LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON

1611 WELLERMAN ROAD, WEST MONROE, LA 71291 (318) 396-3313
For profit - Corporation 140 Beds CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
48/100
#83 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of West Monroe has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality with some concerning issues. It ranks #83 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 10 in Ouachita County, which is relatively favorable locally. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 7 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, but still has a staffing rating of 2 out of 5, which is below average, with a turnover rate of 56%. Although RN coverage is average, some serious incidents were reported, including a resident suffering major injuries from a fall due to inadequate supervision during a bed bath and another resident experiencing physical and verbal abuse from staff. While the facility has strengths, such as good health inspection ratings, the incidents and overall trust score raise significant concerns for potential residents and their families.

Trust Score
D
48/100
In Louisiana
#83/264
Top 31%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$20,869 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Above Louisiana average (2.4)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 56%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $20,869

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above Louisiana average of 48%

The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Jan 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by failing to ensure labs were collected as ordered for 1 (#84) of 5 (#9, #18, #42, #84, #94) residents reviewed for unneccessary medications. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #84 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Review of the January 2024 physician orders revealed the physician ordered Rosuvastatin 20 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. On 03/01/2024, the physician ordered Lipid levels to be obtained every 6 months. Review of the medical record for resident #84 revealed there were no lipid levels done. On 01/14/2025 at 2:00 p.m., interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility had not obtained lipid levels for resident #84.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it assessed residents using the quarterly review instrument approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) not less freq...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it assessed residents using the quarterly review instrument approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) not less frequently than once every 3 months by failing to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment at least every 3 months for 4 (#8, #15, #55, #63) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for timeliness of MDS assessments. Findings: Review of the MDS for resident #8 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 09/10/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #15 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 08/02/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #55 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 08/30/2024. Review of the MDS for resident #63 revealed the last completed MDS assessment was dated 09/11/2024. On 01/25/2025 at 10:30 a.m., interview with #S3Clinical Care Coordinator confirmed the MDS assessments were not completed at least every 3 months for residents #8, #15, #55 and #63.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care pla...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for 1 (#24) of 1 resident reviewed for constipation and 2 (#26, #60) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking. Findings: Resident #24 0n 01/13/2025 at 9:06 a.m., interview with resident #24 revealed she had recurrent problems with constipation. Review of the medical record for resident #24 revealed she had a diagnosis of constipation. Review of the care plan revealed it addressed the constipation with an intervention to assess bowel patterns. Review of the January 2025 documentation for the resident's bowel status revealed it was not recorded for 13 of 13 day shifts, for 4 of 13 evening shifts, and for 7 of 13 night shifts. On 01/15/2025 at 8:30 a.m., an interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility had not been consistently assessing the resident's bowel movements. Resident #26 Review of the medical record for resident #26 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy, insomnia, acute bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and he needed limited assistance with activities of daily living. An interview with resident #26 on 01/13/2025 at 10:37 a.m. revealed he was a smoker and stated he kept his cigarettes and lighter in his room. Also, the resident had oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. Review of the medical record revealed the last Safe Smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was a safe smoker. Review of the current care plan revealed an intervention to assess the resident quarterly for safe smoking. On 01/15/2025 at 5:00 p.m., S1Administrator was informed there was no current quarterly Safe Smoking Assessment for resident #26. On 01/15/2025 at 2:00 p.m., a phone interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed they had not conducted a quarterly Safe Smoking Assessment for resident #26 since 08/24/2024. Resident #60 Review of the medical record for resident #60 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of personal history of nicotine dependence, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #60 had a BIMS score of 12 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and needed limited assistance with activities of daily living. An interview with resident #60 on 01/13/2025 at 10:37 a.m. revealed he was a smoker and stated he kept his cigarettes and lighter in his room. Review of resident 60's medical record revealed the last safe smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was a safe smoker. Review of the current care plan revealed an intervention to assess the resident quarterly for safe smoking. On 01/15/2025 at 5:00 p.m., S1Administrator was informed there was no current quarterly Safe Smoking Assessment for resident #60. On 01/15/2025 at 2:00 p.m., a phone interview with S2DON confirmed they had not conducted a quarterly Safe Smoking Assessment for resident #60 since 08/22/2024.
Sept 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for accidents received the necessary supervision to prevent avoidable accidents includi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for accidents received the necessary supervision to prevent avoidable accidents including a fall. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #1 on 08/22/2024 at 12:25 p.m. when Resident #1 suffered major injuries from falling out of the bed to the floor while left unattended during a bed bath. S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing a bed bath to Resident #1. S4 CNA left the room to get more supplies for the bath and Resident #1 rolled off the bed and to the floor. Resident #1 was sent to a local hospital ER (Emergency Room) on 08/22/2024. Review of the hospital records revealed Resident #1 suffered bilateral supracondylar fractures of the right and left femurs requiring ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) of the right femur and a closed reduction and Ex-Fix application of the left distal femur on 08/22/2024. Resident #1 remained in the hospital at the time of the investigation. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. The Completion date was 08/26/2024. Findings: On 09/03/2024, review of the record for Resident #1 revealed an admit date of 12/27/2021. Further review of the record for Resident #1 revealed diagnoses in part of atresia and stenosis of urethra and bladder neck, schizoaffective disorder, seizures, multiple sclerosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia and a past history on 01/09/2020 of non-displaced extra-articular fracture of the left calcaneus, and displaced fracture of medial malleolus of left tibia. Review of the August 2024 Physician orders revealed to use the Vander-Lift with 2 people for transfers and 2 person total assist with bed mobility. Further review of the record revealed on 08/04/2024 Resident #1 weighed 256 pounds. Review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/10/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 had the following functional abilities: limited range of motion to bilateral upper extremities and lower extremities. Review of Resident #1's MDS revealed Resident #1 required total dependence for bed mobility with two person assist. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident #1 was at risk for falls. Review of the approaches in part revealed transfer using 2 person assist with Vander-Lift. Review of the facility incident report dated 08/22/2024 at approximately 12:25 p.m. revealed Resident #1 was receiving personal care by S4 CNA. During the care, Resident #1's bowels had moved and S4 CNA realized she did not have enough supplies to complete the care, so she left the room to gather more. While she was gathering supplies, she heard Resident #1 yell out and she immediately returned to the room. S4 CNA found Resident #1 beside the bed, on the floor, on her knees, between the bed and the wall. S4 CNA immediately called for assistance. S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) arrived to find Resident #1 on her knees, on the floor, with her hands on top of the mattress, complaining of pain to both of her legs. Resident #1 reported that she fell out of the bed. S5 LPN assessed the resident for injuries and noted a skin tear to her right knee. S5 LPN contacted the physician and orders were received to send to hospital for further evaluation. On 08/22/2024 at 9:35 p.m., S9 LPN received a call from the emergency room informing her that Resident #1 had fractures in bilateral legs and would be having surgery to repair them. S9 LPN immediately notified the DON (Director of Nurses) who then informed the Administrator. Review of the hospital record regarding the injuries sustained from this incident revealed Resident #1 received supracondylar fractures of the right and left femurs. Treatment received was an ORIF to the right and closed reduction and Ex-Fix application of the left distal femur fracture on 08/22/2024. On 09/04/2024 at 11:30 a.m., an interview with S4 CNA revealed on 08/22/2024 about 12:25 p.m. she was assisting the CNAs on the hall. The CNA that normally cares for Resident #1 was on lunch break and had already put supplies in the room for Resident #1 to get a bath. S4 CNA said this was only the second time she had provided care to Resident #1 and said she was giving Resident #1 a bath by herself and was not aware Resident #1 required a 2 person assist with bathing and transferring and failed to review the wall care plan in the resident's room that noted Resident #1 was a 2 person assist. S4 CNA said during the bath, Resident #1 had a bowel movement and she did not have enough supplies in the room. S4 CNA said she turned Resident #1 to face the wall and the resident's hands were touching the wall. S4 CNA lowered the bed and stepped out of the room. S4 CNA said she was not sure if the bed was locked and she did not check the break on the bed before she started the bath or before leaving the room. S4 CNA said she did not even have enough time to get the towel off the cart in the hall when she heard Resident #1 hollering for help. S4 CNA said when she came back in the room, Resident #1 was on her knees between the wall and the bed and Resident #1 was complaining of her right knee hurting. S4 CNA said the bed had moved away from the wall. On 09/04/2024 at 1:30 p.m., an interview with S5 LPN revealed she was at the main desk and S4 CNA came and told her that Resident #1 was on the floor. S5 LPN said she went to the room and Resident 1 was on her knees between the bed and the wall with her hands on the mattress. S5 LPN reported Resident #1 only complained of her right knee hurting and she noticed a skin tear to her right knee. S5 LPN said they got multiple staff, lowered Resident #1 to the floor and then used the lift to get her up off the floor. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital. S5 LPN said she was not sure if the bed was in the lock position when the accident occurred. On 09/03/2024 at 2:30 p.m., an interview with S8 CNA Assistant Supervisor confirmed there should have been 2 staff present when providing care for resident #1 and S4 CNA should not have left the bed unlocked when she left the room. On 09/04/2024 at 2:00 p.m., an interview with S3 DON confirmed S4 CNA should not have been providing care to Resident #1 without another staff member present and S4 CNA should have ensured the bed was locked before leaving the room. During the survey, in-service records and QA (Quality Assurance) monitoring records were reviewed and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice with the completion date of 08/26/2024: 1. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. 2. S4 CNA was suspended pending investigation. 3. S4 CNA was in-serviced on 08/22/2024 on care of residents in bed, to read the wall care plan. The wall care plan is a piece of paper that is placed on each resident's wall by the bed that has the specific care needs for the resident. To make sure all supplies are obtained prior to beginning care, ensure bed wheels are locked, ensure resident in safe position in bed before leaving room (not close to edge of bed but in middle of bed). 4. All nurses and CNAs were in-serviced from 08/23/2024 to 08/26/2024 on the resident wall care plan, 2 person assist with mobility in the bed, toileting, incontinent care, turning and reposition, bathing, a CNA should be on each side of bed. Check with nurse if any questions. Never leave a room with the resident not in safe position, ensure the wheels are locked on the bed. 5. Baseline assessments of all residents functional capabilities performed, care plans updated for all residents with changes to baseline functional status, all in room resident care plans were updated and monitors were put in place to ensure compliance of corrective action. 6. QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) monitors were conducted to ensure that care received while in bed reflects what the baseline review of functional status and needs assessment are followed. 7. QAPI Monitor - Locks on bed monitored 3 times per week.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed. S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) failed to provide 2 person assistance during bed mobility for Resident #1 and failed to ensure the bed was in the locked position prior to exiting Resident #1's room. The facility implemented corrective actions prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. The Completion date was 08/26/2024. Findings: On 09/03/2024 review of the record for Resident #1 revealed an admit date of 12/27/2021. Further review of the record for Resident #1 revealed diagnoses in part of atresia and stenosis of urethra and bladder neck, schizoaffective disorder, seizures, multiple sclerosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia and a past history on 01/09/2020 of non-displaced extra-articular fracture of the left calcaneus, and displaced fracture of medial malleolus of left tibia. Review of the August 2024 Physician orders revealed to use the Vander-Lift with 2 people for transfers and 2 person total assist with bed mobility. Further review of the record revealed on 08/04/2024 Resident #1 weighed 256 pounds. Review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/10/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 had the following functional abilities: limited range of motion to bilateral upper extremities and lower extremities. Review of Resident #1's MDS revealed Resident #1 required total dependence for bed mobility with two person assist. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident #1 was at risk for falls. Review of the approaches in part revealed transfer using 2 person assist with Vander-Lift. Review of the facility incident report dated 08/22/2024 at approximately 12:25 p.m. revealed Resident #1 was receiving personal care by S4 CNA. During the care, Resident #1's bowels had moved and S4 CNA realized she did not have enough supplies to complete the care, so she left the room to gather more. While she was gathering supplies, she heard Resident #1 yell out and she immediately returned to the room. S4 CNA found Resident #1 beside the bed, on the floor, on her knees, between the bed and the wall. S4 CNA immediately called for assistance. S5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) arrived to find Resident #1 on her knees, on the floor, with her hands on top of the mattress, complaining of pain to both of her legs. Resident #1 reported that she fell out of the bed. S5 LPN assessed the resident for injuries and noted a skin tear to her right knee. S5 LPN contacted the physician and orders were received to send to hospital for further evaluation. On 08/22/2024 at 9:35 p.m., S9 LPN received a call from the emergency room informing her that Resident #1 had fractures in bilateral legs and would be having surgery to repair them. S9 LPN immediately notified the Director of Nurses (DON) who then informed the Administrator. Review of the hospital record regarding the injuries sustained from this incident revealed Resident #1 received supracondylar fractures of the right and left femurs. Treatment received was an ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) to the right femur and closed reduction and Ex-Fix application of the left distal femur fracture on 08/22/2024. On 09/04/2024 at 11:30 a.m., an interview with S4 CNA revealed on 08/22/2024 about 12:25 p.m. she was assisting the CNAs on the hall. The CNA that normally cares for Resident #1 was on lunch break and had already put supplies in the room for Resident #1 to get a bath. S4 CNA said this was only the second time she had provided care to Resident #1. S4 CNA said she was giving Resident #1 a bath by herself and was not aware Resident #1 required a 2 person assist with bathing and transferring and failed to review the wall care plan in the resident's room that noted Resident #1 was a 2 person assist. During the bath Resident #1 had a bowel movement and she did not have enough supplies in the room. S4 CNA said she turned Resident #1 to face the wall and the resident's hands were touching the wall lowered the bed and stepped out of the room. S4 CNA said she was not sure if the bed was locked and she did not check the break on the bed before she started the bath or before leaving the room. S4 CNA said she did not even have enough time to get the towel off the cart in the hall when she heard Resident #1 hollering for help. S4 CNA said when she came back in the room Resident #1 was on her knees between the wall and the bed and Resident #1 was complaining of her right knee hurting. S4 CNA said the bed had moved away from the wall. On 09/04/2024 at 1:30 p.m., an interview with S5 LPN revealed she was at the main desk and S4 CNA came and told her that Resident #1 was on the floor. S5 LPN said she went to the room and Resident #1 was on her knees between the bed and the wall with her hands on the mattress and only complained of her right knee hurting and she noticed a skin tear to her right knee. S5 LPN said they got multiple staff, lowered Resident #1 to the floor and then used the lift to get her up off the floor. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital. S5 LPN said she was not sure if the bed was in the lock position when the accident occurred. On 09/03/2024 at 2:30 p.m., an interview with S8 CNA Assistant Supervisor confirmed there should have been 2 staff present when providing care for resident #1 and S4 CNA should not have been providing care by herself and should have checked the locks on the bed prior to exiting the room. On 09/04/2024 at 2:00 p.m., an interview with S3 DON confirmed S4 CNA should not have been providing care to Resident #1 without another staff member present and S4 CNA should have ensured the bed was locked before leaving the room. During the survey, in-service records and QA (Quality Assurance) monitoring records were reviewed, and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following corrective actions to correct the deficient practice prior to entering the facility. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice with the completion date of 08/26/2024: 1. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. 2. S4 CNA was suspended pending investigation. 3. S4 CNA was in-serviced on 08/22/2024 on care of residents in bed, to read the wall care plan. The wall care plan is a piece of paper that is placed on each resident's wall by the bed that has the specific care needs for the resident. To make sure all supplies are obtained prior to beginning care, ensure bed wheels are locked, ensure resident in safe position in bed before leaving room (not close to edge of bed but in middle of bed). 4. All nurses and CNAs were in-serviced from 08/23/2024 to 08/26/2024 on the resident wall care plan, 2 person assist with mobility in the bed, toileting, incontinent care, turning and reposition, bathing, a CNA should be on each side of bed. Check with nurse if any questions. Never leave a room with the resident not in safe position, ensure the wheels are locked on the bed. 5. Baseline assessments of all residents functional capabilities performed, care plans updated for all residents with changes to baseline functional status, all in room resident care plans were updated and monitors were put in place to ensure compliance of corrective action. 6. QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) monitors were conducted to ensure that care received while in bed reflects what the baseline review of functional status and needs assessment are followed. 7. QAPI Monitor - Locks on bed monitored 3 times per week.
Jun 2024 3 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse and psychosocial harm by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1,#2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice resulted in actual harm for resident #1 (who was cognitively impaired with communication deficits) on 05/19/2024 at 6:10 p.m. when S3CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) physically and verbally abused resident #1 by forcefully grabbing resident #1's lower extremities, hands and arms in an attempt to reposition resident #1 and the resident sustained two red bruises that were identified on the left upper arm, and a reddened bruise was noted to the left hand, between thumb and index finger, red bruise was noted on top of right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. S3CNA cursed resident #1 and expressed anger at resident #1. Even though there was no significant decline in mental or physical functioning, it can be determined that the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the physical and verbal abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in her own home or a health care facility. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy dated October 2023 revealed the following: The facility will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, mental and physical abuse including corporal punishment. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, facility members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. Additionally, it included acts of corporal punishment to control behavior. Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Additionally threats of corporal punishment to control behavior are considered verbal abuse. Review of resident #1's electronic health record revealed an admit date of 05/27/2021 with diagnosis that included encephalopathy, aphasia following cerebral infarction, abnormal weight loss, lack of coordination, muscle wasting, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Mental Status Interview) score of 3, which indicated the resident is cognitively impaired and unable to make daily decisions. Further review revealed the resident needs assistance with all activities of daily living including incontinence care. Review of the facility's investigation documentation revealed the following: On 05/20/2024 it was reported to the facility that S3CNA was physically rough and spoke rudely to resident #1 during incontinence care on 05/19/2024. Resident #1's responsible party brought a video of the incontinence care performed by S3CNA on 05/19/2024 at 6:10 p.m. After watching the video that was time and date stamped for 05/19/2024 at 06:10 p.m., the Administration contacted S3CNA and notified her of being suspended pending completion of the investigation. Law enforcement was notified and a report was made to the state in reference to the allegation of abuse. Review of the protective actions taken at this time was resident #1 was immediately examined by medical staff for injuries and supervision increased. Results of the exam revealed two red bruises were identified on the left upper arm, and a reddened bruise was noted to the left hand, between thumb and index finger, red bruise was noted on top of right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. Interview on 06/04/2024 at 10:10 a.m. with S1Administrator confirmed that during the video of incontinence care for resident #1 it showed S7CNA was also in the room with S3CNA and several other CNA's were standing in the doorway. During this video recording S3CNA was seen in the room, with the door open to the hallway, curtain opened in view of the roommate, and window blinds opened. S1Administator stated all staff involved were suspended and later terminated due to staff not reporting the incident of abuse. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 11:10 a.m. S2DON (Director of Nurses) stated S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) were all suspended on 05/20/2024 while the allegation of abuse was being investigated and they were all terminated on 05/23/2024. S2DON stated S7CNA was on one side of resident #1's bed on her phone, while S3CNA was pulling and trying to move the resident in bed very roughly, S7CNA assisted S3CNA pulling the resident up in the bed and then left the resident's room. S2DON confirmed S4CNA, S5CNA, and S6CNA were standing in resident 1's doorway when the care was provided. S2DON stated the physical exam of resident #1 on 05/20/2024 revealed two red bruises on the left upper arm, a reddened bruise to the left hand, between the thumb and index finger, a red bruise was noted on top of the right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. On 06/04/2024 at 1:45 p.m. observation of the video with audio, date and time stamped as 05/19/2024 at 06:07 p.m., revealed a one minute and 59 seconds footage of resident #1 undressed lying in a fetal position on her right side in the bed. S3CNA was observed handling the resident roughly, grabbing onto her lower extremities which were bent at the knees and rapidly, with force attempting to turn her over to the opposite side of the bed. Resident #1 was observed to nearly fall off the edge of the bed, but was caught by S3CNA. S3CNA could be heard on the video cursing using the word s___ and expressing anger at times during the care. S3CNA was also observed to be grabbing at the resident's hands and arms forcefully in order to turn the resident over. Phone interviews were attempted with S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN during the survey with no success on 06/04/2024 at 2:30pm, 6/05/2024 at 9:10 a.m. and 06/05/2024 at 1:10 p.m. On 06/04/2024 at 8:30 a.m. observation of resident #1 revealed she was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room eating breakfast. Resident #1 was unable to answer questions asked by the surveyor due to cognitive impairment. During the survey, in-service records and QA (Quality Assurance) monitoring records were reviewed, and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice. 1. On 05/20/2024 at 02:50 p.m. responsible party of resident #1 produced video footage of the previous evening (05/19/2024) beginning at approximately 06:07 p.m. through 06:23 p.m. that revealed physical and verbal abuse against resident #1 by S3CNA and S7CNA. 2. On 05/20/2024 all CNA's and LPN involved were suspended pending the results of the investigation. Statements were obtained from staff members present during the care on 05/19/2024 were S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN. 3. On 05/20/2024 body audits were performed on all residents who were cared for by S3CNA and S7CNA. Body audits were then conducted on all resident in the facility and were completed by 05/23/2024. 4. On 05/20/2024 through 05/23/2024- the following In-services were done. 1. Dignity for residents with cameras 2. Dignity and maintaining dignity 3. Abuse and Neglect 4. Definitions and policies for abuse and neglect 5. Reporting abuse and neglect 5. On 05/21/2024 interviews were conducted with residents who were cared for by S3CNA and S7CNA. 6. On 05/23/2024 all CNA's and LPN involved were terminated. The QA (quality assurance) implemented changes and will be monitored by QAPI Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan) began on 05/20/2024. 1. A QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This will be completed by interviewing a random sample of residents by the DON (director of Nurses) three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 2. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of Incident and Accident reports by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 3. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of nurse's notes by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 4. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of skin inspection monitors by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. The effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for four weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with findings added to the minutes. Additional in-services and or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. The facility was determined to be in compliance as of May 23, 2024 after completing their action plan that included termination of the employees involved in the incident, assessment of residents, completion of the in-services to all facility staff, and continued review of the QAPI monitoring that was put into place by the facility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide personal privacy during incontient care for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide personal privacy during incontient care for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1,#2,#3) residents reviewed for incontinent care. Findings: Review of resident #1's electronic health record revealed an admit date of 05/27/2021 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, aphasia following cerebral infarction, abnormal weight loss, lack of coordination, muscle wasting, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Mental Status Interview) score of 3 which indicated the resident is cognitively impaired and unable to make daily decisions. Further review revealed the resident needs assistance with all activities of daily living including incontinence care. Review of the facility's investigation documentation revealed the following: On 05/20/2024 it was reported to the facility that S3CNA was physically rough and spoke rudely to resident #1 during incontinence care. Resident #1's responsible party brought a video of the incontinence care performed by S3CNA on 05/19/2024 at 6:10 p.m. to the facility on [DATE]. After watching the video which was time and date stamped for 05/19/2024 at 06:10 p.m., the Administration contacted S3CNA and notified her of being suspended pending completion of the investigation. On 06/04/2024 at 1:45 p.m. an observation of the video with audio, date and time stamped as 05/19/2024 at 06:07 p.m., revealed a one minute and 59 seconds footage of resident #1 undressed lying in a fetal position on her right side in the bed. The video also showed the window blind to be open, the privacy curtain was against the wall and not pulled to obstruct the view of the roommate, and the door to the hall was open during the care being provided. An interview on 06/04/2024 at 10:10 a.m. with S1Administrator confirmed that during the video of incontinence care for resident #1 it showed S7CNA was also in the room with S3CNA and several other CNAs were standing in the doorway. During this video S3CNA was seen in the room, with the door open to the hallway, the privacy curtain opened with the resident in full view of the roommate, and the window blinds opened. S1Administrator stated that privacy should have been provided during the incontient care by the staff, but wasn't. An interview on 06/04/2024 at 11:10 a.m. with S2DON (Director of Nurses) stated S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) were all suspended on 05/20/2024 while the allegation of abuse was being investigated and they were all terminated on 05/23/2024. S2DON stated after viewing the video provided by resident #1's family that the staff left the blinds open on the window, privacy curtain was not pulled and the resident's door was left open to the hallway when they were providing care to the resident; and privacy was not maintained for resident #1.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by staff was reported immediately to t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by staff was reported immediately to the facility administrator no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy dated October 2023 revealed the following: Reporting of Accidents and Incidents: Regardless of how minor an injury may be, all accidents or incidents involving a resident, employee or visitor must be reported. Report all accidents or incidents to your immediate supervisor as soon as you can. All accidents/incidents must be reported to the staff/charge nurse as soon as practical, (on that shift). If the accident/incident involves suspected patient abuse/neglect, or injury is of unknown origin, the staff/charge nurse must immediately report it to the Director of Nurses and Administrator so that the facility abuse/neglect reporting and investigation procedures can be implemented. Review of resident #1's electronic health record revealed an admit date of 05/27/2021 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, aphasia following cerebral infarction, abnormal weight loss, lack of coordination, muscle wasting, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Mental Status Interview) score of 3 which indicated the resident is cognitively impaired and unable to make daily decisions. Further review revealed the resident needs assistance with all activities of daily living including incontinence care. Review of the facility's investigation documentation revealed the following: On 05/20/2024 it was reported to the facility that S3CNA was physically rough and spoke rudely to resident #1 during incontinence care on 05/19/2024. Resident #1's responsible party brought a video of the incontinence care performed by S3CNA on 05/19/2024 at 6:10 p.m. After watching the video time and date stamped 05/19/2024 at 06:10 p.m., the Administration contacted S3CNA and notified her of being suspended pending completion of the investigation. Law enforcement was notified and a report was made to the state in reference to the allegation of abuse. Review of the protective actions taken at this time was resident #1 was resident #1 was immediately examined by medical staff for injuries and supervision increased. Results of the exam revealed two red bruises were identified on the left upper arm, and a reddened bruise was noted to the left hand, between thumb and index finger, red bruise was noted on top of right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. Interview on 06/04/2024 at 10:10 a.m. with S1Administrator confirmed that during the video of incontinence care for resident #1 it showed S7CNA was also in the room with S3CNA and several other CNA's standing in the doorway. During this video recording S3CNA was seen in the room, with the door open to the hallway, curtain opened in view of the roommate, and window blinds opened. S1Administator stated all staff involved were suspended and later terminated. S1Administrator confirmed the staff involved did not report the abuse to anyone and she was not aware of the abuse allegation until after watching the video resident#1's family provided of the care on 05/19/2024. An interview on 06/04/2024 at 11:10 a.m. with S2DON (Director of Nurses) stated S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN were all suspended on 05/20/2024 while the allegation of abuse was being investigated and they were all terminated on 05/23/2024. S2DON stated S7CNA was on one side of resident #1's bed on her phone, while S3CNA was pulling and trying to move the resident in bed very roughly, S7CNA assisted S3CNA pulling the resident up in the bed and then left the resident's room. S2DON confirm S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA and S7CNA were standing in resident #1's doorway when the care was provided. S2DON stated the physical exam of resident #1 on 05/20/2024 revealed two red bruises on the left upper arm, a reddened bruise to the left hand, between the thumb and index finger, a red bruise was noted on top of the right hand and a red bruise noted to the upper right arm. S2DON confirmed the staff involved did not report the abuse to anyone and she was not aware of the incident till resident #1's family provided the video evidence on the following day, 05/20/2024. On 06/04/2024 at 1:45 p.m. an observation of the video with audio, date and time stamped as 05/19/2024 at 06:07 p.m., revealed a one minute and 59 seconds footage of resident #1 undressed lying in a fetal position on her right side in the bed. S3CNA was observed handling the resident roughly, grabbing onto her lower extremities which were bent at the knees and rapidly, with force attempting to turn her over to the opposite side of the bed. Resident #1 was observed to nearly fall off the edge of the bed, but was caught by S3CNA. S3CNA could be heard on the video cursing using the word sh__ and expressing anger at times during the care. S3CNA was also observed to be grabbing at the resident's hands and arms forcefully in order to turn the resident over. Phone interviews were attempted with S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN during the survey with no success on 06/04/2024 at 2:30pm, 6/05/2024 at 9:10 a.m. and 06/05/2024 at 1:10 p.m. On 06/04/2024 at 8:30 a.m. observation of resident #1 revealed she was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room eating breakfast. Resident #1 was unable to answer questions asked by the surveyor due to cognitive impairment. During the survey, in-service records and QA (Quality Assurance) monitoring records were reviewed, and it was determined that the facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice of reporting abuse incidents according to the facility's policies. 1. On 05/20/2024 all CNA's and LPN involved were suspended pending the results of the investigation. Statements were obtained from staff members present during the care of resident #1on 05/19/2024 were S3CNA, S4CNA, S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA and S8LPN. 2. In-services completed: 1. Reporting abuse and neglect-05/21/2024 2. Definitions and policies for abuse and neglect-05/22/2024 3. On 05/21/2024 interviews were conducted with residents who were cared for by S3CNA and S7CNA. 4. On 05/23/2024 all CNA's and LPN involved were terminated. The QA (quality assurance) implemented changes and will be monitored by QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan) began on 05/20/2024. 1. QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This will be completed by interviewing a random sample of residents by the DON (director of Nurses) three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 2. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of Incident and Accident reports by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 3. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of nurse's notes by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. 4. An additional QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure staff is reporting any signs of abuse/neglect/dignity. This monitor will be conducted by reviewing a random sample of skin inspection monitors by the DON three times a week for four weeks then monthly until compliance is reached. Any non-compliance will be addressed. The effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for four weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with findings added to the minutes. Additional in-services and or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. The facility was determined to be in compliance as of May 23, 2024 after completing their action plan noted above.
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #4 Record review revealed resident # 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, Al...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #4 Record review revealed resident # 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, Alzheimer`s disease, hypertension and Bipolar disease. Further record review of the most recent completed minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated resident #4 was cognitively intact. On 01/08/24 at 11:20 a.m., an interview with resident #4 was conducted in the dining room. Resident #4 reported her blood glucose was not regulated and she thought it might be making her feel bad. Review of resident #4's active orders for January 2024 revealed the following: Humulin R U-100 Insulin give 5 units Subcutaneous before each meal and at bedtime Review of finger stick blood sugars for January 01-07, 2024 for resident #4 revealed the following readings: 01/01/2024 06:30a.m. 63 11:30 a.m. 222 04:30 p.m. 267 09:00 p.m. 354 01/02/2024 06:30a.m. 96 11:30 a.m. 259 04:30 p.m. 201 09:00 p.m. 329 01/03/2024 06:30a.m. 83 11:30 a.m. 197 04:30 p.m. 229 09:00 p.m. 367 01/04/2024 6:30a.m. 213 11:30 a.m. 135 04:30 p.m. 228 09:00 p.m. 354 01/05/2024 06:30a.m. 66 11:30 a.m. 225 04:30 p.m. 292 09:00 p.m. 292 01/06/2024 06:30a.m. 86 11:30 a.m. 484 04:30 p.m. 367 9:00 p.m. 279 01/07/2024 06:30a.m. 75 11:30 a.m. 364 Record review revealed no record of nursing staff notifying the physician or nurse practitioner of the fluctuating blood sugars from 01/01/2024-01/07/2024. Record review revealed no record in progress notes that addressed the fluctuating finger stick blood sugars from 01/01/2024-01/07/2024. Record review revealed the last registered dietician assessment was completed on 02/22/2023. On 01/09/2024 at 2:30 p.m. record review revealed an active care plan initiated on 03/14/2017 related to the potential for alterations in blood sugars related to diabetes. The care plan was last updated on 07/31/2019. On 01/09/2024 at 03:05 p.m. an interview with S3 LPN revealed she had provided care for resident # 4. S3 LPN confirmed resident # 4`s finger stick blood glucose levels had been fluctuating from the 60`s to the 400`s for the past week. S3 LPN reported she did not have record of the physician or nurse practitioner being notified of the abnormal blood sugars from 01/01/2024-01/07/2024. On 01/09/24 at 03:15 p.m. an interview with S4 clinical care coordinator (CCC) confirmed resident # 4 did not have an updated care plan for alterations in blood sugars related to diabetes recorded in the past six months. On 01/09/24 at 03:27 p.m. an interview with S2 DON revealed she was aware of resident # 4 having a history of abnormal blood sugars. S2 DON agreed nursing staff should have reported the abnormal finger stick blood glucose findings from 01/01/2024-01/07/2024 to the attending physician or nurse practitioner. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered careplan for 2 (#4, #32) of 6 (#4, #32, #51, #57, #111, #177) residents reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure: 1) nurses administered Insulin according to the residents sliding scale parameters, and report high blood surgars to the resident's physician as ordered (#32) 2) nursing staff reported abnormal blood sugars to the attending physician or nurse practioner and failed to update the plan of care to adress the abnormal blood sugars (#4) Findings: Resident #32 Review of resident #32's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and long term use of Insulin. Review of resident #32's 10/25/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment revealed her Brief Interview for Mental Status Score was 11, indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review revealed resident #32 required substantial to maximal assistance for most Activities of Daily Living. Review of resident #32's January 2024 Physician Orders revealed an order dated 08/06/2022 for blood sugar checks Before Meals and At Bedtime (AC and HS) per Sliding Scale (SS) per Novolog Flexpen as follows: 0-70=give 8 oz juice with 1 pack of sugar 71-250=0 Units (U) 251-300=3U 301-350=4U 351-400=5U 401-450=9U 451-999=10U and call Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician (MD) Review of resident #32's January 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on the following dates, the nurses failed to follow the above Novolog Flexpen SS as ordered: On 1/02/2024 at 4:30 p.m., resident #32's Blood Sugar (BS) was 303, and S6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) gave 3U instead of 4U. On 1/07/2024 at 9:00 p.m., resident #32's BS was 496, and S7LPN failed to notify resident #32's MD of the 496 BS and she failed to recheck resident #32's BS after the 496 reading. On 1/08/2024 at 9:00 p.m., resident #32's BS was 323, and S8LPN administered 3U instead of 4U. On 01/10/2024 at 1:30 p.m., an interview with the S2DON confirmed S7LPN failed to notify resident #32's physician of the 496 BS on 1/07/2023 and she also failed to recheck the resident's BS after the high reading. S2DON also confirmed that S6LPN and S8LPN failed to follow resident #32's Novolog Flexpen SS per physician's orders.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were accessible only to authorized personnel by failing to ensure the medication room remained locked. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were accessible only to authorized personnel by failing to ensure the medication room remained locked. Findings: On 01/09/2024 at 6:30a.m., observation of the medication room revealed the door was open and no staff were within the room. There were 3 medication carts within the room that were locked. The carts and the medications within the room were accessible to residents. Medication blister packs were located on open shelves within the room and accessible to anyone that was able to enter the room. Interview at that time with S5LPN confirmed the door to the medication room was open and medications were accessible.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving injuries of unknown s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving injuries of unknown source are reported immediately to the state agency, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation results in serious bodily injury for 1 (#5) of 2 (#3 and #5) resident investigations reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's current abuse policy revealed, in part: IV. Reporting Requirements: Nursing facility must report to the state agency any incidents and allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and/or injuries of unknown origin immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the event that caused the allegation involves abuse or results in bodily harm or injury. Review of the medical record for resident #5 revealed an admit date of 08/09/2023, with diagnoses of hypertension, vascular dementia, repeated falls, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, multiple fractures of right side ribs, aphasia, hyperlipidemia, vascular dementia, unspecified fracture of facial bones, and fracture of upper end of left tibia. Review of resident #5's Admit Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was assessed to be 5, which indicated she had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident required one person extensive assistance with bed mobility and toilet use. The resident required two person extensive assistance with transfers and one person limited assistance with dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. The resident had impaired range of motion on one lower extremity. An interview with S3Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 11/01/2023 at 8:22 a.m. revealed she had worked with resident #5 previously and when she noticed the bruise on her right shoulder on 09/18/2023, she notified the nurse. Review of the nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 12:00 p.m. by S2Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed S3CNA notified this nurse of bruise to resident #5's right shoulder and head. When assessed noted large bruise to right shoulder, large bruise to right posterior head and hematoma to right posterior head. Resident #5 denies having a fall or any other type of trauma, resident is unable to recall how she obtained the bruises and hematoma, active range of motion/passive range of motion exercises performed with some pain, resident complained of pain to right upper extremity when moved but denies pain when resting, pain rated 5 on a 10 point scale, right shoulder x-ray ordered. Review of the x-ray report dated 9/18/23 for resident #5 revealed fracture of the distal clavicle of indeterminate age. Findings may be acute and should be correlated clinically. Review of the investigation report turned into the state revealed the incident involving resident #5 was discovered on 09/18/2023 at 5:30 p.m. and entered on 09/19/2023 at 5:17 p.m. Further review revealed the following description: staff observed bruising to right shoulder. X-ray was obtained which showed fracture on the distal clavicle of indeterminate age. Resident #5 denies fall. Last Brief Interview for Mental Status was 5. No falls had been reported by staff. Investigation ongoing at this time. An interview with S1Administrator on 10/31/2023 at 2:30 p.m. confirmed that she was responsible for entering the investigation report that is turned into the state agency. S1Administrator further confirmed the incident was not entered within 2 hours following the discovery of resident #5's fractured clavicle.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 117 residents who currently received care and services from the provider. 1) The provider failed to ensure all staff wore KN95 face masks during an outbreak status in accordance with facility's policies and procedures; 2) The provider failed to ensure staff's personal items, including cat food was not stored in the clean laundry room; and, 3) The provider failed to ensure staff's personal items were not stored in the hallway and near an area that was designated for resident restorative therapy. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure regarding the use of face mask during an outbreak (Referring to COVID-19) read as follows: Staff were instructed to wear N95 respirators in COVID rooms only, KN95 within the facility during outbreak status, and when out of outbreak status, a surgical mask is appropriated if a mask is desired. On 09/11/2023 at 8:10 a.m., an observation revealed a signage on the doors located at the front entrance of the facility indicating that the facility was in an outbreak status and masks were required. On 09/11/2023 at 8:15 a.m., S2Assistant Administrator confirmed the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak testing status and all visitors and staff were required to wear a KN95 face mask. On 09/11/2023 at 3:16 p.m., S5ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) reported that she was currently the facility infection control preventionist. S5ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) further reported that the facility currently had one employee, S7LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) who had tested positive for the COVID-19 virus on 09/09/2023 and was on leave at that time. On 09/11/2023 at 4:50 p.m., upon arrival to the laundry department, S8Laundry Worker was observed standing inside of the laundry department without a face mask on. She reported that she was alone in the department when she was not wearing her face mask. Observation of the designated clean laundry room with S8Laundry Worker revealed large fan that was turned and blowing air towards the clean clothing, blankets, and linen items that were located on the shelves. The fan had a large buildup of dust on the fan blades and facing. Observation further revealed a large bag located on a bottom shelf. Inside the bag was a smaller bag containing cat food. S8Laundry Worker reported there was a cat that stayed outside and the workers would use the cat food to feed the animal. Further observation revealed a large black backpack type bag, a cell phone, and a Styrofoam box sitting on top of and in direct contact with a small table top. There were two hand towels on the table. S8Laundry Worker reported the bag, cell phone, and Styrofoam container belonged her (S8Laundry Worker). S8Laundry Worker retrieved the reported that she did have a locker to place her personal belongings in. She further reported that the table was used to fold clothing items for resident use. S8Laundry Worker confirmed that the items should not have been stored in the clean laundry room due to cross contamination. On 09/11/2023 at 5:10 p.m., observation revealed S9CNA and S10CNA ambulating throughout Hall A. Both employees were wearing their KN95 face masks incorrectly as the masks did not completely cover the nose area. On 09/11/2023 at 5:23 p.m., observation revealed S9CNA was observed at the nurses' station with her face mask no applied correctly as it did not completely cover the nose area. On 09/12/2023 at 8:43 a.m., observation revealed S11Housekeeper and S12Transportation Driver standing in the hallway near the laundry department visiting. S11Housekeeper had her face mask down and was drinking. Further observation revealed S12Transportation Driver was wearing a KN95 face mask, but the masks was observed below his nose. S11Housekeeper and S12Transporation Driver reported they knew the masks were supposed to completely cover the bridge of the nose. They confirmed the face masks were incorrectly applied. Further observation of the hallway revealed a small desk that had a hand propelled bicycle type exercise equipment sitting on it. There was a large purse sitting on the window seal to the right of the table. S11Housekeeper reported she thought the purse belonged to S13Restorative CNA. On 09/12/2023 at approximately 9:55 a.m., S3Assistant Administrator was notified of the findings regarding the incorrect use of the face masks and the purse sitting in the window seal. During the observation, S13Restorative CNA was present and confirmed the purse belonged to her and the area next to the purse was designated as the restorative area for residents to participate in restorative exercises. S3Assistant Administrator confirmed the observations of S11Housekeeper and S12Transportation Driver should have on and applied correctly when in the hallway. He further confirmed that S13Restorative CNA should not have stored her purse in the window seal. On 09/13/2023 at 2:13 p.m., observation revealed S14CNA opening the door to exit the room of resident #7 and #8. Further observation revealed S14CNA had a KN95 face mask positioned below her face and in the front of her neck. S14CNA reported she had been assisting resident #7 and the reason she was not wearing the face mask was, because she could not breathe. S14CNA confirmed that she was aware that she was required to wear the face mask during a time of COVID-19 outbreak testing and when providing care for resident #7. After the observation and interview with S14CNA, S2Assistant Administrator was notified of the findings. S2Assistant Administrator confirmed that S14CNA did not wear the face mask as required. On 09/14/2023 at 4:00 p.m., S1Administrator was notified of the above findings that were observed during the Focused Infection Control Survey. S1Administrator confirmed that is was the policy of the facility that all staff were required to have a KN95 face mask and to correctly have the masks placed on their faces during the facility's outbreak testing of COVID-19.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (#1) of 2 (#1, #2) residents observed for pericare as evidenced by, S3Student Trainee failing to change her gloves, apply hand sanitizer, and /or wash her hands after providing pericare for resident #1 and prior to touching clean supplies and resident personal items. Findings: Review of medical record revealed resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included, in part, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right posterior cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, overactive bladder, disorder of brain, and Pseudobulbar affect. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident #1 had a documented brief interview for mental status score of 02. A score of 00-07 indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment with daily decision making. Further review revealed resident #1 was totally dependent with 2+ person physical assistance with toileting. Review of the physician orders dated 09/27/2019 revealed an order for incontinence care: check for incontinence at least every 2 hours, cleanse periarea/buttocks with perifresh perineal cleanser. Pat dry. Apply periguard ointment as a preventative measure. On 03/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an observation revealed S3Student Trainee preparing to provide pericare for resident #1. S3Student Trainee donned a clean pair of disposable gloves prior to beginning the pericare procedure. She positioned the resident, retrieved a clean washcloth, bath pan of water, and a bottle labeled shampoo/body wash, and proceeded with the pericare procedure. Observation revealed resident #1 had a large bowel movement with feces observed on the inside of her brief and covering the perineal area. After S3Student Trainee finished providing pericare for resident #1, she placed a wash cloth she used during the procedure, on the resident's bedside table. The wash cloth was visibly soiled with feces and was laying on top of and in direct contact with the top of the bedside table. S3Student Trainee retrieved a clean brief and placed the brief on resident #1. She did not change her dirty and contaminated gloves after cleaning the resident, handling the dirty wash cloth, and prior to touching the clean brief. Observation further revealed S3Student Trainee placing the bottle of shampoo/body wash on the resident #1's draw sheet and later onto the bed sheet that covered the bed mattress. The dirty and contaminated bottle of shampoo/body wash was in direct contact with resident #1's draw sheet and bed sheet. S3Student Trainee then picked up resident #1's pillow and placed it underneath the resident's right hip, touching the bed sheets and blanket that covered the resident. She did not change her gloves, apply hand sanitizer, and /or wash her hands prior to touching the resident's pillow, bed sheets, and blanket. When S3Student had finished with pericare, she repositioned resident #1, retrieved the bottle of shampoo/body wash and placed the bottle on top of and in direct contact with the resident's bedside table. Further observation revealed the bottle was sitting on the table and next to resident #1's blanket and water pitcher. S3Student Trainee not wipe down and sanitize the bottle prior to placing it on the bedside table. She then retrieved the dirty wash cloth from the bedside table, along with the other dirty supplies, and took them to the soiled linen room for disposal. S3Student Trainee was notified of the findings from the observations during the pericare procedure. S3Student Trainee confirmed she did not perform proper hand hygiene practices during the procedure to help decrease and /or prevent possible cross contamination. On 03/2023 at 3:10 p.m., S1Assistant Administrator notified of the findings during the observation of pericare for resident #1. S2Director of Nursing was also notified.
Jan 2023 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations of medication administration pass, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations of medication administration pass, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without error for 2 of 29 opportunities for errors for 1 (#70) of 3 (#9, #70, #278) residents observed for medication pass. This resulted in a medication error rate of 6.9%. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #70 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, mixed hyperlipidemia and major depressive disorder. Review of resident #70's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of resident #70's January 2023 Physician's Orders revealed the following orders: Namenda 10mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth (po) every night and Colestid 1 GM (gram) give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily (bid) at 12:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. with a full glass of water. On 01/18/2023 at 7:15 a.m. during medication pass observation, S7LPN (licensed practical nurse) administered Namenda 10mg 1 tablet po and Colestid 1GM 1 po in applesauce and with 4 ounces of nutritional supplement. Further observation revealed S7LPN failed to offer a full glass of water with the Colestid as ordered. On 01/18/2023 at 11:00 a.m., an interview with S7LPN confirmed she administered the above Namenda 10mg to resident #70 at 7:15 a.m. instead of at 6:00 p.m, which was the ordered time. S7LPN also confirmed she administered the Colestid 1GM at 7:15 a.m., instead of at 12:00 p.m., which was the ordered time. S7LPN also revealed she failed to administer the Colestid with a full glass of water. On 01/18/2023 at 11:25 a.m., an interview with S3DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above medications were administered to resident #70 at the incorrect times. S3DON also confirmed resident #70's Colestid should have been given with a full glass of water.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician for 1 (#119) of 3 (#11, #43, and #119) residents rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician for 1 (#119) of 3 (#11, #43, and #119) residents reviewed for nutrition, by failing to serve resident #119 a therapeutic diet as ordered. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #119 revealed an admission date of 02/05/2022. Further review of the record revealed diagnoses of osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, end stage renal disease, muscle wasting, rhabdomyolysis, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/19/2022 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance with one person for bed mobility, toileting and bathing, and extensive assistance with two persons for transfers. Resident #119 required limited assistance with one person assist for dressing and hygiene and was independent with setup help only for eating. Review of the care plan revealed altered nutrition and dehydration and to monitor meal percentage intake. Review of the physician's order dated 05/25/2022 revealed for the resident to receive a Regular, no salt on the tray, low concentrated sweets, Renal diet, with no fried foods, no potatoes, no tomatoes, no orange juice and no processed meats. Review of resident #119's diet card revealed the resident was to receive a Low concentrated sweets/Renal, Regular texture diet with no potatoes, no tomatoes, no orange juice, no processed meats, no bananas, no rice or rolls, no ice cream, no gelatin and no pudding. Review of the lunch menu for Renal/LCS diet dated 01/16/2023 revealed the resident should have received 1 baked pork chop, 1/2 cup steamed rice, 1/2 cup cooked vegetable, 1 slice bread, 1/2 cup canned fruit, 8 ounces of beverage and 8 ounces of water as allowed. On 01/16/2023 observation of the lunch meal revealed resident #119 received one pork chop, greens, corn bread, tea and water. The resident did not receive a dessert, or a starch. Review of the lunch menu for Renal /LCS diet dated 01/17/2023 revealed the resident should have received 2 ounces herb baked chicken, 1/2 cup parslied noodles, 1/2 cup mixed vegetables, 1 dinner roll, 1/4 cup hot spiced apples, 8 ounces of beverage and 8 ounces of water as allowed. On 01/17/2023 observation of the lunch meal revealed the resident received a baked chicken breast, green beans, and mixed vegetables, 3 apple slices, water and tea. The resident did not receive parslied noodles or some type of bread. On 01/17/2023 observation of the dinner meal revealed the resident received a bologna sandwich, pasta salad, chicken noodle soup, a piece of cake, fruit cup, tea and water. On 01/17/2023 at 5:30 p.m., S5Interim Dietary Manager confirmed the resident should not have received a bologna sandwich and his diet card indicated he was not to be served processed meats. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S3DON (Director of Nursing) was notified resident #119 did not receive the therapeutic diet as ordered on 01/16/2023 and 01/17/2023.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Client #105 01/16/2023 at 8:45 a.m., an observation of resident # 105's room revealed there was a large amount of white spackle ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Client #105 01/16/2023 at 8:45 a.m., an observation of resident # 105's room revealed there was a large amount of white spackle on his wall behind the headboard on his bed. Resident #105 stated that's been there since I got here. Review of resident #105's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/18/2023 at 2:10 p.m., the surveyor accompanied S8Maintenance Supervisor to resident #105's room. S8Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the above area in resident #105's room was in need of repair. Resident #95 On 01/16/2023 at 8:30 a.m., observation of the resident's room revealed the tube feeding stand and bedside table contained spills and splatters. On 01/18/2023 at 8:35 a.m., interview with S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed the tube feeding stand and bedside table were in need of cleaning. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S3DON (Director of Nursing) was notified that the tube feeding stand and bedside table were in need of cleaning. Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents have a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 (#61, 95, #105, and #122) of 4 (#61, 95, #105, and #122) sampled residents reviewed for environmental issues. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #61's over bed table was not broken; 2. Resident #95's PEG (Percutaneous Ednoscopic Gastrostomy) tube pump stand and bedside table did not contain spills and splatters; 3. Resident #105's bedroom did not have spackle and missing paint on the walls; and 4. Resident #122's PEG tube pump and stand did not contain spills and splatters. Findings: Resident 61 On 01/16/2023 at 3:35 p.m., and on 01/17/2023 at 9:10 a.m., and 3:00 p.m., observations of the resident's room revealed the over bed table had a broken top. On 01/18/2023 at 8:10 a.m., observation of the resident revealed S4CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was feeding the resident on the table with the broken top. Interview at that time with S4CNA confirmed the table had a broken top. On 01/18/2023 at 8:20 a.m., S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed the resident needed a different table due to the one in her room having a broken top. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S3DON (Director of Nursing) was notified of the broken over bed table. Resident 122 On 01/16/2023 at 10:50 a.m., 2:09 p.m., and on 01/17/2023 at 10:00 a.m., and 1:30 p.m., observations of the resident's room revealed the tube feeding pump and stand contained spills and splatters. On 01/18/2023 at 8:35 a.m., interview with S6LPN revealed the tube feeding pump and stand were in need of cleaning. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S3DON was notified of the tube feeding pump and stand were in need of cleaning.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#95) of 2 (#61 and #95) residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure resident #95's tube feeding was being administered per the physician orders. Findings: Resident #95 Review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, reflux, and protein - calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders for January 2023 revealed an order dated 11/30/2022 for Isosource 1.5 calorie at 45 ml/hr (milliliters/hour) per peg tube via pump continuously. Observations on 01/16/2023 at 8:40 a.m., 2:20 p.m., and 4:15 p.m., on 01/17/2023 at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m., and 5:30 p.m., and on 01/18/2023 at 7:50 a.m. revealed the resident's tube feeding was infusing at 35 ml/hr. Observation on 01/18/2023 at 8:35 a.m. with S10 Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed the resident's Isosource was infusing at 35 ml/hr. An interview at this time confirmed the resident should be receiving Isosource at 45 ml/hr. An interview with S3 Director of Nursing on 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed the resident should be receiving Isosource at 45 ml/hr per the physician orders.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #278 Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration (Concentrator or Tank) Policy revealed: While oxygen is in use, No...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #278 Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration (Concentrator or Tank) Policy revealed: While oxygen is in use, No Smoking signs will be posted at the entrance to the room. Humidifier bottles, cannulas and oxygen tubing will be changed at least once weekly and dated. 13. Place the No Smoking, Oxygen in Use warning sign on the resident's room door or in other appropriate locations. Review of the medical record for resident #278 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of shortness of breath, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, heart failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the physician orders for January 2023 revealed: change the oxygen tubing/humidifier bottle and clean filter every week on Thursday and oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula continuously. Observation on 01/16/2023 at 9:32 a.m. revealed the resident's oxygen concentrator did not have a humidifier applied. Further observation revealed there was not a sign on the door indicating that oxygen was in use. Observation on 01/18/2023 at 8:35 a.m. with S10 Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed there was not a No Smoking sign on the resident's door and the oxygen concentrator did not have a humidifier. An interview with S3 DON (Director of Nursing) on 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed there should be a No Smoking sign on the resident's door. S3 DON further confirmed the oxygen concentrator should have a humidifier if there is an order to change the humidifier weekly. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of 5 (#69, #73, #87, #90, #278) residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility failed to: 1.) have No Smoking signs on resident #90 and #278's door per the policy when oxygen was in use, 2.) provide a humidifier to resident #278's oxygen concentrator, and 3.) store resident #69 and #73's nebulizer masks properly per the policy. Findings: Resident #90 Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration (Concentrator or Tank) Policy revealed: While oxygen is in use, No Smoking signs will be posted at the entrance to the room. 13. Place the No Smoking, Oxygen in Use warning sign on the resident's room door or in other appropriate locations. Review of the medical record for resident #90 revealed an admission date of 01/30/2020. Further review of the medical record revealed diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerosis, hypertensive heart disease, oxygen dependent, syncope and collapse. Review of the physician orders for resident #90 revealed an order dated 04/18/2022 for oxygen 2 liter per minute via nasal cannula continuously. Observations on 01/16/2023 at 11:38 a.m., 2:22 p.m., and on 01/17/2023 at 10:15 a.m., 12:30 p.m., 4:10 p.m., and on 01/18/2023 at 8:30 a.m., revealed the resident was in her room and received oxygen at 2 liters/minute per nasal cannula. Further observations of resident #90's room revealed the outside of the door did not have a sign to indicate oxygen was being used in the room. On 01/18/2023 at 9:40 a.m., interview with S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed there was not a No Smoking sign on the resident's door and the resident received oxygen. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S3DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed there should be a No Smoking sign on the resident's door. Resident #69 Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration Policy revealed when not in use, oxygen cannula and masks should be placed in a plastic bag. Review of the resident's medical record revealed she had diagnoses which included wheezing, cough and shortness of breath. Review of the physician orders revealed she received a Duoneb breathing treatment per hand held nebulizer every 6 hours. On 01/16/2023 at 10:28 a.m., observation revealed there was a nebulizer mask laying on the bedside table and not stored in a plastic bag. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., an interview with S3DON confirmed the nebulizer mask should have been stored in a plastic bag. Resident #73 Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration Policy revealed when not in use, oxygen cannula and masks should be placed in a plastic bag. Review of the resident's medical record revealed she had diagnoses which included cough and wheezing. Review of the physician orders revealed resident #73 was to receive Ipratropium and Albuterol per hand held nebulizer every 6 hours. On 01/16/2023 at 10:28 a.m., an observation revealed there was a nebulizer mask laying on the bedside table and not stored in a plastic bag. On 01/18/2023 at 12:30 p.m., an interview with S2DON confirmed the nebulizer mask should have been stored in a plastic bag.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessments were transmitted in a timely manner...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessments were transmitted in a timely manner by failing to transmit the resident assessments within 14 days of completion for 3 (#68, #86, and #112) of 3 (#68, #86, and #112) residents whose assessment transmissions were reviewed. Findings: Resident #68- Review of resident #68's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments revealed: Resident #68 was discharged on 09/04/2022, and the discharge MDS assessment was transmitted on 10/05/2022. Resident #68 had was readmitted on [DATE], and the reentry MDS assessment transmitted on 09/27/2022. Resident #68 had a quarterly MDS assessment on 12/12/2022, and the quarterly MDS has not been transmitted. Resident #86- Review of resident #86's MDS assessments revealed: Resident #86 had a quarterly MDS assessment on 09/02/2022, and the quarterly MDS was transmitted on 10/05/2022. Resident #86 had a quarterly MDS assessment on 12/02/2022, and the quarterly MDS was transmitted on 01/13/2023. Resident #112- Review of resident #112's MDS assessments revealed: Resident #112 had an admission MDS assessment on 09/09/2022, and the admission MDS was transmitted on 10/13/2022. Review of the facility's MDS submission reports revealed that residents #68, #86, and #112 had MDS assessments that were not transmitted within 14 days of completion. An interview on 01/17/2023 at 2:50 p.m. with S9LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)/CCC (Clinical Care Coordinator) confirmed the following: Resident #68's discharge MDS with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 09/04/2022, reentry MDS assessment with ARD of 09/07/2022, and quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 12/12/2022 were not transmitted within 14 days of completion. Resident #86's quarterly MDS assessments with ARD of 09/02/2022 and 12/02/2022 were not transmitted within 14 days of completion. Resident #112's admission MDS assessment with ARD of 09/09/2022 was not transmitted within 14 days of completion.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • 19 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $20,869 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
  • • 56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 48/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon Staffed?

CMS rates LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon?

State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 16 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon?

LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 140 certified beds and approximately 113 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WEST MONROE, Louisiana.

How Does Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon Stick Around?

Staff turnover at LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon Ever Fined?

LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON has been fined $20,869 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,288. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon on Any Federal Watch List?

LANDMARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CTR OF WEST MON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.