LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lutheran Community Home in Seymour, Indiana, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #62 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 4 in Jackson County, meaning only one other local facility is rated higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2023 to 2 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 33%, which is well below the state average of 47%. Notably, there have been no fines, but recent inspections revealed concerns, including inadequate perineal care for a resident with a history of UTIs and failure to administer medications as ordered for a resident with serious health conditions. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and a good reputation, these specific incidents highlight areas needing attention.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Indiana
- #62/505
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Indiana. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
13pts below Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide perineal care in an appropriate manner for a resident with a history of UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) for 1 of 3 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered to prevent significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 07/20/23 at 10:25 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/07/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 07/20/23 at 10:25 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/07/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines related to indwelling urinary catheter care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related following manufacturer's guidelines, labeling medication, and having unsecured loose ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's recommendation related to a urinalysis for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for laboratory services.
Findings include:
The ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to perineal care for incontinence and the use of a bedpan, and hand hygiene for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide meals to residents needing assistance in a dignified manner for 2 of 5 residents dining observations. (Residents 36 a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 56 and 28)
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent urinary catheter care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections). (Resident 14)
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately monitor a resident's meal intake for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 10)
Findings include:
The clinical reco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound healing medications/supplements were available for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 56)
Findings inc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related to labeling medications and having unsecured, loose capsules and tablets in the medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control guidelines were followed related to TBP (Transmission Based Precautions) for 1 of 3 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 33% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Lutheran Community Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Lutheran Community Home Staffed?
CMS rates LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lutheran Community Home?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 15 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Lutheran Community Home?
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 95 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SEYMOUR, Indiana.
How Does Lutheran Community Home Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lutheran Community Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Lutheran Community Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lutheran Community Home Stick Around?
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Lutheran Community Home Ever Fined?
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Lutheran Community Home on Any Federal Watch List?
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.