VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE

3636 NORTH RIDGE RD BLDG 400, WICHITA, KS 67205 (316) 462-7502
Non profit - Corporation 80 Beds ASCENSION LIVING Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
43/100
#168 of 295 in KS
Last Inspection: April 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

VIA Christi Village Ridge has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. Ranking #168 out of 295 facilities in Kansas places it in the bottom half, while it is #15 out of 29 in Sedgwick County, meaning there are only a few local options that may be better. The trend is improving; the number of issues decreased from 7 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 34%, which is lower than the state average. However, the facility has incurred $39,936 in fines, which is higher than 75% of Kansas facilities, indicating potential compliance problems. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to protect a resident from inappropriate advances by another resident with a known history of such behavior, which put them at significant risk. Additionally, after a resident fell due to leg weakness, the facility did not take immediate actions to prevent further falls, leading to a serious injury. Furthermore, there was a high rate of medication administration errors, with 81.48% of medications given incorrectly due to not following proper procedures. While the staffing situation is promising, these incidents highlight serious weaknesses that families should consider when researching this facility.

Trust Score
D
43/100
In Kansas
#168/295
Bottom 44%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
34% turnover. Near Kansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$39,936 in fines. Higher than 81% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 59 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (34%)

    14 points below Kansas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Kansas average (2.9)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 34%

12pts below Kansas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $39,936

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: ASCENSION LIVING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Three residents were reviewed for privacy and confidentiality in their care at t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Three residents were reviewed for privacy and confidentiality in their care at the facility. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of Resident (R) 1 when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M took a video of R1 without R1's consent.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status BIMS score of 99, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS noted R1 required the assistance of one staff member with activities of daily living (ADLs).R1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 99, indicating severely impaired cognition. R1 required assistance from one staff member with all ADL. R1's Care Plan, revised 05/27/25, indicated R1 required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, toileting, transfers, and incontinent care. R1 had altered elimination due to her physical and cognitive status. The plan noted R1 had severe dementia and directed staff to observe for nonverbal cues that she needed assistance with toileting. The Investigation Report dated 09/22/25 indicated that night shift CNA M showed a video regarding R1 to CNA N during shift change. The video shows a fully clothed resident [R1] lying in bed, with bowel movement on her and the wall. CNA N reported the incident to Administrative Staff E. Administrative Staff A suspended CNA M until the investigation was completed. Administrative Staff A notified R1's representative, law enforcement, and the State Agency (SA) of the incident. On 09/23/25 at 09:35 AM, review of the camera footage in the facility for 09/22/25 at 06:08 AM showed the two CNA staff members at the nurses' desk. CNA M showed CNA N her phone. Zooming in on the video, observation revealed that it was unable to tell the identity of the resident in the video. On 09/23/25 at 09:56 AM, CNA N revealed she had come in for the shift. As she received the shift report from CNA M about R1, CNA M showed her a video of a resident from the chest down with BM on the resident and the wall. CNA N said she told CNA M to delete the video immediately and reported the incident to the Administrative Staff E. On 09/23/25 at 02:50 PM, CNA O revealed they had classes on protected health information. CNA O said staff were not to take pictures without the resident's consent, but they had not received any education recently regarding this incident. On 09/23/25 at 03:34 PM, Administrative Staff E said that after the incident, she had gone around to each of the houses and verbally reviewed the expectations on the residents' privacy. Administrative Staff E confirmed she did not have the staff sign off to verify that they had been educated. On 09/22/25 at 04:19 PM, Administrative Staff D stated the facility expected staff not to photograph or video the residents per facility policy. The facility policy Abuse Prevention dated 08/25, states that it is the policy of this community to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification, and verification of license. The community will provide training for associates at new hire orientation and through ongoing programs. Prevention protects the residents from invasion of privacy and or abuse that might occur from photographs, videotapes, digital images, and recordings during resident care or other community activities.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 56 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interview, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 56 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately implement interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 1 after R1 had to be lowered to the floor when her left leg buckled underneath her. This failure led to another staff-assisted fall later the same day. As a result of this deficient practice, R1 sustained a severe fracture of the left ankle. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain, impaired mobility, and decreased independence. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R1's Entry Tracking Record Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R1 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. No further MDS assessments were completed for this admission. R1's Care Plan dated 05/20/24, documented R1 required extensive assistance from one staff for transfers and toileting. The care plan documented R1 had a history of falls in the past and the resident would not have any major injuries from falls. The care plan directed staff to keep pathways clear and provide adequate lighting, keep the bed at an appropriate height, keep personal belongings within reach, transfer the resident per intake information until R1 was seen by therapy, and then follow therapy recommendations/plan of treatment. On 05/22/24, R1's transfer status changed to note the resident required a full lift. The undated Resident at Risk Review documented R1 had a fall risk score of 36 and was at risk for falls. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/17/24, documented R1 was alert and oriented. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/18/24, documented R1 was alert and oriented. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 07:51 AM, documented therapy was walking R1 to the bathroom in R1's room when R1 lost strength in her left leg and staff lowered her to the floor. Staff notified R1's provider who planned to see R1 that day. The note indicated R1's family would also be in that day and staff would notify them then. The nurse manager was notified of the event. The Occupational Therapy Treatment Note, dated 05/21/24, documented upon arrival R1 sat up in a recliner stating she needed to go to the bathroom. R1 completed a transfer from the recliner with minimal assistance using a front-wheeled walker to complete mobility from the recliner to the bathroom. R1 stood outside of the bathroom door when her left lower extremity buckled beneath her Therapy Staff GG slowly lowered R1 to the floor using Therapy Staff GG's leg as a guide and support with R1 sitting on Therapy Staff GG's foot. Staff assisted R1 to the wheelchair with a two-person assist. The note documented the skilled interventions included to stand pivot transfer R1 from her wheelchair to the toilet with the use of bilateral grab bars with minimal assistance, lower extremity clothing management with maximum assistance, and peri care with maximum assistance. R1 required a brief change and lower extremity clothing application with maximum assistance while seated and standing. Staff left R1 in a wheelchair with bilateral lower extremities on leg rests, call light and table within reach, and covered with a blanket. The Physical Therapy Treatment Note, dated 05/21/24, documented they performed therapeutic activities for transfer training to decrease caregiver burden post skilled stay. R1 presented in the recliner with a nasal cannula in place. R1 was very sleepy and required extra time to wake up. R1 was able to wake up and participate in mobility. R1 completed sit to stand activity from various surfaces with minimal assistance. R1 completed stand pivot transfers with cues for correct hand placement. R1 demonstrated a good ability to advance her feet during the stand pivot transfers. Note R1 had a non-injury fall when walking to the bathroom with Therapy Staff GG that morning. R1's legs gave out and she was assisted to the floor. R1's provider stated R1 had polypharmacy (multiple medications) and the provider planned to discontinue Haldol (antipsychotic medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), Baclofen (muscle relaxer), and Lyrica (a controlled substance used to treat muscle and nerve pain) in an effort to decrease tremors and improve alertness. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 09:30 AM, documented R1's daughter arrived and was informed of R1 being lowered to the ground. R1's daughter reported R1 was having pain in her left foot. The nursing staff reported the pain to the Physician's Assistant (PA). The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 10:59 AM, documented R1's PA saw R1 and discontinued Lyrica, Baclofen, and Haldol due to R1 having decreased ability to communicate and twitching muscular movements. Staff notified R1's family of the new orders. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 01:29 PM, documented R1's PA ordered to hold R1's Lasix (diuretic used to promote formation and excretion of urine) for two doses, discontinue the lisinopril (medication used to lower blood pressure), place an intravenous (IV-directly into the vein) device and give R1 500 milliliters (ml) of normal saline at 75 ml's per hour. Staff notified R1's family of the order. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 08:00 PM, documented R1 received the ordered normal saline for dehydration. R1 was confused and pulled out her IV. R1 was unaware of what happened. Staff assessed the IV site and it was without bleeding or concern noted. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/21/24 at 11:00 PM, documented Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M notified the nurse that R1 was unable to stand up for the bathroom and CNA M had assisted R1 to the floor. R1 stated her knees had given up and said she was unable to stand on her feet. R1 had no complaints of pain at that time. Staff performed a head-to-toe assessment, and no injury was noted. Staff assisted R1 up with a full lift, R1's brief was changed, and R1 was assisted to bed. R1 was talking to herself and pointing at stuff in her room. The Fall Scene Investigation Form, dated 05/21/24, documented Therapy Staff GG was walking R1 to the bathroom when R1's left leg gave out and PT lowered R1 to the floor with a gait belt on. R1 lost her strength while ambulating. R1 had gripper socks on. The fall intervention was for therapy to see R1 for strengthening. Therapy Staff GG's Witness Statement, dated 05/21/24, documented R1 was walking with therapy from the recliner to the bathroom. R1 was outside of the bathroom starting to turn in when R1's left lower extremity gave way and R1 was lowered to the floor with R1 ending up sitting on Therapy Staff GG's foot. R1 stated left ankle pain six out of ten. CNA N's Witness Statement, dated 05/21/24, documented R1 was working with therapy. Therapy came to get CNA N to help after R1's leg gave out on her. CNA N stated when she entered the room R1 was sitting on her bottom outside the bathroom door. The nurse was notified and assessed R1. CNA N and Therapy Staff GG helped R1 up from the floor and into her wheelchair. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/22/24 at 04:00 AM, documented R1 had purple bruising noted to her left ankle. R1 complained of pain and the note documented communication was placed for more evaluation. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/22/24 at 06:30 AM documented staff notified the on-call provider of R1's bruises and the provider ordered an x-ray of the left foot/ankle. The order was passed on to the on-coming nurse to notify the x-ray company. R1's Radiology Report, dated 05/22/24 at 05:14 PM, documented three views of the left ankle demonstrated a severe fracture dislocation of the left ankle. There was a transverse fracture (straight line fracture that runs in the opposite direction of the bone) at the medial (inner) malleolus (ankle bone). The distal (lower) fracture fragment as well as the talus (large bone of the ankle that connects with the tibia) were displaced laterally (to the outer side) by approximately 1.5 centimeters. Comminuted fractures (broken bones that have shattered into at least two pieces) were seen involving the distal fibula (lower leg bone) above the joint space. There was lateral angulation of the distal fracture fragment. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/22/24 at 06:15 PM, documented an order was received to send R1 to the hospital after the x-ray results came back. R1 exited the building at 06:15 PM. The Apparent Cause Analysis Report, documented R1 was admitted to the facility for skilled services on 05/16/24 with a primary diagnosis of CHF. On 05/21/24 at approximately 07:50 AM R1 was lowered to the floor by Therapy Staff GG during R1's therapy session. R1's left lower extremity buckled underneath her. Therapy Staff GG notified the charge nurse for assessment at the time of the fall. R1 complained of pain at a six on a scale of zero to ten, in her left ankle. R1 was seen by the PA and medication adjustments were made. The facility continued to manage R1's pain with routine pain medications. R1's weight-bearing status was not changed at that time by the PA or therapy. That evening at approximately 11:00 PM R1 was again lowered to the floor by clinical staff in her bathroom due to R1's legs giving out. R1 had no complaints of pain at the time of the second fall. On 05/22/24 at 04:00 AM, the nurse noted bruising on R1's left ankle and R1 complained of pain. R1's provider was notified via fax notification. At 06:30 AM, R1's PA was notified by phone of R1 having increased pain and bruising to the left ankle. The PA gave an order for an x-ray of the left ankle and foot. The x-ray results returned at 06:15 PM positive for lateral (to the side away from the center of the body) displacement relative to the tibia (lower leg bone). The facility received an order to send R1 to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment and R1 left the building. The facility concluded and documented that the fracture to R1's left lateral ankle appeared to be the result of R1 rolling her ankle when she was lowered to the floor with therapy and immediately complained of pain of six out of ten in her left ankle. The Nurse's Note, dated 05/23/24, documented that R1's daughter did not want to hold her bed at the facility. On 06/25/24 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated it was not up to nursing to determine R1's transfer status. Administrative Nurse D stated therapy determined R1 was a transfer with minimal assistance from one staff. Administrative Nurse D stated after R1's first fall, therapy did not change R1's transfer status so nursing continued to use a one-person assist. On 06/25/24 at 03:30 PM, Therapy Staff GG stated after she lowered R1 slowly to the ground. there was no deformity or bruising to R1's ankle. Therapy Staff GG said after the nurse assessed R1, she and another staff assisted R1 to her feet and to the wheelchair and then took R1 to the bathroom. Therapy Staff GG stated R1 did not complain of any increased pain when she stood and was able to completely bear weight. Therapy Staff GG stated physical therapy worked with R1 later that morning and R1 was able to bear weight and complete all exercises and did not complain of pain. Therapy Staff GG stated therapy staff leave it up to nursing staff to increase the level of assistance required for a resident's transfer status with a change of condition. The facility's Fall Policy, revised July 2023, documented the purpose of the policy was to provide guidelines for the evaluation of a resident in the event a fall occurred and to assist associates in the identification of potential causes of the fall. The [NAME] Fall Risk Assessment form should be utilized to complete the evaluation of the residents' potential for falls during the admission process. The [NAME] Fall Risk Assessment should be completed quarterly or with significant change MDS Assessment and after every fall. If a resident sustains a fall or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, associates shall evaluate for possible injuries and provide first aid or treatment as necessary. Direct care associates shall evaluate the area where the fall occurred for possible contributors. A Licensed Nurse shall document the fall in the resident's Attending Physician and Resident Representative of the event. The Licensed Nurse shall document the fall in the resident's clinical record. The documentation of the identified interventions should be maintained in the resident clinical record and available to the direct care associates. A Licensed Nurse shall observe clinical status for 72 hours after an observed or suspected fall and document findings in the resident clinical record. The fall should be reviewed at the Daily Stand-Up meeting following the fall for identification of any additional individualized interventions to reduce the risk of falls. An incident report shall be completed for resident falls by a Licensed Nurse after the fall occurs. The facility failed to initiate immediate interventions to prevent further falls for R1 after R1 was lowered to the floor when her left leg buckled underneath her. This led to another staff-assisted fall later the same day. As a result, R1 sustained a severe fracture of the left ankle. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain, impaired mobility, and decreased independence.
Apr 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled, that included three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled, that included three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment as free of accident hazards as possible for Resident (R)28, when the facility failed to prevent multiple electrical cords plugged into two power strips next to R28's recliner from being strewn about the floor in the walking path between R28's recliner and R28's bed and the oxygen tubing on the floor in the walking path from the bathroom to R28's bed and recliner area. This deficient practice had the potential to create a trip hazard for R28 that could potentially lead to injury. Findings included: - R8's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), other disorders of the lung, and Parkinson's (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The 09/29/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for all cares except eating and ambulation which were independent. The MDS documented no falls since admission and R8 mobility devices included a walker or wheelchair. The 09/29/23 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R8 had a moderate risk for falls due to use of oxygen and long oxygen tubing. The 03/12/24 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The resident was independent with all cares except bathing, which required partial/moderate assistance of one staff and used a walker or wheelchair for locomotion. The 04/02/24 Care Plan documented an entry on 12/12/23 that R8 had a potential for falls related to change in environment with instructions for staff to keep pathways clear. On 04/02/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation of R8's room revealed two-four port power strips stored next to the recliner with seven items plugged in with cords that laid directly on the floor in the pathway between R8's recliner and R8's bed. R8's oxygen tubing looped on the floor between the resident's bathroom and down the pathway from the bathroom to R8's recliner. On 04/03/24 at 09:10 AM, an observation of R8's room revealed no difference from the previous observation. On 04/03/24 at 12:28 PM, observation of R8's room revealed the oxygen tubing and power cords remained in the same stored location. On 04/04/24 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that electrical cords and oxygen tubing on the ground in the walkway could be a trip hazard for residents. On 04/04/24 at 12:47 PM, Maintenance Staff E revealed the cords on the floor in R8's room were a trip hazard. The facility's 12/2017 Safety and Supervision of Residents policy documented that the facility would provide a safe environment for residents but failed to specifically address power cord or oxygen tubing placement. The facility failed to provide an environment as free of accident hazards as possible for R 28 when the facility failed to prevent multiple electrical cords plugged into two power strips next to R28's recliner from being strewn about the floor in the walking path between R28's recliner and R28's bed and the oxygen tubing on the floor in the walking path from the bathroom to R28's bed and recliner area. This deficient practice had the potential to create a trip hazard for R28 that could potentially lead to injury which would negatively affect the resident's physical and psychosocial wellbeing.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - R8's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - R8's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), other disorders of the lung and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA - a sleep disorder that causes repeated breathing interruptions during sleep). The 09/29/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for all cares except eating and ambulation which were independent. The MDS documented no falls since admission and R8 received oxygen and a non-invasive mechanical ventilator via CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - a ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep airway open during sleep). The 09/29/23 ADL (activities of daily living, such as combing/brushing hair, brushing teeth, dressing and toileting) Functional / Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R8 had significant COPD and required continuous oxygen and utilized a CPAP machine while sleeping. The 03/12/24 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The resident was independent with all cares except bathing which required partial/moderate assistance of one staff. R8 received oxygen and a non-invasive mechanical ventilator via CPAP. The 04/02/24 Care Plan documented an entry on 12/12/23 that R8 had altered respiratory status related to diagnosis of COPD and instructed staff to administer breathing treatments, oxygen and CPAP as ordered, and to monitor the resident for changes in respiratory status. Staff were to wash and dry the CPAP mask after each use and wash and dry the nebulizer after each use. R8's Physician Orders included: 1. Levalbuterol (a medication used to open and relax airway structures), 1.25 milligrams (mg) in 3 milliter (mL) to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, two times per day, for asthma and breathing difficulty, related to COPD, ordered 12/12/23. 2. Trilogy Ventilator, (a CPAP device) at night or with sleep with oxygen at six liters per minute (LPM) supplementally added related to OSA, ordered 11/19/22. On 04/02/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation of R8's room revealed a nebulizer mask stored intact on an over the bed table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a CPAP mask hung from the bedrail. On 04/03/24 at 09:10 AM, an observation of R8's room revealed a nebulizer mask stored intact on an over the bed table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and the CPAP mask hung from the bedrail. On 04/03/24 at 12:28 PM, an observation of R8's room revealed the nebulizer mask and CPAP mask remained in the same stored location. On 04/04/24 at 11:50 AM, an observation of R8's room revealed a CPAP mask remained intact and stored on the over the bed table. On 04/04/24 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that nebulizers should be cleaned after every use and set on a paper towel to dry. Additionally, staff have the availability of a cleaner to place CPAP masks in for cleaning. The expectation was for staff to clean nebulizers and CPAP masks after every use. On 04/04/24 at 12:31 PM, Administrative Nurse F revealed that staff should be cleaning nebulizers and CPAP equipment (masks/hoses/nebulizer chambers) after each use due to infection control concerns. The facility's 12/2022 Procedure: Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection policy, documented that at the completion of therapy, staff were to remove the nebulizer container, rinse the nebulizer components with tap water and dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. The policy lacked guidance for care/cleaning of CPAP equipment except to follow manufacturer's guidelines which were not provided by the facility as requested on 04/04/24 at 12:30 PM. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for R8, regarding the use and cleaning of the nebulizer and CPAP equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to respiratory illnesses that could negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of R8. - R45's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The 05/11/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for all cares except eating which was independent. The resident did not receive special treatments or therapies. The 05/11/23 Care Area Assessment (CAA) lacked documentation related to nebulized medication use. The 01/25/24 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for all cares except eating which was independent. The resident did not receive special treatments or therapies. The 04/02/24 Care Plan documented an entry on 05/09/23 that R45 had the potential for shortness of breath and respiratory complications related to diagnosis of COPD and instructed staff to administer breathing treatments, and to wash and dry the nebulizer after each use. R45's Physician Orders included: 1. Ipratropium (a longer lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures), 0.5 milligrams (mg) and albuterol (a short- lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures) 3 mg in 3 milliter (mL), to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, every two hours as needed, for COPD, ordered 09/14/22. 2. Brovana (a longer lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures),15 micrograms (mcg) in 2 mL solution, to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, twice per day, for COPD, ordered on 09/14/22. 3. Budesonide (an inhaled steroid to reduce chronic airway inflammation) 0.5 mg in 2 mL suspension, to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, twice per day, for COPD, ordered on 09/24/22. On 04/02/24 at 02:08 PM, an observation of R45's room revealed a nebulizer setup sat intact on the bedside table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a second intact nebulizer setup stored inside a porcelain coffee cup. R45 revealed that staff would pre-load her as needed (prn) nebulizer with medications for her to use at her own discretion. On 04/03/24 at 09:16 AM, an observation of R45's room revealed a nebulizer setup stored intact on the bedside table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a second intact nebulizer setup stored inside a porcelain coffee cup. On 04/04/24 at 11:47 AM, an observation of R45's room revealed the nebulizers storage unchanged from previous observations. On 04/04/24 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that nebulizers should be cleaned after every use and set on a paper towel to dry. Additionally, staff should not leave intact nebulizer equipment inside coffee cups. On 04/04/24 at 12:31 PM, Administrative Nurse F revealed that staff should be cleaning nebulizers after each use and should not leave intact nebulizer equipment inside coffee cups, due to infection control concerns. On 04/05/24 at 08:32 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that R45 did not have a self-administration safety assessment performed to be able to self-administer nebulized medications. The facility's 12/2022 Procedure: Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection policy, documented that at the completion of therapy, staff were to remove the nebulizer container, rinse the nebulizer components with tap water and dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for R45, regarding the use and cleaning of the nebulizer equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to respiratory illnesses that could negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of R45. The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents selected for review, which included three residents sampled for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care in maintaining respiratory equipment. for three Residents (R) 223 related to unlabeled nebulizer tubing and mask stored uncovered with unknown liquid remaining in the chamber, hanging on the side of the nebulizer machine and an undated oxygen tubing with nasal cannula, for R 45 with two nebulizers left with unknown clear liquid in nebulizer chambers, the second nebulizer lacked a date to indicate the tubing placement and was stored in an old coffee cup, and R 8 with an unknown clear liquid in the nebulizer chamber, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask left hanging on the bed rail with undated oxygen tubing/nebulizer/CPAP tubing. Findings included: - The Physician Orders, dated 03/26/24, revealed diagnoses that included intervertebral disc degeneration (a cushion of cartilage between the bones in the spine), fracture T11 and T12 (bones in the spine), and traumatic (injury) subdural hemorrhage (a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident received oxygen. The care plan, dated 03/26/24, directed staff the resident had potential for shortness of air (SOA) and/or respiratory complications related to pulmonary fibroids (scarring in the lungs which make it difficult to breath) with oxygen use. He had and upper respiratory infection present on admission. Staff should administer medications and oxygen as ordered. Review of the Physician Orders, dated 03/26/24, documented the following orders: 1. DuoNeb inhalation Solution (inhalation treatment), every 4 hours, while awake, for SOA, ordered 03/26/24. 2. Oxygen at two liters/minute per nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation above 90 percent (%), every shift, ordered 03/25/24. 3. Change oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle weekly , ordered 03/31/24. On 04/03/24 at 10:02 AM, the resident's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula lacked a date to indicate the date it was placed. Additionally, the resident's uncovered, unlabeled handheld nebulizer inhalation administration appliance hung on the side of the nebulizer machine with an unknown liquid remaining in the medication chamber, while not in use. On 04/03/24 at 10:12 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) J, verified the above findings. She stated the CNAs monitor residents with oxygen to make sure the oxygen is on them, and it is going at the right setting. The humidifier bottle on the oxygen concentrator should be filled. The tubing should be labeled with the date it is placed by the third shift. Additionally, the nursing staff should label the oxygen tubing and cannulas when they change them on Sunday nights, and when if the tubing needs to be replaced. If she saw an issue with the oxygen, she would replace the oxygen set up to prevent the spread of infection. On 04/03/24 at 10:22 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) C stated staff should change the oxygen and nebulizer tubing weekly on Sunday night. The nurse should date the tubing when initiating or replacing the tubing and or humidifier. The nebulizer medication chamber should be disassembled, cleaned, and left to air dry on a paper towel after each use, to prevent cross contamination and prevent the spread of infection, and should have a date and a time to indicate when last changed. On 04/03/24 at 10:32 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) K, entered the resident room to administer the resident's 10:00 . She verified the resident's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula lacked a date to indicate the date it was placed. Additionally, the resident's uncovered, unlabeled handheld nebulizer inhalation administration appliance hung on the side of the nebulizer machine with an unknown liquid remaining in the medication chamber, while not in use. She stated the CMAs administer the breathing treatments for residents. The nurses were responsible for dating the tubing and humidifier bottles when initiated or changed. The nebulizer medication chamber should be cleaned and air dried after each treatment. CMA verified the above findings were still present. On 04/03/24 at 01:12 PM, Administrative Nurse B, stated she expected the nursing staff to rinse the nebulizer medication administration appliance and air dry on a paper towel after each use to prevent respiratory infection after each use. Additionally, she stated the oxygen tubing should be changed weekly and the tubing and respiratory equipment should be labeled with the date when initiated or changed. The facility's 12/2022 Procedure: Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection policy, documented that at the completion of therapy, staff were to remove the nebulizer container, rinse the nebulizer components with tap water and dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for the resident, regarding the use and cleaning of the nebulizer equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to respiratory illnesses that could negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being for the resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility reported a census of 72 residents. The facility identified four medication storage rooms and six medication carts used to administer medication to the residents. Based on observations, in...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 72 residents. The facility identified four medication storage rooms and six medication carts used to administer medication to the residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication administration error rate was no greater than five percent (%) when errors occurred with 22 of 27 observed medications had errors when the Licensed Nurse (LN) failed to confirm the medications administered against the physician's order or the eMAR (electronic medication administration record). The medication errors were due to failure follow nursing standard of care which resulted in an error rate of 81.48%. Findings include: - On 04/04/24 at 07:30 AM, LN D administered two medications to Resident (R) 8 by removing them from an outer wrapper (which was labeled with the identification of the contents) and removed the medications from their internal wrapping (which were also individually labeled with the identification of the contents) and failed to confirm the medications against the physician's order or the eMAR. On 04/04/24 at 07:35 AM, LN D confirmed that she had administered the medication without properly confirming the medication against the physician's order or the eMAR. On 04/04/24 at 07:37 AM, LN D administered a total of 13 medications to R15 by confirming the contents printed on the outer wrapper (which was labeled with the identification of the contents) and removing the medications from their internal wrapping (which were also individually labeled with the identification of the contents) without confirmation the individual medications against the physician's order or the eMAR. On 04/04/24 at 07:46 AM, LN D administered a total of seven medications to R3 by confirming the contents printed on the outer wrapper (which was labeled with the identification of the contents) and removing the medications from their internal wrapping (which were also individually labeled with the identification of the contents) without confirmation the individual medications against the physician's order or the eMAR. On 04/04/24 at 07:50 AM, LN D confirmed that she should have compared the individual medication identification labels to the physician's order or eMAR prior to administration to the residents. Additionally, LN D stated that the medication cart she was dispensing medication from serviced 20 residents. On 04/04/23 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that the facility's expectation is for staff to confirm the contents of each individual medication's identification label to the physician's order or the eMAR for accuracy since the outer packaging label could potentially be incorrect. The facility failed to provide a policy related to medication administration as requested on 04/04/24. The facility failed to ensure that the medication administration error rate was no greater than 5% when errors occurred with 22 of 27 observed medications had errors due to failure follow nursing standard of care which resulted in an error rate of 81.48%.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility census totaled 72 residents residing on four neighborhoods. Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to secure medications by the failure to lock two medica...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility census totaled 72 residents residing on four neighborhoods. Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to secure medications by the failure to lock two medication carts on two separate neighborhoods during administration of medications when nursing staff left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. This had the potential to affect 20 residents residing on neighborhood D2 and 20 residents on B2. Findings included: - On 04/03/24 at 11:35 AM, the medication cart on D2 neighborhood was unlocked with no nurse in the vicinity of the cart. On 04/03/24 at 11:35 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) D reported there were 20 residents on the neighborhood who received medications from the medication cart. LN D stated the cart contained narcotics and insulins as well as other medications. LN D reported that all medication carts should be locked when unattended and confirmed that the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. On 04/04/24 at 09:12 AM, on B2 neighborhood, a medication cart was noted unlocked and unattended while LN C administered medications to a resident down the hallway. On 04/04/24 at 09:14 AM, LN C confirmed the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, and stated he should lock the medication cart when he left the cart to give a resident their medications. On 04/04/24 at 09:37 AM, Administrative Nurse B stated that all medication carts should be locked when unattended. The facility policy named Storage of Medications dated 01/24 revealed compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms refrigerators, carts and boxes) containing drugs and biological shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. The facility failed to secure medications by the failure to lock two medication carts on two separate neighborhoods during administration of medications when the nursing staff left the medication cart unlocked and unattended.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program wit...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when delivering meal trays to residents in the dining area, appropriately clean respiratory equipment for Resident (R) 8, R45 and R223 or perform hand hygiene between phases of wound care for R28. This deficient practice has the potential to lead foodborne illness, respiratory illness and wound infections. Findings include: - On 04/03/24 at 12:15 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G and CNA H observed carrying multiple plates from satellite kitchen area in the D-200 neighborhood to resident tables with their thumbs over the edge of the plate and deep into the eating surface of the plates. On 04/03/24 at 12:25 PM, CNA G and CNA H revealed staff should carry resident plates by the bottom of the plate, without their fingers on the eating surface of the plates. On 04/03/24 at 12:36 PM, Dietary Staff I revealed that all staff, regardless of which department they work for, were expected to carry plates to residents by the bottom and keep their fingers off the eating surface of the plates. On 04/04/24 at 12:31 PM, Administrative Nurse F revealed that staff should carry plates to residents sitting at the tables by either using a tray, or by the bottom of the plate and ensure that their fingers do not contact the eating surface of the plates. The facility's 01/20/23 Preventing Food Borne Illness - Associate Hygiene and Sanitary Practices lacked instructions for staff on handling of resident plates. The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when delivering meal trays to residents in the dining area. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the physical and psychosocial health of all 20 residents in the D-200 neighborhood. - R8's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and other disorders of the lung and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA - a sleep disorder that causes repeated breathing interruptions during sleep). R8's Physician Orders included: 1. Levalbuterol (a medication used to open and relax airway structures), 1.25 milligrams (mg) in 3 milliter (mL) to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, two times per day, for asthma and breathing difficulty, related to COPD, ordered 12/12/23. 2. Trilogy Ventilator, (a CPAP device) at night or with sleep with oxygen at six liters per minute (LPM) supplementally added related to OSA, ordered 11/19/22. On 04/02/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation of R8's room revealed a nebulizer mask stored intact on an over the bed table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a CPAP mask hung from the bedrail. On 04/03/24 at 09:10 AM, an observation of R8's room revealed a nebulizer mask stored intact on an over the bed table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and the CPAP mask hung from the bedrail. On 04/03/24 at 12:28 PM, an observation of R8's room revealed the nebulizer mask and CPAP mask remained in the same stored location. On 04/04/24 at 11:50 AM, an observation of R8's room revealed a CPAP mask remained intact and stored on the over the bed table. On 04/04/24 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that nebulizers should be cleaned after every use and set on a paper towel to dry. Additionally, staff have the availability of a cleaner to place CPAP masks in for cleaning. The expectation was for staff to clean nebulizers and CPAP masks after every use. On 04/04/24 at 12:31 PM, Administrative Nurse F revealed that staff should be cleaning nebulizers and CPAP equipment (masks/hoses/nebulizer chambers) after each use due to infection control concerns. The facility's 12/2022 Procedure: Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection policy, documented that at the completion of therapy, staff were to remove the nebulizer container, rinse the nebulizer components with tap water and dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. The policy lacked guidance for care/cleaning of CPAP equipment except to follow manufacturer's guidelines which were not provided by the facility as requested on 04/04/24 at 12:30 PM. The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to appropriately clean respiratory equipment for R8. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to respiratory illnesses that could negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of R8. - R45's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R45's Physician Orders included: 1. Ipratropium (a longer lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures), 0.5 milligrams (mg) and albuterol (a short- lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures) 3 mg in 3 milliter (mL), to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, every two hours as needed, for COPD, ordered 09/14/22. 2. Brovana (a longer lasting medication used to open and relax airway structures),15 micrograms (mcg) in 2 mL solution, to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, twice per day, for COPD, ordered on 09/14/22. 3. Budesonide (an inhaled steroid to reduce chronic airway inflammation) 0.5 mg in 2 mL suspension, to be inhaled orally, via nebulizer, twice per day, for COPD, ordered on 09/24/22. On 04/02/24 at 02:08 PM, an observation of R45's room revealed a nebulizer setup sat intact on the bedside table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a second intact nebulizer setup stored inside a porcelain coffee cup. R45 revealed that staff would pre-load her as needed (prn) nebulizer with medications for her to use at her own discretion. On 04/03/24 at 09:16 AM, an observation of R45's room revealed a nebulizer setup stored intact on the bedside table with an unknown clear liquid inside the nebulizer chamber and a second intact nebulizer setup stored inside a porcelain coffee cup. On 04/04/24 at 11:47 AM, an observation of R45's room revealed the nebulizers storage unchanged from previous observations. On 04/04/24 at 08:05 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that nebulizers should be cleaned after every use and set on a paper towel to dry. Additionally, staff should not leave intact nebulizer equipment inside coffee cups. On 04/04/24 at 12:31 PM, Administrative Nurse F revealed that staff should be cleaning nebulizers after each use and should not leave intact nebulizer equipment inside coffee cups, due to infection control concerns. On 04/05/24 at 08:32 AM, Administrative Nurse B revealed that R45 did not have a self-administration safety assessment performed to be able to self-administer nebulized medications. The facility's 12/2022 Procedure: Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection policy, documented that at the completion of therapy, staff were to remove the nebulizer container, rinse the nebulizer components with tap water and dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards to appropriately clean respiratory equipment for R45. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to respiratory illnesses that could negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of R45. - R28's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain) and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The Physician orders documented the following: 1. On 03/22/24, staff were to cleanse the left upper buttock wound and the left lower buttock wound with wound cleaner, apply skin prep (a solution when applied that forms a protective waterproof barrier on the skin), then cover wounds with hydrocolloid (an opaque dressing for wounds that is biodegradable, non-breathable, and adheres to the skin) On 04/04/24 at 11:15 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) D performed wound care to areas of moisture associated skin damage (MASD) on R28's buttocks. Staff assisted the resident to the right side and removed R28's brief. LN D cleansed the buttock wounds and surrounding skin with bathing wipes. LN D changed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene. LN D then cleaned upper buttock wound and surrounding skin with wound cleaner then skin prep and placed hydrocolloid dressing. LN D then changed gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene before the transition to wound care from the first treated wound to the second wound on the lower buttock. LN D then cleaned the second wound with wound cleaner then applied skin prep, changed gloves but failed to perform hand hygiene. LN D placed a hydrocolloid dressing on the second wound and changed gloves but failed to perform hand hygiene. LN D applied A&D ointment to the surrounding skin then, without glove change or hand hygiene, removed a permanent marker from her scrubs pocket and dated the dressings, then placed the marker directly onto the resident's bed. LN D then assisted the resident with placement of a new brief, then placed the marker on an over-the-bed table, then removed gloves and removed trash bag to bathroom and hand hygiene performed. LN D then returned to the resident's bedside to place a new trash bag and placed the contaminated marker back into her pocket and left the room. On 04/04/24 at 11:44 AM, LN D confirmed that she failed to perform hand hygiene when gloves were changed or when she transitioned between phases of wound care. On 04/04/24 at 12:28 PM, Administrative Nurse F stated that the expectation from staff is that hand hygiene is to be performed whenever gloves are changed during wound care and/or before transition from dirty phase to clean phase of wound care. The facility's 05/2023 Procedure: Wound Care/Dressing Change policy documented that staff were to perform hand hygiene whenever gloves were changed during wound care and/or dressing changes. The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when staff failed to perform hand hygiene between phases of wound care for R28. This deficient practice had the potential to cause wound infections which would negatively affect R28's physical and psychosocial wellbeing.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the five residents/ resident representative...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the five residents/ resident representatives acknowledged receipt related to COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) vaccination information/education for five of five residents, that included Resident (R)126, R124, R45, R6, and R16. Findings included: - On 04/04/24 at 12:20 PM, Administrative Nurse B provided an electronic spread sheet related to resident immunizations. The following were areas of concern: Resident (R)126 documentation revealed the COVID vaccination as Resident refused, however the facility was unable to provide declination information. R124 documentation revealed as resident refused, however the facility was unable to provide declination information. R45's documentation revealed the resident received a COVID vaccination on 10/13/23, however, lacked education for the risk verses benefits. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide a written consent to administer the vaccination. R6's documentation revealed the resident received a COVID vaccination on 10/13/23, however, lacked education for the risk verses benefits. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide a written consent to administer the vaccination. R16's documentation revealed the resident received a COVID vaccination on 10/13/23, however, lacked education for the risk verses benefits. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide a written consent to administer the vaccination. On 04/04/24 at 01:45 PM, Administrative Nurse B reported the facility lacked a no acceptance/declination consent form or an education information form, and verified the facility used verbal consents. The facility policy for Vaccination of Residents (Example: Pneumococcal, Influenza, COVID-19) dated 07/23 revealed residents will be educated about and offered vaccines in accordance to Center of Disease Control (CDC) and attending physician recommendations. Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or resident representative would be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccines. Provision of education shall be documented in the resident record. Residents/resident representative may sign a consent/refusal form for vaccines. The resident or representative may refuse vaccines for any reason. Refusals for any immunizations offered will be documented in the medical record indicating the date of refusal. The facility failed to ensure these five residents/resident representatives acknowledged receipt related to COVID-19 vaccination information/education and/or signed consent verification.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 59 residents with two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review and interview, the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 59 residents with two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 was free from the inappropriate sexual behaviors/advances of R2, who had a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors; both verbal towards the staff in the facility and physical towards R1 on 11/05/22. R2 was treated with medication to help reduce sexual behaviors and the care plan directed staff to monitor R2 and encourage him not to sit within arm's length of female residents. However, on 12/06/22, due to lack of staff supervision, R2 spent an unknown amount of time in R1's room and put his hand up her shirt and down her pants, touching R1's chest and genitals. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy and at risk for psychosocial and physical harm. Findings included: - The Physician Orders (PO), dated 11/29/22, for R2, included a diagnosis of dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident had verbal behavioral symptoms directed at others for one to three days during the seven-day lookback period. R2 required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. The resident used a wheelchair for mobility and received antidepressant medication during the lookback period. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/06/22, documented the resident with a diagnosis of dementia and experienced negative behaviors during the assessment period that was directed at others. The Quarterly MDS, dated 09/24/22, documented R2 with a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition, and exhibited no behaviors. R2 required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. The resident used a wheelchair for mobility and received antianxiety and antidepressant medication during the seven-day lookback period. The Care Plan, updated 12/06/22, advised the staff R2 had a history of a stroke and memory problems and they were to provide cues to promote the resident's independence and ensure his safety. The resident required two staff members to assist with bed mobility, toileting, and transfer and R2 used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident had behaviors due to restlessness and made sexual comments towards the staff. Staff were to redirect and let R2 know it was not ok to speak to staff in that manner 09/28/22. Staff educated R2 not to touch female residents in inappropriate areas 12/06/22. Staff were to monitor resident and encourage him not to sit within arm's length of a female resident 09/28/22. The resident received medication for inappropriate behaviors and moved to another unit to separate R2 from the female resident that he sought out 12/06/22. A Behavior Note, dated 11/05/22 at 01:18 PM, written by Licensed Nurse (LN) G documented R2 touched a female table neighbor during the mid-day meal. Staff immediately separated R2 and the female table neighbor to separate tables for the remainder of the meal. Staff notified LN G as acting Manager on Duty and Director of Nursing (DON) in a timely manner. When questioned about this incident, R2 denied the incident happened and denied touching any female neighbors in a private or inappropriate manner. R2 then verbalized understanding that inappropriate touching of any other resident was not an acceptable action or behavior. A Facility Investigation, dated 11/11/22, documented on or about 11/07/22 at lunch time, staff reported R2 appeared to reach over and attempt to fondle the breast of female resident, R1. R1 reported R2 tried to fondle her breast and it made her uncomfortable. A Physician Communication, dated 11/28/22 at 06:07 PM, by LN H revealed a communication to the physician regarding R2 asking multiple staff to perform sexual acts with him in his room and to lay on his bed. R2 made those requests frequently throughout the day with any of the staff members. R2's family member requested information about any medication that would reduce the behaviors. A Nursing Note, dated 11/29/22 at 07:49 AM, revealed Administrative Nurse E spoke to R2 privately concerning very inappropriate sexual comments made to the staff earlier in the shift. R2 was alert and oriented with a BIMS score of 15. Administrative Nurse E educated R2 on the proper way to communicate with the staff and he was made aware that the comments he made to the staff were making them uncomfortable. A Nursing Note, dated 12/06/22 at 04:53 PM, by Administrative Nurse D documented at approximately 01:00 PM, staff witnessed R2 leaving a female resident's room. The female resident (R1), reported R2 fondled her breast and genitals under her clothing. She said that was the first time he had come to her room and done this. Staff reported the incident to the DON, state agency, local police department, and the emergency contacts for both residents. R2 denied fondling the female resident and stated he only went in there to talk to her. Police officers informed him it was not appropriate to touch other female residents that lived in the unit, and he needed to stay away from the female resident that reported this situation. R2 verbalized understanding. A Witness Statement, dated 12/06/22, by Administrative Nurse F, revealed she was assisting clinical staff members to find R2 as he was scheduled for therapy. Administrative Nurse F observed R2 leaving R1's room in his motorized wheelchair. Administrative Nurse F immediately went into R1's room and found her sitting in her recliner with her feet elevated. Administrative Nurse F inquired about her visitor and R1 stated R2 liked to come into her room sometimes. The nurse asked R1 what happened during their visit and R1 grabbed her breasts and stated that R2 touched them and tried to help her get her pants down. Administrative Nurse F asked R1 if she was okay and R1 stated she was and that she didn't need anything before Administrative Nurse F left the room to immediately notify the DON about the situation. A Witness Statement, dated 12/06/22, by Administrative Nurse D, revealed Administrative Nurse F informed her that she witnessed R2 leaving R1's room. Administrative Nurse F immediately went into R1's room and asked why R2 was visiting her and R1 informed Administrative Nurse F that R2 fondled her. Administrative Nurse D went directly to R1's room and inquired about the situation. R1 reported R2 was getting a feel while she motioned towards her breast area. R1 reported R2 fondled her breast and genital area. Administrative Nurse D asked if it happened above or underneath her clothing. R1 reported R2 touched her under her clothes. R2 told her he needed to get under them. R1 did not give the resident permission to touch her or want him to touch her. She stated, I just wanted him to get it over with so he would calm down. R1 also stated that R2 had never done that to her before. Interview on 12/04/22 at 10:48 AM, with Administrative Nurse D verified the above statements. She was not sure why R2 singled out and targeted R1. R2 had always been inappropriate with the staff and did not bother the residents. R2 was on daily behavior monitoring and charting due to behaviors towards staff. She educated R2 about inappropriate sexual behaviors towards others and he understood as he had a BIMS of 15. Nothing else happened between the residents until the incident on 12/06/22. The resident could move about in the unit in his wheelchair and staff did not see him go into R1's room. When she talked to R1 about it, R1 stated that she lifted up her shirt so he could touch her and also moved her pants and brief so he could put his hand in them. Nothing else happened and R2 left her room after he touched her genitals. R2 was moved downstairs into a different room and nothing else has happened since. The facility policy, Abuse Prevention, approved 06/22, documented .Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect .This includes .sexual or physical abuse .Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with the resident . b. Does not want the contact to occur . 2. Any forced, coerced, or extorted sexual activity with a resident .Training .5. Understanding behavioral symptoms of residents that may increase the risk of abuse and neglect and how to respond .These symptoms, include but are not limited to .b. Wandering . The facility failed to ensure R1 was free from the inappropriate sexual behaviors/advances of R2, who had a history of inappropriate sexual behavior. On 12/06/22, due to lack of staff supervision, R2 spent an unknown amount of time in R1's room and put his hand up her shirt and down her pants, touching R1's chest and genitals. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy and at risk for psychosocial and physical harm. The facility provided their plan of removal on 12/14/2022 at 06:40 PM, which included the following implementation. 1. On 12/06/22 at 01:50 PM, the police and the medical director were notified. 2. On 12/06/22, R2 was moved to a different unit/floor of the facility and away from R1. 3. On 12/07/22, residents in the facility were reviewed by Administrative Staff A and residents reported they had not had any unwanted male visitors in their rooms or unwanted physical touching from others. Residents reported they felt safe in the facility. 4. Education of staff regarding ANE policies and reporting of incidents of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation to Administrative staff immediately was completed on 12/14/22 at 08:00 PM. Any remaining staff were contacted by the facility and advised they would be unable to work until education was completed. 5. Resident was put on one-on-one status on 12/14/22 at 08:30 PM The facility completed the removal plan on 12/14/22 at 08:30 PM.
Apr 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when staff failed to empty a suction canister ...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when staff failed to empty a suction canister for Resident (R) 10, which contained yellow liquid and was visible to all visitors who entered the room, through three days of observations. Findings included: - Review of R10's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 10/25/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a staff assessment indicated long and short-term memory problem with severely impaired cognition. R10 received hospice services. The 01/28/22 Quarterly MDS documented R10 received hospice services and suctioning. The 01/22/22 Care Plan documented R10 received hospice services and as of 10/29/21 the resident had suctioning available, as needed (PRN). The EHR documented an order on 10/16/21 for orally suction PRN. The January through April 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented only one suctioning documented as completed on 01/15/22. On 04/04/22 at 03:32 PM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine. There was yellow liquid in the canister, which sat on the bedside table. The tubing and a Yankauer (an oral suctioning tool used in medical procedures) suction catheter tip were set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted, and visible to anyone who entered the room. On 04/05/22 at 01:09 PM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine. There was yellow liquid in the canister, which sat on the bedside table. The tubing and a Yankauer suction catheter tip were set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted, and visible to anyone who entered the room. On 04/06/22 at 09:33 AM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine. There was yellow liquid in the canister, which sat on the bedside table. The tubing and a Yankauer (an oral suctioning tool used in medical procedures) suction catheter tip were set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted, and visible to anyone who entered the room. Interview on 04/05/22 at 01:21 PM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) K revealed she did nothing with the suctioning for R10. Interview on 04/06/22 at 09:35 AM with Licensed Nurse (LN) D revealed she had not suctioned R10. LN D said she believed the canister and Yankauer suction catheter should be cleaned and stored covered after each use. Interview on 04/06/22 at 10:24 AM with Administrative Nurse B confirmed following suctioning, the canister and Yankauer should be cleaned and stored next to the bed. Administrative Nurse B confirmed she would not expect the Yankauer to be set on the bedside table with no barrier and she expected the canister to be cleaned and not contain any fluids. The 12/2021 Quality of Life- Dignity policy documented each resident should be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. The 01/2022 Suctioning the Upper Airway (oral pharyngeal Suctioning) documented the purpose of the procedure was to clear the upper airway of mucous secretions and prevent the development of respiratory distress . staff were to empty and rinse the collection container, if necessary, or as indicated by community protocol and place catheter in a clean, dry area. The facility failed to promote dignity for R10 when staff did not empty the suction canister.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 61 with 15 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan for one Resident (R) 30 regarding the...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 61 with 15 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan for one Resident (R) 30 regarding the use of a nebulizer (a respiratory treatment). Findings included: - The Physician Order dated 03/02/22 indicated the following diagnoses: viral pneumonia (an infection in the lungs) and chronic respiratory failure (chronically poor airflow). The admission Minimum Data Set dated 03/07/22 indicated R30 received oxygen therapy. The 03/07/22 Care Plan indicated R30 had a potential for shortness of breath and/or respiratory complications related to pneumonia and chronic bronchitis. Staff were to provide treatment per physicians' orders and monitor the resident for response. The 03/07/22 Care Plan lacked interventions related to the use of the nebulizer and/or the care of the nebulizer after each treatment The 03/07/22 Physician Order included the medication Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.083% to be delivered by nebulizer at 2.5 mg (milligrams) in 3 milliliters (mL) inhalation, every 12 hours for interstitial lung disease. Observation on 04/04/22 at 04:45 PM revealed the nebulizer set next to the equipment, with the face mask and tubing still attached, and not in use at the time of observation. Observation on 04/06/22 at 11:33 AM revealed the nebulizer equipment remained attached to the tubing and not in use. The medication bowl had clear fluid in the bottom of the bowl, and not in use at the time of observation. Observation on 04/06/22 at 11:22 AM revealed the nebulizer equipment had tubing and mask attached with liquid from the treatment in the base of the bowl, and not in use at the time of observation. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:34 AM with Licensed Nurse (LN) I indicated the correct process included rinsing the nebulizer after each treatment and to place it on a towel to air dry. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:53 AM with Administrative Nurse B indicated the facility did not include the nebulizer on the care plan because it was considered a standard of practice. The facility's 07/2020 Care Plans policy revealed the plan of care included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident. The baseline care plan should include a review of the health care provider's orders and be implemented to meet the resident' immediate care needs until a comprehensive assessment can be developed. The facility failed to revise R30's care plan to include the care of the nebulizer after each treatment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. The facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. The facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three residents. The facility failed to notify the provider of weight fluctuations greater than two pounds (lbs.) as ordered and failed to document the application of ace wraps and tubigrip bandages (an elasticated tubular bandage used for support) for Resident (R) 16. The facility also failed to document treatments as ordered by the provider for R15 and failed to change the wound dressing daily, as ordered for R25. Findings included: - Review of R16's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). R16 received a diuretic medication for six days of the seven-day look back period. The 04/28/22 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. The 02/05/22 Care Plan for R16 documented staff were to apply ace wraps/tubigrips as ordered. The Orders in the EHR documented on 02/01/19 the staff were to obtain weights daily and notify the provider of fluctuation of two lbs in 24 hours. On 01/31/19 staff were to apply ace wraps to both legs in the morning and remove at hour of sleep, discontinued on 03/23/22. On 03/23/22, the staff were to apply tubigrips to both of R16's legs in the morning and remove them at hour of sleep. The January through April 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented 14 occasions of a fluctuation of two lbs. or greater, with the highest fluctuation of five lbs. noted. The TAR lacked documentation on 15 occasions to apply or remove ace wraps, and four occasions for application or removal of tubigrips. R16's EHR for January through April 2022, lacked documentation of provider notification for the 14 occasions of weight fluctuations. On 04/05/22 at 10:30 AM R16 sat in her wheelchair in her room with tubigrips to both legs and declined staffs offer to sit in her recliner and elevate her legs at the time. On 04/30/21 at 10:20 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C revealed staff were to apply the tubigrips in the morning and removed at bedtime. CNA C stated she did not document this but informed the nurse of the need. CNA C stated R16 was compliant with the tubigrips, but R16 did not like the ace wraps. On 04/06/22 at 09:35 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) D revealed R16's weights were obtained daily and if ordered, staff reported to the physician. When the staff reported the weights to the physician, the staff made a note in the EHR. LN D stated R16 had ace wraps she stated hurt and she would refuse to have them applied. LN D said R16 did better with the tubigrips. On 04/11/22 at 10:57 AM Administrative Nurse B revealed she expected the treatments to be initialed in the TAR. She expected resident weights to be obtained and staff to notify the physician when ordered. If the treatment was out of the Certified Medication Aid (CMA) scope of practice, she would expect them to contact the on-call nurse to complete the task. There were nurses on other units the CMA could also inform to complete the task. The 12/2021 Clinical Protocol: Heart Failure policy documented that the physician would review and make recommendations for relevant aspects of the nursing care plan, such as weight monitoring and when to report findings to the physician, etc. The facility failed to provide R16 care and treatment in accordance with standards of practice by the failure to apply and remove ace wraps/tubigrips, as ordered and the failure to notify the physician for out of parameter weights as ordered. - Review of R15's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The 11/07/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating severely impaired cognition. The 02/05/22 Care Plan for R15 documented staff were to administer treatments as ordered. The Orders in the EHR documented on 03/11/20 staff were to check R15's skin weekly and apply skin prep to both heels at bedtime (HS). The 09/02/21 order instructed staff to apply skin prep (a solution when applied that forms a protective waterproof barrier on the skin) to medial (the middle) skin on knees where they touch for wound prevention. The February through April 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) lacked documentation on three occasions to check R15's skin weekly, lacked documentation on 12 occasions to apply skin prep to medial skin on knees where they touch for wound prevention, and lacked documentation on 12 occasions to apply skin prep to both heels at HS. On 04/05/22 at 12:26 PM R15 sat in her wheelchair in her room having her noon meal. R15 wore shoes and her knees were touching at the time. R15 had no open skin wounds visible. On 04/06/22 at 09:35 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) D revealed treatments were documented in the TAR when completed. She stated she completed her tasks and the on-call nurses were available when needed, as well. On 04/11/22 at 08:25 AM Administrative Nurse B revealed she expected the treatments to be initialed in the TAR. If the treatment was out of the Certified Medication Aid (CMA) scope of practice, she expected the CMA to contact the on-call nurse to complete the task, and there were nurses on other units the CMA could also inform to complete the task. The 01/2022 Wound Care/ Dressing Change policy documented staff were to document treatments in the resident's medical record. The facility failed to provide R15 care and treatment in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to document treatments as ordered. - R25's signed Physician Orders dated 04/05/22 revealed the diagnosis of Huntington's disease (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder). The 12/11/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for all daily care. The resident had one non-injury fall and one minor injury fall. The Annual MDS dated 03/05/22 revealed a BIMS score of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident received limited assistance of one staff for all daily care. The resident had two non-injury and two minor injury falls. The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 03/27/22 revealed the resident had a walker for mobility assistance. He would often rise and ambulate by himself without his walker. The resident had a history of falls and was at high risk for falls. The Care Plan dated 05/26/21 revealed the resident would have falls related to desire for independence. The approaches included the resident wanted to remain free from injury related to falls over the next review period and the resident stated he wished to complete ADLs independently and preferred to risk falling rather than ask for staff assistance. The Nurse's Progress Notes dated 03/27/22 at 11:31 PM revealed the resident fell and sustained a skin tear to the right arm. The Nurse's Progress Notes dated 03/28/22 revealed the resident's right arm with a dressing clean, dry, and intact. The Physician Order dated 04/05/22 revealed wound care every day and directed the facility to cleanse the resident's right arm skin tear with wound cleanser, apply non-adherent dressing, cover with kerlex (stretchy gauze roll wrap), and change daily. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed a CMA initialed the dressing was changed on 04/04/22 and 04/05/22. Observation on 04/05/22 at 12:20 PM revealed the resident sat at the dining table eating. The resident had a large dressing on his right arm with a date of 03/30/22. The dressing appeared dry and intact. On 04/06/22 at 07:33 AM the resident sat at the ding table in a wheelchair and had a large bandage on his right arm with date of 03/30/22. The dressing appeared clean and dry. On 04/06/22 01:07 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) E went in the resident's room to change the dressing on the resident's right arm. The dressing was dated 03/30/22. With gloves on the Allevyn (hydrocellular wound) dressing was peeled back and removed to reveal an open wound on his arm approx 2.5 centimeters. An area of scab on one side of the wound and the other side open and bleeding. The wound was cleaned with wound cleaner and skin prep around the wound and an Allevyn dressing applied. (No order to apply that type of dressing found). During an interview on 04/05/22 at 10:00 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F reported the resident wants to do things by himself. CNA F said the staff try to sit him in the living room where we can keep a closer eye on him and R25 would not use his call light and tried to get up on his own if he is in his room. During an interview on 04/06/22 at 12:35 PM LN E reported it was a job to keep the resident from falling. He refused to ask for assistance and was determined to get up on his own. LN E said she put a dressing on the wound but did not call for an order the day she put it on. She assumed the dressing in place was the right dressing so that is what she replaced the old one with. She did not check the order for the correct dressing. On 04/06/22 at 02:30 PM Administrative Nurse B reported the dressing that was on the resident was a seven- day dressing and that was probably why it was not changed. The CMA could not change the dressing and she did not know why the CMA signed the TAR. Administrative Nurse B stated she expected the CMA to notify another nurse of treatments that needed done and verified that did not happen. Review of the facility policy for Wound Care dated 08/21 revealed nurses were to review and verify physician orders for dressing changes. The facility failed to provide wound care in a timely manner and according to physician orders.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

- R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the following diagnoses under the medical diagnoses tab: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition character...

Read full inspector narrative →
- R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the following diagnoses under the medical diagnoses tab: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 11/20/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R20 had a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition, with use of oxygen noted. The 02/15/22 Care Plan documented staff were to provide R20 treatments as ordered and monitor for response. The EHR documented an order for R20 on 07/14/21 for albuterol sulfate (bronchodilator- works by relaxing and opening air passages to the lungs) nebulization (electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist) solution 2.5 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml) two times daily and as needed (PRN). On 04/05/22 at 01:52 PM, observation revealed R20's O2 mask for nebulized medication sat on her bed with no barrier and no bag for storage and had white, crusty substance on the inside of the mask. On 04/06/22 at 02:31 PM observation revealed R20's O2 mask for nebulized medication sat with no barrier on the bedside table, and continued with the white, crusty substance on inside of mask. On 04/11/22 at 09:24 AM Certified Medication Aid (CMA) L revealed nebulizer masks should be cleaned after each use and allowed to dry. CMA L said the masks should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use. On 04/06/22 at 09:35 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) D stated all nebulizer as well as O2 tubing and masks should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use. LN D said the nebulizer masks should be cleaned after each use. On 04/06/22 at 11:56 AM Administrative Nurse B confirmed all tubing should be kept in a storage bag when not in use and nebulizer tubing should be stored the same. Administrative Nurse B said all nebulizer masks should be cleaned after each use. The 12/2021 Administering Medications Through a Small Volume Handheld Nebulizer policy documented the purpose of the procedure was to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the residents airway. When treatment was complete, staff were to turn off the nebulizer, disconnect the mouthpiece and medication cup, and then rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment according to manufacturer's guidelines. When equipment was completely dry, staff were to store them in a plastic bag with the residents' name and date on it. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for R20 by not cleaning the nebulizer mask after each use. The facility reported a census of 61 with 15 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure staff rinsed the nebulizer a respiratory treatment) after each use for two residents R30 and R 20. Findings included: - The Physician Order dated 03/02/22 indicated the following diagnoses: viral pneumonia (an infection in the lungs) and chronic respiratory failure (chronically poor airflow). The admission Minimum Data Set dated 03/07/22 revealed R30 received oxygen therapy. The Care Plan dated 03/07/22 indicated R30 had a potential for shortness of breath and or respiratory complication related to pneumonia and chronic bronchitis. ( inflammation of the bronchial tubes ) The staff were to provide treatment per physicians' orders and monitor for response. The care plan lacked interventions to include the use of the nebulizer and/or the care of the nebulizer after each treatment The Physician Order dated 03/07/22 included the following nebulizer treatment: Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.083% nebulizer 2.5 milligrams (mg) in 3 milliliters (ml) inhalation every 12 hours for interstitial lung disease (cause shortness of breath and or cough). Observation on 04/04/22 at 04:45 PM revealed the nebulizer set on the window shelf attached to the face mask and tubing with clear fluid in base of bowl Observation on 04/06/22 at 11:33 AM revealed the nebulizer equipment on window shelf still attached to the tubing and the medication bowl had clear fluid in the bottom of bowl. Observation on 04/06/22 at 11:22 AM revealed the nebulizer equipment on window shelf attached to the tubing and mask, with liquid in the base of the nebulizer bowl. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:34 AM, Licensed Nurse I (LN) indicated the correct process would be to not only check her lungs before and after the treatment but to also rinse the nebulizer after treatment and place it on a towel to air dry. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:53 AM, Administrative Nurse B expected the staff to rinse the nebulizer after each treatment. The policy Administrating Medications Through a Small Volume Handheld Nebulizer dated 12/21 revealed the purpose of the procedure was to safely and aseptically (free from contamination) administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident airway. After treatment was complete, turn off the nebulizer and disconnect mouthpiece and medication cup, rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment per manufacturers guidelines, and when the equipment was completely dry, store in a plastic bag with resident name and date on it. The facility failed to rinse the nebulizer after each treatment for resident R30.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents, with 15 in the sample, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents, with 15 in the sample, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report three blood sugars over the parameters of 290 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as ordered by the physician for Resident (R) 4. Findings included: - R 40's signed Physician Orders dated 03/15/22 revealed the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Medications received included insulin injections daily in the seven-day observation period. The Care Plan dated 03/14/22 revealed R40 had a potential for complications from diabetes. Approaches included the staff were to administer medications per physician orders, monitor for side effects and notify physician as needed (PRN), monitor for signs of hyperglycemia including increased thirst, increased urination, weight loss, ketone breath, lethargy, and notify the physician as needed. Review of the Physician Orders revealed: 03/14/22, the resident received Levemir (insulin-medication used to control blood sugars), at bedtime (HS) for diabetes mellitus. 03/15/22, the resident received Novolog (insulin -medication used to control blood sugars), three times day prior to meals for diabetes mellitus 06/01/22, the staff were to check R40's blood glucose before meals and bedtime and document results on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The staff were to notify the physician for blood sugars greater than 290 mg/dL. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 03/15/22-04/06/22 revealed the following blood glucose levels above the parameters: 0n 03/30/22, a blood glucose of 310 mg/dL. On 03/31/22, a blood glucose of 302 mg/dL. On 04/04/22, a blood glucose of 364 mg/dL. The EHR lacked evidence of physician notification for the out of parameter blood glucose levels on 03/30/22, 03/31/22 or on 04/04/22. Observation on 04/06/22 at 12:20 PM revealed the resident slept in her recliner covered up with a blanket. Licensed Nurse (LN) in the resident room attempted to wake the resident and convince her to eat lunch, the resident refused, and the LN administered five units of insulin SQ as ordered stating R40's blood sugar was okay to give the insulin. During an interview on 04/05/22 at 01:40 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F reported the resident had behaviors of refusing meals and care at times. It was hard to get the resident to eat at times. On 04/05/22 at 12:25 PM LN E reported the resident would refuse meals and the staff would re-offer and she generally ate something from the meal if you serve her what she wants. LN E said R40's blood sugars remained good with no concerns with insulin given. On 04/11/22 at 10:20 AM LN G reported she did not know why the high blood sugars on those days were not called to the physician. On 04/11/22 at 10:30 AM Administrative Nurse B was going to check the physician log to see why the blood glucoses were not reported to the physician. Review of the facility policy named Diabetes dated 04/22 revealed the healthcare provider orders desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to diabetes or blood sugar management. The facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugars that were higher than parameters ordered by the physician
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored a suction catheter sanitarily to prevent infection...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored a suction catheter sanitarily to prevent infection for Resident (R) 10. The facility further failed to clean a glucometer (instrument used to calculate blood glucose) after use to reduce the risk of spread of infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 04/04/22 at 03:32 PM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine, with yellow liquid in the canister and sitting on the bedside table with the tubing and a Yankauer (an oral suctioning tool used in medical procedures) suction catheter tip set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted. On 04/05/22 at 01:09 PM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine, with yellow liquid in it, sitting on the bedside table and the tubing with a Yankauer suction catheter tip set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted. On 04/06/22 at 09:33 AM observed R10's room with a suction canister on suction machine, with yellow liquid in it, sitting on the bedside table and the tubing with a Yankauer suction catheter tip set directly on the bedside table, with no barrier noted. On 04/05/22 at 01:22 PM Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) K confirmed she was educated on infection control procedures but did nothing with the suctioning equipment for residents. On 04/06/22 at 09:35 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) D confirmed if a resident was suctioned, the canister should be emptied and cleaned, and the suction catheter should be replaced and all stored covered. LN D confirmed she had not suctioned R10. On 04/06/22 at 10:24 AM Administrative Nurse B stated her expectation would be that a suction canister and catheter be stored sanitarily. Administrative Nurse B confirmed on a bedside table with no barrier was not sanitary. The 06/2021 Infection Prevention and Control Program documented objectives were to prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections in the community. Staff were to be educated regarding proper techniques and procedures. The facility failed to ensure staff emptied a used suction canister and store a suction catheter in a sanitary manner. - On 04/06/22 at 08:14 AM Observation of Licensed Nurse (LN) E revealed the nurse doing an accucheck on R 12. LN E donned gloves and gathered her equipment and went to the resident room. She cleaned the resident's finger on his left hand and used a lancet to obtain a blood sample. The blood was put on the accucheck strip and read a blood sugar of 120. The nurse then removed the strip from the machine and wiped the resident's finger off. She then gathered the accucheck and placed it in the tote that contained lancets, alcohol pads and another glucometer. The nurse failed to clean the machine before putting it in with the other equipment. Interview on 04/06/22 at 08:18 AM LN E reported she should have cleaned the glucometer after use before putting it in the tote with other equipment. She then used a sanitizing wipe and cleaned the machine. On 04/11/22 at 12:30 PM Adminisrative Nurse B reported the glucometer should have been cleaned before returning it to the tote. The Facility policy on Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level dated 2022 revealed clean and disinfect reusable equipment between uses according to the manufactures instructions and current infection control standards of practice. The facility failed to clean and sanitize the glucometer after using on a resident to prevent the spread of infectious disease.
Oct 2020 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 54 residents, with 16 included in the sample and one resident reviewed for dialysis (the clinical pu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 54 residents, with 16 included in the sample and one resident reviewed for dialysis (the clinical purification of blood, as a substitute for the kidney's normal function). Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and service to attain or maintain a resident's highest practicable physical well-being related to dialysis by not assessing of Resident (R) 152's dialysis fistula (surgical connection made between an artery and a vein for dialysis) site. Findings included: - Review of R152's signed History and Physical dated 09/21/20 revealed the following diagnoses: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Review of the Admissions Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 indicating mildly impaired cognition and he received dialysis treatments. Review of the Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/01/20 revealed R152 .has ESRD with routine hemodialysis three times a week .He had shown anxiety by hollering out and voicing refusal of dialysis treatment, but he could be redirected and did attend his dialysis tratments. A review of the Renal Care Plan (09/25/20) revealed R152 received hemodialysis and had a potential for complications. When the client returned from dialysis, the staff were to assess the dialysis access site for bleeding and made sure blood pressure was stable before the resident resumed activity. Staff was to assess thrill (a subtle vibration felt which reflects the blood flow by a dialysis resident's shunt) and bruit (blowing or swishing sound heard which reflects the blood flow with a dialysis resident's shunt) of access site each shift. If absent, they were to notify the physician or dialysis nurse and document this information. Staff was to watch for signs of infection, such as warmth, redness, swelling, or pain in the access arm. If post-dialysis bleeding occurred at the access site, staff were instructed to apply direct pressure to the site for 15 minutes (or longer if necessary) to stop the bleeding. Review of the Dialysis Communication Sheet dated 09/28/20 revealed the form was completed before R152 went to dialysis and at the dialysis center, but the facility staff did not complete this form upon return from dialysis to include obtaining vitals accessing bruit, and thrill or assessing for bleeding to the dialysis access site. Review of the Dialysis Communication Sheet dated 10/02/20 revealed the form was completed before R152 went to dialysis and at the dialysis center, but the facility staff did not complete this form upon return from dialysis to include obtaining vitals accessing bruit, and thrill or assessing for bleeding to the dialysis access site An observation on 10/07/20 at 02:00 PM revealed R152 returned to the facility from the dialysis facility but did not has a Dialysis Communication Form from the dialysis center. An observation on 10/07/20 at 02:42 PM, revealed R152 lifted his shirt sleeve and revealed a couple of bandages over the fistula site and had blood on his shirt. An observation on 10/07/20 at 02:50 PM revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) B was in R152's room after R152 returned to the facility from dialysis. LN B did not look at R152's fistula until asked if she would assess his fistula, which had evidence of bleeding due to blood on his shirt's sleeve. During an interview on 10/07/20 at 03:12 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C stated that staff was to get R152's weight and vitals before and after he went to dialysis. During an interview on 10/07/20 at 03:07 PM, LN B stated regarding the charting for the fistula site, vitals, and visual assessment of the fistula was supposed to be on the dialysis communication form. And if the staff did not complete the form, then the staff did not assess the site. During an interview on 10/08/20 at 08:10 AM, Administrative Nursing staff A revealed that after a resident returned from dialysis, she expected the nurse on duty to complete an assessment of the fistula site, obtain weight, and vitals within the hour of returning to the facility, and document the information. Administrative nursing staff A stated that if the staff did not document it, they did not complete the assessment. Review of the Dialysis policy last reviewed on 12/2019 revealed staff were to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection, including fever, redness, tenderness, and bleeding at the fistula site. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff performed and documented post-dialysis assessments of R152's fistula site.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 34% turnover. Below Kansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $39,936 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $39,936 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 43/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Via Christi Village Ridge's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Via Christi Village Ridge Staffed?

CMS rates VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Via Christi Village Ridge?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE during 2020 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Via Christi Village Ridge?

VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASCENSION LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WICHITA, Kansas.

How Does Via Christi Village Ridge Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Via Christi Village Ridge?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Via Christi Village Ridge Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Via Christi Village Ridge Stick Around?

VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Kansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Via Christi Village Ridge Ever Fined?

VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has been fined $39,936 across 1 penalty action. The Kansas average is $33,478. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Via Christi Village Ridge on Any Federal Watch List?

VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.