Market Square Health Care Center, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Market Square Health Care Center in South Paris, Maine has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average, placing it in the middle of the pack for nursing homes. It ranks #57 out of 77 statewide and #4 out of 5 in Oxford County, indicating it is in the bottom half of facilities in both contexts. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 6 in 2024 to 13 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength here, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars, although the 54% turnover rate is average and the RN coverage is concerning, being lower than 93% of Maine facilities. Notably, there have been specific incidents, such as inadequate infection control measures related to Legionella, failure to properly maintain laundry equipment, and a lack of training for dietary staff regarding food safety, which could affect all residents. Overall, while the staffing situation is better than average, the facility has significant areas for improvement, particularly in health and safety practices.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Maine
- #57/77
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maine facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Maine. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Maine average (3.0)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Maine avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 35 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
13 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure accommodations were made for a resident to include the facility's bathing schedule and resident preferences for 1 of 3 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions for diuretic and anticoagulant medication use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents for (Resident #67).
Finding:
On 3/3/25 Resident #67's clinical ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respira...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (prn) psychotropic medication met the required 14-day limit for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications including treatments were stored properly for 2 of 3 days of survey (3/3/25 and 3/4/25). Additionally, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident #67 was recently admitted to the facility. A review of the nursing assessments, dated 2/11/25 for Resident Smoking S...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controll...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a clinical record contained complete and accurate docu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection relating to Legion...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to reflect the resident's current care needs in the area of falls for 1of 3 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Residents #4 and #5).
Findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's laundry equipment was maintained, according to manufacturer's instructions, and operated to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interview, the facility's Daily High-Temp Ware Wash checklist directions, the facility's Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Logs and the facility's Sink/Bucket Sanitizer Log direc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the small and large steam tables were maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 2 of 2 kitchen tours (10/7/...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was updated in the care area of Nutrition for 1 of 17 resident care plans reviewed. (#2)
Finding:
Resident #2's clini...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to follow physician order for wound evaluation and failed to follow the facilities Skin Management policy for 1 of 1 Resident reviewed for pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated/implemented for si...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open biologicals according to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary environment on 2 or 3 wings observed ([NAM...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 dietary food service workers had the appropriate competencies and were adequately trained around knowing the proper temperatu...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Sets, version 3.0 (MDS) was a...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a training/education program which includes dementia training by failing to ensure that 2 of 5 staff reviewed for in-service trai...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2020
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum health care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for the use of a psychotropic medication and for hospice care for 1 of 21 sampled residents (#3).
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 2/10/20 from 9:10 a.m. to 9:40 a.m., a surveyor conducted and initial tour of the
kitchen during in which the following f...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) Form 10055, which included appeal rights and liability of paym...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to issue a written notice of transfer/discharge to a resident, known fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written bed hold notice to a residents, known family mem...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was at an appetizing temperature and palatable on 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maine facilities.
- • 35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (50/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Market Square Health Care Center, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Market Square Health Care Center, LLC an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Maine, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Market Square Health Care Center, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates Market Square Health Care Center, LLC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Maine average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Market Square Health Care Center, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 35 deficiencies at Market Square Health Care Center, LLC during 2020 to 2025. These included: 29 with potential for harm and 6 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Market Square Health Care Center, Llc?
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 76 certified beds and approximately 66 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SOUTH PARIS, Maine.
How Does Market Square Health Care Center, Llc Compare to Other Maine Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Maine, Market Square Health Care Center, LLC's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Market Square Health Care Center, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Market Square Health Care Center, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Market Square Health Care Center, LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Maine. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Market Square Health Care Center, Llc Stick Around?
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 8 percentage points above the Maine average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Market Square Health Care Center, Llc Ever Fined?
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Market Square Health Care Center, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.