VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
VIA Christi Village Ridge has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. Ranking #168 out of 295 facilities in Kansas places it in the bottom half, while it is #15 out of 29 in Sedgwick County, meaning there are only a few local options that may be better. The trend is improving; the number of issues decreased from 7 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 34%, which is lower than the state average. However, the facility has incurred $39,936 in fines, which is higher than 75% of Kansas facilities, indicating potential compliance problems. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to protect a resident from inappropriate advances by another resident with a known history of such behavior, which put them at significant risk. Additionally, after a resident fell due to leg weakness, the facility did not take immediate actions to prevent further falls, leading to a serious injury. Furthermore, there was a high rate of medication administration errors, with 81.48% of medications given incorrectly due to not following proper procedures. While the staffing situation is promising, these incidents highlight serious weaknesses that families should consider when researching this facility.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Kansas
- #168/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 34% turnover. Near Kansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $39,936 in fines. Higher than 81% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 59 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (34%)
14 points below Kansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Kansas average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
12pts below Kansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Three residents were reviewed for privacy and confidentiality in their care at t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 56 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interview, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled, that included three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - R8's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility reported a census of 72 residents. The facility identified four medication storage rooms and six medication carts used to administer medication to the residents. Based on observations, in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility census totaled 72 residents residing on four neighborhoods. Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to secure medications by the failure to lock two medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the five residents/ resident representative...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 59 residents with two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review and interview, the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when staff failed to empty a suction canister ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 61 with 15 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan for one Resident (R) 30 regarding the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents with 15 sampled. The facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
- R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the following diagnoses under the medical diagnoses tab: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition character...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 61 residents, with 15 in the sample, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored a suction catheter sanitarily to prevent infection...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2020
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 54 residents, with 16 included in the sample and one resident reviewed for dialysis (the clinical pu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 34% turnover. Below Kansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $39,936 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $39,936 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Via Christi Village Ridge's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Via Christi Village Ridge Staffed?
CMS rates VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Via Christi Village Ridge?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE during 2020 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Via Christi Village Ridge?
VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASCENSION LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WICHITA, Kansas.
How Does Via Christi Village Ridge Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Via Christi Village Ridge?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Via Christi Village Ridge Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Via Christi Village Ridge Stick Around?
VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Kansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Via Christi Village Ridge Ever Fined?
VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE has been fined $39,936 across 1 penalty action. The Kansas average is $33,478. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Via Christi Village Ridge on Any Federal Watch List?
VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE RIDGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.