LINDEN PONDS
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Linden Ponds has earned a Trust Grade of A, which means it is considered excellent and highly recommended for families seeking a nursing home. It ranks #36 out of 338 facilities in Massachusetts, placing it in the top half of the state, and is #5 out of 27 in Plymouth County, indicating that there are only four facilities in the area that are rated higher. The trend is stable, with the facility reporting two issues in both 2022 and 2025, suggesting consistent performance. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average, indicating that staff members are experienced and familiar with the residents. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, there have been some concerning incidents, such as a delay in reporting a suspected abuse case and medications being improperly stored in residents' rooms, which could pose safety risks. Overall, Linden Ponds shows many strengths, but families should be aware of the need for improvement in specific areas.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Massachusetts
- #36/338
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near Massachusetts's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Massachusetts facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 55 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Massachusetts. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below Massachusetts average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Massachusetts avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who, on 03/20/25, reported that he/she had been physically abused by Certified Nurse Aide #1, the Facility fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe and secure man...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of practice for two Residents (#5 and #14), out of a tota...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and services for the care of an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder for urine drainage...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Massachusetts.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Massachusetts facilities.
- • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Linden Ponds's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LINDEN PONDS an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Massachusetts, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Linden Ponds Staffed?
CMS rates LINDEN PONDS's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Massachusetts average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Linden Ponds?
State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at LINDEN PONDS during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Linden Ponds?
LINDEN PONDS is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 132 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 48% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HINGHAM, Massachusetts.
How Does Linden Ponds Compare to Other Massachusetts Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts, LINDEN PONDS's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Linden Ponds?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Linden Ponds Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LINDEN PONDS has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Linden Ponds Stick Around?
LINDEN PONDS has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Massachusetts nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Linden Ponds Ever Fined?
LINDEN PONDS has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Linden Ponds on Any Federal Watch List?
LINDEN PONDS is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.