On With Life

715 SW ANKENY ROAD, ANKENY, IA 50023 (515) 965-1339
Non profit - Corporation 28 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#59 of 392 in IA
Last Inspection: September 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

On With Life in Ankeny, Iowa has received a Trust Grade of A, which indicates it is excellent and highly recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #59 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 29 in Polk County, meaning there are only four other local options that are better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from one in 2024 to zero in 2025. While the staffing rating is poor at 0 out of 5 stars, the turnover is impressively low at 0%, suggesting that the staff is stable and familiar with residents. Notably, there have been no fines recorded, indicating compliance with regulations. However, a concern was found regarding infection control practices, as the facility failed to follow proper procedures for five residents with indwelling medical devices, which could put them at risk for infection. Overall, On With Life has strengths in its ratings and stability but needs to address its staffing challenges and ensure adherence to infection control protocols.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Iowa
#59/392
Top 15%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Iowa's 100 nursing homes, only 0% achieve this.

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barri...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier protection practices for residents with indwelling medical devices for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #3, #13, #16, #27, and #25). The facility reported a census of 25. Findings include: 1. The Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses of traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO), resistance to Vancomycin, paraplegia, and quadriplegia. The MDS assessment documented the presence of an indwelling catheter. The Care Plan dated 10/9/24 revealed Resident #3 had a suprapubic catheter related to his spinal cord injury. The Care Plan directed staff to follow provider orders for catheter cares and to provide catheter cares every shift. This included staff to drain the catheter bag every shift and as needed. The Care Plan lacked directives for staff to use Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP). During observation on 10/9/24 at 12:15 PM, Staff E Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) completed catcher cares for Resident #3. Staff E did not wear a gown while performing catheter cares. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] reviewed Resident #13 had the diagnoses of a non-traumatic brain dysfunction, anoxic brain damage, aphasia, and quadriplegia. The MDS documented the resident received tube feedings due to loss of liquids/solids from mouth when eating or drinking, holding food in mouth/cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals, and coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing. The Care Plan revised on 8/7/24 revealed Resident #13 required enteral nutrition as evidenced by presence of a gastrostomy tube and to provide tube feedings and water flushes as ordered. The Care Plan lacked directives for staff to use EBP. During observation on 10/9/24 at 7:45 AM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), did not wear a gown while administering Resident #13's tube feedings and medications via the gastrostomy tube. 3. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction and intracranial abscess and granuloma. The MDS documented the presence of also indicated the presence of intravenous (IV) access for medication administration. The Care Plan revised on 8/15/24 revealed Resident #16 had a Streptococcus Anginosis infection with multiple intracranial abscesses. The care plan directs staff to administer antibiotics as ordered. The Care Plan lacked directives for staff to use EBP. During observation on 10/09/24 at 7:20 AM, Staff F, did not wear a gown while administering Resident #16 IV antibiotic. 4. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident, gastrostomy tube, and a Stage 2 pressure ulcer. The MDS documented the resident received tube feedings and had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer. The Care Plan revised on 9/17/24 revealed Resident #25 had impaired skin integrity as evidenced by a pressure ulcer due decreased mobility and decreased sensation from a stroke. The Care Plan also revealed the resident had a g-tube. The Care Plan directed staff to follow physician's orders for treatments. The Care Plan lacked directives for staff to use EBP. During observation on 10/09/24 11:45 AM, Staff F, did wear a gown while completed wound cares to Resident #25's right foot. 5. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, quadriplegia, diabetes, and neurogenic bladder. The MDS indicated the resident had a catheter. The Care Plan revised on 9/30/24 revealed the resident an activities of daily living (ADL) performance deficit related to a spinal cord injury. The resident had a catheter related to urinary retention. The resident also had impaired skin integrity as evidenced by a pressure ulcer. The Care Plan directed staff to provide catheter care each shift. The Care Plan lacked directives for staff to use EBP. During observations on 10/8/24 at 11:27 AM, Staff D, CNA, washed her hands and donned a pair of gloves. Staff D emptied the resident's catheter bag and cleansed the catheter port with an alcohol swab. Staff D removed her gloves and washed her hands after she performed catheter care. Staff D did not wear a gown during the procedure while she handled and cared for the urinary catheter. The resident's room lacked signage regarding the use of EBP or PPE required. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 9:30 AM, Staff B, CNA, reported she looked at the white board in the resident's room to know what cares a resident needed or she looked at the resident's [NAME] on the computer. Staff B stated staff told her in report if a resident required special precautions. Staff B reported she looked at the sign posted on the resident's door to know what PPE to put on. Whenever a resident on isolation precautions, a bin placed outside the resident's door with PPE such as gown and gloves, and a trashcan placed next to it. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 9:47 AM, Staff C, CNA, reported she looked at the white board on the wall in the resident's room to know what to do for the resident. She also looked at the [NAME] on the computer but the white board had the most updated information. Staff C reported she received information during shift report about whether a resident required special precautions, such as isolation or PPE required. Staff C stated she donned a gown and gloves or whatever PPE needed before she entered an isolation/precautions room. Staff C reported when she left the resident's room, she removed the PPE outside the room and placed it in the trashcan, and sanitized her hands. Staff C reported a sign on door revealed the what PPE to put on prior to entering the resident's room. Staff C reported she didn't normally put a gown on to empty a resident's catheter unless the resident had an infection. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported they initiated EBP's whenever a resident had an active CDC (Center for Disease Control) targeted MDRO infection. If one resident in the facility had an MDRO, it was considered an outbreak and then EBP's implemented. The DON reported they reached out to the State Department on how to proceed with their resident population. The DON confirmed whenever a resident placed in isolation, a bin with PPE placed outside the room, along with a trashcan. The DON confirmed the trash can outside Resident #32's room did not have a lid over it. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy revised 5/2024 revealed EBP utilized as a strategy to decrease transmission of MDRO's. A gown and gloves used for high-contact resident care activities for residents with chronic wounds, indwelling medical devices, or secretions/excretions that are unable to be contained or covered. Persons with acquired brain injury require indwelling medical devices including feeding tubes and/or urinary catheters. All residents who qualified for EBP received education and filled out a consent form indicating their preference for EBP if a MDRO outbreak occurred. Staff donned a gown and gloves during close contact interactions such as wound care, incontinence care/ toileting, and transfers if the resident or guardian indicated they wanted EBP. 6. During observation on 10/7/24 at 10:11 AM, a Contact precautions sign hung on Resident #25's door and a plastic bin with drawers of PPE (gown and gloves) observed outside the resident's room. A trashcan without a lid sat next to plastic bin with drawers. The admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had diagnoses of MDRO and at an increased risk for facility acquired infections. The MDS revealed the on isolation for an active infectious disease and took antibiotics. The Care Plan initiated 9/25/24 revealed the resident required isolation precautions due to ESBL (Extended spectrum betalactamases). The Care Plan directed staff to don proper PPE when caring for him.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is On With Life's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns On With Life an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is On With Life Staffed?

Detailed staffing data for On With Life is not available in the current CMS dataset.

What Have Inspectors Found at On With Life?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at On With Life during 2024. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates On With Life?

On With Life is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 28 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ANKENY, Iowa.

How Does On With Life Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, On With Life's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting On With Life?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is On With Life Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, On With Life has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at On With Life Stick Around?

On With Life has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was On With Life Ever Fined?

On With Life has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is On With Life on Any Federal Watch List?

On With Life is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.