EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Eastside Center for Health & Rehabilitation in Bangor, Maine, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care quality. They rank #36 out of 77 nursing homes in Maine, placing them in the top half, but the overall trust score suggests serious issues. The trend is worsening, with reported problems increasing from 3 in 2024 to 8 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 47%, which is slightly below the state average, but there are still serious concerns due to $34,359 in fines, indicating compliance issues. Specific incidents include failure to provide CPR to a resident in critical need and not following care protocols for bowel management, leading to severe discomfort for another resident, highlighting a mix of staffing strength but critical failures in care procedures.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Maine
- #36/77
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $34,359 in fines. Higher than 51% of Maine facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 72 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Maine nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Maine average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Maine avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
7 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's bowel movements and initiate the Bowel Regime protocol on shift 7 for 1 of 1 r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
4. On 2/24/25 during a clinical record review it is documented that R17 was admitted to the facility in 2020. A review of R17's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a specialized mental health diagnosis had b...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and observations, the facility failed to follow hospital discharge orders for 1 of 13 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on Payroll Based Journal staffing report and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and Beneficiary form review, the facility failed to ensure that a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) was provided to 2 of 3 residents whose Medicare Part ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a current problem of Atrophic Vaginitis for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care planning a current medical problem r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow Physician orders to provide a low sodium diet and assist a resident out of bed to a chair for meals for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free from accident hazard...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a Physician Assistant order for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1 [R1]).
Finding:
On 4/9/24, R1's clinical record was reviewed. I...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform a Resident Representative (RR), in advance, of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives related to use of an antipsy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, employee personnel file review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that references were checked for 1 of 5 sampled employees hired in 2023 (Employee #2, (E2)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the clinical records contained accurate documentation for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #28...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper medication and biological storage temperatures for 1 of 2 medication storage room refrigerators (B wing).
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a Food Service Director (FSD) that met the qualifications of a FSD. This has the potential to affect all the residents.
Findings:
On 12/18/...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure dishes were stored in a sanitary manner for 3 of 3 days (12/18/23, 12/21/23, and 12/22/23), failed to ensure food was stored under sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage on 2 of 3 days of survey (12/18/23 and 12/21/23).
Findings:
On 12/18/23 at 11:15 a.m., two surveyors observed a f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the Facility Reported Incident report, facility's investigation, facility's policies and procedures, record r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the nurse was notified immediately by the Certified Nurses Aide of a resident fall, failed to immediately notify the residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of facility's policies and procedures for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Automated External...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observation and review of the facility's Automated External Defibrillator (AED) policy and procedure, the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update a care plan for the care area of Dialysis for 1 of 1 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires Dialysis receive such services, consistent with the professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. On 8/16/22 at 1:00 p.m., the surveyor noted on review of Resident #211's electronic clinical record that the resident transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22, and subsequently admitted , f...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
3. On 8/16/22 at 1:00 p.m., the surveyor noted on review of Resident #211's electronic clinical record that the resident transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22, and subsequently admitted , f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $34,359 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 26 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $34,359 in fines. Higher than 94% of Maine facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Maine, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Maine average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, 21 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc?
EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 67 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BANGOR, Maine.
How Does Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc Compare to Other Maine Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Maine, EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Maine. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc Stick Around?
EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Maine nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc Ever Fined?
EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC has been fined $34,359 across 3 penalty actions. The Maine average is $33,422. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
EASTSIDE CENTER FOR HEALTH & REHABILITATION, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.