Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #193 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the bottom half, and #7 out of 9 in Bossier County, meaning only one other local facility performs worse. The situation appears to be worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 6 in 2024 to 12 in 2025. Staffing is a weakness, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 55%, which is above the state average, suggesting instability among staff. The facility also faces concerning fines totaling $101,806, which is higher than 80% of Louisiana facilities, and has less RN coverage than 88% of state facilities, limiting oversight of resident care. Specific incidents include a failure to manage a resident's severe pain after a hip fracture, resulting in the resident seeking emergency care due to unrelieved pain. Overall, while the facility struggles with numerous deficiencies and poor ratings, it is essential for families to weigh these factors carefully.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #193/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $101,806 in fines. Higher than 88% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 7 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 23 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Louisiana average (2.4)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
7 points above Louisiana average of 48%
The Ugly 23 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
12 deficiencies
3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (#331) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1(#52) resident of 1(#52) resident reviewed for tube feedings. The facility fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure facility's daily census and nurse/CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) staffing information was clearly displayed in a visible place for r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure:
1. Kitchen staff properly ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 1 (#51) of 36...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0568
(Tag F0568)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure quarterly statements were provided for 2 residents (#35, #5...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop resident's comprehensive person-centered care plans with a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate administ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) as ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have the six required staff members present for quarterly QAA (Quarterly Assessment Assurance) Committee meetings.
Findings:
Review of the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident fall was reported according to facility policy and procedure for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents for falls. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of quality as evidenced by failing to document a resident's fall and failing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop an individualized, person-centered plan of care to meet the needs of 1 (#15) resident out of 15 residents (#1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly assessments were completed no later than 14 days after the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) for 5 (#54, #14, #18, #7, #46)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) as ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, observations, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary choices were honored for 1 of 1 (#49) resident reviewed for dietary choices. The facility continued to serve ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in a sanitary environment. The facility failed to ensure staff assisting 2 of 2 (#0, #5) residents wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on resident council minutes, resident council response sheets and interviews the facility failed to consider the views of residents and respond promptly to the resident group with written docume...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a staff member for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical abuse was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency for 1(Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $101,806 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 23 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $101,806 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 23 deficiencies at Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 19 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Bossier City, Louisiana.
How Does Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is high. At 55%, the facility is 9 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has been fined $101,806 across 3 penalty actions. This is 3.0x the Louisiana average of $34,097. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.