WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center Fairhaven has received a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not without its issues. Ranked #86 out of 219 facilities in Maryland, it sits in the top half, and #3 out of 10 in Carroll County, meaning only two local options are rated better. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 7 in 2022 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is a notable strength, with a perfect 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 31%, which is below the state average, suggesting a stable workforce. However, recent inspections revealed concerning incidents, such as a resident eloping from a secure area and the kitchen failing to serve food at the proper temperature or store items correctly, which could affect residents' health and safety. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and no fines reported, families should be aware of the rising issues and specific incidents that have been flagged.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Maryland
- #86/219
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 31% turnover. Near Maryland's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maryland facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 85 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Maryland nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 32 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (31%)
17 points below Maryland average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
15pts below Maryland avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 32 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse. This was evident for 1 of several observations made on the first floor pin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. This was e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 11 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standard...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to change the humidification bottle for a resident who is on continuous oxygen therapy. This was eviden...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident and representative interviews, record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed 1. t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature. This was evident for 1 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the kitchen failed to ensure food items were stored to maintain the integrity...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
7 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization (i.e., an order for discharge or le...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and reviews of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated in a dignified manner regarding urinary catheter care. The facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and review of facility reported incident (FRI) investigation documentation, it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of alleged employee to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of resident medical record, review of a facility reported incident, staff interviews, and review of the facility ambulation and transfer policy, it was determined that 2 GNA staff memb...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on facility-reported incidents, observations, resident interview, and reviews of the facility call bell policy, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure access to the nurse call bel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on the review of the medical record, interviews with staff, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Observation was made of the laundry room on 5/31/2022 at 9:40 AM. Staff #27 (laundry aide) was in the clean side of the laund...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2018
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on reviews of administrative documents and staff interview, it was determined that a facility staff member failed to report an allegation of physical abuse immediately to the facility administra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident in writing of the reason for a hospital transfer in language that was clear and understand...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to document accurate assessments for a resident on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident for 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on reviews of a closed medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a resident's care plan and document a pain assessment. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed ensure a resident received proper and timely care (Resident #4) and failed to follow physicians' orders for 3 r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on reviews of a closed medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to take steps to address a resident's complaint of pain. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of the resident council meeting notes it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide sufficient staff to respond to call light...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform annual performance reviews for some of the geriatric nursing assistants (GNA). This was ide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation during medication pass it was determined that facility staff failed to administer medications with less than a 5% medication error rate. This was true for 1 out of 25 medication a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medical supplies on 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation it was determined the facility staff was not conducting themselves in a manner that would maintain sanitary conditions by not following accepted personal cleanliness techniques. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that facility staff failed to provide an accurate and complete Matrix, as requested by the survey team at the beginning of the annual re-certific...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and documentation review it was determined that facility staff failed to provide evidence that the facility's Certified Medicine Aide's (CMA) have been deemed competent to adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maryland facilities.
- • 31% turnover. Below Maryland's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 32 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Maryland, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven Staffed?
CMS rates WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 31%, compared to the Maryland average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven?
State health inspectors documented 32 deficiencies at WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN during 2018 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 31 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 79 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 48% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SYKESVILLE, Maryland.
How Does Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven Compare to Other Maryland Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Maryland, WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (31%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Maryland. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven Stick Around?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN has a staff turnover rate of 31%, which is about average for Maryland nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven Ever Fined?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Fairhaven on Any Federal Watch List?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CARE CENTER FAIRHAVEN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.