Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care and operations. It ranks #272 out of 392 nursing homes in Iowa, placing it in the bottom half, and #10 out of 12 in Dubuque County, suggesting only one local option is worse. While the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, it still faces serious challenges. Staffing is a strength, with a 4/5 star rating and 0% turnover, indicating that staff are consistent and likely familiar with residents' needs. However, the facility has incurred $19,698 in fines, which is concerning and indicates repeated compliance problems. Moreover, there have been critical incidents, such as a resident falling and suffering a fractured hip due to inadequate assistance during transfers, and multiple sanitation issues in the kitchen, including expired food and unclean conditions. These findings highlight both strengths and weaknesses at Grand Meadows, making it crucial for families to weigh these factors carefully.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Iowa
- #272/392
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $19,698 in fines. Higher than 92% of Iowa facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 79 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Iowa nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Iowa average (3.0)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facilities Resident's Rights form revealed staff failed to treat 1 of 3 residents with dignity and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide range of motion services ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide trauma informed care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The resident arrived at t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were used only to treat documented conditions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, kitchen record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to store food according to professional guidelines and to clean dishes under sanitary conditions during 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
6 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. The MDS for Resident #138 dated 9/26/23 revealed a BIMS score of 10 which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to prevent a resident from neglect fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, facility record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address previously ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to keep garbage cans covered near food preparation surfaces to provide a sanitary cooking environment. The facility reporte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to date opened foods, use gloves appropriately for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and interventions for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident #1). The facility reported ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately supervise one of three ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on electronic health record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately inform residents of their right to appeal the decision for discontinuation of skilled services for 1 of 3 residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or the resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to clarify and follow physician orders for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus for 1 of 5 residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to document a recapitulation of the res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an intervention and further revise the care plan after a fall for 1 of 1 residents (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to consistently complete nursing assessments and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control standards with catheter tubing and dignity bag for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #139) in the sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on vaccination matrix review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure the facility COVID vaccination rate is 100%, and monitor the COVID...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 24 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $19,698 in fines. Above average for Iowa. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (36/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care Staffed?
CMS rates Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care?
State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 22 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care?
Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 32 certified beds and approximately 28 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Asbury, Iowa.
How Does Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care Stick Around?
Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care Ever Fined?
Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care has been fined $19,698 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Iowa average of $33,276. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care on Any Federal Watch List?
Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.