MOUNDRIDGE MANOR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Moundridge Manor has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is decent and slightly above average among nursing homes. It ranks #29 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the top half, and it is the best option out of seven facilities in McPherson County. The facility is improving, as it reduced the number of issues from five in 2023 to three in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 rating and a low turnover rate of 17%, which is well below the Kansas average, indicating that staff are experienced and familiar with residents. However, the facility has $45,133 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 78% of Kansas facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Notably, there have been some serious incidents, including a cognitive resident leaving the facility unattended, which presented a significant safety risk. Another resident fell outside alone and suffered serious injuries, demonstrating a lack of adequate supervision. Additionally, a resident fell from a whirlpool chair due to improper securing, resulting in facial injuries. While the facility has strong staffing and is improving overall, these incidents highlight critical areas that need attention to ensure resident safety.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Kansas
- #29/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 17% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 31 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $45,133 in fines. Higher than 85% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 43 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (17%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (17%)
31 points below Kansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with 12 reviewed for accidents. Based on observatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Seven residents received ground meat. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve pala...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
The facility identified a census of 77 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents, of which five residents were reviewed for unnecessa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 17% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 31 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $45,133 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 8 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $45,133 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Moundridge Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MOUNDRIDGE MANOR an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Moundridge Manor Staffed?
CMS rates MOUNDRIDGE MANOR's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 17%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Moundridge Manor?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at MOUNDRIDGE MANOR during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 5 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Moundridge Manor?
MOUNDRIDGE MANOR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 78 certified beds and approximately 76 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOUNDRIDGE, Kansas.
How Does Moundridge Manor Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, MOUNDRIDGE MANOR's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (17%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Moundridge Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Moundridge Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MOUNDRIDGE MANOR has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Moundridge Manor Stick Around?
Staff at MOUNDRIDGE MANOR tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 17%, the facility is 29 percentage points below the Kansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 8%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Moundridge Manor Ever Fined?
MOUNDRIDGE MANOR has been fined $45,133 across 3 penalty actions. The Kansas average is $33,530. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Moundridge Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
MOUNDRIDGE MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.