FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Freelandville Community Home has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some significant concerns. It ranks #451 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the bottom half statewide, and #6 out of 6 in Knox County, meaning there are no better local options. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 7 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, which is much lower than the state average of 47%, and they have more RN coverage than 86% of Indiana facilities, ensuring better oversight for residents. However, there were serious incidents, including a failure to provide adequate assistance during a mechanical lift transfer, resulting in a resident sustaining a femur fracture, and a lack of supervision for another resident, leading to a hip fracture. Additionally, there were concerns about inaccurate assessments regarding medication and restraint use, which could impact residents' safety and care.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Indiana
- #451/505
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 58 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Indiana. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Indiana average (3.1)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance was provided during a mechanical lift tr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) incident report, dated 8/29/24, indicated Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 20 was involved w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. On 12/4/24 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and heart failure.
The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 2 of 2 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of an RN (Registered Nurse) were available at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of the 7 days reviewed. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments were completed timely for 3 of 23 residents reviewed. (Resident 10, Resident 33, Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services to maintain or improve mobility for 3 of 6 residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents using psychotropic medications received gradual dose reductions (GDR) for continued use of the medications for 2 of 5 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of an RN (Registered Nurse) were available at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 4 of the days reviewed fro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 2 residents observed for urinary catheter care. The facility lacked...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. During an observation on Hall C on 11/15/23 at 7:35 A.M., the privacy curtain between Resident 33 and Resident 22's had 4 hoo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary documentation to ensure a resident or responsible party was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer or discharge was given to residents or ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. There was n...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Freelandville Community Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Freelandville Community Home Staffed?
CMS rates FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Freelandville Community Home?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Freelandville Community Home?
FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 28 residents (about 56% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in FREELANDVILLE, Indiana.
How Does Freelandville Community Home Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Freelandville Community Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Freelandville Community Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Freelandville Community Home Stick Around?
FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Freelandville Community Home Ever Fined?
FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Freelandville Community Home on Any Federal Watch List?
FREELANDVILLE COMMUNITY HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.