Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #65 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the four nursing homes in Carroll County. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from three in 2024 to one in 2025. Staffing is a strength here, rated 5 out of 5, with a turnover rate of 35%, which is lower than the state average, indicating that staff are experienced and familiar with residents. However, there have been concerning incidents, including a serious failure to obtain timely lab work for a resident, leading to a hospital transfer and subsequent death, and reports of staff sleeping on duty during overnight shifts, which raises questions about resident care quality. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and overall ratings, families should be aware of these significant concerns.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Iowa
- #65/392
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 35% turnover. Near Iowa's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 35 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Iowa. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (35%)
13 points below Iowa average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
11pts below Iowa avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to provide dignity to 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed. The facility failed to prov...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, CDC recommendations and policy review, the facility staff faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility failed to follow an antibiotic steward...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, hospital record review and policy review the facility failed to provide care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow a physicia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, facility document review, and staff interview the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information with the resident census, the total number of staff, their hours w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to accurately document the administration of a me...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to assess and inte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interviews, facility document review and personnel file review the facility failed to provide adequate staff for the overnight shift. Several overnight staff personnel were found to be ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the residents' pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to complete an assessment and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation in the cli...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the staff used appropriate infecti...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
- • 35% turnover. Below Iowa's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll Staffed?
CMS rates Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll?
Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 46 certified beds and approximately 27 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CARROLL, Iowa.
How Does Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll Stick Around?
Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Iowa nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll Ever Fined?
Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center Of Carroll on Any Federal Watch List?
Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.