SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** According to International NPUAP/EPUAP (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel/ European
Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; a group ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** According to International NPUAP/EPUAP (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel/ European
Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; a group of experts who serve as the authoritative voice in
pressure injuries) defined pressure injury stages.
(A) Stage I-nonblanchable erythema.
(B) Stage II-partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis.
(C) Stage III-full-thickness skin loss.
(D) Stage IV-full-thickness skin and tissue loss.
(E) Unstageable pressure injury-obscured full thickness skin and tissue loss.
(F) Deep tissue pressure injury-persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple
discoloration. (2016 NPUAP Pressure Injury Staging Illustrations from
http://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/pressureinjurystagingillustrations/.
Used with permission of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel March 2018.
© NPUAP.)
Nursing and Patient Care Considerations: Prevent Pressure Ulcer Development-1. Provide
meticulous care and positioning for immobile patients. (a.) Inspect skin several times daily. (b.)
Wash skin with mild soap, rinse, and pat dry with a soft towel. (c.) Lubricate skin with a bland
lotion to keep skin soft and pliable. (d.) Avoid poorly ventilated mattress that is covered with
plastic or impermeable material. (e.) Employ bowel and bladder programs to prevent
incontinence.(f.) Encourage ambulation and exercise. (g.) Promote nutritious diet with optimal
protein, vitamins, and iron.
Resident #3:
According to admission face sheet, Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Cardiac, Depression, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, High Blood Pressure, and other complications.
According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #3 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Cognition Assessment indicating no cognition impairment. The MDS also coded Resident #3 as requiring extensive two person assist for Bed Mobility, Toileting and Transfers.
According to section 'M' skin on MDS, Resident #3 was coded as 'Yes' to having Pressure Ulcers, and 'No' to turning and repositioning. Pressure Ulcer location documented as Coccyx.
Review of Resident #3's initial admission MDS, dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'No' to having Pressure Ulcers.
Review of MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'Yes' to having a Pressure Ulcer and documented a Stage II.
Further Review of MDS's from dates of 9/28/21, through 5/9/22, coded Resident #3 as 'No' to having Pressure Ulcers. (area healed).
Review of MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'Yes' to having Pressure Ulcers, as a Stage II, and 'No' to turning and repositioning.
Review of MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'Yes' to having Pressure Ulcers, as a Stage II, and 'No', to turning and repositioning.
Review of MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'Yes' to Stage III Pressure Ulcer.
(worsening/progression from Stage II to Stage III).
Review of MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident #3 as 'Yes' to having a Pressure Ulcer and documented a Stage II, and 'No' to turning and repositioning.
(The Pressure Ulcer was reversed Staged from a III to a II).
Review of Point Click Care (PCC) weekly Skin and Wound-Total Body Skin assessments (tool used by nurses to capture wounds or other skin conditions) was done from a time frame of 5/30/22, through 2/14/23.
Review of the Weekly Skin assessments, under the column to Enter the number of New Wounds were all documented as 0 (reflecting no new wounds).
Review of the Skin assessments reflected that nursing staff were documenting the assessments as performed, but failed to capture the re-opening of Coccyx wound Stage II or Stage III wound.
Review of Skin Policy documented .
Under:
11. A weekly total body skin evaluation is completed for each guest/resident by the licensed nurse. The licensed nurse will document findings of the skin evaluation. The CNA's will report any new skin impairment to the licensed nurse that is identified during daily care.
12. If a new area of skin impairment is identified, notify the guest/resident, responsible party, attending physician, DON/designee and treatment team, if applicable.
13. Guest's/resident's with pressure injury and lower extremity ulcers will be evaluated, measured and staged weekly (pressure injury and vascular ulcers only) in accordance with the practice guidelines until resolved. A photo may be initiated unless the guest/resident refuses.
14. The licensed nurse will notify the attending physician with any changes as needed.
15. A Guest/Resident at Risk meeting will be conducted at least monthly by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). During the meeting, the IDT will evaluate guest/resident skin changes, review treatment modalities, interventions and will make recommendations as needed. Care plans and guest/resident [NAME] will be updated accordingly. Guests/residents reviewed for skin alterations are as follows:
- Newly developed vascular, diabetic/neuropathic and pressure injuries.
- Any pressure or non-pressure area that has shown no signs of healing within a two week time frame.
- New admissions/readmissions with skin conditions (pressure related, non-pressure related, arterial, venous insufficiency, and/or diabetic/neuropathic, surgical sites, rashes, dermatologic conditions, skin tears, etc.).
16. The DON/designee will document any changes in the care plan/[NAME] at the meeting.
17. Quarterly, a system audit of the Skin Management Guideline is conducted by the DON/designee to ensure ongoing compliance in all areas. Results will be reported to the QAPI committee for trending, analyzing and recommendations.
18. The pressure injury incidence rate is calculated monthly, submitted, and reviewed through QAPI to analyze and identify trends.
The DON provided some documentation on a piece of paper with measurements of Resident #3's Pressure Ulcer.
According to the documentation, Resident #3 had a Pressure Ulcer on 6/22/22, measuring
0.86 X 0.73 X 0.5 (Length, Width, and Depth).
According to the measurements dated:
8/11/22, measurements were 1.08 X 0.67 X 0.4.
10/4/22, measurements were 1.35 X 1.82 X 1.0. (wound is larger).
11/1/22, measurements were 1.37 X 1.41 X 1 and documented as Stage III.
Observation of Wound Care for Resident #3 was performed on 2/9/23, at 11:30 AM, with Registered Nurse D and Licensed Practical Nurse H.
Resident #3 was 2-person assisted over to her right side, and the old dressing was removed by RN D.
The Wound Base appeared deep, dark pink, and at a Stage III, with scant amount of scattered slough, noted to the base.
RN D was asked what the Stage of the wound was currently, and indicated it now was a Stage III.
RN D continued with the dressing change and verbalized the area looks better than before, and that at one point there had been some tunneling to the wound.
RN D was asked about the progression from a Stage II to a Stage III and then a Stage II, documented in the wound evaluation.
RN D verbalized she had just recently had the conversation with her Director of Nursing, who educated her on not to reverse stage pressure ulcers. RN D indicated the wounds becomes a healing Stage III not a II and not to reverse Stage a wound.
Review of previous treatment dated 1/27/23 - 2/8/23, was After cleaning the coccyx with Normal saline, apply medi-honey, pack Aquacell silver into the wound and cover with Optifoam every shift for a Stage II.
Review of the Wound Evaluation dated 2/7/23, by RN D documented on the form a Stage III Pressure Ulcer, In-house Acquired, with a start date of 8/19/22. The measurements documented were: 1.42 X 1.14 X 0.2 cm (centimeters).
Review of current active treatment orders reflected an order dated 2/11/23, After cleaning coccyx with Normal Saline, Collagen AG [SIC] and cover with a composite dressing every day shift for a Stage III.
The DON was interviewed on 2/16/23, and was shown the Weekly Skin Assessments did not reflect a change in the Pressure Ulcer for Resident #3 or capture the re-opening in 6/2022, and indicated she had seen that. The DON also verbalized Resident #3 does not like to be moved.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcer injuries for two residents (Resident #3, Resident #66), resulting in facility-acquired (in-house) development of pressure ulcers, pain, discomfort, and the likelihood for prolonged illness or hospitalization.
Findings include:
Record review of the facility 'Skin Management' policy dated 12/15/2022, revealed it is the policy that the facility should identify and implement interventions to prevent development of clinically unavoidable pressure injuries.
Record review of facility provided 'NPIAP (National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel) Pressure Injury Stages' undated 2 pages, revealed a pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure of pressure in combination with shear. Stage 3 Pressure injury- Full-thickness skin loss: Full-thickness loss in skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible. The depth of tissue damage varies by anatomical location; areas of significant adiposity can develop deep wounds. Undermining and tunneling may occur. Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and/or bone are not exposed. If slough or eschar obscures the extent of tissue loss is an Unstageable Pressure injury. Unstageable Pressure Injury- Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar. If slough or eschar is removed, a Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure ulcer injury will be revealed.
Resident #66:
Record review of Resident #66's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed coccyx wound and left medial ankle small scab and skin on bilateral lower extremities dry and scaly. There was no note related to the right heel area.
Observation and interview on 02/08/23 at 01:13 PM Resident #66's buttocks area was noted with wound vac in place and occlusive dressing. Right foot dressing to heel is black in color dressing dated 2/8/23. Observation of Resident #66's left outer ankle with dressing dated 2/8/23. Resident #66 stated it (left outer ankle wound) seems bigger.
Observation on 02/9/23 at 09:18 AM of Resident #66 seated up in wheelchair in her room, was going to wound clinic today for sacral wound care via transit. At around noon Resident #66 came back from the appointment. Resident #66 wanted to sit up in the wheelchair for noon meal.
Record review of wound measurements and interview on 02/9/23 at 10:59 AM of handwritten timeline provided by the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the coccyx/sacral wound was upon admission [DATE], and the right Heel started on 12/30/2022 was facility acquired. Right medial malleolus facility acquired started on 2/7/2023. Left Calf started on 2/3/23 facility acquired.
Record review of Resident #66's electronic medical record revealed that on 12/22/2022 the resident was sent to the hospital. Record review of hospital wound documentation noted on 12/25/2022 right heel pressure injury present upon admission as deep tissue injury.
Record review of Resident #66's December 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that bilateral heels treatment of cleanse with wound cleaner and pat dry every shift (12 hours) started on 12/5/2022. December 13th evening shift and December 15th morning shift were missing documentation of completion.
In an interview on 02/10/23 at 8:10 AM of Resident #66 sitting up in wheelchair in room with breakfast tray on bedside table. Bilateral green puff boots on feet. Resident #66 stated that she got the right heel sore from being in the wheelchair and It is painful at times. Resident #66 stated that its black and her left lateral ankle also started at the facility. Resident #66 stated that she came in here to the facility with only the one sore on her butt area, but currently has more than just the one. Resident #66 stated she feels she's falling apart.
Observation and interview on 02/10/23 at 12:57 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) M of Resident #66's right heel wound. Resident #66 lying in bed. RN M cut the right heel dressing down the top and lifted the right heel upward. The state surveyor observed blood tint purulent (puss) yellow drainage with odor, running drainage pouring out of heel area as heel was elevated onto the dressing. Right heel is open with drainage and odor. Observation on 02/10/23 01:01 PM of Resident #66's left lateral ankle with open area appears to be Stage III with bloody drainage noted.
Observation and interview on 2/14/2023 at 1:25 PM of Resident #66 getting ready for a shower- revealed Certified nurse assistant (CNA) R and CNA S undressed resident. Observation of right heel dressing dated 2/13/2023 and left lateral ankle dressing dated 2/14/2023. Registered Nurse (RN) D entered room to disconnect sacral/coccyx wound vac device. The curtain to the bed was stuck on the far side of the bed close to the walk near the call light wall device. Every time the room door opens the resident is exposed to hallway. Observed the brief removed with BM noted in rectal area. Observed Hoyer transfer with Invacare Reliant 450 Hoyer lift with purple trimmed sling used. Resident was placed into the PVC shower chair. Resident #66 complained of butt/back pain. Resident #66 was covered and taken to A-wing shower room by CNA S. In the shower room came RN D, to remove dressings from lower extremities. Observation of right heel dressing of ABD pad with krelix wrap. Observed right heel with open wound with purulent (Puss) drainage noted, wound is open and skin black in color with noted drainage. RN D stated that a new order needs to be written to add the ABD pad to the dressing. Observation of Resident #66's left lateral ankle dressing removed, observed a 2 x 2 gauze pad with Silver AG (debride) packed into the wound bed. Observed left lateral wound was open with depth.
Record review of Resident #66's electronic medical record revealed that the left lateral calf wound started on 2/3/2023 with a skin assessment as in-house acquired.
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation Pertains to Intake Numbers MI00127323, MI00127700, MI00127808, MI00133739, and MI00134334.
Based on observation, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation Pertains to Intake Numbers MI00127323, MI00127700, MI00127808, MI00133739, and MI00134334.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of planned, timely, and meaningful interventions to prevent falls and monitoring following falls for six residents (Resident #54, Resident #59, Resident #69, Resident #275, Resident #281, and Resident #282) of nine residents reviewed.
This deficient practice resulted in lack of notification of responsible parties, lack of monitoring and assessment following falls, multiple residents experiencing repeated falls including falls with injury, Resident #282 suffering a laceration on their head and finger, Resident #275 falling eight times with various injuries including a right hip fracture, Resident # 54 falling 17 times with subsequent left and right hip fractures, Resident #59 suffering a hip fracture, Resident #281 suffering a laceration to their head requiring emergency medical treatment, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for decline in overall health status.
Findings include:
Resident #54:
Review of intake documentation revealed two Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) pertaining to Resident #54. One FRI report detailed Resident #54 had an unwitnessed fall in the facility on 3/9/22. This fall resulted in Resident #54 sustaining a left hip fracture. The second FRI report revealed Resident #54 had another unwitnessed fall in the facility on 3/22/22 and suffered a right hip fracture. Both fractures necessitated emergency medical treatment and surgical intervention.
On 2/8/23 at 8:40 AM, Resident #54 was observed in the central activity room of the locked memory care unit. The Resident was sitting in a wheelchair with bilateral leg rests in place. The wheelchair was noted to have rollback locks brakes on the wheels (metal section which goes around the back of the wheels which stops the wheelchair from rolling backwards). When spoke to and asked basic questions, Resident #54 did not provide meaningful responses.
On 2/8/23 at 9:44 AM, Resident #54 was sitting in the wheelchair in the same place/position as previous observation.
An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) M on 2/8/23 at 9:58 AM. When queried regarding the rollback lock brakes on Resident #54's wheelchair, RN M revealed the facility calls them Memory brakes. RN M was asked the reason for the memory brakes and indicated they had been in place for a while due to Resident #54 falling in the facility. When asked, RN M revealed they were not aware of the Resident having any recent falls with injury but had multiple falls in the past.
On 2/8/23 at 11:32 AM, Resident #54 was observed sitting in the same place in the Activity room in their wheelchair. The Resident's head was down, their eyes were closed, and an uneaten food tray was on the table in front of them.
Record review revealed Resident #54 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anxiety, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive, one-to-two-person assistance to perform all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with the exception of supervision for locomotion. The MDS detailed the Resident did not have any falls since readmitted to the facility.
Review of Resident #54's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident required supervision to complete ADL including hygiene, toileting, bed mobility, and locomotion on the unit. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 required extensive assistance to perform all ADL with the exception of eating.
Review of documentation in Resident #54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Incident and Accident (I & A) Reports revealed the following pertaining to falls:
- 3/1/22 at 1:27 AM: Nurses Notes . 00:55 (12:55 AM) . Resident observed on floor in hallway sitting on buttocks leaning against door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Nursing staff was alerted to position after the door had been heard slamming open into the metal closet doors in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident states was struck by another resident .
- 3/1/22: I & A Report . Time: 00:55 (12:55 AM) . Location: Hallway . Observed on floor . Location of Injury: L (left) side of neck . Activity Before: Ambulation . Observed on floor in hallway sitting on buttocks leaned against door . states was struck by another resident (Resident #276) . Interventions Implemented: (Blank) . An undated and unsigned typed investigation summary report was provided in addition to the I and A report. The typed document indicated interviews were completed with Resident #54, Resident #276, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U. The interviews did not provide any additional, pertinent information regarding the fall. The typed document detailed, Investigation Summary: after interview and investigation, the facility was unable to substantiate that an incident occurred . no witnesses to the alleged incident .
- 3/9/22 at 10:31 AM: Nurses Notes . Writer alerted by housekeeper that (Resident #54) was laying on the floor in their room. Writer arrived to resident's room and observed (Resident #54) laying on right side on bedroom floor with knees drawn up to almost fetal position. Resident was in bare feet . When asked what happened, resident stated, 'I was going to the bathroom and lost my balance'. (Resident #54) has an abrasion on their nose . also reporting pain in left hip and guarding left hip. There is a bruise present on left hip . unable to extend left leg r/t (related to) pain . resident transported to (local Hospital) for further evaluation.
- 3/9/22: I & A Report . (No Time) . Location: Resident Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Type of Injury: Abrasion . Fracture? . Bruise . Location of Injury: Abrasion on nose; painful left hip . Activity Before: Ambulation . Observed Resident laying on floor on right side with knees drawn up . abrasion on the end of nose and reports pain to left hip which is guarding and is bruise . Transferred to (hospital) at 11:15 (AM) . Interventions Implemented: Keep w/c next to bed .
Documentation of FRI submission and an undated and unsigned typed investigation summary report was also provided with the I and A form. Review of the summary documentation detailed, Reported Incident: On 3/9/22 at approximately 10:30 AM, (Resident #54) was observed on the floor of their bathroom by housekeeping staff . was unable to extend left and had a bruise noted to left hip. Resident was sent to (local hospital) for x-rays of the left hip which revealed a fracture. Resident Protection: (Resident #54) was assessed . noted to be guarding left hip. Nursing staff stayed with (Resident) until EMS arrived and took to (local hospital) where was noted to have sustained a hip fracture during the fall . transferred to (tertiary hospital) for orthopedic intervention . Interviews: (Resident #54) was interviewed on 3/9/22 at the time of the fall . stated 'was trying to go to the bathroom' and lost their balance . Registered Nurse (RN) M was interviewed on 3/9/22 just after the fall . stated that (Resident #54) will stay in bed until around lunch time . said they were heading down to pass (Resident #54) their medication when was alerted by (Housekeeper V) that (Resident #54) was on the floor . Housekeeper V was interviewed on 3/9/22 just after the fall . stated they had cleaned (Resident #54's) room and they were sleeping in bed. (Housekeeper V) left the room and proceeded to clean other rooms nearby. (Housekeeper V) heard a 'thump' sound and went into (Resident #54's) room and observed them on the floor . (CNA W) was interviewed on 3/9/22 just after the fall. (CNA W) stated (Resident #54) was in bed prior to the fall . stated (Resident #54) does not sleep with sock or pants on and had not been to the bathroom yet that day because they were still sleeping. This would explain why (Resident #54) was observed without socks or pants on at the time of the fall . Investigation Conclusion . (Resident #54) is staff supervision for ambulation and will ambulate around the secure unit most of the day . if gets tired, will use a wheelchair for locomotion but doesn't use it very often. (Resident #54) takes themselves to the bathroom independently and does not require staff assistance . was noted to not have pants on or have socks on feet at the time of the fall . has returned to the facility after undergoing orthopedic intervention for fractured hip .
- 3/12/22 at 9:07 PM: Resident arrived via ambulance at 1900 (7:00 PM) from (Tertiary Hospital- hospital which provides specialized care and services) Resident is alert with confusion. C/o (complain of) pain to left hip/leg. Dressing to left hip/thigh dry and intact . Pleasant and cooperative with staff .
- 3/13/22 at 5:27 PM: Nurses Notes . Observed (Resident #54) laying on the floor next to bed on right side . right arm was folded under head . left arm was at side. Both . legs were bent slightly at the knee. Writer and 2 aids lifted resident back into the bed . has an abrasion on right elbow, 2 small abrasions on right hand and 2 purple areas on right hand at 4th and 5th knuckle. When writer asked (Resident #54) what was trying to do, replied, I don't know. ROM (Range of Motion) WNL (Within Normal Limits) for right leg and bilat arms. Neurochecks initiated and WNL at this time .
- 3/13/22: I & A Report . Time: 17:25 (5:25 PM) . Resident room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Type of Injury: Abrasion . Bruise . Location of Injury: Right elbow; right hand abrasions X 2, bruises R hand . Observed resident laying on the floor next to bed on right side on ride side. Abrasion right elbow. Abrasions right hand, bruises X 2 right hand over 4th and 5th knuckles . Abrasions washed with NS. Left open to air . Interventions Implemented: Perimeter guard mattress .
- 3/15/22 at 9:11 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor in front of w/c (wheelchair). No visible injuries .
- 3/15/22: I & A Report . Time: 21:00 (9:00 PM) . Activity Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: w/c . Resident fell forward out of w/c .
- 3/16/22: I & A Report . Time: 06:30 (AM) . Resident room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: Bed . Resident found beside bed laying on right side in a puddle of liquid . Interventions Implemented: Unknown- Resident is confused and forgetful .
Note: There were no progress notes related to this fall in Resident #54's EMR
- 3/16/22 at 9:42 AM: Nurses Notes . Sent to (local hospital) for x-rays and increase pain r/t (related to) falls .
- 3/17/22 at 12:50 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor beside bed, call light within reach, grippy sox's (sic) on .
- 3/17/22: I & A Report . Time: 00:30 (12:30 AM) . Resident Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity before: Bed . Found on floor beside bed laying on R hip. No c/o pain . Interventions Implemented . Resident needs a bed alarm .
- 3/17/22 at 12:00 PM: Resident At Risk . Reviewed Clinical Indicator: Resident is being reviewed by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) related to incidents this month. (Resident #54) had one on 3/9 and was sent out to the hospital and was readmitted back on 3/12 to the facility. Resident had an incident on 3/13/22 at 1725 (5:25 PM) in room . was lying on the floor next to bed as had rolled out of bed. On 3/15 at 2100 (9:00 PM), resident was in wheelchair when slid forward out of wheelchair. Resident had another incident on 3/16/22 at 0630 (AM) in resident room . was on floor besides bed laying on right side in liquid on the floor. Resident was incont (incontinent) of urine at this time. On 3/17/22 at 0030 (12:30 AM), Resident was on the floor beside bed laying on right side. Action Taken . No injuries were noted for 3/15, 3/16 and 3/17. On 3/13/22 was noted that resident had abrasion to right hand and (bruises) to right hand, was cleansed and treated .
- 3/22/22 at 11:48 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor in Activity room, laying on right side. Rom full, except for left upper leg r/t hip surgery . suggested the use of a lap buddy (restraint device positioned in front of Resident in wheelchair to prevent standing) to remind them to stay seated .
- 3/22/22: I & A Report . Time: 2145 (9:45 PM) . Location: Activity Room . Observed on floor (unobserved) . Activity Before: W/C . Resident found laying on right side about 3 (feet) from w/c) . Interventions Implemented: Can we try a lap buddy while in a w/c .
- 3/23/22 at 9:30 AM: Nurses Notes . Writer has call out to (Health Care Provider [HCP]) r/t increasing pain in right hip post fall last night, blood in urine with Lovenox (medication administered by subcutaneous injection to prevent blood clots) therapy .
- 3/23/22 at 1:35 PM: Nurses Notes . (Resident #54) is experiencing increased pain and decreased ROM (in) right leg s/p (status post) fall 3/22. X-rays have been ordered .
- 3/23/22 at 5:00 PM: Nurses Notes . (HCP) notified r/t no results on right hip Xray. (HCP) looked at report and advised hip is fractured and to send resident out for further evaluation.
- 3/23/22 at 5:05 PM: Nurses Notes . EMS (Emergency Medical Service) dispatched to transfer resident . At 17:26 (5:26 PM) administrator notified of hip fx (fracture) and that resident being transferred for further treatment. At 17:45 (5:45 PM) resident taken via EMS to ER for further evaluation/treatment .
- 3/29/22 at 5:30 PM: Nursing Summary . Resident arrived via EMS at 1730 (5:30 PM) . resident verbalized pain .
- 4/8/22 at 2:04 PM: Resident At Risk . Late Entry: Reviewed Clinical Indicator: Resident reviewed by IDT r/t fall that occurred on 3/22/22 at 2145 (9:45 PM) . was observed on lying on right side on the floor of the activity room. Resident stated . was trying to get up and walk. Action Taken . immediately assessed by nurse, with no injury noted. Resident was noted to have c/o pain and decreased ROM in right hip/leg the following day. X-rays showed an acute fracture. Resident sent to hospital for further evaluation. Upon return from hospital, Lap buddy applied to wheelchair. Consent for device obtained .
- 4/9/22: I & A Report . Time: 01:10 (AM) . Resident Room . Observed on floor (unobserved) . Activity Before: Bed . Resident found laying on . side about 3 (feet) from bedside . Interventions . Interventions Implemented: Reminded Resident bilateral broken hips need to heal before walking .
- 4/9/22 at 3:29 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor at 0110 (1:10 AM), laying on left side about 3 (feet) from bed . No complaints of pain. Assisted to w/c and placed in Activity room to be watched closer and lap buddy in place.
- 4/9/22 at 3:34 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] (other residents' room) in the bathroom sitting on bottom .
Note: An I and A report for this fall was not provided by the facility.
- 4/23/22 at 7:22 AM: Behavior Note . Resident frequently self-transferring throughout shift . was reminded many times that we do not wish for them to fall, but resident has short memory and does not recognize physical limitations. Pain was addressed with minimal effectiveness. (Resident #54) continues to repeat 'please help me, please help me' .
- 4/25/22 at 5:00 AM: Nurses Notes . resident has been monitored this shift thus far for poor safety awareness. Attempting multiple times to self-transfer (unsuccessful) while in room and in activity room .
- 4/28/220 at 4:46 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident repeatedly self-transferring this night and not asking for assistance.
- 5/1/22: I & A Report . Time: 23:20 (11:20 PM) . Location: Resident Bathroom . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: Bed . Resident found laying on back, beside bathroom door . Interventions Implemented: Observe for fatigue and unsteadiness and encourage rest periods prn (as needed) .
- 5/1/22 at 11:42 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident found on floor in front of the bathroom. No visible signs of injuries .
- 5/2/22 at 7:45 AM: Nurses Notes . (Resident #54) observed on floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] (not Resident's room) just outside bathroom door sitting on bottom with knees bent and both feet flat on the floor . was assisted to standing position by 2 (Certified Nursing Assistants [CNA]) and put back into w/c . denied any pain . Gripper socks in place. Resident stated, 'I can't remember when asked what was trying to do . will encourage (Resident) to stay in areas that staff are present so staff can assist when needed .
- 5/2/22: I & A Report . Time: (Blank) . Location: room [ROOM NUMBER] (not Resident #54's room) . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) Activity Before: Self transferring in/out of bathroom . Interventions Implemented: Encourage to stay in areas where staff continuously present . Place signs on resident's bathroom to direct to their room .
- 5/2/22 at 10:54 AM: Resident At Risk Reviewed Clinical Indicator: Resident is being reviewed by the IDT r/t incident that occurred on 5/1/22 at 2320 (11:20 PM). Resident was observed laying on back, beside bathroom door. Gripper socks on. Resident had previously been in bed . Resident does have poor safety awareness. Dx. of Dementia and resides in our Memory Care Unit. Resident frequently self-transfers. Intervention initiated: Resident will change to bed B which will put closer to the bathroom to improve successful self-transferring .
- 5/3/22 at 2:01 AM: Nurses Notes . resident observed sitting on the floor between FOB (foot of bed) and room register holding onto the door handle of the BR (bathroom) door. Denies pain, or hitting head . did take off night gown, and only brief and gripper socks on. Brief was dry. No injuries observed or stated by resident. Stated, 'I was trying to go in there to go pee' indicating BR .
- 5/3/22: I & A Report . Time: 02:00 (AM) . Location: Resident room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: Bed . Observed sitting on the floor between FOB and room register holding onto door handle of the BR (bathroom) door . Interventions Implemented: Bed side commode chair with bed against wall ? under the bed light (sic) .
- 5/5/22 at 3:17 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident alert per usual. 0830 am Resident yelling 'Help Me, Help Me' from hallway Nurse at Medication Cart went to where the Noise was and observed Resident sitting halfway out of wheelchair. Nurse with assist of 2 repositioned Resident into wheelchair . noted Resident stated 'I was standing' .
- 5/8/22 at 9:33 AM: Nurses Notes . (Resident #54) was observed sitting on the floor in the dining room stated was trying to transfer from/c into dining room chair . sitting on buttocks with feet flat on the floor and knees bent. Gripper socks in place . left hand was up on the dining room chair . right hand was on the floor . right hand has a skin tear at base of fingers between 1st and 2nd fingers. Skin tear washed with NS (Normal Saline), TAO (Triple Antibiotic Ointment) applied and covered area with Band-Aid . assisted to feet x 2 assist .
- 5/8/22: I & A Report . Time: (Blank) . Location: Dining room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Injury: Tissue/Skin Tear . Right hand at base of fingers between 1st and 2nd finger . Resident observed sitting on floor in dining room . skin tear right hand Interventions Implemented: Offering restroom more frequently; encourage to sit with staff in Activities/Dining Room .
- 5/14/22: I & A Report . Time: 2200 (10:00 PM) . Location: Activity Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: Sitting in activity room watching the ball game . Resident found sitting on floor next to w/c . Interventions Implemented: Resident removed lap buddy. Replaced lap budded and explained that its there to remind them they need help to stand up r/t 2 broken hips .
- 5/14/22 at 11:28 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident found sitting upright on the floor. States was going home. States nothing hurts . assisted back into chair by 3 people, and was them taken to bed .
- 5/15/22: I & A Report . Time: 2230 (10:30 PM) . Location: Dining Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Activity Before: W/C . Resident attempted to transfer from w/c Removed lap buddy and attempted to stand beside w/c. Sat on floor when couldn't bear own weight . Interventions Implemented: Remind resident to leave lap buddy on. Remind CNAs to replace lap buddy when off .
- 5/15/22 at 11:38 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident was found on the floor again tonight with no injuries . Resident removed lap buddy again .
- 6/14/22: I & A Report . Time: 2100 ((:00 PM) . Location: Hallway . Slid out of W/C . Requested Resident to sit back in w/c and they slid forward out of chair on all 4's .Interventions Implemented: Replace lap buddy in w/c .
- 6/14/22 at 10:36 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident was in hallway by Nurses cart and put themselves on the floor. (Resident #54) bent forward and went to hands and knees. No injuries . Assisted back into chair by 3 people and continued to roam the halls .
- 6/15/22 at 1:28 PM: Behavior Note . (Resident #54) will not leave lap buddy in place . continues to remove lap buddy when staff applies it to w/c . continues with poor safety awareness and requires frequent prompts to not try and stand or transfer independently .
- 6/16/22 at 2:54 PM: Resident At Risk . Resident reviewed for incident that occurred on 6/14/22 . Resident observed bending forward in wheelchair and sliding out onto hands and knees. Staff unable to intervene quickly enough to prevent fall .
- 7/17/22 at 1:24 AM: Nurses Notes . Observed on floor in Activities R (right) side position. W/C beside them. Head next to the courtyard door. Denies pain . Denies hitting head . Observed blood R wrist. Cleansed area with normal saline and applied x 3 steri-strips at skin tear area. Also observed area where a scab had been taken off and it too was bleeding. Simple dressing then was applied. There was bruising at base R hand #4 and #5 digit that, per staff, had been there previously .
- 7/17/22: I & A Report . Time: (Blank) . Location: Activity Room . Observed on floor (unwitnessed) . Injury: Tissue/Skin Tear . Right wrist skin tear, scab removed at approx. same area . Observed on floor, right side position. W/C beside them. Head next to courtyard door. Observed blood at right wrist. Cleansed area with normal saline. 3 steri strips applied, covered with simple dressing . Interventions Implemented: Lap buddy check on TAR (Treatment Administration Record) and Kardex Q (every) S (shift) QD (every day). Nursing will monitor and document .
- 1/23/22: I & A Report . Time: 1518 (3:18 PM) . Location: (Resident Room) . Resident was found sitting by side of the bed with back towards the bed with knees up. Resident tried to self-transfer. Wheelchair sitting to the right side. Upon arrival noted call light was on and resident said, 'I need help, are you my helper.' Resident incontinent of urine . Immediate Action Taken: Changed resident and provided with fluids . Predisposing Environmental Factors: Other (not specified) . Predisposing Physiological Factors: Recent Illness, Weakness/Fainted, Hypotensive (low blood pressure), Incontinent, Recent change in medication . Predisposing Situation Factors: During transfer .
- 1/23/23 at 4:01 PM: Nurses Notes . Resident found sitting on the floor with back side to the bed. Wheelchair to right side. Resident tried to self-transfer and had (call) light on calling for assistance. Assisted to standing position with 2 assist. Denies any pain. No injuries noted. Resident incontinent of urine .
The facility provided I and A Reports for Resident #54 did not contain detailed information regarding the falls, analysis to determine the cause, and/or initial/final interventions to prevent further falls.
On 2/9/23 at 2:55 PM, Resident #54 was observed sitting in the Activity Room of the Memory Care unit of the facility in their wheelchair. Resident #54 was unable to provide meaningful responses when asked questions.
An interview was completed with the Administrator on 2/10/23 at 3:30 PM. The Administrator was asked if there was any additional documentation pertaining the I and A's for the falls and replied, No. The Administrator indicated they provided all available information.
Review of Resident #54's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #54) is at risk for fall related injury and falls R/T: decreased safety awareness, weakness. Due to cognitive impairment, (Resident) does not recall they can't get up and ambulate independently . remains at risk for continued falls (Created: 7/7/21; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 5/18/22). The care plan included the interventions:
- Encourage the resident to wear appropriate footwear as needed (Created and Initiated: 7/7/21)
- Keep the resident's environment as safe as possible with even floors free from spills and/or clutter; adequate lighting; call light within reach, commonly used items within reach, avoid repositioning furniture and keep the bed in the appropriate position (Created and Initiated: 7/7/21)
- PT/OT evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN (as needed) (Created and Initiated: 7/7/21)
- Provide resident with activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction (Created and Initiated: 7/7/21; Revised: 7/8/21)
- Put the resident 's call light within reach and encourage them to use it for assistance as needed (Created and Initiated: 7/7/21; Revised: 3/13/22)
- Lay out resident's clothes for the day at the foot of bed (Created: 8/3/21; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Offer assistance, encourage frequent rest periods or using w/c for mobility (Created 11/17/21; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Keep wheelchair next to bed to remind to use it (Created: 3/9/22; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/22/22)
- Color contrasted press pad call light (Created: 3/17/22; Initiated and Revised: 1/24/23)
- Perimeter guard mattress (Created: 3/13/22; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Pommel (seat cushion with a raised, block area between the legs intended for positioning and posture support- not to restrict freedom of movement) cushion to wheelchair (Created: 3/17/22; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Encourage resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility such as: PT/OT as ordered (Created, Initiated, and Revised: 4/9/22)
- Room changed to higher traffic area (Created and Initiated: 4/11/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Observe for fatigue and/or unsteadiness and encourage rest periods as needed (Created and Initiated: 5/1/22)
- Place sign on resident's bathroom door to direct back to their room (Created and Initiated: 5/2/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Resident changed to bed B to make bed closer to the bathroom (Created and Initiated: 5/2/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Bed placed against wall (Created and Initiated: 5/3/22; Revised:12/16/22)
- Press pad alarm pigtailed to call light (Created: 5/3/22; Initiated: 4/6/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Memory brakes to wheelchair (Created and Initiated: 5/9/22)
- Review information on past falls and attempt to determine the root cause of the falls (Created and Initiated: 5/16/22)
- Staff education to assist resident to room/bed or high traffic area after meals (Created and Initiated: 5/17/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Place call bell in activity lounge to enable resident to call for assistance (Created and Initiated: 5/17/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Dycem to w/c (Created and Initiated: 6/15/22; Revised: 12/16/22)
- Tilt wheelchair seat back (Created and Initiated: 7/18/22)
- A color contrasted call light was set up in residents' room (Created and Initiated: 1/26/23)
The following discontinued interventions were also noted in the care plan:
- RESOLVED: Staff will offer toileting every hour and encourage (Resident #54) to stay in activities room or dining room where staff present and can assist him. Fall occurred 5/8/22 (Created and Initiated: 5/8/22; Resolved (discontinued): 5/17/22)
- RESOLVED: Resident removed lap buddy. I put lap buddy back on and explained that it is there to remind them that they shouldn't stand without help' (Created and Initiated: 5/15/22; Resolved: 5/17/22)
- RESOLVED: Lap buddy to wheelchair (Created: 3/22/22; Initiated and Resolved: 12/21/22)
Resident #54 had another care plan entitled, (Resident #54) has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and requires assistance with ADL's and mobility r/t: Confusion secondary to dementia, poor safety awareness, weakness, balance deficit, history of BIL (bilateral) hip fractures (Created: 7/8/21; Revised: 8/30/22). The care plan included the interventions:
- May use standard wheelchair for locomotion (Created and Initiated: 7/8/21)
- Bed Mobility: Resident requires extensive of one staff assist to reposition and turn in bed (Created: 7/9/21; Initiated: 4/5/22; Revised 8/4/22)
- Transfer: Resident requires extensive of one staff assist for transfers (Created: 7/9/21; Initiated: 4/5/22; Revised: 8/4/22)
- Dressing: Resident requires extensive assistance of one staff for dressing (Created: 7/9/21; Initiated: 4/5/22; Revised: 8/4/22)
- Toilet Use: Resident requires extensive assistance of one staff to use toilet (Created: 7/9/21; Initiated: 4/5/22; Revised: 8/4/22)
- Ambulation: Resident is able to ambulate with extensive assistance of one staff and a rolling wheeled walker (Created and Initiated: 4/5/22; Revised 8/4/22)
Note: A walker was not observed in Resident #54's room and the Resident was not observed ambulating with staff and a walker at any time during the survey.
The care plan also included one discontinued intervention which detailed, Resolved: Ambulation: Resident requires supervision of staff to ambulate (Created: 7/9/21; Initiated and Resolved: 4/5/22)
On 2/10/23 at 7:56 AM, Resident #54 was observed in their room. The Resident was sitting in their wheelchair with a meal tray in front of them. The Resident's head was down, and their eyes were closed.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00126015, MI00127357, and MI00134332.
Based on interview and record review, the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00126015, MI00127357, and MI00134332.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent resident-to-resident abuse for two residents (Resident #11 and Resident #278) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse by Resident #276, who repeatedly hit other residents including Resident #11 and Resident #278 14), including hitting Residents #11 and #278 in the face causing injury, the lack of appropriate interventions resulted in the potential for additional instances of abusive behavior towards other residents.
Findings Include:
Resident #276:
Abuse
A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #276 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, delusional disorder, depression, anxiety, history of alcohol dependence and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 and needed some oversight assistance with care. The only behavior documented was wandering.
A record review of a Facility Reported Incident/FRI dated [DATE] identified an incident between Resident #276 and Resident #278. The two residents were observed sitting in the dining room by Staff member O, when Resident #276 turned around and hit Resident #278 in the face by his eye with a closed fist. Staff member O said it was unprovoked.
In the FRI review Staff member O said it was about 7:00 PM on [DATE], when she entered the dining room where the two residents were. She said she saw Resident #276 raise his fist and punch Resident #278 on the left side of his face. She said she then attempted to separate the residents.
The facility interviewed both Residents #276 and #278. Neither resident recalled the incident, although per the interview, Resident #276 appeared upset and said he did not like Resident #278.
The facility substantiated the incident occurred and Resident #276 was transferred to a psychiatric hospital on [DATE] for evaluation. Resident #276 received 1:1- staff to resident monitoring for 3 days.
A review of the progress notes for Resident #276 revealed that prior to hitting Resident #278 in the face on [DATE] at approximately 6:00 PM -7:00 PM, at 12:55 AM [DATE], a nurse's note provided, . At 00:55, it is alleged that he struck another resident. When asked, resident expressed anger toward the resident .
[DATE] at 18:55 (6:55 PM), a behavior note by Nurse N, Resident was in dining room as dinner was finishing up. He was noted to be looking out the window when he walked up to (Resident #278) and punched him on the left side of the face . (Resident #276) verbalized that he knew that man was thieving and conniving . 1:1 at this time.
[DATE] at 9:03 AM, a Social Services note (Resident #276) exhibited physical aggression toward another resident [DATE]. The incident was witnessed and it was unprovoked and without warning .
Resident #276 was transferred to a psychiatric hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility [DATE].
A Resident at Risk note dated [DATE] at 11:32 AM, . (Resident #276) has been residing in this facility since [DATE]. Over his course of stay, he has exhibited multiple behaviors . he has also exhibited physical aggression toward other residents during his stay . The resident was noted to have multiple incidents of hitting other residents and at times causing injury.
A record review of the Care Plans for Resident #276 indicated he had an ongoing Care Plan for mood and behaviors. The Care Plans were not updated with new interventions after the [DATE] incident at 12:55 AM or after the incident on [DATE] at approximately 6:00 to 7:00 PM. The Care Plans were updated [DATE].
Resident #278:
A record review of the Face sheet and MDS assessment indicated Resident #278 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, GERD, Diabetes, history of falls, neuropathy, heart disease, asthma, COPD, arthritis, depression anxiety, hypertension, and chronic pain . The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive loss with a BIMS score of 6/15 and needed some assistance with all care. The resident died in the facility on [DATE].
A review of the progress notes for Resident #278 revealed the following:
[DATE] at 6:48 PM, a nurses note, Resident was sitting in dining room after dinner when another resident (Resident #276) punched him (Resident #278) on the left side of his face. Staff witnessed and stated she turned her head to see (Resident #276) put his fist up and punched (Resident #278) on the left side of his face. Ice immediately applied.
[DATE] at 4:22 AM, Resident up and down till 0300 (3:00 AM) every 15 to 20 minutes, stating he can't sleep .
[DATE] at 5:44 AM, . punched in the face. Area red and a little swollen .
A review of the Care Plans for Resident #278 does not identify mention of the resident being hit by another resident or the injury received from being punched in the face by Resident #276.
On [DATE] at 11:30 interviewed Nurse N on the locked Memory Care/Dementia unit. She was asked about Resident #276. She said he had many incidents of aggressive behavior towards other residents and sometimes staff.
An interview on [DATE] at 12:35 PM with the Administrator related to the incident between Resident #276 and Resident #278 revealed, (Resident #276) There were med changes for mood adjustment and 1:1 for 3 days after hitting (#278) in the face. We don't have the capability to have 1:1. He went months without issues, then would just pop someone. The Director of Nursing said the resident's behaviors were discussed in the weekly team meetings, other than medication changes, there were no new specified interventions mentioned to aid in preventing the ongoing aggression and abusive behavior that Resident #276 exhibited towards other residents. The Director of Nursing/DON and Administrator were asked about staffing on the locked Dementia Unit/Memory Care unit where both Resident #276 and #278 resided. The DON said that there were usually 1 nurse and 2 nurse aides on the unit for approximately 26 residents on the day shift and there were 1-2 activity aides. There was no designated unit manager and the nurses were not specifically assigned to the unit.
A review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated origination [DATE] and dated effective [DATE] provided, Policy: Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment . Abuse shall include . physical abuse . To assure guests/residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, the facility shall monitor guest/resident care and treatments on an ongoing basis. It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for the guests/residents .
Resident #11:
According to admission face sheet, Resident #11 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included early onset Alzheimer's, Vascular Dementia, Mood Disorder, Depression, Panic Disorder, Diabetes, and other complications. According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #11 received no score on the Cognition Assessment, indicating cognition impairment, and required limited assist with transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. According to the MDS Resident #11 was coded positive for behaviors-verbal/physical.
Resident #276:
According to admission face sheet, Resident #276 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Mood Disorder/Delusions, Depression, ETOH Dependence, Anxiety and other complications. According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #276 scored a 5 out of 15 on the on the Cognition Assessment, indicating severe cognition impairment.
The Facility reported a Resident-to-Resident altercation to State Agency and completed an investigation.
Review of Investigation by the facility, reflected that Resident #11 and Resident #276 were involved in a resident to resident altercation on 2 separate occasions; resulting in Resident #11 being punched in the face and sustaining a black eye and also being slapped on the arm and face while on the Dementia unit.
According to Facility investigation, the first altercation took place on [DATE] at 5:45 PM, in the secure Dementia Unit. Resident #276 was witnessed punching Resident #11 in the face, resulting in a hematoma around the right eye (lackeyed) for Resident #11, witnessed by an Activity Aid that was a witness to the incident. According to the investigation, it was dinner time on the unit, and Resident #11 was talking about Resident #276's clothing protector, sitting together after eating dinner. Activity Aid attempted to get Resident #11 away from Resident #276, was not able. Resident #11 tried to removed the cloth protector from Resident #276, resulting in Resident #276 punching Resident #11 in the right eye. Resident #11 stumbled, landed on her bottom in a chair, and then Resident #276 pushed the chair over and then walked out of the Activity room.
The second altercation took place on [DATE] at 6:45 PM, in the Dementia unit, when Resident #11 was coming down the hallway and approached Resident #276. Resident #276 hit Resident #11 on the arm, then slapped her on the left side of her face.
According to the facility investigation, this incident was not witnessed by the nurse on the Dementia Unit who was at the nurse station. but was witnessed by a staff member who was walking towards the Activity room. According to the report, Resident #276 was standing out side the activity room door, when Resident #11 approached, and seen Resident #276 slap Resident #11 on the left side of her face and then hit her in the left shoulder, unprovoked. The Staff member said 'Hey' in attempt to break up the residents.
According to the report, Resident #276 was petitioned out to a Psychiatric Facility.
An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 2:50 PM, with the Director of Nursing and Administrator related to the 2 Resident to Resident altercations with Resident #11 and Resident #276. The Administrator verbalized that Resident #11 was trying to yank the cloth protector off of Resident #276. The Administrator verbalized that Resident #11 is very repetitive and does a lot of repeating of various things, and indicated Resident #11 was the first one Resident #276 hit. The Administrator also indicated they had petitioned Resident #276 out several times to Psych Facility. The Psych facility would provide medications and Resident #276 would come back to the facility and was ok for a short time, then with the second interaction, Resident #11 walked past him and he hit her without provocation. The Administrator verbalized Resident #276 was discharged from the facility [DATE].
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #5:
Respiratory Care
On 2/09/2023 at 10:03 AM, Resident #5 was observed sleeping in his room. Another resident was obse...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #5:
Respiratory Care
On 2/09/2023 at 10:03 AM, Resident #5 was observed sleeping in his room. Another resident was observed entering the room and proceeded to the far side, standing and looking around. Upon seeing Staff member K in the hallway, she was asked about the resident standing in the room with Resident #5, she said that resident was not supposed to be in the room. It was not his room.
A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Alzheimer's Dementia, hypothyroidism, depression, Multiple Sclerosis, anxiety, hypertension, asthma, and arthritis. The resident was positive for Covid-19 on 1/27/2023. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had several cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15. The resident ambulated with supervision and needed assistance with hygiene and bathing.
A review of the progress notes revealed the following:
1/27/2023 at 9:13 AM, a nurses note, Resident was tested for SARS-COV-2 Covid 19 . positive results at 0657 .
2/3/2023 at 10:58 AM, a Resident at Risk note . recently tested positive for Covid-19, so maintaining Contact Droplet precautions isolation through 2/6/2023 .
A review of the Care Plans for Resident #5 revealed the following:
Covid 19 (Resident #5) has the potential for developing Covid-19 infection r/t (related to) current pandemic. Has diagnosis of dementia/Alzheimer's with decreased safety awareness and is unable to understand the need for a mask, date initiated, created and revised 4/14/2022 with Interventions: All dated 4/14/2022. The Care Plan was not updated to indicate the resident tested positive for Covid-19 on 1/27/23; was to be in Transmission Based Precautions, had asthma and was at high risk for complications; received Paxlovid from 1/27/2023 to 1/31/2023 and the resident needed to be monitored for potential side effects.
(Resident #5) has a potential for difficulty breathing and risk for respiratory complications r/t Asthma, date initiated 4/14/2022 and revised 4/15/2022 with Interventions: All dated 4/14/2022. There was no mention that Resident #5 had recently tested positive for Covid-19.
A review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning, dated effective 6/24/2021 and last revised 6/24/2021 provided, Purpose: Every resident in the facility will have a person-centered Plan of Care developed and implemented . The care plan must be specific, resident centered, individualized and unique to each resident and may include: 'It should be oriented toward preventing avoidable declines; How to manage risk factors; Utilize current standards of practice; Treatment objectives should have measurable outcomes .' The care plan and resident [NAME] will be updated . with significant changes. This includes adding new focuses, goals, and interventions .
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans in a timely manner for two residents (Resident #5, Resident #66) of 46 residents reviewed, resulting in (1) no Covid care plan for Resident #5 and (2) Resident #66's catheter care plan did not have catheter strap intervention, resulting in the likelihood for missed interventions in treatment and monitoring of Covid, and increased catheter discomfort or pain.
Findings Include:
Record review of the facility provided 'Lippincott procedures- Indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) care and management' of 16 pages with diagrams, revealed; Make sure that the catheter is secured properly, Assess the securement device daily and change it when clinically indicated and as recommended by the manufactures . If a securement device isn't available, use a piece of adhesive tape to secure the catheter .
Resident #66:
Record review of Resident #66's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed coccyx wound and left medial ankle small scab and skin on bilateral lower extremities dry and scaly. Indwelling catheter noted for urinary retention.
Record review of Resident #66's care plans pages 1-36 revealed the resident was at risk for urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma. Review of the interventions revealed there was no catheter strap noted to decrease catheter-related trauma. There was no intervention to apply or monitor Foley catheter strap noted.
Resident interview on 02/08/23 at 01:09 PM revealed the resident #66 received Pressure ulcer from the previous long term care facility before she came. Observed a Wound vac in place to suction, and a Foley catheter to drain with no catheter strap noted.
Observation on 02/08/23 at 01:13 PM with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) P and CNA Q of Resident #66 Hoyer transfer from wheelchair to bed. Observation of the buttocks area with wound vac in place and occlusive dressing intact. Right foot dressing to heel is black in color dressing dated 2/8/23. Peri care given for bowel movement. Foley catheter in place with no leg strap in place, Foley catheter was dropped from the bed onto the floor the tubing and drainage bag and drain spout came out of the holder and it all landed on the floor. CNA P picked up the catheter drainage bag and put the spout back into the holder without wiping the spout with alcohol.
Observation and interview on 02/10/23 at 8:10 AM Resident #66 sitting up in wheelchair in room with Breakfast tray on bedside table. Bilateral green puff boots on. Resident #66 stated that she got the right heel sore from being in the wheelchair while at the facility and that it is painful at times. Resident #66 stated that its black and that her left lateral ankle also started here. Resident #66 stated that she came in here to the facility with only the one sore on her butt area, but currently has more than just the one. Resident #66 stated she feels she's falling apart. Observation of Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R and CNA T into room to Hoyer lift Resident #66 back to bed from wheelchair. Observation done of transfer. Resident #66 Foley catheter with no catheter strap noted.
Observation on 2/14/2023 at 1:25 PM observation of Resident #66 getting ready for a shower. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R and CNA S, removed brief, observed Foley catheter with no securing device or leg strap to keep catheter from tugging.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of bathing and hygiene care for o...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of bathing and hygiene care for one residents (Resident #24) of two residents reviewed, resulting in foul body odors, lack of bathing and showers per Resident preference, and Resident verbalization of dissatisfaction.
Findings include:
Resident #24:
On 2/8/23 at 1:21 PM, Resident #24's room door was observed to be closed, after knocking and entering, a strong, permeating, foul body odor was immediately noted. The Resident was sitting in a wheelchair in their room and had a disheveled appearance. Resident #24's call light was observed on the floor. An interview was completed at this time. When queried regarding care they receive at the facility, Resident #24 revealed they need assistance with ADL care including showering. Resident #24 was then asked how frequently they receive showers and stated, Only shower on Tuesdays. When asked that was good for them, Resident #24 stated, No. Resident #24 then stated, Took as many as I wanted at home. With further inquiry, Resident #24 indicated getting washed up was not the same as taking a shower and wanted more but didn't think there was enough staff for them to get more. While speaking, no teeth were observed in Resident #24's mouth. When asked if they had dentures, Resident #24 revealed they did not. When queried if they had difficulty eating, Resident #24 revealed they did not. A denture cup, with a different Resident's name written on the top, was sitting in their room near the TV. When asked about the denture cup, Resident #24 stated, Some lady gave me them. They don't fit. When asked how long they have had the dentures, Resident #24 was unsure. Observation of the bathroom in the room revealed a large, unflushed bowel movement in the toilet.
Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, falls, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive to total assistance to complete all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with the exception of eating.
Review of Resident #24's care plans did not include a care plan and/or intervention pertaining to showers and/or frequency of bathing.
An interview was conducted with Resident #24's Family Member X on 2/10/23 at 12:30 PM. When queried regarding the frequency in which Resident #24 receives a shower at the facility, Family Member X stated, Supposed to have a shower two days ago but never got one. When asked if that happened frequently, Family Member X shrugged their shoulders but did not provide a response.
A review of ADL care and bathing documentation in Resident #24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was completed. The documentation did not distinguish if a shower or bed bath was provided.
An interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/14/23 at 10:41 AM. When queried were staff document showers, the DON indicated it was in the reviewed task documentation area in the EMR. When queried if there was a way to identify/distinguish if a shower or bed bath was given, the DON indicated there was not as it is one section in the documentation.
An interview was completed with the Administrator on 2/15/23 at 2:56 PM. The Administrator was asked about shower and bed bath documentation not being separate in the EMR and how the facility identifies when Resident received showers. The Administrator acknowledged charting was together but did not provide further explanation. The Administrator was informed of Resident #24 verbalization of dissatisfaction related to only receiving one shower a week and indicated they would address the concern.
Review of facility provided policy/procedure entitled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Program (Effective 4/26/22) was related to Restorative Nursing Care Programs and did not address showering, daily care, and/or documentation.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review the facility failed to complete urinary catheter care per professional standards of pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review the facility failed to complete urinary catheter care per professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #66), resulting in the likelihood for bladder injury, cross contamination, urinary tract infection and prolonged illness.
Findings include:
Record review of the facility provided 'Lippincott procedures- Indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) care and management' of 16 pages with diagrams, revealed inappropriate or unnecessary use of an indwelling urinary catheter can result in catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTIs are the most common type of health-care associated infection in adult patients . Provide routine hygiene for meatal care; to avoid contaminating the urinary tract, always clean by wiping away from, never toward- the urinary meatus . clean the periurethral area. Clean the periurethral area carefully to prevent catheter movement and urethral traction, which can increase the risk of CAUTI . Make sure that the catheter is secured properly, Assess the securement device daily and change it when clinically indicated and as recommended by the manufactures . If a securement device isn't available, use a piece of adhesive tape to secure the catheter .
Resident #66:
Record review of Resident #66's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed coccyx wound and left medial ankle small scab and skin on bilateral lower extremities dry and scaly. Indwelling catheter noted for urinary retention.
Record review of Resident #66's care plans pages 1-36 revealed the resident was at risk for urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma. Review of the interventions revealed there was no catheter strap noted to decrease catheter-related trauma.
Resident interview on 02/08/23 at 01:09 PM revealed the resident #66 received Pressure ulcer from the previous long term care facility before she came. Observed a Wound vac in place to suction, and a Foley catheter to drain with no catheter strap noted.
Observation on 02/08/23 at 01:13 PM with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) P and CNA Q of Resident #66 Hoyer transfer from wheelchair to bed. Observation of the buttocks area with wound vac in place and occlusive dressing intact. Right foot dressing to heel is black in color dressing dated 2/8/23. Peri care given for bowel movement. Foley catheter in place with no leg strap in place, Foley catheter was dropped from the bed onto the floor the tubing and drainage bag and drain spout came out of the holder and it all landed on the floor. CNA P picked up the catheter drainage bag and put the drain spout back into the holder without wiping the spout with alcohol.
Observation and interview on 02/10/23 at 8:10 AM Resident #66 sitting up in wheelchair in room with Breakfast tray on bedside table. Bilateral green puff boots on. Resident #66 stated that she got the right heel sore from being in the wheelchair while at the facility and that It is painful at times. Resident #66 stated that its black and that her left lateral ankle also started here. Resident #66 stated that she came in here to the facility with only the one sore on her butt area, but currently has more than just the one. Resident #66 stated she feels she's falling apart. Observation of Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R and CNA T into room to Hoyer lift Resident #66 back to bed from wheelchair. Observation done of transfer. Resident #66 Foley catheter with no catheter strap noted.
Observation on 02/10/23 at 12:40 PM of Resident #66's Catheter Care with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) T revealed the bed was elevated and Foley catheter emptied of 375 cc yellow urine. CNA T alcohol wiped the drain spout and placed back in spout holder. CNA T left the room to get wash clothes, came back turned on the water, put on blue gloves. CNA T lowered Resident #66's brief observed Foley catheter in place. CAN T used a washcloth with cleansing solution, wiped abdomen fold noted reddened area, and she will let the nurse know. CNA T then wiped the catheter tubing, failed to spread the legs and clean the meatal area. Catheter care was done wiping catheter tubing downward with cleaning clothe and then dried tubing and fold area. There was no catheter strap noted to area.
Observation on 2/14/2023 at 1:25 PM observation of Resident #66 getting ready for a shower. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R and CNA S, removed brief, observed Foley catheter with no securing device or leg strap to keep catheter from tugging.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure adequate hydration for two residents (Resident #69 and Resident #282) of two residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of accessible beverages and the potential for discomfort, thirst, and dehydration.
Findings include:
Resident #69:
On 2/8/23 at 1:02 PM, Resident #69 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the Activity Room of the locked Memory Care unit of the facility. The Resident was positioned in front of a table with no beverages in reach. Resident #69's lips were noted to have a dry and cracked appearance. When asked questions, Resident #69 was pleasantly confused and unable to provide meaningful responses.
Record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was rarely/never understood and required supervision to total assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) including total assistance for eating and drinking.
Review of Resident #69's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, Resident is at risk for Nutritional decline r/t . Dementia at risk of weight loss . weight loss . Encourage PO (oral) intake .Provide all beverages in blue mugs with lids d/t difficulty drinking from cups (Created and Initiated: 11/9/22; Revised: 2/2/23). The care plan included the interventions:
- Encourage and provide intake of fluids throughout the day (Created and Initiated: 11/9/22)
- Provide all beverages in Blue mugs with lids (Created and Initiated: 2/2/23)
On 2/10/23 at 7:50 AM, an observation occurred of Resident #69 in the Activity Room. The Resident was sitting in their wheelchair in front of a table with their eyes closed, head down, and a breakfast tray in front of them. The only food on the tray which appeared to have been disturbed was the oatmeal. An interview was completed with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC as they were picking up resident trays. When queried how much Resident #69 had eaten, CNA CC replied, One bite of oatmeal. With further inquiry, CNA CC indicated the Resident did not typically eat much at breakfast. When queried if they drank, CNA CC shook their head to indicate no. CNA CC proceeded to remove Resident #69's food tray, including all beverages. Resident #69 was left sitting in their wheelchair with no beverage in reach.
On 2/10/23 at 12:35 PM, Resident #69 was observed in their room in the facility. The Resident was lying in bed and there were no beverages without their reach.
An observation of Resident #69 occurred on 2/14/23 at 11:13 AM in their room. The Resident was in bed and there were no beverages within their reach and/or present in their room.
Resident #282:
On 2/08/23 at 8:15 AM, Resident #282 was not present in their room in the locked Memory Care unit of the facility. An observation of the Resident's room revealed there were no beverages in the room.
On 2/8/23 at 8:22 AM, an interview was completed with Registered Nurse M. When asked where Resident #282 was, RN M looked and pointed out the Resident. Resident #282 was walking in the hallway.
On 2/8/22 at 9:28 AM, Resident #282 continued to walk in the hallway of the unit without staff assistance and/or supervision. When spoke to, Resident #282 responded but did not provide meaningful responses to questions.
Record review revealed Resident #282 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and dementia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision to extensive assistance to complete ADL's.
Review of Resident #282's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, Alteration in nutritional and/or hydration status r/t Dementia, PTSD w/confusion and disorientation, wandering; poor intake of meals w/refusals and significant weight loss . (Created, Initiated, and Revised: 2/3/23). The care plan included the interventions:
- Provide diet as ordered . (Created, Initiated, and Revised: 2/3/23)
- Offer an alternate when 50% or less of meal is consumed (Created, Initiated, and Revised: 2/3/23)
- Assist resident with meals as needed or as will accept, including tray set-up (Created, Initiated, and Revised: 2/3/23)
On 2/9/23 at 2:58 PM, Resident #282 was observed sitting in a stationary chair in the Activity Room of the locked Memory Care unit of the facility. The Resident did not have a beverage. An observation of the Resident's room was completed at this time. No beverages were present in the room.
At 7:59 AM on 2/10/23, Resident #282 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, laying on their back with their eyes closed. An overbed table with nothing on it was positioned near the Resident's bed. There were no beverages present in the room.
An interview was completed with CNA CC and CNA W on 2/10/23 at 8:00 AM. The breakfast tray was present in the hallway. When queried if Resident #282 ate breakfast, CNA W stated, No. CNA CC then stated, Only seen them eat ice cream. When queried regarding the facility policy/procedure related to resident beverages, the CNA's indicated the prior shift passes water cups for the day.
On 2/10/23 at 12:20 PM, Resident #282 was observed sitting in the common room area of the facility. The Resident's head was down and did not respond when asked questions. There were no beverages present near the Resident.
On 2/14/23 at 2:12 PM, Resident #282's room door was open, and the Resident was not present in their room. An untouched lunch tray was observed on the overbed table.
An interview was conducted with the facility Administrator on 2/15/23 at 2:10 PM. The Administrator was queried regarding the facility policy/procedure related to hydration and beverages. The Administrator revealed water is passed by staff at a designated times and staff should ensure that Resident's always have beverages available. When queried regarding observations of Resident #69 and Resident #282 not having beverages within reach, the Administrator stated, That's a problem. A policy/procedure related to hydration was requested at this time but not received by the conclusion of the survey.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure maintenance and storage of oxygen and respiratory equipment per professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #24 and Resident #54) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of monitoring and disposal of oxygen tubing, nebulizer delivery equipment being stored in an unsanitary manner, and the likelihood for respiratory illness.
Findings include:
Resident #24:
On 2/8/23 10:06 AM, Resident #24 was not present in their room. An uncover nebulizer mask was observed on the dresser beside the Resident's bed. The nebulizer mask and medication cup were connected to the nebulizer machine.
An interview was conducted with Resident #24 in their room on 2/8/23 at 1:21 PM. The nebulizer remained in the same place on the dresser. The mask, medication cup, and tubing were connected. Visible spots of fluid were present in the medication cup of the nebulizer. Resident #24 was asked if the nursing staff assist them with the mask and indicated they give them the treatments.
Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, falls, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive to total assistance to complete all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with the exception of eating.
Review of Resident #24's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #24) has a potential for difficulty breathing and risk for respiratory complications RT (Related To): COPD (Initiated: 1/3/23). The care plan included the intervention, Administer medication & treatments per physician orders. Monitor for ineffectiveness, side effects and adverse reactions, report abnormal findings to the physician .
On 2/9/23 at 8:38 AM, an observation of Resident #24's room revealed the nebulizer remained on the dresser, uncontained and connected with visible fluid in the medication cup.
An interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y on 2/9/22 at 8:44 AM. When queried regarding Resident #24, CNA Y stated, Came in with pneumonia, got Covid here.
Resident #54:
On 2/8/23 at 9:44 AM, Resident #54 was observed sitting in the Activity Room of the facility in their wheelchair. The Resident was not receiving oxygen therapy but a portable oxygen tank with connected oxygen tubing were present on the back of their wheelchair. The oxygen tubing was dated, 1/31.
An observation of Resident #54's room on 2/8/22 at 9:50 AM revealed the Resident did not have an oxygen concentrator in their room.
Record review revealed Resident #54 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anxiety, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive, one-to-two-person assistance to perform all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with the exception of supervision for locomotion.
Review of Resident #54's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #54) has a potential for difficulty breathing and risk for respirator complications R/T: COPD (Created: 7/7/21; Initiated: 4/4/22). The care plan included the intervention, Oxygen as ordered . (Created and Initiated: 12/8/21).
On 2/9/23 at 2:54 PM and on 2/10/23 at 7:55 AM, Resident #54 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. The portable oxygen tank remained in place on the back of the wheelchair and the tubing was dated 1/31.
An interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/14/22 at 10:41 AM. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to nebulizer cleaning and storage, the DON stated, Neb equipment should be cleaned set out to air dry and then put in a bag. The DON was then told about observations of Resident #24's nebulizer. When queried if that was acceptable, the DON stated, No. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to oxygen therapy and tubing, the DON stated, Tubing should be changed every seven days. When queried regarding observations of Resident #54's oxygen tubing, the DON revealed Resident #54 received oxygen on an as needed basis but the tubing should be changed.
Review of facility provided policy/procedure entitled, Use of Oxygen (Revised 8/17/21) revealed, Policy . I. The O2 (oxygen) cannula or mask should be changed weekly and dated . III . when not in use, should be stored in a clean bag .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff in sufficient numbers to...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff in sufficient numbers to ensure that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was performed, prevent the development of Facility- Acquired Pressure Ulcers, provide adequate supervision to prevent Falls, prevent Abuse from occurring on multiple occasions with different residents, and mitigate the spread of Covid-19 infections, resulting in complaints about showers not provided, facility-acquired Pressure Ulcers, Falls with Injuries, and the spread of Covid-19 in the facility, frustration, unmet needs, with the likelihood to affect all residents residing in the facility.
Findings include:
Review of Policy Nursing Staffing, dated 10/14/22, documented The nursing service department provides 24-hour nursing services. The facility ensures sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing and related services to assure guest/resident's safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each guest, as determined by each guest's assessments and individual plans pf care .and considering the number of acuity and diagnoses and guest/resident population in accordance with the facility assessment .
The Policy directs that Nursing Services are provided by number and type of personnel to ensure that each guest/resident:
- Receives treatments, medications, and diets as prescribed;
- Receives rehabilitative nursing care as needed;
- Receives proper care to maintain their highest level of functioning (prevent decline in function or poor clinical outcomes);
- Is kept clean, comfortable, and well-groomed;
- Is protected from accidents, injury, and infection; and
- Is encouraged, assisted, and trained in self-care and group therapy.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19),
Strategies to Mitigate Healthcare Personnel Staffing Shortages, Updated July 17, 2020: .
Maintaining appropriate staffing in healthcare facilities is essential to providing a safe work
environment for healthcare personnel (HCP) and safe patient care . Healthcare facilities must
be prepared for potential staffing shortages and have plans and processes in place to mitigate
these, including communicating with HCP about actions the facility is taking to address
shortages and maintain patient and HCP safety .
Resident #11;
According to admission face sheet, Resident #11 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included early onset Alzheimer's, Vascular Dementia, Mood Disorder, Depression, Panic Disorder, Diabetes, and other complications. According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #11 received no score on the Cognition Assessment, indicating cognition impairment.
Resident #276;
According to admission face sheet, Resident #276 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Mood Disorder/Delusions, Depression, ETOH Dependence, Anxiety and other complications. According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #276 scored a 5 out of 15 on the on the Cognition Assessment, indicating severe cognition impairment.
The Facility reported a Resident to Resident altercation to State Agency and completed an investigation.
Review of Investigation by the facility, reflected that Resident #11 and Resident #276 were involved in a resident to resident altercation on 2 separate occasions; resulting in Resident #11 being punched in the face and sustaining a black eye and also being slapped on the arm and face while on the Dementia unit.
According to Facility investigation, the first altercation took place on 1/5/22 at 5:45 PM, in the secure Dementia Unit. Resident #276 was witnessed punching Resident #11 in the face, resulting in a hematoma around the right eye (lackeyed) for Resident #11.
The second altercation took place on 7/8/22, in the Dementia unit, when Resident #11 was coming down the hallway. Resident #276 hit Resident #11 on the arm, then slapped her on the left side of her face.
During an interview on 2/15/23 at 12:33 PM, with Staff G related to staff on the Dementia Unit, it was verbalized that only 2 Nursing Assistants are assigned to work the Dementia Unit. Staff G was asked what happens if there are Residents that require 2 person assist, and no one is out with the residents. Staff G said they do the best they can. Staff G said there is also one or two Activity Aids back there at times. Staff G verbalized there has been only one recently.
Staff G was asked how is the Dementia Unit staffed and indicated it is with one nurse and 2 nursing assistants providing care.
Staff G was asked how she staffs the building and verbalized 2 nurses on the A and B Wing with 5 Nursing Assistants, and 1 Nurse and 2 Nursing Assistants on the Dementia Unit.
Staff G was asked if she has been able to staff the building ideally and said, not always, with Call offs, it is hard. Staff G said that if she can't get volunteers to help, she will work the floor and so does Restorative Aid. Staff G indicated she has not been able to ideally staff the building the way she would like, and had to pull 2 Nursing Assistants to another shift to help train new Aids. Staff G was asked how many times has she worked the floor recently and said about 5-6 times this past month. Staff G was asked how many times Restorative was pulled to work the floor and said at least 10 times in last 30 days. Staff G verbalized that Restorative has worked the floor the whole month of February.
Staff G indicated she has a hard time filling the slot of 11 PM until 3 AM, that she can't always get it covered.
Staff G was asked if the staff that are taking care of the Covid Residents on the Dementia Unit, also work with other residents too, and said she tries to keep consistent staffing, but is not always able to. Staff G was asked how many Aids work the Dementia Unit and said there are only 2 that are regular.
Resident #5:
On 2/9/23 at 10:03 AM, during a tour of the facility in the Memory Care/Dementia Unit a resident was observed walking up and down the hallway and then entering a room with Resident #5. The resident was observed standing across Resident #5's room near the windows. Upon asking Staff member K who the resident was, she said it was (Resident #282) and he was not supposed to be in Resident #5's room. It was not his room; she said she didn't know why but he repeatedly wandered into the room. Staff member K said Resident #282 was currently positive for Covid-19. The resident did not have a mask on. The Staff member was asked why the resident was wandering around on his own and into other resident's rooms and she said that was what he did.
An interview with Nurse M on 2/9/2023 at 10:25 AM, about Resident #282 wandering into other resident's rooms while being COVID-19 positive revealed, What are we going to do? We've all had it. The nurse was asked about the residents and staff who have not had Covid-19 and she lifted her hands in the air and shrugged. Nurse M was asked about staffing on the unit and said there was one nurse, two nurse aides and an activity aid for approximately 26 residents on the day shift. The nurse was responsible for all 26 residents and the nurse aides had 13 residents apiece. While talking Residents were observed wandering up and down the hallways with many other residents in the hallway. No staff were encouraging Residents to wear a mask or not wander into other resident's rooms.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcer injuries for two residents (Resident #3, Resident #66), resulting in facility-acquired (in-house) development of pressure ulcers, pain, discomfort, and the likelihood for prolonged illness or hospitalization.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of planned, timely, and meaningful interventions to prevent falls and monitoring following falls for six residents (Resident #54, Resident #59, Resident #69, Resident #275, Resident #281, and Resident #282) of nine residents reviewed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures to ensure monitoring and disposal of medications and medical supplies, per professional...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures to ensure monitoring and disposal of medications and medical supplies, per professional standards of practice, in one of three medication carts and one of three medication rooms resulting in the potential for residents to receive medications with altered efficiency and potency and have medical procedures performed with expired equipment.
Findings include:
On 2/9/23 at 3:30 PM, a tour of the Memory Care Unit medication cart was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N. The following items were noted in the cart:
- An open 100 count tablet bottle of One Daily multivitamin; Expired: 1/23
- An open, 100 count tablet bottle, of Melatonin 3 milligram (mg); The Expiration date on the bottle was worn and unable to be read.
When queried if the Multivitamin tablets were expired, LPN N looked at the bottle and confirmed they expired in January 2023. When asked if any Residents were currently receiving the medication, LPN N indicated they were. LPN N was then asked what the expiration date was on the Melatonin tablet bottle. After looking at the bottle, LPN N indicated they were also unable to determine the expiration date. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to expired medications and medications with unreadable/unknown expiration dates, LPN N indicated they would dispose of the medications.
At 3:48 PM on 2/9/23, a tour of the Memory Care Unit medication room was conducted with LPN N. When queried regarding the items in the medication room, LPN N revealed staff obtained over the counter medications and supplies from the room. The following expired medications and medical supplies were observed:
- 16 vacutainer Vacuette 4 milliliter (mL) laboratory specimen collection containers; Expired: 10/11/22
- 20 vacutainer Vacuette 4 mL laboratory specimen collection containers; Expired: 1/31/23
- Indwelling Urinary catheter, 18 French (fr), Expired: 10/28/22
- Indwelling Urinary catheter, 14 fr, Package crinkled and worn with indiscernible expiration date
- 1 box, 12 count, acetaminophen rectal suppositories 650 mg; Expired: 1/23
The identified items were reviewed and confirmed with LPN N. When asked about the items, LPN N indicated they would dispose of the items.
An interview was conducted with the facility Administrator on 2/10/23 at 4:00 PM. When queried if expired medications and medical supplies should be disposed of, per facility policy/procedure, the Administrator revealed they should.
Review of facility policy/procedure entitled, 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biological's (Revised: 7/21/22) revealed, Procedure . 4. Facility should ensure that medications and biological's that: (1) have an expired date on the label; (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines . 6. Facility should destroy and reorder medications and biological's with soiled, illegible, worn, makeshift, incomplete, damaged or missing labels or cautionary instructions . 16. Facility should destroy or return all discontinued, outdated/expired, or deteriorated medications or biological's in accordance .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A tour of the Locked Memory Care Unit of the Facility occurred on 2/8/23 beginning at 8:00 AM. During the tour, four Residents w...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A tour of the Locked Memory Care Unit of the Facility occurred on 2/8/23 beginning at 8:00 AM. During the tour, four Residents were noted to have Transmission-Based Isolation Precaution signs and carts in place outside of their rooms.
An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) M on 2/8/23 at 8:22 AM. When queried regarding the transmission-based isolation precautions for four Residents on the unit, RN M revealed all the Residents were Covid positive. With further inquiry, RN M revealed two other Residents who reside on the unit were currently in the hospital due to Covid.
Review of the facility provided CMS- 802 form revealed no Residents were identified as being in transmission-based isolation precautions and/or being Covid positive. The CMS-802 form further indicated the facility did not have any Resident's with Facility Acquired (FA) pressure ulcers (wounds caused by pressure). Review of the revised CMS- 672 form provided by the facility indicated the facility had one Resident with a (FA) pressure ulcer.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/8/22 at 12:42 PM. When queried regarding the CMS - 672 form indicating the facility had one FA pressure ulcer and the CMS- 802 not identifying any Residents with a FA pressure ulcer, the DON stated they did not know about designating FA pressure ulcers on the CMS-802 form. When queried why the CMS-802 did not identify the Residents who were Covid positive and/or in transmission- based isolation precautions, the DON was unable to provide an explanation and indicated the Minimum Data Set (MDS) may be able to elaborate.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed on the Resident Roster Matrix (CMS 802) documentation for 9 Covid-positive residents of 75 residents, resulting in the likelihood of unmet care needs.
Findings include:
Record review of the facility 'Care Management Coordinator' job description undated, revealed the Care Management Coordinator provides oversight of the RAI process and conducts assessments and care plan coordination for those residents assigned. Essential functions and responsibilities . Complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), CAA 's and care plans within regulated time frames, assess the resident through physical assessment, interview and chart review. Communicates with interdisciplinary team new resident care needs .
Upon entrance conference on 2/7/2023 the team leader was notified of Covid positive residents within the facility.
Observations on 2/9/2023 of the surveyor's self-tour of the A-wing unit revealed that there were transmission-based precaution caddies out in the hallway in front of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were noted.
Record review on 02/9/23 11:55 AM of the facility provided Resident Roster Matrix (CMS 802) dated 2/7/2023 at 2:37 PM did not acknowledge Transmission Based Precautions on Covid positive residents. Record review of a second attempt to get the Resident Roster Matrix (CMS 802) dated 2/8/2023 at 12:50 PM again did not acknowledge Transmission Based Precautions on Covid positive residents.
In an interview on 02/14/23 01:14 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) B the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment nurse (April 2022), stated that she does prepare the CMS 802 form. Survey started on 2/7/2023, record review of copy of CMS 802 dated 2/8/2023 with the MDS nurse. RN B stated that the facility did currently have Covid positive residents in the building, Review of room [ROOM NUMBER] with 2 residents, #108 one male resident and room [ROOM NUMBER] with one resident, and on the memory/Dementia care unit we had 5 on 2/9/2023 per infection control. The state surveyor questioned why the Transmission Based Precautions not marked on the CMS 802. RN B stated, because- I wasn't thinking of Covid as a transmission Based precautions. RN B stated that her training was down at corporate in Detroit/South Filed area for two days. No prior history as an MDS nurse. RN B was a long-term care floor nurse, and risk management in acute care 10 years.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Upon entering the facility on [DATE] at approximately 1:00 PM, a sign was present on the exterior door indicating Covid positive...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Upon entering the facility on [DATE] at approximately 1:00 PM, a sign was present on the exterior door indicating Covid positive individuals had been identified.
On [DATE] at 1:11 PM, an entrance conference was conducted with the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). When queried regarding Covid in the building, the Administrator there were currently eight residents who were Covid positive.
A tour of the locked dementia unit of the facility was completed on [DATE] beginning at 8:10 AM. Upon entering the unit, a transmission-based isolation cart was noted outside of Resident # 282's room. The Resident's room door was open, but the Resident was not in the room. A sign was present on the door indicating the Resident was in Contact and Droplet precautions. The information on the sign detailed an N-95 respirator, gown, gloves, and eye protection were required to enter the room. Directly across the hall from Resident #282's room, another isolation cart was present in the hallway. This cart was directly outside of the room with Resident #283 and Resident #285's names beside the door. Their room door was also open and neither Resident was present in the room. The unit was noted to be an L shape with the Nurses Station at the bend and the Activity room next to the Nurses' station on the longer hall. Resident #282, 283, and 285's room were on the longer hallway. Multiple residents and one staff member were observed in the Activity room. In the shorter hall of the unit, another transmission-based isolation cart was present outside of Resident #69 and Resident #70's room. Two alcohol-based hand sanitizer dispensers were present in the hallways of the unit, one in the long hall and one in the short hallway.
On [DATE] at 8:22 AM, an interview was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) M. When asked where Resident #282 was, RN M pointed at a Resident ambulating in the hallway. The Resident was not wearing a mask and walking the short hall. When queried if Resident #282 was Covid positive, RN M confirmed the Resident currently had Covid-19. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to isolation precautions, RN M stated, We can't keep (Resident #282) in their room. When queried regarding Resident #283 and 285, RN M revealed both Resident's were Covid positive. When queried regarding them not being in their room, RN M indicated Resident #283 was sitting in the Activity Room because they were a fall risk and Resident #285 had been transferred to the hospital due to Covid.
Review of Resident #282's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and pain. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was rarely/never understood and required extensive assistance to complete all ADL's.
Further review revealed Resident #283 tested positive for Covid-19 on [DATE] and Contact/Droplet precautions were initiated on that date for 10 days.
Resident #282 was observed ambulating in an aimless manner, without a mask, throughout the hallways of the unit from 8:22 AM until 10:14 AM on [DATE]. During the observation, Resident #282 touched multiple items in the unit including walls, handrails, and doorknobs. They passed and spoke to multiple other Residents who were also not wearing masks. The facility staff did not attempt to redirect Resident #282 to their room, assist them to perform hand hygiene, and/or give/encourage them to wear a mask.
On [DATE] at 10:56 AM, an interview was completed with Resident #67 in their room. When asked if they had any concerns, Resident #67 revealed they did not like it when other residents try to come in my room and get in my bed. Resident #67 further verbalized they did not like that the shared bathroom door was not always closed to the other room. Resident #67 verbalized they were concerned about getting Covid-19 and did not understand who had it. An observation of Resident #67's bathroom was completed at this time. The bathroom was jack/[NAME] style room containing a toilet and sink. The bathroom was shared with Resident #283 and Resident #285 who were Covid positive.
Record review of Resident #67's EMR revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder and dementia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and was independent with ADL's with the exception of requiring supervision with ambulation/bathing and limited assistance with dressing.
Resident #67's EMR further revealed the Resident contracted Covid-19 while at the facility and tested positive on [DATE].
On [DATE] at 1:02 PM, Resident #69 was observed sitting at a table with Activity Staff EE. They were approximately two feet apart and Staff EE was noted to be wearing a procedural mask. Resident #69 was not wearing a mask and multiple other residents were observed sitting in and wandering in and out of the room including Resident #67, Resident #17, Resident #283, and three non-sampled Covid negative Residents. Staff EE was asked if Resident #69 was Covid positive and replied, I think so but they are a fall risk, so we have to keep an eye on them. Resident #67 approached Resident #69 at this time and covered them with a lap blanket and touched their shoulder. Staff EE did not assist Resident #67 to perform hand hygiene. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) requirements, Staff EE indicated they had to wear a mask unless they went into a precaution room. Staff EE was asked if Resident #69 was in transmission-based isolation precautions, Staff EE indicated they were. Staff EE was then asked why they did not need to wear PPE sitting next to the Resident in the Activity Room when they needed to wear PPE when they entered the Resident's room. Staff EE indicated it did not make sense but were not able to provide an explanation. Upon exiting the Activity Room, a wall mounted hand sanitizer dispenser was observed on the wall inside of the Activity Room. No sanitizer was dispensed when depressed. Staff EE was asked if the sanitizer was empty and stated, Oh that has remotes. When asked what they meant, Staff EE opened the sanitizer dispenser and revealed the sanitizer dispenser contained TV remotes. When queried why the container did not have sanitizer, Staff EE shrugged their shoulders. When queried where there is sanitizer to complete hand hygiene, Staff EE replied, In the hall.
Record review revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was rarely/never understood and required supervision to total assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Record review revealed Resident #69 tested positive for Covid on [DATE].
At 1:09 on [DATE], Resident #70 was observed entering the Activity Room in their wheelchair. The Resident was not wearing a mask.
Record review revealed Resident #70 tested positive for Covid-19 on [DATE] and had Contract and Droplet isolation precautions in place.
An interview was conducted with RN M on [DATE] at 1:50 PM. When queried if Resident #67 and Resident #283 share a bathroom, RN M provided confirmation and indicated most of the rooms on the unit share bathrooms. When asked if both Resident's use the bathroom, RN M specified they did.
On [DATE] at 1:52 PM, Resident #282 was observed walking throughout the halls of the unit without a mask. The Resident was visualized wandering in and out of several other Resident rooms (who did not have Covid) and touching items in their rooms. There were no staff in the area providing supervision to the Resident.
On [DATE] at 2:56 PM, Resident #283 was observed sitting in the Activity Room of the Memory Care unit without a mask. Another, non-sampled (Covid-negative) resident was sitting in a chair directly next to them. Multiple other Residents, both Covid positive and negative, were in the room.
On [DATE] from 2:58 PM to 3:26 PM, Resident #282 was observed moving throughout the Memory Unit and interacting with others. The Resident was first observed sitting in the Activity Room without a mask. There were multiple other Residents who were not Covid positive present in the room. Staff did not attempt to separate the Resident's known to be Covid positive from the Residents who did not have Covid. Resident #282 was observed exiting the Activity Room and walking to the nurses' station where they leaned on the desk and spoke to staff. The staff did not attempt to direct the Resident to their room and did not provide a mask. Resident #282 then began walking down the short hall (away from their room) of the unit and entering other Resident's rooms who did not have Covid. In one room, Resident #282 approached a Covid negative Resident, stood less than two feet away and spoke to them. Resident #282 exited the room at 3:04 PM. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N was present in the hall near the room Resident #282 exited by did not address Resident #282 wandering, not wearing a mask, and entering Covid negative Resident rooms. At 3:26 PM, Resident #282 was standing at the nurses' station eating ice cream.
Record review revealed Resident #282 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and dementia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision to extensive assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Resident #282's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the Resident tested positive for Covid-19 on [DATE]. A Health Care Provider order dated [DATE] which detailed, Contact and Droplet Isolation (Transmission Based Precautions) r/t related to Covid-19 every shift for 10 Days .
Review of Resident #282's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident) is on Contact/droplet isolation precautions related to positive Covid POC (Point of Care) test on [DATE] (Created, Initiated, and Revised: [DATE]). The care plan included the interventions:
- Provide education to guest and family regarding type of isolation required as needed (Created and Initiated: [DATE])
- Provide education to guest and visitors related to needed isolation precautions as needed (Created and Initiated: [DATE])
- Provide in room activities (Created and Initiated: [DATE])
- Provide meals in room (Created and Initiated: [DATE])
On [DATE] at 7:50 AM, five Residents, including those with Covid-19, were observed sitting in close proximity in the Activity Room of the Memory Care unit. The Resident's in the Activity Room included Resident #17, Resident #283, and Resident #69. None of the residents were wearing masks. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC was present in the Activity Room and did not attempt to separate the Residents and/or provide masks.
At 8:46 AM on [DATE], Resident #283 was observed sitting in the Activity Room of the unit with multiple other Residents and Activity Staff EE. None of the Residents were wearing masks, physical distancing was not in place, and no attempts to separate Covid positive from Covid negative Residents were observed.
On [DATE] at 8:52 AM, while walking past Resident #283's room, the door was noted to be open. The isolation cart containing PPE remained outside of the room but the sign on the door indicating the resident was on contact and droplet precautions was no longer hanging on the door in plain view. Closer inspection revealed the sign was on top of the PPE cart, under a tote containing vital sign monitoring equipment.
On [DATE] at 11:55 AM, Resident #282's room door was open, the Resident's wheelchair was observed in the room beside the bed, but the Resident was not present. A housekeeping staff member was in the room. When queried where Resident #282 was, the housekeeping staff member replied, They (nursing staff) tool them to the bathroom. When asked to clarify, the housekeeping staff member revealed they were in the central bath/shower room across from the nurse station.
At 11:57 AM on [DATE], the central bath/shower room door was closed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N was asked where Resident #282 was and indicated they were using the central bathroom with staff. LPN N then knocked on the door and entered the bathroom. LPN N exited and revealed Resident #282 was using the toilet. Observation of the Activity Room at this time revealed multiple Residents without masks sitting together in close proximity and intermingling of both Covid positive and Covid negative status Residents.
On [DATE] from 12:00 PM to 12:20 PM, Resident #282 was observed sitting in the Activity Room. The Resident was not wearing a mask and was sitting at the same small table as a non-sampled, Covid negative Resident. Multiple other Residents including Resident #'s 17, 67, 69, 70, and 282 were sitting and/or wandering in and out of the Activity Room as well as a Visitor (Witness DD). None of the Residents and/or the visitor were wearing a mask.
On [DATE] at 12:36 PM, Resident #69 was observed in their room. The Resident's room door was open and they were laying in their bed.
On [DATE] at 11:10 AM, Resident #282's room door was open. There was no signage present on the door indicating the Resident was on transmission-based isolation precautions. The PPE cart remained outside of the doorway and the tote containing vital sign monitoring equipment was observed sitting on a table in the Resident's room.
On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, a transmission-based isolation precaution cart was present in the hallway outside of Resident #17's room.
An interview was completed with Activity Staff EE on [DATE] at 11:17 AM. When queried if Resident #282 was still in isolation precautions related to Covid, Staff EE replied, On precautions. When queried regarding the sign being gone and the reason the tote was in the room, Staff EE was unable to provide an explanation.
An interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N on [DATE] at 11:24 AM. When queried regarding the transmission-based isolation precaution cart outside of Resident #17's room door, LPN N revealed Resident #17 had Covid - 19. LPN N was asked when the Resident tested positive and replied, I think Sunday. When asked why Resident's who are Covid positive sit in the Activity Room, LPN N revealed the Residents are brought to the Activity Room so they can be watched due to their high risk for falls. When asked how the facility is preventing the spread of Covid-19 when Residents who are positive for Covid-19 are intermingling with Residents who are negative, LPN N did not provide an explanation.
Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required limited to extensive assistance to complete ADL with the exception of supervision for eating.
Review of documentation in Resident #17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the Resident tested positive for Covid-19 on [DATE] and transmission-based isolation precautions were ordered.
An interview was completed with Family Member Witness DD on [DATE] at 7:35 PM. When queried if they had visited Resident #17 at the facility on [DATE] in the Activity Room, Witness DD confirmed they had. When asked if they were aware there were other Residents in the dining room who had Covid-19, Witness DD stated, No, I did not. Witness DD was asked if they were wearing a mask during the visit and revealed they were not. When asked if they were offered a mask and/or provided education regarding being in direct proximity of individuals with Covid 19 for greater than 15 minutes, Witness DD revealed they had not been informed. Witness DD then stated, They (facility) called me on Sunday ([DATE]) and let me know (Resident #17) had Covid.
Review of facility provided Covid tracking documentation for 2023 revealed 33 Residents had tested positive and 20 of those Residents resided on the Memory Care unit. Three of the 33 Residents were hospitalized , and one died. The tracking document included a Resident room number but did not detail if the Resident had moved rooms and/or if the room change was prior to or after testing positive for Covid. Review of the staff tracking documentation revealed fifteen staff members had tested positive. The documentation form did not detail the staff members title/role in the facility and/or the unit where they worked.
An interview was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on [DATE] at 10:06 AM. When queried why the provided Covid tracking documentation did not include any room changes, the ADON indicated they did not understand the question. When asked if the room number indicated on the Covid Tracking documentation was the room the Resident was always in when they had Covid and why Resident #282's room number on the provided Covid documentation was not the room they were currently in, the ADON replied, Oh no. The ADON was asked if they monitored room movement as part of Covid infection tracking and revealed they did not. The ADON stated, I can always look it up. When asked if they tracked whether or not revealed they did not and would need to review and print the facility census for each date to determine if a Covid positive Resident had a roommate. When queried regarding Covid positive staff tracking and if staff work location and role in the facility is included in their infection control tracking, the ADON stated, No. When queried how they were able to complete contract tracking and comprehensive surveillance, the ADON replied, Well, it's on the schedule. When asked if staff were consistently assigned to the same unit/residents, the ADON indicated the facility attempts to maintain consistent staff but that it does not always work. When asked why RN M had worked on the Memory Care unit on [DATE] but was on a different hall on [DATE] which had no Covid positive Residents, the ADON revealed LPN N only worked on the Memory Care unit.
Review of Resident #285's medical record revealed the Resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively intact and required extensive to total assistance to complete ADL with the exception of eating.
Review of Resident #285's medical record revealed the Resident tested positive for Covid-19 on [DATE].
Review of Resident #285's progress notes revealed the following:
- [DATE] at 10:14 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident test for Covid using the Binax Now nasal swab .
- [DATE] at 8:44 AM: Nurses Notes .Resident recently tested positive for Covid. Resident having difficulty breathing this morning. Resident has increased Respirations, 02 (oxygen) stats down, ranging between 73-79% via NC (Nasal Cannula) at 4L (Liters/minute) . Orders received to send resident to (local hospital) .
- [DATE] at 9:24 AM: Nurses Notes . Resident sent to (local Hospital) with EMS at 0920 (AM).
Resident #285 was transferred from the local hospital to a tertiary hospital due to severity of illness.
Review of tertiary hospital medical record documentation for Resident #285 included the following:
- [DATE] at 9:17 PM: ED Provider Note . transferred from outlying facility who was diagnosed with Covid 2 to 3 days ago and had been on Paxlovid (oral Covid treatment under FDA emergency use authorization) at the nursing facility had apparently had had increased hypoxia (low oxygen levels) . was found at the ER to have an NSTEMI (Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - heart attack), CHF in addition to the Covid . ED Clinical Course . Patient appears gravely ill, going very poorly. It does not appear they were able to get IV access . patient has been at the outlying facility over 8 hours ago now without any kind of interventions . did confirm with patient's (family) despite the severity of the patient's illness as well as condition . do not want CPR or intubation (tube inserted though mouth to provide respiratory support) . still want ant and all blood work . Central lines,,, and anything else that the patient needs . I did once again try to reiterate severity of the patient condition and how critical appears . Reading the note from outlying facility and it does not appear that . ED physician had conveyed to (family) the grave nature just as I have that the patient may not survive and looks very gravely ill .
- [DATE]: Consult Note: Infectious Disease . Problem 1: Covid . Patient is hypoxic on . high glow nasal cannula . Problem 2: Bacterial Infection Problem 3: Acute Respiratory Failure .
- [DATE]: Physician Discharge Summary . Concerning . Covid . was started on remdesivir and dexamethasone . also received tocilizumab . was also found to be having prerenal acute kidney injury which was corrected . Now condition is improved and is getting discharged to LTAC (Long Term Acute Care) . was given antibiotics . superimposed bacterial pneumonia . Oxygen needs were weaned down . currently alternating between high flow nasal cannula BiPAP . oxygen needs will likely need more time before being weaned down, therefore will be discharged to LTAC (Long Term Acute Care) .
Resident #285 was discharged from the tertiary hospital to the LTAC hospital on [DATE].
An interview was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse/ADON on [DATE] at 4:06 PM. When queried if Resident #67 (Covid negative) shares a bathroom with Resident #283 who is Covid positive, the ADON replied, I don't know. The ADON was informed the bathroom is shared and Resident's in both rooms utilize the restroom per staff. When queried if shared bathrooms are considered during room assignments for Covid positive residents and if that information is including in Covid infection control tracking, the ADON replied, Not sure. The ADON was then asked their thoughts in relation to infection control and standards of practice for a Covid positive resident to share a bathroom with a Covid negative resident and replied, I would need to check. When queried regarding Resident #67's verbalized questions and concerns pertaining to Covid-19, the ADON indicated they were unaware. When asked how many hand sanitizers are present in the hallway of the Memory Care unit, the ADON stated, I don't know. When asked if they thought two wall mounted hand sanitizer dispensers were sufficient for the entire Memory Care unit, the ADON indicated they did not believe they were allowed to have more because of safety. When asked how two were safe but more were not, an explanation was not provided. When asked why they were told it was a safety concern, the ADON indicated the Residents could attempt to ingest the sanitizer. The ADON was then asked when staff should perform hand hygiene and indicated after every resident interaction. When queried how frequently they complete observations of hand hygiene, a response was not provided. When queried regarding the spread of Covid in the Dementia unit, the ADON revealed almost all of the Residents have tested positive at some time.
When queried what has been implemented in the Memory Care unit to attempt to stop the spread of Covid, the ADON stated, We can't force them (Residents) to stay in their rooms. When asked if and how they have attempted to stop Covid positive Resident's from wandering, the ADON stated, They have dementia, we can't stop them. The ADON was then asked if the facility had attempted to set up a dedicated area in the unit for Covid positive residents and replied, No. The ADON queried if it was acceptable, per policy and standards of practice, for staff to bring Covid positive residents out of their rooms to the Activity Room where there are Covid negative residents. The ADON stated, Yes, because of safety. When asked if it is safe to have a Resident who does not have Covid sit next to a Resident who is known to be Covid positive, the ADON replied, Well no. When queried why facility were intermingling Covid positive and Covid negative residents if it is not safe, an explanation was not provided. The ADON was then queried regarding Resident #17 testing positive for Covid-19 over the weekend and observations of the Resident being around Covid positive Residents but did not provide an explanation. When asked if Resident #17 had a shared bathroom, the ADON replied, I think so but I don't think (resident in other room) uses the restroom though. When asked if the facility had an ongoing Covid outbreak in the Memory Care unit, the ADON revealed the facility did. When asked if they had identified the reason for the outbreak, the ADON replied, They have dementia. When asked what the facility has don't to mitigate the spread of Covid and stop the outbreak, the ADON replied, Try to get them (residents) to wear masks. The ADON was then asked why this Surveyor had not witnessed any staff provide, attempt, and/or assist a resident on the Memory Care unit to wear a mask but did not provide an explanation. When queried why facility staff brought residents in the Memory Care unit to the smaller Activity Room when the Dining Room at the end of the long hall is larger and would allow for physical distancing, the ADON did not provide an explanation. When queried if the facility had adequate staffing to supervise the Residents on the unit and control/mitigate the spread of Covid, the ADON stated, There are two CNA's and one nurse but did not elaborate further.
An interview was conducted with the facility Administrator on [DATE] at 1:39 PM. When asked what actions the facility had taken to prevent and mitigate the spread of Covid-19 in the Memory Care Unit, the Administrator stated, We tried some things. When asked how they were ensuring isolation precautions were maintained and Covid positive residents were not intermingling with Residents who did not have Covid, the Administrator indicated they could not keep Resident's in their rooms. When queried regarding the use of consistent staff, the Administrator revealed the facility attempts to ensure staff are consistent but there are staff who only work in specific units. No further explanation was provided.
DPS#2:
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to institute and operationalize appropriate Infection Control practices in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) recommended measures of co-horting Residents with confirmed Covid-19 infection, use of Transmission Based Precautions and source control for Residents with confirmed Covid-19 infection to prevent exposure and transmission of the Covid-19 virus to 33 residents, including 20 residing in the locked Memory Unit, and 15 staff from [DATE] to [DATE].
The failure to maintain infection control practices resulted in lack of transmission-based isolation precautions, ongoing transmission of Covid-19, hospitalization, emergency medical treatment, and the likelihood for decline in resident health status and ongoing outbreak of Covid-19.
Findings Include:
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings, Last update: [DATE]; [NAME] D. [NAME], MD; [NAME], RN MPH CIC; [NAME], PhD; [NAME] Chiarello, RN MS; the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee:
.The Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings 2007 builds upon a series of isolation and infection prevention documents promulgated since 1970 .
.Objectives and methods: The objectives of this guideline are to 1. provide infection control recommendations for all components of the healthcare delivery system, including hospitals, long-term care facilities, ambulatory care, home care and hospice; 2. reaffirm Standard Precautions as the foundation for preventing transmission during patient care in all healthcare settings; 3. reaffirm the importance of implementing Transmission-Based Precautions based on the clinical presentation or syndrome and likely pathogens until the infectious etiology has been determined (Table 2); and 4. provide epidemiologically sound and, whenever possible, evidence-based recommendations. This guideline is designed for use by individuals who are charged with administering infection control programs in hospitals and other healthcare settings
.Epidemiologically important organisms. Any infectious agents transmitted in healthcare settings may, under defined conditions, become targeted for control because they are epidemiologically important .
. Control of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) requires a coordinated, dynamic response by multiple disciplines in a healthcare setting. Early detection of cases is accomplished by screening persons with symptoms of a respiratory infection for history of travel to areas experiencing community transmission or contact with SARS patients, followed by implementation of Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette (i.e., placing a mask over the patient's nose and mouth) and physical separation from other patients in common waiting areas . At the time of this publication, CDC recommends Standard Precautions, with emphasis on the use of hand hygiene, Contact Precautions with emphasis on environmental cleaning due to the detection of SARS CoV RNA by PCR on surfaces in rooms occupied by SARS patients . Airborne Precautions, including use of fit-tested NIOSH approved N 95 or higher level respirators, and eye protection 259 .
. Type and Duration of Precautions Recommended for Selected Infections and Conditions . Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Airborne + Droplet + Contact + Standard Duration of illness plus 10 days after resolution of fever, provided respiratory symptoms are absent or improving Airborne preferred; Droplet if AIIR unavailable. N 95 or higher respiratory protection; surgical mask if N 95 unavailable; eye protection (goggles, face shield); aerosol-generating procedures and supershedders highest risk for transmission via small droplet nuclei and large droplets .
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic, Updated [DATE]
. Patient Placement: Place a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a single-person room. The door should be kept closed (if safe to do so). Ideally, the patient should have a dedicated bathroom
. If cohorting,[TRUNCATED]