SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #317
Review of admission Record revealed Resident #317 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #317
Review of admission Record revealed Resident #317 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #317, with a reference date of [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #317 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Skin Conditions revealed that Resident #317 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers.
Review of Resident #317's Care Plan revealed, .has potential/actual skin impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) stage IV pressure injury to sacrum (tailbone), impaired mobility. Date initiated [DATE]. Goal: Resident's skin integrity breaks will exhibit healing by next review date. Interventions: Elevate heels off bed surface while at rest in bed .Keep skin clean and dry .Follow physician orders for treatment of skin impairments .Provide pain management for treatments as needed .Date initiated [DATE] . There were no interventions related to Resident #317's pressure injury on the sacrum.
During an interview on [DATE] at 08:29 AM, Resident #317 reported concern that call lights did not get answered quickly enough,which led to several occasions where Resident #317 had incontinence while waiting for assistance to use the restroom and was left wet.
During an observation on [DATE] at 03:30 PM, Resident #317 was observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. There were no pillows underneath Resident #317 hips or bottom to offload the sacral pressure ulcer.
During an observation on [DATE] at 7:55 AM, Resident #317 was in her bed, lying on her back with the head of bed elevated at approximately 45 degrees. There were no pillows were observed underneath Resident #317 hips or bottom to offload the sacral pressure ulcer. Resident #17's feet were observed lying directly on the surface of the bed.
During an interview and observation on [DATE] at 09:14 AM, Resident # 317 was observed lying in her bed in the same position as previous observation. Resident #317 reported that the wound on her butt was painful and facial grimacing was noted throughout interview. Resident #317 reported that she felt the staff were unreliable and inconsistent, and she was not getting repositioned every two hours.
During an interview on [DATE] 09:20 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) X reported that she was aware that Resident #317 was in pain and that had already given her Tylenol and oxycodone (pain medication) for this, and that Resident #317 needed a better mattress. RN X also reported that she had been in Resident #317's room every 35 seconds this morning.
Review of Medication Administration Record indicated Resident #317 received Acetaminophen (Tylenol) 500 mg at 08:00 AM, and Oxycodone 5 mg at 07:09 AM. RN X documented Resident #317 pain level at 0 under pain evaluation, and 1 under pain level for administration of Oxycodone.
During an observation on [DATE] at 10:22 AM, Resident# 317 was observed sitting in her wheelchair without any pillows for offloading or positioning, and sitting directly on her pressure wound.
During an observation on [DATE] at 11:16 AM, Resident #317 was observed on her back with the head of the bed elevated to approximately 45 degrees. There were no pillows observed for offloading the wound of Resident #317's sacral area. Resident #317 was positioned on her pressure wound and her feet were directly on the surface of the bed (not elevated).
During an wound care observation on [DATE] at 11:24 AM, Resident #317 was lying in bed on her right side. Physician Assistant-Wound Care (PA-WC) DD removed Resident #317's incontinence brief which revealed a large gaping wound approximately fist size, with slough and eschar (dead tissue) in the wound bed, and reddened skin surrounding the wound. Resident #317 was positioned on her back following wound care and stated Ouch it hurts. PA-WC DD reported that Resident #317 should have an alternating pressure air mattress due to her sacral wound, and LPN UM D reported that she would get it ordered.
During an interview on [DATE] at 12:47 PM, PA-WC DD reported that her clinical recommendations for Resident #317's wound care would include an alternating air pressure mattress, repositioning at least every two hours, and she would not want to see Resident #317 in a position where she is sitting directly on the wound. PA-WC DD reported that offloading with pillows would help decrease the pain from the wound.
During an observation on [DATE] at 01:32 PM, Resident #317 was observed sitting up in bed in the same position as previous observation on [DATE] at 11:24 AM. Resident #317 had been in the same position for greater than 2 hours. Resident #17's feet were observed lying directly on the surface of the bed.
During an interview on [DATE] at 02:05 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O reported that she goes from room to room to check on residents, and she determines which residents need to be repositioned every two hours by just asking the residents. CNA O did not identify that Resident #317 required every 2 hour repositioning.
During an observation on [DATE] at 08:29 AM, Resident #317 was observed lying in bed with the HOB approximately 45 degrees, and there were no pillows to offload Resident #317's sacral pressure ulcer. Resident #317's bed did not have an alternating air pressure mattress.
Review of Resident #317's Order summary report did not include orders for frequency of repositioning or alternating air pressure mattress.
Review of Resident #317's Kardex (CNA care guide) revealed, elevate heels off bed surface while at rest in bed, keep skin clean and dry . There were no interventions related to repositioning. This citation pertains to MI00133137 and MI00131737.
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently implement pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions and ensure complete and accurate skin assessments were performed to monitor, identify and treat skin alterations for 5 residents (Resident #11, #48, #7, #317, and #65) out of 7 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care, resulting in the formation of new facility acquired pressure ulcers for Resident #11 and Resident #48, a delay in the treatment of a DTI (deep tissue injury) to the right foot and a stage 2 pressure injury to the left foot of Resident #65, and the potential for further clinical compromise for Resident #7 and #317.
Findings include:
Resident #11
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included quadriplegia and Multiple Sclerosis.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Further review of the same MDS assessment revealed Resident #11 required assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene.
Review of a current ADL (activities of daily living) Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated [DATE], directed staff that Resident #11 could be up in her powered wheelchair daily for four hours at a time and was then required to lay down for one hour before getting back up for offloading of pressure. Review of a current physical mobility Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated [DATE], directed staff that Resident #11 was totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed frequently as necessary.
In an interview on [DATE] at 11:34 AM, Family Member of Resident #11 KK reported recently only 2 nursing aides showed up for the entire facility, 1 aide for 28 residents.
In an interview on [DATE] at 3:19 PM, Family Member of Resident #11 KK reported staff are not turning Resident #11 every two hours and Resident #11's wound recently reopened because there was not enough staff to get her out of her powered wheelchair.
In an interview on [DATE] at 9:35 AM, Resident #11 reported she had a wound on her bottom that was healed and then opened back up because she was left up in her powered wheelchair for 9 hours. Resident #11 reported that she was only allowed to be up for 4 hours at a time in her powered wheelchair to relieve pressure on her bottom. Resident #11 reported that 3rd shift was good about turning her every 2 hours, but 1st and 2nd shift were not as good. Resident #11 reported that she is unable to turn herself. Resident #11 reported that she was last turned at 6:45 AM, 3 hours ago. Resident #11 reported that 3rd shift checks on her automatically, but on 1st and 2nd shift she has to request turning. Resident #11 reported that it can take a long time for her call light to be answered, sometimes up to 2 hours. Resident #11 reported that call light response time depends on the staffing that day.
In an interview on [DATE] at 10:25 AM, Resident #11 reported that it was a couple months ago that her wound broke back open, after being up in her powered chair for 9 hours. Resident #11 reported that there was a music activity and many residents needed assistance after the activity. Resident #11 reported that there was only 1 aide working on the hall that night and she seemed overwhelmed.
In an observation on [DATE] at 11:58 AM in Resident #11's room, Wound Care Provider DD evaluated Resident #11's pressure ulcer on her right medial buttock to be 0.1 by 0.4 centimeters.
Review of Resident #11's Wound Care Provider Progress Note dated [DATE] revealed .(Resident #11) is seen today because staff state she has an ulcer on her bottom again. Resident has a history of pressure injuries to her sacrum and right medial buttock . Resident with an ulcer on the right upper medial buttock measuring 0.2by1.1by0.2cm . Pressure injury of right buttock, stage 3 . Resident with a pressure injury to the right upper medial buttock again .
Resident #48
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included spinal stenosis and lack of coordination.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Further review of same MDS assessment revealed Resident #48 required assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene.
Review of a current Kardex for Resident #48 directed staff that Resident #48 needed extensive assistance of 1 staff with bed mobility.
In an interview on [DATE] at 10:05 AM, Resident #48 reported she needs help turning in bed and stated, they keep turning the call light off, don't come right away.
In an observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:19 PM in Resident #11's room, Unit Manager E reported that a new wound was found over the weekend on Resident #11's left heel. Wound Care Provider DD evaluated the wound to be a 3.5 by 6.6-centimeter unstageable deep tissue injury. Observed left heel wound to be a large, blood-filled blister.
In an interview on [DATE] at 8:54 AM, Resident #48 reported staffing was short over the weekend when her new left heel wound was found. Resident #48 reported when staffing is short they do not come in to assist her with repositioning in bed. Resident #48 reported when staffing is short it takes a long time for her call light to be answered.
Review of the facility worked schedule on Saturday, [DATE] revealed there were only 3 nursing assistants working in the entire building from 11:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
In an interview on [DATE] at 10:42 AM, LPN AA reported staffing has been challenging for months. LPN AA reported there were only 3 aides in the facility that morning and only 1 aide working with her on the 100 hall with 23 residents to care for. LPN AA reported when there is only 1 aide on the hall, there is not enough time to give residents showers and it is not possible to check, change, and turn residents every two hours. LPN AA reported when staffing is short, the aides work methodically through the unit to get to everyone as quickly as possible.
In an interview on [DATE] at 10:06 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) S reported that she was the only CNA on 100 hall the previous day. CNA S reported that happens at least once a week. CNA S reported there is no time for resident showers when she is the only CNA on the hall and it is not possible to perform check and changes and turns every two hours.
In an interview on [DATE] at 2:55 PM, CNA U reported the facility needs a minimum of 5 CNA's to perform adequate resident care. CNA U reported that a couple times a month she works as the only CNA on a hall. CNA U reported when she is the only CNA working on a hall resident showers cannot be completed, waters might not get passed, and it is not possible to perform two hour resident checks and changes and turns. CNA U reported it takes closer to 4 hours to perform check and changes and turns when she is working alone on a hall.
For patients at risk for skin breakdown who are able to sit in a chair, limit the amount of time they sit to 2 hours or less at any given time. In the sitting position the pressure on the ischial tuberosities is greater than in the supine position . Support surfaces are specialized devices for pressure redistribution designed for management of tissue loads, microclimate, and/ or other therapeutic functions (i.e., any mattress, integrated bed system, mattress replacement, overlay, seat cushion, or seat cushion overlay) (NPUAP, EUPAP, PPPIA, 2014). Support surfaces reduce the hazards of immobility to the skin and musculoskeletal system. [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 72248-72276). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.
Positioning interventions redistribute pressure and shearing force to the skin. Elevating the head of the bed to 30 degrees or less decreases the chance of pressure ulcer development from shearing forces (WOCN, 2010). Change the immobilized patient's position according to tissue tolerance, level of activity and mobility, general medical condition, overall treatment objectives, skin condition, and comfort (NPUPA, EUPAP, PPPIA, 2014). A standard turning interval of to 2 hours does not always prevent pressure ulcer development. Consider repositioning the patient at least every 2 hours if allowed by his or her overall condition. When repositioning, use positioning devices to protect bony prominences (WOCN, 2010). The WOCN guidelines (2010) recommend a 30-degree lateral position (Figure 48-15), which should prevent positioning directly over the bony prominence. To prevent shear and friction injuries, use a transfer device to lift rather than drag the patient when changing positions (see Chapter 39). [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 72244-72253). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.
Review of facility policy/procedure Skin Monitoring and Management- Pressure Ulcer, dated [DATE], revealed .It is the policy of this facility that: A resident who enters the facility without pressure ulcers does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition or other factors demonstrate that a developed pressure ulcer was unavoidable; and a resident having pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new, unavoidable sores from developing . Prevention . Reposition the resident .Treatment . Continue preventative measures as appropriate, including but not limited to : pressure reduction, continence care, mobility, nutrition management, hydration management .
Resident #65
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #65 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: muscle weakness and severe protein/calorie deficiency.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #65, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional Status revealed that Resident #15 required extensive assistance of one person to reposition in bed, and extensive assistance of two people for toileting needs. Review of Skin Conditions revealed that Resident #65 was at risk for pressure ulcers and did not have any pressure ulcers or other skin conditions.
In an interview on [DATE] at 12:43 PM, Family Member (FM) LL reported that Resident #65 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and died a few weeks later. FM LL reported that Resident #65 had uncontrolled pain, was dehydrated, and had wounds on both feet, that the facility had not identified during their skin observations. FM LL reported that Resident #65 was too tall for his bed and his feet pressed against the foot board.
Review of Resident #65 Hospital Records indicated admission via emergency room on [DATE], wound consult on [DATE], transition to palliative care on [DATE], and death in the hospital on [DATE]. Images from [DATE] reviewed and indicate wounds on the bottom of both feet. Wound Care Services on [DATE] at 5:30 AM .The Wound Healing Program is consulted for bilateral black wounds on 5th toes. He is a poor historian and does not know how long the wounds have been present or how he got them. He states he does not ambulate .Pressure injury of deep tissue of right foot, Assessment & Plan: Plantar surface (bottom of foot) over right 5th MT (metatarsal: bone on outside on foot) Dark tissue from evolving DTI (deep tissue injury) likely from pressure, 1.4 x 1.5 x 0.1 cm .Pressure injury of left foot, stage 2. Assessment & Plan: Appears to be recovering DTI, Wound is located over the 5th MT, 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.1 cm, Partial thickness likely from pressure .
In an interview on [DATE] at 10:49 A.M., DON reported that Resident #65's record did not indicate that Resident #65 had any wounds, and that DON had evaluated Resident #65's skin at the request of FM LL, and the only finding was dry skin.
Review of Resident #65's Nursing admission Assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #65 did not admit to the facility with wounds.
Review of Resident #65's Weekly Skin Observations from admission through to the last one complete on [DATE] all indicated that Resident #65 had No New Skin Conditions.
Review of Resident #65's Physician admission Assessment dated [DATE] did not include Skin in the examination and did not indicate Resident #65 had skin wounds under History or Assessment and Plan.
Review of Resident #65's Physician Orders revealed no orders related to dry skin or wounds.
Review of Resident #65's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcers dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #65 was at moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers.
Review of Resident #65's Skin Care Plan revealed, .has potential/actual skin impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) decreased mobility, decreased awareness of needs, incontinence. Date initiated [DATE] .Goal: Resident will maintain intact skin through the next review. Interventions: Educate resident/family/caregivers .Encourage good nutrition and hydration .Follow physician orders for treatment of skin impairments. Refer to eTAR (electronic treatment administration record) for specifics .Observe skin daily .Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdowns . The care plan was created and initiated on [DATE] and did not have any revisions.
Review of Resident #65's Skilled Nursing Note dated [DATE] at 09:25 AM revealed, Resident's guardian came to facility to speak with med staff about resident's pain control. MD (Medical Director), NP (Nurse Practitioner), DON and UM (unit manager) met with guardian .Guardian expressed interest in having resident examined, as he appeared to have continued dryness to his skin. Med staff to see today .
Review of Resident #65's Progress Note dated [DATE] at 6:45 PM revealed, Acute Care Transfer .Resident c/o (complains of) significant pain with sudden onset of worsening pain .Order to send to ER .
Resident #7
Review of the face sheet revealed Resident #7 orginally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, pressure ulcers, and urostomy (opening in the abdomen that connects to the urinary tract to allow urine to drain).
Review of the Physician order dated [DATE] at 1:59 pm revealed Resident #7 was to have Wound Care for Stage 4 pressure ulcer to right ischium : Cleanse with NS; Apply thick layer of zinc barrier cream to peri wound. Pack wound with thin strip of Aquacel AG (about 2 cm deep). Cover with Mepilex. Change daily.
In an observation on [DATE] at 12:58 PM, Physician Assistant/Wound Care Provider (PA/WCD) DD and Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) E were preparing to change Resident # 7 pressure ulcer dressing on her right ischium. PA/WCD DD retrieved zinc oxide and placed it into a cup. LPN/UM E reported the wound is to be dressed using aqua cell AG and PA/WCD DD and LPN/UM E began looking for it. LPN/UM E stated I don't think we carry that. PA/WCD DD reported that the facility doesn't have it, and only the wound clinic has it. PA/WCD DD removed Resident #7's brief and there was a bandage on right lower ischium that was undated and unsigned. PA/WCD DD removed calcium Alginate packing (note, dressing material was not what was ordered)Resident #7's wound edges were clean, dry and intact. PA/WCD DD measured the wound depth to be 1.0. The wound was circular and approximately 1-2 cm. PA/WCD DD decided to use iodoform instead of Aquacel AG since they did not have any and stated the order is for aqua cell but can't follow the order because we don't have the material. PA/WCD DD packed iodoform in the wound, placed gauze into hole and covered with a bandage. Resident #7 then received a new brief, was boosted back up in bed by PA/WCD DD and LPN/UM E. Resident #7 voiced no complaints for procedure. Note that the ordered aqua cell was not used and zinc oxide was not placed in peri wound area.
In an interview on [DATE] at 3:14 PM, LPN/UM E reported the Aqua Cell should have arrived by pharmacy if done by physician orders and it should have been delivered the next day the 29th. LPN/UM E reported the order was not entered correctly by the LPN who put the order in as other category instead of pharmacy.
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for accidents/hazards, resulting in the potential for residents to sustain a fall injury which have the potential to negatively affect the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Findings include:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #14 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, GI bleed, muscle weakness, cervical disc degeneration (compression on the vertebrae in the neck causing pain), colon cancer, diverticulosis (pockets or small pouches in the intestine which can become inflamed), kidney disease, anxiety, bursitis (inflammation in the cushions of the joint) of the left hip, chronic pain, spinal stenosis, anemia, shortness of breath, respiratory failure, and abnormalities of gait.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14, with a reference date of 3/20/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14, with a reference date of 11/01/2022, revealed, .Extensive Assistance .Two+ persons physical assist .Upper extremity .Impairment on one side .
Review of current Care Plan for Resident #14, revised on 3/14/2021, revealed the focus, .Resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (relate to) impaired mobility (cervical disc degeneration, bursitis left hip, sciatic RIGHT LE (lower extremity) . with the intervention .Encourage and/or assist resident to meet toileting needs either with utilization of bathroom, bedpan, commode, urinal per resident request, preference, and as needed .
In an interview on 05/01/23 at 08:04 AM, Resident #14 reported she fell and broke her leg last December 2022. Resident #14 reported the aide didn't' know how to get me up as she utilized a sit to stand for transfers. Resident #14 stated, .I was slipping out of the sling, she didn't buckle the two buckles, it was a smaller of the vest and I couldn't breathe .I think that I fainted .I guess I let go of the handle bars, slid out and flat on my back .I twisted my leg somehow and broke my femur .I was in terrible pain, screaming and the ambulance came and took me to the hospital .
Review of Event Note dated 12/19/2022 at 10:50 PM, revealed, .During transfer resident slid out of [NAME] pad and onto the floor. CNA witnessed this event and state resident did not hit her head. Resident immediately stated pain in her right knee. Right knee appears swollen. On call provider notified and order to send resident to the emergency room obtained. Resident transferred via (ambulance service) to (Local Hospital).
Review of Incident Report dated 12/19/22 at 21:30 PM, revealed, .Resident slid to the floor during a transfer with the Sara lift .Patient Description: I don't know, I think I passed out.Resident stabilized on the floor, physician and EMS notified. Assisted off the floor by EMS and sent to (Local Hospital) .Pain .Right Knee (front) .Predisposing Physiological Factors: Incontinent, Weakness/Fainted .Other Info .Resident states her pad for the lift wasn't positioned properly .
Review of Witness Statement by Agency CNA NN included in the Incident Report revealed, .Her butt was on the edge of the bed, I said to (Resident #14), hold on to the handles I need to push her more and the bed, but she took her hands off the handles, and she slide down to the floor .
Review of Statement dated 12/19/22, signed by LPN SS revealed, .During examination by nurse of (Resident #14) it was noted that (Resident #14)'s right knee had swelling .Resident expressed extreme pain in the right knee and was not able to extend leg out .Nurse was supporting (Resident #14) by sitting behind her and holding her so that she was not resting her head and back on the [NAME] stand legs .Three CNAs and two nurses came to assist nurse with resident. Resident was assisted to the floor and [NAME] stand moved from under her safely .
Review of Post Fall Assessment dated 12/19/22, revealed, .Previous history of fall .Yes .Injuries related to his fall .Yes .Any pain during ROM (range of motion) or ambulation .Yes .Previous Interventions: Call light within reach, medications as ordered, bed in lowest position .New Interventions: Educate all staff that transfers with mechanical lifts must have 2 people
Review of (Local Hospital) Emergency Department Note dated 12/19/22 revealed, .Patient presents emerged department for right knee pain. Patient currently lives in a skilled nursing center. Patient was brought to the emergency department via EMS. According to paramedics, the patient was transferring from wheelchair to bed with assistance. Patient's legs gave out. Patient slid to the floor. Injuring her right knee .Patient is now complaining of right lower extremity pain. She states that she cannot put any weight on her right lower extremity. Patient informs me that she does have a surgery scheduled for tomorrow. She believes it has something to do with her Foley catheter. Patient's prearrival form states that the patient had a bowel prep done today for colonoscopy tomorrow . Musculoskeletal: Right lower extremity: There is obvious deformity over the knee joint. There is gross soft tissue swelling. There is mild shortening or rotation of the right lower extremity when compared to the left. Patient is not able to move the right lower extremity secondary to pain. She has significant tenderness over the generalized femur area .
Review of Orthopedic Trauma Consult dated 12/20/22 at 7:22 AM, revealed, .Patient is a 78 y.o. female with a right periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture s/p twisting injury during transfer at care facility .Clinical impressions: Closed bicondylar fracture of distal femur, right .Closed fracture of distal end of right femur, unspecified fracture morphology .
Review of Admit/Readmit Note dated 12/22/2022 at 3:12 PM, revealed, .Resident arrived at facility approximately 1:40 pm accompanied by two paramedics transferred by stretcher from (Local Hospital). Residents admitting Diagnosis to (Local Hospital) Right Femur Fracture. Paramedics transferred resident from the stretcher to bed Resident c/o some discomfort during transfer and repositioning. Assessment completed by writer .Wound Treatments Primapore to Right Femur. (Primapore: a post operative wound dressing .aids in the prevention of bacterial contamination .water resistant dressing).
Review of General Progress Note dated 12/28/2022 at 1:35 PM, revealed, .Resident c/o (complaint of) mild pain to leg area .accepted prescribed pain medications, Gabapentin and PRN Tramadol. Also allowed writer to administer Lidocaine patch to upper right thigh prior to scheduled therapy. Resident relaxed calm, with no complaints thereafter administration of pain medication. Residents dressing to right thigh intact without drainage. Will continue to monitor resident .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 10:10 AM, Resident #14 reported she was concerned because she was not being taken to the bathroom. Resident #14 stated, People are not wanting to take me to the bathroom .Telling me they don't have time to take me to the bathroom .Supposed to be two people to get me up and take me to the bathroom but there was only one aide on the hallway, and they have to always look for help to take me to the bathroom .
Review of General Progress Note dated 4/4/2023 at 4:32 PM, revealed, .Late entry for 4/3/23 Quarterly MDS w/ ard 3/20. Patient interviewed and confirmed total assist mechanical lift with two assist used for all transfers .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:21 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) I reported she was the manager on duty and it was a significant event. RN I reported the CNA was assisting Resident #14 was transfer to her bed, not quite on the bed and she slid out of the sit to stand. RN I stated, When I got down there, she was on the floor, the nurse was with her .She was in a lot of pain and I could tell something was wrong, told staff not to move her, and call EMS to have the come and evaluate her .They started her IV and gave her fentanyl because she was in so much pain .The resident told me she thought she fainted .It was horrible .Education was immediately provided to staff members .She was a two person sit to stand . RN I reported if they were a lift, they were a two person for transfers.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:42 AM, Agency CNA NN reported the facility was giving the resident prep for a colonoscopy the next day. CNA NN reported staff were telling me the resident did not need two persons for assist with the [NAME] stand lift. CNA NN stated, .I kept telling people I needed help and she needed two people to transfer .What was I supposed to do? I was the only CNA assigned to that hall and she needed to get to the bathroom because she was drinking stuff for the colonoscopy .I set her down on the toilet and raised her up, cleaned her bottom .She was getting weak, pulled the light .I really needed help and yelled out the door but no one would answer me .She was feeling lightheaded and she had diarrhea continuously and she was not strong enough to hold on .I had to get her off the toilet, I couldn't get help and I couldn't let her sit there for hours (in the bathroom) .It was in the best interest of the resident .I got her up and got her over to the edge of the bed and asked her to let me get her steady and everything was intact, the sling goes all around behind her, and raised her up and she let go of everything and slid from underneath the Sara lift . I felt the best of my knowledge not to leave her in that, as that is not right either, and not getting help from the other staff .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 02:18 PM, DON B reported the resident let go of the handles during the transfer and does not participate very well with being transferred with the lift. DON B stated, .With the Sara lift we would have to do some of the work for her . DON B reported Resident #14 was to have been a two person assist with transfers.
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #11
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses whi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #11
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included quadriplegia and Multiple Sclerosis.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, with a reference date of 4/1/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Further review of the same MDS assessment revealed Resident #11 required assistance with bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing.
Review of a current ADL (activities of daily living) Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated 12/7/2021, directed staff that Resident #11 could be up in her powered wheelchair daily for four hours at a time and was then required to lay down for one hour before getting back up for offloading of pressure. Review of a current physical mobility Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated 8/7/2021, directed staff that Resident #11 was totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed frequently as necessary. Review of a current ADL (activities of daily living) Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated 8/7/2021, directed staff that Resident #11 should be showered according to the shower schedule.
In an interview on 4/27/2023 at 11:34 AM, Family Member of Resident #11 KK reported recently only 2 nursing aides showed up for the entire facility, 1 aide for 28 residents.
In an interview on 4/27/2023 at 3:19 PM, Family Member of Resident #11 KK reported staff are not turning Resident #11 every two hours and Resident #11's wound recently reopened because there was not enough staff to get her out of her powered wheelchair.
In an interview on 5/1/2023 at 9:35 AM, Resident #11 reported she had a wound on her bottom that was healed and then opened back up because she was left up in her powered wheelchair for 9 hours. Resident #11 reported that she was only allowed to be up for 4 hours at a time in her powered wheelchair to relieve pressure on her bottom. Resident #11 reported that 3rd shift was good about turning her every 2 hours, but 1st and 2nd shift were not as good. Resident #11 reported that she is unable to turn herself. Resident #11 reported that she was last turned at 6:45 AM, 3 hours ago. Resident #11 reported that 3rd shift checks on her automatically, but on 1st and 2nd shift she has to request turning. Resident #11 reported that it can take a long time for her call light to be answered, sometimes up to 2 hours. Resident #11 reported that call light response time depends on the staffing that day. Resident #11 reported staff are not able to shower her when there are staffing problems.
In an interview on 5/2/2023 at 10:25 AM, Resident #11 reported that it was a couple months ago that her wound broke back open, after being up in her powered chair for 9 hours. Resident #11 reported that there was a music activity and many residents needed assistance after the activity. Resident #11 reported that there was only 1 aide working on the hall that night and she seemed overwhelmed.
In an observation on 5/2/2023 at 11:58 AM in Resident #11's room, Wound Care Provider DD evaluated Resident #11's pressure ulcer on her right medial buttock to be 0.1 by 0.4 centimeters.
Review of Resident #11's Wound Care Provider Progress Note dated 3/7/2023 revealed .(Resident #11) is seen today because staff state she has an ulcer on her bottom again. Resident has a history of pressure injuries to her sacrum and right medial buttock . Resident with an ulcer on the right upper medial buttock measuring 0.2by1.1by0.2cm . Pressure injury of right buttock, stage 3 . Resident with a pressure injury to the right upper medial buttock again .
Review of the facility Daily Shower Assignment revealed Resident #11 was scheduled to receive showers on day shift on Mondays and Thursdays.
Review of Resident #11's Skin Observation Shower sheets provided by the facility revealed that from February 2023 until 5/3/2023, Resident #11 received a shower on 2/2/2023, 2/27/2023, 3/16/2023, 3/20/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/30/2023, 4/17/2023, 4/21/2023, and 4/27/2023.
Resident #48
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included spinal stenosis and lack of coordination.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48, with a reference date of 4/3/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Further review of same MDS assessment revealed Resident #48 required assistance with bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing.
In an observation and interview on 5/2/2023 at 12:19 PM in Resident #11's room, Unit Manager E reported that a new wound was found over the weekend on Resident #11's left heel. Wound Care Provider DD evaluated the wound to be a 3.5 by 6.6-centimeter unstageable deep tissue injury. Observed left heel wound to be a large, blood-filled blister.
In an interview on 5/3/2023 at 8:54 AM, Resident #48 reported staffing was short over the weekend when her new left heel wound was found. Resident #48 reported when staffing is short they do not come in to assist her with repositioning in bed. Resident #48 reported when staffing is short it takes a long time for her call light to be answered.
Review of the facility worked schedule on Saturday, 4/29/2023 revealed there were only 3 nursing assistants working in the entire building from 11:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
Review of the facility Daily Shower Assignment revealed Resident #48 was scheduled to receive showers on day shift on Wednesdays and Saturdays.
In an interview on 5/1/2023 at 10:05 AM, Resident #48 reported she has been missing many showers. Resident #48 reported missing showers makes her feel dirty and grubby.
Review of Resident #48's Skin Observation Shower sheets provided by the facility revealed that from February 2023 until 5/3/2023, Resident #48 received a shower on 2/1/2023, 2/27/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/27/2023, 4/6/2023, 4/24/2023, and 4/27/2023.
In an interview on 5/1/2023 at 10:42 AM, LPN AA reported staffing has been challenging for months. LPN AA reported there were only 3 aides in the facility that morning and only 1 aide working with her on the 100 hall with 23 residents to care for. LPN AA reported when there is only 1 aide on the hall, there is not enough time to give residents showers and it is not possible to check, change, and turn residents every two hours. LPN AA reported when staffing is short, the aides work methodically through the unit to get to everyone as quickly as possible.
In an interview on 5/2/2023 at 10:06 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) S reported that she was the only CNA on 100 hall the previous day. CNA S reported that happens at least once a week. CNA S reported there is no time for resident showers when she is the only CNA on the hall and it is not possible to perform check and changes and turns every two hours.
In an interview on 5/3/2023 at 2:55 PM, CNA U reported the facility needs a minimum of 5 CNA's to perform adequate resident care. CNA U reported that a couple times a month she works as the only CNA on a hall. CNA U reported when she is the only CNA working on a hall resident showers cannot be completed, waters might not get passed, and it is not possible to perform two hour resident checks and changes and turns. CNA U reported it takes closer to 4 hours to perform check and changes and turns when she is working alone on a hall.
.There is a positive correlation between direct patient care provided by an RN (Registered Nurse) and positive patient outcomes, reduced complication rates, and a more rapid return of the patient to an optimal functional status .Research also correlates poor staffing with missed nursing assessments and missed nursing care . [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing, Tenth Edition - E-Book (Kindle Location 1265 of 76897). Elsevier Health Sciences.
This citation pertains to intake #MI00127894
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nurse staffing to promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in 5 of 60 sampled residents (Resident #31, #14, #42, #11, & #48) reviewed for staffing, resulting in unmet care needs , reopening of a pressure ulcer for Resident #11, a fall with fracture for Resident #14, and the potential for physical and psychosocial harm for all residents in the facility.
Findings include:
Review of Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (CMS Form 672) submitted for review on 5/1/2023 indicated a census of 60 residents, and that there were 60 residents were either an Assist of One or Two Staff or Dependent on staff for bathing; 59 residents were either an Assist of One or Two Staff or Dependent on staff for dressing; 54 residents were either an Assist of One or Two Staff or Dependent on staff for transferring; and 60 residents were an Assist of One or Two Staff for toilet use .
In a confidential group interview on 05/03/23 at 10:29 AM, 7 out of 9 residents reported the staff were coming in the resident's rooms and were turning off the call lights when the need was not met. Residents reported concerns with second shift and third shift. Residents reported it was really hard to get their needs met when there was only one aide on each hallway.
Review of the Master Schedule for Nurse Supervisor First Shift 6:45 AM to 3:15 PM had an open position for part time nurse and a full-time nurse; Second shift 2:45 PM to 11:15 PM, had an open position for a part time nurse for coverage on Saturday and Sunday on the first week of the rotation. Nurse Supervisor Third Shirt 10:45 PM to 7:15 AM, had an open full time position .
Review of the Master Schedule for Nurse Aide First Shift 7a - 3p had one full time opening, and two part time openings; Nurse Aide Second Shift 3pm-11pm had three full time openings and one part time opening; Nurse Aide Third Shift 11pm - 7am had a part time opening .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 12:24 PM, Scheduler CC reported the facility had a master schedule with the same rotation every two weeks. The staff process to request personal time off should be submitted at least 30 days prior typically, lesser if they need it off for an emergent situation. Scheduler CC reported she would post all open shifts in the schedule book and would send out mass messages to staff informing them of the openings. If not all the shifts were covered, then there would be a meeting held with the unit managers to recruit staff. Scheduler CC reported the facility does utilize an staffing agency to assist with staffing. Scheduler CC reported for aide staffing had been 3 aides for 100 hallway, 3 aides on 300 hallway, and 1 aide on the 200 hallway with a split person. The split person would cover the hallway with the heavier load based on the acuity level. Scheduler CC reported on the weekends staff don't want to work and would call in. Scheduler CC reported the facility does not do mandations but have offered extra pick up pay per hour.
Resident #31:
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31, with a reference date of 3/15/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident #31 was cognitively intact .B. Transfer: Total Dependence with Two+ persons physical assist.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 10:42 AM, Resident #31 reported he really had a hard time getting to activities because there were not enough CNAs to get him up for the activities. Resident #31 stated, .Sometimes I get to go and sometimes I don't .
Resident #14:
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14, with a reference date of 3/20/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact.
In an interview on 05/01/23 at 08:04 AM, Resident #14 reported she fell and broke her leg last December 2022. Resident #14 reported the aide didn't' know how to get me up as she utilized a sit to stand for transfers. Resident #14 stated, .I was slipping out of the sling, she didn't buckle the two buckles, it was a smaller of the vest and I couldn't breathe .I think that I fainted .I guess I let go of the handle bars, slid out and flat on my back .I twisted my leg somehow and broke my femur .I was in terrible pain, screaming and the ambulance came and took me to the hospital .
Review of Orthopedic Trauma Consult dated 12/20/22 at 7:22 AM, revealed, .Patient is a 78 y.o. female with a right periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture s/p twisting injury during transfer at care facility .Clinical impressions: Closed bicondylar fracture of distal femur, right .Closed fracture of distal end of right femur, unspecified fracture morphology .
Review of General Progress Note dated 4/4/2023 at 4:32 PM, revealed, .Late entry for 4/3/23 Quarterly MDS w/ ard 3/20. Patient interviewed and confirmed total assist mechanical lift with two assist used for all transfers .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:21 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) I reported she was the manager on duty at the time of the fall and it was a significant event. RN I reported the CNA was assisting Resident #14 was transfer to her bed. RN I stated, When I got down there, she was on the floor, the nurse was with her .She was in a lot of pain and I could tell something was wrong, told staff not to move her, and call EMS to have the come and evaluate her .They started her IV and gave her fentanyl because she was in so much pain .The resident told me she thought she fainted .It was horrible .She was supposed to be a two person sit to stand . RN I reported if they were a lift, they were a two person for transfers.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:42 AM, Agency CNA NN reported the facility was giving the resident prep for a colonoscopy the next day. CNA NN stated, .I kept telling people I needed help and she needed two people to transfer .What was I supposed to do? I was the only CNA assigned to that hall and she needed to get to the bathroom because she was drinking stuff for the colonoscopy .I set her down on the toilet and raised her up, cleaned her bottom .She was getting weak, pulled the light .I really needed help and yelled out the door but no one would answer me .She was feeling lightheaded and she had diarrhea continuously and she was not strong enough to hold on .I had to get her off the toilet, I couldn't get help and I couldn't let her sit there for hours (in the bathroom) .I got her up and got her over to the edge of the bed and asked her to let me get her steady and everything was intact, the sling goes all around behind her, and raised her up and she let go of everything and slid from underneath the Sara lift . I felt the best of my knowledge not to leave her in that, as that is not right either, and not getting help from the other staff .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 10:10 AM, Resident #14 reported she was concerned because she was not being taken to the bathroom. Resident #14 stated, People are not wanting to take me to the bathroom .Telling me they don't have time to take me to the bathroom .Supposed to be two people to get me up and take me to the bathroom but there was only one aide on the hallway and they have to always look for help to take me to the bathroom .
Resident #42:
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42, with a reference date of 1/9/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident #42 was cognitively intact.
In an interview on 05/01/23 at 11:30 AM, Resident #42 reported the staff have taken a long time to respond to call lights. Resident #42 reported the staff would come in, say they would get someone to come help me and then they never come back. Resident #42 stated, .I feel sometimes they ignore me . Resident #42 stated, .One day what day I called because I needed my pants changed, they were poopy .They (staff) never came and I was in poopy pants practically all day I was getting a sore in my butt crack and right there (Resident #42 pointed to her vaginal area) .Poopy pants are not good . Resident #42 reported she was not getting her showers or baths as well as the facility was really short on staffing with only one aide on the hallway.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 12:40 PM, CNA Y reported on Monday 05/01/23 reported was super busy and I had no partner to help me. CNA Y reported management was coming out and helping when they could. CNA Y stated, .This does happen a couple times a month .When I have a partner we can usually get things done but when I don't I just try to keep up with the basic stuff, check and changes, and try to touch everybody .Sometimes the resident gets a bed bath instead of a shower .And when the resident was a two person assist there was extra long waiting to get someone else to help me .I really try to communicate with my residents to let them now when I can get to them .It is hard though when they have to go to the bathroom .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 01:58 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) reported the facility maintains a certain level for staffing. The NHA will send out a broadcast if we get to the critical level of staffing. We don't want to go above the number of residents to every one staff. DON B reported it would be 1 staff member for every 8 residents for 1st shift, 1 staff member for every 12 residents for 2nd shift, and 1 staff member for every 15 residents for 3rd shfit. DON B reported we have a staffing meeting and discuss what is happening with staffing for the next few days.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 2 (Resident #14 and #42) of 16 residents reviewed for d...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 2 (Resident #14 and #42) of 16 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the likelihood of feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of self-worth, and a negative psychosocial outcome for the residents impacting their quality of life.
Findings include:
According to https://journals.lww.com/ regarding call light use, It is one of the few means by which patients can exercise control over their care on the unit. When patients use the call light, it is usually to summon the nurse .Patients expect that when they push the call light button, a nursing staff member will answer or come to them.
Resident #14:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #14 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, GI bleed, muscle weakness, cervical disc degeneration (compression on the vertebrae in the neck causing pain), colon cancer, diverticulosis (pockets or small pouches in the intestine which can become inflamed), kidney disease, anxiety, bursitis (inflammation in the cushions of the joint) of the left hip, chronic pain, spinal stenosis, anemia, shortness of breath, respiratory failure, and abnormalities of gait.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14, with a reference date of 3/20/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact.
Review of current Care Plan for Resident #14, revised on 3/14/2021, revealed the focus, .Resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (relate to) impaired mobility (cervical disc degeneration, bursitis left hip, sciatic RIGHT LE (lower extremity) . with the intervention .Encourage and/or assist resident to meet toileting needs either with utilization of bathroom, bedpan, commode, urinal per resident request, preference, and as needed .
In an interview on 05/01/23 at 08:01 AM, Resident #14 reported the facility was short of aides all this past weekend (April 29th and 30th). Resident #14 stated, .When there were not enough aides, I don't get up because there is no one to help get me up .On Saturday, I couldn't get up to the bathroom until second shift .I held my poop all day .Do you know how degrading it is to poop in your pants? .Very degrading .I hate it . Yesterday (Sunday April 30th), one guy who could help me, they put him in the lunch room to pass out the trays .I had to wait again until he got done passing trays Resident #14 reported it was 2:40 PM before she got to go to the bathroom.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 10:10 AM, Resident #14 reported she was concerned because she was not being taken to the bathroom. Resident #14 stated, People are not wanting to take me to the bathroom .Telling me they don't have time to take me to the bathroom .Supposed to be two people to get me up and take me to the bathroom but there was only one aide on the hallway and they have to always look for help to take me to the bathroom .
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:04 AM, Resident #14 stated .It happened again yesterday, on 2nd shift about 09:30 PM, I was told she didn't have time for that (to take her to the bathroom) just go ahead and go in your brief, I will change your brief I told her that she would have to come right back and change my brief .I would prefer to use the bathroom It is so degrading to go to the bathroom in a brief . Resident #14 reported she illuminated her call light and when the staff member came and she told her I told you I was going to have a dirty brief and she told me that she would come and change me before she left for the night. Resident #14 reported she fell asleep and woke up about midnight, I have a terrible rash and I have had it the whole year already. Resident #14 reported when she woke up she was in a lot of pain from the rash and due to the bowel movement she had early in the night. Resident #14 reported she had to yell for about 10-15 minutes before someone came to change me. Resident #14 reported the off going staff never mentioned her brief needing to be changed to the oncoming staff. Resident #14 reported that happens to me a lot, no one want to take me to the bathroom .it takes two people to get me to a sitting position.
Resident #42:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #42 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, cord compression, adult failure to thrive, respiratory failure, low back pain, and multiple myeloma (plasma cells become cancerous and multiply damaging the bones, immune system, kidneys, and red blood cell count).
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42, with a reference date of 1/9/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident #42 was cognitively intact. Review of MDS Section G: Bed Mobility and Transfer require Extensive Assistance with One-person physical assist .
Review of current Care Plan for Resident #42, revised on 8/11/22, revealed the focus, .Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (relate to) deconditioning from recent hospital stay due to pulmonary embolism, LEFT lower lobe pneumonia and chronic medical condition . with the intervention .Bed Mobility: Extensive .Encourage and/or assist resident to meet toileting needs either with utilization of bathroom, bedpan, commode, urinal per resident request, preference, and as needed .
In an interview on 05/01/23 at 11:30 AM, Resident #42 reported the staff have taken a long time to respond to call lights. Resident #42 reported the staff would come in, say they would get someone to come help me and then they never come back. Resident #42 stated, .I feel sometimes they ignore me . Resident #42 stated, .One day what day I called because I needed my pants changed, they were poopy .They (staff) never came and I was in poopy pants practically all day I was getting a sore in my butt crack and right there (Resident #42 pointed to her vagina) .Poopy pants are not good . Resident #42 reported she was not getting her showers or baths as well as the facility was really short on staffing with only one aide on the hallway.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 02:04 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the expectation for call lights was anyone walking in the hallway and observing a call light on would answer the call light. If they were not trained in provide the assistance needed, the staff would have to look for another staff member who was qualified to provide the care. DON B stated, .Battle cry as it not only nursing, it is everyone . DON B reported the call light would remain on until the need was met.
Review of the policy, Call Light adopted 7/11/2018, revealed, .1. All facility personnel must be aware of call lights at all times .2. Facility shall answer call lights in a timely manner .3. Answer all call lights in a prompt, calm, courteaous manner; turn off the call light as soon as you enter the room and attend to the resident needs .
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
This cite pertains to intake: MI00133002
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic pain medication in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #21) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
This cite pertains to intake: MI00133002
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic pain medication in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for misappropriation of property resulting in the potential for delayed pain treatment.
Findings include:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #21 was admitted with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, kidney disease, paralysis on right dominant side, cognitive impairment, stroke, peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory disease where the arteries become built up with fatty deposits and calcium build up causing leg pain), degenerative disc disorder, pain in right foot, peripheral neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage), TMJ (pain and compromised movement of the jaw joint and the surrounding muscles), encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness), and chronic pain syndrome.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21, with a reference date of 12/10/22, revealed, .J0100. Pain Management: Last 5 days has the resident: Been on scheduled pain medications, Yes .Received PRN pain medications, Yes .Pain Assessment Interview be conducted, Yes .Frequency: Occasionally .Pain made it hard for you to sleep at night, Yes .Pain intensity: Numerical Rating Scale (00-10) .07 .
Review of current Care Plan for Resident #21, revised on 1/7/23, revealed the focus, .The resident has potential for pain r/t (related to) angina, OA, Generalized and lower extremity/foot pain r/t neuropathy, right side TMJ . with the intervention .Administer analgesia per physician orders .Anticipate and treat before, during, and after treatments that may cause increased pain or discomfort .Evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions. Review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, and residents satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on cognition .
Review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 10/8/2022, revealed, .Summary of the Event: During the counting of medications at the transition between nurse Agency RN MM(agency) and LPN P the narcotics count for Resident #21 was not accurate, missing 2 tab of 5 MG Oxycodone. Agency RN MM was reported to her agency and suspended pending investigation per agency. Resident #21 (resident) received 1 does of PRN Oxycodone at 1858 (6:58 PM). Per medication administration records. And per Nurse Agency RN MM she gave Resident #21(resident) one does of PRN pain medication per her shift start .Actions taken during the investigative process: o Agency Nurse was not allowed to return to (Name of Facility) o Agency Nurse was reported to her agency. o Agency RN MM (RN) provided an account of what happened. o LPN P (LPN) provided an account of what happened. o Staff who were on the clock during that time frame were interviewed, finding no suspicious activity or visualization of any staff mishandling medications. o A police report was completed for potential theft of resident property. #22-057522 o Resident (R#21) did have missing medications. o Resident (R#21) did not have any adverse issues related to missing medications. All residents on 200 hundred hall were interviewed. Are you aware of any medications that you have not received? Do you have any concerns that have not been addressed? Did Agency RN MM pass your medications to you on afternoon shift of 10/08/2022? o Agency RN MM (RN) provided a statement to the Administrator (NHA A) and DON (DON B) accounting her shift. o LPN P (LPN) provided a statement to the Administrator and DON. o Agency RN MM (RN) provided a statement to the Administrator and DON accounting her shift o LPN AA (RN) provided a statement to the Administrator and DON accounting her shift .Other alert and oriented residents on the hall were interviewed as to whether they saw anything unusual regarding their own medication administration or the medication administration of others that they might have visualized, finding no concerns with interviews .Root Cause Analysis/Contributive Factors: Interview with nurse Agency RN MM found that she provided Resident #21 with his (sic) ordered PRN Oxycodone at 6:58 PM. She recounted her typical medication administration practice. She recounted that she keeps her nurses' keys on her at all times. She stated that she did recall counting the pills prior to administration so did not administer any additional pills when providing them to the resident. She recounted that she was distracted when her husband was texting her because her daughter was at home and got sick. She recounted that she does not recall what happened during her shift with the medication. Actions taken based on investigative findings: o Agency Nurse MM was reported to her agency for potential mishandling of medications. Facility instructed agency that they do not want nurse to return to the facility. o The Director of Nursing evaluated the narcotics policies and procedures providing education to nurse staff members with regards to facility policies .
Review of Agency Nurse (AN) MM's written statement dated 10/8/22 taken by the facility revealed, I arrived for my shift yesterday at 1445 PM. First shift nurse gave me report and we signed off for my second shift at 1500. At 1600 I gave (Resident #21) her PRN oxycodone 5mg; there were 2 pills left in the blister pack. Around 1800 my husband (His name) called me and said that our daughter (Daughter's name) was throwing up and sick and I requested to be sent home early. Shortly after 1900 PM, the third shift RN (LPN P) came on and we did nurse to nurse report. When we went to do narcotics count, we discovered that the card for (Resident #21's) oxycodone 5 mg was missing. An extensive search produced no results, and it still has not been found .
Review of Agency Nurse (AN) MM's typed and signed statement dated 10/8/22 at 7:40 PM, revealed, .I came to the facility at 1445 took report from (LPN AA) on 200 hall. We counted narcotics and three (sic) were three oxycodone 5 mg on (Resident #21's) card .At 1600 I gave her one pill and there were two tablets remaining and put it back on the narcotic drawer .at 1712 I counted off the (LPN P) (incoming nurse) and no card for oxycodone 5 mg for (Resident #21) .We searched the narcotic box, med cart, shredder box and trash but still couldn't locate the card with two tablets of oxycodone .
Review of LPN P's typed witness statement signed by LPN P revealed, .At around 1700 I received a nurse to nurse report from (Agency Nurse MM), RN and when we were counting narcotics, we have a discrepancy of two oxycodone 5 mg tablets that belongs to (Resident #21). The narcotic card was missing - we looked for it on the narcotic box, medication cart, shred box and trash but could not find it .
Review of submit document shows (Local Police Department) Incident Number card with Incident Number #22-057522 . Requested a copy of the police report and did not receive prior to exit and it was not located in the report.
Attempts to contact Agency Nurse MM by telephone were made without success during the survey.
Review of Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 10/1/22, revealed, .Quantity Received: 30 .On 10/8/22 at 4:00 PM .Amount Given: 1 .Amount Left: 2 .Signed off by Agency RN MM .
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 09:14 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA stated, .Only the nurse working that shift has a key to narcotics, she counts at beginning and end of every shift with oncoming/off going nurse .The count book reviewed .Used med (medication) cards are signed out of cart on the master log, any unused meds were wasted by supervisors, in rx destroyer .single dose med wastes require two nurses as witness with signatures .Meds are signed out when they are pulled, 3 meds spot checked and all on count .
In electronic correspondence on 05/02/2023 at 2:15 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported resident .narcotics were not included in the packets; they come separately and stored in the lock box which nurses sign off upon administration .
In electronic correspondence on 10/18/23 at 3:23 PM, Survey Team Manager RR queried .Was the medication count correct when she took the cart and then wrong later? .NHA A stated, .That is correct .
In electronic correspondence on 10/28/22 at 3:33 PM, NHA A stated, .Yes, it would be reasonable to assume that the medication became missing with this nurse that was on duty .
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 11:57 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported she was not able to provide me with the requested education and staff sign in sheets for the education. This writer requested the audits performed until the end of December as indicated by the NHA A. This writer did not receive the requested documents prior to exit of the facility.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 02:58 PM, NHA A reported she has an employee file for Agency Nurse MM, the facilities agency staff onboarding packet was started after the agency nurse left. NHA A reported I would have sent her for drug testing, but she had left the facility already, when queried if the facility performed a drug test on the agency nurse.
Review of policy, Medication Access and Storage adopted on 07/11/2018, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to store all drugs and biological in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications . 9. Schedule III and IV controlled medications are stored separately from other medications in a locked drawer or compartment designated for that purpose .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to proved a bed hold in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for hos...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to proved a bed hold in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for hospitalization, resulting in the potential for the resident to not return to their same room upon readmission.
Findings include:
Review of the face sheet revealed Resident #7 orginally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/19/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, pressure ulcers, and urostomy (opening in the abdomen that connects to the urinary tract to allow urine to drain).
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 01:11 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manger E reported Resident #7 discharged from the room and came back two weeks later to the same room. Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manger E stated, We were beginning to worry. we didn't think she would be out that long for surgery, just a couple of days, but it turned out to be 2 weeks.
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 03:24 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B stated, The nursing staff do the bed holds. it is part of the packet when they go out. I don't see one in the medical record. (for Resident #7). This surveyor requested any documentation a bed hold was provied. On 05/02/23 at 03:33 PM, DON B stated, We did not do one as it was a hospitalization for surgery, not acute.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in 1 of 16 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for accuracy of assessments, resulting...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in 1 of 16 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for accuracy of assessments, resulting in an inaccurate record of MDS assessments and an inaccurate reflection of the resident's status.
Findings include:
Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual v1.15R, Chapter 1: Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), revealed .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS items on the assessment, and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident ' s actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment. As such, nursing homes are responsible for ensuring that all participants in the assessment process have the requisite knowledge to complete an accurate assessment .
Review of a MDS assessment for Resident #31, with a reference date of 3/15/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #31 was cognitively intact. Review of the Skin Conditions revealed that Resident #31 had an infection of the foot, diabetic foot ulcers, open lesions (other than ulcers, rashes, cuts), surgical wounds, burns, skin tears, and MASD (moisture associated skin damage).
During an observation and interview on 05/01/23 at 09:46 AM Resident #31 was lying in bed on his back. Resident #31 reported that he had a surgical wound on his abdomen that was infected, and did not have any wounds or infections on his feet. Resident #31 reported that he had never had any wounds on his feet.
Review of Resident #31's current Physician Orders revealed Order for wound care: Abdominal ulcer .for Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer .Active 4/26/23 Cephalexin (antibiotic) .for cellulitis (infection) abdominal wall .Active 4/25/23. There were no orders related to wounds on the feet.
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 02:12 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)-MDS BB reported that Resident #31 had been incorrectly coded on his current MDS and stated, .does not have any ulcers or infections on his feet .will submit a modification.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was in place for 1 (Resident #318) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was in place for 1 (Resident #318) of 22 sampled residents, resulting in the potential for ineffective care to be provided to the resident.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #318's admission Record revealed Resident #318, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included weakness and major depressive disorder.
Review of Resident #318 Care Plan revealed no care plan orders for Resident #318.
Review of Resident #318 [NAME] (direct care guide) revealed no current orders for Resident #318.
During an interview on 5/01/23 at 12:29 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) I reported that care plans are added by the admitting nurse in the Electronic Medical Record which generates [NAME] orders for Certified Nursing Assistants. RN I reported that nurses follow an admission Checklist and completing care plan orders is listed on that check sheet.
Review of Resident #318s admission Checklist sheet revealed .Verify that CP/[NAME] is available with transfer status & shower schedule within 2-4 hours . This order was initialed as completed on 4/30/23.
Review of Resident #318's Care Plan on 5/02/23 at 9:04 AM, indicated two goals were added on 5/1/23 related to nutrition and oral health.
Review of Resident #318 's [NAME] on 5/2/23 9:04 AM, indicated there were no [NAME] orders listed.
During an interview on 5/02/23 at 10:19 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y reported that CNA's use the [NAME] orders to determine a resident's transfer status, and if a resident is admitted late in the afternoon and they have not been evaluated by physical therapy yet, the CNA would wait to transfer the resident out of bed, and would offer a bed pan. If a resident was admitted on a weekend, they would ask a nurse how the resident should be transferred.
During an interview on 5/02/23 at 01:35 PM, CNA Y reported that she was not sure how Resident #318 is transferred or if she used any kind of device for ambulation.
During an interview on 5/02/23 at 02:15 PM, CNA U reported that CNA's use [NAME] orders to determine what kind of care each resident needs. If a resident did not have any orders in their [NAME], the CNA should let the nurse or the Director of Nursing (DON) know immediately.
During an interview on 5/02/23 03:02 at PM, DON B reported that the expectation for new admission orders is that nurses are follow the admission Checklist and create baseline care plan orders which generate [NAME] orders within 2-4 hours of admission.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to MI00127865 and MI00133137.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and p...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to MI00127865 and MI00133137.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and provide routine showers to dependent residents for 3 residents (Resident #6, #11, and #48) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL(activities of daily living) care, resulting in residents feeling as if they had poor hygiene and the potential for residents to not reach their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.
Findings include:
Resident #6
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and muscle weakness.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #6, with a reference date of 3/6/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact. Further review of same MDS assessment revealed Resident #6 required assistance with bathing.
Review of a current ADL (activities of daily living) Care Plan intervention for Resident #6, initiated 6/1/2019, directed staff to provide assistance in shower chair with bathing.
Review of the facility Daily Shower Assignment revealed Resident #6 was scheduled to receive showers on day shift on Wednesdays and Saturdays.
In an interview on 5/3/2023 at 8:26 AM, Resident #6 reported that she hasn't received a shower in the last couple of weeks. Resident #6 reported that she prefers showers to bed baths.
Review of Resident #6's Skin Observation Shower sheets provided by the facility revealed that from February 2023 until 5/3/2023, Resident #6 received a shower on 2/2/2023, 2/27/2023, 3/16/2023, 3/20/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/30/2023, 4/21/2023, and 4/26/2023.
Resident #11
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included quadriplegia and Multiple Sclerosis.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, with a reference date of 4/1/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Further review of the same MDS assessment revealed Resident #11 required assistance with bathing.
Review of a current ADL (activities of daily living) Care Plan intervention for Resident #11, initiated 8/7/2021, directed staff that Resident #11 should be showered according to the shower schedule.
Review of the facility Daily Shower Assignment revealed Resident #11 was scheduled to receive showers on day shift on Mondays and Thursdays.
In an interview on 5/1/2023 at 9:35 AM, Resident #11 reported staff are not able to shower her when there are staffing problems.
Review of Resident #11's Skin Observation Shower sheets provided by the facility revealed that from February 2023 until 5/3/2023, Resident #11 received a shower on 2/2/2023, 2/27/2023, 3/16/2023, 3/20/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/30/2023, 4/17/2023, 4/21/2023, and 4/27/2023.
Resident #48
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included spinal stenosis and lack of coordination.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48, with a reference date of 4/3/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Further review of same MDS assessment revealed Resident #48 required assistance with bathing.
Review of a current Kardex for Resident #48 directed staff that Resident #48 needed extensive assistance of 1 staff with showering twice a week and as necessary.
Review of the facility Daily Shower Assignment revealed Resident #48 was scheduled to receive showers on day shift on Wednesdays and Saturdays.
In an interview on 5/1/2023 at 10:05 AM, Resident #48 reported she has been missing many showers. Resident #48 reported missing showers makes her feel dirty and grubby.
Review of Resident #48's Skin Observation Shower sheets provided by the facility revealed that from February 2023 until 5/3/2023, Resident #48 received a shower on 2/1/2023, 2/27/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/27/2023, 4/6/2023, 4/24/2023, and 4/27/2023.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00127736
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-surgical preparation procedures for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #64) reviewed for qua...
Read full inspector narrative →
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00127736
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-surgical preparation procedures for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #64) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the residents having to cancel a scheduled surgery for tendon stretching due to a contracture of her right lower extremity.
Findings include:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #64 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included stroke, paralysis affecting right dominant side, diabetes, low back pain, neurostimulator (provides pain relief by disrupting the pain signals traveling between the spinal cord and the brain), restless leg syndrome, seizures, pain in right arm, and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech).
Review of current Care Plan for Resident #64, revised on 5/22/2022, revealed the focus, .Resident has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) CVA, debility, gait and strength concerns, cognitive changes, limitation in ROM (range of motion) and post-surgery . with the interventions .Provide encouragement and reassurance during mobility activities .Provide supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed .Skilled Rehabilitation Therapy evaluation and treatment as ordered .
Review of Skilled Nursing dated 2/4/2022 at 2:15 PM, revealed, .Resident husband, Unit manager, and (Name of Doctor) had discussion and care conference . Will attempt to get appointment with (Name of Doctor) at (Provider Practice Name), as he performed her most recent surgical intervention to affected right foot.
Review of Order dated 3/31/22, revealed, .Start Date: 04/06/2022 .Hibiclens Liquid (Chlorhexidine Gluconate) Apply to entire body during shower topically one time a day .until 04/11/2022 11:59 PM, Please shower daily using Hibiclens for 5 days prior to surgery, including night before and morning of surgery .
Review of one time Order dated 4/11/22, revealed, .Send pt w/c and boot to surgery one time only for surgery for 1 day .
Review of General Progress Note 4/10/2022 at 11:08 PM, revealed, .Note Text: Husband called at this time to notify staff that he has cancelled the surgery that was scheduled for 4/11/22. He said he cancelled EMS transport as well. He stated that the reason for the cancellation was that the pre prep instructions were not followed properly. He is upset that he was not able to stay the night and states he will be calling the facility director tomorrow to complain .
Review of Shower Sheets for Resident #64 revealed, on 4/2/22 received a shower, 4/6/22 received a bed bath, and 4/7/22 shower sheet was completed but did not indicate if the resident received a shower, bed bath, or tub bath or whether the ordered Hibiclens was used.
Review of General Progress Note dated 5/14/2022 at 10:25 AM, .Late entry from 5/13/22 conversation with pre-op nurse (Name of Pre-Op nurse) at approximately 1405. Orders were entered for the patient to take Duloxetine, Gabapentin, and Protonix with sips of water the morning of procedure, noted that it is ok for patient to take PRN Tylenol and/or Oxycontin for pain. Patient is also to have Hibliclens shower and bedding change the night before and the day of procedure. Also instructed to have patient accompanied per staff of spouse .
Review of General Progress Note dated 5/16/2022 at 06:30 AM, revealed, .Resident LOA to Sx (surgical) appt .
In an interview on 5/2/23 at 9:49 AM, Family Member (FM) II reported the facility dropped the ball on everything. FM II stated, The just let her lay there .She developed a contracture in her right foot .the surgery she was to have was a tendon elongation surgery to address the issue .they stopped therapy and just let her lay there for months and months . FM II reported it took months to get his wife in for surgery. FM II reported he was at the facility until approximately 10:00 PM the day before her surgery and they did not shower her and when he arrived the day of the planned surgery, she had on the same clothes she had on the day before. FMII reported he contacted her surgeon's office and was told if they did not change her sheets or give her the shower, they would not perform the surgery, so I cancelled it . FM II reported the next day he contacted the NHA and she stated she would investigate what happened and for the next few weeks, she didn't talk to him to let him know of the outcome of her investigation.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 02:11 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility provided therapy to Resident #64. DON B reported the nurse signed off on the treatment administration record (TAR) the resident received a shower because it was done as an order. DON B reported the husband reported the bedding had to be changed and the facility did perform the showers with the Hibiclens but they did not change the bedding after each shower.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days and/or document the rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the prolonged use of psychotropic medication and the potential for residents to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #38's admission Record revealed Resident #38, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: Cerebral infarction and acute respiratory failure.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 38, with a reference date of 4/3/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired.
Review of Resident #38's Order Summary report revealed an order for Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML (anti-anxiety medication) Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety,agitation for 90 days. Start date: 4/10/23. End date: 7/9/2023.
Review of a facility document Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review: Listing of Residents Reviewed with No Recommendations indicated that Resident#38 was on the list for recommendations created between 4/1/2023 and 4/17/2023 and did not require any recommendations.
During an interview on 5/02/23 03:02 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported she was aware of the medication order for PRN Lorazepam, but did not have the prescription order changed to discontinue after 14 days. DON B reported that she was aware of the regulation requirement for PRN psychotropic medications, and reported that it must have just been missed.
During an interview on 5/03/23 at 09:27 AM, Pharmacist EE reported that he had reviewed Resident #38 medications on 4/17/23, and that he did write a recommendation to change the order for Lorazepam to be discontinued after 14 days. Pharmacist EE provided a document titled Notes To Attending Physician/Prescriber which indicated the pharmacist recommendation of discontinuing the PRN use of Lorazepam 0.25 mg for Resident #38 or reordering for a specific number of days . The document print date was 4/10/23. Pharmacist EE reported that he did not receive any correspondence from the facility regarding his recommendation.
During an interview on 05/03/23 at 02:47 PM, MD GG reported that Resident #38's PRN Lorazepam prescription should have been written for 14 days and then reevaluated for further use. MD GG reported that she understands the regulation and thought that the pharmacist would have not allowed the prescription to be dispensed for more than 14 days when written PRN.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for 1 resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for 1 resident (Resident #27) of 16 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records, resulting in the potential for miscommunication and negative outcomes.
Findings Include:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].
Review of Resident #27's Physician Orders revealed, Obtain urine to be sent PCR (used to identify specific bacteria) when obtained; r/t (related to) altered mental status, with aggressive outbursts, one time only for 1 Day. Completed 4/27/2023 15:00 (3:00 PM).
Review of Resident #27's Physician Orders revealed, Doxycycline Hyclate (antibiotic) Tablet 100 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI (urinary tract infection) for 10 Days. Active 5/1/2023 at 20:00 (8:00 PM).
Review of Resident #27's Progress Notes to determine what had transpired in the prior days leading to Resident #27's UTI diagnosis, revealed no documentation related to behaviors or symptoms related to a UTI.
Review of Resident #27's task Behavior Documentation Q (every) Shift completed by nursing staff indicated that in the past 30 days Resident #27 had no behaviors observed.
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 01:28 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) reported that Resident #27 did not have any documentation related to UTI symptoms until the physicians note on 5/1/23. DON reported that Resident #27 had not been assigned to have alert charting which would be expected when a resident is on an antibiotic. Alert charting prompts nursing staff to monitor and document in the record.
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 01:53 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) U reported that Resident #27 had been himself over the past 4 days, with no symptoms of a UTI and stated, .no behaviors .no dark urine . This was inconsistent with the rationale provided for ordering a urine test.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 09:50 AM, Unit Manager-Licensed Practical Nurse (UM-LPN) E reported that staff had reported that Resident #27 was yelling at staff and different than his baseline and stated, .I talked to the MD .ordered a UA (urine test) . UM-LPN E reported that the behaviors and communication with the MD should have been documented at that time. UM-LPN E reported that she was assigned to the medication cart for the rest of that day and then passed the duties off to another nurse.
Review of Resident #27's Skilled Nursing Progress Note dated 4/27/2023 at 12:59 PM (created on 5/3/22 at 7:01 AM) revealed, Late Entry: Note Text: Resident has had off baseline mentation, discussed with Physician; yelling angrily out at staff, sullen, angry, short tempered. Physician ordered a U/A PCR to evaluate for UA. This documentation was created after this surveyor talked to the DON.
According to Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 4th Edition, ([NAME], G, 2006), a major responsibility of all health care providers is that they keep accurate and complete medical records. From a nursing perspective, the most important purpose of documentation is communication. The standards for record keeping attempt to ensure, patient identification, medical support for the selected diagnoses, justification of the medical therapies used, accurate documentation of that which has transpired, and preservation of the record for a reasonable time period. Documentation must show continuity of care, interventions used, and patient responses. Nurses' notes are to be concise, clear, timely, and complete.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
DPS B
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform incontinence care using adequate infection control practices for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for i...
Read full inspector narrative →
DPS B
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform incontinence care using adequate infection control practices for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for cross contamination and infection.
Findings include:
During an observation and interview on 05/02/23 at 09:25 AM Resident #44 was lying in bed and reported that he was dirty and needed his brief changed. At 9:30 AM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y was in the room and preparing to provide care to Resident #44. CNA Y donned gloves and washed Resident #44's body from the waste up and then removed his incontinence brief. CNA Y rolled Resident #44 onto his side, and did not wash his penis. Resident #44 had a large amount of BM (bowel movement) on his buttocks and in the brief. CNA Y used several disposable wipes and then a wash cloth to clean Resident #44's buttocks. CNA Y then put a clean incontinence brief and a clean gown on Resident #44, but CNA Y did not removed her soiled gloves. CNA Y then proceeded to adjust Resident #44's pressure relieving boots, put supplies in the nightstand, adjust the bed, give Resident #44 his call light, opened the privacy curtain, and bagged up the soiled linen, but did not remove her soiled gloves.
In an interview on 05/02/23 at 9:45 AM, CNA Y reported that she didn't clean Resident #44's front side because he wasn't wet. CNA Y reported that she normally removed her gloves after bagging the soiled linen, and was not aware that her gloves should have been removed when going from dirty to clean areas.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 11:59 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the Infection Preventionist (IP) D was a part-time 3rd shift nurse and that IP D comes in early a couple days a week to work on infection control tasks, but that there were no formal audits being completed at this time. DON reported that the most recent hand hygiene education completed by the nursing staff did not include proper glove use.
In a phone interview on 05/03/23 at 12:54 PM, IP D reported that she was given the role of IP about a month ago and that she had been off work for 2 weeks during that time, so she was behind of the infection control reports. IP D reported that she worked 3 days a week as a floor nurse, and that she spends approximately 4-8 hours per week on infection control. IP D reported that she monitored staff for proper infection control practices, and any issues were discussed in monthly meetings, audits were completed by IP D or a delegate.
Review of the Centers for Disease Control website (https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html) last revised on June 25, 2018 revealed, When to Perform Hand Hygiene .before and after having direct contact with a patient's intact skin .After contact with blood, body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings .After contact with inanimate objects (including medical equipment) in the immediate vicinity of the patient .If hands will be moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care .Steps for Glove Use .Change gloves during patient care if the hands will move from a contaminated body-site (e.g., perineal area) to a clean body-site (e.g., face) .Remove gloves after contact with a patient and/or the surrounding environment (including medical equipment) using proper technique to prevent hand contamination. Failure to remove gloves after caring for a patient may lead to the spread of potentially deadly germs from one patient to another.
This citation has 2 DPS statements.
DPS A
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all of the 60 residents in the facility.
Findings include:
During an interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A, at 1:18 PM on 5/1/23, it was found that Maintenance Director Q has been on leave for health reasons for about a month. When asked if anyone had been overseeing the maintenance concerns at the facility, NHA A stated that a Maintenance Director from another facility has been stopping by as well as the Regional Maintenance Director.
During a review of the facilities Water Management Plan (WMP), at 1:25 PM on 5/1/23, observed that some documentation for the plan had not been updated annually. A risk assessment was performed in 2021, but no documentation was found to show the WMP was active and ongoing to date. A review of total free chlorine logs, to ensure the facilities potable water has disinfection power, had not been logged in the WMP since August of 2019. Two portions of the WMP had sticky notes stating they needed to be updated, these sections referenced old staff and an old facility name. A review of the facilities WMP policy found it requires an annual review and sign off by the WMP team, which consist of the NHA, the Maintenance Director, and Infection Preventionist. Further review of the WMP didn't find any control limits or expectations for corrective action if these limits where not to be maintained.
An interview with NHA A, at 1:45 PM on 5/2/23, found that she was able to speak to Maintenance Director Q and he stated that the testing had been performed, but it wasn't logged in the book.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff received all required doses of COVID-19 vaccine and maintain complete and accurate records of the COVID-19 vaccination status ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff received all required doses of COVID-19 vaccine and maintain complete and accurate records of the COVID-19 vaccination status for all required facility staff.
Findings Include:
Review of Staff Vaccine Matrix revealed, Dietary Staff (DS) PP was hired on 2/13/23 and had received only 1 of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination on 2/9/23.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 08:08 AM, NHA reported that DS PP had been on medical leave since 4/27/23 and was due to return that day (5/3/23). NHA reported that vaccination status is part of the onboarding process and that she did not have any additional information about DS PP's vaccination status, or a contingency plan.
Review of Employee Vaccine Log revealed, Dietary Staff (DS) QQ was hired on 4/8/21 and had received only 1 of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination on 11/19/21.
In an interview on 05/03/23 at 08:08 AM, NHA reported that DS QQ was a current employee and that she did not have any additional information about DS QQ vaccination status, or a contingency plan.
On 05/03/23 at 08:49 AM, NHA provided documentation from MCIR (Michigan Care Improvement Registry) indicating that DS QQ had received does 2 of 2 for COVID-19 on 12/21/21.
Review of Past 30 days of COVID-19 indicated that 2 residents had tested positive for COVID-19 in the past 30 days.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunization were offered to 4 (Resident # 319, 38,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunization were offered to 4 (Resident # 319, 38, 315, and 320) out of 5 residents, reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations, resulting in the higher likelihood of infection and complications from COVID-19.
Findings include:
Resident # 319
Review of Resident #319's admission Record revealed Resident #319, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and depression.
Review of Resident #319's Immunization record revealed Resident #319 had no record of COVID-19 immunization completed or declination for the COVID-19 immunization.
Resident #38
Review of Resident #38's admission Record revealed Resident #38, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: Cerebral infarction and acute respiratory failure.
Review of Resident #38's Immunization record revealed Resident #38 had no record of COVID-19 immunization completed or declination for the COVID-19 immunization.
Resident # 315
Review of Resident #315 admission Record revealed Resident #315, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included weakness and personal history of COVID-19.
Review of Resident #315's Immunization record revealed Resident #315 had no record of COVID-19 immunization completed or declination for the COVID-19 immunization.
Resident #320
Review of Resident #320's admission Record revealed Resident #320, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and muscle weakness.
Review of Resident #320's Immunization record revealed Resident #320 had no record of COVID-19 immunization completed or declination for the COVID-19 immunization.
During an interview on 5/03/2023, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported that all residents are offered the COVID-19 immunization upon admission and annually, and that the infection preventionist is responsible for overseeing the vaccine schedules and placing the information in each resident's chart. DON B was unable to provide forms or documentation to show that Resident # 320, #319, #38, and #315 were offered the COVID-19 immunization. DON B was unable to provide forms or documentation of declination of the COVID-19 immunization for Resident # 320, #319, #38, and #315.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper cold holding temperature of the walk-in cooler; and 2. Ensure proper working order of the hot water sanitizi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper cold holding temperature of the walk-in cooler; and 2. Ensure proper working order of the hot water sanitizing dish machine. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 60 residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Findings Include:
1.
During a tour of the kitchen, at 7:25 AM on 5/1/23, it was observed that the walk-in coolers' ambient air thermometer was found to be 46F at this time. Using a thermoworks rapid read thermometer, it was found that the product temperature of a container of juice, dated 4/30, was found to be 44.5F.
An interview with [NAME] Z, at 7:30 AM on 5/1/23, found that the walk in cooler was logged as being 43F this morning when it was checked. When asked if it was after the unit had been closed all night, [NAME] Z stated yes.
During a revisit to the walk in cooler, at 8:27 AM on 5/1/23, it was observed that the ambient air thermometer was reading 48F. Using a thermoworks rapid read thermometer, a container of pickles was found to be 45F. At this time, a concern regarding the holding temperature of the walk-in cooler was brought to the attention of Food Service Director (FSD) J.
During an interview with FSD J, at 2:13 PM on 5/1/23, it was found that the facility had called a vendor to come check on the walk-in cooler. FSD J stated that the vendor said there was a leak in the coolant line and that they were able to add some to the system to keep it running temporarily, but the facility will need a more thorough long term fix.
During an interview with FSD J at 12:55 PM on 5/2/23, it was found that staff have been monitoring the temperatures since yesterday and have been using the cold from the connected freezer to help keep ensure the cooler stayed 41F or below. At this time, the ambient air thermometer of the walk-in cooler read 35F. FSD J was making plans to distribute the food in the walk-in cooler to other coolers if the problem was not going to be fixed today.
An interview with NHA A, at 1:00 PM on 5/2/23, found that an additional company has been contacted to come out and assess the walk-in cooler.
During an interview with FSD J, at 3:15 PM on 5/2/23, it was found that the additional vendor found an issue with the thermostat of the walk in cooler and a new one is being installed.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under §3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C ) of this section, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: (2) At 5ºC (41ºF) or less.
2.
During a tour of the dish machine area, at 9:15 AM on 5/1/23, it was observed that the dish machine data plate stated the unit needed to be a minimum of 155F for the wash and 180F for the rinse. A review of the facilities High Temperature Dish Machine Log, dated April 2023, found numerous logged temperatures that were below the required minimums for the dish machine to be working properly. The dish machine puck thermometer, logged once a day, should achieve a contact of 160F for adequate hot water sanitizing. 19 of 30 days recorded showed that the dish puck thermometer did not achieve an adequate temperature for sanitizing. Further review of the log found the facility had 13 recorded temperatures that didn't achieve the proper 180F for water coming out of the manifold of the machine with the log stating, If dish machine does not reach these temperatures contact food service director immediately. When asked if she was aware of these low logged temperatures, FSD 'J stated that she was not aware and has some new staff that are still being trained. While reviewing the log, Aide H was starting to get breakfast dishes started. At this time Aid H filled out the breakfast log for the dish machine and wrote down 152F for wash and 173F for the rinse. After a conversation with Aide H about minimum requirements for the high temperature dish machine, Aide H ensured the machine went over the minimum temperature and wrote down the highest temperature achieved.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-501.112 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Hot Water Sanitization Temperatures. (A) Except as specified in (B) of this section, in a mechanical operation, the temperature of the fresh hot water SANITIZING rinse as it enters the manifold may not be more than 90C (194F), or less than: .(2) For all other machines, 82C (180F).
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-703.11 Hot Water and Chemical.
After being cleaned, EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be SANITIZED in: .(B) Hot water mechanical operations by being cycled through EQUIPMENT that is set up as specified under §§ 4-501.15, 4-501.112, and 4-501.113 and achieving a UTENSIL surface temperature of 71C (160F) as measured by an irreversible registering temperature indicator .