ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
St. Anthony Community Care Center has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #23 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #3 out of 12 in Jefferson County, meaning there are only two local options that are better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 6 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, rated at 2 out of 5 stars and with a high turnover rate of 60%, significantly above the state average. Fortunately, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign, and it provides more registered nurse coverage than average, which is beneficial for monitoring resident care. On the downside, there are specific incidents that raise concerns about care quality. For example, staff failed to ensure that opened food products in the kitchen were properly sealed and labeled, and there were lapses in hand hygiene during wound care and incontinence care, which could increase the risk of infection. Additionally, one resident did not receive insulin as prescribed, which could lead to serious health issues. While there are strengths at St. Anthony Community Care Center, potential residents and families should weigh these weaknesses carefully.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Louisiana
- #23/264
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Louisiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 14 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts above Louisiana avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
12 points above Louisiana average of 48%
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer treatment plan w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored in a secured manner for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 (Resident #27) sampled residents reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to:
1. ensure opened food products stored in the kitch...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure:
1. Staff performed proper hand hygiene whi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility:
Failed to report an episode of elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:
1. the nurse performed hand hygiene after handling a soiled dressing and removing gloves (Resident #1); and
2. the n...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nurse assessed, documented, and communicated a resident's fall for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's physician when a resident had a change in status for 1(Resident #36) of 3 (Resident #24, Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the laundry room was kept clean and sanitary.
Findings:
Observation on 12/18/2023 at 11:32 a.m. revealed the facility's laundry room ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received sliding scale insulin per the physicia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to:
1. Ensure hand hygiene was performed after emptying a resident's garbage can;
2. Ensure hand hygiene was performed while assisting 4 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a change in condition and a room change. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #3) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance from staff with bathing received timely assistance to maintain personal hygiene per professional ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 sampled resident (Resident #33) of 18 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure expired medications and wound care dressings were not available for use for 3 (Resident #35, Resident #28 and Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Louisiana.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Louisiana facilities.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is St Anthony Community's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is St Anthony Community Staffed?
CMS rates ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at St Anthony Community?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates St Anthony Community?
ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 124 certified beds and approximately 76 residents (about 61% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in METAIRIE, Louisiana.
How Does St Anthony Community Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting St Anthony Community?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is St Anthony Community Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at St Anthony Community Stick Around?
Staff turnover at ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was St Anthony Community Ever Fined?
ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is St Anthony Community on Any Federal Watch List?
ST ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.