BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care Center received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns. It ranks #430 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the bottom half, and #9 out of 20 in Lake County, meaning there are only a few local options that are better. While the facility's trend is improving, with a reduction in issues from 16 in 2024 to 1 in 2025, it still reported 35 total issues, including a serious incident where a cognitively impaired resident was physically harmed, requiring sutures for injuries. Staffing is below average with a 2/5 rating and a turnover rate of 49%, which is around the state average. On a positive note, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a good sign, and maintains average registered nurse coverage, helping to catch potential problems. However, there were concerns regarding food sanitation and cleanliness in the kitchen, which could affect residents' health.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Indiana
- #430/505
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 49% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Indiana. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Indiana average (3.1)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 35 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident's rights to b...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0660
(Tag F0660)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review & interview, the facility failed to implement a complete discharge planning process and ensure that the discharge needs of each resident were identified and met related to lack ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were managed appropriately related to medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to build up on teeth for 1 of 7 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with impaired vision received the necessary services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision. (Resident 70)
Finding includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was transferred with a Hoyer lift (a full body mechanical lift) as indicated on the Resident Care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube (peg tube) care was completed as ordered related to incorrect enteral feeding administration for 1 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper care and treatment related to oxygen administration flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a follow up for a pain specialist's medication order was completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident 128)
Finding inc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update physician's orders after a medication regimen review was conducted for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. The record for Resident 74 was reviewed on 6/12/24 at 2:34 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.
The Significant Ch...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment was maintained related to an accumulation of dust and debris on floors, piping, and fan blades,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to dirty and greasy food equipment, an accumulation of dust on fan blades, food ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment for a pressure ulcer was administe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were implemented, related to hand hygiene with resident care and glove removal, changes o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary treatment...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 related to the use of personal protective equipment in an isolation room. (Resident B)
Finding inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided with ADL (activities of daily living) care related to long, dirty fingernails for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care related to oxygen administration flow rate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications, related to a lack of non-pharmacological interventions attempted before the admini...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0773
(Tag F0773)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a abnormal laboratory test result for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine and/ or emergency dental services related to a delay in scheduling a procedure to have tee...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 8/9/23 at 9:09 a.m. LPN 1 was observed preparing the medications for Resident 298. She took the blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter from the rolling cart and placed them on the resident. She ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to schedule an appointment with a Physician as ordered for a 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Physician's appointments. (Resident G)
Finding incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly assessed before and after a nebulizer (an inhaled breathing treatment) treatment for 1 of 2 residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records were accurate and complete, related to documentation of the completion of treatments, a Physician's consult visit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a fall risk had a care-planned intervention in place related to a floor mat next to the bed for 1 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a nutritional risk received a therapeutic diet as ordered related to fortified foods omitted from th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a g-tube (feeding tube) was verified for placement per professional standards of practice prior to the administration ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0917
(Tag F0917)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had adequate furniture in their rooms related to no regular chairs for residents and/or visitors to sit were observe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow recommendations from the Pest Control company to assist with keeping bugs at a minimum, related to fruit flies and the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up was completed related to x-ray results for a resident who had a fall for 1 of 4 residents reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed (blended food) meals to correct texture and did not follow the puree recipe. This had the potential to affect 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to touching food and non-food items without changing gloves, foods being held at temperature...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 35 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade F (20/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Staffed?
CMS rates BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 49%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville?
State health inspectors documented 35 deficiencies at BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 34 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 164 certified beds and approximately 142 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MERRILLVILLE, Indiana.
How Does Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (49%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Stick Around?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 49%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Ever Fined?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville on Any Federal Watch List?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - MERRILLVILLE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.