APERION CARE WILMINGTON

555 WEST KAHLER, WILMINGTON, IL 60481 (815) 476-2200
For profit - Limited Liability company 171 Beds APERION CARE Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#437 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Aperion Care Wilmington has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at this facility. With a state rank of #437 out of 665 in Illinois and a county rank of #12 out of 16 in Will County, they are positioned in the bottom half of nursing homes in both the state and county. Although the facility is showing signs of improvement, with the number of issues decreasing from 16 in 2024 to 10 in 2025, it still reported critical incidents, including a serious food safety violation that led to the revocation of their food preparation permit and failure to manage an infectious outbreak that could affect all residents. Staffing is a weak point, reflected in a 1/5 star rating and a high turnover rate of 60%, which is concerning as it exceeds the state average. On a positive note, the facility does provide more RN coverage than 82% of Illinois nursing homes, which is beneficial for resident care, but they also face substantial fines totaling $307,869, higher than 84% of facilities in the state, highlighting ongoing compliance issues.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#437/665
Bottom 35%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
16 → 10 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$307,869 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 16 issues
2025: 10 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 60%

14pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $307,869

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: APERION CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (60%)

12 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Apr 2025 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives written notification...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R57, R93, and R113) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32. The findings include: 1. R113's Face Sheet showed R113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R113 had multiple diagnoses which included psychosis, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorders, auditory hallucinations, and visual hallucinations. R113's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/01/25 showed R113 was cognitively intact. R113's Progress Note dated 11/28/24 at 8:36 AM, showed Resident exhibiting heighten agitation, aggressive behavior this morning, reportedly struck a housekeeping staff member, as she was cleaning his room. Per doctor's orders, he is being sent to (Hospital) for evaluation/stabilization. Progress Note dated 12/20/24 at 5:00 PM, showed Resident roommate observed resident vomiting and came to the nurses' station to report it. He began to continue to have large amounts of coffee brown projectile emesis x 4. 911 was called at 7:23 PM. 911 arrived and assessed resident. He left the facility per stretcher in route to (Hospital). The EMR contained no documentation of written notice for reason of transfer or discharge to the hospital. The facility was unable to provide documentation for written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital. 2. R93's Face Sheet showed R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R93 had multiple diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, morbid obesity, bipolar disorder, anxiety, diabetes, and cardiomegaly. R93's MDS dated [DATE] showed R93 was cognitively intact. R93's Progress Note dated 05/06/24 at 4:29 AM, showed Resident is admitted at (Hospital) for near syncope, elevated troponin, and dyspnea on 05/04/24. Information received from nurse in charge. The EMR contained no documentation of written notice for reason of transfer or discharge to the hospital. The facility was unable to provide documentation for written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital. 3. R57's Face Sheet showed R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R57 had multiple diagnoses which included fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, dementia, anxiety, and auditory hallucinations. R57's MDS dated [DATE] showed R57 was cognitively impaired. R57's Progress Note dated 11/01/24 at 9:30 AM, showed Writer called 911 r/t (Related To) unresponsiveness. VS (Vital Signs) as follows: BP (Blood Pressure) 140/80, PR (Pulse Rate) 65, O2 (Oxygen) 94%, Temperature 97F (Fahrenheit). Two EMT's (Emergency Medical Technician) transported resident via stretcher to (Hospital) for further management and evaluation. Progress Note dated 11/01/24 at 4:35 PM, showed Called (Hospital) in (City) for resident update. Resident was admitted with Acute Metabolic Encephalopathy and complicated UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). Progress Note dated 02/18/25 at 8:07 AM, showed Resident was noted to be laying (sic) in bed twitching to face, both arms, and head. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assisted resident up to chair and resident stated that someone was zapping her head. Doctor to send resident to hospital for evaluation of possible seizure. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) contained no documentation of written notice for reason of transfer or discharge to the hospital provided to R57 and/or the representative, for the hospital transfers dated 11/01/24 and 02/18/25. The facility was unable to provide documentation for written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital. On 04/16/25 at 4:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated residents and/or their representatives should have been notified in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital. The facility's Notice of Transfer and Discharge Policy effective date 03/22/17 showed Prior to discharge or transfer, the facility will: Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative of the facility's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative of the facility's policy for bed hold in writing. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R113) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32. The findings include: R113's Face Sheet showed R113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R113 had multiple diagnoses which included psychosis, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorders, auditory hallucinations, and visual hallucinations. R113's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/01/25 showed R113 was cognitively intact. R113's Progress Note dated 12/20/24 at 5:00 PM, showed Resident roommate observed resident vomiting and came to the nurses' station to report it. He began to continue to have large amounts of coffee brown projectile emesis x 4. 911 was called at 7:23 PM. 911 arrived and assessed resident. He left the facility per stretcher in route to (Hospital). The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) contained no documentation that the written bed hold policy was given to the resident and/or the representative. The facility was unable to provide documentation for the written bed hold policy. On 04/16/25 at 4:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the bed hold policy was not given to R113 for his hospital admission on [DATE]. R113 should have received a bed hold policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent decline and decrease in ROM (Range of Motion). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R107) reviewed for range of mo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent decline and decrease in ROM (Range of Motion). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R107) reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 32. Findings include: R107 diagnoses include Parkinson's disease, anemia, slow transit constipation and osteoarthritis. R107's current plan of care states R107 has limited ROM in the upper and lower extremities related to Parkinson's disease. The goal set for R107 is an active ROM program where R107 will be able to tolerate 1 set of 5 repetitions of AAROM (Active Assisted Range of Motion) to all extremities with limited staff assist, 1 to 2 times daily through next review. No documentation of the ROM program being carried out was noted in R107's EMR (Electronic Medical Record). On 04/17/25 at 01:06 PM, V17 (Restorative Nurse) stated R107's last restorative assessment was done on 12/9/24. The restorative recommendations made for R107 were for active ROM and bed mobility. V17 stated there should have been documentation of R107's restorative assistance, but R107 was not included on the restorative list. R107 stated he was not being seen by the restorative aid or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). V17 stated R107 did not have a program in place to direct staff on what exercises to do with R107 and how often they should be done. The facility policy Restorative Nursing Program dated 1/4/19 states the purpose to promote each resident's ability to maintain or regain the highest degree of independence as safely as possible. Each resident will be screened for restorative nursing upon admission, annually, quarterly and with any significant change in function.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R65 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DAT...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R65 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 04/15/25 at 11:09 AM, R65 was observed in his low bed with an indwelling catheter bag placed on the floor. On 4/15/25 at 11:10 AM, V5 (CNA) observed picking up the indwelling catheter bag from the floor and hooking it to the bed frame, saying, I wasn't working yesterday, and I need to clean up everything. The Catheter bag shouldn't be left on the floor. On 04/15/25 at 02:08 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated staff provide catheter care every shift and PRN. The catheter bag shouldn't be on the floor. The staff should hang the bag on the bed frame. A review of the facility presented Urinary Catheter Care policy revised on 2/14/19 document: 5. Indwelling catheters may be secured to prevent trauma and tension 7. Urinary drainage bags and tubing shall be positioned to prevent either from touching the floor directly. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a sanitary manner, failed to utilize an indwelling catheter securing device, and failed to keep the indwelling catheter bag off the floor. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R65 and 123) reviewed for catheter care in a sample of 32. Findings include: 1. R123 has diagnosis that includes bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes, tremor, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. R123 has a care plan in place for urinary tract infection and antibiotic use. On 04/16/25 at 02:04 PM R123's urinary catheter care was performed by V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), and positioning assistance was provided by V14 (CNA). Using a wash basin and two washcloths, V15 wiped the right side of the labia, folded the washcloth, and wiped the left side of the labia, and folded the washcloth then wiped the outside center of labia's four times with the same washcloth. V15 wet the washcloth in the wash basin. V15 then wiped the right side of the labia, folded the washcloth, and wiped the left side of the labia, and folded the washcloth then wiped the outside center of labia's four more times with the same washcloth. V15 then used the second washcloth to clean the urinary catheter tubing from outside the labia, folded the washcloth wiped the catheter again from outside the labia, folded the washcloth wiped the catheter a third time, then folded the washcloth and wiped the catheter a fourth time. V15 did not clean between the labia. No catheter securing device was in place. R123 was transferred to her wheelchair. On 04/17/25 at 02:32 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated for every wipe during perineal care, a fresh washcloth should be used. The used washcloth should not be placed in the washbasin with clean water. The labia should be opened when providing catheter care. Staff should try and ask to open the labia to clean. More than two washcloths are required to provide catheter care. Having a catheter in place and receiving improper catheter care can cause a urinary tract infection.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were available for admi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were available for administration. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R134, R101) reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 32. The findings include: 1. On April 15, 2025, at 11:51 AM, R134 said they ran out of her Tramadol pain medication. R134 said she needed the Tramadol twice a day. R134 said sometimes it took the facility days to get them the medication and she was told last night that they were on the last pill. R134 said she wished the facility ordered the medication before it was running out. R134 said she would normally have gone for a walk but because she had not gotten the medication, she was not going to be able to. R134 said it was a big deal that she had not gotten it this morning. On April 15, 2025, at 12:40 PM, V9 (Registered Nurse) said R134 ran out of the Tramadol. V9 stated she checked the medication cart, and it was not available. V9 said it was last given at 6:45 PM on April 14, 2025. V9 said normally they should reorder the pills when there are eight pills. R134's face sheet showed she was admitted with diagnoses including pain in right knee and migraines. R134's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 27, 2025, showed she was cognitively intact. R134's POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed orders for Pain Assessment [Every] Shift ordered March 23, 2023, and Pain Clinic referral related to chronic right knee pain ordered March 5, 2024. The POS also showed an order for Tramadol 50 MG (milligrams) with instructions to Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Pain ordered April 4, 2025. R134's April MAR (Medication Administration Record) showed R134 was routinely taking the medication twice daily. R134's care plan showed R134 had pain at times [Related To] migraines and generalized discomfort [Related To] abdominal mass and left perihelia with a goal that the pain would not have an interruption in normal activities due to pain. 2. On April 17, 2025, at 1:13 PM, R101 said they ran out of one of her medications this morning and she still had not received it. On April 17, 2025, at 1:15 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she was R101's nurse. The surveyor requested to see R101's Aripiprazole 10 MG tablets from the medication cart, and V7 said she needed to reorder the medication because she did not have any during the morning medication pass. V7 said she was not notified by the night shift that R101 had run out of medications and reordered it this morning. V7 said medications should not run out and should be reordered when there were three to four tablets left. V7 said it was not good for residents to miss medications as they were crucial to the residents' wellbeing. R101's face sheet showed she was admitted with diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, psychosis, and visual hallucinations. R101's MDS dated [DATE], showed R101 was cognitively intact. R101's POS showed an order for Aripiprazole 10 MG Give 10 MG by mouth one time a day for schizophrenia, which was ordered on January 23, 2024. R101's April MAR showed the 8 AM dose of Aripiprazole 10 MG was not given with a reason of not available. R101's care plan showed R101 used psychotropic medications [Related To] depression, diagnoses of schizophrenia, psychosis, and visual hallucinations with an intervention to Administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician. On April 17, 2025, at 3:33 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said the residents should not run out of their scheduled or as needed medications. V2 said it should be reordered when the nurse sees there are a few pills left. The facility's Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications policy revised June 2024 showed Reordering of medications is done in accordance with the order and delivery schedule established by the pharmacy provider . The refill order is called in, faxed, sent electronically, or otherwise transmitted to the pharmacy .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R3 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] having severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R3 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] having severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R3's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documents that R3 is at high risk for falls. On 04/15/25 at 01:58 PM, R3 was observed in her bed with floor mats underneath the bed. On 04/15/25 at 2:00 PM, V3 (RN) stated that the floor mats should be at the bedside to minimize injury in case of a fall. On 04/15/25 at 02:08 PM, V2 (DON) stated, The floor padding should be on the side of the bed if it's ordered. The staff can move floor padding to get resident in/out of bed and it should be placed back when the resident is in bed. On 04/16/25 at 09:51 AM, R3 was observed in her bed with the floor mat standing against the wall. R3 was observed upset and was moaning and swinging her legs. At 09:53 AM, V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that floor mats should have been on the floor when a resident is on bed. R3's care plan documents that R3 was care planned for fall with interventions including a floor mat for safety. The facility presented Fall Prevention Program Guidelines dated 11/21/17 documents: Residents will be observed approximately every two hours to ensure the resident is safely positioned in the bed or a chair and provide care as assigned by the plan of care. 3. On 04/15/25 at 12:11 PM, R117's bed was in a very high position. R117 stated she did not know why her bed was in high position and she did not raise her own bed. At 12:16 PM, V8 (admission Director) was asked to assess the height of R117's bed. V8 stated staff must have provided care and forgotten to put it down. R117's diagnoses include chronic respiratory failure, dementia, poly-osteoarthritis, macular degeneration, and morbid obesity. R117's care plan show she is at risk for falls and included an intervention to maintain a safe environment. On 04/17/25 at 02:27 PM, V18 (CNA) was leaving the room R117's room and was asked to assess the height of R117's bed and overbed table. V18 stated she was not assigned to R117 and did not leave her bed in the high position. V18 stated she was just checking if she was done with her lunch tray. V18 stated the assigned CNA should have made sure the bed was in a lower position. 4. R48's diagnoses include bilateral osteoarthritis of knee, schizophrenia, anxiety, history of falling, presence of left artificial hip joint, and unequal limb length left femur. R48's MDS dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for assistance with ADLs. R48's fall risk assessment provided by the facility dated 9/5/24 shows R48 is at risk for falls. R48's current care plan includes at risk for falls. 5. R15's diagnoses include paraplegia, adult failure to thrive, contracture of muscles, and major depressive disorder. R15's MDS dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively impaired and dependent upon staff for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R15's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] shows he is at risk for falls. No care plan with interventions was noted in R15's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) related to falls. On 04/15/25 at 12:25 PM, R15's bed was left in a very high position. On 04/15/25 at 12:25 PM, R48's bed was left in a very high position. V13 (CNA) was asked to assess the bed's height. V13 stated she left the R15 and R48's beds in the high position after assisting them with cares and meals. V13 stated R15 and R48 are not able to adjust their own beds. V13 stated she should have lowered the beds in case they did fall from the bed because their injuries would not be as bad. On 4/15/25 at 2:08 PM, V2 (DON) stated residents that are primarily dependent on staff for care assistance and transfers and resident's that are at risk for falls should have their beds placed back in a low and safe position after providing care assistance. V2 stated R15, R48, and R117 are at risk for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall risk precautions for residents at risk for falls. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R3, R15, R21, R48, and R117) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 32. The findings include: 1. On 4/15/25 at 2:09 PM, R21 was lying in bed. Upon entry, R21 tried to get out of bed and began slipping due to the mattress hanging off the mattress. R21's mattress was angled downward and appeared to be about 10 inches larger than the bed frame. R21 said he had fallen in the past because when he sat on the edge of the bed, he slid but never got hurt. R21 said he's been having this issue for months. On 4/16/25 at 1:08 PM, R21's mattress was the same and he continued to struggle to get out of bed. On 4/17/25 at 9:51 PM, R21 said he had been complaining about the mattress for a long time. R21 said he had slipped a bit yesterday while trying to get out of bed as the mattress slides down. R21's mattress was angled downward on the left side. On 4/17/25 at 1:21 PM, the surveyor showed V9 (Registered Nurse/RN), who was R21's nurse for the day, the mattress and bed frame. V9 said the mattress did not fit the frame and he could risk falling if the mattress did not fit the bed. On 4/17/25 at 1:23 PM, V6 (Maintenance Director) came to R21's room and V6 said R21's mattress does not fit the bed frame. V6 said it should not be that mattress on the bed frame in his room. V6 said an improperly fit mattress to the frame could cause the resident to fall. V6 said R21 could roll too far, or he could sit at the edge and fall because of the way the mattress was angled. At 1:27 PM, V6 measured how far the mattress was from the bed frame, which showed the mattress was six inches larger than the bed frame. On 4/17/25 at 3:33 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said the mattress should fit the bed frame. V2 said if the resident starts rolling over and does not know the end of the bed frame, it could cause them to roll off the bed. R21's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including morbid obesity, long term use of anticoagulants, pain in right shoulder, polyosteoarthritis, spondylosis, and sciatica left side. R21's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 1/24/25 showed R21 was cognitively intact. R21's care plan dated 1/29/25 showed R21 has a potential for falls [Related to Diagnosis] of morbid obesity, [Hypertension], [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease], major depression, [Congestive Heart Failure], schizoaffective disorder and dementia. The facility's Fall Prevention Program revised 11/21/17 showed the program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. The bed will be maintained in a position appropriate for resident transfers. Malfunctioning equipment will be immediately reported to maintenance for repair or removed from service.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store resident medications. This applies to 4 residents (R37, R61, R103, and R137) reviewed for medication storage in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store resident medications. This applies to 4 residents (R37, R61, R103, and R137) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 32. Findings include: On 4/16/25 at 1:12 PM, while reconciling narcotics with V3 (Registered Nurse/RN), the following medications were found labeled from pharmacy refrigerated med, but were stored in the narcotic box in the nurse's medication cart, not refrigerated: 1. R37's 3 vials of Lorazepam 2 mg/mL (milligram per milliliter) for a total of 14.5 mLs remaining. R37's Face Sheet shows a primary diagnosis of Conversion Disorder with Seizures. R37's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows an order dated 2/20/25 inject Lorazepam 1 mg intramuscularly (IM) every 6 hours as needed for acute seizure activity. R37's Controlled Drug Administration Record shows he last received IM Lorazepam on 3/11/25. R37's Care Plan last revised 1/17/25 states he has a history of seizure disorder, and interventions include give seizure medication as ordered by doctor and monitor side effects and effectiveness. 2. R103's vial of Lorazepam 2 mg/mL with 6.5 mLs remaining. R103's Face Sheet shows a diagnosis of Conversion Disorder with Seizures. R103's POS shows an order dated 12/18/24 inject Lorazepam 1 mg intramuscularly every 8 hours as needed for acute seizure activity. R103's Controlled Drug Administration Record shows she last received IM Lorazepam on 4/12/25. R103's Care Plan last revised 2/22/25 states she has a seizure disorder, and interventions include give seizure medication as ordered by the doctor and monitor and document side effects and effectiveness. 3. R61's vial of Lorazepam 2 mg/mL with 10 mLs remaining. R61's Face Sheet shows a primary diagnosis of Epilepsy. R61's POS shows an order dated 2/12/25 inject Lorazepam 1 mg intramuscularly every 6 hours as needed for seizure. R61's Care Plan dated 2/22/25 shows he has a diagnosis of seizures. Interventions state to give seizure medication as ordered by the doctor and monitor the effectiveness. On 4/16/25 at 1:25 PM, V3 (RN) said they keep the Lorazepam vials that are supposed to be refrigerated in the narcotic box, unrefrigerated, because their medication refrigerator in the medication room does not have a lock on it. V3 said she is not sure how long the Lorazepam vials have been unrefrigerated, but it has been a while. On 4/16/25 at 1:31 PM, the medication refrigerator in the medication room was observed with V3 and did not have a lock on the outside of it, or a locked drawer inside. On 4/16/25 at 1:42 PM, while reconciling narcotics with V4 (RN), the following medication was found labeled from pharmacy refrigerated med, but was stored in the narcotic box in the nurse's medication cart, not refrigerated: 4. R137's 3 vials of Lorazepam 2 mg/mL with 26 mLs remaining. R137's Face Sheet shows a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. R137's POS shows an order dated 3/28/25 inject Lorazepam 1 mg intramuscularly every 8 hours as needed for agitation related anxiety disorder. R137's Controlled Drug Administration Record shows he last received IM Lorazepam on 3/26/25. R137's Care Plan last revised 8/29/24 shows he has the potential for adverse side effects related to anti-anxiety medication use and diagnosis of anxiety. Interventions include administer medications per MD orders and observe for side effects. On 4/16/25 at 1:56 PM, V4 (RN) said she is an agency nurse, and she is not sure why the IM Lorazepam vials were not stored in the medication refrigerator as they should be. V4 said storing the Lorazepam vials at room temperature is a problem because bacteria could grow inside the vial and the medication may not work as well/be as potent when administered. On 4/17/25 at 10:21 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said if the pharmacy says to refrigerate a medication, the facility must store the medication in the refrigerator, not at room temperature. V2 said the storage temperature of a medication affects its potency. V2 said she found out the Lorazepam vials were being stored in the nurse medication carts, not the refrigerator, right after she started at the facility in October 2024. V2 said the facility needs to be cautious how they store their medications because some residents are receiving Lorazepam for seizures, and if the medication is not as potent, it may not work while trying to treat a resident having a seizure. The facility's undated policy titled, Storage of Medications states, Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier . Procedures: .Temperature: .3. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 2 degrees Celsius (36 degrees Fahrenheit) and 8 degrees Celsius (46 degrees Fahrenheit) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring Controlled substances that require refrigeration are stored within a locked box within the refrigerator. This box must be attached to the inside of the refrigerator .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 163 residents in the facility receiving dietary...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 163 residents in the facility receiving dietary services. Findings include: On 04/15/25 09:56 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed 162 residents were being served from dietary services on 04/15/25. 1. On 04/15/25 at 10:22 AM, V12 (Dietary Director) stated the dishwasher is High temp. The dishwasher disinfects by temperature and should reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The kitchen dishwasher was run. The wash gauge temperature reached 150 degrees. The rinse gauge temperature reached 160 degrees. The temperature test strip used reads pass when blue bar turns orange 160 degrees Fahrenheit. V12 stated the dishwasher gauges have not worked properly for some time over a year. They use the test strips to assure the temperature of the water. They don't write down the temperature from the gauges on the log, they save the test strips to the log. 2. On 04/17/25 at 11:49 PM, V16 (Cook) checked the holding temperature for the coleslaw cups. V16 stated the temperature should be 41 degrees or below. Coleslaw cup #1 was 48.5 degrees Fahrenheit. V12 (Dietary Director) stated the food needs to be held at the correct temperature so it doesn't cause a foodborne illness. If food is held out of temperature for two hours or more, is at risk for causing foodborne illness. V12 stated the coleslaw was made in the morning that day. 3. On 04/15/25 at 10:00 AM, during the kitchen tour with V12, the Dry storage area contained a small container with white powder that did not have a label or dates. V12 stated it was thickener. The covered stand mixer was dirty with crusted debris. A large facility container that held a white powder had no labels or dates. Two metal drawers with cooking utensils were dirty, and the utensils inside the drawer were dirty with crusted and dried debris. A 32fl oz (ounce) bottle of lemon juice that read refrigerate after opening was on the seasoning shelf. The bottle was warm to touch. On 04/17/25 at 11:13 AM, V12 stated every food item should be labeled with its contents, received date, open on, and use by dates. It informs all staff what the item is and when it should be discarded. It also assures resident are not served food they may have an allergy to. Keeping the lemon juice out on the shelf will cause spoilage. V12 stated the kitchen staff is responsible for cleaning the kitchen, but they don't have a lot of time to clean so it falls to him and the night staff. The undated facility policy Storing states food should be stored and prepared in a clean safe sanitary manner that complies with state and federal guidelines. Food not in original containers should be labeled, dated and in NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) approved containers. The facility undated policy Mechanical Ware Washing states the proper cleaning and sanitizing of dishes in the dietary department is extremely important to the health and safety of residents. 4. On 04/15/25 10:10 AM, the walk-in cooler had eight small Styrofoam containers without any labels or dates. V12 identified four of the items as cottage cheese and four as vanilla pudding. On 04/15/25 at 10:15 AM, the walk-in freezer contained: A 10lb (pound) box of frozen chicken breasts open to air A 20lb bag of ground beef patties open to air. A 15.35lb bag of garlic Texas toast open to air. A 11.25lb bag of scrambled eggs open to air. On 04/17/25 at 11:25 AM, V12 stated food items should be sealed to keep out contaminants. 5. On 04/15/25 at 10:00 AM, when the kitchen tour began with V12 (Dietary Director), V12 had a goatee facial hair and did not have a covering on his face. On 04/17/25 at 11:13 AM, V12 stated hair including facial hair should be covered so it doesn't contaminate the food. The facility policy Hair Restraints dated 2020 states hair restraints, hats and or beard guard shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Facial hair is discouraged. Any facial hair that is longer than the eyebrow shall require coverage with a beard guard in the production and dishwashing areas.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the grievance policy to residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R83, R101, R134, and R130) reviewed for grievanc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the grievance policy to residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R83, R101, R134, and R130) reviewed for grievances in a sample of 32. The findings include: On April 17, 2025, at 10:32 AM, the Resident Meeting was held. R83, R101, R134, and R130 were present. R83 said the residents had been asking for copies of the grievance policy and information on how to file a grievance since November 2024. R83 said they had not seen the grievance policy yet. R83 said she was told if they have a grievance, to see a staff member. R83 said she invited V11 (Social Service Director) to come to the meeting to explain the grievance policy, but it was not discussed during the meeting. On April 17, 2025, at 1:38 PM, all the facility bulletin boards were reviewed, and none of the bulletin boards contained the grievance policy. On April 17, 2025, at 3:01 PM, V11 said the residents asked for the grievance policy during the resident council meeting and they asked the administrator for it. V11 said the administrator gave the policy to the resident council. On April 17, 2025, at 3:03 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the resident council had asked her for the grievance policy and it was reviewed with them. V1 said she did not personally give the resident council members the grievance policy, but V10 (Activities Director) may have given them the policy. On April 17, 2025, at 3:05 PM, V10 said the Resident Council residents had recently asked for the grievance policy and she notified V1 about it. V10 said she did not give the resident council the policy because V1 would have. On April 17, 2025, at 3:33 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said if a resident asks for a grievance policy, they should be given it to them. V2 said any policy the residents asked for, the facility should provide it to them. The facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes were reviewed. The January 2025 Meeting Minutes showed Grievance policy needs to be posted throughout the facility. The Minutes showed a response of the administrator will provide a copy of the policy to resident council .A copy of the grievance policy is posted on each unit. The February 2025 Meeting Minutes showed Grievance policy should be posted on all units. The facility's Concern Procedure Policy dated September 2015 showed A grievance is any written or verbal concern by a resident, relative or any other representative relating to resident care or the quality of services.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the minimum 12 hour per year competency training requirements of CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants). This applies to all residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the minimum 12 hour per year competency training requirements of CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants). This applies to all residents that receive care and assistance from CNAs. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 4/15/25 documents that the total census was 164 residents. On 4/18/25 at 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) said all 164 residents in the facility receive care from the CNAs. On 4/16/25, proof of CNA competency training hours was requested from V1 (Administrator) for CNAs V13, V20, V21, V22, and V23. On 4/17/25 at 12:16 PM, V1 said the facility recently switched their computer-based training company and she did not have access to the facility's prior computer-based training platform. V1 said she could only provide the total number of hours of in-services completed at the facility. The provided in-service hours of training showed V13 had 2 hours, V20 had 2.5 hours, V21 had 1.5 hours, V22 had 2 hours, and V23 had 4 hours. On 4/18/25 at 2:28 PM, V1 said 12 hours are required of all CNAs annually. V1 said it is a concern the facility cannot provide proof of the 12-hour minimum competence training because that means they are not in compliance.
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adequately maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent and control the transmission of a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adequately maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent and control the transmission of a highly contagious communicable disease, the norovirus. This failure has the potential to affect all 165 residents that currently reside at the facility. Findings include: On 12/10/2024 at 08:40 AM, surveyor entered the facility and did not observe any signs posted at the front doors or lobby area indicating current norovirus outbreak. Review of resident roster dated 12/10/2024 documented census of 165 residents and indicated residents highlighted in grey are on isolation. On 12/10/2024 at 09:15 AM, V1 (Administrator) said the facility has had a recent norovirus outbreak. V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was also present during this interview and said she is currently overseeing infection preventionist duties including the current norovirus outbreak. V2 (DON) then said the outbreak is clearing up and that currently there was only one resident with watery stools reported yesterday (12/09/2024) and a resident with one reported watery stool today but did not identify residents. Review of initial facility reported incident report submitted by V2 (DON) with onset date of 11/22/2024, indicated that 24 residents and 11 staff exhibited gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms which started on 11/22/24. Local health department was made aware of the GI symptoms and received guidance on disinfection, resident management, contact and droplet precautions, testing and staff management. Facility continues to monitor for GI signs and symptoms; in-service staff on proper precautions (hand washing, use of proper bleach-based products per regulation). As of 12/02/24 there are only 5 residents and 1 staff with moderate symptoms. Continued surveillance is in effect. On 12/10/2024 at 11:41 AM, V4 (Registered Nurse) said she is assigned to the locked (garden) unit and indicated that R1 had watery stools last night and this morning, R2 had a watery stool this morning, and R10 had a watery stool this morning. V4 added that she trying to sort out which residents are having symptoms, then said all symptomatic residents are on contact isolation precautions. On 12/10/2024 at 11:46 AM, observed R2 sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway outside of her room door on the locked (garden) unit. R2 said they told her that she has the virus because she had a loose stool this morning. No posted contact isolation sign or personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed on R2's door or next to room door at this time. At 11:48 AM, observed R10 in her room with no posted contact isolation sign or PPE observed on R2's door or next to room door at this time. On 12/10/2024 at 11:50 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said R1 is on contact isolation for nausea and vomiting. V5 also said staff should wear a gown, gloves, and mask when caring for these residents, then wash hands and use hand sanitizer afterwards. No posted contact isolation sign or PPE was observed on R2's door or next to room door at this time. On 12/10/2024 at 11:56 AM, V6 (CNA) said she is working on the locked (garden) and indicated that R1 and R10 each had a watery stool this morning. V6 then said staff should wear a gown, gloves, and mask when caring for these residents. On 12/10/2024 at 12:00 PM, observed V7 (Housekeeper) cleaning a private room on the short hall west unit that is next to the locked (garden) unit. V7 said when cleaning a resident's room who has norovirus, she first cleans with bleach spray or bleach wipes then uses a disinfectant. V7 then said she has only been using a disinfectant cleaner because she's out of bleach cleaner and was told that she could do this. On 12/10/2024 at 12:25 PM V2 (DON) said some residents who have no symptoms for 48 hours can be taken off contact isolation then indicated there were a few residents that met this criterion, but some are having symptoms and need to be isolated again so she will need to update the current line list. On 12/10/2024 at 1:10 PM V2 (DON) provided an updated line list for acute gastroenteritis dated 11/26/2024 that documented nine current symptomatic residents with their dates of symptom onset and last occurrence. V2 indicated that the letter D means the symptom is diarrhea. The following residents were documented on the line list: R1's date of symptom onset was 11/22/2024 with episodes of diarrhea documented on 12/09/2024 and 12/10/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R1 last admitted to facility on 11/27/2024. R2's date of symptom onset was 11/24/2024 with episodes of diarrhea documented on 12/08/2024 and 12/10/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R2 last admitted to facility on 04/17/2023. R3's date of symptom onset was 11/23/2024 with episodes of diarrhea documented on 12/08/2024 and 12/09/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R3 last admitted to facility on 07/11/2024. R4's date of symptom onset was 11/25/2024 with episode of diarrhea last documented on 12/08/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R4 last admitted to facility on 12/17/2022. R5's date of symptom onset was 11/27/2024 with episode of diarrhea last documented on 12/08/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R5 last admitted to facility on 04/05/2018. R6's date of symptom onset was 12/03/2024 with episodes of diarrhea documented on 12/05/2024 and 12/09/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R6 last admitted to facility on 09/01/2024. R7's date of symptom onset was 12/09/2024 with episodes of diarrhea documented on 12/09/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R7 last admitted to facility on 01/13/2021. R8's date of symptom onset was 12/09/2024 with episodes of diarrhea last documented on 12/09/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R8 last admitted to facility on 01/20/2023. R9's date of symptom onset was 12/10/2024 with episodes of diarrhea last documented on 12/10/2024. Resident roster dated 12/10/2024 indicated R9 last admitted to facility on 11/11/2019. R10 was not identified as having current norovirus symptoms on the provided line list. R1 through R10 were not highlighted grey which indicated resident was on isolation as per above mentioned resident roster dated 12/10/2024. On 12/10/2024 at 01:16 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) said the facility is currently in outbreak for norovirus and if each room has an isolation sign posted, that covers not posting any signs up front. V2 added that visitors are not informed of or screened for symptoms of norovirus themselves. V2 then said if a visitor is visiting a resident who is symptomatic, then the receptionist instructs them on precautions. When asked if the receptionist is a nurse, V2 said no she is not but she can call for either V1 (Administrator) or V2 (DON) to intervene and provide education to the visitor. At 01:18 PM, V2 (DON) said staff have been in-serviced over the last couple of weeks on symptoms of norovirus, hand hygiene, and infection control/PPE use with return demonstration. She also said staff are to notify her as soon as a resident has symptoms and whether there were multiple occurrences, and if a resident has two or more episodes of loose stools or one episode of vomiting, then that resident is placed on enteric contact precaution isolation with that isolation sign posted on their door. When asked what precaution is taken if they have a roommate, she said it usually affects the roommate who will be assessed for symptoms. V2 (DON) then said when caring for a resident with norovirus, gown and gloves are mandatory and a mask for protection from splatters with loose stools, and staff must wash their hands with soap and water because they are hand sanitizer doesn't work on norovirus. At 01:24 PM, V2 said when cleaning and disinfecting resident rooms, all touch surfaces should be cleaned with a bleach water mixture or bleach wipes with a one-minute dry time and housekeeping can use a disinfectant that works on the norovirus. V2 (DON) also said that if housekeeping is using bleach wipes, then they don't have to use disinfectant. At 01:28 PM, V2 said the importance of staff to adhere to the infection control policy and procedures for norovirus and/or any communicable disease to avoid spreading to other residents or bringing home to their families and stressed that this is done through good hand washing especially after leaving an isolated resident's room, following all isolation precautions and guidelines, and through limiting exposure. On 12/10/2024 at 1:39 PM, V8 (Maintenance Director) said is currently overseeing the housekeeping department as well due to that manager being out on medical leave. V8 then said that housekeepers are to clean resident rooms who have the norovirus and high touch surface areas with a bleach and water combination or bleach wipes with a one-minute dry time then they are to use a disinfectant cleaner afterwards. When asked how many parts each of water and bleach are needed, V8 said he was unsure and would need to look it up. He added that housekeepers know they are to ask for more bleach cleaner and/or wipes when they are out, and if not in stock, he will go to the local store to obtain them. On 12/10/2024 at 02:24 PM, no contact isolation sign was observed posted on R6's or R9's room doors. R6 resides on the locked (garden) unit and R9 resides on the short hall west unit that is next to the locked unit. At 02:26 PM, no contact isolation sign was observed posted on R1's room door. R2's room door was observed with a small pink contact isolation sign posted next to PPE bin that was hanging on her door. Both R1 and R2 reside on the locked (garden) unit. R1, R2, R6, and R9 are all listed on the updated gastroenteritis line list provided by V2 (DON). On 12/10/2024 at 02:28 PM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed interacting with R2 in her room without wearing any PPE. Upon exiting R2's room V9 said she was passing ice water and had looked through R2's bag to help her find a wallet. When asked if R2 is on contact isolation, V9 (CNA) said she just came in to work and has been off for a week and was unsure. When shown the contact isolation sign on the R2's door, V9 said the sign isn't specific about what PPE to wear but she should be wearing PPE when in an isolation room. V9 then said she did not wash her hands after leaving R2's room but will do so now then proceeded to walk down the hall and headed towards the nurse's station. On 12/10/2024 at 02:30 PM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said she has worked on the locked (garden) unit all day shift and will continue working second shift on the unit. V10 said she wore a gown, gloves, and a mask every time she entered R2's room but said did not wash her hands prior to exiting the room. V10 (CNA) said upon exiting R2's room, she went down the hall and washed her hands in the clean utility room. On 12/10/2024 at 02:35 PM, no contact isolation signs were observed posted on R3, R4, R5, and R10's room doors, all reside on the locked (garden) unit, and are all listed on the updated gastroenteritis line list provided by V2 (DON). On 12/10/2024 at 02:41 PM, no contact isolation signs were observed posted on R7 and R8's room doors, both residents reside on the front hall east unit, and are both listed on the updated gastroenteritis line list provided by V2 (DON). On 12/10/2024 at 02:50 PM, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) both indicated during interview that there should be a contact isolation sign on a resident's door who is having symptoms of norovirus with personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies in hanging door bins or three drawer bins next to room door and housekeepers should clean with either a bleach cleaner or a bleach and water combination then disinfect afterwards. V2 (DON) added that staff should be wearing gloves in contact isolation rooms and should wear a gown when making direct contact with the resident. At 2:56 PM, V2 (DON) said she was told today that R6's loose stools are from of a prescribed medication due to an irregular lab and not from the norovirus. No documentation was provided to support this finding. On 12/10/2024 at 03:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the health department is aware of what disinfectant the facility is currently using which does kill the norovirus. When asked whether V1 has informed the health department that the facility does not continuously use bleach cleaner first followed by a disinfectant and whether this is an acceptable method, V1 said no. On 12/10/2024 at 3:15 PM, V11 (Quality Assurance Nurse) said staff have been educated continuously regarding the norovirus and precautions to be taken and will continue to in-service staff more so that they can better understand isolation precautions and the seriousness of those precautions. V11 then said while rounding around noon, there was a sign posted on the locked unit door to inform staff of the outbreak on the unit. When asked if this sign indicated which residents were symptomatic, V11 said it did not. Resident information documents were not provided for R6 or R10 by the facility during complaint investigation. Review of Norovirus Outbreak Measures policy with effective date of 02/15/2028 indicated in part: Purpose: This guideline has been developed to help stop the spread of viral gastroenteritis. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports that nearly two thirds of all norovirus outbreaks occur in long term care facilities. Noroviruses are highly contagious and cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. They are transmitted in health care settings by direct person-to-person contact; by hand transfer of the virus after touching contaminated materials or environmental surfaces; via droplet from vomit; or foodborne/waterborne contamination. Outbreaks of norovirus in long term care facilities may be prolonged due to potentially high level of contact, increased population of those most vulnerable and regular introduction of susceptible individuals. Norovirus is very resilient, surviving temperature extremes from freezing to 140 degrees Fahrenheit and low chlorine levels. The virus has been known to survive in the environment for at least 12 hours. Infected persons can continue to shed the virus for up to two weeks after they have recovered. Guidelines: Control Measures for Residents include but not limited to: isolate all ill residents from others by encouraging the ill resident to remain in their room until symptom free for 48 hours (2 days after their last symptom of vomiting and/or diarrhea); post signs explaining the risk of infection of ill patients and ill visitors; Control Measures for Residents include but not limited to: staff should wash hands when entering and leaving every resident room with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. Do not use alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Wash hands thoroughly and often during the outbreak; staff should wear gloves when caring for ill residents who are vomiting or have diarrhea or when touching potentially contaminated surfaces. Gloves should be discarded, and hands washed immediately after completing care; Disinfection and Sanitation: Use a bleach solution of 1:10 or 5000 parts per million (ppm) to frequently clean all common touch surfaces. This should be done twice a day during the outbreak. Common surfaces can include door handles, remote controls, call buttons, railings, bed rails, elevator buttons, arm rests, telephones, water faucets and fountains, toilet seats, ice machines, light switches, walkers, etc.; use a freshly made bleach solution between each room or area cleaned; use another Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant for norovirus according to manufacturer instructions.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and insert an indwelling catheter utilizing the smallest size catheter as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and insert an indwelling catheter utilizing the smallest size catheter as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample of 8. Findings include: The Urology Progress Note dated 11/9/23 documents under Any new orders? Please place 14FR or 16FR foley catheter. The Urology Progress Note dated 05/30/2024 documents R1's diagnoses that includes Urinary Retention, Urethral Stricture and Urethral Erosion. During this visit R1's 16-gauge indwelling catheter was replaced with a specialized indwelling 16-gauge specialty catheter. A Progress Note for R1 dated 10/10/2024 at 09:00 PM documents Foley cath (catheter) found on bed. New 20FR 30ml balloon Foley inserted, clear yellow urine obtained. On 10/21/2024 at 10:41 AM V10 (Registered Nurse) stated I went into (R1's) room and saw he had pulled the catheter with the balloon intact. It was laying on the bed. I knew he needed the catheter replaced so I just grabbed one and put it in. There was no bleeding or issues. He tolerated the procedure and the urine flowed through clear, yellow. I just failed to check the order for the size of the catheter before inserting it. On 10/21/2024 at 12:45 PM V17 (Nurse Practitioner) stated The nurse should have followed the order and placed the 16 French not the 20. There was absolutely no trauma resulting from the larger catheter. A tour of the medical supply storage room with V4 (Medical Records/Supply Director) on 10/17/24 revealed the facility's urinary catheter supply included 10 size 14 French, 10 size 16 French, 12 size 18 French, and 12 size 20 French. On 10/17/24 at 11:50 AM V4 stated If the nurses can't find what they need they can always call one of us. There are always catheters of all sizes here in the building. The facility's policy titled Urinary Catheter Care that was last revised on 2/14/19 states Guidelines: 3. Licensed personnel shall use aseptic and atraumatic techniques when inserting a catheter, utilizing the smallest size catheter possible to avoid trauma, as ordered by the physician.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed, and served to res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed, and served to residents in a manner to prevent food contamination. The facility failed to have a system in place for sanitizing dishware and food service equipment during the renovations of the kitchen. This failure resulted in the local health department revoking the facility's permit to prepare food on site and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. This has the potential to affect all 161 residents that consume food from the facility. Finding include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on August 26, 2024, when the facility's kitchen was closed for floor repair and food preparation continued in the facility without the ability to maintain safe food temperatures and sanitize food service equipment and dishware. As a result, the local health department revoked the facility's permit to prepare food on August 27, 2024. On August 28, 2024, the facility was still attempting to prepare puree and mechanically altered food onsite from catered food items and use plastic food trays and other dietary service equipment without a means of sanitation. V1(Administrator), V3(Dietitian Consultant), V4 (Corporate Consultant) and V5 (Nursing Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on August 28, 2024, at 4:30PM. The facility submitted a removal plan on August 29, 2024, at 10:00AM, that was returned for modification and the plan was accepted at 2:20PM. The immediacy was confirmed as removed by observations, interviews, and record reviews. Although the immediacy was removed on August 29, 2024, the facility remains out of compliance at a Level II because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the plan. The facility's census sheet dated August 28, 2024, documents a facility census of 165 residents. V8 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated on August 28, 2024, that 4 residents were NPO (nothing by mouth). The facility diet list that the facility has 11 residents on puree diets and 30 residents on mechanical soft diets. R3 to R13 are listed as residents receiving puree textured diets. The local County Health Department documented on August 27, 2024, a suspension to operate (food service operations) related to, inadequate refrigeration and ongoing construction project. V6 (Director of Environmental Services from the local County Health Department) stated during phone interview on August 27, 2024, that food service operation needed to close due to inability to maintain food temperatures and lack of hand washing sinks for dietary employees. V6 stated that the rented refrigeration unit was not holding temperatures. The facility's incident report submitted to the department August 27, 2024, that charted, The facility was inspected by the local food health department that food temperatures were not holding in the temporary refrigerated container. The facility enacted our emergency crisis management plan. The facility's kitchen was observed on August 28, 2024, at 10:30AM to be closed and nonfunctional. Construction workers were noted in the kitchen removing floor tiles. Dietary equipment food service carts, food trays, wash bins and dishware were noted being stored in the hallway near the kitchen and door leading to the parking lot. This area did not have a hand sink or means for staff to perform hand washing. V2 (Dietary Manager) and V1 (Administrator) stated during interviews of August 28, 2024, that the facility needed to close the kitchen for removal and repair of the floor. Both V1 and V2 confirmed that the kitchen was closed, and work began on August 26, 2024, at 8:30AM. The facility rented three 20-foot storage containers, one of which was a refrigerated unit. These storage containers were located outside the building near the kitchen in the parking lot. This area did not contain any handwashing stations for staff. The area surrounding the refrigerator unit outside was observed with puddles of free-standing water from the previous night rainfall. V2 then added that prior to the local health department shutting down the kitchen, staff was attempting to prepare food in other areas of the facility and 20-foot storage containers. V2 confirmed that temperatures in the refrigerated storage container were high secondary to the warm weather conditions and need to open the door. V2 stated that he had only a few days' notice prior to the work starting in the kitchen and did not have a plan for this project. V2 continued to add that the facility had numerous issues with the refrigerated container and needed to obtain a generator to provide power. V1 also stated a brief notice about the kitchen closure and that corporate had discussed this project but specific plans were not developed. On August 28, 2024, the residents were still being served breakfast at 10:00AM until 10:30AM. R1 was observed without the super cereal (high protein/calorie hot cereal) on his tray. R1's diet is listed in the medical record as no added salt with super cereal supplement for breakfast. R8 was observed with puree eggs, bread, and hash browns on his tray. R8's diet order is listed in the medical record as regular puree diet with nectar thick liquids and house supplement 2.0 three times a day. Residents were being served the meal in take out type containers with milk in disposable Styrofoam cups. V2(Dietary Manager) was asked about the meal and stated that the meal was catered due to the kitchen closure. V2 was asked about the food temperatures and stated, I have them in my head, I have not had time to write them down. V2 was interviewed about preparation of puree food items and stated that the staff was using the blender in the sub kitchen and then cleaning it. This sink was a single hand washing type of sink with one compartment. Space for air drying cleaned items was not noted in place. Later during the tour of the rented food storage containers, V2 stated that the facility was going to use plastic food trays for lunch meal service. V2 then added that the dietary staff would use the sinks in the activity room to clean used food trays and other dietary service equipment and dishware. The two sinks in the activity room were observed to be household type sinks measuring 12 inches by 12 inches that would not allow the food trays or larger pots/pans to be totally submerged for sanitation. Again, space for air drying items was not noted in this area. The only available hand wash sink for food service employees was noted in the service kitchen. This service kitchen is in another area of building and not near the back door entry and outdoor rented food storage containers. This consisted of a large steam table and small hand wash sink. The other hand wash sink located in the main dining area was disconnected and nonfunctional since it was connected to the main kitchen. V7 (Cook) was observed on August 28, 2024, attempting to prepare the puree dinner rolls for the evening meal. V7 was using the food processor in the sub kitchenette with only the single hand sink to provide for cleaning and sanitizing. V7 stated he would clean the food processor in this sink. This same sink would be used for hand hygiene. V6 (Director of Environmental Services from the local County Health Department) was interviewed by phone on August 28, 2024, at 12:52PM and stated that the facility was told, no food preparation on site and that the facility could, plate the catered food. V6 confirmed that additional processing of food for puree diets should not happen on site secondary to lack of hand washing stations and ability to safely clean and sanitize dishware. V6 stated the facility was advised to use all disposable items. The facility's policy for Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Services, dated 2020 documents: Prior to serving a meal food temperature will be taken and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper serving temperature. The temperature for each food item will be recorded on the Food Temperature Log. Foods that require a corrective action (such as reheating) will have the new temperature recorded with a notation of the corrective action interventions. The FDA documents in the Food Code of 2022 that, Food employees shall keep their hand hands and exposed portions of their arms clean. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms, including surrogate prosthetic devices for hands or arms for at least 20 seconds, using a cleaning compound in a handwashing sink. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified. Immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment, and utensils. Food service employees shall clean their hands in a handwashing sink or approved automatic handwashing facility and may not clean their hands in a sink used for food preparation. The FDA Code of 2022 also documents that Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. The code continues to add that when cleaning food contact surfaces and equipment the item must be submersed in the solution between 7 to 30 seconds depending upon the solution for sanitation and then air-dried. The facility submitted the following plan to remove the immediacy: 1. Facility will utilize a local organization's kitchen in [NAME] to prepare mechanical and puree diets for residents that are on puree or mechanically altered diets to have their food safely prepared. This will be managed by the Dietary Director/Designee. Facility spoke with V6 (Director of Environmental Services from the local County Health Department) and V6 approved the facilities use of the local organization's kitchen to be used in the interim. 2. The facility anticipates a completion date of 9/4/24 to have the Local County Health Department come in and inspect the facilities project and approve food service operations. 3. Facility has 1 handwashing sink in each serving room; a total of 1 of operational handwashing sinks since there are two serving rooms in the facility. In addition, the facility will obtain 2 portable hand washing stations to ensure that dietary staff is able to perform appropriate hand washing process. The portables were on site on 8/29/2024. 4. The facility will obtain disposable foil pans. For Utensils, 3 containers will be provided to rinse, wash and sanitize to ensure a method for sanitizing food service equipment and service items between meals to prevent food borne illnesses. This will be on site at local organization's kitchen in [NAME]. Once sanitized the equipment will be transported back to the facility. A delivery was made this morning for additional disposable supplies and the facility can obtain more as needed during this project. Facility will utilize test strips to ensure proper Ph for sanitation. This will be managed by the Dietary Director/Designee and monitored by the facility Administrator. 5. The facility is only storing milk products in the cooler located in the dining room. The cooler temperature is being monitored to maintain at safe temperatures during holding. A log for temperatures will be maintained by the Dietary Director/Designee and is being checked every shift. The facility will continue to cater food for the residents until the project has been completed. Administrator will maintain documentation of temperatures. 6. The facility is having food delivered from vendor in insulated bags via private vehicle to the facility. Food is then transferred back and forth to local organization's kitchen in [NAME] via private vehicle in insulated bags. The facility has developed a temperature tool to monitor and document temperatures of food - pick up time and temps, after transfer time and temps. 7. Prior to start of shift, the Dietary Director/Designee will monitor food temperatures and document temperature on the newly developed log. The Administrator will monitor and maintain these logs daily during the kitchen closure and make immediate corrective action if not complete. 8. An emergency QA meeting has been conducted with facility medical director and IDT team to review the incident and action plan. The facility has reviewed the policies and procedures and has developed and amendment on how the facility will monitor temperatures during this interim. The QA team will also refer this incident for review of emergency action plan for any changes.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to timely complete a physician order for an X-Ray for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: O...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to timely complete a physician order for an X-Ray for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: On 04/26/2024 at 11:45 AM R1 was in bed with a cast on her right foot. The Progress Note dated 04/13/2024 10:00 PM documents R1 had a witnessed fall 04/13/2024 at 8:00 PM in the bathroom. R1 stated, I'm alright, my knee just give up, I am not in pain. After an hour R1 complained of pain and swelling to her right ankle. The physician was contacted, and an x ray was ordered to be completed by the on-call X-Ray service. The Radiology Results Report dated 04/17/2024 at 12:00 AM documents R1 with an Oblique fracture of the distal fibula and a distal tip fracture of the medial malleolus with ongoing healing. On 04/26/2024 at 10:40 AM V12 (Quality Assurance Nurse) stated I should have been calling the X-ray company to see why there was the delay in them coming out. I realized (04/16/2024) after needing them for another resident that (R1's) X-ray still wasn't done. The Facility Agreement with the portable X-Ray company documents Provider shall provide Services within 24 business hours or schedule a time for the service. The Provider will promptly notify the Facility if Services time is unable to be met.
Mar 2024 12 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident that was NPO (Nothing by Mouth)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident that was NPO (Nothing by Mouth) was not left in the dining room during meal service and failed to ensure that a resident was clothed adequately during dining. This applies to 2 of 4 (R52 and R64) residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 34. The Findings Include: 1. R52's face sheet included diagnoses of gastrostomy, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination and anoxic brain damage. R52's admission MDS (minimum data set) showed that R52 was moderately impaired with cognition and required maximum assistance from the staff with mobility and transfers. On March 25, 2024 at 12:20 PM, R52 was seated in the dining room at a table with R18 who was eating her lunch. R52 was receiving tube feeding from a container that was hung on a pole and covered with a cloth. R52 was looking at R18's food and extending her arms towards it and saying no, no, no and mouthing other incoherent sounds. On March 25, 2024 at 1:12 PM, R52 remained in the dining room throughout the meal even when the second seating received their trays. R52 was seen crying out and making unintelligible sounds. V10 (Activity Aide) who was in the area, stated that R52 usually sits in the dining room during meals. On March 26, 2024 at 12:08 PM, R52 was seated in the dining room at a table with R18 and other residents that were eating their lunch meal. R52 was receiving tube feeding from a container that was hung on a pole and covered with a cloth. 2. R64's face sheet included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction without residual deficits, history of TIA (transient ischemic attack) and presence of left artificial knee joint. R64's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that R64 was severely impaired in cognition and required maximum assistance from the staff in dressing. On March 25, 2024 at 1:20 PM, R64 was seated in the dining room feeding himself. R64 was in a hospital gown that reached to his mid-thigh and was not wearing any pants. R64 was noted to have a red T-shirt underneath the hospital gown but his incontinence brief was visible as he adjusted his legs. R64 was seated with multiple residents at tables that were joined together and many of the residents were females. V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant) who was present in the dining room stated that R64's clothes may not have come back from the wash. On March 26, 2024 at around 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) was informed about the above observations. V1 stated that it's a dignity issue.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was safe to keep and administe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was safe to keep and administer his own medications. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R127) reviewed for medication pass/administration in the sample of 34. The findings include: On March 26, 2024 at 10:31 AM, V15 (Registered Nurse) prepared and administered multiple medications to R127. During this observation, R127 was informed by V15 that his inhaler and Lisinopril (blood pressure medication) was not available at the facility. After taking his prepared medications from V15, R127 walked away and appeared to be upset. On March 26, 2024 at 10:39 AM, R127 stated that he was upset because he did not receive his inhaler and blood pressure medication. R127 opened his bedside drawer and took out a small plastic container. Inside the said plastic container were seven (7) unidentified tablets, not in its original packaging. The seven unidentified tablets/medications were all dry and intact. R127 asked the surveyor to identify which one was the Lisinopril tablet among the seven unidentified tablets. R127 wanted the surveyor to identify the Lisinopril tablet because he wanted to take it. R127 was asked where he got the seven tablets from. R127 stated that the nurses (no name given) gave it to him. According to R127, the nurses usually prepare his medications before checking his blood pressure and heart rate and whenever his blood pressure and heart rates were low, the nurses would dispose of the blood pressure medications, and he does not want it to go to waste, so he would ask the nurses (no name given) to give him the medication in order for him to take it at a later time when his blood pressure medication was not available at the facility, like that morning during the medication pass with V15. R127 stated that he had blood thinners and blood pressure medications in the plastic container, however he could not identify it correctly. There was no documentation to shows that R127 was allowed to keep and/or take his medications by himself. There was no physician's order and/or assessment for self-administration of medications in R127's EMR (Electronic Medical Record). On March 26, 2024, at 1:46 PM, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated that residents should not keep medications at bedside. The nurses should not be handing their unused medications to the resident to use at a later time especially without the staff present. R127 was asked on different times of how he obtained the seven unidentified medications, he stated the same thing. R127 refused to identify the nurses who gave him the medications to keep. R127's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed that R127 was cognitively intact. The facility's undated Pharmacy medication administration guidelines, showed under administration, 12. Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administrations of medications.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the urinary catheter tubing was off the floor. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R107) reviewed for urinary cathet...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the urinary catheter tubing was off the floor. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R107) reviewed for urinary catheter in the sample of 34. The findings include: R107's face sheet included diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. R107's care plan revised on February 6, 2024 showed that the resident has urinary catheter related to obstructive uropathy. On March 25, 2024 at 10:14 AM, R107's urinary catheter bag was in a privacy bag under R107's wheelchair with the tubing lying on the floor. R107 was stepping on the tubing when he moved his wheelchair back and forth with his feet getting tangled in the tubing every now and then. On March 25, 2024 at 10:57 AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was shown the same and V13 stated It shouldn't be on the floor. He should have a leg bag. It is not attached now. I got him up today. On March 27, 2024 at 11:29 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that the normal process is that the urinary catheter should be hooked on to a leg bag and should not be dangling. V2 stated that the tubing should not be touching the floor due to infection control. Facility policy titled Urinary Catheter Care (effective November 28, 2012) included as follows: Policy: To establish guidelines to reduce the risk of or prevent infections in the resident with an indwelling catheter. Guidelines: 5. Indwelling catheters may be secured to prevent trauma and tension. 7. Urinary drainage bags and tubing shall be positioned to prevent either from touching the floor directly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R73's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R73's most recent admission to the facility was on March 2, 2020, with multiple ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R73's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R73's most recent admission to the facility was on March 2, 2020, with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, personal history of traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. R73's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 1, 2024, showed R73 with severe cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including supervision from staff for eating and total assistance from staff for bathing, dressing, toileting, and transfer. R73's physician order summary showed multiple psychoactive medication ordered including Risperidone 0.5 mg (milligram) one time a day ordered on April 28, 2022, Ativan 0.5 mg., two times a day ordered on January 19, 2022, Citalopram Hydrobromide 10 mg., one time a day ordered on January 19, 2022, and Depakote 250 mg., twice a day, ordered on January 19, 2022. On March 25, 2024, at 11:10 AM, R73 was observed lying in bed, sleeping. On March 26, 2024, at 4:30 PM, R73 was observed lying in bed, sleeping. On March 27, 2024, at 9:38 AM, R73 was lying in bed, awake and asked for the overbed light to be turned off and declined to converse any further. V18 (CNA) stated she has been R73's caregiver for the past two months and R73 does not respond positively to staff and often refuses ADL care. V18 described how R73 will only eat while lying on his side in bed and refuses to sit up, refuses bathing, and refuses to get out of bed with staff assist. The facility did not provide documentation that GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) was recommended by the pharmacist or provide documentation that a GDR was attempted or contraindicated until March 26, 2024, after surveyor request. The documentation from the pharmacist dated March 26, 2024, showed R73 has been receiving Ativan 0.5 mg. twice a day, Citalopram 10 mg. once a day, Divalproex 250 mg. and Risperidone 0.5 mg daily since April 28, 2022. Between April 28, 2022, and March 26, 2024, there was no documentation provided that a GDR was attempted or contraindicated. R73's Care Plan initiated on January 31, 2024, for psychotropic medication use, did not identify target behaviors or symptoms to be evaluated to assess effectiveness of the medication. On March 28, 2024, at 9:15 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that the facility's process for conducting GDR reviews includes a monthly meeting that includes the DON, QA (Quality Assurance) Nurse, Social Services staff, and Psychiatrist. V2 stated they review residents who are due for GDR, every 6 months or twice a year or when there is a change in the resident's behavior. V2 could not provide documentation of the monthly review or identify which residents had been reviewed. V2 stated the pharmacist is not part of the facility team who does the review. V2 also stated resident behavior is monitored by social services staff who also document the behavior. V2 stated if a resident's behavior is identified by the CNA, the CNA will tell the Nurse, who will tell the social service staff who will then document the behavior. V2 was not aware of the behavior tracking log in the EMR as part of the POC (Point of Care) documentation. The facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Gradual Dose Reduction dated November 28, 2012, showed .The plan to alternatives to psychotropic medications and/or use of psychotropic medications shall be incorporated into the care plan with suitable goals and approaches Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) .Residents who use psychotropic medication shall receive gradual dose reduction and behavior interventions, unless clinically contraindicated in an effort to discontinue or reduce the medication. A gradual dose reduction shall be encouraged at least twice yearly .and .The physician has documented the clinical rationale for why any additional attempted dose reduction at that time would likely impair the resident's function or increased distressed behavior. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the diagnosis and specific behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medication. In addition, the facility also failed to attempt gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident on psychotropic medication. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R73, R90) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 34. The findings include: Face sheet showed that R90 is 62 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. On March 25, 2024 at 10:00 AM, R90 was resting in bed. R90 was alert and oriented and somewhat sleepy. R90 appeared irritable but there was no aggressive behavior displayed. R90 did not display any auditory or visual hallucination and paranoia. There was no psychotic behavior displayed. On March 25, 2024, at 12:00 PM, R90 was sitting in his wheelchair inside the bedroom, talking to another resident. R90 was alert, oriented and calm. There was no sign of agitation or psychotic behavior noted. On March 26, 2024, at 11:08 AM, V20 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) rendered incontinence care to R90. R90 was calm and cooperative, there was no psychotic behavior displayed during the care. R90 was alert and oriented, slightly sleepy. V20 stated that she's familiar with R90 and she did not observe him with any psychotic behavior excepts for his occasional irritable behavior. R90's active POS (Physician Order Summary) showed multiple medication orders including, Risperidone 1 milligram (mg) twice daily for unspecified psychosis which was ordered on October 11, 2023. R90's active care plan had no documentation addressing the use of Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) and specific targeted behavior pertaining to the use of Risperidone. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 15, 2024, shows that R90 is alert and oriented. The same MDS shows that R90 has no psychotic behavior and no diagnosis of psychosis. V21's (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner/NP) psycho-therapy notes dated March 22, 2023, showed: History of Present Illness: [AGE] year-old male with major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, and general anxiety disorder. Info gathered from staff: No concerns. No behavior updates noted on chart review. [R90] was seen at bedside today resting in bed and appeared in no acute distress. Reports sleeping without trouble. Endorse fair appetite. Reports no sadness. Endorses intermittent worries. Reports the Hydroxyzine is causing somnolence. This writer (V21) explained that the Hydroxyzine was discontinued 1 week ago, and [R90] is currently prescribed Buspar 5 mg PO (orally) TID (3 times a day). (V21) explained that [R90] should observe improvement in anxiety symptoms after 2 weeks from initiation of Buspar. [R90] verbalized understanding. (V21) and [R90] have no other concerns and complaints. [R90] does not exhibit any symptoms of depression, sadness or loneliness, hopelessness, or helplessness. [R90] does not exhibit symptoms of grandiosity, flight of ideas, racing thoughts. [R90] does not exhibit or display any symptoms of suicidal or homicidal ideations or auditory or visual hallucinations. Assessment/Plan: [AGE] year-old male with major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, and general anxiety disorder. Major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate - currently stable - continue current management - encourage engagement with family and friends. General anxiety disorder - currently stable with intermittent exacerbations - continue Buspar 5 mg three times a day - continue current management. There was no documentation in the psycho-therapy notes regarding R90's unspecified psychosis and there was no documentation to show R90 displayed any psychotic behavior. On March 26, 2024, at 2:22 PM, V22 (Social Service Director) stated that R90 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder. R90 has depressed mood, fatigue, excessive sleeping. V22 was not sure why R90 was taking Risperidone but it showed in his POS that R90 was taking it for unspecified psychosis. V22 also said that he has never seen R90 display psychotic behavior. V22 was surprised that R90 was taking the Risperidone. R90 has been taking it since October 2023. On March 27, 2024, at 9:29 AM, V21 stated that she just took over as a psychiatric NP two weeks ago and she (V21) just continued whatever previous psychotropic order was made for R90. V21 added that she will investigate the use of Risperidone for R90.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe physician's order for an anticoagulant medication. This ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe physician's order for an anticoagulant medication. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R27) reviewed for anticoagulant medications in the sample of 34. The findings include: R27's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses myocardial infarction, nonrheumatic aortic valve insufficiency, presence of prosthetic heart valve, long term use of anticoagulants, and nicotine dependence. R27's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 20, 2024, showed R27 was cognitively intact. R27's anticoagulant care plan dated September 8, 2023, showed, I am on long term use of anticoagulant therapy related to nonrheumatic aortic valve insufficiency status post prosthetic heart valve. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated November 29, 2023, including Labs as ordered. Report abnormal lab results to the physician. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated November 29, 2023, including administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. On March 25, 2024, at 9:51 AM, R27 said he has a mechanical heart valve and takes warfarin (anticoagulant medication). R27 continued to say he had a laboratory test done today. On March 26, 2024, at 4:07 PM, V17 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she called the doctor on March 25, 2024, with R27's laboratory results. V17 continued to say the doctor ordered for R27's warfarin to be continued at the previous dose and to repeat laboratory tests in two weeks. R27's Order Summary Report dated March 26, 2024, at 4:15 PM, did not show an order for warfarin. R27's March 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) showed R27 did not receive warfarin on March 25, 2024. On March 26, 2024, at 4:54 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said if a resident is on warfarin, a weekly laboratory test is completed. V2 continued to say when the nurse receives the laboratory results, the nurse should call the doctor and transcribe the doctor's order. V2 said when V17 received the order to continue the warfarin, V17 should have entered the order into R27's medical records. On March 27, 2024, at 1:21 PM, V24 (R27's Doctor) said if a nurse receives laboratory test results for a resident's anticoagulant medication, the nurse calls the doctor, and the doctor will order to continue or adjust the anticoagulant medication based on the laboratory result. V24 continued to say the expectation of facility staff is to ensure the physician's order is transcribed in the resident's medical record. V24 said since R27 has a mechanical heart valve, missing two doses of the anticoagulant medication could cause R27 to have blood clots or a stroke.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R11, R86 and R140) observed dur...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R11, R86 and R140) observed during dining in the sample of 34. The findings include: On March 25, 2024 starting at 11:30 AM, the tray line service was observed in the facility's kitchen with V8 and V9 (Dietary Aides) on the tray line. 1. On March 25, 2024 at 11:48 AM, during tray line, R11 was served mechanical soft diet with 2 glasses (8 ounces) of nectar thick liquid milk. R11's meal ticket showed to add health shake and cottage cheese and these items were not served on the tray. On March 25, 2024 at 12:48 PM, R11 received a room tray and did not receive a health shake nor cottage cheese. V13 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) who served the meal tray to R11, stated that the kitchen sends what is listed on the meal ticket. R11's diet order on the POS (Physician Order Sheet) included: Continue with health shakes with lunch and supper. May substitute fortified pudding for health shakes. Add cottage cheese every meal. 2. On March 25, 2024 at 11:55 AM, during tray line, R140 was served pureed diet with 2 glasses of nectar thick liquid milk. R140's meal ticket showed to add health shake and it was not served on the tray. On March 25, 2024 at 12:23 PM, R140 was fed in her room by V12 (CNA) and R140 did not receive health shake. When V12 was shown the health shake on the meal ticket, she stated She (R140) did not get one. That was missing. R140's diet order on the POS included: Add health shake with lunch and supper daily, may substitute with fortified pudding. 3. On March 25, 2024 at 12:23 PM, R86 was served 2 bowls of chili and cranberry juice. R86's meal ticket showed to add ice cream and health shake and these items were not served on the tray. On March 25, 2024 at 12:40 PM, R86 was served a tray in his unit and did not receive the ice cream nor the health shake. V34 (CNA) verified that R86 did not get both ice cream and health shake. R86's diet order on POS included: Add ice cream with lunch, and supper, health shake with lunch and supper, may substitute fortified pudding. On March 27, 2024 at 11:49 AM, and on March 28, 2024 at 9:37 AM, V6 (Registered Dietitian) stated that if the supplement is ordered, it should be given. V6 stated that a month ago, the food vendor had stated that they may be short on health shakes so she had written the order that facility may substitute fortified pudding for health shakes. V6 stated that health shakes were added for R11 and R140 as they were not eating well and had history of [previous] weight loss but are currently stable. V6 stated that health shakes were added for R86 as he is a picky eater. V6 stated that the heath shakes for R11 and R86 were added a while ago (date not able to verify). V6 added that the health shake at lunch for R140 was added in October 2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence care a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence care and blood glucose level check. This applies to 3 of 34 residents (R38, R90, R105) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. On March 25, 2024 at 12:15 PM, V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R105 who had a large loose bowel movement. V19 wiped R105 from front to back, placed new incontinence brief and pad, assisted to dress, and repositioned R105. V19 changed her gloves multiple times throughout the care without performing hand hygiene. 2. On March 26, 2024 at 11:08 AM, V20 (CNA) rendered incontinence care to R90 who was wet with urine. V20 used wet wash cloth and wiped R90 from front to back. V20 removed the soiled brief and incontinence cloth pad and applied the clean incontinence brief and pad. V20 completed the tasks while wearing the same soiled gloves. 3. On March 26, 2024, at 4:16 PM, V16 (Registered Nurse) checked the BGL (blood glucose level) of R38. V16 did not perform hand hygiene prior to blood glucose check. After V16 obtained the BGL, he changed his gloves and without performing hand hygiene proceeded to administer the insulin, then he removed his gloves and put the glucometer and the insulin back into the medication cart without performing hand hygiene. On March 27, 2024, at 11:46 AM, V3 (Infection Control Nurse) stated hand hygiene should be performed before the start of any care. Staff should change gloves and perform hand hygiene from dirty to clean task to prevent spread of infection. Facility's Hand Hygiene/Hand Washing Policy and Procedure with revision date of January 10, 2018, shows: Definition: Hand Hygiene means cleaning your hands by using either handwashing (washing hands with soap and water), antiseptic hand wash, or antiseptic hand rub (i.e., alcohol-based hand sanitizer including foam or gel). Examples of when to perform hand hygiene (Either Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer or Hand Washing): - Before and after having direct contact with patient's intact skin. - After contact with blood, body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings. - If hands will be moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. - After glove removal. Facility's Glove Use-Nursing Policy and procedure with revision date of January 31, 2018, shows: 5. Gloves used for contact shall be removed and discarded after contact with each person, fluid item, or surface. The facility's undated Pharmacy medication administration guidelines shows: Procedures: 2. Handwashing and Hand Sanitization: The person administering the medications adheres to good hand hygiene, which includes washing hands thoroughly: a) before beginning a medication pass, b) prior to handling any medication, c) after coming into direct contact with a resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R46's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, dysphagia, and gastrostomy tube. R46...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R46's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, dysphagia, and gastrostomy tube. R46's MDS dated [DATE], showed that the resident was cognitively intact, and needs partial staff assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. On March 25, 2024 at 10:31 AM, R46 was lying in bed wearing a gown and had long facial hair on the upper lip, chin and face and when asked if R46 wanted to be shaved, he indicated yes with a nod and rubbed his face. On March 26, 2024, at 1:00 PM, R46 was lying in bed wearing a gown and remained with long facial hair. V15 (RN) was informed and R46 indicated with a nod, yes when asked if he wanted to be shaved. R46's care plan initiated on January 10, 2024, showed R46 needs partial assistance with personal hygiene. 3. R51's EMR showed multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective, bipolar type, need for assistance with personal care, artificial left hip joint and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R51's MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required substantial staff assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. On March 25, 2024 at 10:40 AM, R51 was dressed sitting in the wheelchair with long hair on his face, chin, and upper lip and stated he would like to be shaved. On March 26, 2024 at 12:55 PM, R51 remained with long facial hair and stated he would like to be shaved. V15 was informed of R51's request to be shaved. On March 27, 2024 at 9:35 AM, R51 was sitting in the wheelchair, dressed, in his room and remained with long facial hair, and stated he would like a shave, stated he asked staff and staff will get around to it. 4. R120's EMR showed multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, gastrostomy tube and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. R120's MDS dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and required substantial staff assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. On March 25, 2024, at 10:54 AM, R120 was lying in bed, wearing a gown and had long facial hair on the upper lip, face and chin. R120 felt his chin when asked if he would like to be shaved and nodded and stated yeah. On March 26, 2024, at 10:38 AM, R120 was lying in bed, wearing a gown with long facial hair and V15 was informed and agreed that R120 needed shaving. R120's care plan initiated on January 10, 2024, showed that the resident required assistance with personal hygiene including shaving. On March 26, 2024, at 9:42 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated it is the expectation that residents receive assistance with their personal hygiene as needed to maintain a nice appearance. The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) effective date November 28, 2012, showed Grooming .maintaining personal hygiene, including planning the task and obtaining supplies .including shaving. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R12, R46, R51 and R120) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. R12 had multiple diagnoses including ataxia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and history of traumatic brain injury, based on the face sheet. R12's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated March 15, 2024 showed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from the staff with regards to personal hygiene, including shaving. On March 25, 2024 at 11:39 AM, R12 was observed with accumulation of long and thick facial hair. R12 stated that he needed an electric razor and staff assistance to shave his facial hair. On March 26, 2024 at 10:25 AM, R12 was standing in the front lobby. R12 was observed with accumulation of long and thick facial hair. R12 stated that he needed the staff's assistance with shaving because his facial hair is thick, and an electric razor was needed to shave him. R12 stated that he wants his mustache to be trimmed neatly. On March 26, 2024 at 11:01 AM, V35 (RN/Registered Nurse) was notified of the resident's need for assistance with regards to shaving. V35 acknowledged that R12 needed assistance with shaving because the resident's facial hair and mustache were thick and that a regular razor might not work well. R12's active care plan initiated on January 3, 2024 showed that the resident wished to grow mustache. The care plan goal was for the resident to keep his mustache neat, trimmed and clean. The intervention for this care plan showed, Assist with ADLs as needed/Prompt resident to maintain his facial hair. Further review of R12's active care plan showed no evidence that the resident was resistive to shaving, personal care or grooming assistance. On March 27, 2024 at 8:37 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that it is part of the facility's nursing care to provide assistance to all residents needing assist with personal hygiene and grooming as needed. V2 stated that for R12, the resident needed the assistance because of his thick facial hair and mustache.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it was free of tripping hazard in a common area of the facility. This applies to 35 of 35 residents (R6, R12, R14,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it was free of tripping hazard in a common area of the facility. This applies to 35 of 35 residents (R6, R12, R14, R15, R23, R27, R34, R37, R42, R50, R54, R55, R56, R57, R70, R74, R75, R78, R79, R82, R85, R88, R92, R94, R98, R101, R112, R114, R115, R143, R152, R156, R158, R162, and R164) reviewed for falls. The Findings Include: On March 26, 2024 at 12:05pm, there was a difference in height of 1½ inches between the concrete slab immediately outside the front door and the next slab, approximately 6 feet from the front door to the facility. All persons coming into the front door must navigate this uneven pathway. On March 26, 2024, R143 stated he tripped on the uneven concrete outside the front door to the facility on March 22, 2024 and on one time before. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) shows R143 to be cognitively intact and that R143 uses a walker for ambulation. Documentation provided by the facility shows R143 had at least 2 falls related to the uneven concrete in the front of the facility. The facility record shows R143 is one of the Safe Smoking Program Participants with Level 3 Community Pass Privilege. The facility provided a list of residents in the Safe Smoking Program Participants with Level 3 Community Pass Privilege. This list includes 35 residents including R143. On March 28, 2024 at 12:43pm, V36 (Receptionist) stated the residents with Level 3 Pass Privilege are allowed to leave the facility at will between 8:00am and 8:00pm. V36 stated the Level 3 Pass Privilege residents are not directly supervised when out of the building. According to the facility records all 35 residents (R6, R12, R14, R15, R23, R27, R34, R37, R42, R50, R54, R55, R56, R57, R70, R74, R75, R78, R79, R82, R85, R88, R92, R94, R98, R101, R112, R114, R115, R143, R152, R156, R158, R162, and R164) on Level 3 Pass Privilege had a risk of falling. Thirty-one residents on Level 3 Pass Privilege were prescribed psychoactive medications and four had other diagnoses which put them at risk for falling. The facility was unable to produce documentation of efforts to repair the uneven concrete pathway leading to/from the facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. R120's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R120 had multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, gastrostomy tube and hyper...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. R120's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R120 had multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, gastrostomy tube and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. R120's physician order summary showed an order for midodrine 10 mg., three times a day (6:00 AM, 11:00 AM, and 10:00 PM) give per g-tube (gastrostomy tube) for hypotension, initiated on November 3, 2023. On March 26, 2024 at 12:40 PM, V15 (Registered Nurse) took R120's blood pressure which was 132/70 and discarded the midodrine dose that V15 had prepared for administration and omitted the midodrine 10 mg dose that was scheduled to be administered at 11:00 AM. V15 held the dose of midodrine without contacting the prescriber, when there were no parameters to hold the medication. On March 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM, V15 stated he had not contacted the prescriber regarding holding the dose of midodrine 10 mg that had been scheduled to be given at 11:00 AM. 4. R110's EMR showed R110 had multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, severe persistent asthma, respiratory failure with hypoxia, and morbid obesity. R110's physician order summary showed R110 had orders for Atrovent HFA aerosol solution 17mcg/act, 2 puff inhaled orally two times a day (scheduled for 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM) initiated on January 5, 2022, and Symbicort aerosol 160-4.5 mcg/act 2 inhalation orally, two times a day (scheduled for 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM) initiated on January 31, 2023. On March 26, 2024 at 10:35 AM, V15 was preparing medications to be administered to R110. V15 stated the Atrovent inhaler and the Symbicort inhaler were not available to be administered, neither was it in the medication cart. Both scheduled inhaler doses were omitted. On March 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM, V15 stated he did not receive the Atrovent or Symbicort inhalers for R110 from the pharmacy and neither medication had been administered. On March 27, 2024, at 9:47 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated it is his expectation that nurses administer medications as ordered by the prescriber and reorder medications before running out of medication to maintain the medication supply. The facility's undated policy titled Administration Procedures for all Medications showed, .16. Notification to the Prescriber .b) held medications for pulse, blood pressure, low or high blood sugar, or other abnormal test results, vital signs, resulting in medications being held. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for medication administration. There were 25 medication opportunities with 6 errors resulting to 24% medication error rate. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R88, R110, R120 and R127) observed during medication administration in the sample of 34. The findings include: 1. Face sheet showed that R127 is 92 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation, and Hypertension (HTN). R127's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 12, 2024, showed that R127 is alert and oriented. On March 26, 2024 at 10:31 AM, V15 (Registered Nurse) administered morning medications to R127. V15 administered Carvedilol 6.25 milligrams (mg) tablet, Vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg) tablet, and Eliquis 5 mg tablet. V15 stated that R127 was supposed to received Ventolin inhaler and Lisinopril 40 mg tablet, however, it was not available. On March 26, 2024 at 10:39 AM, R127 stated he was upset about not getting his medications in a timely manner plus the unavailability of the inhaler and his Lisinopril. On March 26, 2024 at 1:46 PM, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated that the staff nurse should notify the physician if the medications were not available. On March 26, 2024 at 1:58 PM, R127's progress notes showed no documentation that V15 notified the physician with regards to unavailability of R127's medications. On March 26, 2024 at around 2:30 PM, V15 stated that he has not given the Lisinopril and the Albuterol to R127 yet. Physician Order Summary (POS) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that R127 was prescribed to take the Albuterol twice daily at 8 AM and 8 PM, while the Lisinopril was supposed to be administered daily at 9 AM, it was not given because it was not available. However, the MAR showed that it was given at its prescribed time, despite the observation and interview. 2. On March 26, 2024, at 4:28 PM, V17 (Registered Nurse) administered medications to R88 which include Symbicort Inhaler 160/4.5. V17 opened a new package of Symbicort inhaler, shook the inhaler and gave it to R88 without priming it first, and without giving instructions on how to administer the medication. R88 took the inhaler from V17 and pressed the inhaler twice (two quick puffs) one after another without interval. R88 did not take a deep breath while inhaling the medication. In addition, R88 was not given an instruction to rinse her mouth. R88's MAR shows to administer Symbicort Aerosol 160/4.5 mct/act (Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate) 2 puffs inhale orally 2 times a day. Instruct the resident (R88) to rinse mouth with water (swish and spit) with inhalation. On March 27, 2024, at 11:56 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that the facility uses a bingo card system for medication container and the card has a highlighted section which shows the staff when to re-order medications. The staff were supposed to give instructions to residents prior to administration of inhaler so the medication can be administered the right way. The facility's undated Pharmacy policy for oral inhalation administration showed, Purpose: To allow for safe, accurate and effective administration of medication using an oral inhaler (with or without a space/chamber) or nebulizer. The same policy showed under procedure, 8. If necessary, prime inhaler. Prime new inhalers by depressing until a full dose is emitted. Do not spray toward resident while priming. 13. Press down on inhaler once to release medication as residents starts to breathe in slowly through the mouth over 3-5 seconds.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the nutritive value was maintained during preparation of pureed diet. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R56, R69...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the nutritive value was maintained during preparation of pureed diet. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R56, R69, R71, R83, R100, R129, R131, R132, R133, R140) reviewed for pureed diet in the sample of 34. The findings include: On March 26, 2024 at 10:03 AM, the pureed lunch meal prep of Swedish meatballs, buttered noodles and carrots prepared by V7 (Cook) was observed in the facility's kitchen. V7 stated that she had about 12 residents on pureed consistency and was going to prepare 12 servings and a few extra. V7 was not following any recipes. V7 started with the carrots and placed cooked carrots that was into water to the blender. V7 stated that she used a quart of carrots and cooked it in a quart of water. The blender showed that the water just covered the cooked carrots. V7 then added another quart of hot water to the blender. The contents now showed to fill up to almost the top of the blender. When V7 pureed the mixture, the blended product resembled a thin soupy mixture of water and carrots. V7 stated that she is going to add thickener to get it to the desired consistency. V7 was seen adding 1/3 cup thickener at a time in between running the blender. V7 added a total of five 1/3 cups of thickener to the mixture until the final product was a homogeneous thicker consistency. Recipe # 28820 for pureed carrots included to place the ingredients (for 10 servings) consisting of 1 quart +1 cup carrots and 1/4 cup margarine into a washed and sanitized food processor and blend until smooth. V7 then prepared the buttered noodles. V7 added a quart of cooked noodles which had a quart of pasta water into a cleaned and sanitized blender and then added another quart of hot water to the mixture and pureed it. V7 added 1/2 cup of thickener to bring it into a cohesive form. Recipe #1089 for pureed buttered noodles included to place the ingredients (for 10 servings) consisting of 1 quart +1 cup buttered noodles into a clean and sanitized food processor. Add broth (prepared with 1 cup of water with 1 tsp/teaspoon of chicken base) gradually as needed and blend until smooth. For the Swedish meatballs, V7 counted 36 cooked meatballs and added it to the blender. V7 stated If I am doing the math correctly, that should give 4 pieces for each serving. V7 then measured 4 cups of hot broth into the blender and pureed the mixture, adding 1/2 cup of thickener to bring it to a thicker consistency. Recipe # 29390 for pureed Swedish meatballs included to place ingredients (for 10 servings) of 2 and 1/2 pound of Swedish meatballs into a clean and sanitized food processor and gradually add broth (prepared with 2 cups of broth and 2 tsps (teaspoon) of beef base) as needed and blend until smooth. On March 26, 2024 at 10:27 AM, when asked what her rationale was to add so much water and thickener and whether she follows a recipe for the preparation, V7 replied that she typically does not look at the ingredients. V7 added It doesn't always match up to the scoop size (portions) so I will add two quarts of water to make more quantity. On March 26, 2024 at 10:30 AM, V5 (Dietary Director) was notified that the recipes were not followed and he stated that he will look for the recipes. On March 26, 2024 at 2:26 PM, V5 presented the recipes and on review of the amount of water and thickener that was added, V5 stated that he was always trained (at a previous facility) that hot water can be added [in place of broth] when pureeing hot foods. V5 added that V7 is fairly new at the position and is a fill in cook and requires some training. On March 27, 2024 at 11:57 AM, V6 (Registered Dietitian) stated that the facility needs to follow the recipe to serve the right amount of nutrients and protein as not to cause nutritional decline. Facility policy titled Pureed Food Preparation taken from the Guideline and Procedure Manual 2020 included as follows: Guideline: Pureed foods will be prepared using standardized recipes to ensure quality, flavor, palatability, and maximum value. Procedure: 3. Recipes will not use water to thin pureed foods. Only broth, milk, juice, gravy, margarine or another appropriate condiment that preserves flavor shall be used. 4. Food thickener will be used only in accordance with a specific recipe or product instructions. Measure and add commercial thickener, stabilizer, or shaping/enhancing product as directed in the recipe and process until blended. Facility diet roster printed on March, 25, 2024 showed that R56, R69, R71, R83, R100, R129, R131, R132, R133 and R140 were on pureed diet.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R115's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R115's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including type two diabetes. On March 25, 2024 at 12:38 PM, R115 was sitting in the dining room. R115 said he was waiting for lunch to be served. R115 continued to say lunch is supposed to be served at 12:30 PM, but sometimes it isn't served until 2:00 PM. On March 26, 2024 at 10:01 AM, during the Resident Council meeting, R115 said meals are late every day. On March 26, 2024, at 12:50 PM, R115 was sitting in the dining room waiting for lunch to be served, lunch service had not started in the main dining room. 4. R156's EMR showed R156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression and hyponatremia. On March 25, 2024, at 10:57 AM, R156 said he would like it if the facility could be more consistent with mealtimes. R156 said he does not know what time lunch is because it is served at all different times. R156 said sometimes he has to wait until 2:00 PM for lunch to be served. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve lunch meal as in accordance with their schedule meal service times. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R93, R115, R124 and R156) review for mealtime preference in the sample of 34. The Findings Include: 1. R124 had multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, based on the face sheet. R124's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated 3/13/2024 showed that the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with eating. On March 25, 2024 at 10:31 AM, R124 was in his room, alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R124 stated the facility's lunch service is slow and that he had to wait for a long time for his meals. On March 25, 2024 at 1:05 PM, R124 was served his lunch meal inside the main dining room. Resident ate independently with good appetite and had consumed 100% of his meal. On March 26, 2024 at 11:04 AM, R124 stated that it was common for the facility to serve meals late, especially during lunch. R124 stated that he was informed by the staff that lunch is served at around 12 noon, however most of the time his lunch is served between 12:30 PM and 1:00 PM. R124 stated, I get annoyed sitting in the lunchroom waiting for my lunch for an hour. On March 27, 2024 at 1:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) was asked what information is given to the newly admitted resident with regards to mealtimes. V1 responded that whatever the meal-service times that was provided to the survey team. She verified the meal service times for breakfast was at 6:30 AM, for lunch was at 11:30 AM and supper was at 4:30 PM. The meal-service times sheet presented to the survey team showed, breakfast at 6:30 AM, lunch at 11:30 AM and supper at 4:30 PM. 2. R93 had multiple diagnoses including obesity, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety, based on the face sheet. R93's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating. On March 25, 2024 at 1:29 PM, R93 was observed ambulating in the hallway near the main dining room. R93 stated that she has not eaten yet because her lunch meal had not been served. According to R93 her lunch is always served late.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was free from abuse. This failure resulted in R2 being physically abused by V5 (Certified Nursing Assi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was free from abuse. This failure resulted in R2 being physically abused by V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) on 11/2/23; R2 complaining of leg pain and limping on 11/5/23; a new order for morphine sulfate every six hours for pain being placed on 11/6/23; and R2 using a wheelchair for leg pain relief. The findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/2/23 at 9:00 PM when V3 (CNA) and V4 (CNA) witnessed V5 (CNA) physically abusing R2 during nighttime cares. V1 (Administrator) was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/17/23 at 1:03 PM. The surveyors confirmed by observation, interview, and record review, that the immediacy was removed on 11/20/23, however, noncompliance remains at a Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. R2's admission Record, printed by the facility on 11/16/23, showed she had diagnoses including severe dementia, senile degeneration of brain, adult failure to thrive, and weakness. R2's 8/14/23 facility assessment showed R2 had severe cognitive impairment, with hallucinations and delusions. The assessment showed R2 had behaviors of rejection of care and required extensive staff assistance for dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. R2's care plan initiated on 5/3/23 showed she is resistive to care and will regularly refuse ADL (activities of daily living)/hygiene tasks such as showering, changing soiled clothes and linens related to dementia. The care plan showed R2 may become aggressive/ combative during care related to confusion. Interventions in place included: Encourage as much participation/interaction by the resident as possible during care activities. Give clear explanation of all care activities prior to and as they occur during each contact. Identify and document resident's triggers for resisting care. If resident resists with ADLs, reassure resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. R2's care plan initiated on 5/6/22 showed she was receiving hospice services related to a diagnosis of failure to thrive and dementia. R2's care plan initiated on 3/5/23 showed she was at risk for abuse and neglect related to cognitive impairment, depression, and dysfunctional behavior (combative behavior, care resistance) related to dementia and senile degeneration of brain. On 11/16/23 at 11:22 AM, V3 (CNA) said she worked a double shift on 11/2/23 from 6:00 AM-10:00 PM. V3 said about 9:00 PM that night she was assisting V4 (CNA) with changing R2's clothes and providing nighttime care. V3 said she asked V4 about using the cream (topical antianxiety cream) for R2 that calms her down before changing. V3 said V4 declined using the cream. V3 said her and V4 took off R2's shirt and R2 was grabbing onto her clothes when they were taking them off. V3 said R2 was not being combative. V3 said V5 was in the room at the time, charting on a computer and V4 asked V5 to help with R2. V3 said V5 grabbed R2's hair and started punching R2 in the chest. V3 said V5 hit R2 in the chest at least 6 times, maybe as much as 12 times. V3 said V5 then kicked R2 in the leg. V3 said her and V4 told V5 to stop several times. V3 said she (V3) backed away and V4 got in between R2 and V5 to block them. V3 said it all happened so fast. V3 said one of the times V5 hit R2 close to the neck and she heard R2 gasp for air. V3 said the incident started in the bathroom doorway and ended up in the corner of the bathroom. V3 said she did not see R2 do anything to make V5 do that. V3 said R2 was not combative prior to V5 hitting her. V3 said of course R2 was combative after V5 started hitting her. V3 said she did not report the incident until the next morning because she was afraid of retaliation. On 11/16/23 at 11:58 AM, V4 (CNA) said he worked on 11/2/23 from 4:00 PM-10:00 PM. V4 said he was the CNA assigned to R2 on 11/2/23. V4 said R2 was being a handful so he asked V3 to help him. V4 said he asked V5 to help and hold R2's hands. V4 said he did not know if V5 pulled R2's hair because he was trying to pull R2's pants up. V4 said when he stood up, both V5 and R2's hands were swinging, and he could not tell who was hitting who. V4 said he had to stand between R2 and V5 to make sure no physical contact continued, because they were both hitting each other. V4 said he can get R2 to calm down and de-escalate by playing music. V4 said he did not report the incident. V4 said he was baffled by the situation and did not know what to do. V4 said he had never seen V5 act like that with any other resident. On 11/17/23 at 9:51 AM, V9 (Registered Nurse/RN) said V3 reported to her before 7:00 AM on 11/3/23, that she (V3), V4 and V5 were changing R2's clothes on the PM shift on 11/2/23 and V5 started punching R2's chest and pulling R2's hair. V9 said V3 told her that at one point during the incident V5 hit R2 by the throat and R2 gasped for air. V9 said V3 told her that V5 kicked R2's leg. V9 said V3 told her that V5 started hitting R2 in R2's room and continued into R2's bathroom. V9 said she assessed R2 after V3 reported the allegation to her. V9 said as she was palpating R2's upper chest area, R2 said Some people can be nasty. V9 said she asked R2 if anyone hit her, R2 hesitated, then said no. V9 said she thinks it was Sunday (11/5/23) that staff noticed R2 limping. V9 said R2 was assessed and when her leg was squeezed, she would move her leg and had pain. V9 said Hospice was updated, X-rays were completed and were negative. V9 said she thinks R2's leg pain was a result of the incident on 11/2/23. V9 said the gel was discontinued and morphine was ordered for the pain. V9 said R2 uses the wheelchair for comfort, to reduce her leg pain. V9 said R2 did not use the wheelchair prior to the incident on 11/2/23. On 11/17/23 at 2:03 PM, V5 (CNA) said V4 and V3 were taking care of R2 on 11/2/23. V5 said V4 asked her to help with R2. V5 said she went over to help them and R2 hauled off and kicked her (V5) in her knee. V5 denied hitting or kicking R2. V5 said she put her arm out and put her hand on R2's forehead, on her hairline, to stop R2 from kicking her. V5 said V4 got between them and took R2 out of the bathroom. On 11/17/23 at 10:32 AM, V7 (CNA) said R2 could be calmed down by having the nurse apply the cream, by playing music, telling R2 a story, listening to her, leaving her alone and approach later. On 11/17/23 at 10:55 AM, V8 (CNA) said R2 could be calmed down by music and with the cream that calms her down. On 11/16/23 at 1:57 PM, V1 (Administrator) said R2 tends to be aggressive with care. V1 said she was notified of a potential situation related to V5 being aggressive towards R2. V1 said she investigated the allegation. V1 said V3 told her that she did not see everything, but she thought she saw V5 kick R2. V1 said V5 denied this. V1 said when she took V4's statement, he said that R2 kicked V5, and V5 pushed R2 away from her, then R2 lunged at V5. V1 said V4 said when R2 lunged out, V5 reflexively responded and made contact with R2's chest. V1 said V4 told him that he stepped between them to separate them. V1 said V5 said she did not strike out but put her hand on top of R2's head to calm her. V1 was asked why V5 was terminated, yet the allegation was not substantiated by the facility. V1 said she terminated V5 because there was inappropriate behavior, but not abusive behavior. V5 should be trained enough to know to walk away from a combative resident. V1 said that was not the correct way to handle the situation. V1 said something physical happened, but it was a reflex reaction, and a physical response was not an appropriate response. V1 said while interviewing V4 he did not tell her that he witnessed V5 hitting R2, and she (V1) can only go by what she is told during the interviews. On 11/16/23, R2 was observed in her room on the dementia unit, lying in a low bed at 10:32 AM. R2 was not able to be interviewed. R2 was also observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining/activity room holding a stuffed animal on 11/16/23 at 2:00 PM. R2 was confused and not able to be interviewed. The facility's Preliminary 24-hour Abuse Investigation Report, dated 11/3/23, showed an allegation of physical abuse to R2 by an employee was reported on 11/3/23 at 6:37 AM. The report showed V5 was removed from the schedule and suspended pending the investigation. R2's doctor, the police, R2's guardian, and the Ombudsman were all notified. The facility's timecard document from October 23-11/5/23 showed V5's last date and time of work at the facility was 11/2/23 at 10:00 PM. R2's Progress note dated 11/5/23 showed Writer was informed by the CNA that the resident is limping on her right leg .Resident was grimacing when the posterior side of the leg was touched. R2's Order Recap Report, printed by the facility on 11/17/23, showed a new order on 11/6/23 for morphine sulfate solution 20 mg (milligrams) per ml (milliliter). Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. The report also showed an order placed on 11/6/23 for X-ray of right hip, right femur, right knee, right tibia, right fibula, right ankle, right foot, right toes STAT for pain and limping. The X-ray results dated 11/7/23 showed no fractures or dislocations to any of these areas. V5's employee file was reviewed. The 11/6/23 facility document titled Human Resources Notice of Corrective Action showed R2 was terminated on 11/6/23 due to inappropriate physical behavior towards a resident on 11/2/23. The facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting-Illinois, with a revision date of 10/24/22 showed This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents .Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention .Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment . The immediate jeopardy that began on 11/2/23 was removed on 11/20/23 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: On 11/20/23, the staff were re-educated on Abuse and Abuse reporting by the Administrator and a risk management training agency. All abuse assessments were reviewed, and care plans were updated as appropriate on 11/20/23 by Social Services. All residents, as appropriate, received in-servicing by Social Services on 11/20/23 regarding abuse and neglect and reporting procedures. Employees (V5 and V4) were terminated on 11/6/23 by the Administrator and HR (Human Resources). The Abuse and Neglect Policy was reviewed on 11/17/23 by the Administrator and the Medical Director. On 11/17/23, the Medical Director reviewed and approved the Abatement Plan. Beginning 11/20/23 and ongoing, Abuse Assessments and care plans shall be randomly audited by the Psychiatric Rehabilitator Services Director monthly x 6 months to assure residents at risk for abuse are identified and care plans are updated accordingly. Results of audits will be reviewed monthly by the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report to the abuse coordinator an allegation of physical abuse to a resident (R2). This has the potential to affect all residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report to the abuse coordinator an allegation of physical abuse to a resident (R2). This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility resident roster printed on 11/16/23 showed 167 residents reside in the facility. On 11/16/23 at 11:22 AM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated she was working with V4 and V5 (CNAs) on the evening shift of 11/2/23. V3 said V4 asked her and V5 to help undress and toilet R2. V3 stated R2 is a dementia resident with known behaviors including resisting care. V3 said R2 was clutching her clothes when V5 suddenly began pulling R2's hair. V5 was punching and kicking at R2 repeatedly. V3 said it did not stop until V4 put himself between V5 and R2. V3 said the incident happened around 9 PM and she should have reported it right away. V3 said she was afraid of retaliation by V5, so she did not report it until the next morning around 6:30 AM. On 11/16/23 at 11:58 AM, V4 (CNA) said he was working with V3 and V5 on the evening of 11/2/23. V4 said he asked V3 and V5 to help toilet and undress R2. V4 said R2 was pushing away so he asked for their help. V4 said he was pulling up R2's pants and when he stood up V5 was punching and kicking R2. V4 said R2 was punching and kicking back. V4 stated they were both hitting each other and arms were flying. V4 said after the incident he suggested to the floor nurse (V20) that R2 and V5 should be separated going forward but did not say why. V4 said he did not report the physical abuse. V4 said he was baffled by the situation and did not know what to do. On 11/17/23 at 2:20 PM, V20 (Registered Nurse) stated she did not receive any allegation of abuse or suggestion that R2 and V5 be kept apart. V20 stated she had no knowledge of any physical incident between the two of them on 11/2/23. On 11/17/23 at 11:55 AM, V1 (Administrator/Abuse Coordinator) stated the incident between R2 and V5 occurred on 11/2/23 at 9:00 PM. V1 said she was not notified of the incident until 11/3/23 at 6:35 AM. V1 said abuse should be reported immediately. It is facility policy and protects other residents from potential further abuse. V1 said V3 and V4 were at fault for not reporting the abuse immediately. The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting-Illinois policy last revision dated 10/24/22 states under the Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations section: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an infectious outbreak, implement measures to prevent the spread of this infectious outbreak, and failed to have an i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an infectious outbreak, implement measures to prevent the spread of this infectious outbreak, and failed to have an infection control program in place to monitor and track infectious diseases at the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 166 residents residing at the facility. The Facility Data Sheet dated 8/29/2023 documents 166 residents reside at the facility. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/11/2023 at 12:37 PM after R1 tested positive for scabies and the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the spread. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 9/7/23. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9/7/23 at 9am. The surveyor confirmed by observation, record review and interview that the immediacy was removed on 9/12/2023, non-compliance remains at a Severity Level Two due to the need to evaluate the implementation of policies and procedures, audits, and quality assurance monitoring. Findings include: The Scabies Outbreak Report documents on 8/24/2023 R7-R41 were identified with rashes that were treated with Permethrin (medicated cream used to treat scabies) beginning 8/25/2023. On 9/1/2023 at 9:21 AM V5 (County Infectious Disease Investigator) stated the facility has been in continuous outbreak status for scabies since 5/11/2023 and the facility just reported a large number of new cases in the past week for which she provided the facility with recommendations in an email on 8/25/2023 to treat the outbreak. On 8/29/2023 at 9:30 AM V1 (Administrator) stated the corporate office reported to her there was an outbreak of rashes at the facility. V2 stated a whole house sweep was completed on 8/23/2023 and the facility identified several residents with rashes. V1 stated V6 (Medical Director) was at the facility to assess the rash outbreak on 8/24/2023 and provided orders to treat the rashes as suspected scabies. V1 confirmed staff were also identified with suspicious rashes. 1. On 9/1/2023 at 11:29 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R1 tested positive for scabies on 5/11/2023 and the facility policy is for roommates to be treated and isolated in the effected room and if there is an adjoining bathroom, the residents in that room are also treated and isolated. V2 confirmed R1's room had an adjoining bathroom so the residents in the adjoining room were also to be treated. R1's scabies scraping lab report, resulted 5/11/2023, shows R1 positive for scabies. R1's Physician Progress Note, dated 5/5/2023, documents R1 with a scattered red itchy red rash noted from head to toe of his body. R1's Order Recap Report dated 5/1-6/30/2023 does not document R1 being placed in contact isolation. R1- R3's Census List Report dated 9/5/2023 shows R1 residing in the same room as R2 and R3. Census List Report dated 9/5/2023 shows R4 and R5 residing in the adjoining room with a shared bathroom. R2-R5's Order Recap Report dated 5/1-6/30/2023 does not show R2-R5 receiving prophylactic treatment or being placed in isolation. 2. On 8/29/2023 12:39 PM, R7 stated he was hospitalized Father's Day weekend for pain in his foot and during this hospitalization he was diagnosed and treated for scabies. R7 stated he had a rash for approximately 2 months before being hospitalized in June. R7 further stated he was treated again a few days ago and his rash is now gone. R7's scabies scraping lab reports, dated 5/10/2023 and 6/1/2023, shows R7 negative for scabies. R7's Order Recap Report dated 5/1-6/30/2023 documents R7 with orders on 5/26/2023 for Mupirocin twice per day and Doxycycline for 5 days for a rash and Impetigo. R7's Physician Progress Notes dated 5/5/2023 documents R7 with an itchy rash to right upper and bilateral lower extremities. R7's Progress Note dated 6/1/2023 documents R7 with a rash to his arms, abdomen, and legs. R7's Physician Progress Note dated 6/7/2023 documents R7 with a rash to his body and a diagnosis of impetigo was made. R7's Progress Notes dated 6/18/2023 shows R7 sent to the hospital and admitted with a diagnosis of cellulitis. R7's Physician Note dated 6/23/2023 shows R7 diagnosed for scabies during his hospital admission. The Scabies Outbreak Report documents R7 with a rash to his arms, legs, and abdomen, identified on 8/24/2023, and treated for scabies on 8/25/2023. R7's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) report dated 7/21/2023 documents R7 as cognitively intact. 3. On 8/29/2023 at 12:25 PM R6 stated approximately a month ago he was treated for a rash and itching. R6's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 shows R6 with orders dated 6/30/2023 for Diphenhydramine for 3 days to treat a rash, and Hydrocortisone 6/30-8/10/2023. R6's Practitioner Visit Note dated 6/30/2023 documents R6 with a rash and itching. R6's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 shows R6 treated for scabies on 7/28/2023 and 8/5/2023. The Scabies Outbreak Report documents R6 with a rash to his arms, legs, and abdomen, identified and diagnosed as scabies on 7/27/2023 per a positive skin scraping. R6's BIMS report dated 8/22/2023 documents R6 as cognitively intact. 4. On 8/31/2023 at 11:10 AM R11 had scratches and scabs to both her upper arms. On 9/5/2023 at 9:50 AM a skin assessment completed with V7 showed R11's rash improving. R11's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 documents R10 with orders on 6/12/2023 for Clotrimazole External Cream to her left-hand rash for 10 days, 6/14 and 21/2023 for Promethean Cream, 6/17/2023 with Doxycycline Monohydrate for a skin infection, and Clotrimazole External Cream for a rash 6/22-7/6/2023. R11's Initial Wound Evaluation and Summary Report dated 6/14/2023 documents R11's rash diagnosed as scabies and a reassessment on 6/21/2023 shows R11's rash as resolving. R11's scabies scraping lab report, dated 6/14/2023, shows R11 negative for scabies. On 8/31/2023 at 11 AM V7 stated she noted R11 would screaming out frequently during the day when she had the rash on her hands which is not her usual behavior. On 9/5/2023 at 3:05 PM V23 (Wound Physician) stated she does not usually see residents for skin rashes but did assess R11 as a favor. V23 stated she was suspicious the rash could be scabies and her protocol are if is suspicious, she treats. 5. On 8/31/2023 at 10:50 AM R8 stated, It (rash) is starting to go away. They are finally treating me right. Not sure what they treated me with before. R8 stated the rash is all over and lifted his shirt showing a visible rash to his arms and chest-multiple areas of this rash showed healing scratches and scabbed lesions. R8 stated, I had it a long time .I have been suffering for a long time. I scratch and bleed, I am up all night, and I was not getting any relief. On 9/5/2023 at 9:25 AM a skin assessment completed with V7 showed R8's rash resolving. R8 stated, he is feeling a lot better. R8's Physician Progress Notes dated 4/28, 5/8, 5/16, 6/6, and 8/3/2023 document R8 with itching and rashes to his body. R8's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 documents R8 with orders 6/2/2023 for Triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream twice a day through 8/3/2023 for itching and Hydroxyzine at bedtime for itching (order continues). R8's scabies scraping lab report, dated 4/10/2023, shows R8 negative for scabies. 9/6/2023 6:59 AM V24 (Night Nurse) stated he was not sleeping well because of the itching from his rash but after the Hydroxyzine was ordered that did help. Since he was treated with Promethean he is improving. R8's BIMS dated 7/4/2023 documents R8 as cognitively intact. 6. On 8/31/2023 at 10:56 AM R9 stated, I have been scratching the (heck) out of them. R9 stated he has been scratching at his itchy rash for a couple of months, and since a cream was applied a few days ago it is now going away. R9 exposed his arms which had a resolving red rash and scratches to both his arms. On 9/5/2023 at 9:30 AM a skin assessment completed with V7 showed R9's rash resolving. R9 stated, his rash is much better. R9's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 documents R9 with an ongoing order dated 6/23/2023 for Triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream for itching twice daily. R9's Weekly Skin Observation Notes dated 7/5/2023 documents R9 with healing scabs to shoulder from scratching, 8/9/2023 with a rash to back and chest and scabs to lower extremities. R9's Physician Progress Notes dated 8/1, 18 and 21/2023 document R9 with a rash to his body. R9's scabies scraping lab report, dated 7/31/2023, shows R9 negative for scabies. R9's BIMS dated 8/5/2023 documents R9 with moderate cognitive impairments. 7. On 8/31/2023 at 11:13 AM R12 was noted with scratches and a rash to his abdomen, entire right arm and from his left elbow up toward his shoulder. R12 was scratching at these areas stating he itches. On 9/5/2023 at 9:40 AM a skin assessment completed with V7 showed R12's rash was resolving but he was continuing to itch. R12's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 documents R12 with orders dated 6/30/2023 for Hydrocortisone Cream to abdomen, chest, and left trunk for 10 days and Diphenhydramine for 3 days for itching, 7/18/2023 for Hydrocortisone Cream to abdomen, chest, and left truck for 10 days for itching. Another order on 8/2/2023 documents Hydrocortisone to abdomen, chest, arms for severe itching and rashes related to restlessness and agitation. An order 8/18/2023 documents R11 to receive Diphenhydramine at bedtime and Loratadine every morning for a rash. R12's Progress Notes dated 6/30-8/23/2023 do not document any assessments of R12's rash. 9/6/2023 6:59 AM V24 (Night Nurse) stated R12 had the worst time sleeping because of itching, .I felt sorry for him. He would be up at night unable to sleep because of the scratching . V24 stated he is much better and sleeping again. R12's BIMS dated 8/8/2023 documents R9 as severely cognitive impaired. 8. On 8/29/2023 at 12:21 PM R10 laid in bed scratching at her arms which had scabbed scratches in various stages of healing and open bleeding wounds up and down both of her upper arms and chest. On 9/5/2023 at 9:45 AM a skin assessment completed with V7 showed R10's rash to her arms almost gone and the rash to the chest improving. R10's Order Recap Report dated 7/1-9/5/2023 documents R10 with orders dated 7/22/2023 for Alclometasone Dipropionate External Cream for 7 days and Claritin daily (current order) for a rash, 8/18/2023 for Diphenhydramine and Loratadine for 5 days for a rash and 8/23/2023 for Alclometasone Dipropionate Cream for 7 days for a rash. R10's Progress Notes dated 7/22-8/23/2023 do not document assessments of R10's rash. 9. R29's Order Recap Report dated 6/1-9/5/2023 documents R29 with a current order dated 6/20/2023 for DermaCerin External Cream twice a day for itching to left abdominal area. R29's Progress Notes dated 6/20/2023 documents R29 with complaints of itching and a rash to her trunk. A note dated 7/10/2023 documents R29 with a rash and complaints of itching with no new orders. 10. R36's Order Recap Report dated 7/1-9/5/2023 documents R36 with orders dated 7/22/203 for Triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream for 7 days to a rash to his right underarm and face, and 8/8/2023 for Cephalexin Oral Capsule and Mupirocin (antibiotics) for 7 days for a rash. R36's Physician Progress Notes dated 7/12/2023 document R36 with a rash and on 8/7/2023 with itching and rash to his bilateral arms. 11. R35's Order Recap Report dated 7/1-9/5/2023 documents R35 with an order dated 7/22/2023 for Hydrocortisone to bilateral leg rash twice a day for 7 days. R35's Progress Notes dated 7/22-8/23/2023 do not document any assessments of R35's rash. 12. On 8/31/2023 at 10:05 AM R15 stated she had a rash to her arms and legs with itching for about a month. On 8/31/2023 at 10:10 AM R14 stated he had a rash to his legs with itching for about over a month. Both these residents reside in the behavior health area at the facility. On 8/31/2023 at 10:05 AM R20 stated he had a rash to his entire body with itching for about a month. R20 residents on the main resident living area. On 9/1/2023 at 12:54 PM, V7 (Nurse) stated rashes were consistently present after being identified for R9, R10, R12, and R35 and intermittent for R21 and R36. V7 stated if the resident ran out of their ordered treatment cream, she would place the resident on the physician list for renewal. V7 further stated, if she still had some treatment cream left, she would apply it as needed when the nursing assistants reported the rash or itching and confirmed she was applying these treatments, even if the order was not currently in place. On 8/29/2023 11:03 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the facility noted rashes in the building the 2nd week of July and did a sweep through the building between 7/11-13/2023, with the main focus on the dementia area. V2 confirmed direct care staff also reported rashes but continued working. On 8/29/2023 at 10:20 AM V3 (Acting Infection Control Preventionist) stated she started employment at the facility on 8/22/2023, on 8/23/2023 an in-service was completed with staff to ensure rashes were identified and reported; we in-service staff because the rashes were prevalent and noticeable. On 8/24/2023 she was notified by employees that they had rashes that they reported have been present anywhere from 10 days to 3 months. 8/29/202 11:19 AM V7 (Nurse) confirmed she is the nurse on the dementia area and is working on this date providing direct care to residents. V7 was wearing short sleeve shirt and had a rash visible to her arms, stating she also has the same rash behind her knees, abdomen, and feet for approximately 1- 2 months. V7 stated she reported this rash to V8 (Wound Care Nurse) at the time she noticed it. V7 stated after V6 (Medical Director) came and assessed the residents on 8/24/2023, V4 (Quality Assurance Nurse) instructed staff to apply Promethean cream, but she has not because the cream was not available on 8/24/2023, on 8/25/2023 she was off, there was nobody present at the facility on 8/26-27/2023 to issue her the Promethean cream and still has not yet received it as of the time of this interview. V7 stated the facility did not tell her she could not work with her rash and has worked 8/26, 27, and 29/2023 without being treated. V7 stated she primarily works on the dementia area and first noted R11 with a rash approximately 2 months prior and reported R10 currently has the worst rash. V7 further stated R11, R29 and R35 have been placed on the physician list for a few weeks related to their rashes which are not resolving. On 8/29/2023 at 11:51 V10 (Nursing Assistant) confirmed she is primarily assigned to the dementia area and is working on this date providing direct care to residents. V10 was wearing short sleeve shirt and had a rash visible to her arms stating she also had the same rash to her legs and abdomen. V10 stated her primary assignment is the dementia area and she has not been treated because they told her they were out of Promethean and needed to order more; V10 was off 8/25-28/2023. V10 stated she reported her rash to a nurse a while back but does not remember who. V10 stated there was a facility meeting approximately 8 weeks ago with V2 and V4 and during this meeting the staff were asked to put up hand if they had a rash which multiple staff did. V10 stated some residents have had a rash for 2-3 months and some have creams ordered which are being applied by nurses. V10 stated she has reported and observed rashes to R8, R9 and R41. On 8/29/2023 at 12:10 PM V9 (Nursing Assistant) confirmed she is a nursing assistant assigned to work on the dementia area and is providing direct care to residents on this date. V9 had on a short sleeved and had a visible rash to her hands but stated she also has a rash to her stomach, feet, and back for approximately 2 months. V9 stated she treated herself 3 weeks ago with a bottle of Promethean provided by V8 (Former Wound Nurse) in the past but has not received treatment since. V9 stated she has reported these rashes multiple times to multiple people, including V2, V4 and the regular floor nurses. V9 stated she has never been taken off work. V9 stated the first resident she noted with a rash was R8 about 3 months ago, then after that she saw R11. On 8/31/2023 at 11:20 AM V9 stated she worked 8/30/2023 until approximately 8:30 AM when they sent her home instructing her to treat her rash and report back to work 8/31/2023. V9 said she on occasion will work on other units in the facility. On 8/29/2023 11:30 AM V11 (Nursing Assistant) confirmed she is a nursing assistant assigned to work on the dementia area and is providing direct care to residents on this date. V11 was wearing short sleeves and had a visible rash to her arms, and reported she also has the rash to her wrists, stomach, and underarms. V11 stated R9 and R41, who reside in the same bedroom, had rashes approximately 1 month after her return from medical leave. V11 stated she reported the resident rashes which was reported to V7 who would apply treatments, but the rashes were not resolving. V11 stated on 8/22/2023 she noted rashes to R9, R36, R40 and R12 while providing care. V11 stated she told V4 on 8/24/2023 that she had a rash, and he did not remove her from directly providing care to the residents but offered her to see the company workers compensation nurse. V11 stated she treated herself with Promethean cream she purchased herself on 8/25/2023 after working her shift. On 9/5/2023 12:37 PM V1 confirmed V11 returned from medical leave on 9/5/2023. On 8/30/2023 at 1:10 PM V14 (Nursing Assistant) stated she primarily works in the dementia area and routinely takes care of R8, R11, R29, and R10 who all have had rashes for the past 2 months. V14 stated she will occasionally work on other units in the facility. V14 had a rash visible to her arms and stated she is providing direct care to residents on the dementia area on this date. V14 stated she has reported her ongoing rash to V1, V2, V4, V7, V8, and V15 (Wound Care Nurse). V14 stated, V15 scraped her for scabies in June and it came back negative and gave her Promethean cream. V14 stated she also worked 8/28/2023 and has not treated or been removed from resident contact. On 8/29/2023 at 12:23 PM V12 (Nursing Assistant) stated she has been employed at the facility for 3 weeks. V12 stated she worked 8/24, 8/25, and 8/28/2023 and was first treated after work on 8/28/2023 after she went to the emergency room. V12 stated she reported her rash to her stomach, arms, and chest to the nurses and V4 last week when first noted it and was not told to remain off work. On 8/31/2023 at 11:00 AM V28 (Agency Nursing Assistant) stated he is agency and works at other facilities, only working at this facility a several days per month. V28 stated when he works, he is scheduled in all the different areas within the facility. V28 showed a visible rash to both his forearms stating it stared on 8/28/2023. He stated when he arrived to work on 8/29/2023 he was sent home and has since been treated. On 8/29/2023 at 1:07 PM V13 (Nursing Assistant) stated she started at the facility on August 1, 2023, and trained and worked throughout the facility. V13 stated she has a rash for a week and a half and received treatment outside of the facility on 8/24/2023. V13 stated when she started there were multiple residents in the facility with rashes, but she can only remember, R9 and R12 had rashes while she cared for them. The Daily Staffing Schedules show on 8/22/2023 V13 worked the main residential unit, 8/25 and 28/2023 working the dementia unit and 8/29/2023 working the regular unit but escorted a R36 to an appointment in the community. On 9/1/2023 at 1:55 PM V25 (Restorative Nursing Assistant) stated she had a rash which she did not report to the facility and treated herself on 8/21/2023 with Promethean cream the facility provided her last year. V25 stated her rash resolved after she treated herself. V25 confirmed she provides care to residents throughout the facility. On 8/31/2023 at 11:35 AM V20 (Human Resources) stated a couple of months ago there was a staff meeting and some staff, including V10 and V14, reported they had rashes. An in-service sheet dated 7/14/2023 document V10 and V14 attended this meeting. On 8/31/2023 at 11:48 AM V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she has been employed at the facility since October 2022. V2 stated she did not notify or involve V6 (Medical Director) of the outbreak of employee and resident rashes until their corporate office contacted the facility. V2 stated she was unaware a negative skin scraping did not necessarily indicate a resident did not have a scabies infestation. V2 stated she has an ongoing argument with wound care nurses as to who should track and monitor rashes, stating the wound care nurses state they do not track or monitor rashes. V2 stated currently there is no specific facility protocol to track and monitor rashes but the nurses and herself are responsible for tracking, monitoring, and reporting these rashes. V2 confirmed there was no facility infection control surveillance being completed at the facility prior to June 2023 to monitor resident infections and outbreaks, except for Covid, and no employee tracking at all. V2 stated the employees did report itching and rashes in July and the staff affected were instructed to go through their dermatologist or they were informed they could see the facility workers compensation nurse. No employees were removed from direct resident care. V2 stated she had no direction, and she was doing the best she could. V2 stated she has since become aware V8 had provided some employees with cream to treat scabies while he was employed at the facility. The Employee Rash Survey provided 9/6/2023 at 9:04 AM additionally documents V26-34 (Nursing Assistants) and V35 (Nurse) with rashes. The Monthly Infection Log was provided on 8/31/2023 for the months June-August 2023 for residents. No rashes which were identified between June-August were present on these logs and no logs were provided for employees. The facilities Daily Staffing Schedules showed on 8/25/2023 V11, V12 and V14 worked at the facility, on 8/26 and 27/2023 V7 worked on 8/28/2023 V7, V12, and V14 worked, and on 8/29/2023 V7, V9, V10 and V14 worked. The Daily Staffing Schedules show V34 (Nursing Assistant) worked the main residential unit on 8/23/2023, the dementia area on 8/25 and 8/28/2023; V33 (Nursing Assistant) worked the behavior health unit on 8/22 and 8/24/2023 and the dementia area on 8/26-27/2023. On 9/1/2023 1:29 PM V6 (Medical Director) stated he was at the facility to assess the residents last week. V6 stated the rashes he saw appeared to be an infectious rash and he is treating those rashes as suspicious for scabies. V6 stated the big picture is to prevent this from happening again and he has discussed protocol going forward so an outbreak at this level can be prevented in the future. V6 stated he was not aware of the number of resident and employee rashes further stating he does expect the facility to let him know, follow the protocol, and monitor and report to the physicians as they should. V6 stated employees with rashes need to be assessed to determine if it is infectious and removed from work if infectious to prevent spreading. V6 confirmed scabies is worse at night and if the scraping is negative, it does not rule out scabies as the cause of the rash. V6 confirmed delay in treatment can cause spread of the rash and residents experiencing symptoms, but each resident needs to be assessed and evaluated individually. On 9/5/2023 at 11:56 AM V21 (Local Health Department Epidemiologist) stated any new onset rash that appears to be spreading or affecting more than one resident should be suspected as possibly contagious and investigated to determine the diagnosis and medically investigated to determine if it is infectious. Until the rash can be ruled out as not infectious, residents should be isolated, and employees should not provide direct care. V21 stated the County Health Department expects the facility to follow Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, monitor their infectious diseases at the facilities, report their outbreaks, and follow protocols to prevent outbreaks. V21 stated failure to contain the spread is up to the facility to monitor and work with their Medical Director to determine the cause of the rash, establish a treatment plan, and implement of measures to prevent the spread. V21 confirmed if a scraping resulted as negative that does not mean the resident does not have scabies, stating it is up to the facility and the Medical Director to diagnose and treat accordingly. V21 confirmed if treated for scabies and symptoms resolve, the rash is likely from scabies, particularly if there have been recent exposures. V21 confirmed, if an affected person is treated and the rash resolves, and then re-occurs, there is likelihood they were re-exposed again and re-infected. V21 stated untreated scabies can lead to further spread within the facility, in the community and to the family of employees. V21 stated if a person with scabies goes untreated, they will continue with symptoms, including an itching rash, often more prevalent at night, and potential infection of the wounds from scratching. V21 stated, it is negligent for the facilities not to take the proper care to prevent the spread and to follow CDC guidelines and lack of surveillance and delay of treatment causes ongoing transmittal and spread. Email correspondence dated 8/24/2023 at 4 PM between V1 and V5 includes direction from V5 that all residents and employees (symptomatic and asymptomatic) should be treated on the same day. This email includes an attached document titled, Management of Scabies in Illinois Healthcare and Residential Facilities. This document includes guidance including, healthcare workers should immediately report any signs of infestation to themselves or residents to the infection control practitioner and should have process in place to identify and controlling a scabies outbreak. Signs and symptoms include rash to the skin which may vary greatly in appearance according to pre-existing skin conditions and the site, and secondary bacterial infections may develop because of intense scratching caused by the mites. The Scabies Control policy dated 2/15/2018 documents scabies is a highly communicable disease of the skin caused by the itch mite. The purpose is to eliminate and treated irritated skin areas and prevent the spread of infection. Signs include intense itching and eruptions of burrows which is transmitted by physical contact. The physician is to be notified promptly upon identification and the physician will provide an examination. Treatment for residents infected or being considered for prophylactic treatment will be provided and all affected individuals will be completed at the same time. Contact isolation will be initiated until after initial treatment. The Infection Surveillance, Tracking and Reporting policy dated 2/14/2018 documents the purpose is to identify, monitor, track and report infections and monitor adherence to infection control practices. Infection tracking includes but is not limited to completing infection tracking logs for all residents with an infection, monitor for trends by unit/location, clusters of the same infection, outbreaks and employee illnesses, track resident and staff outbreaks and complete outbreak line-listing report/investigation. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 5/11/2023 was removed on 9/12/2023 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: 1. House wide skin checks of residents was completed by nursing staff on 8/23/23. Residents identified with skin rashes were given treatment of Permethrin cream 5% and placed on contact precautions until treatment was completed by nurses. All residents identified with skin rashes received second treatments by nursing staff. Exposed residents (asymptomatic) were educated and treated prophylactically with Permethrin cream 5% and placed on contact precautions until treatment was completed by nursing staff. 2. All staff were checked and or interviewed for any signs and symptoms of any skin rashes by Nursing staff. All staff were provided with Permethrin cream 5% and completed treatment overseen by Infection Preventionist. 3. All staff were in-serviced regarding guidance on Infection Control: Identification of outbreaks and implementation of measures to prevent the spread once outbreak occurs, education of general communicable diseases, contact precautions, and prevention of transmission of any communicable disease and prevent further spread. Any new employees, agency staff and any staff on vacation shall receive in-service prior to working on the unit. 4. Skin checks to be completed for all new resident admissions upon arrival at the facility and will be performed by nursing staff to be monitored by Infection Preventionist (IP). 5. New hire staff will complete a self-skin assessment questionnaire during first day of orientation. 6. Facility has implemented an infection surveillance procedure to monitor and track outbreaks for both residents and employee infection and identify outbreaks. 7. Call off log will be monitored by IP and Administrator daily to identify staff with potential infectious illness. Any staff identified with a rash will not be able to return to work without proper medical clearance to be monitored by Human Resources and IP. 8. Resident and employee skin checks will continue weekly until outbreak ends. 9. Audits will be conducted weekly to ensure that skin checks are completed to be overseen by IP and Administrator. 10. Any new occurrences of rash will be assessed by nurse, findings will be reported to Director of Nursing, or IP, proper notification to family and proper physician notification, in house skin assessment by MD/NP for appropriate treatments and interventions. 11. Currently new hired IP to complete CDC infection control training. 12. Emergency Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) with Medical Director was done and action plan will be reviewed monthly during QAPI meeting thereafter overseen by Administrator and IP nurse.
Jan 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to provide monthly drug regimen review for 1 resident (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to provide monthly drug regimen review for 1 resident (R11) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 34. On 01/19/23 at 01:28 PM a record review of R11 showed that she is a [AGE] year old female with impaired cognition (12/5/22 Minimum Data Set), and diagnoses including delusional disorders, major depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, essential hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, long term use of anticoagulants, personal history of diseases of the circulatory system, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R11 review of medications included clonazepam 0.5 milligrams by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, Eliquis 5 milligrams by mouth two times a day for heart disease, lidocaine pain relief 4% patch one time a day for pain, meclizine HCL 25 milligrams one tablet by mouth two times a day for dizziness/vertigo, aspirin 81 milligrams by mouth one time a day, sertraline 100 milligrams one time a day for depression. No documents were found for R11's monthly drug regimen review. On 1/19/23 at 1:28pm V2 (Interim Director of Nursing) submitted 2 medication reviews for R11: one review for 10/17/22 and a second review for 4/5/22. V2 said that was all that was done for R11 for the year. During an interview of 1/19/23 at 308pm V2 confirmed that residents should have a medication review done every month by the pharmacist to ensure medications are the right dose and is needed. The facility's pharmacy medication regimen review policy dated 11/28/17 showed under Guidelines, The consultant pharmacist shall provide pharmaceutical care consultation including the medication regimen review at least once per calendar month of each resident residing in certified areas of a skilled long term care facility. The policy shows under procedure 1. the consultant pharmacist will review the medication regimen of each resident in sufficient detail to determine if any apparent irregularities defined by CMS as the use of medication that is inconsistent with accepted standards of practice for providing pharmaceutical services not supported by medical evidence and or that impedes or interferes with achieving the intended outcome of pharmaceutical services exists.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to maintain infection control practices while providing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to maintain infection control practices while providing care to 3 residents (R108, R454 and R126) who were reviewed for infection control in a sample of 34. 1. R454 is an [AGE] year-old female with severe cognitive impairment per MDS dated [DATE]. Record review on wound assessment dated [DATE] documented a stage 4 (4.14 x 2.82 x 1.2 centimeter) sacral wound. On 1/17/23 at 12:41 PM, the surveyor observed V3 (Registered Nurse) providing wound care to R454's sacral wound. V3 removed the soiled dressing with drainage, cleaned the wound with wound cleanser and patted the wound dry. V3 did not wash hands or sanitize his hands after removing the old dressing with drainage. V3 continued and irrigated the wound with a topical antiseptic solution (Dakin) and then applied calcium alginate to the wound bed and covered it with a foam dressing without changing gloves and washing his hands after removing the soiled old dressing. On 1/17/23 at 12:52 PM, V3 stated, I hand sanitized before I start with wound care. I forgot to hand sanitize after I removed the soiled old dressing. On 1/17/23 at 1:30 PM, V2 (Interim Director of Nursing) stated that V3 was supposed to change his gloves and wash his hands after removing the old soiled dressing. 2 On 01/19/23 at 10:07 AM R108 was observed in his bed with a dressing to his right big toe. V8 (Nurse) was providing wound care to R108. V8 cleaned her hands, donned gloves, removed the dirty bandage, doffed her gloves, donned new gloves (didn't clean her hands), cleaned R108's wound, picked up a sterile dressing and opened it, picked up R108 tube of medication (Hydrogel), then placed both items back down and then removed gloves, donned new gloves (did not clean hands again), then applied ointment to toe. V8 then doffed her dirty gloves and donned new gloves (again not cleaning hands before donning clean hands). V8 then applied an adhesive dressing to R108's right big toe and dated the dressing, doffed the dirty gloves (did not clean dirty hands again) and then she picked up the garbage bag and tied the bag, and then cleaned her hands. The facility presented guidelines on the wound care document: Remove soiled dressing and soiled gloves and place them in a plastic trash bag. Wash hands, or if hands are not visibly soiled, use alcohol-based hand gel to decontaminate the hands. The facilities hand hygiene policy dated 11/28/2012 showed under definition hand hygiene means cleaning your hands by using either hand washing, washing hands with soap and water, aseptic hand wash or antiseptic hand rub. The policy shows hand hygiene needs to be performed before and after direct contact with patients intact skin, after contact with blood bodily fluids or excretions, after contact with inanimate objects including medical equipment, if hands will be moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site, during patient care, after glove removal, and after using restroom. 3. On 01/19/23 at 10:44 AM V10 (Nurse) was checking R126's blood glucose levels and he wiped the machine with bleach wipes before performing the blood glucose check, then after checking R126's blood glucose level V10 picked up the machine and placed it on the medication cart and unlocked the medication cart, all with his dirty gloved hands. V10 then removed his gloves, (did not clean his hands or don new gloves), and then wiped the glucose machine down with 1 wipe, he did not wrap the machine with a wipe. V10 then placed the machine back into the medication cart. V10 then started touching the keys on the tablet on the medication cart with his dirty uncleaned hands. V10 then opened the medication cart and picked up R126's bag with his insulin pen (Humalog 100 unit/ml), took pen out of the bag, put a needle on the pen, drew up 1 unit of Humalog, donned gloves (did not clean hands), closed the drawer to the medication cart, then open the drawer back up and got an alcohol wipe from the drawer, went into R126's room, wiped R126's left arm, administer the insulin to R126, then put the insulin pen back in the bag and put the bag back in the drawer of the medication cart (all of this was done with uncleaned hands). V10 then removed his gloves and cleaned his hands. V10 then began preparing to give R126 his medication and nutritional feedings through his G-tube (Gastric tube). V10 with gloved hands crushed R126's medication (Midodrine 5mg), then V10, while bag of crushed medication was still in crusher, started touching/typing on the tablet on the medication cart, V10 then picked up the bag with medication in it, and put it in a medication cup with his dirty gloved hands. Then V10 picked up a bagged container that contain a syringe, (still with dirty gloved hands) and went into R126's bathroom and put water into the container. V10 washed his hands while in the bathroom, came back to the medication cart and put 30cc of water into the medication cup with the crushed medication in it. V10 then went into R126's room, pulled the curtain, and then donned gloves (did not clean his hands), picked up R126's G-tube to check for residual, flushed the tube with 30cc of water, then left the room with the dirty uncleaned hands, returned to the medication cart, picked up a opened bottle of Glucerna and put 400 cc of it into the container, still with dirty uncleaned hands. Then V10 doffed and cleaned his hands. V10 then returned to R126's room with clean, gloved hands, pulled the privacy curtain, and then picked up R126's G-tube and started to administer R126's medication, stopped and turned on the overhead light, then returned to administering the medication, then he started to administer the 400 cc of nutritional supplement (Glucerna), all of this was done with dirty gloved hands. V10 then left R126's room, went to the medication cart picked up a cup and poured the remainder of the Glucerna into the cup (with the dirty gloved uncleaned hands). V10 then returned to R126's room and gave the remainder of the Glucerna to R126. V10, still with dirty gloved hands, removed the towels from R126's abdomen, picked up the container and cup, and turned off the overhead light, all with his dirty gloved hands. On 1/19 at 308pm V2 (Interim Director of Nursing) said the nurse should always wrap the blood glucose machine with a bleach wipe for 3 mins. before and after use to kill all the germs and bacteria. V2 said the nurse should clean hands and doff clean gloved before treatments or administering medications or nutritional feeding. V2 said nurses are to doff gloves, clean hands, and then don new gloves after touching a dirty surface or when hands become dirty. V2 said this needs to be done because of infection control, if not it can cause cross contamination. V2 said after cleaning a wound the nurse should doff dirty gloves clean her hands and don clean gloves because of infection control. V2 said the nurse should have doffed her dirty gloves and cleaned her hands before tying the garbage bag because of infection control and cross contamination. The manufacturer's instructions on how to clean the blood glucose machine showed under maintenance, to use a wrap, removed from container and follow product label instructions to disinfect the meter. The facilities bleach wipes container directions show that the machine needs to be wrapped with the wipe and the white must be remained in contact for three minutes to disinfect.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by failing to repair headb...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by failing to repair headboards and doors in residents rooms. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R25, R69, R99, and R454) reviewed for safe environment. Findings include: On 1/17/23 at 12:41 PM, during wound care observation, the surveyor observed a loose and shaky headboard with R454. On 1/17/23 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor observed the room [ROOM NUMBER] (R25, R69, and R99) entry door with the bottom panel peeling off and protruding outward. On 1/18/23 at 10:30 AM, V4 (Maintenance Director) stated, I wasn't notified on room door bottom panel peeling off and on loose/shaky headboard for R454. There is a maintenance log available, and anybody can enter the maintenance issues. There was no entry in the logbook to alert me of the maintenance issues. On 1/19/23 at 10:50 AM, V4 added, We fixed the door panel yesterday, but it came off again. The protruding door panel and loose/shaky bed headboard can injure residents. The facility presented Preventative Maintenance and Inspection dated 1/7/23 document: Each resident room and common area will be inspected and documented monthly. Replacement and repair of all furnishings and equipment be completed as soon as possible.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive meals in a timely manner and at the required temperatures that affect palatability. This applies to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive meals in a timely manner and at the required temperatures that affect palatability. This applies to R12, R76, R140, R144 and 73 of 78 residents reviewed for temperatures and timeliness of food delivery in the sample of 34 The findings include: 1. Facility Resident Census and Condition of Residents (Form CMS--Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services--672), dated 1/18/23, documents the total census was 78 residents. V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated there were 5 residents with gastrostomy tube feeding. On 1/17/23 at 10:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, The residents are not eating in the main dining rooms due to Covid outbreak status. Instead, we are having the residents eat in their rooms. On 1/18/23 at 2:00 PM, the food trays were delivered in an uncovered cart to East Unit. V5 (Dietary Manager) stated, We are running behind. This unit should have been served at 1:30pm. We are short staffed. I only have two dietary aides and one cook. Ideally, one more aide would be helpful. The taco meal consisted of a lot of ingredients like onions, lettuce, tomatoes, which takes a long time to cut. On 1/18/23 at 2:16pm, after delivering the last tray to the last resident, V5 checked the temperature of the food items on the test tray using a digital thermometer. The temperature readings were as follows: rice-138 degrees F (Fahrenheit), refried beans-126 F, and beef in a tortilla-114 F. V5 stated the temperature of the rice was ok, but the refried beans and the beef in the tortilla should be at least 135 degrees F. On 1/18/23 at 2:18pm, V5 stated that with the uncovered tray carts, it makes it difficult to keep trays warm while staff is passing out trays. V5 stated he will order thicker picker upper plastic covers for the carts. V5 stated that he did purchase a new open/uncovered tray, but it doesn't do any good. V5 said he put in a quote for an insulated/covered tray cart and is waiting for management to approve it. On 1/18/23 at 2:25pm, V1 stated that she's waiting for corporate to approve the insulated cart quote. Resident Council meeting minutes document the following: 7/12/21-Corndog that was served was hard and cold. All foods are tempted before and during serving to appropriate temperatures. 1/31/22-Dietary: Food is alwasy cold. Do staff temp the food before sending food out? Reply: Food is always temped before it goes out. Residents have a great chance of having a hot tray if they attend meals in the dining room. If trays are not warm enough for residents liking, they can warm them up using the microwave in the dining room. R12, R17, R140 and R144 are all cognitively intact and confirmed during interviews of January 17, 2023 that the food is served cold. Facility's policy Serving Temperatures for Hot and Cold Foods documents that foods will be served at the following temperatures to ensure a safe and appetizing dining experience. The minimum serving temperatures do not reflect the required temperatures needed for preparation, cooking or cooling of foods. These are minimum serving/holding temperatures and may vary based on state regulations. Meat-135 degrees F (Fahrenheit) to 170 F. Vegetables-135F to 170F.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to preven...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to prevent house flies and gnats in resident rooms and facility hallways. This applies to all 154 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/17/23 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] with two large house flies chasing R59. R59 stated to the surveyor that those were so annoying. On 1/17/23 at 12:10 PM, house flies were observed in the hallway in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. R25 in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated, Sometimes those follow me onto the toilet. On 01/19/23 at 10:01 AM, during wound care observation with V6 (nurse), observed gnats and house flies in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 01/17/23 at 12:01 PM, a large gnat flew out of R12, R47, and R144's room when the door was opened. On 01/18/23 at 10:24 AM, while observing V11 passing residents medications, a large gnat was observed flying around the medication cart. On 1/18/23 at 10:30 AM, V4 (Maintenance Director) stated, Staff can enter the pest control log when they find out about issues with house flies or other pests. I wasn't aware of flies as there were no entries with the pest control log. Residents should have a pest-free environment. The facility presented the Pest Control policy revised on 9/1/22 document: 3. The pest control program will be conducted on a regular and as-needed base 5. Employees are instructed to promptly report all pest observations to their department heads.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $307,869 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 34 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $307,869 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Aperion Care Wilmington's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns APERION CARE WILMINGTON an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Aperion Care Wilmington Staffed?

CMS rates APERION CARE WILMINGTON's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Aperion Care Wilmington?

State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at APERION CARE WILMINGTON during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 29 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Aperion Care Wilmington?

APERION CARE WILMINGTON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by APERION CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 171 certified beds and approximately 164 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WILMINGTON, Illinois.

How Does Aperion Care Wilmington Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, APERION CARE WILMINGTON's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Aperion Care Wilmington?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Aperion Care Wilmington Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, APERION CARE WILMINGTON has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Aperion Care Wilmington Stick Around?

Staff turnover at APERION CARE WILMINGTON is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Aperion Care Wilmington Ever Fined?

APERION CARE WILMINGTON has been fined $307,869 across 5 penalty actions. This is 8.5x the Illinois average of $36,158. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Aperion Care Wilmington on Any Federal Watch List?

APERION CARE WILMINGTON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.