HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC

28070 CR 24, ELKHART, IN 46517 (574) 295-6260
Non profit - Corporation 66 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#57 of 505 in IN
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hubbard Hill Estates Inc has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is excellent and highly recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #57 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 12 in Elkhart County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 33%, significantly lower than the state average. There are no fines on record, which is promising; however, there are some concerns, such as issues with food sanitation and accessibility to personal funds for residents on weekends. Additionally, oxygen accessories were not properly stored for one resident, which could pose safety risks. Overall, while there are some weaknesses, the facility has strong staffing and a good reputation.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Indiana
#57/505
Top 11%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
2 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
33% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 71 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Indiana nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
○ Average
6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (33%)

    15 points below Indiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 33%

13pts below Indiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record

Sept 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0567 (Tag F0567)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to withdrawal her money on weekends and evenings for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal funds. (Resident 31) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to withdrawal her money on weekends and evenings for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal funds. (Resident 31) Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/4/2024 at 3:06 P.M., , Resident 31 indicated she was unable to get her money out of her account on the weekends or evenings. The record for Resident 31 was completed on 9/9/2024 at 11:05 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: depression, hemiplegia, diabetes and vascular dementia. During an interview, on 9/10/2024 at 9:57 A.M., the Business office manager indicated the residents could get money out of their personal fund accounts from 7:30 A.M. to 8:00 P.M., when someone was working at the front desk. After 8:00 P.M. the money was locked up in a safe in the office and was not assessable to the residents. During an interview, on 9/10/20 at 10:11 A. M., the Administrator indicated the residents can get their money when the receptionist was at the front desk, between 7:30 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. She indicated they should have been able to get their money out at any time of the day or night. On 9/10/2024 at 11:08 A.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled,Availability of Resident Funds-After Business Office, dated 2018, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated . It is the policy of this facility to provide residents reasonable access to their personal funds after business office hours 3.1-6(f)(1)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper storage of oxygen accessories for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 11) Finding includes: During...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper storage of oxygen accessories for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 11) Finding includes: During an observation on 9/6/2024 at 9:10 A.M., Resident 11's nasal cannula tubing, attached to the oxygen concentrator, was wrapped around the bedrail. During an observation on 9/10/2024 at 9:12 A.M., Resident 11's nasal cannula tubing, attached to the oxygen concentrator, was on the floor between the bed and the recliner. During an observation on 9/10/2024 at 11:06 A.M., Resident 11's nasal cannula tubing, attached to the oxygen concentrato,r was draped over the arm of the recliner. A record review for Resident 11 was completed on 9/9/2024 at 10:54 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: asthma, acute respiratory failure and congestive heart failure. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/17/2024, indicated Resident 11 used oxygen therapy. A Physician's Order, dated 11/23/2024, indicated oxygen was to be used at 2 liters per nasal cannula as needed. A Care Plan, with an effective date of 5/11/2023 to present, indicated Resident 11 was not able to maintain oxygen saturations and received supplemental oxygen. During an interview, on 9/10/2024 at 11:00 A.M., CNA 8 indicated the nasal cannula tubing should be stored in a respiratory bag when not in use. A policy was provided, on 9/10/2024 at 12:59 P.M. by the Director of Nursing. The policy titled, Use of Oxygen, indicated, .The following guidelines will be observed in oxygen administration .II. The tubing should be kept off the floor 3.1-47(a)(6)
Sept 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a care plan for a skin issue for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin. (Resident 18) Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/6/2023 a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a care plan for a skin issue for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin. (Resident 18) Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/6/2023 at 1:27 P.M., Resident 18 indicated he had an area to his right toe. A record review was completed on 9/07/2023 at 11:34 A.M. Resident 18's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: fractured left leg, dysphagia, hypertension, diabetes, obstructive and reflux uropathy. A 5-day MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/17/2023, indicated the resident required extensive assist of one staff for bed mobility, toilet use, dressing and two assist for transfers. A Nurses Note, dated 6/13/2023, indicated a scab was found during weekly skin assessment. Measured 1.2 x 2 cm (centimeters). Family notified and MD notified. No new orders to care for this site. A Nurse's Note, dated 6/16/2023, indicated Resident 18 was receiving therapy when the therapist found the wound to his toe. New order received for skin prep to resident's skin area on the Right 2nd toe. Area is scabbed over and there are no signs/symptoms of infection to this area. A Physician's order, dated 6/27/2023, included skin prep to the right 2nd toe three times a day, and notify the wound nurse if the area worsens or open. A Nurse's Note, dated 8/30/2023, indicated Resident 18 received doxycycline hyalite (antibiotic) 100 mg (milligram) capsule 2 times daily for right 2nd toe infection. A Physician's order, dated 8/30/2023, indicated to cleanse area to the toe with NS (normal saline), apply bacitracin (antibiotic ointment) and a dry dressing every day. The record lacked a care plan for the skin issue to the toe. During an interview, on 9/07/2023 at 2:17 P.M., the Infection Preventionist indicated there should have been a care plan. On 9/11/2023 at 12:45 P.M., the Director of Nursing provided the policy titled, Care Plan, dated November 2017, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated . 3. Each resident's Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan has been designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas . 6. Care plans are revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate On 9/11/2023 a 12:45 P.M., the Director of Nursing provided the policy titled Wound Care/Treatment Guidelines, undated, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated . XIV. The care plan should reflect the current status of the wound and appropriate goals 3.1-35(a)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented related to fanning dry skin after cleansed with alcohol for 1 of 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented related to fanning dry skin after cleansed with alcohol for 1 of 1 Accucheck (blood glucose level) observed and not wearing gloves for 1 of 1 insulin injections observed. (RN 4) Finding includes: During an observation of an Accucheck, on 9/11/2023 at 11:08 A.M., RN 4 put on gloves and cleansed Resident 49's right middle finger with an alcohol wipe. After cleaning the area, RN 4 used an open hand to fan the area she had just cleansed and then used a lancet to poke the skin that had been fanned dried. During an observation of an insulin injection, on 9/11/2023 at 11:12 A.M., RN 4 cleaned the left lower quadrant of Resident 49's abdomen and administered insulin without wearing gloves. During an interview, on 9/11/23 at 11:17 A.M., RN 4 indicated that she shouldn't have fanned the skin dry after cleaning and that she should have been wearing gloves while giving an injection. A policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated 7/31/2017 and updated on 11/1/2017, was provided by the Director of Nursing, on 9/11/2023 at 12:45 P.M., and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .To administer medications via subcutaneous, intradermal and intramuscular routines in a safe, accurate, and effective manner .Equipment .E. Examination gloves .Gather supplies .gloves, alcohol wipes .Put on gloves .Inject medication .Remove & discard gloves. Clean hands by washing or using sanitizer . A 4/2019 policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, and identified as the policy currently used by the facility was provide by the Director of Nursing, on 9/11/2023 at 12:45 P.M. The policy indicated, .7. Clean the intended site with an alcohol pad and allow to dry completely . 3.1-18(a)
Jun 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and failed to ensure the catheter drainage tubing tip was covered when not in use for 1 of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and failed to ensure the catheter drainage tubing tip was covered when not in use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheter use. (Resident 25) Finding includes: During a random observation on 6/20/2022 at 3:07 P.M., Resident 25's catheter drainage tubing was dragging the floor. During an observation, on 6/20/2022 at 12:35 P.M., Resident 25 was being pushed in the wheelchair back to his room with the catheter drainage tubing dragging the floor. A clinical record review was completed on 6/22/2022 at 1:21 P.M. Resident 25's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, prostatic hyperplasia and reflux uropathy, history of prostate neoplasm and urinary tract infection. A Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/20/2022 indicated Resident 25 was severely cognitive impaired, required extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfer and toilet use, and used a Foley catheter. A Nurses' Note, dated 6/10/2022, indicated an aide informed a nurse that Resident 25's Foley was split in half. Physician was notified and stated to send to ER. A Nurses' Note, dated 6/10/2022, indicated Resident 25 was admitted to hospital with the diagnoses of: UTI (urinary tract infection) and CKD (chronic kidney disease). Catheter was removed/replaced in ER without difficulty. On 6/24/2022 at 9:50 A.M., CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 3 was observed to provide catheter care to Resident 25. CNA 3 washed her hands and applied gloves. She then informed the resident what she was going to do. She removed the covers from the residents chest and peri area down to below the knees. She unfastened the brief on both sides, then washed from the tip of the penis down the Foley catheter and away from the opening. She dried the area and without removing her gloves, she then reapplied the brief, moved the covers onto the residents body, then used the bed control to put the bed in a lower position. She then took the supplies in the bathroom with the same gloves still on. During an interview, on 6/24/2022 at 10:00 A.M., CNA 3 indicated she should have removed her gloves and washed her hands after providing catheter care. On 6/24/2022 at 10:01 A.M., the catheter drainage bag was in a plastic bag hanging off the hand rail with the tip of the drainage tubing sticking out of the bag with the tip not covered. During an interview, on 6/24/2022 at 10:02 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the tubing tip should have been covered. On 6/24/2022 at 9:45 A.M., Unit Manager 6 provided the policy titled, Urinary Leg Drainage Bags, dated 9/1/2012, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .General Guidelines: 1. Every attempt should be made to maintain a closed urinary drainage system. 2. The regular Foley drainage bag may be reconnected only if it appears that the integrity of the system has been maintained. Steps in the procedure: .7. Place the cover over the connection tip of the Foley drainage bag On 6/24/2022 at 11:05 A.M., Unit Manager 6 provided the policy titled,Catheter Care, dated March 2021,and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use . Guidelines: . 5). Assist resident to a lying position or the most comfortable position. 6). Drape resident to expose only the perineal area. 7). Perform hand hygiene. 8). [NAME] gloves. Both: 1).Bag and gather supplies used, discarding disposable items in the trash can. 2). Assist the resident to a comfortable appropriate position. 3). Ensure call light is within reach. 4). Return room back to original order. 5). Perform hand hygiene. 3.1-41(a)(2)
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner in both the main kitchen and the healthcare kitchen. This deficient p...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner in both the main kitchen and the healthcare kitchen. This deficient practice potentially affected 61 of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. During a sanitation tour of the main kitchen, located in the Assisted Living side of the facility, conducted on 6/20/2022 between 9:45 A.M. - 10:05 A.M., the following was noted: The regular oven and the convection oven had a build up of burnt food debris in the bottom and the convection oven doors had a heavy buildup of a brown greasy residue. The large, rolling plastic flour and sugar bins had splatters of a dried yellow substance and a gritty residue on the outsides and lids. The inside bottom of a reach in refrigerator had a dried light brown substance and a heavy accumulation of food crumbs. There was also a dried red residue noted on the outer lip of the bottom. The bottom of the warming/holding cabinet was very dirty with food debris/crumbs. During an interview with the Food Service Supervisor, during the sanitation tour, he indicated the stoves were to be cleaned every other week and the flour and sugar bins were to have been cleaned the past weekend. He also indicated some of the food served in both the assisted living and healthcare dining rooms were prepared in the main kitchen. 2. During an observation of the healthcare kitchen, conducted on 6/22/2022 at 9:52 A.M., the following was noted: The air vent above the reach in refrigerator had a heavy accumulation of dark colored dust. Three of 5 food scoops, put away as clean, had dried food substances on them 3. During observation of the lunch meal service, in the healthcare kitchen, conducted on 6/22/2022 from 11:10 A.M. - 11:40 A.M., the following was noted: The cook donned a pair of disposable gloves, after washing his hands. He then, with his gloved hands, sorted through a stack of food order paper tickets, touched handles of serving scoops, ladles and tongs, the bottoms of clean plates, plastic plate covers the counter attached to the steam table and then placed a few slices of roast beef onto the attached counter. With his contaminated, gloved hands, the cook them placed his gloved hand directly on top of the meat to position it, while he utilized a knife to chop the meat into bite size pieces. The cook then, after scooping the meat onto a plate for service, removed his gloves and washed his hands. After donning a clean pair of disposable gloves, the cook continued to touch various items in the kitchen with his gloved hands, such as paper tickets, plates, handles of scoops, ladles and tongs, the counter attached to the steam table, a steam table pan lid and then was observed to grab a loaf of bread. After opening the bread plastic bag, the cook reached into the bag and removed two slices of bread with his contaminated gloved hands and proceeded to touch the bread while he prepared a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for a resident. During an interview with the Assistant Food Service Supervisor, Employee 7, just after the noon meal observation, on 6/22/2022 at 11:45 A.M., she indicated she would review food handling with the cook. Review of the facilities current policy and procedure, titled, Dietary Services provided by the Director of Nursing on 6/24/2022 at 9:25 A.M. included the following: .1. Proper Food Handling C. Foods are prepared and served with clean tongs, scoops, spatulas or other suitable implements to avoid manual contact of prepared foods Review of the facilities current policy and procedure, titled, Dining Services Policy and Procedure Manual, provided by the Director of nursing on 6/24/2022 at 9:15 A.M., included the following .Follow the standards below to maintain clean equipment and work areas 7. Ovens a. All racks and drip trays are debris and grease free with no visible buildup of grease. b. Interior of oven is free of debris and grease, no carbonized grease. c. Doors, hinges an handles are free of grease and debris. d. Glass is clean .12. Hot Boxes/Warming Cabinets .b. Interior and exterior are smooth to the touch and free of grease build up .Refrigerators/Freezers .c. Walls, ceiling, and floors should be free of ice, stains, spots food, drippings and debris .k. Upright refrigerators and freezers clean and free of dirt and food build up inside and out 3.1-21(i)(3)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
  • • 33% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Hubbard Hill Estates Inc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Hubbard Hill Estates Inc Staffed?

CMS rates HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hubbard Hill Estates Inc?

State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 6 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Hubbard Hill Estates Inc?

HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 66 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ELKHART, Indiana.

How Does Hubbard Hill Estates Inc Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hubbard Hill Estates Inc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Hubbard Hill Estates Inc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Hubbard Hill Estates Inc Stick Around?

HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Hubbard Hill Estates Inc Ever Fined?

HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Hubbard Hill Estates Inc on Any Federal Watch List?

HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.