Marian Home

2400 Sixth Avenue North, Fort Dodge, IA 50501 (515) 576-1138
Non profit - Church related 90 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
88/100
#46 of 392 in IA
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Marian Home in Fort Dodge, Iowa, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #46 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half, and is #1 out of 4 in Webster County, indicating it is the best local option. The facility is improving, having gone from one serious issue in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a perfect rating of 5/5 stars and a low turnover rate of 29%, significantly better than the Iowa average of 44%. However, there was one serious incident where a resident who required assistance to prevent falls did not receive adequate help, highlighting a potential area for improvement. Overall, while Marian Home shows strengths in staffing and quality ratings, families should remain aware of past incidents to ensure their loved ones receive the best care.

Trust Score
B+
88/100
In Iowa
#46/392
Top 11%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Iowa's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Iowa. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (29%)

    19 points below Iowa average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Iowa's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
May 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent a fall with injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #31). The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #31 scored 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) of 1 side, upper extremity. The resident required supervision or touching assistance with transfer and ambulation. The resident's diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Care Plan identified the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's, disease process, RA, chronic back pain, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, chronic urinary tract infections (UTI's), depression, impaired balance, but able to stabilize self with walker, and increased risk for falls. The resident had limited ROM of the left hand. The interventions included: a. On 12/8/23 the resident ambulated with a walker to all destinations. The resident ambulated with guidance and direction from staff. Staff were at the resident's side at times. On occasion the resident would walk independently for short distances. The intervention resolved 4/11/24. b. On 4/11/24 the resident ambulated as tolerated to destinations with 1 assist and walker. The resident's bilateral hands had rheumatoid arthritis knuckle contractures, assisted with the walker as needed. The Progress Notes dated 4/23/24 at 11:37 a.m. documented staff were summoned for help in the main nurses station due to the resident on the ground. Staff stated they were assisting the resident up to go to the dining room for lunch. After the resident was in a standing position from the chair she grabbed her walker with her right hand and staff tried to assist the resident's contracted left hand to the walker but the resident let her right hand go from the walker. The resident was lowered to the ground but did end up on her right hip. Vital signs were taken. No shortening noted to bilateral lower extremities. Assisted the resident to a sitting position, then assisted into a standing position with a gait belt and 3 staff members. The resident was wheeled into the dining room in a wheelchair. The resident showed signs of pain by facial expressions and verbally. Interventions included: Updating the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), received orders for x-ray of the right hip, sent out via emergent ambulance for x-ray, would no longer use the walker for ambulation. A hospital History and Physical dated 4/23/24 at 12:43 p.m. documented Resident #31 presented to the emergency room (ER) with hip pain following a fall. Hip X-ray results dated 4/23/24 documented an acute appearing right femoral neck fracture in mild varus malalignment. Orthopedic surgery was contacted per their documentation and discussion with the resident's power of attorney (POA). They decided to proceed with surgery the following day. The physical exam revealed the resident's right lower extremity shortened and externally rotated. A Post-hospitalization visit dated 5/1/24 at 10 a.m. documented the resident had right hip hemiarthroplasty (surgery to treat hip fracture) on 4/24/24. Staff reported the resident had increased pain since returning to the facility, noticed with transfers, assisting the resident with daily cares, in the mornings, and in the middle of the night. The resident was cognitively impaired at baseline. Given the resident's cognitive impairment, there was concern she would be unable to express the pain she truly experienced. The resident reported no pain, but even with light palpation over the right hip, she grimaced and stated ouch. New orders included increasing Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen to 7.5/325 mg 3 times a day, and Hydrocodone 5 mg as needed every 6 hours for breakthrough pain. The Progress Notes dated 5/7/24 at 8:42 a.m. documented the resident readmitted on 4/29 post right hip hemiarthroplasty. Appetite very poor, required cues and assistance during meals. Required maximum assist of 2 for transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. Assist of 1 for ADL's and showering. Weight bearing as tolerated to right lower extremity but resident did not allow leg to bear any weight. Left hand remained contracted and painful to the resident. The resident complained of pain in the right lower extremity during any attempts of movement. On 5/14/24 at 10:35 a.m. Staff A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated (on 4/23/24) she went to assist the resident to go to the bathroom before going to lunch. She said she helped the resident stand up to her walker and one hand was on the walker holding it and the other hand was closed. She opened the hand to put it on the walker and the resident let go of the walker with the one hand, lost her balance and she went to the ground. Staff A was able to hold on to her to ease her down. Staff A stated she did not know they needed to have a gait belt on. She had not seen other staff use a gait belt on the resident. The Director of Nursing (DON), present during the interview, stated the resident had recently changed from independent to a 1 assist prior to the incident. The resident should have had the gait belt on when assisting her. A note dated 4/23/24, Gait belt use, documented discussion of the importance and mandate to use a gait belt with any resident when required an assist of 1 or 2 with any and all transfers and ambulation. Caregivers had to have on their person or within reach a gait belt at all times while on the floor. Failure to follow the protocol could result in disciplinary action. A Summary of the self report on Resident #31: When transferring the resident from the recliner chair the CNA did not have a gait belt on the resident. The resident stood up from the chair, and the CNA was guiding the resident's arthritic hand to grip the walker and the resident's opposite hand, her right hand, let go of the walker. The resident's knees began to buckle, and the CNA slowly guided her to the floor. The resident's Care Plan had recently changed to assist of 1 from independent. Prior to the change the resident had been transferring and ambulating independently. Employee education done with all CNA's and Nurses regarding gait belt use on all residents that were assist of 1 or greater, when not using a manual lift. Education of all nursing staff started on 4/24/24 and completed on on 4/26/24. Each individual CNA or Nurse was given the education on a 1 to 1 basis. Going forward Nursing Administration would conduct audits on all shifts to make sure all were using gait belts properly.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
  • • 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Iowa's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • 1 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Marian Home's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Marian Home an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Marian Home Staffed?

CMS rates Marian Home's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Marian Home?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at Marian Home during 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Marian Home?

Marian Home is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 90 certified beds and approximately 70 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Fort Dodge, Iowa.

How Does Marian Home Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Marian Home's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Marian Home?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Marian Home Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Marian Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Marian Home Stick Around?

Staff at Marian Home tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Iowa average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Marian Home Ever Fined?

Marian Home has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Marian Home on Any Federal Watch List?

Marian Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.