Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

1524 Doctors Drive, Bossier City, LA 71111 (318) 742-1623
For profit - Limited Liability company 155 Beds PRIORITY MANAGEMENT Data: November 2025 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#236 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #236 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana places it in the bottom half, and #9 out of 9 in Bossier County means there are no better local options. Although the facility is improving, having reduced issues from 14 in 2024 to 1 in 2025, it still faces serious challenges, including 63% staff turnover, which is much higher than the state average. The facility has amassed $204,637 in fines, showing compliance problems that are concerning. Specific incidents include a cognitively impaired resident eloping from the facility due to inadequate supervision and assessments, demonstrating significant weaknesses in safety protocols. While there are some improvements in recent inspections, families should weigh these serious deficiencies against any strengths when considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#236/264
Bottom 11%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
14 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$204,637 in fines. Higher than 85% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 7 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 14 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 63%

17pts above Louisiana avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $204,637

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (63%)

15 points above Louisiana average of 48%

The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record

5 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to use a Hoyer lift, as determined necessary by the resident's compr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to use a Hoyer lift, as determined necessary by the resident's comprehensive care plan, during a transfer from the resident's bed to wheelchair for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents which resulted in a right humeral neck fracture.The deficient practice resulted in harm for Resident #1 on 07/14/2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. when S6 agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred Resident #1 from the bed to a wheelchair with a stand and pivot method without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 had an onset of acute pain to her right arm/shoulder and reported her right arm hit the wheelchair armrest during transfer. Resident #1 was care planned for activities of daily living self-care deficit with intervention of dependent in transferring with the use of Hoyer lift. S7 agency LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), Hospice and Resident #1's Responsible Party were notified. Resident #1's right shoulder x-ray results dated 07/14/2025 revealed an acute complex impacted fracture involving the right humeral neck. Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation and treatment and returned to the facility with a right upper arm sling in place. Findings:Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admit date of 09/14/2023 with a re-admit on 12/13/2023 with diagnoses that included in part other sequelae of cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, generalized muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy bilateral shoulders, and generalized osteoarthritis. Resident #1 was admitted to hospice for cerebral infarction on 12/16/2023 and passed away on 07/28/2025 in the facility.Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Mental Status of 8 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident #1 had impaired functional range of motion in bilateral upper extremities and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfer.Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the following problems with interventions: At risk for falls with intervention of transfer with Hoyer lift initiated on 11/23/2023.Activities of daily living self-care deficit with intervention of totally dependent in transferring with the use of Hoyer lift initiated on 01/01/2024. At risk for pain initiated 01/24/2024 with an update on 07/14/2025 for intervention right arm sling due to fracture of proximal end of right humerus.Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 07/14/2025 created by S7 agency LPN included in part S6 agency CNA was assisting Resident #1 into the wheelchair. Resident #1 reported during transfer she hit her right arm on the right wheelchair armrest and had an acute onset of pain rated 10 out of 10 to her right arm and more defined in right shoulder. Resident #1 was assessed and Resident #1 was able to move her hand but refused to perform range of motion to her right upper arm and shoulder due to pain. Resident #1's Hospice and Responsible Party were notified.Review of Resident #1's three view right shoulder x-ray results dated 07/14/2025 revealed an acute complex impacted fracture involving the right humeral neck.Review of Resident #1's Nurses Notes revealed in part Resident #1 was sent to the a local emergency room and returned to the facility the same day with a sling in place to her right arm.Review of the facilities training records revealed an Agency Facility Orientation sheet signed by S6 agency CNA on 04/14/2025. S6 agency CNA was oriented on locating CNA care guides including each resident's individual plan of care at CNA stations.Review of _______Staffing Agency records for staff in the facility July 2025 indicated S6 agency CNA worked at the facility on the following dates:07/01/2025; 07/05/2025; 07/06/2025; 07/08/2025; 07/13/2025; and 07/14/2025.During an interview on 08/26/2025 at 1:40 p.m. S8 agency CNA reported Resident #1 was able to make her needs known and was a two person assist with the Hoyer lift for transfers.During an interview on 08/26/2025 at 1:52 p.m. S9 LPN reported Resident #1 was able to make her needs known and was a two person assist with the Hoyer lift for transfers. S9 LPN reported a list of resident's activities of daily living needs was kept at the nurses' station and if the resident required a Hoyer lift for transfer there would be a sign over the resident's bed. During a telephone interview on 08/27/2025 at 1:40 p.m. S7 agency LPN reported on 07/14/2025 S6 agency CNA transferred Resident #1 using a turn pivot method. S7 agency LPN reported residents who required the Hoyer lift for transfer had signs over their bed and Resident #1 did not on 07/14/2025. S7 agency LPN reported S6 agency CNA did not ask her about Resident #1's transfer abilities prior to using a turn pivot method. S7 agency LPN reported Resident #1 complained of shoulder pain and reported Resident #1 had bumped her arm on the wheelchair when transferring from the bed to the wheelchair. S7 agency LPN reported she notified Hospice and an x-ray was ordered. S7 agency LPN reported the x-ray indicated a fracture and Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation and treatment.During an attempted telephone interview on 08/27/2025 at 2:25 p.m. with S6 agency CNA there was no answer. Surveyor immediately received a call back from S6 agency CNA's telephone number. During this interview, S6 agency CNA reported she had worked agency throughout the facility wherever she was assigned. S6 agency CNA reported she had training at the facility, reported a resident's level of care could be checked in the computer, and if a resident required a Hoyer lift for transfer there would be a sign over the resident's bed. During interview on 08/27/2025 at 3:34 p.m. S3 DON reported Resident #1 had been on hospice for about 2 years, was able to make her needs known, and was a two person assist with the Hoyer lift for transfers. When asked about Resident #1's incident on 07/14/2025 S3 DON reported Resident #1 told her she hit her elbow on the arm of the wheelchair when the CNA transferred her to the wheelchair. S3 DON reported Resident #1 was assessed and indicated it appeared as though Resident #1's shoulder had possibly come out of socket. S3 DON reported Resident #1 reported pain and guarded her arm and shoulder. S3 DON reported Resident #1's Hospice and Responsible Party were notified and an x-ray was ordered. S3 DON reported the x-ray indicated a fracture and Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room and returned that evening with a sling in place to her arm. During a telephone interview with S11 agency CNA on 09/02/2025 at 8:18 a.m. S11 agency CNA reported she did not recall having cared for Resident #1. S11 agency CNA reported she learned of resident's transfer abilities from report or in the resident's chart. S11 agency CNA reported she recalled a resident being hurt during transfer. S11 agency CNA reported she recalled S6 agency CNA crying and telling her she had transferred a resident and did not know she was supposed to use the Hoyer lift. S11 agency CNA reported there was not a sign over the resident's bed.During an attempted phone interview with Resident #1's Responsible Party on 09/02/2025 at 9:13 a.m. there was no answer.During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 10:05 a.m. S12 agency LPN reported Resident #1 was not able to move on her own, and was not able to make her needs known all the time. S12 agency LPN reported when she provided care to Resident #1 there was a sign over her bed that indicated Resident #1 was transferred with a Hoyer lift.During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 10:45 a.m. S13 CNA reported Resident #1 was transferred with a Hoyer lift and had a sign over her bed that indicated Resident #1 was transferred with a Hoyer lift.During an attempted telephone interview with Resident #1's Responsible Party on 09/02/2025 at 12:59 p.m. there was no answer.During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 1:10 p.m. S3 DON and S4 ADON reported new staff and agency CNA staff were oriented to the facility, given access to the CNA charting record, and trained on how to locate things in a resident's CNA charting including transfer abilities prior to working. S3 DON and S4 ADON reported the agency CNAs sign on the Agency Facility Orientation sheet indicating they were oriented to the facility CNA charting system.During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 1:24 p.m. S1 Quality Improvement Nurse and S2 Quality Improvement Nurse confirmed new staff and agency CNA staff were oriented to the facility, given access to the CNA charting record, and trained on how to locate things in a resident's CNA charting including transfer abilities. S1 Quality Improvement Nurse and S2 Quality Improvement Nurse confirmed the agency CNAs sign on the Agency Facility Orientation sheet indicating they were oriented to the facility CNA charting system.During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 2:20 p.m. S5 ADON confirmed new staff and agency CNA staff were oriented to the facility, given access to the CNA charting record, and trained on how to locate things in a resident's CNA charting including transfer abilities prior to working. S5 ADON confirmed the agency CNAs sign on the Agency Facility Orientation sheet indicating they were oriented to the facility CNA charting system. S5 ADON reported she had scheduled staff for Resident #1's hall. S5 ADON reported on 07/14/2025 S6 agency CNA arrived late to the facility because she had to call the agency to cover staff due to a late call in. S5 ADON reported she was called to go with S3 DON when the incident with Resident #1 occurred on 07/14/2025. S5 ADON reported she was told Resident #1 was transferred using a lift and pivot method. S5 ADON reported she did not recall Resident #1's transfer abilities without reviewing Resident #1's record.During an interview on 09/03/2025 at 10:15 a.m. S14 RN (Registered Nurse)/Wound Care Nurse reported Resident #1 could not do anything on her own and required the Hoyer lift for transfers. S14 RN/Wound Care Nurse reported there should have been a sign over Resident #1's door indicating she required a Hoyer lift for transfers.During an interview on 09/03/2025 at 11:00 a.m. S6 agency CNA reported on 07/14/2025 she came late and was given access to the CNA charting record and her assigned residents. S6 agency CNA reported she transferred Resident #1 with a stand and pivot method and Resident #1 told her she hit her arm on the wheelchair and complained of pain. S6 agency CNA reported she notified the nurse and DON and they assessed Resident #1, an x-ray was done, and Resident #1 had a fracture. S6 agency CNA reported she did not know Resident #1 was to be transferred with a Hoyer lift until after the incident. S6 agency CNA reported she did not know how to look up a resident's transfer abilities until after the incident. When asked if she had worked at the facility before S6 agency CNA reported she had worked at the facility once before that date and had not come back until recently. S6 agency CNA reported she was in-serviced regarding obtaining information regarding proper transfer after the incident with Resident #1.During an interview on 09/03/2025 at 12:30 p.m. S2 Quality Improvement Nurse reviewed S6 agency CNA's work history in the facility and reported S6 agency CNA first worked at the facility on 04/14/2025 and did not work again at the facility until 07/01/2025. S2 Quality Improvement Nurse confirmed S6 agency CNA had worked at the facility on 07/01/2025; 07/05/2025; 07/06/2025; 07/08/2025; 07/13/2025; and 07/14/2025 and confirmed documentation of S6 agency CNA's charting record entries for the dates worked in July 2025 which indicated proficient use by the CNA of resident's care guides.
Dec 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2 (#102, #105) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure safe oral medication administration practices by leaving medication at the bedside. Findings: Review of the facility's policy Administering Oral Medications with a revision date of October 2010 revealed in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. Preparation: 21. Remain with the resident until all medications have been taken. Resident #102 Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed an admit date of 07 /11/2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #102's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 indicating intact cognition. An observation on 12/15/2024 at 8:35 a.m. revealed a medicine cup with one pinkish colored pill and four white colored pills on Resident #102's bedside table. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #102 reported the nurse left her medications on her table for her to take after she finished eating. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 8:40 a.m. S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed she left Resident #102's medications in a medication cup at the bedside. S4LPN further confirmeded Resident #102 did not have an order for self-administration of medications. S4LPN reported medications should not have been left at Resident #102's bedside. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 9:20 a.m. S11RN (Registered Nurse) confirmed a resident must have an order to leave medications at bedside for a resident to take on their own. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 11:00 a.m. S3DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #102 did not have an order for self-administration, and medications should not have been left at the bedside. Resident #105 Review of Resident #105's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/09/2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to malignant neoplasm of the right kidney. Review of Resident #105's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 indicating intact cognition. An observation on 12/15/2024 at 11: 20 a.m. revealed a medicine cup on Resident #105's bedside table containing one small white pill and one small pink pill. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 11:20 a.m., Resident #105 reported the pills were left there this morning and he fell asleep before he could take them. Resident #105 stated that is my Oxycodone and my Lexapro. During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 11:25 a.m., S10 LPN confirmed the pills in the medicine cup on Resident #105's bedside were Lexpro and Oxycodone from the morning medication pass. S10LPN acknowledged she left Resident #105's room before Resident #105 had taken his medications. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 11:45 a.m., S2Corporate Nurse, reported Resident #105 did not have an order for self-administration. S2Corporate Nurse acknowledged medications should not have been left at the bedside and a nurse should stay at the bedside until medication administration has been completed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (#27, #224) out of 2 (#27, #224) residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (#27, #224) out of 2 (#27, #224) residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to: 1. Change the humidification bottle and nasal cannula weekly as ordered for Resident #27, and 2. Ensure oxygen tubing was dated, and humidification was administered with oxygen for Resident #224. Findings: Review of facility policies related to oxygen therapy revealed in part: Department (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection (revised November 2011): Use distilled water for humidification per facility protocol. [NAME] bottle with date and initials upon opening . Oxygen Administration (Revised October 2010)-The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration .The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure. 1) portable oxygen cylinder or concentrator 2) nasal cannula, nasal catheter, mask (as ordered), 3) humidifier bottle . Resident #27 Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/14/2023, and diagnoses including but not limited to: other sequelae of cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, shortness of breath, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #27's current physician's orders as of 12/16/2024 included: -an order dated 02/16/2023-oxygen-may have oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula or mask related to shortness of breath -an order dated 06/14/2024-oxygen: change mask, O2 (oxygen) tubing, water bottle, and clean concentrator filter every Friday night shift Observation on 12/15/2024 at 10:20 a.m. revealed Resident #27's humidification bottle with attached cannula were dated 12/01/2024. Observation on 12/16/2024 at 8:20 a.m. revealed Resident #27's oxygen humidification bottle with attached nasal cannula was dated 12/01/2024. During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 8:25 a.m. S9 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) viewed Resident #27's oxygen set up and confirmed the humidification bottle with attached nasal cannula was dated 12/01/2024. S9 LPN further confirmed the set up should be changed weekly and had not been. Resident #224 Review of Resident #224's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/13/2024, and diagnoses including but not limited to sepsis and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #224's current physician's orders as of 12/16/2024 revealed orders including: -an order dated 12/13/2024-oxygen: administer continuous oxygen at 3L/NC (liters per nasal cannula) -an order dated 12/13/2024-oxygen: change mask, O2 tubing, water bottle and clean concentrator filter every day shift every Saturday. Observation on 12/15/2024 at 10:10 a.m. revealed Resident #224 had oxygen in use at 3L/NC connected to concentrator with no humidification bottle and no date on cannula tubing. Observation on 12/16/2024 at 8:20 a.m. revealed Resident #224 had oxygen in use at 3L/NC connected to concentrator with no humidification bottle and no date on cannula tubing. During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 8:25 a.m. S9 LPN viewed Resident #224's oxygen setup and confirmed there was no humidification and no date on the cannula tubing and there should be.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in a safe, sanitary environment to prevent contamination and food borne illness for the 121 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in a safe, sanitary environment to prevent contamination and food borne illness for the 121 residents served a meal tray from the kitchen per the Dietary Manager. The facility failed to ensure frozen meat was thawed following accepted practices. Findings: Observation in the facility kitchen on 12/15/2024 at 7:50 a.m. revealed 2 large tube shaped chubs of ground beef in plastic packing and 3 large tube shaped pork tenderloins in plastic packing submerged in standing water in the sink. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 7:58 a.m. S7 [NAME] confirmed the meat should be thawing under running water, and should not be submerged in standing water. S7 [NAME] further reported the pork tenderloin was for the day's lunch, and the ground beef was for spaghetti for supper. During an interview on 12/15/2024 at 8:32 a.m. S6 Dietary Manager confirmed meat should be thawed under running, not standing, water. Observation in the facility kitchen on 12/16/2024 at 8:13 a.m. revealed multiple loose pork chops, out of packaging, along with ground beef in a zip lock bag thawing in a sink full of standing water. During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 8:15 a.m. S8 [NAME] confirmed the meat should be thawed under running, not standing, water. S8 [NAME] further reported she did not know how the sink was cleaned before the meat was placed in direct contact with the sink. During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 3:27 p.m. S6 Dietary Manager reported there were 121 residents served meal trays from the kitchen on 12/15/2024 and 12/16/2024.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2024 (July 1- September 30) revealed triggers for the following: One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 11:30 a.m. S5 Regional [NAME] President acknowledged, for the FY Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 - September 30), there was a PBJ system reporting error to CMS (Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services) for staffing.
Dec 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free fro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from deprivation of goods and services by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents when staff failed to utilize a Hoyer lift during a transfer. The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 11/17/2024 when Resident #1 was transferred from a Geri chair to the bed without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital related to a left lower leg wound which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. Review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE (left lower extremity) above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a past noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of Resident #1's hospital record with an admission date of 11/17/2024 revealed in part, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. Further review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed Resident #1 underwent incision and debridement surgical intervention to left ankle/leg wound on 11/18/2024 and 11/21/2024 with wound vacuum placement and was discharged on 11/22/2024 to a different local nursing home. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/20/2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral ischemia, polyosteoarthritis, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 resided on Hall A in Room A while a resident in the facility. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 discharged from the facility on 11/17/2024 and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed in part Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was totally dependent upon two staff members for transfer. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed in part: 11/24/2023 Resident may be up in Geri chair for trunk control and positioning. 10/09/2024 Non-weight bearing to left leg. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan, updated 10/08/2024, revealed Resident #1 required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and was totally dependent in transferring with the use a Hoyer lift. Review of the facility's in-service dated 10/07/2024 included in part, how to use a lift for transfers. Further review of the facility's in-service and attendance record dated 10/07/2024 revealed S5CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) signed the attendance record dated 10/07/2024. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 11/17/2024 for Resident #1 revealed Resident #1 was propelled to her room in a Geri chair by S5CNA. S5CNA was in Resident #1's room for about a minute and a half before going to the nurse's station and informing S3RN (Registered Nurse) Supervisor that Resident #1's leg was bleeding. S3RN Supervisor and S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) went to Resident #1's room where Resident #1 was found lying in bed with a laceration to her left leg. Resident #1's Geri chair, with lift pad still present, was observed to be perpendicular to Resident #1's bed. Resident #1 was assessed by S3RN Supervisor and S4LPN, 911 was called, and Resident #1 was transported to hospital. Further review of facility's Incident Report dated 11/17/2024 for Resident #1 revealed local law enforcement was called and transported S5CNA to police station for further questioning related to S5CNA's statement which did not match the facility's video surveillance. Review of S3RN Supervisor's written statement for Resident #1's 11/17/2024 incident revealed: Summoned to room per S5CNA yelling that Resident #1's left leg was cut and bleeding. Found resident in bed lying flat and face up. Resident #1's left lower leg had a laceration measuring 6 inches with adipose tissue and bone exposed. Towels were immediately placed on wound placing adipose tissue back in wound. Blood was noted on floor on right side of Geri chair. Blood was also noted on Geri chair seat, on Geri chair leg rest, lift sling, and 2 screws on the left side of Geri chair foot rest. Geri chair was in a reclined position with brakes applied. Resident #1 was asked what happened and she replied The man in the hall with a bed did it. Review of S5CNA's written statement for Resident #1's 11/17/2024 incident revealed: Resident #1 was in the dining room. I took Resident #1 to her bedroom so I could go get the Hoyer lift machine. When I came back I saw blood everywhere and that is when I went and got the nurse supervisor. Review of facility's video surveillance of hall A dated 11/17/2024 with S1Administrator on 12/03/2024 at 12:00 p.m. revealed: At 2:48 p.m. on 11/17/2024, Resident #1 was observed in Geri chair with legs elevated and resting on Geri chair foot rest. Resident #1 was wheeled down hall A and into Resident #1's room by staff member, who was identified as S5CNA. Further observation failed to reveal any blood on Resident #1's lower extremity clothing or Resident #1's skin which was visible between socks and clothing. At 2:49 p.m. on 11/17/2024, S5CNA exited Resident #1's room and walked directly to nurse's station and approached nurse, identified as S3RN Supervisor. S3RN Supervisor walked out of nurse's station and followed S5CNA to Resident #1's room. At 2:50 p.m. on 11/17/2024, S5CNA and S3RN Supervisor, entered Resident #1's room followed by a third staff member, identified as S4LPN. Review of facility's video surveillance from 11/17/2024 of hall A failed to reveal S5CNA left Resident #1's room to obtain a lift. After viewing the facility's video surveillance, S1Administrator reported it was clear in the video that S5CNA never went to get a Hoyer lift as she only left the room once and went directly to the nurse's station. During an interview on 12/02/2024 at 12:45 p.m., S1Administrator reported S5CNA was an agency CNA and had not worked at the facility since the incident on 11/17/2024. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 9:50 a.m., S6CNA reported she was working hall A with S5CNA on 11/17/2024 at time of Resident #1's incident. S6CNA reported she remembered Resident #1 was a resident who required a Hoyer lift and two persons for transfers. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 12:05 p.m., S3RN Supervisor reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1. S3RN Supervisor reported S5CNA came up to her and reported Resident #1's leg was bleeding and S3RN Supervisor followed S5CNA into Resident #1's room. S3RN Supervisor observed Resident #1 lying in bed, face up, with a wound to her lower left leg which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. S3RN Supervisor reported she covered the wound and called 911. S3RN Supervisor reported when she entered Resident #1's room she also observed the Geri chair perpendicular to Resident #1's bed in a reclined position. S3RN Supervisor reported Resident #1's Hoyer lift sling was still in the Geri chair and there was not a Hoyer lift in Resident #1's room. S3RN reported S5CNA stated Resident #1 must have injured her leg herself. S3RN Supervisor further reported prior to being summoned to Resident #1's room, Resident #1 was in her Geri chair in the dining room, which was visible from nurse's station, and S3RN Supervisor had not observed any blood or injury to Resident #1. During a telephone interview on 12/03/2024 at 12:18 p.m., S4LPN reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1. S4LPN confirmed she was the nurse working hall A on 11/17/2024. S4LPN reported prior to the incident on 11/17/2024, Resident #1 had been in the dining room in her Geri chair and Resident #1 did not have any blood on her or injury. During a telephone interview on 12/04/2024 at 8:25 a.m. S5CNA reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1 and confirmed she was Resident #1's assigned CNA at the time of the incident. S5CNA reported Resident #1 was in her Geri chair in the dining area and a staff member told her Resident #1 was ready to return to her bed. S5CNA reported she took Resident #1 back to her room in the Geri chair and left Resident #1's room to get the Hoyer lift. S5CNA reported Resident #1 was in the Geri chair and the Geri chair foot rest was pushed up to the side of the bed when she exited the room. S5CNA reported when she went back into Resident #1's room, Resident #1 was in bed with a wound to her leg. S5CNA reported she exited the room again and went to get the nurse. During an interview on 12/04/2024 at 10:30 a.m., S1Administrator reported S5CNA had been in-serviced, knew how to use a lift, and the lift sling was still in Resident #1's Geri chair. S1 Administrator acknowledged S5CNA failed to follow Resident #1's plan of care and utilize a Hoyer lift during transfers. During the survey, in-service records and Quality Assurance (QA) monitoring records were reviewed and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice beginning on 11/17/2024 with a completion date of 11/26/2024: 1. Nursing staff will be educated in the proper usage of a mechanical lift using 2 staff members by 11/25/2024. 2. Nursing staff will be in-serviced on how to access the [NAME] in the resident's electronic health record by 11/25/2024. 3. All residents who require a mechanical lift will be reassessed by the DON (Director of Nursing) or designee. The QI (Quality Improvement) Nurse will open a retired assessment for quality assurance purpose only. The assessment will then be turned off and the facility will resume the therapy screen by 11/25/2024. 4. The DOR (Director of Rehabilitation) was in-serviced on completing therapy screens upon admission, readmission, quarterly, and as needed. As needed screens will be requested after the interdisciplinary team determines the need. QI Nurse completed this on 11/22/2024. 5. The DON or designee will evaluate staff members using the mechanical lift or assessing 2 person assist transfers at least 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Any issues found will be addressed immediately, staff educated, and the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee will be notified beginning 11/22/2024. 6. A sign was placed at the head of the bed of any resident assisted in transfers with the mechanical lift to remind staff to use the mechanical lift and that it requires two people beginning 11/22/2024 and is ongoing with any changes in Residents' condition or new admissions. 7. The DON or designee will monitor that nursing staff, including agency nursing staff, can access the [NAME] from the computer by observation of staff retrieval of the data from the electronic health record. 8. The Administrator, DON, DOR, MDS staff were in-serviced by QI Nurse on proper completion of therapy screen assessments on 11/26/2024. (Completed prior to surveyor's arrival on 11/26/2024 at 12:55 p.m.) 9. The CNA involved in the incident was reported to the CNA board on 11/18/2024 by the Administrator. The QAPI committee will review this plan weekly for four weeks, then monthly, and as needed after that to make certain the plan is being implemented, functioning, and appropriate to meet the needs of the residents in the facility.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate assista...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for transfers by failing to follow Resident #1's plan of care. The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 11/17/2024 when Resident #1 was transferred from a Geri chair to the bed without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital related to a left lower leg wound which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. Review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE (left lower extremity) above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a past noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of Resident #1's hospital record with an admission date of 11/17/2024 revealed in part, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. Further review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed Resident #1 underwent incision and debridement surgical intervention to left ankle/leg wound on 11/18/2024 and 11/21/2024 with wound vacuum placement and was discharged on 11/22/2024 to a different local nursing home. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/20/2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral ischemia, polyosteoarthritis, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 resided on Hall A in Room A while a resident in the facility. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 discharged from the facility on 11/17/2024 and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed in part Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was totally dependent upon two staff members for transfer. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed in part: 11/24/2023 Resident may be up in Geri chair for trunk control and positioning. 10/09/2024 Non-weight bearing to left leg. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan, updated 10/08/2024, revealed Resident #1 required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and was totally dependent in transferring with the use a Hoyer lift. Review of the facility's in-service dated 10/07/2024 included in part, how to use a lift for transfers. Further review of the facility's in-service and attendance record dated 10/07/2024 revealed S5CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) signed the attendance record dated 10/07/2024. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 11/17/2024 for Resident #1 revealed Resident #1 was propelled to her room in a Geri chair by S5CNA. S5CNA was in Resident #1's room for about a minute and a half before going to the nurse's station and informing S3RN (Registered Nurse) Supervisor that Resident #1's leg was bleeding. S3RN Supervisor and S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) went to Resident #1's room where Resident #1 was found lying in bed with a laceration to her left leg. Resident #1's Geri chair, with lift pad still present, was observed to be perpendicular to Resident #1's bed. Resident #1 was assessed by S3RN Supervisor and S4LPN, 911 was called, and Resident #1 was transported to hospital. Further review of facility's Incident Report dated 11/17/2024 for Resident #1 revealed local law enforcement was called and transported S5CNA to police station for further questioning related to S5CNA's statement which did not match the facility's video surveillance. Review of S3RN Supervisor's written statement for Resident #1's 11/17/2024 incident revealed: Summoned to room per S5CNA yelling that Resident #1's left leg was cut and bleeding. Found resident in bed lying flat and face up. Resident #1's left lower leg had a laceration measuring 6 inches with adipose tissue and bone exposed. Towels were immediately placed on wound placing adipose tissue back in wound. Blood was noted on floor on right side of Geri chair. Blood was also noted on Geri chair seat, on Geri chair leg rest, lift sling, and 2 screws on the left side of Geri chair foot rest. Geri chair was in a reclined position with brakes applied. Resident #1 was asked what happened and she replied The man in the hall with a bed did it. Review of S5CNA's written statement for Resident #1's 11/17/2024 incident revealed: Resident #1 was in the dining room. I took Resident #1 to her bedroom so I could go get the Hoyer lift machine. When I came back I saw blood everywhere and that is when I went and got the nurse supervisor. Review of facility's video surveillance of hall A dated 11/17/2024 with S1Administrator on 12/03/2024 at 12:00 p.m. revealed: At 2:48 p.m. on 11/17/2024, Resident #1 was observed in Geri chair with legs elevated and resting on Geri chair foot rest. Resident #1 was wheeled down hall A and into Resident #1's room by staff member, who was identified as S5CNA. Further observation failed to reveal any blood on Resident #1's lower extremity clothing or Resident #1's skin which was visible between socks and clothing. At 2:49 p.m. on 11/17/2024, S5CNA exited Resident #1's room and walked directly to nurse's station and approached nurse, identified as S3RN Supervisor. S3RN Supervisor walked out of nurse's station and followed S5CNA to Resident #1's room. At 2:50 p.m. on 11/17/2024, S5CNA and S3RN Supervisor, entered Resident #1's room followed by a third staff member, identified as S4LPN. Review of facility's video surveillance from 11/17/2024 of hall A failed to reveal S5CNA left Resident #1's room to obtain a lift. After viewing the facility's video surveillance, S1Administrator reported it was clear in the video that S5CNA never went to get a Hoyer lift as she only left the room once and went directly to the nurse's station. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 9:50 a.m., S6CNA reported she was working hall A with S5CNA on 11/17/2024 at time of Resident #1's incident. S6CNA reported she remembered Resident #1 was a resident who required a Hoyer lift and two persons for transfers. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 12:05 p.m., S3RN Supervisor reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1. S3RN Supervisor reported S5CNA came up to her and reported Resident #1's leg was bleeding and S3RN Supervisor followed S5CNA into Resident #1's room. S3RN Supervisor observed Resident #1 lying in bed, face up, with a wound to her lower left leg which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. S3RN Supervisor reported she covered the wound and called 911. S3RN Supervisor reported when she entered Resident #1's room she also observed the Geri chair perpendicular to Resident #1's bed in a reclined position. S3RN Supervisor reported Resident #1's Hoyer lift sling was still in the Geri chair and there was not a Hoyer lift in Resident #1's room. S3RN reported S5CNA stated Resident #1 must have injured her leg herself. S3RN Supervisor further reported prior to being summoned to Resident #1's room, Resident #1 was in her Geri chair in the dining room, which was visible from nurse's station, and S3RN Supervisor had not observed any blood or injury to Resident #1. During a telephone interview on 12/03/2024 at 12:18 p.m., S4LPN reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1. S4LPN confirmed she was the nurse working hall A on 11/17/2024. S4LPN reported prior to the incident on 11/17/2024, Resident #1 had been in the dining room in her Geri chair and Resident #1 did not have any blood on her or injury. During a telephone interview on 12/04/2024 at 8:25 a.m. S5CNA reported she remembered the incident on 11/17/2024 involving Resident #1 and confirmed she was Resident #1's assigned CNA at the time of the incident. S5CNA reported Resident #1 was in her Geri chair in the dining area and a staff member told her Resident #1 was ready to return to her bed. S5CNA reported she took Resident #1 back to her room in the Geri chair and left Resident #1's room to get the Hoyer lift. S5CNA reported Resident #1 was in the Geri chair and the Geri chair foot rest was pushed up to the side of the bed when she exited the room. S5CNA reported when she went back into Resident #1's room, Resident #1 was in bed with a wound to her leg. S5CNA reported she exited the room again and went to get the nurse. During an interview on 12/04/2024 at 10:30 a.m., S1Administrator reported S5CNA had been in-serviced, knew how to use a lift, and the lift sling was still in Resident #1's Geri chair. S1 Administrator acknowledged S5CNA failed to follow Resident #1's plan of care and utilize a Hoyer lift during transfers. During the survey, in-service records and Quality Assurance (QA) monitoring records were reviewed and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice beginning on 11/17/2024 with a completion date of 11/26/2024: 1. Nursing staff will be educated in the proper usage of a mechanical lift using 2 staff members by 11/25/2024. 2. Nursing staff will be in-serviced on how to access the [NAME] in the resident's electronic health record by 11/25/2024. 3. All residents who require a mechanical lift will be reassessed by the DON (Director of Nursing) or designee. The QI (Quality Improvement) Nurse will open a retired assessment for quality assurance purpose only. The assessment will then be turned off and the facility will resume the therapy screen by 11/25/2024. 4. The DOR (Director of Rehabilitation) was in-serviced on completing therapy screens upon admission, readmission, quarterly, and as needed. As needed screens will be requested after the interdisciplinary team determines the need. QI Nurse completed this on 11/22/2024. 5. The DON or designee will evaluate staff members using the mechanical lift or assessing 2 person assist transfers at least 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Any issues found will be addressed immediately, staff educated, and the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee will be notified beginning 11/22/2024. 6. A sign was placed at the head of the bed of any resident assisted in transfers with the mechanical lift to remind staff to use the mechanical lift and that it requires two people beginning 11/22/2024 and is ongoing with any changes in Residents' condition or new admissions. 7. The DON or designee will monitor that nursing staff, including agency nursing staff, can access the [NAME] from the computer by observation of staff retrieval of the data from the electronic health record. 8. The Administrator, DON, DOR, MDS staff were in-serviced by QI Nurse on proper completion of therapy screen assessments on 11/26/2024. (Completed prior to surveyor's arrival on 11/26/2024 at 12:55 p.m.) 9. The CNA involved in the incident was reported to the CNA board on 11/18/2024 by the Administrator. The QAPI committee will review this plan weekly for four weeks, then monthly, and as needed after that to make certain the plan is being implemented, functioning, and appropriate to meet the needs of the residents in the facility.
Aug 2024 3 deficiencies 3 IJ (2 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff possessed the competency to accurately a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff possessed the competency to accurately assess a resident for elopement risk for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 ( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 walked out of the front entrance of the facility after S5Evening Receptionist remotely released the front sliding doors to an open position for Resident #1 to exit. Staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until 07/23/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m. Resident #1 had been inaccurately assessed upon admission to the facility on [DATE] by S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) as not at risk for elopement. S4ADON failed to interview Resident #1's family or RP (Responsible Party) at the time of the initial elopement risk assessment and did not capture Resident #1's history of elopement from home prior to admission to the facility, failed to capture Resident #1 told staff on the day of admission he was ready to leave and go home and family reported wandering behaviors. Therefore, protective measures had not been put into place related to Resident #1's elopement risk. S1Adminsitrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/30/2024 at 3:45 p.m. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to any resident residing in the facility at risk for elopement. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 07/31/2024 at 4:05 p.m. when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of the facility's admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse with a revision date of September 2012 revealed in part: Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to gather information about the resident's physical, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial condition upon admission for the purposes of managing the resident, initiating the care plan, and completing required assessment instruments, including the MDS (Minimum Data Set). Steps in the Procedure: 5. Conduct an admission assessment (history and physical), including: a. A summary of the individual's recent medical history, including hospitalizations, acute illnesses, and overall status prior to admission . b. Relevant medical, social and family history if available. Review of the facility's Wandering and Elopements policy with a revision date of 11/15/2023 revealed in part: Policy Statement: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and implement appropriate protective measure to help guard against a resident wandering from the facility. The facility strives to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Identifying Residents at Risk 1. On admission/readmission, quarterly during observation period of MDS, annual, significant changes and PRN (as needed), the nursing staff will screen each resident for elopement risk using the Elopement risk Evaluation V (version) 2.0, or equivalent form. After reviewing this information, the nursing staff will determine if the resident is at risk for wandering/elopement. 2. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. 4. The following items will be used to increase staff awareness of residents at risk to wander/elope: A list of residents that are high risk for elopement or with security bracelets will be posted at the nurse's stations. Identification of each resident with a picture and face sheet will be with the resident list at the nurse's stations. Orientation of all staff to potential wanderers will be performed on an on-going basis. Review of the Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/23/2024 at 12:58 p.m. with diagnoses including Dementia (unspecified severity) with Mood Disturbance, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Nicotine Dependence. Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Evaluation Audit Report revealed Resident #1, who had a history of elopement from home, was assessed as not at risk for elopement on 07/23/2024 at 3:59 p.m. by S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). Review Resident #1's Nursing admission Assessment dated 07/23/2024 revealed Resident #1 walked independently and needed no assistance from staff. Review of Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan failed to reveal Resident #1 was at risk for elopement and had a history of elopement from home. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #1 stated multiple times I want to go home; can you take me home? Resident #1 also asked do you have a car; can you take me home? During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 11:00 a.m., S2DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #1 told staff on admission day, he was ready to leave and go home and Resident #1's family reported he had wandering behaviors. S2DON reported Resident #1 should have been placed on the list of Residents at risk for elopement. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 1:30 p.m., S2DON reported she reviewed Resident #1's initial admission Elopement Evaluation on the night Resident #1 eloped and Resident #1 had been evaluated as not at risk for elopement by S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) on 07/23/2024 at 3:59 p.m. S2DON confirmed S4ADON did not complete an accurate admission Elopement Risk Evaluation for Resident #1 and should have. S2DON reported she had not looked at Resident #1's initial evaluation again until 07/29/2024, when she realized some of the answers had been changed. Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Evaluation Audit Report dated 07/29/2024 with S2DON revealed questions #3 and 5 had been changed from no as entered on 07/23/2024 at 3:59 p.m. to yes on 07/24/2024 at 7:55 a.m. by S4ADON. Further review of Resident #1's admission Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 07/23/2024 revealed in part, a 'yes' answer to any question identified with an asterisk (*) identifies a risk for elopement: Question #3. *Does the resident have a history of elopement or an attempted elopement while at home and Question #5. *Has the resident verbally expressed the desire to go home, packed belongings to go home or stayed near an exit door? S2DON confirmed these answer changes made Resident #1 at a high risk for elopement. S2DON reported S4ADON should not have changed answers on the initial elopement risk evaluation and a new elopement evaluation should have been completed after Resident #1 eloped. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 1:40 p.m., S4ADON acknowledged she had interviewed Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of Dementia, upon admission and evaluated Resident #1 as not at risk for elopement. S4ADON acknowledged she performed an inaccurate assessment by not interviewing the family or RP who were present at the time. S4ADON further acknowledged she changed some of the answers on Resident #1's initial elopement risk evaluation on the morning of 07/24/2024 to reflect Resident #1 was at risk for elopement, after she learned Resident #1 had eloped on 07/23/2024. S4ADON acknowledged she should not have changed the answers and instead should have opened a new elopement assessment. S4ADON reported risk assessments were a new task and was not sure if she was doing it right because she was not accustomed to performing assessments. S4ADON acknowledged she did not alert staff or put elopement interventions into place for Resident #1 until after he had eloped on 07/24/2024. S4ADON acknowledged had she interviewed the family during the initial evaluation and put protective measures into place, Resident #1 may not have eloped from the facility. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 4:15 p.m., Resident #1's RP reported Resident #1 had eloped from home about 2 months ago and was found by a construction crew. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 4:40 p.m., S5Evening Receptionist reported she was assigned to the front desk on the 07/23/2024 evening shift and acknowledged she had let Resident #1 out, not realizing he was a resident. S5Evening Receptionist further reported she was not notified on 07/23/2024 of any new admits who were at risk for elopement. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1Administrator, reported the S5Evening Receptionist not knowing Resident #1 was a resident and was at risk for elopement contributed to the safety process failure. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:10 a.m., S3Corporate Nurse, reported she reviewed Resident #1's initial elopement assessment the night Resident #1eloped and confirmed Resident #1 had been evaluated as not at risk for elopement by S4ADON. S3Corporate Nurse further acknowledged the 07/23/2024 elopement evaluation was inaccurate and S4ADON should have interviewed the family during the initial elopement assessment. S3Corporate Nurse acknowledged the initial assessment was changed the following day 07/24/2024 by S4ADON and should not have been. Review of S4ADON's personnel record failed to reveal nursing assessment competencies were completed.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, and interviews the facility failed to supervise a cognitively impaired resident from exiti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, and interviews the facility failed to supervise a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 ( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 walked out of the front entrance of the facility after S5Evening Receptionist remotely released the front sliding doors to an open position for Resident #1 to exit. Staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until 07/23/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m., when the search began and local police and Resident #1's RP (Responsible Party) were notified. Resident #1 was found with no injuries on 07/23/2024 at approximately 8:25 p.m. by Resident #1's RP. Resident #1 was located at a local restaurant approximately one mile from the facility, in which Resident #1 had crossed two four-lane roads. Resident #1's RP returned Resident #1 to the facility on [DATE] at 8:34 p.m. Resident #1 had been inaccurately assessed upon admission to the facility on [DATE] as not at risk for elopement and protective measures had not been put into place related to Resident #1's history of elopement from home. Multiple observations throughout the survey revealed the front entrance door, which opened to a large sitting area accessible to the residents, was not locked during the day and allowed staff and visitors open access to enter the facility. S1Adminsitrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/30/2024 at 3:45 p.m. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to any resident residing in the facility at risk for elopement. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 07/31/2024 at 4:05 p.m. when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Review of the facility's Wandering and Elopements policy with a revision date of 11/15/2023 revealed in part: Policy Statement: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and implement appropriate protective measure to help guard against a resident wandering from the facility. The facility strives to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Identifying Residents at Risk 1. On admission/readmission, quarterly during observation period of MDS (Minimum Data Set), annual, significant changes and PRN (as needed), the nursing staff will screen each resident for elopement risk using the Elopement risk Evaluation V (version) 2.0, or equivalent form. After reviewing this information, the nursing staff will determine if the resident is at risk for wandering/elopement. 2. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. 4. The following items will be used to increase staff awareness of residents at risk to wander/elope: A list of residents that are high risk for elopement or with security bracelets will be posted at the nurse's stations. Identification of each resident with a picture and face sheet will be with the resident list at the nurse's stations. Orientation of all staff to potential wanderers will be performed on an on-going basis. Review of the Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/23/2024 at 12:58 p.m. with diagnoses including Dementia (unspecified severity) with Mood Disturbance, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Nicotine Dependence. Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Evaluation Audit Report revealed Resident #1, who had a history of elopement from home, was assessed as not at risk for elopement on 07/23/2024 at 3:59 p.m. by S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). Review Resident #1's Nursing admission Assessment dated 07/23/2024 revealed Resident #1 walked independently and needed no assistance from staff. Review of Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan failed to reveal Resident #1 was at risk for elopement and had a history of elopement from home. Review of an internet mapping site revealed Resident #1 was located approximately 1 mile from the facility and had to cross two four-lane roads. Review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary Notes revealed a late entry by S7LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 07/24/2024 at 5:05 a.m. which read in part, (07/23/2024) 7:30 p.m., upon rounding, Resident #1 was not in room nor bathroom. S7LPN alerted staff. Search began. Notified S2DON (Director of Nursing). Notified RP. (07/23/2024) 8:45 p.m. Resident #1 returned to facility via private vehicle, accompanied by RP. Resident redirected to assigned room. Vital Signs: 133/70 (blood pressure), 68 (heart rate), 20 (respiratory rate), 97.7 (temperature) and 98% RA (oxygenation on room air). Body Audit performed. No bruising. No opened areas. Close monitoring in progress. Will continue to monitor. Observation on 07/29/2024 at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident #1 smoking a cigarette on the designated smoking patio with an assigned CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) present. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #1 stated multiple times I want to go home; can you take me home? Resident #1 also asked do you have a car; can you take me home? During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 10:40 a.m., S10Agency LPN reported the off-going night nurse on 07/23/2024 informed her during shift change report, Resident #1 was to have 1 on 1 supervision at all times and could not go up front because the entrance doors do not lock. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 11:00 a.m., S2DON confirmed Resident #1 told staff on admission day, he was ready to leave and go home. S2DON confirmed Resident #1 was seen on the facility video exiting through the front door on 07/23/2024 at 6:00 p.m. and S5Evening Receptionist opened the door remotely to let Resident #1 out. S2DON acknowledged staff did not realize Resident #1 was missing until around 8:00 p.m. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 1:30 p.m., S2DON confirmed Resident #1 was not deemed at risk for elopement on the admission Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 07/23/2024 at 15:59 p.m. by S4ADON and should have been. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 1:40 p.m., S4ADON acknowledged she had interviewed Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of Dementia, upon admission and evaluated Resident #1 as not at risk for elopement. S4ADON acknowledged she performed an inaccurate assessment by not interviewing the family or RP who were present at the time. S4ADON acknowledged had she interviewed the family during the initial evaluation, Resident #1 may not have eloped from the facility. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 2:40 p.m., S9Day Receptionist, reported she was not informed Resident #1 was a new admit or an elopement risk on 07/23/2024. S9Day Receptionist reported the front door was unlocked during the day for anyone to enter the facility and the sliding glass door automatically opens when a person approaches the front entrance. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 4:15 p.m., Resident #1's RP reported he found Resident #1 at a local restaurant at approximately 8:25 p.m. Resident #1's RP further reported Resident #1 had eloped from home about 2 months ago and was found by a construction crew. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 4:40 p.m., S5Evening Receptionist reported she was assigned to the front desk on the 07/23/2024 evening shift and acknowledged she had let Resident #1 out, not realizing he was a resident. S5Evening Receptionist further reported she was not notified on 07/23/2024 of any new admits who were at risk for elopement. Review of the facility's surveillance video footage of the front entrance area on 07/30/2024 at 8:50 a.m. with S1Administrator and S3Corporate Nurse revealed in part, the following sequence of events on 07/23/2024: 5:55:30 p.m. Resident #1 walked past the front desk with his personal coffee cup towards the front door and was seen by S5Evening Receptionist who was sitting at the front desk. 5:55:41 p.m. S5Evening Receptionist unlocked and opened the front sliding doors with the remote control button for Resident #1 to exit. 5:55:46 p.m. Resident #1 walked out of the facility and remained on the front porch for a brief time. 5:56:58 p.m. Resident #1 exited the facility's front porch and began walking away in a left direction. 8:31:55 p.m. A white truck was observed to pull up to front entrance of facility. 8:34:00 p.m. Resident #1 was observed getting out of the white truck and walked back into facility. Further review of facility's surveillance video footage of the front entrance area on 07/30/2024 at 8:50 a.m. with S1Administrator and S3Corporate Nurse revealed in part, the following sequence of events on 07/23/2024: 6:59:40 p.m. S5Evening Receptionist left the front desk to assist a wheelchair bound resident towards the back of the facility. 6:59:50 A visitor was observed entering the facility through the sliding doors, which opened upon approach to the entrance; front desk was observed to be unattended. 7:03:15 p.m. S5Evening Receptionist, returned to front desk, having left the front desk unattended for approximately 3 to 4 minutes. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:20 a.m., S11CNA reported she was working on 07/23/2024 and Resident #1 asked if she would open the front door because he wanted to go home. During a telephone interview on 07/30/2024 at 10:20 a.m., S7LPN reported she came to work on 07/23/2024 at 7:00 p.m. and did not see Resident #1 on initial rounds. S7LPN reported she began medication pass and by around 8:00 p.m. had still not located Resident #1 and that is when she and staff started searching and got S2DON involved. S7LPN acknowledged the day shift nurse reported to her on 07/23/2024 during change of shift report, Resident #1 was a wanderer. During an interview on 07/31/2024 at 1:05 p.m., S2DON reported once a resident has had an elopement assessment indicating at risk for elopement or a resident is known to wander, the resident's name will remain on the facility's Elopement List as an indicator of high risk for elopement, even if the resident has a follow-up assessment revealing no risk for elopement. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1Administrator, reported the S5Evening Receptionist not knowing Resident #1 was a resident and was at risk for elopement contributed to the safety process failure. S1Administrator acknowledged the front door was left unattended upon review of 07/23/2024's surveillance video and confirmed a resident could elope when someone enters the unlocked front door. S1Administrator acknowledged the front door entrance was not secure and there were times the desk may not be manned. S1Administrator further acknowledged the facility did not have a lock down unit or wander guard system in place to aide in measures to prevent elopement.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, an interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resourc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video review, an interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently by failing to implement a system to provide quality care to meet the needs of each resident by failing to: 1. Ensure a process was in place to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. and 2. Ensure the nursing staff possessed the competency to accurately assess a resident for an elopement risk. The lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 walked out of the front entrance of the facility after S5Evening Receptionist remotely released the front sliding doors to an open position for Resident #1 to exit. Staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until 07/23/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m., when the search began and local police and Resident #1's RP (Responsible Party) were notified. Resident #1 was found with no injuries on 07/23/2024 at approximately 8:25 p.m. by Resident #1's RP. Resident #1 was located at a local restaurant approximately one mile from the facility, in which Resident #1 had crossed two four-lane roads. Resident #1's RP returned Resident #1 to the facility on [DATE] at 8:34 p.m. Resident #1 had been inaccurately assessed upon admission to the facility on [DATE] by S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) as not at risk for elopement. S4ADON failed to interview Resident #1's family or RP (Responsible Party) at the time of the initial elopement risk assessment and did not capture Resident #1's history of elopement from home prior to admission to the facility, failed to capture Resident #1 told staff on the day of admission he was ready to leave and go home and family reported wandering behaviors. Therefore, protective measures had not been put into place related to Resident #1's elopement risk. Multiple observations throughout the survey revealed the front entrance door, which opened to a large sitting area accessible to the residents, was not locked during the day and allowed staff and visitors open access to enter the facility. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/30/2024 at 3:45 p.m. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to any resident residing in the facility at risk for elopement. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 07/31/2024 at 4:05 p.m. when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record reviews prior to exit. Findings: Cross Reference F689 and F726 Review of facility's surveillance video footage of the front entrance area on 07/30/2024 at 8:50 a.m. with S1Administrator and S3Corporate Nurse revealed in part, the following sequence of events on 07/23/2024: 6:59:40 p.m. S5Evening Receptionist left the front desk to assist a wheelchair bound resident towards the back of the facility. 6:59:50 A visitor was observed entering the facility through the sliding doors, which opened upon approach to the entrance; front desk was observed to be unattended. 7:03:15 p.m. S5Evening Receptionist, returned to front desk, having left the front desk unattended for approximately 3 to 4 minutes. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 2:40 p.m., S9Day Receptionist reported the front door was unlocked during the day for anyone to enter the facility and the sliding glass door automatically opened when a person approaches the front entrance. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S1Administrator, reported the S5Evening Receptionist not knowing Resident #1 was a resident and was at risk for elopement contributed to the safety process failure. S1Administrator acknowledged the front door was left unattended upon review of 07/23/2024's surveillance video and confirmed a resident could elope when someone enters the unlocked front door. S1Administrator acknowledged the front door entrance was not secure and there were times the desk may not be manned. S1Administrator further acknowledged the facility did not have a lock down unit or wander guard system in place to aide in measures to prevent elopement. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 9:10 a.m., S3Corporate Nurse, reported she reviewed Resident #1's initial elopement assessment the night Resident #1eloped and confirmed Resident #1 had been evaluated as not at risk for elopement by S4ADON. S3Corporate Nurse further acknowledged the 07/23/2024 elopement evaluation failed to include the family in the elopement assessment process, and S4ADON should have, to capture a history of elopement from the home. Review of S4ADON's personnel record failed to reveal nursing assessment competencies were completed.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure grievances/complaints had been documented and investigated. The facility failed to follow their policy for reporting and investigati...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure grievances/complaints had been documented and investigated. The facility failed to follow their policy for reporting and investigating grievances for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of policy titled Resident Grievances/Complaints, Filing with revision date of 11/01/2023 revealed: Policy Statement The facility shall establish a grievance policy in order to ensure prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights. All residents, family and resident representatives are to be encouraged and assisted (if necessary) in filing grievances, in the event they have a need to make a concern known. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. 4. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing, and may be filed anonymously. 7. Upon receipt of a grievance/complaint the staff receiving the complaint will initiate the RESIDENT GRIEVANCE/COMPLAINT FORM. An investigation lead by the Grievance Officer or designee based on the allegations will be set forth. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer and/or designee will review and investigate the allegations and discuss findings and recommendations with the Administrator. Findings will be discussed with the complainant within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. 9. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 10/22/2021 with diagnoses that included, in part, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified multiple sites, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, contracture right elbow, primary osteoarthritis right shoulder, primary osteoarthritis right shoulder, gastrostomy status, essential (primary) hypertension, vascular dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/02/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 99, indicating Resident #1 was unable to complete the interview. The MDS further revealed Resident #1 had no memory/recall ability and cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Review of 2024 Complaint/Grievance Log failed to reveal any grievance in regard to Resident #1. During an interview on 04/22/2024 at 11:20 a.m. S1 Administrator reported any resident/family issues that could be resolved quickly for residents were not included in the grievance log. During an interview on 04/23/2024 at 10:15 a.m. Resident #1's family member reported informing S1 Administrator that Resident #1 was repeatedly found in a soiled brief when visiting. During an interview on 04/24/2024 at 8:20 a.m. S1 Administrator reported about 4 weeks ago Resident #1's family member had complained that upon arriving for visits, Resident #1's brief was always soiled. S1 Administrator further confirmed he had not initiated a resident grievance/complaint form and did not have a documented investigation for the family member's voiced concern.
Jan 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the resident's representative were provided...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the resident's representative were provided with written information concerning advance directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive for 14 (#1, #3, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, #74) of 15 (#1, #3, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #33, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, #74) residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #1's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #13's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #20 Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #20's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #21 Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #21's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #22 Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #22's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #24 Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #24's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #28 Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #28's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #40 Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #40's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #45 Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #45's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #50's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #58 Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #58's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #65 Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #65's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #67 Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #67's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. Resident #74 Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #74's medical record failed to reveal resident or resident's representative was provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 8:48 a.m. S1 ADM (Admissions Coordinator) confirmed Residents #1, #13, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, and #74's medical records did not contain documentation that resident or resident's representative were provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 8:48 a.m. S2 SS (Social Services) also confirmed Residents #1, #13, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, and #74's medical record did not contain documentation that resident or resident's representative were provided with written information concerning advanced directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were transmitted within the required t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were transmitted within the required timeframe for 3 (#88, #60, #49) of 19 residents reviewed for assessments out of a total of 28 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #88's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments revealed a Quarterly/State Optional MDS dated [DATE] with a status of in progress. Further review revealed Resident #88's last transmitted Quarterly MDS was dated 09/14/2023. Review of Resident #60's MDS assessments revealed a Quarterly/State Optional MDS dated [DATE] with a status of in progress. Further review revealed Resident #60's last transmitted Quarterly/State Optional MDS was dated 12/14/2023. Review of Resident #49's MDS assessments revealed an Annual/State Optional MDS dated [DATE] with a status of in progress. Further review revealed Resident #49's last transmitted Quarterly MDS was dated 09/19/2023. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 1:15 p.m. S7 Licensed Practical Nurse/MDS Nurse reviewed Resident #88, Resident #60, and Resident #49's MDS assessments and acknowledged their MDS assessments had not been completed and transmitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) within the required time frame.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain g...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure oral care was provided for 2(#30, #109) of 4(#1, #30, #109, #111) residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Resident #30 Record review revealed Resident #30 had an initial admission date of 09/14/2023. Review of Resident #30's care plan revealed on 09/14/23 Resident #30 had a self-care deficit related to a left elbow fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and degenerative changes. Interventions include in part: observe and address and document residents ability to carry out ADLs, assist as needed in aspects of self-care that are problematic and resident requires assistance with personal hygiene. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 8:14 a.m. Resident #30's husband reported Resident #30 had no oral care this morning or in a long time. Resident #30's husband further reported the facility has not been providing oral care. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:10 p.m. Resident #30's husband reported Nobody has brushed her teeth. Resident #30's husband further reported oral care supplies should be in the bedside dresser. Resident #30's husband confirmed he does not brush her teeth. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:12 p.m. S3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported she did not brush Resident #30's teeth today. When asked where the oral care supplies were stored, S3 CNA reported in the resident's bedside dresser. When asked to see the oral supplies, S3 CNA could not find the oral care supplies and confirmed no oral care supplies were in Resident #30's bedside dresser. An observation on 01/30/2024 at 3:12 p.m. with S3 CNA failed to reveal oral supplies were stored in Resident #30's bedside dresser. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:19 p.m. S4 RN (Registered Nurse) reported the residents should get oral care after meals and as needed. S4 RN reported Resident #30 was not able to brush her own teeth and requires assistance. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 1:58 p.m. S5 Corporate Nurse reported oral care should be done twice a day and as needed for the residents. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 2:00 p.m. S6 DON (Director of Nursing) reported Resident #30 should receive oral care and confirmed Resident #30 needed assistance with oral care. S6 DON confirmed oral hygiene should have been performed on Resident #30. Resident #109 Review of Resident #109's record revealed an initial admission date of 07/21/2023. Review of Resident #109's record revealed the following medical diagnoses in part: Cerebral ischemia, dysphagia following cardiovascular disease, aphasia, and dementia. Review of Resident #109's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) dated 10/26/2023 revealed in part, no BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score due to not able to understand resident, requires a wheelchair, upper extremities impaired on both sides, and Resident #109 holds food in mouth/cheeks for residual in mouth after meals. During an interview on 01/29/2024 at 8:53 a.m. Resident #109's RP (Responsible Party) reported he visited every day and stays most of the day with Resident #109 to make sure she eats. An observation on 01/29/2024 at 8:53 a.m. revealed Resident #109 had a white substance noted on her tongue. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 12:34 p.m. RP reported Resident #109's oral care has not been performed since she has been at the facility. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:15 p.m. S3 CNA was asked if oral care was performed today on Resident #109, S3 CNA, answered No. S3 CNA reported she has never performed oral care on Resident #109. When asked to locate oral care supplies in Resident #109's room, S3 CNA could not locate the oral care supplies. S3 CNA confirmed Resident #109 did not have oral care supplies in the room. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:19 p.m. S4 RN reported residents should have oral care after meals and as needed. An observation and interview on 01/30/2024 at 3:20 p.m. S4 RN confirmed Resident #109 did not have any oral care supplies in her room. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 1:58 p.m. S5 Corporate Nurse reported oral care should be done twice a day and as needed for the residents. During an interview on 01/31/2023 at 2:00 p.m. S6 DON reported Resident #109 required assistance with oral care. S6 DON confirmed oral care should have been performed on Resident #109.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed as ordered by a physician for 2 (#20, #106) of 4 (#20, #30, #74, #106) residents reviewed for pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed as ordered by a physician for 2 (#20, #106) of 4 (#20, #30, #74, #106) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Findings: Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's diagnoses revealed the resident had a stage three pressure ulcer to right heel and an arterial ulcer to left lateral foot. Record review of Resident #20's current physician orders for January 2024 revealed the following, in part: Right heel clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Zinc and Collagen three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, and as needed for dislodgement/soilage. Start date 12/23/2023. Arterial ulcer to left lateral foot, clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Zinc and Collagen every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and as needed until resolved. Start date 12/21/2023. Record review of Resident #20's January 2024 TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed wound care was not marked as completed on January 16th, 25th, 27th, and 30th of 2024 for the arterial ulcer to left lateral foot. Right heel wound care was not marked as completed on January 9th, 16th, 25th, 27th, and 30th of 2024. During an interview on 01/31/2024, S6 DON (Director of Nursing) verified Resident #20's wound care treatments were not marked as completed for the arterial ulcer to left lateral foot on January 16th, 25th, 27th, and 30th of 2024. Right heel wound care was not marked as completed on January 9th, 16th, 25th, 27th, and 30th of 2024. Resident #106 Record review of Resident #106's diagnoses revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer to right heel. Record review of Resident #106's current physician orders for January 2024 revealed the following, in part: Clean right heel with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Santyl ointment, Calcium Alginate, and cover with dry dressing once daily and as needed for soilage/dislodgement until resolved. Record review of Resident #106's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed the following: December 2023 treatments were not completed on December 4th, 12th, 15th, 25th, and 29th of 2023. January 2024 treatments were not completed on January 3rd, 7th, 10th, 12th, 16th, 25th, 27th, 28th, 29th, and 30th of 2024. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 2:20 p.m., S6 DON verified Resident #106's right heel wound was not marked as completed December 4th, 12th, 15th, 25th, and 29th of 2023 and January 3rd, 7th, 10th, 12th, 16th, 25th, 27th, 28th, 29th, and 30th of 2024.
Jun 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each Resident's basic needs. The facility failed to provide the minimum required staffing hours for 3 of 28 weekend days. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2023 (October 1-December 31) revealed the submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. Review of the facility's staffing pattern reports for weekends from FY Quarter 1 2023 revealed the facility provided 288.76 hours on 10/16/2022 and were required to provide 293.75 hours. Further review revealed the facility provided 269.36 hours on 12/11/2022 and were required to provide 270.25 hours, and the facility provided 280.75 hours on 12/31/2022 and were required to provide 284.35 hours. During an interview on 6/7/2023 at 8:20AM S1 Administrator reviewed the facility's staffing pattern reports for weekends from FY Quarter 1 2023 and acknowledged the facility did not provide the minimum hours required on 10/16/2022, 12/11/2022, and 12/31/2022 and should have.
Jan 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and failed to ensure residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (#90) of 1 (#90) residents identified by the facility as an unsafe smoker by: 1. Failing to properly supervise an unsafe smoker (Resident #90) by the resident having cigarettes and lighter in his possession; 2. Failing to ensure all smoking receptacles in the designated smoking areas were of safe design and cigarettes were safely extinguished. Findings: Review of the facility's Smoking Policy-Residents with a revision date of 12/30/2022 revealed in part: This facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices . smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building .smoking is not allowed inside the facility under any circumstances . ensure that fire proof containers are available in smoking areas .once a resident is determined to be a smoker, his/her ability to smoke safely will be re-evaluated upon admission, readmission, routine quarterly, upon a significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) and PRN (as needed) Any smoking-related privileges, restrictions, and concerns (for example, need for close monitoring) shall be noted on the care plan, and personnel caring for the resident shall be alerted to these issues. The facility may impose smoking restrictions on a resident at any time if it is determined that the resident cannot smoke safely with the available levels of support and supervision .residents will not be permitted to keep cigarettes, e-cigarettes, pipes, tobacco, and other smoking articles in their possession if they are determined to have smoking restrictions or an unsafe smoker unless under supervision. Residents and visitors are not permitted to give smoking articles to other residents .this facility maintains the right to confiscate smoking articles found in violation of our smoking policies. Review of Resident #90's record revealed an admit date of 07/30/2021 and diagnoses including but not limited to Cerebral ischemia, lack of coordination, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #90's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15 indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #90's January 2023 Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 12/16/2022: Unsafe smoker. Staff to keep smoking material. Needs occasional supervision for safety during smoking. Review of Resident #90's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the resident was care planned as an unsafe smoker beginning 12/14/2022 related to smoking in his room with approaches including monitoring during smoking, occasional supervision for safety during smoking, and staff to keep smoking material on medicine cart. Review of Resident #90's Safe Smoking Assessments revealed a smoking assessments dated 12/15/2022: The Resident has demonstrated that he/she only smokes in designated areas in or around the facility=No. The resident was determined to be an unsafe smoker due to episodes of smoking in his room and required occasional supervision by staff for safety during smoking. The assessment further indicated staff was to keep the resident's smoking materials. Review of Resident #90's nursing notes revealed the following notes: 12/15/2022 at 6:42 a.m. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to writer that resident was smoking in room. Asked resident had he been smoking in room, resident said no. Writer informed resident that smoking was not allowed in building resident stated what are you going to do write me up? 12/22/2022 at 8:42 p.m. reported to writer by roommate and CNA Resident #90 was smoking in room. CNA brought lighter to writer. When writer attempted to give Resident #90 medications he refused until he could get lighter back. Informed resident that he could use the lighter just return it to nurse when done. Resident stated I don't give a damn I have another one. Writer asked resident for lighter. Resident continued to curse and be rude .In smoking area at this time with another lighter that he refused to give nurse. 12/23/2022 at 11:17 a.m. Cigarette lighter removed from resident and placed on med cart. Observation on 01/30/2023 at 1:11 p.m. revealed Resident #90 was not in his room. During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 1:11 p.m. S4 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was asked if she knew where Resident #90 was and she replied that he was probably outside smoking. Observation on 01/30/2023 at 1:12 p.m. revealed Resident #90 walking in the hallway just inside the smoking area adjacent to Hall B with the use of a wheeled walker that had a seat and storage pockets. During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 1:12 p.m. Resident #90 was asked if he had been outside to smoke today, and he responded that he had just finished smoking. Resident #90 reported he was able to go outside and smoke whenever he wanted to without staff supervision and kept his own smoking supplies. The resident pointed to the storage pockets on his walker which contained 1 unsmoked cigarette and 1 cigarette lighter. During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 1:14 p.m. in the hallway within sight of Resident #90, S4 LPN indicated Resident #90 was an unsafe smoker and his smoking supplies were kept locked on the medication cart and given to the resident when he wanted to smoke. S4 LPN indicated staff was supposed to go with the resident to supervise him while smoking. S4 LPN was informed that Resident #90 had a cigarette and a lighter on his walker, and she indicated he probably got them from someone else and that is a problem. S4 LPN made no move to ask the resident how he got the cigarette or attempt to retrieve the smoking supplies from him at that time. During a repeat interview on 01/30/2023 at 1:38 p.m. Resident #90 confirmed he had been caught smoking in his room but that was a year ago. Resident #90 would not say where he had obtained the cigarette and lighter from today. During a repeat interview on 01/30/2023 at 1:40 p.m. S4 LPN confirmed Resident #90 was an unsafe smoker and was not supposed to have smoking supplies in his possession without staff supervision. S4 LPN indicated the resident would not tell her where he got the cigarette and lighter from today. S4 LPN reported she reminded Resident #90 of his being caught smoking in his room and he told her that was a year ago, but she reminded him it was only 1 month ago. S4 LPN further indicated Resident #90 probably obtained the smoking supplies from another smoker. Observation of the enclosed smoking patio adjacent to Hall B on 01/31/2023 at 7:55 a.m. revealed 1 open top metal can approximately 8 inches tall and 6 inches in diameter containing ashes, cigarette butts and partially smoked cigarettes, and paper trash on 1 side of the patio and another on the other side of the patio. Further observation revealed multiple cigarette butts scattered on the ground and among the pine straw mulch in garden beds surrounding the patio. Further observation failed to reveal any smoking receptacle designed for safe disposal of smoking materials. Observation of the enclosed smoking patio adjacent to Hall A on 01/31/2023 at 8:17 a.m. revealed 1 open top metal ashtray approximately 4 inches high and approximately 6 inches in diameter with ashes, cigarette butts and partially smoked cigarettes. Further observation revealed multiple cigarette butts scattered on the ground and among the pine straw mulch in garden beds surrounding the patio. During an interview on 01/31/2023 at 8:35 a.m. S1 Administrator observed the smoking patios adjacent to Hall A and Hall B, and confirmed the open top cans and ashtray on the smoking patios were not of safe design for disposal of smoking materials. S1 Administrator further confirmed the cigarette butts and partially smoked cigarettes scattered among the pine straw in the garden beds surrounding the patio was a safety hazard.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#116) of 2 (#116, #79) residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#116) of 2 (#116, #79) residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure the tube feeding and water bags were labeled correctly. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump Policy revised November 2018 revealed in part: check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: resident name, ID and room number, type of formula, date and time formula were prepared, route of delivery, method (pump, gravity, syringe) and rate of administration .On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered. Review of Resident #116's record revealed an admit date of 12/23/2022 and diagnoses including, but not limited to Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and Gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #116's January 2023 Physician's Orders revealed and order dated 01/12/2023 for Isosource 1.5 liquid formula 65 ml (milliliters) per hour x 22 hours via pump. Observation on 01/29/2023 at 9:47 a.m. revealed Resident #116 had a clear feeding bag of beige colored fluid infusing to the resident's enteral feeding tube at 65 ml per hour via pump with no label indicating what the fluid was, when it was hung, or by whom. Further review revealed there was also a clear feeding bag of clear fluid hanging and attached to the feeding pump with no label indicating what the fluid was, when it was hung, or by whom. During an observation and interview on 01/29/2023 at 9:52 a.m. S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed the 2 bags of fluid attached to Resident #116's enteral feeding tube and was asked what was in them. S5 LPN responded that she didn't know, and there was no way for her to tell what was in the bags or how long they had been there since they were not labeled and should be.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 3 residents (#8, #34, and #74) out of a total sample of 36 residents. The facility failed to ensure Residents #8, #34, and #74 had a way to turn on their light from the bed. Findings: Resident #8 During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 3:20 p.m. Resident #8 was in resident room and reported there was not a light that could be turned on from the bed. Observation on 01/30/2023 at 3:21 p.m. revealed Resident #8's room had a light switch at the room entry door and a light switch on the wall near the head of the bed and did not have a way to turn light on from the bed. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), other intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region, scoliosis, other cervical disc degeneration unspecified cervical region, history of falling, pain and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy unspecified,. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Date Set) dated 10/27/2022 revealed Resident #8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15 indicating Resident #8 was cognitively intact. Resident #34 During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 3:15 p.m. Resident #34 was in resident room and reported there was not a way to turn the light on from the bed. Further reported her prior room had a string that reached her bed to turn the light on and her current room did not. Observation on 01/30/2023 at 3:16 p.m. revealed Resident #34's room had a light switch at the room entry door and a light switch on the wall near the head of the bed and did not have a way to turn the light on from the bed. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, polyosteoarthritis, Fibromyalgia history of falls, other lack of coordination, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. Review of Resident #34's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Resident #74 During an interview on 01/29/2023 at 4:26 p.m. Resident #74 was in resident room and reported there was not a way to turn on the light from the bed. Observation on 01/29/2023 at 4:27 p.m. revealed Resident #74's room had a light switch at the room entry door and a light switch on the wall near the head of the bed and did not have a way to turn the light on from the bed. Review of Resident #74's 's medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, polyosteoarthritis, spinal stenosis site unspecified, history of falling, obesity, essential hypertension, pain, arthropathic psoriasis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #74's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating Resident #74 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 3:45 p.m. S6 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and S7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) observed Resident #74's light and agreed Resident #74 could not reach the switch to turn light on/off from the bed. Observation on 01/30/2023 at 3:58 p.m. with S2 Regional [NAME] President revealed all the Resident #8, Resident #34 and Resident #74's rooms did not have a way for residents to reach the switch to turn on the light from the bed. During an interview on 01/30/2023 at 3:58 p.m. S2 Regional [NAME] President reported the 500 hall and 600 hall had opened approximately 2 weeks ago after a renovation and agreed Resident #8, Resident #34, and Resident #74's rooms did not have light switches residents could reach from the bed and should have.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 113 residents served a meal...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 113 residents served a meal tray from the kitchen as reported by the Dietary Manager. The facility failed to ensure staff performed chemical and temperature checks for the dish machine and 3 compartment sink, and failed to ensure temperatures were maintained at safe levels for the kitchen's walk-in freezer and refrigerators. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Manual Cleaning and Sanitizing of Utensils and Portable Equipment revealed in part: the facility will follow the cleaning and sanitizing requirements of the state and US (United States) Food Codes for manual cleaning in order to ensure that all utensils and equipment are thoroughly cleaned and sanitized to minimize the risk of food hazards .Use a three-compartment sink with running hot and cold water for cleaning, rinsing and sanitizing .Sanitize all multi-use eating and drinking utensils and the food-contact surfaces of other equipment in the third compartment .Test and record the parts per million concentration of the solution. Review of the facility's policy for Mechanical Cleaning and Sanitizing of Utensils and Portable Equipment revealed in part: If a low temp machine that uses chemicals for sanitizing is in use, follow these guidelines: the temperature of the wash water must be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit, Utensils and equipment must be exposed to the final chemical sanitizing rinse in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications for time and concentration, the chemical sanitizing rinse water temperature must be no less than the temperature specified by the machine's manufacturer, a test kit or other device that accurately measures the parts per million concentration of the solution must be available and used . Review of the facility's policy for Food Storage revealed in part: Refrigerators .Place a thermometer inside refrigerators near the door where the temperature is warmest. Check the temperature of all refrigerators using the internal thermometer to make sure the temperature stays at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Temperatures should be checked each morning and again on the PM (evening) shift. Record the temperatures on a log that is kept near the refrigerator .Freezers .Place a thermometer inside freezers near the door where the temperature is warmest. Check the temperature of all freezers using the internal thermometer to make sure the temperature stays at zero degrees Fahrenheit or below. Temperatures should be checked each morning and again on the PM shift. Record the temperatures on a log that is kept near the freezer . Review of the January 2023 dishwasher, 3 compartment sink, refrigerator, and freezer logs revealed the logs were not maintained as follows: Test Strip Log for Three Compartment Sink not completed on 01/15/2023 through 01/28/2023; Dish Machine Temperatures and Sanitizing Log not completed on 01/01/2023, 01/02/2023, and 01/06/2023 through 01/20/2023; Freezer Temperature Record not completed on 01/07/2023 through 01/12/2023, and 01/20/2023 through 01/29/2023; Refrigerator #1 Temperature Record not completed on 01/09/2023 through 01/12/2023, and 01/20/2023 through 01/28/2023; Refrigerator #2 Temperature Record not completed on 01/11/2023 through 01/18/2023, and 01/26/2023 through 01/28/2023. During an interview on 01/29/2023 at 8:40 a.m., S3 Dietary Manager reviewed the January 2023 temperature and chemical logs for the kitchen's dish machine and 3 compartment sink and the temperature logs for the kitchen's walk-in freezer and refrigerators, and confirmed they had not been completed and should have been.
Nov 2022 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as determined necessary by the comprehe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as determined necessary by the comprehensive care plan, during a transfer from the resident's wheelchair to bed for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents who required two-person assist with transfers. The deficient practice resulted in actual harm for resident #5 on 8/3/2022 when the resident was being transferred from a wheelchair to her bed. Resident #5 required two plus person physical assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Resident # 5 was being transferred by only one person when her left leg was hit on the bed rails and injured. On the morning of 8/4/2022 after resident #5 left leg was hit on the bedrail she complained of pain and discomfort. Resident #5 was assessed by a facility nurse, an x-ray was ordered and it was confirmed resident #5 had a left tibia/fibula fracture. Resident #5 was sent to a local hospital with at diagnosis of proximal fibula fracture with mid shaft comminuted spiral tibia fracture with non-displaced fracture of medical malleolus. Findings: Review of the facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents Policy revealed in part: Revised July 2017 Policy Statement: Our facility strives to make environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Individualized, Resident - Centered Approach to Safety 5. Monitoring the effectiveness of interventions shall include the following: a. Ensuring the interventions are implemented correctly and consistently. Resident Risks and Environmental Hazards 1. B. Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents Review of resident #5's clinical records revealed an admit date of 7/8/2022 to this facility and a discharge date of 8/9/2022. Diagnoses include hemiplegia following a cerebral infraction affecting right dominant side, diabetes, arthritis, aphasia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia and muscle wasting and weakness. Review of resident #5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) 7/15/2022 revealed the resident required two plus persons physical assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of resident #5's Comprehensive Plan of Care revealed she required staff assistance for all activities of daily living. Resident #5 needs included extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Some of the approaches are staff will provide assistance with transfers using two people. 7/13/2022 May use sliding board for transfers. 8/5/2022 Transfer with mechanical lift. Review of a hand written statement dated 8/3/2022 by S4 Agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistance) revealed: upon putting resident #5 in the bed during the transfer I heard her leg pop as we were putting her in the bed on yesterday and after I heard it pop I asked her was she okay. She said she was, but her legs always hurt like that and she was rubbing the left one saying that if you have it just right it'll go back right. When I was transferring her we started out using the sliding board but as we were using it she was having difficulty getting on it right so I turned her around towards the bed to put her in it so it would be more helpful for her to get in the bed. We did not use the sliding board because it was easier for her without it. Review of S14 LPN Charge Nurse Hand written statement, documented on 8/3/2022 she was scheduled to work on the same hall with S4 Agency CNA. I noticed S4 Agency CNA transferring resident #5 from her wheelchair to her bed by himself. Review of S10 CNA hand written statement dated 8/9/2022 documented, the day resident #5's had her incident I witnessed almost the ending I was in the process of putting resident ____ in the bed and I heard something like a loud yell. S4 Agency CNA was putting resident #5 in the bed by himself. Resident #5 said her leg hurt he continued to adjust her in the bed. As far as anyone helping S4 Agency CNA put resident #5 in bed there was no one helping him. Review of S2 DON (Director of Nursing) notes dated 8/4/2022 revealed the following documentation: 10:00 a.m. resident #5 was found to have pain by daytime nurse S13 LPN. S13 LPN assessed resident #5 left lower leg. Left lower leg noted swollen, warm to touch, and with bruising to medial aspect of leg. Left leg was noted to be turned in an outward position towards the patient's left side. Resident voiced the person who put her to bed from the wheelchair, the night before, bumped her leg on the bed frame, but he did not use the sliding board. Dr._____ was notified of the above findings and new orders were notified for x-ray and Doppler ultrasound of left leg. 3:40 p.m. x-ray tech arrived and completed x-ray indicating possible fracture. NP (Nurse Practitioner) aware of x-ray results and referred resident to ER (emergency room) for evaluation. 4:13 p.m. resident transport to ER for evaluation per____ stretcher prior to being able to do a Doppler ultrasound. 8/5/2022 at 11:00 a.m. Administrator and I spoke with resident #5's RP (responsible party) related to resident's incident on 8/3/2022. Informed resident #5's RP the CNA who performed the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed 8/3/2022 did not use proper procedure in placing resident in the bed with a slide board, even after resident stated to him to use it. CNA stated to me that he felt he could do the transfer without it. CNA will no longer be working at this facility because of the lack of proper transferring technique resulting in a resident's injury. Review of resident #5's Nurse Notes revealed: Nurse's notes dated 8/4/2022 at 10:00 a.m. S13 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented writer called to resident #5's room by PT (physical therapist) for resident complaint of pain to left lower leg. Examined and noted purple bruise to left lower leg, swollen, warm to touch and painful. Resident able to flex foot but notable to rotate inward. Resident reported she bumped her leg on bed frame when they were putting her to bed last night. Call to Dr. _____ notified new order for x-ray and Doppler study. Resident given APAP (Tylenol) 650mg (milligram) by mouth for pain. Review of nurse's notes dated 8/4/2022 at 11:30 a.m. S16 LPN documented late entry writer received report from floor nurse that resident has swelling and bruising to her left lower leg. Writer went to resident's room to evaluate resident left lower extremity, swollen, warm to touch with bruising noted to medial aspect of leg. Resident left foot is also turned outward. Resident stated that she is experiencing intense pain when writer touched her leg. When trying to lift resident's leg she screamed in pain. Floor nurse administered resident prn pain meds and contacted doctor for new orders Review of nurse's notes dated 8/4/2022 at 4:34 p.m. S16 LPN documented __ Imaging arrived to perform x-ray of resident's left leg at 3:40 p.m. Upon completion of x-ray tech showed NP (Nurse Practitioner) resident's imaging and NP stated that resident needs to be sent to the ER(Emergency Room) due to possible bone fracture. EMS (emergency medical services) was called and they arrived to facility at 4:13 pm to transport resident. Resident #5 left facility in stable condition. Vital signs 96% - 97.3-130/80-78-18. Resident #5 stated that she was still having intense leg pain. Review of the hospital emergency room notes dated 8/4/2022 at 4:55 p.m. revealed the chief complaint, leg injury. [AGE] year old female presents to the emergency department with complaint of left lower leg injury. Patient states she was being moved into bed when her lower leg hit the bed. Content: other (hit on side of bed). Extremity/Vascular: Left lower extremity: Knee joint (swelling noted), lower leg left; Lower leg: Inspection (bruising from mid to distal left anterior shin) and palpation (tenderness of mid left anterior shin distally to left ankle) and ankle joint (ankle deformity with left foot rotated laterally. Imaging Data Attestation imaging: X-ray left tib-fib (tibia-fibula) and left ankle: Proximal fibula fracture with mid shaft comminuted spiral tibia fracture with non-displaced fracture of medical malleolus, mortise appears intact. Impression: Fractured tibia and fibula as described. 2. Fracture medial malleolus. Attempted to interview S4 Agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) by phone on 11/21/2022 at 1:34 p.m. and 6:04 p.m., with no answer. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 9:36 a.m. S2 DON reported she had notified the Staffing Agency, S4 Agency CNA is not to return to work at this facility again. S2 DON reported S4 Agency CNA did not follow the resident plan of care. S2 DON reported S4 Agency CNA admitted he did not use the resident sliding board, he thought he could get her into bed by himself. S2 DON reported resident #5 did not complain of pain or anything until the next day. S15 Physical therapist reported to S13 LPN resident #5 complained of pain and discomfort to her left leg. At this time S13 LPN assessed resident #5 and found her left leg red, warm, painful and swollen. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 10:15 a.m. S13 LPN reported she was notified by S15 PT (Physical Therapist) on 8/4/2022 at 10:00 a.m. that resident #5 was complaining of pain to her left lower extremity. S13 LPN reported she assessed resident #5 and found her left lower extremity to be swollen, red, warm, rotated outward and hurting. S13 LPN reported she notified S2 DON and she assessed resident #5 herself. S13 LPN reported she administered Tylenol for pain, she reported it was effective. S13 LPN reported the Unit Manager notified the family. S13 LPN reported resident #5's physician was notified. X-rays was ordered and it showed resident #5 had a fracture. S13 LPN reported resident #5 requires maximum assistance with 2 persons for transfer and bed mobility. S13 LPN reported resident #5 can use the sliding board with assistance. S13 LPN reported resident #5 is alert and able to make her needs know. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 12:55 pm S21 Corporate Nurse reported they have a contract with _______ Staffing Agency that they are provided trained and competent staff. She further reported an agency CNA has a sign in code where they have access to all resident's plans of care. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 1:51 p.m. S10 CNA reported she and another CNA were working on the hall with S4 Agency CNA on 8/3/2022. S10 CNA reported they passed resident #5's room in route to help put another resident to bed. S10 CNA reported she asked S4 Agency CNA if he need some help to put resident #5 in bed and he declined help. S10 CNA reported she knew he needed assistance because resident #5 requires 2 person assistance with transfers. She reported S4 Agency CNA refused any help. During an interview 11/21/2022 at 2:16 p.m. S14 LPN reported she works 2 days a week at this facility for ____ Staffing Agency. S14 LPN reported on 8/3/2022 she was in the room across from resident #5 room when she noticed S4 Agency CNA helping resident #5 from her wheelchair to the bed. S4 Agency CNA was in the process of transferring resident #5. S14 LPN reported before she could remove her PPE's (personal protective equipment) S4 Agency CNA had transferred resident #5 to her bed without any assistance. She reported S4 Agency CNA did not wait for any assistance, did not use a sliding board or the mechanical lift. S14 LPN reported the reason she was concerned about S4 Agency CNA moving resident #5 by himself is because he is a small man and she is a large woman. S14 LPN reported that entire night resident #5 never complained of foot or leg pain. S14 LPN reported she was aware resident #5 required extensive assistance, 2 plus assistance for transfers and bed mobility. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 6:58 p.m. resident #5's RP (Responsible Party) reported her mother was not available for an interview. She reported her mother confirmed she tried to tell S4 Agency CNA he could not get her up by himself but he would not listen. She acknowledged her mother is over 6 feet tall and weighs over 200 pounds and S4 Agency CNA was a small guy. During an interview on 11/22/20222 at 9:10 a.m. S15 PT (Physical Therapist) reported he was performing side board training with resident #5. S15 PT reported the morning of 8/4/2022 he arrived in the resident's room and she complained of not feeling very good. She complained of pain to her left leg, so I said let's just do the training in the bed this morning. S15 PT reported resident #5's left leg was swollen, red and tender. S15 PT reported he notified the floor nurse, S13 LPN about resident #5 complaint about her left leg. S15 PT reported resident #5 required 2 plus person assistance with transfers and bed mobility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Employment Screening (Tag F0606)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure criminal background checks, Adverse Actions checks, and/or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Registry checks prior to employment for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure criminal background checks, Adverse Actions checks, and/or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Registry checks prior to employment for 4 (S5 CNA, S6 CNA, S7 CNA, S8 CNA) of 8 (S4 CNA, S5 CNA, S6 CNA, S7 CNA, S8 CNA, S9 CNA, S10 CNA, and S11 CNA) CNA personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol revealed in part: The facility will ensure that each resident has the right to be free from, among other things, physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse .The facility assumes the responsibility upon admission of ensuring safety and well-being of the resident. Review of S5 CNA's employee record revealed a hire date of 05/24/2021. Further review revealed the criminal background check was done 02/08/2021. Review of S6 CNA's employee record revealed a hire date of 06/06/2022. Further review revealed the Adverse Actions check was not done until 7/20/2022. Review of S7 CNA's employee record revealed a hire date of 06/15/2022. Further review revealed the Adverse Actions check was not done until 07/20/2022 and the CNA Registry check was not done until 11/21/2022. Review of S8 CNA's employee record revealed a hire date of 05/16/2022. Further review revealed the Adverse Actions check was not done until 07/20/2022. During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 4:22 p.m. S12 HR (Human Resources) confirmed the only criminal background check for S5 CNA was done 02/08/2021 and was not repeated prior to her hire date of 05/24/2021. S12 HR further confirmed the CNA registry check for S7 CNA and the Adverse Actions checks for S6 CNA, S7 CNA, and S8 CNA were not done prior to their hire dates and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, policy reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal and physical abuse was reported to the State Agency for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, policy reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal and physical abuse was reported to the State Agency for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol revealed in part: The management and staff, with physician support, will address situations of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner to appropriate agencies. Review of Resident #1's record revealed an admit date of 10/18/2022 and diagnoses includingbut not limited to Metastatic Colon Cancer, colostomy, decubitus ulcer right hip, history of multiple fractures to left leg, protein calorie malnutrition, herpes viral infection; muscle wasting and atrophy, localized swelling, mass and lump trunk, Cachexia, major depressive disorder with severe psych symptoms, Histrionic personality disorder, left artificial hip joint, history of falling, Anxiety disorder, and Chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #1's admit MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/20/2022 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of the facility's grievance log revealed a grievance filed by Resident #1 and S17 Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) on behalf of Resident #1 for an incident that allegedly occurred on 11/13/2022. Resident #1 stated she called ___Hospice on 11/13/2022 to tell them people are being mean to her. She went on to say two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) hit her on her shoulders. Review of the Grievance Findings of Investigation revealed S3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) assessed resident along with S17 Hospice RN 11/13/2022 related to complaints of two CNA S18 CNA and S19 CNA hitting her on shoulders and being mean. No bruising, redness, or swelling found to body. Review of Grievance Results of actions taken revealed: follow up assessment done by S2 DON (Director of Nursing) on 11/14/2022. Resident remains with same complaint, body assessed by S2 DON. No bruising, redness, or swelling to body. No CNA staff with those CNA names. A care plan meeting was scheduled related to confusions and delusional. Body reassessed 11/15/2022 and no changes found to skin. Review of staff schedules and sign-in sheets which included facility staff and agency personnel from 10/16/2022 to 11/17/2022 revealed no staff named S18 CNA or S19 CNA. Review of the facility's SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System) reports failed to reveal the facility had notified the state agency of Resident #1's allegations of abuse by staff. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 9:48 a.m. S10 CNA indicated Resident #1 would yell out in pain anytime she was touched no matter how gentle you were with her. Observation and interview on 11/17/2022 at 10:13 a.m. revealed Resident #1 lying in bed on her right side facing the hallway, moaning, and asked me what I wanted when I stopped at her door. She asked where she was, and stated she was afraid. When asked her what she was afraid of she said she was afraid of the pain, but not hurting right now. Resident #1 indicated it hurt whenever they touch her and that they are rough and tough with her. Resident #1 indicated she was not feeling that good I hurt, I'm just sorry .I'm so frightened because of the pain . There were long pauses between statements, and the resident would start statements, but not complete them. When Resident #1 was asked if she talked to anybody about people being mean to her, she said nobody knows . When Resident #1 was asked about Hospice, she said at the time I didn't have Hospice. During a telephone interview on 11/17/2022 at 12:47 p.m. Resident #1's family member reported the resident hurts all the time with her cancer and is dying. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:46 p.m. S3 ADON indicated she did notify S2 DON and the S1 Administrator on 11/13/2022 about Resident #1's allegations of abuse. S3 ADON further indicated it would be the S1 Administrator who would report allegations to the state agency. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:46 p.m. S2 DON confirmed the S1 Administrator was the staff member who would report allegations to the state agency. S2 DON further indicated S1 Administrator was made aware of the allegations the evening of 11/13/2022. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 3:14 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed Resident #1's allegation of abuse had not been reported to the state agency.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to have evidence that an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#1) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to have evidence that an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol revealed in part: The staff, with the physician's input as needed, will investigate alleged abuse and neglect to clarify what happened and identify possible causes. Review of the facility's grievance log revealed a grievance filed by Resident #1 and S17 Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) on behalf of Resident #1 for an incident that allegedly occurred on 11/13/2022. Resident #1 stated she called ___Hospice on 11/13/2022 to tell them people are being mean to her. She went on to say two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) hit her on her shoulders. Review of the Grievance Findings of Investigation revealed S3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) assessed resident along with S17 Hospice RN 11/13/2022 related to complaints of two CNAs, S18 CNA and S19 CNA hitting her on shoulders and being mean. No bruising, redness, or swelling found to body. Review of Grievance Results of actions taken revealed: follow up assessment done by S2 DON (Director of Nursing) on 11/14/2022. Resident remains with same complaint, body assessed by S2 DON. No bruising, redness, or swelling to body. No CNA staff with those CNA names. A care plan meeting was scheduled related to confusions and delusional. Body reassessed 11/15/2022 and no changes found to skin. Review of facility investigation and witness statements revealed written statements from S2 DON, S3 ADON, and S17 Hospice RN. The written statements by S2 DON and S17 Hospice RN included interviews with Resident #1 in which she confirmed S18 CNA and S19 CNA were mean to her. S2 DON's statement also verified there were no staff with the names S18 CNA or S19 CNA. Further review of the facility's investigation records related to Resident #1's allegation of staff abuse failed to reveal any witness statements or interviews with CNA staff and any interviews or assessments of other residents residing on the same hall as Resident #1. Review of staff schedules and sign-in sheets which included facility staff and agency personnel from 10/16/2022 to 11/17/2022 revealed no staff named S18 CNA or S19 CNA. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:25 p.m. S2 DON brought in written statements regarding Resident #1's allegation of abuse and indicated the statements were, to her knowledge, the entirety of the investigation. S2 DON indicated she was unsure if any other residents or staff had been interviewed. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:29 p.m. S2 DON confirmed the 3 written statements were all of the investigation for Resident #1's allegation of abuse. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:46 p.m. S3 ADON in the presence of S2 DON, confirmed she was the ADON and charge nurse on duty on 11/13/2022 when S17 Hospice RN asked to speak with her about Resident #1 saying 2 CNAs were being mean to her. S3 ADON further confirmed no interviews with other staff members were conducted the day the allegations were made with the exception of the floor nurse S20 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse.) There was no written statement from S20 LPN included in the investigation file. S3 ADON further confirmed no other residents were questioned or assessed about any staff being mean to them. During an interview on 11/22/2022 at 10:48 a.m. S1 Administrator agreed a thorough investigation including interviews with CNAs on duty at the time the alleged abuse occurred and interviews and assessments of other residents was not done, and was not aware they should have been.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 5 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $204,637 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 24 deficiencies on record, including 5 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $204,637 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 63%, which is 17 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation during 2022 to 2025. These included: 5 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 17 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 155 certified beds and approximately 125 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Bossier City, Louisiana.

How Does Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (63%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is high. At 63%, the facility is 17 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has been fined $204,637 across 4 penalty actions. This is 5.8x the Louisiana average of $35,125. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.