CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER

2832 BURDETTE STREET, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70125 (504) 866-2741
Non profit - Corporation 171 Beds COMMCARE CORPORATION Data: November 2025 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#181 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Chateau de Notre Dame Community Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #181 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the bottom half, and #4 out of 11 in Orleans County, meaning there are only a few local options that are better. The facility's performance appears stable, with 39 reported issues, including 6 critical incidents, showing no improvement over the past year. Staffing is average, with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars, but the turnover rate is concerning at 52%, which is close to the state average. Alarmingly, the center has accumulated fines totaling $245,302, which is higher than 89% of other Louisiana facilities, indicating ongoing compliance problems. Specific incidents reported include the failure to protect residents from abuse, such as a cognitively impaired resident being left unsupervised and sexually abusing another resident. Additionally, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision for residents known to exhibit inappropriate behavior, which put vulnerable residents at risk. While some aspects, like staffing levels, are average, the serious issues related to resident safety and the high fines raise significant red flags for families considering this option.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#181/264
Bottom 32%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
7 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$245,302 in fines. Higher than 83% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
39 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $245,302

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: COMMCARE CORPORATION

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 39 deficiencies on record

6 life-threatening
Jun 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected medication orders for 1 (Resident #74) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #53, R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected medication orders for 1 (Resident #74) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #53, Resident #55, Resident #74, Resident #102) residents reviewed for medications. Findings: Review of Resident #74's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for April 2025 revealed, in part, an order for Lasix 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day (a diuretic medication used to reduce swelling and fluid retention) and Trazodone Hydrochloride50 mg by mouth one time a day (an antidepressant medication used to treat depression) were administered during the lookback period (the period required to review information to complete the MDS), 04/24/2025 through 04/30/2025. Review of Resident #74's Quarterly MDS Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2025 revealed, in part, Sections C: antidepressant was not checked, Section G: diuretic was not checked, and Section Z: none of the above was checked. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 12:24PM, S3Clinical Care Coordinator (CCC) indicated Resident #74's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 04/30/2025, was not accurate and Section-C: antidepressant and Section G diuretic should have been checked. S3CCC further indicated Section-Z none of the above should not have been checked. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 1:45PM, S2Director Of Nursing, indicated Resident #74's Quarterly MDS was not accurate and should have been as required. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 1:45PM S1Administrator indicated Resident #74's Quarterly MDS section was not accurate and should have been as required.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding bag (bag that contains a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding bag (bag that contains a formula for the purpose of supplying nutrients directly into the stomach) and the free water flush bag was properly labeled to include the rate of the infusion for 1 (Resident #130) of 1 (Resident #130) sampled residents reviewed for enteral feeding. Findings: Review of the Resident #130's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food and/or liquids) and gastrostomy status (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen and into the stomach to provide nutritional support). Review of the facility's Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy and procedure, undated, revealed, in part, to check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Further review revealed to check the resident's name and room number, type of formula, date and time formula was prepared, route of delivery, access site, method (pump, gravity, syringe); and the rate of administration in milliliters (ml) and hours (hrs). Review of Resident #130's May 2025 physician's order revealed, in part, continuous Isosource 1.5 (brand of enteral feeding formula) with an infusion rate of 45 ml/hr and free water flush with an infusion rate of 120 ml every four hours. Review of Resident #130's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #130 received enteral feedings. Observation on 06/02/2025 at 10:21AM revealed Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush bag was not labeled with the infusion rate. Observation on 06/03/2025 at 10:56AM revealed Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush was not labeled with the infusion rate. Observation on 06/03/2025 at 3:00PM revealed Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush was not labeled with the infusion rate. Observation on 06/04/2025 at 8:48AM revealed Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush was not labeled with the infusion rate. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 8:51AM, S2Director of Nursing indicated Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush should have been labeled with the infusion rate. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 10:05AM, S1Administrator indicated Resident #130's enteral feeding bag and free water flush should have been labeled with the infusion rate as required.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration for 1 (Resident #52) of 1 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration for 1 (Resident #52) of 1 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #52's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #52 had a medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and lung cancer. Review of Resident #52's June 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, Resident #52's oxygen was to be administered at 4 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen through your nose) every shift related to COPD, which may be removed for bathing and daily care. Review of Resident #52's care plan revealed, in part, Resident #52 was at risk for altered breathing related to the diagnosis of COPD and lung cancer. Observation on 06/02/2025 at 10:05AM revealed, Resident #52 was lying in bed with oxygen administered at 3.4lpm via nasal cannula. Observation on 06/03/2025 at 2:35PM revealed, Resident #52 was lying in bed with oxygen set to be administered at 3lpm via nasal cannula. In an interview on 06/03/2025 at 2:35PM, S3Clinical Care Coordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse (CCC/LPN) confirmed Resident #52's oxygen was administered at 3lpm via nasal cannula. S3CCC/LPN indicated Resident #52's oxygen should have been administered at 4lpm via nasal cannula. In an interview on 06/03/2025 at 3:20PM, S2Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #52's oxygen should have been administered at 4lpm via nasal cannula per physician orders.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop resident-specific approaches and implement a plan of care for a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop resident-specific approaches and implement a plan of care for a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident #52) of 1 (Resident #52) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional services. Findings: Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #52's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #52 had a medical history of PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #52's June 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence an order was implemented to monitor for signs and symptoms of PTSD and/or triggers associated with Resident #52's PTSD. Review of Resident #52's Psychiatric Progress Notes dated 03/28/2025 and 04/28/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #52's active medical problems were PTSD and depression. Further review revealed no documented evidence Resident #52's PTSD was assessed to include the source of his trauma, monitoring for signs and symptoms of PTSD, identification of triggers, and/or interventions implemented to avoid further trauma. Review of Resident #52's Office of Behavioral Health-Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Summary & Determination Notice (a federal requirement for Medicaid-certified nursing facilities that ensures residents with serious mental illness are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes) dated 04/29/2025 revealed Resident #52 had a serious mental illness. Further review revealed a recommendation for Resident #52 to have a crisis/safety intervention plan. Review of Resident #52's care plan revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence Resident #52's plan of care included documentation regarding Resident #52's diagnosis of PTSD to include the source of his trauma, monitoring for signs and symptoms of PTSD, identification of triggers, and/or interventions implemented to avoid further trauma. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 10:45AM, S3Clinical Care Coordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse (CCC/LPN) confirmed Resident #52's clinical record and plan of care did not address his diagnosis of PTSD, to include the source of his trauma, monitoring for signs and symptoms of PTSD, identification of triggers, and/or interventions implemented to avoid further trauma, and should have. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 11:02AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #52's clinical record and/or plan of care should have addressed his diagnosis of PTSD to include the source of his trauma, monitoring for signs and symptoms of PTSD, identification of triggers, and/or interventions implemented to avoid further trauma.
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly secure a resident's wheelchair using the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly secure a resident's wheelchair using the front securement straps in the facility's transportation vehicle for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for transportation safety. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/06/2025 at 11:30AM for Resident #1, when S3Certified Nursing Assistant/Transport Driver (CNA/TD) failed to properly secure Resident #1's wheelchair in the facility's transportation van with the front securement straps. Resident #1's wheelchair tipped over backwards during transport, which caused Resident #1 to strike the back of his head. Resident #1 was then transported to a local emergency room where he was assessed as having a bump to back of the head and had to receive pain medication for head and shoulder pain. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to the 104 residents who resided in the facility identified by the facility to utilize the facility's wheelchair transportation vehicle. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a past noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Vehicle and Driver policy and procedure dated 09/27/2018, with a revision date of 11/29/2019, revealed, in part, wheelchairs/scooters must be properly secured with the securement equipment. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, end stage renal disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), cognitive communication deficient, and a right above knee amputation. Review of Resident #1's May 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, orders dated 04/16/2025 for one apixaban (medication used to prevent blood clots and can cause an increased risk of bleeding ) 5 milligrams (mg) tablet by mouth twice a day related to PVD and an order for dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Further review revealed an order dated 04/17/2025 for one aspirin (a medication used to prevent blood clots and can cause an increased risk of bleeding) delayed release 81 mg tablet by mouth once a day related to PVD. Review of S3CNA/TD's undated written statement revealed, in part, Resident #1 was being transported in the facility van on 05/06/2025 to his dialysis appointment, when the van accelerated after stopping at a red light. S3CNA/TD further indicated she then witnessed Resident #1's wheelchair tip backwards with Resident #1 landing on the floor of the van. Further review revealed S3CNA/TD did not secure the front of Resident #1's wheelchair to the transport van with the securement straps as required. Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed, in part, Resident #1 was evaluated at a local emergency department on 05/06/2025 for a head injury sustained during transport in the facility's van. Further review revealed Resident #1 was unable to receive his required dialysis treatment as ordered on 05/06/2025. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 3:00PM, S1Administrator confirmed Resident #1 was not secured in accordance with facility transportation guidelines. In an interview on 05/14/2025 at 12:04PM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #1 was prescribed and taking blood thinning medications. S2DON further indicated that taking blood thinning medications placed Resident #1 at a significantly higher risk for developing a serious injury, such as a brain bleed, following a head injury. In an interview on 05/14/2025 at 1:30PM, S6Maintenance Director (MD) indicated residents' wheelchairs should be secured to the transport vehicle in a forward facing position using four straps as per the facility's training videos and checklists related to transportation safety. S6MD further indicated if a wheelchair was strapped down properly it should not move or tip over. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice beginning on 05/06/2025 with a completion date of 05/08/2025: 1. S3CNA/TD was counseled for failing to secure Resident #1 properly and removed from the status as a transport driver (Completed on 05/06/2025). 2. All staff who have the potential to transport residents in the facility's transportation van will complete the Facility Vehicle Safety Strap Training - Securement 101 (Completed on 05/08/2025). 3. All employees that drive the transportation van will be re-educated on the facility's vehicle and transportation policy (Completed on 05/08/2025). 4. All employees that drive the transportation van will be retrained and reevaluated on the competencies for securing a resident's wheelchair in the transport van with return demonstrations (Completed on 05/08/2025). 5. The facility administrator or designee will randomly monitor resident wheelchair van transports to ensure they are secured properly prior to departure 3 times a week for 4 weeks, then as needed (Started on 05/07/2025 and currently in progress). 6. Plan of Correction to be completed by 05/08/2025.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was competent in the facility's procedure for securing a resident's wheelchair ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was competent in the facility's procedure for securing a resident's wheelchair in a transport vehicle for 1 (S5CNASupervisor) of 3 (S4Maintenance Staff/Transport Driver [MS/TD], S5CNASupervisor, S6Maintenance Director [MD]) staff members investigated for resident safety competency. Findings: Review of the facility's CNA Job Description dated 12/03/2019 revealed, in part, CNAs may have been assigned additional assignments and duties to meet the needs of the residents. Further review revealed any additional tasks, duties, and responsibilities assigned to a CNA were to be performed in accordance with established policies, procedures, and standards. Review of the facility's Vehicle and Driver policy and procedure dated 09/27/2018, with a revision date of 11/29/2019, revealed, in part, wheelchairs/scooters must be properly secured with the securement equipment. Review of the facility's undated Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair and Patient Securing Systems Competency Checklist revealed, in part, staff would ensure the wheelchair brakes were engaged before securing the system. Review of S5CNA Supervisor's Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair and Patient Securing Systems Competency Checklist revealed, in part, S5CNA Supervisor completed the training on 05/07/2025. Observation on 05/13/2025 at 9:01AM of Resident #2 being loaded into the facility van revealed S5CNA Supervisor attached the front Q'Straint securement straps to Resident #2's wheelchair without engaging the wheelchair brakes. Further observation revealed S5CNA Supervisor exited the vehicle and prepared to close the transport van's door without engaging either of Resident #2's wheelchair brakes. Review of the facility's Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair Monitoring Tool revealed, in part, Resident #2 was monitored by S1Administrator on 05/13/2025. Further review revealed S1Administrator documented Resident #2's wheelchair was secured properly. Observation on 05/13/2025 at 9:04AM revealed S1Administrator monitored the securement of Resident #2 in the transport van without using the facility's Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair and Patient Secure Systems Competency wheelchair securement checklist. Further observation revealed S1Administrator did not verify if Resident #2's wheelchair brakes were engaged. Review of the undated Q'Straint QRT Series user instructions revealed, in part, wheelchair wheel locks should be engaged before attaching securement straps. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 9:05AM, S5CNA Supervisor indicated Resident #2's wheelchair brakes were not required to be engaged since the Q'Straint securement straps were attached to the wheelchair. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 9:45AM, S1Administrator confirmed the steps in the wheelchair securement procedure found on the facility's Competency for Securing Residents in Vehicle Wheelchair checklist included ensuring the wheelchair brakes were engaged before securing the resident using the Q'Straint securement system. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 12:03PM, S6MD confirmed the first step in securing a resident's wheelchair in the transport van was to engage the wheelchair's brakes. S6MD further indicated the wheelchair may not be properly secured by the Q'Straint securement straps if the wheels were not locked first. In an interview on 05/13/2025 at 1:00PM, S4MS/TD indicated Resident #2's wheelchair should have been locked prior to attaching the securement straps. S4MS/TD further indicated locking the wheelchair wheels was part of the procedure to properly secure Resident #2 in the transport van. In an interview on 05/14/2025 at 1:12PM, the Q'Straint Representative indicated part of the securement process of a wheelchair included engaging the wheelchair's brakes before applying the Q'Straint securement system. In an interview on 05/14/2025 at 3:30PM, S1Administrator was presented with the above findings and indicated he did not visualize the status of Resident #2's wheelchair brakes during the above mentioned monitoring. S1Administrator had no further explanation as to why the facility's Vehicle Wheelchair and Patient Secure Systems Competency checklist was not followed when securing Resident #2 into the transport van.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident was given a 30 day written notice before a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident was given a 30 day written notice before a facility-initiated discharge as required; and, 2. A resident's written discharge notice included the name and contact information for Louisiana's Mental Health Advocacy Service. This deficient practice was identified (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) sampled residents investigated for discharge requirements. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an inpatient psychiatric hospital. Further review revealed Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 01/27/2025. Further review revealed Resident #1 received a written Discharge Notification on 01/27/2025. Review of Resident #1's Discharge Notification dated 01/27/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was discharged because the facility was unable to meet Resident #1's needs and Resident #1 continued to smoke in the facility. Review of Resident #1's EMR revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence Resident #1 was observed smoking in the facility and/or with smoking paraphernalia after she returned from her inpatient psychiatric hospital stay on 01/23/2025, until her discharge on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's one on one monitoring logs revealed Resident #1 received one on one monitoring from 4:00PM on 01/23/2025 until 5:30PM on 01/27/2025. In an interview on 03/18/2025 at 12:33PM, S1Administrator did not provide any further evidence that disputed the deficient practice. 2. Review of Resident #1's EMR revealed, in part, Resident #1 had diagnoses, which included, major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities that were once enjoyable) and bipolar disorder (a mental condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania) and lows (depression). Review of Resident #1's Discharge Notification dated 01/27/2025 revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, the name, mailing address, email address, and telephone number for Louisiana's Mental Health Advocacy Service was included in Resident #1's Discharge Notification dated 01/27/2025 as required. In an interview on 03/19/2025 at 5:04PM, S1Administrator confirmed the contact information for Louisiana's Mental Health Advocacy Service was not included in the 01/27/2025 Discharge Notice to Resident #1 as required.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care needs for a resident who displayed passive suicidal ideation for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care needs for a resident who displayed passive suicidal ideation for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health care needs. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy Statement: Resident suicide threats shall be taken seriously and addressed appropriately. Policy Interpretation and Implementation with a Revision date of 2002 revealed in part that staff were to report any resident threats of suicide immediately to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/16/2024, revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 5 which indicated Resident #1's cognition was severely impaired. Further review revealed diagnoses of Dementia, Depression, and Schizophrenia. In an interview on 07/30/2024 at 1:35 p.m., S3Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated on 07/22/2024 while transporting Resident #1 into the shower room, Resident #1 stated, If you are going to give me a shower, you might as well kill me. S3CNA further indicated she responded to Resident #1 by saying we don't talk like this around here. S3CNA further indicated she gave Resident #1 a shower and afterwards brought him to his room. S3CNA further indicated she did not notify the nurse on duty. In an interview on 07/30/2024 at 3:57 p.m., S1Administrator indicated S4CNA should have notified Resident #1's nurse of the above statement Resident #1 made. In an interview on 07/30/2024 at 4:10 p.m., S4CNA indicated on 07/22/2024, she was present when Resident #1 stated, If you're going to give me a shower, you might as well kill me. S4CNA further indicated she and S3CNA brought Resident #1 back to his room. S4CNA also indicated she did not ask Resident #1 any questions and she did not notify the nurse on duty. S4CNA further indicated about an hour later she removed the straps of a blue promotional bag from around Resident #1's neck and brought him to the nurse on duty. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 9:17 a.m. S7Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated after making the above statement, S3CNA should have remained with Resident #1, and reported the statement Resident #1 made immediately to the nurse. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 10:00 a.m. S5Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) indicated the statement, if you are going to give me a shower, you might as well kill me is a passive form of suicidal ideation. S5PMHNP also indicated S3CNA should have been reported the above incident to the nurse immediately, and not bring him back to his room.
Jun 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (Resident #64) of 4 (Resident #44, Resident #60, Resident #64, and Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (Resident #64) of 4 (Resident #44, Resident #60, Resident #64, and Resident #112) residents reviewed for call devices. Findings: Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13. A score of 13 indicated Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #64's Care Plan revealed, in part, a potential for alteration in breathing pattern related to respiratory distress, self-care deficit, and risk for falls. Further review of Resident #64's Care Plan revealed an intervention to have the call bell within reach for the above mentioned issues. Observation on 06/10/2024 at11:18 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was on the nightstand. The surveyor asked Resident #64 how he called for help and he replied, I holler. Observation on 06/11/2024 at 11:07 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was on the nightstand. Observation on 06/12/2024 at 9:55 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was in the top drawer of his nightstand. Observation on 06/12/2024 at 11:55 a.m. revealed Resident #64's call bell was in the top drawer of his nightstand. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #64 stated he could not reach his call bell. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 10:28 a.m., S7Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated Resident #64 was able to use his call bell. In an interview on 6/12/2024 at 10:36 a.m., S8Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated Resident #64 was capable of using the call bell. S8CNA further indicated the call bell was in the top drawer of the nightstand and Resident #64 was unable to reach the call bell.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident and/or a resident's responsible party was invited to the resident's care planning meeting for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident and/or a resident's responsible party was invited to the resident's care planning meeting for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 (Resident #44) resident investigated for participation in care planning. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), dated September 2013 revealed, in part, the resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the residents care plan; every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family, and the mechanics of how the IDT meets its responsibilities in the development of the interdisciplinary care plan (e.g.; face-to-face, teleconference, written communication) is at the discretion of the care planning committee. In an interview on 06/10/2024 at 11:02 a.m., Resident #44's family member indicated when Resident #44 was first admitted to the facility they participated in quarterly care plan conferences; however, they were no longer invited to the care plan conferences. Resident #44's family member indicated he would like to participate in the care plan conferences. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 11:43 a.m., S3Social Services Director (SSD) indicated she had not contacted families to schedule care plan conferences since June 2023. S3SSD further indicated a care plan conference was only completed if a family member attended the conference. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 10:59 a.m., S1Administrator indicated staff should try to schedule a care plan conference for each quarterly assessment completed. S1Administrator further indicated he was aware the facility had not completed care plan conferences for long term residents since June 2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services as identified in a therapy scre...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services as identified in a therapy screening for 1(Resident #44) of 1 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of Resident #44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #44 had a functional limitation in range of motion of both upper extremities. Review of Resident #44's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #44 had limited physical mobility related to contractures of the bilateral upper extremities. Review of Resident #44's rehabilitation screen dated 09/01/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #44 had hand contractures and would be evaluated by Occupational Therapy for splint fitting to prevent further decline. Observation on 06/11/2024 at 11:06 a.m. revealed Resident #44 was in her room in her wheelchair. Further observation revealed Resident #44 had bilateral hand contractures and she did not have splints on her hands. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 10:30 a.m.5am, S7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed Resident #44 did not have hand splints. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 12:10 p.m., S5Rehab Director confirmed Resident #44 was assessed for therapy services on 09/01/2023. S5Rehab Director further indicated the screening determined Resident #44 should have an Occupational Therapy evaluation for splints for her contractures. S5Rehab Director indicated Resident #44's Occupational Therapy evaluation had not been completed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for targeted behaviors for 1 (Resident # 138) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for targeted behaviors for 1 (Resident # 138) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy for Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring dated 03/2019 revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will monitor for side effects and complications related to psychoactive medications. Review of Resident #138's Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed no record of monitoring for targeted behaviors for administered antidepressant and antianxiety medications in the eMAR prior to 06/13/2024. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 10:15 a.m., S4Clinical Coordinator indicated a resident who received psychoactive medications should be assessed and monitored for targeted behaviors every shift and those targeted behaviors should be documented on the eMAR. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 11:05 a.m., S2Director of Nursing indicated that nursing staff do not perform routine charting for the assessment and monitoring of targeted behaviors when receiving psychoactive medications, and staff only document a progress note if targeted behaviors for psychoactive medications were observed. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 12:45 p.m., S1Administrator indicated he was unaware that Resident # 138 was not being monitored for targeted behaviors when receiving psychotropic medications. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 12:50 p.m., S2Director of Nursing indicated that facility staff was not monitoring targeted behaviors for psychoactive medications for Resident # 138 and they should have been.
May 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was asse...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at risk for wandering/elopement, was supervised and unable to elope off of the facility's grounds; 2. Failed to ensure staff tested the WanderGuard system to ensure the transmitters were properly functioning at ankle level to alert staff and prevent residents from being able to exit the facility unsupervised for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for wandering/elopement and accident/hazards. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/07/2024 at 6:30 p.m. when Resident #1, a resident who was assessed as being at high risk for wandering and elopement, and who had a WanderGuard transmitter placed on his right ankle was allowed to exit the facility through Door a. Resident #1 left the supervision of the facility's staff for approximately 13.45 hours. Resident #1 was located by S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 05/08/2024 when she observed him walking on a street near the facility. S4LPN returned Resident #1 to the facility on [DATE] at 8:12 a.m. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/17/2024 at 4:52 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/20/2024 at 2:10 p.m., after it was verified through observations, interviews, and record review the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. This deficient practice had the likelihood to cause more than minimum harm to the remaining 19 residents were identified as being at risk for wandering and elopement. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review dated 05/06/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was assessed as being at risk for wandering with a score of 11 (a score of 11 or above indicated Resident #1 was at high risk for wandering). Review of Resident #1's May 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 05/07/2024 and discontinued on 05/08/2024 for Resident #1 to have a WanderGuard bracelet in place to his right ankle. Further review revealed, an order dated 05/08/2024 for Resident #1 to have a WanderGuard bracelet in place to his left ankle. Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Note dated 05/07/2024 at 12:51 p.m. revealed, in part, a call was placed to Resident #1's responsible party regarding Resident #1 wandering in and out of other residents' rooms. Review of Resident #1's late entry Nurse's Note dated 05/07/2024 at 3:03 p.m. revealed, in part, Resident #1 would pace in and out of his room and stated, I need to get to work. Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Note dated 05/07/2024 at 6:45 p.m. revealed, in part, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) went into Resident #1's room and he was not present. Further review revealed S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a CNA (S5CNA) went to each room on Floor b to look for Resident #1. Further review revealed, after the search for Resident #1 was unsuccessful on Floor b, S4LPN continued to search for Resident #1 on Floor c. Review revealed a staff nurse (S6LPN) informed S4LPN that a person who matched Resident #1's description had inquired about a streetcar or cab and the staff nurse (S6LPN) had directed him to the lobby. Further review revealed, a receptionist (S7Receptionist) informed S4LPN she let out a group of visitors, and hadn't heard any WanderGuard system alarms. Further review revealed, S4LPN and a CNA (S5CNA) continued to search throughout the building, but Resident #1 was still missing. Further review revealed S4LPN went to the facility's parking lot and searched surrounding the area, but Resident #1 remained missing. In a telephone interview on 05/17/2024 at 11:14 p.m., S5CNA indicated on 05/07/2024 she was unable to locate Resident #1. S5CNA further indicated she looked for Resident #1, but was unable to locate him in the facility or the surrounding area. In a telephone interview on 05/20/2024 at 2:29 p.m., S4LPN indicated on 05/07/2024, S5CNA had gone into Resident #1's room and Resident #1 was not there. S4LPN further indicated she and S5CNA attempted to look for Resident #1 on Floor b, Floor c, the facility's common areas, and the facility's parking lot, but were unable to locate Resident #1. S4LPN further indicated she observed Resident #1 walking on a street near the facility on 05/08/2024 and brought him back to the facility around 8:10 a.m. Review of the facility's surveillance footage on 05/20/2024 at 10:32 a.m. revealed, in part, Resident #1 exited the facility through Door a, walked through Parking Lot e, and was last within view of the surveillance cameras at 6:30 p.m. on 05/07/2024. Review of S4LPN's written statement dated 05/08/2024 revealed, in part, S4LPN while driving observed Resident #1 walking on a street near the facility and offered him a ride home. Further review revealed S4LPN noted Resident #1 still had a WanderGuard bracelet on his right ankle. Further review revealed S4LPN returned Resident #1 to the facility at 8:12 a.m. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review dated 05/08/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #2 was assessed as being at high risk for wandering with a score of 16 (score of 11 or above indicated Resident #2 was at high risk for wandering). Review of Resident #2's May 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 05/08/2024 for Resident #2 to have a WanderGuard bracelet placed on his right ankle. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review dated 05/08/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #3 was assessed as being at risk for wandering with a score of 16 (a score of 11 or above indicated Resident #3 was at high risk for wandering). Review of Resident #3's May 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 05/09/2024 for Resident #3 to have a WanderGuard bracelet placed on her right ankle. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review dated 05/08/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #4 was assessed as being at high risk for wandering with a score of 16 (score of 11 or above indicated Resident #4 was at high risk for wandering). Review of Resident #4's May 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 05/08/2024 for Resident #4 to have a WanderGuard bracelet placed on her left ankle. Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review dated 05/08/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #5 was assessed as being at high risk for wandering with a score of 19 (score of 11 or above indicated Resident #5 was at risk for wandering). Review of Resident #5's May 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 05/08/2024 for Resident #5 to have a WanderGuard bracelet placed on her left wrist. Observation on 05/17/2024 at 12:37 p.m., revealed S2Corporate Administrator placed a WanderGuard transmitter bracelet to the surveyor's left ankle. Further observation revealed the surveyor was able to exit the automatic doors of Door a without the automatic doors locking or the WanderGuard system alarm sounding for two attempts. Observation on 05/17/2024 at 12:42 p.m., revealed the surveyor with the WanderGuard transmitter bracelet placed to her left ankle, was able to exit the automatic door of Door a without the automatic doors locking when surveyor approached from the left side of Door a. Observation on 05/17/2024 at 12:50 p.m. revealed the surveyor with the WanderGuard transmitter bracelet placed to her left ankle, was able to exit the automatic doors of Door a without the automatic doors locking or the WanderGuard system alarm sounding when approached from the left side of Door a. In an interview on 05/17/2024 at 12:55 p.m., S3Plant Manager indicated when he tested the WanderGuard system on Door a weekly, he placed the WanderGuard transmitter in a cup at waist level. In an interview on 05/17/2024 at 1:20 p.m., S2Corporate Administrator indicated the range of the WanderGuard system on Door a was not set as wide as it could have been in order to allow residents with WanderGuard transmitters to use the facility's elevator. S2Corporate Administrator further confirmed the facility was not testing the WanderGuard system on Door a from multiple angles. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, the WanderGuard system on Door a was tested with a WanderGuard transmitter bracelet entering Door a at ankle height or with a WanderGuard transmitter bracelet entering Door a at different angles.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was asse...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at risk for wandering/elopement, was supervised and unable to elope off of the facility's grounds; 2. Failed to ensure staff tested the WanderGuard system to ensure the transmitters were properly functioning at ankle level to alert staff and prevent residents from being able to exit the facility unsupervised for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for wandering/elopement and accident/hazards. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/07/2024 at 6:30 p.m. when Resident #1, a resident who was assessed as being at high risk for wandering and elopement, and who had a WanderGuard transmitter placed on his right ankle was allowed to exit the facility through Door a. Resident #1 left the supervision of the facility's staff for approximately 13.45 hours. Resident #1 was located by S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 05/08/2024 when she observed him walking on a street near the facility. S4LPN returned Resident #1 to the facility on [DATE] at 8:12 a.m. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/17/2024 at 4:52 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/20/2024 at 2:10 p.m., after it was verified through observations, interviews, and record review the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal, prior to the survey exit. Findings: Cross Reference F689 In an interview on 05/17/2024 at 12:55 p.m., S3Plant Manager indicated when he tested the WanderGuard system on Door a weekly, he placed the WanderGuard transmitter in a cup at waist level. In an interview on 05/17/2024 at 1:20 p.m., S2Corporate Administrator indicated the range of the WanderGuard system on Door a was not set as wide as it could have been in order to allow residents with WanderGuard transmitters to use the facility's elevator. S2Corporate Administrator further confirmed the facility was not testing the WanderGuard system on Door a from multiple angles. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, the WanderGuard system on Door a was tested with a WanderGuard transmitter bracelet entering Door a at ankle height or with a WanderGuard transmitter bracelet entering Door a at different angles.
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure over the counter eye drops were labeled with a resident's name. This deficient practice was identified for 1 medication...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure over the counter eye drops were labeled with a resident's name. This deficient practice was identified for 1 medication cart (Cart x) of 2 medication carts (Cart x and Cart y) observed for medication administration. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Labelling of Medication Containers revealed, in part, labels for individual resident medications would include all necessary information, such as the resident's name. Observation on 12/05/2023 at 3:15 p.m. of Cart x revealed 6 opened bottles of Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution (eye drops used for dry eye relief and lubricant). Further observation revealed the 6 opened bottles of Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution were only labeled with room numbers and not residents' names. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 03:20 p.m., S3Licened Practical Nurse acknowledged the 6 opened bottles of Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution did not identify the residents by name, only by resident's room, In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 4:00 p.m., S2DON acknowledged the 6 opened bottles of the Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution should have been labeled with the resident's name not just the room numbers.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure foods stored in the facility's kitchen refrigerator were dated; 2. Ensure expired beverages were not available for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure foods stored in the facility's kitchen refrigerator were dated; 2. Ensure expired beverages were not available for resident consumption; and 3. Ensure the inside of the facility's kitchen Prep-refrigerator (Fridge c and Fridge d) were free of an unknown thick substance, buildup of an unknown brown substance, and debris. Findings: 1. Observation on 12/05/2023 at 9:55 a.m. of the facility's kitchen refrigerator revealed a jar of spinach dip was not labeled with an open date. Further observation revealed a container with pudding had no date labeled on it. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 9:57 a.m., S4Dietary Manager acknowledged the jar of spinach dip was not labeled with an opened date and should not have been in the facility's kitchen refrigerator. S4Dietary Manager further acknowledged the container with pudding should have been labeled with a date to identify when it was prepared and put into the facility's kitchen refrigerator. 2. Observation on 12/05/2023 at 09:58 a.m. of Fridge c revealed 1 container of thickened lemon water with a use by date of 11/27/2023 was available for resident's consumption. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 10:00 a.m., S4Dietary Manager acknowledged the thickened lemon water with a use by date of 11/27/2023 needed to be removed from the facility's refrigerator. 3. Observation on 12/05/2023 at 10:01 a.m. of Fridge c) revealed the inside had an unknown thick substance on the lower shelf. Further observation of Fridge d revealed a buildup of unknown brown substance and debris in the lower compartment. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 10:03 a.m., S4Dietary Manager acknowledged the inside of the Fridge c should not have a buildup of a unknown vicious substance and Fridge d should not have a buildup of an unknown brown substance and debris. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage revealed, in part, food services or other designated staff will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. Further review revealed, all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated (received and/or open date). In an interview on 12/06/2023 at 2:33 p.m., S1Administrator acknowledged the jar of spinach dip was not labelled with an opened date and should not have been in the refrigerator; the container with pudding should have been labeled with a date to identify when it was prepared and put into the facility's kitchen refrigerator; the thickened lemon water with a use by date of 11/27/2023 should not have been available for resident's consumption; and Fridge c should not have had an unknown viscous substance and Fridge d should not have had an unknown brown substance and debris.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the injury was discovered to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 ) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed, in part, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, of Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Other lack of Coordination, and Muscle Wasting Atrophy, Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/2023 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 which indicated Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed, Resident #1 required extensive assistance from one person with bed mobility and transfers and total dependence from one person for toileting. Review of Resident #1's nurse's note dated 10/27/2023 at 9:42 a.m., revealed in part, S2ClininalCoordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse was notified of x-ray results via phone. Impression: fracture of the proximal humerus (bone in the upper arm). The facility's Medical Director and S4Director of Nursing (S4DON) were present. Review of Resident #1's x-ray results dated 10/27/2023 at 9:39 a.m., revealed, in part, Resident #1 had an acute appearing fracture to the proximal left humerus (bone in the upper arm). Review of a Statewide Incident Management System (SIMS) report revealed, in part an injury of unknown origin was discovered for Resident #1 on 10/27/2023 at 9:53 a.m. Further review revealed, the SIMS report was entered on 10/27/2023 at 4:47 p.m. In an interview on 11/21/2023 at 12:57 p.m., S2ClinicalCoordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse (S2CC/LPN) stated she reviewed the x-ray results for Resident #1 in the presence on the S4DON, S1Administrator, and the facility's medical director in the morning meeting on 10/27/2023 at 9:42 a.m. In an interview on 11/21/2023 at 1:04 p.m., S4DON acknowledged S1Administrator and herself were present in the morning meeting on 10/27/2023. S4DON further stated S1Administrator and herself were made aware of Resident #1's x-ray results of a fractured humerus during the above mentioned meeting. In an interview on 11/20/2023 at 1:45 p.m., S1Administrator stated he was made aware of Resident #1's x-ray results of a fractured humerus on 10/27/2023 at 9:53 a.m. S1Adminstrator stated he did not file a Statewide Incident Management System (SIMS) report within 2 hours of being aware of the fracture to Resident #1's left arm.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0776 (Tag F0776)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a stat (also known as immediate) x-ray was done in a timel...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a stat (also known as immediate) x-ray was done in a timely manner, for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse that received diagnostic services. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Request for Diagnostic Services revealed, in part, an emergency request must be labeled stat ( a word meaning immediately) to assure prompt action is taken. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Lack of Coordination, and Muscle Wasting Atrophy. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/2023 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 which indicated Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed, Resident #1 required extensive assistance from one person with bed mobility and transfers and total dependence with one person for toileting. Review of Resident #1's nurse's note dated 10/26/2023 at 7:21p.m., revealed, in part, upon entering room with S3CertifiedNursingAssistant (S3CNA) to assist Resident #1, S5LicensedPracticalNurse (S5LPN) observed Resident #1 squealing in pain when S3CNA attempted to put her in bed. Review revealed upon observation S5LPN noticed Resident #1's left upper extremity swollen and painful to touch. Further review revealed Resident #1 was assessed and a stat x-ray for her left arm was ordered by Resident #1's physician. Review of Resident #1's physician's order dated 10/26/2023 at 6:51 p.m., revealed, in part, portable x-ray of left upper extremity stat for swelling in arm. Review of Resident #1's nurse's note dated 10/27/2023 at 6:01 a.m., revealed, in part, Resident #1 was still waiting for a stat x-ray to left arm. Review of Resident #1's radiology report dated 10/27/2023 at 9:39 a.m., revealed, in part, Resident #1 had an acute appearing fracture of the proximal left humerus (break of the upper part of the bone in the arm). In an interview on 11/21/2023 at 10:19 a.m., S6LPN acknowledged she had not followed up with the x-ray provider until 6:50am on 10/27/2023. S6LPN further acknowledged she should have notified the x-ray provider at the beginning of her shift and not waited until the end of her shift to notify the x-ray provider that Resident #1 had a stat left arm x-ray. In an interview on 11/21/2023 at 10:44 a.m., S1Administrator acknowledged Resident #1's stat left arm x-ray order should have been followed up on by the night shift nurse within a few hours if the x-ray tech didn't arrive at the facility.
Aug 2023 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure a physician and resident representative were notified immediately after an incident occurred for 1 (Resident #100) of 1 resident sample...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure a physician and resident representative were notified immediately after an incident occurred for 1 (Resident #100) of 1 resident sampled for accidents. Findings: Review of facility of policy on Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revealed, in part: Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Interpretation and Implementation: The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/12/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #100 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9 which indicated Resident #100 had a moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #100 required extensive assistance with transfers and toilet use with the assistance of 1 person. Review of nurses' notes revealed, in part, on 07/17/2023 at 10:37 p.m., Resident #100 complained to the nurse of left ankle pain. The note further revealed Resident #100 informed the nurse she had twisted her ankle during a transfer where a CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) had assisted her to bed. Further review of nurses' notes, revealed, in part the nurse informed the physician of the incident at 7:13 a.m. on 07/18/2023 and at 1:35 p.m. on 07/18/2023, an x-ray of her left ankle was ordered after Resident #100 continued to complain of pain. Review of x-ray results completed on 07/18/2023 revealed, in part, acute-appearing fractures of the left lower leg. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:45 a.m., S12LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Supervisor stated the nurse should have notified the doctor immediately on 07/17/2023 when she was informed the resident had twisted her ankle during a transfer and was in pain. S12LPN Supervisor further stated the nurse should not have waited until the next morning to notify the MD. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 12:35 p.m., S2DON (Director of Nursing) stated the nurse should have notified the doctor immediately upon notification of an incident and not have waited until the next day.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and electronically submit a comprehensive assessment to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in a timely manner for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and electronically submit a comprehensive assessment to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #80) of 5 (Resident #3, Resident #52, Resident #66, Resident #80, and Resident #120) residents reviewed for MDS discrepancies. Findings: Review of the facility's IQIES (Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System) MDS 3.0 Final Validation Report dated 08/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #80's Significant Change Assessment with and ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/30/2023 was completed more than 14 days after the ARD and therefore completed late. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 12:05 p.m., S4MDS Coordinator, stated the comprehensive assessment for Resident #80 was not completed or transmitted timely and it should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and electronically submit a quarterly assessment to CMS (Center for Medicare Service) in a timely manner for 2 (Resident #66 and R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and electronically submit a quarterly assessment to CMS (Center for Medicare Service) in a timely manner for 2 (Resident #66 and Resident #80) of 5 (Resident #3, Resident #52, Resident #66, Resident #80, and Resident #120) residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings: Review of the facility's IQIES (Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System) MDS (Minimum Data Set) 3.0 Final Validation Report dated 08/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #66's Quarterly Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/17/2023 and Resident #80's Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 05/18/2023 were completed more than 14 days after the ARD and therefore completed late. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 12:05 p.m., S4MDS Coordinator, stated the above mentioned quarterly assessments for Resident #66 and Resident #80 were not completed or transmitted timely and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately refle...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the status of residents' limited range of motion for 2 (Resident #93 and Resident #105) of 3 (Resident #10, Resident #93, and Resident #105) residents reviewed for limited range of motion; and 2. Ensure the MDS accurately reflected a resident's discharge location status for 1 (Resident #126) of 1 (Resident #126) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings: 1. Resident #93 Review of Resident #93's MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/18/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #93 had a history of stroke with left sided hemiplegia (weakness). Further review revealed resident was assessed as having no functional limited range of motion in her upper extremities (arms and hands) and did not indicate Resident #93 had a diagnosis of left hand contracture. Review of Resident #93's Care Plan with a start date of 12/22/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #93 had hemiplegia related to a stroke with left sided weakness and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #93's Office Visit Report for 05/17/2023 and 05/15/2023 revealed Resident #93 had a diagnosis of left hand contracture and the plan indicated to use a splint daily. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 8:50 a.m., S11Therapy Director/Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) confirmed Resident #93 had a left hand contracture with limited range of motion. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 2:21 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility failed to assess and document Resident #93's left hand contracture. Resident #105 Review of Resident #105's MDS with an ARD of 05/18/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #105 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (score of 08-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). Further review revealed Resident #105 was assessed as having no impairment of lower extremities (legs). Observation on 07/31/23 at 11:38 a.m. revealed Resident #105 appeared to have limited range of motion to his bilateral lower extremities (legs). Further observation revealed no visible splints present. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 10:30 a.m., S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Treatment Nurse stated Resident #105 had contractures to both legs. Review of Resident #105's Physical Therapy Plan of Care dated 01/27/2023 revealed Resident #105 had an increase in knee flexion contractures to bilateral knees. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 10:28 a.m., S5LPN/MDS Nurse stated after reviewing Resident #105's therapy assessment Resident #105's MDS was coded inaccurately. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 11:38 a.m., S11Therapy Director/COTA stated therapy went and assessed Resident #105. S11Therapy Director/COTA confirmed Resident #105 had contractures to bilateral lower extremities. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 12:17 p.m., S2DON stated the facility failed accurately assess Resident #105's bilateral lower extremity contractures. 2. Resident #126 Review of Resident #126's Nurse Progress Note dated 06/27/2023 revealed Resident #126's representative notified the nurse that she was leaving with her mother. Further review revealed Resident #126's nurse explained the process of leaving against medical advice (AMA), and Resident #126's responsible party stated she would not sign any document and left with Resident #126. Review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of Resident #126 had been sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #126's MDS with an ARD of 06/27/2023 revealed, in part, a discharge date of 06/27/2023 with the discharge status assessed as acute hospital. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 5:20 p.m., S4MDS Coordinator, S5LPN, and S6LPN stated Resident #126 left AMA on 06/27/2023 with her responsible party, and therefore her discharge status was coded incorrectly. S4MDS Coordinator further stated the MDS should have been coded to community and not acute hospital. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 10:36 a.m., S2DON stated she spoke with S4MDS Coordinator and confirmed the MDS discharge status was coded incorrectly and should have been coded as discharge to the community instead of discharge to the acute hospital.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve a res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve a resident's limited range of motion for 2 (Resident #93 and Resident #105) of 3 (Resident #10, Resident #93, and Resident #105) sampled residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. Findings: Resident #93 Review of Resident #93's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/18/2023 revealed Resident #93 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 which indicated her cognition was intact. Review of Resident #93's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #93 had a stroke with left sided weakness and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #93's Office Visit Reports for 05/15/2023, 5/22/2023, 6/26/2023, 6/29/2023, 07/19/2023, and 7/25/2023 revealed Resident #93 had a diagnosis of left hand contracture (stiff joints that do not move) and the plan indicated to use a splint daily. Review of Resident #93's May, June, July, and August 2023 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, no order for a splint to left hand. Observation on 07/31/2023 at 10:21 a.m. revealed Resident #93's left hand was contracted and no splint was in use. Observation on 08/01/2023 at 12:16 p.m. revealed Resident #93's left hand was contracted and no splint was in use. Observation on 08/03/2023 at 8:50 a.m. revealed Resident #93's left hand was contracted and no splint was in use. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 8:50 a.m., S11Therapy Director/Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) confirmed Resident #93 had a left hand contracture with limited range of motion. S11Therapy Director/COTA stated Resident #93 received occupational therapy from 05/15/2023 - 07/31/2023 but did not receive treatment for a left hand contracture. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 2:21 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a process to review what was documented by the physician on the resident's office visit progress notes. S2DON further stated she was not aware the office visit notes for Resident #93 indicated the use of a splint daily to manage left hand contracture. Review of Resident #93's record revealed there was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any evidence Resident #93's left hand contracture was assessed and/or a splint was utilized daily for treatment. Resident #105 Review of Resident #105's Occupational Therapy (OT) Plan of Care dated 01/27/2023 revealed Resident #105 had only 50% of normal range of motion to his right upper extremity (arm and hand). Review of Resident #105's Physical Therapy (PT) Plan of Care dated 01/27/2023 revealed Resident #105 had only 25% of normal range of motion to his bilateral lower extremities (legs). Review of Resident #105's PT Therapist Progress and Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #105's caregiver/staff were provided education regarding splinting and proper joint positioning. Review of Resident #105's OT Therapist Progress and Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #105 was provided with right upper extremity functional resting hand splint to promote proper positioning of right upper extremity. Staff educated on the correct way to put on and take off Resident #105's right upper extremity resting hand splint and wearing schedule of 6 hours a day. Review of Resident #105's MDS with an ARD 05/18/2023 revealed, in part, BIMS of 11 (score of 08-12 indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment). Further review of Resident #105's MDS revealed Resident #105 had an impairment on one side of the upper extremity, and no impairment in range of motion of the lower extremities. Review of Resident #105's record revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of Resident #105 receiving range of motion services or splinting for the limited range of motion to his bilateral lower extremities and/or his right upper extremity. Observation on 07/31/2023 at 11:38 a.m. revealed Resident #105 had both legs partially flexed. In an interview on 07/31/2023 at 11:38 a.m., Resident #105 stated he could not stretch out his legs, and none of the staff assisted him with stretching his legs. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 10:30 a.m., S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Treatment Nurse stated Resident #105 had contractures to both legs. Observation on 08/01/2023 at 10:30 a.m. revealed no splints present to either Resident #105's bilateral lower extremities, or right upper extremity. In an interview on 08/03/2023 10:18 a.m., S16Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she had Resident #105 for about 2 months. S16CNA stated Resident #105 did not have any splinting or range of motion exercises that she was aware of. S16CNA further stated she was not instructed on range of motion exercises to complete with Resident #105. S16CNA further stated Resident #105 cannot fully extend either of his legs, and cannot fully open his right hand. Observation on 08/03/2023 10:26 a.m. revealed Resident #105 did not have any splints visible to either the bilateral lower extremities or the right upper extremity. In an interview on 08/03/2023 10:28 a.m., S5LPN/MDS Nurse stated the facility did not develop a care plan with interventions for Resident #105's limited range of motion. In an interview on 08/03/2023 10:45 a.m., S11Therapy Director/COTA stated after reviewing the prior therapy company's discharge notes, Resident #105 should have received splinting and range of motion services for his limited range of motion to his right upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 12:17pm, S2DON stated the facility failed to implement therapy discharge recommendations for Resident #105's limited range of motion to his right upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to communicate the Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations to the Physician for 1 (Resident #43) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #23, Resident #...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to communicate the Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations to the Physician for 1 (Resident #43) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #23, Resident #43, Resident #62, and Resident #116) sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of Resident #43's Weights revealed a weight of 107 pounds on 01/06/2023, and 83 pounds on 08/03/2023 (22% weight loss in six months). Review of Resident #43's Registered Dietician Progress Note dated 06/27/2023 revealed the registered Dietician recommended increasing Resident #43's Med Pass (nutritional supplement) (or Resource (2.0) from 4 ounces to 6 ounces by mouth three times a day for additional changes. Review of Resident #43's July and August 2023 Physician Orders revealed, in part, revealed Med Pass (nutritional supplement) 2.0 give 4 ounces three times a day. Review of Resident #43's June, July, and August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed, in part, revealed Med Pass 2.0 4 ounces three times a day was administered. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence Resident #43's was increased to 6 ounces per the registered dietician recommendations. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 10:18 a.m., S13Clinical Supervisor stated Resident #43 had a registered dietician recommendation to increase Med Pass to 6 ounces three times a day. S13Clincial Supervisor further stated Resident #43's nurse practitioner should have been given the dietician recommendations for review and approval. S13Clinical Supervisor confirmed this was not done and the order was not implemented. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 11:00 a.m., S2Director of Nurses stated the recommendation of the registered dietician should have been given to the Nurse Practitioner or physician for review and approval. S2Director of Nurses confirmed the dietary recommendation process for physician notification was not followed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an unauthorized person who was not employed by the facility d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an unauthorized person who was not employed by the facility did not administer medication or treatment to a resident for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 (Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for constipation. Findings: Review of the facility's Private Duty Sitters Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, private duty personnel must follow the facility's established nursing care policies and procedures, instructions issued by the nurse supervisor/charge nurse. Further review revealed medications may only be administered by authorized facility personnel. Review of Resident #4's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 07/31/2023 at 10:14 a.m., Resident #4 stated she had an issue with constipation. Resident #4's private duty sitter stated the responsible party would get the fleet enema and the private duty sitters would administer the fleet enema or a suppository. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) dated 05/14/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (score of 13-15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact); was totally dependent of one person's physical assistance for toileting; and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of Resident #4 having a care plan for Resident #4's private duty sitter to have been approved to administer medications or treatments. Review of Resident #4's Office Visit Note dated 07/25/2023 revealed Resident #4 complained of constipation. Further review revealed, in part, a plan for one enema one time. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 11:10 a.m., Resident #4's private duty sitter stated she was not sure if the nurse knew about the fleet enema being administered by private duty sitter. Resident #4's private duty sitter further stated when Resident #4 would get constipated Resident #4's responsible party would get the sitters a fleet enema and the private duty sitters would administer the enema. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 12:06 p.m., Resident #4's private duty sitter stated the last enema she administered to Resident #4 was on Monday, 07/31/2023. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 12:42 p.m., S14Licensed Practical Nurse stated Resident #4 did have an issue with an impaction last week and the nurse practitioner ordered a one-time enema. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 4:03 p.m., S14LPN stated when she went to administer the fleet enema last week to Resident #4, the private duty sitter stated she had already completed the enema so it was not repeated. S14LPN stated the private duty sitters had administered the enemas to the resident when she was at home prior. S14LPN stated the nurse practitioner was aware that the private duty sitter had administered the fleet enema, but she (S14LPN) did not notify anyone else regarding the private duty sitter having completed the administration of the fleet enema. S14LPN stated she did not educate the private duty sitters that they were not to administer medications or treatments to Resident #4. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 4:06 p.m., S13Clinical Supervisor stated she was not notified of Resident #4's private duty sitter having administered the enema to Resident #4. S13Clinical Supervisor further stated Resident #4's private duty sitter should not be administering the enema to Resident #4. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 4:50 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated the LPN should have immediately notified the supervisors of Resident #4's private duty sitter having administered the fleet enema to Resident #4 when she found out about the administration; furthermore, she should have documented the issue and educated the private duty sitters they were not to administer any medications or treatments.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a therapeutic diet as orde...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #380) of 1 resident reviewed for Food. Findings: Review of Resident #380's admission records revealed, in part, Resident #380 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #380's physician orders revealed, in part, no evidence of a diet order. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 12:22 p.m., S18Dietary Manager stated Resident #380 did not have an active diet order. S18Dietary Manager also stated she did not follow-up with anyone about the missing diet order. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 2:00 p.m., S2DON stated she reviewed Resident #380's physician orders and he did not have a diet order in the system. S2DON further stated Resident #380 should have had a diet order and did not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain their infection control program by the following: 1. Failed to have a male urinal contained in a plastic bag and i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain their infection control program by the following: 1. Failed to have a male urinal contained in a plastic bag and identified with a residents name (Resident #41); 2. Failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after performing wound care and prior to (Resident #105). This deficient practice was identified for and 2 (Resident #41 and Resident #105) of 2 (Resident #41 and Resident #105) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #41 Observation on 08/02/2023 at 10:01 a.m., revealed in Resident #41's bathroom, there was a male urinal on the grab bar by the commode and was uncontained with no name on the urinal. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:07 a.m., S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) after observing the male urinal, stated that the male urinal in the bathroom should be contained in a plastic bag with a residents' name documented on it but it was not done. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 11:10 a.m., S8Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated that a male urinal needs to be in a plastic bag but does not have to be labeled with the name if the resident was in a private room. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 4:50 p.m., S2Director of Nurses (DON) stated that urinals should be contained with a plastic bag and a resident' name on it. Observation on 08/03/2023 at 10:16 a.m., revealed in Resident #41's bathroom the male urinal was on a blue reclining chair in the bathroom. Observation further revealed the male urinal was not contained and not labeled. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 10:23 a.m., S9CNA after observing the male urinal on the blue reclining chair, stated that the male urinal should be contained in a plastic bag and have the name of the resident documented on it and the blue reclining chair should not be in the bathroom. In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 10:25 a.m., S8LPN came into Resident #41' room and stated that the urinal was not contained in a plastic bag. S8LPN stated she did not know who the male urinal was for because it had no name on it, and the chair should not be in the bathroom. Resident #105 Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure revealed hand hygiene should be performed, in part: - Before and after direct contact with residents; - Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; - After contact with a resident's intact skin; - After contact with blood or bodily fluids; - After handling dressing; and - After contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of the resident. Observation on 08/01/2023 at 10:35 a.m., of Resident #105's wound care S10LPN/Treatment Nurse and S15CNA revealed, in part, S10LPN/Treatment Nurse washed her hands and applied gloves then cleaned and applied the dressing to Resident #105's right hip wound, did not remove gloves after dressing the wound and then grabbed Resident #105's bed remote with the soiled gloves used during wound care. S10LPN/Treatment Nurse changed gloves and completed hand hygiene, then provided wound care to Resident #105's left 5th (small toe) lateral toe wound and without removing gloves or performing hand hygiene performed wound care to Resident #105's left lateral foot wound. S10LPN/Treatment Nurse did not remove her soiled gloves after performing wound care to Resident #105's left lateral foot wound and then proceeded to adjust Resident #105's sheets, and reposition Resident #105's catheter bag and tubing. S15CNA then without removing the gloves she had worn while assisting in wound care, or performing hand hygiene grabbed a towel and wiped Resident #105's mouth of saliva, and then pulled back the privacy curtain before changing gloves and performing hand hygiene. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 10:56 a.m., S10LPN/Treatment Nurse stated she should have changed gloves and completed hand hygiene between cleaning different wounds. S10LPN/Treatment Nurse further stated she and S15CNA should have also changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after having performed wound care and prior to touching items within Resident #105's environment.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed: 1. Ensure all food items were dated when opened; 2. Ensure perishable food items were not stored outside of acceptable tempera...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed: 1. Ensure all food items were dated when opened; 2. Ensure perishable food items were not stored outside of acceptable temperature controls. Findings: 1. Review of Policy and Procedure Manual Food Storage, in part, revealed the following: food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. Observation on 07/31/2023 at 9:15 a.m. revealed in the refrigerator was a one gallon, half full, bottle of Caesar dressing with no open date documented. In an interview on 07/31/2023 at 9:23 a.m., S17Dietary Director stated food items were to be dated when opened and the Caesar dressing did not have an open date documented. 2. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure Manual Food Safety revealed, in part, staff will monitor potentially hazardous foods because of their protein content, moisture content and/or food source and handle them carefully. The following foods are referred to as time/temperature controlled for safety (TCS) foods and include but not limited to milk and milk products (yogurt, cottage cheese, sour cream), and poultry. Review of Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHF) or Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Foods guidelines revealed potentially hazardous foods should be held below 41 degrees Farenheit. Observation on 07/31/2023 at 9:15 a.m. revealed the refrigerator/cooler temperature read 48 degrees Fahrenheit. Further observation revealed the following items were contained in the refrigerator/cooler: a one gallon, half full, container of Caesar dressing; one box of raw chicken thawing on bottom shelf in shallow pan; and 16 crates of individual milk cartons. In an interview on 07/31/2023 at 9:25 a.m., S17Dietary Director stated the refrigerator was currently 48 degrees Fahrenheit but the reading could be due to the door being open for too long. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 11:30 a.m., S17Dietary Director stated approximately 730 milk cartons, and thawed chicken was moved on 07/31/2023 from the refrigerator/cooler to the freezer and then put back in the cooler after an outside vendor for refrigeration completed maintenance repairs. Observation on 08/02/2023 at 10:49 a.m. revealed 16 crates of individual milk cartons in the refrigerator/cooler. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:49 a.m., S17Dietary Director stated on 07/31/2023 at 7:00 a.m. the dietary staff noted the refrigerator/cooler did not feel like it was cooling properly and the temperatures were reading approximately 33-38 degrees Fahrenheit inside the fridge. S17Dietary Director stated by 9:00 a.m. the temperature had reached 48 degrees Fahrenheit and the facility was unaware of how long the temperature in the refrigerator/cooler had been outside of safe parameters. S17Dietary Director further stated the chicken was to be cooked for lunch today but after the interview had decided to use the chicken that was delivered today instead due to safety. S17Dietary Director stated the milk in the refrigerator/cooler was the same crates observed on 07/31/2023 and would need to be discarded.
Mar 2023 8 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect: 1. Resident #1 from physical and psychosocial abuse by S3Contracted Certified Nursing Assistant (CCNA); 2. Resident #2 from sexual and psychosocial abuse by Resident #3; and, 3. Resident #5 from sexual and psychosocial abuse by Resident #4. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/25/2023 at 11:34 a.m. when Resident #3, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #2's breast while Resident #3 had an erection. Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP)/Medical Power of Attorney (POA) stated Resident #2 would have felt that her personal space was invaded and Resident #2 would have reacted with both verbal and physical aggression towards Resident #3's sexual abuse. Then, on 03/01/2023 and 03/03/2023, S3CCNA, a contracted employee without an approved criminal background check, physically abused Resident #1 by forcibly jerking Resident #1's body, physically restraining Resident #1, and throwing Resident #1 into his bed. Resident #1 sustained multiple discolorations to his upper body and two skin tears to his right forearm as a result of the physical abuse. Resident #1's RP and POA stated Resident #1 had been very withdrawn and quiet since the incident, and had Resident #1 not had a diagnosis of dementia at the time of the abuse, it would have made him very angry. Furthermore, on 03/07/2023, Resident #4, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #5's genitals. Resident #5's RP and power of attorney stated Resident #5 would have felt very scared and violated following the incident. Resident #5's RP/POA further stated he noted a new behavior of nervousness following Resident #4's sexual abuse. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/28/2023 at 4:56 p.m. The facility submitted an acceptable Plan of Removal which included: 1. Identified those residents who have suffered, or likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance. Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #5 suffered as a result of noncompliance. All other residents had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. 2. Specified actions the entity would take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring. The facility placed the following actions in place to ensure this outcome did not reoccur. -Immediately placed Resident #3 and Resident #4 on one to one monitoring to ensure all resident were safe. This was initiated on 03/28/2023 at 5:00 p.m. -All facility and contract staff who were present in the facility were provided in-service training on the forms of abuse and neglect as well as company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation-reporting and investigation, protections of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education were initiated on 03/28/2023 at 6:00 p.m. -All facility and contract staff who were present in the facility by S1Administrator and S2Director of Nursing educated on abuse and neglect as well as ways to manage residents with sexually inappropriate behavior for all employees currently working with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. This was initiated on 03/28/2023 at 6:00 p.m. In-service trainings were completed by the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing (DON), and Nursing Administration. This will be randomly monitored by S2Director of Nursing or designee once a week for four weeks, then as needed as determined by the QA (Quality Assurance) committee. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee including S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, and S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -In-service education will continue with all incoming facility and contract staff as they enter the building on abuse and neglect as well as ways to manage resident with sexually inappropriate behavior for all employees currently working with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education to ensure all staff working are educated on abuse and neglect prior to working with residents. All training will be completed by 03/30/2023 at 11:59 p.m. Future education will be randomly monitored by S2DON or designee weekly. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing Services/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -100% of residents were interviewed to determine if resident had any concerns with physical or sexual abuse were completed by facility Charge Nurses on 03/28/2023 at 8 p.m. The Charge Nurses did not report any significant findings. S2DON or designee will randomly monitor performance of resident interview on abuse once a week for four weeks. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Body Audits were completed on resident with cognitive impairments to see if any signs and symptoms of abuse were present. This was completed by S9Woundcare Nurse on 03/28/2023 at 8:00 p.m. No significant findings were discovered. S2DON or designee will ensure body audits are completed weekly by the nurses. Compliance will be randomly monitored weekly for four weeks, then and as needed as determined by the QA committee. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Full psychosocial assessments were completed on Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 by the S41Social Services on 03/28/2023 at 8 p.m. There were no negative findings identified during the assessments. S41Social Services will complete psychosocial assessments on Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 once a week for four weeks. The S2DON or designee will randomly monitor performance tool weekly for four weeks, then as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Abuse policy was revised by the President of the health system, S1Administrator, and S2Director of Nursing on 03/28/2023 at 6:00 p.m. to include initial abuse training requirements and as needed. -Education was provided to the S1Administrator, S43Admissions Director and S2Director of Nursing on performing individualized assessment of referrals for admission by the President of the Health system 03/29/2023 at 1:15p.m. -The staffing agency representative was notified that all agency staff members were required to have background checks performed by a Louisiana approved company effective 03/28/2023 at 12:17 p.m. Any staff member that did not have a Louisiana background check was not allowed to work a shift. A message was sent to the staffing agency representative for all agency employees so they would know to complete abuse trainings with the charge nurse upon arrival to their scheduled shift. This will be randomly monitored by S2DON or designee weekly for four weeks, and as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -All Administrative staff including S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurses, Charge Nurses, Wound care team, S41Social Services, S45Business Office Manager, S46Housekeeping Supervisor, S47Maintenance Director, S42Physical Therapist, S48Medical Records Manager, S49Human Resources, S50Dietary Manager, S51Activities Director and S43admission Coordinator was in-serviced by the Present of the Health Care System on the process from background screening and training staff to ensure abuse and neglect competencies are completed prior to providing care. This training also included changes in the onboarding process to include initial abuse and neglect training and as needed. This training was initiated on 03/28/2023 at 5:00 p.m. and will be concluded by 03/30/2023 at 11:59 p.m. -S1Administrator in-serviced all members of the Nursing Administration in-serviced on the screening and training policy for facility agency staff on 03/28/2023 at 7:00 p.m. 3. Included a date by which the entity asserts the likelihood for serious harm to any resident no longer exists. 03/28/2023 at 8:30 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/29/2022 at 3:34 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal. The deficient practice had the potential to cause serious harm or injury to all 136 residents identified on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS-672. Findings: Review of the facility's Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure revealed, in part, all types of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited. Review revealed abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. The policy revealed the following were signs of physical abuse: injuries that are non-accidental or unexplained, discolorations, skin tears including those that are in locations that would unlikely result from an accident or bruises including those found in unusual locations. Review also revealed sexual abuse was defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Review of the facility's Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations policy revealed, in part, residents are protected from harm, retaliation, reprisal, discrimination or coercion during investigations of abuse. Further review revealed if the alleged perpetrator was an employee or staff member, the individual was to be immediately reassigned to duties that do not involve resident contact or are would be suspended until the findings of the investigation are reviewed by the administrator. Review also revealed if the alleged abuse involved another resident, there may be restrictions on the accused resident's freedom to visit other resident rooms unattended. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Further review revealed, in part, additional diagnosis included major depressive disorder, need for assistance with personal care, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/28/2022 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicated Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review, revealed, in part, Resident #1 required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan initiated on 06/22/2018 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had episodes of combative behavior which included resisting care, attempting to hit staff, and being verbally abusive. Further review revealed, in part, if Resident #1 was having combative behaviors facility staff should remove the certified nursing assistant (CNA) from the situation and another CNA should provide care to the resident. The staff should then identify triggers that stimulate combative behavior and educate staff to avoid if possible, approach Resident #1 in a quiet non-threatening manner, and when care is provided care staff should explain the procedure gently prior to implementing. Further review revealed, in part, staff should change their approach or return later to continue with Resident #1's care and Resident #1 should receive a psychiatric consultation as needed. Review of Facility Incident Report with an incident date and time of 03/01/2023 at 12:03 p.m. for Resident #1 revealed, in part, S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated Resident #1's was combative with S3CCNA and refused further assistance. Further review revealed, Resident #1 had skin tears to his right upper arm. Review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Report with a date of 03/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had multiple skin discolorations to his bilateral upper arms and two skin tears to his right forearm. Review of Resident #1's wound evaluation with a date of 03/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a new skin tear to his right outer forearm which was acquired in the facility. Review revealed, the area of Resident #1's skin tear was 4.62 centimeters (cm), the length was 3.04cm, and the width was 2.06cm. Review revealed, Resident #1 had an additional skin tear to his right inner forearm that was acquired in the facility. Further review revealed, the area of Resident #1's skin tear area was 1.7cm, the length was 3.89cm, and the width was 1.09cm. Review of Facility Incident Report with an incident date and time of 03/06/2023 at 9:11 a.m. for Resident #1 revealed, in part, S4Charge Nurse stated she was informed by S1Administrator and S2Director of Nursing (DON) that Resident #1's POA reported an allegation of alleged physical abuse by a staff member. Review of the facility's Statewide Incident Management System revealed an incident was discovered at 8:45 a.m. on 03/06/2023 for Resident #1. Review revealed Resident #1's POA notified S1Adminsitrator that Resident #1 was physically abused by S3CCNA. Review revealed S1Adminsitrator conducted a meeting with Resident #1 and Resident #1's POA and reviewed video surveillance that confirmed S3CCNA physically abused Resident #1. Review of the facility's list of contracted CNA timesheets, revealed the following contracted CNAs worked throughout the facility on various floors from 03/01/2023 until 03/28/2023 and did not have an approved criminal background check on file at the facility: S3CCNA, S11CCNA, S12CCNA, S13CCNA, S14CCNA, S15CCNA, S16CCNA, S17CCNA, S18CCNA, S19CCNA, S20CCNA, S21CCNA, S22CCNA, S23CCNA, S24CCNA, S25CCNA, S26CCNA, S27CCNA, S28CCNA, S29CCNA, S30CCNA, S31CCNA, S32CCNA, S33CCNA, S34CCNA, and S35CCNA. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 3:04 p.m. Resident #1's POA stated on 03/02/2023 S9Wound Care Nurse called to inform her Resident #1 had two skin tears to his right upper extremity, but S9Wound Care Nurse was unaware of how they occurred. Resident #1's POA stated she went to visit Resident #1 on 03/04/2023 at approximately 11:00 a.m. and observed bruising to Resident #1's is right arm, right chest, and left shoulder. Resident #1's POA stated she previously visited Resident #1 on 02/26/2023 and Resident #1 had no bruising present. Resident #1's POA stated reviewed Resident #1's camera footage from the camera located in Resident #1's room from 03/01/2023 at 12:00 a.m. to present time. She stated on 03/01/2023 at approximately 1:20 p.m., she observed S3CCNA restrained Resident #1 by his wrist, pulled Resident #1's shirt off of his body in an extremely rough manner, transferred Resident #1 to the bed, and yelled demeaning comments at Resident #1 such as What you do to me, I will do to you. Resident #1's POA stated while watching the video Resident #1 was heard breathing hard and groaning. Resident #1's POA stated on 03/03/2023 at approximately 1:40 p.m. she observed S3CCNA approached Resident #1, did not provide him any instructions on care, and attempted to remove his shirt. Resident #1's POA stated she observed S3CCNA place his knee on top of Resident #1's right arm to hold it down. Resident #1's POA stated she observed S3CCNA removed Resident #1's shirt in an extremely rough manner and pulled his shirt over his head. Resident #1's POA stated she observed S3CCNA rolled Resident #1 in his wheelchair to the right side of Resident #1's bed and without giving Resident #1 guidance or instruction and roughly threw him in the bed. Resident #1's POA stated once Resident #1 was transferred into the bed his body was out of the visual field of the camera, but she could still hear Resident #1 grunting, groaning, and breathing heavily while S3CCNA was providing care. Resident #1's POA stated she questioned S5LPN on the nature of Resident #1's injuries and S5LPN stated she did not know what happened. Resident #1's POA stated S5LPN notified S8Unit Manager who was the supervisor on duty. Resident #1's POA stated S7Housekeeper and S5LPN were called into Resident #1's room and she showed the video to them. Resident #1's POA stated S8Unit Manager came to Resident #1's room and stated that she would be investigating the bruising and then exited Resident #1's room. Resident #1's POA stated she did not get to show S8Unit Manager the video. Resident #1's POA stated she saw S3CCNA in the facility and requested he be removed from Resident #1's assignment. Resident #1's POA stated on 03/06/2023 she went to the facility and had a meeting with S1Administrator and presented the video for him to view. Resident #1's POA further stated she had pictures of Resident #1's bruises she captured on her camera on 03/05/2023 and she would forward them to the survey team. Review of five photo images captured on 03/05/2023 by Resident #1's POA revealed, in part, Resident #1 had multiple discolorations that varied in size and color on his right and left upper extremities, his right and left hands, and his left chest and shoulder. Further review revealed, Resident #1 had a brown bandage with a date of 03/02/2023 on his right forearm and two small open skin tears that were not bandaged. Review of seven video clips with audio provided by Resident #1's POA, dated 03/01/2023 and time-stamped from 1:19 p.m. through 1:25 p.m., revealed in summary S3CCNA entered Resident #1's room with Resident #1 in his wheelchair facing the camera and propelled him to the right side of the bed. S3CCNA unbuttoned Resident #1's shirt near Resident #1's wrists without an explanation of care. S3CCNA began to unbutton Resident #1's shirt near his chest area and Resident #1 pushed S3CCNA away. S3CCNA placed his body in front of Resident #1, where Resident #1 was out of visual, but could be heard groaning. S3CCNA was heard telling Resident #1 You are not going to win, you are too old. Resident #1 continued to resist care and S3CCNA stated I told you, you are not going to win. S3CCNA then used his right hand to restrain Resident #1's right arm. During this time, Resident #1 was groaning and hollering out. S3CCNA stated I can do this all day. S3CCNA continued to remove Resident #1's shirt until it was completely off of his body. S3CCNA then wheeled Resident #1 via wheelchair to the right side of the bed. S3CCNA attempted to put his arms under Resident #1's arms. At this time, Resident #1 was heard groaning and yelling Ah. S3CCNA lifted Resident #1 out of his wheelchair, dragged him to the right side of the bed, and then threw Resident #1 in his bed. At this time, Resident #1 cannot be visualized on the camera view. S3CCNA stated to Resident #1 I fight back, I fight back. Resident #1 replied mmhmm and S3CCNA stated Alright, I am glad you know. S3CCNA stated to Resident #1 So be careful who you assault. S3CCNA removed Resident #1's right shoe and stated to Resident #1 Come on, what you do to me I'm going to do to you. S3CCNA shook his head up and down at Resident #1 and stated, Ok, Alright. S3CCNA ripped Resident #1's pants off of his legs and stated Come on, I don't have time for this. S3CCNA approached Resident #1's bedside with wipes and a brief and Resident #1 is heard groaning. S3CCNA stated, Look at ya, you're scratching yourself, look at ya, look at ya. S3CCNA then yelled for assistance due to Resident #1 bleeding everywhere. Review of nine video clips, with audio, provided by Resident #1's POA dated 03/03/2023, time-stamped from 2:07 p.m. through 2:15 p.m., revealed in summary Resident #1 sat in his wheelchair facing the camera and S3CCNA walked in Resident #1's room. S3CCNA approached Resident #1 and unbuttoned Resident #1's shirt without any instruction being provided to Resident #1. Resident #1 groaned and began to push S3CCNA away. S3CCNA continued to unbutton Resident #1's shirt. S3CCNA used his right hand to forcibly push Resident #1's right hand down and S3CCNA placed his right knee on top of Resident #1's hand to hold Resident #1's hand down as S3CCNA continued to unbutton Resident #1's shirt. S3CCNA removed Resident #1's headphones, walked away to place them on the bedside, and returned to Resident #1. Resident #1 pushed S3CCNA away as he removed his shoe from his right leg. S3CCNA slapped Resident #1's right hand with his left hand and stated, Don't hit me. S3CCNA raised his left hand with a closed fist over Resident #1 and repeated Don't hit me, move. S3CCNA removed Resident #1's shoes. S3CCNA placed his body in front of Resident #1 and Resident #1 was heard groaning. Resident #1 then attempted to push S3CNA away and S3CCNA moved behind Resident #1's wheelchair and pulled the right arm of Resident #1's shirt hyperextending Resident #1's right arm behind his head which cause Resident #1 to groan and scream ah. S3CCNA reached behind Resident #1's neck, grabbed Resident #1's shirt by the collar, and jerked Resident #1's shirt over his head with enough force to lift Resident #1 out of his wheelchair. S3CCNA then forced Resident #1's shirt over his head which caused Resident #1 to groan. S3CCNA then removed Resident #1's footrests from his wheelchair, wheeled Resident #1 to the right side of the bed, and lifted Resident #1 out of the wheelchair and forcefully threw him down on the bed. At this point in the video, Resident #1 was out of visual of the camera. Resident #1 was seen kicking in the air and S3CCNA yelled at Resident #1, Stop hitting me. Resident #1 was heard mumbling and S3CCNA stated, No, ya momma. Stop putting your hands on me. Stop hitting me and same to you too. Resident #1 was heard mumbling and S3CCNA stated, You ain't gonna show nothing. You do it, you do it, you suck you a big one. Resident #1's foot was seen flailing in the air. S3CCNA then placed Resident #1's comforter over Resident #1, yelled, Loser! and exited Resident #1's room. In an interview via telephone on 03/24/2023 at 3:58 p.m., S7Housekeeper stated on 03/01/2023, when the first incident of abuse occurred between S3CCNA and Resident #1, she worked on the second floor as the housekeeper. S7Housekeeper stated S3CCNA requested she get S6LPN because Resident #1 had a skin tear. S7Housekeeper stated Resident #1's POA showed her the video of S3CCNA abusing Resident #1 on 03/03/2023 and S5LPN was present. S7Housekeeper stated since S6LPN was notified of the incident on 03/01/2023 and S5LPN was present when Resident #1's POA showed the video footage of S3CCNA abusing Resident #1, S7Housekeeper did not feel the need to report the incident to anyone else. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 5:03 p.m., S6LPN stated on 03/01/2023 at approximately 3:00 p.m., S7Housekeeper notified her that Resident #1 was bleeding. S6LPN stated she entered Resident #1's room and saw S3CCNA standing on Resident #1's right bedside, Resident #1 was visibly upset, and Resident #1 had two large skin tears to his right arm. S6LPN stated the skin tear did not look self-inflicted, and Resident #1 was not coordinated enough to self-inflict a skin tear that was consistent with the story that S3CCNA provided to her. S7LPN stated S3CCNA stated Resident #1 got combative and scratched himself. S6LPN stated she asked S3CCNA to leave Resident #1's room, and she provided Resident #1 first aid. S6LPN stated upon questioning S3CCNA again he stated Resident #1 was being combative so, He had to be rough with him, but he wasn't too rough. S6LPN stated S3CCNA's behavior made her feel as if he had abused Resident #1. S6LPN stated S3CCNA should have been removed from caring for all resident at the occurrence of the first incident and because S3CCNA was not removed all the residents in the facility were left subjected to abuse and neglect. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 6:07 p.m., S1Adminstrator stated he discovered the facility had not been keeping a record of personnel records for any of the contracted staff that worked at the facility. He stated he did not report S3CCNA directly to the CNA Registry. S1Administrator stated he currently had no record S3CCNA's criminal background check or of S3CCNA's personnel record. S1Adminstrator stated the new staffing agency being used by the facility just began doing state background checks in batches due to a new regulation. S1Administrator further stated the contracted staff working at his facility at this time do not all have background checks from an approved agency because he did not know that was a regulation. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 6:31 p.m., S8Unit Manager stated she was called to Hall A on 03/04/2023 by S5LPN to address the concerns Resident #1's POA had. S8Unit Manager stated Resident #1 had bruising to his left and right upper extremities that all varied in coloration and presented to be in various stages of healing. S8Unit Manager stated Resident #1's POA stated I am not saying anyone is beating him but something is going on. S8Unit Manager stated she advised Resident #1's POA that she would notify administration of her concerns and they would get back to her. She stated she notified S2DON about the incident and was instructed not to proceed any further after Resident #1's chart was reviewed. S8Unit Manager further stated she was not notified of any video footage of the incident that occurred between S3CCNA and Resident #1. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:27 p.m., S5LPN stated on 03/04/2023 Resident #1's POA showed her a video with audio that revealed S3CCNA physically restraining Resident #1 and stated, I am a man, I fight back. S5LPN stated she did not notify the supervisor of the video, because she felt like when she removed S3CCNA from Resident #1's care she provided an appropriate intervention. S5LPN further stated she knew S1Administrator was going to see it on Monday so she did not report it to anyone else. S5LPN further stated she should have sent S3CCNA home, and the supervisor should have been notified of the video footage. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 3:24 p.m., S1Adminstrator stated he did not view all of the video footage provided by Resident #1's POA because he could not view the video on his computer. S1Administrator stated he was unaware on 03/04/2023, Resident #1's POA showed S5LPN and S7Housekeeper video footage of Resident #1 being abused by S3CCNA. S1Administrator stated S5LPN should have reported the abuse immediately to administration. In an interview in 03/27/2023 at 3:28 p.m., Resident #1's POA stated if Resident #1 was approached correctly, Resident #1 was normally a pleasant person. Resident #1's POA stated she visited Resident #1 every Saturday and Sunday. Resident #1's POA stated since the incidents of abuse that occurred on 03/01/2023 and 03/03/2023, Resident #1's POA has been very withdrawn, quiet, not his usual self or happy, and had he not had a diagnosis of dementia at the time of the abuse, it would have made him very angry. Review of Resident #1's Social Services Progress Notes revealed, in part, a note with a date of 03/08/2023 which stated Resident #1 did not want to attend activities and he was quiet. Review of Resident #1's outpatient psychiatric progress notes, revealed, in part, Resident #1 had not had a psychiatric consult and/or evaluation since 02/28/2023. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 4:00 p.m., S2DON stated Resident #1 should have been seen by psychiatric services after the incidents of physical abuse occurred. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 10:46 a.m. S2DON stated criminal background checks were not reviewed prior to the agency staff entering their facility. S2DON stated she relied on the CCNA staffing agency to ensure a criminal background check was completed by an approved agency. S2DON stated she also relied on the staffing agency to ensure contracted staff had no charges that barred employment. S2DON confirmed the facility did not have a system in place to ensure statewide criminal background checks were completed by an approved agency prior to contracted staff working with the facility's residents. Review of S3CCNA's background check presented to survey team on 03/29/2023 revealed, S3CCNA was charged on 06/13/2016 with R.S. 40:966- Manufacturing, distribution, and possession of a Schedule 1 (a medication that has a high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychosocial or dependence). In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 3:21 p.m., S1Administrator confirmed all of the facility's residents were in harm's way on 03/04/2023, 03/05/2023, and 03/06/2023 when S5LPN did not report to administration that S3CCNA abused Resident #1. S1Adminstrator stated if he had reviewed S3CCNA's background check prior to him entering the facility, S3CCNA would not have been allowed to work at the facility due to having a charge that barred employment in the nursing home. S1Adminsitrator stated because no background checks from an approved agency were completed on contracted staff that were working in the facility and their criminal history was unknown, all of the residents in the facility were at risk for abuse. 2. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/22/2023 revealed, in part, a diagnoses of unspecified dementia and a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 03, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's record revealed, in part, diagnoses of unspecified dementia and psychotic disturbance. Review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 02/07/2023 revealed, in part, a BIMS score of 05, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's care plan for inappropriate sexual behavior was initiated on 04/27/2022 for touching female residents in an inappropriate sexual manner. Review of the facility's accident and incident log for the last 3 months revealed Resident #3 had initiated a physical aggression incident on 02/25/2023. Further review revealed Resident #2 was involved in an incident on 02/25/2023 where Resident #2 was the victim of physical aggression. Review of Resident #3's nurse's note from 02/19/2023 at 12:47 p.m. written by S36Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed Resident #3 was in his wheelchair in the day room and rolled to Resident #2. Resident #3 had his legs open with Resident #2's legs inside of his. Resident #3 was noted to have an erection. Review of Resident #3's nurse's note from 02/25/2023 at 11:38 a.m. written by S36Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed, in part, Resident #3 rolled himself to the day room, and Resident #3 was observed touching Resident #2's breast.[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure sufficient staff to supervise residents with known sexually inappropriate behaviors to prevent sexual abuse for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure sufficient staff to supervise residents with known sexually inappropriate behaviors to prevent sexual abuse for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents; and, 2. Ensure direct care staff had abuse and neglect competencies to ensure all residents were protected from abuse for 29 (S52Certifed Nursing Assistant (CNA), S53CNA, S54CNA, S55CNA, S56CNA, S57CNA, S58CNA, S59CNA, S3Contracted CNA, S11Contracted CNA, S15Contracted CNA, S16Contracted CNA, S18Contracted CNA, S19Contracted CNA, S22Contracted CNA, S23Contracted CNA, S25Contracted CNA, S27Contracted CNA, S31Contracted CNA, S32Contracted CNA, S60Contracted CNA, S62Contracted CNA, S63Contracted CNA, S64Contracted CNA, S65Contracted CNA, S66Contracted CNA, S67Contracted CNA, S68Contracted CNA, and S69Contracted CNA) of 89 direct care staff who provided direct care to the residents in the facility . This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/25/2023 at 11:34 a.m. when Resident #3, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #2's breast while Resident #3 had an erection. Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP)/Medical Power of Attorney (POA) stated Resident #2 would have felt that her personal space was invaded, and Resident #2 would have reacted with both verbal and physical aggression towards Resident #3's sexual abuse. Then, on 03/01/2023 and 03/03/2023, S3CCNA, a contracted employee without an approved criminal background check, physically abused Resident #1 by forcibly jerking Resident #1's body, physically restraining Resident #1, and throwing Resident #1 into his bed. Resident #1 sustained multiple discolorations to his upper body and two skin tears to his right forearm as a result of the physical abuse. Resident #1's RP and POA stated Resident #1 had been very withdrawn and quiet since the incident, and had Resident #1 not had a diagnosis of dementia at the time of the abuse, it would have made him very angry. Furthermore, on 03/07/2023, Resident #4, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #5's genitals. Resident #5's RP and power of attorney stated Resident #5 would have felt very scared and violated following the incident. Resident #5's RP/POA further stated he noted a new behavior of nervousness following Resident #4's sexual abuse. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/28/2023 at 4:56 p.m. The facility submitted an acceptable Plan of Removal which included: 1. Identified those residents who have suffered, or likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance. Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #5 suffered as a result of noncompliance. All other residents had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. 2. Specified actions the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring. The facility placed the following actions in place to ensure this outcome does not reoccur. -Nursing Administration was provided In-service training on nursing competencies by the Administrator and Director of Nursing Services. Training was completed on 03/28/2023 at 8:30 p.m. - The Director of Nursing Services will schedule one on one monitoring using facility or agency staff. Ongoing compliance will be randomly monitored and documented by the Administrator or designee for four weeks then as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing Services, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Competencies for all licensed (LPN/RN) (Licensed Practical Nurse/Registered Nurse) direct care staff including agency staff present was completed on 03/28/2023 at 10:30 p.m. by Nursing Administration related to documentation, skills, crash cart, nutrition, skin integrity programs, and nursing assessment. Education for abuse and neglect including company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating, protection of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. Competencies will be completed by DON or designee on all employees on prior to reporting on duty to ensure nurse competencies are completed before providing care to the residents. Ongoing compliance will be randomly monitored and documented by DON or designee for four weeks then as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing Services, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Competencies for all Certified Nursing Assistants including agency staff present were completed on 03/28/2023 by Nursing Administration to include skilled checkoffs, infection control precautions, resident safety standards, and reporting abuse and neglect. Education for abuse and neglect including company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating, protections of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. Competencies will be completed by DON or designee on all Certified Nursing Assistants prior to reporting on duty to ensure competencies are completed before providing care to residents. Ongoing compliance will be randomly monitored and documented on a monitoring tool (see attached) and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing Services, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. 3. Included a date by which the entity asserts the likelihood for serious harm to any recipient no longer existed as 03/28/2023 at 8:30 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/29/2022 at 3:34 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal. The deficient practice had the potential to cause serious harm or injury to all 136 residents identified on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS-672. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy and procedure revealed, in part, the facility must provide sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Review revealed licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week to provide competent resident care services including: a.) assuring resident safety; b.) attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident; c.) assessing, evaluating, planning, and implementing resident care plans; and, d.) responding to resident needs. Further review revealed licensed nurses are required to supervise nurse aides/nursing assistants and are scheduled in a way that permits adequate time to do so. Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care, the resident assessments and the facility assessments. Review of the Facility Assessment, completed on 06/20/2022 revealed, in part, the facility should be staffed with 18 CNAs on the day shift in order to have the sufficient amount of staff to provide for resident's needs. Further review also revealed the facility should be staffed with 14 CNAs on the night shift in order to have a sufficient amount of staff to provide for residents' needs. Review of the facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form for the time period of 02/25/2023 through 03/10/2023 revealed, in part, the following dates did not have the appropriate amount of CNAs to provide care and services to residents on the day shift per the facility's assessment: 02/25/2023 - 13 CNAs were provided; 02/26/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; 03/02/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; 03/04/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; and, 03/05/2023 - 13 CNAs were provided. Further review revealed the following dates did not have the appropriate amount of CNAs to provide care and services to residents on the night shift per the facility's assessment: 02/25/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 02/26/2023 - 11 CNAs were provided; 02/27/2023 - 11 CNAs were provided; 02/28/2023 - 11 CNAs were provided; 03/01/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/02/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/03/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/04/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/05/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/06/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/07/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/08/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided; 03/09/2023 - 11 CNAs were provided; and, 03/10/2023 - 10 CNAs were provided. Review of the facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form for the time period of 03/12/2023 through 03/25/2023 revealed, in part, the following dates did not have the appropriate amount of CNAs to provide care and services to residents on the day shift per the facility's assessment: 03/12/2023 - 12 CNAs were provided; 03/14/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; 03/17/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; 03/18/2023 - 12 CNAs were provided; 03/19/2023 - 13 CNAs were provided; 03/21/2023 - 17 CNAs were provided; 03/22/2023 - 16 CNAs were provided; 03/23/2023 - 15 CNAs were provided; and, 03/25/2023 - 14 CNAs were provided. Further review revealed the following dates did not have the required amount of CNAs to provide care and services to residents on the night shift per the facility's assessment: 03/12/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/13/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/14/2023 only 11 CNAs were provided; 03/15/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/16/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/17/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/18/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/19/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/20/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/21/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/22/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/23/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; 03/24/2023 only 10 CNAs were provided; and, 03/25/2023 only 11 CNAs were provided. Resident #3 Review of the facility's accident and incident log for the last 3 months revealed Resident #3 had initiated a physical aggression incident on 02/25/2023. Further review revealed Resident #2 was involved in an incident on 02/25/2023 where Resident #2 was the victim of physical aggression. Review of Resident #3's nurse's note from 02/25/2023 at 11:38 a.m. written by S36Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed, in part, Resident #3 rolled himself to the day room, and Resident #3 was observed touching Resident #2's breast. Further review revealed Resident #3 had Resident #2's legs inside of his legs as he touched her breast, and Resident #3 had an erection. Review also revealed Resident #3 was pulled away from Resident #2 earlier as Resident #3 was in the same position with Resident #2's skirt slightly raised. Review of the facility's 5 Whys Template for Resident #3 and Resident #2's incident revealed, in part, on 02/27/2023 the problem of inappropriate sexual contact was identified, and the primary cause was documented as Resident #2 was touched inappropriately by Resident #3 in the Hall A day room Further review revealed the root cause was identified as a lack of supervision for residents in the solarium. Further review revealed the corrective action documented was for the accused to be monitored on one on one supervision, and staff to increase supervision to one on one whenever accused is out of his room or off the unit for safety of all residents. Review of the facility's Statewide Incident Management System report revealed, in part, Resident #3 sexually assaulted Resident #2 on 02/25/2023 at 11:20am. The following documentation was submitted as reasons why the situation occurred: 1. No direct staff supervision of residents in the day room; 2. Resident were in area where there were no staff members present; 3. The staff members on duty were noted at the nursing station and seated along the hallway; 4. The remaining staff members were preparing other residents for lunch; 5. Staff members did not remove Resident #3 from the day area when he was observed sitting close to Resident #2 with her shirt slightly raised. Further review revealed once Resident #3 returned from his psychiatric hospitalization, Resident #3 would be placed on one-to-one supervision to keep other residents on unit safe. Review of the facility's Plan of Correction and Implementation record following 02/25/2023 incident revealed, in part, Resident #3 was to be monitored with one on one supervision whenever Resident #3 was out of his room, either on or off the unit for the safety of all residents. Further review revealed the plan was signed by S2DON and dated 03/07/2023. Observation on 03/24/2023 at 12:07 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was lying in his bed with no staff present or in the visual vicinity to allow 1:1 supervision. Observation further revealed resident #3 was observed unsupervised until 03/24/2023 at 12:11 p.m. Observation on 03/23/2023 from 1:20 p.m. through 1:27 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was seated in his wheelchair in the Hall A day room. Observation further revealed Resident #3 was not in the constant line of sight of staff. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 3:22 p.m., S4Charge Nurse stated Resident #3 had inappropriate sexual behaviors toward others prior to the 02/25/2023 sexual abuse incident. S4Charge Nurse stated when Resident #3 came back from his psychiatric hospitalization, Resident #3 was placed on one on one supervision initially, and then Resident #3's physician deemed he did not need one on one supervision. S4Charge Nurse further stated with knowledge of Resident #3's prior incidents, Resident #3 should be in staff's line of sight at all times. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 5:30 p.m., S6LPN, stated Resident #3 was receiving facility staff rounding once every hour. S6LPN stated when Resident #3 was in his wheelchair out of his room, Resident #3 should be kept in the line of sight of staff. S6LPN stated she was unable to provide the supervision Resident #3 needed. S6LPN further stated it was physically impossible for facility staff to provide the supervision Resident #3 needed, and another sexual abuse incident was likely to happen again with Resident #3. S6LPN stated one hour rounding did not mean Resident #3 was always in sight, and the monitoring did not account for what Resident #3 did while the check rounding was not taking place. Observation on 03/24/2023 at 5:42 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was lying in his bed unsupervised by staff. Observation on 03/27/2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed Resident #3 was lying in his bed unsupervised by staff. Observation on 03/27/2023 at 12:58 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was lying in his bed unsupervised by staff. Observation on 03/27/2023 at 1:08 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was in his room unsupervised by staff. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:11 p.m., S1Administrator stated he was unaware how the facility would be able to ensure all other residents were safe from Resident #3 if Resident #3 was not kept on constant observation. S1Administrator confirmed the reasonable person would feel violated after a sexual abuse incident. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 3:00 p.m., S5Licensed Practical Nurse stated if Resident #3 was not kept in the line of sight of facility staff at all times, another sexual abuse incident was likely to occur due to Resident #3's previous sexual behaviors. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 11:05 a.m., Resident #2's POA stated prior to Resident #2's dementia diagnosis, Resident #2's sexual assault would have made her feel that her personal space was invaded. Resident #'s POA further stated Resident #2 would have been very angry, and Resident #2 would have reacted both verbally and physically towards Resident #3. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 12:04 p.m., S10Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDS Nurse) stated Resident #3 was capable transferring himself to his wheelchair and ambulating via wheelchair out of his room to a location of his choosing. S10MDS Nurse also stated a resident with known inappropriate sexual behaviors and the ability to ambulate should be constantly monitored and kept on one on one supervision in order to protect other residents from sexual abuse. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 11:05 a.m., Resident #2's POA stated prior to Resident #2's dementia diagnosis, Resident #2's sexual abuse would have made her feel that her personal space was invaded. Resident #2's POA further stated Resident #2 would have been very angry, and Resident #2 would have reacted both verbally and physically towards Resident #3. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:21 p.m., S2DON stated she felt Resident #3 and Resident #2 sexual abuse incident on 02/25/2023 occurred because residents in Hall A day room were left unsupervised by staff. S2DON further stated her plan to protect other residents from sexual abuse was to place Resident #3 on one on one observation when Resident #3 returned from his psychiatric hospitalization, but Resident #3 was not on one on one supervision. S2DON stated the proper intervention to prevent sexual abuse from reoccurring would have been to keep Resident #3 on one on one supervision following his sexual abuse of Resident #2. Resident #4 Review of the facility's accident and incident log revealed Resident #4 had an unknown incident on 03/07/2023. Review of Resident #4's nurse's note dated 3/07/2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed, in part, S39LPN saw Resident #4 inappropriately touch Resident #5 in her groin area. Resident #4 was placed on one on one supervision with a staff member. Review of the facility's Plan of Correction and Implementation Record for Resident #4's inappropriate sexual contact revealed, in part, staff were to ensure Resident #4 was monitored with one to one supervision when out of his room either on or off of the unit for the safety of all residents. Observation on 03/23/2023 from 1:20 p.m. to 1:27 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was not in the constant visual vicinity of nursing staff. Observation further revealed at 1:26 p.m. a female resident entered the day room unsupervised by staff, and Resident #4 started propelling himself out of the day room. Observation on 03/24/2023 at 1:31 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was unsupervised by staff and within touching distance of Resident #2, a cognitively impaired female resident. Observation further revealed at 1:34 p.m. Resident #4 was unsupervised by staff, entered the elevator with a random male resident, and proceeded to another facility floor. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 3:38 p.m., S4Charge Nurse stated Resident #4 had inappropriately touched Resident #5 in a sexual manner on 03/07/2023. S4Charge Nurse further stated Resident #4 needed to be visualized at all times due to his history of inappropriate sexual behaviors. Observation on 03/24/2023 at 3:56 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was in his wheelchair in his room unsupervised by staff. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 5:30 p.m., S6LPN stated Resident #4 was receiving every hour rounding by staff. S6LPN stated when Resident #4 was in his wheelchair out of his room, Resident #4 needed to be kept in the line of sight of staff. S6LPN stated she was unable to provide the supervision Resident #4 needed. S6LPN further stated it was physically impossible for facility staff to provide the supervision Resident #4 needed, and another sexual abuse incident was likely to happen again with Resident #4. Observation on 03/24/2023 at 5:42 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was lying in his bed unsupervised by staff. Observation on 03/27/2023 at 12:58 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was lying in bed unsupervised by staff. Observation on 03/27/2023 at 1:08 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was lying in bed unsupervised by staff. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 1:59 p.m., Resident #5's POA stated prior to Resident #5's dementia diagnosis, Resident #5 would have felt very scared and violated following the sexual abuse incident. Resident #5's POA stated he noted Resident #5 had a new behavior of nervousness. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:29 p.m., S1Administrator stated staffing could have been considered an issue in order to provide the supervision needed for residents who require additional monitoring. S1Administrator stated he was unaware how the facility could ensure the safety of all other residents in the facility if Resident #4 was not constantly monitored by staff. S1Administrator stated Resident #5 had not had any changes in her behavior since the sexual abuse incident, but S1Administrator did confirm that a cognitive person would feel violated if someone inappropriately touched them. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 3:00 p.m., S5LPN, stated if Resident #4 was not kept in the line of sight of facility staff, another incident was likely to occur due to Resident #4's previous inappropriate sexual behaviors. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 12:06 p.m., S10Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDS Nurse) stated a new care plan intervention to place Resident #4 on one on one supervision was entered on 03/07/2023 following Resident #4 incident of sexual abuse. S10MDS Nurse further stated, per Resident #4's care plan, Resident #4 should have been placed on one on one supervision. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:31 p.m., S2DON stated the facility did not implement any facility wide system to identify other perpetrators or to protect residents from residents with sexually inappropriate behaviors. S2DON stated Resident #4 required one on one supervision to protect other residents from Resident #4's inappropriate sexual behavior. S2DON also stated if she had an adequate amount of staff, Resident #4 would be on 1:1 supervision. S2DON further stated all residents were at risk for to be sexually abused by Resident #4, since Resident #4 was not being constantly supervised. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 3:08 p.m., S38Medical Director stated he was Resident #3 and Resident #4's medical physician. S38Medical Director further stated it was almost physically impossible to redirect Resident #3 and Resident #4 from their inappropriate sexual behaviors. S38Medical Director also stated if the facility had the resources available, Resident #3 and Resident #4 would require one on one supervision. 2. Review of the facility's Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy and procedure revealed, in part, staff must demonstrate the skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs including (but not limited to) the following areas: resident rights, behavioral health, psychosocial care, dementia care, person centered care, communication, basic nursing skills, basic restorative skills, skin and wound care, medication management, pain management, infection control, identification of changes in condition and cultural competency. Review of the facility's Statewide Incident Management System (SIMS) revealed an incident was discovered at 08:45 a.m. on 03/06/2023 for Resident #1. Review revealed, Resident #1's POA notified S1Adminsitrator that Resident #1 was physically abused by S3CCNA. Review revealed S1Adminsitrator conducted a meeting with Resident #1 and Resident #1's POA and reviewed video surveillance that confirmed S3CCNA physically abused Resident #1. Review of the facility's Audit Tool for tag F726 revealed the following staff did not have documented Abuse and Neglect Training and/or Abuse and Neglect Competency: S52CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) with a date of hire of 07/03/2007; S53CNA with a date of hire of 08/21/2018; S54CNA with a date of hire of 09/05/2017; S55CNA with a date of hire of 06/13/2022; S56CNA with a date of hire of 08/15/2022; S57CNA with a date of hire of 01/25/2023; S58CNA with a date of hire of 10/26/2018; and S59CNA with a date of hire of 05/29/2010. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of the above named CNAs having ever received Abuse and Neglect training from the facility. Review of the facility's Contract Staff List who have Worked from 02/25/2023 to 03/28/2023 revealed the following contract staff did not have documented Abuse and Neglect Training and/or Abuse and Neglect Competency: S3Contracted CNA; S11Contracted CNA; S15Contracted CNA; S16Contracted CNA; S18Contracted CNA; S19Contracted CNA; S22Contracted CNA; S23Contracted CNA; S25Contracted CNA; S27Contracted CNA; S31Contracted CNA; S32Contracted CNA; S60Contracted CNA; S62Contracted CNA; S63Contracted CNA; S64Contracted CNA; S65Contracted CNA; S66Contracted CNA; S67Contracted CNA; S68Contracted CNA; and S69Contracted CNA. Further review revealed no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence of the above named contracted CNA having ever received Abuse and Neglect training from the facility. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 4:14pm, S1Administrator stated the training provided by Staffing Agency C staffing agency was not sufficient. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 6:07 p.m., S1Adminsitrator stated the facility had not been keeping a record of up to date competencies for any of the contracted staff that worked at the facility. S1Administrator further stated he still has no current record of staff competencies for the contracted certified nursing assistants that worked in the facility that were employed by Staffing Agency C. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 3:55 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated she does not have the abuse and neglect training for the contracted staff used by Staffing Agency D. In an interview on 03/28/23 at 10:46 a.m., S2DON stated she had no way of ensuring the contracted CNAs used but Staffing Agency D was competent prior to them working with the facility's residents. S2DON further stated contracted CNAs used but Staffing Agency D had not completed an orientation with the facility that included any competencies. S2DON stated she was unaware that agency staff required competencies prior to entering the facility. In an interview on 03/29/2023 at 4:00 p.m., S2ADON/IP stated she recently was recently placed in the position of nurse education/staff develop approximately two weeks ago. S2ADON/IP stated she has attempted to complete some competencies but not all facility staff have been completed. She stated she was in charge of facility staff only at this time. In an interview on 03/29/2023 at 4:15 p.m., S1Administrator stated he is aware all direct care staff must have an up to date competency and not all facility direct care staff working in the facility have one at this time.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources to effectively and efficiently protect residents from abuse by failing t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that used its resources to effectively and efficiently protect residents from abuse by failing to: 1. Ensure contracted staff had evidence of a criminal background check from an approved agency prior to providing resident care; 2. Ensure the facility had sufficient staff to supervise residents with known inappropriate sexual behaviors to prevent sexual abuse for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents; and, 3. Ensure direct care staff had abuse and neglect competencies to ensure all residents were protected from abuse for 29 (S52Certifed Nursing Assistant (CNA), S53CNA, S54CNA, S55CNA, S56CNA, S57CNA, S58CNA, S59CNA, S3Contracted CNA, S11Contracted CNA, S15Contracted CNA, S16Contracted CNA, S18Contracted CNA, S19Contracted CNA, S22Contracted CNA, S23Contracted CNA, S25Contracted CNA, S27Contracted CNA, S31Contracted CNA, S32Contracted CNA, S60Contracted CNA, S62Contracted CNA, S63Contracted CNA, S64Contracted CNA, S65Contracted CNA, S66Contracted CNA, S67Contracted CNA, S68Contracted CNA, and S69Contracted CNA) of 94 direct care staff who provided direct care to the residents in the facility . This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/25/2023 at 11:34 a.m. when Resident #3, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #2's breast while Resident #3 had an erection. Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP)/Medical Power of Attorney (POA) stated Resident #2 would have felt that her personal space was invaded, and Resident #2 would have reacted with both verbal and physical aggression towards Resident #3's sexual abuse. Then, on 03/01/2023 and 03/03/2023, S3CCNA, a contracted employee without an approved criminal background check, physically abused Resident #1 by forcibly jerking Resident #1's body, physically restraining Resident #1, and throwing Resident #1 into his bed. Resident #1 sustained multiple discolorations to his upper body and two skin tears to his right forearm as a result of the physical abuse. Resident #1's RP and POA stated Resident #1 had been very withdrawn and quiet since the incident, and had Resident #1 not had a diagnosis of dementia at the time of the abuse, it would have made him very angry. Furthermore, on 03/07/2023, Resident #4, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior, was unsupervised and fondled Resident #5's genitals. Resident #5's RP and power of attorney stated Resident #5 would have felt very scared and violated following the incident. Resident #5's RP/POA further stated he noted a new behavior of nervousness following Resident #4's sexual abuse. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/28/2023 at 4:56 p.m. The facility submitted an acceptable Plan of Removal which included: 1. Identified those residents who have suffered, or likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance. Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #5 suffered as a result of noncompliance. All other residents had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. 2. Specified actions the entity would take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring. The facility placed the following actions in place to ensure this outcome did not reoccur. -All Administrative staff including S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing(DON), S40-Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurses, Charge Nurses, Wound care team, S41Social Services, S48Business Office Manager, S46Housekeeping Supervisor, S47Maintenance Director, S42Physical Therapist, S48Medical Records Manager, S49Human Resources, S50Dietary Manager, S51Activities Director and S43admission Director was in-serviced by the President of the Health Care System on abuse and neglect as well as company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating, protections of residents during abuse investigations. Other trainings includes documentation, skills, crash cart, nutrition, skin integrity programs, and nursing assessment for nursing staff as well as skilled checkoffs, infection control precautions, resident safety standards, and reporting abuse and neglect. Specific training topics on background screening, sufficient staffing, staff competency requirements, and supervision of residents. All trainings and monitoring will be monitored by the President of the Health System once a week for four weeks, then as needed as determined by the QA (Quality Assurance) committee. Findings will be discussed with S1Administrator and results will be addressed with S2Director of Nursing. If needed, the plan of correction will be updated and reviewed with the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing Service/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -All facility and contract staff who were present in the facility were provided in-service training on the forms of abuse and neglect as well as company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation-reporting and investigation, protections of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education were initiated on 03/28/2023 at 6:00 p.m. This action will be monitored by the Charge Nurses using a monitoring tool. -All facility and contract staff who were present in the facility by the S1Administrator and S2Director of Nursing educated on abuse and neglect as well as ways to manage residents with sexually inappropriate behavior for all employees currently working with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. This was initiated on 03/28/2023 at 6:00 p.m. In-service trainings were completed by the S1Administrator, S2Director of nursing, and Nursing Administration and will continue with each staff member prior to working. This will be randomly monitored by the S2Director of Nursing or designee once a week for four weeks, then as needed as determined by the QA committee. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by S1Administrator and President of the Health System. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -100% of residents were interviewed to determine if resident had any concerns with physical or sexual abuse were completed by facility Charge Nurse on 03/28/2023 at 8 p.m. The Charge Nurses did not report any significant findings. S2DON or designee will randomly monitor performance of resident interview on abuse once a week for four weeks. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the S1Administrator and President of the Health System. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Body Audits were completed on resident with cognitive impairments to see if any signs and symptoms of abuse were present. This was completed by the Treatment Nurses on 03/28/2023 at 8:00 p.m. No significant findings were discovered. S2DON or designee will ensure body audits are completed weekly by the Nurses. Compliance will be randomly monitored weekly for four weeks, then and as needed as determined by the QA committee. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the S1Administrator and President of the Health Care System. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Full psychosocial assessments were completed on Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 by the S41Social Services on 03/28/2023 at 8 p.m. There were no negative findings identified during the assessments. S41Social Services will complete psychosocial assessments on Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 once a week for four weeks. The S2DON or designee will randomly monitor performance tool weekly for four weeks, then as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the S1Administrator and President of the Healthcare System. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Competencies for all licensed (LPN/RN) (Licensed Practical Nurse/Registered Nurse) direct care staff including agency staff present was completed on 03/28/2023 at 10:30 p.m. by Nursing Administration related to documentation, skills, crash cart, nutrition, skin integrity programs, and nursing assessment. Education for abuse and neglect including company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating, protections of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. Competencies will be completed by S2DON or designee on all employees prior to working to ensure nurse competencies are completed before providing care to the residents. Ongoing compliance will be randomly monitored and documented by S2DON or designee for four weeks then as needed. Findings will be documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the S1Administrator and President of the Healthcare System. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. -Competencies for all Certified Nursing Assistants including agency staff present were completed on 03/28/2023 by Nursing Administration to include skilled checkoffs, infection control precautions, resident safety standards, and reporting abuse and neglect. Education for abuse and neglect including company policies and procedures for recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating, protections of residents during abuse investigations with a posttest to evaluate knowledge of education. Competencies will be completed by S2DON or designee on all Certified Nursing Assistants prior to working to ensure competencies are completed before providing care to residents. Ongoing compliance will be randomly monitored and documented on a monitoring tool and reviewed by the QAPI committee including the S1Administrator, S2Director of Nursing, S40Assistant Director of Nursing Services/Infection Preventionist and S38Medical Director. Proposed date of compliance 04/22/2023. 3. Included a date by which the entity asserts the likelihood for serious harm to any resident no longer existed as of 03/28/2023 at 8:30 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/29/2022 at 3:34 p.m., after it was determined through observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal. The deficient practice had the potential to cause serious harm or injury to all 136 residents identified on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, CMS-672. Findings: Cross Reference F600 and F725 In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:11 p.m., S1Administrator, he stated he was unaware how facility residents were safe from Resident #3 if Resident #3 was not kept under constant observation. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:29 p.m., S1Administrator stated staffing was considered an issue to provide the supervision needed for residents who required additional monitoring. S1Administrator further stated he was unaware how the facility was able to ensure all other facility residents were safe from Resident #4 if Resident #4 was not kept under constant observation. In an interview on 03/28/23 at 10:46 a.m. S2DON stated criminal background checks were not reviewed prior to the agency staff entering their facility. S2DON stated she relied on the CNA staffing agency to ensure a criminal background check was completed by an approved agency. S2DON stated she also relied on the staffing agency to ensure contracted staff had no charges that barred employment. S2DON confirmed the facility did not have a system in place to ensure statewide criminal background checks were completed by a LSP approved agency prior to contracted staff working with the facility's residents. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:21 p.m., S2DON stated she felt like Resident #3 was able to sexually abuse Resident #2 on 02/25/2023 because residents in the day room were not being supervised by staff. S2DON stated her plan to protect other residents from sexual abuse was to place Resident #3 on one on one observation when he returned from the psychiatric hospital, but the monitoring was changed to every hour rounding. S2DON confirmed if she had the staff available, Resident #3 would be on one on one supervision. S2DON confirmed the risk for other residents to be abused was present due to Resident #3 not being constantly supervised. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:31 p.m., S2DON stated after Resident #3's sexual abuse incident, the facility did not implement any facility wide system to identify other perpetrators or protect facility residents from sexually inappropriate behaviors. S2DON further stated Resident #4 required one on one supervision to protect other facility residents from Resident #4's inappropriate sexual behavior. S2DON stated if the facility had adequate staff, Resident #4 would have been kept on one on one supervision. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 3:21 p.m., S1Administrator confirmed all of the facility's residents were in harm's way on 03/04/2023, 03/05/2023, and 03/06/2023 when S5LPN did not report to administration that S3CCNA abused Resident #1. S1Adminstrator stated had he reviewed S3CCNA's background check prior to him entering the facility, S3CCNA would not have been allowed to work at the facility due to having a charge that barred employment in the nursing home. S1Adminsitrator stated because no background checks from an approved agency were completed on contract staff that were working in the facility and because their criminal history was unknown, all of the residents residing in the facility were at risk for abuse. Prior to the survey team leaving the facility, S1Administrator informed the survey team the President of the Health System would ensure inservice training, staff education, and monitoring of compliance was completed by S1Administrator and all additional administrative staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's Physician and Responsible Party(RP)/Medical Power of Attorney (POA) when Resident #1 sustained skin tears t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's Physician and Responsible Party(RP)/Medical Power of Attorney (POA) when Resident #1 sustained skin tears to his right upper arm while in the care of S3Contract Certified Nursing Assistant (CCNA) for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy revealed, in part, the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician or Nurse Practitioner, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical condition. Further review revealed, the nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician and/or Nurse Practitioner on call and the resident representative when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident. Review of Facility Incident Report with an incident date and time of 03/01/2023 at 12:03 p.m. for Resident #1 revealed, in part, Resident #1 sustained skin tears to his right upper arm while in the care of S3CCNA. Review revealed, Resident #1 had skin tears to his right upper arm. Further review, revealed Resident #1's POA and Physician were not notified of the above mentioned incident. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 3:04 p.m., Resident #1's POA stated she received a call from the wound care nurse on 03/02/2023 to inform her that Resident #1 had a skin tears to his right upper arm. Resident #1's POA further stated she had not been informed prior to the phone call she received on 03/02/2023 about the incident that occurred on 03/01/2023. In an interview on 03/24/2023 at 5:03 p.m., S6LPN stated she forgot to notify the daughter and the physician of the above mentioned incident that occurred on 03/01/2023 that caused Resident #1 to acquire a skin tear which required physician orders for treatment S6LPN further stated Resident #1's RP/POA and physician was not notified until later the following day. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:10 p.m., S4Charge Nurse stated S6LPN notified Resident #1's POA and Physician the day after. S4Charge Nurse further stated S6LPN should have notified Resident #1's RP/POA and Physician as soon as the skin tears occurred. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:41 p.m., S2DON stated S6LPN should have notified Resident #1's RP/POA and the physician immediately.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident of sexual abuse was reported to the state agency no later than 2 hours after the incident occurred for 2 (Resident #3 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident of sexual abuse was reported to the state agency no later than 2 hours after the incident occurred for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident R6) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy and procedure revealed, in part, all reports of resident abuse must be reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations). Review also revealed if resident abuse was suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator. Further review revealed the administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports within two hours his or her suspicion to the appropriate persons or agencies. Review of Resident #3's record revealed, in part, diagnoses of aphasia, unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/07/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 05, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #3 had a care plan developed on 04/27/2022 for episodes of inappropriate sexual behavior including inappropriate touching female residents secondary to a diagnosis of dementia and being hard to redirect. Review of Resident #3's nurse's note on 09/30/2022 at 5:15 p.m. revealed, in part, Resident #3's physician ordered to send Resident #3 to an outpatient psychiatric hospital related to touching another resident inappropriately. Review of Resident R6's nurse's note on 10/22/2022 revealed, in part, Resident R6 had BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident R6's nurse's note on 09/30/2022 at 7:22 p.m. revealed, in part, staff noticed Resident #3 inappropriately touched Resident R6. Review of the facility's documented 5 Whys Template initiated on 09/30/2022 revealed, in part, a problem of inappropriate sexual contact was identified after Resident #3 inappropriately touched Resident R6's groin. Review revealed the corrective action to the above identified problem included Resident #3 was sent for a psychiatric evaluation and treatment due to inappropriate sexual behavior. In an on interview 03/27/2023 at 10:53 a.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated the incident between Resident #3 and Resident R6 that occurred on 09/30/2022 was sexual abuse. S2DON further stated the sexual abuse was not reported to the state agency, but it should have been. S2DON stated the previous administrator informed her the sexual abuse did not need to be reported to the state agency. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 1:25 p.m., S70Therapy Aide, stated the above mentioned incident that happened on 09/30/2022 occurred in the Hall B day room. S70Therapy Aide stated she stepped off the elevator and witnessed Resident #3 with his hands between Resident R6's legs. S70Therapy Aide stated Resident R6 said, Stop, move away. S70Therapy Aide confirmed the incident was resident to resident sexual abuse. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 2:11 p.m., S1Administrator stated the state agency was not notified of Resident #3's sexual abuse of Resident R6 that occurred on 09/30/2022. S1Administrator stated the incident should have been reported because it was an allegation of sexual abuse.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Employment Screening (Tag F0606)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have evidence that an incident that resulted in multiple discolorations to a residents bilateral arms was thoroughly investigated for 1 (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have evidence that an incident that resulted in multiple discolorations to a residents bilateral arms was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for accidents and incidents. Findings: Review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting policy and procedure revealed, in part, the nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of an accident or incident. Review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Report with a date of 03/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had multiple skin discolorations to his bilateral upper extremities and two skin tears to his right forearm. Further review revealed, in part, S9Wound Care Nurse was notified by the nurse, who worked 7:00 p.m-7:00 a.m. shift on 03/01/2023, that she found the discolorations during her shift. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 3:04 p.m. S8Unit Manager stated she assessed Resident #1's right and left arm and observed multiple discolorations which were all different in color. S8Unit Manager stated she did not do a full body audit and she should have. S8Unit Manager stated she did not investigate the multiple discolorations on Resident #1. S8Unit Manager stated she assumed Resident #1 had a clotting disorder based off of her own personal opinion. S8Unit Manager stated facility protocol was if an injury of any kind was present without a known cause, then a full investigation should be completed. S8Unit Manager further stated she should have investigated the multiple discolorations immediately. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 12:18 p.m., S9Wound Care Nurse stated S6LPN reported to her she did not know the cause of Resident #1's discolorations to his right and left arm. In an interview on 03/28/2023 at 2:41 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated a thorough investigation was not completed for the multiple discolorations noted of Resident #1's right and left arm on 03/02/2023. S2DON further stated a thorough investigation should have been completed immediately. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence that a thorough investigation was completed upon the discovery of the multiple discolorations noted to Resident #1's right and left arm.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
Jan 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. This deficient practice was identified for 4 staff [S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. This deficient practice was identified for 4 staff [S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), S11CNA, S12CNA, S13Porter] out of 157 staff. Findings: Review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination policy revealed, in part, the following: 1. All staff must be fully vaccinated or have an approved medical or religious accommodation or exemption. 2. All vaccinated staff are required to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of where they received vaccination. Proof of vaccination status should be submitted to the administrator. 3. Requests for exemptions or accommodations must be initiated by contracting your administrator. Administrator will provide the appropriate exemption request form to the staff member. All exemptions and accommodations must be reviewed by the Director of Human Resources and approved by the CEO. Review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, in part, S7CNA did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Further review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, S7CNA's religious exemption request is incomplete with no indication of religious belief, practice, or observance that specifically conflicted with the COVID-19 vaccination requirement, and no review by the Director of Human Resources or approval by the CEO. Review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, in part, S11CNA received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccination on 06/23/2022, and there was no documented evidence S11CNA received her second dose of the vaccination. Further review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, S11CNA's religious exemption request is incomplete with no indication of religious belief, practice, or observance that specifically conflicted with the COVID-19 vaccination requirement, no signature and date by S11CNA. Further review revealed there was no review by the Director of Human Resources or approval by the CEO. Review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, in part, S12CNA received the first dose of the vaccination on 04/13/2022, and there was no documented evidence S12CNA received her second dose of the vaccination. Further review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, S12CNA's religious exemption request indicated a second dose was to be obtained, and no indication of religious belief, practice, or observance that specifically conflicted with the COVID-19 vaccination requirement signed on 01/04/2023, and no review by the Director of Human Resources or approval by the CEO. Review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination tracking documentation revealed, in part, S13Porter's request for medical exemption to the COVID-19 vaccination requirement indicated vaccinated in Dallas with no card available with no signature from a medical provider; no review by the Director of Human Resources or approval by the CEO. In an interview on 1/05/2023 at 2:25 p.m., S3Assisstant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged she did not know why S11CNA's religious exemption was not signed or dated by the employee which was required. In an interview on 1/05/2023 at 2:45 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged S12CNA did not receive her 2nd vaccination but she planned to. In an interview on 1/5/2023 at 2:59 p.m., SN12CNA acknowledged she did not have her second COVID-19 vaccination, and she has not requested a medical or religious exemption. In an interview and record review on 01/05/2023 at 4:20 p.m. S2DON acknowledge she and the S3ADON oversee the nursing staff vaccination status. S13Porter was chosen at random and a medical exemption form was completed by the staff member which indicated staff member was already vaccinated in Dallas, no card available to prove vaccination took place. S2DON could not explain why a medical exemption form was completed on a staff member who was missing their vaccination paperwork.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed annual competencies as required for 5 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA) of the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed annual competencies as required for 5 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, S11CNA) of the 5 CNAs reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 129 residents residing in the facility who may receive care and services per the CNAs as documented on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form (CMS-672). Findings: Review of the facility's Staff Development Program Policy revealed, in part, the following: 1. Staff development is defined as initial orientation, followed by regularly scheduled in-service training programs. 2. Required training topics include: Resident rights and responsibilities, Dementia management, and Resident abuse prevention. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights Policy revealed, in part, orientation and in-service training programs are conducted quarterly to assist our employees in understanding our residents' rights. Review of S7CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, no documentation of completed Resident Rights competency and Abuse Policy training competency. Review of S8CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, no documentation of completed Resident Rights competency, and the last documented Dementia training competency was completed on 10/14/2021. Review of S9CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, no documentation of completed Resident Rights competency. Review of S10CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, no documentation of completed Abuse training competency. Review of S11CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, no documentation of completed Resident Rights competency. In an interview on 1/05/2023 at 3:55 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated the Resident Rights, Dementia, and Abuse/Neglect trainings must be completed annually. S2DON further acknowledged these 5 CNAs did not complete all trainings per the facility's policies.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0729 (Tag F0729)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documented evidence the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Registry was performed for 4 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA) of 5 personnel re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documented evidence the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Registry was performed for 4 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA) of 5 personnel records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 129 residents residing in the facility who may receive care and services per the CNAs as documented on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form (CMS-672). Findings: Review of the personnel record for S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed a hire date on 05/29/2010. Further review revealed the CNA Registry was last checked on 09/19/2014. There was no documented evidence the CNA Registry had been checked since 09/19/2014. Review of the personnel record for S8CNA revealed a hire date on 04/04/2016. Further review revealed the CNA Registry was last checked on 03/30/2016. There was no documented evidence the CNA Registry had been checked since 03/30/2016. Review of the personnel record for S9CNA revealed a hire date on 07/31/2015. Further review revealed the CNA Registry was last checked on 07/14/201. There was no documented evidence the CNA Registry had been checked since 07/14/2015. Review of the personnel record for S10CNA revealed a hire date on 04/27/2020. Further review revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence the CNA Registry had been checked upon hire and annually. In a telephone interview on 1/05/2023 at 1:51 p.m., S6Human Resources Manager further stated she completed all certification and license verifications with background checks prior to hire, and CNA certification verifications are completed only upon hire. In an interview on 1/5/2023 at 2:18 p.m., S2DON stated CNA certification verification is only done upon hire by human resources and after hire the facility obtains certification verification annually. S2DON was unable to provide annual certification verification.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 6 life-threatening violation(s), $245,302 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 39 deficiencies on record, including 6 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $245,302 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 6 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Chateau De Notre Dame Community's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Chateau De Notre Dame Community Staffed?

CMS rates CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Chateau De Notre Dame Community?

State health inspectors documented 39 deficiencies at CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 6 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 33 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Chateau De Notre Dame Community?

CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by COMMCARE CORPORATION, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 171 certified beds and approximately 147 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana.

How Does Chateau De Notre Dame Community Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Chateau De Notre Dame Community?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Chateau De Notre Dame Community Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Chateau De Notre Dame Community Stick Around?

CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Chateau De Notre Dame Community Ever Fined?

CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has been fined $245,302 across 3 penalty actions. This is 6.9x the Louisiana average of $35,532. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Chateau De Notre Dame Community on Any Federal Watch List?

CHATEAU DE NOTRE DAME COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.