HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Harbour Manor Health & Living Community has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality with some serious concerns. It ranks #248 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half, but it is #10 out of 17 in Hamilton County, meaning only a few local options are better. The facility's trend appears stable, with three issues reported in both 2024 and 2025. Staffing is decent, with a 3/5 rating and a turnover rate of 43%, which is slightly below the state average. While there have been no fines reported, there are significant concerns, including a serious incident where a nurse restrained a cognitively impaired resident against their will while administering medications, and another where staff failed to intervene during an abuse incident.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Indiana
- #248/505
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 43% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Indiana. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (43%)
5 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from staff-to-resident abuse perpetrated by RN 2 when the nurse held the hands of a cognitively imp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when a staff member (CNA 1) failed to intervene when witnessing the abuse of a cognitively impaired resident (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a care plan intervention of providing care with staff pairs to protect the resident from anxiety related to allegations of inappropr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic count reconciliation was completed for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication reconci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D)
Findings include:
During a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse to one or more law enforcement and adult protection agencies for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was scheduled with urology (a specialist), as ordered by the primary care provider, for 1 of 3 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were reconciled per facility policy for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (East 1 car...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely communication was maintained between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician as ordered for daily weights and follow physic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a behavior monitoring and management program for residents who resided on a memory care unit and had a diagnoses of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychoactive medications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize proper infection prevention and control practices for residents in transmission-based precautions during a facility CO...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 43% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (45/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Harbour Manor Health & Living Community's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Harbour Manor Health & Living Community Staffed?
CMS rates HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Harbour Manor Health & Living Community?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Harbour Manor Health & Living Community?
HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CARDON & ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 129 certified beds and approximately 119 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in NOBLESVILLE, Indiana.
How Does Harbour Manor Health & Living Community Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Harbour Manor Health & Living Community?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Harbour Manor Health & Living Community Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Harbour Manor Health & Living Community Stick Around?
HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Harbour Manor Health & Living Community Ever Fined?
HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Harbour Manor Health & Living Community on Any Federal Watch List?
HARBOUR MANOR HEALTH & LIVING COMMUNITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.