BRIA OF WOODRIVER

393 EDWARDSVILLE ROAD, WOOD RIVER, IL 62095 (618) 259-4111
For profit - Limited Liability company 106 Beds BRIA HEALTH SERVICES Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#476 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

BRIA OF WOODRIVER has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care and operations. With a state ranking of #476 out of 665, they are in the bottom half of nursing homes in Illinois, and only rank #10 out of 17 in Madison County, suggesting limited local options for better care. The facility is reportedly improving, as the number of issues decreased from 22 in 2024 to 13 in 2025, but it is still concerning given the history of critical incidents. Staffing is a weakness, rated at 2 out of 5 stars with a high turnover rate of 78%, which is significantly above the state average of 46%. Specific incidents include a failure to provide proper tracheostomy care, resulting in two residents' deaths and inadequate CPR being performed, highlighting serious deficiencies in staff training and emergency response. Overall, while there are signs of improvement, families should be aware of the facility's troubling history and ongoing challenges.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#476/665
Bottom 29%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
22 → 13 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
78% turnover. Very high, 30 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
$110,456 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
58 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 22 issues
2025: 13 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 78%

32pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $110,456

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: BRIA HEALTH SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is very high (78%)

30 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 58 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening 12 actual harm
Oct 2025 4 deficiencies 4 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) according to accepted p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) according to accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R1) reviewed for CPR in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 and R2 not receiving adequate respiratory ventilation when staff did not provide rescue breathing via R1 and R2's primary airway of tracheostomy. R1 and R2 both died while in the Facility, and death certificates are pending. This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 6:40 PM when R1 was found unresponsive, and CPR was not performed in accordance with professional standards. V1 and V2 were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 11:37 AM. The surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan.Findings include:1-R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and tracheostomy status. R1's MDS dated [DATE] documented R1 was cognitively intact and independent with mobility.R1's Physician Orders do not document supplemental oxygen orders.R1's Care Plan initiated [DATE] documented R1 was a full code.R1's Progress Note by V34, Registered Nurse (RN), on [DATE] at 10:27 PM documents V11, Certified Nursing Assistant, informed V34 that the R1 appeared blue and to come assess him. Staff initiated CPR and continued until Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived. EMS continued resuscitation efforts until (Local Hospital) cleared them to call time of death at 7:14 PM.On [DATE] at 1:15 PM, V34 stated we tried to do CPR for R1 over his tracheostomy, but we did not have the correct tubing to attach it, so we just tried to cover the tracheostomy with a gloved hand and attempted bagging (placing Bag Valve Mask, BVM) over his mouth. On [DATE] at 1:45 PM, V11 stated staff did not provide any ventilation for R1 during CPR and only did chest compressions. There were multiple (BVM) bags in the room, but none would fit over his tracheostomy. The one on the crash cart did not work either, so they continued with compressions, but did not provide any ventilation during the resuscitation.2-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for mobility, and received high concentration oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care.R2's Physician Order dated [DATE] documented R2 was a full code.R2's Care Plan initiated [DATE] documents R2 is a full code and wishes will be honored.R2's Progress Note by V9, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated [DATE] at 6:00 PM documents, Aides were in room giving patient care when they grabbed nurse and alerted her that resident was unresponsive at 4:50pm, CPR started for 1q0 (10) minutes before EMTS (Emergency Medical Technicians) arrived and took over. EMT performed CPR until 5:30pm when they called timeof {sic} death.On [DATE] at 1:55 PM, V9 stated there were two CNAs whose names she was unable to recall in R2's room caring for him. V9 was standing outside in the hallway with the medication cart waiting for them to finish care so she could go in and give R2 his medications. V9 left for a break at 4:43 PM, and the CNAs let her know at that time R2 would probably need suctioning when they were finished. When V9 returned from break, EMS was in the Facility and had already stopped resuscitation efforts. On [DATE] at 12:43 PM, V8, CNA, stated she was working on another unit when a code was called on the 200 Hall. She ran to R2's room and could tell he was not breathing. V10, Registered Nurse (RN) started compressions, and V8 started bagging R2 by mouth. She was not aware the bag had to be on the tracheostomy and stated, I don't even know how to attach the thing. I have never bagged a trach before. I think that is something we need to be educated on. None of us in there knew. I even asked. (V10) gave me the oxygen and I just took the bag and went with the mouth because that's all I knew how to do. (V10) said she did not know how to attach it either. On [DATE] at 2:55 PM, V10 stated on [DATE] around 4:50 PM, a CNA whose name she cannot remember came and told her R2 was unresponsive. R2's nurse was on break at that time. R2 was a full code, and CPR was initiated. There was tube feeding coming out of R2's trach, so they just placed the respiratory bag over his face and turned the oxygen up. The (Local Fire Department) Incident Report dated [DATE] at 5:15 PM documents, FD (Fire Department) units arrived on scene and found staff bagging the patients mouth and performing CPR on the patient while he was still in bed. Staff states they were bagging the patients mouth and not his trach tube due to secretions coming from the tube while CPR was being performed. FD crew marked the patient was cold to the touch while attempting to find a femoral pulse, no pulse was found. FD crews moved the patient to the floor, continued CPR and ventilation. The BVM (Bag Valve Mask) was taken off the patients mouth, mask was removed, and the BVM was connected to the patients trach tube. Staff left the room and came back a few minutes later with paper work for the patient, showing the patients extensive medical history. The [NAME] and the defib pads were placed on the patient, showing an initial rhythm of asystole. FD crew gained IO access in the left tibial tuberosity. IO drew and flushed. First epi at 1723 (5:23 PM). ACLS protocols were followed with pulse checks every 2 minutes and Epi every 3-5. Initial end tidal reading was an 11. AMA crew arrived on scene and briefed on patient. Patient remained in asystole for the duration of the resuscitation attempt. AMA medic called medical control for directions. Medical control advised crews to terminate resuscitation efforts, per DM 153. FD gathered restock from the ambulance and returned to service.On [DATE] at 2:37 PM, V22, (Local Fire Department) Chief, stated when his staff arrived to the facility on [DATE], Facility staff were bagging R2 with the BVM over the naso-oral pharynx which is not the standard place for the BVM when a resident has a tracheostomy. The BVM should have been via tracheostomy. On [DATE] at 3:15 PM, V35, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated there is a bag that goes over the tracheostomy when you provide CPR. On [DATE] at 3:20 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated there is a bag that goes on the trach, and those BVMs should be at bedside. She was not previously informed of any issues with staff getting the BVMs on the tracheostomy. On [DATE] at 3:33 PM, V1, Administrator, stated standard CPR protocol should be followed for residents with tracheostomies, but the respiratory bag should go over the tracheostomy site or the residents would not be getting air. On [DATE] at 3:50 PM, V33, Medical Director, stated he would expect staff to know how to perform CPR on residents with tracheostomies and would expect the Facility to have the necessary equipment and supplies for both maintenance and emergent situations. The Facility's Tracheostomy Care Policy reviewed 10/2024 documents, It is the policy of this facility that residents with tracheostomies receive care to maintain a patent airway.The Facility's Code Blue Policy reviewed 10/2024 documents, Breathing: provide 2 breaths via ambu or manually if ambu is not available. Continue CPR per BLS guidelines until EMS arrives and takes over CPR.The Facility provided CPR Certificates for Nursing Staff which document V19, V54, and V55, CNAs, did not have CPR certification from the American Red Cross or American Heart Association with hands on, in person training.The Facility's CPR Certification Policy revised [DATE] documents, Staff will have CPR certification from the American Red Cross or the American Heart Association The CPR Certification will be the CPR/BLS for Healthcare Providers level and include in-person training, hands on training.The Immediate Jeopardy and deficiency practice that began on [DATE] was corrected/removed on [DATE] after the Facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance: Clinical and agency staff were inserviced on performing CPR on residents with tracheostomies, CPR Policy was reviewed, CPR equipment was verified as available in the Facility, CPR audits were initiated, and QAPI Meeting was held. The abatement was validated by review of CPR policy and audits, observation of CPR/tracheostomy equipment and supplies, review of purchase orders for equipment and supplies, and interviews from V2, V6, V10, V13, V24, V25, V34, V39, V42, V44, V45, V47, V49, V51, V52, and V53.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure changes in condition were reported for timely assessment and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure changes in condition were reported for timely assessment and intervention for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 showing a change in condition with dilated pupils, hand to touch cool body temperature and decreased baseline response to care on [DATE] when V11 and V12 were providing care to R2. V11 and V12 stated they did not inform R2's nurse of R2's changes. Approximately 15-20 minutes later, V12 returned to check on R2 and R2 was found unresponsive and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was initiated. R2 died in the Facility, and death certificate is pending.This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at approximately 5:00 PM when R2 displayed changes from his baseline that were not reported to his nurse. V1 and V2 were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:12 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interview, observation, and record review Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan.Findings include:1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for mobility, and received high concentration oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care.R2's Physician Order dated [DATE] documented R2 was a full code.On [DATE] at 1:45 PM, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated she was helping another aide clean R2 on [DATE]. She noticed R2's skin was cool, and he seemed more relaxed than normal. She said usually R2's eyes are wide open and moving from side to side, but this day they were more droopy and he just seemed calmer than normal. V11 did not tell the nurse about these changes and went on to help another resident.On [DATE] at 3:13 PM, V12 (CNA) stated, I've done nursing homes for 30 years. I could tell by (R2)'s eyes that his pupils had dilated a little bit. Around 5:00 PM another young lady helped me clean him up. I said, ‘His pupils are dilated a little.' He was still breathing and everything. We cleaned him up. I couldn't wash his arm because it was really stiff. Usually (R2) tries to bat us away with his little arm that is all curled up, but he was stiff, and we had to lift his arm to wash his armpit. V12 said she did not convey these changes to the nurse and went on to care for another resident. V12 checked back on R2 15-20 minutes later and he was not responding. She told the nurse she thought R2 expired and she needed to go check on him. She said the nurse was moving too slow and it took her one or two minutes to get down to R2's room. When the nurse got there, CPR was initiated.On [DATE] at 1:55 PM, V9, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated there were two CNAs whose names she cannot remember caring for R2 right before he was found unresponsive. V9 was right outside R2's room with the medication cart waiting them to finish with R2 so she could give him his medications. These CNAs did not tell her R2 had any changes from his baseline, so V9 left for a break. When she returned from break, EMS (Emergency Medical Services) was in the building and had already called R2's death.On [DATE] at 2:55 PM, V10, Registered Nurse (RN), stated a CNA whose name she cannot remember told her R2 was unresponsive. R2's nurse was on break at that time. CPR was performed for 15-20 minutes, then EMS arrived and took over. V10 was checking vital signs and was never able to get anything, like he was already gone.The (Local) Fire Department Incident dated [DATE] at 5:15 PM documents Fire Department arrived on scene while staff was performing CPR on R2. Fire Department Crew attempted to find a femoral pulse and noted R2 was cold to the touch.On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, V4, Local Fire Department Paramedic, stated staff were performing CPR on R2 when they arrived at the Facility. R2 had no femoral pulse and was cold to the touch, so he questioned when R2 was last known to be well.On [DATE] at 11:00 AM, V8, CNA, stated R2 was already starting to stiffen up during CPR. On [DATE] at 1:48 PM, V19, CNA, stated R2 was already cold when CPR was being performed. On [DATE] at 2:09 PM, V20, CNA, stated she helped perform CPR on R2 and he was already cold.On [DATE] at 3:50 PM, V33, Medical Director, stated he would expect staff to report any changes in condition to the nurse on duty. On [DATE] at 1:40 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated if a resident experiences a change in condition, staff should report it to the nurse. If the resident's nurse is not available, they should report it to another nurse that is available. R2's change of condition was not reported to her, and she had no idea why they would not have reported those changes to the nurse on duty.The Facility's Change In Resident Condition Policy reviewed 10/2024 documents, It is the policy of the facility, except in a medical emergency, to alert the resident, resident's physician and resident's responsible party of a change in condition. The policy does not contain documentation pertaining to communication between nurse aids and licensed nurse staff.The Immediate Jeopardy that began on [DATE] was corrected/removed on [DATE] after the Facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance: Clinical and agency staff were in-serviced on timely assessments, Notification of Change Policy was reviewed, QAPI meeting was held on [DATE], 24 hour reports were reviewed for change in condition. The abatement was validated through review of 24 hour nursing reports and Notification of Change Policy and interviews with V2, V6, V10, V13, V24, V25, V34, V39, V42, V44, V45, V47, V49, V51, V52, and V53.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0659 (Tag F0659)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure staff were educated and competent in providing the necessary...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure staff were educated and competent in providing the necessary care and services for tracheostomies for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R4, R5, R6) in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2, R4, R5, and R6 being sent out emergently for routine tracheostomy care. R2 was found unresponsive in the Facility and staff performed CPR that was not in accordance with professional standards using R2's primary airway because they did not know how to do so. R2 died in the Facility, and death certificate is pending.This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at approximately 10:44 PM when R5 was sent to the hospital for suctioning/removal of mucus plug and tracheostomy replacement. V1 and V2 were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 9:03 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan.Findings include:1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for mobility, and received high concentration oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care.R2's Physician Order dated [DATE] documented R2 had a tracheostomy.R2's Care Plan initiated [DATE] documented R2 was at risk for breathing difficulty and complications related to tracheostomy placement.R2's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 8:20 AM documents R2 had two episodes of brown tube feeding colored fluid projecting from trach in a large amount. EMS was called for transport to hospital, and there was no documentation that R2's tracheostomy was suctioned.R2's emergency room (ER( Note dated [DATE] documents R2 came from Facility with tube feeding coming out of tracheostomy. R2 had no distress in the hospital and had been seen there frequently for the same issue.R2's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 1:00 PM documents R2 had increased secretions that changed from clear to brownish in a large amount. EMS was called for transport to hospital, and there was no documentation that R2's tracheostomy was suctioned.R2's ER Note dated [DATE] documents R2's tracheostomy tube was suctioned, cleaned, and monitored without any additional increased secretions. The cause of R2's symptoms was unclear with a plan to send him back to the nursing home. R2's Progress Note by V9, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated [DATE] at 6:00 PM documents, Aides were in room giving patient care when they grabbed nurse and alerted her that resident was unresponsive at 4:50pm, CPR started for 1q0 (10) minutes before EMTS (Emergency Medical Technicians) arrived and took over. EMT performed CPR until 5:30pm when they called timeof {sic} death.On [DATE] at 12:43 PM, V8, CNA, stated she helped perform CPR on R2 on [DATE]. V10, Registered Nurse (RN), started compressions while she placed the respiratory bag over R2's mouth because she was not aware it needed to be on the tracheostomy. She stated, I don't even know how to attach the thing. I have never bagged a trach before. I think that is something we need to be educated on. None of us in there knew. I even asked. (V10) gave me the oxygen and I just took the bag and went with the mouth because that's all I knew how to do. (V10) said she did not know how to attach it either.On [DATE] at 2:55 PM, V10 stated there was tube feeding coming out of R2's tracheostomy during CPR, so they just placed the respiratory bag over his face and turned the oxygen up.The (Local Fire Department) Incident Report dated [DATE] at 5:15 PM documents Fire Department arrived while staff were performing CPR on R2. Staff stated they were bagging the patient's mouth and not his tracheostomy tube due to secretions coming from the tube while CPR was being performed. On [DATE] at 2:37 PM, V22, (Local) Fire Department Chief, stated when his staff arrived to the facility on [DATE], Facility staff were bagging R2 with the BVM (Bag Valve Mask) over the naso-oral pharynx which is not the standard place for the BVM when the resident has a tracheostomy. The BVM should have been via tracheostomy. V22 stated over the past several months, the Fire Department has encountered multiple issues with tracheostomy residents at the Facility, making him question the care they receive, as far as keeping airways clear and patent so the residents can breathe. He stated they get calls for shortness of breath on a tracheostomy resident, and it is often something as simple as suctioning or cleaning of the tracheostomy tube or applicator. He stated these should be part of routine maintenance that he would expect from a facility that allows tracheostomies to be there.On [DATE] at 8:12 AM, V3, Local Fire Department Paramedic, stated R2 was sent to the hospital frequently for tracheostomy secretions and does not think the Facility has the staff they need to care for the residents with tracheostomies.On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, V4, Local Fire Department Paramedic, stated they get called to the Facility every day for suctioning or other non-emergent issues.2-R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and tracheostomy status.R4's MDS dated [DATE] documented R4 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent with mobility and required tracheostomy care, suctioning and oxygen therapy.R4's Care Plan dated [DATE] documents R4 is at risk for complications due to tracheostomy. The interventions include performing tracheostomy care as ordered and as needed and suctioning mouth and tracheostomy as needed.R4's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 4:55 PM documented R4 had several episodes of emesis that day. R4 was found with agonal breathing, emesis and what appeared to be water coming out of his tracheostomy and mouth. EMS was contacted for transport, and there was no documentation that R4's tracheostomy was suctioned at that time.R4 Hospital Record dated [DATE] documents R4 has had multiple troubles with tracheostomy management and partial (mucus) plugs. On arrival to the hospital, R4 had a very dirty, partially plugged tracheostomy, but was breathing much better with no signs of distress after it was cleaned by respiratory therapy.On [DATE] at 11:59 AM, R4 was lying on stretcher in his room with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) present. EMS suctioned out clear, thick, frothy sputum that was bubbling from the tracheostomy. V4, Local Fire Department Paramedic, and V27, Local Fire Department Captain, both stated there was suction tubing in R4's room, but no yankeur (suction tip), so they used their own equipment to suction R4. R4 was transported from the Facility on stretcher at 12:02 PM.R4's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 12:02 PM documents blood was expelled through R4's trachea while being suctioned. There was a scant amount of red clotted blood, and R4 was sent out with EMS.R4's Hospital Record dated [DATE] documents R4 presents due to blood being noted in his tracheostomy at the Facility. Paramedics are highly skeptical as to this history given that when they arrived on scene there was no noted blood and the suction equipment that staff were reporting using was not hooked up to any mechanical suction. Paramedics got normal colored secretions and one small drop of blood from R4's tracheostomy. R4 was seen here 5 days ago after an episode of vomiting and perceived issues with his tracheostomy being obstructed after vomiting. His tracheostomy was suctioned copiously, and the X-ray was unrevealing. R4 has been seen in the ER several times in the last week and has had normal lab workups.3-R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD, chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R5's MDS dated [DATE] documented R5 was cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, required supervision with transfer, and required tracheostomy care, suctioning, and oxygen therapy.R5's Care Plan dated [DATE] documents R5 has potential for difficulty breathing related to bronchiectasis, COPD, chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyspnea.R5's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 10:44 PM documents R5 was transferred to (Local Hospital) to have tracheostomy evaluated. R4 [NAME] EMS that her tracheostomy was supposed to have been replaced last month, but never was. V58, RN, was unable to change it in the Facility. R5's (Local) Fire Department Incident Report dated [DATE] documents, Upon arrival found pt (patient) sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses' station. The nurse advised that the pt was complaining of difficulty breathing and felt like something was in her airway. Pt was able to talk as normal, breathing was normal, and SPO2 (Peripheral Oxygen Saturation) was 94% on RA (Room Air). Visualized the trach opening and nothing noted to be obstructing; however, the area around it appeared to be pus, and the gauze was saturated with saliva and pus. Asked pt when was the last time the trach was last replaced. She advised it was supposed to be replaced over a month ago, and it's not been done yet. Asked the nurse if they have the proper supplies to switch out her trach, and she advised that she didn't know anything about it, she was agency. And just working her {sic} temporarily.R5's [DATE] Hospital Records document R5 was short of breath at Facility. Staff tried to suction her, but had trouble getting to the left (side) and she feels the left side is plugged. R5 was suctioned with removal of mucus plug, then saturations were fine with no further symptoms or distress. R5's [DATE] Hospital After Visit Summary documents R5 was seen for tracheostomy tube change.4-R6's Face Sheet documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.R6's MDS dated [DATE] documented R6 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial assistance with rolling from side to side, was dependent with transfer, and required oxygen therapy.R6's Care Plan does not contain any documentation regarding tracheostomy.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport to hospital when R6 removed his tracheostomy.R6's Hospital Records dated [DATE] document R6 pulled out tracheostomy in the Facility.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport when R6 pulled out his tracheostomy tube. Staff reported R6 was admitted to the Facility two days prior and had pulled out his tracheostomy every day since admission. R6's Hospital Records dated [DATE] document R5 removed his own tracheostomy and was just discharged from (Regional Hospital) earlier today for the same issue.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport when R6 removed his tracheostomy and feeding tube. R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport R6 removed his tracheostomy. This time, staff had replaced R6's tracheostomy, but still wanted him to be transported due to redness around the tracheostomy site.R6's Medical Record does not document any interventions to prevent R6 from removing tracheostomy.On [DATE] at 4:17 PM, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she did not receive any training at the Facility regarding tracheostomies.On [DATE] at 4:20 PM, V17, LPN, stated the Facility does not provide routine training on tracheostomy care.On [DATE] at 7:45 AM, V24, LPN, stated she has not had any training in the Facility regarding tracheostomy care. If a resident's tracheostomy ever came out and there was no RN at the Facility she would send the resident to the hospital.On [DATE] at 1:56 PM, V25, LPN, stated she has not had any inservices regarding tracheostomy care in the Facility.On [DATE] at 12:56 PM, V31, CNA, stated she has not had any training in the Facility on CPR for residents with tracheostomies and would always place the respiratory bag over the resident's mouth.On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, V32, LPN, stated she is not comfortable caring for residents with tracheostomies and did not know how to provide respiratory support to a resident with a tracheostomy needing CPR. She has not had any training regarding tracheostomies in the Facility.On [DATE] at 3:15 PM, V35, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated there has not been much staff education regarding tracheostomies, and there has been no formal training in the Facility.On [DATE] at 9:03 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated she expects nursing staff to be proficient in providing routine tracheostomy care, including suctioning and cannula changes, and know what to do during emergencies.The Facility's Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description, Undated, documents, Under the direction of the physician, is responsible for total nursing care to all residents on assigned unit during the assigned shift including responsibility for delegation of duties, resident nursing care, staff performance and adherence by staff members to facility policies and procedures. Remain current in facility policies, procedures and nursing trends by participating in in-service and continuing education programs.The Facility's Facility Assessment reviewed [DATE] documents the Facility provides care for COPD, pneumonia, asthma, chronic lung disease, and respiratory failure. Specialized Rehabilitation Services include Respiratory. Special Care Needs include tracheostomy care and ventilator care.The Immediate Jeopardy and deficiency practice that began on [DATE] was corrected/removed on [DATE] after the Facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance: Tracheostomy in-service was completed on [DATE], and all nurses, including agency nurses, were educated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. The abatement was validated with interviews with V15, V25, V48, V50, V56, and V57.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the knowledge, skills, and n...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the knowledge, skills, and necessary supplies to provide tracheostomy care for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) not being performed in accordance with professional standards on R1 and R2 and caused unnecessary emergency hospital transport for R4, R5 and R6. R1 and R2 died in the Facility, and death certificates are pending. This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 10:44 PM when staff were unable to replace R5's tracheostomy and adequately suction R5 to ensure airway remains clear and patent. V1 and V2 were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 9:03 AM. The surveyor confirmed by record review, interview and observation that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan.Findings include:1-R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and tracheostomy status. R1's MDS dated [DATE] documented R1 was cognitively intact and independent with mobility.R1's Care Plan initiated [DATE] documented R1 was a full code and was at risk for shortness of breath related to COPD, acute respiratory failure, and tracheostomy,R1's Progress Note by V34, Registered Nurse (RN), documents, (V11, CNA) informed this nurse that the resident appeared blue and to come assess.On [DATE] at 1:15 PM, V34 stated staff tried to provide ventilation for R1 over his tracheostomy, but did not have the correct tubing to attach the respiratory bag, so we just tried to cover the tracheostomy with a gloved hand and attempted bagging over his mouth. On [DATE] at 1:45 PM, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated staff did not provide ventilation for R1 during CPR and only performed chest compressions. There were multiple respiratory bags in the room, but none would fit over his tracheostomy. The bag on the crash cart did not work either, so they continued with compressions and did not provide any ventilatory support.2-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for mobility, and received high concentration oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care.R2's Physician Order dated [DATE] documented R2 had a tracheostomy.R2's Care Plan documented R2 was a full code and was at risk for complications related to tracheostomy placement.R2's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 8:20 AM documents R2 had two episodes of brown tube feeding colored fluid projecting from trach in a large amount. There was no documentation that R2 was suctioned, and EMS was called for transport to hospital.R2's emergency room (ER) Note dated [DATE] documents R2 came from Facility with tube feeding coming out of tracheostomy. R2 had no distress in the hospital and has been seen frequently for the same thing.R2's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 1:00 PM documents R2 had increased secretions that changed from clear to brownish and in large amount. There was no documentation that R2 was suctioned in the Facility, and R2 was transferred by EMS to the hospital. R2's ER Note dated [DATE] documents R2's trach tube was suctioned, cleaned, and monitored without any additional increased secretions. The cause of R2's symptoms was unclear and R2 would be sent back to the nursing facility.R2's Progress Note by V9, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated [DATE] at 6:00 PM documents, Aides were in room giving patient care when they grabbed nurse and alerted her that resident was unresponsive at 4:50pm, CPR started for 1q0 (10) minutes before EMTS (Emergency Medical Technicians) arrived and took over. EMT performed CPR until 5:30pm when they called timeof {sic} death.On [DATE] at 12:43 PM, V8, CNA, stated she helped perform CPR on R2 on [DATE]. V10 started compressions, and she placed the respiratory bag over R2's mouth because she was not aware it had to be on the tracheostomy. She stated, I don't even know how to attach the thing. I have never bagged a trach before. I think that is something we need to be educated on. None of us in there knew. I even asked. (V10) gave me the oxygen and I just took the bag and went with the mouth because that's all I knew how to do. (V10) said she did not know how to attach it either.On [DATE] at 2:55 PM, V10, Registered Nurse (RN), stated when CPR was performed on R2 on [DATE], there was tube feeding coming out of R2's tracheostomy, so they just placed the respiratory bag over his face and turned the oxygen up.The (Local) Fire Department Incident dated [DATE] at 5:15 PM documents Fire Department arrived while staff were performing CPR. Staff stated they were bagging the patients mouth and not his tracheostomy tube due to secretions coming from the tube while CPR was being performed. On [DATE] at 2:37 PM, V22, (Local) Fire Department Chief, stated when his staff arrived to the facility on [DATE], Facility staff were performing CPR with the BVM (Bag Valve Mask) over the naso-oral pharynx which is not the standard place for the BVM when the resident has a tracheostomy. The BVM should have been via tracheostomy. V22 stated over the past several months, the Fire Department has encountered multiple issues with tracheostomy residents at the Facility, making him question the care they receive, as far as keeping airways clear and patent so the residents can breathe. He stated they get calls for shortness of breath on a tracheostomy resident, and it is often something as simple as suctioning or cleaning of the tracheostomy tube or applicator. He stated these should be part of routine maintenance that he would expect from a facility that allows tracheostomies to be there.On [DATE] at 8:12 AM, V3, Local Fire Department Paramedic, stated R2 was sent to the hospital frequently for tracheostomy secretions and does not think the Facility has the staff they need to care for the residents with tracheostomies.On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, V4, Local Fire Department Paramedic, stated they get called to the Facility every day for suctioning and other non-emergent issues.3-R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and tracheostomy status.R4's MDS dated [DATE] documented R4 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent with mobility and required tracheostomy care, suctioning and oxygen therapy.R4's Care Plan dated [DATE] documents R4 is at risk for complications due to tracheostomy. The interventions include performing tracheostomy care as ordered and as needed and suctioning mouth and tracheostomy as needed.R4's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 4:55 PM documented R4 had several episodes of emesis that day. R4 was found with agonal breathing, emesis and what appeared to be water coming out of his tracheostomy and mouth. There was no documentation that R4 was suctioned at that time, and R4 was sent to the hospital by EMS.R4 Hospital Record dated [DATE] documents R4 has had multiple troubles with tracheostomy management and partial (mucus) plugs. On arrival, R4 had a very dirty partially plugged tracheostomy, but was breathing much better with no distress after respiratory therapy cleaned it. On [DATE] at 11:59 AM, R4 was lying on stretcher in room with EMS present. EMS suctioned out clear, thick, frothy sputum that was bubbling from the tracheostomy. V4, Local Fire Department Paramedic, and V27, Local Fire Department Captain, stated there was suction tubing in the room, but no yankeur (suction tip), so they used their own equipment to suction R4. R4 was transported out on a stretcher at 12:02 PM.R4's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 12:02 PM documents blood was expelled through R4's trachea while being suctioned. There was a scant amount of red clotted blood, and R4 left with EMS.R4's Hospital Record dated [DATE] documents R4 presents due to blood being noted in his tracheostomy at the Facility. Paramedics are highly skeptical as to this history, given that when they arrived on scene there was no noted blood and the suction equipment that staff were reporting using was not hooked up to any mechanical suction. They got normal colored secretions and one small drop of blood from the tracheostomy. R4 was seen here 5 days ago after an episode of vomiting and perceived issues with his tracheostomy being obstructed after vomiting. His tracheostomy was suctioned copiously, and X-ray was unrevealing. R4 has been seen several times in the ER in the last week and has had normal lab workup.4-R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD, chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status.R5's MDS dated [DATE] documented R5 was cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, required supervision with transfer, and required tracheostomy care, suctioning, and oxygen therapy.R5's Care Plan dated [DATE] documents R5 has potential for difficulty breathing related to bronchiectasis, COPD, chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyspnea.R5's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 10:44 PM documents R5 was transferred to (Local Hospital) to have tracheostomy evaluated. R4 told EMS that her trach was supposed to have been replaced last month, but never was. V58, RN, tried to locate a tracheostomy, but was unable to change it. R5's (Local) Fire Department Incident Report dated [DATE] documents, Upon arrival found pt (patient) sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses' station. The nurse advised that the pt was complaining of difficulty breathing and felt like something was in her airway. Pt was able to talk as normal, breathing was normal, and SPO2 (Peripheral Oxygen Saturation) was 94% on RA (Room Air). Visualized the trach opening and nothing noted to be obstructing; however, the area around it appeared to be pus, and the gauze was saturated with saliva and pus. Asked pt when was the last time the trach was last replaced. She advised it was supposed to be replaced over a month ago, and it's not been done yet. Asked the nurse if they have the proper supplies to switch out her trach, and she advised that she didn't know anything about it, she was agency. And just working her {sic} temporarily.R5's [DATE] Hospital Records document R5 was short of breath at Facility. Staff tried to suction her, but had trouble getting to the left (side) and feels the left side is plugged. R5 was suctioned with removal of mucus plug, then saturations were fine with no further symptoms or distress.R5's [DATE] After Visit Summary documents R5 was seen for tracheostomy tube change.5-R6's Face Sheet documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.R6's MDS dated [DATE] documented R6 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial assistance with rolling from side to side, was dependent with transfer, and required oxygen therapy.R6's Care Plan does not contain documentation regarding tracheostomy.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport to hospital after R6 removed his tracheostomy.R6's Hospital Records dated [DATE] document R6 pulled out tracheostomy in the Facility.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport to hospital after R6 pulled out his tracheostomy tube. Staff reported R6 was admitted to the Facility two days prior and had pulled out his trach every day since admission. R6's Hospital Records dated [DATE] document R5 removed his own tracheostomy and was just discharged from (Regional Hospital) earlier today for the same issue.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents Fire Department responded for transport to hospital after R6 removed his tracheostomy and feeding tube.R6's Fire Department Incident Narrative dated [DATE] documents R6 removed his tracheostomy in the Facility. Staff replaced R6's tracheostomy, but want him to be transported due to redness around the tracheostomy site.R6's Medical Record does not document any interventions to prevent R6 from removing tracheostomy.On [DATE] at 4:17 PM, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she did not receive any training at the Facility regarding tracheostomies.On [DATE] at 4:20 PM, V17, LPN, stated the Facility does not provide routine training on tracheostomy care.On [DATE] at 7:45 AM, V24, LPN, stated she has not had any training in the Facility regarding tracheostomy care. If a resident's tracheostomy ever came out and there was no RN at the Facility, she would send the resident to the hospital.On [DATE] at 1:56 PM, V25, LPN, stated she has not had any education regarding tracheostomy care in the Facility.On [DATE] at 12:56 PM, V31, CNA, stated she has not had any training in the Facility on CPR for residents with tracheostomies and would always place the respiratory bag over a resident's mouth.On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, V32, LPN, stated she is not comfortable caring for residents with tracheostomies and does not know how to provide respiratory support to a resident with a tracheostomy needing CPR. She has not had any tracheostomy training in the Facility.On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, V16, CNA, stated she wishes CNAs were allowed to suction residents because sometimes nurses are so busy and she thinks it would cut back on sending residents out to the hospital and save a lot of people. On [DATE] at 3:15 PM, V35, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated there has not been much staff education regarding tracheostomies, and there has been no formal training in the Facility.On [DATE] at 9:03 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated she expects nursing staff to be proficient in providing routine tracheostomy care, including suctioning and cannula changes, and know what to do during an emergency.The Facility's Tracheostomy Care Policy revised 10/2024 documents, It is the policy of this facility that residents with tracheostomies receive routine care to maintain a patent airway. Suction as needed. Cleanse stoma site. Document appropriately.The Facility's Facility Assessment reviewed [DATE] documents the Facility provides care for COPD, pneumonia, asthma, chronic lung disease, and respiratory failure. Specialized Rehabilitation Services include Respiratory. Special Care Needs include tracheostomy care and ventilator care.The Immediate Jeopardy and deficiency practice that began on [DATE] was corrected/removed on [DATE] after the Facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance: Tracheostomy in-service was completed on [DATE], and all nurses, including agency nurses, were educated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. The abatement was validated with interviews with V15, V25, V48, V50, V56, and V57.
May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0573 (Tag F0573)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's medical records for 1 of 4 residents (R2) revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's medical records for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for medical records (MR) in the sample of 4. The Findings Include: R2's admission Record, dated [DATE], documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged on [DATE], and expired on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:15 AM, V3, Business Office Manager, stated The previous medical record person (V5) was terminated on Thursday [DATE] and I am coordinating with the Regional Medical Records person (V4) for any medical record requests. I have not had any medical record requests since I have been assisting. The process depends on who is requesting it, if it is an Attorney, it automatically has to go through our corporate office, and if it is family, paperwork has to be completed, then corporate office will let us know if we can process the request at the facility level or if they will be doing it, and either way, the payment for the record request has to be received before any medical record request gets processed. On [DATE] at 9:20 AM, V1, Administrator, stated (V5, Previous Medical Record staff), was terminated on Thursday [DATE] so (V3) is working with the Regional Medical Record person (V4) with any record requests. I am not aware of anyone who has recently requested their medical records, or anyone who is waiting for their medical records. On [DATE] at 11:08 AM, V5, Previous Medical Records staff, stated I was working on (R2's) medical record request, which I believe was from an attorney, and not (R2's) family. I had completed the paperwork and sent the request up to our Regional Medical Records person (V4). I had to wait to get it back from (V4), and when I called inquiring about it, (V4) told me to send it to Corporate Legal. I was in the process of doing that on Thursday [DATE], when I was called into (V1, Administrator's) office and was fired. The request could have started back in March, but I'm not sure. I remember working on an ADR (Additional Documents Request) on the request, which is a way of only getting the things out of the chart that is requested, and not giving all the other stuff. (V4) called me and told me I did not need to do the ADR and to just send it to Corporate Legal. I was in the process of changing offices and had a lot of things going on at once, so the original request could have been back in March, but I have no control of it once it gets to Corporate. On [DATE] at 12:08 PM, V4, Regional Medical Records, The first time I was aware of (R2's) medical records request from the Attorney was on Thursday [DATE], when the facility called me after they received a letter from the Attorney. I immediately called the Attorney's office and faxed the requested paperwork on Friday [DATE]. (V5) was not doing her job correctly, and that is why she was terminated. (V5) would send me a lot of things and I would have to tell her what to do with them. I do not remember seeing anything from (V5) regarding (R2), and there should not have been any delay with that request. If things are done correctly, it is a very smooth process and would have been processed immediately, especially from an Attorney. When I spoke with the Attorney's office, they were very understanding, was not upset, and felt like everything was ok. I do not remember talking to (V5) about (R2), however, it could have been via email, which I would have told her how to handle it. On [DATE] at 12:58 PM, V7, Attorney, stated I have assistants that request medical records and things like that, so I am not sure exactly when it was requested for (R2). I know that I don't send a letter or complaint to the State unless it is longer than 30-days, so I know it had to be later than that. I know we received paperwork from the facility this past Friday ([DATE]). On [DATE] at 1:14 PM, V8, Paralegal, stated We use an outside company to ask for medical record requests so I will reach out to them to get the original request to the facility. From what I can see, our report shows that the first fax was sent to the facility on [DATE] at 2:29 PM. We then called the facility on [DATE] but was unable to talk to someone about it. We did receive all of the requested records this past Friday [DATE] which was given to (V7) for his review. V3's Email, dated [DATE], sent to V1 and V5, documents I have attached what was received today [DATE] via mail for a medical records request on (R2). I have the original if needed. The attachment was the medical record request for R2, dated [DATE]. V8's Email, dated [DATE], documents I spoke with our team at (medical records company) and they said that the fax number was auto populated in their system, but they called and followed up with the facility to confirm receipt. The facility confirmed the fax had been received on [DATE]th by (V5). This was the first time we were able to contact a live agent. We had called the facility 8 times prior to try and confirm receipt. However, I did a quick google search of the fax number to double check it and found multiple sites that provide the same fax number for (this facility). All timestamps are shown in the client portal I originally sent you (MR request tracking), but I have attached our original fax including our medical authorization and all necessary documents for release, which was sent on [DATE], and the violation fax that was sent on [DATE]. The same request had also been mailed to the facility on [DATE]. The Medical Record Request Tracking, dated from [DATE] to [DATE], documents several faxes were sent to the facility's (Fax Number B), including the first medical record request dated [DATE], as well as multiple phone calls to the facility's main phone number. The facility's website documents the facility's fax number is (Fax Number B). On [DATE] at 4:00 PM, V1 verified the facility's fax numbers and stated The (Fax Number A) is the secured fax/email number, and the (Fax Number B) is the one that goes directly to our copier/fax machine and does not go to anyone's email. So, if anyone faxes to (Fax Number B), it would have been picked up by someone. On [DATE] at 2:40 PM, V1 stated I am supposed to be notified of any medical record request, and I was not notified of (R2's) request until the email sent by (V3) on [DATE]. A medical record request can come two ways, one by email/fax - comes as an email (Fax Number A), and the other as a regular fax (Fax Number B). If it comes as an email/fax, then (V3) would get it, and if it comes by regular fax, then most likely (V5) would have gotten it. I would expect anyone who receives a medical record request to make sure I am aware of it as mentioned in the policy. The Facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated [DATE], documents The facility shall: follow HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) guidelines. This includes insuring that residents have personal privacy, access to their personal records upon request and that the privacy and confidentiality of their records is protected. The Facility's Medical Records Request Policy, dated 9/2024, documents General: To provide a process for Medical Record Requests. Responsible Party: Medical Records, Administrator. Guidelines: 1. All requests for medical records will be given to the Administrator. 2. If the request is determined to be in anticipation of litigation, the RNC (Regional Nurse Consultant) will complete a review of the medical record. 3. Once a medical record review is complete and the requesting party has been determined to have authority to obtain a copy, the facility will notify the requesting party of the cost of copies. 4. All parties requesting copies of medical records will be charged for the copies in accordance with State regulations. 5. The Administrator may, after consultation with the RNC, waive the copying cost in order to reduce the likelihood of litigation. 6. Medical records should be sent offsite to be scanned in order to reduce copying costs.
May 2025 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow written orders for wound care treatment for 1 out of 4 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow written orders for wound care treatment for 1 out of 4 residents, (R2); reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2 being admitted to the hospital with wounds declining. Findings include: R2's face sheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/2/25. R2's face sheet documented his diagnoses were, in part, burn of third degree of right foot, type two diabetes mellitus and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented he was cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan dated 4/25/25 documented R2 was at risk for skin complications (entered on 5/4/25) with interventions, in part, to provide treatment as ordered (entered on 5/4/25). R2's discharge summary was faxed from hospital on 4/23/25 to the facility, it included his wound care orders. The discharge summary wound care orders documented the following: Donor site location: left thigh, Xeroform/bacitracin: leave adherent xeroform on donor site. Wash it daily with soap/water to remove any debris/old ointment. Reapply new bacitracin over adherent xeroform then leave it open to air. Trim loose xeroform as it lifts up. Once donor site is heeled (usually 2 weeks after surgery) xeroform should be able to be easily removed to reveal healed pink/dry donor site skin. Graft location: bilateral feet: bacitracin, xeroform and gauze daily to foot burns-separate toes with gauze. f/u (follow up) in 1 week with burn/plastic surgery clinic. R2's hospital discharge paperwork dated 4/23/25 documented to start bacitracin 500 unit/gram ointment on 4/24/25; apply to affected area daily. R2's Progress notes dated 4/28/25 documented V3, Wound Nurse Practitioner, wrote out the same wound care orders as mentioned in the discharge summary. R2's Orders documented on 4/25/2025 at 6:48 AM, are as follow: Left upper leg clean with soap and water cover old xeroform with bacitracin cover with either wrapped gauze or bordered dressing every day shift every Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri for wound care management. R2's Orders documented on 4/25/2025 at 6:00 AM, are as follow: Left upper leg clean with wound cleanser cover wound with xeroform cover with either wrapped gauze or bordered dressing every day shift every Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri for wound care management. R2's Orders documented on 4/24/2025 at 1:36 PM are as follow: right foot clean with wound with wound cleanser cover with xeroform wrap with gauze every day shift every Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri for wound care management. R2's Orders documented on 4/24/2025 at 1:33 PM, left foot clean with wound cleanser cover with xeroform cover with wrapped gauze every day shift every Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri for wound care management. R2's Progress note dated 4/25/2025 at 9:33 AM, documented V4 (Wound Nurse) charted she received a call back from surgeon's nurse and was informed by the nurse that the area where the skin graft was taken from was not to be changed. V4 continued to document We are to wash the area with soap and water and cover the xeroform that is on the area with bacitracin and leave open to air. I explain the clothing sticking to the clothing. Nurse stated that we can wrap it in gauze. I informed the nurse of removing one strip of the xeroform from the area do to what I read from the first set of orders. Nurse question if I covered it back up with xeroform, which I inform her that I did. Nurse stated that it is ok but not to do it again. R2's April Treatment Administration Record documented no wound care was signed off on 4/26/25 or 4/27/25 and there is no PRN (as needed) order for wound care on R2 in the TAR. R2's Progress note dated 4/30/25 at 3:43 PM documented R2 had a temperature of 100.8 degrees but asymptomatic and received new orders for labs. R2's labs collected on 4/25/25 resulted on 4/26/25 with a WBC of 17.10 where the normal range is documented to be between 3.4 - 10.8. On 4/30/25 R2's labs were done again and resulted with a WBC of 15.25. R2's orders documented Doxycycline Monohydrate Tablet 100 mg (milligram), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for infection for 7 Days with a start dated of 4/30/25 at 8:00 PM. Post-op paperwork documented R2 was admitted with diagnosis of wound cellulitis on 5/5/25. R2's Hospitalist Progress note dated 5/6/25 at 2:28 PM, documented under Assessment and Plan: Burn involving 5% of body surface status post grafting 4/16 and full-thickness third degree burns on feet with management per burn primary. Status post-split-thickness skin grafts on 5/5 with bilateral wound VAC (vacuum-assisted closure) in place. Wound cultures from 5/2 positive for Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis and Corynebacterium species. Continue ceftazidime for cellulitis. On 5/12/25 at 9:35 AM, R2 stated his stay at the facility was horrible, the treatment he was supposed to have, he didn't get. R2 stated they rarely changed his wound dressings or washed his feet. R2 stated the day or two right before he was going in for his follow up at the burn clinic, they did the dressing changes completely, out of nowhere. R2 stated he was concerned about getting an infection because it was so dirty at the facility, and they did wound care on the floor of his room not in a cleaned room or on his bed. R2 stated he asked the Director of Nursing (DON) if there was a more sanitary way to clean his feet but was told they'll just do it on his floor. R2 stated when he first arrived, the nurse just started to rip off the dressing from his thigh. R2 stated the nurse came back later and told him she didn't look at the second page of instructions where it said to leave the dressing in place on his thigh. R2 stated one nurse tried giving him wound care and told him she couldn't do it after she completed one of his feet and just left him sitting in his room for an hour with his foot undressed. R2 stated he can only remember the facility changing his wound dressings three times while he was there, his pain increased over time, and the wounds started to smell bad. R2 stated his surgeon asked him what the facility didn't do to his wounds because they shouldn't look the way they did. R2 stated his surgeon told him it pushed his recovery back but hopefully not too far and that his feet aren't as good as they would have hoped. R2 stated because of his stay at the facility he went backwards in recovery from the care they provided and had to undergo another surgery; now he is back in the hospital instead of home. On 5/8/25 at 2:41 PM, V13, R2's daughter in law, stated she arrived on 5/2/25 with R2. V13 stated she handed R2's discharge paperwork to the staff member that helped them get situated and emphasized how important it was because it has everything the facility needs to know on how to take care of R2 including his wound care. V13 stated the next day she went to the facility, and they had no idea what happened to it and said they didn't have any of R2's orders. V13 stated on 4/25/25 she talked to the wound care nurse who was rude to her, she said she had already done R2's wound care but later that day we received a phone call saying she removed R2's thigh dressing that was supposed to stay in place, so she obviously hadn't done his wound care yet or looked at the orders from the surgeon. V13 stated on 4/27/25 the facility was placing R2 on bedrest because when he walks around his bandages get dirty. V13 stated on 5/2/25 she took R2 to his follow up appointment with the surgeon at the burn clinic and he told them he was very sorry, R2's wounds are not supposed to look like this, they have gone backwards from when he was initially admitted with the burns, and he would like to admit R2 right away. V13 stated the surgeon said they could do another skin graft from the other thigh and redo it all. V13 stated on Monday 5/5/25, R2 had both of his feet skin grafted again and they also skin grafted the left thigh donor site from the skin loss that occurred there also. V13 stated all R2's wounds were infected on admission to the hospital. V13 started to cry and stated she thought we were sending R2 somewhere to get taken care of, she just hopes this doesn't happen to anyone else. On 5/8/25 at 10:26 AM, V12, R2's son, stated when R2 first got to the facility he dropped off the discharge paperwork with all the care instructions in it at the nurse's station. V12 stated the wound care nurse must not have looked at the packet because the first day she ripped off a strip of xeroform from R2's donor site that was supposed to stay in place for 2 weeks. V12 stated the facility barely did wound care to R2 and they weren't ambulating him like his surgeon instructed to. V12 stated all the wounds were to be done daily. V12 stated when he took R2 to his follow up appointment with the surgeon, you could smell the infection coming off R2's feet. V12 stated the surgeon said at the follow up all R2's sites failed, and they will probably need to do a skin graft to the donor site, redo his feet and use the other thigh for the skin graft. V12 stated the doctor said all R2's wounds were infected, and he was admitted to the Burn Unit ICU. On 5/7/25 at 10:30 AM, V4, Wound Care Nurse, stated that R2 came to the facility after burning his feet with tea, he was transferred from the hospital with 5% burns to his body. V4 stated R2's orders initially were to cleanse the sites, apply xeroform and wrap them up. V4 stated when she went to remove the xeroform from R2's thigh, he was in a lot of pain and later found out it was not supposed to be removed. V4 stated because R2 was in so much pain she only removed one strip and stopped. V4 stated she found the wound care orders several hours after she removed the one strip from R2's thigh. V4 stated there was supposed to be bacitracin applied to the thigh, but didn't have that at the facility. V4 stated she notified the surgeon's office and was told to leave the remaining xeroform on and apply more, cover with A&D ointment because the facility did not have bacitracin, and cover the area. V4 stated R2's feet were to be changed daily and PRN (as needed). V4 stated she wasn't concerned about R2's wounds until 2 days prior to him leaving the facility and notified the surgeon and sent pictures. V4 stated she was concerned about R2's wounds the entire time he was at the facility especially because he constantly dropped things on his dressings like urine from his urinal and juice. V4 stated she told the nurses to tell her anytime R2's dressing were wet. V4 stated she wanted to try to keep R2 in bed more to keep his feet safe but was told we couldn't do that. V4 stated two days prior to him leaving, parts were coming off his wound and reported it to the surgeon's nurse. On 5/8/25 at 10:05 AM, V4 stated that V3 (Wound Care NP) told her she could make R2's dressing changes Monday through Friday and PRN (as needed). V4 stated the surgeon's nurse also said R2's dressings could be done as needed. V4 stated she sent a picture of just one of R2's feet when she saw concerns but did not look at the other foot because it had a new dressing on it applied by another nurse. V4 stated the facility did not have bacitracin so she used A&D ointment on the thigh but did not see the discharge orders had instructions to apply bacitracin to the feet also. V4 stated the office only mentioned the xeroform on the phone. V4 stated the PRN wound care orders were not in the TAR, so that is why it does not document R2 had wound care over the weekend, and she had to make Progress notes instead for the treatment administration. V4 stated she had to enter those progress notes late because her computer wasn't working. On 5/7/25 at 2:35 PM, V4 stated wound care is documented as being completed on the treatment administration record (TAR) and should be completed there unless there is a question about the order, then hold doing it until clarifying. V4 stated wounds are supposed to be changed as needed when she is not at the facility by the staff nurses. V4 stated the TAR will show when the last dressing was done. On 5/8/25 at 9:44 AM, V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated when she took care of R2 over the weekend once and she remembered he spilled on his dressing but did not have to change them, she didn't feel comfortable changing his wounds because of how severe they were. On 5/7/25 at 2:56 PM, V11 (LPN) stated wound care is to be done according to the doctor's order. V11 stated she was concerned from the start with R2's wounds because of how severe they were but had never done his wound care. On 5/7/25 at 2:41 PM V9 (LPN) stated the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) will tell you what the wound care orders are, and will follow those when doing dressing changes. On 5/7/25 at 12:58 PM V3, Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP), stated V4 sent her a picture of R2's wound and it looked like it was failing. V3 stated V4 removed the donor site dressing and told said she didn't see the orders to leave it in place. V3 stated she was not told the facility did not have bacitracin to use on R2. V3 stated she would recommend following orders from the surgeon. On 5/8/25 at 10:52 AM, V3 stated her recommendations were to follow the surgeon's orders on R2 and she did not want to change anything. V3 stated she only put in orders as written by the surgeon. V3 stated she thinks they were supposed to be daily but would have to check the chart to make sure. V3 stated she did not put in for R2's wound care to be done on Monday through Friday and PRN because he was treated by a surgeon and would follow their recommendations. On 5/8/25 at 1:56 PM, V15, Facility's NP, stated she was concerned about infection for R2 after a nurse reported a low-grade fever on Thursday (5/1/25) and thought it could be related to his wounds, so she started him on a broad-spectrum antibiotic. V15 stated not administering the bacitracin ointment as ordered could have contributed to R2's wounds declining, it is an antibiotic ointment. On 5/12/25 at 10:06 AM, V14, Burn Unit Social Worker, stated upon discharge, she notifies the facilities of what patients need for aftercare and they never told her they didn't have bacitracin because if that was the case she would have sent some with R2 before he left. V14 stated the providers did not change any of their discharge orders for R2's wound care after he left and never said to use A & D ointment or to give dressing care Monday through Friday and PRN (as needed). V14 stated the wound care is very particular for burns and skin grafts. On 5/12/25 at 2:25 PM V2 (DON) stated R2 came with a donor site and skin graft wounds. V2 stated she started to have concerns about his wounds when he had an elevated temp and WBC (white blood cell). V2 stated V4 told her she notified the surgeon of this and provided updates on the wounds, but they wanted to hold off on doing anything until they saw him at his follow up appointment which was in the next day or two at that time. V2 stated she expects nurses to follow orders as written from the discharge paperwork and to only put in orders as a provider instructs to do so. V2 stated she was never notified that bacitracin wasn't available, she thought it was being applied to R2 the entire time. V2 stated no one made concerns to her that R2 wasn't getting wound care as ordered. The facility's Treatment/General Wound Treatment Policy dated 4/2024, documented under treatment guidelines to document routine and PRN treatments in the treatment administration record of the EHR (electronic health record) and to document all significant observations in the Nursing Progress Note. The facility's Skin and Wound Management Guidelines revised on 1/3/22 documented on admission or readmission to ensure the treatment order is in place and appropriate. The wound care nurse is to obtain or ensure appropriate treatment order is in place.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow wound care orders for 1 out of 4 residents, (R2) reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow wound care orders for 1 out of 4 residents, (R2) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2's experiencing severe pain. Findings include: R2's face sheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/2/25. R2's face sheet documented his diagnoses were, in part, burn of third degree of right foot, type two diabetes mellitus and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented he was cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan dated 4/25/25 documented R2 was at risk for skin complications (entered on 5/4/25) with interventions, in part, to provide treatment as ordered (entered on 5/4/25). R2's orders documented acetaminophen 650 mg (milligram) tablet to be started 4/23/25 as needed for pain/fever/headache and oxycodone 5 mg tablet to be started 4/23/25 as needed for pain. R2's Medication Administration Record documented the first dose of acetaminophen he was given was on 4/24/25 at 8:53 AM and the first dose of oxycodone was administered on 4/24/25 at 11:25 AM. R2's discharge summary was faxed from hospital on 4/23/25 to the facility, it included his wound care orders. The discharge summary wound care orders documented the following: Donor site location: left thigh, Xeroform/bacitracin: leave adherent xeroform on donor site. Wash it daily with soap/water to remove any debris/old ointment. Reapply new bacitracin over adherent xeroform then leave it open to air. Trim loose xeroform as it lifts up. Once donor site is heeled (usually 2 weeks after surgery) xeroform should be able to be easily removed to reveal healed pink/dry donor site skin. Graft location: bilateral feet: bacitracin, xeroform and gauze daily to foot burns-separate toes with gauze. f/u (follow up) in 1 week with burn/plastic surgery clinic. Progress note dated 4/24/25 at 2:38 PM, V4 documented that R2 refused wound care treatment due to pain. After given pain pill and waiting 35 to 40 mins. Went back to resident to try to do wound care. R2 was still in a lot of pain. Resident agreed to let me cover the wound back up. Spoke with facility NP about resident's pain. NP increased frequency of pain medicine given. Called the wound NP and went over different ideas and how to help resident with dressing change and if she wanted to change any of the orders. The only change was to wrap or put a bordered dressing over graft area. Went over plan with R2 about changing dressings tomorrow. R2 did not want dressing change but stated that he will try. R2's son came into voice concerns about treatments. V4 explained R2's pain level and what she discussed with R2. Also went over that surgeon was called and left a voice message to see if anything needs to be changed with wound care due to the pain. R2's son was upset that the wound care was not completed and was worried about R2's mental status. NP called and orders for labs and urine to be collected by tomorrow. R2's Progress note dated 4/25/2025 at 9:33 AM, documented V4 (Wound Nurse) charted she received a call back from surgeon's nurse and was informed by the nurse that the area where the skin graft was taken from was not to be changed. V4 continued to document We are to wash the area with soap and water and cover the xeroform that is on the area with bacitracin and leave open to air. I explain the clothing sticking to the clothing. Nurse stated that we can wrap it in gauze. I informed the nurse of removing one strip of the xeroform from the area do to what I read from the first set of orders. Nurse question if I covered it back up with xeroform, which I inform her that I did. Nurse stated that it is ok but not to do it again. On 5/12/25 at 9:35 AM, R2 stated his stay at the facility was horrible, the treatment he was supposed to have, he didn't get. R2 stated when he first arrived, the nurse just started to rip off the dressing from his thigh, she didn't try to wet it down or peel it back slowly the way the hospital would do. R2 stated it felt like a strip of skin was ripped off his thigh. R2 stated he was screaming in pain, and they didn't give him medication before doing it; the nurse kept telling him It needed to be done until he finally told her to stop, he couldn't take the pain anymore. R2 stated he looked down at his leg after she ripped of the dressing, and it was bleeding. R2 stated they put in the charts that he refused care and ignored that it was causing him so much pain. R2 stated he's cut off a finger in his past and was treated better for that, they made sure his pain was managed first before providing the wound care but at the facility they didn't do any of that. R2 stated he was in severe pain screaming and she put him through hell. R2 stated the nurse came back later and told him she didn't look at the second page of instructions where it said to leave the dressing in place on his thigh. R2 stated because of his stay at the facility he went backwards in recovery from the care they provided and had to undergo another surgery; now he is back in the hospital instead of home. On 5/7/25 at 10:30 AM, V4, Wound Care Nurse, stated that R2 came to the facility after burning his feet with tea, he was transferred from the hospital with 5% burns to his body. V4 stated when she went to remove the xeroform from R2's thigh, he was in a lot of pain and later found out it was not supposed to be removed. V4 stated because R2 was in so much pain she only removed one strip and stopped. V4 stated she found the wound care orders several hours after she removed the one strip from R2's thigh. On 5/8/25 at 10:05 AM, V4 stated the initial time she took off the dressing from R2's thigh, R2 was in extreme pain. V4 stated we would pre-medicate R2 for wound care after that. On 5/8/25 at 9:44 AM, V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R2 would complain of his wounds causing him pain. V7 stated the day V4 took the dressing off R2's thigh, he was bleeding, and she had to give him oxycodone after because he was in pain and wouldn't let anyone touch it afterward. On 5/13/25 at 9:53 AM, V16 (LPN) stated she would review orders first and see if there is pain medication to administer to the residents at least 30 minutes prior to providing wound care. V16 stated if the resident was in severe pain, then something is wrong and would stop. V16 stated she would soak the dressing first before removing it if it was dried to the skin. On 5/13/25 at 9:55 AM, V17 registered nurse (RN) stated she would pre-medicate if there were orders to do so prior to wound care. V17 stated she would not continue with wound care if it was causing the resident severe pain especially if it was sensitive. V17 stated she would wet the dressing first if it was dried to the skin before removing only if she had orders to remove it. On 5/13/25 at 10:56 AM, V2 (DON) stated she would expect the nurses to provide pain management if the resident is having complaints of pain. The facility's Pain Management Policy dated 1/2025 documented it will facilitate and provide guidance on pain observations and management. The policy continues to document the pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to resident comfort and pain is defined as whatever the experiencing person says it is and exists whenever he or she says it does. The policy further documented pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals.
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed assess, monitor, and treat a change of condition for 1 of 4 resident (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed assess, monitor, and treat a change of condition for 1 of 4 resident (R6) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in a delay of treatment for a significant change in condition resulting in R6's hospitalization. Findings include: R6's Face Sheet, print date of 2/19/25, documents that R6 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia. R6's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R6 is moderately cognitively impaired and is independent with eating. R6's Nurses Note, dated 1/13/25, documents, Resident returned to the facility via (hospital) ambulance accompanied by EMS (Emergency Medical Services). The resident is alert and denies pain. The resident was a total assist into her bed and is 1.5 L (liters) of oxygen per nasal canula. Call light is within her reach. The resident is on droplet / contact isolation for influenza. R6's Nurses Note, dated 1/14/25, documents, Resident refused to leave O2 NC (oxygen) (nasal canula) on, repeatedly attempted to place NC on and resident takes it off. Resident educated on the importance of using her supplemental oxygen and resident still refuses. R6's Nurses Note, dated 1/15/25, documents, 'Resident refuses to keep on O2. Resident has been redirected several times. Resident is currently sitting in bed resting with nasal canal (cannula) on will continue to monitor. R6's Note Text, dated 1/15/25 9:53 PM, documents R6 received a DRIPT IV Therapy infusion per provider order with post infusion vital signs of 136/84 blood pressure and a heart rate of 82. R6's Progress Note, written by V12, Medical Nurse Practitioner, dated 1/17/25, documents, Patient seen and examined today for routine 30 day follow up. Patient reports good appetite. Is sleeping well overnight. Denies acute medical conditions. It continues, resident requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) and mobility. Patient recently hospitalized for Influenza A. Continues to refuse to wear supplemental oxygen. R6's vital signs, dated 1/18/25, documents R6's blood pressure of 102/68, heart rate of 51, temperature of 98.2, respirations of 18, and oxygen saturation of 88%. R6's Meal Intake, dated 1/23/25, documents R6 at 75 to 100% of her meal at 11:15 AM and 12:45 PM. R6 has no other meal intakes documented before R6's discharge to the hospital on 1/27/25. The facility Weekly Weeks documents the week of 1/13 R6 weighed 173 pounds, the week of 1/20 R6 weighed 162.5 pounds. The facility Communication for Daily Facility Discharges documents R6 was sent to the hospital on 1/27/25 because of AMS (Altered Mental Status), Hypotension, and Dehydration. R6's Electronic Medical Record fails to document any other Nursing Notes, Vital Signs, Nursing Assessments, Doctor Notification, Change of Condition, or Hospital Transfer documentation between 1/13/25 and 1/27/25. R6's Emergency Department Disposition, dated 1/27/25, documents Hospital Problems present upon admission Pneumonia of right lower lobe, Acute on chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, Hypernatremia, Moderate malnutrition, SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) UTI (urinary tract infection). A/P (assessment and plan): lab's significant for leukocytosis 14.6, lab's look like hemo-concentrate. Hypernatremia 155 (high normal is 145) AKI (acute kidney injury), cre (creatine) 1.94 baseline 1.1, UA (urinalysis) showed 4 plus leukocyte estrase, 4 plus bacteria. CXR (chest x-ray) noted opacities right lower lobe concern for pneumonia, no pleural effusion, no pneumothorax. In the ED (Emergency Department), she was given ceftriaxone/azithromycin for pneumonia and UTI. 1 L of fluid and continuous fluid. Plan: Hypernatremia AKI cre 1.94 baseline 1.1 Free water deficit: 2.7 L. repeat labs, sodium q6h (every 6 hours) These fluid and electrolyte abnormalities are being treated, evaluated, or monitored. Dehydration - IVF's (Intravenous Fluids) and repeat electrolytes. On 2/20/25 at 11:43 AM, V2, Director of Nurses, stated, (R6) just came off of our NAR (Nutrition At Risk) watch on 1/6/25. The way that the weekly weights work is as long as the weight is done that week, I enter the weight on Friday, and then on Tuesday when the Dietitian comes, we talk about putting new interventions in place. (R6) was 173 the week of 1/13/25 and the week of 1/20/25 she was 162.5. I entered the (R6's) weight of 162.5 on the 24th which was a Friday. I had planned on talking to the Dietitian about her on Tuesday, but she was sent to the hospital on Monday (1/27/25) and did not return. We already had her on fortified pudding and supplements. We can put things in place but if she is not eating it is not going to help. I am not sure if the Doctor was notified of (R6) not eating. I did educate the staff to push fluids and encourage her to eat. The staff should have been charting on her decline, a note about her going to the hospital, meal intake, and notifying the doctor if they did. On 2/20/25 at 1:48 PM, V12, Medical Nurse Practitioner, stated, I saw (R6) on 1/17/25. I knew she had just come back from the hospital with Influenza. I was not notified that she had a decline, she was not eating, and had weight loss. I should have been. On 2/19/25 at 12:30 PM, V3, Assistant Director of Nurses, stated I took care of (R6) on 1/26/25 going into the 27th. I did hear she was not feeling well, wasn't eating, and didn't want to get her hair cut. She hadn't been herself after she came back from the hospital with the flu. She was not eating or drinking like before. She would go to the dining room for meals. Before she was independent with dining, after that sometimes we would have to help her and encourage her to eat. There should be nurse's notes of her decline and why when she was transferred to the hospital. On 2/19/25 at 2:30 PM, V16, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R6 really did decline fast after she got the flu. On 2/19/25 at 2:45 PM, V17, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), stated The last two weeks she was probably eating 25% of her meal. It came to where we had to feed her. She used to be able to eat. I would say she totally stopped eating 2 to 3 days before she went to the hospital. The nurses knew. It should be documented in our charting of the intakes. On 2/20/25 at 11:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated that V24, agency LPN is the nurse that sent R6 out to the hospital. On 2/20/25 at 11:05 AM, V2, Director of Nurses, stated I was in the building the evening that (R6) went out to the hospital because I told (V24) to send her out. The aides came out and said that (R6) wasn't acting right. She was acting very sluggish just not herself. She had low blood pressure. On 2/20/25 at 11:07 AM, V22, CNA, stated, The last time I worked with her (R6) it was 2 days before she went out. She was really tired. I was able to get her eat a few bites. I had to fed her. I even tried to get her to take some bites of her fortified pudding, but she wasn't having it. She was ok just really really tired. She was still urinating like normal. I did chart her intakes. I let the nurse know that she did not have an appetite that day. On 2/20/25 at 11:39 AM, V24 stated, I haven't worked there often but I didn't send anyone out to the hospital while I was there. On 2/20/25 at 12:26 PM, V25, CNA, stated, I took care of (R6) the evening before she went to the hospital (1/26/25). Before she would talk to me. She was confused but she would talk. The last night I cared for her, she was completely out of it. She looked horrible. She would go ew ew ew she couldn't even talk anymore. I tried to get her to drink her water, but she couldn't even swallow it just sat in her mouth. The nurse was going in and giving her meds (medications). I asked what was going on and she said she has had a decline. On 2/20/25 at 1:20 PM, V8, Registered Nurse, stated, (R6) was more tired and less talkative but about her normal self. She would always sit in her doorway in her wheelchair wanting to go to her room which she was in her room. She wasn't doing that. As far as I know, she was eating and drinking just fine. I did not see anything alarming about her. The policy Change in Resident Condition, dated 9/2024, documents, Nursing will notify the resident's physician or nurse practitioner when: b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or emotional status. c. There is a pattern of refusing treatment or medication. It continues, e. It is deemed necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident. The Weight Change Policy, dated 9/22, documents, 1. Review weights and vitals dashboard for significant weight changes. 2. upon identification of a newly significant weight change, complete NARs weekly review tool. 3. Notify Dietician, Physician, and resident representative. The Policy Documentation by Exception, dated 9/2024, documents, 2. documentation should include any unusual event or change of condition of the resident. 3. Any communication with the physician, nurse practitioner, or consulting physician should be documented.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and monitor pressure ulcers, and pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and monitor pressure ulcers, and provide the Physician prescribed treatment for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 15. The failure resulted in R5 developing a pressure ulcer of unknown stage while at the facility, not receiving treatment for a pressure ulcer for 23 days at which time it was unstageable, and R4 developing 3 pressure ulcers while at the facility and a sacral pressure ulcer that became infected. Findings include: 1. R5's Face Sheet, print date of 2/20/25, documents R5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Delusional disorder, Schizophrenia, and Heart Failure. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R5 is moderately cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for dressing, toileting, and hygiene, frequently incontinent for urine and bowel, and R5 has 2 unstageable pressure ulcers. R5's Braden Scale for predicting Pressure Sore Risk, dated 1/8/25, documents that R5 is a high risk for pressure ulcers. R5's Electronic Medical Record fails to document a Braden Scale before 1/8/25. R5's Nurse's Note, dated 12/1/2024 11:12 AM, documents, Resident has 2 open wounds. 1 is on his right hip, and the other is on his inner left knee. I put TAO (Triple Antibiotic Ointment) and bandages on both of the wounds. His right heel on the left side is also becoming soft. I had CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) put a pillow in between his knees and feet to take the pressure off. Plan of care ongoing. R5's Weekly Skin Assessments, dated 11/14/24 - 12/23/24 fails to document any pressure areas noted on R5. R5's Electronic Medical Record fails to document a pressure ulcer wound assessment for the pressure ulcer found on 12/1/24, Physician Notification, or Physician Orders for treatment for the pressure ulcer. There are no progress notes regarding the monitoring, assessment, or treatment of R5's pressure ulcer from 12/1/24 to 12/24/24 for the pressure ulcer to R5's right hip. R5's Nurse's Note, dated 12/24/24, documents, Was informed by CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) that resident has a bad wound on his right hip/ butt. Check wound with wound NP (Nurse Practitioner) and found an unstageable wound. Resident stated that its fine don't touch it. Resident stated that it is not a wound, its clothing. Did wound care on wound with resident upset with wound care being done. Resident stated that he would pull it off when I am gone. R5's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for December 2024, documents, Start date 12/19/24 Discontinue date of 1/5/25, right buttock, cleanse wound with wound cleaner and apply Silvadene, calcium alginate, collagen and cover with gauze dressing. every day shift for wound care. This TAR documents R5 refused dressing changes 5 of the 24 ordered changes. R5's Skin and Wound Note, dated 12/24/24, documents, Patient seen today for a new unstageable PI (Pressure Injury) to his right hip. Per staff, patient refuses to roll to left side, always laying on right side causing pressure. Wound: 3 Location: Right hip Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Unstageable Wound Status: New. Size: 5.5 cm (centimeters) x 3 cm x 0.2 cm. Wound Base: 100% eschar Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Intact, Fragile Exposed Tissues: Epithelium Exudate: None amount of None. Wound # 3 Right hip Pressure. Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Hydrogel to base of the wound. 3. secure with Bordered gauze. 4. change Daily, and PRN (as needed). NEW RECOMMENDATIONS: The resident has a treatment change listed above. Please reference the recommended orders for updated treatments. R5's December 2024 Physician Orders or TAR failed to document a right hip pressure ulcer treatment recommendation, written on 12/24/24 of cleanse with wound cleanser, apply hydrogel to base of the wound, secure with bordered gauze, change daily and PRN (as needed). R5's Skin and Wound Note, 1/3/25, documents, Wound: 3 Location: Right hip Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Unstageable Wound Status: Improving with delayed wound closure Size: 4 cm x 4 cm x 0.2 cm. Wound Base: 100% eschar Exposed Tissues: Epithelium Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Intact, Fragile Exudate: None amount of None. Wound # 3 Right hip Pressure. Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Hydrogel to base of the wound. 3. secure with Bordered gauze. 4. change Daily, and PRN. NEW RECOMMENDATIONS: The resident has a treatment change listed above. Please reference the recommended orders for updated treatments. R5's January 2025 TAR, documents, Start date of 1/6/25 Discontinue date of 1/16/25, right buttock, cleanse wound with wound cleanser cover with hydrogel cover with boarder dressing every shift for wound care. This TAR documents that R5 refused 1 of the 10 dressing changes. R5's January 2025 TAR documents, right buttock cleanse wound with betadine and cover slough with silver alginate cover with boarder dressing every day shift for wound care. Start date of 1/17/25 Discontinue date of 2/4/25. This TAR documents that R5 refused the dressing change 2 of the 11 dressing changes. R5's January 2025 TAR documents, left hip clean with wound cleanser cover with silver alginate cover with boarder dressing every day shift for wound care. Start date of 1/17/25 Discontinue date of 2/4/25. 2. R4's Face Sheet, print date of 2/10/25, documents R4 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of compression fracture of T (thoracic) 11-T12. R4's MDS, dated [DATE], document that R4 was cognitively intact, required moderate to partial assistance for bed mobility, and totally dependent on staff for transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. R4's Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk, dated 1/2/24 documents R4 is a high pressure risk. R4's Skin Condition Assessment, dated 1/2/25, fails to document a skin condition or pressure ulcer. R4's Electronic Medical Record fails to document an admission Assessment for R4 on 1/2/25. R4's Physician Order, dated 1/3/25, documents Cleanse sacrum with wound cleanser &/or NS (normal saline), apply dry dressing daily until wound MD (Medical Doctor) sees for new ordered. R4's TAR, dated 1/3/25, documents Cleanse sacrum with wound cleanser &/or NS (normal saline), apply dry dressing daily until wound MD (Medical Doctor) sees for new ordered. R4's TAR, dated 1/3/25, documents apply zinc oxide to buttocks every shift for redness and open area. R4's Nurses Note, dated 1/5/25, documents, called to resident room, resident is not responding to verbal or physical stimulation, breathing normally, vital signs at this time 99.7, 68/48, 129 hr (heart rate), 22 resp (respirations). It continues, Call placed to 911 for transport to hospital for eval (evaluation) and treatment. R4's Nurse's Note, dated 1/9/25, documents, Resident came from (local hospital). It continues, Resident has an open wound on her bottom, hospital said wound was not open; however, the area is open. R4's Nursing admission Observation, dated 1/9/25, documents R4 has Pressure Ulcers. This document fails to document the location, appearance, or measurements of the pressure ulcer (s). R4's Skin Note, dated 1/9/25, documents, No new skin issues noted. R4's Physician Order, dated 1/9/25, documents Apply Zinc Oxide to buttocks every shift for redness, open area. R4's TAR, start date of 1/9/25 end date of 2/5/25, documents apply zinc oxide to buttocks every shift for redness and open area. R4's Skin and Wound Evaluation, dated 1/10/25, documents, Wound Measurements Length 3.4 cm Width 1.1 cm. This Skin and Wound Evaluation fails to document the type of wound, location, appearance of the wound, or notification of the Physician of the wound. R4's Skin Screen dated 1/9/25 and 1/16/25 fails to document R5 having skin conditions or pressure ulcers. R4's Skin and Wound Note, dated 1/15/25, documents Wound: 1 Location: right buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) Wound Status: Present on admission Size: 3 cm x 5 cm x 0 cm. Wound: 2 Location: sacrum Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Unstageable Wound Status: Present on admission Size: 4.5 cm x 2 cm x 0.2 cm. Wound Base: 10% granulation, 90% slough Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Fragile, Erythema Exudate: Scant amount of Serous Wound: 3 Location: left buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: DTI Wound Status: Present on admission Size: 7.5 cm x 4 cm x 0 cm. Wound Base: 100% epithelial Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Intact, Fragile PLAN: Wound # 1 right buttock Pressure. Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Zinc Oxide Paste to base of the wound. 3. secure with Leave open to air. 4. change Q Shift. Wound # 2 sacrum Pressure. Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Medical grade honey to base of the wound. 3. secure with Bordered gauze. 4. change Daily. Wound # 3 left buttock Pressure. Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Zinc Oxide Paste to base of the wound. 3. secure with Leave open to air. 4.change Q Shift. The above dressing(s) was selected to promote autolytic debridement and moist wound healing within the wound bed. R4's Physician Order, dated 1/17/25, documents sacrum clean with wound cleanser cover open wound with medihoney cover with sacrum comfort foam dressing every day shift for wound care management. R4's TAR documents, Start date of 1/17/5 Discontinue date of 2/4/25, clean with wound cleanser cover open wound with medihoney cover with sacrum comfort foam dressing every day shift for wound care management. R4's TAR, start date of 1/9/25 end date of 2/5/25, documents apply zinc oxide to buttocks every shift for redness and open area. R4's Skin and Wound note, dated 1/21/25 WOUND ASSESSMENT: Wound: 1 Location: right buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: DTI Wound Status: Worsening Size: 5 cm x 5 cm x 0 cm. Wound Base: 100% epithelial Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Fragile Wound Pain at Rest: 5 Wound: 2 Location: sacrum Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Unstageable Wound Status: Improving without complications Size: 4.1 cm x 2 cm x 0.4 cm. Wound Base: 30% granulation, 70% slough Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Fragile, Erythema Exudate: Scant amount of Serous Wound Pain at Rest: 5 Wound: 3 Location: left buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: DTI Wound Status: Improving without complications Size: 6.5 cm x 3 cm x 0 cm. Wound Base: 100% epithelial Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Intact, Fragile Exudate: None amount of None. R4's Skin and Wound Note, dated 1/28/25 documents WOUND ASSESSMENT: Wound: 1 Location: right buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Ulcer/Injury Stage/Severity: Stage 2 Wound Status: Improving without complications. Size: 4 cm x 2.5 cm x 0 cm. Wound Base: 100% epithelial Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Fragile Exudate: Scant amount of Serosanguineous Wound Pain at Rest: 5. Wound: 2 Location: sacrum Primary Etiology: Pressure Ulcer/Injury Stage/Severity: Stage 4 Wound Status: Worsening Size: 3.8 cm x 3.5 cm x 0.5 cm. Wound Base: 60% granulation, 40% slough Wound Edges: Unattached Periwound: Fragile, Erythema Exposed Tissues: Muscle/Fascia, Subcutaneous, Dermis Exudate: Heavy amount of Purulent, Serosanguineous. Wound: 3 Location: left buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Stage 2 Wound Status: Improving without complications Size: 2 cm x 1 cm x 0.1 cm. Wound Base: 100% epithelial Wound Edges: Attached Periwound: Intact, Fragile Exudate: Scant amount of Serosanguineous Wound Pain at Rest: 5 PLAN: Wound # 2 sacrum Pressure Ulcer/Injury Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Silver alginate to base of the wound. 3. secure with Bordered gauze. 4. change Daily. R4's 1/2025 Physician Orders or TAR fails to document R4 being ordered or treated the change in sacrum pressure ulcer treatment of cleanse with wound cleanser, apply silver alginate to base of wound, secure with bordered gauze, and change daily that was ordered on 1/28/25. R4's Emergency Department document, dated 2/3/24 4:07 PM, documents Was called into the room by (Hospital Registered Nurse) when changing the patient's diaper, she has a deep sacral ulcer with purulent drainage present. (Hospital Physician) updated on wound and CT (computed tomography scan) abdomen and pelvis, sed (sedimentation) rate, CRP (C- Reactive Protein), vancomycin, and cefepime ordered. R4's Emergency Department Record, dated 2/3/25, documents Wound of sacral region initial encounter, Mental status has improved. Son at beside. Explained the wound will likely not heal at all given the advancement and bone involvement If there is any chance to heal this will require a diverting ostomy. Risks/benefits discussed. Code status has been addressed. Discussions with palliative hospice ongoing. As soon as determination is made, we can discuss further. R4's Hospital Record, dated 2/3/25, documents Sacral wound with infection, present on admission, s/p (symptom / plan) debridement. -Wound present on prior discharge but has certainly progressed and now with concerns of infection. - CT 5.8 x 1.6 x 2cm sacral ulceration extending from S (sacral)4-S6 containing gas and fluid and/or debris. Thin tract of gas along left side of sacrum with possible fistula and/or osteomyelitis - General surgery consulted - Continue Vanc (vancomycin)/Cefepime/Flagyl - Wound would likely require diverting ostomy for optimal healing - 2/5: Family opting to proceed with surgical intervention and hospice will follow for discussion postoperatively - 2/6: general surgery for sacral debridement and possible diverting ostomy - Wound culture with MSSA (Methicillin- resistant staphylococcus aureus), pseudomonas, continue vanc/cefepime/flagyl today. can likely de-escalate postoperatively pending findings. 3. R1's Face Sheet, print date of 2/10/25, documents R1 was re-admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dementia. R1's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R1 is mildly cognitively impaired, requires substantial maximal assist with rolling in bed, dependent on staff for transfers, has an indwelling urinary catheter, and is always incontinent of bowel. R1's Skin and Wound Note, dated 2/5/25, documents Patient seen today for a healing stage 4 PI to his right buttock. Location: right buttock Primary Etiology: Pressure Stage/Severity: Stage 4 Wound Status: Stable Size: 0.8 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.2 cm. Wound Base: 70% epithelial, 30% granulation, 0% slough, 0% eschar. Wound # 5 right buttock Pressure Treatment Recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. apply Collagen Particles to base of the wound. 3. secure with Bordered gauze. 4. change Daily, and PRN. NEW RECOMMENDATIONS: The resident has a treatment change listed above. Please reference the recommended orders for updated treatments 2/5. On 2/8/25 at 9:18 AM, V4, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) and V5, CNA, entered R1's room to provide incontinent care. V4 removed R1's covers. R1 is not wearing heel protectors. R1 had a large liquid bowel movement that has leaked out of R1's incontinent brief. R1's brief was removed. V4 provided incontinent care. R1 did not have a dressing on the right buttock pressure ulcer. V4 confirmed R1 did not have a pressure ulcer dressing on the right buttock. The pressure ulcer was actively bleeding. While providing the incontinent care V4 wiped a stool soiled pre-moistened cloth over the pressure ulcer. V4 and V5 both stated that R1 should have on his heel protectors, and they placed them on him. On 2/8/25 at 10:34 AM, V9, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN entered R1's room to provide R1's right buttock pressure ulcer treatment. V9 cleansed the wound with wound cleaner. The wound bed is red with white edges at the top. V9 measured the wound 3.2 centimeters (cm) long x 1.4 cm wide. V9 applied Hydrogel, Collagen Particles, (Silver Sulfadiazine) SSD cream, calcium alginate and a superabsorbant gauze, and then taped it securely. R1's February 2025 TAR documents, Clean with wound cleanser on right buttock hydrogel, collagen particles, SSD, calcium alginate rope, Cover with super absorbent gauze every day shift for wound care management start date of 1/8/25. This TAR fails to document and order from 2/5/25 of cleanse with wound cleanser, apply collagen particles to base of the wound, secure with bordered gauze. 4. R2's Face Sheet, Print date of 2/10/25, documents R2 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Type 1 Diabetes and Paraplegia. R2's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R2 is cognitively intact, requires partial to moderate assistance for bed mobility, is dependent on staff for transfers, has an indwelling urinary catheter, and an ostomy. R2's Physician Orders, dated 2/7/25, documents, SSD (Silver sulfADIAZINE) External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine) Apply to right buttock topically in the morning for wound care management. R2's Physician Orders, dated 2/6/25, documents right buttock clean wound with wound cleanser cover wound with mixture of SSD, collagen filler and hydrogel cover with calcium alginate cover with bordered gauze every day shift for wound care management AND as needed for whenever the wound dressing comes off or dirty. R2's Physician Orders, dated 2/6/25, documents sacrum clean wound with wound cleanser cover with zinc ointment leave open to air every day shift for wound care management AND as needed after bowl movements. On 2/8/25 at 10:52 AM, V8, Registered Nurse, RN entered R2's to provide pressure ulcer treatments. V8 cleansed the sacrum pressure ulcer with wound cleanser, applied a mixture of SSD, hydrogel, collagen particles, calcium alginate, and covered the pressure ulcer with border gauze. The pressure ulcers were 5.5 cm x 4.5 cm. The wound bed was red. The upper left side of the pressure ulcer had scabs. V8 then cleansed the right buttock pressure ulcer with wound cleanser, applied a mixture of hydrogel, collagen particles, calcium alginate, and covered the pressure ulcer with border gauze. The pressure ulcer measured 3 x 1.5. There is a stitch in the middle of the pressure ulcer. The middle is indented, and the wound bed color is dark pink. V8 stated she just may have done the wrong order on the sacrum. V8 did not remove the applied a mixture of SSD, hydrogel, collagen particles, calcium alginate, and covered the pressure ulcer with border gauze. On 2/8/25 at 11:15 AM, R2 stated that she just returned from the hospital because one of the wounds needed to be cauterized because it would not stop bleeding. On 2/8/25 at 2:30 PM, V8 stated she did not use the SSD cream on the right buttock is because R2 was out. On 2/10/25 at 2:30 PM, V2, Director of Nurses, stated that she is unsure why the orders that the Wound Nurse Practitioner are not put in as orders. A pressure ulcer assessment should be done at admission, readmission, or when a pressure ulcer is found. On 2/13/25 at 11:49 AM, V13, LPN/Wound Nurse, stated a skin assessment should be done within the first two hours of admission. If a pressure ulcer is new, it will get a dressing over it, and I notify the Nurse Practitioner or the Doctor to get orders for it. I then put the order in and do the treatment. I do rounds with the Wound Nurse Practitioner. the Nurse Practitioner will go over the pressure ulcer and then what order she wants. If I am not here the floor nurse will go with the Wound Nurse Practitioner. When she changes an order, I put it in right then that way it gets put in the Physician Orders and to the Treatment Administration Record. The Wound Nurse Practitioner will send an email with the wound information and what order she wants. Sometimes it is the same and sometimes it is different. If a dressing is missing it should be replaced as soon as possible. The dressings should be done as they are ordered. On 2/19/25 at 10:48 AM, V14, Wound Nurse Practitioner, stated We are a contracted company, so we are not allowed to put in orders. The nurses here do it. I have 48 hours to turn in my report with the recommendations which are the orders, but they are called recommendations. Once they get that report, the recommendations should be entered as orders and then carried out. If a new pressure ulcer or wound develops the facility should be calling the Medical Doctor for orders. I am only here once a week so when I come next, I will then look at it. The nurses should be putting on the treatments as they are ordered. The policy Skin Management: Pressure Injury Treatment/ General Wound Treatment, dated 4/2024, documents, General Treatment Guidelines; 1. Review the physician order in the EHR (Electronic Health Record) and place all necessary supplies in treatment care. It continues, 6. Perform the treatment as ordered using proper techniques of infection prevention and control. 9. Pressure Injuries will be evaluated, and the following areas documented weekly (minimum every 7 days). Location. Size: Perpendicular measurement of the greatest extent of length and width of the injury using a disposable measuring device. Depth: insert a swab in wound and gloved finer at end, then measure in centimeters. Presence and location (based on the clock) of undermining/ tunneling/ sinus tract. exudate: type, color, odor, and appropriate amount. pain: Nature and frequency. Wound bed: color and type of tissue / character including evidence of healing (granulation tissue) or necrosis. Description of wound edges and surrounding tissue (rolled edges, redness, maceration, etc.) 10. The staff nurse will notify the Wound Nurse upon identification of skin impairment. If the Wound Nurse is not available, the staff nurse should document the open area on a Skin Screen Form and alert the health Care Provider for treatment orders. 11. When the Wound Care Team assesses the resident, they will take a picture, measure the wounds, review the orders, and update any notes and care plans as appropriate.
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to adhere to their Facility's Abuse Policy and Prevention Program for 1 of 3 residents (R1) in the sample of 3. Findings include: The Facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to adhere to their Facility's Abuse Policy and Prevention Program for 1 of 3 residents (R1) in the sample of 3. Findings include: The Facility's Abuse Policy and Prevention Program dated 10/2022 documents, Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation. It continues to document, Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents. It continues, Informing Local Law Enforcement- The Facility shall also contact local law enforcement authorities in the following situations: When there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed in the facility by a person other than a resident. It continues, If there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed that results in serious bodily harm, a report shall be made to local law enforcement and IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) immediately. If there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed that is not listed above and does not involve serious bodily injury, then a report to local law enforcement as soon as possible, but within 24 hours of when the suspicion was formed. The Facility's Illinois Department of Public Health Incident Report dated 1/11/2025 documents, Incident Category: Drug Diversion. It further documents the victim was R1, who is not capable of communication (due to impaired cognition). It continues to document V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and V5, Registered Nurse (RN) as witnesses. The report continues, The Facility notified me (V2) that medications were missing from the cart for resident. The medication in question is Lorazepam. It is scheduled every 6 hours. His last administered dose was 0600 ( 6 AM) by the midnight nurse. This medication was provided by hospice and was delivered on December 20th. He was provided with 4 (medication) cards for a one month supply. On evenings the night of 1/10 (2025) the third card was zero'd out (marked as empty on the narcotics count book) and 2 doses were given from the new card. Interview with the nurse that worked an evening/night shift recalls that she completed 1 card and started using a new card and that there were 28 (pills) left in the card. The nurse that assumed care of the hall notified the other nurses working on another hall that the medication was not available and they assisted her in reaching out to the hospice team. They learned from hospice the amount and date of last delivery. The three nurses then searched the carts for this missing medication. When they were unable to located this medication they notified me of this issue. Video footage was reviewed and was inconclusive on who took the mediation. (Local) police department was notified and a report was made. Resident was assessed and no negative outcome was noted. The hospice doctor was notified of this occurrence, administrator notified. This report was completed by V2, Director of Nursing (DON). The local police department Incident Report dated 1/15/2025 documents V12, Police Officer responded to the Facility for a report of a theft of medication. It further documents, Complainant called this department to report Lorazepam had been stolen on 1/11/2025. Caller had narrowed down the theft to one nurse and had camera footage of the incident. R1's Progress Notes dated 1/11/2025 documents, Spoke with (V13), RN, with (hospice company) and he stated that the patient should have more accounted for on the Ativan. Stated to the nurse that the DON would like hospice to reorder the Ativan for the resident and bill the facility, RN stated he would order more for the resident, should be out on Monday or Tuesday of next week. On 1/22/2025 at 9:10 AM, V1, Administrator (ADM) stated R1's Ativan was confirmed missing. V1 stated V1 and V2 watched video footage and believe an agency nurse took the medication. V2 stated she expects the nurses to count in between shifts and she did observe V3, Registered Nurse (RN) and the on-coming nurse counting the narcotics at shift change. On 1/22/2025 at 9:53 AM, V2 stated when V4 reached out to the hospice nurse, they determined a card was definitely missing. V2 stated the pharmacy sent 4 cards (Lorazepam, also known as Ativan) on 12/20/2025. V2 stated she attempted to contact V3 to ensure the medication wasn't just misplaced somewhere in the Facility, but received no call back. V2 stated V1 and V2 watched the video footage of V3 on the morning of the incident. V2 stated V3 went all the way down to the end of the hallway, spent 10-20 minutes with the narcotic box left open and kept going in and out of a room of a hospice resident between rummaging in the narcotic box. On 1/22/2025 at 10:15 AM, the video footage was reviewed with V1 and V2 and confirmed what V2 stated in her interview. On 1/22/2025 at 10:35 AM, V7, LPN stated she heard there was a missing medication card, but was unsure if it was ever found. On 1/22/2025 at 11:09 AM, V5, RN stated she worked on 1/11/2025, orientation V4. V5 stated a card of medication came up missing when an agency nurse was working that hall (200). V5 stated V3 was the one who discovered it. V5 stated the medication was never located. V5 stated V4 called the pharmacy to see how many cards had been dispensed as well as called hospice to see how much they ordered. V5 stated V4 did the math and saw with what was sent out, he (R1) should have had a whole card left. V5 stated she looked in all the other carts to make sure it wasn't just misplaced and it was never found. On 1/22/2025 at 2:48 PM, V2 stated, By 2:45 (PM-1/11/2025) I was convinced it (R1's Lorazepam) was gone. V2 stated she was not aware of the timeframe regarding notifying law enforcement officials. V2 stated she completed her investigation prior to calling the police so she could have more information to tell them. On 1/22/2025 at 3:04 PM, V1 stated V2 thought V2 had to prove there was a crime committed before calling law enforcement. V1 stated she informed V2 it should be reported immediately, and then proceed with the internal investigation. V1 stated the Facility policy to to report incidents of suspected crime immediately. On 1/27/2025 at 9:45 AM, V1 stated notifying the local police should have been completed more timely.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to inform local law enforcement in a timely fashion related to suspected misappropriation of a narcotic medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to inform local law enforcement in a timely fashion related to suspected misappropriation of a narcotic medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) in the sample of 3. Findings include: The Facility's Illinois Department of Public Health Incident Report dated 1/11/2025 documents, Incident Category: Drug Diversion. It further documents the victim was R1, who is not capable of communication (due to impaired cognition). It continues to document V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and V5, Registered Nurse (RN) as witnesses. The report continues, The Facility notified me (V2) that medications were missing from the cart for resident. The medication in question is Lorazepam. It is scheduled every 6 hours. His last administered dose was 0600 ( 6 AM) by the midnight nurse. This medication was provided by hospice and was delivered on December 20th. He was provided with 4 (medication) cards for a one month supply. On evenings the night of 1/10 (2025) the third card was zero'd out (marked as empty on the narcotics count book) and 2 doses were given from the new card. Interview with the nurse that worked an evening/night shift recalls that she completed 1 card and started using a new card and that there were 28 (pills) left in the card. The nurse that assumed care of the hall notified the other nurses working on another hall that the medication was not available and they assisted her in reaching out to the hospice team. They learned from hospice the amount and date of last delivery. The three nurses then searched the carts for this missing medication. When they were unable to located this medication they notified me of this issue. Video footage was reviewed and was inconclusive on who took the mediation. (Local) police department was notified and a report was made. Resident was assessed and no negative outcome was noted. The hospice doctor was notified of this occurrence, administrator notified. This report was completed by V2, Director of Nursing (DON). The local police department Incident Report dated 1/15/2025 documents V12, Police Officer responded to the Facility for a report of a theft of medication. It further documents, Complainant called this department to report Lorazepam had been stolen on 1/11/2025. Caller had narrowed down the theft to one nurse and had camera footage of the incident. R1's Progress Notes dated 1/11/2025 documents, Spoke with (V13), RN, with (hospice company) and he stated that the patient should have more accounted for on the Ativan. Stated to the nurse that the DON would like hospice to reorder the Ativan for the resident and bill the facility, RN stated he would order more for the resident, should be out on Monday or Tuesday of next week. On 1/22/2025 at 9:10 AM, V1, Administrator (ADM) stated R1's Ativan was confirmed missing. V1 stated V1 and V2 watched video footage and believe an agency nurse took the medication. V2 stated she expects the nurses to count in between shifts and she did observe V3, Registered Nurse (RN) and the on-coming nurse counting the narcotics at shift change. On 1/22/2025 at 9:53 AM, V2 stated when V4 reached out to the hospice nurse, they determined a card was definitely missing. V2 stated the pharmacy sent 4 cards (Lorazepam, also known as Ativan) on 12/20/2025. V2 stated she attempted to contact V3 to ensure the medication wasn't just misplaced somewhere in the Facility, but received no call back. V2 stated V1 and V2 watched the video footage of V3 on the morning of the incident. V2 stated V3 went all the way down to the end of the hallway, spent 10-20 minutes with the narcotic box left open and kept going in and out of a room of a hospice resident between rummaging in the narcotic box. On 1/22/2025 at 10:35 AM, V7, LPN stated she heard there was a missing medication card, but was unsure if it was ever found. On 1/22/2025 at 11:09 AM, V5, RN stated she worked on 1/11/2025, orientation V4. V5 stated a card of medication came up missing when an agency nurse was working that hall (200). V5 stated V3 was the one who discovered it. V5 stated the medication was never located. V5 stated V4 called the pharmacy to see how many cards had been dispensed as well as called hospice to see how much they ordered. V5 stated V4 did the math and saw with what was sent out, he (R1) should have had a whole card left. V5 stated she looked in all the other carts to make sure it wasn't just misplaced and it was never found. On 1/22/205 at 12:08 PM, V14, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated she was told about the 28 Ativan missing the next day. V14 stated she believes an agency nurse took the medication and the card of medication was never found. On 1/22/2025 at 2:48 PM, V2 stated, By 2:45 (PM-1/11/2025) I was convinced it (R1's Lorazepam) was gone. V2 stated she was not aware of the timeframe regarding notifying law enforcement officials. V2 stated she completed her investigation prior to calling the police so she could have more information to tell them. On 1/22/2025 at 3:04 PM, V1 stated V2 thought V2 had to prove there was a crime committed before calling law enforcement. V1 stated she informed V2 it should be reported immediately, and then proceed with the internal investigation. V1 stated the Facility policy to to report incidents of suspected crime immediately. On 1/27/2025 at 9:45 AM, V1 stated notifying the local police should have been completed more timely. The Facility's Abuse Policy and Prevention Program dated 10/2022 documents, Informing Local Law Enforcement- The Facility shall also contact local law enforcement authorities in the following situations: When there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed in the facility by a person other than a resident. It continues, If there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed that results in serious bodily harm, a report shall be made to local law enforcement and IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) immediately. If there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed that is not listed above and does not involve serious bodily injury, then a report to local law enforcement as soon as possible, but within 24 hours of when the suspicion was formed. It also documents, The purpose of this policy is to assure that the Facility is doing all that is withib it's control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: filing accurate and timely investigative reports.
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide three meals daily at regular times for 4 of 6 residents (R6...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide three meals daily at regular times for 4 of 6 residents (R6, R7, R8, and R10) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 10. Findings include: 1-R6's Face Sheet documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R6 was cognitively intact, ambulated with walker and wheelchair, required supervision with eating, and was on a therapeutic diet. R6's Physician Order dated 6/11/21 documents regular diet order with fortified cereal at breakfast and fortified pudding or ice cream with all meals. R6's Facility Grievance dated 12/19/24 documents, Fri (Friday) the 13th dinner was not given to (R6) when ask (asked) kitchen said they would get - but was on phone it took from 6 PM to 8:10 (PM) to get grilled cheese. The Facility's Grievance response dated 12/20/24 documents items need to go out in a timelier manner and staff members need to stay off their phones. On 1/15/25 at 9:50 AM, R6 stated the food is always late. She said, I don't want to eat at 8:00 PM. 2-R7's Face Sheet documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate protein calorie malnutrition, oral dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and weakness. R7's MDS dated [DATE] documented R7 was cognitively intact, ambulated with wheelchair and walker, required supervision with eating, had weight loss not on physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen, and was on a therapeutic, mechanically altered diet. R7's Physician Order dated 12/30/24 documents renal diet with regular texture and thin liquids. On 1/15/25 at 7:45 AM, R7 stated the meals are always late and you never know when they are going to come. 3-R8's Face Sheet documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition and ileostomy status. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documented R8 was cognitively intact, independent with ambulation, required setup or clean up assistance with eating, and was on a therapeutic diet. R8's Physician Order dated 12/16/24 documents regular, low fat, low cholesterol diet with double portions. R8's Facility Grievance dated 10/10/24 documents, I was sitting in the dining hall at 7:35 AM. I received my coffee, 3 milks, apple juice and silverware but no food after sitting for 30 mins (minutes). She said nobody told her that I was there so she continues making trays for the carts for the halls instead of making my plate. I had no breakfast. Something needs to be done about kitchen workers. The Facility's Grievance Response dated 10/10/24 documents the situation should not have happened. On 1/14/25 at 1:45 PM, R8 stated he filed the grievance because he never got breakfast that day and the kitchen issues need to be addressed. 4-R10's Face Sheet documents R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease stage four (severe). R10's MDS dated [DATE] documented R10 was cognitively intact, ambulated via wheelchair and walker, required supervision with eating, and was on a therapeutic diet. R10's Physician Order dated 3/12/22 documents regular diet with no added salt. On 1/15/25 at 9:52 AM, R10 stated the food is always late. On 1/15/25 at 10:25 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, stated she expects residents to receive three meals a day and expects them to be delivered timely. On 1/15/25 at 1:50 PM, V1, Administrator, stated she would expect the Facility to provide three meals a day and serve them on time. The Facility's Frequency of Meals Policy revised 10/2022 documents, At least three daily meals will be provided, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community. The Dining Services Director will ensure that each meal is served within the designated time frame unless there is an emergency situation or a resident request. The Facility's Meal Times document breakfast is served at 7:30 AM, lunch is served at 11:30 AM, and dinner is served at 5:30 PM.
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a physician's order to remove staples from a wound for 1 of 3 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a physician's order to remove staples from a wound for 1 of 3 residents (R2) residents reviewed for quality of care/treatment in the sample of 3. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis right hip fracture. R2's Medical Record from November 2022 documents no physician's order to remove the surgical staples from the right hip incision. R2's Nurse's Progress Note, dated 11/16/2022 at 9:18 PM documents, staples removed, and steri-strips applied to incision site. R2's Nurse's Progress Note, dated 11/24/2022 at 2:59 AM, documents resident was feeling some discomfort at incision site and still a staple in incision asses there was a staple in incision from previous removal incision cleaned with betadine staple removed repeat of betadine and covered with dry dressing. On 1/9/2025 at 9:00 AM V2, Director of Nurses (DON) stated she expects staff before removing staples from a surgical site to count the number of staples in the incision and then remove the staples and reassess the surgical incision to ensure all staples have been removed. At 1:26 PM V2 stated she expected staff to have a physician's order to remove staples from a surgical incision she stated she went through R2's entire medical record and did not find a physician's order to remove the staples from R2's right hip incision. Review of the Facility's Physician's Order Policy, revised 1/2023, documents physician orders may be written by the provider or received by telephone by a licensed nurse or other licensed or registered health care specialist who are legally authorized to do so. Physician orders are followed as written; if there is a question about the order, contact the physician for clarification.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0776 (Tag F0776)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule a colonoscopy ordered by the physician in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for radiology/other diagnostic services in the sample of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule a colonoscopy ordered by the physician in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for radiology/other diagnostic services in the sample of 4. Findings include: On 10/30/24 at 8:15 AM, R2 stated he went out to the hospital recently because he had vomiting and diarrhea. R2 stated they couldn't find out what was wrong with him at the hospital. R2 stated he had to have colon surgery a few years back but he hasn't seen that doctor because he is in a different county, further away. R2 stated his last colonoscopy was about 5 or 6 years ago at the local hospital and he hasn't had one since. On 10/30/24 at 9:20 AM, V8, R2's POA (Power of Attorney)/Emergency Contact, returned call and stated approximately 2-3 weeks ago, R2 was sent to the hospital with a bowel obstruction, it was cleared and he was sent back to the facility. V8 stated R2 had colon resection surgery years ago and it is important that he has a colonoscopy. V8 stated he has notified V2, DON (Director of Nurses), but the appointment still hasn't been made and he just wants to make sure R2 gets that done. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has a diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/5/24, documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's POS (Physician Order Sheet), documents an order dated 9/10/24 to refer R2 for a colonoscopy screening. On 10/30/24 at 12:25 PM, V2, DON, stated she has been having trouble getting doctors offices to return her calls and she is waiting for the doctor's office to call her back so she can schedule R2's colonoscopy. V2 stated she has talked to V8, R2's POA/Emergency Contact, unsure of date, about him wanting R2 to have a colonoscopy scheduled. V2 stated she tries to follow up so she can get those appointments and transportation set up. On 10/30/24 at 2:05 PM, V1, Administrator, stated they do not have a policy on radiology/diagnostic services.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent pressure ulcer development and failed to provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent pressure ulcer development and failed to provide resident centered interventions, monitoring and orders for residents who were identified to be at risk for pressure ulcers and for residents with pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for skin impairment. This failure resulted in R1 acquiring an unstageable pressure ulcer to his/her left heel and stage 3 pressure ulcer to right buttock; R2 requiring debridement of an unstagable pressure ulcer during a hosptial stay to R2's coccyx. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet with a print date of 10/21/2024 documented R1 has diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, sepsis, cognitive communication deficit, contracture of left knee, dementia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/9/24 documented R1 has moderately impaired cognition. R1's MDS dated [DATE] documented R1 requires substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility and is dependent on staff for all other mobility. R1's care plan, undated, documented R1 is at risk for pressure ulcers related to impaired mobility and incontinence. This care plan documented R1's interventions include assist and encourage resident to turn and reposition frequently, document signs and symptoms of skin break down, low air loss mattress, notify nurse of signs and symptoms of skin breakdown noted during routine care, weekly and prn (as needed) skin assessment. R1's progress note dated 8/30/24 at 10:40 AM by V10 NP (Nurse Practitioner) documented R1 developed a new stage 2 pressure ulcer to left heel. V10 documented wound size 2.5 cm x 4 cm x 0 cm, wound base 100% epithelial, wound edges attached, and exposed tissues: epithelium and dermis. R1's progress note dated 9/5/24 at 9:17 am by V10 NP documented wound left heel, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: stage 2, wound status: worsening, size 3 cm x 5 cm x 0 cm, wound base: 100% eschar. R1's progress note dated 9/12/24 at 10:10 AM by V10 NP documented R1's stage 2 pressure ulcer on left heel as worsening and new measurements of 4.6 cm x 4.5 cm x 0 cm. This progress note documented that R1 was experiencing pain in the heel at rest and that V10 surgically debrided that pressure ulcer during this visit. V10 documented post-debridement measurement of 4.6 cm x 4.5 cm x 0 cm. R1's progress noted dated 9/20/24 at 9:40 am by V10 NP documented R1's stage 2 pressure ulcer on left heel as unstageable. On 10/17/24 at 8:35 am R1 was observed in bed on a regular mattress lying on his back. On 10/17/24 at 11:35 am V8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)/Wound Nurse and V9 LPN/former Wound Nurse were observed as they performed wound care to R1's heel. V9 stated R1's heel started out as what appeared as a bruise and that the pressure ulcer worsened and developed tunneling in the wound. V9 stated she would consider the pressure ulcer on R1's heel to be a stage 4 since it has the tunneling but she must document what the Nurse Practitioner stages the wound as, so she documented a stage 2 on the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) wound evaluation with a picture dated 9/12/24 at 3:07 pm. V9 stated that R1 is supposed to be on a low air loss mattress and she doesn't know why he isn't unless it didn't get moved when he changed rooms about a week ago. V9 stated that R1's only pressure ulcer is on R1's left heel and that R1 does not have any pressure ulcers on his backside. Surveyor then requested to observe R1's buttock region. V8 and V9 then turned R1 onto his right side revealing a large undated dressing covering R1's coccyx and partially covering R1's left buttock. V9 stated to V8 he has a wound on his bottom and a dressing over it. V8 replied no one told me. V9 then removed the dressing from R1's buttock/coccyx region revealing a large area of detached skin approximately 6 cm x 6 cm on left buttocks from what appeared to have been a fluid filled blister that had drained and an approximate 1 cm x 1 cm open area to R1's coccyx. V9 stated that R1's EMR does not document anything regarding these open areas to R1's buttock and coccyx. V9 stated that R1 does not have a treatment order for these wounds and that she would have expected the nurse to notify R1's doctor about the new pressure ulcers and get orders for a treatment. V9 stated that she expects the staff to turn and reposition R1 at least every two hours. On 10/17/24 at 11:55 am R1 stated that the staff do not turn him very often and that he was on his back all morning until the nurses changed his dressing. R1's progress note dated 10/17/24 with time of service at 12:14 pm V10 NP documented left heel stage 3 pressure ulcer, right buttock new stage 2 pressure ulcer 6 cm x 6.1 cm, and coccyx new DTI (deep tissue injury) with primary etiology as pressure measuring 1 cm x 0.6 cm. R1's progress notes orders do not documented anything regarding the pressure wounds on R1's buttock and coccyx region until V8 and V9 discovered the wounds upon the surveyor's request to observe R1's skin on R1's buttock region. R1's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) documented a new order to cleanse buttock with wound cleanser, apply calcium alginate, collagen, Silvadene, cover with bordered gauze everyday shift to promote wound healing dated 10/18/24. This treatment is not signed off as completed on 10/20/24 as ordered. R1's TAR documented an order to apply calcium alginate, collagen, Silvadene, and rolled gauze to R1's left heel daily dated 10/17/24. This treatment is not signed off as completed on 10/20/24. On 10/21/24 at 11:32 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated that she would have expected the nurse that placed the dressing on R1 to call R1's doctor and get a treatment for the pressure ulcers that were found but were not documented on R1's coccyx and buttock. V2 stated that she would have expected R1 to be on a low air loss mattress as is on his care plan. On 10/21/24 at 3:45 pm V1 Administrator stated that she would expect interventions to be in place as care planned and that R1 should have been on a low air loss mattress. V1 stated that if a treatment is not signed off on the TAR, then it was not completed as ordered. 2. R2's face sheet with a print date of 10/21/24 documented R2 has diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy with macular edema, diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, depression, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorders, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic kidney disease. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented R2 is severely cognitively impaired and is dependent on staff for bed mobility. R2's progress note dated 8/9/24 at 11:30 AM documented R2 has a new skin condition. Please see skin condition observation for details. R2's skin condition report dated 8/9/24 at 12:06 PM documented left buttocks open area, Kennedy ulcer in appearance. R2's skin and wound progress note dated 8/22/24 at 9:55 AM by NP V10 documented reason for visit: new skin and wound consult on current resident. It continues, wound assessment: Wound 1, location: coccyx, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: unstageable, wound status: new. R2's skin and wound progress note dated 9/5/24 at 8:16 AM by NP V10 documented wound 1, location: coccyx, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: unstageable. It continues, wound 2, location: right heel, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: DTI (deep tissue injury), size 1.5 cm x 2 cm x 0 cm. It continues, wound #2 right heel pressure treatment recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. Apply skin prep to base of the wound. 3. Leave open to air. 4. Daily treatment. R2's skin and wound progress note dated 9/16/24 at 2:41 PM by NP V10 documented wound 1, location: coccyx, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: unstageable, size: 1.5 cm x 3 cm x 0.5 cm, wound status: stable. It continues, wound 2, location: right heel, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: DTI (deep tissue injury, size 1.5 cm x 2 cm x 0 cm. R2's skin and wound progress note dated 10/3/24 at 8:47 AM by NP V10 documented wound 1, location: coccyx, size 1.5 cm x 2.6 cm x 0.7 cm. Undermining from 12 o'clock to 1 o'clock, 3 cm. It continues, wound #1 coccyx pressure treatment recommendations: 1. Cleanse with wound cleanser. 2. Apply Dakins moistened fluffed gauze to base of the wound. 3. Secure the bordered gauze. 4. Change daily, and PRN (as needed). R2's skin and wound progress note dated 10/11/24 at 11:12 AM by NP V10 documented wound 1, location: coccyx, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: unstageable, size 3 cm x 3.2 cm x 0.7 cm, undermining from 10 o'clock to 3 o'clock. It continues, wound 2, location: right heel, primary etiology: pressure, stage/severity: stage 3, wound status: worsening, size: 0.5 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.1 cm. R2's TAR dated October 2024 documented a treatment order for R2's coccyx to cleanse with wound cleanser and apply Dakins moistened fluffed gauze everyday and night shift for wound care management. R2's October 2024 TAR does not document that this treatment was performed as ordered on the following day shifts: 10/4/24, 10/5/24, and 10/9/24. R2's TAR dated October 2024 documented a treatment order to R2's right heel to be cleansed with wound cleanser and to apply skin prep everyday shift for wound care management. R2's October 2024 does not document that this treatment was completed on 10/2/24, 10/4/24, and on 10/5/24 as ordered by R2's physician and as recommended by V10 NP for wound consultant company. R2's wound progress notes by NP V10 were reviewed and none of the progress notes by V10 documented a diagnosis of a Kennedy ulcer on R2's coccyx. R2's EMR does not document a diagnosis of a Kennedy ulcer by a Physician nor by a Nurse Practitioner. R2's progress note dated 10/12/24 at 1:20 PM documented that R2 was transferred to a local hospital. R2's hospital progress note dated 10/16/24 at 7:33 PM documented Plan #3. Left buttock decubitus ulcer. This is a deep ulcer. Doctor V15 has debrided it. Wet to dry dressing should be continued and the patient will need frequent repositioning. R2's hospital records were reviewed, and these records do not document that R2's pressure ulcer is a Kennedy ulcer. On 10/17/24 at 12:06 PM V9 stated that R2's pressure ulcer looked like it was the start of a Kennedy ulcer when it started and that is what she documented on R2's wound evaluation form. On 10/21/24 at 11:32 AM V2 DON stated that she is not sure where R2's diagnosis on a Kennedy ulcer came from. The facility's Skin Management: Monitoring of Wounds and Documentation policy dated 1/2022 documented it is important that the facility have a system in place to assure that the protocols for daily monitoring and for periodic documentation of measurements, terminology, frequency of assessment, and documentation are implemented consistently throughout the facility. Responsible Party: All nursing staff. General Guidelines: An evaluation of the PU/PI (pressure ulcer/pressure injury), in no dressing is present; an evaluation of the status of the dressing, if present (whether it is intact and whether drainage, if present, is or is not leaking); the status of the area surround the PU/PI; the presence of possible complications, such as signs of increasing area of ulceration or soft tissue infection; and whether pain, if present, is being adequately controlled. The facility's Skin Management: Pressure Injury Treatment/General Wound Treatment Policy dated 6/2015 documented General: The following treatment guidelines have been developed to serve as a general protocol for selecting the type of treatment or dressing to be used. It continues, an order is required for all treatment orders. Responsible Party: All nursing staff. General Guidelines: implement prevention protocol according to resident needs, sensory perception risk factor: watch for nonverbal cues, assess areas of the body that do not feel pain for openings or redness, Moisture: avoid prolonged periods of wetness, apply moisture barrier with each incontinent episode, choose treatments that do not cause skin maceration, Activity: turn and reposition as needed using a person-centered approach (minimum of every 2 hours). It continues 10. The staff nurse will notify the Wound Nurse upon identification of skin impairment. If the Wound Nurse is not available, the staff nurse should document the open area on a skin screen form and alert the health care provider for treatment orders.
Sept 2024 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident from resident-to-resident physical abuse for 3 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident from resident-to-resident physical abuse for 3 of 3 residents (R8, R54, R135) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 40. Findings Include: R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R54 is severely cognitively impaired. R54's Face sheet dated 3/4/22 documents R54 has Alzheimer's Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Psychosis Unspecified. R54's Abuse Care Plan dated 3/15/22 documents R54 is at risk for abuse neglect due to dementia and depression (R54) will have zero episodes of abuse and neglect. Intervention: Assess resident for abuse and neglect. R54's Resident to Resident Abuse Investigation dated 1/15/24 documents an altercation between (R135) and (R54). (R54) was trying to take (135's) bedside table, when (R135) hit (R54) with her cane on the head. (R135) claims that (R54) was trying to take her (R135) over the bed table and said it was hers. (R135) told (R54) that she has had the table since she moved in, because she eats in her room. (R135) stated she only has use of one hand, so she (R135) put the impaired hand up to hold (R54) back from her and used the other hand to pick up her quad cane and lifted it up at (R54) to back (R54) up from her. She (R135) said she doesn't have much strength to hold up a quad cane in one hand, So she didn't hit (R54). (R54) has confusion and her statement changes. (R54)'s son, (V19) understands the situation and asked to be called with any changes. (V18), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported to (V2), DON (Director of Nursing) that (R135) hit her roommate (R54) with cane, because she was going to go through her drawers. Police were called and no report was generated. (R54) has a hematoma on her head. (V18), LPN stated this writer was called to the resident's room by one staff. Upon entering room (R135) is sitting in her wheelchair holding her cane. (R135) states she hit her roommate (R54) with her cane, because she told her to leave her bedside table alone, and she would not. Educated to use a call light for resident altercation and help needed with ADL's (activities of daily living) resident voiced understanding will continue to monitor. R54's Progress Note dated 1/15/24 documents (R54) have a hematoma (measuring) 0.5 cm (centimeter) x 0.8 cm to left cranium frontal lobe. R135's Face Sheet dated 2/14/24 documents (R135) has a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction Unspecified Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis. R135's MDS dated [DATE] documents R135 is cognitively intact. R8's Resident to Resident Abuse Investigation dated 3/2/24 documents (R8) claims (R54) was going through her belongings and an argument started over whose belongings they were. She (R8) claims (R54) then walked toward her, while she was in bed and (R8), put her hands up and started yelling and nurse came in and separated them. (R54) denies that she physically touched her roommate and isn't able to describe what happened. (V2), DON (Director of Nursing) states that (R54) gets conversations confused and believes that all belongings in a room belong to her. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documents R8 is moderately cognitively impaired. R8's Electronic Health Record Diagnosis section documents her diagnoses are Schizoaffective Disorder, Depression, Schizophrenia, and Major Depression Disorder. On 09/12/24 12:28 PM, (V18), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she cannot recall the incident between (R8) and (R135) On 09/12/24 12:34 PM, (V17), LPN stated they were arguing in the room and (R54) picked up some of (V8) things and she grabbed (V8) hair and (R54) got a scratch on her face. On 9/12/24 at 1:30 PM, (V1), Administrator stated she (R54) has had a decline, and she is no longer able to walk, she is on hospice. The facility Abuse Policy and Prevention Program dated 10/2022 documents physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Residents who allegedly abused another resident shall be immediately evaluated to determine the most suitable therapy, care approaches, and placement. Considering his or her safety as well as the safety of other residents and employees of the facility in addition the facility shall take all steps necessary to ensure the safety of residents including but not limited to the separation of the residents.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 5 residents (R73) revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 5 residents (R73) reviewed for abuse, in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 8:35 AM, (R73) stated everything is going ok. She stated she did have a few incidents with some CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants), one scratched her back with the call light and another one attacked her. She stated she reported the incidents to (V1) administrator and she called the police and one of them went to jail. R73's Progress Note dated 6/20/24 at 6:01 PM documents, Resident c/o (complained of) her night CNA being rough and rude. She didn't know the CNAs name. There were no new skin issues to report. Will continue to monitor. R73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents (R73) is alert and oriented. On 9/10/24 at 4:05 PM, (V1) stated, no staff or (V2), DON (Director of Nursing) informed her of (R73's) allegation on 6/20/24 that a CNA had been rough and rude to her during care. (V1) stated, she would expect staff to report any allegation made by a resident of mistreatment so she can investigate it. The facility' policy, Abuse Policy and Prevention Program 2022 documents, The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, or mistreatment. The facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by by staff and mistreatment of residents. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or the compliance officer. In the absence of the administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act in the administrator's absence. Supervisors shall immediately inform the administrator or person designated to act in the administrator's absence of all reports of incidents, allegations or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. Upon learning of the report, the administrator or designee shall initiate an incident investigation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 5 residents (R73) reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 5 residents (R73) reviewed for abuse, in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 8:35 AM, (R73) stated everything is going ok. She stated she did have a few incidents with some CNAs, one scratched her back with the call light and another one attacked her. She stated she reported the incidents to (V1),the administrator and she called the police and one of them went to jail. R73's Progress Note dated 6/20/24 at 6:01 PM documents, Resident c/o (complained of) her night CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) being rough and rude. She didn't know the CNAs name. There were no new skin issues to report. Will continue to monitor. R73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents (R73) is alert and oriented. On 9/10/24 at 4:05 PM, (V1), Administrator stated no staff or (V2), Director of Nursing (DON) informed her of (R73's) allegation on 6/20/24 that a CNA had been rough and rude to her with care. (V1) stated she would expect staff to report any allegation of mistreatment made by a resident so she can investigate it. The facility' policy, Abuse Policy and Prevention Program 2022 documents, The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. The facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by by staff and mistreatment of residents. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or the compliance officer. In the absence of the administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act in the administrator's absence. Supervisors shall immediately inform the administrator or person designated to act in the administrator's absence of all reports of incidents, allegations or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. Upon learning of the report, the administrator or designee shall initiate an incident investigation. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation. Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health immediately, but not more than two hours after the allegation of abuse. Any incident that does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure residents did not elope the facility for 1 of 3 resident (R71...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure residents did not elope the facility for 1 of 3 resident (R71) reviewed for elopements in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 09/10/24 at 10:09 AM, (R71) was exit seeking and was on one on ones with staff. R71's POS (Physician Order Sheet), September 2024, documents a diagnosis of chronic ischemic heart disease, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, hyperlipidemia, hypokalemia, cannabis abuse with withdrawal, anxiety disorder, elevation myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, abnormal weight loss, pain, depression, other psychoactive substance, depression, deficiency of other, hypertension, post-traumatic stress, hypertension. (R71)'s POS also documents, check placement of wander guard every shift, every shift equipment Maintenance. Order date 2/29/2024. Check placement of wander guard every shift, every shift Equipment Maintenance.(start date 2/29/2024). Evening room sweep. Every evening shift for safety monitoring. (Order date 6/7/2024). Replace wander guard every 90 days and document location of replacements every day shift every 3 month(s) starting on the 29th for 84 day(s), Equipment Maintenance. R71's Care Plan date initiated 2/29/2024, Behavior is at risk related exit seeking, wandering. Goal: Will remain free from making elopement attempts throughout next review. Date initiated 2/29/2024. Interventions: Check placement of wand guard every shift. May use wander guard to monitor resident for safety. Communication: at risk for communication deficit related being hard of hearing. Date initiated 3/8/2024. Cognitive Status: At risk for impaired cognitive status related BIMS (brief interview mental status) of 12 (moderately impaired), recent intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, cerebral aneurysm, hydrocephalies. Date initiated 3/8/2024. R71's MDS dated [DATE] documents (R71) was moderately impaired for cognition for activities of daily living. R71's Elopement evaluation effective date 7/24/2024 documents (R71) is at high risk for elopement. On 9/13/2024 at 12:42 PM, (V27), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, (R71) wanders around, and at times he is confused and will say he has to go home and anytime he is close to the doors the alarms will go off. I am aware of two occasions that he got out. Anytime he goes out the alarms will go off. I was not working the last time he got out. I know he got out a couple of times. On 9/13/2024 at 12:49 PM, (V28), Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated, (R71) is very confused and is always saying he wants to go home. He is a wanderer. He does have a wandergaurd and anytime he gets close to the doors it will sound, go off. I was not working the day he eloped. I was part of the IDT (Interdisciplinary team) that reviewed his elopement the next day and when (V1), Administrator, viewed the tapes (R71) did leave the building. All I really know is from the meeting we determined he should be placed on one on ones and he is now. R71's Progress Notes dated 8/16/2024 at 8:31 PM, This nurse went on break at 7:10 PM in the parking lot when notified by staff that there was no sign of resident inside the building. Once this writer got back into the building staff members double checked rooms and any door in the facility and still did not note resident. As this writer was proceeding to call 911, 911 called facility and notified facility that resident was at apartment building next door to the facility, and staff members went to get resident, as they were driving around looking for resident and spotted him at the apartments with police officers. Once resident arrived back to the facility resident was immediately assessed, blood pressure 136/81, pulse was 101, temperature was 97.7 F, and oxygen saturations were 95%, and respiratory 20. No new skin injuries were noted, resident had prior scratch to left side of neck that keeps opening due to constantly scratching. Scratch was cleaned off and dry dressing applied to neck. Resident stated, he was tired from walking but that he is okay. Resident is currently on one to one observations by staff members until further notice. R71's Progress Notes dated 8/16/2024 at 7:30 PM, Called to North hall by (CNA), Certified Nursing Assistant on duty, resident was unable to be contacted by staff, all rooms and building were checked with no results. Surround building is being searched at this time. (draft). R71's Progress Notes dated 8/13/2024 at 5:30 PM, Resident exit seeking, wander guard in place, stated he's going to (town). Patient educated on safety, discharge procedures, and health condition. After patient redirected back to room where he is resting quietly. R71's Progress Notes dated 8/14/2024 at 9:30 AM, Replace wander guard every 90 days and document location of replacement every day shift, every 3 month (s) starting on the 28th for 84 days. Equipment maintenance. On 9/13/2024 at 2:30 PM, (V1), Administrator stated, (R71) did get out of the facility. When I reviewed the tapes, he was hanging on the door on the acesss door and then after 15 seconds it opened and he walked out. We were able to find him as he was next door. The Elopement and unsafe wandering prevention and management policy dated 5/13/2023 documents, Our mission to provide safe compassionate care and services to maintain the safety of our residents, and maximize each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Access doors on some units are alarmed so that staff can secure the environment rather than the resident and can intercede when a resident wants to leave the unit or safe area. When possible, staff is advised to walk with the resident off the unit area, rather than restrict him from leaving. All staff are responsible for responding to a door/elevation alarm immediately. This response will include visual check of the immediate vicinity surrounding the door/elevator that tripped the alarm, including the stairwells and outside area.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for 1 of 1 resident (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for 1 of 1 resident (R54) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence in the sample of 40. Findings Include: R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents (R54) is always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. R54's Incontinence Care Plan documents (R54) is incontinent of bowel and bladder. (R54)'s goal is to be kept clean, dry, and odor free. (R54)'s intervention provide incontinence care when incontinent. On 9/11/24 at 11:45 AM, (V11), (CNA) Certified Nursing Assistant, (V12), CNA and (V13), CNA all entered the resident's room and told (R54) they were going to clean her up and get her ready for lunch. (V13), CNA pulled down the resident's incontinent brief and wiped each side of her vaginal area and the middle. (V13), CNA then turned the resident over to wipe her buttocks and rectal area. The incontinent brief was heavily soiled with yellow urine from one end of the incontinent brief to the other end of the incontinent brief. The incontinent pad underneath (R54) was also stained with yellow urine. On 9/11/24 at 12:00 PM, (V13), CNA stated, I checked her this morning. I'm all confused I can't remember the time. On 9/13/24 at 7:50 AM, (V21), CNA stated, every two hours. On 9/13/24 at 7:55 AM, (V22), CNA stated, we check every two hours. On 09/13/24 10:12 AM, (V2), Director of Nursing (DON) stated, at least every two hours. On 9/11/24 at 12:00 PM, (V26), (R54)'s Son stated, I have come in and found my mom wet. She (R54) went out to the hospital and was septic with dehydration. The facility's policy Incontinence Care dated 9/2023 documents incontinence care is provided to keep residents as dry, comfortable and odor free as possible. It also helps in preventing skin breakdown.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were labeled with open dates, for 5 of 5 residents (R20, R52, R242, R235 and R242), reviewed for med...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were labeled with open dates, for 5 of 5 residents (R20, R52, R242, R235 and R242), reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 9/10/2024 at 10:00 AM, the 400/500 hall medication cart was observed with (V6), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). At this time: There was an Insulin Pen with (R20)'s name on it, there was no date the insulin pen was opened. At this time (V6) stated she didn't know the insulin pen should be dated the date it was open and she didn't know what day the insulin pen was opened because she was an agency nurse. On 9/10/2024 at 10:04 AM, There was an Insulin Pen with (R242)'s name on it, there was no date the insulin pen was opened. On 9/10/2024 at 10:06 AM, There was an Insulin pen with (R235)'s name on it, there was no date the insulin pen was opened. On 9/10/2024 at 10:15 AM, the 100-hall medication cart was observed with (V7), LPN. At that time there was an Insulin pen with (R52)'s name on it, there was no date the insulin pen was opened. At this time (V7) stated she was a new LPN and she didn't know to date the insulin pens when they are opened and she didn't know what day (R52)'s insulin pen was opened. On 9/10/2024 at 10:35 AM, (V2) the Director of Nurses (DON) stated she expects all staff to date insulin pens the date they are opened because they expire after 28 days and the facility needs to know when to discard of the insulin pen. (V2) was not aware there were undated insulin pens in the medication carts. The facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy with a revision date of 6/2024 documents, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securing, and properly following the manufacturing or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Responsible Party: Nursing.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and at a safe a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 4 of 5 (R6, R24, R47, R66) residents reviewed for food temperatures in the sample of 40. Findings include: 1- R66's MDS dated [DATE] documents (R66) was moderately cognitively impairment for decision making for activities of daily living. On 9/10/2024 at 7:55 AM, during the breakfast meal, all food was being served on Styrofoam plates. The hall trays did not have any insulation for the bottoms and only the top dome was placed on top. The meals were placed on tray and taken to the halls. On 9/11/2024 at 2:42 PM, during the group meeting (R66) stated the food was cold and staff do not pass out the trays and the food gets cold, and staff do not offer to heat the food up. We have been complaining about the food and nothing changes. 2-R47's MDS dated [DATE] documents (R47) was cognitively intact for decision making. On 9/11/2024 at 2:44 PM, (R47) stated, I am the president of the resident council and we have been having complaints about food for at least six months. I believe the Dietary Manager (V26) tried her best, but I do not believe it is her fault. We have formed a special food committee but honestly the food is not getting better. The food is cold, and they ask us every month what meal we would like for the meal of the month, and we vote and tell them, but we never get it. They do not follow up with us let us know why, they just pretend it is not a big deal. Snacks are a joke and I do not believe there are enough snacks for everyone. I do not think they have enough money budgeted for food. 3-R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents he was cognitively intact for decision making for activities of daily living. On 9/11/2024 at 2:45 PM, (R6) stated he attends every resident council meeting and food has been an issue for at least six months. There was a special committee formed because of all the complaints. The food is not improving and still has issues. Issues with cold food, we have complained but it is not better, and it is still a problem. 4- R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she was cognitively intact for decision making for activities of daily living. On 9/11/2024 at 2:47 PM, (R24) was not able to communicate with her mouth, but was able to type out all of her responses on her cell phone. She stated she was not happy with the food. Food was cold, everyone has complained. We have complained at resident council meetings for month after month and nothing has changed. Food is cold. On 9/13/2024 at 8:11 AM, kitchen staff was serving breakfast. On 9/13/2024 at 8:15 AM, Breakfast hall trays went out for the 100 hall. The trays remained on the cart and no staff attempted to pass out the trays when they arrived on the halls. On 9/13/2024 at 8:20 the kitchen staff ran out of bowls and the breakfast service stopped. On 9/13/2024 at 8:23 AM, (V26), Dietary Manger stated we do not have enough bowls but we have ordered bowls, but they are not here yet. We are waiting for bowls to finish the service. On 9/13/2024 at 8:35 AM, the hall trays started being passed out on the 100 and 200 halls at 8:29 AM. On 9/13/2024 at 8:41 AM, after the last tray had been passed a sample tray was taken. The tray was not attractive all of the hues were gray and slight yellowish hue. The food was not palatable and or appetizing. The flavor was bland and not seasoned well. The oven casserole egg was not palatable or flavorful. On 9/13/2024 at 8:42 AM, The following temperatures were taken with a metal calibrated thermometer, pureed eggs 126.4 Fahrenheit (F), oatmeal 133.4F, brown unidentified brown substance 80.0F, oven baked eggs 166.5F. Only one of the six items was within the acceptable range of 135 F or higher. On 9/13/2024 at 10:27 AM, (V23), Activity Aid stated, I have had some complaints from resident regarding the food being cold. I know we formed a food council on top of the resident council. I know they still complain about the food being cold. On 9/13/2024 at 10:30 AM, (V24), Activity Director, when I took over in April/May of this year they had already had a food counsel to address any concerns regarding dietary. There were a lot of complaints related to food. (V20), Dietary Manager completes those forms. During resident council we go over all of the departments and the main concern that I have heard voiced has been the vegetables, being overdone and portions. There has also been a couple times of resident voicing concerns regarding cold food. R185's Grievance dated 9/5/2024 documents, Went to breakfast biscuits and gravy had a good taste wanted to eat but was cold. Result of action: He said to cook sausage longer but the taste was good just needed to be hotter. Talked to cook. Was concern resolved? Yes, The Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 6/25/2024, Are foods served at the proper temperature? Back and forth. The Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 7/22/2024 documents, Are foods served at the proper temperature? His and Miss/Most said No. No August and or September Meeting Minutes were available for August or September. The Food Preparation Policy with a revision date of 2/2023 documents, The Dining Services Director/Cook (s) will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize the amount of time that food items are exposed to temperature greater than 41 degrees F and/or less than 135 F (Fahrenheit), or per state regulations. The Dining Services Operations Policy with a revision date of February 2014 documents, This is an audit tool to evaluate the accuracy of meal assembly and the qualities aspects of the meal. Data should be reviewed to identify any patterns of deficient practices that would trigger a quality improvement project. Testing includes the following criteria: Temperature of foods, appearance of food.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. On 9/12/2024 at 12:50 PM, (V14), Wound nurse was doing treatments on (R20). During the treatment (V14), removed the old bandages from (R21)'s wounds, and cleaned the wound with a saturated gauze. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. On 9/12/2024 at 12:50 PM, (V14), Wound nurse was doing treatments on (R20). During the treatment (V14), removed the old bandages from (R21)'s wounds, and cleaned the wound with a saturated gauze. The wounds were open, and they were bleeding. After (V14) cleaned the wound, (V14) removed her gloves and put on a new pair of gloves but did not wash her hands and or apply any disinfectant in between before donning a new set of gloves. (V14) then began touching the clean bandages and applying them to (R21)'s leg. 3. On 9/12/24 at 12:00 PM, (V14), LPN/Wound Nurse provided pressure ulcer treatment for (R58) who has pressure ulcers on her sacrum, right ischium and left ischium. (V14) donned gloves and gown (already wearing an N-95 mask related to COVID outbreak). She removed the soiled dressings from all three pressure ulcers and cleansed all three pressure ulcers with wound cleanser and gauze. (V14) cleansed the infected pressure ulcer to (R58)'s sacrococcygeal area first, then cleansed the pressure ulcer on her left ischium and then the pressure ulcer on her right ischium last. (V14) went directly from one wound to the next when cleaning the pressure ulcers without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene between sites. R58's Face Sheet documents she has a diagnosis of Osteomyelitis of Vertebra, Sacrum and Sacrococcygeal Region. R58's Physician Order dated 9/4/24 documents: Vancomycin intravenous solution 1000 mg (milligrams)/200 ml (milliliters) every 12 hours related to other Acute Osteomyelitis, unspecified site. On 9/12/24 at 12:40 PM (V16), Wound Nurse Practitioner, stated by not changing her gloves between cleansing each of (R58)'s separate pressure ulcers, (V14) increased the risk of cross contaminating the wounds with infection. She stated there is a chance she has the same etiology in each wound but it is only established she has osteomyelitis in her sacral wound. (V16) stated (V14) should have washed her hands and changed her gloves between each wound. 4. On 9/11/24 at 3:17 PM (V10), LPN provided medication to (R65) via her g-tube . (V10) did not perform hand hygiene or don a gown prior to entering (R65)'s room. The water was running in (R65)'s bathroom when (V10) first entered (R65)'s room and (V10) partially filled two cups with water, but did not wash her hands. She donned gloves and proceeded to administer medication via (R65)'s g-tube. After completing g-tube medication administration, (V10) left room without performing hand hygiene, went to computer to verify amount of insulin (R65) was to receive, re-entered the room and washed her hands, donned gloves, and administered insulin per order. (V10) then left room and used alcohol hand sanitizer. There was a sign on the door documenting (R65) is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to having a g-tube and documented a gown and gloves are required to be worn by staff when performing High-Contact Resident Care Activities. When asked why she did not wear a gown while administering medications via (R65)'s g-tube, (V10) stated, (R65) does not have anything going on that requires barrier precautions. It's her roommate who is on precautions because of her wounds and I think she has (C-Diff ), Clostridium Difficile Colitis. The facility's policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), revised 10/16/23 documents, Our facility employs the use of EBP to reduce transmission of MDRO's (Multidrug-resistant organisms) to staff hands and clothing that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. EBP are indicated (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with any of the following: open wounds that require a dressing regardless of MDRO status or an indwelling medical device regardless of MDRO status, or colonization with a targeted MDRO/XDRO (Extensively Drug-Resistant Organisms). Process: Staff utilize gowns and gloves for high-contact resident care activities when residents require EBP; high-contact resident care activities may include: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, and wound care: any skin opening requiring dressing. The facility's policy, Skin Management: Pressure Injury Treatment/General Wound Treatment reviewed 1/2023, documents, General Treatment Guidelines: 5. Remove and discard dressing and gloves. Perform hand hygiene and apply new gloves. When treating an individual with multiple pressure injuries, treat the most contaminated area last. Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to follow infection control policy and guideline for 4 of 4 residents (R65, R58, R54, R20) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1.R54's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 8/23/24 documents (R54) has a wound to her coccyx. R54's POS dated 9/4/24 documents (R54) has a wound to her right heel. On 9/12/24 at 1:15 PM there was signage on the door stating that someone in the room is on enhanced precautions. Along with what should be worn. On 9/12/24 at 1:30 PM, (V11), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), (V12), CNA, and (V13), CNA all entered (R54)'s room and told her (R54) they were going to clean her up and get her ready for lunch. That room was on enhanced precautions, and they went in to do incontinent care and were not wearing gowns. On 9/12/24 at 1:30 PM, (V140, Wound Nurse and (V16), Wound Nurse Practitioner entered the room with (V15), CNA and told the resident that she was going to do her dressings. (V15), CNA went in and got on the other side of the bed and held (R54) over. (V14) removed all old bandages from her coccyx, right heel, and upper thigh, and then cleansed the areas with wound cleanser. She then sanitized her hands and removed her gown and left the room. (R14), Wound Nurse, did not hand sanitize or change gloves after removing the old dressings. On 9/13/24 at 7:50 AM, (V21), CNA stated, we should wear gowns, gloves, and eye protection. On 9/13/24 at 7:55 AM, (V22), CNA stated, we should wear PPE (personal protective equipment).
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0836 (Tag F0836)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility to provide a competent licensed nurse to provide care for one of one residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility to provide a competent licensed nurse to provide care for one of one residents (R9) review for licensing compliance in the sample of 10. Findings Include: R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R9 is cognitively intact. R9's Pain Care Plan dated 3/1/24 documents pain: alteration in comfort. Goal: (R9) will maintain adequate level of comfort as evidenced by no s/s (signs or symptoms) of pain or distress. Intervention: administer pain meds (medications) and treatments as ordered. Assess effectiveness of pain med. R9's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 3/1/24 documents Acetaminophen tablet 325 mg (milligrams) give two tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. On 7/31/24 at 2:30 PM R9 stated, I started asking for Tylenol at 2:30 AM in the early hours of Saturday Morning (7/27/24). At 5:00 AM V20 the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) came to my room and I asked her to tell the nurse again that I needed pain medication. At around 5:30 AM (V20) CNA brought me my Tylenol. The nurse (V19 Registered Nurse RN) gave it to her (V20) to give to me. I told the day shift nurse what happened when she came in. R9's Emar (Electronic Medication Administration Record) Medication Administration Note dated 7/27/24 at 6:41 PM documents Acetaminophen 325 mg given. R9's Medication Administration Record for the month of July documents that the last dose of Acetaminophen was charted on 7/27/24 at 6:41 PM. (V19 did not chart the dose of acetaminophen given by V20). On 7/31/24 at 11:52 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, I don't condone what the nurse (V19) did. The nurse on day shift notified me Saturday morning as soon as I learned of it. I talked to V1 (administrator). I reached out to the CNA (V20) (Certified Nursing Assistant), and she admitted to having administered the medication. The agency nurse was told she (V19) cannot come back and her agency (staffing agency) was notified. On 7/31/24 at 12:15 V1 Administrator stated, that nurse (V19) will not be back. I thought she was pretty good. She usually works on day shift. On 7/31/24 at 1:00 PM an attempt to interview both V19 RN and V20 CNA was made, but they did not respond to this request. The Facility policy Medication Administration dated 4/24 documents all medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness. Medications are administered by licensed personnel.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine drugs in a timely manner for 4 of 4 residents (R1,R2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine drugs in a timely manner for 4 of 4 residents (R1,R2, R3, R4) reviewed for Pharmacy services in the sample of 10. This failure resulted in residents missing medications such as insulin, antihypertensives, and anticoagulants. Findings Include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Pulmonary Hypertension, Mitral Valve Prolaspe, Congestive Heart Failure, and Bactermia. R1's Facesheet also documents R1's facility assigned pharmacy is 274 miles away, which is 4 hours and 16 minutes travel. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of July documents R1 did not receive Empagliflozin 10 mg (milligrams) daily for Diabetes Type 2, Spironolactone 25 mg daily for Edema, Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily for Urinary Retention, Carvedilol 12.5 mg one twice daily for High Blood pressure/Heart Failure, Gabapentin 300 mg one twice daily for Nerve Pain, Sacubitril-Valsartan 24-26 mg one twice daily for Heart Failure, and Metronidazole 500 mg three times a day for infection was not given on 7/6/24. R1's Nurses Note dated 7/6/24 documents new admit medications not in. R1's Nurses Note dated 7/5/24 documents R1 arrived at the facility at 8:37 PM. 2. R2's Face sheet dated 7/10/24 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm, Acute Respiratory Failure, Crerbrovascular Disease, Hypokalemia, Hyperglycemia, Atherosclerotic Disease,Hypertension, and Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent R2's MAR for the month of July documents R2 did not receive Bupropion 100 mg three times daily for Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent, Amiodarone 200 mg daily for VFIB (Ventricular Fibrillation), Aspirin 81 mg daily for Prophylaxis, Ezetimibe 10 mg daily to maintain healthy cholesterol levels, Heparin Sodium solution inject 5000 units subcutaneously every eight hours for clotting prevention were not given on 7/10/24. Xopenex Nebulization Solution 1.25 mg/3 ml (Milliters) 3 ml every 8 hours for respiratory management was not given on 7/10/24 or 7/11/24. R2's Nurses Notes dated 7/11/24 documents medications are awaiting delivery from the pharmacy. R2's Nurses Note also documents resident C/O (complaining of) sternum incision site from surgery and states feeling dehydrated and requests to be sent to ED (Emergency Department) Telehealth doctor spoke with resident and stated to go ahead and send resident to (local hospital) for eval. (evaluation). R2's Nurses Note dated 7/10/24 documents she arrived at the facility at 5:41 PM. 3. R3's MAR for the month of July documents R3 did not receive Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg give one tablet one time daily for excessive secretions related to disease of the tongue. R3's MAR further documents that Hyoscyamine was charted as given 8 times from July 10th through July 17th, 2024. On 7/19/24 at 2:00 PM V12 Pharmacist from assigned facility pharmacy stated, for (R3) the hyoscamine was filled on 7/9/24 for three pills, it was filled for three days because either they needed a diagnosis or the insurance would not pay I don't know which one. Some of those medications are available in the (Automated Medication Dispensing Machine) 4. R4's Face sheet dated 7/16/24 documents R4 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, DMII (Diabetes Mellitus 2) Narcolepsy, Acute Respiratory Failure, Aphasia, Dysphasia, Fluid Overload, Retention of Urine, Tracheostomy, and Gastrostomy. R4's Nurses Note dated 7/16/24 documents resident arrived to facility via stretcher with EMT's (Emergency Medical Technicians) x2 at 8:30 PM from a Regional Respiratory Specialty Hospital. Resident has trach (Tracheostomy) 7 Bivona on 6L. Peg tube in Left-upper quadrant appears patent continuous tube feeding of Glucerna 1.5/65hr (hour) with 40 ml (mililiters) of H20 (water) every hour flush. 16in (inch) Fr (french) (indwelling) catheter draining gold color urine. Respiratory set high flow oxygen machine with concentrator in room with suction machine. Resident appears to have involuntary jerking movements. Alert x0 (oriented). Resident transfer with slide do to fistula graph. No s/s (signs and symptoms) of pain observed at this time. R4's MAR for the month of July documents R4 did not receive Amlodipine 5 mg (miligrams) once daily for Hypertension, Bumetanide 0.5 mg in the morning for Fluid Retention, Finasteride 5 mg in the morning for Urinary Retention, Modafinil 200 mg in the morning for Sleep Apnea and Narcolepsy, Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in the morning for Urinary Retention, Insulin Glargine 40 units twice daily for Diabetes, Heparin Sodium Solution Inject 1 ML subcuetaneously every 8 hours on 7/17/24. They were awaiting a delivery from pharmacy. On 7/31/24 at 1:10 PM V13 Nurse Practitioner (NP) stated, we don't have a lot of control over it (medications) We can't put in admitting orders before they come, because they might not come. No its not ok obviously some medications are more important than others. We have to decide what is needed in the Ekit (Emergency Kit). The delay in medications may be because we need a more local pharmacy or a need to decide what is important for the EKit. On 7/18/24 at 11:25 AM V2 Director of Nursing stated, it's (missing doses of medication) situational. We try to investigate why the meds (medications) aren't given. Sometimes it's an ordering issue (or) sometimes it's a pharmacy issue. Sometimes its available in the automatic dispensing machine. On 7/31/24 at 10:19 AM V2 DON stated all nurses have access to the automatic dispensing machine. They all have a username and passcode that pharmacy sets up for them, agency nurses don't have access. Pharmacy will get them in if they call. The pharmacy is open 24 hours a day. On 7/31/24 at 9:00 AM V10 Registered Nurse (RN) stated I don't have access to the (automated medication dispensing machine) I'm agency I guess I could call pharmacy and get access. On 7/31/24 at 9:02 AM V11 RN stated, I'm suppose to have one ( a passcode for the automated medication dispensing machine) but I haven't tried it yet. On 7/31/24 at 9:05 AM V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, no I don't have access to the (automated medication dispensing machine). The facility policy Medication Administration dated 4/24 documents If the medication is ordered, but not present. check to see if it was misplaced, and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. Or obtain from the contingency or convenience box. If the physician order cannot be followed for any reason the physician should be notified in a timely manner.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer Intravenous (IV) Medications as ordered for 1 of 11 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer Intravenous (IV) Medications as ordered for 1 of 11 residents (R2) reviewed for medications in the sample of 14. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, printed 6/28/24 documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Resistance to Vancomycin Related Antibiotics, Pyothorax without Fistula, Peritoneal Abscess, Encounter for Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Respiratory and Digestive Systems. R2's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documents orders for the following IV antibiotics: Tigecycline 50 mg (milligrams) by intravenous injection every 12 hours for 20 days and Voriconazole 200 mg Reconstituted Solution -inject 300 mg by intravenous injection every 12 hours for 20 days. R2's Progress Note dated 6/13/24 at 1:45 PM documents, Talked to pharmacy (staff) about 2 IV ABX (antibiotics) that are to be infused every 12 hours. I was told 1 of the ABX will be here this afternoon, and the 2nd one needs to be ordered and will not be here till tomorrow afternoon. Last dose of both were given yesterday morning at hospital before being released to us at (facility). R2's Progress Note dated 6/13/24 at 2:05 PM documents, Reviewed with (V14, Medical Assistant for V15, Infectious Disease Doctor). She has notified (V15) of the challenges encountered in obtaining Tygacil (Tigecycline) and Vfend (Voriconazole). He would like updated tomorrow on when doses are given and when the medication will arrive. R2's Progress Note dated 6/14/24 at 1:19 PM documents, Pharmacy notified facility that IV antibiotic Vfend will not be obtainable by them. It is a hazardous medication and they are not able to mix it. They also reported that the other facility that they use to mix medications can not mix this as well. Their facilities are not equipped to do so. This medication is unavailable to us. R2's Progress Note dated 6/14/24 at 1:24 PM documents, Spoke with (V14) at (V15's) office. She has relayed the unavailability of the Vfend to V15. He would like (R2) to return to (hospital) for further ID (Infectious Disease) management. EMS (Emergency Medical Service) is being arranged. R2's Pharmacy Packaging Slip dated 6/13/24 documents the pharmacy delivered 4 doses of Tigecycline IV antibiotic for R2 on 6/13/24 at 6:11 PM, making it available to be administered for that evening dose. R2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 6/1/24 - 6/30/24 does not document R2's available antibiotic, Tigecycline, was administered as ordered for 8:00 PM dose on 6/13/24. There was no documentation as to why this medication was not administered as ordered. On 6/28/24 at 11:53 AM V2, Director of Nursing, provided documentation of pharmacy packaging slip which documents 4 doses of R2's IV antibiotic, Tigecycline 50mg/100 ml was delivered on 6/13/24 at 6:11 PM. V2 stated this IV antibiotic should have been administered on 6/13/24 in the evening because it was available. She stated, This is a teaching moment for me. On 6/28/24 at 11:00 AM spoke with V14, Medical Assistant for V15, Infectious Disease Doctor who stated she did receive phone calls from V2, DON on 6/13/24 stating they were unable to obtain the antibiotics as ordered and were waiting on pharmacy to get them.V14 stated she has never had a problem with facilities obtaining Voriconazole as ordered before, but R2 was also ordered to get Tigecycline IV antibiotic also, so it should have been administered as ordered when they got it from the pharmacy. V14 stated R2 did not receive any of her antibiotics for 48 hours after she left the hospital. The facility's policy, Medication Administration revised 5/2017, documents, All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Guideline: 22. If medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR and notify the Health Care Provider if required. 26. If medication is ordered, but not present, check to see if it was misplaced and then call pharmacy to obtain the medication.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for 1 of 4 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R2 being physically and mentally abused, causing her to feel scared and not safe in the facility. Findings include: On 6/14/24 at 6:10 AM, R2 was in her room, sitting up on the side of the bed, with purplish green bruising noted under both eyes and a bruise to her left forearm. R2 was tearful and stated that the bruising under her eyes was caused by a fall, she was feeling scared after what happened, and she was pulling a wet pad out from underneath her and when she went to put it on the floor she fell forward out of the bed. R2 stated prior to that she was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room and V12, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), wanted her to go to bed. R2 stated she was having pain in her feet, doesn't need much sleep and wasn't ready to go to bed. R2 stated V12 and an unknown female employee (later identified as V15, CNA, Certified Nursing Assistant), came into her room, grabbed her on the left forearm and was fighting with her in a back-and-forth motion. R2 stated V15 got into her ear and loudly yelled something like you're going to get up and get in bed. R2 stated it hurt her ear when V15 yelled in it. R2 stated then they went and grabbed the mechanical lift, put her in it and then put her in bed. R2 stated she was yelling out for someone to help her, save her. R2 stated this made her feel low class and scared. R2 stated anytime V12 wants something done, she gets V15 to help her do it. R2 stated in one way she doesn't feel safe in the facility because she was yelling for someone to help her, and no one did. R2 stated this happened last Thursday (6/6/24), she isn't sure exactly what time, but it would have been after everyone goes to bed around 10:00 PM. R2 stated she reported it to V13, LPN, either the next day or the following day. R2 stated the police came to the facility and talked to her about what happened. R2 stated she has not seen V12 or V15 since she told V13 about what happened. R2 stated she still feels scared and if she would have known something like this could happen here, she wouldn't have come here. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, Weakness, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pain in Bilateral Knees, Lumbago, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dorsalgia and Insomnia. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, which means R2 is cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan, dated 2/16/24, documents R2 is at risk for abuse/neglect. R2's Progress Notes by V13, LPN, document the following: 6/10/2024 9:39 PM - Resident initially said to me that she wanted to tell me something, but didn't want to if someone would get in trouble or if I would have to report it. I said depending on what it is I would have to report it. She said never mind, but eventually told me that one of the CNA's was being abusive to her. She said she was in her chair and the CNA wanted her to get up into bed, but demanded it, so she wasn't cooperating with her. The abuser tried to pull her up by her wrists and put a bruise and small cut on her left wrist. (R2) also said that the abuser yelled 3 times in her ear, you're going to get up. The resident was clearly scared to divulge the information to me. After she told me about it, I immediately notified my DON (Director of Nursing) and HR (Human Resources) manager, who notified the local Police. The police officer took both mine and (R2's) statement and left a card with the case number on it. I put the card under the DON's office door; 6/10/2024 9:42 PM - I did a skin assessment on her and she has a bruise and a small cut on her left forearm. There are no other skin issues. Will continue to monitor. The Police Report by V17, Police Officer, documents the following: Report for Incident 2024-012193, Possible Abuse, document created on 6/11/2024 @ (at) 03:59:02. On 06/10/2024, at approximately 2018 hours, I, responded to (the facility) in reference to a possible abuse complaint. On arrival, I met and spoke with (V13). (V13) advised that a resident brought an incident up to her that was concerning. (V13) stated that (R2) informed her that she has a large bruise on her left arm that she obtained from the Nurse or CNA working on the night before she went into the hospital on Friday night (06/06/2024). (R2) informed (V13) that the bruise was attained when the worker attempted to pull her up by her arms. (V13) stated that (R2) told her she was scared to talk to her about the incident and she did not want to get anyone into trouble. (V13) informed (R2) that due to the nature of the complaint, she was going to have to speak to her supervisor to report the incident. (V13) advised that after speaking with (R2), she contacted her supervisor, (V2, DON). (V13) informed (V2) of the complaint made by (R2) and (V2) then contacted the police department for a report to be created. (R2) said that she does not know the name of the Nurse or CNA working on the night of the incident, but it happened the night before she went into the hospital. (R2) stated that the nurse came into the room and told her to get up, but she did not feel like getting up at that moment, so she did not try to help the aide and the nurse in moving her. (R2) said that this made the nurse angry, so she went to get the bigger, bully, female CNA to make (R2) get up. (R2) advised that the CNA yelled into her ear 3 times that she was going to get up and this scared her. (R2) then held her left arm out and I observed a large bruise on her left arm, above her wrist, and a small cut on her wrist. (R2) advised this happened when the CNA placed one arm on top of the other and attempted to pull her up. (R2) then stated that it could have happened when the CNA grabbed her arm with her hand to pull her up. It should be noted that I observed face was due to her falling out of bed and due to falling out of bed, she was in the hospital on Friday (06/07/2024). (R2) stated that she is scared due to the situation. I took photos of the injury; they were later attached to the report. I provided (R2) with my department issued business card and told her to call the police, if a situation like the one she told me about, happened again. (V13) informed me that at this time, they did not know who was working but (V2) was working on figuring that out at this time. (V13) advised, if any additional information was obtained, the police department would be contacted. I provided (V13) with my department issued business card and report number. R2's Follow-Up Investigation Report, dated 6/14/24, documents the following: Resident was scared to report the issue but is now feeling better that she did. Resident claims that a tall woman grabbed her by the wrist and yelled in her ear that she was going to bed now - resident couldn't remember the exact date, but it happened on night shift. Resident claims she stayed up late because she doesn't sleep much, and staff kept telling her she needed to go to bed. She told them she wasn't tired yet and she just keeps requiring less and less sleep the older she gets. Then, they came in the room and forced her in bed. One grabbed her arm and yelled in her ear that she was going to bed now. Resident appeared scared to tell what happened. (V12) claims that she, (V15, CNA), and (V16, Agency CNA), put the resident to bed. She stated that they got the sit to stand and kept telling the resident she needed to go to bed because of her wound and she needed to put her legs up and get out of the wheelchair. V15 claims that she put the resident to bed in the sit to stand. (V16), states that (V15) put resident to bed while she was fighting because she didn't want too yet. (V15), told R2 she was going to bed and got the sit to stand and forced her, the nurse was in the room. The conclusion was the allegation of abuse was substantiated due to evidence collected during the investigation. The investigative evidence contains the following information: On 6/10/24, Resident claims a tall white woman grabbed her arm and yelled into her ear that she was going to bed now but she didn't know what date it happened - either 6/6 or 6/7. Resident had a bruise and small cut on her left forearm - skin assessment completed. A review of camera footage showed that (V12) and (V15, CNA) went into residents' room with a sit to stand to put resident to bed on 6/6/24 at 11:32 PM. (V12) claims that she informed resident that she needed to go to bed to put her legs up due to her wound. (V15) claims that she put resident to bed in the sit to stand. (V16) claims that the resident was fighting by kicking, hitting, and biting but (V15) still made her go to bed with the sit to stand. Resident claims she kept telling them that she didn't want to go to bed yet because she wasn't tired, and she doesn't need much sleep anymore. (V12) and (V15) were suspended immediately. (V12) was terminated on 6/13/24 on an unrelated issue. (V15), was terminated on 6/14/24 for violating resident rights to choose what time to go to bed. On 6/14/24 at 7:10AM - V3, Human Resources, stated that V12 was being terminated today for a HIPPA violation and due to an abuse investigation. On 6/17/24 at 7:55 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, DON, stated V12 and V15 were terminated due to forcing R2 into bed. The Abuse Policy, dated 10/2022, documents the facility affirms the right of their residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish to a resident.
May 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care to prevent urinary t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for incontinent care and UTIs in the sample of 4. Findings include: On 5/3/24 at 2:30 PM, incontinent care was observed on R2 with V9, CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant), and V13, CNA. R2's incontinence brief was removed and was wet with urine. V9 donned gloves, got supplied ready, changed gloves, and did not perform hand hygiene. R2 was then turned onto her right side, V9 took a pre-packaged wipe and wiped down the buttocks towards the urethra, then down the left side and back up the left leg. V9 then took a clean wipe and wiped upwards in the buttock crease and placed a clean brief under R2. R2 was then turned onto her left side, R2's right side was not cleaned, and V13 then took and pulled the brief towards her, then R2 was turned onto her back. V9 then took a clean wipe and wiped down in-between the labia and then fastened R2's brief. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: History of UTIs, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder, Guillain Barre Syndrome and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is dependent with toileting and incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's Care Plan, dated 12/28/23, documents R2 requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, is incontinent of bowel and bladder and requires total assistance with toileting. R2's Progress Note, dated 3/15/24 at 3:11 PM, documents the following: Resident sent out to the hospital. R2's Progress Note, dated 3/15/24 at 5:25 PM, documents the following: Resident admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of UTI, Altered Mental Status and Pressure Injury. R2's Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 3/19/24, documents R2 was admitted with the following diagnoses: Acute Metabolic Encephalopathy, Seizure, UTI, and Sepsis. The urine culture was positive for E. Coli (Escherichia Coli). R2's Urine Culture, dated 3/22/24, documents R2's urine was positive for E. Coli. R2's Progress Note, dated 4/17/24 at 8:18 AM, documents the following: Patient unresponsive when trying to administer medications this morning, oxygen saturation 82%, diaphoretic, pulse 56, blood pressure 118/62, blood sugar 117. Applied oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. Called EMS (Emergency Medical Services) to facility. R2's Hospital Post Acute Care Transfer Report, dated 4/21/24, documents R2 was diagnosed with the following: Fecal Impaction, Hypoxemia, and UTI. On 5/7/24 at 9:15 AM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON), stated she would expect staff to complete incontinent care on any incontinent resident. The Incontinence Care policy, dated 5/2015, documents the following: Incontinence care is provided to keep residents as dry, comfortable and odor free as possible. Clean perineal area with appropriate cleanser and dry. Cleansing should always be from front to back.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have enough CNAs (Certified Nurses Assistants) working to meet the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have enough CNAs (Certified Nurses Assistants) working to meet the needs of the residents for 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for staffing in the sample of 4. Findings include: On 5/3/24 at 6:15 AM, R3 stated she is continent of bowel and bladder if the staff get her on the bed pan. R3 stated during the night on 4/29/24, her call light had fallen off her bed and she couldn't reach it and her cell phone was not within her reach. R3 stated finally around 5:00 AM, she managed to get herself to the side of the bed and was able to reach her cell phone and called the facility and they sent V7, Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA, to her room. R3 stated she hadn't been checked on by staff all night and was soaked with urine. R3 stated when V7 entered her room, she (R3) asked V7 why she hadn't checked on her all night and V7 replied because they were short staffed and busy. R3 stated she was chaffed from lying in her urine all night but is cleared up now. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R3 is cognitively intact. On 5/3/24 at 5:45 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, stated they are short staffed on nights a lot due to call offs. V4 stated normally they have two nurses and four to five CNAs on night shift but there are times when there are just three and it's hard. V4 stated management offers to come in and help but doesn't come in until around 4:00 AM and by then the shift is almost over, so they work together to get stuff done. V4 stated she has seen residents lie in their urine/feces for long periods of time when they are short staffed. On 5/3/24 at 7:48 AM, V9, CNA, stated she worked night shift on 4/29/24 on the 400/500 halls and half of the 300-hall. V9 stated there were three CNAs working that night, there would have been four, but one called off and they couldn't find anyone to replace them. V9 stated she and another CNA worked the 300, 400 and 500 halls with no problems. V9 stated there was only one CNA for the 100/200 halls and she (V9) went and helped that CNA because one CNA couldn't do it on those halls by them self. On 5/3/24 at 12:15 PM, V10, CNA, stated they are short staffed with CNAs sometimes. V10 stated they don't have very many full-time staff that work in the building so they must use agency. On 5/7/24 at 9:15 AM, V2, Director of Nurses, DON, stated they staff their CNAs and nurses utilizing a staffing grid based on census. V2 stated with their census today of 77, they have 3 nurses on day shift, 3 nurses on evening shift, 2 nurses on night shift and between 21-22 CNAs in a 24-hour period. V2 stated if someone doesn't show up for their shift, they will reach out to them to try and find out why. If they call off for their shift, they will reach out to their own CNA staff and agency CNAs to see if someone can come into work. V2 stated the Restorative CNA and staffing director are both CNAs so they will come in or she (V2), the ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) and the Wound Nurse will help the CNAs. The CNA Schedule documents only 3 CNAs working the night shift on 4/16/24, 4/27/24, and 4/29/24. The facility was unable to provide a staffing policy.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered by the physician to 1 of 3...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered by the physician to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 4. Findings include: On 5/3/24 at 6:15 AM, R3 stated she was denied her medication, staff were giving her the run around and she ended up running out. R3 stated she was getting her medications delivered to her house through her own pharmacy before she came to the facility. R3 stated the nurses didn't let her know she was running low, so she ran out and then had to have them refilled. R3 stated she was without her medications for about 3 days. R3 stated she doesn't care about her vitamins but needs her pain medication, muscle spasm medication, heart medications and seizure medications. R3's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has the following diagnoses: Benign Intracranial Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Epilepsy, Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Hemiplegia, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Depression and Adjustment Disorder. R3's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R3 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status, BIMS, score of 15, which indicates R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents the following orders: 3/11/24 - Baclofen 10 mg (milligrams) TID (three times daily); 2/17/24 - Trileptal 600 mg BID (twice daily); 2/17/24 - Amlodipine 10 mg Qd (daily); 2/17/24 - Atorvastatin 40 mg every evening; 2/18/24 - Jardiance 10 mg Qd (daily); 2/17/24 - Lamictal 25 mg two tablets BID and 100 mg Qd; 2/17/24 - Lisinopril 20 mg Qd; 2/19/24 - Venlafaxine 150 mg Qd and 75 mg Qd; 2/17/24 - Coreg 3.125 mg BID; Metformin 1000 mg BID. R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 3/2024, documents Trileptal was not given 9 times. R3's MAR, dated 4/2024, documents R3's Amlodipine was not given once; Atorvastatin was not given twice; Jardiance was not given once; Lamictal was not given once; Lisinopril was not given once; Coreg was not given 3 times; Metformin was not given 3 times; Trileptal was not given 8 times, Baclofen was not given 21 times. R3's MAR, dated 5/2024, documents R3's Baclofen was not given twice and the Trileptal was not given once. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/8/24 at 1:36 PM, documents the following: Spoke with pharmacy, Trileptal will be out for delivery tonight. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/8/24 at 6:32 PM, documents the following: Baclofen, awaiting pharmacy delivery. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/8/24 at 8:05 PM, documents the following: Baclofen, awaiting pharmacy delivery. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/26/24 at 9:58 AM, documents the following: Baclofen, awaiting delivery from pharmacy. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/26/24 at 4:38 PM, document the following: Baclofen, medication not available, see progress note. R3's Progress Note, dated 4/26/24 at 5:32 PM, documents the following: Baclofen not in facility. Resident receives medications from an outside Pharmacy. Called pharmacy, spoke with customer service representative and R3's Baclofen was not on her profile. This writer informed him that she would fax orders over. Per customer service representative, once medications are reviewed, will call facility for medications not on their profile to request scripts from the physician for those medications. R3's Progress Note, dated 5/2/24 at 8:38 AM, documents the following: Resident voiced displeasure of having her medications come from her pharmacy due to the difficulty in getting them here. Writer explained that she would talk to our pharmacy and get things switched over. She (R3) was agreeable to this. R3's Progress Note, dated 5/2/24 2:31 PM, documents the following: Spoke with pharmacy and confirmed dispense dates. Resident medications Baclofen and Venlafaxine will be sent out tonight as a 10-day supply. All of her medications will be sent on the 11th from our pharmacy for routine fill. On 5/7/24 at 9:15 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, DON, stated when a medication is not available, the nurse is to call pharmacy, see what the hang up is, various things impact why a medication isn't available and then they try to resolve it. When the nurses are documenting #9 on the MAR, it means the medication was not given or not available and then allows for the nurse to make a progress note as to why it wasn't given. The Medication Administration policy, dated 6/2015, documents the following: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. If a medication is ordered but not present, check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. If available, obtain it from the contingency or convenience box. If the physician's order cannot be followed for any reason, the physician should be notified in a timely manner (depending on the situation), and a note should reflect the situation in the resident's record.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0700 (Tag F0700)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to install the correct bed rail and get consent from the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to install the correct bed rail and get consent from the resident/resident representative prior to the installation/use of the bed rails in 4 of 4 residents (R2, R4, R7 and R8) reviewed for bed rails in the sample of 8. Findings include: 1. On 4/9/24 at 8:00 AM, R2's bed was observed with a 1/2 (half) side/bed rail to the right side of the bed. R2 stated she uses the bed rail to turn and move in the bed. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has a diagnosis of Weakness, TIA (Trans-Ischemic Attack) and Hemiparesis/Hemiplegia. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status, BIMS, score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's MDS documents R2 is independent with rolling in bed. R2's Care Plan, dated 3/18/24, documents R2 needs assistance with daily care needs. R2's Side Rail Review, dated 2/22/24, documents R2 utilizes 1/2 side/bed rails to enable the resident to attain and maintain his/her practicable level. R2 did not have consent for the side rail prior to 4/9/24. 2. On 4/8/24 at 9:15 AM, R4's bed was observed with a grab bar to the left side of the bed. R4's Face Sheet, undated, documents R4 has a diagnosis of Cerebral Vascular Accident. R4's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R4 requires substantial/maximal assist with rolling in the bed. R4's Care Plan, dated 11/29/22, documents R4 requires assistance with daily care needs with an intervention for 1/2 side/bed rails for bed mobility/transfers. R4's Physician Order Sheet, POS, documents an order dated 4/24/23 for half side rails for bed mobility. R4's Side Rail Review, dated 1/9/24, documents R4 utilizes a 1/2 side/bed rail to enable the resident to attain and maintain his/her practicable level. There was no consent for the side rail. 3. On 4/8/24 at 9:40 AM, R7's bed was observed with bilateral 1/2 side/bed rails on the bed. R7's Face Sheet, undated, documents R7 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness. R7's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R7 requires supervision/touch assist with rolling in the bed. R7's Care Plan, dated 11/25/22, documents R7 has a self-care deficit in bed mobility related to decreased ability to position or reposition self in bed. R7's Side Rail Review, dated 4/3/24, documents R7 utilizes 1/4 side/bed rails to enable the resident to attain and maintain his/her practicable level. R7 did not have consent for the side rail prior to 4/9/24. 4. On 4/9/24 at 9:55 AM, R8 was observed in bed with bilateral 1/2 side/bed rails up. R8 stated they help her to turn in bed. R8's Face Sheet, undated, documents R8 has a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction and Weakness. R8's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R8 has a BIMS of 13, cognitively intact, and requires supervision/touch assist with rolling in the bed. R8's Care Plan, dated 12/19/23, documents R8 has a self-care deficit in bed mobility. R8's Side Rail Review, dated 4/4/24, documents R8 utilizes 1/2 side/bed rails to enable the resident to attain and maintain his/her practicable level. R8 did not have consent for the side rail prior to 4/9/24. On 4/9/24 at 10:55 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated V8 (MDS/Restorative Nurse) was told not to do side/bed rail consent previously. V1 stated they checked with corporate, and they are supposed to be getting consent, so they are getting them now. On 4/9/24 at 11:35 AM, V8 (MDS/Restorative Nurse) stated they were looking at bed rails prior to this survey. V8 stated she does the bed rail assessment. V8 stated prior they had a restorative aide that completed the assessment, but she is no longer at the facility. V8 stated they assess they resident for the least restrictive bed rail needed. The Bed Rails/Side Rails policy, dated 10/2021, documents bed rails may be used in order to assist with mobility to ensure that residents maintain the optimal amount of independence. All residents will be assessed for the use of bed rails upon admission and upon significant change utilizing the Restorative: Side Rail Review Form. If it is determined that the resident requires the use of bed rails, the restorative nurse will follow up accordingly and update the plan of care. Upon installing bed rails, maintenance will ensure that the appropriate manufacturer guidelines are followed for safe installation and use.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders to treat a new pressure ulcer, to preven...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders to treat a new pressure ulcer, to prevent deterioration of the pressure ulcer, and failed to have appropriate interventions in place to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing and keep existing pressure ulcers from getting worse for 2 of 4 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in R4 developing a Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer on his right buttock. Findings include: 1. On 2/22/24 at 9:15 AM V4 (Wound Nurse) provided pressure ulcer treatment to R4's Stage 4 pressure ulcer on his right buttock. V4 stated that the wound was just discovered on 2/20/24. She stated that she has ordered a cushion for his wheelchair (w/c), and he is on an air mattress. She stated R4's pressure ulcer is on the side affected by his stroke, and he cannot feel it and she think this contributed to his not being aware he was getting a sore and not letting anyone know about it. V4 unfastened R4's adult diaper and removed the dressing from the pressure ulcer on his right buttock. The pressure ulcer was larger than a quarter and the wound base was completely covered with yellow slough. There was a moderate amount of drainage noted on the soiled dressing. R4's Face Sheet, undated, documents his diagnoses to include Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA); Flaccid Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); Neuropathy; Aphasia; Bipolar Disorder; Schizoaffective Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Hypertension (HTN); and Alcohol Dependence in Remission. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R4 was severely cognitively impaired, and he uses w/c for mobility and propels self independently. This assessment documented that R4 requires substantial to maximal assist with most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including transferring and toileting hygiene and requires supervision with eating and turning and positioning. According to this assessment, R4 is always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. At the time of this assessment, on 1/2/24, R4 had no unhealed pressure ulcers. R4's Care Plan, dated 6/12/22, documented, Pressure Ulcer: (R4) has potential for pressure ulcers related to decreased independent mobility. Dx (Diagnosis): CVA w/right hemiplegia, incontinence. Interventions for this Care Plan include doc s/s skin breakdown, Notify MD & family prn of changes in skin status, notify nurse of any new areas of skin breakdown, redness, blisters, bruises or discoloration observed during routine care, Remind/assist as needed to reposition frequently, utilize pressure-reducing mattress, and weekly body assessment. R4's Care Plan, dated 2/15/24, documented, Skin: At risk for skin complications r/t (related to) open area on right buttocks. This Care Plan was revised on 2/21/24, documented, Skin: At risk for skin complications r/t wound on right buttock. Interventions for this care plan include: 2-22-24 (brand name protein drink) as ordered, 2-21-24 air mattress as ordered, assist and encourage resident to turn and reposition frequently, educate resident on MD (Medical Doctor) orders for wound care, educate resident on the risks of infection and poor healing r/t non-compliance, monitor area for s/s of infection: odor, drainage, color, size, observe and assess regularly, provide skin care after each incontinent episode, RD (Registered Dietician) to assess and recommend, serve diet as ordered, skin check weekly, treatment as ordered, (Wound Physician) to follow. R4's Progress Note, dated 2/14/2024 at 8:47 PM, documented, Resident has open pressure sore on right buttock. It's roughly 4cm (centimeters) x 3cm. I cleansed it with wound cleaner and put a dressing with TAO (Triple Antibiotic Ointment) on it. R4's progress notes were reviewed for 2/1/24 through 2/14/24 and there was no documentation of R4 having a pressure wound to his right buttock until 2/14/24. R4's Wound Physician Progress Note, dated 2/20/24, incorrectly documented that the Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer as a skin tear and documents and the measurements of his wound as 4cm x 1.5 cm x 0.2 cm. R4's Wound Physician Progress Note, dated 2/22/24, documented, Non-visit Progress Note: Stage 4 pressure ulcer on Right buttock, not left buttock. R4's Physician Orders, dated 2/22/24, documented, Silver Sulfadiazine External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine). Apply to Left buttock topically every day shift for Stage 4 pressure ulcer Cleanse stage 4 pressure ulcer to left buttock with wound cleanser, apply silver sulfadiazine cream, collagen, calcium alginate, cover with boarder dressing daily until clear. There was no order for a treatment to R4's pressure ulcer before 2/20/24, after R4 was evaluated by V9 (Wound Physician) for treatment of R4's facility acquired pressure ulcer that was discovered on 2/14/24, indicating R4's pressure was untreated for 6 days. R4's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, dated 1/2/24, documented a score of 13 indicating he is at moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers. On 2/22/24 at 11:20 AM V4 (Wound Nurse) stated that she was not aware of R4's Pressure Ulcer until 2/20/24 which was the first time she observed it, along with V9 (Wound Physician). V4 stated no staff had reported to her that R4 had a pressure ulcer before that. She stated that was the first time she received orders for the treatment of the pressure ulcer. V4 confirmed the pressure ulcer is a stage 4 pressure ulcer on R4's right buttock. V4 stated she had seen the discrepancy in the physician orders and with the wound physician's progress note and stated he had documented the wrong wound location and type of wound on R4's progress note. V4 confirmed the stage 4 pressure ulcer is on R4's right buttock and it is not a skin tear. She stated she had spoken to V9 (Wound Physician), and he is going to send her a revised progress note with the correct information. On 2/22/24 at 11:25 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), stated that any staff who find a pressure ulcer or other skin impairment should notify the physician immediately and have a treatment order in place, and then notify V4 (Wound Nurse), of the new wound so she can follow-up and get the resident on the list to be seen by V9 (Wound Physician). V2 stated that R4 was very resistant to care and often the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) provide incontinent care over the toilet because he refuses to lay down, and that might be why they missed the pressure ulcer on his buttock. V2 stated that she does not know why the pressure ulcer was not found on his weekly skin checks before it became a Stage 4. On 2/23/24 at 10:05 AM, V2 stated that there was no documentation of weekly skin being done for R4 prior to the observation of his pressure ulcer on 2/14/24. She stated she does not know when his pressure ulcer started but does not think it would have started a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. On 2/23/24 at 12:33 PM, during phone interview, V13 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated that she received a report on 2/14/24 from a CNA who was putting R4 to bed and providing him with incontinent care that he had an open area on his buttock. V13 stated she went down to assess the wound and put a treatment on it and notified V17 (Nurse Practitioner) via a text message of the new area. V13 stated she did not receive any new orders that evening regarding R4's pressure ulcer. V13 stated that she did not notify the V2 (DON) or V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) or V4 (Wound Nurse) of the new pressure ulcer, but did document it in his progress notes. V13 stated she has taken care of R4 again and cannot remember seeing an actual order for a pressure ulcer treatment, but stated she did put some cream on it the other day. V13 stated R4's pressure ulcer looks much worse now than when she first saw it. She stated on 2/14/24 when she first identified the pressure ulcer, it was barely a Stage 1. She stated it was an open wound but didn't look that bad. V13 stated the wound is larger and deeper now and just looks a lot worse. V13 stated she believes the protocol if you find a new pressure ulcer is to document it, put a treatment on it and notify the doctor or nurse practitioner. V13 stated she did not notify anyone else of R4's new pressure ulcer. 2. On 2/21/24 at 10:05 AM, R3 was lying in her bed on her back. She stated that she was here for rehab because she broke her ankle when she fell at home. R3 stated nobody comes to turn and reposition her in bed. She stated they did turn her one time because she put on her call light and asked them to, otherwise she does not get turned and she knows she needs to or the sore on her bottom will get worse. R3 stated that she worked in the health field for a long time and knows it is important to get pressure off her backside if she wants it to heal, but they just don't have enough staff. R3 stated that she has never told staff she does not want to be turned because she knows how important it is, but they just don't do it and she hates to bother them. She stated they got her out of bed yesterday for therapy but then put her right back in bed because the wound doctor came. R3 stated that yesterday was the first time she got out of bed since she's been here because therapy was delayed with insurance problems. On 2/21/24 at 12:05 PM R3 was laying on her back in her bed. She stated that nobody has turned her. On 2/21/24 at 1:50 PM V4 (Wound Nurse) provided pressure ulcer care for R3. Upon entering R3's room, she was lying on her back. R3 stated they had just cleaned her up because she knew V4 was going to come in and do her treatment. R3 stated she has been on her back all day except for when they turned her and cleaned her up. R3 stated her butt does hurt from lying on her back all day. She stated she has not been out of bed since yesterday when therapy got her up for a short time. V4 cleansed the stage 2 pressure ulcer on R3's left buttock. The wound was irregular shaped with dark red base. There was no treatment in place when V4 rolled R3 onto her left side to do the treatment. R3 stated, They just cleaned me up. V4 applied silver sulfadiazine cream, collagen, and calcium alginate and covered it with a foam dressing. R3 complained that the bed was very uncomfortable to lay on and felt like she had things sticking her in the back and buttocks. V4 stated they would get her an air mattress because she should have one anyway because she has a wound. V4 stated R3 was on a regular mattress right now. V4 stated when the air mattress is put on R3's bed, that will be the pressure relieving device on the bed. V4 stated R3 did not have any type of pressure relieving device on her bed right now and stated R3 should be turned and repositioned every two hours to relieve pressure off her bottom. R3 stated to V4 that she has been on her back all day except during incontinent care. V4 placed a wedge cushion under R3's left hip to relieve pressure and R3 stated that felt a lot better. On 2/21/24 at 2:05 PM, V4 asked V8 (CNA) if R3's pressure ulcer dressing came off during incontinent care and V8 stated that it had come off because R3 had been incontinent of bowel and bladder and the dressing was soiled. V8 stated R3 is not turned and repositioned every two hours because of her fractured ankle and it being so uncomfortable when she is moved for incontinent care. V4 informed her it is still important for R3 to be turned and repositioned every two hours to help her pressure ulcer heal and prevent any other pressure ulcers. R3's Face Sheet, printed 2/22/24, documented her diagnoses to include Displaced Bimalleolar Fracture of Right Lower Leg, Asthma, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Other Specified Symptoms and Signs Involving the Circulatory and Respiratory Systems, Non-Displaced Fracture of Neck of Left Talus, Unspecified Fall, Other Reduced Mobility, and Generalized Edema. R3's MDS, dated [DATE], documented that she was alert and oriented and she required substantial/maximal assist for turning and repositioning. The assessment further documented that R3 was dependent for all transfers and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. It continued to document that R3 was admitted with one Stage 2 pressure ulcer and has a pressure reducing device for her bed and application of nonsurgical dressings other than to feet. It documents she is not on a turning and repositioning program. R3's Care Plan, initiated 2/18/24 documented, The focus: Bed Mobility: has a self-care deficit in bed mobility r/t decreased ability to position or reposition self in bed/turn from side to side/ use side rails to move in bed/move from lying to sitting or sitting to lying position. Interventions for this care plan include Position and reposition resident in bed for comfort, joint support, and skin integrity. R3's Care Plan, initiated 2/16/24 documented, Skin: At risk for skin complication r/t blister right ankle, left gluteus present on admission pressure per wound nurse. Interventions for this care plan include Therapeutic mattress in bed and cushion in chair as appropriate. R3's Skin and Wound Evaluation, dated 2/16/24, documented that she has a stage 2 pressure ulcer on her left gluteus, middle that was present on admission. Under Additional Care this evaluation documented that R3 was to have incontinence management, mattress with a pump, moisture barrier, moisture control, positioning wedge, and turning/repositioning program. R3's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, dated 2/9/24, documented a score of 16, indicating she is at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The facility's policy, Pressure Injuries, reviewed 9/2022, documented, To prevent or reduce the incidence of pressure injuries, standards of practice should be implemented. A pressure injury may be defined as any lesions caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Although friction and shear are important contributing factors to the development of pressure injuries. The facility's policy, Skin Management: Pressure Injury, reviewed 1/2023, documented, The following treatment guidelines have been developed to serve as a general protocol for selecting the type of treatment or dressing to be used. However, the facility recognizes that the selection of treatment protocols is individualized based on the resident condition and Health Care Provider practice patterns. Therefore, these are only guidelines and not all-inclusive. An order is required for all treatments. General Guidelines: Implement prevention protocol according to resident needs. Sensory Perception risk factor: watch for nonverbal cues, assess areas of body that do not feel pain for openings or redness. Activity: turn and reposition as needed using a person-centered approach (minimum every 2 hours), reposition in chair, provide appropriate pressure redistribution devices, teach resident to weight shift if appropriate, ensure proper body alignment. Mobility: turn and reposition as needed using a person-centered approach (minimum every 2 hours), provide appropriate pressure reducing devices. It continues, Under General Treatment Guidelines: 10. The staff nurse will notify the Wound Nurse upon identification of skin impairment. If Wound Nurse is not available, the staff nurse should document the open area on a Skin Screen Form and alert the Health Care Provider for treatment orders. Treatment Guidelines for Stage 2 Pressure Injuries: Turn and reposition as needed using a person-centered approach (minimum of every 2 hours).
Feb 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for 2 of 6 residents (R2, R4) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for 2 of 6 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. Findings include: 1. On 2/2/24 at 9:50 AM, R2 stated a few weeks or a month ago, he had diarrhea and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) unsure of name, but she no longer works at the facility, (later identified as V13 Agency CNA) was getting angry with him and slapped his arms and belly, then threw his diaper on the wall. R2 stated it upset him and felt it was abusive. R2 stated the facility called the police and they came to talk with him. On 2/2/24 at 12:50 PM, R20 stated a couple of months ago he was woken up to the sound of a slap, he looked over and saw a CNA, unsure of her name but was later identified as V13 (Agency CNA) standing over R2. R20 stated R2 said Hey what was that about? and R20 saw V13 slap R2 a second time and then threw R2's diaper at the wall. R20 stated it irritated him. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R2 is cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan, dated 3/30/21, documents R2 is at risk for abuse/neglect. R2's Abuse Investigation was reviewed and documents the following: Follow-up investigation, dated 1/5/24, documents R2 stated V13 (CNA) was getting upset because he had diarrhea multiple times on the night shift on 1/2/24. R2 stated she (V13) was tossing his depend to the side by the wall and at one point slapped him lightly on the shoulder. R2 told the police officer he did not want to press any charges. V1 (Administrator) told resident that she (V13) will not be allowed to pick up shifts at the facility anymore. V13's interview, documented she stated she had two residents who had diarrhea multiple times on the night shift on 1/1/24, but denied slapping or hitting anyone. R2's roommate, no name provided but later identified as R20, claims to have heard a slap sound that woke him up around 4:30 AM. R20 claims that he was awake when V13 came into the room to change R2. Conclusion: inconclusive, allegation cannot be verified or refuted because there was insufficient information to determine whether the allegation had occurred. Corrective actions taken: V13 was immediately put on the Do Not Return list. 2. R4's Face Sheet, undated, documents R4 has a diagnosis of Dementia. R4's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R4 has severe cognitive impairment. R4's Abuse/Neglect Screening, dated 10/10/23, documents R4 is at risk for abuse/neglect. R4's Abuse Investigation, dated 11/21/23, with incident date of 11/16/23, documentation an allegation of mental abuse involving R4 and V16 (Former Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). The Investigation documents R4 does not remember the incident. The Investigation documents V16 admits she carries a can of disinfectant spray but denies that she did or would ever threaten a resident with it. The Investigation documents V14 (Admissions) claims to have witnessed V16 hold a can of disinfectant spray in front of R4's face and tell him if he gets in her face again, she will spray him. The Investigation documented conclusion: inconclusive, the allegation could not be verified or refuted because there was insufficient information to determine whether or not the allegation had occurred, LPN was terminated due to other tasks not being completed after DON (Director of Nursing), specifically told her to do them. The Investigation documented corrective actions taken: The allegation is inconclusive due to one staff member's word against another, we have terminated the employee due to short length of employment and poor performance. V14's Written Statement, dated 11/17/23, on 11/16/23 at approximately 4:45 PM, V14 was the manager on duty and was assisting with one on one with R4. R4 came to the desk without his mask up and was coughing. The other staff was getting frustrated by telling him to pull his mask up and go sit down. The nurse (later identified as V16, Former LPN) grabbed her can of disinfectant spray and pointed at R4 saying, if you don't pull your mask up and go sit down, I'm going to spray you in the face with my (disinfectant spray), you're coughing all over us. V16's Written Statement, dated 11/17/23, V16 only told the resident (R4) to put his mask up on his face. V16 does carry disinfectant spray for her personal use but would never use it in a violent way towards a resident. On 2/2/24 at 8:30 AM, V14 (Admissions) stated she was the manager on duty the night that the incident involving the nurse on duty, unsure of her name but is no longer working at the facility, and R4. V14 stated they had residents with COVID in the building, so they were encouraging the residents to wear masks. V14 stated R4 had dementia and was wandering on the hallways with his mask down, he went to the nurse's station and was coughing, still with his mask down, he had to be constantly reminded to pull his mask up. V14 stated R4 went and sat down and then came back up to the nurse's station with his mask down and the nurse held up a can of disinfectant spray and told R4 I'm going to spray you in the face with this if you don't pull your mask up and sit down. V14 stated she reported the incident to the Administrator. On 2/6/24 at 9:50 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R2 had an allegation of abuse with an agency CNA (V13) on night shift. V1 stated R2 told her that he had diarrhea, the CNA was frustrated, rude, flinging the depend around and slapped him. V1 stated R2 told her he wasn't injured. V1 stated it was more of a dignity issue. V1 stated R2's roommate (R20), said he was awake, and the CNA was being rude to R2 and flinging his depend around. V1 stated R20 told her the CNA slapped him (R2) so hard that it woke him up. V1 stated the stories kept changing, so she couldn't verify the allegation, but she called the staffing agency and put the CNA on the do not return list. V1 stated there was an allegation made against V16 (Former LPN) by V14 (Admissions) involving R4. V1 stated V14 told her that R4 was coughing and walking around with his mask down, this was during a COVID outbreak and V16 told R4, if you cough again in my face, I'll spray you with this, while holding up a can of disinfectant spray. V1 stated they looked at the cameras and couldn't validate the allegation, but they did terminate V16 because she hadn't been employed with the facility very long and they already had concerns with her work performance. The Abuse Policy & Prevention Program, dated 10/2022, documents the following: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Mental abuse includes but is not limited to, humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or deprivation. .
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0800 (Tag F0800)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an adequate supply of food for the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an adequate supply of food for the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 2/1/24 at 9:00 AM, V4 (Dietary Aide) stated they run out of food one to two times per week, all different food items. V4 stated they were out of milk today, but their delivery came 30 minutes before serving breakfast, so they had milk to serve. V4 stated they ran out of syrup today before the end of breakfast service. V4 stated V6 (Dietary Manager) is responsible for ordering the food. V4 stated they receive a delivery twice a week on Monday and Thursdays. V4 stated when they run out of a menu item, they will either flop that meal with another meal or change it to whatever they have available. On 2/1/24 at 9:00 AM, V5 (Cook) stated they run out of food all the time. V5 stated they must substitute the menu frequently with what they have available. On 2/1/24 at 9:20 AM, V3 (Dietary District Manager) stated V6 (Dietary Manager) orders twice per week and receives a delivery twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. V3 stated if she (V6) orders before Thursday, it will come in on Monday's delivery, if she orders by Monday, it will come on Thursday's delivery. V3 stated they have a computer program that calculates how much food to order based on the number of residents and scoop sizes needed for each food item and that is what is ordered. V3 stated they also go off a PPD (Per Resident Per Day) which is $7.40 per resident per day. V3 stated their food PPD just went up from $7.20 to $7.40. V3 stated they also do a weekly inventory to know what to order. V3 stated they can also order items requested by the residents as long as it is within reason and within budget. V3 stated he is not aware of the facility running out of food, sometimes they might run out of some of the always available food items, but they always have something available. On 2/2/24 at 10:30 AM, R1 stated lately, they have run out of food quite a bit. R1 stated the other morning they served French toast and a very small piece of ham. R1 stated they were out of syrup and butter, and they were told they had to eat it like that. R1 stated they also ran out of juice and just served them water. On 2/2/24 at 11:25 AM, V6 (Dietary Manager) stated they have had issues running out of the menu items, but they also have substitutions available. V6 stated they get frequent admissions so they might have an extra one or two residents that aren't accounted for, but they don't go without food. V6 stated she does an inventory every Wednesday to see what they have on hand and then what she needs to order. V6 stated based off their menu, they have a program that tells her how much she will need per resident, so she uses that to know how much to order and does order a little extra for the new admissions. V6 stated she has a budget of $7.40 per resident per day and with the increases in cost for food, that is a tight budget, but they make it work. V6 stated every substitution that is given is approved by the dietician. On 2/1/24 at 9:05 AM, the following was observed: Walk in cooler with the following noted: 6 crates of unopened milk cartons, 2 1/2 crates of 1/2 gallon jugs of milk, 15 dozen eggs, 1 box of scrambled egg mix. Upright meat refrigerator: 3 unopened boxes of chicken tenders (10.46 lbs. (pounds) each) and 1 partial opened box of breaded chicken breasts, 20 lbs. of beef patty mix, 2 packs of unopened salami (no weight on package), corned beef bottom roast (no weight on package), 4 corned beef eye of round (no weight on package), 5 chicken thigh/leg quarters. Dry storage: no syrup, very few items in storage. The Resident Council Minutes, dated 12/20/23, document they are not getting the food items requested. The Dietary Menu for breakfast on 2/1/24, documents the following items are to be served: choice of vitamin C juice, choice of hot or cold cereal, scrambled eggs, grilled sausage patty, fluffy pancakes, syrup, margarine, milk, coffee/hot tea, and condiments. There was no syrup available to serve with the meal. On 2/6/24 at 9:50 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated they do not have a policy regarding food supply, they order based off inventory and the resident needs. The Resident Census, dated 1/31/24, documents there are 83 residents residing in the facility.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for a severely cognitively impair...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for a severely cognitively impaired resident, failed to provide progressive interventions to address the resident's exit seeking behavior, and failed to follow the facility's policy for elopement for 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for resident safety in the sample of 9. The findings include: R8's Face Sheet, undated, documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Aphasia, Dementia, Schizophrenia, Delusional Disorder, Insomnia, Anxiety Disorder, and Osteoarthritis. R8's Care Plan, dated 12/4/23, documents (5/17/23) R8 is at risk for Elopement related to dementia, history of elopement from another facility, and loitering around exits. Interventions: 12/24/23: Care Plan reviewed, 12/24/23: Enhanced supervision: one-on-one for five days with reassessment, 12/24/23: Medication review, 12/24/23: Staff at the exit door until the alarm company comes, 12/29/23: one-on-one discontinued, 12/29/23: Door watchers continue, encourage resident to keep busy with activities, monitor 72 hours, offer toileting, 5/17/23: (electronic monitoring device) system. It continues R8 at risk for falls related to incontinence, wandering, impaired safety awareness, and the use of psychotropic medication. It continues R8 has unsafe wandering, wanders into other resident's room, the break room, and the offices, 6/15/23: R8 hides in closets. Interventions: 6/15/23: Offer (geriatric specialty) chair when R8 doesn't want to sleep in his bed, ask if R8 needs to go to bathroom, friendly approach, offer snacks as R8 redirects with cookies, redirect away from others room, show R8 his room, use frequent reassuring phrases to help minimize feelings of fear and anxiety. Statements such as, You are safe with me., and You are O.K., You are in good hands., You and I are old friends, will help instill a feeling of security and in turn, should minimize incidents of maladaptive behavior. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R8 has a severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance from staff for toileting, partial/moderate assistance from staff for other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). R8 is occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. R8's admission Elopement Assessment, dated 5/16/23, documents R8 is a High Elopement Risk. R8's Elopement Assessment, dated 12/24/23, documents R8 is a High Elopement Risk. On 1/23 24 at 1:45 PM, V1 (Administrator), stated, We have only had one elopement that I was made aware of and that was (R8). When (R8) eloped, the exit door alarm on his hallway was not working, and that is the one he exited out of. It was fixed immediately, and we put a door monitor on that hall to watch the residents. On 1/24/24 at 9:55 AM, V14 (Registered Nurse/RN), stated We really only have one resident who always tries to get out, and that is (R8). On 1/24/24 at 10:10 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON), stated I was the nurse on duty when (R8) eloped. (R8) got out the door on his hallway without anyone knowing. The (local gas/food store) called and said they had (R8) there. I sent two Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) to walk him back to the facility, he was assessed and was without injuries. After that, I had staff sit and watch him and the doors to make sure nothing else happened. On 1/24/24 at 1:30 PM, V1 stated I started here on 9/18/23, and was not aware of any of (R8's) elopements prior to the 12/24/23 one. I may check with his family about placing him in a secured memory care facility to keep him safe. On 1/23/24 at 2:45 PM, R8 was seen across the hall from his room standing in another resident's room, with the residents of that room not in their room at this time. R8 had a (electronic monitoring device) bracelet on his left wrist, walking around the hallways with no shoes and non-skid socks on. V12 (CNA) found R8 and escorted him back to his room. There was no staff seen in the hall watching exit doors. On 1/23/24 at 2:46 PM, V12 (CNA) stated There is usually a door watch staff member who sits in the middle of the two halls (400-500) to watch both exit doors, but I don't see anyone there now. On 1/24/24 at 3:05 PM, V1 stated Prior to (R8's) elopement, the exit doors were only getting checked once a week, and they should be and will be done on a daily basis going forward. R8's Nursing Note, dated 5/16/23 at 11:46 PM, documents Resident up ambulating in hallway, exit seeking at the door at the end of 500-hall. Resident not using wheelchair at this time. Resident difficult to understand. Resident does not appear to be alert and oriented. Staff attempted to re-orientate resident and escorted him back to his room where he laid down in his bed, and the lights were then turned off and the TV (television) volume was turned down as not to disturb him while he tried to sleep. (Electronic monitoring device) in place and in working condition at this time. Will continue to monitor. R8's Care Plan Note, dated 6/15/23 at 12:32 PM, documents IDT (interdisciplinary team) completed for review of enhanced supervision program. Resident on enhanced supervision at 30-min intervals related to high risk wandering. Resident has history of attempts at elopement from previous facility. Resident noted with continued high risk wandering as noted standing in a closet last night. Enhanced supervision to continue per current orders with follow up to review as indicated. MD and family aware and agreeance to plan of care and orders. Care plan reviewed and revised. R8's Nursing Note, dated 6/26/23 at 2:35 PM, documents IDT meeting completed for review of enhanced supervision program. Review of monitoring and interviews with staff completed. Enhanced supervision d/c (discontinued) at this time as noted with further acclimation to the facility and minimized high risk wandering noted. Family and MD aware and in agreeance with plan of care. R8's Nursing Note, dated 7/2/23 at 3:34 PM, documents Note Text: 15:14 (3:14 PM); This nurse was alerted by CNA staff regarding resident possibly exiting facility via end of south corridor. CNA reports that the alarm was sounding and an alert female resident stated, Some man left I think. This nurse initiated a search and DON made aware. Upon search it was noted this resident not in facility. Resident noted at 15:23 (3:23 PM) during search by staff, sitting with guests at the assisted living next door. Upon review it appears that resident exited and walked across the small yard between the facility and neighboring assisted living and had sat down in a chair during their activity. This nurse easily directed the resident back to the facility and body assessment was completed with no noted injuries. DON notification to MD and Brother completed. Resident immediately placed on 1:1 supervision for safety. All doors checked for functioning of (electronic monitoring device) with no concerns noted. Resident shows no s/s (signs/symptoms) of acute distress or recollection of the event following return to the facility. R8's Nursing Note, dated 7/3/23 at 3:30 AM, documents Note Text: Has been resting sound this MN (midnight) shift with no acute distress observed. Q (every) 15-min checks continue. R8's Nursing Note, dated 7/12/23 at 12:31 PM, documents Note Text: Enhanced supervision changed to every 30-min POA notified. R8's Nursing Note, dated 7/20/23 at 1:03 PM, documents Note Text: Enhanced supervision dc'd (discontinued) at this time. R8's Nursing Note, dated 7/25/23 at 7:55 PM, documents Around 6 PM (R8) was exit seeking on 500-hall, got out the door, staff could not catch him quick enough but chased behind him and made contact by the back kitchen door. (R8) was very combative while staff was trying to calm him back into the building (R8) swung and hit staff in the face. She is fine and was still able to get (R8) to come back into the building. (R8) was still exit seeking when he came back into the building, he was on 100-hall going to his room and turned around quick attempting to get out again. (R8) was trying to go in other patients' room for unknown reasons. (R8) began to get restless and finally went to his room and watched TV. (R8) is now on 15-min checks DON aware, family did not answer, and Dr notified. R8's Nursing Note, dated 10/31/23 at 00:15 AM, documents Note Text: Resident went out the door this shift. Redirected by staff and assisted back to his assigned room. (Electronic monitoring device) remains in place to his Left arm. WCTM (will continue to monitor). R8's Nursing Note, dated 12/24/23 at 5:35 PM, documents Resident left out of side door on 500-hall and was next door at store. Resident was brought back to facility. Nurse did a head-to-toe assessment, no visible injury's observed, and no signs of pain or discomfort. ADON notified Administrator. Nurse notified MD (Medical Doctor) and POA (Power of Attorney). R8's Medication Administration Note, dated 12/24/23 at 11:46 PM, documents Check function of (Electronic monitoring device) every night shift, every night shift Equipment Maintenance (Electronic monitoring device) not working, management aware. R8's Nursing Note, dated 12/28/23 at 9:18 AM, documents IDT Note: team met to reassess ongoing enhanced supervision 1-1, decision was made to discontinue 1-1 and have door watchers continue. The facility's Incident Report/Initial Report, dated 12/24/23, documents Resident (R8) eloped from building and was picked up at (local gas/food mart) next to the building by staff. Resident was out of the building approximately 15 minutes. Assessment of resident showed no injuries. Assessment of the alarms showed that 200-hall and 500-hall door alarms are not working. Staff assigned to monitor both doors continuously and the alarm company was called on an emergency ticket to send a technician to check the alarms. The facility's Follow-Up Investigation Report, dated 1/28/24, documents Resident is not interviewable. Resident's brother was understanding of the situation and voiced no concerns. No signs of psychological harm or distress. Receptionist (V15) received a call from her cousin who saw a resident outside who looked like one of our residents. (V15) notified (V3 ADON), who was working as a floor nurse. Staff immediately went to pick the resident up. Conclusion: Substantiated - the allegation was verified by evidence collected during the investigation. The facility's Maintenance Logbook Report, for the month of December 2023, documents the Resident Monitoring Systems: Check operation of door monitors and patient wandering system was only completed once a week by V11 (Maintenance Director). The Facility's Elopement and Unsafe Wandering Prevention Policy, dated 5/15/23, documents Our facility strives to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents who are at risk for unsafe wandering and elopement. V. Safety Mechanisms: a) Safety mechanisms are an adjunct to resident individualized approaches/interventions to prevent elopement and unsafe wandering. b) An assessment of our facility structural features to identify any unsafe areas may be completed. 2. Communal areas. 4. Unit areas. 6. Exterior areas (exit doors). c) Personal alarms (bracelet devices). 2. Check functioning of the personal alarm and receiver locations (elevators, doors, etc.). d) Door and stairwell alarms and automatic looking mechanisms. 1. Ensure door alarms and stairwell alarms are functioning properly and are checked per manufacturer recommendations or monthly. 2. Doors with automatic locking mechanisms are checked per manufacturer recommendations or monthly, 3. Exit doors are monitored during change of shift.
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their policy to ensure proper placement of the catheter bag for infection prevention measures for 1 of 3 residents (R2)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their policy to ensure proper placement of the catheter bag for infection prevention measures for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for catheters, in the sample of 7. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet dated 12/20/2023 documents R2 has obstructive and reflux uropathy and a history of acute cystitis with hematuria. R2's Care Plan dated 10/30/2023 documents R2 has a catheter, and the goal is for R2 to remain free of complications and infection. On 12/19/2023 at 12:45 PM, R2's catheter bag was located under R2's chair on the floor. R2's urine was dark amber. V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) applied gloves and picked up R2's catheter bag and secured it to the chair off the floor. On 12/21 /2023 at 11:00 AM V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, They (catheter bags) should be hooked to the side of the wheelchair, below the groin, but not on floor. On 12/21/2023 at 12:15 PM, R2's catheter bag was again located on the floor while in the dining room. The Facility's Catheterization of Urinary Bladder Policy dated 2/2022 documents, Hang collection bag appropriately to the side of the bed, keeping it below the bladder and off the floor.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure prescribed nutritional supplements were provide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure prescribed nutritional supplements were provided and consumed for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R4, R5 and R6) reviewed for nutritional status, in the sample of 7. 1. On 12/19/2023 at 10:00 AM, V7 (R2's sister) stated, Sometimes when I go there (Facility) his (R2's) plate is just sitting there or it's on the floor. V7 stated when R2 was first admitted to the Facility in February 2023 he weighed 135 pounds and now weighs 111 pounds. On 12/19/2023 at 12:15 PM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R2 is on a pureed diet, requires feeding assistance and is on nutritional supplements. V5 stated, (R2) will eat every bite if he is fed. On 12/19/2023 at 12:45 PM R2 was being fed by V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA). V12 was asked by this surveyor where R2's health shake was, to which V12 replied, He didn't get it and then V12 wheeled R2 out of the dining room and to his room. The Facility's Nourishment Report dated 12/12/2023 documents R2 is to receive a health shake at lunch. On 12/19/2023 at approximately 1 PM, V14 (Dietary Manager) provided the Report and stated there had been no changes since it was printed off on 12/12/2023. R2's Face Sheet dated 12/20/2023 documents R2 has a diagnosis of Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Anemia, low Magnesium, Potassium, vitamin A, and Calcium. R2's Order Summary Report dated 12/20/2023 documents R2 is to receive shakes with meals for weight maintenance. R2's Care Plan dated 10/30/2023 documents R2 is at risk for complications with weight and nutrition related to diagnosis of severe diet malnutrition and weight loss. It further documents to continue health shakes as ordered. It also documents R2 is at risk for alternation in nutrition and to give supplements as ordered. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 requires substantial/Maximal assistance for eating. R2's Weights Summary documents on 2/24/2023 R2 weighed 132 pounds. It further documents on 12/13/2023 R2 weighs 111 pounds. On 12/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, R2's health shake had not even been opened/drank. On 12/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, V17 and V22 confirmed the above information when asked to describe what they observed. 2. R4's Face sheet dated 12/21/2023 documents R4 has a diagnosis of severe protein calorie malnutrition, Dementia, and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) R4's Weight Summary dated 12/13/2023 documents R4 has had a 10% weight loss going from 75 pounds on 7/6/2023 to 67 pounds. R4's Care Plan dated 11/1/2023 documents R4 has self-care deficient in feeding herself and is at nutritional risk as her disease progresses. It further documents R4 requires assistance from staff with eating, offer house supplements and provide diet as ordered. R4's Physician's Orders dated 9/18/2023 documents R4 is on a pureed diet, double portions, and is to receive fortified pudding with meals. On 12/19/2023 R4 was observed with single serving dishes, a container of applesauce and no pudding. At this time, V24 (CNA) confirmed that was all that she was served and that the applesauce is an alternative for the pudding as the desert. On 12/20/2023 at 12:20 PM, V19 (CNA) was assisting R4 with feeding. V19 stated R4 was served a single portion, looked at the card and stated, Oh, does that say double portion?. V19 also stated that R4's pudding was substituted with yogurt. On 12/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, R4 was no longer at the table. R4's fortified pudding remained untouched/uneaten. On 12/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, V17 (Dietary Manager In Training) and V22 (District Dietary Manager) confirmed the above information when asked to describe what they observed. 3. R5's Face Sheet dated 12/21/2023 documents R5 has dementia, Vitamin D deficiency, and dysphasia. The Facility's Nourishment Report dated 12/12/2023 documents R5 should receive a health shake at lunch and dinner. R5's Physician' Orders dated 11/28/2023 documents R5 is on a pureed diet and is to get house supplements three times a day (TID) between meals. R5's MDS dated [DATE] documents R5 is severely cognitively impaired. R5's Care Plan dated 10/1/2023 documents R5 requires encouragement/cueing/assist at times, staff are to assist to complete meal as needed and provide supplements. R5's Weight Summary dated 12/21/2023 documents R5's weight on 5/16/2023 was 150 pounds. It further documents R5's weight on 12/4/2023 was 130 pounds. On 12/21/2023 at 12:40 PM, R5's health shake was unopened. R5's fortified pudding and food was untouched. On 12/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, V17 and V22 confirmed the above information when asked to describe what they observed. 4. R6's Face Sheet dated 12/21/2023 documents R6 has a diagnosis of dementia. R6's Weight Summary dated 11/30/23 documents R6 had a 5% weight loss, weighing 110.2 pounds, compared to weighting 116.5 pounds on 11/1/2023. R6's Care Plan dated 12/7/2023 documents R6 has an alteration in nutrition and to offer health shakes as ordered related to continuing weight loss. On 12/19/2023 at 12: 20 PM, R6 was asleep at the table. V24 (CNA) and V25 (CNA) were at a nearby table feeding but did not provide verbal cues or encourage R6 to eat. R6's dietary card documented R6 should have received a health shake and ice cream. R6 had neither. On 12/20/2023 at 12:40 PM, R6's health shake was unopened and had not been drank. On 12/19/2023 at 1:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R2 requires assistance with meals and his weight has been trending down. V2 stated V20 (Registered Dietician) recommended supplements. On 12/20/2023 at 2:47 PM, V20 stated, We have a long list of people that are losing weight. I'm not sure why. We just had a meeting yesterday and they (Facility staff) said they were having problems getting the protein powder. I am in the process of switching them to (a drink) giving during medication pass from the nursing staff, so hopefully they will get it. Yogurt would not be an appropriate replacement for the fortified pudding. On 12/21/2023 at 10:15 AM V1 (Administrator) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated they would expect staff to be familiar with the residents' diets and ensure they are followed. On 12/21/2023 at 11:45 AM, V14 (Dietary Manager) stated, They (CNAs) are supposed to make sure the supplements/shakes are on the tray when they serve. You would be able to tell by looking if there was a double portion. Applesauce was just the dessert that day (not a substitute for fortified pudding).
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition a resident that is at moderate ri...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition a resident that is at moderate risk for pressure sore development and failed to follow the resident's care plan interventions for pressure ulcer prevention for 1 of 6 resident (R7) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 11. Findings Include: R7's Face sheet documents an admission date of 8/9/2022. Diagnosis include Bilateral hearing loss, Polyneuropathy, Arthropathy, Contracture of bilateral lower legs, Atrial Fibrillation. R7's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R7 has no cognitive impairments. R7's MDS dated [DATE] documents R7 requires maximum assist for showers, toileting, and bed mobility. R7's care plan dated 10/17/2023 documents Pressure ulcer: R7 is at risk for pressure ulcers related to impaired mobility and incontinence. Interventions include encourage and assist with frequent re-positioning. Notify nurse of signs and symptoms of skin breakdown noted during routine care. Provide incontinent care. Therapeutic mattress on bed and cushion in chair as appropriate. R7's Braden Scale Assessment for the Predication of Pressure Sore Development dated 11/18/2023 documents R7 has a moderate risk for pressure sore development. On 12/12/2023 at 10:00AM R7 sitting up in wheelchair in room. R7 stated I got up at 7:30AM so I will go back to bed soon. Our room is being sprayed for bedbugs and we have to be out of the room for 4 hours this afternoon. On 12/12/2023 at 12:00PM R7 in facility dining room in wheelchair. On 12/12/2023 at 2:15PM R7 in facility dining room in wheelchair. Stated I have been up since 7:15AM. We can't go back in our rooms because the rooms are being sprayed for bugs. I am hurting from being up so long. On 12/14/2023 at 10:15AM V3, (Registered Nurse) stated on 12/12/2023 R7 was not up yet at 7:30AM. He must've gotten up closer to 8:00AM and he was put back to bed, because the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were using the mechanical lift to get him up at 11:30AM for lunch. R7 was still up in wheelchair at 4:00PM. He then had a large emesis and needed to be showered. He was transferred to shower chair and back to wheelchair. I ordered him some chicken noodle soup for dinner. He was still up in wheelchair at 6:15PM when I left the facility. On 12/14/2023 at 9:30AM V14 (Activity Assistant) stated R7 was in facility dining room on 12/12/2023 at 2:00PM. Stated R7 remained in wheelchair and was complaining of being in pain and uncomfortable. Stated I readjusted R7 in the wheelchair and R7 remained in wheelchair. On 12/14/2023 at 11:10AM V16 (CNA) stated on 12/12/2023 we got R7 up close to lunch time, but he didn't come back to the floor before I left at 2:00PM. On 12/14/2023 at 12:15PM V17 (CNA) stated she was working on 12/12/2023 evening shift. V17 stated that when she came on shift at 2:00pm, R7 was in the dining room. Stated R7 came back to the floor around 4:00PM and had vomited all over himself. Stated we were going to give him a shower, but he refused, so we just cleaned him up in his wheelchair. We put him in his bed between 5:30pm and 6:00PM. On 12/14/2023 at 9:30AM V1 (Administrator) stated I thought R7 was in a reclining wheelchair, not in a regular wheelchair. On 12/14/2023 at 10:00AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she expects residents to be turned and repositioned every 2 hours. Facility Skin Care Prevention Policy updated 5/2021 states All residents unable to reposition themselves will be repositioned as needed, based on a person-centered approach per the resident's plan of care. Educate the resident and resident representative regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment as appropriate.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to wear gloves and a hair net to prevent contamination and food borne illness while serving food onto the plates. This failure h...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to wear gloves and a hair net to prevent contamination and food borne illness while serving food onto the plates. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 residents living in the facility. The findings include: On 11/14/23 at 7:50 AM, Breakfast Observation: V6 (Cook) was seen inside the kitchen, plating food, and passing the trays of food through a window to dietary aides, who were putting the trays on a metal cart and delivering them to the halls to be distributed to each resident. V6 only had one glove on her right hand, however, was using both hands to plate the food. V6 had her hair up in a ponytail and her hair net was only covering her ponytail and did not cover the front or top of her head. On 11/14/23 at 8:58 AM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), was seen walking down the resident halls with a full metal cart of finished breakfast trays. V8 stated that she went room to room to pick up the residents' trays, including the COVID positive rooms, and then took the cart to the kitchen. On 11/14/23 at 9:00 AM, V4 (Dietary Aide) was seen removing the plate lids off the food trays and putting them on a separate cart to be washed. V4 was not wearing gloves while handling the trays, which some were coming from a COVID positive resident. On 11/14/23 at 10:00 AM, V6 was seen in the kitchen with a hair net on the top and back side of her head, however, her front bangs were still outside the net and hanging out over her forehead. On 11/14/23 at 11:25 AM, Lunch Observation: V6 was seen plating the food in the serving window/warming area, with her hair net on top of her head which covers the back side (ponytail), however, her front bangs were hanging out of the net and over her forehead. V4 (Dietary Aide) was seen getting the trays of food from V6 and placing the trays on the cart, with a hair net that was covering the top and back of her hair, and she had her front bangs and sides hanging out of the net on her forehead. On 11/15/23 at 7:40 AM, Breakfast observation: V6 was seen plating food with V16 (Cook). V6 had a hair net only covering her ponytail and was not on the top or the front of her hair. V4 (Dietary Aide) was seen in the kitchen with her hair net covering the top of her hair, but still had hair on the sides and front that were outside of the hair net. On 11/15/23 at 11:20 AM, V3 (Dietary Account Manager) stated I would expect all kitchen staff to properly wear their hair net to avoid contamination of food. I would also expect all kitchen staff to wear gloves when handling and/or serving food. The (Contracted Dietary Company's) Staff Attire Policy, dated 9/2017, documents All employees wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. 1. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained. The (Contracted Dietary Company's) Food: Preparation Policy, dated 9/2017, documents All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food Code. 1. All staff will practice proper hand washing techniques and glove use. 2. Dining Services staff will be responsible for food preparation procedures that avoid contamination by potentially harmful physical, biological, and chemical contamination. The Facility's CMS 671, dated 11/15/23, documents there are 69 residents residing in the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies related to the staff donning and utilization of appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while caring for a resident on isolation, stocking PPE supplies for staff/visitors use, and COVID testing residents without wearing appropriate PPE, for 1 of 5 residents (R6) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 6. This has the potential to affect all 69 residents. The findings include: On 11/14/23 at 7:40 AM, Upon entering the facility, there were signs posted on the front door for all staff to wear N95 mask, and all visitors must wear a mask. There was a sign-in sheet on a table in the front lobby with PPE supplies (surgical masks and N-95 masks) available. On 11/14/23 at 7:42 AM, V10 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated We have a lot of COVID in the building right now. On 11/14/23 at 8:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated There are currently 69 residents in the building with one resident (R5) in the hospital with Pneumonia/COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), who was tested for COVID before he left and was negative. We have 14 residents and four staff members positive for COVID as of this morning. On 11/14/23 at 8:55 AM, V7 (Regional Manager/Phlebotomist for contracted lab) was seen going room to room testing residents for COVID-PCR. V7 only had on a surgical mask, with no N95 mask and no other PPE seen on her as she went in and out of resident rooms for testing. V7 stated that she works for the contracted lab to do COVID testing and that she only wears PPE when she must go into a COVID positive resident's room. On 11/14/23 at 10:30 AM, there were seven PPE/Isolation carts sitting in front of resident rooms on the 200-hall, and each one of them appeared to be empty with no PPE available to wear. On 11/14/23 at 10:43 AM, V10 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated I just stocked these PPE carts this morning, and now they're empty again. (V15 Central Supply) is supposed to be filling these. On 11/14/23 at 11:02 AM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), stated Most of the time we have enough PPE in the isolation carts, but sometimes we do run out and have to get the carts filled. On 11/14/23 at 10:55 AM, R3 stated I don't have COVID, but my roommate (R2) does, so I guess I am on isolation too. On 11/14/23 at 4:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated What we are doing with the COVID outbreak is all residents are eating in their rooms, and we cancelled all activities for now to avoid gatherings. If an employee becomes symptomatic, they are tested immediately. All residents and staff were tested on [DATE] and 11/12/23. All residents also get a COVID-PCR test done every Tuesdays and Fridays. If a resident comes up positive, and the roommate is negative, we still keep them together, because the negative one is already exposed to the positive one. On 11/15/23 at 8:55 AM, V17 (CNA) was seen in R6's room performing care on R6. R6 is on contact isolation for MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus). The isolation sign posted on the entrance to R6's room documents Contact Precautions Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the care of more than one person. Use dedicated or disposable equipment. Clean and disinfect reusable equipment before use on another person. On 11/15/23 at 9:00 AM, R6 who was alert to person, place and time stated The staff always have on a mask and gloves. The CNA who was just in here (V17) only had on her mask and gloves and was not wearing a gown. On 11/15/23 at 11:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated I would expect the staff to wear appropriate PPE if entering and caring for any resident on isolation. I will be talking to the lab company about (V7) doing all the COVID testing without PPE on. I would expect that person to wear PPE during each resident testing. The facility's Infection Control Program Content Policy, dated 9/2023, documents The infection control program establishes guidelines to follow in the prevention and control of contagious, infectious, or communicable diseases. The objectives of the program are to: Provide a safe and sanitary environment. Prevent or control the spread of communicable diseases. Establish guidelines that adhere to standards of care and CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) Guidelines. The facility's Personal Protective Equipment Policy, dated 1/2020, documents To prevent the spread of infections from resident's known to be infected or colonized with pathogens that can be transmitted by contact, droplet, or airborne transmission. 3. [NAME] PPE when entering the room as indicated and before contact with the resident in the following order: a) Gown. b) Mask. c) Goggles/Face Shield. d) Gloves. The facility's Transmission Based Isolation Precautions Policy, dated 3/2023, documents It is the policy of this facility to follow and implement isolation precautions according to the recommendations of the CDC in order to aid in the prevention and transmission of pathogens. Transmission Based Precautions are designed for residents with documented or suspected to be infected with highly transmissible pathogens for which additional precautions beyond standard are needed to prevent transmission of the pathogens. Droplet Precautions: are used for a resident with suspected or known infection of microorganism transmitted by droplet. Droplet precautions are used in addition to Standard Precautions and include the following: 1) Standard Precautions. 2) Private room, if a private room is not available, the resident may be placed in a room with another resident who has an active infection with the same microorganism but with no other infection. Contact Precautions are used for resident with suspected or known infections of colonized microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the patient or resident or indirect contact. Example includes MRSA. Contact Precautions are used along with Standard Precautions and include the following: 1) Standard Precaution. 3) Gowns are to be worn when entering the resident's room if direct care is to be provided or when potential for clothing to be contaminated exists.
Aug 2023 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility to monitor and prevent weight loss for one of two residents (R48) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 33. This failure resulted in R48 having a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility to monitor and prevent weight loss for one of two residents (R48) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 33. This failure resulted in R48 having a slow insidious weight loss from March 2023 through July 2023 and a 12% weight loss since January 2023. Findings include: R48's admission Record Sheet, printed on 8/1/23, documented R48 had diagnoses of Dysphagia following other Cerebrovascular Disease, Moderate Protein-calorie Malnutrition, Cerebral Infarction. R48's Care Plan initiated on 10/12/22, documented Tube feeding: Resident is a risk for complications of g-tube r/t dysphagia from CVA (stroke). R48's Care Plan Intervention, dated 10/19/22 documented monitor weights and labs as ordered and notify dr (doctor) of sig (significant) wt (weight) changes. R48's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R48 weighed 264.5 pounds (lbs.) on 11/25/22. R48's Physician Order, dated 12/15/22 documents Every shift Osmolite 1.2, 68ml (milliliter)/hr (hour). R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 255 pounds (lbs.) on 12/27/22, a 9 lb. weight loss in one month. R48's Dietary Nutrition at Risk Follow up dated 1/24/23 documents increase tube feeding to 68ml. R48's currently tube feeding order was Osmolite 1.2 68ml/hr and did not change. R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 245.5 lbs. on 1/31/23, a 9.5 weight loss in one month and 19 lbs. in two months. R48's Physician Order dated 2/21/23 documents Osmolite 1.2 320ml bolus every 4 hours. R48 remained NPO (nothing by mouth) at the time. R48's Nurses Note 2/21/23 Pt (patient) has had no issues with her g-tube. All medications, feedings, and flushes have flushed well. R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 248 lbs. on 2/28/23. R48's Dietary Nutrition at Risk Follow up dated 2/28/23 discontinue continuous feeding and started bolus. R48's Physician Orders dated 3/1/23 documented Osmolite 1.2, 320ml bolus q 4 hours. R48's March and April 2023 Physician's Order Sheet documents Osmolite 320ml Q 4hrs. R48's POS dated 5/5/23 documents Regular diet mechanical soft texture nectar thick liquids. R48's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 5/5/23 documents Enteral Feed Osmolite 1.2 320ml TID if resident eats less than 50% Enteral Feed. R48's Dietary Nutrition at Risk Follow up dated 5/5/23 Patient wants to eat will inquire about speech therapy. R48's Care Plan, revised 5/6/23, documented Tube feeding dc'd (discontinued) tube for free water flushes has been upgrade to mech altered diet and thickened liquids, wt. loss. The Interventions dated 5/5/23 documented diet as ordered mech altered with thickened liquids 5/5/23. R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 249.4 lbs. on 5/19/23. R48's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 6/1/23 documents regular diet puree texture nectar thick liquids. R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 237.4 lbs. on 6/5/23 which was over a 10 lb. weight loss in one month. There was no documented assessment to address R48's weight loss and there were no interventions to address this weight loss. On 7/26/23 documentation was requested as to how the facility was documenting if R48 was eating less than 50%. This was never provided. R48's EHR documented R48 weighed 235.6 lbs. 7/6/23 and then 215.8 lbs. on 7/27/23 which is a 20 lb. weight loss. R48's Nurse's Note dated 7/25/23 documents R48 noted with a 20-pound weight loss, and she remains on a pureed diet with nectar thick liquids. On 7/26/23 at 1:00 PM V24 Director of Nursing (DON) from another facility stated We reviewed her chart on 7/25/23, and a note was sent to the dietician for her case to be reviewed. She (R48) has had a 20-pound weight loss from January to July. R48's Dietary Evaluation dated 11/15/22 documents Current ht (height): 63 and wt. (weight): 264.5#; BMI 46.8 Wt. hx: 11/9 and 11/11 264.5# 10/19 277# 9/26- 296# 9/6- 292# 8/25- 290.5# 7/15- 268# 6/16- 251# 5/18- 246.5. Tube feeding Osmolite 1.5 continuous feeds at 55ml/hr provides total of 1320ml of feeding: 1980kcalorie (cal)/day and 82.8 g protein (PRO)/day. EEN: Calories: 2400-2770kcal/day (20-23kcal/kg (kilograms) BW body weight)) for weight moderation/maintenance Protein: 96-120g pro/day (0.8-1.0g/kg BW). Significant change of status/readmission assessment. hospitalized 9/28-10/12/22 following CVA; returned on tube feeding d/t difficulty swallowing while in hospital. hospitalized again 10/24-11/9/22. Current ht: 63 and wt: 264.5#; BMI( basic metabolic index) 46.8. Resident had been triggering for significant weight gains just prior to CVA; now triggering for loss. Current tube feeding order: Osmolite 1.5 continuous feeds at 55ml/hr provides total of 1320ml of feeding; 1980kcal/day and 82.8 g pro/day. This order meets needs for weight moderation, as resident had previously displayed multiple triggers of significant weight gains. Resident tolerating tube feeding well at this time. Speech therapy will be working with resident to reinstate PO intake. Will continue on weekly weights while on tube feeding. Will continue to monitor and adjust tube feeding as necessary. On 8/1/23 at 1:45 PM V26 Registered Dietician stated, You know I'm trying to recall we had a different company now. I took over in March. She was a tube feeding then. I don't have access to her stuff. I think she lost weight from her hospitalizations. I usually put my recommendations in forms. The facility Policy entitled Weight Change Policy 9/2022 documents it is the policy of this facility to monitor the nutritional status of all residents, including all significant or trending patterns of weight change.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers to residents who require bathing assistance for 3 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers to residents who require bathing assistance for 3 of 5 residents (R16, R276, R277) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care for dependent residents in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. R276's July 2023 Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents R276's diagnoses as Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Unspecified Vertebral Artery, Type 2 Diabetes, Respiratory Failure, Cardiac Arrest, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. R276's July 2023 shower sheets only documents one bath/shower given and this is not dated as to when R276 received. R276's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R276 is severely cognitively impaired. R276's MDS documents R276 is totally dependent and requires 2-person physical assist for bathing. R276's Care Plan dated 6/1/2023 documents R276 has a self-care deficit in dressing and grooming related to Cerebral Vascular Accident. On 7/26/2023 at 3:30PM, V10, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) stated residents get showered twice weekly or more if needed. V10 stated the Facility has shower aide for day shift. On 7/26/2023 at 11:30AM V18, R276's family member, stated My Mom wasn't getting bathed. I would bath her when I came to visit her. 2. R277's July 2023 POS documents R277 has diagnoses of Tracheotomy status, Gastrostomy status, Abnormal posture, Weakness. R277's shower sheets dated 7/2023 documents 1 bath/shower given on 7/22/23. R277's MDS dated [DATE] documents R277 is severely cognitively impaired. R277's MDS dated [DATE] documents R277 requires physical assist with part of bathing and 1-person physical assist. R277's Care Plan dated Activities of Daily Living: R277 is complete care with ADLs related to weakness. Interventions include complete Assist resident with ADLs. The Care Plan documents staff to monitor for changes with daily care abilities and provide assist if needed. 3. R16's July 2023 POS documents R16 has diagnoses of Ataxic Cerebral Palsy, Severe Intellectual Disabilities, Multiple Contractures, and Dementia. R16 had no shower sheets for month of July 2023. R16's MDS dated [DATE] documents R16 is severely cognitively impaired and is totally dependent for bathing with 1-person physical assist. R16's Care Plan dated 6/12/2023 documents R16 has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit spastic quadriplegia. Extensive assistance of staff for transfers, bed mobility, and toilet use. Dependent on staff for locomotion, personal hygiene, eating, and dressing. Dependent on staff for bathing/showers. Interventions include document changes in ADLs, extensive total assist with ADLs, mechanical lift for transfers. Encourage the resident to participate, if possible, with each interaction. On 7/28/2023 at 1:30 PM V2, Director of Nursing, DON, stated I expect the residents to be bathed or showered twice weekly. Facility policy dated 9/2022 states Showers or bath are scheduled, and assistance is provided when required.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide progressive fall interventions for 1 of 7 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide progressive fall interventions for 1 of 7 residents (R34) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. R34's July 2023 Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents R34 has diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, Dementia and Orthostatic Hypotension. R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R34 has severe cognitive impairment. R34's MDS documents R34 requires supervision of one person for transfers limited assist of one person for walking in his room and corridor. R34's MDS documents R34's balance is not steady only able to stabilize with staff assistance. On 7/27/23 at 10:00 AM V19 Restorative Aide stated (R34) is a one assist. V19 Restorative Aide entered R34's room and asked to assist him to toilet. V19 placed a gait belt around his waist and asked him to stand. He then walked to the bathroom. R34 was unsteady on his feet but was able to stabilize with staff assistance. He walked to the be bathroom and back, with staff member V19. R34's Fall Care Plan, dated 7/2/2019, provided by the V8, MDS Coordinator, documents R34 is high risk for falls related to weakness, impaired balance, incontinence, and psychotropic medications, recent falls, and impaired safety awareness. Interventions on this care plan had dates of initiation ranging from 7/2/2019 through 512/23. R34's Care Plan Interventions with initiation dates are as follows: 7/2/19, remind to ask for assist with transfer prn; 7/2/19, observe attempts at independent transfer/gait. Assist as needed; 5/31/22, med for hypotension as ordered, 12/15/22 grip strips by bed and toilet; 12/15/22 call light more noticeable with ribbon; 5/30/22, bp (blood pressure) taken as ordered and needed; and 5/12/23, sign in room for reminder to use wheelchair. R34's Fall Investigation dated 10/24/22 documents resident walked up to the nursing station desk and this nurse looked up to see that the resident was bleeding on his face and toward the back side of his head stated that he fell his intervention is Cardiology to evaluate ortho static B/P (Blood Pressure) every shift x 7 days. The Investigation did not address why R34 was ambulating without supervision. R34's Care Plan was not revised after R34's fall on 10/24/22 to prevent R34 from future falls. R34's Fall Investigation dated 10/27/22 documents this nurse returned from lunch and was informed that residents (R34's) roommate came up to the nurse's station and stated resident had fallen. Resident (R34) was gotten off of the floor and brought to the nurse's station. The Investigation documented that R34's issue was related to safety and possible hospice related to decline. R34's Care Plan was not revised after R34's fall on 10/27/22 to prevent R34 from future falls. R34's Fall Investigation dated 10/30/22 this writer was notified that the resident R34 was sitting on the floor in his bedroom. R34's intervention is therapy to screen patient due to weakness. R34's Fall investigation dated 12/3/22 documents resident's roommate notified this writer that the resident had fallen in room, while walking from the bathroom back to bed. The Intervention implemented on this was R34 was placed on prompted toileting as tolerated. R34's Fall Investigation dated 12/4/22 summoned to room per CNA (certified nursing assistant) and R34 was sitting on bathroom floor with back against wall resident. The Investigation documented R34 to be attempted with prompt toileting. R34's Fall Investigation dated 12/5/22 summoned to room resident (R34) on bathroom floor. R34's intervention is nonskid to floor placed. R34's Care Plan was revised on 12/15/22 and documented call light more noticeable with ribbon and grip strips by bed and toilet. R34's Fall Investigation dated 3/2/23 documents resident (R34) sitting in wheelchair in common area. The nurse observed resident standing up from the chair then stumble backwards and fell to floor on buttocks resident did hit his head. His intervention is changing positions slowly, encourage fluid intake. MD (medical doctor) called, enhanced supervision program for 1 hr. R34's Care Plan was not updated with resident centered interventions to prevent R34 from future falls after this fall occurred. R34's Fall Investigation dated 3/23/23 documents The nurse observed resident standing up from chair then stumbles backwards and fell to the floor on buttocks. The Investigation documented R34 did not hit his head. R34's Interventions are to encourage R34 to change positions slowly, encourage fluid intake, resident placed on enhanced monitoring supervision program. The Investigation did not document how long R34 was on enhanced supervision. R34's Care Plan was not updated with resident-centered intervention to prevent R34 from future falls after this fall occurred. R34's Fall Investigation dated 4/11/23 documents called to room by staff resident (R34) lying on the floor on right side skin tear on forehead. R34's Post Fall Huddle, undated, documents R34 fell and was unable to communicate fall details. The Huddle documented that poor safety awareness was the initial root cause of the fall. The Huddle documented Hospice patient-d/t (due to) cognitive and physical decline. In the section Immediate Interventions placed to prevent further reoccurrence/falls there was no documentation. R34's Care Plan, initiated on 4/11/23, documented R34 fell on 4/11/23. The Interventions, initiated on 4/11/23 with resolution date of 4/27/23 documented enhanced supervision x's 30 minutes. R34's Fall Investigation dated 4/23/23 documents resident (R34) stood up himself even though the writer told him to allow writer to help him. His intervention is psych to evaluate for needs for changes related to behaviors, sign placed on bathroom door as reminder. R34's Fall Investigation dated 5/12/23 documents resident walked out to the nurse's station and was standing in front of the 400-hall med cart. This nurse walked around desk assist resident (R34) back to his room and as I approached resident (R34) he fell. This nurse was able to prevent residents head from hitting the floor. He was assisted off of the floor. R34's Care Plan Interventions, dated 5/12/23 documented sign in room for reminder to use wheelchair. On 08/01/23 at 11:40 AM V8 stated, We now talk about the falls and interventions in clinical after morning meeting. We are working on getting it together. The facility policy entitled Fall Prevention and Management dated 7/2022 documents This facility is committed to maximizing each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. While preventing all falls is not possible, the facility will identify and evaluate those residents at risk for falls, plan for preventive strategies, and facilitate as safe an environment as possible. All resident falls shall be reviewed, and the resident's existing plan of care shall be evaluated and modified as needed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based interview and record review, the facility failed to provide tracheotomy (trach) care to 1 of 3 residents (R276) reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based interview and record review, the facility failed to provide tracheotomy (trach) care to 1 of 3 residents (R276) reviewed for trach care in the sample of 33. Findings include: R276's Face Sheet documents R276 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Unspecified Vertebral Artery, Type 2 Diabetes, Respiratory Failure, Cardiac Arrest, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. R276's Progress Note dated 7/17/2023 at 12:24 AM document R276 was suctioned, and this nurse noted a very foul odor coming from R276's trach. Light yellow color noted to sputum. Message sent to physician on call, and no response. R276 is being sent out to Hospital for evaluation. R276's Progress Note dated 7/17/2023 at 11:48 AM documented R276 was admitted to Hospital with diagnosis of hydronephrosis, acute renal failure, and left lower lobe pneumonia. R276's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R276 is severely cognitively impaired. MDS dated [DATE] documents R276 receiving tracheotomy care and suctioning. R276's Physician Order (PO) dated 6/1/2023 at 3:43PM documents trach care every shift and as needed (PRN). R276's PO dated 6/1/23 at 3:32PM documents suction trach every shift and as needed. R276's Treatment Administration Records (TARS), dated 6/1/2023-6/30/2023 has no documentation that R276 was suctioned on 6/16/2023 day shift and 6/9/2023 night shift. R276's Treatment Administration Records (TARS), dated 6/1/2023-6/30/2023 documents R276 received no trach care on 6/16/2023 day shift and 6/9/2023 night shift. R276's Treatment Administration Records (TARS), dated 7/1/2023-7/31/2023 documents R276 received no suctioning on 7/14/23 day shift, 7/11/23, 7/13/2023, 7/16/2023 evening shift, and 7/16/2023 night shift. R276's Treatment Administration Records (TARS), dated 7/1/2023-7/31/2023 documents R276 received no trach care on 7/14/2023 days and 7/11/23, 7/12/2023, 7/13/2023, 7/16/2023 evenings, and 7/16/2023 night shift. On 7/26/2023 at 11:30AM V18, R276's family member, stated (R276) had a foul smell in her trach and she was not being suctioned enough. On 7/26/2023 at 2:45PM V2, Director of Nursing, DON, stated Respiratory therapy comes in once a week and when a resident is admitted . The nurses do trach care every shift and it should be documented on the treatment records. Education is provided by an outside company for the nurses. On 7/28/2023 at 1:10PM V21, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, stated she had not had tracheotomy care training. She is an agency nurse and not an employee of the facility. Facility policy dated 5/2023 documents The facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement protocol to optimize the treatme...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement protocol to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 4 of 4 residents (R39, R226, R278, R279) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 33. Finding include: 1. R39's Results Lab dated 06/05/23 at 8:37 PM documents n.o. (new order) received Ciprofloxacin 500 mg (milligram) PO (by mouth) QD (every day) x7 d (days). Resident and mother notified of new orders. R39's Physician Order dated 06/06/23 documents Cipro Oral Tablet 500 MG (Ciprofloxacin HCl); Give 500 mg by mouth in the evening for UTI (urinary tract infection) for 7 Days. R39's Urine Culture dated 06/02/23 documents S. Maltophilia as the bacteria. Bacteria sensitive to Bactrim, Ceftazidime, and Levofloxacin. Culture does not specify whether or not that Ciprofloxacin is resistive or susceptible. R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS documents that R39 requires extensive assistance of one person for toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS documents that R39 has an indwelling catheter. 2. R226's Physician Order dated 04/19/23 documents Macrobid Oral Capsule 100 MG (Nitrofurantoin Monohydrate/macrocrystals); Give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for UTI for 10 Administrations. There was no urine culture noted in the R22's electronic medical record (EMR) to determine if the antibiotic was effective in treating the organism causing the UTI. R226's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. The MDS documents that R226 required extensive assistance of one person for toilet use. The MDS documents that R226 required limited assistance of one person for personal hygiene. The MDS documents that R226 had an indwelling catheter. 3. R278's Physician Order dated 04/06/23 documents Cipro Oral Tablet 500 MG (Ciprofloxacin HCl); Give 1 tablet via G-Tube (gastric tube) two times a day for UTI until 04/21/2023 23:59 Give for 14 days. R278's Hospital Record dated 04/06/23 does not document a urine culture or the type of bacteria in urine. R278's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 99 out of 15. The MDS documents that R278 required total dependence of one person for toilet use. The MDS documents that R278 required extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. The MDS documents that R278 had an indwelling catheter. 4. R279's Physician Order dated 06/09/23 documents Ciprofloxacin HCl (Hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 500 MG (milligrams) (Ciprofloxacin HCl); Give 500 mg by mouth two times a day for UTI with altered mental status for 14 Administrations 1 week (14 doses). R279's Nurses Notes dated 06/05/23 at 05:49 AM documents Remains on abt. (antibiotic) therapy for abnormal UA. There was no documentation in R279's medical record that R279 had a culture and sensitivity to determine if the antibiotic being used to treat R279';s UTI was effective. R279's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. The MDS documents that R279 required extensive assistance of two plus persons for toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS documents that R279 is always incontinent of bladder and bowel. On 08/01/23 at 11:57 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated that they realized the infection log was being done correctly and they have plans to fix it. V2 stated they realize that the cultures and organisms are not listed, and that the urine culture are being looked before prescribing antibiotics. They are in the process of fix it. Facility's policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated 12/2017 documents It is the policy of [NAME] Health Services to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with the mission of promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics to treat infections and reduce possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Components of the policy were developed by using evidence-based practice guidelines and are aligned with the Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, published by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1), and the State Operations Manual (Appendix PP): Guidance to Surveyors of Long-Term Care Facilities, published by CMS (2).
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to conduct and provide evidence of quarterly and ongoing QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program) program and failed to have ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to conduct and provide evidence of quarterly and ongoing QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program) program and failed to have medical director attend the QAPI meetings. This has the potential to affect all 74 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/27/23 at 2:50 PM, V2 Director of Nurses (DON) stated that V16, Medical Director has not been coming to the facility for the QAPI meetings. On 7/27/2023 at 3:04 PM, V3 Regional Director stated she found four QAPI Meeting documents and does not know why V16 Medical Director does not attend or sign the documents. On 8/1/2023 at 11:36 AM V1 Administrator stated her expectations is the facility wound meet quarterly and review old action items and put further action items in place based on review of the process. V1 stated she expects V16 Medical Director to be attending and signing the facility QAPI meetings. V1 stated she wasn't sure when the last quarterly meeting was conducted. On 07/27/23 03:08 PM, V3 Regional Director stated they had a QAPI meeting on 7/25/2023. V3 stated that V16 Medical Director not present, no signature on QAPI Meeting Agenda and Minutes documentation. Quality Assurance Meeting Sign-In List and Minutes dated 10/31/2023 documents no signature for Administrator, DON, or Medical Director. Quality Assurance Meeting Sign-In List and Minutes dated 9/30/2022 documents no signature of a DON, or Medical Director. Quality Assurance Meeting Sign-In List and Minutes dated 1/27/2023 documents no signature of a Medical Director. The facility's QAPI Program policy and procedure, dated 1/2018, documents, Purpose: The purpose of QAPI in our organization is to take a proactive approach to continually improve the way we care or/and engage with our residents, caregivers, and other partners so that we may realize our vision to be value driven. To do this, all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts, which support meaningful relationships with the lives we touch. Governance and Leadership: The facility's governing body is ultimately responsible for overseeing the QAPI Committee. The administrator has direct oversight responsibilities for all functions of the QAPI Committee and reports directly to the governing body. The QAPI Committee, which includes the medical director, is ultimately responsible for assuring compliance with federal and state requirements and continuous improvement in quality of care and customer satisfaction. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form dated 7/25/23, documented there were 74 residents residing in the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately develop an ongoing infection control program that adequately collects data to calculate and analyze infections. This has the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately develop an ongoing infection control program that adequately collects data to calculate and analyze infections. This has the potential to affect all 74 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Facility's Infection Log undated does not document the bacteria/organism on the log. Infection Log undated does not document whether or not there was culture done for any of the infections. There are 4 residents listed on the Infection Log with having Urinary Tract Infections with no culture information or the type of bacteria/organism present. Infection Log undated documents that R39 had a Urinary Tract Infection and was prescribed Ciprofloxacin on 06/15/23 with no bacteria/organism listed. Infection Log undated documents that R226 had a Urinary Tract Infection and was prescribed Macrobid on 04/20/23 with no bacteria/organism listed. Infection Log undated documents that R278 had a Urinary Tract Infection and was prescribed Ciprofloxacin on 04/07/23 with no bacteria/organism listed. Infection Log undated documents that R279 had a Urinary Tract Infection and was prescribed Ciprofloxacin on 06/10/23 with no bacteria/organism listed. On 08/01/23 at 11:57 AM, V2, Director of Nursing stated that they realized the infection log was being done incorrectly. V2 stated they have plans to fix it and realize that the cultures and organisms are not listed. V2 stated they realize that the urine cultures are being looked before prescribing antibiotics and they are in the process of fix it. V2 stated the facility has a new ICP (Infection Control Preventionist). Facility's policy Infection Surveillance dated 06/2015 documents Surveillance of infections will be completed to calculate baseline rates, detect outbreaks, track progress and determine trends to assist in preventing the development or spread of infections. The goal is to minimize the number of infections and to identify behaviors or environmental factors that may warrant further evaluation. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 7/25/23, documented there were 74 residents residing in the facility.
May 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to perform tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning consist...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to perform tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents (R6, R7, R8) reviewed for respiratory/ tracheostomy care in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. R6's Face Sheet, undated, documents R6 has a diagnosis of Tracheostomy Status, Cerebral Infarction and Acute/Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. R6's Progress Note, dated 5/27/23 at 2:16 PM, documents R6 was admitted to the facility with a tracheostomy in place, utilizing at size 8 tracheal tube. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) fails to document an order for tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, what size/type of tracheal tube or how often to change the tracheal tube. On 5/30/23 at 8:15 AM, R6 was observed in bed, saliva running down R6's mouth onto his chin and chest. R6 had a large amount of saliva in his mouth. The tracheostomy dressing had dried reddish tan colored drainage on it. There was a dried white substance to R6's right anterior chest. Suction was available at bedside. There was approximately 350 ml (milliliters) of frothy, cloudy liquid in the suction canister. The tracheal suction tubing was sitting out on the bedside table, exposed, not covered, tubing had a dried tan colored substance around the tip and approximately 1 inch down the tubing. R6's tracheal tube had a dried brown substance on the end of it. R6 was observed coughing and was having difficulty breathing. V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was notified and stated, I just suctioned him, but I can do it again. V3 donned non-sterile gloves and used the same suction tubing that was sitting out on the bedside table. As V3 pulled the tracheostomy collar up, V3 was touching R6's skin with the suction catheter tip and then inserted the suction catheter into R6's tracheal tube, suctioning R6 2 times, then removed the suction catheter and sat it back on the bedside table. R6's oxygen level prior to suctioning was 89% and after suctioning was 98%. R6 appeared comfortable and without signs of respiratory distress after being suctioned. V3 then removed R6's old tracheostomy site dressing, cleaned the site and placed a new clean dressing to the site without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. 2. R7's Face Sheet, undated, documents R7 has a diagnosis of Tracheostomy Status, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Acute/Chronic Respiratory Failure and Cerebral Infarction. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R7 is cognitively intact, receives oxygen therapy, suctioning and tracheostomy care. R7's Progress Note, dated 5/15/23 at 6:54 PM, documents R7 was admitted to the facility with a tracheostomy in place. R7's POS fails to document an order for tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, what size/type of tracheal tube or how often to change the tracheal tube, tracheostomy care or suctioning. On 5/30/23 at 8:50 AM, R7 was observed in bed with no signs of respiratory distress. Tracheostomy dressing in place with reddish brown drainage noted. Suction at bedside. Suction canister had approximately 750 ml of white liquid in it. Tracheal suction tubing in bedside drawer uncovered and exposed. R7 is unable to speak but does shake his head yes/no and uses hand gestures. When asked if the staff cleaned his tracheostomy site, R7 shook his head yes. When asked how often the staff cleaned his tracheostomy site a day, R7 held up 2 fingers. On 5/30/23 at 12:25 PM, tracheostomy care and suctioning were observed with V3 (LPN). V3 used the same tracheal suction tubing that was observed in R7's bedside drawer on 5/30/23 at 8:50 AM. V3 donned sterile gloves, inserted the tracheal suction tube 3 times, each time the suction catheter had blood noted on it. V3 then proceeded to remove R7's tracheostomy site dressing with the same gloves, cleaned the area and then placed a new clean dressing to the site without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. R7's tracheostomy site was red and irritated. 3. R8's Face Sheet, undated, documents R8 has a diagnosis of Tracheostomy Status and Acute/Chronic Respiratory Failure. R8's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R8 is cognitively intact. R8's Progress Note, dated 5/16/23 at 1:28 AM, documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 10:50 PM, with tracheostomy in place. R8's POS fails to document an order for tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, what size/type of tracheal tube or how often to change the tracheal tube, tracheostomy care or suctioning. On 5/30/23 at 8:55 AM, R8 was observed in his room with no signs of respiratory distress. R8's tracheostomy dressing had a dried tannish brown colored drainage on it. There was suction at bedside. The tracheal suction tubing was lying on top of a yellow bag, uncovered and exposed. R8 stated the staff only clean/change the dressing to his tracheostomy site when he asks, the nurses do not do it unless he asks. On 5/30/23 at 12:20 PM, tracheostomy care with V3 (LPN). V3 removed the old tracheostomy site dressing, cleaned the site and then without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. V3 placed the new clean dressing on the tracheostomy site. On 5/30/23 at 12:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated the nurses perform tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning every shift and as needed. V2 stated the nurses are to use sterile technique when tracheostomy care or suctioning is provided. The Tracheostomy Care policy, undated, documents the facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences. 3a. Provide tracheostomy care at least twice daily. 6e. Remove old dressing; pull soiled glove down over the hand, and the soiled dressing, and roll glove over dressing; discard both in appropriate receptacle. Perform hand hygiene. The Tracheal Suctioning policy, dated 6/2015, documents the following: 4. Open suction catheter kit and don gloves; 5. Using non-sterile hand, pour normal saline or sterile water solution into solution container; 6. Using sterile hand, remove catheter from wrapper. Keep coiled so as not to touch a non-sterile object. Using opposite hand, attach the catheter to tubing; 7. Pre-oxygenate prior to suctioning. Keep pressure on suction machine between 80-120 mg (milligrams). Occlude the suction part to assess suction pressure. Pre-oxygenating before the procedure; 8. Dip catheter tip in sterile solution to lubricate outside of catheter and reduce tissue trauma during insertion; 9. With catheter tip in sterile solution, occlude control valve with non-sterile hand. Suction a small amount of solution through catheter; 10. Insert suction catheter while suction port is open until resistance is met. Withdraw catheter 1-2 cm (centimeters); 11. Suction resident using continuous suction as you withdraw catheter. Never suction for more than 5-10 seconds at a time. Do not exceed 15 seconds. Withdraw catheter. Post-oxygenate; 12. Discard used supplies.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to perform tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning utilizing infection prevention practices for 3 of 4 residents (R6, R7, R8) revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to perform tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning utilizing infection prevention practices for 3 of 4 residents (R6, R7, R8) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. On 5/30/23 at 8:15 AM, R6 was observed in bed, saliva running down R6's mouth onto his chin and chest. R6 had a large amount of saliva in his mouth. The tracheostomy dressing had dried reddish tan colored drainage on it. There was a dried white substance to R6's right anterior chest. Suction was available at bedside. There was approximately 350 ml (milliliters) of frothy, cloudy liquid in the suction canister. The tracheal suction tubing was sitting out on the bedside table, exposed, not covered, tubing had a dried tan colored substance around the tip and approximately 1 inch down the tubing. R6's tracheal tube had a dried brown substance on the end of it. R6 was observed coughing and was having difficulty breathing. V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was notified and stated, I just suctioned him, but I can do it again. V3 donned non-sterile gloves and used the same suction tubing that was sitting out on the bedside table. As V3 pulled the tracheostomy collar up, V3 was touching R6's skin with the suction catheter tip and then inserted the suction catheter into R6's tracheal tube, suctioning R6 2 times, then removed the suction catheter and sat it back on the bedside table. V3 then removed R6's old tracheostomy site dressing, cleaned the site and placed a new clean dressing to the site without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. 2. On 5/30/23 at 8:50 AM, R7 was observed in bed with no signs of respiratory distress. Tracheostomy dressing in place with reddish brown drainage noted. Suction at bedside. Suction canister had approximately 750 ml of white liquid in it. Tracheal suction tubing in bedside drawer uncovered and exposed. On 5/30/23 at 12:25 PM, tracheostomy care and suctioning were observed with V3 (LPN). V3 used the same tracheal suction tubing that was observed in R7's bedside drawer on 5/30/23 at 8:50 AM. V3 donned sterile gloves, inserted the tracheal suction tube 3 times, each time the suction catheter had blood noted on it. V3 then proceeded to remove R7's tracheostomy site dressing with the same gloves, cleaned the area and then placed a new clean dressing to the site without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. R7's tracheostomy site was red and irritated. 3. On 5/30/23 at 8:55 AM, R8 was observed in his room with no signs of respiratory distress. R8's tracheostomy dressing had a dried tannish brown colored drainage on it. There was suction at bedside. The tracheal suction tubing was lying on to of a yellow bag, uncovered and exposed. R8 stated the staff only clean/change the dressing to his tracheostomy site when he asks, the nurses do not do it unless he asks. On 5/30/23 at 12:20 PM, tracheostomy care with V3 (LPN). V3 removed the old tracheostomy site dressing, cleaned the site and then without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. V3 placed the new clean dressing on the tracheostomy site. On 5/30/23 at 12:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated the nurses perform tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning every shift and as needed. V2 stated the nurses are to use sterile technique when tracheostomy care or suctioning is provided. The Tracheostomy Care policy, undated, documents the facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences. 3a. Provide tracheostomy care at least twice daily. 6e. Remove old dressing; pull soiled glove down over the hand, and the soiled dressing, and roll glove over dressing; discard both in appropriate receptacle. Perform hand hygiene. The Tracheal Suctioning policy, dated 6/2015, documents the following: 4. Open suction catheter kit and don gloves; 5. Using non-sterile hand, pour normal saline or sterile water solution into solution container; 6. Using sterile hand, remove catheter from wrapper. Keep coiled so as not to touch a non-sterile object. Using opposite hand, attach the catheter to tubing; 8. Dip catheter tip in sterile solution to lubricate outside of catheter and reduce tissue trauma during insertion; 9. With catheter tip in sterile solution, occlude control valve with non-sterile hand. Suction a small amount of solution through catheter; 10. Insert suction catheter while suction port is open until resistance is met. Withdraw catheter 1-2 cm; 11. Suction resident using continuous suction as you withdraw catheter. 12. Discard used supplies.
Sept 2022 9 deficiencies 4 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family representative and physici...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family representative and physician of changes in condition for 2 of 3 residents (R40, R71) reviewed for changes in condition in the sample of 36. This failure resulted in R40's psychiatric decline and R71's exacerbation of heart and lung issues resulting in hospitalization. Findings include: 1. On 9/6/22 at 10:54 AM, R40 was sitting in the recliner in her room with her eyes closed. R40 was able to state her name but then had slurred, mumbled speech when answering questions, and was very difficult to understand. She stated she has only been in the facility a couple of days and had moved here because the last facility she lived in told her she had to leave because the administrator didn't want her there. R40 kept nodding off to sleep but would wake to try to answer questions. She appeared very lethargic and drowsy. Her hair was uncombed and general appearance disheveled. R40's Face Sheet documents her diagnoses to include Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is alert and oriented. It also documents she did not have any delusions , hallucinations, or behaviors during that assessment period. R40's Care Plan dated 4/14/21 documents, Medication: (R40) uses antianxiety medications related to anxiety disorder. Is at risk for side effects. Interventions for this Care Plan include anti-anxiety medication as ordered. R40's Care Plan dated 4/16/21 documents, Behavior: (R40) has a history of anxiety and self-isolation. At risk for alteration in mood. Diagnosis: Anxiety, Schizophrenia. Interventions for this care plan include medications as ordered. R40's Care Plan dated 9/3/22 documents: Elopement: At this time (R40) is experiencing delusions and hallucinations related to her mental illness. Interventions for this care plan include: 1:1 with staff as needed; 15-30 minute checks as needed; allow concerns to be expressed; encourage resident to keep busy with activities; MD notification as needed. R40's Physician Orders dated Physician Order Summary dated 9/7/22 documents the following orders: Clozapine (antipsychotic medication) 100 mg by mouth at bedtime with start date 6/8/21 and Clozapine 50 mg by mouth in the morning with a start date of 9/3/22. R40's Physician Orders also included an order for Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg 1 tablet by mouth two times a day with a start date of 6/8/21, but no discontinue date. Review of R40's Progress Notes dated 6/1/22 to 9/7/22 document she missed 18 doses of Lorazepam 0.5 mg which was ordered to be given twice a day for anxiety. All the missed doses of Lorazepam occurred between 6/20/22 and 7/26/22. On R40's Medication Administration Record (MAR) starting on 7/27/22, R40's Lorazepam was on hold by the physician, but there was no order on R40's Physician Order Sheet documenting an order to put Lorazepam on hold and no documentation in R40's Progress Notes documenting a physician had put R40's Lorazepam on hold on 7/27/22. R40's Progress Notes document she did not receive her Clozapine 100 mg which was ordered to be given at 8:00 PM every night, on 8/6/22, 8/19/22 or 8/20/22. R40's Drug Record Book dated 6/1/22 to 9/30/2022 documents her Clozapine 100 mg was reordered on 8/27/22 and notes on that date, out, please send asap (as soon as possible). Review of R40's Progress Notes dated 6/1/22 to 9/7/22 does not document any behaviors until 9/4/22 at 4:46 AM when it documents, most of evening and night, resident up yelling and screaming. Very confused and talking about people and things from the past. no distress noted. Will continue to monitor. There was no documentation that family or physician was notified of R40's change in condition. R40's Progress note dated 9/3/22 at 8:52 AM documents, Resident very restless, walking from her room to nurses station to front lobby. Voicing delusional thoughts and difficult to redirect. Told this nurse, You are a bad nurse, you don't have any facts. I no longer live here. I was in Australia all last week. Resident's family reports that resident refusing to take their phone calls and denied knowing who her sister is when she came to see her this AM. V24 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) aware of above. New order received. Resident placed on 15-minute checks for safety. On 9/8/22 at 9:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) provided R40's psychiatric progress notes dated 4/27/21, 2/4/22 and 5/25/22. She included a handwritten note that documents, (R40) verified with NP (Nurse Practitioner) 9/7 at 5:28 PM that R40 was last seen May 2022 and was not seen in June or July (did not mention August). The note documents she will see this month. May call (V24) to discuss. On 9/7/22 at 2:36 PM, V18 (LPN) stated R40 was moved yesterday. She stated R40 had been having some kind of psychosis V18 stated on the past Thursday, September 1st, R40 was delusional and saying that she needed to go to Washington DC, and she thought her sister had committed suicide and that her roommate had gotten inside her head and stolen all her memories and deleted them. V18 stated she did not know anything about R40 having fallen recently. On 9/7/22 at 2:38 PM, V19 (LPN) stated she was here last Thursday (September 1st) and saw changes in R40's behaviors. She stated R40 had missed one of medications for a couple of days because of problems with pharmacy, something about them not getting the order, or it was outdated. V19 stated today R40 was doing a lot better, but last night when she worked R40 was still not the same but did finally remember V19's name. V19 stated if they don't have a resident's medication, they notify the pharmacy to see what is going on. V19 stated if the medication is not a psych med, they notify the MD's nurse practitioner, but if it is a psych med, they notify V24 (psych nurse practitioner). On 9/7/22 at 2:45 PM, R40 was sitting in her room. Her speech was clear, and she was awake and alert. R40 stated, I couldn't sleep because I didn't have my medicine. They kept telling me it didn't come in from pharmacy. I haven't been sleeping good for 4 or 5 weeks, and I wasn't getting enough to eat. I felt like they were punishing me because (V1) doesn't want us to have Resident Council meetings and it's our right. I felt bullied by her. I am the resident council president and I have to look out for the residents here. She stated her parents are not her guardians, her husband is . She stated, You know, he is Hawkeye on MASH. She stated she goes out on Saturdays with her sister to eat and shop. She stated they wouldn't let her husband take her out. R40 stated she talks to her brother a lot on the phone, but he doesn't live around here. On 9/7/22 at 3:05 PM, V2 (DON), stated the facility had some problems with the pharmacy at the beginning of August when they went to a new system. She stated they went from the card system to having medications in individual plastic rolls, except high acuity medications, which were still on cards. V2 stated the first couple of weeks after the change they had a lot of problems because the pharmacy thought they still had the high acuity medication cards, but they had sent everything to the pharmacy and then did not get the high acuity meds back with the other meds. V2 stated R40 did miss her Clozapine 50 mg on September 3 but did get it as soon as it came in on September 4. V2 stated R40 had started getting a little manic, and the psychiatric nurse practitioner had ordered her to have Clozapine 50 mg every morning in addition to her current dose of Clozapine 100 mg at HS. V2 stated R40's brother had called and asked about her missing some medication. V2 stated he talked to V1 (Administrator) but she was unable to give him any information because he was not on R40's contact list. V2 stated when R40 had behaviors last week she had contacted R40's parents and sister on Thursday, August 1st and asked them to come and see her and help figure out what was going on with R40. V2 stated they came to see R40 on Saturday. V2 stated R40's sister does not see her often; she has only seen her visit a couple of times in the last year. V2 stated R40's parents are her guardians, but they are elderly and don't hear well so when staff call them, if they can't hear what is being said, they hang up. V2 stated R40's parents and sister have left specific instructions that they are not to give her brother any information regarding R40; he is to call either her parents or sister and they will let him know what they want him to know. V2 stated I called R40's sister and parents to inform them of her behaviors last week. I can show you on my cell phone where I called them. V2 then looked through her cell phone and stated, I must have used (V1's) cell phone because I can't find it on my phone. V2 stated when a medication is missed, if it is a psych med, they notify the psychiatrist because the medical doctor and his nurse practitioner will not do anything with psych meds. She stated the nurse usually notifies V24, the psychiatric nurse practitioner, with any psyche issues. She stated she does not think the psychiatrist has been in the facility for several months. On 9/7/22 at 3:50 PM, V16 (R40's brother) during phone interview, stated he had not talked to R40 about her missing medications, because he was on a zoom call when she tried to call him, but R40 had notified his niece, who is in medical school, by text, stating that she had missed some of her medication and was not sleeping. V16 stated R40, in her text message to his niece, stated the facility was giving her Melatonin and it was not helping her to sleep, and was asking if there was anything else that would help. V16 stated he called and tried to ask the administrator (V1) about R40 having missed medications, and she told him she is dealing with a state survey and has a funeral to attend and did not have time to talk to him. V16 stated he tried to set up a better time to discuss R40 but (V1) told him he was not on her contact list so she would not be able to talk to him. V16 stated he then asked if his sister (V17) could call and make the appointment and was told yes, she could. V16 stated R40's text to his niece indicated she had missed her medication for about a week. He stated R40 had been doing very well with no psychiatric setbacks for about 17 years and was usually very alert and oriented and well organized. V16 stated he had called and informed his sister about the text message R40 had sent to her niece about missing medication, so she went to see her on Saturday, which was the usual routine, and R40 was not her normal self. V16 stated he did not know of any falls or injuries that had occurred as a result of R40 not receiving all her medication, but he feels she has had a mental set back as noted by her change in behaviors and her lack of sleep. V16 stated he is worried about the facility retaliating against R40 because the family is complaining, but he stated he just wants to know what medication was missed, why it was missed and what is being done about it, so it doesn't keep happening because he knows her medications are very important to her stability mentally. On 9/7/22 at 5:15 PM, V17 (R40's sister) during a phone interview, stated she comes in every Saturday and takes R40 out of the facility for the day and they usually have lunch or dinner with their parents. V17 stated R40 is very alert and oriented and runs the Resident Council at the facility, and if she feels like she or any of the other residents are being mistreated, she will say something about it. V17 stated R40 usually calls her during the week to talk about what they are going to do on the Saturday when she comes to get her, but R40 did not call her last week, which was very unusual for R40. V17 stated nobody from the facility called her last week to tell her about R40 having behaviors, but when she arrived at the facility that Saturday morning, September 3, a staff met her at the door and stated she had meant to call her and warn her that R40 was having a lot of behaviors and was not acting like herself. V17 stated they told her R40 was yelling and cursing at the staff. She stated she went to R40's room and R40 yelled for her to get the f*#% out. V17 stated nobody from the facility had notified her or R40's parents that R40 was not receiving all of her medications. V17 stated her brother had called her with concerns because their niece had received a text message from R40 last week, telling her R40 was not getting her medications and could not sleep and wanted to know if she could tell her something that would help her because the Melatonin the facility was giving her was not working. V17 stated R40 knew her own medication very well and sometimes when she went on home visits, R40 would catch that they had forgotten to send one of her medications and would call up and tell them she needed it. V17 stated no one had given any directive to the facility to not release any information to R40's brother regarding her care. V17 stated he is not on her list because he lives out of state and it is easier to get in touch with her or her parents, but there is no reason he cannot call with concerns about her care. She stated R40 speaks to her brother on the phone often. V17 stated she feels the facility owes them an apology and an explanation of why some of R40's medications were missed and why they had not been informed of this or R40's change in behaviors and overall condition. V17 stated R40 has not had a psychotic break like this since 2005, and when it happened back then, it caused her to have to be institutionalized. V17 stated she knows R40 not receiving her medications could be very detrimental to her mental health. On 9/8/22 at 10:35 AM, V2 (DON), stated, I don't do medication error reports when medications are missed, only when the wrong medication is given. We don't do a medication error report, but we notify the doctor when a medication is missed. If the doctor was notified of the missed medication it is documented in the eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) documentation progress notes. V2 stated she would expect physician orders to be followed and medications to be given as ordered. On 9/8/22 at 2:00 PM, V24 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) stated the facility does sometimes send a fax or calls the office when a resident's medication is not available. V24 stated she was surprised when the nursing staff called about R40 having behaviors this past weekend. V24 stated staff reported to her that R40 was in the midst of the delusion of having a famous husband and was trying to run out of the facility to meet him. V24 stated she does not recall anyone reporting R40 missing 18 doses of Lorazepam in July 2022 because that would have been pretty significant. V24 stated she would think the facility would contact the pharmacy right away and figure out what was going on so R40 would get her medications as ordered. V24 stated there is no reason R40 should have missed 18 doses of her Lorazepam without the facility doing something about it. V24 stated she does not think that is related to R40's behaviors this past weekend, as R40 had been complaining of being tired and her Lorazepam would have made her drowsier, not caused her to have behaviors. V24 stated they had been decreasing R40's Clozapine gradually over the past year, so missing a dose may cause her to have changes in her behaviors for a couple of days following the missed dose, but the missed dose a couple of weeks ago probably would not have affected R40's behaviors this past weekend. V24 stated she knows R40 very well and has been treating her for the past 5 years and stated R40 is normally very alert and oriented and is aware of her own care. V24 stated she would not be surprised if R40 remembers meetings she had 2 or 3 years ago. V24 stated she does not know what would have caused R40's behaviors last weekend but she did give an order to add Clozapine 50 mg QAM because they had decreased her dose quite a bit. On 9/8/22 at 7:00 PM, R40 was sitting in her room waiting on her medication and snacks. R40 stated she is feeling a lot better. R40 was noticeably more alert, and her speech was clearer than during previous encounters with her during the survey. She remembered this surveyors name. She stated she had missed her nighttime dose of Clozapine 3 nights last week and it was horrible. R40 stated, The didn't give me my Clozapine for 3 days and I couldn't sleep. I begged them to give me my meds and they told me pharmacy didn't bring them yet. I asked them to call my doctor and they told me they couldn't because he was on vacation. It was terrible. I felt like my eyelids wouldn't close. I cried because I knew I wasn't right, but I didn't know what to do. On 9/8/22 at 7:20 PM, during an off-hours portion of the survey, V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated the facility is still using the same pharmacy since changing owners, but they reorder residents' medications differently. V19 stated they reorder a resident's medication through the electronic medical record but several times the medication has been reordered it doesn't show up with the delivery. V19 stated this has happened with R40's Clozapine more than once, but she knows she missed some doses last week, but doesn't know how many because she doesn't always work on the same hall. V19 stated she felt very bad about what R40 went through last week and the beginning of this week. V19 stated R40 got so bad mentally that she did not even know V19's name, and she stated R40 usually recognizes all the staff and her fellow residents. V19 stated R40 was upset because she was afraid her changes were part of her illness and was afraid, she was getting worse, but V19 stated she reassured R40, when she was able to understand again, that her mental changes and behaviors were not her fault, and that it was the facility's fault because they did not get her Clozapine ordered on time. V19 stated she has worked with R40 for over a year, and this is the first time she has seen her have behaviors like these, and not recognize staff. V19 stated when R40 had missed doses of her Clozapine in the past it did not affect her this bad. V19 stated she talked to R40's sister when she came in and she told V19 that R40 had behaviors similar to these back in 2009 and that is what caused her to be institutionalized. On 9/9/22 at 8:45 AM, V31 (Pharmacist) stated R40's Clozapine 50 mg was ordered and processed on 9/2/22 and should have been delivered on 9/3/22. V31 stated she could not tell when R40's Clozapine 100 mg was ordered, but all the orders she has are old. V31 stated she could not tell exactly when the last Clozapine 100 mg was last sent to the facility and would have to check with someone else and will return call. On 9/9/22 at 12:00 PM, V31 (Pharmacist) stated they did receive the facility's request for a refill of her Clozapine on 8/27/22 but it was not sent because they needed a lab that is required before they can send Clozapine. V31 stated her records show the pharmacy has not refilled R40's Clozapine 100 mg since April 2022. V31 stated since April 2022, the only Clozapine that has been sent to facility for R40 was Clozapine 50 mg for her new order received on 9/2/22 for Clozapine 50 mg one every morning. On 9/9/22 at 12:15 PM, V2 (DON) and V23 (ADON) stated they were not aware R40 did not receive her Clozapine 100 mg from 8/27/22 until her Clozapine 50 mg was delivered on 9/4/22. V23 stated, I am the one who wrote on the order that we were out of (R40's) Clozapine and to please send it out. Both V2 and V23 stated they have given R40 her medications when they have worked the floor since April 2022, and they feel like she had her Clozapine 100 mg when they gave her medications. On 9/9/22 at 1:37 PM, V24 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) during phone interview, stated R40 having missed her Clozapine 100 mg QHS would have directly caused her to have experience her changes in mental status resulting in her psychosis she experienced starting on 9/2/22 and she is continuing to have some psychosis. V24 stated R40 will most likely require a higher dose of Clozapine to get back to her baseline and it might take a while. V24 stated she will be assessing R40 next week and will be contacting the DON to get an update on R40. V24 stated it is very sad that R40 is going through this because she was doing so well and was very active in the facility before last week. 2. R71's Face Sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Acute Exacerbation, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Hypertension, Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Personal History of Pulmonary Embolism. R71's Progress Notes dated 8/24/2022 at 4:36 PM documents, resident admitted to (local hospital) with dx (diagnosis) of exacerbation of COPD and acute CHF. R71 had an additional Progress Note dated 8/24/2022 at 4:36 PM which documents, resident sats (saturates) at 95% on 2.5L (liters) O2 (oxygen) states she feels SOB (short of breath), abdominal breathing observed, wheezing auscultated. pulmonologist NP (Nurse Practitioner) here to see and assess resident, new orders received of daliresp 500 mcg ( micrograms) and breo ellipta inhaler that were just ordered and not available from pharmacy at this time. medical NP here to see and assess resident ordered to be sent to ER (emergency room) per 911 for respiratory distress. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived approx (approximately) 1305 (1:05 PM) to take over tx (treatment). Review of R71's Progress Notes dated 8/16/22 to current (9/9/22) includes documentation of R71's medications that were not available on these dates. There is no documentation that the facility notified the physician or nurse practitioner of the missed doses of medications on these dates: 8/17/22: Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, and Spiriva were not available 8/18/22: Propranolol and Dicyclomine were not available 8/19/22: Cardizem, Dicyclomine, Flonase, Furosemide, Guaifenesin, Isosorbide, Lisinopril, Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, Vitamin D, and Spiriva were not available. 8/21/22: Spiriva was not available 8/22/22: Cardizem was not available (R71 was hospitalized at local hospital 8/24/22 to 8/25/22 with diagnosis of COPD Exacerbation and CHF) 8/26/22: Guaifenesin, Cardizem, Prednisone, Furosemide was not available 8/29/22: Spiriva was not available 8/31/22: Spiriva was not available 9/1/22: Incruse Ellipta not available 9/3/22: Breo Ellipta not available 9/7/22: Incruse Ellipta not available. R71's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documents her admitting diagnoses were Acute Congestive Heart Failure and COPD with Acute Exacerbation. On 9/9/22 at 12:37 PM R71 stated she does not know why she did not get her medications when she was first admitted and thinks that was the reason she had to go back to the hospital. R71 stated it scares her when she doesn't get her medications because she has heart and breathing problems. She stated the nurses said it was not their fault that her medications were not here; it was because of pharmacy. On 9/9/22 at 12:40 PM, V38 (Pulmonary Nurse Practitioner) stated she was not notified by the facility that R71 was not receiving her medications as ordered. After reviewing the medications R71 had missed since her admission on [DATE] until 9/7/22, V38 stated R71 having missed those medications definitely would have caused her to have an exacerbation of her COPD and CHF and caused her to be sent to the hospital. V38 stated she had seen R71 on 8/24/22, the day she was sent to the hospital, and noted she was short of breath, but she had just finished with therapy, so she thought R71 was just needing to recover from that. V38 stated the Primary Nurse Practitioner called her later that day and told her R71 was continuing to be short of breath and lethargic and they made the decision to send her to the emergency room for evaluation. V38 stated the facility did not notify her that R71 was not receiving all of her medications and that would have absolutely been something they should have reported to her so she could follow up with the pharmacy to determine the estimated time of delivery of the medications. She stated R71's diuretics and inhalers are very important medications for her to receive because of her COPD and CHF diagnoses. The facility's policy, Change in Resident's Condition with the review date of 9/2022, it documents, General: It is the policy of the facility, except in medical emergency, to alert the resident, resident's physician and resident's responsible party of a change in condition. Policy: 1. Nursing will notify the resident's physician or nurse practitioner when: it continues, b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or emotional status. and e. It is deemed necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, assess, and investigat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, assess, and investigate for the root cause of falls, and implement progressive interventions to prevent further falls for 1 of 4 residents (R42) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 36. This failure resulted in R42 having 32 falls from 1/2022 through 9/8/2022, 6 of which required R42 to be transported to the emergency room for right knee fracture, right hand fracture, staples to R42's head, and 2 concussions. B. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed utilize safe equipment to propel residents for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for safe equipment to provide locomotion in the sample of 36. Findings include: A. R42's Undated Face Sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R42's Face Sheet documents diagnoses of history of falling, cerebral palsy, difficulty walking, seizures, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. R42's Referral form from a local group home, dated 6/7/2021 documents she was at risk for falls. The referral form documents R42 ambulated with a wheeled walker with minimum assist of 2 staff for balance, weakness, and safety. The Referral Form documented R42 needed assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living). The Referral Form documented interventions in place included call light within reach, bed in lowest position, bed wheels locked and a bed alarm. The Referral Form documented the group home staff documented R42 whereabouts every 2 hours. R42's admission Fall Risk Assessment, dated 6/15/2021 documents she was high risk for falls. The Fall Risk Assessment documented she had 3 or more falls in the last 3 months, assess the resident's gait/balance, have him or her stand on both feet without holding onto anything; walk straight forward; walk through a doorway; and make a turn: N/A not able to perform function adequate vision and intermittent confusion. R42's medical record documented R42 had falls on following dates with no major injuries: 1/20/2022 no injury, 2/4/2022 no injury, 2/11/2022 no injury, 2/4/2022 laceration to nose, 2/16/2022 no injury, 2/22/2022 abrasion right knee, 2/23/2022 no injury, 2/26/2022 no injury, 3/6/2022 no injury, 3/8/2022 no injury, 3/9/2022 no injury, 3/10/2022 no injury, 3/13/2022 no injury, 3/15/2022 no injury, 3/18/2022 no injury, 3/19/2022 blood coming from her nose, large hematoma to left eye, bruise on right wrist, 3/31/2022 no injury, 5/20/2022 no injury, 5/22/2022 no injury, 5/23/2022 no injury, 5/28/2022 no injury, 6/5/2022 steri-strips right forehead, 6/14/2022 no injury, 6/22/2022 no injury, 6/23/2022 no injury, 6/29/2022 no injury, 7/26/2022 no injury, 7/28/2022 no injury, 7/30/2022 no injury, 8/21/2022 abrasion to left knee and elbow and 8/23/2022 bruise right side of face and lump on right forehead. R42's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documents she is alert and needs supervision/setup help only with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene and walk in room. Independent/setup help only with locomotion on and off unit. R42's MDS documents R42 requires staff dressing limited assist with one-person physical assist for dressing, and extensive assistance one-person physical assist with toileting. R42's MDS documents R42 is not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance for moving from seated to standing position, walking (with assistive device if used), turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking, moving on and off toilet, surface-to-surface transfer (transfer between bed and chair or wheelchair). R42's MDS documents R42 utilizes a walker and wheelchair. R42's MDS documents R42 had 4 falls including 2 with no injury and 2 with injuries except major. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 1/11/2022 at 6:26 AM documents R42 fell in room between bed and dresser. The Nurse's Note documented R42 busted her head-on right-side ear level. R42's Nurse's Note documented she was able to move extremities and sat herself up. The Nurse's Note documented R42 stated she don't want to be on this covid unit and wait until her family hears about her being on unit. R42's Nurse's Note documented at 6:45 AM Emergency Medical service (EMS) called and R42 left facility to local hospital via ambulance at 7:00 AM. The Nurse's Note documented R42's sister was called, and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) was notified and called report to local hospital. R42's Hospital Paperwork, dated 1/11/2022, documents reason for visit was a fall. R42's Hospital Record documented R42 had diagnoses of fall, closed nondisplaced fracture of right patella (knee), concussion with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes or less and acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) without hematuria (bloody urine.) R42's Care Plan, dated 1/11/2022 documents post fall intervention cardiologist consultation as she allows. The Care Plan did not document any staff interventions to provide R42 with increased supervision. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 1/15/2022 at 5:11 PM, documents took residents out to smoke at 4:00 PM. The Note documented Upon entering building heard resident scream. 4:05 PM entered room resident lying face down on floor. Assessed resident she has hematoma on right eye, laceration on nose, and swollen right wrist. Resident was laughing and stated she was upset over TV not working. 4:15 PM Called 911. B/P (blood pressure) 158/92, T (temperature) 97.8, P (pulse) 94, O2 (oxygen saturation) 98% RA (room air), R (respiration) 24. 4:35 PM EMS arrives and picks up resident going to local hospital. 4:40 PM DON (Director of Nurses) called, 4:45 PM NP (nurse practitioner) called, 4:50 PM POA (power of attorney) called. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 1/15/2022 at 8:19 PM documents, R42 returned to facility from local hospital. The Note documented Resident RT (right) orbital/eye swollen shut, purple in color. Sutures noted to RT eyebrow. RT hand had splint and wrapped. Resident has nasal fracture, metacarpal bone fracture, metacarpal neck, 2nd thru 5th. Eyebrow laceration which was sutured. Orders to f/u (follow up) with physicians Resident was alert and not complaining of any pain. Resident assisted into her bed and instructed her to use call light for assistance. R42's Hospital Paperwork, dated 1/15/2022, documents reason for visit, fall. The Hospital records documented Diagnoses metacarpal (hand) bone fracture, metacarpal neck, 2nd through 5th, nasal fracture and facial laceration. R42's Care Plan, dated 1/15/2022 documents post fall intervention discuss behaviors with her as she allows, moved closer to the nurse's station, referred for cardiologist re-visit and seen by cardiologist. R42's Medical Practitioner Late Entry Note (Physician/NP), dated 1/18/2022 at 9:51 AM documents Will continue to monitor falls and attempt to gather additional information from the patient about the falls. Will order tilt table test to assess for syncope Continue to monitor. R42's Medical Practitioner Late Entry Note (Physician/NP), dated 2/22/2022 at 7:18 AM, documents Tilt table test for syncope pending, most recent fall occurred on 2/20/2022, no loss of consciousness reported. Continue to monitor. R42's Medical Practitioner Late Entry (Physician/NP), dated 3/8/2022 at 10:53 AM, documents Unable to obtain tilt table test due to no local hospitals performing them. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 4/12/2022 at 12:04 PM documents Call to local hospital ER (emergency room) to check up on res. Received info that res has closed nasal FX (fracture) but stable. Blood work pending and res to be discharged back to facility at that time. R42's Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 4/12/2022 documents R42 fell and sustained closed fracture of nasal bone. R42's Hospital Paperwork, dated 4/12/2022, document diagnoses of fall, closed fracture of nasal bone and syncope. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 4/12/2022 has no documentation R42 fell or that she was transferred to the hospital. R42's Care Plan, dated 4/12/2022 documents post fall intervention out to ER for evaluation. Referred to ENT (ear/nose and throat physician). R42's Medical Practitioner (Physician/NP) Late Entry Note, dated 4/19/2022 at 5:29 AM documents Since last visit, patient has had an additional fall which required hospitalization and surgery for a nasal fracture. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 4/19/2022 at 6:15 PM documents R42 was found face down in room by bed. The Note documents R42 was bleeding from nose and lump to front mid forehead. The Note documented Resident c/o (complaint of) pain to right arm during ROM (range of motion). NP notified and ordered resident to be sent to ER for eval and tx (treatment.) Resident agreed to go to ER after three attempts. Family called to make aware with no answer. Message left to call facility back. EMT arrived at approximately 6:10 PM to transport resident. R42's Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 4/19/2022, documents she sustained a closed fracture of nasal bone and a right forearm contusion. R42's Hospital Paperwork, dated 4/27/2022 documents chart review pt (patient) presented to hospital on 4/19/2022 for evaluation after a fall. Imaging showed bilateral mildly displaced nasal bone fractures. R42's Care Plan, dated 4/19/2022 documents post fall intervention ER visit with f/u (follow up) radiology as indicated. No injuries noted. The Care Plan documented Camera review completed. Resident stood fell forward bending at knees prior to falling to floor. No hazards or issues observed. Lost balance when she stood up quickly from seated position on bed. Education provided on carefully/slowly changing positions. Resident agreed to allow staff to attempt to set up neurology apt (appointment). Resident agrees to hospital. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 4/27/2022 at 12:20 PM documents Heard res yelling out and noted her laying face down in her BR (bathroom) in front of her toilet with her pants halfway up. Large pool of blood under res head. Pressure held to laceration to R (right) hairline and position safely maintained. Call to 911. NP, DON and res family notified of above. R42's Hospital ED report, dated 4/27/2022 documents Resident arrived via EMS from nursing home for evaluation after a fall today. Pt (patient) states she was using the bathroom and when she was trying to pull up her pants, she had a syncopal (to faint) episode in which she fell forward, hitting her head on the ground. Pt states she 'blacked out' for 2-3 seconds. She notes a laceration to the anterior aspect of her scalp and states she noted blood on the floor of her home. She states her roommate called EMS (emergency medical services). The Record documented R42 received 6 staples to scalp. R42's Care Plan, dated 4/27/2022 documents post fall intervention out to ER laceration to forehead treated. Refused therapy screen and orthostatic v/s (vital signs) refused. Continue at risk interventions, evaluate cause of falls, neuro checks per policy and staples to right scalp. The Care Plan did not address R42's need for increased supervision. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 5/7/2022 at 4:38 PM documents Called to room by CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide). Resident noted on floor beside bed in prone position bleeding noted from scalp wound above middle of forehead. states 'don't know what happened I blacked out.' Pressure dressing applied refused vitals to be taken refused neuro checks ambulance called. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 5/7/2022 at 9:25 PM documents Hospital ER called resident is returning dx concussion and with staples. R42's Hospital Paperwork, dated 5/7/2022 documents Patient presenting via EMS for syncope and ground level fall. Prior to presentation patient states that she got up, lost consciousness and woke up on the ground. Per EMS report patient fell down on her knees then fell headfirst into the tile floor. Patient regained consciousness within seconds. Was alert oriented immediately afterwards. Apparently, patient has a long history of syncope. Additionally, patient had staples removed from her forehead today no which were used to fix an injury due to a similar event about a week ago. She lacerated her head in the same place. Hemostatis noted. ED provider notes documents there is a vertical laceration on the right side in the hairline extending into the forehead measuring approximately 7 cm (centimeters.) 6 staples were used to suture the laceration. R42's Nurse's Note, dated 5/7/2022 at 10:50 PM documents Resident returned from hospital via ambulance. Ambulated to bed with 2 assist. Resident refused to have vital signs taken. Staples intact to left upper forehead. Small trickle of blood noted. Paramedics stated they attempted to wipe her face, but she refused. She also refused from me. Resident denies headache or dizziness. Resident is able to move all extremities. Call light within reach. R42's Care Plan, dated 5/7/2022 documents post fall intervention IDT (interdisciplinary team) review completed and w/c seat dumped to provide for safety. The Care Plan documents the following interventions: Encourage her to leave her door open so we can observe her, neuro checks as she allows, out to ER, review camera footage for cause of fall and wheelchair dumped. R42's Medical Practitioner (Physician/NP) Late Entry Note, dated 5/17/2022 at 12:41 PM documents patient continues to have falls, cardiac work-up has been negative, continue to monitor. R42's Medical Practitioner (Physician/NP) Late Entry Note, dated 6/14/2022 at 7:53 PM documents Patient continues to have falls, cardiac work-up has been negative, continue with Midodrine 5 mg (milligrams) PO (by mouth) 3 times a daily to prevent orthostatic hypotension and continue to monitor. Observation of R42's room on 9/8/2022 at 2:00 PM showed quarter side rails on her bed, nonskid strips on the side of the bed located toward the door. On 9/7/2022 at 3:30 PM R42 stated she doesn't know why she keeps falling, she just blacks out. R42 stated she lets staff assist her with care and she doesn't ambulate on her own. R42 stated she walks with a walker with assistance of staff. R42 stated she goes to the bathroom in her room independently. R42 stated she hasn't changed rooms or wheelchairs recently. She wears a padded headband to protect her head when she falls. R42 stated she's never fell out of bed. On 9/7/2022 at 1:00 PM V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated (R42) just keeps falling and there is nothing we can do about it. She refuses assistance. On 9/8/2022 at 12:20 PM V5, (Registered Nurse/RN) stated (R42) has probably set a record for falls. (R42) seems to fall a lot in her bathroom after having a large bowel movement and she has educated her to stand up slowly and hold onto the grab bar after when getting up. (R42) has no safety awareness. She recalled she removed staples from (R42's) forehead in May 2022 and the same day she fell again and had to get staples again in the same place. On 9/9/2022 at 9:52 AM V33 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) stated she wouldn't answer questions regarding why R42 has had so many falls. V33 stated to talk to V32, R42's Physician. V33 stated she expected the facility to follow the fall policy and to have progressive interventions after each fall because that is the expectation. On 9/9/2022 at 10:07 AM V32 stated he have to look at (R42's) medical record to see what the medical reason why she is falling so much. V32 stated he was aware (R42) having a lot of falls, he expected staff to document the falls and to follow the facility's fall policy and to have progressive interventions in place after each fall. On 9/9/2022 at 11:40 AM V36 (Physical Therapist/PT) stated she started working at the facility in March 2022. V36 stated (R42) is a very difficult resident because she falls a lot, and no one knows what the medical cause. (R42) is alert and propels herself in her wheelchair. Her understanding was (R42) falls in her bathroom a lot. (R42) has received PT and occupational therapy (OT) when she is willing to participate. On 9/7/2022 at 2:00 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated she has a line listing of all R42's fall with interventions the facility put in place after each fall. V2 stated (R42) has fell 32 times in 2022. V2 stated she doesn't know why R42 falls so much; it could be behavioral she may throw herself out of her wheelchair. V2 stated (R42) refuses ADL care from staff and she doesn't want assist with anything. She self-propels about the facility in a wheelchair. She falls a lot in her bathroom. Staff placed a camera in her room, and she reviews it for post fall assessment (R42) often stands up and falls. On 9/8/2022 at 2:00 PM V1 (Administrator) stated she knew R42 called 911 many times and had multiple times prior to being admitted to the facility. V1 stated staff have done everything they felt they can for R42. She didn't know what else to do to stop R42 from falling. The facility's Fall Prevention and Management Policy, revised 10/2018, documents This facility is committed to maximizing each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. While preventing all falls is not possible, the facility will identify and evaluate those residents at risk for falls, plan for preventive strategies, and facilitate as safe an environment as possible. All resident falls shall be reviewed, and the resident's existing plan of care shall be evaluated and modified as needed. Upon admission a fall risk evaluation will be completed on admission, readmission and quarterly, significant change and after each fall. Residents at risk for falls will have fall risk identified on the interim plan of care and the ISP (Individualized Service Plan) with interventions implemented to minimize fall risk. Evaluate the resident for any injury and notify the physician and emergency contact. Complete a fall incident report in the PCC (Point Click Care) risk management portal. A fall risk evaluation is completed by the nurse. A score of 10 or greater indicates the resident is at high risk for falls; a score of less than 10 indicates at risk for fall. Care plan to be updated with a new intervention based on root cause analysis after each fall occurrence. Complete the follow-up monitoring from every shift for 72 hours. All incident and accident with serious physical injury will be reported to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) within 24 hours. A full written investigative report is required by IDPH within five (5) days of the incident. B. R2's Face sheet documents on 9/6/2022 a weight of 288 pounds. On 9/7/2022 at 10:32 AM, R2 was in a large shower chair on the VVV hall and was being pushed by V22 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), and V27 (Maintenance Director). V27 was bending over and was grabbing the bottom of the chair and was pulling R2 down the hallways while bending down the entire time all the way down from the VVV-hall to the end of the YYY-hall. The large shower chair did not have any wheels in the front of the chair and the white pipes where the wheels had detached were brown in color and there were two wheels on the back of the chair. On 9/7/2022 at 10:39 AM, V27 stated, The wheels are no longer on the chair because they rusted out or rather the bolt broke. I am looking into fixing it. On 9/27/2022 at 11:01 AM, R2 stated, The shower chair has been broken for several weeks and it has been like that for a while now with the missing wheels. On 9/8/2022 at 4:02 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, I would not expect any staff to transfer residents in shower chairs down the hall with no wheels in the front or not in working order. I heard about the chair not having wheels yesterday. The Fall Prevention Policy dated May 2015 documents, This facility is committed to maximizing each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. While preventing all falls is not possible, the facility will identify and evaluate those residents at risk for falls, plan for preventive strategies, and facilitate as safe an environment as possible.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement progressive interven...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement progressive interventions to prevent weight loss for one of one resident (R62) reviewed for nutritional needs and the sample of 36. This failure resulted in R62 having a significant weight loss of 24 pounds (lbs. and/or 12.9%) in six months. Findings include: On 09/06/2022 at 12:23 PM R62's head of bed was up 30 degrees for lunch. V14 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) did not raise the head of the bed up any further for R62 to eat his lunch. R62 was frail, thin, and pale. R62's bedside table was approximately six feet away from his bed. A water cup and the lunch meal were sitting on the bedside table. The bedside table was out his reach. R62's lunch consisted of two hamburgers on a bun, potato chips, brownie, and milk in a carton with a straw. V14 handed R62 his hamburger which she had broken apart in quarter sizes. V14 handed R62 a quarter size of his hamburger each time she handed the hamburger to R62 until R62 consumed both hamburgers. V14 gave him a drink of milk. V14 stated, He won't eat his chips. R62 stated, I will eat my chips. V14 handed him his chips, and she laid some chips on his bed where he picked the chips up and ate them. V14 handed the milk to R62, and he drank 100% of his milk. V14 stated He won't eat the brownie he doesn't like the consistency or texture. Immediately R62 stated, I will eat my brownie. I like brownies. V14 then handed him his brownie and he ate the brownies. No fluids were offered after R62 ate his brownie. There were no noted house supplements, or ice cream on his meal tray. R62 stated Thank you each time he was handed his hamburger, chips, and milk. At the end of the meal V14 stated, I better raise the head of the bed up more. She then raised the head of bed to 45 degrees. On 9/08/2022, at 11:30 AM R62 was up in his tilted back wheelchair sitting in the dining room for lunch. R62's meal tray consisted of two hamburgers, potato chips, brownie, ice cream, 8-ounce glass of water. R62 was not given his house supplements, health shake, or milk that was documented on his meal ticket. V14 tore one hamburger apart and handed the torn hamburger to R62. He proceeded to eat the hamburger and ate 100% of the first hamburger, then R62 picked up the second hamburger that had not been torn or cut apart. R62 ate 100% of his hamburger. V14 handed him a cup of water. R62 drank 100% of his water. R62 then picked up his potato chips and started to eat the chips. He ate 100% of the chips. V14 went to get R62 a glass of (flavored drink) then handed him his (flavored drink) he drank 100% of his (flavored drink) without a straw. V14 fed R62's ice cream at times to him. At times, R62 would feed himself the ice cream, he was using a plastic spoon which he had difficultly scooping up the ice cream from the cup, he ate 100% of his ice cream. R62 stated, I am still hungry, he was supposed to have gotten hot dogs for lunch. (R62) stated, I would like to have hot dogs. V14 stated, we are out of hot dogs, she offered a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. They brought him a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. R62 picked up the sandwich and ate 100% of his sandwich. No other fluids were offered after he ate the peanut butter and jelly sandwich. No house supplements, health shake was noted on the meal tray. V14 stated, We are done, and wheeled R62 out of the dining room. R62's weights were reviewed and documents on Physician Order Sheet (POS) the following weights: 12/06/2021 at 185 pounds (lbs.), 1/6/2022 at 182 lbs., 2/4/2022 at 174 lbs., 3/7/2022 at 175 lbs., 5/1/2022 at 161 lbs., and 9/6/2022 at 158 lbs. There were no weights for R62 documented for the following months 04/2022, 06/2022, 07/2022, and 08/2022. From 12/2021 through 5/1/22, R62 experienced a 24 lbs. (12.9%) weight loss. R62's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a BIMS score of 99, severely impaired cognition. R62's MDS documents he is totally dependent upon staff for eating. The MDS did not document R62 had a weight loss. The MDS documented R62's weight as 161 lbs. R62's Note Text Nutrition Assessment Weight Warning written by V40 (Registered Dietician), dated, 03/07/2022, document R62's current body weight was 175 lbs. The Note documented R62's weight indicates stability in the last two months, but overall loss as previously noted. The Note documented the following dates and weight history: 2/4/2022 176 lbs. 12/6/2021 185 lbs., and 9/3/2021 200 lbs. indicating a 12% loss of weight. The Note documented R62 remains on regular thin liquids with milk all meals, ice cream with lunch/dinner. Intake >/=50% now, improved. The Note documented a (nutritional supplement ice cream) and (nutritional supplement drink) previous added, but reported to refuse (nutritional supplement drink), appropriate to discontinue. The Note documented reported improved intake and self-assist when finger type foods offered, stability at current weight desired. The Note documented to recommend discontinue (nutritional supplement ice cream) as ordered, continue ice cream for lunch/dinner, discontinue (nutritional supplement drink) as ordered refusing and overall, with improved intake at meals, offer finger type foods, when possible, monitor weight, will follow. There was no documentation a Physician's Order (PO) was obtained regarding the recommendation made by the dietician on 3/7/22 for ice cream at lunch and dinner and finger type foods when possible. R62's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated, 05/01/2022, documents Regular diet, regular texture, Thin liquids consistency. GI soft, house supplement with all meals for diet order. R62's form, (Requests for Diet Change) dated, 05/04/2022, documents add super cereal and fortified pudding at lunch. Will follow. There was no documentation noted in Physician Orders Sheet (POS) for fortified cereal and fortified pudding at lunch. R62's Dietary Notes dated 08/01/2022, documents Nutrition assessment: Resident with unintentional weight loss related to hospitalizations, inadequate oral intake, as evidenced by 15 lbs. weight loss in 6 months, 8.5 %. Recommend: continue soft diet as tolerated, monitor swallowing, add house supplement with meals, obtain a new weight (last weight taken 5/1/2022), encourage PO (by mouth) intake and offer snacks, will monitor tolerance to supplements, PO intakes, and weight. R62's Care Plan dated 09/06/2022, documents (R62) is at risk for complications with weight and nutrition r/t (related to) need max assist -total assist with eating most of the time now. R62's Care Plan Goal documented R62 will consume adequate nutrition and weight to remain stable throughout next review. R62's Care Plan interventions, dated 9/6/22, document assist feed resident with meals as needed, document signs and symptoms of chewing/swallowing problems, monitor weight and labs, notify MD, RD, of any significant weight changes, offer substitutes for uneaten foods, RD to assess and recommend as needed, serve diet as ordered. R62's Meal ticket dated, 09/09/2022, documents, breakfast diet regular, diet texture regular, needs up for all meals NAS (No added salt), high protein meals. Soft food, resident has no teeth. Adaptive equipment paper products. Lunch diet regular, diet texture regular, needs up for all meals NAS high protein meals. Soft foods, resident has no teeth. Supper documents diet regular, diet texture regular, needs up for all meals NAS high protein meals, soft foods, resident has no teeth. On 09/09/2022 at 9: 04 AM, V4 (Dietary Manager) stated, (R62) was asked what he wanted for lunch this morning for 09/09/2022. V4 said, (R62) requested two grilled cheese sandwiches. (R62) wants what is on the regular menu for supper V4 (Dietary Manager) stated, (R62) did not get his hot dogs yesterday for lunch that he requested because we ran out of hot dogs and it will be several days before the hot dogs will be delivered, so, we just gave him hamburgers. V4 stated, (R62) told me during lunch he really wanted the hot dogs. On 09/09/2022 at 9:10 AM V4 gave surveyor another meal ticket that R62 did not have on his table yesterday for 09/08/2022 that did not match up with the meal ticket given to surveyor this morning. meal ticket. R62's meal ticket documented on 9/8/2022 needs up for all meals, NAS, House Supplements with all meals, Health Shake 8 fl ounces, Milk 8 fluid ounces, and Ice Cream for lunch and dinner. V4 stated, They changed these meal tickets last night in the office. On, 09/06/2022 at 10:02 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse/RN), stated, We feed (R62) in his room we don't get him up because he fights the staff, and curses staff. On 09/06/2022 at 10:30AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), stated, We had (R62) losing weight because he was too big. On 09/08/2022 at 2:00PM, V2 stated, Not sure why (R62's) weights were not done during the months of April, June, July, and August of 2022. V2 stated, not sure what happened. On 09/08/2022 at 2:10PM, V2 said, I would expect the staff to be checking the meal tickets before giving the tray to the resident to make sure the correct diet was being served. V2 stated, I would expect the staff to give what is ordered, or on the meal tickets for any supplements. On 09/09/2022 at 11:48 AM V40 (Dietician) said, (R62's) weight loss was significant. V40 stated she not aware that four months of weights were not gotten. V40 stated that she would expect what is recommended on the nutrition assessment and signed off by the MD to be followed. V40 stated she would expect the meal tickets to be correct based on the diet orders, and any supplements be given and on the meal tickets. V40 stated she expect R62 having a weight loss a monthly weight be gotten, and sometimes more often. V40 stated I haven't been to that facility since July 2022. Weight Change Policy review date, 09/2022 documents General: It is the policy of this facility to monitor the nutritional status of all residents, including all significant or trending patterns of weight change.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors for two of 7 residents (R40, R71) reviewed for medication in the sample of 36. This failure resulted in R40 experiencing acute psychotic episode due to not receiving her antipsychotic medication as ordered, and R71 being hospitalized with an exacerbation of her COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) after not receiving her cardiac and respiratory medications. Findings include: 1. On 9/6/22 at 10:54 AM, R40 was sitting in the recliner in her room with her eyes closed. R40 was able to state her name but then had slurred, mumbled speech when answering questions, and was very difficult to understand. She stated she has only been in the facility a couple of days and had moved here because the last facility she lived in told her she had to leave because the administrator didn't want her there. R40 kept nodding off to sleep but would wake to try to answer questions. She appeared very lethargic and drowsy. Her hair was uncombed and general appearance disheveled. R40's Face Sheet documents her diagnoses to include Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is alert and oriented. It also documents she did not have any delusions, hallucinations, or behaviors during that assessment period. R40's Care Plan dated 4/14/21 documents, Medication: (R40) uses antianxiety medications related to anxiety disorder. Is at risk for side effects. Interventions for this Care Plan include anti-anxiety medication as ordered. R40's Care Plan dated 4/16/21 documents, Behavior: (R40) has a history of anxiety and self-isolation. At risk for alteration in mood. Diagnosis: Anxiety, Schizophrenia. Interventions for this care plan include medications as ordered. R40's Care Plan dated 9/3/22 documents: Elopement: At this time (R40) is experiencing delusions and hallucinations related to her mental illness. Interventions for this care plan include: 1:1 with staff as needed; 15-30 minute checks as needed; allow concerns to be expressed; encourage resident to keep busy with activities; MD (medical doctor) notification as needed. R40's Physician Orders dated Physician Order Summary dated 9/7/22 documents the following orders: Clozapine (antipsychotic medication) 100 mg by mouth at bedtime with start date 6/8/21 and Clozapine 50 mg by mouth in the morning with a start date of 9/3/22. R40's Physician Orders also included an order for Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg 1 tablet by mouth two times a day with a start date of 6/8/21, but no discontinue date. Review of R40's Progress Notes dated 6/1/22 to 9/7/22 document she missed 18 doses of Lorazepam 0.5 mg which was ordered to be given twice a day for anxiety. All the missed doses of Lorazepam occurred between 6/20/22 and 7/26/22. On R40's Medication Administration Record (MAR) starting on July 27, 2022, R40's Lorazepam was on hold by the physician, but there was no order on R40's Physician Order Sheet documenting an order to put Lorazepam on hold and no documentation in R40's Progress Notes documenting a physician had put R40's Lorazepam on hold on 7/27/22. R40's Progress Notes document she did not receive her Clozapine 100 mg which was ordered to be given at 8:00 PM every night, on 8/6/22, 8/19/22 or 8/20/22. R40's Drug Record Book dated 6/1/22 to 9/30/2022 documents her Clozapine 100 mg was reordered on 8/27/22 and notes on that date, out, please send asap (as soon as possible). Review of R40's Progress Notes dated 6/1/22 to 9/7/22 does not document any behaviors until 9/4/22 at 4:46 AM when it documents, most of evening and night, resident up yelling and screaming. Very confused and talking about people and things from the past. no distress noted. Will continue to monitor. There was no documentation that family or physician was notified of R40's change in condition. R40's Progress note dated 9/3/22 at 8:52 AM documents, Resident very restless, walking from her room to nurses station to front lobby. Voicing delusional thoughts and difficult to redirect. Told this nurse, You are a bad nurse, you don't have any facts. I no longer live here. I was in Australia all last week. Resident family reports that resident refusing to take their phone calls and denied knowing who her sister is when she came to see her this AM. (V24 Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) aware of above. New order received. Resident placed on 15-minute checks for safety. On 9/8/22 at 9:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) provided R40's psychiatric progress notes dated 4/27/21, 2/4/22 and 5/25/22. She included a handwritten note that documents, (R40) verified with NP (Nurse Practitioner) 9/7 at 5:28 PM that (R40) was last seen May 2022 and was not seen in June or July (did not mention August). The note documents she will see this month. May call (V24) to discuss. On 9/7/22 at 2:36 PM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated R40 was moved yesterday. V18 stated R40 had been having some kind of psychosis. V18 stated on the past Thursday, September 1st, R40 was delusional and saying that she needed to go to Washington DC, and she thought her sister had committed suicide and that her roommate had gotten inside her head and stolen all her memories and deleted them. V18 stated she did not know anything about R40 having fallen recently. On 9/7/22 at 2:38 PM, V19, LPN, stated she was here last Thursday (September 1st) and saw changes in R40's behaviors. V19 stated R40 had missed one of medications for a couple of days because of problems with pharmacy, something about them not getting the order, or it was outdated. V19 stated today R40 was doing a lot better, but last night when she worked R40 was still not the same but did finally remember V19's name. V19 stated if they don't have a resident's medication, they notify the pharmacy to see what is going on. V19 stated if the medication is not a psych med, they notify the MD's nurse practitioner, but if it is a psych med, they notify V24 (psychiatric nurse practitioner.) On 9/7/22 at 2:45 PM, R40 was sitting in her room. Her speech was clear, and she was awake and alert. R40 stated, I couldn't sleep because I didn't have my medicine. They kept telling me it didn't come in from pharmacy. I haven't been sleeping good for 4 or 5 weeks, and I wasn't getting enough to eat. I felt like they were punishing me because V1 (Administrator) doesn't want us to have Resident Council meetings and it's our right. I felt bullied by her. I am the Resident Council President and I have to look out for the residents here. She stated her parents are not her guardians, her husband, (television actor) is. She stated, You know, he is Hawkeye on MASH. She stated she goes out on Saturdays with her sister to eat and shop. She stated they wouldn't let her husband take her out. R40 stated she talks to her brother a lot on the phone, but he doesn't live around here. On 9/7/22 at 3:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing /DON), stated the facility had some problems with the pharmacy at the beginning of August when they went to a new system. V2 stated they went from the card system to having medications in individual plastic rolls, except high acuity medications, which were still on cards. V2 stated the first couple of weeks after the change they had a lot of problems because the pharmacy thought they still had the high acuity medication cards, but they had sent everything to the pharmacy and then did not get the high acuity meds back with the other meds. V2 stated R40 did miss her Clozapine 50 mg on September 3 but did get it as soon as it came in on September 4. V2 stated R40 had started getting a little manic, and the psychiatric nurse practitioner had ordered her to have Clozapine 50 mg every morning in addition to her current dose of Clozapine 100 mg at HS. V2 stated R40's brother had called and asked about her missing some medication. V2 stated he talked to V1 (Administrator), but she was unable to give him any information because he was not on R40's contact list. V2 stated when R40 had behaviors last week, she had contacted R40's parents and sister on Thursday, August 1st and asked them to come and see her and help figure out what was going on with R40. V2 stated they came to see R40 on Saturday. V2 stated R40's sister does not see her often; she has only seen her visit a couple of times in the last year. V2 stated R40's parents are her guardians, but they are elderly and don't hear well so when staff call them, if they can't hear what is being said, they hang up. V2 stated R40's parents and sister have left specific instructions that they are not to give her brother any information regarding R40; he is to call either her parents or sister and they will let him know what they want him to know. V2 stated, I called (R40's) sister and parents to inform them of her behaviors last week. I can show you on my cell phone where I called them. V2 then looked through her cell phone and stated, I must have used (V1's) cell phone because I can't find it on my phone. V2 stated when a medication is missed, if it is a psych med, they notify the psychiatrist because the medical doctor and his nurse practitioner will not do anything with psych meds. V2 stated the nurse usually notifies V24 (psychiatric nurse practitioner) with any psych issues. V2 stated she does not think the psychiatrist has been in the facility for several months. On 9/7/22 at 3:50 PM, V16 (R40's brother) during phone interview, stated he had not talked to R40 about her missing medications, because he was on a zoom call when she tried to call him, but R40 had notified his niece, who is in medical school, by text, stating that she had missed some of her medication and was not sleeping. V16 stated R40, in her text message to his niece, stated the facility was giving her Melatonin and it was not helping her to sleep, and was asking if there was anything else that would help. V16 stated he called and tried to ask the Administrator (V1) about R40 having missed medications, and she told him she is dealing with a state survey and has a funeral to attend and did not have time to talk to him. V16 stated he tried to set up a better time to discuss R40 but (V1) told him he was not on her contact list so she would not be able to talk to him. V16 stated he then asked if his sister (V17) could call and make the appointment and was told yes, she could. V16 stated R40's text to his niece indicated she had missed her medication for about a week. V16 stated R40 had been doing very well with no psychiatric setbacks for about 17 years and was usually very alert and oriented and well organized. V16 stated he had called and informed his sister about the text message R40 had sent to her niece about missing medication, so she went to see her on Saturday, which was the usual routine, and R40 was not her normal self. V16 stated he did not know of any falls or injuries that had occurred as a result of R40 not receiving all her medication, but he feels she has had a mental set back as noted by her change in behaviors and her lack of sleep. V16 stated he is worried about the facility retaliating against R40 because the family is complaining, but he stated he just wants to know what medication was missed, why it was missed and what is being done about it, so it doesn't keep happening because he knows her medications are very important to her stability mentally. On 9/7/22 at 5:15 PM, V17 (R40's sister) during a phone interview, stated she comes in every Saturday and takes R40 out of the facility for the day and they usually have lunch or dinner with their parents. V17 stated R40 is very alert and oriented and runs the Resident Council at the facility, and if R40 feels like she or any of the other residents are being mistreated, she will say something about it. V17 stated R40 usually calls her during the week to talk about what they are going to do on the Saturday when she comes to get her, but R40 did not call her last week, which was very unusual for R40. V17 stated nobody from the facility called her last week to tell her about R40 having behaviors, but when she arrived at the facility that Saturday morning, September 3, a staff met her at the door and stated she had meant to call her and warn her that R40 was having a lot of behaviors and was not acting like herself. V17 stated they told her R40 was yelling and cursing at the staff. V17 stated she went to R40's room and R40 yelled for her to get the f*#% out. V17 stated nobody from the facility had notified her or R40's parents that R40 was not receiving all of her medications. V17 stated her brother had called her with concerns because their niece had received a text message from R40 last week, telling her R40 was not getting her medications and could not sleep and wanted to know if she could tell her something that would help her because the Melatonin the facility was giving her was not working. V17 stated R40 knew her own medication very well and sometimes when she went on home visits, R40 would catch that they had forgotten to send one of her medications and would call up and tell them she needed it. V17 stated no one had given any directive to the facility to not release any information to R40's brother regarding her care. V17 stated he is not on her list because he lives out of state and it is easier to get in touch with her or her parents, but there is no reason he cannot call with concerns about her care. She stated R40 speaks to her brother on the phone often. V17 stated she feels the facility owes them an apology and an explanation of why some of R40's medications were missed and why they had not been informed of this or R40's change in behaviors and overall condition. V17 stated R40 has not had a psychotic break like this since 2005, and when it happened back then, it caused her to have to be institutionalized. V17 stated she knows R40 not receiving her medications could be very detrimental to her mental health. On 9/8/22 at 10:35 AM, V2 (DON) stated, I don't do medication error reports when medications are missed, only when the wrong medication is given. We don't do a medication error report, but we notify the doctor when a medication is missed. If the doctor was notified of the missed medication it is documented in the eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) documentation progress notes. V2 stated she would expect physician orders to be followed and medications to be given as ordered. 9/8/22 at 2:00 PM, V24 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) stated the facility does sometimes send a fax or calls the office when a resident's medication is not available. V24 stated she was surprised when the nursing staff called about R40 having behaviors this past weekend. She stated staff reported to her that R40 was in the midst of the delusion of having a famous husband and was trying to run out of the facility to meet him. She stated she does not recall anyone reporting R40 missing 18 doses of Lorazepam in July 2022 because that would have been pretty significant. She stated she would think the facility would contact the pharmacy right away and figure out what was going on so R40 would get her medications as ordered. V24 stated there is no reason R40 should have missed 18 doses of her Lorazepam without the facility doing something about it. She stated she does not think that is related to R40's behaviors this past weekend, as R40 had been complaining of being tired and her Lorazepam would have made her more drowsy, not caused her to have behaviors. V24 stated they had been decreasing R40's Clozapine gradually over the past year, so missing a dose may cause her to have changes in her behaviors for a couple of days following the missed dose, but the missed dose a couple of weeks ago probably would not have affected R40's behaviors this past weekend. V24 stated she knows R40 very well and has been treating her for the past 5 years and stated R40 is normally very alert and oriented and is aware of her own care. V24 stated she would not be surprised if R40 remembers meetings she had 2 or 3 years ago. V24 stated she does not know what would have caused R40's behaviors last weekend but she did give an order to add Clozapine 50 mg QAM because they had decreased her dose quite a bit. On 9/8/22 at 7:00 PM, R40 was sitting in her room waiting on her medication and snacks. R40 stated she is feeling a lot better. R40 was noticeably more alert, and her speech was clearer than during previous encounters with her during the survey. She remembered this surveyors name. She stated she had missed her nighttime dose of Clozapine 3 nights last week and it was horrible. R40 stated, The didn't give me my Clozapine for 3 days and I couldn't sleep. I begged them to give me my meds and they told me pharmacy didn't bring them yet. I asked them to call my doctor and they told me they couldn't because he was on vacation. It was terrible. I felt like my eyelids wouldn't close. I cried because I knew I wasn't right, but I didn't know what to do. On 9/8/22 at 7:20 PM, during an off-hours portion of the survey, V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated the facility is still using the same pharmacy since changing owners, but they reorder residents' medications differently. V19 stated they reorder a resident's medication through the electronic medical record but several times the medication has been reordered it doesn't show up with the delivery. V19 stated this has happened with R40's Clozapine more than once, but she knows she missed some doses last week, but doesn't know how many because she doesn't always work on the same hall. V19 stated she felt very bad about what R40 went through last week and the beginning of this week. V19 stated R40 got so bad mentally that she did not even know V19's name, and she stated R40 usually recognizes all the staff and her fellow residents. V19 stated R40 was upset because she was afraid her changes were part of her illness and was afraid, she was getting worse, but V19 stated she reassured R40, when she was able to understand again, that her mental changes and behaviors were not her fault, and that it was the facility's fault because they did not get her Clozapine ordered on time. V19 stated she has worked with R40 for over a year, and this is the first time she has seen her have behaviors like these, and not recognize staff. V19 stated when R40 had missed doses of her Clozapine in the past it did not affect her this bad. V19 stated she talked to R40's sister when she came in and she told V19 that R40 had behaviors similar to these back in 2009 and that is what caused her to be institutionalized. On 9/9/22 at 8:45 AM, V31 (Pharmacist) stated R40's Clozapine 50 mg was ordered and processed on 9/2/22 and should have been delivered on 9/3/22. She stated she could not tell when R40's Clozapine 100 mg was ordered, but all the orders she has are old. She stated she could not tell exactly when the last Clozapine 100 mg was last sent to the facility and would have to check with someone else and will return call. On 9/9/22 at 12:00 PM, V31 stated they did receive the facility's request for a refill of her Clozapine on 8/27/22 but it was not sent because they needed a lab that is required before they can send Clozapine. V31 stated her records show the pharmacy has not refilled R40's Clozapine 100 mg since April 2022. V31 stated since April 2022, the only Clozapine that has been sent to facility for R40 was Clozapine 50 mg for her new order received on 9/2/22 for Clozapine 50 mg every morning. On 9/9/22 at 12:15 PM, V2 (DON) and V23 (ADON) stated they were not aware R40 did not receive her Clozapine 100 mg from 8/27/22 until her Clozapine 50 mg was delivered on 9/4/22. V23 stated, I am the one who wrote on the order that we were out of (R40's) Clozapine and to please send it out. Both V2 and V23 stated they have given R40 her medications when they have worked the floor since April 2022, and they feel like she had her Clozapine 100 mg when they gave her medications. On 9/9/22 at 1:37 PM, V24 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) during phone interview, stated R40 having missed her Clozapine 100 mg QHS would have directly caused her to have experience her changes in mental status resulting in her psychosis she experienced starting on 9/2/22 and she is continuing to have some psychosis. V24 stated R40 will most likely require a higher dose of Clozapine to get back to her baseline and it might take a while. V24 stated she will be assessing R40 next week and will be contacting the DON to get an update on R40. V24 stated it is very sad that R40 is going through this because she was doing so well and was very active in the facility before last week. 2. R71's Face Sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Acute Exacerbation, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Hypertension, Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Personal History of Pulmonary Embolism. R71's Progress Notes dated 8/24/2022 at 4:36 PM documents, resident admitted to (local hospital) with dx of exacerbation of COPD and acute CHF. R71 had an additional Progress Note dated 8/24/2022 at 4:36 PM which documents, resident sats (saturates) at 95% on 2.5L (liters) O2 (oxygen) states she feels SOB (short of breath), abdominal breathing observed, wheezing auscultated. pulmonologist NP (Nurse Practitioner) here to see and assess resident, new orders received of daliresp 500 mcg ( micrograms) and breo ellipta inhaler that were just ordered and not available from pharmacy at this time. medical NP here to see and assess resident ordered to be sent to ER (emergency room) per 911 for respiratory distress. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived approx (approximately) 1305 (1:05 PM) to take over tx. Review of R71's Progress Notes dated 8/16/22 to current (9/9/22) includes documentation of R71's medications that were not available on these dates. There is no documentation that the facility notified the physician or nurse practitioner of the missed doses of medications on these dates: 8/17/22: Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, and Spiriva were not available 8/18/22: Propranolol and Dicyclomine were not available 8/19/22: Cardizem, Dicyclomine, Flonase, Furosemide, Guaifenesin, Isosorbide, Lisinopril, Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, Vitamin D, and Spiriva was not available. 8/21/22: Spiriva was not available 8/22/22: Cardizem was not available (R71 was hospitalized at local hospital 8/24/22 to 8/25/22 with diagnosis of COPD Exacerbation and CHF) 8/26/22: Guaifenesin, Cardizem, Prednisone, Furosemide was not available 8/29/22: Spiriva was not available 8/31/22: Spiriva was not available 9/1/22: Incruse Ellipta not availabel 9/3/22: Breo Ellipta not available 9/7/22: Incruse Ellipta not available. R71's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documents her admitting diagnoses were Acute Congestive Heart Failure and COPD with Acute Exacerbation. On 9/9/22 at 12:37 PM, R71 stated she does not know why she did not get her medications when she was first admitted and thinks that was the reason she had to go back to the hospital. R71 stated it scares her when she doesn't get her medications because she has heart and breathing problems. She stated the nurses said it was not their fault that her medications were not here; it was because of pharmacy. On 9/9/22 at 12:40 PM, V38, Pulmonary Nurse Practitioner, stated she was not notified by the facility that R71 was not receiving her medications as ordered. After reviewing the medications R71 had missed since her admission on [DATE] until 9/7/22, V38 stated R71 having missed those medications definitely would have caused her to have an exacerbation of her COPD and CHF and caused her to be sent to the hospital. V38 stated she had seen R71 on 8/24/22, the day she was sent to the hospital, and noted she was short of breath, but she had just finished with therapy, so she thought R71 was just needing to recover from that. V38 stated the Primary Nurse Practitioner called her later that day and told her R71 was continuing to be short of breath and lethargic and they made the decision to send her to the emergency room for evaluation. V38 stated the facility did not notify her that R71 was not receiving all of her medications and that would have absolutely been something they should have reported to her so she could follow up with the pharmacy to determine the estimated time of delivery of the medications. She stated R71's diuretics and inhalers are very important medications for her to receive because of her COPD and CHF diagnoses. The facility's policy, Medication Administration with date reviewed of 3/2022, documents, General: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illnesses, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. It continues, 26. If medication is ordered, but not present, check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. If available, obtain from the contingency or convenience box. 27. If the physician's order cannot be followed for any reason, the physician should be notified in a timely manner (depending on situation), and a note should reflect the situation in the resident's medical record.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's clothing/laundry is kept safe from loss ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's clothing/laundry is kept safe from loss for 4 of 4 residents (R19, R21, R30, R67) reviewed for missing clothing in the sample of 36. Findings include: 1. On 9/9/22 at 10:10 AM, during the Group Interview, R19 stated the facility has lost all his socks and has not replaced them. R19 stated he has reported this to the laundry department. R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R19 has cognitive impairment. 2. On 9/9/22 at 10:10 AM, during the Group Interview, R21 stated that she is missing several items of clothing and the facility has not found or replaced the missing items. R21 stated she has reported this in resident council meetings, to the nurses and Laundry Supervisor. R21's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R21 is cognitively intact. 3. On 9/9/22 at 10:10 AM, during the Group Interview, R30 stated she has clothing missing and the facility has not found or replaced them. R30 stated she has reported this in resident council meetings. R30's, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R30 is cognitively intact. 4. On 9/9/22 at 10:10 AM, Group Interview, R67 stated he is missing clothing, and the facility has not found or replaced them. R67 stated he has reported this in the resident council meetings. R67's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R67 is cognitively intact. The Resident Council Minutes reviewed and documented the following: On 5/17/22 - Laundry - Several residents claim to not be getting things back from laundry. Residents do understand their names get washed off of the tags, they look forward to a solution. The Environmental Services Manager will be made aware of all lost clothing. The residents do enjoy the shop for your clothes back day. On 6/21/22 - Laundry - Resident have said they have a few articles of clothing missing. They hope to find them on lost and found day. On 9/9/22 at 12:55 PM, V39 (Laundry Supervisor) stated when a resident reports a missing clothing item, they write down the item that is missing with a description of the item and begin looking for the item. V39 stated they look in the laundry room lost and found rack, the resident closets, they look everywhere to try and get the item back to the resident. V39 stated the resident's families will bring in clothing to the residents and it isn't marked with the resident's name or taken to laundry to have it marked. V39 stated the clothing that isn't marked with a resident's name goes on the lost and found rack in laundry and on the 28th of each month, the rack is taken to the dining room for the residents to look through to see if any of their missing clothing is there but the problem is they don't remember what it is that is missing. V39 stated after that, they will pass those unclaimed clothing items to other residents that need clothing. The Resident Rights policy, dated 8/1/22, documents Procedure: Protection of resident's personal items and supplies from loss or theft.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were timely available for administration as ordered for 3 of 7 residents (R5, R40, R71) reviewed for medications in the s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were timely available for administration as ordered for 3 of 7 residents (R5, R40, R71) reviewed for medications in the sample of 36. Findings include: R5's Physician Order Sheets for September 2022 document a diagnosis of seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depression, and acquired absence of right leg below knee. R5's September 2022 POS documents R5 was prescribed carbidopa-levodopa tablet 25-100 milligrams (MG), give a tablet via g-tube four times a day related to Parkinson's disease (Order dated 4/27/2022) , Cymbalta Capsule delayed release particles 60 mg (duloxetine HCL) give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day related to major depression disorder, recurrent, unspecified. Order dated 4/27/2022. Carbamazepine Suspension 100 milligrams/5 milliliters (ML) 15 ml by mouth two times a day related to schizophrenia order dated 4/27/2022. Cymbalta Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 MG (milligrams) (Duloxtine HCL) give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day related to major depressive disorder, recurrent unspecified (start dated 4/27/2022). Senna S tablet 8.6-50 MG (sennosides-docusate Sodium) give 2 tablets by mouth at bedtime (order date 4/27/2022). On 9/9/2022 at 3:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), stated, The codes are listed on the MARs (Medication Administration Records). They tell you if the resident refused, if the resident was sleeping, things like that. I did not realize the number 9 was not on the code. I am looking at the codes on the MAR and I see the number 9 is not on the codes. The number 9 on the MAR means the medicine was not available to give to the resident. R5's July 2022 MAR documents 9 indicating R5 did not receive 5 doses of Carbamazepine, one dose of Cymbalta, and one dose of Senna S because they were not available. R5's August 2022 MAR documents 9 indicating R5 did not receive 7 doses of Carbidopa-levodopa and 8 doses of Cymbalta because they were not available. On 9/8/2022 at 3:32 PM, V24 (Psych Nurse Practitioner/NP), stated, I am aware that the facility has been having issues with residents' medicine running out and residents not receiving their medications as ordered. When the patient's medicine was running out, we were not being contacted. If this would happen on the weekends, then there would be no way for us to know and the facility was having issues with the pharmacy delivering medication on time as well. I am aware of several residents not receiving their medication. The facility also was bought out by another company and there were some bugs that needed to be worked out. On 9/8/2022 at 4:14 PM, V2 (DON) stated, We were having some issues with the pharmacy and resident not getting their medications. We were bought out by another company, and we had some problems with not getting medications and medicine not being available from the pharmacy. 2. R40's Physician Orders dated Physician Order Summary dated 9/7/22 documents the following orders: Clozapine (antipsychotic medication) 100 mg by mouth at bedtime with start date 6/8/21 and Clozapine 50 mg by mouth in the morning with a start date of 9/3/22. R40's Physician Orders also included an order for Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg 1 tablet by mouth two times a day with a start date of 6/8/21, but no discontinue date. Review of R40's Progress Notes dated 6/1/22 to 9/7/22 document she missed 18 doses of Lorazepam 0.5 mg which was ordered to be given twice a day for anxiety. All the missed doses of Lorazepam occurred between 6/20/22 and 7/26/22. R40's Progress Notes document she did not receive her Clozapine 100 mg which was ordered to be given at 8:00 PM every night, on 8/6/22, 8/19/22 or 8/20/22. R40's Drug Record Book dated 6/1/22 to 9/30/2022 documents her Clozapine 100 mg was reordered on 8/27/22 and notes on that date, out, please send asap (as soon as possible). 3. Review of R71's Progress Notes dated 8/16/22 to current (9/9/22) includes documentation of R71's medications that were not available on these dates. 8/17/22: Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, and Spiriva were not available 8/18/22: Propranolol and Dicyclomine were not available 8/19/22: Cardizem, Dicyclomine, Flonase, Furosemide, Guaifenesin, Isosorbide, Lisinopril, Protonix, Propranolol, Potassium Chloride, Vitamin D, and Spiriva was not available. 8/21/22: Spiriva was not available 8/22/22: Cardizem was not available (R71 was hospitalized at local hospital 8/24/22 to 8/25/22 with diagnosis of COPD Exacerbation and CHF) 8/26/22: Guaifenesin, Cardizem, Prednisone, Furosemide was not available 8/29/22: Spiriva was not available 8/31/22: Spiriva was not available 9/1/22: Incruse Ellipta not available 9/3/22: Breo Ellipta not available 9/7/22: Incruse Ellipta not available. On 9/9/22 at 12:37 PM, R71 stated she does not know why she did not get her medications when she was first admitted and thinks that was the reason she had to go back to the hospital. R71 stated it scares her when she doesn't get her medications because she has heart and breathing problems. She stated the nurses said it was not their fault that her medications were not here; it was because of pharmacy. The facility's policy, Medication Administration with date reviewed of 3/2022, documents, General: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illnesses, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. It also documents, 26. If medication is ordered, but not present, check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. If available, obtain from the contingency or convenience box.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to test the dish machine for proper chemical sanitation and check the temperature of the dish machine to ensure proper sanitatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to test the dish machine for proper chemical sanitation and check the temperature of the dish machine to ensure proper sanitation to prevent outbreak of foodborne illness. This failure has the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Pot Sink Sanitation Record and Dish Machine Temperature Logs were reviewed and failed to document the dish machine sanitizer or dish machine temperatures were checked 30 of 31 days in August 2022 and only documented on 9/5/22 for September of 2022. On 9/06/22 at 9:40 AM V4 (Dietary Manager/DM), stated regarding the sanitation and dish machine temp logs, If it's not on there, it wasn't done. On 9/6/22 at 9:40 AM, the dish machine chemical check and temperature check was observed with V4. The rinse cycle reached 147 degrees on the first cycle, after the second cycle it reached 160 degrees. V4 stated if it doesn't get to up to temperature, 160 degrees, they have to run it through twice, the local health department came and the same thing happened while they were here and they were told, when that happens, to turn their sanitizer amount up and then the temperature only has to get up to 120 degrees. The Warewashing policy, dated 9/1/22, documents 2. All dish machine water temperatures will be maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations for high temperature or low temperature machines. Dish machine will be checked periodically for correct ppm. 3. Temperature and/or sanitizer concentration logs will be completed, as appropriate. The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 9/6/22, documents the facility had a census of 78 residents.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable meals to 4 of 4 residents (R21, R29,R47, R53) rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable meals to 4 of 4 residents (R21, R29,R47, R53) reviewed for palatable food in the sample of 36. Findings include: 1. On 9/6/22 at 12:30 PM, R47 stated the food tastes like s***, has no flavor. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R47 is cognitively intact. 2. On 9/6/22 at 12:30 PM, R53 stated the food tastes horrible and isn't hot when it's supposed to be or cold when it's supposed to be. R53's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R53 is cognitively intact. On 9/9/22 at 8:15 AM, V4, Dietary Manager, stated they follow a recipe when making the food. The Resident Council Minutes, dated 7/7/22, document the residents have stated the food is cold at times can be overcooked and have been getting food at different times, mostly late. The Food Palatability policy, dated 9/1/21, documents Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. 3. R21's MDS dated [DATE] document R21 was cognitively intact. On 9/6/2022 at 8:39 AM, R21 stated, I do not like the food here. It is almost always served cold. We have complained about it multiple times at resident council and V1 (Administrator) will chime in and tell us she eats the food and there is nothing wrong with it. I think they make sure her food is hot because she would not say that if she was eating what we are eating. 4. R29's MDS dated [DATE] document R29 was cognitively alert in decision making. On 9/6/2022 at 8:30 AM, R29 stated The food here is not very good. It is not hot when it is supposed to be hot and they really don't put much thought about it. We have complained at Resident Council but nothing changes.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0575 (Tag F0575)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post an accessible poster or contact information for the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman Program. This has the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post an accessible poster or contact information for the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman Program. This has the potential to affect all 72 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 9/6/22 at 9:00 AM on the tour of the facility there was no Ombudsman number/poster displayed with contact information for the Ombudsman program on any of the walls or at the nurse's station. On 9/8/2022 at 11:20 AM, there was still no Ombudsman number/poster displayed with contact information for the Ombudsman program On 9/8/2022 at 3:05 PM, V29 (Ombudsman) stated, I have been getting a lot of complaints from residents about not being able to find the Ombudsman information. The time before I came into the facility, I noticed that there were no Ombudsman posters posted so I made sure that when I came back the next week, I gave them one. However, they never posted it. When I asked staff, they said they were not sure where the poster was at. I have had multiple residents complaining to me because they feel the Administrator is bullying them and intentionally does not have the poster posted so they will not be able to call me so I will not be in the building to express any of their concerns. On 9/9/2022 at 9:40 AM, the Ombudsman Poster was posted at the nurse's station. The numbers on the sign were not readable from the distance at the nurse's station. On 9/9/2022 at 9:41 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, We do not allow residents at the nurse's station. I am not sure when that poster was put up. The Resident Right Policy dated 8/1/2022 documents, The objective of the accommodation of resident needs and preferences is to create an individualized, home-like environment to maintain and/or achieve independence functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preference. The undated Facility Contract Between Resident and Facility documents, The right to uncensored access to the State Ombudsman or his or her designee as well as any employee or agent of a public agency, representative of a community legal services program, or any member of a community organization that renders assistance to residents without charge, and the right to refuse access to a State Ombudsman or Department Reviewer: The Facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS 672, dated 9/6/2022 documented the facility had a census of 72 residents.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 12 harm violation(s), $110,456 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 58 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $110,456 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Bria Of Woodriver's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BRIA OF WOODRIVER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Bria Of Woodriver Staffed?

CMS rates BRIA OF WOODRIVER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 78%, which is 32 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bria Of Woodriver?

State health inspectors documented 58 deficiencies at BRIA OF WOODRIVER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 12 that caused actual resident harm, 40 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bria Of Woodriver?

BRIA OF WOODRIVER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BRIA HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 106 certified beds and approximately 86 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WOOD RIVER, Illinois.

How Does Bria Of Woodriver Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, BRIA OF WOODRIVER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (78%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bria Of Woodriver?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Bria Of Woodriver Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BRIA OF WOODRIVER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bria Of Woodriver Stick Around?

Staff turnover at BRIA OF WOODRIVER is high. At 78%, the facility is 32 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Bria Of Woodriver Ever Fined?

BRIA OF WOODRIVER has been fined $110,456 across 3 penalty actions. This is 3.2x the Illinois average of $34,183. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Bria Of Woodriver on Any Federal Watch List?

BRIA OF WOODRIVER is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.