ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF

85 NORTH GRAND AVENUE, FORT THOMAS, KY 41075 (859) 572-3211
Non profit - Corporation 26 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
85/100
#34 of 266 in KY
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

St. Elizabeth Fort Thomas SNF has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating that it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #34 out of 266 nursing homes in Kentucky, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and it is the best option out of five in Campbell County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from one in 2022 to none in 2025. Staffing is rated as excellent with a 5/5 star rating, although the turnover rate is concerning at 58%, which is higher than the state average. Importantly, the facility has not incurred any fines, demonstrating good compliance, and offers more RN coverage than 98% of Kentucky facilities, ensuring that skilled nurses are available to catch any potential issues. However, there was a notable concern raised during an inspection regarding infection control practices, where staff were observed transferring supplies between resident rooms without adequate precautions, potentially risking the spread of infections. Overall, St. Elizabeth Fort Thomas SNF has strong points in staffing and compliance but needs to address infection control procedures to ensure resident safety.

Trust Score
B+
85/100
In Kentucky
#34/266
Top 12%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 257 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Kentucky nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 58%

11pts above Kentucky avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Kentucky average of 48%

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Aug 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's training, and review of the facility's policies, it was...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's training, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice affected two (2) of fourteen (14) sampled residents, Resident #112 and #160. Observation of State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #1, on 08/03/2022 at 5:00 PM, revealed she took extra supplies, in a plastic sealed bag, between resident rooms, to perform finger sticks for blood glucose levels. One (1) room was non-isolation, and one (1) room was identified as Airborne and Contact Precautions isolation, which was designated per signage on the door. Observation of Physician #1, on 08/02/2022 at 11:55 AM, revealed the physician exiting room [ROOM NUMBER] with gloves on then doffing gloves and placing in the garbage can outside room [ROOM NUMBER], identified as Airborne and Contact Isolation per signage on the door. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions, origination date 12/01/2020, revealed Standard Precautions meant to treat all patients' blood or body fluids as infectious material. Per the policy, under Contact Isolation, gloves were to be removed before leaving the resident care area to prevent possible contamination of the environment outside the residents' rooms. Further instructions revealed gloves and gown were to be removed before leaving the room. Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Inf-Cntrl-P-01, revision date 12/01/2020, revealed employees received training, during orientation, on the proper selection, use, and indicators for PPE. Continued review revealed PPE must be removed prior to leaving the work area or clinical areas. Review of the facility's Computer Based Learning (CBL) training titled, Infection Control Update, All Clinical Associates, revision date 09/2021, under Transmission-Based Precautions, revealed, for all isolation types, to use dedicated or disposable equipment when available and take only necessary supplies into a resident's room. Further review revealed to remove all PPE before exiting the resident's room. Review of SRNA #1's training records revealed the SRNA received training for Infection Control and NOVA StatStrip glucose meter (glucometer, medical device that was used to measure blood glucose levels) on 03/23/2022. 1. Observation of Physician #1, on 08/02/2022 at 11:55 AM, revealed the physician exited Resident #160's room, room [ROOM NUMBER], an Airborne and Contact Precautions Isolation room, with gloves on. Physician #1 then doffed (removed) the gloves and placed them in the garbage can outside the room. Interview with Physician #1, on 08/02/2022 at 11:55 AM, revealed the physician had received training from the facility for donning (putting on) and doffing PPE, but it had been some time ago. 2. Observation of SRNA #1, on 08/03/2022 at 5:00 PM, revealed she entered the room of Resident #112 to obtain a blood glucose level. She had, in her hand, a plastic bag, which could be sealed at the top, and contained lancets, alcohol pads, glucose monitoring strips, and 2 x 2 gauze pads. She also carried the glucometer in her hand. Per the observation, SRNA #1 placed a paper towel on the overbed table, and then placed the glucometer and the needed supplies from the plastic bag on the paper towel. The first attempt to get a drop of blood from Resident #112 yielded an amount that was insufficient for a blood glucose level reading, but the second attempt was successful. Per the observation, SRNA #1 properly disposed of supplies, properly performed hand hygiene, disinfected the plastic bag and the glucometer with sanitizing wipes, and left the room. Continued observation of SRNA #1, on 08/03/2022 at 5:15 PM, revealed she donned PPE, took the glucometer, including the plastic bag with supplies, and entered room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #160's room. which was an Airborne and Contact Precautions Isolation room. Additional observation revealed, upon exiting room [ROOM NUMBER], she began donning PPE to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], which was an Airborne and Contact Precautions Isolation room with the plastic bag of supplies and the glucometer. At this point, SRNA #1 was stopped and interviewed by the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor about entering different resident rooms with the same plastic bag of extra supplies. Interview with SRNA #1, on 08/03/2022 at 5:15 PM, revealed she knew the policy of taking only needed supplies into resident rooms which would decrease possible cross contamination of residents and knew better than to take the same plastic bag with numerous supplies into each room. Additional interview with SRNA #1, on 08/02/2022 at 2:20 PM, revealed she had worked at the facility since March 2022 and had received new orientation training upon hire at that time which included isolation training for PPE and training for usage of glucometers. She stated there were two (2) glucometers for the unit, and they were cleaned with sanitizing wipes after use for the isolation rooms but not always for the non-isolation rooms. Interview with SRNA #2, on 08/04/2022 at 11:40 AM, revealed, for blood glucose monitoring, he placed the glucometer on a barrier, performed hand hygiene, and put on new gloves. Additionally, he stated he never took the bag of supplies into a room and would never reach in the bag or place supplies in his pockets. He also stated the glucose strip was scanned prior to entering the resident's room. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 08/03/2022 at 4:00 PM, revealed her job duties included medication administration, assessments, drawing labs, and contacting the physician as needed. She stated the PPE supply was plentiful. She stated she would don PPE prior to entering the resident's room and doff PPE prior to exiting the room. LPN #1 also stated glucometers were to be cleaned after each use with sanitizing wipes for all rooms, including non-isolation rooms, and wipes were inside each room. Interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) Manager, Registered Nurse (RN) # 4, on 08/04/2022 at 10:00 AM, revealed she had been the IP at this facility for three (3) years and was covering for the IP nurse at this time. She stated doffing (removing) PPE, including gloves, should occur inside isolation rooms. The IP Manager stated only needed supplies should be taken into residents' rooms. She stated the plan for the facility was to begin audits for PPE use, but the audits had not begun yet. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit Manager, on 08/04/2022 at 1:50 PM, revealed her expectations were for staff to abide by PPE use and glucometer checks for residents according to guidelines and regulations by taking gown and gloves off in the room. Per the interview, the DON said scanning of supplies should take place before entering the room and only (2) lancets and strips should be taken inside the room; the strip bottle should be left outside the room. She stated 2 x 2 gauze pads and alcohol pads were in the room, and supplies not used should be thrown away inside the room. The DON stated training for staff occurred annually, with hands on training for glucometer use, donning and doffing of PPE, and infection control videos. Interview with the Assistant [NAME] President of Post-Acute Services, on 08/04/2022 at 3:15 PM, revealed she had been in this role for four (4) months but had been the Administrator for the facility since December 2021. She stated her expectations for staff was to know and follow policies and to maintain training. She stated training for staff was conducted in person as well as with CBL, and she also expected staff to follow current practice concerning any medical equipment.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Kentucky.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kentucky, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf Staffed?

CMS rates ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 11 percentage points above the Kentucky average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF during 2022. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf?

ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 26 certified beds and approximately 13 residents (about 50% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in FORT THOMAS, Kentucky.

How Does St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf Compare to Other Kentucky Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kentucky, ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kentucky. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf Stick Around?

Staff turnover at ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF is high. At 58%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Kentucky average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf Ever Fined?

ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf on Any Federal Watch List?

ST ELIZABETH FT THOMAS SNF is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.