PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB

407 N LOCUST STREET, PEABODY, KS 66866 (620) 983-2152
For profit - Limited Liability company 45 Beds MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
49/100
#33 of 295 in KS
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Peabody Health and Rehab has a Trust Grade of D, which means it is below average and has some concerning issues. It ranks #33 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 5 in Marion County, indicating only one nearby option is better. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from one in 2024 to five in 2025. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for the state. However, the $22,711 in fines is concerning, as it is higher than 76% of similar facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. On a positive note, the facility has more RN coverage than 92% of Kansas facilities, which is beneficial for catching potential issues. However, there are serious concerns highlighted in inspector findings, such as a resident jumping from a window due to inadequate supervision and another resident who exited the facility unsupervised, which placed them in immediate jeopardy. Additionally, there was a case of a resident experiencing significant weight loss due to a lack of nutritional support, further emphasizing the need for improvement in resident care.

Trust Score
D
49/100
In Kansas
#33/295
Top 11%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$22,711 in fines. Higher than 62% of Kansas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 53 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
23 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 51%

Near Kansas avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $22,711

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 23 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Jan 2025 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility had a census of 39 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 39 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the correct CMS form 10123, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for two residents, Resident (R) 1 and R23. The facility also failed to include the estimated cost to continue skilled services on CMS form 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), to the resident or their representative for the two residents, R1 and R23. This deficient practice placed the two residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled care. Findings included: - The Medicare NOMNC informed beneficiaries of their discharge and their right to an expedited review of the determination to terminate skilled coverage. The ABN form informed the beneficiaries of the estimated cost to continue their services, The facility's Medicare NOMNC form was not provided to R1 (or their representative), and the ABN form staff provided to R1 (or their representative) lacked the estimated cost to continue services when the resident's skilled services ended on 10/25/24. The facility's Medicare NOMNC form was not provided to R23 (or their representative), and the ABN form staff provided to R23 (or their representative) lacked the estimated cost to continue services when the resident's skilled services ended on 08/19/24. On 01/29/25 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated he was not aware that he was supposed to provide the residents or their representatives with the NOMNC forms when skilled services ended. Administrative Nurse E stated the facility had recently changed therapy companies and was unsure of the estimated cost of continuing skilled services. The facility's Beneficiary Notices policy, dated revised 08/24, documented the skilled nursing facility must give notice to the beneficiary at least three days before termination of all Part A services when the beneficiary still had days left in the benefit period. The facility would use the Medicare Provider Non-Coverage, Form CM'S 10123, to inform the beneficiary on how to request an expedited redetermination. Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN), CMS 10055, must be issued to the resident if the resident intends to continue services and the facility had determined that the services may not be covered under Medicare. The resident must be informed of potential non-coverage and document in the record that the resident understands they are accepting financial liability. The facility failed to provide R1 and R23 the CMS 10123 as required and failed to provide R1 and R23 the estimated cost to continue skilled services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on obs...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice for facility-imitated transfer to the hospital for two residents, Resident (R) 4 and R19. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin type 2), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had intact cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. R4 required substantial assistance with showers and transfers. R4 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and R4 did not require supplemental oxygen use. R4's Medicare 5 Day MDS, dated 01/02/25, documented R4 had moderately impaired cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff for bathing, personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. R4 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel and required supplemental oxygen use. R4's Care Plan dated 01/23/25, initiated on 10/04/24, directed staff to administer medication as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, elevate the head of the bed, provide oxygen as ordered, and position R4 with proper body alignment for optimal breathing pattern. The care plan directed staff to monitor and document changes in orientation, increased restlessness, anxiety, and air hunger. The Progress Note dated 12/28/24 at 10:10 AM documented R4 was admitted to the hospital for COPD exacerbation. Review of R4's clinical record lacked evidence the resident or representative was provided a written notice when she was transferred to the hospital. On 01/28/25 at 01:48 PM, R4 sat in her recliner, her feet elevated, and she had oxygen on. On 01/29/25 at 04:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility lacked documentation R4, or their representative was provided a written notice when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The facility's Emergency Transfer or Discharge policy, dated 08/21, documented the facility should make an emergency transfer or discharge when it was in the best interest of the resident. The facility would notify the resident's attending physician and notify the resident's representative. When the resident was transferred, the facility would prepare a transfer to send with the resident. The facility failed to provide R4 or her representative written notice regarding R4's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice placed the resident and/or her representative at risk for uninformed care choices. - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin type 2, and multiple sclerosis (MS-progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had severely impaired cognition. R19 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADL), was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and did not require supplemental oxygen. R19's Significant Change MDS, dated 01/16/25, documented R19 had severely impaired cognition. R19 was dependent upon staff for all ADLs, was incontinent of bladder and bowel, and required supplemental oxygen. R19's Care Plan dated 01/21/25, initiated on 03/22/22, directed staff to administer supplemental oxygen as needed. The update, dated 10/22/24, directed staff to give medications as orders to monitor and document side effects and the effectiveness of medications. Staff were directed to monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to the physician as needed. The Progress Note, dated 04/06/24 at 02:54 AM, documented R19 was sent to the hospital. Review of R19's clinical record lacked evidence the resident or representative was provided written notice when she was transferred to the hospital. On 01/29/25 at 12:15 PM, R19 sat in her wheelchair, feet elevated, and she had oxygen on. On 01/29/25 at 04:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility lacked documentation R19, or their representative was provided a written notice when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The facility's Emergency Transfer or Discharge policy, dated 08/21, documented the facility should make an emergency transfer or discharge when it was in the best interest of the resident. The facility would notify the resident's attending physician and notify the resident's representative. When the resident was transferred, the facility would prepare a transfer to send with the resident. The facility failed to provide R19 or her representative written notice regarding R19's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice placed the resident and/or her representative at risk for uninformed care choices.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12, with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12, with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide two residents, Resident (R) 4 and R19, with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed R4 and R19 at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin type 2), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had intact cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. R4 required substantial assistance with showers and transfers. R4 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and R4 did not require supplemental oxygen use. R4's Medicare 5 Day MDS, dated [DATE], documented R4 had moderately impaired cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff for bathing, personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. R4 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel and required supplemental oxygen use. R4's Care Plan dated [DATE], initiated on [DATE], directed staff to administer medication as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, elevate the head of the bed, provide oxygen as ordered, and position R4 with proper body alignment for optimal breathing pattern. The care plan directed staff to monitor and document changes in orientation, increased restlessness, anxiety, and air hunger. The Progress Note dated [DATE] at 10:10 AM documented R4 was admitted to the hospital for COPD exacerbation. Review of R4's clinical record lacked evidence a copy of the bed hold policy was provided to the resident or representative, and the facility was unable to provide evidence upon request. On [DATE] at 01:48 PM, R4 sat in her recliner, her feet elevated, and she had oxygen on. On [DATE] at 04:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not provided R4 or their representative was provided the bed hold notice when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The facility's Bed Hold policy, revised on 05/23, documented the community staff would inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization of the bed hold policy. When emergency transfers were necessary, the facility would provide the resident or representative with information concerning our bed hold policy per state law as applicable. The bed hold days in excess of our state Medicaid plan are considered noncovered services; a resident would be required to pay for any additional days that he/she wished the facility to hold the bed. Medicaid residents whose bed hold days had expired would be required to provide the facility with written authorization to either reserve or release the bed space within 24 hours of the expiration of such bed hold days. The facility failed to provide R4 with a copy of the bed hold policy when she was transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin type 2), and multiple sclerosis (MS - progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had severely impaired cognition. R19 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADL), was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and did not require supplemental oxygen. R19's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], documented R19 had severely impaired cognition. R19 was dependent upon staff for all ADLs, was incontinent of bladder and bowel, and required supplemental oxygen. R19's Care Plan dated [DATE], initiated on [DATE], directed staff to administer supplemental oxygen as needed. The update, dated [DATE], directed staff to give medications as orders to monitor and document the side effects and effectiveness of medications. Staff were directed to monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to the physician as needed. The Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 02:54 AM, documented R19 was sent to the hospital. Review of R19's clinical record lacked evidence a copy of the bed hold policy was provided to the resident or representative, and the facility was unable to provide evidence upon request. On [DATE] at 12:15 PM, R19 sat in her wheelchair, feet elevated, and she had oxygen on. On [DATE] at 04:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not provided R19, or their representative was provided the bed hold notice when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The facility's Bed Hold policy, revised on 05/23, documented the community staff would inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization of the bed hold policy. When emergency transfers were necessary, the facility would provide the resident or representative with information concerning our bed hold policy per state law as applicable. The bed hold days in excess of our state Medicaid plan are considered noncovered services; a resident would be required to pay for any additional days that he/she wished the facility to hold the bed. Medicaid residents whose bed hold days had expired would be required to provide the facility with written authorization to either reserve or release the bed space within 24 hours of the expiration of such bed hold days. The facility failed to provide R19 with a copy of the bed hold policy when she was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0849 (Tag F0849)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for hospice services. Based on ob...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a communication process between the hospice provider and the facility for Resident (R )25, who was admitted to hospice on 09/08/24, and R19, who was admitted on [DATE], which included a plan of care and a description of the services provided which included contact information, visit frequency, medications, and medical equipment. This deficient practice placed R25 and R19 at risk of not receiving needed care. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition that occurs when plaque (fatty material) builds up in the arteries of the heart), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products from the blood), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), and congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS document R25 was dependent on staff with toileting, showering, putting on and taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. R25 was partial to moderate assistance with oral hygiene, sitting to standing position, chair to bed/ bed to chair transfers, and toilet transfers. R25 required substantial to maximal staff assist with upper and lower body dressing, sitting to lying, supervision with eating, independent with bed mobility, and propelling in a wheelchair. R25's Care Plan, dated 12/16/24, recorded R39 required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R25's Care Plan documented the resident was admitted to [hospice services] on 09/08/24. The care plan directed the staff to administer medications ordered and notify the physician if there is breakthrough pain, assist with supporting the function of ambulation and mobility to the extent needed, talk to the resident during all encounters to avoid isolation and encourage visits from family and friends. The care plan lacked instruction on the services provided by hospice, including the frequency and type of support visits, supplies and medical equipment provided by hospice, medications covered by hospice, and the hospice contact information. A review of R25's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to hospice care on 09/06/24. The facility lacked a hospice plan of care. The hospice agreement documented the hospice plan of care would specify the hospice care and hospice services necessary to meet the needs of the hospice resident. The agreement documented the resident and his/her family would be identified in the initial comprehensive care plan, and staff would update assessments as necessary for the palliation and management of the resident's terminal illness and related conditions. The hospice care plan would provide the frequency of service, interventions to manage pain, drugs, supplies, appliances, and clinical record documentation and would coordinate care with the facility. 01/28/25 at 02:53 PM, R25 self-propelled in a wheelchair to the activity room and sat quietly waiting to have nails done, no signs or symptoms of pain. 01/29/25 at 04:48 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified R25's clinical record lacked a hospice care plan. 01/30/25 at 12:19 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility lacked R25's hospice care plan and stated she had faxed hospice today and requested it. Administrative Nurse D verified the resident's care plan lacked information regarding hospice visits, phone numbers, and medical supplies. Administrative Nurse D stated Administrative Nurse E was responsible for updating care plans. 01/30/25 at 12:19 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified he was responsible for updating the care plans and was unaware the hospice information regarding contact number, medical supplies, phone numbers, and hospice visits were to be included in R25's care plan. The facility's Hospice Program Policy, updated 10/2024, documented that hospice would identify in writing the services hospice would be providing, address in the resident's person-centered care plan, and the facility would provide collaboration and coordination of hospice care. The policy-documented facility would ensure the appropriate documents were readily available, which included the hospice plan of care. The facility failed to coordinate care between the facility and the hospice provider for R25, who received hospice services. This deficient practice placed him at risk for inadequate end-of-life care.- R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin type 2, and multiple sclerosis (MS - progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). R19's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had severely impaired cognition. R19 was dependent upon staff for all ADLs, was incontinent of bladder and bowel, and required supplemental oxygen. R19's Care Plan, dated 01/21/25, documented R19 received hospice services and directed staff to assist her with eating, provide comfort measures as ordered, listen to her concerns, and ensure her call light was in reach. The care plan lacked instruction on the services provided by hospice, including the frequency and type of support visits, supplies and medical equipment provided by hospice, medications covered by hospice, and the hospice contact information. A review of R19's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to hospice on 01/17/25. The facility lacked a hospice plan of care. The hospice agreement documented the hospice plan of care would specify the hospice care and hospice services necessary to meet the needs of the hospice resident. The agreement documented the resident and his/her family would be identified in the initial comprehensive care plan, and staff would update assessments as necessary for the palliation and management of the resident's terminal illness and related conditions. The hospice care plan would provide the frequency of service, interventions to manage pain, drugs, supplies, appliances, and clinical record documentation and would coordinate care with the facility. On 01/29/25 at 12:15 PM, R19 sat in her wheelchair, feet elevated, and she had oxygen on. 01/29/25 at 04:48 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified that R19's clinical record lacked a hospice care plan. 01/30/25 at 12:19 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility lacked R19's hospice care plan and stated she had faxed hospice today and requested it. Administrative Nurse D verified the resident's care plan lacked information regarding hospice visits, phone numbers, and medical supplies. Administrative Nurse D stated Administrative Nurse E was responsible for updating care plans. 01/30/25 at 12:19 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified he was responsible for updating the care plans and was unaware the hospice information regarding contact number, medical supplies, phone numbers, and hospice visits were to be included in R19's care plan. The facility's Hospice Program Policy, updated 10/2024, documented hospice would identify in writing the services hospice would be providing, address in the resident's person-centered care plan, and the facility would provide collaboration and coordination of hospice care. The policy-documented facility would ensure the appropriate documents were readily available, which included the hospice plan of care. The facility failed to coordinate care between the facility and the hospice provider for R19, who received hospice services. This deficient practice placed her at risk for inadequate end-of-life care.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 01/28/25 at 07:42 AM, In a three-door refrigerator, an unsealed plastic bag of yellow shredded cheese, an unlabeled updated 1 1/2-pound (lb.) plastic bag with white cheese, and an unlabeled, undated zip-lock plastic bag with two round slices of meat. A two-door silver freezer located in the storage room across the hall from the kitchen was an undated three-gallon container of orange sherbet with numerous different-sized dried orange substances around the outside of the container. An unsealed, approximately 3/4 full, 50 lb. bag of flour and an unsealed, approximately 1/4 full, 50 lb. bag of breadcrumbs. On 01/28/25 at 08:20 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified the above findings and stated staff should label and date food items before placing them in the refrigerator. DS BB stated staff should place flour and breadcrumbs in a sealed container after opening the bag. On 01/29/25 at 10:50 AM, the mopboard around the kitchen's perimeter had numerous different sizes of grayish-black substances on it. The pipes underneath the dishwasher, approximately two feet long, had numerous areas of different sizes of grayish-black substance. On 01/29/25 at 10:50 AM, DS CC verified the above finding and stated the dietary staff should clean the mopboard and the pipes underneath the dishwasher. On 01/30/25 at 09:55 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the administrator was overseeing the dietary department until next week when the new dietary manager became employed at the facility. The facility's Food Safety Requirements Policy, revised 10/2024, documented that all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered, labeled, and dated. The facility's Sanitation Policy, updated 10/2024, documented all kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas should be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish, and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. Kitchen and dining room surfaces not in contact with food would be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent the accumulation of grime. The food services manager was responsible for scheduling staff for regular cleaning of the kitchen and dining areas. The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety for the 39 residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 39 residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0742 (Tag F0742)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 35 residents which included three residents sampled for appropriate treatment and services for mental disorders and safety. The facility failed to ensure staff provid...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 35 residents which included three residents sampled for appropriate treatment and services for mental disorders and safety. The facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate supervision, monitoring, and interventions in response to Resident (R)1's suicidal ideation/actions and self-harm. At an unknown time on 03/10/24, R1, who suffered from delusions and hallucinations, jumped from an open window in her room, falling 12 feet to the sidewalk, and sustained multiple injuries that required hospitalization and surgery. Staff last saw R1 between 09:00 PM and 09:30 PM and found R1 on the sidewalk underneath her window at 10:54 PM. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R1 had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS - a progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), severe bipolar (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) disorder with psychotic (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception) features, suicidal ideations (contemplations, wishes and/or preoccupation with death and suicide), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, schizophrenia (a psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and unspecified psychosis. The 12/15/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R1 had hallucinations and no behaviors directed towards self or others during the look-back period. R1 had a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ - a screening and diagnostic tool to assess for depression) score of eight, which indicated mild depression. The resident took antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions), antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people), and antidepressants (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) daily during the seven-day look-back period. The 12/15/23 Psychosocial Well-Being Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented the resident had the potential for manic (mood characterized by an unstable expansive emotional state, extreme excitement, hyperactivity) and depressive (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) episodes and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The 12/15/23 Falls CAA documented the resident was a high risk for falls due to her diagnoses of MS and bipolar disorder and knew of her current limitations. The 12/15/23 Psychotropic (classes of medications that alters mood or thought) Drug Use CAA documented the resident had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder with potential for manic and depressive episodes and received antidepressant and antipsychotic medications. The Care Plan included the following interventions: An intervention dated 12/14/23, revealed staff were to monitor for side effects of antidepressant medication, which included suicidal ideations, and report to the physician any ongoing symptoms unaltered by medication therapy. An intervention dated 12/14/23, revealed staff were to monitor for side effects of antipsychotic medication which included suicidal ideations and behavior not usual for the person, and to report to the physician. The Care Plan lacked further instructions for staff in the event of suicidal ideations or episodes of actual or attempted self-harm. The facility lacked a formal suicide risk assessment for R1. The Behavior Monitoring Record task, dated 03/01/24 to 03/10/24, directed staff to monitor for the following: crying, repetitive movements, yelling/screaming, kicking/hitting, pushing, grabbing, pinching/scratching/spitting, biting, wandering, abusive language, threatening behavior, sexually inappropriate behaviors, and rejection of care. The Behavior Monitoring Record task did not include monitoring for suicidal ideations/self-harm. The Progress Notes documented the following: On 12/18/23, the physician documented R1 had a history of suicidal ideations, but no current thoughts of self-harm. On 01/13/24 at 09:01 PM, staff documented R1 attempted to drown herself in the toilet water in her bathroom and R1 expressed suicidal intent. R1 made a contract with staff that she would make no further attempts at self-harm. The staff then placed R1 on increased observation and removed items that could potentially be used for self-harm from the resident's room. On 01/13/24 at 12:04 PM, the physician documented R1 had suicidal ideations but could not get to her therapist due to severe weather outside. On 02/02/24 at 10:43 AM, staff documented attempts were made to find alternate placement for the resident due to family request and the resident's recent behavior outbursts. Other facilities declined to accept the resident. On 02/06/24 at 03:11 PM, staff documented R1 could verbally commit to safety when asked and had delusions of persecution about her children. The staff were able to redirect the resident away from the delusional thought. On 02/11/24 at 06:28 PM, staff documented R1 had experienced delusions and displayed withdrawn behaviors and voiced suicidal ideations. Staff notified the provider and required an unspecified medication for anxiety. On 02/27/24 at 05:18 AM, staff documented R1 experienced delusions that her children were able to watch her through the heating/air-conditioning vent in the bathroom and remained fixated on this delusion despite multiple redirection attempts by staff. On 02/28/24 at 03:04 AM, staff documented R1 experienced delusions of persecution with people outside her window (second floor) and the people threatened to harm her. The resident expressed suicidal ideations and staff were able to partially redirect the resident away from delusion. The record lacked additional documentation related to suicidal ideations. On 02/29/24 at 08:23 AM, staff documented R1 attempted to cut her tongue out with the blunt end of a metal spring from her hairclip. Staff were able to redirect R1 and staff moved R1 to the common area for easy observation by staff. Additionally, staff documented R1 was able to commit to safety. On 03/10/24 at 04:23 AM, staff documented that at approximately 03:00 AM, R1 was found army crawling on the floor in the hallway to another resident's room and expressed delusions of persecution about her children. Staff were able to redirect R1 away from the delusional thoughts. On 03/10/24 at 11:04 AM, staff documented that R1 displayed behaviors of self-harm and pulled some of her hair out but was easily redirected and her physician was notified and ordered medication. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that hydroxyzine (an antihistamine medication that can be given to treat mild to moderate anxiety) 25 milligrams (mg) related to anxiety disorder was administered to R1. On 03/10/24 at 07:24 PM, staff documented R1 had not taken her evening medication doses but had put them in her cheek and later spit them out. R1 stated to the staff that the medication was for her son, and he needed to take them. R1 maintained this delusion and refused to take the medication as prescribed. On 03/11/24 at 12:28 AM, staff documented that on 03/10/24 at approximately 10:54 PM, CNA staff observed R1 was not in her room and was found on the ground, on the sidewalk, outside R1's room. Staff called 911 on 03/10/24 at 10:55 PM, and two staff members left the facility to render aid to the resident on the ground. Staff documented R1 was naked from the waist down, lying face down with obvious injuries with blood from an unseen wound on her head and an abrasion (scraping or rubbing away of skin) to her right knee. Staff further documented R1 clearly stated that she had attempted suicide and expressed delusions that an unseen person had told her to do it. Staff covered her with a sheet to protect her dignity and remained with R1 until emergency personnel arrived and assumed care of R1 and transported her to the hospital. Staff documented telephone notification of Administrative Nurse B and R1's durable power of attorney (DPOA- a person named in a legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to). On 03/11/24 at 08:18 PM, staff documented that the facility called the hospital and were notified that the resident required surgery for her injuries and was in surgery and would be taken to the ICU (intensive care unit) after the operation was completed. On 03/11/24 at 12:54 PM, staff documented the facility called and spoke with R1's DPOA, who stated that seven days prior to the incident, R1 expressed to them that she was contemplating suicide by jumping from the window in her room and expressed regret that they had not notified the facility about the intent with a plan for self-harm. Review of the facility's investigation dated 03/11/24, revealed the cause of the incident was suicidal intent, and the root cause of the event was that the window was not secured correctly. Review of hospital records revealed R1 sustained the following injuries that required surgery and subsequent hospitalization: 1. A fracture (broken bone) of her 10th thoracic vertebra (bone of the spinal column) and was treated with a TLSO (Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis - a rigid brace that restricts movement of the trunk of the body) brace. 2. A right femur (thigh bone) head/neck fracture which required an open reduction internal fixation (ORIF - a surgery in which the broken bone is exposed and put back together with plates/screws/rods/etc.) surgery and she was non-weight bearing. 3. A left elbow olecranon (the bony formation at the top of the ulna [one of the bones in the forearm] that forms the point of the elbow) fracture, which required immobilization with a splint and sling. 4. A right radial head (the knobby end of the radius [one of the bones in the forearm] where it meets the elbow) fracture which required immobilization with a splint/sling. 5. A right patella (kneecap) fracture which required a knee immobilizer and ORIF. 6. A left patella fracture which required a knee immobilizer. 7. A facial laceration (a wound to the skin) that was three centimeters (cm) long and treated with four sutures (a medical device used to hold body tissues together to approximate wound edges after an injury or surgery). Review of weather data for the facility area from the National Weather Service (www.weather.gov) revealed on 03/10/24 at 10:00 PM, the temperature was 48 degrees Fahrenheit, winds were out of the south at 12 miles per hour (MPH) with clear skies and no precipitation. A facility tour on 03/13/24 at 08:15 AM with Administrative Nurse A revealed the area where staff found R1, after she had jumped or fallen from the window in her room. It was approximately 10-12 feet to a cement sidewalk on the ground. Maintenance Staff C stated the measured distance from the bottom of the window to the ground was 12 feet. On 03/18/24 at 12:10 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E stated she arrived on shift on 03/10/24 at approximately 10:00 PM, and she and CNA G started the night ice and water pass with visual checks on all the residents. When staff got to R1's room, the resident was not in the room, so CNA E went and asked CNA G to verify that the resident was not in her room. Once CNA E went into the room, CNA E noticed that the window was open and verified by the other aide. CNA G ran to the window and saw the resident laying on the ground and verified by CNA E. CNA G then ran to get the nurse on duty, then ran outside to the resident with the nurse. CNA E stated she stayed in the room at the window and talked to the resident, who was responsive, then and dropped a blanket and gloves out the window to the staff that were outside. CNA E stated R1 was wearing only a sweater. On 03/18/24 at 12:17 PM, surveyor was unsuccessful at an attempted interview with CNA F via telephone, however, a written witness statement from CNA F in the facility's investigation revealed that she had checked on R1 during evening rounds on 03/10/24 between approximately 09:00 PM and 09:30 PM. On 03/18/24 at 12:45 PM, CNA G stated at approximately 10:45 PM when CNA E and CNA G were doing the night ice/water pass, CNA E noticed R1 was not in her room and her wheelchair sat empty in the room. Both aides searched the room and the bathroom and did not locate the resident. CNA E noticed the bedroom window was open, and CNA G went to the window and looked down and saw the resident laying on the sidewalk. R1 wore only a long-sleeve shirt and was naked from the waist down. CNA G stated she ran and notified the nurse that the resident was out the window. The nurse ran to the window to verify, then both the nurse and CNA G ran outside to the resident, while the nurse called 911. CNA G went back inside to get a sheet to cover the resident, while they waited for Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On 03/18/24 at 12:23 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H revealed after the CNA told her the resident was outside, on the ground, LN H went into the room and saw the open window and peered out. It was dark outside and with the aid of a flashlight, they saw how the resident was laying on the ground and immediately ran to the door and called 911 on the company cell phone. When LN H arrived to where the resident laid on the ground outside, LN H reported the resident was responsive. LN H briefly assessed for injuries and made the decision to not move R1 due to the potential for major injury. There was blood on the ground around R1's head coming from an unseen wound and abrasions to her knees. She wore a shirt, but otherwise had no clothing on. EMS transferred R1 to the hospital. R1 had documented instances of delusions prior to the incident in the progress notes. On 03/18/24 at 12:40 PM, Administrative Nurse B stated the staff's actions and reactions to the incident were appropriate, and nothing could have happened differently to prevent the incident from happening. However, Administrative Nurse B stated that immediately following the incident, window locks were placed on all the windows in the facility to prevent them from opening fully. Administrative Nurse B confirmed the facility lacked a formal suicide screening tool and had initiated a task for nursing staff to ask the resident to commit to safety daily. Administrative Nurse B confirmed that R1's care plan lacked interventions specific to suicide prevention and would be updated to reflect these changes when and if the resident returned to the facility. On 03/18/24 at 01:55 PM, Social Services Designee (SSD) C confirmed that R1's care plan lacked interventions specific to suicide prevention and said that residents whose PHQ score was greater than five (which indicated more than minimal depression) received a more specific safety assessment and the physician should be notified. SSD C confirmed that the facility lacked a formal suicide screening assessment tool. The facility's policy Behavior Assessment and Monitoring, dated 04/2023, documented that problematic behavior will be identified and managed appropriately. A resident with problematic behavior or mood would have ongoing reassessments of changes in behavior, mood, and function. The facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate supervision, monitoring, and interventions in response to Resident (R)1's suicidal ideation/actions and self-harm when at an unknown time on 03/10/24, R1, who suffered from delusions and hallucinations, jumped from an open window in her room, falling 12 feet to the sidewalk, and sustained multiple injuries that required hospitalization and surgery. Staff last saw R1 between 09:00 and 09:30 PM and found R1 on the sidewalk underneath her window at 10:54 PM. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. On 03/18/24 at 04:58 PM, Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse B were provided the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template for failure ensure staff provided appropriate supervision, monitoring, and interventions in response to Resident (R)1's suicidal ideation/actions and self-harm. The facility immediately implemented corrective measures following R1's departure from the facility to the hospital. The facility's corrective measures included the following, which were verified by the surveyor on-site during the investigation: 1. The facility implemented education for all staff on QAPI Plan: Injury From Failure To Follow Care Plan which outlined steps and instructions for staff to follow immediately following an injury caused by failure to follow a resident's care plan and Behavior Assessment and Monitoring which outlined steps and instructions for staff to follow for residents with problematic behavior on 03/11/24 at 12:01 AM and completed with all employees on 03/12/24 at 10:00 PM. 2. The facility provided documentation that immediately following the event, all windows in the facility were secured with mechanical window locks to prevent the windows from opening more than 5 inches and completed at 03/11/24 at 02:00 AM. 3. The facility provided documentation of daily checks of the window locks from 03/11/24 to 03/13/24 and Maintenance staff D revealed that checks were to be performed daily for three weeks, then checked twice a week for two weeks, then weekly checks would continue indefinitely. 4. The facility performed a PHQ and suicide screen on all residents in the facility on 03/11/24 at unknown time and identified five additional residents with scores that indicated more than minimal depression and no additional residents with suicidal ideations or thoughts of self-harm. 6. The facility provided documentation of a Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) meeting that occurred on 03/11/24. All corrections were completed prior to the onsite survey, therefore the deficient practice was cited as past noncompliance at a scope and severity of J.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 38 residents and identified one resident at risk for elopement. Based on observation, intervie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 38 residents and identified one resident at risk for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to cognitively impaired, independently mobile Resident (R)1, identified as a moderate risk for elopement. On 11/01/23 at 06:45 PM, R1 exited the north door, unsupervised, which triggered the door alarm. The responding staff silenced the door alarm without checking outside the door to determine who/what triggered the alarm. R1 ambulated down six crumbling cement steps, around the facility approximately 450 feet and through an unfenced, unsecured courtyard, where staff found R1 approximately 53 minutes later, trying to re-enter the facility through a locked door. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R1 had diagnoses which included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion, difficulty in walking) and generalized weakness. The 02/09/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated R1 could not complete the interview. The resident wandered daily in the seven-day look-back period. R1 required the assistance of two or more staff for all cares, except eating and locomotion, which required supervision and setup. The MDS documented the resident was not steady with walking. The 08/08/23 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of 99, which indicated the resident could not complete the interview. The resident wandered four to six days in the seven-day look-back period. R1 required the assistance of two or more staff for all cares except eating and locomotion, which required supervision and setup. The MDS documented the resident was not steady with walking. The Care Plan documented an intervention, dated 06/21/22, for staff to provide redirection when the resident ambulated in the facility. The Care Plan lacked interventions specific to elopement risk. The Wandering and Elopement Evaluation Assessments revealed the following for R1: A low risk on 02/03/22, 08/03/22, 08/24/22, 11/24/22, and 07/09/23. A moderate risk on 05/03/22, 02/24/23, 05/24/23, and 10/09/23. The Progress Notes on 10/22/23 at 09:59 PM documented R1 attempted to open an exit door and set off the alarm. The staff intervened and redirected the resident away from the door. The Progress Notes on 11/01/23 at 07:20 PM documented Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C notified Licensed Nurse (LN) O the staff could not locate R1 within the facility. The Progress Notes on 11/01/23 at 07:32 PM documented CNA C and CNA E located R1 outside of the building in an unfenced courtyard area. Review of the facility investigation revealed on 11/01/23, at approximately 06:30 PM to 06:40 PM, CNA D observed R1 seated at a dining table after the evening meal. Administrative Staff A reviewed the camera footage and noted R1 pushed on the north exit door at 06:43 PM, which set off the exit door alarm, and R1 exited the building at 06:45 PM. At 06:47 PM, the camera revealed CNA C silenced the door alarm and looked out the windows but failed to exit the building to investigate who exited or why the door alarm was sounding. At 07:20 PM, CNA C discovered R1 was missing when staff could not locate R1 for his shower. CNA C notified LN O, who initiated the facility's elopement procedure. At 07:32 PM CNA C and CNA E located R1 outside of the building, in an unfenced courtyard area, attempting to reenter the building through a locked door. At 07:38 PM (53 minutes after the resident exited the facility door) CNA C and CNA E escorted R1 back into the building. On 11/06/23 at 10:00 AM, observation with Administrative Staff A revealed the area the resident traveled during the elopement on the evening of 11/01/23. Administrative Staff A explained the resident exited the building through the north alarmed exit door into an atrium. The atrium's secondary exit door lacked an alarm to alert staff of the resident leaving the facility. Immediately outside the exterior door was an elevated cement porch with multiple deep and uneven cracks and hand railings. R1 exited the porch down six cement stairs, with crumbling edges and hand railings down both sides. The handrails had rusted and broken rail supports with exposed jagged metal where the upright portions of the rails would have met the cement steps. R1 would have walked approximately 400 feet along the western exterior of the building which contained multiple elevated down-spouts that carry storm water an additional 10-15 feet out and away from the building. R1 would have then walked along the southern edge of the building, approximately 50 feet, in an area that contained grass and a cement sidewalk. R1 then walked north approximately 350 feet along the eastern exterior of the building. This side of the building also contained multiple elevated down-spouts, and multiple areas where fallen leaves collected along the edge of the building, creating potential trip hazards. The staff located R1 in an unfenced, unsecured courtyard. The resident was trying to re-enter the building through a locked door. The resident had to travel a total of approximately 800 feet around the building, in the dark, with multiple trip hazards along his way. Review of weather data for the facility area from Weather Underground (www.wundergound.com), on 11/01/23 at approximately 07:00 PM, revealed the Sun set at 06:29 PM, 16 minutes before the resident exited the building. The temperature was 45 degrees Fahrenheit, with a south wind of 10 miles per hour (mph). Observation of the area around the facility revealed a heavily traveled highway, approximately one-half mile to the north of the facility. On 11/06/23 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Staff A explained on the night of 11/01/23 the staff failed to search the outside vicinity of the alarming door, prior to silencing the alarm. Observation on 11/06/23 at 11:30 AM, revealed R1 ambulated with a slow shuffling gait (manner or style of walk) from the common area into the dining area with supervision from staff. The resident used no assistive devices to ambulate but appeared unsteady with his gait. On 11/06/23 at 01:10 PM, interview with CNA C verified her written witness statement regarding R1's elopement on 11/01/23. CNA C heard the exit door alarm sounding when she returned from her break at 06:45 PM. She walked to the door and silenced the alarm, but she failed to check outside of the exit door to determine who opened the door. She then failed to perform a head check of the residents in the facility to determine if anyone was missing. When CNA C found the resident later outside of the facility, he wore a long sleeve shirt without a jacket and was trying to reenter the facility through a locked door. On 11/06/23 at 01:22 PM, interview with CNA D verified her witness statement information regarding R1's elopement. The last time CNA D saw the resident was at approximately 06:30 PM to 06:40 PM on 11/01/23. CNA D reported she knew the resident had a history of exit seeking prior to the elopement. On 11/06/23 at 01:54 PM, interview with Administrative Nurse B revealed R1 did have previous exit seeking behavior and at one time used a WanderGuard (device worn which triggers an alarm to alert staff when the resident came within range of the transmitter, usually posted near an exit door ). The staff later reevaluated the resident and removed the WanderGuard on or around 07/09/2 3 and placed interventions of increased supervision and a locked building. Administrative Nurse B stated looking back on the removal of the WanderGuard, the resident should not have had the WanderGuard removed. Administrative Nurse B further explained the resident was not safe being on the stairs without assistance due to his slow, shuffling gait. On 11/07/23 at 11:20 AM , interview with LN L reported knowledge R1 had a history of wandering, with exit seeking behavior, prior to the elopement. The facility's Accidents - Elopement policy, dated 10/2022 documented all residents with a history of substance use disorder will be evaluated for elopement and wandering upon admission and quarterly and will be deemed no risk, low risk, moderate risk, or high risk. The facility failed to ensure staff responded appropriately to door alarms to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired, independently mobile R1, identified as a moderate risk for elopement. On 11/01/23 at 06:45 PM, R1 exited the facility, unsupervised, setting off the door alarm and the responding staff silenced the door alarm without checking outside the door to determine what triggered the alarm. R1 remained outside the facility for approximately 53 minutes in the dark, which placed the resident in immediate jeopardy. The facility immediately implemented corrective measures following the resident's return into the facility. The facility corrective measures included the following, which were verified by the surveyor on-site during the investigation: 1. The facility implemented education for all staff on the elopement policy on 11/01/23 following the resident's return into the facility and completed 42 of the 50 employees on 11/02/23 at 04:18 PM. The remaining eight employees were required to complete the training before return to duty. 2. The facility provided documentation that staff placed a WanderGuard on the resident's right ankle upon return into the facility on [DATE]. 3. The facility provided documentation of testing completed on 11/01/23 for the WanderGuard system and exit door alarm system. 4. The facility completed Wandering/Elopement Assessments on all residents in the facility, completed by 11/02/23. 5. The facility provided documentation of a Quality Assurance Process Improvement meeting that occurred on 11/02/23. All corrections were completed prior to the onsite survey therefore the deficient practice was cited past noncompliance at a scope and severity of J.
Feb 2023 11 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide nutritional support to prevent a significant weight loss of 10 lbs. or 6.36 percent in 21 days for Resident (R) 142. This failure placed the resident at ongoing risk for malnutrition and continued weight loss. Findings included: - R142's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the only diagnosis of Huntington's (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder) disease. R142 had an admission weight of 157.2 pounds (lbs.). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ADR) of 02/14/23, was not completed and remained in progress. The Care Area Assessment (CAA), associated with the 02/14/23 MDS, also remained in progress. R142's Baseline Care Plan, dated 02/06/23, documented to promote/maintain adequate gastrointestinal habits, monitor for signs and symptoms, and monitor meal intake per protocol. On 02/15/23, R142's Care Plan documented R142 was at risk for altered nutritional/hydration status related to Huntington's disease. The care plan directed staff to encourage consumption of fluids provided, provide adaptive equipment of weighted silverware, [NAME] (designed to be spill proof) cups with a straw, and a divided plate. It directed staff to provide and serve a regular diet, regular texture, and thin liquids as ordered, and monitor and record meal intake. Monitor/record/report to the Medical Doctor as needed for signs and symptoms of malnutrition: loss of three lbs. in one week or greater than five percent (%) in one month. The care plan further directed staff to honor R142's food preferences and update as needed; R142 loved cottage cheese, Dr. Pepper (soda drink), cheese, and sandwiches. Provide set-up and assistance with meals/snacks. The care plan further documented the Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate and make recommendations as needed and physical, occupational, and speech therapy to evaluate and treat as needed. R142's Comprehensive Care Plan had not been completed. The Physician Order dated 02/06/23, documented dietary supplements may be used when determined appropriate by Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) or RD, and physical, occupational, and speech therapy to evaluate and treat. The Physician Order dated 02/07/23, directed staff to provide a regular diet, regular texture, and thin consistency liquids. The Nutrition: RD admission Assessment dated 02/07/23, documented R142's nutrition information, from the EMR, documented R142 was 71 inches tall and weighed 157.2 lbs. The assessment recorded the nursing admission note reported R142 had a recent weight loss, and the RD was unsure of details; per progress notes R142's diet was regular, but there was no physician ordered diet ordered yet. R412's meal intake was good at 76-100%, no special items were utilized. R142 independently fed himself and was ambulatory. On 02/07/23 R142's EMR recorded he weighed 156.0 lbs. (a 7.2 lb. difference) The Nutrition Progress Note, dated 02/07/23, documented R142's oral intake demonstrated he had a good appetite. He was edentulous (without teeth), no dentures, and had no nutrition recommendations at that time. The Progress Note dated 02/09/23 at 10:44 AM, documented R142 received orders for therapy. The nurse spoke with R142's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) who verbalized the desire to put therapy on hold and said the DPOA would let facility know when the DPOA was ready for the therapy to resume. The Task section of R142's EMR documented he received limited assistance of one-person physical assist with eating on 02/12/23 and 02/13/23 only. The Nutrition: Dietary Manager Initial (Admission) Evaluation, dated 02/14/23, recorded the source of the nutrition information evaluated as R142. R142's desired weight range was 150-160 lbs., he had a regular diet and thin liquids, and no specialized items utilized. R142's beverage preferences were water, coffee, milk, juice, and Dr. Pepper. R142 stated his appetite was good, his usual eating pattern was all three meals. He liked to snack between meals. The note recorded r142's self-feeding ability as he required supervision, oversight, and cueing. Family brought in snacks and drinks. R142 was not a picky eater, and before coming to facility would occasionally skip a meal and would eat snacks. The evaluation further documented R142 had Huntington's disease; he may burn extra calories due to body movements; he used weighted silverware and on occasion nursing would assist with feeding. The Dietary admission Welcome and Interview Sheet, dated 02/14/23, documented R142 had a usual weight of 155 lbs. and a desired body weight of 150-160 lbs. R142 liked cottage cheese, cheese, Dr. Pepper, and sandwiches. He disliked broccoli. R142 was not picky, and he fed himself with weighted silverware. R142 had no difficulty with swallowing, chewing, or feeding himself with weighted silverware and some assistance from staff. On 02/20/23 the Weight Variance Note recorded R142 weighed 148.8 lbs. (5.34% loss in two weeks), and a nutritional supplement twice a day was initiated. The medical provider was notified of the weight loss. The goal for R142 was to encourage and or assist him at meals; R142 had snacks and drinks in his room and used weighted silverware. The Task section of R142's EMR documented he received limited assistance of one-person physical assist with eating on 02/12/23 and 02/13/23 only. The EMR dated 02/27/23 recorded R142's weighed 147.2 lbs., a continued loss of greater than 5%. On 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM observation revealed R142 sat in the dining room wearing a clothing protector. The meal served to R142 consisted of thin soup in a bowl, a biscuit, and mixed fruit. R142 used a weighted spoon and his fingers to eat chunks of vegetables and meat from soup. R142 had extensive continual involuntary movements in his arms, trunk, hands, neck, and head. After obtaining the biscuit and attempting to split it in half, R142 unintentionally flung the biscuit across the table, and it landed on the floor. R142 then placed the other half of the biscuit in the soup then did not eat it. During the process of eating, he continually tried to keep his clothing protector in place. R142 then placed the weighted spoon into the ice cream and withdrew over half the ice cream on the spoon and placed all of it into his mouth. Staff seated at the table offered no assistance to the resident with cueing, or meal intake, or placement/adjustment of his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 08:11 AM observation revealed R142 received a breakfast of French toast, hot cereal with brown sugar and bacon. R142 had continual involuntary movements. He poured syrup onto the hot cereal, picked up the whole slice of French toast and ate it with his fingers, and then picked up the bacon. He placed the bacon in his mouth and tore off large pieces to chew then, using the weighted spoon started, eating the hot cereal. While eating R142's clothing protector continually slipped to his lap, and he attempted numerous times to keep it over his chest area to protect his clothing. R142 was not successful and dropped cereal on his shirt. Staff seated at the table did not assist the resident with his clothing protector or help with eating. On 02/23/23 at 12:22 PM observation revealed R142 received a meal of whole boneless, barbecue chicken breast, peas in a bowl, and macaroni and cheese. R142 managed to cut the chicken breast in half despite the involuntary movements of his body. R142 took one half of the chicken breast into his mouth (resident has not teeth or dentures) and worked at chewing it to swallow. R142 then used his hands to cup the macaroni and cheese in his right hand to eat. R142 worked at eating all his macaroni and cheese and the other half of the chicken breast. Again, R142 was not able to keep clothing protector in place and dropped a great deal of food on his shirt. Staff present at the table did not assist R142 with eating or his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 01:12 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P stated R142 was new to the facility and ate almost anything put in front of him. CNA P reported R142 used of weighted silverware but was messy during meals. CNA P reported R142 had snacks and Dr. Pepper in his room, and since the resident was mostly independent, and he did not need assistance with snacks and drinks in the room. On 02/27/23 at 07:44 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB stated R142 received nutritional supplement two times a day. DS BB said Huntington's disease was new to her and was aware of constant flailing of arms and that she provided the resident with weighted silverware. DS BB verified she did the diet history and preference and R142's soup should have been in a cup. She also verified the resident was at risk for choking by placing half a chicken breast in his mouth and should have foods cut up. She reported dietary and nursing department could referred to therapy services. CDM also reported she had not observed resident's eating. On 02/27/23 08:45 AM Administrative Nurse D reported she had not observed meals for R142, she stated he was mostly independent. She verified staff should be mindful of the resident's struggle with clothing protector and assistance with cutting up food to prevent choking and involving therapy as an intervention due to R142 weight loss. Administrative Nurse D verified staff should assist the resident at meals to enhance dignity and prevent further weight loss. The facility's Nutrition(impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss Clinical Protocol, dated 04/2021 documented assessment and recognition monitor and document the weight and dietary intake of residents in a format which permits readily available comparisons over time. As part of the initial assessment the IDT through the various assessments will define the individuals with anorexia, recent weight loss and significant risk for impaired nutrition. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria of one-month five percent (%) weight loss is significant and greater than five % is severe. For individuals with recent or rapid weight loss the IDT should consider possible fluid and electrolyte imbalances as a cause. IDT should attempt to identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss, or increased the risk of weight loss. Closely monitor residents who have been identified as having impaired or risk factors for developing impaired nutrition. Identify pertinent interventions based on cause-specific interventions as indicated with careful consideration. The facility failed to provide nutritional support for R142 resulting in a significant weight loss of 10 lbs. or 6.36 percent in 21 days. This failure also placed R142 at ongoing risk for malnutrition and weight loss.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident 142, who was left unattended and unassisted while dropping food down on the front of his shirt. This placed R142 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - R142's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the only diagnosis of Huntington's (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder) disease. R142 had an admission weight of 157.2 pounds (lbs.). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ADR) of 02/14/23, was not completed and remained in progress. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) also remained in progress. R142's Baseline Care Plan, dated 02/06/23, documented to promote/maintain adequate gastrointestinal habits, monitor for signs and symptoms and monitor meal intake per protocol. On 02/15/23 R142's Care Plan addition documented R142 was at risk for altered nutritional/hydration status related to Huntington's disease. The care plan directed staff to encourage consumption of fluids provided, provide adaptive equipment of weighted silverware, [NAME] (designed to be spill proof) cups with a straw, and a divided plate. It directed staff to provide and serve a regular diet, regular texture, and thin liquids as ordered, and monitor and record meal intake. Monitor/record/report to the Medical Doctor as needed for signs and symptoms of malnutrition: loss of three lbs. in one week or greater than five percent (%) in one month. The care plan directed staff to honor R142's food preferences and update as needed; R142 loved cottage cheese, Dr. Pepper (soda drink), cheese, and sandwiches. Provide set-up and assistance with meals/snacks. The care plan further documented the Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate and make recommendations as needed and physical, occupational, and speech therapy to evaluate and treat as needed. R142's Comprehensive Care Plan had not been completed. On 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM observation revealed R142 sat in the dining room wearing a clothing protector. The meal served to R142 consisted of thin soup in a bowl, a biscuit, and mixed fruit. R142 used a weighted spoon and his fingers to eat chunks of vegetables and meat from soup. R142 had extensive continual involuntary movements in his arms, trunk, hands, neck, and head. After obtaining the biscuit and attempting to split it in half, R142 unintentionally flung the biscuit across the table, and it landed on the floor. R142 then placed the other half of the biscuit in the soup then did not eat it. During the process of eating, he continually tried to keep his clothing protector in place. R142 then placed the weighted spoon into the ice cream and withdrew over half the ice cream on the spoon and placed all of it into his mouth. Staff seated at the table offered no assistance to the resident with cueing, or meal intake, or placement/adjustment of his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 08:11 AM observation revealed R142 received a breakfast of French toast, hot cereal with brown sugar and bacon. R142 had continual involuntary movements. He poured syrup onto the hot cereal, picked up the whole slice of French toast and ate it with his fingers, and then picked up the bacon. He placed the bacon in his mouth and tore off large pieces to chew then, using the weighted spoon started, eating the hot cereal. While eating R142's clothing protector continually slipped to his lap, and he attempted numerous times to keep it over his chest area to protect his clothing. R142 was not successful and dropped cereal on his shirt. Staff seated at the table did not assist the resident with his clothing protector or help with eating. On 02/23/23 at 12:22 PM observation revealed R142 received a meal of whole boneless, barbecue chicken breast, peas in a bowl, and macaroni and cheese. R142 managed to cut the chicken breast in half despite the involuntary movements of his body. R142 took one half of the chicken breast into his mouth (resident has not teeth or dentures) and worked at chewing it to swallow. R142 then used his hands to cup the macaroni and cheese in his right hand to eat. R142 worked at eating all his macaroni and cheese and the other half of the chicken breast. Again, R142 was not able to keep clothing protector in place and dropped a great deal of food on his shirt. Staff present at the table did not assist R142 with eating or his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 01:12 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P stated R142 was new to the facility and ate almost anything put in front of him. CNA P reported R142 used of weighted silverware but was messy during meals. CNA P reported R142 had snacks and Dr. Pepper in his room, and since the resident was mostly independent, and he did not need assistance with snacks and drinks in the room. On 02/27/23 at 07:44 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB stated R142 received nutritional supplement two times a day. DS BB said Huntington's disease was new to her and was aware of constant flailing of arms and that she provided the resident with weighted silverware. DS BB verified she did the diet history and preference and R142's soup should have been in a cup. She also verified the resident was at risk for choking by placing half a chicken breast in his mouth and should have foods cut up. She reported dietary and nursing department could referred to therapy services. CDM also reported she had not observed resident's eating. On 02/27/23 08:45 AM Administrative Nurse D reported she had not observed meals for R142, she stated he was mostly independent. She verified staff should be mindful of the resident's struggle with clothing protector and assistance with cutting up food to prevent choking and involving therapy as an intervention due to R142 weight loss. Administrative Nurse D verified staff should assist the resident at meals to enhance dignity and prevent further weight loss. The facility's Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living policy dated 11/2017, documented the community environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintain and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Residents whom are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by not assisting R142 with eating and his clothing protector and as a result R142 dropped food down the front of his shirt. This placed R142 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial well-being.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Remeron (an antidepressant medication), Lasix (a diuretic medication), and Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication), which required a Black Box Warning for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 29. This placed the resident at risk for adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure that affects arteries in the lungs and in the heart), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), chronic kidney disease (disease of the kidney's leading to kidney failure), diabetes mellitus type 1 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), artherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fats cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls) and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R29 had severely impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R29 received an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression), diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine, anticoagulant (medication to prevent and treat clots in blood vessels and the heart), and an antibiotic ( a medication used to treat infections caused by bacteria and other microorganisms). R29's EMR lacked documentation of a Black Box Warning (BBW-indiates that the drug carries a significant risk of serious or even life threatening adverse effects) care plan for the use of the Remeron, Lasix, and Eliquis medications. The Physician Order, dated 01/26/23, directed staff to administer Remeron, 7.5 milligrams (mg), by mouth, daily for sleep disorder. The Physician Order, dated 01/26/23, directed staff to administer Eliquis, 5 mg, by mouth, twice daily, for artherosclerotic heart disease. The Physician Order, dated 01/27/23, directed staff to administer Lasix, 40 mg, by mouth, daily, for congestive heart failure. On 02/21/23 at 03:03 PM, observation revealed R29 independently ambulating with her walker down the hall. On 02/22/23 at 04:00 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified she had not developed a care plan for R29's medications that required a Black Box Warning. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated there should be a care plan completed for R29's medications. The facility Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated August 2022, documented an individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, cultural, and psychological needs was developed for each resident. The residents comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of the completion of the residents comprehensive assessment. The care plan team was responsible for periodic review and updating of care plans when there was a significant change in condition, or when the desired out come was not met, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay and at least quarterly. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for R29's Black Box Warning medications, placing her at risk for adverse side effects.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (rapid, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cerebral infarction (stoke), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), morbid (severe) obesity, and angina pectoris (chest pain). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R14 had intact cognition, no delirium or exhibited behaviors. R14 required extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living with the exception of eating which required limited assistance of one staff member. R14 had pain and pain treatment, shortness or trouble breathing with exertion and when lying flat. The MDS further documented R14 received oxygen and required non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The EMR Care Plan reviews were dated 03/17/22, 06/21/22, 09/20/22, and 12/20/22. Review of R14's Care Plan Invitation for 03/17/22 and 06/21/22 revealed the resident had been invited and signatures of the interdisciplinary team in attendance along with R14's signature. The 09/20/22 and 12/20/22 invitation did not include R14 had attended nor had R14's signature for attendance. On 02/21/23 during initial tour and resident interview, R14 reported she had not been invited or participated in the care planning process. On 02/23/23 at 04:29 PM Administrative Nurse E reported she was responsible for the care plan invitation, and she keeps the care plan conference invitation. The information sheet documented the letter was to inform that the resident or representative it was time for the care plan conference, and the interdisciplinary team would like to invite them to discuss the resident's care. Administrative Nurse E stated the goal at the facility was to work as a team with the residents and families to provide the best possible care. She said the form included a question as to whether the resident had been invited and signature lines for attendance. The facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 08/2022, documented an individualized comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident. The facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, develop and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of function the resident may be expected to attain. The facility failed to invite R14 to participate in two of the last four care plan conferences, which placed the resident at risk for decreased autonomy. The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with resident-centered interventions to prevent falls for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 7 and R18, and failed to notify and invite one sampled resident, R14 to her care plan meetings. This placed the affected residents at risk for uncommunicated and unmet care needs as well as decreased autonomy. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses dementia with behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unsteadiness on feet, cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had long and short-term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing and toileting. The MDS further documented R7 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment and had one non-injury fall. The Significant Change MDS, dated 11/17/22, documented R7 had long and short- term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS further documented R7 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls. The Fall Risk Assessments, dated 04/10/22, 07/10/22, 08/06/22, and 11/07/22 documented the resident was a high risk for falls. The Fall Care Plan, dated 01/10/23, originally dated 09/17/19, directed staff to ensure R7 wore appropriate footwear when ambulating, check and change upon rising in the morning, before and after meals, and prior to bedtime, and ensure R7 wore nonskid socks at night. The update, dated 05/01/21, directed staff to sit with the resident while in the dining room and redirect him as needed to stay seated. The update dated 08/20/22 directed staff to check alarm placement every two hours for correct positioning. The update, dated 01/26/23, directed staff to have resident in full view when not in bed and be aware of R7 when he wandered outside of the 200 hall and commons area to determine if the resident had any needs. The Fall Investigation, dated 02/15/22 at 05:42 PM, documented R7 stood from his wheelchair, appeared to be off balance, went to sit down and missed the seat of the wheelchair. The investigation further documented the fall was witnessed and the resident did not obtain any injuries. The Fall Investigation, dated 05/31/22 at 04:40 PM, documented R7 was observed on the floor in his room, lying on his back. The investigation further documented the fall was unwitnessed and the resident could not describe what he was doing at the time of the fall. The Fall Investigation, dated 08/06/22 at 06:35 PM, documented R7 slid out of his wheelchair on to the floor. The investigation further documented R7 tried to get up unassisted and was not wearing shoes or gripper socks. The investigation directed staff to make sure R7 wore shoes or gripper socks. The Fall Investigation, dated 08/20/22 at 03:00 PM, documented R7 was found on the floor in the activity room. The investigation further documented R7's chair alarm was not on, and education was given to staff to always keep the alarm on. The Fall Investigation, dated 01/20/23 at 07:30 PM, documented R7 was found in another resident's room on the floor. The investigation further documented staff were notified by another resident that R7 had fallen in his room. The investigation documented R7's alarm was not on and staff were educated to make sure the alarm was turned on after transfers and throughout the day. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M transferred the resident from his wheelchair to his bed without a gaitbelt. Further observation revealed R7 spoke to CNA M in Arabic, and she stated she did not know what he was saying. CNA M checked his incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red and stated she would apply barrier cream after peri care. Observation revealed, CNA M could not find barrier cream and put a clean incontinence brief on R7, took his shoes off, and covered him up. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, CNA M stated a lot of the time she did not know what the resident was saying as he spoke in Arabic and did not have any means to find out what he was saying. CNA M further stated staff made sure his bed was lowered, a bed alarm, and a fall mat was placed next to the bed to prevent further falls. On 02/27/23 at 07:49 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated R7 got restless when he required toileting and had received therapy in the past for his falls. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff checked his alarm every two hours to make sure it is on and verified there should be interventions in place after a resident fell. The facility Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated August 2022, documented an individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, cultural, and psychological needs was developed for each resident. The residents comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of the completion of the residents comprehensive assessment. The care plan team was responsible for periodic review and updating of care plans when there was a significant change in condition, or when the desired out come was not met, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay and at least quarterly. The facility failed to provide identify and implement resident centered interventions to the care plan to prevent falls for cognitively impaired R7, placing him at risk for further falls and injury. - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented the resident had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), cognitive communication deficit (may occur after a stroke, tumor, brain injury, or other neurological damage), traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a blow to the head), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18 was admitted to the facility 08/30/22 and had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, and extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, ambulation, toileting, and personal hygiene. The assessment further documented R18 had unsteady balance, no functioning impairment, and had one fall since admission. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/10/23, documented R18 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent upon two staff for transfers, toileting, and extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, and toileting. The assessment further documented R18 did not ambulate, had unsteady balance, no functional impairment and had one non-injury fall. The Fall Assessments, dated 08/31/22, 11/07/22, and 02/09/23, documented R18 was a high risk for falls. The Nursing Evaluation, dated 08/30/22, documented R18 used a walker when ambulating with staff assistance, had full range of motion, and did not require the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. Review of the EMR lacked documentation a fall care plan was completed until 12/18/22. The Nurse's Note, dated 09/03/22 at 02:09 PM, documented R18 was lowered to the floor with two staff assistance and a gait belt. The note further documented R18 did not receive any injuries. Review of the EMR lacked further documentation regarding the fall. On 02/23/23 at 08:58 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H and Certified Nurse Aide N attached the sling to the mechanical lift and lifted R18 up and lowered her onto the bed. On 02/23/23 at 09:00 AM, CNA N stated she was not aware of any falls prior to the most recent fall the resident had. CNA N laughed and stated the most recent fall happened as a CNA rolled the resident, and the resident kept rolling and fell out of bed. CNA N further stated R18 was not hurt and that she should not laugh about it, but it was funny. CNA N stated staff use a mechanical lift and two staff for her transfers. On 02/27/23 at 09:17 AM, LN G stated R18 was lowered to the ground by two staff, and the facility considered that a fall, but LN G was unable to find an incident report. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified she was unable to find any incident report related to staff lowering R18 to the floor and stated an incident report should have been completed as well as fall interventions for the resident The facility Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated August 2022, documented an individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, cultural, and psychological needs was developed for each resident. The residents comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days of the completion of the residents comprehensive assessment. The care plan team was responsible for periodic review and updating of care plans when there was a significant change in condition, or when the desired out come was not met, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay and at least quarterly. The facility failed to identify and implement resident centered interventions for falls for R18, after staff lowered her to the ground, placing her at risk for further falls and injury.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for communication. Based on obser...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for communication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement alternative communication methods for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 17, who had a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with any aspect of communication that was affected by disruption of cognition) and spoke in Arabic. This placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, frustration, and loneliness. Findings Included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses dementia with behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unsteadiness on feet, cerebrovascular disease, conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), muscle weakness, dysphasia (swallowing difficulty, colon cancer (a cancer of the colon or rectum, located at the digestive tract's lower end). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had long and short- term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS documented R7 sometimes made self-understood, had unclear speech. The MDS further documented R7 was on hospice services. The Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/17/22, documented R7 was at risk for communication deficits related to his unclear speech. The CAA further documented staff anticipate and meet his needs as needed and he was able to communicate with body language and gestures most of the time. The Care Plan, dated 01/10/23, documented R7 was at risk for impaired communication related to being bilingual and inability to complete thoughts, observe his for nonverbal signs of distress to anticipate his needs, encourage R7 to speak in English, and documented a translation line was available should he need to speak in a foreign language. The EMR documented R7 was admitted to Hospice on 11/12/22 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (dementia) and colon cancer. On 02/22/23 at 08:15 AM, observation revealed R7 in the small dining room, seated at the table with two other residents. Further observation revealed R7 speaking in his native language. Further observation revealed staff at the table did not acknowledge him or try to talk to him. Continued observation revealed R7 continued to talk in his native language throughout the meal without staff talking to him. On 02/22/23 at 08:51 AM, observation revealed, after breakfast, R7 sat in the living room area in his wheelchair, which did not have a pressure relieving cushion. R7 was very vocal, saying uh, uh, uh, and spoke in a different language than English. Further observation revealed R7 continued to say uh, uh, uh, and rested his chin in his hands and closed his eyes. R7 stated magahela, magahela, magahela, comarsh, comarsh. At 09:14 AM, R7 stated, look at me, look at me! R7 continued speaking saying ukahara, comarsh, comarsh, ummm, ummm, ya, ya. At 09:23 AM, R7 continued to holler out and would periodically close his eyes and at one point, his head dropped down causing him to wake up and then he began again saying comarsh, comarsh, sokahara, sokahara. At 09:39 AM, as R7 stated comarsh, comarsh Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R went to the resident and said what does that mean? I don't know what that means, and walked away. At 09:43 AM, R7 continued to repeat the same words over and over without staff offering assistance to see if they could provide care and reposition the resident as he had been in the wheelchair since before breakfast at 08:00 AM. At 10:06 AM, ongoing observation revealed R7 fell asleep in his wheelchair until 10:15 AM, when this surveyor asked CNA M to attend to the resident. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed CNA M transferred the resident from his wheelchair to his bed without a gaitbelt. Further observation revealed R7 spoke to CNA M in Arabic, and she stated she did not know what he was saying and did not know of any type of communication book or anything to help to understand what he was saying. CNA M checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red and stated she would apply barrier cream after peri care. Observation revealed CNA M could not find barrier cream, so she put a clean incontinence brief on R7, took his shoes off, and covered him up. Observation revealed there was not any documentation or phone number for a translation line as stated in the resident's care plan. On 02/22/23 at 12:12 PM, observation revealed R7 spoke his native language to CNA N, who was seated beside of him and she did not respond or try to speak to him. On 02/23/23 at 07:46 AM, observation revealed R7 in the small dining room, seated at the table with two other residents. Further observation revealed R7 stated, kolzar, kolzar, soblah, then laughed. Continued observation revealed CNA N did not talk with the resident during the meal. On 02/23/23 at 07:49 AM, another staff member, CNA O stated she was unsure what the resident was saying because he was speaking Arabic. CNA O stated she had tried, in the past, to use an online translator but was unable to put in the right words. CNA O stated, If only he could say it in English. On 02/23/23 at 08:41 AM, observation revealed staff pushed R7 into the living room area and left him facing the wall with his back towards other residents. Further observation revealed R7 would sigh and rest his head in his left hand. Continued observation revealed R7 sat in his wheelchair, without a pressure relieving cushion or repositioning until 10:15 AM, when the surveyor asked staff to attend to the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed R7 held his hand out towards CNA N and she did not take his hand or acknowledge him. Further observation revealed CNA N placed a gaitbelt around R7's waist and she and CNA P transferred the resident into bed. CNA N stated she was going to break and said CNA P could finish with cares for R7. Observation revealed CNA P checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red, as R7 had had a bowel movement. CNA P stated he would put barrier cream on the resident. CNA P looked for the barrier cream and found a tube on the top shelf of the resident's closet in a basin (small plastic tub) and applied the cream after peri care. CNA P took off the resident's shoes and covered up the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, CNA P stated that he worked at the facility three days a week and sometimes could understand the resident because he knew some classic Arabic and it did not always cross over to the Arabic R7 spoke. On 02/27/23 at 07:52 AM, observation revealed R7 in the small dining room at the table with two other residents. Further observation revealed R7 started to eat his pureed food with his fingers and CNA sat down beside of him to mix up his food for him and handed him a spoon. R7 started talking in his native language, asalumya, asalumya, agumeal, agumeal, ooh, ah, ooh, ah, and the CNA did not speak to him nor did she ask him to speak in English. Continued observation revealed CNA N did not interact or try to converse with R7 throughout the entire breakfast. On 02/27/23 at 07:49 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) N stated, that R7 spoke Hebrew or something, she was not quite sure but at times was able to speak in English. LN G further stated sometimes R7 spoke so fast, you were not able to understand and would ask him to please speak in English. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated he does speak in his language and was difficult for staff to understand and know his language. Administrative Nurse D further stated, she was unsure if therapy had ever tried any type of picture book or assistive devices to help the resident and staff with the language barrier. The facility Culturally Competent Care policy, dated October 2022, documented, if language assistance services was required, the interpreter or translator would be contacted. The resident's cultural beliefs, experiences, expectations, needs and values would be reviewed, documented, and added to the care plan so that they could be honored. If the resident was non-English speaking, staff identified how communication would occur with the resident, if indicated language assistance services would be arrange for the resident. The facility failed to effectively communicate with R7, placing the resident at risk for unmet needs, frustration and loneliness.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide Resident (R) 5 assistance with toileting as requested and care planned and failed to provide R142 with meal assistance. This placed R5 and R142 at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnosis of type two diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, mood disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality (OCD - anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and persistent thoughts, ideas and feelings of obsessions severe to cause marked distress, consume considerable time or significantly interfere with the resident's occupational, social or interpersonal functioning) disorder, intellectual disabilities (characterized both by a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and by limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life, such as communication, self-care, getting along in social situations and school activities), bipolar (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) disorder, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), secondary Parkinsonism (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), and unsteady on feet. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, rejections of cares and wandering behaviors which occurred daily. R5 required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL), was not steady with surface transition and balance and was only able to stabilize with staff assistance. The MDS further documented R5 had no toileting program, was always incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. R5 experienced shortness of breath with exertion and had two or more falls with no injury. R5 received an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) and other mental emotional conditions), antianxiety (class of medication used to treat anxiety) , antidepressant (class of medication to treat depression), received daily. R5 had occupational and physical therapy services. The Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/02/22, documented R5 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, needed extensive assistance with toileting and hygiene, utilized adult pull ups during the day and adult briefs at night. The CAA further documented R5 was able to make staff aware when he has been incontinent. On 06/13/22 R5's Care Plan was updated following a fall, with an incontinence episode. On 06/09/22 the documented intervention was to educate staff to the importance of (incontinence) check and changes at night and early morning. On 07/21/22 the Accident Investigations root cause analysis documented R5 had decreased mobility and an intervention that staff were educated to offer toileting to R5. On 07/25/22 R5's Care Plan directed staff to offer to assist R5 to the toilet, upon R5 rising from bed, before and after meals, and before bed to decrease R5's risk of falling. The Progress Note, dated 08/06/22 at 08:30 PM, documented R5 had been on skilled services for medication management. R5 ambulated with a walker with supervision and cueing, was assisted by one staff with toileting as needed, was incontinent of bladder at times, wore pullups and fed self. The note further documented R5 was difficult to redirect and R5 attempted to open other resident's doors for staff. On 02/22/23 at 12:47 PM observation revealed R5 was assisted out of the dining room. At 02:15 PM R5 left the Bingo activity. Ongoing observation from the time R5 left the dining room to the Bingo activity revealed R5 was not offered toileting or check and changes. On 02/23/23 at 07:55 AM observation revealed R5 was pushed in a wheelchair by staff into the dining room. At 09:03 AM R5 was in the hallway trying to open a conference room door, staff within the room informed R5 could not enter due to a meeting. At 09:56 AM continued observation revealed R5 slept in his wheelchair in the commons area, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P asked R5 if he wanted to rest in his recliner in his room. R5 was agreeable. CNA P assisted R5 into his recliner. During the ongoing observation from 07:55 AM to 09:56 AM, R5 had not been offered toileting or check and change by staff. On 02/27/23 at 07:28 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S reported R5 used his wheelchair mostly for mobility, and had a room move closer to where staff was. CMA S said staff were to make sure R5 had a call light, and R5 used a night light and keep door partially open for observation to prevent falls. On 02/27/23 at 08:43 AM Administrative Nurse G verified and expected staff to toilet R5 as care planned, to prevent falls and maintain skin integrity. The facility's Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living policy dated 11/2017, documented the community environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintain and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Residents whom are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The facility failed to follow R5's specific care plan assistance with toileting which placed R5 at risk for unmet care needs. - R142's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the only diagnosis of Huntington's (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder) disease. R142 had an admission weight of 157.2 pounds (lbs.). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ADR) of 02/14/23, was not completed and remained in progress. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) also remained in progress. R142's Baseline Care Plan, dated 02/06/23, documented to promote/maintain adequate gastrointestinal habits, monitor for signs and symptoms and monitor meal intake per protocol. On 02/15/23 R142's Care Plan addition documented R142 was at risk for altered nutritional/hydration status related to Huntington's disease. The care plan directed staff to encourage consumption of fluids provided, provide adaptive equipment of weighted silverware, [NAME] (designed to be spill proof) cups with a straw, and a divided plate. It directed staff to provide and serve a regular diet, regular texture, and thin liquids as ordered, and monitor and record meal intake. Monitor/record/report to the Medical Doctor as needed for signs and symptoms of malnutrition: loss of three lbs. in one week or greater than five percent (%) in one month. The care plan directed staff to honor R142's food preferences and update as needed; R142 loved cottage cheese, Dr. Pepper (soda drink), cheese, and sandwiches. Provide set-up and assistance with meals/snacks. The care plan further documented the Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate and make recommendations as needed and physical, occupational, and speech therapy to evaluate and treat as needed. R142's Comprehensive Care Plan had not been completed. The Physician Order dated 02/06/23, documented dietary supplements may be used when determined appropriate by Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) or RD, and physical, occupational, and speech therapy to evaluate and treat. The Physician Order dated 02/07/23, directed staff to provide a regular diet, regular texture and thin consistency liquids. The Nutrition: RD admission Assessment dated 02/07/23, documented R142's nutrition information, from the EMR, documented R142 was 71 inches tall and weighed 157.2 lbs. The assessment recorded the nursing admission note reported R142 had a recent weight loss and the RD was unsure of details; per progress notes R142's diet was regular, but there was no physician ordered diet ordered yet. R412's meal intake was good at 76-100%, no special items were utilized. R142 independently fed himself and was ambulatory. The Task section of R142's EMR documented he received limited assistance of one-person physical assist with eating on 02/12/23 and 02/13/23 only. The Nutrition: Dietary Manager Initial (Admission) Evaluation, dated 02/14/23, recorded the source of the nutrition information evaluated as R142. R142's desired weight range was 150-160 lbs., he had a regular diet and thin liquids, and no specialized items utilized. R142's beverage preferences were water, coffee, milk, juice and Dr. Pepper. R142 stated his appetite was good, his usual eating pattern was all three meals. He liked to snack between meals. The note recorded R142's self-feeding ability as he required supervision, oversight and cueing. Family brought in snacks and drinks. R142 was not a picky eater, and before coming to facility would occasionally skip a meal and would eat snacks. The evaluation further documented R142 had Huntington's disease; he may burn extra calories due to body movements, he used weighted silverware and on occasion nursing would assist with feeding. The Dietary admission Welcome and Interview Sheet, dated 02/14/23, documented R142 had a usual weight of 155 lbs. and a desired body weight of 150-160 lbs. R142 liked cottage cheese, cheese, Dr. Pepper, and sandwiches. He disliked broccoli. R142 was not picky, and he fed himself with weighted silverware. R142 had no difficulty with swallowing, chewing, or feeding himself with weighted silverware and some assistance from staff. On 02/20/23 the Weight Variance Note recorded R142 weighed 148.8 lbs. (5.34% loss in two weeks), and a nutritional supplement twice a day was initiated. The medical provider was notified of the weight loss. The goal for R142 was to encourage and or assist him at meals; R142 had snacks and drinks in his room and used weighted silverware. The EMR dated 02/27/23 recorded R142's weighed 147.2 lbs., a continued loss of greater than 5% On 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM observation revealed R142 sat in the dining room wearing a clothing protector. The meal served to R142 consisted of thin soup in a bowl, a biscuit, and mixed fruit. R142 used a weighted spoon and his fingers to eat chunks of vegetables and meat from soup. R142 had extensive continual involuntary movements in his arms, trunk, hands, neck, and head. After obtaining the biscuit and attempting to split it in half, R142 unintentionally flung the biscuit across the table, and it landed on the floor. R142 then placed the other half of the biscuit in the soup then did not eat it. During the process of eating, he continually tried to keep his clothing protector in place. R142 then placed the weighted spoon into the ice cream and withdrew over half the ice cream on the spoon and placed all of it into his mouth. Staff seated at the table offered no assistance to the resident with cueing, or meal intake, or placement/adjustment of his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 08:11 AM observation revealed R142 received a breakfast of French toast, hot cereal with brown sugar and bacon. R142 had continual involuntary movements. He poured syrup onto the hot cereal, picked up the whole slice of French toast and ate it with his fingers, and then picked up the bacon. He placed the bacon in his mouth and tore off large pieces to chew then, using the weighted spoon started, eating the hot cereal. While eating R142's clothing protector continually slipped to his lap, and he attempted numerous times to keep it over his chest area to protect his clothing. R142 was not successful and dropped cereal on his shirt. Staff seated at the table did not assist the resident with his clothing protector or help with eating. On 02/23/23 at 12:22 PM observation revealed R142 received a meal of whole boneless, barbecue chicken breast, peas in a bowl, and macaroni and cheese. R142 managed to cut the chicken breast in half despite the involuntary movements of his body. R142 took one half of the chicken breast into his mouth (resident has not teeth or dentures) and worked at chewing it to swallow. R142 then used his hands to cup the macaroni and cheese in his right hand to eat. R142 worked at eating all his macaroni and cheese and the other half of the chicken breast. Again, R142 was not able to keep clothing protector in place and dropped a great deal of food on his shirt. Staff present at the table did not assist R142 with eating or his clothing protector. On 02/23/23 at 01:12 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P stated R142 was new to the facility and ate almost anything put in front of him. CNA P reported R142 used of weighted silverware but was messy during meals. CNA P reported R142 had snacks and Dr. Pepper in his room, and since the resident was mostly independent, and he did not need assistance with snacks and drinks in the room. On 02/27/23 at 07:44 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB stated R142 received nutritional supplement two times a day. DS BB said Huntington's disease was new to her and was aware of constant flailing of arms and that she provided the resident with weighted silverware. DS BB verified she did the diet history and preference and R142's soup should have been in a cup. She also verified the resident was at risk for choking by placing half a chicken breast in his mouth and should have foods cut up. She reported dietary and nursing department could referred to therapy services. CDM also reported she had not observed resident's eating. On 02/27/23 08:45 AM Administrative Nurse D reported she had not observed meals for R142, she stated he was mostly independent. She verified staff should be mindful of the resident's struggle with clothing protector and assistance with cutting up food to prevent choking and involving therapy as an intervention due to R142 weight loss. Administrative Nurse D verified staff should assist the resident at meals to enhance dignity and no further weight loss. The facility's Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living policy dated 11/2017, documented the community environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintain and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Residents whom are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The facility failed to provide R142 assistance during meals which placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for Hospice (end of life) cares. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for Hospice (end of life) cares. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate end-of-life Hospice treatment and care for one resident, Resident (R)7, who was restless, hollering, and had the potential for skin breakdown. This placed the resident at risk for unmet needs and skin breakdown. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses dementia with behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unsteadiness on feet, cerebrovascular disease, conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), muscle weakness, dysphasia (swallowing difficulty, colon cancer (a cancer of the colon or rectum, located at the digestive tract's lower end). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had long and short- term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS documented R7 sometimes made self-understood, had unclear speech, and risk for skin breakdown. The MDS further documented R7 was on hospice services. The Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/17/22, documented R7 was at risk for communication deficits related to his unclear speech. The CAA further documented staff anticipate and meet his needs as needed and he was able to communicate with body language and gestures most of the time. The Care Plan, dated 01/10/23, documented R7 received hospice services and directed staff to work with the hospice team to ensure his spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs were met, and work with nursing staff to provide maximum comfort for the resident. The care plan further directed staff to observe R7 for non-verbal signs of distress, and staff should anticipate R7's needs, The EMR documented R7 was admitted to Hospice on 11/12/22 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (dementia) and colon cancer. On 02/22/23 at 08:51 AM, observation revealed, after breakfast, R7 sat in the living room area in his wheelchair, which did not have a pressure relieving cushion. R7 was very vocal, saying uh, uh, uh, and spoke in a different language than English. Further observation revealed R7 continued to say uh, uh, uh, and rested his chin in his hands and closed his eyes. R7 stated magahela, magahela, magahela, comarsh, comarsh. At 09:14 AM, R7 stated, look at me, look at me! R7 continued speaking saying ukahara, comarsh, comarsh, ummm, ummm, ya, ya. At 09:23 AM, R7 continued to holler out and would periodically close his eyes and at one point, his head dropped down causing him to wake up andthen he began again saying comarsh, comarsh, sokahara, sokahara. At 09:39 AM, as R7 stated comarsh, comarsh Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R went to the resident and said what does that mean? I don't know what that means, and walked away. At 09:43 AM, R7 continued to repeat the same words over and over without staff offering assistance to see if they could provide care and reposition the resident as he had been in the wheelchair since before breakfast at 08:00 AM. At 10:06 AM, ongoing observation revealed R7 fell asleep in his wheelchair until 10:15 AM, when this surveyor asked Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M to attend to the resident. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed CNA M transferred the resident from his wheelchair to his bed without a gaitbelt. Further observation revealed R7 spoke to CNA M in Arabic, and she stated she did not know what he was saying. CNA M checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red and stated she would apply barrier cream after peri care. Observation revealed CNA M could not find barrier cream, so she put a clean incontinence brief on R7, took his shoes off, and covered him up. On 02/23/23 at 08:41AM, observation revealed staff pushed R7 into the living room area and left him facing the wall with his back towards other residents. Further observation revealed R7 would sigh and rest his head in his left hand. Continued observation revealed R7 sat in his wheelchair, without a pressure relieving cushion or repositioning until 10:15 AM, when the surveyor asked staff to attend to the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed R7 held his hand out towards CNA N and she did not take his hand or acknowledge him. Further observation revealed CNA N placed a gaitbelt around R7's waist and she and CNA P transferred the resident into bed. CNA N stated she was going to break and said CNA P could finish with cares for R7. Observation revealed CNA P checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red, as R7 had had a bowel movement. CNA P stated he would put barrier cream on the resident. CNA P looked for the barrier cream and found a tube on the top shelf of the resident's closet in a basin (small plastic tub) and applied the cream after peri care. CNA P took off the resident's shoes and covered up the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, CNA P stated R7 sometimes propelled himself around the facility after breakfast and did not want to lay down. CNA P said R7 should be repositioned every two hours and he did not know why R7 did not have a pressure reducing cushion in his wheelchair. On 02/27/23 at 07:49 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated, when R7 got restless, it would usually mean he needed toileted and should have been repositioned, either by lying down in bed or placed in the recliner. On 02/2723 at 10/26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated R7 should be repositioned and checked to make sure he had not been incontinent. Administrative Nurse D stated staff should be more aware of R7's needs and not to sit in the wheelchair without a cushion for so long and said would contact Hospice for one to be sent for him. The facility Hospice Program policy, dated June 2021, documented the community retained the ultimate responsibility for the care plan and coordinates the plan of care with the hospice provider, community staff, the resident and family. The policy further documented the care plan should discuss the need for oral care, skin integrity, medical diagnostics treatment, symptom management, nutrition and hydration, activities, psychosocial needs, and interventions to manage pain and other symptoms of discomfort. The facility failed to provide adequate end of life care for R7 who was restless and sat in his wheelchair for an extended period of time without staff attention to his needs or intervention. This placed the resident at risk for unmet needs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to reposition one sampled resident in a manner consistent with the standards of care and failed to provide a pressure reducing cushion for Resident (R) 7, who was at risk for impaired skin integrity. This placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses dementia with behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unsteadiness on feet, cerebrovascular disease, conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), muscle weakness, dysphasia (swallowing difficulty, colon cancer (a cancer of the colon or rectum, located at the digestive tract's lower end). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had long and short- term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS documented R7 was at risk for pressure ulcers, had a pressure ulcer device in his bed and chair, and had ointment other that to his feet. The Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/17/22, documented R7 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired activities of daily living function and incontinence. The CAA further documented R7 had a pressure reducing mattress and pressure reducing wheelchair cushion to help with skin integrity and required extensive assist with bed mobility and repositioning, was incontinent of bowel/bladder. The CAA documented staff would monitor for skin breakdown during showers and report changes to charge nurse, the charge nurse would complete weekly skin and Braden assessments quarterly and as needed. The Care Plan, dated 01/10/23, R7 had a potential for altered skin integrity related to impaired immobility and incontinence and directed staff to apply barrier cream as needed to assist with skin integrity, complete weekly head to toe skin assessments, educate care givers to the causes of skin breakdown, including transfer and positioning requirement, to follow facility policies and procedures for the prevention and treatment of skin breakdown, pressure reducing mattress on his bed, extensive assistance of 1-2 staff for repositioning in bed to avoid shearing during positioning, transferring and turning, check and change the resident upon rising in the morning, before and after meals, and prior to bedtime. The Braden Scale Assessment, (assessment for predicting pressure ulcer risk) dated 01/10/23, documented a score of 15, which indicated low risk. The EMR documented R7 was admitted to Hospice on 11/12/22 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (dementia) and colon cancer. On 02/22/23 at 07:45 AM, observation revealed R7, in his wheelchair in the living room area waiting for breakfast. Further observation revealed R7's wheelchair did not have a pressure relieving cushion. On 02/22/23 at 08:51 AM, observation revealed, after breakfast, R7 sat in the living room area in his wheelchair, which did not have a pressure relieving cushion. R7 was very vocal, saying uh, uh, uh, and spoke in a different language than English. Further observation revealed R7 continued to say uh, uh, uh, and rested his chin in his hands and closed his eyes. R7 stated magahela, magahela, magahela, comarsh, comarsh. At 09:14 AM, R7 stated, look at me, look at me! R7 continued speaking saying ukahara, comarsh, comarsh, ummm, ummm, ya, ya. At 09:23 AM, R7 continued to holler out and would periodically close his eyes and at one point, his head dropped down causing him to wake up andthen he began again saying comarsh, comarsh, sokahara, sokahara. At 09:39 AM, as R7 stated comarsh, comarsh Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R went to the resident and said what does that mean? I don't know what that means, and walked away. At 09:43 AM, R7 continued to repeat the same words over and over without staff offering assistance to see if they could provide care and reposition the resident as he had been in the wheelchair since before breakfast at 08:00 AM. At 10:06 AM, ongoing observation revealed R7 fell asleep in his wheelchair until 10:15 AM, when this surveyor asked Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M to attend to the resident. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed CNA M transferred the resident from his wheelchair to his bed without a gaitbelt. Further observation revealed R7 spoke to CNA M in Arabic, and she stated she did not know what he was saying. CNA M checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red and stated she would apply barrier cream after peri care. Observation revealed CNA M could not find barrier cream, so she put a clean incontinence brief on R7, took his shoes off, and covered him up. On 02/23/23 at 07:46 AM, observation revealed R7, in his wheelchair in the living room area waiting for breakfast. Further observation revealed R7's wheelchair did not have a pressure relieving cushion. On 02/23/23 at 08:41 AM, observation revealed staff pushed R7 into the living room area and left him facing the wall with his back towards other residents. Further observation revealed R7 would sigh and rest his head in his left hand. Continued observation revealed R7 sat in his wheelchair, without a pressure relieving cushion or repositioning until 10:15 AM, when the surveyor asked staff to attend to the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed R7 held his hand out towards CNA N and she did not take his hand or acknowledge him. Further observation revealed CNA N placed a gaitbelt around R7's waist and she and CNA P transferred the resident into bed. CNA N stated she was going to break and said CNA P could finish with cares for R7. Observation revealed CNA P checked R7's incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red, as R7 had had a bowel movement. CNA P stated he would put barrier cream on the resident. CNA P looked for the barrier cream and found a tube on the top shelf of the resident's closet in a basin (small plastic tub) and applied the cream after peri care. CNA P took off the resident's shoes and covered up the resident. On 02/23/23 at 10:15 AM, CNA P stated R7 sometimes propelled himself around the facility after breakfast and did not want to lay down. CNA P said R7 should be repositioned every two hours and he did not know why R7 did not have a pressure reducing cushion in his wheelchair. On 02/27/23 at 07:49 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated, when R7 got restless, it would usually mean he needed toileted and should have been repositioned, either by lying down in bed or placed in the recliner. On 02/2723 at 10/26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated R7 should be repositioned and checked to make sure he had not been incontinent. Administrative Nurse D stated staff should be more aware of R7's needs and not to sit in the wheelchair without a cushion for so long and said would contact Hospice for one to be sent for him. The facility Skin Integrity, Pressure Injuries Nursing Protocol policy, dated May 2021, documented the resident would receive care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries and would not develop pressure injuries unless the individuals clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. The facility would implement and modify interventions to attempt to stabilize, reduce or remove underlying risk factors and use the Braden scale. The policy documented, based on the assessment and the residents clinical condition, choices and identification needs, basic or routine care could include but not limited to provide appropriate pressure redistribution support surfaces, redistribute pressure, minimize exposure to moisture and keep skin clean. The facility failed to reposition R7, who had the potential for skin breakdown, for over two hours. The facility further failed to ensure a pressure reducing cushion was used for R7 This place the resident at risk for skin breakdown.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and intervi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 40 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for Resident (R)5 for toileting, and failed to identify and implement resident-centered interventions to prevent falls for R7 and R18 This palced the resident at risk for further falls and/or avoidable injuries. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnosis of type two diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, mood disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality (OCD - anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and persistent thoughts, ideas and feelings of obsessions severe to cause marked distress, consume considerable time or significantly interfere with the resident's occupational, social or interpersonal functioning) disorder, intellectual disabilities (characterized both by a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and by limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life, such as communication, self-care, getting along in social situations and school activities), bipolar (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) disorder, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), secondary Parkinsonism (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), and unsteady on feet. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, rejections of cares and wandering behaviors which occurred daily. R5 required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL), was not steady with surface transition and balance and was only able to stabilize with staff assistance. The MDS further documented R5 had no toileting program, was always incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. R5 experienced shortness of breath with exertion and had two or more falls with no injury. R5 received an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) and other mental emotional conditions), antianxiety (class of medication used to treat anxiety) , antidepressant (class of medication to treat depression), received daily. R5 had occupational and physical therapy services. The Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/02/22, documented R5 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, needed extensive assistance with toileting and hygiene, utilized adult pull ups during the day and adult briefs at night. The CAA further documented R5 was able to make staff aware when he has been incontinent. The Fall Care Plan dated 05/13/22 documented R5 was at risk for falls related to an unsteady and shuffling gait. On 06/13/22 R5's Care Plan was updated following a fall, with an incontinence episode. On 06/09/22 the documented intervention was to educate staff to the importance of (incontinence) check and changes at night and early morning. On 07/21/22 the Accident Investigations root cause analysis documented R5 had decreased mobility and an intervention that staff were educated to offer toileting to R5. On 07/25/22 R5's Care Plan directed staff to offer to assist R5 to the toilet, upon R5 rising from bed, before and after meals, and before bed to decrease R5's risk of falling. The Progress Note, dated 08/06/22 at 08:30 PM, documented R5 had been on skilled services for medication management. R5 ambulated with a walker with supervision and cueing, was assisted by one staff with toileting as needed, was incontinent of bladder at times, wore pullups and fed self. The note further documented R5 was difficult to redirect and R5 attempted to open other resident's doors for staff. On 02/22/23 at 12:47 PM observation revealed R5 was assisted out of the dining room. At 02:15 PM R5 left the BINGO activity. Ongoing observation from the time R5 left the dining room to the Bingo activity revealed R5 was not offered toileting or check and changes. On 02/23/23 at 07:55 AM observation revealed R5 was pushed in a wheelchair by staff into the dining room. At 09:03 AM R5 was in the hallway trying to open a conference room door, staff within the room informed R5 could not enter due to a meeting. At 09:56 AM continued observation revealed R5 slept in his wheelchair in the commons area, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P asked R5 if he wanted to rest in his recliner in his room. R5 was agreeable. CNA P assisted R5 into his recliner. During the ongoing observation from 07:55 AM to 09:56 AM, R5 had not been offered toileting or check and change by staff. On 02/27/23 at 07:28 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S reported R5 used his wheelchair mostly for mobility, and had a room move closer to where staff was. CMA S said staff were to make sure R5 had a call light, and R5 used a night light and keep door partially open for observation to prevent falls. On 02/27/23 at 08:43 AM Administrative Nurse G verified and expected staff to toilet R5 as care planned, to prevent falls and maintain skin integrity. The facility's Managing Falls and Fall Risk policy, dated 10/2022, documented based on previous evaluation and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will attempt to identify appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls. If a systematic evaluation of a resident's fall risk identifies several possible interventions, the staff may choose to prioritize interventions. The IDT will identify and implement relevant interventions to try to minimize serious consequences of falling. The facility failed to follow R5's specific interventions in place to prevent falls which placed the resident at risk for continued falls and possible injuries. - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses dementia with behavior disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unsteadiness on feet, cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R7 had long and short-term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing and toileting. The MDS further documented R7 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment and had one non-injury fall. The Significant Change MDS, dated 11/17/22, documented R7 had long and short- term memory impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS further documented R7 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls. The Fall Risk Assessments, dated 04/10/22, 07/10/22, 08/06/22, and 11/07/22 documented the resident was a high risk for falls. The Fall Care Plan, dated 01/10/23, originally dated 09/17/19, directed staff to ensure R7 wore appropriate footwear when ambulating, check and change upon rising in the morning, before and after meals, and prior to bedtime, and ensure R7 wore nonskid socks at night. The update, dated 05/01/21, directed staff to sit with the resident while in the dining room and redirect him as needed to stay seated. The update dated 08/20/22 directed staff to check alarm placement every two hours for correct positioning. The update, dated 01/26/23, directed staff to have resident in full view when not in bed and be aware of R7 when he wandered outside of the 200 hall and commons area to determine if the resident had any needs. The Fall Investigation, dated 02/15/22 at 05:42 PM, documented R7 stood from his wheelchair, appeared to be off balance, went to sit down and missed the seat of the wheelchair. The investigation further documented the fall was witnessed and the resident did not obtain any injuries. The Fall Investigation, dated 05/31/22 at 04:40 PM, documented R7 was observed on the floor in his room, lying on his back. The investigation further documented the fall was unwitnessed and the resident could not describe what he was doing at the time of the fall. The Fall Investigation, dated 08/06/22 at 06:35 PM, documented R7 slid out of his wheelchair on to the floor. The investigation further documented R7 tried to get up unassisted and was not wearing shoes or gripper socks. The investigation directed staff to make sure R7 wore shoes or gripper socks. The Fall Investigation, dated 08/20/22 at 03:00 PM, documented R7 was found on the floor in the activity room. The investigation further documented R7's chair alarm was not on, and education was given to staff to always keep the alarm on. The Fall Investigation, dated 01/20/23 at 07:30 PM, documented R7 was found in another resident's room on the floor. The investigation further documented staff were notified by another resident that R7 had fallen in his room. The investigation documented R7's alarm was not on and staff were educated to make sure the alarm was turned on after transfers and throughout the day. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M transferred the resident from his wheelchair to his bed without a gaitbelt. Further observation revealed R7 spoke to CNA M in Arabic, and she stated she did not know what he was saying. CNA M checked his incontinence brief and verified his buttocks were red and stated she would apply barrier cream after peri care. Observation revealed, CNA M could not find barrier cream and put a clean incontinence brief on R7, took his shoes off, and covered him up. On 02/22/23 at 10:15 AM, CNA M stated a lot of the time she did not know what the resident was saying as he spoke in Arabic and did not have any means to find out what he was saying. CNA M further stated staff made sure his bed was lowered, a bed alarm, and a fall mat was placed next to the bed to prevent further falls. On 02/27/23 at 07:49 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated R7 got restless when he required toileting and had received therapy in the past for his falls. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff checked his alarm every two hours to make sure it is on and verified there should be interventions in place after a resident fell. The facility Fall and Fall Risk, Managing policy, dated October 2022, documented the definition of a fall was unintentionally coming to rest on the ground floor or other lower level but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. The policy further documented the team would attempt to identify appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls and if falling reoccurs, despite initial interventions, staff would implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the current approach remained relevant. The facility failed to provide supervision, ensure R7's personal alarm was activated, and failed to implement interventions for cognitively impaired R7, placing him at risk for further falls and injury. - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented the resident had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), cognitive communication deficit (may occur after a stroke, tumor, brain injury, or other neurological damage), traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a blow to the head), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18 was admitted to the facility 08/30/22 and had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, and extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, ambulation, toileting, and personal hygiene. The assessment further documented R18 had unsteady balance, no functioning impairment, and had one fall since admission. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/10/23, documented R18 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent upon two staff for transfers, toileting, and extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, and toileting. The assessment further documented R18 did not ambulate, had unsteady balance, no functional impairment and had one non-injury fall. The Fall Assessments, dated 08/31/22, 11/07/22, and 02/09/23, documented R18 was a high risk for falls. The Nursing Evaluation, dated 08/30/22, documented R18 used a walker when ambulating with staff assistance, had full range of motion, and did not require the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. Review of the EMR lacked documentation a fall care plan was completed until 12/18/22. The Nurse's Note, dated 09/03/22 at 02:09 PM, documented R18 was lowered to the floor with two staff assistance and a gait belt. The note further documented R18 did not receive any injuries. Review of the EMR lacked further documentation regarding the fall. On 02/23/23 at 08:58 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H and Certified Nurse Aide N attached the sling to the mechanical lift and lifted R18 up and lowered her onto the bed. On 02/23/23 at 09:00 AM, CNA N stated she was not aware of any falls prior to the most recent fall the resident had. CNA N laughed and stated the most recent fall happened as a CNA rolled the resident, and the resident kept rolling and fell out of bed. CNA N further stated R18 was not hurt and that she should not laugh about it, but it was funny. CNA N stated staff use a mechanical lift and two staff for her transfers. On 02/27/23 at 09:17 AM, LN G stated R18 was lowered to the ground by two staff, and the facility considered that a fall, but LN G was unable to find an incident report. On 02/27/23 at 10:26 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified she was unable to find any incident report related to staff lowering R18 to the floor and stated an incident report should have been completed. The facility Fall and Fall Risk, Managing policy, dated October 2022, documented the definition of a fall was unintentionally coming to rest on the ground floor or other lower level but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. The policy further documented the team would attempt to identify appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls and if falling reoccurs, despite initial interventions, staff would implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the current approach remained relevant. The facility failed to implement interventions for R18, who was lowered to the ground by staff. This placed the resident at risk for further falls and injury.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to obtain and replace Resident (R) 14's oxygen mask as physician ordered placing R14 at risk for respiratory infection. Findings included: -R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cerebral infarction (stoke), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), morbid (severe) obesity, and angina pectoris (chest pain). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R14 had intact cognition, no delirium or exhibited behaviors. R14 required extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living with the exception of eating which required limited assistance of one staff member. R14 had pain and pain treatment, shortness or trouble breathing with exertion and when lying flat. The MDS further documented R14 received oxygen and required non-invasive mechanical ventilator. R14's Care Plan documented R14 had difficulty breathing at times related to chronic respiratory failure and required the use of supplemental oxygen. The care plan directed staff to administer oxygen to home ventilation and nebulizer treatments, change oxygen mask daily and nurse to assess for respiratory distress. The Physician Order, dated 10/22/20, directed staff to administer oxygen at two to six liters (l) to maintain oxygen saturation range between 92 and 98 percent (%), and change oxygen mask daily every night shift. Record review of R14's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed dates of coded 3 which indicated a supply was not available and had been reordered for: December 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, and 31, 2022. (six days) January 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 2023. (seven days) February 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22, 2023. (eight days) The Progress Note, dated 02/02/23 at 09:49 AM, documented R14 appeared in no apparent distress, alert with oxygen via mask. On 02/21/23 during initial tour/interview observation revealed R14 was in her room in bed with a visibly soiled oxygen mask on her face. On 02/27/23 at 09:03 AM Administrative Nurse D stated R14's mask should have been changed daily. Administrative Nurse D reported at times the masks had been back ordered, but the facility had two cases of mask in supply storage and the nursing staff needed to be educated where to find the oxygen masks and open the boxes for replacement. Administrative Nurse D stated the oxygen masked should have been cleaned when supply was not available but lacked documentation of cleansing the masks. The facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 06/2021, documented the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. The facility failed to replace R14's oxygen mask daily as ordered placing R14 at risk for respiratory infections.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility' Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility' Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concerns for the 40 residents, who reside in the facility. Findings included: -Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 142 with dignified dining. Refer to F550. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include R29's Black Box Warning medications. Refer to F656. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update care plans following falls for R7 and R8, and lacked care plan invitation and participation for R14. Refer to F657. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to find ways to communicate R 7 language barrier for activities of daily living. Refer to F676. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provided care planned toileting for R5 and meal assistance for R142. Refer to F677. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed provide comforting care for R7 while resident moaned in the living room. Refer to F684. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure reducing device for R7 who was left in a wheelchair for over 2 hours two days in a row. Refer to F686. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to place intervention for R7 and R18 from falling and had not followed care planned toileting to prevent falls for R 5. Refer to F689. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent significant weight loss for R142. Refer to F692. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change R14's oxygen mask daily, placing the R14 at risk for respiratory infections. Refer to F695. On 02/27/23 at 01:37 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she collects data from the interdisciplinary team and other sources of information for the quality assessment and assurance program that meets on a monthly basis for formulate plans of improvement. The facility's QAPI Committee, Program Feedback, Data Systems and Monitoring policy, dated 10/2022, documented this facility shall establish and maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAPI) that oversees the identification and handling of quality issues. The facility shall establish a system for program feedback, data collection systems and monitoring, to include adverse event monitoring. The facility failed identify multiple issues of concern for the 40 resident who reside in the facility placing the residents at risk for lack of quality care.
Sept 2021 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for Activities of Da...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three dependent residents had appropriate assistance with ADLs, including Resident (R)18, regarding appropriate nail care and R 20 and R 40, regarding lack of personal hygiene. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/06/21, documented Resident (R)18 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She had no rejection of care and required extensive staff assistance of one for personal hygiene. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Functional Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/03/21, documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with ADLs. The quarterly MDS, dated 06/23/21, documented the resident had a BIMS score of 10, indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. She had no rejection of care and required extensive staff assistance of one for personal hygiene The care plan for ADLs, updated 08/13/21, instructed staff the nurse would do the resident's nail care. On 09/01/21 at 08:36 AM, the resident was in the dining room for breakfast. Her fingernails were long and dirty. Her fingernails had a dried tannish substance underneath them. On 09/02/21 at 08:43 AM, the resident was in the dining room for breakfast. Her fingernails remained long and dirty. The dried tannish substance remained underneath her fingernails. On 09/02/21 at 12:38 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated he had never cleaned the resident's fingernails. On 09/03/21 at 09:29 AM, Consultant staff GG stated, it was the expectation that staff clean resident's fingernails. The facility policy for Quality of Life ADLS, dated 05/2021, included: Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary care and services to maintain grooming. The facility failed to ensure appropriate nail care for this dependent resident. - Review of Resident (R)40's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/06/21, revealed diagnoses included Huntington's Disease (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder,) major depressive disorder (major mood disorder,) and generalized anxiety disorder (excessive nervousness/tension.) The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident had impaired cognitive status and required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA,) dated 10/15/20, assessed the resident at risk for impaired ADL and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The Care Plan, reviewed 08/17/21, instructed staff the resident required assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The resident received a shower twice a week. The Bath Sheet, dated 08/15/21, documented staff shaved the resident. Observation, on 08/31/21 at 11:00 AM, revealed the resident seated in a chair in the dining area. The resident had several days' worth of facial hair. When asked if the facial hair caused itching the resident answered yes. The resident remained with facial hair on 09/01 through 09/02/21. Interview, on 09/02/21 at 01:40 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) NN, revealed staff should shave the resident on bath days (Monday and Thursday evenings.) If staff do not shave him on those days, then the best time to shave him is after a nap when he is more cooperative. Interview, on 09/02/21 at 04:00 PM with CNA N, revealed she usually shaved the resident when she provided a bath to him, but she was off the previous week. Interview, on 09/03/21 at 11:28 AM, with Consulting Nurse GG, revealed she would expect staff to provide shaving to residents per their preferences, usually on bath days. The facility policy Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living, reviewed 05/2021, instructed staff for residents whom are unable to carry out ADL, receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. The facility failed to provide shaving opportunities for this resident who required staff assistance to maintain personal hygiene in a manner as a normal person would expect. - Review of Resident (R)20's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/06/21, revealed diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body,) dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin,) and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (Normal cognition score 13-15.) The resident had verbal behaviors and rejection of care one to three days of the seven day look back period. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. The resident had no impairment in range of motion in the upper or lower extremities. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/ Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/14/20, assessed the resident was at risk for impaired ADL function related to history of stroke, hemiplegia and right below the knee amputation. The resident required limited to extensive assistance of one to two staff for ADL. The Care Plan, reviewed 05/25/21, instructed staff the resident was at increased risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility. Staff were to complete a weekly skin assessment and provide a skin check during showers. Observation, on 08/31/21 at 10:30 AM, revealed the resident in his wheelchair in his room. The resident's face contained several days' worth of facial hair. Observation on 09/01/21 revealed continued facial hair until 09/02/21 at which time the resident was shaven. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 09:23 AM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O revealed the resident required assistance for ADL's and usually CNA N shaved him on evening shift. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 03:56 PM, with CNA PP, revealed the resident could get combative at times. Interview, on 09/02/21 at 01:40 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) NN, revealed staff should shave the resident on bath days. If staff do not shave him on those days, then the best time to shave him is after a nap when he is more cooperative. Interview, on 09/02/21 at 04:00 PM with CNA N, revealed she usually shaved the resident on bath days or when they needed to be shaved. Interview, on 09/03/21 at 11:28 AM, with Consulting Nurse GG, revealed she would expect staff to provide shaving to residents per their preferences, usually on bath days. The facility policy Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living, reviewed 05/2021, instructed staff for residents whom are unable to carry out ADL, receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. The facility failed to provide shaving opportunities for this resident who required staff assistance to maintain personal hygiene in a manner as a normal person would expect.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/06/21, documented Resident (R)11 had diagnoses, which included: bipolar (major menta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/06/21, documented Resident (R)11 had diagnoses, which included: bipolar (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. It was somewhat important for her to listen to music she likes and to do her favorite activities. She required total assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit. The Activities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/20/21, did not trigger. The quarterly MDS, dated 06/20/21, documented the resident's BIMS score was 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. She required total assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit. The Activities care plan, updated 06/07/21, instructed staff the resident would occasionally attend group activities. Staff were to encourage the resident to attend activities. Review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Assessment tab, revealed the resident enjoyed music, movies and sports. Review of the resident's EMR, under the Tasks tab, from 08/07/21 through 09/02/21, revealed the resident had no activities provided. On 09/01/21 at 09:18 AM, the resident sat in the commons area in the recliner. The resident's eyes were opened and she was alert. The TV was playing a child's cartoon. The resident was not watching the cartoon and did reported did not like cartoons. On 09/01/21 at 10:50 AM, the resident remained in the commons area in a recliner. There was a small group musical activity taking place in one of the dining areas. Staff had not invited the resident to attend the music activity. On 09/01/21 at 10:50 AM, the resident stated she had not been invited to attend the music activity and would have liked to have been invited. On 09/01/21 at 09:11 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated the resident did not participate in activities. On 09/01/21 at 01:10 PM, Activity staff Z stated, residents who are not mobile enough or who need a lot of assistance do not come to activities. Staff Z stated that the resident liked music activities. On 09/02/21 at 12:38 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated, he had not seen the resident participating in any type of activity. 09/03/21 at 09:29 AM, Consultant staff GG, stated she would expect the residents to have 1:1 activity or attend music activities if that was something that the resident enjoyed doing. The facility policy for Activities and Social Events, effective 05/2021, included: The staff will evaluate a resident's physical and mental capacity to participate in various levels of activities. The facility failed to provide individualized appropriate activities for this dependent resident. - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/06/21, documented Resident (R)28 had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The staff assessment for activity preferences revealed the resident enjoyed listening to music and spending time outdoors. She required total assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit. The Activities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/28/20, documented the resident was at risk for not participating in activities due to inattention related to dementia. Staff were to encourage the resident to participate in activities in which she enjoyed. The quarterly MDS, dated 07/26/21, documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed the resident was moderate cognitive impairment. She required total assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit. The activities care plan, updated 05/11/21, instructed staff to encourage the resident to attend activities she enjoyed. Review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a Recreation (Activities): Admission/Annual Assessment, dated 10/26/20, which was left blank. Review of the resident's EMR, under the Tasks tab, from 08/07/21 through 09/02/21, revealed the resident participated in no activities. On 09/01/21 at 10:50 AM, a music activity took place in one of the dining areas. Staff did not invite the resident to attend. On 09/01/21 at 02:45 PM, an activity of making pudding in a jar took place in the activity room. Staff did not invite the resident to attend. On 09/01/21 at 08:39 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stated, she does not inform the resident of activities occurring in the facility. On 09/01/21 at 01:10 PM, Activity staff Z stated, residents who are not mobile enough or who need a lot of assistance do not come to activities. Staff Z stated that the resident liked music activities. On 09/03/21 at 09:29 AM, Consultant staff GG, stated she would expect the residents to have 1:1 activity or attend music activities if that was something that they enjoyed doing. The facility policy for Activities and Social Events, effective 05/2021, included: The staff will evaluate a resident's physical and mental capacity to participate in various levels of activities. The facility failed to provide individualized appropriate activities for this dependent resident. The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with 13 residents sampled, including seven residents sampled for activities. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities for three Residents (R) 22, R11, and R28 to enhance their lives through activities of their choice. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 22's Physician Order Sheet, dated 07/16/21, revealed diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with moderately impaired cognitive status, the resident was unable to speak, and rarely /never understood. The resident required total dependence for activities of daily living. The resident's preferences included listening to music, pets and animals. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/30/20, assessed the resident was at risk for cognitive loss. The Communication CAA, dated 12/30/20, assessed the resident was at risk for communication deficits due to aphasia ( condition with disordered or absent language function)' The Activities CAA, dated 12/30/20, assessed the resident preferred not to participate in facility activities. The Care Plan, reviewed 06/16/21, instructed staff the resident occasionally enjoyed watching Animal Planet and Scy Fy on TV. The resident enjoyed listening to meditation music and listening to his portable waterfall running. The resident enjoyed being read to and manicures. Observation on 08/31/21 and on all days of the survey revealed the television on the Animal Planet station, continuously. The resident appeared to be watching the television intermittently. The resident did not have a portable waterfall or meditation music. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 01:00 PM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O, revealed the resident usually stays in bed and watched TV. CNA O stated the resident liked animals. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 01:10 PM, with Activity Staff Z, revealed she provided one on one reading and talking and opened the window, so he could hear the rain. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 03:56 PM, with CNA PP, revealed the resident does not like to get up out of bed and usually watched the Animal Planet station. CNA PP did not know of any other activity the resident enjoyed. Interview, on 09/02/21 at 09:35 AM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) H, revealed he used to have a device that played birds and water flowing, but he did not know what happened to the device. Interview, on 09/03/21 at 11:48 AM, with Consulting Nurse GG, revealed the Activities Staff did one on one with the resident. The previous Activities Staff had a White Noise device she used for the resident's enjoyment, but she was no longer at the facility. The facility Activities and Social Events, reviewed 05/21, instructed staff the resident should be given an opportunity to choose when, where and how he will participate in activities and develop a plan of care based on resident's interests and assessments. The facility failed to provide this dependent resident with activities other than constant television, to enhance the resident's enjoyment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 selected for review which included two residents reviewed for skin issues...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 selected for review which included two residents reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures for skin protection as advised by hospice for one resident (R)19 and failed to investigate and monitor the bruising and skin tear for R20. Findings included: - Review of R19's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/18/21, revealed diagnoses included sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass), anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues,) cachexia (a state of ill health involving weight loss and loss of muscle mass,) psoriatic (chronic skin disorder characterized by red patches covered by thick, dry silvery adherent scales) arthropathy (joint disease), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing,) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive status, required extensive assistance of two person for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, and toilet use. The resident required extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. The resident received hospice services and had one unhealed pressure ulcer. The Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/23/23, assessed the resident at risk for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence and impaired mobility. The care plan, revised 07/02/21, instructed staff to cleanse the buttock ulcer with wound cleanser, dab dry, and apply Polyox (a type of medicated powder to heal wounds) to the wound and cover with a foam dressing. The care plan instructed staff the resident received hospice services. The facility lacked a care plan from the hospice agency. The Nursing Skin Wound Note, dated 08/09/21, documented the buttock ulcer as closed. The Hospice Nurse Note, dated 08/10/21 in the hospice notebook, revealed an evaluation that the resident had two- dime sized areas on his buttocks that looked like shearing (wound caused by friction) and staff was to apply Calmoseptine (a medicated cream that forms a moisture barrier to protect the skin from irritants and moisture) after each brief change. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for August 2021, documented the treatment with Plyox discontinued on 08/12/2021, as the wound healed. The TAR lacked documentation of the hospice recommendation for Calmoseptine use. Observation, on 09/01/21 at 01:30 PM, revealed the resident positioned in his recliner. Licensed Nurse (LN) G and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) OO turned the resident in his recliner. The resident's incontinence brief saturated with urine, and the resident's buttocks contained three shallow open areas with sanguineous (bloody) drainage. Observation, on 09/01/21 at 02:30 PM, after the resident received a whirlpool bath, LN G measured the open areas as 0.8 by 0.8 centimeters (cm) on the right buttock, left inner buttocks 2.8 by 0.5cm and 1.3 by 1.5cm. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 02:30 PM, with LN G revealed the resident's pressure ulcers had healed but did not know what could be used for these areas of shearing. LN G stated usually the hospice nurse gave a verbal report after the visit with the resident. LN G stated sometimes the charge nurse read the hospice notes but did not recall the note that indicated the recommendation for Calmoseptine to the areas of shearing on the resident's buttocks. Interview on 09/01/21 at 03:56 PM, with CNA PP, revealed the resident was incontinent of urine and used his call light to alert staff when he was wet, and staff provided incontinence care. CNA PP stated staff applied lotion to his arms and legs, but the resident did not like the Calmoseptine on his buttocks. Interview, on 09/03/21 at 10:30 AM with Consulting Nurse GG, revealed staff should read the hospice notes and follow through with recommendations. The facility policy Hospice Interpretation and Implementation, revised 06/2021, instructed staff to establish a communication mechanism with hospice provider for clinical changes in the care of the resident. The facility failed to coordinate hospice care recommendations for use of calmoseptine ointment to provide a protective barrier for this resident skin to prevent irritation and further damage. - Review of Resident (R)20's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/06/21, revealed diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body,) dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin,) and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (Normal cognition score 13-15.) The resident had verbal behaviors and rejection of care one to three days of the seven day look back period. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. The resident had no impairment in range of motion in the upper or lower extremities. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/ Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), assessed the resident was at risk for impaired ADL function related to history of stroke, hemiplegia and right below the knee amputation. The resident required limited to extensive assistance of one to two staff for ADL. The Care Plan, reviewed 05/25/21, instructed staff the resident was at increased risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility. Staff were to complete a weekly skin assessment and provide a skin check during showers. Staff was to provide education to the resident and caregivers as to the cause of skin breakdown which included transfer, positioning and taking care during ambulation. The electronic medical record lacked documentation of the right arm injury. Observation, on 08/31/21 at 10:30 AM, revealed the resident in his wheelchair in his room. The resident's right forearm arm contained an area wrapped in undated Coban (an elastic type of wrap). Interview, on 09/01/21 at 09:23 AM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P, revealed the resident required assistance for ADL's and required the sit to stand lift mechanical lift for transfers. CNA P stated the resident had fragile skin, and probably had a skin tear under the dressing on his right forearm. Observation on 09/01/21 at 09:35 AM, revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G, removed the undated dressing from the resident's right forearm and measured a 13 by 12 centimeter (cm) irregularly shaped purple bruise with a skin tear measuring 1.6 by 0.2 cm. LN cleansed the area with skin cleanser, then place a foam dressing over the skin tear. LN G stated she did know the resident had the bruise or skin tear, but the resident did have fragile skin and frequently had bruising and skin tears. LNG stated staff should monitor the bruise and skin tear for resolution on the treatment administration record. Interview, on 09/01/21 at 03:56 PM, with CNA PP, revealed the resident could get combative at times. CNA PP stated she did not know what the dressing on his right arm was for. Interview, on 09/03/21 with Consulting Nurse GG, revealed she would expect staff to document injuries such as the 13 by 12 cm bruise with a skin tear, determine the root cause of the injury, provide treatment and monitor for resolution. The facility policy Skin Tears Abrasions and Minor Breaks, reviewed 05/21, instructed staff to complete a Report of Incident /Accident form and document measurements, appearance shape of wound and treatment provided. The facility failed to investigate and monitor this resident's 13 by 12 cm bruise with skin tear and to determine interventions for further prevention.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for urinary incontinen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for urinary incontinence (involuntary passage of urine) and Indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to care for the catheter in a clean manner to prevent infections for the one Resident (R)7 sampled. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 07/16/21, documented Resident (R)7 had a diagnosis of urinary retention (the inability to empty the bladder). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She required total assistance of two staff for toilet use and had an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/23/20, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The quarterly MDS, dated 06/23/21, documented the resident had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She required total assistance of two staff for toilet use and had an indwelling urinary catheter. The care plan for toileting, dated 08/03/21, instructed staff the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Staff were to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the resident's bladder. On 09/02/21 at 12:50 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M entered the resident's room to perform catheter care. CNA M opened several packets of alcohol wipes and laid them directly on the floor next to the resident's bed. CNA M unhooked the spigot from the catheter collection bag and drained 800 cubic centimetres (ccs) of dark urine into the graduate (a container used to measure liquids such as urine). She then picked up an alcohol pad, resting directly on the resident's floor, and wiped the spigot of the catheter collection bag with the soiled alcohol swab. CNA M then emptied the urine into the toilet and drained out 300 ccs of dark urine from the collection bag, emptying the catheter collection bag completely. On 09/02/21 at 12:50 PM, CNA M stated she had picked up the alcohol swab, which rested directly on the resident's dirty floor, and used it to clean the spigot of the catheter collection bag. CNA M stated she should not have used the soiled alcohol swab. On 09/02/21 at 01:38 PM, Licensed Nurse H stated, staff should use clean alcohol swabs when cleaning the catheter collection bag. On 09/03/21 at 09:29 AM, Consultant staff GG stated, she would expect staff to use clean alcohol swabs when performing catheter care. A facility policy for cleaning and care of a urinary catheter was not made available. The facility failed to care for the indwelling urinary catheter for this dependent resident in a clean manner in order to prevent infections.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for the residents of the facility in five resident ro...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for the residents of the facility in five resident rooms, located in two of three resident halls. Findings included: - On 09/02/21 at 09:08 AM, an environmental tour of the facility had the following areas of concern: 1. A resident room had approximately two inches of loosened baseboard by the entrance to the bathroom. The perimeter around a toilet had approximate two-inch to four-inch areas that lacked floor covering. The areas had a large build-up of dark colored grime. 2. A resident room had approximately an inch of dark grime build=up in the corners around the door frames of the room and the bathroom. 3. A resident room had approximately an inch of dark grime around the edges of the baseboard. 4. A resident room had approximately eight inches of loose baseboard in the entrance of the room, with approximately a two-inch band of grime build-up on the floor. The corners of the doorframes to the room and bathroom had approximately two inches of dirt/ grime accumulation, and approximately one half inch of grime at the base of the moldings from the door to the bathroom. 5. A resident room had approximately one-inch build-up of grime around the edges of the floor at the baseboard. The bathroom lacked two triangular shaped areas of flooring that measured approximately two by two inches on the shorter sides, and these areas contained a dark grime build-up. In addition, the floor covering lacked an additional area, approximate three by three inch, and the area had a grime build-up. There was approximately a half-inch of grime build-up in front and all around the baseboard of the bathroom and approximately two inches of grime build-up behind the sink. On 09/03/21 at 08:20 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the expectation of the facility's environment should be clean, and without grime around the edges or in the corners and the floors around the toilets to be intact so the floors could be cleaned and disinfected properly. A facility policy addressing maintaining floors free from grime was unavailable. The facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for the residents of the facility in five resident rooms, located in two of three resident halls.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 23 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $22,711 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (49/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 49/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Peabody Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Peabody Health And Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Peabody Health And Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 23 deficiencies at PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 20 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Peabody Health And Rehab?

PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 45 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PEABODY, Kansas.

How Does Peabody Health And Rehab Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Peabody Health And Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Peabody Health And Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Peabody Health And Rehab Stick Around?

PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is 5 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Peabody Health And Rehab Ever Fined?

PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $22,711 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Kansas average of $33,306. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Peabody Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

PEABODY HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.