GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

1525 W MCNEESE ST., LAKE CHARLES, LA 70605 (337) 474-6000
For profit - Corporation 109 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
41/100
#37 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns. They rank #37 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing them in the top half, and #2 out of 10 in Calcasieu County, meaning only one local facility ranks higher. Unfortunately, the trend is worsening, as the number of issues increased from 4 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a notable weakness, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 58%, significantly above the state average. On a positive note, the facility has good RN coverage, exceeding that of 79% of Louisiana facilities, which is crucial for addressing potential health issues. However, there have been serious incidents, such as a failure to promptly notify a physician about a resident's arm injury, which resulted in a fracture. Another incident involved a lack of timely treatment for a resident's ongoing condition, indicating communication and procedural gaps that could impact resident care. Overall, while there are strengths in RN coverage, significant concerns about staffing and critical incidents should be carefully considered.

Trust Score
D
41/100
In Louisiana
#37/264
Top 14%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$29,042 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Louisiana avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $29,042

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Louisiana average of 48%

The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Jun 2025 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed and submitted to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed and submitted to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in a timely manner for 1 (#44) of 5 (#29, #41, #44, #46, #56) residents investigated for resident assessments in a final sample of 30 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #44's electronic medical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/06/2025. Review of the MDS assessment signature page revealed the assessment had been completed and signed on 06/05/2025. On 06/11/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7MDS who stated she was responsible for Resident #44's MDS assessments. S7MDS reviewed Resident #44's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2025 and confirmed the assessment had not been completed in the CMS required timeframe of 14 days.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for use of antiplatelet medication for 1 (#56) out of 30 sampled residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for use of antiplatelet medication for 1 (#56) out of 30 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #56's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 02/12/2025 revealed, in part: Section N- Medications High Risk Drug Classes E. Anticoagulant, Is taking- checked Yes .I. Antiplatelet, Is taking- checked No. Review of Resident #56's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for February 2025 revealed he had taken Plavix, an antiplatelet medication. On 06/11/2025 at 12:45 p.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S7MDS. She verified that Resident #56 was administered Plavix, an antiplatelet medication during the lookback period for his Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/12/2025. S7MDS confirmed that Resident #56's Quarterly MDS was coded incorrectly as him taking an anticoagulant instead of an antiplatelet medication.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#9, #41) out of a final sample of 30 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 84 residents. Findings: Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date of 03/24/2025 and diagnoses that include Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Morbid Obesity. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 03/28/2025 indicated Resident #9 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 06/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #9 unshaven with long unkempt facial hair and fingernails that were long, curling under with brown debris under them. On 06/11/2025 at 8:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S8LPN confirmed the resident had unkempt facial hair and fingernails. She stated the resident refuses ADL (activities of daily living) care almost on a daily basis. S8LPN confirmed this has been reported to administration to address. On 06/11/2025 at 1:51 p.m., a concurrent records review and interview was conducted with S7MDS. S7MDS viewed Resident #9's resident centered care plan. S7MDS confirmed that the Resident #9's care plan failed to identify and address the resident's refusals of ADL care and confirmed this information should be addressed in the care plan and was not. Resident #41 Review of Resident #41's EMR revealed an admission date of 11/23/2022 with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction affecting left side, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #41 required substantial to maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene. On 06/09/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #41 with fingernails that were long and curling under.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured accurate administration of medication to meet the needs of 1 (#72) of 6 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured accurate administration of medication to meet the needs of 1 (#72) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the facility census of 84 residents. Findings: On 06/11/2025 at 9:40 a.m., S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed during medication pass. During her preparation for medication administration for Resident #72, S10LPN stated that the prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa ER Tablet 25-100 mg (milligrams) orders on her computer indicated Resident #72 was to take 1 tablet PO (by mouth) TID (three times per day) but that the instructions on the medication blister pack read to take 2 tablets PO TID. In that moment, S10LPN reviewed Resident #72's physician's orders on her computer and read from the prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa order, take 1 tablet PO TID. S10LPN returned to the Carbidopa-Levodopa blister pack and read, take 2 tabs PO TID. S10LPN then removed a round, bright orange sticker from a drawer on her medication cart and applied it to the top of the Carbidopa-Levodopa blister pack. The nickel-sized decal read, Direction Change See Chart. S10LPN stated in addition to her reporting this to the DON (Director of Nursing) as soon as possible, this would help to flag the medication. S10LPN also verified that this blister pack was the only blister pack in the medication cart that contained Resident #72's Carbidopa-Levodopa medication. Resident #72's medication was contained in a plastic pill cup and was counted, identified, and noted to include only one Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 mg tablet. This observation was confirmed by S10LPN, and on 06/11/2025 at 9:47 a.m., Resident #72 was observed swallowing his medication, including only one Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 mg tablet. Review of Resident #72's physician's orders indicated he was prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa Tablet Extended Release 50-200 MG (milligrams) on 05/15/2025. The orders read, Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for Parkinson's disease. A review of Resident #72's June 2025 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) was conducted. An entry on page 3 read, Carbidopa-Levodopa ER Tablet Extended Release 50-200 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for Parkinson's disease -Start Date- 05/15/2025. S10LPN's initials were noted as having given the morning dose on 06/11/2025. There was no note of irregularity to indicate there was conflict between the orders and administration of the medication on Resident #72's eMAR. On 06/11/2025 at 10:38 a.m., an interview with record review with S2DON (Director of Nursing) was conducted. S2DON was asked to verify orders regarding Resident #72's Carbidopa-Levodopa medication regimen. S2DON reviewed physician's orders and eMAR for Resident #72's prescribed medication on her computer, as well as a photo of the Carbidopa-Levodopa blister pack from which the morning dose was taken. S2DON confirmed Resident #72's physician's orders, as well as his eMAR, read to administer 1 Carbidopa-Levodopa 50-200 mg tablet three times a day. S2DON then verified that the medication blister pack instructed to administer 2 Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 mg tablets by mouth, three times each day. S2DON stated she understood the complication, as physician's orders read to administer one each of the 50-200 mg tablets of Carbidopa-Levodopa, but the blister pack in the medication cart contained 25-100 mg tablets and read to admin 2 each, in order to total the prescribed dose of 50-200 mg.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to ensure: 1. dietary staff with facial...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to ensure: 1. dietary staff with facial hair utilized a hair restraint to prevent hair from contacting food; 2. dietary staff utilized gloves when handling and preparing food; and, 3. dietary staff utilized proper sanitary procedures when serving ice with a ice scoop. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the entire census of 80 residents who consumed food and beverages prepared in the kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Employee Work Practice, with a revised date of 05/2018 and annual policy review date of 01/30/2025, read in part: Policy: Food service employees shall follow sanitary practices to prevent the spread of food borne illness. Procedure: 2. Proper Work Attire a.maintain their hair and skin to prevent the transfer of pathogens to food and food equipment .c. ii. Wears a clean hat or other hair restraint (hair net, hat, surgical cap and/or beard restraint) in the food production area. The restraint must cover all hair and prevent the hair from contacting exposed food. A review of the facility's policy titled Hand Sanitation Practices, with a revised date of 05/2018 and annual policy review date of 01/30/2025, read in part: Procedure: 6. Use of gloves a. gloves are worn to protect food by creating a barrier between the hands and food but should be used only when doing one task. On 06/09/2025 at 10:40 a.m., an observation of pureed food preparation was done with S4DC (Dietary Cook). S4DC was observed preparing the pureed food without the use of gloves nor did he have his facial hair covered with a restraint. On 06/09/2025 at 11:15 a.m., an observation of S5DC measuring temperature at the steam table for lunch meal was conducted. S5DC was observed not wearing gloving while taking food temperatures. On 06/09/2025 at 11:30 a.m., an observation of S6DA (Dietary Aide) was conducted while scooping ice from the icemaker and putting ice into glasses of a red drink. As S6DA scooped ice into the glasses of red drink, she tapped the ice in the red drinks with the back of the ice scoop. Red drink was then observed dripping from the back of the ice scoop. Without cleaning the scoop, S6DA then reached into icemaker to get another scoop of ice. S3DM (Dietary Manager) informed S6DA, the scoop needed to be cleaned before reaching for more ice. On 06/09/2025 at 11:45 a.m., a 2nd observation was made of S4DC in the kitchen area without the use of a hair restraint to cover his facial hair. On 06/09/2025 at 11:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DM. She confirmed all of the above findings. S3DM confirmed that all persons should have hair restraints to cover all hair, including facial hair, while in the kitchen area. S3DM also confirmed that staff should wear gloves when handling food and the ice scoop should not touch anything while serving ice without cleaning the scoop before returning to the ice bin.
Jun 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a reentry MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed ti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a reentry MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed timely for 1 (Resident #14 ) out of 25 sampled residents. The deficient practice had a potential to affect a total census of 73. Findings: A review of Resident #14's electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Urinary Tract Infection and Vascular Dementia. A review of Resident #14's electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 05/30/2024. Further review of Resident #14's MDS assessments failed to reveal a reentry MDS assessment had been initiated indicating the resident had readmitted from the hospital. On 06/05/24 at 9:51 a.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S7RN (Registered Nurse). S7RN confirmed Resident #14 had a recent hospital stay with a readmission date of 05/30/2024. She reviewed the Resident #14's assessments and confirmed a reentry assessment had not been initiated and was overdue.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the provider failed to ensure that a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the provider failed to ensure that a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#68) out of 3 (#38, #3, #68) residents' records reviewed in a final sample of 25 residents. The deficiency had the potential to affect a census of 73. Findings: Review of Resident #68's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admit date of 10/03/2023 with diagnosis not limited to Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Further review of Resident #68's EMR had a PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level II determination date 01/17/2024 indicating the individual had a serious mental illness and was recommended nursing home admission. Lesser services were commended and specialized services were recommended. Review of Resident #68's Significant Change (SC) MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) 01/17/2024 revealed resident evaluated by PASRR - No. On 06/04/2024 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4MDS. S4MDS reported the SC MDS was completed on 01/17/2024. S4MDS confirmed the PASRR was not identified on the SC MDS dated [DATE]. She stated she was not aware the resident had a PASRR Level II.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored securely and discarded upon expiration and was not available for improper resident use as eviden...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored securely and discarded upon expiration and was not available for improper resident use as evidenced by an expired medication being left in an unlocked refrigerator designated for resident food storage. The facility had a census of 73. Findings: On 06/04/2024 at 12:05 p.m., a review of a policy titled Medication Storage ,with a last revision date of 11/2017, read in part: There shall be storage areas provided that assure . security for medications within the facility, including .a lock and key system with suitable protection against access by unauthorized personnel. This locked system shall be secured when not in use by authorized personnel. A separate and secure area shall be provided for the storage of medications that are discontinued, expired, or otherwise unusable. On 06/04/2024 at 9:20 a.m., an observation of an unlocked refrigerator labeled Resident Refrigerator centrally located on Hall A was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). She confirmed the refrigerator was for the use of resident food items and not for medication storage. She stated that residents and their families had access to this refrigerator at any time. During the inspection of the resident food storage refrigerator, a one gallon container of Gavilyte G (a laxative used to clean out the colon), which was half full was observed. The container contained a prescription label for Resident #53 which indicated that it had been dispensed by the pharmacy on 06/02/2022 and had an expiration date of 06/16/2023. S3ADON confirmed the Gavilyte G was Resident #53's medication, and should not have been placed within the resident food storage refrigerator where anyone had access to and the medication should have been discarded due to it being expired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and preventi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program as evidenced by staff failing to put on the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and perform hand hygiene and glove changes when indicated during a nephrostomy tube dressing change for 1 (#280) of 2 (#61, #208) residents who were investigated for catheters in a final sample of 25 residents. Findings: On 06/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with the latest review date of 03/2024 revealed in part . Enhanced Barrier Precautions require the use of gown and gloves only for high-contact resident care activities. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with any of the following: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO (multidrug-resistant organism). On 06/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Dressing Change Policy and Procedure with the latest review date of 08/2021 revealed in part . 3. Wash your hands thoroughly before beginning the procedure. 9. Put on disposable gloves. 11. Remove dressing. Pull gloves over dressing and discard into appropriate plastic waste bag. 12. Perform hand hygiene. Put on disposable gloves. 13. Irrigate/cleanse the area as ordered. 16. Perform hand hygiene. Apply disposable gloves. 18. Dress the area with prescribed dressing, date and initial the dressing. A review of Resident #280's electronic health record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Malignant Neoplasm of Cervix Uteri, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Bladder. A further review of Resident #280's EHR revealed following the physician's orders in part: 1) 05/24/2024 Replace occlusive dressing to (left) nephrostomy tube daily. 2) 05/24/2024 Replace occlusive dressing to (right) nephrostomy tube daily. A review of Resident #280's care plan revealed the following problem in part, Resident has bilateral nephrostomy tubes to lower back flank (Catheter 10.2 French). The interventions included in part, Change dressings to nephrostomy tubes as ordered. Enhanced barrier precautions followed. On 06/04/2024 at 11:39 a.m., an observation was made of S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) as she conducted a dressing change to Resident #280's to left and right nephrostomy tubes. S4LPN entered the room that had an EBP sign on the door and a box outside to the right of the door with PPE available. S4LPN did not put on a gown or gloves before entering the room. S4LPN entered the resident's room then put on a pair gloves. She obtained a piece of saline soaked gauze and held it in her left hand. She then removed the soiled dressing to the right nephrostomy tube site, placed the soiled dressing in her left hand, then cleaned the site with the saline soaked gauze. S4LPN discarded the soiled dressing and gauze into the trash. S4LPN used the same gloves and grabbed another saline soaked gauze. She removed the dressing from the left nephrostomy tube site then cleaned the site with the saline soaked gauze. S4LPN removed her gloves then put on a clean pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. She proceeded to apply the dressing to the right and left nephrostomy tube sites wearing contaminated gloves since she did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between both sites. On 06/04/2024 at 11:49 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She confirmed Resident #280 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and she should have worn a gown to perform wound care. S4LPN confirmed she did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene after she removed the soiled dressing and before she cleaned the wound site and should have. S4LPN confirmed she did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between the dressing changes on the left and right nephrostomy tubes and should have. On 06/04/2024 at 11:57 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventions) who confirmed Resident #280 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to bilateral nephrostomy tubes. S3ADON confirmed a gown and glove should have been worn before entering the room and during wound care to the nephrostomy sites. She also confirmed the nurse should have completed glove changes and perform hand hygiene after removing the soiled dressing and between the glove and dressing changes to the left and right nephrostomy tube sites. On 06/04/2024 at 11:59 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed S4LPN should have changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after removing the soiled dressing, before cleaning the site, and between the left and right nephrostomy tube sites.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the provider failed to ensure that a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the provider failed to ensure that a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents' records reviewed. The deficiency had the potential to affect a census of 84. Findings: Review of Resident #1's EHR (electronic health record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part, but not limited to Gastroenteritis, Colitis, Chronic Kidney Disease, Acute Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression and Anxiety. A review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/18/2023 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating resident was cognitively intact. Also, resident was dependent for rolling left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair bed-to-chair transfer, toilet transfer and wheelchair mobility. On 11/20/2023 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. She reported she was able to care for her own needs and got herself in and out of bed. On 11/20/2023 at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3RN (Registered Nurse) MDS. She reviewed Resident #1's quarterly MDS with an ARD date of 10/18/2023. S3RNMDS stated the MDS documentation identified Resident #1 as dependent for rolling left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair bed-to-chair transfer, toilet transfer and wheelchair mobility. S3RNMDS confirmed Resident #1 was independent with mobility and transfers, therefore the MDS was coded incorrectly.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record on each resident for 1 (#1) out ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record on each resident for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. This was evidenced by failing to ensure medications were documented as administered on the MAR (medication administration record) after administering to the resident. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 84 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications, read in part: Oral Medication Administration Procedure . 2. Ensure that an appropriate physician's order is in place. 3. Verify the physicians order, comparing the medication label to the MAR to verify the following: a. right medication, b. right dose, c. right route, d. right time, e. right resident. Review of Resident #1's EHR revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part, but not limited to Gastroenteritis, Colitis, Chronic Kidney Disease, Acute Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression and Anxiety. Review of the physician's standing orders revealed the following: nausea/vomiting (N/V) - Zofran ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) 4 mg SL (sublingual) Q4H (every 4 hours) times 2 doses, notify MD (Medical Doctor). Review of resident #1's nursing progress notes revealed in part: 11/07/2023 6:57 p.m. at 2:15 p.m., Resident complaining of nausea, no vomiting noted, PRN Zofran given. Signed by S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Further review of nursing progress notes revealed an entry on 11/09/2023 at 3:30 a.m., resident again called the nurse to her room where she was lying in bed with compliant of pain in her lower abdomen, left side, and nausea. Resident stated it feels like gas bubbles .Zofran administered. Signed by S5LPN. Review of Resident #1's MAR for November 2023 revealed no documentation of the Zofran order or administration of the medication. On 11/20/2023 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated on 11/07/2023 Resident #1 complained of nausea and was given Zofran, but it was not documented on the MAR. She confirmed the order for Zofran should have been in the EHR and documented on the MAR. On 11/21/2023 at 9:30 a.m., in an interview with S2DON (Director of Nursing), she reviewed Resident #1's physician orders, nursing progress notes and the MAR. S2DON confirmed the nurses notes of Zofran being given to Resident #1 on 11/07/2023 at 6:57 p.m. and 11/09/2023 at 3:30 a.m., for N/V. She also confirmed the physician's standing orders included Zofran ODT 4 mg SL Q4H times 2 doses; notify MD for N/V. She further confirmed the standing order for Zofran was not entered into Resident #1's EHR and there was no documentation on the MAR showing the medication had been given. She stated the order should have been put into Resident #1's EHR and medication should have been documented on the MAR.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff effectively notified the physician of a resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff effectively notified the physician of a resident's injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on Friday, 10/13/2023 at 7:30 p.m., when S5LPN noted Resident #1's right arm tucked behind her back. She observed the resident's whimpering and her right arm was swollen and puffy. S5LPN notified S9MD's office via fax at approximately 10:30 p.m. that same evening when the physician's office was closed and would have remained closed and not staffed for the weekend. On Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. S3LPN observed the injury, notified the doctor by phone and sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment where she was diagnosed with a fracture of the right arm. The facility implemented corrective actions and was in substantial compliance on 10/16/2023 prior to the State Agency's investigation on 11/08/2023; thus, it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Change in Resident Medical Status revealed the following: A facility must immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological status. A significant change is defined as a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, is not self-limiting. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included, but not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant Side, Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Specified Disorders of Bone Density and Structure. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a standardized health status assessment) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/08/2023 (prior to injury) revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 which indicated the resident to be mildly impaired. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was dependent of staff for her functional status. Section GG, titled Functional Abilities and Goals, indicated the resident had impairment on one side of the upper extremity. Further review revealed she was not on a scheduled pain medication regimen nor was receiving as needed pain medication. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a standardized health status assessment) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/16/2023 (after injury) revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 which indicated the resident to be mildly impaired. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was dependent of staff for her functional status. Section GG, titled Functional Abilities and Goals, indicated the resident had impairment on one side of the upper extremity. Further review revealed the resident had occasional pain and received as needed pain medications. Review of Resident #1's Care Pan included the following, in part: Date initiated: 01/22/2021. ADL Function-bed mobility, transfers, locomotion requires total assistance. Goal: Resident will have needs met through next review. Approach: assist resident with turning and repositioning in bed and observe for and notify MD as needed for any joint pain and/or discomfort. Date initiated: 01/22/2021. Health Condition-resident has a diagnosis of hemiplegia/hemiparesis-CVA with right hemi (hemiparesis - one sided muscle weakness). Goal: Resident will have all needs met through next review. Approach: notify MD of any complications and assist resident with ADL's as needed. Date initiated: 01/22/2021. Resident is at risk for pain related to diagnosis of CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with hemi to right side. Goal: Resident will not have any unrelieved pain through next review. Approach: administer meds as ordered, notify MD of any unrelieved pain, and observe onset, location, severity, and duration of pain. Date initiated: 10/16/2023. Health condition-resident has a diagnosis of osteopenia. Goal: resident will have no complications through next review. Approach: notify MD of any unrelieved pain/discomfort. Review of Resident #1 Nurses Notes revealed the following: 10/13/2023 10:00 p.m. Right arm and hand swollen and red. Resident repositioned off of arm. Tylenol given for pain. Doctor faxed and waiting for response. Sore noted to elbow area of right arm. Signed by S5LPN. 10/16.2023 7:11 a.m. During morning rounds, resident noted in bed with eyes open and crying. Resident complaining of severe pain to right arm. Assessment completed. Severe swelling noted to right mid arm. Right elbow dark red scab noted with red, light purple and yellow discoloration noted. Right arm warm to touch .Vital signs stable . 7AM verbal order received to transfer resident to ER for evaluation and treatment related to right arm edema, pain and discoloration. Signed by S3LPN. Further review of nurse's notes for the resident revealed that there were no notes regarding the resident's injury or additional attempts to notify a physician after Friday, 10/13/2023 at 10:00 p.m. until Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. when S3LPN assessed the injury, notified the doctor and sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of Resident #1's hospital medical records revealed the attending physician, S10MD (Medical Doctor), noted on the resident's disposition: obvious area of ecchymosis (bruising) and the patient moans with pain upon palpation (physical exam). CT (cat scan) of the upper extremity for pain in the right arm revealed an acute transverse distal humeral (upper arm bone) fracture .additional non-displaced fracture through the base of the olecranon (part of the elbow) process suspected. On 11/06/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an observation was made of the resident sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway. She was pleasant and smiled when spoken to but did not answer any questions, only smiled. There was no evidence or outward displays of pain or discomfort observed. On 11/08/2023 at 10:40 a.m., an observation was made of the resident lying in her bed. Resident is awake and alert but did not communicate verbally. Resident is noted lying on left side with her right arm in a soft cast and elevated on a pillow. Resident did not demonstrate any outward signs or symptoms of pain or discomfort An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 3:00 p.m. with S4CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). She confirmed she cared for the resident on the evening of Friday, 10/13/2023. She stated when she initiated care, Resident #1's right arm was lying across her abdomen and stated this is when she noticed the discoloration and swelling of the resident's right arm. She then notified S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) immediately and they elevated Resident #1's arm using a wedge after they changed the resident's bedding. She confirmed the resident had bruising to the right arm along with redness. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 3:15 p.m. with S5LPN who worked the 2:00 pm to 10:00 pm shift on 10/13/2023. She reported that on 10/13/2023 around 6:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m., S4CNA notified her that Resident #1's right arm was red and crying in pain. S5LPN stated that when she entered the room, Resident #1's right elbow was tucked under her back and that resident's right arm was swollen and puffy and thought that it was caused by her being on the arm for an undetermined amount of time. She denied seeing any bruising at that time. She reported that the resident was whimpering but did not continue to cry or whimper after she was left alone. She stated that she did not immediately notify the doctor and continued to administer medications. She reported that when she did notify the doctor, it was by fax but should have called instead due to it being after normal business hours on a Friday evening. A phone interview was conducted on 11/07/2023 at 1:15 p.m. with S6LPN who worked the night shift (10:00 pm to 6:00 a.m.) on 10/13/2023 and cared for Resident #1. She confirmed that S5LPN told her Resident #1's right arm was red, swollen, painful, and that the doctor had been notified. She stated she never received any communication from the doctor and never followed up with any doctor regarding the resident's arm during her shift. She reported that she communicated the residents' change of condition to the oncoming nurse (S7LPN) at the end of her shift. A phone interview was conducted on 11/07/2023 at 2:12 p.m. with S7LPN. She established that she worked double shifts (from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) on both 10/14/2023 and 10/15/2023 and cared for Resident #1. She attested that upon her first assessment of the resident on 10/14/2023 at 8:00 a.m., the resident's right arm was swollen and had some mild, yellow discoloration. She verified that she had received information about Resident #1's arm from S6LPN and that the doctor had been notified. She stated that she did not clarify if the doctor had called or responded to the notification. She confirmed that had she known that the physician was only faxed about the resident's arm, she would have called him for a follow up. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 1:45 p.m. with S3LPN. She stated she was first notified by S8CNA that Resident #1's right arm was swollen, red and she was crying in pain on Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. Upon her assessment she noted yellow, blue, green and purple bruising to the resident's right outer arm (elbow area) spreading to the inner arm (elbow crease area) and also noted a skin tear to the outer elbow. She stated she attempted to perform an assessment but the resident would not allow her manipulate the arm due to pain. She verified that she immediately phoned the doctor to report her assessment, followed by phoning the ambulance services, the resident's family, S2DON, and finally the hospital to give a report. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 2:30 p.m. with S2DON (Director of Nursing). She confirmed that S3LPN notified her of Resident's #1's condition and that the resident was being transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. S2DON confirmed that the physician should have been contacted by phone as opposed to fax for Resident #1. An interview was conducted on 11/08/2023 at 11:00 a.m. with S9MD. He confirmed that there is no one in his office after hours or on weekends to monitor faxes and confirmed his office hours are Monday -Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. S9MD confirmed, that if a resident demonstrated new onset extremity pain, swelling, tenderness, discoloration and/or temperature changes, he or the on-call physician should have been notified by phone, not fax. Interviews with multiple nursing and CNA staff verified that they were in-serviced and corroborated that the facility was conducting pain monitoring, ADL monitoring, MD notification monitoring, and abuse/neglect monitoring as per the corrective action plan. An interview was conducted on 11/08/2023 at 1:05 p.m. with S1ADM. She stated that the initial QA monitoring performed on Monday, 10/16/2023 resulted in the facility being in compliance with the exception of Resident #1's reported incident. She verified that the monitoring will continue weekly for another 2 months or longer if any negative outcomes are discovered. The facility implemented the following actions beginning Monday, 10/16/2023 to correct the deficient practice that occurred on 10/13/2023: 1. S2DON and S1ADM immediately opened an investigation into the injury of unknown origin. 2. On 11/16/2023, S1ADM and S2DON conducted staff re-education with all staff on the following: Proper assessment for Pain and Notification to MD, Pain Scales, Abuse Neglect Injury of Unknown Origin, ADL care & Transfers per lift status and care plan, Any and all PRN medications administered must be entered into AHT, Change of status of residents should be documented every shift and reported to physician and responsible party. 3. Monitoring performed by DON or Designee. Monitoring consists of accurate ADL care, accurate pain assessment, MD notification as needed, abuse/neglect/injury of unknown origin.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff: 1. effectively communicated a change in Resident #1's condition to a physician and 2. intervene by following up with the physician after the identified a change in condition for Resident #1 when she continued to display signs of injury and pain. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on Friday, 10/13/2023 at 7:30 p.m., when S5LPN noted Resident #1's right arm tucked behind her back. She observed the resident whimpering and her right arm was swollen and puffy. S5LPN notified S9MD's office via fax at approximately 10:30 p.m. that same evening when the physician's office was closed and would have remained closed and not staffed for the weekend. Nursing staff verbalized the resident's arm was red and swollen and displayed signs of pain yet failed to assess and administer medication for pain or implement any interventions to address the resident's injury. On Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. S3LPN observed the resident crying in pain due to her arm injury, notified the doctor by phone and sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment where she was diagnosed with a fracture of the right arm. The facility implemented corrective actions and was in substantial compliance on 10/16/2023 prior to the State Agency's investigation on 11/08/2023; thus, it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Change in Resident Medical Status revealed the following: A facility must immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological status. A significant change is defined as a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, is not self-limiting .A facility must immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential requiring physician intervention . Review of the facility's policy for Pain Screen and Management revealed the following: .all residents have the right to treatment for pain .non-communicative residents are assess by observation on nonverbal behavior .A pain screen is completed when a resident has a new onset of pain, a new type of pain, new pain medication or treatment, or when a resident has not experienced an acceptable level of pain relief .when documenting regarding pain, the following elements should be addressed: date and time of onset, location of pain, character, severity, alleviate factors, exacerbation factors, treatments and medication, responses . Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included, but not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant Side, Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Specified Disorders of Bone Density and Structure. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a standardized health status assessment) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/08/2023 (prior to injury) revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 which indicated the resident to be mildly impaired. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was dependent of staff for her functional status. Section GG, titled Functional Abilities and Goals, indicated the resident had impairment on one side of the upper extremity. Further review revealed she was not on a scheduled pain medication regimen nor was receiving as needed pain medication. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a standardized health status assessment) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/16/2023 (after injury) revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 which indicated the resident to be mildly impaired. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was dependent of staff for her functional status. Section GG, titled Functional Abilities and Goals, indicated the resident had impairment on one side of the upper extremity. Further review revealed the resident had occasional pain and received as needed pain medications. Review of Resident #1's Care Pan included the following, in part: Date initiated: 01/22/2021. ADL Function-bed mobility, transfers, locomotion requires total assistance. Goal: Resident will have needs met through next review. Approach: assist resident with turning and repositioning in bed and observe for and notify MD as needed for any joint pain and/or discomfort. Date initiated: 01/22/2021. Health Condition-resident has a diagnosis of hemiplegia/hemiparesis-CVA with right hemi (hemiparesis - one sided muscle weakness). Goal: Resident will have all needs met through next review. Approach: notify MD of any complications and assist resident with ADL's as needed. Date initiated: 01/22/2021. Resident is at risk for pain related to diagnosis of CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with hemi to right side. Goal: Resident will not have any unrelieved pain through next review. Approach: administer meds as ordered, notify MD of any unrelieved pain, and observe onset, location, severity, and duration of pain. Date initiated: 10/16/2023. Health condition-resident has a diagnosis of osteopenia. Goal: resident will have no complications through next review. Approach: notify MD of any unrelieved pain/discomfort. Review of Resident #1's October 2023 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed the following: -Monitor for edema every shift: Day shift: 10/13/2023 was documented as trace. 10/14/2023 & 10/15/2023 was documented as none. Evening shift: 10/13/2023, 10/14/2023 & 10/15/2023 was documented as no. Night shift: 10/13/2023, 10/14/2023 & 10/15/2023 was documented as no. -Observe for s/s abnormal bleeding/bruising every shift. All shifts for 10/13/2023, 10/14/2023 and 10/15/2023 were answered as no. Further review revealed that the Tylenol S7LPN documented as administered in her nurse's note dated and timed 10/13/2023 at 10:00 p.m. was not reflected on the resident's MAR nor were there any additional doses documented by any other staff from 10/13/2023 to 10/15/2023. Review of Resident #1 Nurses Notes revealed the following: 10/13/2023 10:00 p.m. Right arm and hand swollen and red. Resident repositioned off of arm. Tylenol given for pain. Doctor faxed and waiting for response. Sore noted to elbow area of right arm. Signed by S5LPN. 10/16/2023 7:11 a.m. During morning rounds, resident noted in bed with eyes open and crying. Resident complaining of severe pain to right arm. Assessment completed. Severe swelling noted to right mid arm. Right elbow dark red scab noted with red, light purple and yellow discoloration noted. Right arm warm to touch .Vital signs stable . 7AM verbal order received to transfer resident to ER for evaluation and treatment related to right arm edema, pain and discoloration. Signed by S3LPN. Further review of nurse's notes for the resident revealed that there were no notes regarding the resident's injury, pain, or additional attempts to notify a physician after Friday, 10/13/2023 at 10:00 p.m. until Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. when S3LPN assessed the injury, notified the doctor and sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of Resident #1's hospital medical records revealed the attending physician, S10MD (Medical Doctor), noted on the resident's disposition: obvious area of ecchymosis (bruising) and the patient moans with pain upon palpation (physical exam). CT (cat scan) of the upper extremity for pain in the right arm revealed an acute transverse distal humeral (upper arm bone) fracture .additional non-displaced fracture through the base of the olecranon (part of the elbow) process suspected. On 11/06/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an observation was made of the resident sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway. She was pleasant and smiled when spoken to but did not answer any questions, only smiled. There was no evidence or outward displays of pain or discomfort observed. On 11/08/2023 at 10:40 a.m., an observation was made of the resident lying in her bed. Resident is awake and alert but did not communicate verbally. Resident is noted lying on left side with her right arm in a soft cast and elevated on a pillow. Resident did not demonstrate any outward signs or symptoms of pain or discomfort An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 3:00 p.m. with S4CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). She confirmed she cared for the resident on the evening of Friday, 10/13/2023. She stated when she initiated care, Resident #1's right arm was lying across her abdomen and stated this is when she noticed the discoloration and swelling of the resident's right arm. She then notified S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) immediately and they elevated Resident #1's arm using a wedge after they changed the resident's bedding. She confirmed the resident had bruising to the right arm along with redness. An attempt for a follow-up interview with S4CNA was made on 11/08/2023 at 10:15 a.m. but was unsuccessful. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 3:15 p.m. with S5LPN who worked the 2:00 pm to 10:00 pm shift on 10/13/2023. She reported that on 10/13/2023 around 6:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m., S4CNA notified her that Resident #1's right arm was red and crying in pain. S5LPN stated that when she entered the room, Resident #1's right elbow was tucked under her back and that resident's right arm was swollen and puffy and thought that it was caused by her being on the arm for an undetermined amount of time. She denied seeing any bruising at that time. She reported that the resident was whimpering but did not continue to cry or whimper after she was left alone. She stated that she did not immediately notify the doctor and continued to administer medications to other residents. She reported that when she did notify the doctor, it was by fax but should have called instead due to it being after normal business hours on a Friday evening. A phone interview was conducted on 11/07/2023 at 1:15 p.m. with S6LPN who worked the night shift (10:00 pm to 6:00 a.m.) on 10/13/2023 and cared for Resident #1. She confirmed that S5LPN told her Resident #1's right arm was red, swollen, painful, and that the doctor had been notified. She stated she never received any communication from the doctor and never followed up with any doctor regarding the resident's arm during her shift. She reported that she communicated the resident's change of condition to the oncoming nurse (S7LPN) at the end of her shift. A phone interview was conducted on 11/07/2023 at 2:12 p.m. with S7LPN. She established that she worked double shifts (from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) on both 10/14/2023 and 10/15/2023 and cared for Resident #1. S7LPN stated that the resident cannot move or reposition herself. She attested that upon her first assessment of the resident on 10/14/2023 at 8:00 a.m., the resident's right arm was swollen and had some mild yellow discoloration. She verified that she had received information about Resident #1's arm from S6LPN and that the doctor had been notified but did not clarify if the doctor had called or responded to the notification. She stated she first assessed the resident at around 8:00 a.m. on 10/14/2023 when she administered medications to the resident. She stated the resident's right arm was swollen and had some mild yellow discoloration but saw nothing immediately alarming. She stated that the resident never gave any cues of pain and therefore never administered pain medications. She stated that she did not assess the resident's range of motion or pulse because it was her paralyzed side and only visually inspected it. S7LPN stated that because she worked double weekend shifts, she never faxed a doctor to report changes in a resident's condition because no one would be in the office. She always called the on-call physician if needed. She confirmed that had she known that the physician was only faxed about the resident's arm, she would have called him for a follow up. She verified that she gave report to the oncoming nurse (S11LPN) that the resident's right arm was red, swollen, and that the physician had been contacted. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 1:45 p.m. with S3LPN. She stated she was first notified by S8CNA that Resident #1's right arm was swollen, red and she was crying in pain on Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. Upon her assessment she noted yellow, blue, green and purple bruising to the resident's right outer arm (elbow area) spreading to the inner arm (elbow crease area) and also noted a skin tear to the outer elbow. She stated she attempted to perform an assessment but the resident would not allow her manipulate the arm due to pain. She verified that she immediately phoned the doctor to report her assessment, followed by phoning the ambulance services, the resident's family, S2DON, and finally the hospital to give a report. An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 2:30 p.m. with S2DON (Director of Nursing). She confirmed that S3LPN notified her of Resident's #1's condition and that the resident was being transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. S2DON confirmed that the physician should have been contacted by phone as opposed to fax when Resident #1's arm first appeared red and swollen on 10/13/2023. S2DON confirmed that the nurses had not documented bruising on this resident as listed on her MAR. She then reviewed resident's nurse's notes and confirmed that the only documentation the resident's injury was at the time of discovery on 10/13/2023 and again at the time the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. She stated that that there was no evidence of monitoring for or assessment of the resident's injury for 3 days. She viewed nurse's note on 10/13/2023 by S7LPN at the time of initial discovery and stated that it failed to reflect that the resident had a full assessment of the right arm (including range of motion, pulse, capillary refill, hand grasps). An interview was conducted on 11/06/2023 at 4:20 pm with S2DON and S1ADM. S2DON reviewed the resident's plan of care for pain and agreed that the resident should have had pain monitoring especially because of the injury. She was unable to produce any evidence/documentation that staff had assessed and monitored the resident's pain. at this An interview was conducted on 11/08/2023 at 11:00 a.m. with S9MD. He confirmed that there is no one in his office after hours or on weekends to monitor faxes and confirmed his office hours are Monday -Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. S9MD confirmed, that if a resident demonstrated new onset extremity pain, swelling, tenderness, discoloration and/or temperature changes, he or the on-call physician should have been notified by phone, not fax. Interviews with multiple nursing and CNA staff verified that they were in-serviced and corroborated that the facility was conducting pain monitoring, ADL monitoring, MD notification monitoring, and abuse/neglect monitoring as per the corrective action plan. An interview was conducted on 11/08/2023 at 1:05 p.m. with S1ADM. She stated that the initial QA monitoring performed on Monday, 10/16/2023 resulted in the facility being in compliance with the exception of Resident #1's reported incident. She verified that the monitoring will continue weekly for another 2 months or longer if any negative outcomes are discovered. The facility implemented the following actions beginning Monday, 10/16/2023 to correct the deficient practice that occurred on 10/13/2023: 1. S2DON and S1ADM immediately opened an investigation into the injury of unknown origin. 2. On 11/16/2023, S1ADM and S2DON conducted staff re-education with all staff on the following: Proper assessment for Pain and Notification to MD, Pain Scales, Abuse Neglect Injury of Unknown Origin, ADL care & Transfers per lift status and care plan, Any and all PRN medications administered must be entered into AHT, Change of status of residents should be documented every shift and reported to physician and responsible party. 3. Monitoring performed by DON or Designee. Monitoring consists of accurate ADL care, accurate pain assessment, MD notification as needed, abuse/neglect/injury of unknown origin.
May 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physica...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by other residents for 1 (#27) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility failed to protect Resident #27 from physical abuse when Resident #32 shoved Resident #27 in the left shoulder on 2/28/2023. The facility had a census of 79. Findings: Review of the facility's incident, investigation, and reporting policy revealed .Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from any type of abuse including: verbal, sexual, mental, physical abuse, neglect, exploitations, misappropriation of resident property .Relevant terms: Abuse: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Resident #27 Review of Resident #27's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Alzheimer's Disease, Essential Hypertension, Anxiety Disorder, Hyperlipidemia, Review of Resident #27's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating her cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #27's comprehensive care plan, dated 02/28/2023, revealed in part Resident has physical behavior towards others-resident had altercation with roommate. Review of the facility's Incident Report for the past 120 days revealed one incident of Px (Physical) contact-res (resident) for Resident #27 dated 02/28/2023 at 8:08 p.m. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 02/28/2023 at 08:08 p.m., revealed in part the following: Incident Type: Px contact-res Report Prepared By: S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Nursing Description: Separated from another resident (Resident #32) d/t (due to) verbal confrontation in res doorway. Res was pointing her finger and arguing with roommate stating, This is my apartment not yours. Removed and assisted to a chair in the hallway to deescalate the situation. Head to toe assessment performed without injury noted. Res stated, She (Resident #32) just pushed me a little. Denied pain. Removed other resident to another room for safety. Notified DON (Director of Nursing) and Administration. Notified Resident daughter. Injury Type: None apparent Location: Other Action Taken Description: Separated the two resident Review of Resident #27's weekly body audit dated 03/01/2023, revealed, in part, the following: Head to toe assessment completed. Resident had no skin tears, bruises or abrasions noted. Skin intact, warm and dry to touch, no complaints pain currently noted. On 05/10/2023 at 08:27 a.m., an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #27. She stated she did not remember any incident of her former roommate (Resident #32) pushing her. Resident #32 Review of Resident #32's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Vascular Dementia Unspecified Severity, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Essential Hypertension Review of Resident #32's most recent Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/05/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 6 indicating her cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #32's comprehensive care plan, dated 02/28/2023, revealed, in part, resident had roommate had altercation. Review of Resident #32's Nurses Notes revealed, in part, the following: 02/28/2023 at 8:06 p.m., written by S8LPN. Observed resident standing in doorway of resident assessment performed Denies pain. Denies other resident (Resident #27) hitting or touching her. Stated. hell no she did not hit me! Notified resident #32's daughter. On 5/9/2023 at 3:37 p.m., an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #32. She was asked about the incident with Resident #27 and she stated she had no idea why she was being asked that question because she just got to the facility yesterday. Resident #32 was confused and did not remember the incident. On 05/09/2023 at 09:06 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM and S2DON. S2DON stated the LPN that was on duty for the shift for 2/28/2023 had not witnessed the incident. Per S2DON, S8LPN was an agency LPN that picked up shifts every now and again. S1ADM stated she was the one who investigated the incident. Per her investigation, Resident #32 was telling Resident #27 to get out of her room. Resident #27 and Resident #32 started arguing over whose room it was. Resident #32 took Resident #27's popcorn and threw it on the floor. After this, Resident #32 shook her finger in Resident #27's face. Resident #32 then proceeded to push Resident #27 on the left upper side of her chest. This was an unwitnessed incident. S1ADM stated that she instructed S8LPN to separate the residents since they were roommates Resident #27 was moved to a different room and there has been no further incidents between the two residents. Three attempts were made to retrieve S8LPN'S contact information from S1ADM, and S2DON on 05/09/2023 at 09:06 a.m. and at 3:02 p.m. as well as on 5/10/2023 at 08:00 a.m. S1ADM and S2DON failed to provide S8LPN's contact information.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders or had a significant change in their mental condition to the appropriate state-design...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders or had a significant change in their mental condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for evaluation and determination for 2 (#31, #48) of 5 residents (13, 31, 46, 48, 58) investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 32 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #31's diagnosis list revealed on 11/22/2022 she was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder in full remission, most recent episode manic. Review of Resident #31's records revealed no evidence of a Level II PASARR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority. Review of Resident #48's diagnosis list revealed on 05/25/2021 she was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #48's records revealed no evidence of a Level II PASARR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority. On 05/09/2023 at 11:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4SSD. She confirmed Resident #31 had a new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on 11/22/2022, and Resident #48 had a new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on 05/25/2021. S4SSD confirmed no Level 1 PASARR was completed after the new diagnosis.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #58 A review of Resident #58's clinical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Unspec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #58 A review of Resident #58's clinical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Vascular Dementia, Hypertension, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Tremor, Dysphagia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 5, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. MDS also revealed that Resident #58 did not have any weight loss. Review of Weight Change History for Resident #58 revealed the following weights recorded: 03/03/2023 113.3 pounds 03/04/2023 113.4 pounds 03/09/2023 111.9 pounds 03/15/2023 109.5 pounds 03/22/2023 107.1 pounds 03/29/2023 105.3 pounds 04/04/2023 104.9 pounds 04/10/2023 104.2 pounds 04/17/2023 103.7 pounds 04/24/2023 102.9 pounds 04/30/2023 102.4 pounds 05/07/2023 102.1 pounds 05/08/2023 102.1 pounds These weights revealed a significant weight change with a loss of 7.41% weight for a period of one month from 03/03/2023 to 04/04/2023. Review of Resident #58's Care Plan revealed in part: At risk for weight loss related to Barrett's Esophagus (damage to lower portion of the tube that connects the mouth and stomach) and included approaches in part, supplements as ordered, notify medical doctor of any significant weight loss, and registered dietician consult. Further review of the care plan revealed, Resident is on a Therapeutic Diet: NSOT (No Salt on Tray) with approaches in part, RD (Registered Dietician) to evaluate per schedule and as needed, and observe weight as ordered. Review of Nursing progress notes revealed no documentation of a weight loss from 03/03/2023 to 04/04/2023. Review of Resident #58's Nutrition Evaluation dated 03/08/2023 revealed no weight loss. There were no additional Nutrition Evaluations done after this date. Review of Resident #58's electronic clinical record revealed no documentation from the registered dietician since 12/15/2023. Review of physician's progress notes dated 03/14/2023 and 04/19/2023 did not reflect any issues with weight loss. On 05/09/23 08:06 a.m., observation made of resident #58 in bed asleep, with her breakfast tray at bedside uneaten. On 05/09/23 12:15 p.m., observed Resident #58 lying in bed, with her meal tray at bedside. Resident stated that she was done eating. Further observation revealed, she had eaten consumed approximately 30-35% of the meal. On 05/10/2023 at 10:40 a.m. an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She verbalized Resident #58 consumed about 50% of her meals most days. She was unsure of any significant weight loss and confirmed Resident #58 received no supplemental nutrition or appetite stimulants. On 05/10/2023 at 10:52 a.m. an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She verbalized Resident #58 always eats in her room with no assistance from the staff. She consumes about 25% of most meals for breakfast and lunch. She denies knowledge of Resident #58's weight loss. An interview was conducted with S3DM (Dietary Manager) on 05/10/2023 at 11:08 a.m. She stated that she has not noted any weight changes on Resident #58 prior to this past Sunday, 05/07/2023 ,when she received an email from the weekend staff reporting a weight loss to her. She confirmed that she was not aware of any weight loss prior to Sunday and denied knowledge of a significant weight loss from 03/03/2023 to 04/04/2023. On 05/10/2023 at 12:35 p.m. a message was left the Registered Dietician. As of survey exit, no return call was made. On 05/10/2023 at 3:00 p.m. an interview and review of records was conducted with S2DON. She confirmed Resident #58's weight on 03/03/2023 was 113# and weight on 04/04/2023 was 104# which was a significant weight loss of over 7% in one month. She confirmed the significant weight loss was not addressed with a nutritional evaluation, registered dietician evaluation, notification made to the physician or resident representative, nor any interventions. She verbalized the last nutritional evaluation was completed prior to the weight loss that occurred. The registered dietician visit was on 12/15/2022. She reviewed Resident #58's physician orders and confirmed there was no indication of any dietary recommendations nor any supplemental nutrition given. She verbalized the significant weight loss was not addressed until 05/07/2023, which was over one month since the significant weight loss occurred. She verbalized they had a termination of an employee that was responsible for the reviewing of the residents weights around the time of the weight loss. She would look for additional documentation regarding if the weight loss was addressed during that time. As of exit of the survey, no additional documentation was provided regarding the significant weight loss that occurred for Resident #58 on 04/04/2023. Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status was maintained for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #58) out of 4 (#1, #15, #57, #58) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to: 1. obtain a weight monthly for Resident #1, and 2. identify significant weight loss for Resident #58. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 79. Findings: Review of Policy and Procedures titled Weights, revealed in part: A. Weight/Height policy guidelines . 2. All residents will be routinely weighed monthly, unless otherwise specified by the physician's orders or care plan . 10. All weight deviations plus or minus 5% or more per month, or 10% of body weight over a six month period, require a Weight Evaluation form , physician notification, notification of resident representative and facility intervention, if appropriate, with physician supervision. Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: End Stage Renal Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Dementia, Malnutrition and Depression. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed in part: order entry dated 03/20/2023 Pureed/thin liquids, renal diet, and order entry dated 05/09/2023 Tube Feeding formula, Nepro at 40ml/hr (milliliters per hour) via PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) continuous with 100 ml water flush every shift. Okay to hold tube feeding while at dialysis. Review of Resident #1's Medicare 5 day MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 04, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's weights for the past six months revealed: 11/02/2022 - 235.8 pounds 12/15/2022 - 231.2 pounds 01/13/2023 - 203 pounds 01/19/2023 - 211.4 pounds 03/10/2023 - 210 pounds 04/10/2023 - 194.4 pounds 05/07/2023 - 215 pounds On 05/10/2023 at 3:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing), she confirmed Resident #1 did not have a facility documented weight for February 2023, and the documented weights showed a weight loss for the resident in January 2023 and March 2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food products were discarded on or before the expiration date and discard canned goods with compromised seals in the dry stor...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food products were discarded on or before the expiration date and discard canned goods with compromised seals in the dry storage room. This deficient practice has the potential to effect the 79 residents that eat meals in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage Labeling.foods store in storage units will be surveyed routinely to identify and discard foods that have passed its manufacturers use-by date or expiration date. On 05/08/2023 at 8:42 a.m., an interview and observation with S3DM of the food stored on the shelves in the dry storage room revealed: one compromised dented can of lemon pudding, and one cheesecake mix that was expired on 9/13/22. S3DM confirmed the cheesecake mix was expired and remained on the shelf for use. S3DM confirmed the lemon pudding can was dented and remained on the shelf for use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #46 Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney D...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #46 Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertension, Anxiety, Unspecified Dementia, and Schizophrenia. Review of the resident's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 which indicated the resident is cognitively intact. Review of Resident #46's current Physician Orders for May 2023 revealed: Draw VPA (Valporic Acid), LFT (Liver Function Test) and CBC (Complete Blood Count) Every 3 Months (March, June, September, December). Review of Resident #46, Electronic Health Record and paper record revealed no documentation that an LFT or VPA had been completed for March 2023. In an interview conducted with S2DON on 05/09/23 at 04:31 a.m., she stated that there was no evidence that an LFT or VPA had been collected on Resident #46 for March 2023. Resident #58 Resident # 58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Mood Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Vascular Dementia, Hypertension, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, Essential Tremor, Dysphagia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the resident's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 03/08/2023 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 5, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #58's current Physician's Orders for May 2023 revealed: Diet: NSOT (No Salt On Tray). Record Diet Amount For Each Meal 1=25%, 2=50%, 3=75%, 4= 100%, 5=Refused. Review of meal intake percentage documentation from May 01, 2023 to May 09, 2023 revealed that not all meals were documented as ordered. Percentage of breakfast consumption was not documented for the following: 05/01/2023, 05/05/2023, 05/06/2023, 05/07/2023, and 05/08/2023. Percentage of lunch consumption was not documented for the following dates as: 05/01/2023, 05/02/2023, 05/03/2023, 05/05/2023, 05/06/2023, 05/07/2023, and 05/08/2023. Percentage of dinner consumption was not documented for the following dates: 05/01/2023, 05/06/2023 and 05/07 2023. On 05/10/23 at 03:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON and she confirmed meal percentage documentation intake for Resident #58 was incomplete. Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to implement the person centered care plan by not following physician orders for 4 (#1, #15, #46, #57 and #58) residents out of a total of 32 sampled residents as evidenced by failing to: 1. obtain a monthly weights as per facility policy and procedure for Resident #1 and, 2. document dietary intake amount for each meal as ordered for Residents #1, #15, #57 and # 58, and, 3. obtain laboratory testing as ordered for Resident #46 This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 79 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: End Stage Renal Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Dementia, Malnutrition and Depression. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed in part: order entry dated 03/20/2023 Pureed/thin liquids, renal diet, and order entry dated 05/09/2023 Tube Feeding formula, Nepro at 40ml/hr (milliliters per hour) via PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) continuous with 100 ml water flush every shift. Okay to hold tube feeding while at dialysis. Review of Resident #1's Medicare 5 day MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 04, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The facility did not provide documentation of meal intake percentages for Resident #1 by survey exit. Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] including diagnoses in part: Malnutrition, Abnormal Posture, Dementia, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Pressure Ulcer and Anxiety. Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 08, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #15's physician's orders revealed in part an order dated 05/26/2021 Mechanical soft diet, Record Diet intake amount for each meal. Review of meal intake percentages documentation from April 1, 2023 to May 8, 2023 failed to include documentation of all meals consumed by Resident #15 as ordered. The following dates did not include documented percentages for Resident #15's meals consumed: Breakfast: 04/01/2023, 04/02/2023, 04/04/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, 04/15/2023, 04/16/2023, 04/21/2023, 04/22/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/26/2023, 04/30/2023, 05/04/2023, 05/06/2023 and 05/07/2023. Lunch: 04/01/223, 4/02/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, 04/14/2023, 04/15/2023, 04/16/2023, 04/17/2023, 04/21/2023, 04/22/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/26/2023, 04/30/2023, 05/04/2023, 05/06/2023 and 05/07/2023. Dinner: only documented percentages were on 04/05/2023, 04/06/2023, 04/13/2023, 04/20/2023, 04/21/2023, and 04/30/2023. Resident #57 Resident #57 was admitted to facility on 01/21/2021 including diagnoses in part: Dementia, Cellulitis Left Lower Limb, Stage III Pressure Ulcer Left Heel, Stage III Pressure Ulcer to Right Heel, Malnutrition and Depression. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #57's physician's orders revealed in part: order entry dated 01/21/2021 - Diet: No Salt on tray, record diet amount for each meal. Review of resident #57's meal intake percentages documentation from April 1, 2023 to May 8, 2023 revealed not all meals were documented as ordered. The following dates did not include ordered meal intake percentages: Breakfast: 04/01/2023, 04/02/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, 04/15/2023, 04/16/2023, 04/21/2023, 04/22/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/26/2023, 04/30/2023, 05/04/2023, 05/06/2023 and 05/07/2023. Lunch: 04/01/2023, 04/02/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, 04/15/2023, 04/16/2023, 04/21/2023, 04/22/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/26/2023, 04/30/2023, 05/04/2023, 05/06/2023 and 05/07/2023. Dinner: only documented percentage were on 04/05/2023, 04/13/2023, 04/20/2023, 04/21/2023 and 04/30/2023. On 05/09/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), she reported the LPN's were responsible for ensuring the meals percentages were documented for each meal in the residents electronic record. On 05/09/2023 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON, she confirmed the meal percentages were to be documented as ordered and the LPN was responsible for ensuring the meals were charted as ordered. On 05/09/2023 at 2:55 p.m., a review of each identified residents' electronic record was conducted with S5DON and surveyor. S5DON confirmed the staff were not documenting all meal percentages in the identified residents' electronic record and should have since they had physician orders to do so.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $29,042 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 18 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $29,042 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (41/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 41/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Staffed?

CMS rates GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 109 certified beds and approximately 85 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LAKE CHARLES, Louisiana.

How Does Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?

GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $29,042 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,369. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?

GRAND COVE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.