RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center in Lake Charles, Louisiana, received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality of care. It ranks #240 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana, placing it in the bottom half of all facilities in the state, and #7 out of 10 in Calcasieu County, meaning only three local options are worse. The situation is worsening, as the number of issues reported increased from 5 in 2023 to 12 in 2024. Staffing has a moderate rating of 3 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for the state, but there is good RN coverage, exceeding that of 90% of Louisiana facilities. However, concerning incidents were noted, including a failure to maintain a clean kitchen, leading to unsanitary conditions that posed a risk of foodborne illness for residents, and the presence of live cockroaches in food preparation areas, indicating a lack of effective pest control.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #240/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $34,369 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Louisiana average (2.4)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
12 deficiencies
2 IJ (2 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
I. Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the likelihood of foodborne illn...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#4) of 3 (#1, #4, and #32) residents reviewed for tube feeding by failing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #27
A review of Resident #27's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff followed facility policies ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and policy reviews, the facility's staff failed to follow the facility's policy for storage of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Social Worker
(Tag F0850)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it employed a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. The facility had 160 licensed beds with a census of 111 residents.
Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program and implement accepted infection control practices to help prev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #5
Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Dementia i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility's kitchen was free from insects. The deficient ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Condition Minimum Data Set (MDS...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to refer all residents with a newly evident or serious ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan for 1 (#90) out of 33 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total censu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents identified with Mental Disorder and/or Intellectua...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum data set (MDS) assessment for use of anticoagulants for 3 (#38, #59, #71) out of 26 sampled ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility was positioned...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility's nursing staff failed to ensure the medication cart remained locked when unattended.
Findings:
Review of the facility's policy on med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nurses implemented infection control practices as evidenced by:
1. failing to perform hand hygiene when going room ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $34,369 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 21 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $34,369 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (11/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 19 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc?
RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 162 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LAKE CHARLES, Louisiana.
How Does Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc Stick Around?
RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc Ever Fined?
RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC has been fined $34,369 across 1 penalty action. The Louisiana average is $33,423. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
RESTHAVEN NURSING & REHAB CENTER, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.