slid out of bed onto the floor no injuries. Intervention R2 re-educated on use of call light for assistance. 8/29/22 R2 slid out her recliner and on to her bottom. No injuries, wearing regular socks at this time. Intervention R2 was re-educated on proper footwear of gripper socks, or non-skid footwear. 9/19/2022 resident fall, intervention CBC and BMP ordered. 9/20/2022 UA and CNS ordered. 10/29/22 unwitnessed fall in bathroom, no injuries, R2 was not wearing non-skid socks at time. Intervention R2 re-educated on wearing non-skid footwear. 11/5/22 slid out of chair on to floor, no injuries. Intervention re-educated on wearing gripper socks, and shoes. 11/7/22 resident slid out of chair onto floor, no injuries. Intervention educated R2 on importance of proper footwear and calling for and waiting for assistance. R2 is refusing to have the (nonskid material), in her chair which is an intervention for a fall. 11/18/22 slid out of recliner, no injuries. Intervention staff re-educated R2 on importance of using call light and waiting for assistance and proper footwear. 11/19/22 found on floor no injuries, did not have shoes on. Intervention staff re-educated about the importance of wearing shoes. 01/09/2023 resident found on the floor in her room in front of recliner, plain socks on. Resident educated regarding keeping tennis shoes on feet, fall had no injury. 01/21/23 slide off recliner onto the floor. Intervention education to keep shoes on until transfer complete. 01/25/23 slide off recliner onto the floor, plain socks. Continues to not follow instructions given by staff. 03/06/23 fall from recliner, slide out, no injuries. 03/30/23 found on floor in front of chair, no injuries. 04/2/23 found sitting on floor in front of recliner, no injuries. R2 continues to be non-compliant. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/27/23 documents, a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score 15 out of 15. Resident has no impairment. The MDS documents, that R2 is independent with setup help, only for bed mobility, transfer, walk in room, locomotion on unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident is not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 07/10/22 documents, Resident fall. Spoke with resident concerning leaving (nonskid material) in her recliner and not covering it up with a blanket, also educated resident to use her call light and not to transfer without assistance. R2's Nursing Note dated, 07/11/22 at 4:22 PM documents, CNA (Certified Nurses Assistant), notified this nurse that resident was on the floor. When this nurse entered residents' room, resident observed sitting on her buttocks with her legs stretched out in front of her, reclining chair. When this nurse asked resident what happened, resident states, she slipped, when she got out of her chair, to go to the bathroom. Resident denies hitting head. ROM (range of motion), WNL (within normal limits). Denies pain with ROM. 0 (no) shortening or rotation noted to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) 0 injuries noted at this time. Resident assisted to her feet by this nurse and 2 CNAs. Resident encouraged to have on gripper socks or shoes when self-transferring, and to utilize call light for assistance. Resident expressed understanding, resident observed in bathroom an hr. (hour) later and resident had not utilized call light for assistance or put on shoes for transfer. MD (Medical Director), Family, and DON (Director of Nursing) notified of INC (incident). R2's Fall Investigation dated, 07/11/22 documents, spoke with resident concerning wearing the shoes, that are non-slip that her son bought for her, resident voiced understanding. R2's Nursing Note dated 08/03/22 at 2:22 AM documents, CNA notified this nurse, that resident was on the floor. When this nurse entered residents' room, resident observed sitting on her buttocks with her legs stretched out in front of her, in front of her reclining chair with W/W (wheeled walker) at feet. When this nurse asked resident what happened, resident states, she slipped, when she got out of her chair to go to the bathroom. Resident denies hitting head, ROM WNL. Denies pain with ROM, 0 shortening or rotation noted to BLE. 0 injuries noted at this time, resident assisted to her feet by this nurse and 1 CNA. Resident had tennis shoes on at the time of fall. Resident encouraged to utilize call light for assistance, resident expressed understanding. MD, Family, and DON notified of INC. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 08/03/22 documents Unwitnessed fall without injury, intervention in place, continue current care plan. R2's Nursing Note dated, 08/23/23 at 7:10 PM documents, CNA notified writer that resident was in room on floor. Upon entering room writer found resident sitting in room upright on coccyx with back against bed and leg stretched out in front of her and arms to her side. Staff assisted resident up off ground and back onto her bed. When asked how the fall occurred resident stated, I was attempting to get up off bed when my foot slipped from under me, and I fell onto my bottom. Resident denies any pain at this time, no injuries or bruising found at this time residents ROM is WNL per her baseline. Resident's Son notified of fall and call placed to (V33) exchange to make aware of fall. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 08/23/22 documents, Fall in bedroom, resident slid off of the side of the bed to the floor. No injuries, educated to utilize call light when needing assistance. Care plan updated and continued. R2's Nursing Note dated, 08/29/22 at 3:38 PM documents, CNA notified, this nurse that resident is on the floor, upon entering, resident was on the floor on her buttocks, resident stated, that she slid from her recliner when she was trying to get up, resident had plain socks on her feet, nurse educated resident to wear gripper socks or shoes before she transfer, resident stated, she did not hit her head, denies for any pain or discomfort, no injury noted, helped resident onto her chair, made aware to resident son and NP (V30). R2's Fall Investigation dated, 08/29/22 documents, Fall from recliner, no injury. Investigation completed, resident slid out of recliner onto her bottom, no injuries. Resident was wearing plain socks at the time. Educated to wear gripper socks or non-skid footwear, Care plan updated and continued. R2's Nursing Note dated, 09/19/22 at 2:07 PM documents, Resident found on the floor in her room, on the floor by her recliner. Resident stated that she fell while attempting to go to the restroom. ROM completed and WNL, proper footwear in place. Resident assisted from the floor and back into her recliner, no injury apparent. Resident currently resting quietly in recliner with call light in place. Scheduled pain medication as well as Tylenol administered and tolerated well. No current c/o, (complaint of), pain or discomfort voiced, and no acute s/s, (signs and symptoms), of distress noted, monitor for change. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 09/19/22 documents, Fall in bedroom. Investigation completed, resident slid down from recliner to bottom when attempting to transfer, no injuries. Intervention, decrease Tramadol and U/A. Continue current care plan. R2's Nursing Note dated, 09/20/22 at 4:08 AM documents, This nurse was doing rounds and resident call light was on. Upon entering room, resident was noted sitting on buttocks, in front of recliner with pants down. Assessed resident immediately, no injuries noted, no c/o pain or discomfort when asked. Resident stated that she was trying to go to the bathroom and had pulled pants down before going. She stated that she lost her balance when trying to pull pants up. Resident was wearing regular socks and wheeled walker wasn't locked. Resident educated on using call light when needing assistance and spoke with resident about transitioning to a wheelchair vs wheeled walker, due to recent falls, resident agreed, and stated son suggested that she do the same. Resident was assisted off the floor and into bed by this nurse. NP (V30), DON, and son made aware. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 09/20/22 documents Fall in bedroom. Investigation completed; resident slid down to bottom when attempting to get out of her recliner. No injuries. Intervention: Labs. R2's Nursing Note dated, 10/29/22 at 9:17 AM documents, CNA notified, (V22), that resident was on the floor in her bathroom at 8:30am. Resident was transferring self-off of the toilet & slipped onto her bottom. Resident noted to be in regular socks with no shoes. VS (vital signs), BP (blood pressure), 110/68, HR (heart rate) 70, RR (respiration rate) 16, O2 (oxygen saturation) 97%, RA (room air), T (temperature) 97.6, PERRLA (pupils equal, round, reactive to light, accommodation) and no new complaints of pain, related to fall. Reported to NP (V30), NNO (no new orders). POA (Power of Attorney) notified as well and (V18) (on-call) notified. Resident educated on importance of asking for help with transfers and either gripper socks or shoes at all times. Resident voiced understanding, however, is noncompliant & unaware of safety guidelines & needs. Resident resting in her recliner at this time with call light within reach, no other concerns at this time. R2's Fall Investigation, 10/29/22 documents, Unwitnessed fall, resident fell while in the bathroom. Resident had plain socks on, no shoes or gripper socks. Resident educated on proper footwear and voiced understanding. R2's Nursing Note dated, 11/05/23 at 10:44 PM documents, resident turned on call light and CNA went to answer, and resident was on floor in front of her chair. R2 stated just slipped out of chair, CNA help her back up in chair, nurse went down to assess. Resident stated, did not hit head & no bumps or red areas seen. PERRL, BP 134/82, T 97.3, P 100, R 18, O2 sats 96%. Stated, did not hurt anything just twisted her neck a little no red/open areas noted. Resident remains up in chair with call light within reach, POA called & made aware. No fall investigation for fall on 11/05/22. R2's Nursing Note dated, 11/07/22 at 10:13 AM documents, CNA informed this nurse, that resident was on floor, upon observation resident was sitting in front of the bed with legs outstretched in front of her. Resident informed this nurse that she slid out of recliner, resident noted to have plain socks on with no shoes or gripper socks. Resident informed of the importance of proper footwear, to stop further incidents or injuries. Resident assessed to have ROM to all extremities without difficulty, no other injury noted, resident denies hitting head. VS assessed, T 97.6, P 94, R 18, 02 99% on room air; Resident assisted back to recliner and proper footwear put in place. (V30) NP notified of incidents; no new orders; son notified of new incident. No fall investigation noted for fall on 11/07/22. R2's Nursing Note dated, 11/18/22 at 10:23 PM documents, Staff was answering residents call light at 9:50PM, resident sitting on buttock on the floor stated, to staff that she slid off recliner and landed on her bottom. Denies hitting head or injuries. Tennis shoes were off and in front of resident. Resident states, that they came off when she slid down. Resident was assisted back off the floor by staff and into recliner. (V30) NP for (V33) notified, son was notified, and ADON was notified. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 11/18/22 documents Slid off chair in room. Resident slid out of chair while returning from the restroom, reminded resident to wear shoes and socks and push call light for help. R2's Nursing Note dated, 11/19/22 at 4:41PM documents, resident picked up off floor, no injuries noted. Denies hitting her head, VS, WNL, help into bed after assessment. Made sure call light within reach, resident was not wearing shoe. Reminded to put shoes on for all transfers, POA call & left message. (V30) NP, made aware with no new orders. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 11/19/22 documents, Fall from bed, Therapy referral. R2's Nursing Note dated, 01/09/23 at 7:20PM documents, Answered resident's call light and resident was noted on the floor sitting on her buttocks, in front of her recliner. Resident was assessed immediately, no injuries noted, no c/o pain or discomfort when asked. Asked resident what happened, and she stated, she was trying to pull her pants up and slipped. Resident had on regular socks only, no shoes on before she slipped. Resident educated on putting shoes on before standing and using call light if needing assistance. Resident understood and stated, she didn't hit her head. Son, NP (V30), and (V15) made aware. R2's Fall Investigation dated 01/09/22 documents unwitnessed fall in room. Found on the floor in front of her recliner. Resident had taken her tennis shoes off and only had her plain socks on. [NAME] was in front of resident. Attempted to place (nonskid material) to the floor in front of resident's recliner but, resident removes it off the floor. Intervention is resident teaching; resident is alert and responsive oriented to know that she needs to leave her shoes on. Despite all safety measures taken and in place, resident continues to remove her tennis shoes and walk around her room in plain socks. R2's Nursing Note dated, 01/21/23 at 1:18PM documents, Resident had an unwitnessed slide in room. Resident was found sitting on bottom leaning against recliner. Resident did not have gripper socks on, resident had normal black socks on. Call light in use, alarm on. CNA answered light and informed this nurse that resident was on the floor. Resident was assessed, no injuries noted, no s/s of shock. VS: T:97.8, R: 20, P:96, BP:154/81, O2:98% RA, Pain: 0, Resident denies any pain. Resident is A&O x4 able to make needs known. When asking resident what happened she stated, I was trying to get out of my recliner and slide onto the floor. When asking resident if she hit her head she stated, no, I did not hit my head. Resident was transferred off the floor with two staff members, using gait belt into recliner per resident's request. Intervention was put into place, gripper socks applied and rest. Neuro checks initiated; resident is currently sitting in recliner with call light in place. NP contacted, note was made in 24hr nursing report to call POA in the AM. On call nurse contacted, statements made. No fall investigation noted, for fall on 01/21/23 R2's Nursing Note dated, 01/25/23 at 3:25 PM documents, Was notified by staff that resident had a fall. Resident was sitting on buttocks in front of recliner. She stated that she was trying to stand and slid to the floor. No injuries noted, no c/o pain or discomfort. Educated resident on using call light and waiting for staff assistance, when needing to stand during the night, she stated she would. NP (V30), DON and family made aware. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 01/26/23 documents Fall investigation, resident slipped while transferring self from recliner chair. Resident very non-complaint with safety devices/interventions. Resident given night light for safety. R2's Nursing Note dated, 03/06/23 at 1:22AM documents, Resident had an unwitnessed fall; found on floor on bottom by CNA. Resident A&O (alert and oriented) X3; able to make needs known. Resident stated she slid out of her reclining chair attempting to go to the restroom. Resident stated, she did not hit her head and was not in pain. 0 s/s of distress or discomfort, VS WNL; BP 137/82, P 77, RR 12, O2 at 98%, room air, T 97. Resident assessed by this nurse and reoriented on importance of call light use. Resident is resting in bed at this time call light within reach, will continue to monitor during shift. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 03/06/23 documents, Fall investigation. Resident slid to floor from chair with no injuries. Resident remains non-complaint with safety devices/inventions. R2's Nursing Note dated, 03/06/23 at 7:42PM documents, Resident had an unwitnessed fall at 7pm. Resident was found on the floor next to bed. Resident said she fell while getting off the toilet. VS, T 97.6, P 83, R 20, O2 96%, RA, BP 122/63. A&O x4, she reached for her walker and the walker breaks were not locked in place, the walker went the opposite direction and the resident slid and fell. The resident denies hitting her head, when the nurse first assessed the fall, the resident said, she was in pain and hurting; she was on the floor crying, and she appeared to be in distress. When the nurse discussed the possibility of her going to the ER r/t (related to) 2 falls in one day, the resident began to deny pain and plead not to be sent to the hospital. No signs of bleeding noted, no changes in skin condition. NP (V30) contacted, NP suggest we ask the POA for instruction r/t hospital and to begin Neurological Checks. The nurse contacted POA son, POA chose not to send resident to the ER stating, if she says she's not in pain, she not in pain. I know it may seem concerning, but I'm ok with her not going to the hospital. The nurse will initiate Neuro-checks. Resident last seen in recliner, call light in reach. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 03/06/23 documents, Unwitnessed fall. Incorrect documentation. R2's Nursing Note dated, 03/30/23 at 9:10PM documents, Was notified by staff that resident was on the floor. Upon entering room resident was noted sitting on her buttocks, in front of her chair. She stated, she slid trying to get up to hold on to walker, and she didn't fall or hit her head. Resident did have shoes on. Resident was assessed immediately, no injuries, no c/o pain or discomfort. Educated resident on using call light when needing assistance, she stated she would. Family, NP (V30), and on-call nurse (V15) made aware. R2's Fall Investigation dated, Fall investigation. Resident fall, attempting to transfer from recliner chair, no injury. Resident remains non-complaint with safety interventions. R2's Nursing Note dated, 04/02/23 at 10:30PM documents, Was notified by staff that resident was on the floor. Upon entering room resident was noted sitting on her buttock, in front of her recliner. When asked what happened resident stated, she was trying to get up and go to the bathroom and slid out of her recliner. Resident educated on using her call light when needing help, resident agreed and stated, I know I am just embarrassed to ask for help. Resident was assessed immediately, ROM WNL, hand grips strong, no injuries noted, denies having pain. Resident had shoes on, lighting in room was adequate, floor was dry, no items in pathway. Call light and personal belongings within reach. POA, on call nurse (V18) and NP (V30) notified. Resident was assisted to the bathroom and is currently resting in bed with call light within reach. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 04/02/23 documents, Fall investigation. Resident fall, attempting to transfer from recliner chair, no injury. Resident remains non-complaint with safety interventions, continues to remove (Nonskid material) from chair. R2's Nursing Note dated, 04/14/23 at 10:04PM documents, Resident had an unwitnessed fall. Resident was observed on the floor, sitting on bottom in front of chair. Resident states, I was trying to get up to use the bathroom and my feet slipped from under me. [NAME] breaks were not locked prior to fall, call light was within reach, tennis shoes and non-slip socks were on. VS, T 98, P 78, R 16, BP 102/77, O2 98% RA. Resident denies hitting head and pain, no injuries noted. POA notified, NP (V30) notified, no new orders at this time. Resident is currently laying down in bed resting, call light in reach. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 04/14/23 documents, Fall investigation. Fall during self-transfer from recliner chair. Wheeled walker brakes not locked, no injury. Resident educated/reminded to lock brakes before transferring. Resident continues to remove, (nonskid material), from recliner chair. Resident remains non-complaint with safety interventions/devices. R2's Nursing Note dated, 04/17/23 at 8:52AM documents, This nurse was going to the 200 hall and heard voice calling for help; upon entering in the room, observed resident on the floor on her buttocks in front of the toilet; resident states she slipped when she was trying to get up from commode; resident denies hitting her head; no injury noted; denies for any pain or discomfort; ROM, WNL; walker breaks were not locked; resident stated, she did had tennis shoes on but, when she slipped her shoes came off; bp 145/84, temp 98.3, pulse 90, resp 20; POA notified; NP (V30) notified, no new order received. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 04/17/23 documents, Fall investigation. Resident stated, she fell when shoes fell off during transfer from commode. Brakes to rollator not engaged. Resident non-complaint with safety devices/interventions. Refuses to ask for assistance. R2's Nursing Note dated, 05/29/23 at 9:30PM documents, Was notified by staff that resident was on the floor. Upon entering room resident was noted sitting on her buttock in front of the bathroom door. When asked what happened resident stated, I was coming out of the bathroom and slid. Resident educated on the risks and benefits of using call light when needing assistance, resident stated, I know baby. Resident was assessed immediately. VS: T 97.3, B/P 116/68, P 73, R 18, O2, 96% RA. Shearing noted on buttock; SWM nurse made aware, resident to be evaluated. ROM, WNL, hand grips strong, denies having pain, resident had shoes on prior to fall, lighting in room was adequate, floor was dry, no items in pathway. POA, DON (V2), and NP (V30), notified. Resident currently resting in bed, call light in reach. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 05/29/23 documents, Fall investigation. Resident fall when leaving bathroom, no injury. Resident remains non-complaint with safety interventions. Will not use call light for assistance. R2's Nursing Note dated, 06/03/23 at 11:30PM documents, This writer was alerted by CNA, that the resident was on the floor, upon entering the room this writer observed the resident sitting in an upright position, in front of her recliner and her rollator position in front of her, her shoes was noted her the side of the chair and she had on regular socks. The resident stated that her rollator did not brake and she lost her balance and slide to the floor from her recliner. She does not voice any c/o new pain, nor did she hit her head. This writer assessed the resident from head to toe, no visible injuries noted at this time, ROM, WNL for resident, and neuro checks initiated. Resident transfer x2 up to recliner and assisted to the bathroom. VS stable, MD (V33) notified, no new orders, resident son notified. R2's Fall Investigation dated, 06/03/23 documents, Fall investigation. Resident slid from recliner chair, no injury. Resident was wearing regular socks, shoes beside her. Resident removes (nonskid material) from chair. States rollator brakes not engaged at the time. Resident non-complaint with safety interventions and does not use call light for assistance. 6. R54's Physician Order dated, 07/18/22 documents, repeated falls. R54's Physician Order dated, 01/26/23 documents, Alzheimer's disease with late onset. R54's Care Plan dated, 06/15/22 documents, Problem: At risk for falls due to: Unsteady gait, Dementia, unaware of safety needs, non-compliant with safety instructions, Dementia. (R54) had a fall on 6/18/22 and was sent to ED for further evaluation and TX. W/C changed out and anti-rollback device put on w/c. Fall on 6/28/22 no injuries. Staff to ensure proper footwear on at all times, non-skid socks. 07/17/22 Resident fell out of bed, no injuries. Resident did not use call light to ask for assistance. (R54) moved her bed to a very high position. (R54) is unaware of safety awareness; (R54) was re-educated on using call light from staff to call for assistance. Intervention: bed control to be placed out of reach of resident. 07/26/22 Unwitnessed fall out of bed no injuries. Intervention: Bolster mattress placed on bed. 08/16/22 unwitnessed fall while transferring self from bed to w/c c/o leg pain. Intervention: mats on the floor next to bed and STAT X-ray ordered. 09/2/22 (R54) fell trying to get out of w/c, by herself and fell and hit head on door. Intervention: Sent out to ED for further evaluation and Tx, and anti-thrust cushion placed in wheelchair. 10/28/22 Unwitnessed fall. Interventions: order to Send out to ER from NP, POA refused, NP notified of refusal. (R54) placed on Restorative Program for transfers and AROM. 11/25/22 Fall taking self to bathroom, no injuries. Intervention: UA /CS 12/31/22 - resident had a self-reported fall. Resident stated, she had fallen out of her wheelchair and assisted herself back into her wheelchair. The fall is questionable because, resident is unable to assist herself back into her wheelchair without assistance. No injuries were noted. Resident will be beginning therapy to assist with transfer. 3/6/23 Fall without injury attempting self-transfer. Intervention: Bed in low position while in bed. 3/17/23 Fall found sitting on floor with injuries, received laceration to forehead sent to ER and returned with N.O. (no orders), Intervention: Non-compliant with safety interventions. R54's Care Plan dated 04/20/23 documents Problem: Resident is at risk for falls due to: Unsteady gait, Dementia, unaware of safety needs, non-compliant with safety instructions. 4/19/23 res was self-transferring from w/c to bed and pants caught on w/c and res was found on right side laying on floor mat, received S/T, (skin tear), to right forearm. R54's MDS dated , 06/16/23 documents, a BIMS score of 10 out of 15. Resident is moderately impaired. The MDS documents, that R54 requires supervision of one person of bed mobility, transfer, locomotion on unit, locomotion on one person, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident is not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. R54's Nursing Note dated, 07/17/22 at 8:19PM documents, At 7:45pm this nurse was at the nurse's station when I heard someone yell for help. This nurse went down the hallway by residents' room and noticed resident sitting on the floor by her bed, yelling I fell out of bed. This nurse asked the CNA to come help assist with getting resident up off the floor. Resident when asked if anything hurt stated, Nothing hurts get me up. Resident was assessed head to toe, bandage noted to middle of back and pain patch noted to back and old bruise noted to lateral side of left lower leg. No new visible injuries noted. Residents bed was all the way up. CNA stated that bed was in normal position and not that high when she just left residents room after putting her to bed and went to the restroom. Resident was taken to the bathroom and toileted. VS, WNL, 98.9, 84, 18, 112/60, SPO2 94% RA. DON notified, and NP notified of fall. POA called and VM (voice message), left, awaiting a call back. Resident placed on neuro checks since fall was unwitnessed. R54's Fall Investigation dated, 07/18/22 documents, resident fall from bed. Resident fall from bed, using remote raising the bed and then tried to self-transfer. Intervention to keep bed remote out of reach. R54's Nursing Note dated, 07/26/22 at 1:27AM documents, Resident had an unwitnessed fall at 1:00am. Resident was yelling for help. This nurse walked into resident's room where I found her sitting on the side of her bed. Resident was stable. A&0 x4. When asked what happened resident stated, I was trying to get up to use the bathroom and fell. When asking resident if she hit her head she stated no. When asking resident if she was in pain she stated no. When asking resident if she used the call light that was in reach resident stated no. Resident was assessed and VS were taken and WNL. No skin tears, no bruising nor bleeding was noted. Immediate intervention was putting gripper socks on and reinforcing the importance of using the call light. Resident was then transferred into wheelchair using gait belt with two nurses and CNA in room. CNA then assessed resident into bathroom. Resident was then transferred in bed. Resident is in bed stable with call light in place. MD, DON, contacted. POA will be contacted in the morning. R54's Fall Investigation dated, 07/26/22 documents, Unwitnessed fall in bedroom. Slid out of bed onto floor. Call light in reach, resident fall from bed, Bolster mattress. R54's Nursing Note dated, 08/16/23 at 9:27PM documents, Resident starts IFU, (investigation follow-up), r/t post fall no c/o pain no injuries noted found on floor by bed trying to transfer w/o, (without), assistance denies hitting head fall unwitnessed neuro checks started POA called, MD aware and DON notified VSS will continue to monitor. R54's Fall Investigation dated, 08/16/22 documents, Fall in bedroom. Intervention: Floor mat to bedside for safety, continue current care plan. R54's Nursing Note dated, 09/02/22 at 7:51AM documents, CNA notified this nurse that resident is on the floor; upon entering to room found resident on the floor by the door on her buttock; resident stated, she did hit her left side of her head; denies for any pain at this time; no bleeding, swollen noted; helped resident on her chair with help of staff; made aware to NP, (V30), and received order to send resident to ER for evaluation; made aware to family as well as ADON; (local ambulance service) contacted for emergency transfer. Report given to nurse at (Hospital). R54's Fall Investigation dated, 09/02/22 documents, Fell and sent to ED, (Emergency Department), for eval and treatment. Resident fell out of wheelchair landing on her left side. Was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. X-ray negative and resident returned same day. Intervention: Anti-thrust cushion added to wheelchair, continue current care plan. R54's Nursing Note dated, 10/28/22 at 11:12 AM documents, Resident fell this shift; unwitnessed, Neuros in place per MAR, (medication administration record). VS stable/WNL for resident; BP: 1[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours in a day. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours in a day. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facility. The facility Nursing Schedule dated, Monday June 12th through June 29th documents. The facility has three RNs (V4, V10, and V25.) The facility did not have a RN for eight consecutive hours in a day on June 16th, 24th, 25th. On 6/29/23 at 11:00 AM V3 Director of Nursing stated our night nurse just walked in and resigned. We just don't have the RN coverage. The facility policy entitled, Direct Care Staffing dated, 12/2012 documents, the facility will comply with staffing requirements set forth by the State and Federal requirements to meet the needs of its residents. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents Form dated, 6/27/23 documents the facility has a census of 66.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a manner that prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 6...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a manner that prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 6/27/23 at 7:58 AM, on the bottom shelf of the preparation table, beside the large steam table, there were 4 clear containers with various dry cereals that were not labeled or dated. On 6/27/23 at 8:08 AM, in the standing freezer, there was a brown paper bag containing an unknown food. The bag was sealed, but not labeled or dated. There was a bag of snicker doodle cookies, inside a cardboard box. The plastic bag inside the cardboard box had been opened, but was not resealed or dated, and the cookies were open to air. There were two trays of individual ice cream cups covered with sheets of wax paper, but not sealed. The wax paper was labeled ice cream and 6/27/23 in black marker. On 6/27/23 at 8:07 AM, in the walk-in refrigerator, there was a bag of shredded yellow cheese and a bag of parmesan cheese that were previously opened and resealed but were not dated. On 6/27/23 at 8:12 AM, in the dry storage room, there was a dented 108 ounce can of pinto beans on the rack. There was a plastic bag containing an opened box of baking soda on a shelf that was not sealed up or dated. There were two bins, each approximately three feet high, containing white powdery substances, labeled sugar and flour that were not dated. On 6/27/23 at 8:23 AM, V7 (Cook) was serving food from the small steam table. The entire scoop and handle of the scoop fell into the scrambled eggs. On 6/27/23 at 8:25 AM, V7 (Cook) served toast using the tongs that were used for the bacon. On 6/27/23 at 8:26 AM, V7 (Cook) resumed serving scrambled eggs with the scoop that was inside the bin on top of the food. On 6/27/23 at 8:28 AM, V6 (Cook) and V8 (Dietary Aid) were serving food at the larger steam table. V6 was wearing a loose, unzipped sweatshirt that brushed the inside of the scrambled egg container when she reached forward to place the plate on the counter to be served. V8 had a mustache and goatee approximately one inch long and was not wearing a beard net. V8 used the tongs for the French toast, then the tongs fell into the French toast container. V6 then used the tongs that were in the sausage and bacon container for the French toast. On 6/27/23 at 8:30 AM V6 touched the French toast with her bare hand while reaching for the tongs inside the container. On 6/27/23 at 8:33 AM, V9 (Dietary Aid) was running the dish machine. He stated, he has been working in the facility for 1 or 2 months and has never tested the dish machine. He stated, he was never told he should be testing the machine. During the final rinse, the final rinse temperature dial did not move from 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 6/27/23 at 8:39 AM, V5 (Dietary Supervisor) stated, they check the dish machine twice weekly and asked if she should be testing it more often. V5 removed a test strip from a plastic bag. The text on the test strip stated, If center is black then correct temperature has been achieved. V5 placed a test strip on a coffee cup, placed the cup in the dish machine, and started the dish cycle. After the cycle was complete, the test strip remained white and did not change color. V5 stated, when the machine is tested, it usually takes a few cycles to get to the correct temperature, but she will be contacting the person who maintains the dishwasher. On 6/27/23 at 8:37 AM, after the last resident tray was served, the pureed sausage, from the assisted dining room steam table measured 94.4 degrees Fahrenheit on a metal calibrated thermometer. V7 (Cook) stated, It should have been on the hot plate. On 6/29/23 at 7:55 AM, V7 stated, the pureed food on her steam table is used for all pureed diets in the facility. The Facility's Resident Orders for Dietary documents, R4, R9, R10, R19, R30, R32, R39, R40, R52, R54, and R56 have pureed diets. On 6/30/23 at 8:19 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, she expects staff to follow all of the Facility's food service and sanitation policies. The Facility's Food Storage Policy revised 8/2017 documents, Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food is stored, prepared, and transported at appropriate temperatures and by methods designed to prevent contamination. Plastic containers with tight-fitting covers must be used for storing cereals, cereal products, flour, sugar, dried vegetables, and broken lots of bulk foods. All containers must be legible and accurately labeled. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. Leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated for refrigerated and frozen foods. The Facility's Food Safety and Sanitation Policy dated 2017 documents, All local, state and federal standards and regulations will be followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary department of food and nutrition services. All staff will be in good health, will have clean personal habits and will use safe food handling practices. Beard nets are required when facial hair is visible. When a food package is opened, the food item should be marked to indicate the open date. This date is used to determine when to discard the food. The Facility's Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine dated 2017 documents, The dish machines will be checked prior to meals to assure proper functioning and appropriate temperatures for cleaning and sanitizing. Prior to use, verify proper temperatures and machine function. Note: Staff should check the dish machine gauges throughout the cycle to assure proper temperatures for sanitation. Thermal strips may be used as verification that the temperature is adequately hot but, cannot verify actual temperatures. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions Form (CMS-672) dated 6/27/23 documents there are 66 residents living in the Facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement an infection control program which analyzed trends of infection. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement an infection control program which analyzed trends of infection. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. R3 was listed on the undated Infection Control Log for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The Infection Control Log documented; a urine specimen was collected 01/26/23. No organisms were listed but, the antibiotic Macrobid (Nitrofurantoin) was prescribed. On 6/29/23 at 3:30 PM, V3 (Director of Nurses) presented Lab results dated, 5/11/23 documenting, the organisms as (1) Escherichia Coli ESBL >100,000 CFU/mL (2) Mixed Skin Flora, no sens, (Sensitivity), done >100,000CFU/ml. The Prescription Order Sheet dated, 5/17/23 documents, Macrobid 100 mg, 1 tab twice a day between 7:00 AM-10:00 AM and 7:00-10:00 PM. Start date documented as 5/16/23 and end date 5/21/23. Electronic Medical Record, (eMAR), dated, May 2023 documents, R3 received a dose of Macrobid at 4:00 PM and the order was discontinued. Another prescription order was issued on 5/17/23 with a start date of 5/17/23 and end date of 5/21/23. On 6/30/23 at 8:45 AM V3 Director of Nursing stated, charts are audited to ensure accuracy of orders to eliminate any medication errors. It is her expectation that staff will adhere to the facility's policy and procedures. 2. R8 is on the undated Infection Control Log for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), no test was listed; no test results were listed, and no antibiotics were listed. On 6/29/23 at 3:30 PM V3 provided lab results dated 5/11/23 which documents, lab results as (1) Escherichia Coli > 100,000 CFU/mL (2) Mixed Skin Floras, no sens done 50-60,000 CFU/ml. The facility received an order for Macrobid 1 tab by mouth twice a day by mouth for 7 days. Start date documented, as 5/16/2023 and end date documented, as 5/23/2023. (eMAR) dated, May 2023 documents. On 5/16/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 4:00 PM. On 5/17/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/18/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/19/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/20/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/21/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 5/22/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM and On 5/23/23 R8 was given a dose of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Instead of 14 doses of Macrobid received 15 doses. On 6/29/23 at 3;30 PM V3 also provided Labs results dated, 6/7/23 documents a urine specimen was collected, and the organisms were documented, (1) Escherichia Coli >100,000 CFU/mL and (2) Mixed Skin Flora, no sens done 40-50,000 CFU/mL and no antibiotics were started. 3. R39 is listed on the undated Infection Control Log with a Urinary Tract Infection. The Infection Control Log documents, a urine specimen was collected 10/24/22. In the test results column, the note documents, spoke with NP, hospital results received from Hospital, Macrobid ordered. eMAR dated, 10/2022 documents, Ciprofloxacin suspension microcapsule recon 500 mg/5 ml; amount to administer 5 mL oral daily. R39 was given 5 ml of Ciprofloxacin on 10/28/22. R39 was given 5mL of Ciprofloxacin on 10/29/22. R39 was given 5 mL of Ciprofloxacin on 10/31/22 and R39 was given 5 mL of Ciprofloxacin on 10/31/22. R39 was not listed on the undated Infection Control Log again but, an (eMAR) dated, November 11/2022 documents, an order for Macrobid 100 mg 1 tab twice a day with a start date of 11/6/22 and end date of 11/11/22 for a urinary tract infection. On 11/6/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 11/7/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 11/8/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 11/9/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 11/10/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 11/11/22 R39 was given 2 doses of Macrobid at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. On 6/30/23 at 8:45 AM V3 stated, she was the ICPC but does not have certification as an Infection Control Preventionist Program. 4. R58 was listed on the undated Infection Control log as having a Urinary Tract Infection. The specimen collection dated was documented, as 5/19/23 no organism(s) were documented, and the antibiotic Bactrim DS was ordered. On 6/29/23 at 3:30 PM supplied lab results dated, 5/15/23 documenting, the organisms as (1) Proteus Mirabilis (2) Enterococcus Faecalis-Unable to isolate organism for definitive susceptibility due to swarming properties of Proteus. The organism was sensitive to Bactrim (<=0.5/9.5). eMAR dated 5/1/23-5/31/23 documents R58 was given Bactrim-DS 1 tab twice a day x 7 days. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/22/23 at 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/23/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/24/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/25/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/26/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/27/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. R58 was given Bactrim-DS on 5/28/23 at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM R58 did not receive a dose of Bactrim on 5/29/23 at 8:00 AM, however did a total of 13 doses instead of 14. The Facility's Policy and Procedure undated Mercy Rehab & Care Center Antibiotic Stewardship documents the policy establishes directives for antimicrobial stewardship at Mercy Rehab & Care Center to develop antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the services of an Infection Preventionist (IP), at a minimum part time basis, to track facility infections and resident vaccinatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the services of an Infection Preventionist (IP), at a minimum part time basis, to track facility infections and resident vaccinations in order to prevent the spread of infectious disease. This has the potential to affect all 66 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 06/30/23 at 9:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, (V3) is our Infection Preventionist, but she is not certified. She is working on it but, has not completed the training. On 06/30/23 at 8:45 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, I have been doing the job but, I am not certified. The Facility's Infection Control log undated but, covers the months June 2022 to June 2023 for Urinary Tract Infections, (UTI), have 12 entries with no organisms documented, as source of infection. Additionally, there are 6 residents with antibiotics with no organisms listed. The Facility's QAPI Meeting Attendees list does not document (V3) as the Infection Control Preventionist. The Facility's Policy and Procedures undated documents, The infection Preventionist, (IP), will incorporate antibiotic stewardship into their current activities and will allocate dedicated time (10 hours/week) specifically for antimicrobial stewardship activities. The IP's primary professional training is in nursing, medical technology, microbiology, or epistemology, or other related field. the IP is qualified by education, training, experience or certification and by November 28th, will have completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The IP works at the facility full-time/part-time. Resident Census and Conditions of Resident form dated 6/27/23 document. The facility has a census of 66.
May 2023 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse by a staff member for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse by a staff member for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for abuse. A reasonable person would feel angry, intimidated, and fearful of staff from being hit and cursed at by a staff member. The findings include: R5's Care Plan, dated 03/10/2023, documents Problem: Cognitive skills for daily decision making moderately impaired - decisions poor; cues/supervision required d/t (due to) Dementia. It continues Approach: Engage in activities that do not require frequent decisions; observe for signs of frustration. Provide assistance as needed. It also documents Problem: Short-Term memory impaired - unable to recall after 5 minutes d/t Dementia, New Environment. It continues Approach: Re-orient to time, location, events, and activities as needed. Approach: Provide direct guidance when resident is unable to follow through with instructions. Approach: Maintain consistent routine; introduce change slowly to reduce confusion. R5's Progress Notes, dated 4/13/2023 at 7:20 AM, documents CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) came and made me aware that resident had slid off the sliding board while trying to transfer. The writer came into the room to see resident lying on the floor. Resident said, nothing hurts at this time and has no bumps or bruising at this time. VS (Vital Signs), WNL (within normal limits). Resident is currently in dining room waiting on breakfast. NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified, family notified, and DON (Director of Nursing). R5's Progress Notes, dated 4/13/2023 at 7:31 AM, documents Administrator and DON made aware of Incident. The facility's Final Report of Alleged Physical and Verbal Abuse, not dated, documents on 4/13/2023 V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V17 (CNA) were called to the room of resident R5, age [AGE], by V18 (CNA) to assess and assist in getting R5 off the floor, due to a fall while doing a sliding board transfer with V18. All staff members assisted the resident bask into his wheelchair. Almost immediately, V18 pushed and slapped, R5 and called him a Mother Fxxxxx as witnessed by the 2 other staff in the room. V18 was removed from the facility immediately. Resident was assessed for injury, and none noted. Resident did not voice any complaints of pain. (Local Police) was called. Physician, Administrator, DON, and family contacted. V19 (Officer from Local Police Department) arrived at facility to investigate. Staff who witnessed were interviewed and resident was also interviewed. Resident told (V19) that he remembered the fall but does not remember being struck by an employee. V19's report is (XXXX-XXXXX). Report was still in progress as of 4/17/23 at 2p.m. Several other residents who were assigned to V18 were interviewed by the V2 (DON). No resident mentioned being hurt by V18, but a few said he was 'rough' when pulling them up in bed with draw sheet. No one interviewed has been hit or cursed at by V18. Nurse Practitioner/NP assessed and interviewed resident on 4/14/23. No injuries noted. Resident unable to recall event for NP. V18 was interviewed by V2 on 4/13/23 by phone. V18 was asked what happened with R5. V18 talked about the fall and stated without being asked I didn't say anything disrespectful but, did not say anything about the physical altercation. V18 was terminated at that time. Facility does substantiate the physical and verbal abuse. The facility's Patient and staff interviews as it relates to Abuse allegations: 4/13/23 documents the following: 1. V7 (LPN) stated that she was called into patient's room, (R5), due to a fall. While trying to get him off the floor, with assistance of V17 and V18, V18 slapped the patient on the head twice and called him a Big Mother Fxxxxx. She also stated that she smelt alcohol on his breath. After that she asked, (V18) to leave the building, notified the Administrator, called the Police, and notified DON. 2. V17 stated, around 6am her co-worker, (V18) asked for assistance with getting (R5) off the floor. She stated, when she entered the room, she saw the patient lying on his back on the floor. She then told (V18) he should get the nurse to make sure he was okay before they moved him. After the nurse assessed him, they (V18, V17, and V7) assisted him into the w/c (wheelchair), using the (full body), lift pad. Once (R5) was in the w/c, he (R5), leaned forward and asked if they needed to remove the (full body lift), pad and V7 responded it was fine. She then stated, that (V18) pushed him back in the chair and told him to behave, then called him a Big Fxxxxx. On 5/1/2023 at 2:30 PM V1 stated that she did do an investigation on the incident that occurred with (R5) and a staff member. V1 stated that she was notified that (V18) physically and verbally abused (R5). V1 stated that she was proud of her staff for being advocates for the resident. V1 stated that the nurse was able to get the employee out of the facility and assessed the resident. V1 stated that she was notified that R5 did not have any injuries. V1 stated that the Police were called, and the incident was reported. V1 stated that an officer came out to the facility and interviewed the resident and the staff members. V1 stated that she has followed up with the police and as of current the report hasn't been completed. V1 stated,that she has also been in contact with the family, and they are upset and wanting to file a complaint as well. V1 stated that V2 performed the interviews with the staff and residents and did not find any other residents that had been abused by V18. V1 stated that some of the residents felt he was rough but not abusive. V1 stated that they were able to substantiate the abuse because they had witnesses that were vocal about what happened. On 5/2/2023 at 9:39 AM V7 (LPN) stated that she was the nurse the night of the incident. V7 stated that V18 told her that R5 had fallen and V7 needed help getting R5 off the floor. V7 stated that she (V7) and V17 went to room to help V18. V7 stated that once entering the room she observed R5 on the floor and assessed him. V7 stated that initially they attempted to transfer R5 manually but R5 would not move his legs. V7 stated that at that time V18 stated to R5 all you had to do was move your legs. V7 stated that they then transferred R5 using the full body lift. V7 stated that once in the wheelchair V18 called R5 a fat Mxxxxx Fxxxxx and hit R5 in the head twice. V7 stated that V18 then said all you had to do was move your legs. You are ruining my morning you big Mother Fxxxxx. V7 stated that R5 did not say anything but you could see that he wanted to but V18 was standing over him and stated What. You are ruining Morning you big Mxxxxx Fxxxxx. V7 stated that V18 was posturing over R5 trying to intimidate R5. V7 stated that she told V18 that he needed to leave the facility. V7 stated that V18 became aggressive with her and would not leave initially asking what he did. V7 stated that she had to tell V18 to leave multiple times before he would leave the building. V7 stated that she was able to get V18 to leave. On 5/2/2023 at 10 am R5 stated that he has had a fall, but it was the staff fault because they put him to close to the edge of the bed. R5 stated that he did not remember the employee and did not remember being cursed at or hit. R5 stated that he would not like to be hit. R5 stated that he would not have been ok with that. R5 stated that he would be angry and wanting to fight back. R5 stated that he isn't in any condition to fight back. R5 stated that not being able to fight back is scary. On 5/2/2023 at 157 PM V13 (R5's Sister) stated that she was made aware of the incident with her brother and the staff member. V13 stated that R5 has dementia and has short-term memory problems. V13 stated that R5 would have never tolerated being hit or cursed at. V13 stated that R5 would have felt like anyone else in that situation. V13 stated he would have been angry, intimidated and scared all at the same time. V13 stated that how would you feel if this was done to you? V13 stated that they are thankful that the staff spoke up about the situation with her brother but what about the times they were not there and what about the other residents that were cared for. On 5/3/2023 at 2:15 PM V2 stated, that she interviewed V18 by phone. V2 stated, that she asked V18 what happened with R5. V18 stated, that R5 had fallen. V2 stated that she asked is that all that happened and V18 responded I didn't say anything wrong. V2 stated, that she asked again if that was all that happened with R5 and V18 stated, that he didn't know what she was talking about. V2 stated, that informed V18 that his services were no longer needed. The facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 8/2016, documents The facility believes that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, misappropriation of their property, involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to facility staff, other Residents residing at (facility), consultants, volunteers, staff of outside agencies providing services at (facility), family members, legal guardians, and individuals visiting our facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consecutive 8-hour Registered Nurse coverage in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. Fi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consecutive 8-hour Registered Nurse coverage in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 5/1/2023 at 11:00 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, that the facility Census is 65. V1 stated that the facility received a citation from a previous complaint on RN (Registered Nurse) coverage and have submitted their plan of correction that has been accepted. On 5/3/2023 at 2:15 PM, the Nursing Working staffing schedule from 3/25/2023 through 5/1/2023 was reviewed with V2 (Director of Nurses/DON). There was no consecutive 8-hour RN coverage in 24 hours for the following dates: 4/20/23, 4/21/23, 4/24/23, 4/29/23, and 4/30/23. On 5/2/2023 at 12:20 PM V10 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated that she is new to the facility. V10 stated that she has been only at the facility for a week. V10 stated that her start date at the facility was on 4/24/2023. On 5/3/2023 at 2:00 PM V1 stated, that the facility is trying to get RN in the facility. V1 stated, that the facility hired an assistant (ADON) and have a weekend RN. V1 stated, that they are getting close but knows that they are not there yet. On 5/3/2023 at 2:15 PM V2 (DON) verified that the facility did not have RN coverage on dates listed above. V2 stated, that facility is actively trying to recruit staff. V2 stated, that they have hired an RN for the ADON position, and they did not show. V2 stated, that currently they have a new ADON that is an RN. V2 stated, that they have assured that they have nurses in the building to provide the care needs of the residents in the facility. The facility's Direct Care Staffing policy, dated December 2012, documents that the facility will comply with staffing requirements set forth by stated and federal requirements to meet the needs of its residents.
Mar 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the integrity of each resident's skin is maintained for 1 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the integrity of each resident's skin is maintained for 1 of 4 (R3), residents reviewed in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining 3 pressure ulcers to her sacrum, 1 pressure ulcer to posterior left thigh and 1 pressure ulcer to anterior right thigh. Findings include: R3's Face Sheet, not dated, list Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting dominant side as diagnosis. R3's Care Plan, dated 7/3/22, documents Problem: Resident is at risk for pressure ulcer due to friction and shear. It continues Approach: Minimum of 2 people plus draw sheet to lift resident while in bed. It also documents Problem: Resident is at risk for pressure ulcer due to activity and chairfast. Approach: Pad bony prominences with foam wedges, rolled blankets, or towels prn, (as needed). Consider PT consult for conditioning and w/c (wheelchair), assessment. Instruct resident to reposition frequently in chair. Consider postural alignment, weight distribution, balance stability, and pressure relief when positioning in chair or wheelchair. It also documents Problem: Resident is at risk for pressure ulcer due to bedfast/mobility, resident often refuses to get up out of bed, daughter likes resident to remain in bed in the evening time. Resident has history of pressure ulcers. It continues Teach or do frequent small shifts of body weight, assist as needed. Elevate heels off bed or use heel protector's prn. Position with pillows to elevate pressure points off the bed. Position prone if appropriate or elevate HOB (head of bed) no more than 30 degrees. R3's Braden Scale, dated 1/26/23, documents that R3 is High Risk for obtaining pressure ulcers. R3's Specialized Wound Management note, dated 2/14/2023, documents left buttock pressure ulcer. Plan: promote healing and comfort-Met Plan: 1. Left buttock closed- staff will use house barrier per protocol. Nursing is assisting with peri care and repositioning q (every) 2 hours and PRN (as necessary). R3's Shower Sheet, dated 3/4/23, documents that a bed bath was given. R3's Shower Sheet, dated 3/8/23, documents that shower refused. No reason indicated. R3's history, dated 7/4/22-3/10/23, documents that on 3/5/2023 at 10:18 AM to 10:19 AM R3 was moved in bed, transferred, and dressed. On 3/6/2023 at 6:44 AM R3 was moved in bed. On 3/8 at 7 AM R3 was moved in bed, toileted and dressed. From 9:54 AM to 10:01 AM R3 was moved in bed, transferred, dressed and personal care. On 3/10/2023 at 7:05 AM R3 was moved in bed and toileted. No further documentation of resident being repositioned every 2 hours, toileted, dressed, bathe and personal care provided by the facility. No documentation provided by the facility of ADL, (activity of daily living), care performed on 3/11/2023. R3's Wound Assessment from local hospital, dated 3/11/2023, documents 3 pressure ulcers to R3's sacrum. Areas measured, approximately, facing resident 1. left 1.2 cm x 0.6 cm. 2. middle 1.1 cm x 1.2 cm 3. right 0.6 cm x 0.5 cm. On 3/21/2023 at 1:15 PM V10 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that she works for the facility since December and works the same hall, working with R3. V10 stated that the last time she provided care for R3 was 2 days before she went to the hospital. V10 stated she provided everyday care, and she did not remember R3 having any open areas to her buttock. R3 had swelling on her left side but, not aware of her having swelling to the right side. V10 stated she had given R3 bed baths and cleaned her feet as well, R3's feet were ashy but not flaky. V10 stated R3 could not reposition herself independently in the bed, she needed help to turn and reposition, but R3 would help by grabbing rail and pulling when staff is pushing but could not fully reposition self. On 3/21/2023 at 3:44 PM V23 (CNA) stated she has taken care of R3, and that R3 needed help with repositioning and could not reposition herself without help. V23 stated in the past when she cared for R3 she did not have an area to her buttocks. On 3/21/2023 at 3:30 PM requested documentation of care provided for R3 up until discharge on [DATE]. Receiving on 3/22/23 at 9:00 AM from V24 (Administrator) R3's Point of Care History, dated 7/4/2022 to 3/10/2023. V24 stated she is not sure why on 3/11/2023 R3 was not provided care and they must not have been documented. On 03/22/23 at 11:55 AM V20 (CNA) stated she works at the facility part time and works every other weekend. V20 stated, that the last day she worked with R3 was on 03/05/23. V20 stated she was not assigned to R3, but did help with incontinent care, on 03/05/23. V20 stated, that R3 was incontinent of bowel. V20 stated, that R3 did have a small area that was open to her buttocks, that area was small and did not cause for concern to V20. V20 stated she applied barrier cream to the area; she puts barrier cream on all of her residents to help prevent areas to their bottoms from breaking down. On 3/22/2023 at 12:39 PM V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, she is an employee of the facility and works every other weekend and was the nurse assigned to R3's hall. V21 stated the only care she had provided for R3 was administering her medications and then left R3's room. V21 stated she was called to R3's room by her daughter (V9) who had voiced concerns about R3's swelling and showed V21 an area to R3's buttocks that area was red with bleeding, the blood looked fresh. V21 stated it looked like the area was sheared, like someone had pulled her across the mattress. V21 stated she was not aware of a new area prior to this and had not seen R3's buttocks before this time. V21 stated she was aware when R3 came to the facility with areas that was like scar tissue. V21 stated V23 (CNA) and V22 (CNA) cleaned R3 up prior to R3 going to the hospital. On 3/22/2023 V22 stated she had not provided care to R3, except for the day R3 left for the hospital. V22 helped V23 clean R3 up. V22 stated V23 cleaned R3 up and she assisted with holding R3 over. V22 stated at that time V23 told her to get the nurse because there was an area on R3's buttocks. V22 stated, that R3 had previously had an area to her bottom, but she never saw the actual wound, because it had a dressing over it. V22 stated she had not provided care to R3 that day, this was the first time she had interacted with R3. On 3/23/2023 at 9:44 AM V25 (Physician) stated she had an opportunity to view the photos from Hospital and documentations, that those areas were old and not obtained at the hospital. V25 stated that the facility may have missed documented, but the areas are pressure and old. On 3/23/2023 at 2:25 PM V25 (Physician stated) she was aware of R3 having an area to her buttocks previously, that this area had healed. V25 stated R3 did have the area that reopened, and that once there is an area that has closed it is prone to reopening, this puts R3 at a higher risk of obtaining pressure areas and would require more focus and monitoring to assure the area doesn't reopen or new ones doesn't occur. V25 stated depending on how long R3 laid in the emergency room the area may have been obtained there. When notified that R3 was transported to the hospital, per facility documentation, R3 left at 6pm and the hospital documentation, with pictures which were time stamped, as was time being at 8:11 PM. V25 then stated, that there was no way R3 could have obtained the pressure areas documented by the ER in that short of time. The facility's Skin Care Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, dated 3/03, documents Policy: To ensure the integrity of each resident's skin is maintained, [NAME] Care Center will utilize specific care protocols for those residents identified at risk for pressure ulcers. Procedure: The Nurse will: 4. Implement appropriate protocols to prevent impairment of skin integrity, based on the Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment scores.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours a day Registered Nurse coverage, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 63 residents in the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours a day Registered Nurse coverage, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 63 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 03/20/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Nursing Working staffing schedule from 01/01/2023 through 03/20/2023 was reviewed with V2 (Director of Nurses/DON). There were no consecutive 8-hour Registered Nurse/RN coverage in 24 hours for the following dates: 01/21/2023, 01/22/2023, 02/05/2023, 02/18/2023, 02/19/2023, 02/24/2023, 02/26/2023, 02/27/2023, 02/28/2023, 03/02/2023, 03/04/2023, 03/05/2023, 03/09/2023, 03/12/2023, 03/13/2023, 03/14/2023, 03/17/2023, and 03/18/2023. On 03/20/2023 at 9:00 AM V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility census is 63. On 03/20/2023 at 2:34 PM when asked if the facility was having staffing problems V2 (DON) stated that the answer is yes and no. V2 stated that when the facility doesn't have adequate staff, they utilize the staffing agency. V2 stated that they have a couple of agencies that are reliable. V2 stated that she is new to the DON roll and was originally hired as the Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON and started as the DON February 24, 2023. V2 stated, currently they have 1 RN on day shift. V2 stated, that she has hired a RN for midnights, and this nurse would work the opposite days of the day shift RN giving the facility RN coverage 7 days a week. V2 stated, that the RN has not started yet, but will start on Tuesday 03/21/2023. On 3/21/2023 at 9:00 AM, V2 verified that the facility did not have RN coverage on dates listed above. The facility's Direct Care Staffing policy, dated December 2012, documents that the facility will comply with staffing requirements set forth by stated and federal requirements to meet the needs of its residents.
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely report and investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely report and investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for resident injuries in the sample of seven. Findings Include: R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R2 is moderately cognitively impaired. R2's Progress Note dated 1/14/23 documents resident was discharged at 7PM. She was released to her niece (V12). Resident (R2) is A&Ox2 (alert and oriented) w (with)/ behavior. Resident (R2) was DC (discharged ) home w/ meds (medications) and PT (physical therapy)/OT(occupational therapy) orders, and to follow up w/ PCP (primary care physician). VS (vital signs) WNL (within normal limits). Resident niece (V12) got all of her belongings including meds gave education on meds. She was escorted by her niece (V12) via personal vehicle. On 1/19/23 at 8:35 AM, V12 (R2's niece and Power of Attorney/POA), stated, My aunt had bruising to her right breast from her nipple all the way back to her arm pit, and a lump in her left breast. I found the bruise on Sunday when I gave her a shower. I went to the facility, but they could not tell me how she (R2) got the bruise. On 1/19/23 at 8:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated (R2) was discharged on Saturday, and her niece spoke with me on Sunday on the telephone. Saying she (V12) had found a bruise to her aunt's (R2's) breast, but the resident had been discharged for over 14 hours. R2's Progress Note dated 1/12/23 at 7:04 PM documents skin assessment completed. No skin issues noted. Right side near breast has purplish bruising. Bilateral arms and legs intact. Peri area and buttocks are clean and intact. Heels clean and intact. Skin dry and warm to touch. Resident (R2) denies any pain. Fluids encouraged. Resident is currently laying in low bed with call light in place. On 1/19/23 at 2:13 PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), stated, I just made the skin assessment. I didn't know if it was previously reported. I didn't report it to anyone. R2's Event Final Report dated 1/15/23 documents on 1/12/23 a skin assessment was completed by the nursing staff. Bruising was noted to the right side near her breast on that date. The resident denied anyone hurting her. The physician stated that bruising of unknown origin is to be expected considering the diagnoses of Thrombocytosis and a low platelet count. The resident was discharged to her niece's home at 7:00 PM on 1/14/23. The staff assisted the resident into her niece's (V12) car to go home. On the following day 1/15/23, the niece (V12) came to the facility, concerned about a bruise that she had noticed on the resident's right side under her breast. The administrator spoke with the niece via the phone. The niece (V12) stated that she had not undressed the resident on 1/14/23 and noted the bruise when she showered (R2) on 1/15/23. All staff that cared for (R2) was interviewed by the administrator. The resident had no complaints of any staff hurting her. The administrator interviewed several alert residents on the hall that (R2) resided. All residents interviewed stated that no staff had been rude or rough with them during care. The administrator spoke with the physician regarding the bruise. The physician stated that the resident has a diagnosis of thrombocytosis and a low platelet count. (R2) also receives Aspirin as an anticoagulant with the diagnosis it is to be expected that the resident will bruise easily and could develop bruising without trauma causing it. The resident left the facility over 12 hours prior to the niece (V12) questioning the bruise. It is difficult for the facility to determine if an incident occurred when the resident was not in the facility. No abuse could be substantiated. The facility policy Incidents/Accidents dated 8/2022 documents, (the facility) will take every precaution to prevent the occurrence of accidents. When an incident/accident does occur, the facility will document it in the Events section of (documentation system), and in the Nurses Notes. An incident may be defined as, but not limited to falls, resident injuries of known or unknown origin, or any occurrence of an unusual nature that requires investigation. The Administrator will 1.begin investigation per facility abuse prevention policy, 2. send the initial report of the event to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) via the smartsheet, 3. conduct the investigation, 4. Final report of event to IDPH, 5. inform the family.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for 8 hours daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents living in the fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for 8 hours daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents living in the facility. Findings Include: The facility Nursing Schedule dated 1/6/23 through 1/19/23 documents the facility did not have a Registered Nurse (RN) eight hours a day for three days on January 7, 14, and 15. On 1/19/23 at 8:45 AM, V1 (Administrator), stated, We are trying to hire RNs (Registered Nurses). On 1/19/23 at 4:05 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA),stated, No, we don't have enough staff. On 1/19/23 at 8:15 AM, R3 stated, I would like my chair turned around, but I bet they won't come until tomorrow they need more nurses. On 1/19/23 from 3:45 PM through 3:50 PM, R4 through R6 all stated the facility did not have enough staff. The facility policy Direct Care Staffing dated 12/2012 documents the facility will comply with staffing requirements set forth by state and federal requirements to meet the needs of its residents. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions form dated 1/19/23 documented the facility had a census of 61 residents.
Nov 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure affects the entire faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure affects the entire facility. Findings include: Facility's Nurses Staffing Schedule dated 10/3/22 to 10/30/22 and 10/31/22 to 11/27/22 documents that no RNs were scheduled to work on 10/09/22, 10/15/22, 10/16/22, 10/22/22, 10/23/22, 10/30/22, 10/31/22, 11/06/22, 11/12/22, and 11/13/22. On 11/15/22 at 3:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, (V3 Assistant Director of Nursing) does sometimes work the weekends. She worked a double on the 5th. We don't always have a RN. It's hard to get RNs to come here and work. On 11/16/22 at 12:28 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, There isn't an RN that works my weekend. I don't think they have one that works on the other weekend. On 11/16/22 at 12:30 PM, when asked if there is a RN at the facility every day, V8 (LPN), stated, I don't think so. Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 11/15/22 documents a census of 61 residents.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), $189,638 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 22 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $189,638 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (5/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 5/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Evervella Of Swansea's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Evervella Of Swansea Staffed?

CMS rates EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 70%, which is 23 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Evervella Of Swansea?

State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 19 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Evervella Of Swansea?

EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 90 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SWANSEA, Illinois.

How Does Evervella Of Swansea Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (70%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Evervella Of Swansea?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Evervella Of Swansea Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Evervella Of Swansea Stick Around?

Staff turnover at EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA is high. At 70%, the facility is 23 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Evervella Of Swansea Ever Fined?

EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA has been fined $189,638 across 25 penalty actions. This is 5.4x the Illinois average of $34,975. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Evervella Of Swansea on Any Federal Watch List?

EVERVELLA OF SWANSEA is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.