WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Waldon Health Care Center in Kenner, Louisiana, has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns with care quality. The facility ranks #262 out of 264 in Louisiana, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #11 out of 12 in Jefferson County, suggesting limited better options nearby. While the facility's situation is improving, with a decrease in health inspection issues from 22 to 12, it still reported serious deficiencies, including critical incidents where staff failed to provide necessary supervision for a resident identified as at risk for elopement, leading to a dangerous situation where the resident was missing for over 24 hours. Staffing is below average with a 52% turnover rate, and the facility has incurred $120,279 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 75% of Louisiana facilities. However, it offers average RN coverage, which is essential for catching potential problems that other staff may overlook.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #262/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $120,279 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 41 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Louisiana average (2.4)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 41 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement facility policy to ensure all witness statements received verbally were titled, and signed by both the person making the statem...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0741
(Tag F0741)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were provided resident specific behavior training prior to providing supervision for a resident's behaviors for 4 (S6Social Se...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 (Resident #R1) of 7 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide privacy for a resident during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #21) of 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #27) sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #84) of 3 (Resident #26, Resident #64, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident, with a new diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disord...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and observations the facility failed to:
1. Develop a person-centered care plan for a resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blister was evaluated and treated for 1 (Resident #79) of 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #79) residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an expired medication was not available for resident use for 1 (Medication Cart c) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary manager had completed an approved food safety program and passed the accompanying test for 1 (S13Dietary Manager) of 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure:
1. Food items were not placed in areas in which water had accumulated on food packaging;
2. Food items were covered...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, the facility failed to ensure:
1. A facility-wide surveillance of resident's infections were maintained (Resident #7, Resident #12, Resident #27, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error was not greater than 5% for 2 (Resident #R3 and Resident #R4) of 10 (Resident #1, Resident #3,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
12 deficiencies
3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to deliver care per professional standards by failing to ensure:
1. L...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided supervision to prevent elope...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to have an adequat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to protect resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to:
1. Maintain a system to periodically reconcile controlled drugs for 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, and Medi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0836
(Tag F0836)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a certified nurse aide's (CNA) criminal background check was completed for 1 (S6CNA) of 5 (S6CNA, S30CNA, S31CNA, S32CNA, and S33CN...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0944
(Tag F0944)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were provided Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training for 4 (S6CNA, S31CNA...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0946
(Tag F0946)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received ethics training for 1 (S6CNA) of 5 (S6CNA, S30CNA, S31CNA, S32CNA, and S33CNA) sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure the facility had a sufficient number of licensed nurses to provide direct care to residents (08/08/2024, 08/13/2024, 08/14/202...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment Tool:
1. Was reviewed and updated as necessary annually;
2. Addressed contracts;
3. Had involvement from t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee met at least quarterly to evaluate the activities under the Quality Assurance and Pe...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was posted daily as required.
Findings:
Observation on 09/01/2024 at 10:14 a.m. revealed the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not sustain an injury when st...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0836
(Tag F0836)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain a final disposition for a fugitive charge that appeared on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication when a nonverbal resident showed signs a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the state survey agency no later than 2 hours after it was discovered for 1 (Resident #2...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with identified mental health diagnosis were refer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to:
Maintain ongoing communication regarding a resident's condition prior to leaving the facility for dialysis treatments for 1 (Resident #2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable to residents in temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 101 residents who rec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0729
(Tag F0729)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry was verified on hire and/or every 6 months for 5 (S3CNA Supervisor, S6CNA, S7CNA, S8CNA, a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperature gauges were maintained in proper working order and maintain the ice machine and water dispense...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a comprehensive care plan that addressed her sexual health care needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 (Resident #1, Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) had completed annual competencies as required for 3 (S11CNA, S12CNA, S10CNA)of 3 CNAs reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the nurse staffing information posted on a daily basis.
Findings:
Observation on 01/10/2023 at 09:46 a.m. revealed no daily nursing staf...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were entered correctly into facility's records for 1 (Resident #373) of 26 sampled residents.
Findings:
Revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate reconciliation records of controlled medication for 2 (D1Medication Cart and D2Medication Cart) of 3 medi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure:
1.) Medication and treatment carts were lo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff:
1)
performed hand hygiene prior to providing meal assistance for 8 (Resident #4, Resident #15, Resident #18, Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $120,279 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 41 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $120,279 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Waldon Health's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Waldon Health Staffed?
CMS rates WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Waldon Health?
State health inspectors documented 41 deficiencies at WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 36 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Waldon Health?
WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 205 certified beds and approximately 88 residents (about 43% occupancy), it is a large facility located in KENNER, Louisiana.
How Does Waldon Health Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Waldon Health?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Waldon Health Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Waldon Health Stick Around?
WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Waldon Health Ever Fined?
WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER has been fined $120,279 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.5x the Louisiana average of $34,282. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Waldon Health on Any Federal Watch List?
WALDON HEALTH CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.