Cass County Medical Care Facility

23770 Hospital St, Cassopolis, MI 49031 (269) 228-4000
Government - County 80 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
48/100
#107 of 422 in MI
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Cass County Medical Care Facility has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns about care quality. It ranks #107 out of 422 nursing homes in Michigan, placing it in the top half, and is #1 of 2 facilities in Cass County, meaning it is the best local option. The facility is showing improvement, with the number of issues decreasing from 8 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. While staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, the 60% turnover rate is concerning, as it is higher than the state average of 44%, which may impact continuity of care. However, they have average RN coverage, which is important as registered nurses can catch issues that nursing assistants might miss. There are some serious concerns highlighted in the inspector findings. One resident had a skin tear that went uncared for for four days, resulting in signs of infection due to inadequate wound care and monitoring. Additionally, the facility failed to properly assess and treat another resident with a skin infection, which raises questions about the overall quality of care. Despite these weaknesses, the facility's overall ratings for health inspection and quality measures are good, indicating some positive aspects in the care provided. Families should weigh these strengths against the serious issues reported when considering this facility for their loved one.

Trust Score
D
48/100
In Michigan
#107/422
Top 25%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
8 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$15,593 in fines. Lower than most Michigan facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Michigan. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 8 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 60%

14pts above Michigan avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $15,593

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Staff turnover is elevated (60%)

12 points above Michigan average of 48%

The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record

4 actual harm
Mar 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted a dignified dining experience for 4 residents (Resident #15, #10, #49, & #40) of 4 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted a dignified dining experience for 4 residents (Resident #15, #10, #49, & #40) of 4 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in feelings of disappointment with the dining experience. Findings include: During an observation on 03/23/25 at 11:37 AM, dining service had started, and residents were being served roast beef, broccoli, French fries or baked beans. On 03/23/25 at 11:46 AM, this writer observed there were multiple residents seated throughout the dining room who had not received their lunches. Noted no particular order for meal tray delivery. In an interview on 03/23/25 at 11:47 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) U reported a resident who was not served had ordered a special meal and those take longer to cook. CNA U asked Dietary Aide (DA) AA where the resident's food was as the other residents at the table had their meals already. In an interview on 03/23/25 at 11:56 AM, this writer requested from Activity Aide (AA) XX who were the multiple residents still waiting for their lunches. AA XX reported Resident #15, Resident #49, Resident #10, and Resident #40. This writer observed the other residents seated at the tables with those residents were already served their lunches and were eating or close to finished with the meal. Resident #15: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #15 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, diabetes, paralysis on his right side, kidney disease, and stroke. During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:00 PM, Dietary Aide (DA) AA was observed exiting the dining room and entered the kitchen, waited in line for a plate of food for Resident #15. DA AA grabbed the plate for him and headed over to his table and delivered his meal. Resident #49: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #49 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing foods or liquids, arising from the throat or esophagus), and cognitive communication deficit (progressive degenerative brain disorder resulting in difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:02 PM, Resident #49's meal was brought to him by AA XX. Resident #10: During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:04 PM, DA OO was observed bringing a plate to the dining room for Resident #10. Resident #40: During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:06 PM, Resident #40 received her meal brought to her by AA XX. In an interview on 03/24/25 at 09:12 AM, Resident #40 reported she gets to the dining room early and was one of the first ones there and her ticket goes to the bottom. Resident #40 stated that's the way it is and reported it would be nice to eat her lunch with the other ladies she sat at the table with. Using the reasonable person concept, though Residents #10, #15, and #49 had decreased ability to verbally express their own thoughts due to their medical diagnoses, any reasonable person would likely feel a sense of frustration, loss of self-worth, and emotional distress. In an interview on 03/25/25 12:05 PM, Dietary Manager (DM) TT reported she had the dietary staff bring out soup, side salad, or cottage cheese to the residents so they would have something in front of them to keep them occupied while waiting for their food. DM TT reported as there were two cooks on 03/23/25, the alternate meals for residents should not have taken 15-20 minutes to be served to them after their table mates had been served. DM TT reported we had enough staff to ensure those who have the alternate meal would not wait that long for their meals.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #46: Review of an admission Record for Resident #46 revealed the resident was a male with pertinent diagnoses which inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #46: Review of an admission Record for Resident #46 revealed the resident was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (infection in a bone) in a active wound, urinary tract infection and sepsis (life threatening complication of infection). Review of Care Plan dated 02/02/2023 for Resident #46, revealed the focus, .require assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) r/t (related to) contractures of BLE (bilateral lower extremities), immobility, abnormal labs, and chronic disease processes . with the intervention .TRANSFERS: I require a full body mechanical lift for transfer with 2 assist .BED MOBILITY: I require assistance of 1-2 staff members to turn and reposition in bed .DRESSING: I require assistance of 1 staff member with dressing . Review of Care Plan dated 9/10/24 for Resident #46, revealed the focus, .I require Enhanced Barrier Precautions AND I am at increased risk of MDRO (Multidrug-Resistant Organism) acquisition r/t my urine, wound, and midline line. DX: Chronic Osteomyelitis, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), hx (history) Klebsiella (bacteria that can cause health care associated infections spread through person to person contact and can be dangerous if it enters other parts of the body other than the nose, throat, skin and intestinal tract) . with the intervention .Institute Enhanced Barrier Precautions (Don (to put on) gloves and gown) with all care involving my wound Osteomyelitis R (right) Ischium (sit bones where you sit) and urine (MDRO) such as, bathing, wound dressing changes, to decrease risk of cross contamination and risk for active infection. If there is a chance of bodily fluid splashing, please wear a mask . During an observation on 03/24/25 at 09:44 AM, Shower Aide (SA) II entered Resident #46's room to re-position him in the bed. SA II was behind the head of the bed and pulled Resident #46 up in his bed, she placed his pillows back under his arms and she asked if he wanted his wedges under his hips and he said he wanted them on both sides. SA II placed the wedges on the side of the resident. She repositioned the pillows between his legs for comfort. SA II did not don a gown when she repositioned him or when she placed the pillows and wedges. During an observation on 03/24/25 at 12:20 PM, Resident #46 was being assisted with care by CNA K At 03/24/25 at 12:35 PM, CNA Q had come to the room, she moved the hoyer over to the side of the bed, she moved the wheelchair over to the privacy curtain, she washed her hands after moving the chair over and then donned gloves. CNA K and CNA Q were observed to not be wearing gowns. On 03/24/25 at 12:37 PM, CNA Q lowered the bed, both had gloves on but no gowns, they had removed his oxygen, and he was lying flat in the bed. CNA K had tucked in the tubing to the plastic bag hanging on the side of the oxygen concentrator. CNA K removed his pillows from both sides of him. The blue wedges were noted at the foot of his bed. Resident #46 was flat in the bed, but his legs were positioned to the left of his body, he was turned at the waist in that direction. CNA K rolled him towards the wall and CNA Q and CNA K tucked the sling under him. And then both CNA's rolled him back, flat in the bed. CNA Q moved to the foot of the bed and held his legs and then placed the sling between his legs. CNA K and CNA Q proceeded to adjust the sling and placed the loops on the hooks of the machine. CNA Q was gently raising the lift and Wound Nurse C entered the room and informed them he needed to be transported in a different chair and went to obtain the chair. Transport Aide F had entered the room at this time as well. CNA K did not remove her gloves while attempting to put together the broda chair footrest. CNA K and CNA Q guided the hoyer over to the broda chair, CNA K guided his legs, supporting them and slowly lowered him into the broda chair. CNA K and CNA Q raised the hoyer back up and CNA K held the back bottom of the sling to guide him back in the seat of the broda chair. CNA K placed the blue wedges on each side of Resident #46's hip/side area, had to readjust him in the chair. CNA K readjusted the back of the broda chair, so he was reclined more, she still had on her gloves from earlier in the care process. On 03/24/25 at 12:55 PM, Transport Aide F placed the plastic bag with his oxygen tubing for him on his lap area, went to grab gloves and placed his nasal cannula on his face. CNA K was putting his tennis shoes on his feet. On 3/24/25 at 12:57 PM, CNA Q placed the hoyer into the bathroom and exited the room. CNA K had her gloves on still and proceeded to make his bed and adjusted his blankets again while he was in the chair prior to him leaving to attend his appointment. During this observation, neither CNA had donned a gown as required when transferring/repositioning a resident who was on EBP. In an interview on 03/25/25 at 11:46 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D reported the enhanced barrier precautions sign was on the doorway and it informed the staff what activities they were to wear a gown and gloves, like with a catheter bag, wounds, PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) lines or any type of care that would require hands on care. CNA D reported this was done to protect the resident from us and any germs the staff would have. Dining: During an observation on 03/23/25 at 11:49 AM, in the main dining room, Dietary Aide (DA) AA brought a resident her meal, set it up for her, used the resident's fork and cut up the fried fish in smaller bites, and went back into the kitchen, opened the doors to the carts and then went to the back of the kitchen in the freezer scooped out a cup of ice cream and brought it back to the resident without performing hand hygiene without performing hand hygiene in between. During an observation on 03/23/25 11:52 AM, DA AA was observed heading into the kitchen from the dining room, adjusted her apron, she then went and grabbed a plate of toast for a resident dropped it off to them, returned to the kitchen grabbed a plate for another resident and handed the plate to Activity Aide (AA) XX and proceeded back in the kitchen and grabbed a plate for another resident and dropped it off at her table without performing hand hygiene in between. During an observation on 03/23/25 at 11:59 AM, DA AA was observed serving Resident #10's meal, provided her with the salt and went back to the kitchen into the freezer, grabbed ice cream without performing hand hygiene in between. During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:00 PM, DA AA was observed exiting the dining room and entered the kitchen. DA AA grabbed the plate for Resident #15 and went over to his table to drop it off and headed back into the kitchen without performing hand hygiene at all during this observation. During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:12 PM, DA OO brought a cup of ice cream to AA HH and went back into the kitchen, then she was observed walking in the kitchen tossed a dirty serving spoon into the sink, went to the other side of the kitchen, grabbed chocolate milk for a resident, and brought it to them in the dining room. DA OO did not perform hand hygiene during this observation. In an interview on 03/23/25 12:13 at PM, DA OO reported hand hygiene would be performed when they handle a dirty plate and if they had dirty hands. DA OO reported hand hygiene would be performed when you would give items to one resident prior to giving to the next resident. DA OO reported there was hand sanitizer on the table for staff to use to sanitize their hands. It was noted there was no hand sanitizer over by the drink machines and ice cream machine on the other side of the kitchen. During an observation on 03/23/25 at 12:16 PM, DA AA entered the kitchen from the dining room, brought in two mugs used for coffee, then went back to the door of the kitchen organized the dessert plates on the cart, went over to the table with hand sanitizer, took a drink from her water bottle, and exited the kitchen to the dining room. No hand hygiene was performed during this observation. In an interview on 03/25/25 at 10:16 AM, DA W reported when a staff member exited the kitchen and delivered food to a resident and entered back into the kitchen the staff member should sanitize their hands. In an interview on 03/25/25 at 11:46 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D reported in the dining room hand hygiene would be performed between serving food, performing set-up for a resident, and when the staff assisted a resident with meals. In an interview on 03/25/25 12:05 PM, Dietary Manager (DM) TT reported hand hygiene would be done prior to serving a resident their meal and after before serving another resident their meal. DM TT reported this was done as not to contaminate the residents with other's germs. In an interview on 03/25/25 at 11:26 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported during orientation staff were educated on hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. DON B reported the staff demonstrated on return hand hygiene and the donning of PPE. DON B reported the staff were educated on the types of isolation and what the needs were for PPE when providing care for the resident. DON B reported hand hygiene was required after touching self/clothing, environment, after touching the resident, prior to entry and upon exit from a resident's room. DON B reported when meals were delivered to a resident, hand hygiene should be performed prior to handling another resident's meal. This citation contains two Deficient Practices Statements, A & B. Deficient Practice Statement A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Water Management Plan book on 3/24/25 at 4:00 pm, revealed no documentation regarding a team of staff members who meet to discuss water management, no test results, and no risk assessment that had been completed. In an interview on 3/24/25 at 5:00 pm, Maintenance Director (MD) DD reported he was not aware of a team related to water management in the building. In an interview on 3/24/25 at 5:05 pm, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the team for water management should include maintenance director, director of nursing, and herself. In an interview on 3/25/25 at 10:51 am, MD DD reported he was new to the position, about six months, and he did recall when he first started, he was introduced to the water management plan, and the binder, but did not understand what needed to be done related to the water management plan. MD DD reported the facility has city water and the water supply was tested by the county and that he had never completed any kind of water testing in the facility. MD DD reported he had not conducted any evaluation on the water system in the building, he had not evaluated any areas of potential risk, and he had no established control measures to monitor water in the building. Review of facility policy Water Management Program with a review date of 4/2024 revealed .to establish water management plans for reducing the risk of legionellosis and other opportunistic pathogens .in the facilities water system .1. A water management team has been established to develop and implement the facility's water management program including facility leadership, the infection preventionist, maintenance employees, safety offices, risk and quality management staff and the director of nursing .2. The maintenance director maintains documentation that describes the facility's water system . 3. A risk assessment will be conducted by the water management team annually .5. Based on the risk assessment control points will be identified .6. Control measures will be applied to address potential hazards at each control point .7. Testing protocols and control limits will be established for each control measure .8. The water management team shall regularly verify that the water management program is being implemented as designed . Deficient Practice Statement B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices as evidenced by 1). Incorrect use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in an enhanced barrier precaution setting for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #46) of 2 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) PPE use during catheter care, dressing, repositioning and transferring; and 2). Proper hand hygiene by staff during meal service in the dining room resulting in the potential for introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: paraplegia (paralysis of the lower part of the body), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (loss of control of the bladder), and retention of urine (inability to empty the bladder). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1, with a reference date of 1/29/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. (BIMS score 13-15 indicates no cognitive impairment). In an observation on 3/24/25 at 8:45 am, signage was noted on Resident #1's room door indicating that enhanced barrier precautions were to be used when providing care, including catheter care. Review of the Order Summary for Resident #1 revealed .Enhanced barrier precaution with a start date of 1/6/2025. Review of a current Care Plan for Resident #1 revealed Focus .I require enhanced barrier precautions .r/t (related to) my supra pubic catheter/urine . Interventions- enhanced barrier precautions (don (put on) glove and gown) with all care involving suprapubic (catheter inserted directly through the skin into the bladder) (urine) .such as device care to decrease the risk of cross contamination and risk for active infection . with an initiation date of 9/25/2023 . In an observation on 3/24/25 at 8:51 am, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) K was observed in Resident #1's room, at her bed side, with a graduated cylinder (a triangle shaped plastic container to collect urine from a drainage bag) preparing to empty Resident #1's catheter drainage bag. CNA K was then observed placing the graduated cylinder on the floor and holding Resident #1's catheter bag in her left hand while she unclamped the drain tube with her right, positioned the drain tube into the graduated cylinder and allowed for the urine to drained from Resident #1's catheter drainage bag. CNA K then emptied the graduated cylinder into the toilet in the bathroom. CNA K was not wearing a gown during this process as indicated by the EBP signage present on Resident #1's door to her room. In an interview on 3/24/25 at 9:22 am, CNA K reported that EBP were to be used for residents who had wounds and that it did include Resident #1. CNA K reported Resident #1 was in EBP and she should have been wearing a gown when she emptied Resident #1's catheter drainage bag. In an interview on 3/24/25 at 2:37 pm Wound Nurse/Infection Preventionist (WN/IP) C reported that EBP were to be used when the staff was come into contact with the potential infection site, opening, or line when providing care. WN/IP C reported EBP should be used when providing catheter care and emptying a catheter drainage bag. In an interview on 3/24/25 at 2:41 pm, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported that her expectations were that if a resident was in enhanced barrier precautions, the staff were using the correct PPE when providing care. Review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revised date of 02/2024 revealed .maintain and implement infection control measures/processes/procedures that will help control the spread of infection .an order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following .indwelling medical devices (i.e. urinary catheter .) implementation of enhanced barrier precautions will include: Make gowns and gloves .for high contact resident care activities .bathing, providing hygiene . dressing, transferring .providing device care or use .urinary catheter .masks should be available for activities involving possible risk of splashing/spraying . Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dated March 20, 2024, revealed, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .EBP are used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing .EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: 1. Infection or colonization with a CDC-targeted MDRO when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply; or 2. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO .Effective Date: April 1, 2024 .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions and ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen and the resident refrigerator in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions and ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen and the resident refrigerator in the activity room, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen and residents that store food in the activity room refrigerator. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/23/2025 at 9:41 AM, 1 spout on the coffee machine had lime buildup around the spout (white crusty and flakes around it). During another visit to the kitchen on 3/24/2025 at 9:31 AM, the same spout was observed to still have lime buildup around it. Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) TT stated that it should have been cleaned the day before and they must have missed it. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/23/2025 at 9:52 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) FFF accompanied this surveyor and the following items were observed: The ice-cream freezer had 3 individual bowls of hand dipped ice cream in them with no label and dates and ice cream was splattered on the bottom of the freezer. The following items were observed in the dietary aides reach in dessert refrigerator: 6 pear and 2 peach individual bowls with an expiration date of 3/22/2025. 1 big plastic container with chicken noodle soup with an expiration date of 3/22/2025. 1 big plastic container of tomato soup with an expiration date of 3/21/2025. The following items were observed in the aides reach in refrigerator: 7 individual 12-ounce (oz) cups of specialty drinks with no label and date. 6 individual 12 oz cups of chocolate milk and 4 individual 12 oz cups of white milk with no label and date. 35 individual 8 oz cups with either iced tea or milk with no label and date. The following was observed in the dry storage room: A big plastic bag of orzo (pasta) was not sealed, had no label and date and was lying in a box and spilling into it. A plastic bag of flour was not sealed, had no label and date and was lying in a box spilling into it. The following was observed in the cook's refrigerator: 1 styrofoam carryout container with salad in it with no label and date. 1 quart milk carton, not closed with no label and date. A sandwich plastic bag with mozzarella cheese, not sealed and no label and date. The bottom of the refrigerator was dirty with crumbs on the bottom. During an interview on 3/23/2025 at 10:22 AM, DA FFF stated that there should have been labels and dates on the food items that were not labeled and dated, food items should be sealed and food should be tossed past the expiration date. During the full kitchen tour on 3/24/2025 at 9:31 AM with DM TT the following was observed: In the main kitchen area, a shallow pan with breading for fish with saran wrap was not sealed and didn't have a label and date. The resident refrigerator in the activities room contained an open gallon milk jug with a best by date of 3/22/2025, and cheese slices in a sandwich bag did not have a label and date. During an interview on 3/24/2025 at 10:30 AM, CDM TT stated that labels and dates should be on perishable food items in the kitchen and the resident refrigerator in the activity room and said staff is aware of what they should do. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A)PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean . According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TOEAT, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. (B) Except as specified in (E) -(G) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT and if the FOOD is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded, based on the temperature and time combinations specified in (A) of this section and: (1) The day the original container is opened in the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be counted as Day 1; and (2) The day or date marked by the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date if the manufacturer determined the use-by date based on FOOD safety . Review of the Date Marking for Food Safety Policy with a review date of 1/2025 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Staffing 2. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. 3. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for date marking the food at the time the food is opened or prepared. 4. The marking system shall consist of a color-coded label, the day/date of opening, and the day/date the item must be consumed or discarded. 5. The discard date or date may not exceed the manufacturers use-by-date or four days, whichever is earliest. The date of opening or preparation counts as day 1. (For example, food prepared on Tuesday shall be discarded on or by Friday.) 6. The head cook or designee shall be responsible for checking the refrigerator daily for food items that are expiring and shall discard accordingly. 7. The Dietary Manager, or designee, shall spot check refrigerators weekly for compliance, and document accordingly. Corrective action shall be taken as needed.
Apr 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one resident (#46) of 18 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one resident (#46) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity, by denying the resident the right to use personal belongings of choice in her room. This deficient practice resulted in decreased ability to pursue an independent activity of choice, and feelings of frustration and disappointment. Findings include: Resident #46 Review of a facility policy titled Resident Personal Belongings with a review date of 4/24 revealed: It is the policy (facility name omitted) to protect the resident's right to posses personal belongings .for their use while in (facility name omitted) . will support the resident's right to .use personal possessions to promote a homelike environment . Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #46, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: major depressive disorder and occipital neuralgia (condition in which the occipital nerves are inflamed causing headaches/blurred vision, neck pain). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #46, with a reference date of 4/10/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Section B revealed Resident #46 wore glasses. During an observation on 4/23/24 at 3:17pm, a 40 television sat in a box on the floor near Resident #46's shelving unit. The head of Resident #46's bed was against the wall on the right side of the room. A small television was mounted on the wall opposite of Resident #46's bed, in a recessed area with shelving. The distance from Resident #46's head of her bed to the television was approximately 15 feet. In an interview on 4/23/24 at 3:18pm, Resident #46 reported her daughter her a larger television to use in her room because the facility's television was too small for her to use. Resident #46 reported she was told she could not use the 40 television in her room because the wall mounted brackets that held the facility's television would only accommodate a 32' television. Resident #46 reported she offered to purchase larger brackets herself if the facility would install them and was told that was not an option. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 4:08pm, Resident #46 sat at the edge of her bed, resting her arms on her bedside table, staring straight ahead in her darkened room. During an observation 4/25/24 at 10:21am, Resident #46 sat at the edge of her bed, resting her arms on her beside table, staring straight ahead. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 3:59pm, Social Services Director (SSD) U reported the facility had no specific restrictions regarding the personal belongings residents used in their rooms unless they posed a safety hazard. SSD U reported the facility refused to allow Resident #46 to use the 40 television her daughter purchased for her because the television would not fit above the shelving in the room. When further queried, SSD U reported the facility had not explored other options for mounting the television, changing the location of the television bracket, running additional cable to the television. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 4:04pm, Social Services Assistant S reported the facility would provide Resident #46 with a 34 television but would not allow her to use the 40 television. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 4:09pm, Resident #46 she could not enjoy watching television on the smaller television the facility provided because she could not see it well, and had developed headaches after watching it for short periods of time. Resident #46 reported in her own home, prior to coming to the facility, she had a larger television and never developed headaches while watching it. Resident #46 reported her daughter measured the space where the facility television was mounted and found the opening to be 40 wide by 48 diagonal which would accommodate the larger television. Resident #46 reported facility made no attempt to resolve the issues involving mounting the television on the wall and she was told it was at the discretion of the maintenance department regarding her use of a larger television. In an observation on 4/24/24 at 4:16pm, the measurements of the television space in Resident #46's room were confirmed to be 40 wide, >40 high, by 48 diagonal. The 40 television measured approximately 38 wide by 20 high.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow and accommodate resident choice to spend time outdoors by the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow and accommodate resident choice to spend time outdoors by themselves in 1 of 18 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for self-determination, resulting in the potential for residents not meeting their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #6, with a reference date of 2/7/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 04/23/24 at 01:05 PM, Resident #6 reported that she enjoyed being outside in the fresh air, but that she was not allowed to go outside unless someone from activities was with her. Resident #6 reported that when she admitted to the home, she was told that she could come and go as she wished, but now she had been told that she can only leave the home with family or staff. Resident #6 reported that she made all her own decisions, and did not have a power of attorney (POA), and did not want a staff member supervising her while she was outside. Review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed, Self-Medical Decision Maker, Responsible Party for billing. Review of Resident #6's Care Plan revealed, .I enjoy outdoor sports .I enjoy being outside when the weather permits. Please offer to take me outside on nice days. Date initiated: 11/28/23 . Review of Resident #6's Activities Assessment from admission, dated 4/12/23 revealed, .enjoys playing sports (tennis, pool, baseball), and really enjoys being outside . In an interview on 04/24/24 at 11:25 AM, Receptionist M reported that no residents are allowed to go outside by themselves. Receptionist M reported that some residents are allowed to go into the courtyard along with someone from activities. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 03:57 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) QQ reported that she does not take any residents outside, and that Resident #6 always says that she's waiting for her family, so that she can go outside. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 03:58 PM, Activity Aide (AA) BB reported that the home does not allow any residents to go outside by themselves, and does not offer residents to go outside until the weather is warm. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 03:46 PM, Social Services Director (SSD) U reported that residents must have a staff member with them at all times when they are outside. SSD U reported that Resident #6 is her own decision maker and there would be no reason that she should need someone to go outside with her. SSD U reported that the home had not ever thought about allowing residents to go outside on their own. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 09:50 AM, Resident #6 reported that staff had discussed with her yesterday about being able to go outside on her own now, and that she planned on spending time outside that afternoon.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with getting out of bed for depend...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with getting out of bed for dependent residents in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care, resulting in the potential for residents to not meet their highest practical level of well-being. Findings include: Resident #55 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: down syndrome. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #55, with a reference date of 3/6/24, under Functional Abilities and Goals section GG revealed that Resident #55 was dependent on staff for eating and transferring out of bed. Review of Resident #55's Skin Care Plan revealed, .at high risk for skin breakdown .need to sit upright after meals .Date initiated: 3/13/24. Interventions: .Please assist be back to bed if I have been in my chair for more than 2 hours at a time. Date initiated: 3/9/24. Please only have resident up with meals, but no longer than 2 hours in chair at a time. Date initiated: 3/13/24 . In Resident #55's ADL care plan there was nothing related to getting out of bed. During an observation on 04/23/24 at 10:30 AM Resident #55 was lying in her bed wearing a gown from the home. There was signage of the door indicating Contact Precautions. During an observation on 04/23/24 at 12:59 PM Resident #55 was lying in her bed with the head of bed (HOB) at 45-90 degrees, and she was still wearing a gown, and had just finished eating lunch. Resident #55 did not get out of bed for lunch. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 11:37 AM Resident #55 was in her bed with the HOB at 30 degrees, and wearing a gown from the home. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 01:06 PM Resident #55 was in her bed and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) LL was assisting her with lunch. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 01:12 PM, CNA LL reported that Resident #55 does not get out of bed for meals anymore. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 02:15 PM Resident #55 was lying in her bed wearing a gown from the home. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 11:30 AM, CNA EE reported that Resident #55 would not be getting out of bed for lunch. During an observation on 04/25/24 at 11:30 AM in Resident #55's room, CNA EE and CNA RR were giving Resident #55 a bed bath, and put a clean gown from the home on her. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 11:55 AM, CNA RR reported that Resident #55 was not getting out of bed for lunch, because she was only allowed to be up in her chair for 1 hour and she was isolated to her room because she had C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile: a highly contagious bacteria that causes an infection of the bowels). In an interview on 04/25/24 at 11:57 AM, Infection Preventionist (IP) Z reported that Resident #55 could be up in her chair for 2 hours at a time, and she could still go to the dining room for meals, even though she was positive for C. Diff. IP Z reported that staff should know this information because they had just been educated them recently about it.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities based on resident p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities based on resident preferences, needs, and abilities for 3 of 18 Residents (Resident #65, Resident #69, and Resident #63) reviewed for activities, resulting in feelings of boredom, and a potential for loneliness, social withdrawal, and depressed mood. Findings include: Resident #65 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #65 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: aphasia (language disorder affecting verbal communication), and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #65, with a reference date of 11/23/23 revealed Resident #65 had unclear speech and could not complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status. Section F of the MDS revealed Resident #65 indicated it was very important to him to go outside to get fresh air when the weather was good, somewhat important to pursue his favorite leisure activities, listen to music, and do things with groups of people. Resident #65 felt it was not important at all to pursue religious activities. Review of a Care Plan for Resident #65, with a reference date of 11/24/23 revealed a focus/goal/interventions as follows: Focus: I am an independent person, I would like to be invited to activities, and I enjoy keeping busy .Goal: Resident will maintain involvement in cognitive stimulation, social activities as desired .Interventions: all staff converse with me .encourage ongoing family involvement .I enjoy reading crime books .please go over activities calendar with me . Review of an Activity Assessment for Resident #65 dated 11/10/23 revealed Resident #65 enjoyed traveling, working, learning new things, and reading crime novels. Section C of the assessment revealed Resident #65 wished to participate in activities, including group activities and independent activities but did not want individual visits. Section D indicated that activities did not need to be modified to address a communication deficit. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 1:12pm, Resident #65 used yes/no responses and gestures to communicate. Resident #65 indicated he wanted to get outside more often, would enjoy listening to crime novels on audio books, and would like to listen to rap and rhythm and blues music in his room. When asked if he felt bored frequently, Resident #65 nodded his head up and down to indicate yes. Resident #65 attempted to verbally respond to questions, but his vocal quality was poor and unintelligible. In an interview on 4/23/24 at 12:14pm, Family Member (FM) NN reported Resident #65 did not enjoy the types of activities provided by the facility. RM NN reported Resident #65 enjoyed being outside and loved listening to Rap and Rhythm and Blues music. In an interview on 4/23/24 at 12:27pm, Family Member/Power of Attorney (FM/POA) MM reported she visited Resident #65 approximately 3 times a week and had not seen him attend any group activities. FM/POA reported Resident #65 cried during some of her visits and. FM/POA MM reported Resident #65 enjoyed trivia games, playing cards, listening to rap and rhythm and blues music, and spending time outside. FM/POA MM reported she was worried about Resident #65 losing his abilities and becoming depressed due to his lack of activity. FM/POA MM reported she was assist Resident #65 in pursuing coloring during her visits but he needed someone to encourage him and set it up in order for him to actively participate. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 1:34pm, Community Enrichment Director (CED) OO reported Resident #65 had not been doing a whole lot regarding his involvement in activities. When further queried about what interventions were in place for residents who were not attending group activities, LED OO reported Life Enrichment staff came by and chatted with them. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 2:20pm, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) LL reported Resident #65 slept a lot throughout the day and would often be in bed for the night before the evening meal was served. CENA LL reported Resident #65 did not participate in many activities, seemed withdrawn, and primarily seemed to look forward to mealtime. When further queried, CENA LL stated it wouldn't surprise me if he's depressed because he sleeps so much. In an interview on 4/25/24 at 10:20am, Community Enrichment Aide (CEA) PP reported she was assigned to Resident #65's hallway on this date, and that Resident #65 had not been involved in many activities since his admission. When queried about Resident #65's interests, CEA NN stated He really likes church. In an interview on 4/25/24 at 9:53am CED OO reported he was unsure how many activities Resident #65 had been involved in during the last 3 months. CED OO reported it would require a lot of digging to track each residents monthly group activity attendance due to the current documentation process. CED OO reported it was important to be able to track each resident's involvement to ensure the activities program was meeting each person's needs/interests. CED OO reported the facility did offer card games every evening, but he was unsure if Resident #65 had attended. CED OO reported the facility had not offered Resident #65 any devices that would allow him to listen to music or use audio books in his room. Review of activity logs dated February, March, April 2024 revealed Resident #65 participated in 1 exercise group and 2 outdoor visits during the 84-day period. During an observation on 4/23/24 at 1:21pm, Resident #65 laid in bed on his back, curtains were drawn, and the room was dark. Resident #65 appeared to be asleep. During an observation on 4/23/24 at 3:02pm, Resident #65 laid bed on his side, curtains were drawn, and the room was dark. Resident #65 appeared to be asleep. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 11:06am, Resident #65 was lying in bed, awake, his television was on, but he was not watching it. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 1:40pm, Resident #65's curtains were drawn, room darkened, and he sat in his wheelchair, awake with his back turned toward his television. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 2:15pm, Resident #65 laid on his back, in his bed, and appeared to be asleep. During an observation on 4/25/24 at 10:19am, Resident #65 sat in front of a large window at the end of the hallway and looked out the window. Review of The Boredom of Solitude published 4/21/23 by Psychology Today, [NAME] Danckert Ph.D., [NAME], Ph.D, revealed Loneliness is a complex experience, one that can heighten our sense of vulnerability .which leads to elevated stress . and just like boredom, loneliness has been associated with poor mental health, challenges to cognitive function, and even cognitive decline in the elderly .perceived lack of meaning will color things as being boring. So, to solve loneliness, like solutions to boredom, we can't simply reach for any kind of interaction. We need things that are meaningful to us. Review of a facility policy, Community Enrichment, with a reference date of 2/24 revealed a statement: Facility sponsored group, individual and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will .enhance the resident's sense of well-being, belonging, and usefulness .reflect a resident's interests and age .reflect choices of the resident . Resident #69: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #69 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included glaucoma, chronic pain, pain in right hip, low back pain, severe protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, disc degeneration lumbar region, and muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #69, with a reference date of 4/1/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated Resident #69 was cognitively intact. Review of Care plan revised on 4/2/24, revealed the focus, .I prefer independent activities, I would also like to be invited to group activities as well . with the intervention .All staff to converse with me while providing care. I am from (local city), I have three children, I have been married for over 50 years, and I enjoy jazz music .I am a religious person. Please invite me to religious based groups .I enjoy spending time outside. Please offer to take me outside when the weather is nice .I enjoy watching sports (baseball and football). Please remind me if there are any games on TV . Review of MDS assessment for Resident #69, with a reference date of 4/1/24 revealed, .Section GG: .Chair/bed-to-chair transfer: Dependent - Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity . Review of Activities Assessment - Initial/Annual/SC dated 3/29/24 at 2:38 PM, revealed, .A. Past Activity Interests/Service .[NAME] likes baseball, football, and enjoys being outside a lot .previous occupation Gas Manufacturing .Education Level: High school graduate .Military service .b. yes .dd. branch- Army .ee. Specific Era: Vietnam .Religious Affiliation: aa. Protestant .1. Does the resident wish to participate .Yes .2. Does the resident wish to participate in group activities .Yes .5. Does resident like independent activities (i.e. reading, puzzles, etc.)? .Yes .D. Limitations/Special Needs: 4. Activities should be modified to address visual deficit .Yes .6. [NAME] Resident #69 has almost no vision, will need help to locate and grab things . Review of medical record for Resident #69 revealed no Activity notes and/or Activity Participation notes. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 09:34 AM, Resident #69 reported he had low vision and he can't read anything. He reported he had his vision as a child and then when he got older her lost his vision. Resident #69 reported when he was at home his wife would read the Bible to him. Resident #69 reported since he was not able to see it was difficult for him to participate in activities. Resident #69 reported the facility had not offered to have an audiobook version of the Bible for him. There was no noted radio in the room. Reviewed the March 2024 Activity Calendar revealed on .3/28/24 at 1030 Prayer and Worship, 3/28/24 at 200 Bible Study, and 3/2924 at 1030 Men's Club . Review of the A Hall Activity Logs for March 2024 revealed Resident #69 was marked as participating in the activity Room Visit on 3/27/24, 3/29/24, 3/30/24, and 3/31/24 and independent activity Music/TV/Radio on 3/27/24, 3/28/24, and 3/29/24-3/31/24, and the independent activity Visitors on 3/31/24, and the activity Social Dining on 3/27/24. Noted no documentation to indicate if Resident #69 had been invited or encouraged to attend group activities. Reviewed the April 2024 Activity Calendar noted the activity Bible Study was scheduled every Tuesday at 10:30 AM, Prayer and Worship was scheduled every Thursday at 10:30 AM, Men's Group was scheduled every other Friday at 10:30 AM starting on 4/12/24, Church Services were scheduled every Sunday. Note: No activities scheduled geared towards sports or outdoor activities for April 2024. Reviewed the April 2024 Activity Calendar noted the activity 4/2/24: Ice Cream Social, 4/6/24: Corn hole, 4/11/24: Resident Council, 4/13/24: Exercises, 4/15/24: Popcorn Social, 4/19/24: Snack and Chat, and 4/10/24: Karaoke. Review of the A Hall Activity Logs for April 2024 revealed Resident #69 was marked as participating in the activity Room Visit on 4/1/24 - 4/4/24, 4/6/24 - 4/8/24, 4/10/24 - 4/13/24, 4/15/24 - 4/17/24, 4/19/24 - 4/23/24 and the independent activity Music/TV/Radio on 4/1/24 - 4/4/24, 4/6/24 - 4/8/24, 4/10/24 - 4/13/24, 4/15/24 - 4/17/24, 4/19/24 - 4/23/24, the independent activity Visitors on 4/10/24, 4/15/24, 4/20/24, the activity Social on 4/2/24, the activity Bingo on 4/23/24. Noted no documentation to indicate if Resident #69 had been invited or encouraged to attend group activities. Review of activity logs dated March and April 2024 revealed Resident #69 participated in 1 social group activity, 1 bingo activity, and 1 social dining activity during the previous 29-day period. During an observation on 04/23/24 at 10:56 AM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed, supine position, with his eyes closed. During an observation on 04/23/24 at 11:15 AM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed with the television on low. During an observation on 04/23/24 at 12:08 PM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed with the rolling beside table next to him with a couple of snacks on it, with the television on low volume. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 09:25 AM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed supine position. The television was on at a low volume. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 12:26 PM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed with his lunch on the rolling table over his lap area. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 3:57 PM, Resident #69 was asked if he attended the all month birthday celebration which happened today and he reported he wasn't aware of it. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 12:18 PM, Resident #69 reported he liked to watch sports, jazz music, really like baseball and the Tigers were his team. Resident #69 reported he had been to a few Tigers games before. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 4:17 PM, Community Enrichment Director (CED) OO reported he was at a seminar a few weeks ago and had the activity staff start implementing whether the resident accepted or declined the invitation to attend an activity prior to that it was not done. When queried if Resident #69 had attended any group activities, CED OO reported the resident had not been at the facility very long but he did come to Bingo yesterday. CED OO reported if Resident #69 wanted someone to help him with the chips at Bingo or if he wanted someone to read the Bible to him, they could do that for him but indicated this had not been offered to Resident #69. CED OO indicated he would like to have his staff document activities in the electronic medical record as there was a lot of paper to compile for tracking activity participation. CED OO reported he asked Resident #69 when he was admitted if he wanted a radio in his room and the resident declined but he did not reapproach. Resident #63 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #63 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included autism, depression, and a developmental disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 3/27/24, revealed Resident #63 had a short-term memory problem, and some difficulty with daily decision making in new situations. Review of an Activities Assessment for Resident #63, dated 7/6/23, revealed .(Resident #63) enjoys playing music, drawing, reading magazines, and working on various forms of artwork .Does the resident wish to participate in activities while in the home? Yes .Does the resident wish to participate in group activities? Yes .Does the resident wish 1:1 with staff? No . Review of a current Care Plan for Resident #63 revealed the focus .I enjoy independent activities (reading and listening to music), and I may attend activities with some encouragement . initiated 7/14/23, with interventions which included .All staff to converse with me while providing care .I am Christian, and I enjoy listening to country and Christian music .I am a religious person. Please offer to take me to bible study on days it is offered . initiated 7/14/23, and .I enjoy being outside or in the sun. Please offer to take me outside when weather permits or offer to put a chair in the sun for me . initiated 8/9/23. Review of an Activity Note for Resident #63, dated 1/4/24, revealed .(Resident #63) is not receptive to attending activities or room visits too much, but he enjoys company when he is open to it . Review of a Care Conference note for Resident #63, dated 1/17/24, revealed .Dietary reported that (Resident #63) has gained weight which isn't a problem as long as he becomes more active. Activities will encourage him in that area . Review of a Behavior Note for Resident #63, dated 4/19/24, revealed .(Resident #63) had 3 noted behaviors in this review period of agitation, mood changes, restless, uncooperative, and withdrawn. Noted increase from previous month. Non pharmacological interventions were .involve in activities . In an observation on 4/23/24 at 10:51 AM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room. Resident #63 was awake, watching television. In an observation on 4/23/24 at 12:21 PM, Resident #63 was noted sitting on the edge of the bed in his room, drumming his hands on the tray table. In an observation on 4/23/24 at 2:54 PM, Resident #63 was noted sitting in his armchair in his room, with the television on. In an observation on 4/24/24 at 9:25 AM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room, laying on his left side facing the wall. Noted his television was on, with the volume low. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 9:43 AM, Family Member SS reported Resident #63 enjoys music, plays the drums, and often strums on his acoustic guitar. Family Member SS reported Resident #63 also enjoys coloring. Family Member SS reported with Resident #63, his participation depends on how he is approached, and stated .He is really good at saying no . Family Member SS reported he believes Resident #63 would be interested in group activities, and hopes facility staff .keep trying . to encourage his participation. In an observation on 4/24/24 at 11:36 AM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room, laying on his right side with his eyes closed. In an observation on 4/24/24 at 12:17 PM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room, laying on his right side with his eyes closed. Noted his television was on, with the volume low. In an observation on 4/24/24 at 3:41 PM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room, laying on his left side facing the wall. Noted a guitar in Resident #63's room, leaning against the far wall. In an interview on 4/24/24 at 3:45 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y reported Resident #63 does not do much during the day, and spends most of his time in bed. CNA Y stated Resident #63 .comes alive at night . and will sometimes spend time with staff at the nurses desk, playing his guitar or coloring. In an observation on 4/25/24 at 9:50 AM, Resident #63 was noted in bed in his room, laying on his left side facing the wall. Noted his television was on, with the volume low. In an interview on 4/25/24 at 9:55 AM, CNA TT reported Resident #63 will occasionally be up all day strumming on his guitar, and then other days spends the majority of the day in bed. CNA TT reported she has not observed Resident #63 in any group activities. CNA TT reported Resident #63 sometimes enjoys going with staff to the cafeteria to get a pop. Review of the B Hall Activity Logs for February 2024 revealed Resident #63 was marked as participating in the activity Room Visit on 2/7/24, 2/11/24, 2/12/24, 2/17/24, 2/19/24-2/22/24, and 2/24/24-2/29/24, the independent activity Music/TV/Radio on 2/11/24, 2/12/24, 2/16/24, 2/17/24, and 2/19/24-2/29/24, the activity Social on 2/7/24, 2/14/24, 2/18/24, 2/20/24-2/23/24, and 2/29/24, the activity Music/Singing on 2/14/24 and 2/18/24, and the independent activity Crafts on 2/18/24. Noted no documentation to indicate if Resident #63 had been invited or encouraged to attend Religious or Outdoors activities. Review of the B Hall Activity Logs for March 2024 revealed Resident #63 was marked as participating in the activity Room Visit on 3/1/24-3/15/24, 3/17/24, 3/19/24-3/21/24, and 3/23/24-3/31/24, the independent activity Music/TV/Radio on 3/1/24-3/24/24 and 3/26/24-3/31/24, the independent activity Visitors on 3/5/24 and 3/24/24, the activity Music/Singing on 3/8/24 and 3/27/24, the activity Social on 3/11/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/27/24, and 3/30/24, the activity Movies/TV (TV Room) on 3/16/24, and the independent activity Crafts on 3/20/24. Noted no documentation to indicate if Resident #63 had been invited or encouraged to attend Religious or Outdoors activities. Reviewed the April 2024 Activity Calendar. Noted the activity Bible Study was scheduled every Tuesday at 10:30 AM, Thursday 4/18/24 at 2:00 PM, and Thursday 4/25/24 at 2:00 PM. Review of the B Hall Activity Logs for April 2024 revealed Resident #63 was marked as participating in the activity Room Visit on 4/1/24-4/9/24, 4/13/24-4/14/24, and 4/16/24-4/23/24, the independent activity Music/TV/Radio on 4/1/24-4/10/24, 4/13/24-4/14/24, and 4/16/24-4/22/24, the independent activity Visitors on 4/3/24, the activity Education on 4/5/24, the activity Social on 4/6/24, 4/8/24, 4/10/24, 4/14/24, 4/16/24, 4/17/24, 4/21/24, and 4/22/24, and the activity Pets/Birds on 4/14/24. Noted no documentation to indicate if Resident #63 had been invited or encouraged to attend Religious or Outdoors activities. In an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:15 AM, Community Enrichment Director OO stated in regard to Resident #63 .He is a very unique individual. He clicks with a few of my employees. Other times (Resident #63) is quick to push someone out . Community Enrichment Director OO reported Resident #63 sometimes comes out in the hallway to play music on his guitar, and stated .most of the time we only get him to do room visits . Community Enrichment Director OO reported documentation under the activity Social indicates the resident was participating in some type of social behavior, such as talking to another resident or staff in the hallway. Community Enrichment Director OO reported Social does not necessarily indicate a scheduled or group activity. Community Enrichment Director OO reported a Room Visit is typically 20-30 minutes long, and the content of this activity depends on resident preferences. Community Enrichment Director OO reported the activity Music/TV/Radio indicates that a resident was participating in this type of activity independently in their room. Community Enrichment Director OO reported Resident #63 does not attend religious activities. Community Enrichment Director OO reported Resident #63 should still be invited to attend group activities. Community Enrichment Director OO reported in regard to activity documentation, activity staff recently switched to documenting A for accept or D for decline on the activity logs, beginning 4/12/24, to show which activities the residents were invited to.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin breakdown for residents at risk for pressure ulcers, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin breakdown for residents at risk for pressure ulcers, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #69) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, resulting in the potential for the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer, infection, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #69 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included glaucoma, chronic pain, pain in right hip, low back pain, severe protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, disc degeneration lumbar region, and muscle weakness. Review of Care plan revised on 3/26/24, revealed the focus, .I am at risk for skin breakdown per my Braden assessment due to vision loss, general weakness, indwelling Foley use, potential shearing, medication use, abnormal labs, and chronic disease processes. I was admitted with open area to left great toe and am at risk for poor wound healing and/or unavoidable skin breakdown due to the above factors. DX: Prostate CA, BPH, anemia, HTN A-fib, glaucoma, PVD, chronic pain, malnutrition . with the interventions . Heel protector boots on while in bed as I allow .Standard turning & repositioning program except with sleep initiative which is defined as 0000-0400 .Skin Observation per protocol .Monitor and report signs of skin breakdown to Nurse . Review of Order Summary dated 3/27/24, revealed, .Apply betadine to toes on L foot every shift for skin prevention . Review of Order Summary dated 3/26/24, revealed, .Skin Observation Tool every day shift every Tuesday .Alert wound nurse/Unit manager of any new skin concerns . Review of Order Summary dated 4/7/24, revealed, .Monitor open areas to L foot every shift for s/s (signs & symptoms) infection every day shift for skin prevention . Review of Plan of Care Note dated 4/8/24 at 8:52 AM, revealed, .(Resident #69) is assessed as at risk for skin breakdown per Braden assessment, was admitted with open are to left great toe, and has preventive measures in place . Review of Health Status Note dated 4/14/24 at 12:45 PM, revealed, .He is compliant with care today as long as staff is explaining everything. He is blind L eye and visually impaired R eye .Betadine is applied to residents toes on L foot . Review of Health Status Note dated 4/17/2024 at 3:11 PM, revealed, .Resident is currently in his room and resting in bed .dependent on staff for total ADL care .Betadine is applied to toes on L foot per orders . Review of Health Status Note dated 4/17/2024 02:59 AM, revealed, .Resident is currently resting in bed .Betadine applied to toes with no s/s of worsening noted . During an observation on 04/23/24 at 10:56 AM, Resident #69 was observed lying in his bed, supine position, with his eyes closed. In an interview on 04/23/24 at 11:07 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N reported Resident #69 had wounds on the tops of his three toes on his left foot and they were treated with betadine. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 09:25 AM, Resident #69 reported his toes were painful and they didn't appear to be healing, and you can look at them and see why they are painful. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 09:25 AM, observed Resident #69 lying in his bed with his right foot right up against the foot board of the bed with his right knee bent, the left leg was bent at the knee and laid to the side with his left foot arch touching the calf area of his right leg. The left foot had a wound to the tip of the left great toe appearing as the toenail was lifting off the toe, the second toe had a scabbed area to the top of the first knuckle and a small spot without a scab, third toe had a scabbed area to the knuckle, and the fourth toe had multiple scabbed areas spread across the top of the toe. His right great toe had an open area where the scab had fallen off the tip of his toe, second toe had an open area on the base of the toe nail on the left side of it and on the right side of it, the third toe had an scabbed appearing area on the knuckle area, the fourth toe had damage to the base of the toenail and was black in appearance. The toenails on both of his feet did need to be trimmed. When queried on how tall Resident #69 was, he replied he was 6'4 tall. Resident #69's top of his head was approximately 2.5 inches from the end of the mattress at the head of the bed. The resident's head of the bed was at an approximate 45 degrees. Resident #69 did not have the prescribed blue heel boot protectors on either foot. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed no documentation of the declination of the heel protector boots. Review of Admit/Readmit Screener dated 3/26/24, .Section C: Skin Integrity: Details/Comments: Multiple scab areas/bruising x4 extremities .L big toe small pea sized open area at end of big toe .Pacemaker and foley in place . Review of Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 3/26/24, revealed a score of 18 which indicated the resident was At risk for pressure ulcers. During an observation on 04/24/24 at 12:26 PM, Resident #69 was lying in his bed, he did not have the blue heel protector boots on and both of his knees were bent upwards to prevent his feet from being pressed up against the head board. The head of his bed was approximately 30 degrees. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 12:28 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C reported Resident #69 did get assistance with his meals if he requests it. CNA C proceeded to enter Resident #69's room and spoke to him to see if he needed assistance with his meal. CNA C reported to the resident she was lowering his bed so she could adjust him in the bed to pull him up more in the bed and asked him to reach for the headboard and she would pull him up. CNA C repositioned the resident and placed the rolling tray table over the bed and informed the resident of where each item was located on his meal plate and tray. CNA C informed the resident where the call light was and guided his hand to show him. During an observation on 4/24/24 at 3:57 PM, Resident #69 was lying in his bed on his back and he had his legs bent at the knees and leaned over towards the left facing the wall. The head of the bed was approximately 45 degrees. His feet were at the end of the mattress touching the foot board. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 09:58 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) O reported when a skin assessment was completed the nurse would notify the wound nurse of any new wounds or changes to existing wounds and obtain treatment recommendations. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 10:03 AM, Maintenance I reported the maintenance department would be notified by a work order completed by staff. Maintenance I reported the request was on paper and after it was submitted the department had two days to respond to it unless it was deemed emergent. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 10:07 AM, Maintenance I reported Resident #69 had a standard bed which was 6 feet long, but all of their beds were convertible. Maintenance I reported there were two hand screws with twist handles, pull those out, adjust the bed and relock them. Maintenance I reported the head and food of the bed both extend outward approximately 12 inches. Maintenance I reported as he looked at Resident #69's positioning that the bed was not at a comfortable length for him but nursing would have had to initiate a work order for them to be aware of Resident #69's comfortableness and positioning in the bed. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 12:23 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF reported the nurse would complete the skin observation form in the medical record and if there was any concerns or changes, they would notify the wound nurse, ensure there were treatments in place and contact the appropriate contacts. LPN FF observed the photos of Resident #69's feet and reported those appeared to be pressure wounds which could have been caused by the linens on the bed or from being pressed against something. LPN FF reported the betadine was used to dry out wounds. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 11:56 AM, LPN N reported with skin concerns it would depend on the condition but would notify the wound nurse, add to alert charting to monitor the wound/skin condition, and obtain orders for treatment. LPN N reported Resident #69 preferred to have his feet tucked up and he had slight contractures to his legs. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 12:18 PM, Resident #69 stated, I don't think the sores on my toes are getting any better, can't be getting better if they are still putting medication on them, plus they hurt him and that treatment isn't working. The resident was up dressed and seated in his wheelchair. This writer asked Resident #69 if he could straighten out his legs, Resident #69 proceeded to outstretch his left leg and then his right leg completely. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 09:48 AM, Wound Care Nurse (WCN) F reported when the resident was admitted the wound care nurse would complete the initial admission skin check assessment for the new resident. When queried whether she was aware of the extent of skin concerns for Resident #69 she reported he was not on her rotation and she had not seen him. WCN F reviewed the medical record of Resident #69 and reviewed the skin assessments completed since admission and stated, 4/2/24: no skin issues, groin redness .4/9/24: no new skin issues .4/16/24: no new skin issues .and 4/23/24: no new skin issues. This writer and WNC F proceeded to Resident #69's room to make observations of his wounds on his bilateral toes. During an observation and interview on 04/25/24 at 09:53 AM, WNC F reported after she observed Resident #69's toes, he should have been on her rotation and would be on her rotation and would be seen by the wound provider. WNC F reported the wound looked like they would be pressure ulcers based on their appearance and reported she would complete a referral to the wound provider, who came to the facility to see residents, for them to see Resident #69.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly maintain standard infection control practice...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly maintain standard infection control practices during incontinence care for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #55 & #58) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the lack of hand hygiene and improper glove use, and the potential for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and cross-contamination of C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile: a highly contagious bacteria that causes an infection of the bowels). Findings include: Resident #55 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: down syndrome. Review of Resident #55's Physician Orders indicated orders for Contact Precautions. During an observation on 04/25/24 at 11:30 AM in Resident #55's room, CNA EE and CNA RR were giving Resident #55 a bed bath. Both CNA's were wearing gowns and gloves and providing direct care to the resident. Both CNA's changed their gloves multiple times during care, and did not perform any type of hand hygiene before donning clean gloves from the glove box on the wall near the entrance of the room. Both CNA's removed their gloves in the room and washed their hands for approximately 10-15 seconds in resident bathroom. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 11:57 AM, Infection Preventionist (IP) Z reported that Resident #55 tested positive for C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile: a highly contagious bacteria that causes an infection of the bowels) last week. IP Z reported that CNA's are expected to perform hand hygiene after removing soiled gloves and before donning clean gloves to ensure there is no cross contamination from dirty to clean. IP Z reported that staff were recently educated about C. Diff. and the importance of proper PPE (personal protective equipment) use. Resident #58 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #58 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which a stroke. Review of Resident #58's Physician Orders indicated orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). During an observation on 04/24/24 at 11:57 AM in Resident #58's room, CNA JJ and CNA RR were providing incontinence care to the resident who had a large BM (bowel movement). Both CNA's donned gloves and gowns, and began by changing the resident's gown. The BM was noted to be a large loose consistency. CNA RR was holding Resident #58 by her shoulder and hip to keep her positioned on her side, while CNA JJ used multiple washcloths to clean the residents backside. CNA JJ ran out of washcloths, removed her gloves and walked out the door into the hall, calling for assistance and more wash clothes. CNA JJ had removed her soiled gloves, touched the door knob, obtained clean washcloths, then donned clean gloves and resumed with incontinence care; CNA JJ did not perform any type of hand hygiene. With soiled gloves on, CNA JJ obtained clean bed linens, positioned them on the bed, and assisted to position Resident #58 onto her other side to continue washing the resident's bottom. There was a large wound dressing just above the anus, which had BM noted on it. CNA JJ gathered additional washcloths to clean Resident #58 front side and urinary catheter; CNA JJ was still wearing soiled gloves. CNA JJ then removed her gloves and walked out into the hall again to call for the nurse to assist with applying a medicated powder to the resident's abdominal folds. CNA JJ did not perform hand hygiene, and donned clean gloves. Registered Nurse (RN) O came into the room, wearing gloves and did not have a gown on, when she leaned on the resident's bed to observe the resident's skin, while CNA RR shook powder over the residents abdomen. RN O then reattached the resident's brief and assisted CNA JJ to boost Resident #58 up in the bed. In an interview on 04/24/24 at 12:33 PM, CNA JJ was unable to explain proper hand hygiene during in continence care, and/or when to change gloves. In an interview on 04/25/24 at 12:01 PM, IP Z reported that Resident #58 was currently on EBP due to chronic wounds. IP Z reported that staff are expected to wear gloves and a gown when providing direct care to Resident #58, and when in the resident's personal space for a prolonged period of time. IP Z reported that staff should perform hand hygiene every time they removed soiled gloves, when going from dirty to clean areas during baths or incontinence care, and before donning gloves.
Mar 2024 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to intake #MI00143146 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide services that m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to intake #MI00143146 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of nursing practice related to assessing, monitoring and providing wound care dressing changes for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for professional standards, resulting in ineffective monitoring, dressing changes not completed as ordered, inaccurate documentation, and Resident #101 having a skin tear not cared for for 4 days with signs and symptoms of a wound infection. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, general anxiety disorder, reduced mobility, and urinary tract infection. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 1/3/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 which indicated Resident #101 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Incident Note dated 2/22/24, 02:20 AM revealed . Resident has a new 5 cm skin tear to her right upper thigh .cleansed skin tear with NS (normal saline), patted dry, and covered with dry dressing .on call manager, provider, and family notified .new order to monitor skin tear till resolved and cleanse daily . Review of Midnight Census report as used for rounding requests for providers dated 2/22/24 revealed . Resident #101 was listed for an acute visit for a skin tear on the right thigh . Review of Progress Note from provider dated 2/22/24 revealed .reason for visit skin issue . chief complaint skin wound injury . right thigh skin tear .SKIN: right thigh skin tear noted .assessment: right thigh skin tear . Plan: Ensure proper wound care . Review of Physician Orders for Resident #101 revealed .monitor skin tear to right upper thigh every shift for worsening or s/s (signs and symptoms) of infection until resolved started on 2/22/24 at 07:00 AM and Cleanse skin tear to right upper thigh with NS and cover with a dry dressing daily until resolved. Review of Midnight Census report as used for rounding requests for providers dated 2/23/24 revealed Resident #101 was listed for an acute visit for a new skin issue and crossed out and indicated addressed 2/22. Review of Progress Notes for Resident #101 dated 2/25/24 revealed .continue to monitor skin tear on R (right) thigh. No s/s (sign and symptoms) infection noted . Review of Progress Notes for Resident #101 dated 2/26/24 revealed No s/s of infection to right thigh, will continue to monitor . Review of Progress Note for Resident #101 dated 2/27/24 at 07:00 revealed . skin tear to right thigh noted. Yellowish/green drainage noted on dressing. Dressing changed. Cleansed with NS, applied TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and covered with a dry dressing . placed in dr. (doctor) book for rounds in AM r/t (related to) increased drainage. Review of handwritten communication note dated 2/27/24 revealed CNA's (certified nurse assistant) called the nurses to change resident dressing to right thigh. Observed the dressing was dated for 2/22/24 .Order is in for it to be changed daily. It has been signed out all 4 days as done . wound is a lot bigger with green drainage . Review of Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #101 revealed documentation indicated the order for cleanse skin tear on right upper thigh with NS and cover with dry dressing daily until resolved. One time a day; and monitor skin tear to right upper thigh every shift for worsening or s/s of infection until resolved every shift; both orders were noted to be documented completed on each of the shifts on the dates 2/23/24, 2/24/24, 2/25/24, and 2/26/24 by the nurses working that shift. During an interview on 3/20/24 at 6:50 AM., CNA D reported that on 2/22/24 Resident #101 was found to have a skin tear on her right upper thigh. CNA D reported that a dressing was applied to the skin tear by the nurse on 2/22/24. CNA D reported the nurse was notified on 2/27/24 that the dressing on Resident #101's right upper thigh needed to be changed. CNA D reported that the dressing present on Resident #101's right thigh on 2/27/24 was dated as 2/22/24 at 2:20 AM. CNA D reported that Resident #101 verbalized pain during the dressing change on 2/27/24. CNA D reported that the wound appeared slimy with puss and green colored drainage, and the dressing was wet with green/yellow puss and drainage. Purulent drainage (pus or exudate) is a symptom of infection. This thick, milky fluid oozes from a wound that isn ' t healing properly. It contains a mixture of dead cells and bacteria, as well as white blood cells, which rush to the site at the first sign of injury. Pus from an infected wound might be white, yellow, green, pink or brown in color. Changes in purulent drainage color or odor usually mean the infection is getting worse. Left untreated, a wound with purulent drainage can turn into a chronic wound (also called a non-healing wound). This refers to a wound that doesn ' t heal within eight weeks. This type of infection can spread to other areas of your body, causing increased pain and a range of health complications .The best way to reduce your risk of purulent drainage is to clean and dress the wound properly. (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/purulent-drainage) During an interview on 3/20/24 at 6:09 AM., LPN H reported that on 2/27/24 the CNA notified her that Resident #101's dressing on her right thigh needed to be changed. LPN H reported that the dressing, dislodged from the wound area and was dated for 2/22/24 at 02:20 AM. LPN 'H reported that on 2/27/24 the dressing was noted to have green drainage, a foul odor, and the skin tear on Resident #101's right thigh appeared to be spread open with drainage present. During an interview on 3/20/24 at 7:46 AM., RN G reported that she applied a dressing to Resident #101's right upper thigh on 2/22/24 for a skin tear. RN G reported that the edges of the skin tear were well approximated (closely touching) and there was no noted blood or drainage on 2/22/24. RN G reported she completed a skin observation tool, an incident report, a progress note, and orders to change the dressing and monitor the wound daily. RN G reported she notified the manager, the provider, and family member about the injury. RN G reported that she was notified on 2/27/24 by the CNA that Resident #101's dressing needed to be changed. RN G reported that the dressing that was present on #101's right thigh was the same dressing she had applied on 2/22/24. RN G reported she verified there was an order in place to change the dressing daily and noted documentation in the TAR that the dressing change had been completed daily since the order was started on 2/22/23. RN G reported that the wound edges were no longer well approximated, and there was green/yellow drainage noted. RN G reported that the findings were noted in the doctor's book for increased drainage and as a request for a doctor's visit, and the findings were reported to the unit manager. Review of Staff Schedule for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed 8 licensed nurses had been assigned to care for Resident #101 during those dates. Review of TAR for Resident #101 for the dates of 2/23/24, 2/24/24, 2/25/24, and 2/26/24 revealed 8 licensed nurses had documented the completion of the order to monitor Resident #101's skin tear to the right upper thigh and documented completion of the ordered daily dressing change. Review of Staff Schedule for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed that RN L was scheduled to work with Resident #101 on two days during the hours of 7 am and 7 pm. Review of TAR for Resident #101 for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed that RN L documented she completed the daily dressing change to her right upper thigh on the two days she worked. During an interview on 3/19/24 at 4:06 PM., RN L reported that Resident #101 had a skin tear on her right inner thigh and the dressing was changed daily on the day shift and she did not recall any drainage. RN L reported she did not recall any time during a shift she worked when she was unable to complete the scheduled dressing change for Resident #101. During a telephone interview on 3/20/24 at 9:03 AM., RN L reported that an order to monitor a wound or dressing the nurse needs to look for changes and document if there are any. RN L reported that to monitor a dressing the nurse would make sure the dressing was clean, dry, and intact. RN L reported that dressings should be dated and timed when changed and during monitoring if the date is old that dressing should be changed. RN L stated that if a dressing had an old date, she would automatically change it. RN L reported that she recalls Resident #101 having a dressing to her right upper thigh but did not recall a time when she didn't change the dressing as ordered. Review of Staff Schedule for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed that RN J was scheduled to work with Resident #101 on one day during the hours of 7 am and 7 pm. Review of TAR for Resident #101 for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed that RN J documented she completed the daily dressing change to her right upper thigh on the one day she worked. During an interview on 3/20/24 at 8:20 AM., RN J reported that Resident #101 had a skin tear on her right upper thigh and the dressing was to be changed daily. RN J reported that dressing change documentation occurred on the TAR, and it should include when a dressing change was not completed. RN J reported that she did not have a day she documented completing Resident #101's dressing change and it did not occur. During an interview on 3/19/24 at 4:23 PM., Unit Manager (UM) I reported that Resident #101 did have a skin tear on her right upper thigh. UM I reported that the dressing was changed daily, there was no concern with the dressing change being completed. During a second interview on 3/20/24 at 10:29 AM., UM I reported that Resident #101 obtained a skin tear on 2/22/24 and there was an order for monitoring the wound every shift and an order for a daily dressing change. When asked, UM I confirmed that concerns that Resident #101's dressing changes were not being completed as ordered were brought to her attention on 2/27/24. UM I reported that she assessed Resident #101's wound by pealing back the dressing and visualizing the wound and there was no drainage present. UM I reported she asked the wound nurse to monitor Resident #101's wound. UM I reported Resident #101 was not added to the providers rounding list to be seen since the wound had no drainage when she assessed it. UM I reported that she did not document her assessment of Resident #101's wound. UM I reported that she discussed the concerns for Resident #101's dressing changes not being completed with the management team and a one-to-one education was provided to one nurse. UM I reported that there was no documentation regarding the concern, the discussion, or the one-to-one education she provided. UM I reported that she did not complete an investigation into the concern for Resident #101's dressing changes not being done. The Professional Standard of Quality for documentation of the resident's health care in a medical record is the information must be true and complete. Under no circumstances should erroneous records be removed from the overall record and new pages submitted. (Fundamentals of Nursing, Concepts, and Practice. Mosby. [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., 1985) According to the Nursing's Social Policy Statement (American Nurses Association, 2003, pg. 2), Society grants the professions authority over functions vital to itself and permits them considerable autonomy in the conduct of their affairs. In return, the professions are expected to act responsibly, always mindful of the public trust. Self-regulation to assure quality in performance is at the heart of this relationship. It goes on to state (pg. 11), Professional nursing .is accountable for ensuring that its members act in the public interest in the course of providing the unique service society has entrusted to them.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

This citation pertains to intake #MI00143146 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, and treat a resident with a skin tear in 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
This citation pertains to intake #MI00143146 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, and treat a resident with a skin tear in 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in an Resident #101 having a skin tear not cared for for 4 days and signs and symptoms of a wound infection due to lack of care. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, general anxiety disorder, reduced mobility, and urinary tract infection. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 1/3/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 which indicated Resident #101 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #101 revealed .monitor skin tear to right upper thigh every shift for worsening or s/s (signs and symptoms) of infection until resolved started on 2/22/24 at 07:00 AM and Cleanse skin tear to right upper thigh with NS and cover with a dry dressing daily until resolved. Review of Progress Note from provider dated 2/22/24 revealed .reason for visit skin issue . chief complaint skin wound injury . right thigh skin tear .SKIN: right thigh skin tear noted .assessment: right thigh skin tear . Plan: Ensure proper wound care . Review of Progress Notes for Resident #101 dated 2/25/24 revealed .continue to monitor skin tear on R (right) thigh. No s/s (sign and symptoms) infection noted . Review of Progress Notes for Resident #101 dated 2/26/24 revealed No s/s of infection to right thigh, will continue to monitor . Review of Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #101 revealed documentation indicated the order for cleanse skin tear on right upper thigh with NS and cover with dry dressing daily until resolved. One time a day; and monitor skin tear to right upper thigh every shift for worsening or s/s of infection until resolved every shift; both orders were noted to be documented as completed on each of the shifts on the dates 2/23/24, 2/24/24, 2/25/24, and 2/26/24. No documentation was noted to indicate that the orders were not complete. Review of Staff Schedule for the dates of 2/23/24 through 2/26/24 revealed 8 licensed nurses had been assigned to care for Resident #101 during those dates. Review of TAR for Resident #101 for the dates of 2/23/24, 2/24/24, 2/25/24, and 2/26/24 revealed 8 licensed nurses had documented the completion of the order to monitor Resident #101's skin tear to the right upper thigh and 4 licensed nurses had documented completion of the ordered daily dressing change. Review of Progress Note for Resident #101 dated 2/27/24 at 07:00 revealed . skin tear to right thigh noted. Yellowish/green drainage noted on dressing. Dressing changed. Cleansed with NS, applied TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and covered with a dry dressing . placed in dr. book for rounds in AM r/t (related to) increased drainage. Review of handwritten communication note dated 2/27/24 revealed CNA's (certified nurse assistant) called the nurses to change resident dressing to right thigh. Observed the dressing was dated for 2/22/24 .Order is in for it to be changed daily. It has been signed out all 4 days as done . wound is a lot bigger with green drainage . During an interview on 3/20/24 at 6:50 AM., CNA D reported that on 2/22/24 Resident #101 was found to have a skin tear on her right upper thigh. CNA D reported that a dressing was applied to the skin tear by the nurse on 2/22/24. CNA D reported the nurse was notified on 2/27/24 that the dressing on Resident #101's right upper thigh needed to be changed. CNA D reported that the dressing present on Resident #101's right thigh on 2/27/24 was dated as 2/22/24 at 2:20 AM. CNA D reported that Resident #101 verbalized pain during the dressing change on 2/27/24. CNA D reported that the wound appeared slimy with pus and green colored drainage, and the dressing was wet with green/yellow puss and drainage. CNA D reported that the dressing on Resident #101's right leg appeared to not have been changed for 4 days. Purulent drainage (pus or exudate) is a symptom of infection. This thick, milky fluid oozes from a wound that isn ' t healing properly. It contains a mixture of dead cells and bacteria, as well as white blood cells, which rush to the site at the first sign of injury. Pus from an infected wound might be white, yellow, green, pink or brown in color. Changes in purulent drainage color or odor usually mean the infection is getting worse. Left untreated, a wound with purulent drainage can turn into a chronic wound (also called a non-healing wound). This refers to a wound that doesn ' t heal within eight weeks. This type of infection can spread to other areas of your body, causing increased pain and a range of health complications .The best way to reduce your risk of purulent drainage is to clean and dress the wound properly. (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/purulent-drainage) During an interview on 3/20/24 at 6:09 AM., LPN H reported that on 2/27/24 the CNA notified her that Resident #101's dressing on her right thigh needed to be changed. LPN H reported that the dressing, dislodged from the wound area and was dated for 2/22/24 at 02:20 AM. LPN 'H reported that on 2/27/24 the dressing was noted to have green drainage, a foul odor, and the skin tear on Resident #101's right thigh appeared to be spread open with drainage present. LPN 'H reported that the dressing appeared to have not been changed in 4 days when it should have been changed daily. During an interview on 3/20/24 at 7:46 AM., RN G reported that she applied a dressing to Resident #101's right upper thigh on 2/22/24 for a skin tear. RN G reported that the edges of the skin tear were well approximated (closely touching) and there was no noted blood or drainage on 2/22/24. RN G reported she completed a skin observation tool, an incident report, a progress note, and orders to change the dressing and monitor the wound daily. RN G reported she notified the manager, the provider, and family member about the injury. RN G reported that she was notified on 2/27/24 by the CNA that Resident #101's dressing needed to be changed. RN G reported that the dressing that was present on #101's right thigh was the same dressing she had applied on 2/22/24. RN G reported she verified there was an order in place to change the dressing daily and noted documentation in the TAR that the dressing change had been completed daily since the order was started on 2/22/23. RN G reported that the wound edges were no longer well approximated, and there was green/yellow drainage noted. RN G reported that the findings were noted in the doctor's book for increased drainage and as a request for a doctor's visit, and the findings were reported to the unit manager. During an interview on 3/19/24 at 4:23 PM., Unit Manager (UM) I reported that Resident #101 did have a skin tear on her right upper thigh. UM I reported that the dressing was changed daily, there was no concern with the dressing change being completed and that the wound had not healed prior to Resident #101 passing away on 3/15/24. During a second interview on 3/20/24 at 10:29 AM., UM I reported that Resident #101 obtained a skin tear on 2/22/24 and there was an order for monitoring the wound every shift and an order for a daily dressing change. When asked, UM I confirmed that concerns that Resident #101's dressing changes were not being completed as ordered were brought to her attention on 2/27/24. UM I reported that she assessed Resident #101's wound by pealing back the dressing and visualizing the wound and there was no drainage present. UM I reported she asked the wound nurse to monitor Resident #101's wound. UM I reported Resident #101 was not added to the providers rounding list to be seen since the wound had no drainage when she assessed it (after the dressing had already been changed). UM I reported that she did not document her assessment of Resident #101's wound. UM I reported that she discussed the concerns for Resident #101's dressing changes not being completed with the management team and a one-to-one education was provided to one nurse. UM I reported that there was no documentation regarding the concern, the discussion, or the one-to-one education she provided. UM I reported that she did not complete an investigation into the concern for Resident #101's dressing changes not being done.
Mar 2023 9 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #40) resulting ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #40) resulting in the worsening and infection of a cyst. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #40 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, weakness, anxiety, restlessness & agitation, reduced mobility, dementia, and lipomatous neoplasm of skin and subcutaneous tissue of right arm (fatty tumor located just below the skin), and cyst. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #40, revised on 3/13/23, revealed the focus, .I have been diagnosed with skin infection r/t (related to) cyst (middle upper chest) . with the intervention .Administer antibiotic medications as ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness .Observe and report signs of cellulitis: Localized pain, redness, swelling, tenderness, drainage, fever, chills, malaise, tachycardia, hypotension .Observe and report signs of sepsis: fever, lassitude or malaise, change in mental status, tachycardia, hypotension, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, lymph node tenderness/enlargement .Tx (treatment) per MD orders . Review of electronic correspondence provided on 3/22/23 at 1:30 PM, Unit Manager Z reported, .8/16/2022 (Previous Provider) states in a monthly visit, left chest wall mass-seems to be a cyst, non-infected. Will have alert charting to see whether it becomes red, painful or starts to drain. If so, can refer him to CFC to have it drained. Otherwise for now just monitor .10/25/2022 (Previous Provider) states in a monthly visit, left chest mass mass-seems to be a cyst, non-infected. Will have alert charting to see whether it becomes red, painful, or starts to drain. Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 3/6/23 at 2:06 PM, .Cyst on left side of chest has some redness around it and no drainage . Review of Doctor Visit/Chart Review dated 3/6/23 at 5:27 PM, revealed, .ACUTE VISIT .the patient is being seen today by (Provider Name) for complains of left chest cyst. Cyst is hard, immobile, not tender and measures 5x3 CM .Assessment: Left cyst chest .Plan: Continue monitoring . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/13/23 at 1:49 PM, revealed, .Cyst on left chest warm, pink/red, size has remained unchanged since Friday, 3/10; now appears with visible with head; tender to touch . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/14/2023 at 00:15 AM, revealed, .Easily aroused for po ABT for cellulitis on middle upper chest. Area swollen and appears to be slightly more swollen but remains dark pink to red in color. It is the same temperature as surrounding skin. No discomfort and (Resident #40) said, No when asked about pain in this area. I explained about infection and swelling . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/14/2023 at 11:36 AM, revealed, .Cyst on left chest warm, pink/red, size has remained unchanged since Friday, 3/10; now appears with visible white heads; tender to touch. VS WNL with the exception of temp 99.3; scheduled acetaminophen given - effective. No s/e, s/s of ABT noted . Review of Vitals Note dated 3/14/23 at 12:10 PM, revealed, .TEMPERATURE WARNING: 99.3 .High of 99.0 exceeded . Review of Skin Tool Audit completed on 3/14/23 at 1:27 PM, revealed, .(Resident #40) .Location: Lt. Upper Chest .Type: Cyst .Treatment Order: N (no) .Monitor Order: Y (yes) . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/15/23 at 00:48 AM, revealed, .Remains on antibiotic for cyst to upper chest, area red and raised with two small white pus pockets present in center . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 3/15/2023 at 7:48 PM, revealed, .Resident alert and oriented. Chest abscess red and swollen but resident continues to tolerate ABX .ABD (abdominal gauze pads) applied over abscess to catch any drainage if needed . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/16/2023 at 11:34 PM, revealed, .Skin pink, warm, and dry. Lump on upper middle chest covered with dry dressing. (Resident) reports the area itches at times. Continues on ABT for cellulitis on chest at this time. Temperature 99.0 . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/17/2023 at 1:43 PM, revealed, .Cyst on left chest covered with bandage; oozing with yellow drainage, open red areas and yellow pustules (bulging patch of skin contains fluid or pus); tender to touch. VS WNL; scheduled acetaminophen for pain. No s/e (side effects), s/s (signs or symptoms) of ABT (antibiotic) noted . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/18/2023 at 00:57 AM, revealed, .Resting in bed with eyes closed but aroused easily for po ABT and dressing change. Skin pink, warm, and dry. Lump on upper middle chest has three open areas measuring .5cmX.5cm,.5cmX.5cm (both on left side of lump) and 1.2cmX1.2cm (on right side of lump).dressing had moderate amount of purulent drainage and slight amount of dark pink drainage. Area remained dark red in color and swollen but surrounding skin pink and intact. (Resident #40) called out with removal of old dressing and during procedure to cleanse area but closed eyes and quieted once new dressing placed over the area. Continues on ABT (antibiotic) for cellulitis on chest at this time. Afebrile . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/18/2023 at 11:22 AM, revealed, .Cyst on left chest covered with bandage; oozing with yellow drainage, open red areas and yellow pustules; tender to touch. VS WNL; scheduled acetaminophen for pain. No s/e (side effects), s/s (sign or symptoms) of ABT (antibiotic) noted . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 3/19/2023 at 1:09 PM, revealed, .Resident alert and oriented to self .Resident up in wheelchair and continues to take his abx for the cyst on his upper chest .Cyst on upper chest continues to drain purulent drainage (a sign of infection, it is a white, yellow, or brown fluid, might be slightly thick, made up of white blood cells trying to fight infection, there may be an unpleasant smell to the fluid) at this time .Dressing changed and resident tolerated it well . Review of Social Service Note dated 3/20/2023 at 3:17 PM, revealed, .(Resident #40) is tearful and stating, I'm hurting .(Resident #40) voiced, I just want to go Review of Orders dated 3/20/23, revealed, .Referral to General Surgery for cyst extraction . In an interview on 03/21/23 at 12:53 PM, Resident #40 was observed lying in his bed. Resident #40's wife reported a nurse tried to pop the spot on his chest, she thought it was a blackhead, but it wasn't. R#40's wife reported it was a growth filled with fluid, (Resident #40) was taking medications for it. R#40's wife thought the facility referred him to (local hospital) to see a wound doctor. During an observation on 03/21/23 at 02:44 PM, observed dressing change for Resident #40. Observed bandage dated 3/20/23 with initials of nurse who completed dressing change on 3/20/23 at 7:08 PM. RN D prompted Resident #40 on how she was proceeding with the dressing change. Observed removal of previous dressing, Resident #40 was very painful, grimacing/wincing and calling out in pain. Resident #40 was observed to be painful in the areas surrounding the golf ball sized cyst as well. Resident #40 was observed to reach to grab something with his hands on the side of the bed. Resident #40's skin on and around the cyst was very red and inflamed, a dark reddish color and the dressing showed purulent drainage on the gauze. When RN D proceeded to clean the wound, Resident #40 was observed to be very painful, grimacing/wincing in pain. RN D stated to Resident #40, .No, no more .All done . Resident #40 was grabbing at side of the bed. RN D proceeded to place the new dressing, and Resident #40 grimaced/winced in pain. RN D reported Resident #40 had broken out in a rash and a new course of antibiotics was prescribed, she reported today was the last day of 10 days of the two previously prescribed antibiotics. RN D reported the resident did receive Tylenol prior to the dressing change. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 10:43 AM, CNA H reported Resident #40's wife told her the nurse popped it. CNA H reported she did that a couple of weeks ago and since then it has gotten big and really red. CNA 'H reported the cyst did not bother him, he had no complaints until now. CNA H stated, .It is bothering him since the nurse did what she did with it .Have to be careful when getting him dressed or touch in that area .It really hurts him .She doesn't work at the facility anymore .Heard she was terminated . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 02:10 PM, CNA FF reported the cyst had been there a long time. CNA FF stated, .I came in for my shift and I took his shirt off and saw it, I asked what happened to chest. (Resident #40's) wife reported the nurse took a needle to it, popped it and it smelled really, really bad . CNA FF' reported the cyst was painful and he did clutch his chest when it was bothering him, even when no one was touching it. CNA FF reported it is upsetting as it was not bothering him until she did that. CNA FF reported the nurse does not work here anymore. In an interview on 3/22/23 at 11:21 AM, Unit Manager Z reported the cyst was first noted last August and it remained stable until recently .when it got infected . When queried on how the cyst became infected, UM Z stated, .There was a floor nurse who was not here for very long .She worked first shift .She had no orders to do anything to the cyst only to just monitor the cyst .There was no investigation conducted in to her actions .Was not aware the nurse tried to pop or aspirate the cycst until after the fact when it was placed on the doctor's board on Monday, 3/6/23 .Unsure of when the incident occurred . UM Z reported monitoring was to look for redness and if it was painful .Prior to that day, there was no issue for months and months . In an interview on 3/22/23 at 11:27 AM, Unit Manager R reported the nurse had tried to aspirate it with a needle .The nurse used term blackhead, she never talked to other nurse about cyst indicating what she saw or what she had done .(Resident #40) never had pain until that happened .Couple of antibiotics started on 3/10/23 .(Resident #40 got a rash and received Benadryl .He was switched to another antibiotic to continue until he goes to surgery appointment on 4/4/23. When queried if the nurse documented on her actions in a progress note, the response was No .The cyst was currently draining fluid and due to the drainage indicating the cyst was open .the resident should be on enhanced barrier precautions. When queried if resident was currently on enhanced barrier precautions, UM R reported he was not.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and /or worsening of pressure...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and /or worsening of pressure ulcers in 2 of 2 residents (R56 and R31) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, resulting in the worsening of a sacral pressure ulcer and deep tissue injury for R56 and the development of pressure ulcers for R31. Findings include: Resident #56: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #56 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, down syndrome, adult failure to thrive, need for assistance with personal care, kidney failure, and incontinence without sensory awareness. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #56, revised on 12/31/22, revealed the focus, .I am at high risk for skin breakdown per my Braden assessment. I was admitted with an unstageable pressure injury to the sacrum and acquired a DTI (deep tissue injury) to my right ischial with the potential for further skin breakdown r/t cognitive loss, communication deficits, incontinence, immobility . with the intervention .Turn & reposition every 2 hour in bed and chair (1/12/23) .Monitor and report signs of skin breakdown to Nurse (12/17/22) .Apply- Skin Protectant to bilateral buttocks (12/16/22) .Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness (12/18/22) .Skin observation 3x weekly per protocol (1/12/23) .Heel protector boots when in bed (2/15/23) .Please only have resident up with meals, but no longer than 2 hours in chair at a time (3/7/23) and Please assist me back to bed if I have been in my chair for more than 2 hours at a time . Review of admission Report Sheet/Hand Off Form dated 12/16/23, revealed, .Skin Condition: Coccyx .Treatments/Dressing orders: Mepilex . Review of Doctor Visit/Chart Review dated 12/20/23 at 10:24 AM, revealed, .Assessment and Plan: 4. Stage 2 PU (pressure ulcer) - local wound care measures. Does not reposition self. Will need offloading and monitoring . Review of Health Status Note dated 12/23/2022 7:38 PM, revealed, .Note Text: Resident's wounds noted on admission assessed by Wound Care Coordinator (WCC) RN. Sacrum: Unstageable pressure ulcer to medial sacrum measuring 2.4 x 1.4 X 0.1 cm with wound bed tissue consisting of 70% yellow slough tissue and 30% red granulation tissue. Wound edges well-defined and without tunneling, undermining, or epibole (wound edge curling). Peri-wound tissue WNL without erythema, heat, or induration. R. Ischium: previously noted deep tissue injury evolved into a stage II pressure injury measuring 2.1 x 2.4 x 0.1cm. Wound bed consists of 100% red granulation tissue. Wound edges ill-defined but without undermining, tunneling, or epibole. Peri-wound tissue WNL without erythema, induration, or heat .Recommend treatment with leptospermum honey to both wounds and covering with the sacral wound with a optifoam sacral dressing every three days to promote autolytic debridement. The ischial wound will also be covered with an optifoam dressing every three days . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 12/26/2022 at 3:31 PM, revealed, .Resident's wounds reassessed during wound rounds. Unstageable wound to sacrum measures 1.8 x 1.0 x 0.1cm with wound bed tissue consisting of 80% yellow slough tissue and 20% red granulation tissue. Wound edges well-defined and without undermining, tunneling, or epibole. Peri-wound tissue without erythema, induration, or heat. The deep tissue injury to the resident's left ischial tuberosity (bony protrusion which takes the body's weight during sitting) has evolved into a stage II pressure injury measuring 0.9 x 0.8x 0.1cm with wound bed consisting of 100% red granulation tissue. Wound edges WNL without undermining, tunneling, or epibole. Peri-wound tissue without erythema, induration, or heat observed .Recommend continuing with current treatment orders . Review of Health Status Note dated 12/30/2022 at 03:14 PM, revealed, .Resting in bed with eyes closed at this time .Skin pale pink, warm, and dry. Extreme dry skin on chest and bottom of both feet with peeling, chest skin receiving medication treatment. Has two areas with intact drsg. in place, one on thigh and one over coccyx . Review of Order dated 1/2/23, revealed, .Keep resident's head of bed to 30 degrees or less except when eating/drinking and 30 minutes after PO intake . Review of Order dated 1/9/23, revealed, .Wound Consult . Review of Order dated 1/11/23, revealed, .Skin Observation Tool: every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri Alert Wound Nurse/Unit Manager of any new skin concerns . Review of Order dated 1/12/23, revealed, .Monitor Sacrum (PI) two times a day for s/s of worsening or infection . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 1/2/2023 at 09:31 AM, revealed, .Resident's wounds reassessed by WCC RN .The unstageable pressure injury to the resident's sacrum measures 1.7 x 1.3 x 0.1cm. No exudate noted upon dressing removal. Wound bed consists of 70% yellow slough tissue and 30% red granulation tissue. Wound edges are circular in configuration and they are without undermining, tunneling, or epibole. Peri-wound tissue WNL and without erythema, induration, or heat. Recommend increasing frequency of dressing changes to sacrum to twice daily. The head of the resident's bed should be kept to 30 degrees or lower except when the resident is eating/drinking and 30 minutes afterwards to reduce shearing forces to the wound bed. Will also add liquid protein supplementation daily . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 1/2/2023, revealed, .Sacrum: Pressure Ulcer, Unstageable .Wound Measurements: 1.7x 1.3x 0.1CM .Granulation: 30% wound filled .Slough: 70% wound filled .Surrounding Tissue: Denuded: loss of epidermis caused by exposure to urine, feces, body fluids, wound exudate, or friction .Progress: Deteriorating . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 1/2/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Stage: Deep Tissue Injury .Left Ischial Tuberosity . Note: No other data. Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 1/7/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Stage: Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss .Sacrum .Measurements: 3.0 x 2.0 x 2.0 CM .Epithelial: 0% of wound covered .Granulation: 10% of wound filled .Slough: 80% of wound filled .Eschar: 10% of wound filled .Exudate: Light, Purulent (sign of infection, made up white blood cells trying to fight the infection, it's white, yellow, or brown fluid, and there may be an unpleasant smell to the fluid) .Open lesion .Left Ischial Tuberosity .Measurements: .7 x .8 x .1 CM .Granulation: 90% of wound filled .Slough: 0% of wound filled .No infection noted. Wound appears to be a shearing injury. Triad cream applied as dressing . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 1/9/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 3.0 x 2.8 x 1.5 CM .Slough: 100% wound filled .Exudate: Light, Serous (thin, watery fluid produced in response to local inflammation) .Surrounding Tissue: Denuded: loss of epidermis caused by exposure to urine, feces, body fluid, wound exudate, or friction .Erythema: Redness of the skin: may be intense bright red to dark red or purple . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 1/23/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: None entered .Slough: 100% wound filled .Exudate: Light, Serous . Surrounding Tissue: Erythema: Redness of the skin - may be intense bright red to dark red to purple .Progress: Deteriorating . Review of Doctor Visit/Chart Review dated 1/23/23 at 4:07 PM, revealed, .Late Entry: Visit per (Wound Provider) services (Wound provider) MD .Change in treatment to be made .Primary Nurse apprised . Review of Treatment Administration Report (TAR) for January 2023, revealed, .Sacrum: Cleanse with NS (normal saline) or wound cleanser. Apply leptospermum honey to wound bed. Cover with bordered gauze dressing. In the morning for Unstageable Pressure Injury .Start date: 1/18/23 .D/C date: 1/24/23 . For dates: 1/20/23 and 1/23/23 the order was not implemented and not denoted on the report. Review of Treatment Administration Report (TAR) for January 2023, revealed, .Skin Observation Tool every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri. Alert Wound Nurse/Unit Manager of any new skin concerns .Start date: 1/11/23 at 07:00 AM . For date, 1/20/23 the order was not implemented and not denoted on the report. Review of medical record revealed, Resident #56 was in isolation from 1/31/23 to 2/11/23 due to testing positive for COVID-19. Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 2/1/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 1.6 x 1.2 x 1.9 CM .Epithelial 10% wound covered .Granulation: 10% wound filled .Slough: 80% wound filled .Other: Bleeding, Pink or Red .Exudate: Light, Serous . Review of Health Status Note dated 2/5/2023 at 10:47 PM, revealed, .Remains in Enhanced respiratory isolation for + COVID on 1/31. Resting in bed with eyes open. Communication per typical with looks, movement, and occasionally a word or two. Accepted offered evening snack. Skin pale pink, warm, and dry. Resp. even and unlabored. No cough heard. VS stable . Review of Doctor Visit/Chart Review dated 2/7/2023 at 6:34 PM, revealed, .Note Text: (Wound Provider) PA from (Wound Care Provide Business Name) wound care here to see resident . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 2/9/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 2.8 x 2.3 x 1.5 CM . Granulation: 10% wound filled .Slough: 90% wound filled .Surrounding Tissue: Erythema: Redness of the skin - may be intense bright red to dark red to purple .Progress: Deteriorating . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 2/16/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 2.7 x 1.8 x 1.9 CM .Slough: 100% wound filled . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 2/21/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 4.2 x 1.9 x 3.1 CM . Eschar: 100% .Exudate: Light, Serous .Surrounding Tissue: Erythema: Redness of the skin - may be intense bright red to dark red to purple . Review of Treatment Administration Report (TAR) for February 2023, revealed, .Monitor Sacrum (PI) two times a day for s/s of worsening or infection .Start Date: 1/12/2023 . For date, 2/26/23 the order was not implemented and not denoted on the report. Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 3/2/2023, revealed, .Pressure: Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 1.7 x 1.4 x 1.5 CM . Slough: 90% .Exudate: Light, Serous .Surrounding Tissue: Erythema: Redness of the skin - may be intense bright red to dark red to purple . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 3/7/2023 at 3:04 PM, revealed, .Resident currently in bed, alert and oriented to self .Coccyx wound cleansed with normal saline, santyl and optiform applied .Right gluteal fold red, blanchable and center is unstageable injury .Optiform applied to site . Doctor Visit/Chart Review 3/7/2023 6:23 PM, revealed, .Note Text: (Wound Care Provide Business Name) wound visit per (Wound Provider) PA . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 3/7/2023, revealed, .Pressure .Deep Tissue Injury - Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration .In-House Acquired .New .Measurements: 2.2 x 2.0 x 1.6 CM . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 3/7/2023, revealed, .Pressure .Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 3.0 x 2.1 x 1.9 CM . Slough: 50% wound filled .Eschar: 50% wound filled .Exudate: Serous . Review of Skin Tool Audit completed on 3/8/23 at 1:27 PM, revealed, .(Resident #56) .Location: Sacrum .Type: Pressure .Stage: Unstageable .admitted with: Y (yes) .(Resident #56) .Location: R (right) hip .Type: Pressure .Stage: SDTI (deep tissue injury) .admitted with: N (no) .Noted: 3/7/23 . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/8/2023 at 2:34 PM, revealed, .DTI (Deep tissue injury) to right buttocks treatment continues, slight purple red in color, skin prep applied . Review of Order dated 3/8/23, revealed, .Sacral Unstageable pressure injury: Cleanse wound with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply 0.125% Dakin's gauze in wet to moist fashion, cover with bordered gauze one time a day for Sacral unstageable pressure injury AND as needed for Sacral unstageable pressure injury . Review of Order dated 3/8/23, revealed, .Monitor Rt Ischial for s/s of worsening or infection two times a day for DTI (deep tissue injury) . Review of Order dated 3/8/23, revealed, Apply Sureprep to bilateral Hips (Ischial)two times a day .two times a day for Right Ischial DTI, left hip preventive . Review of Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 3/10/23, revealed, .Score: 14.0 .Moderate Risk . Review of Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 3/14/2023, revealed, .Pressure .Unstageable .Due to: Slough and/or eschar .Sacrum .Measurements: 3.4 x 2.8 x 1.7 CM .Granulation: 20% wound filled .Slough: 90% wound filled .Exudate: Light, Serous .Surrounding Tissue: Erythema: Redness of the skin - may be intense bright red to dark red to purple .Progress: Stalled . Review of Wound Assessments dated 3/14/23, revealed, .Wound #1 Sacral is an Unstageable Pressure Injury Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss Pressure Ulcer and has received a status of Not Healed. Subsequent wound encounter measurements are 3.1cm length x 1.7cm width x 0.6cm depth, with an area of 5.27 sq cm and a volume of 3.162 cubic cm. There is a small amount of sero-sanguineous drainage (liquid drainage which contains blood) noted which has no odor. The patient reports a wound pain of level 1/10. The wound is improving .The periwound skin texture is normal. The periwound skin moisture is normal. The periwound skin color is normal. The temperature of the periwound skin is WNL. Periwound skin does not exhibit signs or symptoms of infection Wound #2 Right Ischial is a Deep Tissue Pressure Injury Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple decoloration Pressure Ulcer and has received a status of Not Healed. Subsequent wound encounter measurements are 2.1cm length x 1.6cm width with no measurable depth, with an area of 3.36 sq cm . There was no drainage noted. The patient reports a wound pain of level 0/10. The wound is deteriorating The periwound skin texture is normal. The periwound skin moisture is normal. The periwound skin color is normal. The temperature of the periwound skin is WNL. Periwound skin does not exhibit signs or symptoms of infection .General Notes: Portion of wound with intact serous (fluid) filled blister . Review of Treatment Administration Report (TAR) for March 2023, revealed, .Santyl Ointment 250 UNIT/GM (Collagenase) Apply to per additional directions topically in the morning for Unstageable Pressure Injury .Sacrum: Cleanse with NS only. Apply to Santyl to wound bed with approximately a nickels width thickness. Cover with bordered gauze dressing .Start Date: 1/27/2023 .D/C Date: 3/8/2023 . For date, 3/3/23 the order was not implemented and not denoted on the report. During an observation on 03/20/23 at 01:04 PM, Resident #56 was [NAME] back to her room and left seated in her chair. In an interview on 03/20/23 02:34 PM, CNA QQ reported the facility was thinking her pressure ulcers on her bottom were from the resident's chair. In an interview on 03/20/23 at 02:51 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) J reported Resident #56 had two areas, one on her sacrum and one on her coccyx. RN J stated, .She has got a few areas on her bottom .She likes to sit up and watch people and we think that from her being seated in her chair for long periods of time it was not helping that wound, it was getting worse .Had to curb that down and get her back to bed, after meals will have her get placed in bed to off load . Review of NAR Note dated 3/21/2023 at 12:44 PM, revealed, .NAR team monitoring r/t dx PCM, low BMI, compromised skin integrity, dysphagia, and UTI .Skin: Per wound physician note 3.14.23 PU sacral improving, PU R ischial deteriorating. Skin and Wound Eval 3.15.23 DTI pressure not set, PU sacrum improving, open lesion resolved .Recommend: increase additional fluids 120 ml QID (4 times a day), eval for swallow study to advance texture/liquid consistency. Continue monitor PRN and respect res choice . During an observation on 03/21/23 at 01:09 PM, Resident #56 was observed lying in her bed with the head of her bed at approximately 80 degrees. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 10:50 AM, CNA H reported Resident #56 mostly gets up on first shift. CNA H reported when she comes in for second shift and she was up in her chair, we lay her down. CNA H reported she had a time limit of how long she can be in her chair now. In an interview of 03/22/23 at 11:12 AM, Unit Manager (UM) R reported the skin audit were completed weekly, nurse would notify the UM if there was a new wound. UM would observed the wound and if it was an actual wound the resident would be referred to the wound provider who comes to the facility every Tuesday. UM R reported that was when the measurements were taken of the wound as well as photographs of the wound. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 11:15 AM, UM Z reported the skin audits were completed this morning. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 1:00 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported, Wound Tracking - the facility has been working on (before we lost our wound nurse) the whole wound process. How the Braden translates to actual care. The facility has kind of done an algorithm. We had also worked on wound types and so forth. The unit managers keep a line listing of skin issues. It helps them track what all needs to happen with them. NHA A reported we do at least weekly skin observations. Based on the Braden, the nursing staff may do more frequent observations, as well as, the shower aides work with the nurse on those. NHA A reported the facility had an alert in (electronic medical record) - as a communication tool. The facility had a wound care team, and (Outside wound provider) that comes in weekly, and if there was a new wound that the outside provider needed to see, it was communicated either by verbalization or notes. Review of policy, Pressure Injury Risk Assessment dated 11/2022, revealed, .Procedure: 1.Pressure injury risk assessments will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse on admission/re-admission, weekly times four weeks, then quarterly, and as needed. Assessments may also be conducted after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injury .2.Standardized pressure injury risk assessments will be conducted, using a validated risk assessment tool or scale. Braden Scale has been designated as the standardized tool .a. Each item will be scored individually (i.e. moisture, mobility, nutrition) .b. Individual scores will be added to obtain an overall score .c. Consider at risk according to the parameters set by the validated tool .3. Each item on the standardized risk assessment will be considered, individually, to ensure risk factors are addressed appropriately, regardless of the total risk score .4. The tool will be used in conjunction with assessment of other risk factors not captured by the risk assessment tool. (i.e. presence of a pressure injury, prior stage 3 or 4 pressure injury, hypoperfusion states, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, smoking, restraint use, spinal cord injury, end-of-life/palliative care) .5. Residents determined as at risk for developing pressure injuries will have interventions documented in plan of care based on specific factors identified in the risk assessment .7. Training on the completion of the pressure injury risk assessment will be provided to licensed staff as needed . During an observation on 03/22/23 at 08:54 A.M., CNA KK was observed exiting Resident #56's room with a breakfast tray. Resident #56 was observed lying in bed with the HOB (head of bed) at approximately 90 degrees, slouched down and leaning to the left, and her head was off of the pillow. During an observation on 03/22/23 at 09:39 A.M., Resident #56 was lying in bed in the same position as the previous observation. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 09:43 A.M., CNA KK reported that Resident #56 had been checked and changed recently, and that CNA KK would be laying her down soon. During an observation on 03/22/23 at 10:10 A.M. Resident #56 was lying in bed in the same position as previous observations and CNA KK was in the room preparing to reposition Resident #56. CNA KK removed Resident #56's incontinence brief and turned Resident #56 onto her left side, this revealed pink discolored skin with deep creases from the brief and mattress, covering the entire surface of Resident #56's buttocks. There was a large bandage covering Resident #56's sacral area, and it was partially detached and soiled around the bottom edge of the bandage. CNA KK reported that she would let the nurse know that the bandage needed to be replaced. Resident #56's right hip was observed with darker red skin, and a small open wound, that was not covered with a bandage. At 10:16 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) J entered the room and removed the soiled bandage that covered Resident #56's sacral area, which revealed a deep open wound, with a small amount of slough (dead tissue) noted in the wound bed. When the wound care was finished, CNA KK positioned Resident #56 onto her left side. R31 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS dated [DATE], R31 scored 7/15 (moderately cognitively impaired) on his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), received a formal assessment for pressure ulcer risk which determined he was at risk, with diagnoses that included stroke, and hemiplegia (partial paralysis). Review of R31's Order Summary revealed, 2/16/2023- Skin Observation Tool every day shift every Thursday. Alert Wound Nurse/Unit Manager of any new skin concerns. 3/15/2023 Skin protectant to left heel every shift for skin prevention every shift for skin prevention. Cleanse R (right) heel with wound cleanser, pat dry. Apply xerofoam dressing and bordered gauze. Change dressing daily until healed one time a day for skin treatment. Review of R31's Care Plan at Risk for Skin Breakdown 2/16/2023 reported this focus due to the resident's Braden assessment r/t (related to) cognitive loss, communication deficits, general weakness, poor awareness of needs, and acute/chronic illnesses including diabetes and stroke. The goal was to maintain intact skin. To meet this goal, interventions included monitoring and reporting signs of skin breakdown to the resident's nurse. Review of R31's [NAME] (resident care guide for CNA pulled from care plan) reported Skin Prevention to monitor and report signs of skin breakdown to nurse. During an interview and observation on 3/21/23 at 1:19 PM Registered Nurse (RN) X and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB prepared supplies to perform a wound dressing change on R31's right heel. When RN X asked resident if he was in pain, R31 stated, They (feet) burn everyday like on fire, I don't see any difference with new medication they are giving me. RN stated, You are on Gabapentin. RN stated, I told the Social Worker (SW) that (R31) may need new shoes. It looks to me like the back of his shoes are rubbing his heel and causing the wound. The orders are to change the dressing QD (every day) in the morning and PRN (as needed). RN X removed the dressing, stating, It is coming off so it needed changing anyway. Observed with the RN a small amount of serosanguineous (blood and clear yellow liquid) drainage on the bandage. The wound was round approximately 2.5 cm (centimeters) in width and length with a small open area in the middle. The RN dated the dressing 3/21/23 placed a towel as a barrier underneath his feet, donned clean gloves, cleaned the wound, applied the petroleum-based pad and covered it with the large bandage. During an interview on 3/21/23 at 1:32 PM SW Y stated, (R31), I did not know (R31) had a wound on his right heel. (RN X) did not talk to me about his shoes possibly rubbing on his heel to cause the wound. Observed on 3/22/2023 at 10:05 AM R31 sitting in room in a wheelchair watching television wearing gripper socks to both feet. During an interview and record review on 3/22/2023 at 10:15 AM Unit Managers (UM) R and W, and Director of Nursing (DON) B reviewed R31's medical records. UM R stated, (R31) has in his care plan under skin integrity, he is to wear blue protective boots while in bed. DON B stated, The nurses are doing wound care right now because the facility wound nurse left (employment) about two weeks ago. She managed all the wounds. Now, the nurses are to measure wounds weekly. Reviewed R31's medical record with UM R and W which did not reveal any measurements for the wound on the right heel. UM W stated, I audit weekly to see if the nurses have done the weekly skin/wound assessments. UM R stated, (R31) was reported as having a dry skin crack on his right heel on March 13 (2023). It was about 0.1 cm. It has not been reported as open. Review of R31's Skin Observation Tool dated 3/8/2023 reported Yes to new skin issues as redness to right heel Review of R31's Progress Note 3/10/2023 at 2:22 (2:22 AM) revealed, Health Status Note . Skin prep to right heel . Review of R31's Progress Note 3/15/2023 02:40 (AM) revealed, Health Status Note . Opti foam in place to right heel . Review of R31's Progress Note 3/15/2023 14:05 (2:05 PM) revealed, Health Status Note .R (right) heel skin treatment dc' d (discontinued) with new orders to apply xerofoam and cover with bordered gauze dressing. Skin protectant to L (left) heel for skin prevention. Staff will continue to monitor .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 1 (Resident #33) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 1 (Resident #33) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the likelihood of feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of self-worth, and a negative psychosocial outcome for the residents impacting their quality of life. Findings include: According to https://journals.lww.com/ regarding call light use, It is one of the few means by which patients can exercise control over their care on the unit. When patients use the call light, it is usually to summon the nurse .Patients expect that when they push the call light button, a nursing staff member will answer or come to them. Resident #33: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, muscle spasm, history of urinary tract infections, contracture, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #33, with a reference date of 1/18/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated Resident # 33 was cognitively intact. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #33, revised on 4/22/22, revealed the focus, .I require assistance with ADL's r/t (related to) general weakness, impaired mobility, and incontinence. DX: MS, muscle spasms, contractures . with the intervention .Transfer: I require assistance of 2 staff members to transfer. Sit to Stand Mechanical Lift - PRN .I require a scheduled toileting/prompted program every 2 hours . In an interview on 03/20/23 at 02:04 PM, Resident #33 reported she activated her call light at approximately 09:00 AM in the mornings and stated, .It takes 09:30 to 10:00 AM before someone responds to take me to the bathroom but then it is too late .I have a brief on in just in case .Waiting hours and hours and by then there is nothing I can do .I use the bathroom if taken in time . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 09:46 AM, Resident # 33 stated, .Waiting for assistance depends on the day and time of day .The staff are busy all the time .Staff know that if I am using the call light to call for assistance, I need to use the bathroom .The staff know this and they come prepared with the sit to stand or get the hoyer, if needed . Review of Resident Rights and Responsibilities Policy revised on 2/2023, revealed, .1. Resident Rights. The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility .2. Iv. The right to receive the services and /or items included in the plan of care .5. Self-determination .b. The resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident the right to use personal furnishing...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident the right to use personal furnishings for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for resident personal property, resulting in the resident being upset due to not being able to display her personal belongings and a potential for lack of a homelike environment. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21, with a reference date of 4/13/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of Preferences indicated that is was Very Important to Resident #21 to take care of personal belongings or things. In an interview on 03/21/23 at 12:59 P.M., Resident #21 became emotional, began to cry and reported that she does not have anywhere to put her books and her stuffed animals and stated, .everything has to be on the floor or on my bed . Resident #21 reported that she had a net that hangs on the wall to hold all of her stuffed animals, but that the facility refused to let her have it in her room and stated, .they said it was a fire hazard . Resident #21 reported that having her personal belongings visible and safely displayed was very important to her, some of her things were very valuable and stated, .it's all I have left . Observation of several books, papers and stuffed animals on the floor at the end of the bed, on the dresser and on Resident #21's bed. Resident #21 reported that Director of Social Services (DSS) Y was aware of her concerns. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 10:32 A.M., DSS Y reported Resident #21's friend had brought in a net to hang on the wall and display stuffed animals, but that Maintenance Assistant (MA) I would not allow it and stated, .it's a fire hazard . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 01:44 P.M. with the state Life Safety Code surveyor, indicated after observing Resident #21's room, that it was determined there was no fire hazard concern with hanging a net on the wall. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 03:02 P.M., MA I reported that Resident #21 has a hoarding problem and there was a concern that more storage would increase the hoarding. MA I stated, .I was under the impression that a net on the wall was a fire hazard .so we told her no . MA I could not provide specific reasoning as to why the net would be a fire hazard.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide timely treatment for skin breakdown and discomfort in 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #57) reviewed for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide timely treatment for skin breakdown and discomfort in 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #57) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in Resident #57 having pain and sking breakdown that was not adequately monitored. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #57 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included pain in right ankle and joints of right foot, paralysis on right dominant side following a stroke, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, kidney disease, and diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #57, with a reference date of 2/2/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #57, revised on 01/28/23, revealed the focus, .I am assessed at risk for skin breakdown per my Braden assessment general weakness, medication use, abnormal labs, and admitted with healing surgical wound. DX Rt femur fx, DM, depression, hx CVA w/rt side weakness, HTN . with the intervention .Skin Observation per protocol .Monitor and report signs of skin breakdown to Nurse . Review of Health Status Note dated 03/13/2023 at 1:59 PM, revealed, .Resident AOx4 (alert and oriented). Up in chair this shift .Right sided weakness; Left sided poor vision as baseline. x1 assist with all ADLs .Small reddened closed area on Right outside ankle bone from shoes rubbing; encouraging the use of gripper socks instead of shoes unless out of chair . Review of Skin Tool completed on 3/14/23, revealed, no noted skin concerns for Resident #57. Review of Health Status Note dated 3/16/2023 at 8:30 PM, revealed, .Resting in bed with eyes open, TV on .Healed surgical incision on right hip. CMS to right lower extremity within normal. Requested and received PRN pain medication r/t right foot/leg pain . Review of Health Status Note dated 3/21/23 at 6:16 PM, revealed, .Skin: scab to left elbow and right heel .Pain: 2/10 . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 11:36 AM, Unit Manager Z reported the area on her right ankle was blanchable with redness, was not on the skin tool, and there was no order for monitoring of the area. UM Z reported the facility would monitor the area and would use sure prep to the area. (Sure prep: skin protectant, vapor permeable, protection from friction and incontinence). Review of Health Status Note dated 3/22/23 at 3:00 AM, revealed, .Blood sugar 238 coverage given Humalog insulin per nurse pain medication given for r (right) ankle discomfort affect noted . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 3:02 PM, Resident #57 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room. Resident #57 reported her right foot hurts and reported she has a purple spot on her toe. During an observation on 03/22/23 at 03:23 PM, Resident #57 was observed seated in her wheelchair on the right side of her bed in her room. Resident #57 was observed to have her tennis shoes on her feet. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) JJ removed Resident #57's tennis shoes and socks to both feet. LPN JJ made observations of all three areas on the resident's right foot/ankle area. Resident #57 was observed to have on her right foot 3rd toe the nail was raised and pointed upward until approximately the middle of the nail, scabbing with which appeared to be dried blood was noted under the toe nail, on her 5th toe noted a dark spot on the inside area of her toe on the left side of it, towards the base of the toe, and on her right outside ankle bone was noted to have a scab about the size of a dime with raised sides, dark brown area in the center with dry skin around it. Resident #57 reported both of the toes burn. LPN JJ' reported Resident #57 does receive gabapentin at night due to her diabetes and she has Norco for pain and those would help with the burning and pain. LPN JJ reported she would inform the provider of the areas on the resident's foot and ankle and see how they would like to proceed. LPN JJ reported Resident #57's middle toenail looked like it had bled and dried, and had a scab under it .It was real dry . Review of Skin/Wound Note dated 3/22/23 at 3:30 PM, revealed, .Resident voiced increased burning/tingling to bilateral feet. Increased pain to right ankle and right pinky toe. Upon assessment scab noted to right ankle area blanchable but tender upon palpation. Small 0.1x0.1 red spot noted to top of pinky toe. Skin assessment completed and note added to physician communication book to review at next physician visit. Will monitor for further changes to affected areas and pain management . Review of Skin Tool Audit completed on 3/22/23, revealed, no noted skin concerns for Resident #57.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were in pl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were in place for residents with limited range of motion (ROM) for 1 resident (Resident #62) reviewed for limited ROM, from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for decreased range of motion and related complications, skin breakdown, contractures (hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other tissues) and pain. Finding include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #62 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: spinal cord disease, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction (stroke), lumbar spinal stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small, puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves that travel through the spine), and low back pain. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #62, with a reference date of 2/9/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #62 was cognitively impaired. Review of the Functional Status/Functional limitation in Range of Motion revealed that Resident #62 had an impairment of bilateral upper and lower extremities. During an observation on 03/21/23 at 02:43 P.M. Resident #62 was lying in bed with the HOB (head of bed) at approximately 45 degrees, with both legs pulled up close to his body. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F changed Resident #62's gown, and was very careful not to bend Resident #62's arms. CNA F then adjusted the pillows under and between Resident #62's legs, careful not to move Resident #62's legs, and maintaining his left-side lying position. In an interview on 03/21/23 at 02:59 P.M., Resident #62 reported that he would like to have physical therapy so that he can stretch his legs out and stated, .I can only lay on my left side, otherwise I can't see the TV or use my right arm .my left arm does work as good . Resident #62 reported that his daughter does some stretching exercises with him when she is here and he wished that the CNA's would at least stretch his legs out when they wash him and get him dressed. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 12:19 P.M., CNA U reported that the therapy department is responsible for the restorative care and ROM with residents. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 01:23 P.M., Medical Director (MD) OO reported that Resident #62 is at high risk for contractures and that the therapy department is experienced in performing that type of physical therapy, but he does not believe that the resident would qualify for rehabilitation services. MD OO reported that the CNA's should perform ROM and encourage Resident #62 to do as much as possible to prevent contractures during all cares. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 01:55 P.M., Therapy Director (TD) EE reported that all newly admitted residents receive a therapy screening and Resident #62's therapy screening was missed. TD EE reported that she was catching up with quarterly screenings and noticed that Resident #62 had not ever received therapy services, and was not able to find documentation of Resident #62 being screened, therefore a screening was scheduled. TD EE reported that the screening was completed a couple weeks ago and it was determined that Resident #62 would benefit from therapy, but that he had not been scheduled for a therapy evaluation at that time and stated, .he will get therapy and then restorative and/or functional maintenance depending on his potential for progress . TD EE reported that she was not sure if the facility had a restorative therapy program yet. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 02:02 P.M., Physical Therapist (PT) Q reported that he screened Resident #62 about 2 weeks ago and determined that Resident #62 was at risk for contractures, but has not seen him since. Review of Resident #62's Rehab Services Screening Form dated 3/14/23 revealed, .Other: Comments: Pt (patient) would benefit PT/OT (physical and occupational therapy) due to high contracture risk and decreased functional mobility. Initial Screen indicates skilled therapy evaluation indicated for: PT, OT . The screening took place 1 week ago and 5 weeks after Resident #62 admitted to the facility. Review of Resident #62's Care Plan revealed, I require assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) r/t (related to) cognitive loss, immobility .Date Initiated: 2/7/23, Interventions/Tasks: .I require assistance of 2 staff members to turn and reposition in bed, I require a full body mechanical lift for transfer .Date Initiated 2/7/23 . There was no care plan for limited ROM and/or a risk for contractures. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 02:24 P.M., Unit Manager (UM) R reported that Resident #62 did not have a care plan addressing his contractures and a risk for worsening, and the interventions should include a functional maintenance program and stated, .I will do it right now .he will need a contracture care plan and ROM . UM R reported that she would expect that the CNA's would provide daily ROM regardless of the care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents that are trauma survivors receive care and service...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents that are trauma survivors receive care and services that account for experiences, and address their needs in 1 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for trauma informed care, from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for re-traumatization due to staff not being informed and knowledgeable of the resident's past trauma, and the lack of care plan interventions in place. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #22 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: depression, schizophrenia, alcohol dependence, and nicotine dependence. Review of Resident #22's Initial Trauma Informed Assessment dated 11/11/22 revealed, Have you experienced or witnessed any of the following in your entire life? 1. Natural Disaster Yes, 2. Fire or explosion Yes, 3. Transportation accident Yes, 4. Serious accident at work, home, or during recreational activity Yes .8. Sexual assault Yes .14. Sudden violent death Yes .18. Were you or a family member (loved one) ever incarcerated? Yes .If you answer Yes to more than one of the above questions in Part 1 & 2, then answer these questions as best as you can remember. 1. How long ago did it happen? Estimate if not sure 41-50 years ago, 2. How did you experience it? It happened to me directly, 3. Was someone's life in danger? Yes, my life, 4. Was someone seriously injured or killed? Yes, I was seriously injured, 5. Did it involve sexual violence? Yes . Review of Resident #22's Care Plan revealed, I have reported past Trauma/Life Events. I have experienced a tornado 10 years ago, I was in a house fire 50 years ago, and I have been in a car accident 40 years ago. I've had a serious work accident while driving a forklift 40 years ago. My older brother molested me but I don't know when it started. Someone in my family has committed suicide and been incarcerated. I become agitated and irritable when speaking about the molestation. I may exhibit signs or symptoms of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) as a result. Dated Initiated: 11/21/2022. GOAL: I will not experience any triggers through the next review period. Date Initiated: 11/21/2022. INTERVENTIONS/TASKS: Encourage me to participate in different activities of my enjoyment. Please identify my patterns of behavior and assess my understanding. Date Initiated: 11/21/2022. Review of Resident #22's [NAME] (direct caregiver guide to care) did not include any information related to trauma or triggers. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 10:28 A.M., Director of Social Services (DSS) Y reported that Resident #22 has occasional times of agitation and attempts of physical aggression towards staff, but did not have a diagnosis of PTSD or any triggers related to past trauma. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 11:57 A.M., Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) P reported that she frequently provides care to Resident #22, and was not aware of the resident having any past trauma or potential triggers for re-traumatization. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 12:19 P.M., CNA U reported that she was not aware of any specific trauma or triggers for Resident #22 and stated, .he does sometimes imagine that his brother is here and then gets very upset . In an interview on 03/22/23 at 12:27 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON) reported that Resident #22's history of traumatic experiences should have been care planned with resident-centered interventions and stated, .there is nothing on the [NAME] related to his trauma or triggers . The survey team was notified on 3/22/23 by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) that the facility would be performing a tornado drill at 1:45 P.M. that day. In a subsequent interview on 03/22/23 at 12:46 P.M., DSS Y reported that Resident #22's trauma assessment triggered the development of the care plan, but that Resident #22 did not have any triggers to the trauma that he had experienced. DSS Y reported that the CNA's do not have access to care plans and can only see the [NAME] and stated, .they would not even be able to see his past trauma and possible triggers . DSS Y agreed that the facility wide tornado drill today could potentially be a trigger for Resident #22's past traumatic experience with a tornado.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue psychotropic as needed (PRN) medications after 14 days ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue psychotropic as needed (PRN) medications after 14 days and/or document clinical rationale and indicate a timeframe for extend prn psychotropic medication use in 1 of 5 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medication use and inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of documented supporting evidence. Findings Include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #52 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: depression and bipolar disorder (condition characterized by periods of depression and of abnormally elevated mood). In an interview on 03/22/23 at 10:40 A.M., Director of Social Services (DSS) Y reported that Resident #52 was currently on receiving several psychotropic medications, which included Mirtazapine, Seroquel, Trazadone, and a standing order for Ativan (Lorazepam) as needed and reported, .had not used it at all since it's been ordered .I don't know why it has not been discontinued . DSS Y reported that she would look for documentation related to why Ativan was not discontinued after 14 days. Review of Resident #52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed, Ativan Oral Tablet 1 MG (Lorazepam) Give 1 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Agitation, anxiety, restlessness. Start date 1/13/2023, Stop date Indefinite. The record indicated that Resident #52 received the medications on 3 days in February (2/2/23, 2/4/23 & 2/5/23). Review of Resident #52's Pharmacy Note dated 2/20/23 revealed, Note to attending physician/prescriber .(Resident #52) has a prn order for Lorazepam 1 mg every 4 hours According to current guidelines, prn orders of psychotropics are limited to 14 days. If further therapy is required, please document clinical rationale and length of therapy to remain compliant Pt (patient) is hospice benefit outweighs risk. The document is dated 3/3/23 and signed my MD OO. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 12:38 P.M., DON reported that she was not familiar with all of the regulations related to psychotropic medications, but that Medical Director (MD) writes all of the medication orders for residents upon admission. In an interview on 03/22/23 at 01:12 P.M., MD OO reported that he was aware of the state regulation related to limiting PRN psychotropic medication orders to 14 days and that Resident #52's original order for Ativan should have been written with a stop date and discontinued if not needed, and added that when the pharmacist noted the concern the order should have been corrected. MD OO reported that he could not recall receiving any calls related to Resident #52's behaviors.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #40 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #40 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, weakness, anxiety, restlessness & agitation, reduced mobility, dementia, and lipomatous neoplasm of skin and subcutaneous tissue of right arm (fatty tumor located just below the skin), and cyst. During an observation on 03/21/23 at 02:44 PM, observed dressing change for Resident #40. Observed removal of previous dressing, Resident #40's skin on and around the cyst was very red and inflamed, a dark reddish color and the dressing showed purulent drainage on the gauze. In an interview on 3/22/23 at 11:27 AM, Unit Manager R reported the nurse had tried to aspirate it with a needle .The cyst was currently draining fluid and due to the drainage indicating the cyst was open .the resident should be on enhanced barrier precautions. When queried if resident was currently on enhanced barrier precautions, UM R reported he was not. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard practices of infection control in 4 of 5 residents (Resident #41, #9, #31, and #40) reviewed for infection control, resuling in the potential for cross-contamination, development, and spread of contagious and infectious disease and illnesses. Findings include: Urinary Catheter and Hand Hygiene R41 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R41 required an indwelling catheter to drain his urine. Review of R41's Order Summary 1/24/2023 revealed, Indwelling Foley catheter care every shift. Review of R41's Care Plan 1/25/2023 Indwelling Foley catheter with penile erosion r/t (related to) urinary retention, long term catheter use, and have hx (history) of CAUTI (catheter-associated urinary tract infection). The goal set for the resident was for him to tolerate the indwelling catheter without significant adverse effects. Interventions to meet this goal included care every shift. During an interview on 3/20/2023 at 12:22 PM CNA PP stated, Residents that use a CPAP, nebulizer, or have a Foley catheters with infection, have to wear a N95 mask and other PPE that is designated on the sign that is on their door. There should be a sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions or other precautions. During an observation on 3/20/23 at 12:42 PM, R41's door had an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign with PPE supplies on wall next to it. During an observation and interview on 3/21/23 at 1:52 PM CNA II entered R41's room to empty his urinary catheter bag and record the output. The CNA donned a N95 mask, eye protection, and gloves. The CNA did not don a gown. CNA II set the urine bag on top of resident's bed without a barrier and cleaned the opening with an alcohol pad. Then placed a paper towel on the floor and put the canister on top and emptied urine collection bag into it with a total of 300 cc of urine. The CNA emptied approximately 300 cc of thicker cloudy urine. CNA stated, It (urine) is not coming out of the bag very good. It is thick and cloudy. I will tell the nurse. CNA then put the urine bag back into the privacy bag and attached it to the resident's wheelchair, emptied the urine in the resident's toilet and doffed her gloves. Without performing hand hygiene after doffing gloves, CNA II touched the resident on the shoulder and put his bedside table closer to his bed. CNA II stated, Hand hygiene should be done after taking off gloves. I did not wash my hands after taking off the gloves I used to empty the urine bag. I do not know if (R41) is on any precautions. Observed with CNA II the Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign on R41's door. I did not know a gown was to be worn when working with a catheter. I did not know there was a sign on the door. I have been trained on when and how to wash my hands and what PPE to wear with precautions. I did not know about (R41). During an interview on 3/22/2023 at 10:10 AM CNA PP stated, Hand hygiene should be done before donning gloves and after doffing gloves. If a resident is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and the staff is emptying his catheter bag, they should be wearing a gown as stated on the sign. Enhanced Barrier Precautions R9 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R9 scored 13/15 (cognitively intact), had medical diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic lung disease, and required oxygen therapy. During observation and interview on 3/20/2023 at 1:27 PM, R9 did not have transmission-based precautions signage on her door indicating she was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions during nebulizer (aerosol generating procedure) treatments. A sign was posted that read, Fit-tested N95 & Eye protection required during aerosol generating procedures. Resident stated, I have nebulizer treatments when I am short of breath. During an interview on 3/21/2023 at 12:55 PM Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) CC stated, If a resident has a urinary Foley catheter and open wounds they should be on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. If a resident has MDRO (Multidrug-resistant organisms) in their urine, and if it uncolonized they should be on Contact Precautions and their Care Plan (drives treatment) and [NAME] (guide for resident care for CNAs). If a resident receives a nebulizer treatment, CPAP, BiPAP, or any other aerosol generating procedure, they are put on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. But I step it up one step and label it as an aerosol generating procedure that is why some rooms have the aerosol generating procedures sign. R31 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS dated [DATE], R31 scored 7/15 (moderately cognitively impaired) on his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), received a formal assessment for pressure ulcer risk which determined he was at risk, with diagnoses that included stroke, and hemiplegia (partial paralysis). Review of R31's Order Summary 3/15/2023, reported Cleanse R (right) heel with wound cleanser . It was noted there was no order for Enhanced Barrier Precaution. Observed on 3/20/2023 at 12:17 PM, R31's room did not have Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage on door. During an interview and observation on 3/21/23 at 1:19 PM Registered Nurse (RN) X and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB prepared supplies to perform a wound dressing change on R31's right heel in the hall outside R31's room. RN X and LPN BB entered resident's room with supplies wearing surgical masks. RN X removed the dressing, with a small amount of serosanguineous (blood and clear yellow liquid) drainage on the bandage. The wound was round approximately 2.5 cm (centimeters) in width and length with a small open area in the middle. The RN donned clean gloves, cleaned the wound, applied the petroleum-based pad and covered it with the large bandage. It was noted, there was no Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage on door. RN X and LPN BB did not wear N95 masks, gowns, or eye protection during the wound dressing change. Observed on 3/22/2023 at 10:05 AM R31's door did not have an Enhanced Barrier signage on his door. During an interview on 3/22/2023 at 10:10 AM Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) CC stated, If a wound is open, then an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign should be placed on the resident's door to prevent them from contracting infection during direct care. When staff have direct contact with a resident on this precaution, they are to wear a N95 mask, gown, and eye protection. I did not know (R31's) wound was open. I only know if the wound is open when the Unit Manager tells me. During an interview and record review on 3/22/2023 at 10:15 AM Unit Managers (UM) R and W, and Director of Nursing (DON) B reviewed R31's medical records. UM R stated, (R31) has in his care plan under skin integrity, he is to wear blue protective boots while in bed. If a resident' wound is open then yes, they should be put on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. There is no order for (R31) to be on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Review of R31's Progress Note 3/19/2023 13:51 (1:51 PM) revealed, Health Status Note .Treatment continues to open area on right heel .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 20 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $15,593 in fines. Above average for Michigan. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 48/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Cass County Medical Care Facility's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Cass County Medical Care Facility an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Michigan, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Cass County Medical Care Facility Staffed?

CMS rates Cass County Medical Care Facility's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Michigan average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Cass County Medical Care Facility?

State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at Cass County Medical Care Facility during 2023 to 2025. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 16 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Cass County Medical Care Facility?

Cass County Medical Care Facility is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 80 certified beds and approximately 69 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Cassopolis, Michigan.

How Does Cass County Medical Care Facility Compare to Other Michigan Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Michigan, Cass County Medical Care Facility's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cass County Medical Care Facility?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Cass County Medical Care Facility Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Cass County Medical Care Facility has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Michigan. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Cass County Medical Care Facility Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Cass County Medical Care Facility is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Michigan average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 60%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Cass County Medical Care Facility Ever Fined?

Cass County Medical Care Facility has been fined $15,593 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Michigan average of $33,235. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Cass County Medical Care Facility on Any Federal Watch List?

Cass County Medical Care Facility is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.