SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE

88 HARBOR DRIVE, SACO, ME 04072 (207) 283-3646
For profit - Corporation 105 Beds FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#75 of 77 in ME
Last Inspection: July 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Seal Rock Healthcare in Saco, Maine, has received an F trust grade, indicating significant concerns and a poor quality of care. It ranks #75 out of 77 facilities in the state, placing it in the bottom half, and #8 out of 9 in York County, meaning there is only one facility in the county that performs worse. The situation is worsening, with the number of issues escalating from 4 in 2023 to 5 in 2025. While staffing is a strength with a 4 out of 5-star rating, the turnover rate is concerning at 66%, significantly higher than the state average. Notably, the facility has incurred $75,433 in fines, which is higher than 96% of facilities in Maine, indicating ongoing compliance problems. Critical incidents have included a failure to properly manage a gastroenteritis outbreak, which resulted in the spread of symptoms among 17 residents due to inadequate isolation and PPE measures. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing, the significant weaknesses in care quality and safety raise serious concerns for prospective residents and their families.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Maine
#75/77
Bottom 3%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
66% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$75,433 in fines. Lower than most Maine facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Maine. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
28 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 4 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Maine average (3.0)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 66%

19pts above Maine avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $75,433

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (66%)

18 points above Maine average of 48%

The Ugly 28 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Apr 2025 5 deficiencies 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement isolation/contact precautions...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis and failed to follow the Nurse Practitioner's recommendation to ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all staff were knowledgeable about which residents were experiencing these symptoms and ensure PPE were used while providing care. This resulted in the spread of gastroenteritis [nflammation that spreads from your stomach into your intestines, causing pain, vomiting and diarrhea symptoms] (GI) symptoms creating an immediate jeopardy situation to 17 out of 90 residents', on 6 of 7 units: Eagle Island, Ram Island, Bluff Island, [NAME] Islan, Beach Island and Gooseberry Island. (Resident #27 #26, #25, #22, #9, #10, #13, #14, #16, #34, #4, #32, #6, #5, #7, #33, and #3) Findings: 1. On 3/17/25 the Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint regarding quality-of-care concerns and that a resident tested positive for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The family was not notified of a resident being positive for RSV and the facility had not implemented isolations precaution with use of PPE and signage posted notifying staff and visitors of the precautions. On 4/1/25 during a telephone interview, the complainant stated Norovirus (contagious gastroenteritis) is currently active in the facility, there is no PPE out for use, staff are not utilizing PPE and there is no posted/signage of isolation precautions out. On 4/2/25 at 8:45 a.m., upon entry to facility, during an observation, there was no posting or signage on the door of any infections/symptoms occurring in the building. In an interview, the Administrator stated there is something GI going around, a few residents have had it and believed there is one resident who was having symptoms. She then stated that both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionists (ADON/IP) were out sick with nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. On 4/2/25 at approx. 8:50 a.m., 2 surveyors completed an initial tour of the facility. During this tour, the following first floor units; Eagle Island, Ram Island, Bluff Island, [NAME] Island, were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. The second-floor units: Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. On 4/2/25 at 11:13 a.m., during an interview with the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) and the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN. The FNP provided the surveyor with a list of 30 residents, located on all units of the facility, who have had or currently have GI symptoms with the first symptoms reported on 3/24/25. The FNP stated the main symptoms were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Almost everybody had fatigue, lack of appetite and lethargy for 48-72 hours. She confirmed there was a stool sample pending for Resident #27. At this time, the FNP reviewed Nordex for the stool sample results. Resident #27 results were positive for Norovirus. She stated, she had notified the facility a week ago, via email, of the concern for a norovirus outbreak and asked them to ensure isolation precautions are put into place, cleaning and use soap and water for hands not hand sanitizer stating, I sent it to everyone, the Administrator, DON and the ADON, I asked them to stop activities, and I was told its residents rights, we can't do that. At this time, FNP stated she will notify the facility of Resident #27's positive norovirus results. Review of the email the FNP sent the facility, dated 3/26/25 stated, I believe we are about to have large norovirus outbreak here: already five people have nausea and vomiting, within a 24 hour period. We will be sending some stool samples, will keep you posted. If they are positive and this continues, suspect probable outbreak. Precautions should be in place. Gowns, gloves, signage, please. Isolation should be onset of symptoms/exposure to 2 days after s/s resolve. Treatment is supportive: antiemetics, push fluids. Hand sanitizer is ineffective. Soap and water for hands, bleach for surfaces, to clean. Can Seal Rock please communicate with housekeeping to alert his staff? On 4/2/25 at 11:24 a.m., observation of Resident #7, #25 and #26 rooms to now have a Contact precaution sign posted with a PPE cart near the door. Resident #27 did not have isolation/contact precaution sign posted or PPE cart near the door. On 4/2/25 at 2:18 p.m., 2 surveyors observed Resident #27's room again with no isolation/contact precautions posted or PPE available. Resident #27's significant other was observed visiting sitting with the resident. On 4/2/25 at 3:39 p.m. during an observation with the Administrator and the surveyor, Resident #27's room lacked isolation/contact precautions or a PPE cart by the room. At this time, the surveyor confirmed the Administrator was aware that Resident #27 was positive for norovirus. On 4/2/25 at 5:47 p.m., during an observation, Resident #27's room continued not to have isolation/contact precautions posted and PPE available in a cart near the door. The facilities Infections Prevention and Control Program policy and procedure last revised 3/2025 states, An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. 7. Prevention of infection . Important facets of infection prevention include: identifying possible infections or potential complications of existing infections Cortana instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination, educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures, communicating the importance of standard precautions and respiratory hygiene to visitors and family members, screening for possible significant pathogens . implementing appropriate enhanced barrier or transmission-based precautions when necessary and following established general and disease-specific guidelines such as those of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 2. Additional interviews with facility staff confirmed the lack of isolation/contact precautions being initiated upon first GI symptoms and knowledge of what residents were having these symptoms requiring isolation precautions and use of PPE: On 4/2/25 at 9:04 a.m., during an interview with Certified Nurses Aid (CNA#3) stated, we had norovirus going around, for the most part, it's cleared up. The surveyor asked if she was given a report of any residents with current GI symptoms. She stated Resident #22 did have symptoms but was not having any right now and Resident #17 had symptoms a few days ago but nothing yesterday or today. At this time, CNA #3 confirmed she had worked on 4/1/25 on the unit and both yesterday and today she was unaware of any new GI symptoms. On 4/2/25 at 9:16 a.m., during an interview, the Certified Nurses Aid (CNA#1) on Beach Island and Gooseberry Island, stated she was unaware of any resident's experiencing GI symptoms of nausea/vomiting/diarrhea (n/v/d). The surveyor asked how she would be made aware if a resident was on isolation precautions requiring PPE for care. She stated it would be posted on the resident's door. On 4/2/25 at 9:23 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), stated he is the nurse in charge of Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island (the nurse in charge of Resident #27). The surveyor asked if any residents were experiencing GI symptoms of n/v/d. He stated, he was aware of Resident #26 had n/v/d that started this weekend, Resident #25 started with loose stools yesterday and Resident #22 started with loose stools last night. He stated there has not been any testing since it started, and he is unaware of any current testing being completed. The surveyor asked if the [NAME] Island unit had any GI symptoms, he stated, a few days back but nothing since. When asked what he would do if a resident showed signs of GI symptoms, he stated he would notify the provider, put in a change of condition in the resident's chart, notify the family, and put up PPE. At this time, the surveyor asked why the residents he mentioned did not have Isolation/Contact precautions posted and a PPE cart outside of their room. He stated, he relies the Unit Coordinator/CNA (on Eagle/Ram unit, first floor) to put up the PPE for residents needing to go on precautions and he was going to be putting up precaution signs on the rooms however he is busy but will do it this morning. When asked the follow up question if there are any difficulties obtaining PPE, he stated that finding a cart to hold the PPE and the signage is very challenging. On 4/2/25 at 9:37 a.m., during an interview with Certified Nurses Aid - Medication technician (CNA-M #2) on Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island, stated she is unaware of any residents having GI symptoms of n/v/d or the need to wear PPE. The surveyor asked how she would know if a resident was on isolation/contact precautions and PPE was required. She stated it would be on their door, posted with gloves and gowns. On 4/2/25 at 9:40 a.m., during an interview, with Housekeeper on Beach Island and Gooseberry Island, stated she just returned from 3 days off. The Surveyor asked if she was aware of any residents having GI symptoms of n/v/d, she stated, nope, The surveyor asked how she would know if she needed to wear PPE prior to going into the rooms, she stated, it would tell you, on the door what you have to wear. On 4/2/25 at 9:45 a.m., during an interview, with CNA #2 on Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island, stated she was not given any report regarding residents having GI symptoms or anyone on precautions other than Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). On 4/2/25 at 9:50 a.m., during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN#1) on the Bluff Island and [NAME] Island, stated that there are a few residents who are experiencing GI symptoms, Resident #9 is experiencing nausea and diarrhea, Resident #10 has vomiting and diarrhea with a stool sample sent out and they are awaiting results, Resident #13 is experiencing nausea and dry heaves that started last night, Resident #14 has been vomiting since last night, Resident #16 has been vomiting since yesterday and there are orders to collect a stool sample. At this time, RN#1 stated she cannot confirm if there are PPE carts available or at these residents' rooms, but they all should be on precautions. On 4/2/25 at 9:55 a.m., during an interview with LPN #2 on Bluff Island and [NAME] Island, stated she would only get a report when she is the nurse in charge. She confirmed she was not the nurse in charge, only passing medications and did not receive a report. The surveyor asked if she was aware of any residents having GI symptoms of n/v/d, she stated, Yes, Resident #14 had emesis yesterday, nobody else as far as I know .Resident #34 had signs and symptoms of norovirus. The doctor said to go ahead and get a stool. Nobody I know of on Bluff side. On 4/2/25 at 10:05 a.m., during an interview, with RN #2 on the Ram Island, stated she believes that the facility has a lot of Noro cases; Resident #4 was sent out to the hospital yesterday for GI issues, Resident #32 had symptoms over the weekend which have resolved, Resident #6 started having stomach cramps this morning, Resident #5 started having diarrhea this morning and Resident #7 started vomiting this morning. RN #2 then stated that she herself had GI issues on Friday 3/28/25, called out Saturday but returned to work Sunday 3/30/25. During the week of 3/28/25 she had Resident #33 who had GI symptoms. She then stated, a lot of staff have been getting it along with the residents. On 4/2/25 at 10:15 a.m., during an interview, with LPN #3 working on Eagle Island, stated Resident #3 started to have nausea about a half hour ago and denies anyone else having GI symptoms. The surveyor asked if she gets a report on who requires PPE and/or isolation precautions, she stated, we don't, there's a sign on the door for people on precautions that we follow. On 4/2/25 at approx. 10:18 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator, 2 surveyors discussed the lack of Isolation/Contact precautions posted, the lack of available PPE carts, the lack of staff knowledge of residents who are experiencing GI symptoms, staff entering the rooms of residents with GI symptoms without the use of PPE and are unaware of the risks and the GI symptoms have been spreading throughout the facility. At this time, the Administrator stated again that both the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP) were out sick. On 4/2/25 at 10:22 a.m. during an interview with both CNA #6 and CNA #7 on Eagle Island and Ram Island. CNA #6 stated he does not know of any residents, on his side, that are having GI symptoms or anyone needing contact precautions. CNA #7 then stated that she knows Resident #7 having symptoms and Resident #4 being sent to the hospital yesterday due to GI symptoms. The surveyor asked both CNA's which residents are on contact precautions. CNA #7 stated, the only one on my side is Resident #2 who is on EBP. Based on the above information, IJ was called on 4/2/25 for the facility's failure to to identify and implement isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis, failed to follow the Nurse Practitioner's recommendation to ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents, and failed to ensure all staff were knowledgeable about which residents were experiencing these GI symptoms and ensure PPE was available. The facility's failure to provide these services constituted an immediate jeopardy situation. Please see F-0000 Initial Comments related to the IJ removal plan.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified of a significant change in medical condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified of a significant change in medical condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) (Resident #29). Findings: On 3/17/25 Division of Licensing received a complaint that Resident #29, was transported to the hospital on 3/15/25 due to mental status changes. The hospital notified the POA that, according to the facility records, Resident #29 had tested positive for RSV on 3/7/25. The POA was not made aware of this diagnosis. On 4/2/25, a review of Resident #29's medical record lacked evidence of nursing documentation and/or labs to verify that he/she was tested or positive for RSV. At 3:25 p.m., during an interview with the Advance Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) she confirmed that Resident #29 was seen by the provider and swabbed for RSV on 3/7/25, which resulted in him/her testing positive for RSV. The APRN was able to obtain the positive lab results through the lab documentation. The medical record lacked evidence of his/her POA being notified of the positive RSV results. On 4/2/25 at 3:35 p.m., during an interview with the facility Administrator the above information was confirmed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for diabetes management. (Resident #29) Findings: On 4/2/25 a surveyor ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for diabetes management. (Resident #29) Findings: On 4/2/25 a surveyor reviewed Resident #29 clinical record which showed an active physician order initiated on 11/5/24 for blood glucose monitoring one time a day every Tuesday and to call the provider if blood sugars are less than 100 or above 200. Further review shows the blood sugar levels on 3/4/25 was 285, on 3/11/25 was 311, on 3/25/25 was 298, and on 4/1/25 was 253. The clinical record lacked evidence of physician notification for the above levels. On 4/2/25 at 4:38 p.m. and at 5:50 p.m., during an interview, the Family Nurse Practitioner stated that she was aware of Resident #29 blood sugar being elevated on 4/1/25. However, she was unable to recall if she was made aware of any other elevated glucose levels for Resident #29. On 4/2/25 at 4:38 p.m., during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated, when he gets a high blood sugar reading, he will either call the provider, if the provider was in the facility he would speak to them in person, and if the glucose reading was elevated overnight, he would call the on-call provider. He then stated he would document this information in the residents' chart. On 4/2/25 at 6:00 p.m., during an interview, the Facility Administrator confirmed that the residents clinical record lacked evidence of physician communication for the elevated sugars on the dates above.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff immediately initiated isolation/...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff immediately initiated isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis (GI) (i.e. diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or fever) and ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. This has resulted in the spread of GI symptoms throughout the facility which began on 3/24/25 and Norovirus being confirmed on 4/2/25. Findings: 1. On 4/2/25 at 8:45 a.m., upon entry to the facility, 2 surveyors observed no posting or signage on the door of any infections/symptoms occurring in the building. In an interview, the Administrator stated there is something GI going around, a few residents have had it and believed there is one resident who was having symptoms. She then stated that both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionists (ADON/IP) were out sick with nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. On 4/2/25 at approx. 8:50 a.m., 2 surveyors completed an initial tour of the facility. During this tour, the following first floor units; Eagle Island, Ram Island, Bluff Island, [NAME] Island, were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. The second-floor units: Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. On 4/2/25 at 11:13 a.m., during an interview with the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) and the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN. The FNP provided the surveyor with a list of 30 residents, located on all units of the facility, who have had or currently have GI symptoms with the first symptoms reported on 3/24/25. The FNP stated the main symptoms were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Almost everybody had fatigue, lack of appetite and lethargy for 48-72 hours. She confirmed there was a stool sample pending for Resident #27. At this time, the FNP reviewed Nordex for the stool sample results. Resident #27 results were positive for Norovirus. She stated, she had notified the facility a week ago, via email, of the concern for a norovirus outbreak and asked them to ensure isolation precautions are put into place, cleaning and use soap and water for hands not hand sanitizer stating, I sent it to everyone, the Administrator, DON and the ADON, I asked them to stop activities, and I was told its residents rights, we can't do that. At this time, FNP stated she will notify the facility of Resident #27's positive norovirus results. Review of the email the FNP sent the facility, dated 3/26/25 stated, I believe we are about to have large norovirus outbreak here: already five people have nausea and vomiting, within a 24 hour period. We will be sending some stool samples, will keep you posted. If they are positive and this continues, suspect probable outbreak. Precautions should be in place. Gowns, gloves, signage, please. Isolation should be onset of symptoms/exposure to 2 days after s/s resolve. Treatment is supportive: antiemetics, push fluids. Hand sanitizer is ineffective. Soap and water for hands, bleach for surfaces, to clean. Can Seal Rock please communicate with housekeeping to alert his staff? 2. Additional interviews with facility nursing staff confirmed the lack of isolation/contact precautions being initiated upon GI symptoms and knowledge of what residents were having these symptoms requiring isolation precautions and use of PPE: On 4/2/25 at 9:23 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), stated he is the nurse in charge for the second-floor units which included Resident #27. The surveyor asked if any residents were experiencing GI symptoms of n/v/d. He stated he was aware of one that had n/v/d that started this weekend, one who started with loose stools yesterday and another who started with loose stools last night. He stated there has not been any testing since it started, and he is unaware of any current testing being completed. When asked what he would do if a resident showed signs of GI symptoms, he stated he would notify the provider, put in a change of condition in the resident's chart, notify the family, and put up PPE. At this time, the surveyor asked why the residents he mentioned did not have Isolation/Contact precautions posted and a PPE cart outside of their room. He stated, he relies the Unit Coordinator/CNA (on Eagle/Ram unit, first floor) to put up the PPE for residents needing to go on precautions and he was going to be putting up precaution signs on the rooms however he is busy but will do it this morning. When asked the follow up question if there are any difficulties obtaining PPE, he stated that finding a cart to hold the PPE and the signage is very challenging. On 4/2/25 at 9:50 a.m., during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN#1) on the first floor, she stated there are a few residents who are experiencing GI symptoms, one with nausea and diarrhea, another with vomiting and diarrhea with a stool sample sent out and they are awaiting results, one who is experiencing nausea and dry heaves that started last night, one who has been vomiting since last night and another one who had been vomiting since yesterday and there are orders to collect a stool sample. At this time, RN#1 stated she cannot confirm if there are PPE carts available or at these residents' rooms, but they all should be on precautions. On 4/2/25 at 9:55 a.m., during an interview with LPN #2 on the first floor, she stated she would only get a report when she is the nurse in charge. She confirmed she was not the nurse in charge, only passing medications and did not receive a report. The surveyor asked if she was aware of any residents having GI symptoms of n/v/d, she stated one had emesis yesterday, and another resident had signs and symptoms of norovirus, and the doctor said to get a stool. On 4/2/25 at 10:05 a.m., during an interview, with RN #2 on the first floor she stated, the facility has a lot of Noro cases; one resident was sent out to the hospital yesterday for GI issues, another had symptoms over the weekend which have resolved, one who started having stomach cramps this morning, one who started having diarrhea this morning and one who started vomiting this morning. RN #2 then stated that she herself had GI issues on Friday 3/28/25, called out Saturday but returned to work Sunday 3/30/25. She then stated, a lot of staff have been getting it along with the residents. On 4/2/25 at 10:15 a.m., during an interview, with LPN #3 working on first floor, she stated one resident started to have nausea about a half hour ago and denies anyone else having GI symptoms. The surveyor asked if she gets a report on who requires PPE and/or isolation precautions, she stated, we don't, there's a sign on the door for people on precautions that we follow. On 4/2/25 at approx. 10:18 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator, 2 surveyors discussed the lack of Isolation/Contact precautions posted, the lack of available PPE carts, the lack of staff knowledge of residents who are experiencing GI symptoms, staff entering the rooms of residents with GI symptoms without the use of PPE and are unaware of the risks and the GI symptoms have been spreading throughout the facility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Administration (Tag F0835)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations and record review the Administration failed to follow the facility's Infection - Clinical Prot...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations and record review the Administration failed to follow the facility's Infection - Clinical Protocol policy and procedures by not following the Family Nurse Practitioner's (FNP) recommendation of isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis (GI) (i.e. diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or fever) and ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. In addition, Administration failed to ensure the infection Preventionist was following the facilities Infection prevention and Control Program which included oversight, outbreak management, prevention of infection and monitoring employee health and safety. This has resulted in the spread of GI symptoms throughout the facility. The administration was notified of the potential outbreak on 3/26/25 and Norovirus being confirmed on 4/2/25 Finding: On 4/2/25 at 8:45 a.m., upon entry to the facility, 2 surveyors observed no posting or signage on the door of any infections/symptoms occurring in the building. In an interview, the Administrator stated there is something GI going around, a few residents have had it and believed there is one resident who was having symptoms. She then stated that both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionists (ADON/IP) were out sick with nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. On 4/2/25 at approx. 8:50 a.m., 2 surveyors completed an initial tour of the facility. During this tour, the following first floor units; Eagle Island, Ram Island, Bluff Island, [NAME] Island, were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. The second-floor units: Beach Island, Gooseberry Island and [NAME] Island were observed with no isolation/contact precautions in place requiring the use of PPE. On 4/2/25 at 11:13 a.m., during an interview with the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) and the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN. The FNP provided the surveyor with a list of 30 residents, located on all units of the facility, who have had or currently have GI symptoms with the first symptoms reported on 3/24/25. The FNP stated the main symptoms were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Almost everybody had fatigue, lack of appetite and lethargy for 48-72 hours. She confirmed there was a stool sample pending for Resident #27. At this time, the FNP reviewed Nordex for the stool sample results. Resident #27 results were positive for Norovirus. She stated, she had notified the facility a week ago, via email, of the concern for a norovirus outbreak and asked them to ensure isolation precautions are put into place, cleaning and use soap and water for hands not hand sanitizer stating, I sent it to everyone, the Administrator, DON and the ADON, I asked them to stop activities, and I was told its residents rights, we can't do that. Review of the email the FNP sent the facility, dated 3/26/25 stated, I believe we are about to have large Norovirus outbreak here: already five people have nausea and vomiting, within a 24 hour period. We will be sending some stool samples, will keep you posted. If they are positive and this continues, suspect probable outbreak. Precautions should be in place. Gowns, gloves, signage, please. Isolation should be onset of symptoms/exposure to 2 days after s/s resolve. Treatment is supportive: antiemetics, push fluids. Hand sanitizer is ineffective. Soap and water for hands, bleach for surfaces, to clean. Can Seal Rock please communicate with housekeeping to alert his staff? The facilities Infections - Clinical Protocol policy and procedure last revised on 3/2025 states, under Assessment and Recognition, 1. The physician or provider will help identify individuals who have had a recent infection or who are at high risk for developing an infection. 2. Infection may be suspected based on clinical signs and symptoms and/or temperature. 3. Nursing staff will notify the physician or provider of all pertinent details about the residents condition. Under section Cause Identification, 1. Based on the preceding information, the physician or provider and staff will discuss and determine whether an infection exists or is likely, whether additional evaluations or testing is indicated, and whether other active conditions related to an infection also need to be managed simultaneously. 3. Based on the overall clinical picture, including the severity of the current illness, the physician or provider will help the staff address the following issues: whether an infection is present . 4. The physician or provider and staff will identify infection transmission risks and (in conjunction with the Infection Preventionist) will implement relevant precautions. The facilities Infections Prevention and Control Program policy and procedure last revised 3/2025 states, An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Under Elements of the IPCP, 1. Coordination and oversight . Surveillance data and reporting information is used to inform the committee of potential issues and trends. Some examples of committee reviews may include: documented IPCP incidents and corrective actions taken, whether provider management of infection is optimal, whether information about culture results or antibiotic resistance is transmitted accurately and in a timely fashion and whether there is appropriate follow up of acute infections. 2. Surveillance and reporting . Surveillance tools are used for identifying the occurrence of infections, recording their number and frequency, detecting outbreaks and epidemics, monitoring employee infection, monitoring adherence to infection prevention and control practices, and detecting unusual pathogens with infection control implications. 6. Outbreak Management . Outbreak management is a process that consists of: determining the presence of an outbreak, managing the affected residents, preventing the spread to other residents, documenting information about the outbreak, quoting the information to the appropriate public health authorities, educating the staff and the public, monitoring for reoccurrences . 7. Prevention of infection . Important facets of infection prevention include: identifying possible infections or potential complications of existing infections Cortana instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination, educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures, communicating the importance of standard precautions and respiratory hygiene to visitors and family members, screening for possible significant pathogens . implementing appropriate enhanced barrier or transmission-based precautions when necessary and following established general and disease-specific guidelines such as those of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 8. Monitoring employee health and safety . The facility has established policies and procedures regarding infection preventions and control among employees, contractors, vendors, visitors, and volunteers, including: . situations when these individuals should report their infections or avoid the facility (for example . active respiratory infections with considerable coughing and sneezing, or frequent diarrhea stools). Please see F880 for details related to Norovirus
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's Bowel Maintenance Program was followed, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's Bowel Maintenance Program was followed, and the staff did not notify the physician of resident's condition for 1 of 8 sampled residents (#1). Finding: Review of Resident #1's clinical record indicated on Physician's Notes from 6/5/2023 to 7/24/2023 list diagnosis of Chronic Diarrhea and Constipation. Resident #1's Stool Output record demonstrated that the resident had no documented bowel movement (BM) for a period of 5 days (7/10/2023, 7/11/2023, 7/12/2023, 7/13/2023, and 7/14/2023. Medical record indicates resident was hospitalization on 7/24/2023. The Medication admission Record (MAR) demonstrated that the resident continued to receive Imodium 2mg (milligrams) twice daily until the resident was hospitalized on [DATE]. The Bowel Maintenance Program states: If no bowel movement for 3 days, follow physicians orders for bowel management. Constipation: No BM times 3 days check for impaction. If impacted, notify MD, if not impacted, Give MOM (Milk of Magnesia) 30cc PO (by mouth) 1st day. If no results from MOM. On 2nd day may repeat MOM 30cc x1 (times one) or Administer Dulcolax 10mg suppository PR (rectally) x1. If no results on 3rd day from Dulcolax or MOM give Mineral Oil enema PR x1, if no results call physician. The resident's clinical record contained no documentation of communication to the provider the lack of BMs, as stated in the facilities Bowel Maintenance Program. On 8/8/2023 at 9:35 a.m., the surveyor confirmed the facility failed to implement their Bowel Maintenance Program after the Resident #1 was without a BM for five days days with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve residents meals in a homelike manner by serving meals on paper/plastic dishware plates and plastic cutlery. That has the ability to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve residents meals in a homelike manner by serving meals on paper/plastic dishware plates and plastic cutlery. That has the ability to effect all residents in facility. Findings: On 8/8/2023, during and interview with Resident #3, the resident stated I am tired of always being served on paper plates and plastic. It makes me feel like a kid, and not in a good way. On 8/08/2023, during an interview with Resident #4, the resident stated It is very bad, and everyone knows it. And then they serve it to you in 'doggie dishes' which makes it even worse. On 8/8/2023 at 11:10 a.m., during an interview with Food Service Manager( FSM) he stated , the dishwasher is broken and are awaiting on a new dishwasher. The FSM also stated We have not had the staff for that for a long time. For over a year. FSM said that he had no idea and no documentation of when the dishwasher might be repaired. On 8/8/2023 at 11:20 a.m., a surveyor discussed the finding of plastic/paper dishware and plastic cutlery with the Administrator.
Jul 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart containing multiple medicated creams, powders...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart containing multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments, syringes, insulin and inhalation treatment medications was locked on 1 of 7 units. Finding: On 7/12/23 at 12:15 p.m., a surveyor noted an unattended, unlocked treatment cart outside the Bluff [NAME] nurses station containing multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments, syringes, insulin and inhalation treatment medications in corridors where residents and unauthorized personnel cross through. A surveyor confirmed the above finding, at the time of observation, with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON).
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents a whirlpool/shower as directed by a residents p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents a whirlpool/shower as directed by a residents plan of care/shower schedule for 5 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5 & #6). Findings: 1. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Assignment sheet indicates that Resident #2's scheduled shower/whirlpool day is every Monday on the 7-3 shift. Review of Resident #2's current Care Plan, dated 2/9/23, indicates the following: [Resident #2] requires 1 assist to help bathe and 2 assist to transfer to the shower chair. Electronic clinical records reviewed from 5/15/23 to 7/8/23 indicated Resident #2 did not receive a scheduled shower on 5/15/23, 5/22/23, 5/29/23, 6/5/23, 6/12/23, 6/19/23, 6/26/23, 7/3/23 and 7/10/23. 2. The CNA Assignment sheet indicates that Resident #3's scheduled shower/whirlpool day is every Thursday on the 3-11 shift. Review of Resident #3's current Care Plan, dated 3/6/23, indicates the following: [Resident #3] bathes with the help of 2 people, to transfer and 1 assist for washing. I prefer showers. Electronic clinical records reviewed from 5/15/23 to 7/8/23 indicated Resident #3 did not receive a scheduled shower on 5/18/23, 5/25/23, 6/1/23, 6/8/23 6/15/23, 6/22/23, 6/29/23 and 7/6/23. 3. On 7/12/23 at 10:24 a.m., during an interview with the surveyor, the family member of Resident #4, stated I don't think he/she is getting his/her weekly showers. The CNA Assignment sheet indicates that Resident #4's scheduled shower/whirlpool day is every Tuesday on the 7-3 shift. Electronic clinical records reviewed from 5/15/23 to 7/8/23 indicated Resident #4 did not receive a scheduled shower on 5/16/23, 5/23/23, 5/30/23, 6/6/23, 6/13/23, 6/20/23, 6/27/23, 7/4/23 and 7/22/23. 4. The CNA Assignment sheet indicates that Resident #5's scheduled shower/whirlpool day is every Friday on the 3-11 shift. Review of Resident #5's Significant change Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] shows Section F: Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities: F0400-How important is it to you to choose between tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath? SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT(Resident response). Review of Resident #5's current Care Plan dated 6/12//23 indicates the following: [Resident #5] I bathe with the help of 1 person, to help me transfer, to help me wash. I transfer with the help of 2 people, not bearing my weight, transfer me with a full body mechanical lift. Electronic clinical records reviewed from 5/15/23 to 7/8/23 indicated Resident #5 did not receive a scheduled shower on 5/19/23, 5/26/23, 6/2/23, 6/9/23, 6/16/23, 6/23/23, 6/30/23 and 7/7/23. 5. The CNA Assignment sheet indicates that Resident #6's scheduled shower/whirlpool day is every Monday on the 7-3 shift. Review of Resident #6's Annual MDS 3.0, dated 5/18/23, shows Section F: Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities: F0400-How important is it to you to choose between tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath? SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT (Resident response). Review of Resident #6's current Care Plan, dated 5/23/23, indicates the following: [Resident #6] I bathe with the help of 1 person doing 100% of the effort. Electronic clinical records reviewed from 5/15/23 to 7/8/23 indicated Resident #6 received a shower on 6/5/23 and did not receive a scheduled shower/whirlpool on 5/15/23, 5/22/23, 5/29/23, 6/12/23, 6/19/23, 6/26/23, 7/3/23 and 7/10/23. On 7/12/23 at 2:00 p.m., a surveyor discussed the above findings in an interview with the Administrator.
Jul 2022 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided to 1 of 1 Resident (#374) reviewed for ADLs on 2 of 3 survey days. Findings: Resident #374 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include recent hip fracture, and congestive heart failure, and skin cancer. Review of Resident # 374's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) documentation for July 2022 revealed that he/she is scheduled to receive a whirlpool or shower on Thursdays. Further review of ADL charting reveled that Resident #374 received a bath on 7/25/22. No other documentation to indicate he/she received hygiene care was provided. Review of Resident #374's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #374 is a total assist for bathing and needs extensive assistance with hygiene and dressing needs. During an interview on 7/25/22 at 11:03 a.m., Resident #364 indicated he/she has only had one bath since coming to the facility and they have not been offered. He/she also indicated that he/she has been in the same clothes for 2 days. During an interview on 7/25/22 at 9:01 am Gooseberry Island, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated that residents should receive at least a full bed bath daily and be assisted with dressing and a shower or bath 1-2 times a week. He further indicated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)'s should be documenting in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that it is complete and at this time LPN confirmed that Resident #374's ADL records indicate he/she has only received bathing assistant on one day during his/her stay. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 9:15 a.m. Certified Nursing Assistant indicated that residents get a bath or shower 1-2 times a week and should have a full bed bath at least daily and CNA's are required to document bathing daily on the kiosk and if a resident refuses a bath it must be documented as so. CNA also indicated that Residents clothes should be changed daily and as needed. She was unable to remember the last time she provided bathing assistance to Resident #374.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory services as directed by physician orders related to humidification for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who rec...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory services as directed by physician orders related to humidification for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who received oxygen services (Resident #48). Finding: On 7/25/22 at 10:25 a.m., 7/26/22 at 7:01 a.m. and 7/27/22 at 6:33 a.m., a surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator with connecting nasal cannula (undated) and lying on the floor. On 7/25/22 at approx. 10:25 a.m., during an interview, Resident #48 stated he/she has no idea why it is in the room because he/she has never used it. During review of Resident #48's medical record, a provider order with a start date of 3/4/22, instructs nursing to apply oxygen at 2L (liters) per NC (nasal cannula) for SOB (shortness of breath) and/or 02 (oxygen) sat of less than 90% and Notify Provider as needed. The Medication Administration Resident dated July 2022 revealed that resident #48 did not receive oxygen from July 1st through July 26th. On 7/27/22 at 7:01 a.m. the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed that resident #48 has not needed supplemental oxygen in 1.5 months and the nasal cannula tubing was on the floor. On 7/27/22 at 2:21 p.m., a surveyor discussed the above concerns with the Director of Nursing.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition on 2 of 7 units, for 1 of 1 Environmental Tours. (Bluff Island and [NAME] Island). Findings: On 7/27/22 at 9:28 a.m., an environmental tour was conducted with the Administrator in which the following findings were observed: Bluff Island: room [ROOM NUMBER]A - the wall beside the recliner was gouged and had chipped/missing paint with exposed sheetrock. room [ROOM NUMBER]A and B - the wall behind both recliners were large areas of gouged wall with chipped/missing paint exposing sheetrock. room [ROOM NUMBER]B- the bed foot board had gouged and peeling laminate exposing rough wood. [NAME] Island: room [ROOM NUMBER]- the bathroom door frame was deeply marred exposing rough wood causing sharp and uncleanable surface, The above concerns were confirmed with the Administrator at the time of observations. On 7/26/22, at 8:20 a.m., during observation of laundry room, with the Administrator, it was observed that there were no staff in the laundry due to staff member being out due to COVID-19. There is no cleaning schedule posted for the area. There was a light to moderate level of dust on most flat surfaces in the room, and heavy level of dust on all washing machines and dryers. This was confirmed with the Administrator at that time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 8 of 27 residents reviewed for care plans (#24, #31, #52, #57, #58, #65, #324 and #374). Findings: 1. In review of Resident #24's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include depression, Celiac Disease (gluten allergy) hypertension and heart failure. Further review of Resident #24's clinical record revealed his/her baseline care plan failed to include the gluten allergy. 2. In review of Resident #31's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include type II diabetes melitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure and dementia. Further review of Resident #31's clinical record revealed his/her baseline care plan was not initiated until 6/16/22 (18 days after admission) and failed to include goals and interventions to meet his/her immediate care needs. 3. In review of Resident #52's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebral ataxia, repeated falls, osteoporosis, history of stroke, and is wheelchair dependent. Further review of Resident #52's clinical record reveled his/her baseline care plan was not initialized until 6/21/22 (6 days after admission) and failed to include goals and interventions to meet his/her immediate care needs. 4. In review of Resident #57's medical record, he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of left femur fracture, repeated falls, dementia, congestive heart failure, and history of urinary tract Infections and pulmonary embolism. The clinical record lacked evidence that the baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours to include the instructions necessary to properly care for Resident #57's immediate health and safety needs for the above diagnoses. On 7/27/22 at approximately 2:22 p.m. a surveyor confirmed the above findings with the Director of Nursing. 5. In review of Resident #58's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] for skilled services from an acute care hospital with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Heart Failure, oxygen dependent, diabetes, chronic pain, depression with anxiety, Chronic Kidney Disease and delirium. Further review of Resident #58's clinical record revealed his/her baseline care plan was not initiated until 7/19/22. The clinical record lacked evidence that the baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours to include the instructions necessary to properly care for Resident #58's immediate health and safety needs for the above diagnoses. 6. In review of Resident #65's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] for skilled services from acute care hospital with diagnoses to include legal blindness, anemia, dementia, dysphasia, prostate cancer, and presence of a Foley catheter. Resident #65's clinical record lacked evidence that a baseline care plan to include goals and interventions for the immediate care of him/her was completed. 7. In review of Resident #324's medical record, he/she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include pneumonia, myeloproliferative disease and heart failure. Resident #324's clinical record lacked evidence that a baseline care plan to include goals and interventions for the immediate care of him/her was completed. On 7/27/22 at 11:15 a.m. the Admissions Coordinator confirmed with the surveyor that there was no evidence of a baseline care plan. 8. In review of Resident #374's medical record, he/she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dementia, chronic heart failure, hypertension, skin cancer of left lower leg, multiple skin tears and new surgical incision from left hip replacement. The baseline care plan: initiated 7/25/22 (6 days after admission) did not included goals and interventions for his/her immediate care needs in the areas to address, dementia, cardiac concerns, wound care, or skin cancer. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 7:20 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated that baseline care plans are supposed to be completed upon admission and that the care the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)'s provide is largely driven from information on those care plans. During an interview on 7/26/22 at 7:23 a.m., Gooseberry Island Unit Manager (GUM) indicated that she was responsible to complete baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission, and they should reflect residents' active diagnoses and immediate care needs. During follow up interviews on 7/26/22 at approximately 2:08 p.m., GUM confirmed that baseline care plans were not initiated within 48 hours for Residents #31, #52, #65 or #374. -
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to adequately store controlled substances in a permanent...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to adequately store controlled substances in a permanently affixed compartment and double locked in 1 of 2 medication rooms observed, failed to date and/or store biological's after opened and according to manufacturer specifications and failed to dispose of expired medications on 3 of 3 units observed. (Eagle Island/Ram Island, Bluff Island/[NAME] Island and Beach Island/Gooseberry Island) Finding: PharMerica policy and procedure for Controlled Medication Storage, revised 11/17 states: #3 The access system (key, security codes) used to lock controlled medications and other medications subject to abuse cannot be the same access system used to obtain the non-scheduled medications. #4 Controlled medications requiring refrigeration are stored within a locked, permanently affixed box within the refrigerator. On 7/25/22 the following was observed: 1. At 11:08 a.m., observation of the Skilled unit (Eagle Island and Ram Island) medication room with the Registered Nurse (RN), a refrigerator containing 2 opened multiuse vials of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (TB) with manufacturer's directions to discard opened product after 30 days, further observation revealed one TB vial had an open date of 3/16/22 and the other vial with open date of 5/20/22. In addition, an opened and not dated vial of Novolog insulin with manufacturer specifications to Discard unused portion after 28 days. These findings were confirmed at this time with the RN. 2. At 11:15 a.m., observation of the Skilled Unit medication cart with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), contained the following expired medications: Famotidine 40 milligram (mg) tabs with expiration date of 6/22, Vitamin B-6 100 mg tabs with expiration date 5/22, Thiamin Vitamin B-1 100 mg with best by date of 4/22, Multivitamin tabs with best by date of 5/22, Famotidine 10mg with expiration date of 6/22, Vitamin B complex with expiration date of 2/22, Acidophilous probiotic with expiration date of 5/22, These findings were confirmed at this time with the LPN 3. At 1:20 p.m., observation of Beach Island and Gooseberry Island nurse medication carts with the LPN. Beach Island medication cart contained 2 opened and unlabeled vials of Levemir insulin with manufacturer specifications of store up to 42 days after opening. Gooseberry Island medication cart contained an opened and unlabeled vial of Lispro insulin with manufacturer specifications to discard unused portion 28 days after first opening. These findings were confirmed at this time with the LPN 4. At 1:28 p.m., observation of the Beach Island and Gooseberry Island Medication Technician cart with the Certified Nurse Technician (CNA-M). Beach Island CNA-M cart contained an opened bottle of Famotidine 20mg tabs with expiration date of 6/22. This findings were confirmed at this time with the CNA-M 5. At 1:46 p.m., observation of Bluff Island and [NAME] Island medication room with the LPN contained a refrigerator which had an unlocked, pad lock. The refrigerator contained 12 bottles of liquid Ativan (Controlled substance), 2 packages containing 4 syringes each of Lorazepam (Ativan) Gel, that was not stored within a locked, permanently affixed box within the refrigerator. In addition, 2 opened and unlabeled multiuse vials of TB, with manufacturer's directions to discard opened product after 30 days. These findings were confirmed at this time with the LPN On 7/25/22 at 3:10 p.m., the surveyor confirmed the above findings with the Director of Nursing
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, and Facility Reported Incident review, the facility failed to ensure that clinical recor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, and Facility Reported Incident review, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 4 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medications (Resident(s)#24, #31, #48 and #374). Findings: Review of Resident #24's signed provider orders for June 2022 revealed the following: -order with start date on 6/2/22 for [Oxycodone HCI 5 milligrams (mg) Give one tablet by mouth three times a day x 30 days]. Review of Resident #24's MAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/9/22 at 1400, 6/15/22 at 1400, 6/25/22 at 1400, 7/6/22 at 2200. -order with start date 6/11/22 for (Diclofenac Sodium 1% Gel (2 gram) apply to right knee four times a day. Review of Resident #24's MAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/15/22 at 8:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., 6/25/22 at 12:30 p.m. and 6/6/22 at 2100 -Order with start date of 5/18/22 for MCR/skilled charting, chronic lower extremity wounds/right sacral wound daily, Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/13/22, 6/19/22, 6/21/22, 6/23/22, 7/1/22, 7/2/22, 7/7/22, 7/15/22, 7/18/22 and 7/23/22 -Order with start date of 5/18/22 for Do daily wound documentation, Left lower extremity ulcers daily a.m. Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/10/22, 6/21/22, 6/23/22, 7/1/22, 7/7/22, 7/15/22, 7/16/22, 7/18/22 and 7/19/22 -Order with start date of 6/6/22 for Cleanse bilateral feet with warm soap and water. Please clean between toes. Pat dry. Apply antifungal cream on toenails as ordered daily. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/10/22, 6/21/22 and 6/23/22, 7/1/22, 7/2/22, 7/3/22, 7/7/22 and 7/18/22 -Order with start date of 6/6/22 for Cleanse wounds on bridge of nose with normal saline, pat dry, apply hydrocolloid dot dressing 2x a week. Monday Thursday a.m. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/23/22, 6/7/22, 6/18/22, 7/1/22, 7/7/22, 7/15/22, 7/16/22, 7/18/22 and 7/19/22 -Order with start date of 6/8/22 for Cleanse sacrum wound with vashe, pat dry and apply promogran cut to size in wound bed, cover with silicone adhesive bordered foam dressing Sunday, Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/10/22.7/15/22 and 7/18/22 -Order with start date of 5/18/22 for Do daily wound documentation, right lower extremity ulcers daily a.m. Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/7/22. -Order with start date of 6/22/22 for Do daily wound documentation, sacral wound until resolved x 6 weeks a.m. Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Review of Resident #24's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 6/23/22, 6/24/22, 7/1/22, 7/2/22, 7/3/22, 7/4/22, 7/7/22, 7/15/22, 7/16/22, 7/18/22 and 7/19/22. 2. Resident #31 was admitted to facility on 5/30/22 with diagnosis to include dementia, hypertension, a fib, heart failure and type II diabetes melitus. Review of Resident #31's signed provider orders for July 2022 reveled the following: -order with start date on 5/30/22 for [Levemir insulin Detemir 100 unit/ml solution dose (0.22 ml/22 unit) [subcut] two times a day 0600 1800 for Type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Review of Resident #31's MAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/26/22 at 0800. -order with date of 6/7/22 for blood glucose checks fasting four times a day 0600 1130 1630 and 2000. Review of Resident #31's MAR/TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/26/22 0600. -order with start date 6/23/22 for humalog insulin Lispro 100 unit/ml solution dose: (1 unit) [subcut t.i.d ]0600, 1130 and 1630. for Type 2 diabetes melitus. 61-150=0 units, 151-200=2 units, 201-250=4 units, 251-300=6 units, 301-350=8 units, 351-400=10 units >400=12 units call MD. Review of Resident #31's MAR lacked evidence this was completed on 2/26/22 at 0600. 3. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cellulitis, orthostatic hypotension, edema, and prostate cancer. Review of Resident #48's signed provider orders for July 2022 reveled the following: -Order with start date of 6/24/22 for, Miconazole Powder dose (1 application) topical, apply to groin and testicles two time a day 0800 2000 x 14 days for Intertigo. Review of Resident #48's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/5/22. -Order with start date of 3/14/22 for, [Hydrocerin]Skin Protectants, Misc. Cream dose: (1 application) topical apply to body daily 1000 for skin procedure. Review of Resident #48's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/8/22. -Order with start date of 7/5/22 to, Apply Miconozole Powder 2% to affected area(s) (yeast infection/intertrigo) two times a day AM PM. Review of Resident #48's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/9/22. -Order with start date of 6/27/22 to, Do daily wound documentation*Left top hand skin tear until resolved RM [ROOM NUMBER] x week. Sunday Monday, Tuesday Thursday Friday Saturday. Review of Resident #48's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/9/22 and 7/11/22. -Order with start date of 3/14/22 to, Check daily weight NOC Review of Resident #48's clinical record lacked evidence this was completed on 7/11/22. 4. Resident #374 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dementia, chronic heart failure, hypertension, skin cancer of left lower leg, and multiple skin tears. Review of Resident #374's signed provider orders for July 2022 reveled the following: -order with start date 7/14/22 to please pre-medicate with tramadol at least a half hour before dressing changes, daily. Review of Resident #374's Medication Administration Record (MAR) lacked evidence this was completed on 7/14/22 and 7/17/22. -order with start date of 7/14/22 for daily wound documentation right shin wound until healed AM 6 x week, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Review of Resident #374's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) lacked evidence this was completed on 7/14/22 or 7/19/22 -order 7/20/22 for weekly skin check, Wednesday. Review of Resident #374's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/20/22 -Order with start date of 7/11/22 for daily wound documentation, left hip surgical incision until resolved. AM 6x week Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Review of Resident #674's TAR lacked evidence this was completed on 7/15/22 and 7/17/22. -720/22 weekly non-pressure wound documentation. Right lower extremity wounds until resolved AM 1 x wk. Wednesday not documented completed on 7/20/22 -7/13/22 cleanse left elbow skin tears with normal saline, pat dry, apply mepitel cut to size in the wound bed of the two large skin tears, cover with double layer xeroform, cover with silicone border comfort foam dressing, date and initial 3 x week M, W F not documented as completed 7/15/22 -7/13/22 cleanse left lower leg surgical site with normal saline, pat dry, apply thin layer of Santyl. During an interview on 7/27/22 at approximately 2:26 pm Gooseberry Island Unit Manger (GUM) indicated that nurses are responsible to sign the MAR/TAR immediate after giving a medications or performing a treatment. At this time GUM confirmed the above findings were not documented as completed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the 8/17/2022 statement of deficiencies and plan of correction (POC) in effect from the annual Long Term Care...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the 8/17/2022 statement of deficiencies and plan of correction (POC) in effect from the annual Long Term Care Survey Process, record review and interview, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee failed to ensure that the plan of correction was followed and effective for F761. Finding: On 7/25/2022 through 7/27/2022, during the annual Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP), a deficiency was cited at F761 for the failure to ensure expired medications were removed from medication carts and refrigerators. On 10/4/2022, during the survey revisit, a surveyor observed expired stock medications in medication carts on the Beach/Gooseberry and Eagle/Ram units. In addition, expired medications were observed in the medication room refrigerators on the Bluff/[NAME] and Eagle Ram units. Unit charge nurses confirmed the findings as they occurred, and the Interim Director of Nursing was notified. On 10/4/2022 at 1:00 pm, the findings were discussed with the Administrator.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary environment on 3 or 7 units observed (Ram ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary environment on 3 or 7 units observed (Ram Island, Bluff Island and [NAME] Island) for 3 of 3 days of survey. Findings: On 7/25/22, 7/26/22 and 7/27/22 the following was observed: 1. Ram Island: room [ROOM NUMBER] - bathroom had a bed pan stored between the handrail and the wall. 2. Bluff Island: room [ROOM NUMBER]A - bathroom had 2 graduates, only one labeled 131B, stored on the back of the toilet. room [ROOM NUMBER]B - bathroom has a bed pan stored between the handrail and the wall. 3. [NAME] Island: room [ROOM NUMBER] - bathroom had a urine hat stored behind the toilet, between the handrail and the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER] - bathroom had 2 urinals hanging on the handrail and a basin on the floor under the sink. On 7/27/22 at 9:28 a.m., the surveyor and Administrator observed the above concerns
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

2. Review of Resident #374's clinical record a surveyor noted resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22 and subsequently admitted . The surveyor could not locate evidence in the cl...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. Review of Resident #374's clinical record a surveyor noted resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22 and subsequently admitted . The surveyor could not locate evidence in the clinical record that Resident #374 and his/her representative was notified in writing of the transfer/discharge to the hospital. During an interview with Resident #374 on 7/26/22, at approximately 8:45 a.m., he/she could not recall receiving a written transfer notice at the time of the hospitalization. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 2:14 p.m. Social Worker confirmed that transfer/discharge documents were not completed and provided to Resident #374 and his/her representative. The above findings were discussed with Director of Nursing on 7/27/22 at approximately 2:21 p.m. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to a resident or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 2 of 2 sampled residents transferred/discharged to an acute care facility (#58 & #374). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident #58''s clinical record indicated that he/she transferred to an acute care hospital on 7/10/22 and subsequently admitted . The surveyor could not locate evidence in the clinical record that Resident #58's and his/her representative was notified in writing of the transfer/discharge to the hospital. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 11:12 a.m. the Social Worker confirmed that transfer/discharge documents were not completed and provided to Resident #58 and his/her representative.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

2. Documentation in Resident #374's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record contained no evidence tha...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. Documentation in Resident #374's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care facility on 7/15/22 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record contained no evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold notice to the resident, a family member, or legal representative upon transfer. During an interview with Resident #374 on 7/26/22, at approximately 8:45 a.m., he/she could not recall receiving a written bed hold notice at the time of the hospitalization. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 2:14 p.m. Social Worker confirmed Resident #374 and his/her representative did not receive bed hold notice upon his/her transfer. The above findings were discussed with Director of Nursing on 7/27/22 at approximately 2:21 p.m. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written bed hold notice to a resident, known family member or legal representative for 2 of 6 sampled residents who had been transferred to an acute care facility (#58, #374). Findings 1. Documentation in Resident #58''s clinical record indicated that he/she transferred to an acute care hospital on 7/10/22 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record contained no evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold notice to the resident, a family member, or legal representative upon transfer. On 7/27/22 at 11:12 a.m., a surveyor confirmed the finding in an interview with the Director of Social Services.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information that includes the facility name, day of the month, a breakdown of the number of registered ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information that includes the facility name, day of the month, a breakdown of the number of registered and licensed nursing staff responsible for direct resident care and indicate which shifts the numbers corresponded to for facility census for 3 of 3 survey days. Findings: During observations of facility on 7/25/22 at 1:12 p.m., 7/26/22 at 11:11 a.m., and 7/27/22 at 8:30 a.m., there was no evidence of posted daily staffing ratios for the facility. During an interview on 7/27/22 at 8:30 a.m., Office Assistant (OA) indicated that she's responsible to post staffing and keeps it in a binder behind the lobby desk. At this time OA confirmed that daily staffing is not posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors. During an interview on 7/22/22 at approximately 1:09 p.m. a surveyor discussed with Director of Nursing that staffing has not been posted during 3 of 3 survey days.
Nov 2019 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0552 (Tag F0552)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform a resident or their representative, in advance, of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives related to use of an ant...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform a resident or their representative, in advance, of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives related to use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 25 sampled Residents (#47). Finding: On 11/7/19, in review of Resident #47's record, there was no evidence the resident or representative were informed in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives prior to the use of Risperdal, an antipsychotic, initially prescribed 8/12/19 for aggressive behavior related to a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia With Behavioral Disturbance. On 11/7/19 at 9:50 a.m., in an interview with the Beach Island Wing Nurse Manager, the surveyor inquired about verbal or written information provided to the resident or their representative in advance of treatment outlining risks and benefits related to use of the antipsychotic, and he/she could not confirm if the facility informed the resident or their representative in advance of treatment risks and benefits related the use of Risperdal. On 11/7/19 at 11:03 a.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor informed him/her there was no evidence that the facility informed the resident or their representative in advance of treatment the risks and benefits related to use of the antipsychotic. The DON was also unable to produce evidence that the resident or their representative was informed in advance of treatment risks and benefits related to use of the antipsychotic. At this time, the surveyor confirmed the finding. On 11/14/19, the DON emailed the surveyor a policy titled, Resident's Rights, which states: These rights include the resident's right to: be informed of his or her medical condition and any changes in his or her condition; be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning treatment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of bathing frequency were being followed for 1 of 15 resident/family interviewed (Resident #65...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of bathing frequency were being followed for 1 of 15 resident/family interviewed (Resident #65). Finding: On 11/06/19 at 12:16 p.m., two (2) family members stated during an interview with the surveyor that their mother (Resident #65) has not received showers or whirlpools as often as she/he would desire, at least once a week. The surveyor confirmed with the family members and through clinical record review and screening the resident that the resident could not be reliably interviewed. On 11/06/19 at 02:46 p.m., during an interview with the surveyor, Resident #65's primary Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she gave the resident a shower today. She stated that [the Resident] was scheduled for Mondays but [he/she] wasn't getting them so the shower day was changed to Wednesdays. Further interviews with CNAs during the survey revealed that staffing did not affect the shower schedule. The surveyor reviewed Resident #65's clinical record and noted the CNAs' electronic bathing documentation from 7/1/19 to 11/6/19. According to the resident's clinical record, he/she received a whirlpool or shower on 7/1/19, 7/15/19, 7/29/19, 8/12/19, 8/26/19, 9/23/19, 9/30/19, 10/7/19 and not receiving a whirlpool or shower on 7/8/19, 7/22/19, 8/5/19, 8/19/19, 9/2/19, 9/16/19 and 10/14/19. On 11/07/19 at 10:44 a.m., during an interview with the Unit Manager/Registered Nurse (RN), the surveyor received confirmation that the resident also received showers on 10/23/19, 10/30/19 and 11/6/19 after the bathing schedule was changed and confirmed the dates the resident did not receive a whirlpool or shower at this time.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0675 (Tag F0675)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide services to a resident necessary to attain the highest practicable level of care related to positioning during 1 of 4 observed meal ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide services to a resident necessary to attain the highest practicable level of care related to positioning during 1 of 4 observed meal services (Resident #19). Finding: On 11/04/19 at 11:58 a.m., in the first floor long term care unit dining room, a surveyor observed Resident #19 seated in a Broda chair with the back of the wheelchair in a slightly reclined position. The resident's plate was set to the left of the resident. The resident proceeded to bring him/herself up in an upright position, fully extend his/her right arm to reach the plate, place food on the fork, then lay back into the chair and take a bite of the food. The surveyor observed the resident do this for approximately 3 minutes when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) offered and proceeded to cut up the resident's meat, repositioned the plate directly in front of the resident and then left the resident in the same reclined position. The surveyor then observed Resident #19 continue to feed him/herself by sitting upright, fully extending his/her right arm to place food on the fork, even with the plate in closer proximity to the resident. On 11/07/19 at 08:26 a.m., in an interview with the Charge Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Unit Manager/Registered Nurse (RN), a surveyor described the 11/4/19 observation. The RN and LPN agreed that Resident #19 needed to be in an upright position to facilitate self-feeding. At this time two surveyors confirmed the finding.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On [DATE], at 10:45 a. m., the [NAME] Island medication storage room refrigerator was observed by the surveyor and the charg...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On [DATE], at 10:45 a. m., the [NAME] Island medication storage room refrigerator was observed by the surveyor and the charge nurse to contain one (1) bottle of Lorazepam Intensol Oral Concentrate, 2mg/ml solution, for Resident #8, with an expiration date hand written on the box indicating the medication was expired on [DATE] with no opening date. The Lorazepam bottle inside the box was opened and undated. A review of the bound narcotic book with the Director of Nursing (DON) who indicated the first dose of the medication was on [DATE]. A review of the Lorazepam package directions indicated Discard opened bottle after 90 days. 5. On [DATE], at 11:00 a. m., the skilled unit's medication storage room refrigerator was observed by the surveyor and a nurse to contain (1) opened undated vial of Aplisol (tuberculin PPD) 5 T units/0.1ml. The nurse discared the Aplisol during the observation. At approximately 11:15 a. m., the surveyor observed the inside locked section of the skilled units' refigerator with the DON to contain two (2) unopened vials of Lorazepam Solution both showing expiration dates as [DATE]. The expired and undated medications/biologicals were removed and discarded during the observations by the nurses and DON. The surveyor confirmed the findings at the time of the observations with the Director of Nursing who was present. 3. On [DATE] at 6:38 a.m., a surveyor noted an unattended, unlocked treatment cart containing multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments, syringes, insulin and inhalation treatment medications. The surveyor noted no residents or staff in the area. At [DATE] at 6:43 a.m., a Registered Nurse and a Certified Nursing Assistant-Medications (CNA-M) entered the area and went into nearby residents' rooms. At 6:44 a.m., the CNA-M went to the locked medication cart, located beside the unlocked treatment cart, and proceeded to work from the medication cart. When this surveyor informed the CNA-M of the unlocked cart, she stated, it's not my cart; that's the RN's cart, and continued to work at the medication cart. At 6:46 a.m., the RN, reentered the area and was notified of the unlocked cart and immediately locked it. The RN acknowledged the unlocked treatment cart and the surveyor confirmed the finding at this time. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to safely secure drugs and biologicals on 3 of 7 wings during 2 of 4 survey days. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were dated when opened, and expired medication removed, from 2 of 4 medication storage refrigeration units on 1 of 4 days of survey. Findings: 1. On [DATE] 8:02 a.m. to 8:20 a.m., the surveyor observed 1 unlocked unattended medication cart on Beach Island wing and 1 unlocked unattended treatment cart on the Gooseberry Island wing; both in corridors where residents and unauthorized personnel cross through. The medication cart contained a bottle of acetaminophen, a bottle of aspirin, prescribed bubble packaged medications, and several bottles of prescribed medications. The treatment cart contained syringes with needles. On [DATE] at 8:20 a.m., the surveyor informed the Certified Medication Technician (CMT), who returned to the unlocked cart on Gooseberry Island wing and the surveyor demonstrated the cart was unlocked by opening the drawer. The CMT acknowledged the safety concern and ensured carts were secured. 2. On [DATE] at 11:20 a.m., the surveyor observed an unlocked unattended treatment cart at the end of the Eagle wing corridor. The treatment cart contained syringes with needles and 5 insulin pens. The surveyor waited at the treatment cart until 11:35 a.m., when a Registered Nurse (RN) returned to the cart. The surveyor opened a drawer to demonstrate the treatment cart was left unlocked, the RN acknowledged the safety concern and secured the cart. On [DATE] at 10:45 a.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor informed the DON of the unlocked and unattended carts. At the time of the interview, the DON acknowledged the safety concern and the surveyor confirmed the findings.
Dec 2018 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of all residents by allowing an uncovered urine filled catheter bag to be seen by passersby for 1 of 7 residents with ur...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of all residents by allowing an uncovered urine filled catheter bag to be seen by passersby for 1 of 7 residents with urinary catheters (Resident #60); an uncovered bedside commode in a resident's room for 2 of 4 days of survey (Resident #42); and feeding residents (Residents #12 and #78) in an undignified manner during 1 of 5 observed meal services. Findings: 1. On 12/17/18 at 6:40 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #60's uncovered urinary catheter bag uncovered and resting on the floor of the resident's bedside closest to the door. The catheter bag had urine in it and could be clearly seen from the corridor by other residents, staff and visitors. On 12/17/18 at 6:45 a.m., in an interview, a surveyor confirmed the finding with the Certified Nursing Aid who immediately covered the urinary catheter bag. 2. On 12/17/18 at 10:35 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #42's room with an uncovered bedside commode that could be clearly seen from the corridor by other residents, staff and visitors. During an interview with the surveyor, Resident #42 stated, I like it covered. 50% of the time it's covered. 3. On 12/18/18 at 12:27 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #42's room with an uncovered bedside commode that could be clearly seen from the corridor by other residents, staff and visitors. On 12/18/18 at 2:16 p.m., in an interview, a surveyor confirmed the finding with the Licensed Practical Nurse who confirmed the facility's practice is to cover the commodes. 4. On 12/17/18 at 12:40 p.m., during the lunch meal service on the [NAME] Island Unit, a surveyor observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assist with feeding Resident #12 and Resident #78 while standing. In an interview with the Administrator and the surveyor on 12/19/18, at 10:00 a. m., the findings were discussed. The Administrator acknowledged the manner the resident was fed was not dignified and the surveyor confirmed the finding.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food, readily available in the unit refrigerators, was unopened, labeled, dated, and maintained in a sanitary manner in 3 of 5 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food, readily available in the unit refrigerators, was unopened, labeled, dated, and maintained in a sanitary manner in 3 of 5 refrigerators on the resident units (Wood Island Unit, 1st and 2nd floor Long Term Care Units and the Skilled Unit). Findings: 1. On 12/17/18 at 7:30 a.m., a surveyor observed the second floor [NAME] Island Unit refrigerator to contain a plastic container of ice with the scoop lying inside the container and the handle directly touching the ice. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Charge Nurse, was made aware and removed the ice container and scoop from Unit's refrigerator and discarded the ice. 2. On 12/19/18, at 7:15 a.m., a surveyor observed the 1st floor, Long Term Care Unit refrigerators to contain expired and opened food products available for resident use was one (1) small container of Activia Yogurt-Vanilla with manufacture expiration date of 12/15/18 stamped on the container; and one (1) small container of Chobani Greek Yogurt, blackberry, with a puncture hole in the top and manufacture date of 12/14/18 stamped on the container. During the observation, the Unit Manager was alerted, observed the expired and opened food items and removed them from the refrigerator. 3. On 12/19/18, at 7:30 a. m., a surveyor observed the 1st floor, Skilled Unit refrigerator to contain items of two (2) small covered plastic containers with a reddish brown food substance in it and dated 11/24/18; one (1) large container of sliced Cantaloupe with date, 12/8, hand written on the lid; one (1) pint size package of blackberries with a white mold-like substance on the blackberries; and one (1) quart size container of strawberries with white mold-like substance on the strawberries. The Food Service Aide observed the findings for out-of-date and moldy-like items and then discarded the items from the Unit's refrigerator. In an interview with the Food Service Director on 12/19/18 at 8:30 a. m., the findings were discussed and confirmed by the surveyor. In an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/18 at 10:00 a. m., the findings were discussed and confirmed by the surveyor.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to urinary catheter drainage bags for 1 of 4 days of survey. Finding: On 12/17/18 at 6:40 a.m., a surveyor observed resident #60's urinary catheter bag uncovered and resting on the floor of the resident's bedside. On 12/17/18 at 6:45 a.m., in an interview with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the surveyor confirmed the finding and the CNA immediately ensured the urinary catheter bag was off the floor. In an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing Services on 12/19/18 at 3:30 p.m., a surveyor confirmed the infection control concern.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN) were provided to 2 of 3 residents reviewed whose Medicare...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN) were provided to 2 of 3 residents reviewed whose Medicare Part A services were discontinued (Residents #32 and #48). Findings: 1. On review of Resident #32's clinical record, a surveyor noted a current resident, Resident #32, received Medicare Part A services that ended on 11/15/18 but the surveyor could not locate evidence that the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) was provided to the resident so that he/she could make an informed decision to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. 2. On review of Resident #48's clinical record, a surveyor noted a current resident, Resident #48, received Medicare Part A services that ended on 11/8/18 but the surveyor could not locate evidence that the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) was provided to the resident so that he/she could make an informed decision to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. On 12/18/18 at 8:15 a.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing, the surveyor confirmed that SNFABNs were not issued prior to the end of Medicare Part A services.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $75,433 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 28 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $75,433 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Maine. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Seal Rock Healthcare's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Maine, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Seal Rock Healthcare Staffed?

CMS rates SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 66%, which is 19 percentage points above the Maine average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Seal Rock Healthcare?

State health inspectors documented 28 deficiencies at SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE during 2018 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 22 with potential for harm, and 5 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Seal Rock Healthcare?

SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 105 certified beds and approximately 85 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SACO, Maine.

How Does Seal Rock Healthcare Compare to Other Maine Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Maine, SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (66%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Seal Rock Healthcare?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Seal Rock Healthcare Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Maine. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Seal Rock Healthcare Stick Around?

Staff turnover at SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE is high. At 66%, the facility is 19 percentage points above the Maine average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Seal Rock Healthcare Ever Fined?

SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE has been fined $75,433 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Maine average of $33,833. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Seal Rock Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?

SEAL ROCK HEALTHCARE is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.